Understanding treatment guidelines with bismuth and non-bismuth quadruple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies

Antibiotic-free responsive biomaterials for specific and targeted Helicobacter pylori eradication

Gastric cancer is highly correlated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Approximately 50 % of the population worldwide is infected with H. pylori. However, current treatment regimens face severe challenges including drug resistance and gut microbiota disruption. An integrative treatment with slight negative influences on intestinal flora, conforming with concepts of integrative prevention of gastric cancer, is urgently needed. Non-antibiotic responsive biomaterials can respond to different stimuli, including pH, enzymes, light, ultrasound and magnetism, under which biomaterials are specifically activated to perform antibacterial capabilities, while neutral intestinal microenvironments differ from gastric microenvironments or inflammatory sites and have no or minimal irradiation via precisely controlled exogenous stimuli, which may not only overcome antibiotic resistance but also avoid gut microbiota disorders. First, the latest progress in responsive biomaterials against H. pylori without gut microbiome disturbance and their anti-H. pylori performances are profoundly summarized. Second, the mechanisms against planktonic bacteria, biofilms and intracellular bacteria are discussed respectively. Finally, the strategies of specific and targeted H. pylori elimination by responsive biomaterials are introduced. Additionally, the challenges and the focus of future research on translation into clinical application are fully proposed. Antibiotic-free responsive biomaterials for specific and targeted H. pylori eradication represent an innovative approach.

Guideline-based bismuth quadruple therapy for helicobacter pylori infection in China: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, quadruple therapy is unanimously recommended as the current first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) eradication. However, the drug composition of quadruple therapy is very complex, and the efficacy and safety between them is not clear.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of H. Pylori eradication regimens, which were recommended by the Fifth Consensus of China, by network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature databases were used to retrieve clinical randomized controlled trials of H. Pylori eradication. Network meta-analysis was performed using BUGSnet and meta package of R software, using OR values as effect size, and SUCRA was used to rank the efficacy of interventions under each outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies and 130 arms were included. The NMA analysis found that the top regimen in term of eradication rate outcome was: Rabeprazole +  Bismuth +  Furazolidone +  Tetracycline (SUCRA, 97.5). In terms of safety outcomes: Lansoprazole +  Bismuth +  Amoxycillin +  Clarithromycin (SUCRA, 91.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The bismuth quadruple therapies recommended by the guidelines for the treatment of H. Pylori have good performance in terms of four-week eradication rate and safety outcome indicators, and due to the different resistance of antibiotics in different regional populations, rational use of drugs should be combined with local conditions.

Helicobacter pylori-targeted AI-driven vaccines: a paradigm shift in gastric cancer prevention

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a globally prevalent pathogen Group I carcinogen, presents a formidable challenge in gastric cancer prevention due to its increasing antimicrobial resistance and strain diversity. This comprehensive review critically analyzes the limitations of conventional antibiotic-based therapies and explores cutting-edge approaches to combat H. pylori infections and associated gastric carcinogenesis. We emphasize the pressing need for innovative therapeutic strategies, with a particular focus on precision medicine and tailored vaccine development. Despite promising advancements in enhancing host immunity, current Helicobacter pylori vaccine clinical trials have yet to achieve long-term efficacy or gain approval regulatory approval. We propose a paradigm-shifting approach leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) to design precision-targeted, multiepitope vaccines tailored to multiple H. pylori subtypes. This AI-driven strategy has the potential to revolutionize antigen selection and optimize vaccine efficacy, addressing the critical need for personalized interventions in H. pylori eradication efforts. By leveraging AI in vaccine design, we propose a revolutionary approach to precision therapy that could significantly reduce H. pylori -associated gastric cancer burden.

Eradication rate and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), prevalent in developing regions, is a key factor in gastrointestinal diseases. Despite the common use of bismuth-based quadruple therapy, its drawbacks have prompted the search for alternatives. Recently, vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant, has shown promise in combination with antibiotics as a dual therapy for H. pylori eradication. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy compared to quadruple therapy.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled H. pylori-infected patients at Zhejiang Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to dual and quadruple therapy groups. The primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 400 patients studied from April 2022 to June 2023, In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates of H. pylori in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy group and quadruple therapy group were 94.0% and 87.0%, respectively, p = 0.017. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis were 97.9% and 93.0%, p = 0.022. Additionally, the dual therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (19%) compared to the quadruple therapy group (53%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy demonstrates superior eradication efficacy and reduced adverse events compared to quadruple therapy in H. pylori-infected patients, suggesting its potential for clinical application and promotion.

In Vitro Susceptibility and Synergistic Effect of Bismuth Against Helicobacter pylori

Background/objectives: Bismuth is commonly used in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy. However, few studies have examined the in vitro susceptibility of H. pylori to bismuth. Moreover, the exact mechanism of action of bismuth on H. pylori remains unclear. The aim of this study was to identify the anti-bacterial effect of bismuth as well as to evaluate potential synergistic effects between bismuth and various antibiotics. Methods: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of three bismuth preparations, bismuth subsalicylate, bismuth potassium citrate, and colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS, De-Nol) were determined for H. pylori strains using the agar dilution technique. Agar plates of varying pH values from 5.0 to 8.0 were used to investigate whether acidity influences the anti-bacterial effect of bismuth. A checkerboard assay was performed to assess the synergism between CBS and antibiotics (amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole). Results: Twelve H. pylori strains, including three reference strains (H. pylori 26695, J99, and ATCC 43504), and nine clinically isolated strains were tested. The MICs for bismuth subsalicylate, bismuth potassium citrate, and CBS ranged from 4 to 32 μg/mL, 2 to 16 μg/mL, and 1 to 8 μg/mL, respectively. The bismuth MICs for the reference strains were similar at pH 5-8. In the checkerboard assay, no interactions between CBS and any of the antibiotics were observed in the reference H. pylori strains. Conclusions: Bismuth showed in vitro susceptibility against H. pylori. The enhanced eradication efficacy of bismuth-containing regimens appears to be due to mechanisms other than direct synergy with antibiotics.

Antibiotic Susceptibility-Guided Concomitant Therapy Regimen with Vonoprazan, High-Dose Amoxicillin, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori Eradication as Fourth-Line Regimen: An Interventional Study

This is the first registered intervention study for vonoprazan, high-dose amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole 14-day concomitant therapy based on a susceptibility test of Helicobacter pylori. We conducted this study as a fourth-line rescue regimen in Japan.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent three rounds of eradication therapies (first- or second-line 7-day triple therapy consisting of amoxicillin and clarithromycin, or metronidazole- and sitafloxacin-based third-line therapy) and had failed eradication based on a urea breath test or fecal antigen test were recruited. All patients underwent endoscopic examination and culture tests before starting eradication therapy. The intervention was concomitant therapy consisting of vonoprazan 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 500 mg qid, clarithromycin 400 mg bid, and metronidazole 250 mg bid for 14 days, which were modified based on the susceptibility test, and the resistant drugs were removed from the regimen. Patients with negative culture results were treated with quadruple therapy. The primary outcome was the eradication rate (UMIN000025765, jRCTs 031180208).

RESULTS

The eradication rate of susceptibility-testing-based fourth-line eradication therapy was 63.2% (95%CI: 38.4-83.7%) in intent-to-treat analysis and 70.6% (95%CI: 44.0-89.7%) in per-protocol analysis. Thirteen patients received quadruple therapy, with eradication rates of 61.5% and 75.0%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This vonoprazan-based concomitant therapy modified by the susceptibility test is a potential option as fourth-line eradication after first-line clarithromycin-based 7-day triple, second-line metronidazole-based 7-day triple, and third-line sitafloxacin-based 7-day triple therapy failure.

Network meta-analysis of treatment interventions for Helicobacter pylori infection in adult populations in East and Southeast Asia

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection poses a global health challenge, necessitating diverse treatment strategies. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess various treatment regimens for H. pylori in East and Southeast Asian populations.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from inception to 20 Dec 2023, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on H. pylori treatment interventions in East Asian and Southeast Asian populations. The primary outcome focused on effectiveness, specifically the rate of H. pylori eradication, while the secondary outcome evaluated overall safety, including the incidence of total and serious adverse effects. Network geometry plots were generated to illustrate direct and indirect treatment comparisons, using triple therapy (TT) as the reference standard. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models to account for study heterogeneity and consistency models for indirect comparisons. The treatment hierarchy was assessed using the ranking probabilities and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.

Results

79 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 99 paired comparisons. The included studies, conducted in Southeast Asia and among East Asian populations, included 29,903 patients. Significant outcomes in treat effectiveness were observed in various comparisons, such as sequential therapy vs. TT, bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) vs. TT, high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) vs. TT, concomitant therapy vs. TT, P-CAB-based therapy vs. TT, and R-HT/HT vs. TT. R-HT/HT was the top choice based on rankograms and SUCRA values (SUCRA = 96.5). Regarding overall safety, significant results were noted in comparisons involving BQT, HDDT, concomitant therapy, sequential therapy, and P-CAB-based therapy. HDDT achieved the highest overall safety based on rankograms and SUCRA values (SUCRA = 0.0). HDDT demonstrated the lowest incidence of serious adverse events, according to global rankograms and SUCRA values (SUCRA = 19.7).

Conclusion

This network meta-analysis highlights the complexity of treating H. pylori in East and Southeast Asia. R-HT/HT emerged as the most effective regimen, while HDDT proved to be the safest, with the lowest incidence of serious adverse events. These findings are crucial for optimizing treatment protocols in these regions.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023435318.

Clarithromycin sustained-release tablet may be an improper therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background

Clarithromycin plays an important role in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) through quadruple therapy. However, there is limited research on whether different forms of clarithromycin dosage have similar efficacies against H. pylori.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different forms of clarithromycin dosage in bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori.

Design

A single-center retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy of different forms of clarithromycin dosage in eradicating H. pylori.

Methods

An analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection through the 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) at Henan Provincial People's Hospital, China from 2020 to 2022 who were treated with either a dispersible or sustained-release clarithromycin tablet (500 mg each), alongside amoxicillin (1000 mg), a standard dose of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and bismuth citrate (220 mg), administered twice daily as part of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. Treatment efficacy was assessed using 13C-UBT at least 4 weeks after treatment completion. The H. pylori eradication rate was the primary outcome of this study, and factors influencing it were analyzed.

Results

Among 2094 screened patients, 307 with H. pylori infection (mean age, 41.8 ± 0.7 years; 43% men) received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. Univariate analysis of the dispersible and sustained-release tablet groups revealed a lower eradication rate with the sustained-release tablet compared with the dispersible clarithromycin tablet regimen (75.26% (73/97) vs 95.26% (200/210), respectively; p < 0.05). Other factors, such as smoking, age, and PPI type, were not significantly associated with the cure rate. Multivariate analysis identified the form of clarithromycin dosage (dispersible vs sustained-release) to be an independent risk factor for eradication failure using the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (odds ratio = 0.145, 95% confidence interval: (0.065-0.323); p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The clarithromycin dispersible tablet demonstrated a higher H. pylori eradication rate, and the sustained-release clarithromycin tablet may be inappropriate for H. pylori eradication.

6-gingerol and its derivatives inhibit Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric mucosal inflammation and improve gastrin and somatostatin secretion

The resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has increased in recent years, prompting a trend in the research and development of new drugs. In our study, three derivatives (JF-1, JF-2, and JF-3) were synthesized using 6-gingerol as the main component, while JF-4, containing both 6-gingerol and 6-shogaol as the main components, was extracted from dried ginger. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), determined using the ratio dilution method, were 80 μg/mL for JF-1, 40 μg/mL for JF-2, 30 μg/mL for JF-3, 40 μg/mL for JF-4, 60 μg/mL for 6-gingerol standard (SS), and 0.03 μg/mL for amoxicillin (AMX). After treating H. pylori-infected mice, the inflammation of the gastric mucosa was suppressed. The eradication rate of H. pylori was 16.7% of JF-3 low-dose treatment (LDT), 25.0% of JF-3 high-dose treatment (HDT), 16.7% of JF-4 LDT, 16.7% of JF-4 HDT, 30% of SS LDT, 50% of SS HDT, and 36.4% of the positive control group (PCG). The levels of gastrin, somatostatin (SST), IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-8 were significantly recovered in the JF-3 and JF-4 administration groups, but the effect was stronger in the high-dose group. These results demonstrate that 6-gingerol and its derivatives have significant anti-Helicobacter pylori effects and are promising potential treatments for H. pylori infection.

Best Practices for Helicobacter pylori Management

For decades, antimicrobial therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection has been given empirically, and the results of therapy (success or failure) have either not been confirmed or when confirmed have not been used to modify prescribing behavior. These practices coupled with increasing antibiotic resistance have resulted in low cure rates overall. Susceptibility testing for H pylori has increasingly become available, especially in the United States. Availability of susceptibility-based therapy has encouraged adoption of the principles of antimicrobial stewardship for H pylori infection (eg, limiting antibiotic choice to antibiotics for which the infection is susceptible given at optimal doses, formulations, frequency of administration, and duration). Antimicrobial regimens can now be classified as empiric therapies, susceptibility-based therapies, potentially effective therapies requiring optimization, and therapies containing unneeded antibiotics that should not be used. This article describes current best practices and recommendations for integrating culture-based and molecular-based susceptibility testing into H pylori therapy.

Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Recently, vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported as a promising approach for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. However, the effects of VA therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) on H. pylori eradication remains unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of VA dual therapy with BQT for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted from the beginning to September 2023, utilizing PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science database. A random-effects model was used to perform a meta-analysis to determine the pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Moreover, trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to evaluate the conclusiveness of the H. pylori eradication rate.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1233 patients were included. The VA therapy has similar eradication rate (ITT analysis: 87% vs. 85.7%, RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.93-1.09, p = 0.84; PP analysis: 92.5% vs. 93.2%, RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94-1.06, p = 0.97) and compliance (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03, p = 0.32) compared to BQT. The VA therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of total adverse events than the BQT group (16.3% vs. 40.0%, RR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37-0.55, p < 0.00001). The TSA result showed that the effect was conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence indicated that VA therapy is just as successful as BQT in eliminating H. pylori, yet it has fewer adverse events and similar compliance.

Management of Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: A large population-based study (HP treatment failures trial)

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori treatment failure remains a challenging problem. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for successful eradication in patients following treatment failures.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. This study included 1,050 dyspeptic patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection at tertiary care center in Thailand between March 2014 and October 2021. Patients' demographic data, endoscopic findings, H. pylori culture, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), treatment regimens and outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

Of 1,050 patients with H. pylori infections, 302 (28.7%) experienced treatment failure (mean age 58.4 years; 44.7% males). AST was performed in 192. Resistance was observed for metronidazole (43.2%), levofloxacin (33.9%), clarithromycin (24%), and amoxicillin (2.1%). There was no tetracycline resistance. Multidrug-resistance (MDR) was significantly more common following treatment failure (45.5% vs. 15.7%, p<0.001). Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment successes and failures. Eradication rates after first-line and second-line regimens were 71.2% and 54.5%, respectively. Medication nonadherence [OR 36.6 (95%CI 8.65-155.03, p<0.001)] and MDR [OR 4.49 (95%CI 2.29-8.81, p<0.001)] were associated with treatment failure. Over time, resistance increased for metronidazole, levofloxacin, and clarithromycin, while eradication rates with triple therapy declined. Tailored antibiotic therapy [OR 4.92 (95%CI 1.61-14.99, p = 0.005)] and a regimen including 4-times-daily dosing of amoxicillin (2 grams/day) [OR 3.05 (95%CI 1.10-8.41, p = 0.032)] were significantly associated with treatment success after first-line failure. Eradication rates when using tailored therapy and 4-times-daily dosing of amoxicillin (2 grams/day) were 91.1% and 89.4%, respectively. Performing AST before first-line therapy resulted in the highest cure rates. AST performed after multiple treatment failures was also associated with higher eradication rates compared with the group without AST (94.4% vs. 50%,p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

AST either before or after treatment failure correlated with a higher proportion of successful eradication. Nonadherence and the MDR infections predicted treatment failure. Tailored therapy and 4-times-daily dosing of amoxicillin after treatment failure were likely to be successful.

Helicobacter pylori infection: a dynamic process from diagnosis to treatment

Helicobacter pylori, a gram-negative microaerophilic pathogen, causes several upper gastrointestinal diseases, such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. For the diseases listed above, H. pylori has different pathogenic mechanisms, including colonization and virulence factor expression. It is essential to make accurate diagnoses and provide patients with effective treatment to achieve positive clinical outcomes. Detection of H. pylori can be accomplished invasively and noninvasively, with both having advantages and limitations. To enhance therapeutic outcomes, novel therapeutic regimens, as well as adjunctive therapies with probiotics and traditional Chinese medicine, have been attempted along with traditional empiric treatments, such as triple and bismuth quadruple therapies. An H. pylori infection, however, is difficult to eradicate during treatment owing to bacterial resistance, and there is no commonly available preventive vaccine. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of our understanding of H. pylori infections and to highlight current treatment and diagnostic options.

Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial

Background

With the increase in antibiotic resistance, the success rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy has declined in recent years. Vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy has been reported to be a promising regimen.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy and safety of VA dual therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy containing amoxicillin and clarithromycin for H. pylori first-line eradication, and to further analyze the effects of clarithromycin resistance on eradication rate.

Design

This study was a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Methods

Treatment-naïve H. pylori-infected patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to the VA group (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily, for 14 days) or the RBAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, for 14 days). H. pylori clarithromycin resistance and CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms were detected with real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The eradication rates and adverse events were analyzed.

Results

A total of 151 patients were enrolled. The intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (mITT), and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 94.6% (86.0-98.3%), 98.6% (91.3-99.9%), and 98.5% (90.9-99.9%) for VA group and 87.0% (77.0-93.3%), 91.8% (82.3-96.6%), and 93% (83.7-97.4%) for RBAC group. The eradication rate of the VA group was noninferior to the RBAC group in ITT, mITT, and PP analyses (p < 0.0001). In patients infected with strains of clarithromycin resistance point mutation, the eradication rate of the RBAC group decreased to lower than 90%, but the difference from the VA group did not achieve statistical significance (ITT eradication rate: 81.5% in the RBAC group and 96.2% in the VA group, p = 0.192). The incidence of adverse events in the VA group was 39.2%, which was significantly lower than that in the RBAC group (79.2%, p = 0.000).

Conclusion

The efficacy of VA dual therapy is noninferior to RBAC in H. pylori first-line eradication, with fewer adverse reactions.

Registration

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052550) on 30 October 2021.

Antibiotic Resistance, Susceptibility Testing and Stewardship in Helicobacter pylori Infection

Despite the declining trend of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) prevalence around the globe, ongoing efforts are still needed to optimize current and future regimens in view of the increasing antibiotic resistance. The resistance of H. pylori to different antibiotics is caused by different molecular mechanisms, and advancements in sequencing technology have come a far way in broadening our understanding and in facilitating the testing of antibiotic susceptibility to H. pylori. In this literature review, we give an overview of the molecular mechanisms behind resistance, as well as discuss and compare different antibiotic susceptibility tests based on the latest research. We also discuss the principles of antibiotic stewardship and compare the performance of empirical therapies based on up-to-date resistance patterns and susceptibility-guided therapies in providing effective H. pylori treatment. Studies and clinical guidelines should ensure that the treatment being tested or recommended can reliably achieve a pre-agreed acceptable level of eradication rate and take into account the variations in antibiotic resistance across populations. Local, regional and international organizations must work together to establish routine antibiotic susceptibility surveillance programs and enforce antibiotic stewardship in the treatment of H. pylori, so that it can be managed in a sustainable and efficient manner.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Patients with Penicillin Allergy

Helicobacter pylori is among the prevalent causes of infections worldwide, and its resistance rate to antibiotics has been rising over time. Amoxicillin is the cornerstone for the treatment regimen. However, the prevalence of penicillin allergy ranges from 4% to 15%. In patients with true allergy, Vonoprazan-Clarithromycin-Metronidazole and bismuth quadruple therapy have demonstrated excellent eradication and high adherence rates. Vonoprazan-based therapy is administered less frequently and may be better tolerated than bismuth quadruple therapy. Therefore, vonoprazan-based therapy may be considered as a first-line therapy if accessible. Bismuth quadruple therapy can be used as the initial therapy when vonoprazan is unavailable. Levofloxacin or sitafloxacin-based regimens achieve a moderately high eradication rate. However, these are associated with potentially serious adverse effects and should only be used when other effective and safer regimens are unavailable. Cephalosporins such as cefuroxime have been used as an alternative to amoxicillin. Microbial susceptibility studies can guide the selection of appropriate antibiotics. PPI-Clarithromycin-Metronidazole fails to achieve a high eradication rate and should be used as a second-line therapy. PPI-Clarithromycin-Rifabutin should not be used because of low eradication rate and frequent adverse reactions. The choice of the most effective antibiotic regimen can enhance clinical outcomes in patients with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy.

New regimens as first-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients allergic to penicillin: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients is challenging. The effective regimen is lacking in areas with high antibiotic resistance and tetracycline unavailable. Minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole are promising drugs.

AIMS

To compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance among three new bismuth quadruple therapies for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients.

METHODS

This randomized trial was conducted on 450 naive patients with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy. The 14-day minocycline-metronidazole-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day), minocycline-cefuroxime-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily), and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing (cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day) bismuth quadruple therapies were randomly assigned to the participants. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome.

RESULTS

The differences of eradication rates in either intention-to-treat (84.0%, 82.7%, and 23 82.0%, p = .896) or per-protocol (91.7%, 90.9%, and 88.2%, p = .599) analysis among minocycline-metronidazole, minocycline-cefuroxime, and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing bismuth quadruple therapies were statistically insignificant. The incidence of adverse events (35.1%, 22.6%, and 28.9%) and compliance (90.5%, 91.8%, and 91.9%) were similar. Taste distortion, nausea, and anorexia were more common in metronidazole-containing regimens, and dizziness was more common in minocycline-containing regimens. The allergy was rare (~3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacies of three bismuth quadruple therapies containing minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole (pairwise) for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients were similarly satisfactory with relatively good safety and compliance. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registration (ChiCTR1900023702).

Implications of the paradigm shift in management of Helicobacter pylori infections

The recent availability of susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori infections in the United Sates has resulted in paradigm shifts in the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of H. pylori infections. Here, we reviewed the English literature concerning changes in H. pylori diagnosis and therapy with an emphasis on the last 3 years. We focus on the new methods that offer rapid and convenient susceptibility testing using either invasive (endoscopic) or noninvasive (stool) methods of obtaining test material. We also discuss the implications of this availability on therapy and follow-up after therapy. The approach to therapy was categorized into four groups: (1) therapies that can be used empirically, (2) therapies that should be restricted to those that are susceptibility-based, (3) potentially effective therapies that have yet to be optimized for local use, and (4), therapies that contain unneeded antibiotics that should not be prescribed. The most convenient and efficient method of susceptibility testing is by using reflexive stool testing in which if the sample is positive, it is automatically also used for determination of susceptibility. Reflexive testing can also be done via reflexive ordering (e.g., for all positive urea breath tests). The post therapy test-of-cure has emerged as a critical component of therapy as it not only provides feedback regarding treatment success but when combined with susceptibility testing also provide evidence regarding the cause of failure (e.g., poor adherence versus emergence of resistance during therapy. Susceptibility testing has made even the most current H. pylori guidelines for diagnosis and therapy generally obsolete. Clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin triple therapies should only be administered as susceptibility-based therapy. Regimens containing unneeded antibiotics should not be given. We provide recommendations regarding the details and indications for all current therapies.

Evolution of Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Antibiotics: A Topic of Increasing Concern

Antibiotic resistance among Helicobacter pylori strains is the major cause of eradication failure. Resistance prevalence is dynamic and can greatly vary among countries over the years. We revealed H. pylori resistance trends for five antibiotics in 14 countries through articles predominantly published in 2018-2022, since the latest data can best show the most recent trends in resistance evolution. Amoxicillin resistance generally exhibited no evolution, yet it increased in Bulgaria, Iran, China, and Vietnam. Metronidazole resistance exhibited different trends, including an increase, a decrease and no evolution in six, three, and five studies, respectively. Clarithromycin resistance increased in Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Italy, Iran, and Taiwan, but remained stable in France, Spain, Russia, China, Chile, and Colombia. Tetracycline resistance was low and stable except in Iran. Levofloxacin resistance increased in four European and six other countries/regions, without significant increases in France, Spain, and Chile. In Chile, triple resistance also increased. In countries such as France and Spain, resistance to most antibiotics was stabilized, while in Bulgaria, Belgium, Iran and Taiwan, resistance to three or more agents was reported. Use of non-recommended regimens, national antibiotic consumption, patient's compliance, host factors, strain virulence, migrations, and azithromycin overuse during the COVID-19 pandemic can influence resistance evolution. New drugs, eradication regimens and diagnostic methods, such as next-generation sequencing can improve H. pylori infection control.

Tailored triple plus bismuth therapy based on previous antibiotic medication history for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate the role of tailored therapy based on past medication history in improving efficacy of H. pylori eradication compared to empiric therapies. The objective of this study was to determine whether tailored triple plus bismuth therapy (TBT) can achieve higher eradication rates based on previous antibiotic history than empiric TBTs.

METHODS

800 treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to four groups receiving clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- or metronidazole-containing empiric TBT and tailored TBT (clarithromycin and levofloxacin chosen based on previous macrolides and quinolones medication history). Correlation analyses were performed between past medication history and resistance or eradication rate.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of tailored TBT were significantly higher than clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- and metronidazole-containing empiric TBT in both intention-to-treat (89.5%, 80.8%, 81.5% and 81.5%) and per-protocol (95.1%, 86.7%, 86.5% and 87.8%) analyses (P<0.05). In patients with previous macrolides, quinolones or nitroimidazoles medication history, the resistance rates of corresponding clarithromycin, levofloxacin or metronidazole were significantly higher than patients without past medication history, and the eradication rates of corresponding clarithromycin- or levofloxacin-containing empiric TBT were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

Tailored TBT based on previous antibiotic history can achieve higher eradication rates than empiric TBT for first-line H. pylori eradication.

How widespread and convenient H. pylori susceptibility testing will result in pharmacological opportunities

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, antimicrobial therapy for Helicobacter pylori infections was almost universally empirical and based on a combination of expert opinion and local effectiveness. However, the new requirement that all therapeutic regimens reliably achieve high cure rates, the introduction of potassium competitive acid blockers and the availability of susceptibility testing many pharmacological opportunities particularly since all current therapies will require optimization. The ability to rapidly and inexpensively obtain H. pylori susceptibility data using stool samples makes obtaining susceptibility data practical and allows using susceptibility-based therapy routinely for both treatment-naïve patient and treatment failures.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the literature from 1990 to current to identify studies reporting the effect of susceptibility testing on H. pylori treatment. This review examines how widespread and convenient H. pylori susceptibility testing will result in pharmacological opportunities. . Many pharmacological opportunities will emanate from a renewal of efforts to develop, propagate, confirm, and update best practices based on local and regional susceptibility/resistance patterns.

EXPERT OPINION

The ability to evaluate treatment decisions and outcomes in susceptible infections and reliably achieve high cure rates should foster precise tailoring of pharmacologic therapy and should achieve the goals of high cure rates while preventing antimicrobial misuse and extending the useful life of current antibiotics.

High-dose dual therapy versus culture-based susceptibility-guided therapy as a rescue regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Although the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report recommended high-dose proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin dual therapy as possible rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, clinical evidence of its efficacy was lacking.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy, safety, patient compliance, and cost between high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) and culture-based susceptibility-guided therapy (CB-SGT) as a rescue regimen for H. pylori infection.

Design

A single-center, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Methods

In all, 146 patients with a history of eradication failure were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive HDDT or CB-SGT. HDDT consisted of esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg, both given four times per day (qid). CB-SGT consisted of esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily (bid), amoxicillin 1000 mg bid plus clarithromycin 500 mg bid, metronidazole 400 mg bid, or levofloxacin 500 mg daily (qd) for sensitive patients, in that order. For patients with triple resistance, a bismuth-containing regimen with a high dose of metronidazole was chosen, including esomeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth 220 mg bid, amoxicillin 1000 mg bid, and metronidazole 400 mg qid. All regimens were given for 14 days.

Results

The eradication H. pylori rates achieved with HDDT in the intention-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol, and modified ITT analyses were all 84.9% [62/73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 76.5-93.9%], compared with 83.6% (61/73, 95% CI: 74.9-92.3%), 84.7% (61/72, 95% CI: 76.2-93.2%), and 84.7% (61/72, 95% CI: 76.2-93.2%) with CB-SGT, respectively. For patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms of intermediate/poor metabolizers, the eradication rates of HDDT and CB-SGT were 90.70% (39/43, 95% CI: 77.86-97.41%) and 84.21% (32/38, 95% CI: 68.75-93.98%), respectively. The difference between groups was 6.49% (95% CI: -8.00% to 20.97%), and the non-inferiority p value was 0.0128. For patients with a treatment interval of more than 3 months, the eradication rates of the two regimens reached 88.71% (95% CI: 78.11-95.34%) and 71.97% (95% CI: 70.02-90.64%). The difference between groups was 6.74% (95% CI: -5.71% to 19.20%), with a non-inferiority p value of 0.0042. Patient adherence was high in both groups. The HDDT had a lower cost and rate of side effects (p < 0.001) compared with CB-SGT.

Conclusions

HDDT can reach an eradication rate of 85% in treatment-experienced patients of H. pylori infection and 91% in patients with CYP2C19 polymorphisms of intermediate/poor metabolizers, with good compliance, lower side effects and costs, and less use of antibiotics. In conclusion, HDDT offers an effective rescue regimen for H. pylori infection.

Registration

This clinical trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (trail registration number: ChiCTR1900025044).

Effects of Quadruple Therapy Combined with Probiotics on Helicobacter Pylori-Related Peptic Ulcer

The present study was designed to observe the effect of quadruple therapy combined with probiotics on Helicobacter pylori-related peptic ulcer. The patients in the control group (n = 90) were given regular quadruple therapy including proton pump inhibitor ilaprazole enteric-coated tablet + two antibiotics amoxicillin dispersible tablet and metronidazole tablet + colloidal bismuth pectin capsule for 2 weeks. Patients in the study group (n = 90) were given abovementioned quadruple therapy combined with probiotics live combined Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus Capsules, oral for 2 weeks. Then Hp clearance rate, recurrence rate, levels of gastrointestinal hormone makers, and advance reactions between two groups were compared. At the 2nd week after the treatment, the Helicobacter pylori clearance rate in the study group (87.79%) was significantly higher than the control group (78.89%), and the total recurrence rate in the study group (6.67%) was significantly lower than the control group (13.33%) (P < 0.05). Serum gastrin and motilin expression were lower, and somatostatin expressions was significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). In summary, quadruple therapy combined with probiotics in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related peptic ulcer can improve the Helicobacter pylori clearance rate, reduce the Helicobacter pylori recurrence rate, and is beneficial to improving the level of gastrointestinal hormones, with certain safety.

Efficacy and safety of triple therapy containing berberine hydrochloride, amoxicillin, and rabeprazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness and safety of triple therapy containing berberine, amoxicillin, and rabeprazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized controlled, open-label, noninferiority trial included treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection who were randomly allocated at a ratio of 1:1 into the berberine triple therapy group (berberine hydrochloride 300 mg thrice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, and rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily) or standard bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group (amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and bismuth tartrate 200 mg twice daily) for 14 days. Negative ¹³ C/¹⁴ C-urea breath test at 4 weeks after completion of the therapy was regarded as successful eradication.

RESULTS

Altogether 262 and 262 patients received berberine triple therapy and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, respectively. Both intention-to-treat (79.8% vs 80.9%, P = 0.742) and per-protocol analyses (83.6% and 85.1%, P = 0.636) showed comparable eradication rate between the two groups, indicating a noninferior eradication rate (the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval over -10% [-7.9% and -7.87%, respectively]). Adverse events more commonly occurred in the bismuth-containing quadruple-therapy group (8.8% vs 16.0%, P = 0.012), while patient compliance and symptom improvement of the two regimens were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy containing berberine, amoxicillin and rabeprazole is noninferior to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in the initial treatment for H. pylori eradication.

Biomaterials for Helicobacter pylori therapy: therapeutic potential and future perspectives

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the main cause of gastric adenocarcinoma. However, the traditional antibiotic treatment of H. pylori is limited due to increased antibiotic resistance and low efficacy; low drug delivery efficiency and difficulties in eradicating H. pylori that is present intracellularly or in biofilms cause further setbacks. Biomaterials that can protect drugs against stomach acid, target lesions, control drug release, destroy biofilms, and exhibit unique antibacterial mechanisms and excellent biocompatibility have emerged as attractive tools for H. pylori eradication, particularly for drug-resistant strains. Herein, we review the virulence mechanisms, current drug treatments, and antibiotic resistance of H. pylori strains. Furthermore, recent advances in the development of biomaterials, including nanoparticles (such as lipid-based nanoparticles, polymeric nanoparticles, and inorganic nanoparticles), microspheres, and hydrogels, for effective and precise therapy of H. pylori and different types of therapeutic mechanisms, as well as future perspectives, have also been summarized.

Amoxicillin-vonoprazan dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The efficacy and safety of amoxicillin-vonoprazan (VA) dual therapy remained unclear.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. A systematic search of the Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane database was conducted using the combination of "Helicobacter pylori or H. pylori or Hp," "amoxicillin or penicillin," and "Vonoprazan or TAK-438 or Takecab or (potassium AND competitive) or potassium-competitive." The initial and secondary outcome of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VA dual therapy.

RESULTS

Three studies and 668 H. pylori infected patients were included in this meta-analysis. The crude eradication rate of VA dual therapy was 87.5% and 89.6% by ITT and PP analysis, respectively. No significant differences were observed regarding the VA dual therapy and vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC) triple therapy according to ITT (RR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.93-1.05, P = 0.65) and PP (RR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.94-1.05, P = 0.82) analysis. The side effect of VA dual therapy was 19.1% (95% CI, 5.9-32.4), which was lower than that of VAC triple therapy but there was no statistical significance (RR = 0.75, 95% CI, 0.59-1.06, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

VA dual therapy shows acceptable efficacy, good safety and avoid unnecessary antibiotic use in the first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. However, its application in other regions need to be further explored.

Current guidelines for Helicobacter pylori treatment in East Asia 2022: Differences among China, Japan, and South Korea

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is highly prevalent in East Asia. The overall seroprevalence rate of H. pylori infection is 44.2% in China, 37.6%-43.2% in Japan, and 51.0% in South Korea. H. pylori can cause peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. East Asian countries have high rates of gastric cancer (age-standardized incidence rate: 20-30 per 100000). The Kyoto global consensus report emphasized that H. pylori gastritis should be considered the main cause for the development of gastric cancer. H. pylori treatment guidelines in China, Japan, and South Korea have recently been revised according to data from each of those countries. However, emerging antibiotic resistance is an important barrier to H. pylori eradication. The recommended H. pylori treatment regimens differ among those three East Asian countries. In this review, recent guidelines and up-to-date research on H. pylori treatment regimens from China, Japan, and South Korea are discussed.

Primer for Development of Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori Therapy Using Antimicrobial Stewardship

We provide a primer to assist in the difficult transition of Helicobacter pylori therapy guidelines to those that adhere to the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. This transition will entail abandonment of many of the principles that heretofore formed the basis of treatment guidelines and recommendations. The goals of antimicrobial stewardship include optimization of the use of antibiotics while reducing antimicrobial resistance. The critical outcome measure is absolute cure rate which largely restricts comparative trials to those which reliably produce high cure rates (eg, ∼95%). Therapies that fail to achieve at least a 90% cure rate should be abandoned as unacceptable. Because only optimized therapies should be prescribed, guidance on the principles and practices of optimization will we required. Therapies that contain antibiotics which do not contribute to outcome should be eliminated. Surveillance, one of the fundamental elements of antimicrobial stewardship, must be done to provide ongoing assurance that the recommended therapies remain effective. It is yet not widely recognized when utilizing otherwise highly successful therapies, the routine test of cure data is an indirect, surrogate method for susceptibility testing. To systematically guide therapy, test of cure data should be collected, shared and integrated into local antimicrobial stewardship programs to provide guidance regarding best practices to both prescribers and public health individuals. Treatment recommendations should be compatible with those of the American Society of Infectious Disease white paper on the conduct of superiority and organism-specific clinical trials of antibacterial agents for the treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant bacterial pathogens which include criteria for ethical active-controlled superiority studies of antibacterial agents.

All-in-One Theranostic Platform Based on Hollow Microcapsules for Intragastric-Targeting Antiulcer Drug Delivery, CT Imaging, and Synergistically Healing Gastric Ulcer

Bismuth-containing therapies are suggested as first-line and rescue alternatives for gastric ulcer (GU) treatment and Helicobacter pylori eradication. The current treatment strategy is called quadruple therapy and includes proton pump inhibitors, bismuth, and two broad-band antibiotics. This fact may affect medication compliance, leading to a resistance rate of more than 25% to clarithromycin or metronidazole. To counter this, from the perspective of natural products, an intragastric-targeting all-in-one theranostic platform is established: a drug carrier microcapsule composed of multiple synergistic antiulcer drugs, including bismuth, gallotannin, and antibiotics is obtained (BiG@MCs), and the therapeutic effects of BiG@MCs in rodent models are further evaluated. The results show that the BiG@MCs are spherical with homogeneous particle size (3 ± 0.5 µm) and can be response-released to the acidic environment of the stomach (pH 2.0-3.0), preventing the premature release of the BiG@MCs in physiological conditions. It is worth noting that the bismuth component can be easily identified by computed tomography and other detection instruments, which provide the possibility for drug tracing. In summary, these results indicate that BiG@MCs provide a versatile intragastric-targeting drug delivery platform for GU therapeutics.

Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Study of Helicobacter pylori Isolates from Myanmar and Their Susceptibility to Antibiotics

Evaluation of Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics is crucial for treatment strategy in Myanmar. Moreover, the genetic mechanisms involved remain unknown. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of H. pylori infection, antibiotic resistance, and genetic mechanisms in Myanmar. One hundred fifty patients from two cities, Mawlamyine (n = 99) and Yangon (n = 51), were recruited. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was 43.3% (65/150). The successfully cultured H. pylori isolates (n = 65) were tested for antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, levofloxacin, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline by Etest, and the resistance rates were 80%, 33.8%, 7.7%, 4.6%, and 0%, respectively. In the multidrug resistance pattern, the metronidazole–levofloxacin resistance was highest for double-drug resistance (16/19; 84.2%), and all triple-drug resistance (3/3) was clarithromycin–metronidazole–levofloxacin resistance. Twenty-three strains were subjected to next-generation sequencing to study their genetic mechanisms. Interestingly, none of the strains resistant to clarithromycin had well-known mutations in 23S rRNA (e.g., A2142G, A2142C, and A2143G). New type mutation genotypes such as pbp1-A (e.g., V45I, S/R414R), 23S rRNA (e.g., T248C), gyrA (e.g., D210N, K230Q), gyrB (e.g., A584V, N679H), rdxA (e.g., V175I, S91P), and frxA (e.g., L33M) were also detected. In conclusion, the prevalence of H. pylori infection and its antibiotic resistance to metronidazole was high in Myanmar. The H. pylori eradication regimen with classical triple therapy, including amoxicillin and clarithromycin, can be used as the first-line therapy in Myanmar. In addition, next-generation sequencing is a powerful high-throughput method for identifying mutations within antibiotic resistance genes and monitoring the spread of H. pylori antibiotic-resistant strains.

Empiric "Three-in-One" Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Second-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: An Intervention Study in Southern Italy

The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) may be difficult due to antibiotic resistance. Indeed, after one failure, a second-line therapy is needed and a bismuth containing quadruple therapy (BQT) with a three-in-one capsule formulation is becoming very popular. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of BQT as a second-line therapy. We recruited consecutive patients with one therapy failure. For ten days patients received the three-in-one BQT Pylera^® therapy, in combination with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), decided at the choice of the investigator, at full dose bid. The eradication rate was calculated by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP)analyses and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Seventy-three patients were recruited, 41 females and 32 males (mean age 53.0±13.1 years). Fifty-five patients failed triple therapy with amoxicillin and clarithromycin and the remaining 18 received sequential therapy. Seventy-two patients consumed at least 90% of the capsules, while only one did not complete the therapy due to adverse events (nausea and diarrhea). By ITT analysis, BQT was successful in 62 subjects (eradication rate 84.9%, 95%CI 76.7–93.1%). By PP analysis, the eradication rate was 86.1% (95%CI 78.1–94.1%).Adverse events were observed in 14 subjects (20.5%).In conclusion, our report confirmed that BQT is effective as an empiric second-line regimen.

Efficacy of Twice a Day Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for Second-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is an effective treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, frequent dosing schedules of BQT regimen often compromise drug adherence and may affect treatment outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of twice-daily BQT compared to that of four times a day therapy. From August 2018 to November 2020, adult patients who failed first-line standard triple therapy and underwent BQT were eligible. Patients were categorized into two groups according to dosing schedule: (i) the BQT group (n = 213) who received standard BQT administered four times a day; and (ii) the BQTb group (n = 141) who received proton pump inhibitor, bismuth 600 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and tetracycline 1 g twice a day. The eradication rate did not differ between the BQT (92.5%) and the BQTb groups (90.1%) (p = 0.441). Adherence and adverse event rate were similar between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that current smoking was associated with eradication failure; however, dosing frequency was not associated with the efficacy of eradication therapy. This study suggested that twice a day BQT is as effective as four times a day therapy for second-line treatment of H. pylori infection.

Helicobacter pylori diagnosis and therapy in the era of antimicrobial stewardship

The diagnosis and therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection have undergone major changes based on the use the principles of antimicrobial stewardship and increased availability of susceptibility profiling. H. pylori gastritis now recognized as an infectious disease, as such there is no placebo response allowing outcome to be assessed in relation to the theoretically obtainable cure rate of 100%. The recent recognition of H. pylori as an infectious disease has changed the focus to therapies optimized to reliably achieve high cure rates. Increasing antimicrobial resistance has also led to restriction of clarithromycin, levofloxacin, or metronidazole to susceptibility-based therapies. Covid-19 resulted in the almost universal availability of polymerase chain reaction testing in hospitals which can be repurposed to utilize readily available kits to provide rapid and inexpensive detection of clarithromycin resistance. In the United States, major diagnostic laboratories now offer H. pylori culture and susceptibility testing and American Molecular Laboratories offers next-generation sequencing susceptibility profiling of gastric biopsies or stools for the six commonly used antibiotics without need for endoscopy. Current treatment recommendations include (a) only use therapies that are reliably highly effective locally, (b) always perform a test-of-cure, and (c) use that data to confirm local effectiveness and share the results to inform the community regarding which therapies are effective and which are not. Empiric therapy should be restricted to those proven highly effective locally. The most common choices are 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy and rifabutin triple therapy. Prior guidelines and treatment recommendations should only be used if proven locally highly effective.

Comparison of tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication versus modified bismuth quadruple therapy in Korea: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to compare the success rate, adverse drug events, and cost-effectiveness of tailored Helicobacter pylori eradication and modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapy.

METHODS

The diagnosis of H. pylori infection was randomly based on either rapid urease test (RUT) or dual priming oligonucleotide (DPO)-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 1:1 ratio. According to the presence of point mutations that cause clarithromycin resistance, patients in the tailored therapy (TT) group received standard triple therapy or classic bismuth quadruple therapy. Patients with positive RUT results received 40 mg pantoprazole, 1000 mg amoxicillin, 750 mg metronidazole, and 600 mg bismuth subcitrate twice daily for 14 days (PAM-B therapy).

RESULTS

Between the TT (n = 141) and PAM-B groups (n = 141), H. pylori eradication rate did not differ significantly according to intention-to-treat (TT: 80.9% vs. PAM-B: 85.8%, P = 0.262), modified intention-to-treat (TT: 89.1% vs. PAM-B: 91.0%, P = 0.606), and per-protocol (TT: 89.0% vs. PAM-B: 93.5%, P = 0.198) analyses. The average cost for successful eradication was higher in the TT group than in the PAM-B group ($340.7 vs. $263.9 per patient).

CONCLUSION

PAM-B therapy exhibits similar efficacy and improved cost-effectiveness compared to TT based on the results of DPO-PCR tests.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05002595.

The efficacy and safety of different bismuth agents in Helicobacter pylori first-line eradication: A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bismuth pectin capsules and bismuth pectin granules in the first-line quadruple treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

METHODS

This study was a multicenter, randomized, open-labelled controlled clinical trial. Patients with a H. pylori infection were randomized into 4 groups (1:1:1:1) and treated with a 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy. The 4 groups received either bismuth potassium citrate capsules (220 mg), colloidal bismuth pectin capsules (200 mg), bismuth pectin granules (150 mg), or bismuth pectin granules (300 mg). The primary outcome was the eradication rate of H. pylori. The secondary outcomes included symptom improvement, patient compliance, and incidence of adverse events. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04209933).

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients were included in this study, and 211 patients completed the follow-up. An intention-to-treat analysis showed that the H. pylori eradication rates of the 4 groups were 73.3%, 76.7%, 75.0%, and 71.7%, respectively. The per-protocol analysis showed that the H. pylori eradication rates of the 4 groups were 86.3%, 82.1%, 83.3%, and 86.0%. There was no significant difference among the 4 groups in the H. pylori eradication rate (P > .05). There were also no significant differences in the symptom improvement rate, overall adverse reaction rate, or patient compliance among the 4 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bismuth pectin capsules and bismuth pectin granules had similar efficacy and safety for H. pylori eradication compared to bismuth potassium citrate. These data suggest that bismuth pectin can be an alternative to bismuth potassium citrate to eradicate H. pylori when using bismuth-containing quadruple therapy.

Tailored eradication strategy vs concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in Korean patients

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, which ultimately results in eradication failure, has been an emerging issue in the clinical field. Recently, to overcome this problem, an antibiotic sensitivity-based tailored therapy (TT) for H. pylori infection has received attention.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of TT for H. pylori infection treatment compared to a non-bismuth quadruple therapy, concomitant therapy (CT) regimen.

METHODS

We included patients (> 18 years) with an H. pylori infection and without a history of Helicobacter eradication who visited the Gil Medical Center between March 2016 and October 2020. After being randomly assigned to either the TT or CT treatment group in 1 to 1 manner, patient compliance, eradication success rate (ESR), and patient-reported side effects profiles were assessed and compared between the two groups. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using a rapid urease test, Giemsa stain, or dual priming oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (DPO-PCR). Tailored eradication strategy based through the presence of a 23S ribosomal RNA point mutation. For the TT group, a DPO-PCR test, which detected A2142G and/or A2143G point mutations, and a clarithromycin resistance test were performed. Patients in the clarithromycin-resistant group were treated with a bismuth-containing quadruple combination therapy, while those with sensitive results were treated with the standard triple regimen.

RESULTS

Of the 217 patients with a treatment naive H. pylori infection, 110 patients [mean age: 58.66 ± 13.03, men, n = 55 (50%)] were treated with TT, and 107 patients [mean age: 56.67 ± 10.88, men, n = 52 (48.60%)] were treated with CT. The compliance (TT vs CT, 100% vs 98.13%, P = 0.30), and follow-up loss rates (8.18% vs 9.35%, P = 0.95) were not significantly different between the groups. The ESR after treatment was also not statistically different between the groups (TT vs CT, 82.73% vs 82.24%, P = 0.95). However, the treatment-related and patient-reported side effects were significantly lower in the TT group than in the CT group (22.77% vs 50.52%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The DPO-based TT regimen shows promising results in efficacy and safety profiles as a first-line Helicobacter eradication regimen in Korea, especially when physicians are confronted with increased antibiotic resistance rates.

Efficacy and safety of bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 10-day quadruple therapy containing colloidal bismuth sub-citrate (CBS), esomeprazole (ESO), amoxicillin (AMO), and metronidazole (MET) for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication in children.

METHODS

Monocentric, open-label, prospective, single-arm clinical trial in children aged 6-17 years with H. pylori infection. The study was carried out on consecutive patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and H. pylori infection confirmed by histology and culture of gastric biopsies. The outcome was evaluated using a ¹³ C-urea breath test 8-10 weeks post-therapy. Adverse events and compliance were evaluated by daily journal and pill counting.

RESULTS

A total of 36 children fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Eight (22.2%) of them had a prior H. pylori eradication treatment. Thirteen (36.1%) patients were infected by a strain resistant to MET and 8 (22.2%) by a strain resistant to both MET and Clarithromycin (CLA). In the intention-to-treat population (ITT), eradication was achieved in 35/36 patients (95%CI: 85%-99%). Twenty-three children reported at least one adverse event (63.8%), mostly mild (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dark stool, metallic taste, headache, and rash). The compliance rate was high, with 30 (83.3%) patients taking >90% of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

10-day quadruple therapy containing CBS, ESO, AMO, and MET for H. pylori eradication in children is a safe and very effective solution, especially for previously treated patients and those infected with double resistant strains.

Efficacy of bismuth added to standard triple therapy as the first-line eradication regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Addressing the increasing antibiotic resistance, including clarithromycin resistance, which affects Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, is a challenge for clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of bismuth added to standard triple therapy as a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection. The secondary outcome was the treatment efficacy for clarithromycin-resistant strains.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was undertaken from January to December 2019. A total of 107 patients with Helicobacter pylori infection were enrolled and received Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with bismuth added to standard triple therapy for 14 days. We also evaluated the clarithromycin resistance rate by dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex PCR and treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients completed standard triple therapy with bismuth added for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The eradication rates in the intention to treat and per-protocol analyses were 87.9% and 90.4%, respectively. The frequency of clarithromycin resistance was 33.6% (35/104), and the eradication rate was 77.1% in resistant strains (27/35).

CONCLUSION

Bismuth added to standard triple therapy could be acceptable as a first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with clarithromycin-resistant strains. In particular, in areas with high clarithromycin tolerance, it is advisable to consider bismuth add-on therapy as the first-line treatment regimen.

Bismuth salts with versus without acid suppression for Helicobacter pylori infection: A transmission electron microscope study

BACKGROUND

Bismuth oxychloride produced by interaction of bismuth compounds with gastric acid is believed to damage Helicobacter pylori. The effect of bismuth salts on H. pylori in the presence of strong acid suppression is unknown. This randomized trial aimed to determine effects of bismuth subcitrate on H. pylori with and without acid suppression.

METHODS

H. pylori -positive participants were allocated (1:1:1) to receive (a) no treatment (control), (b) colloidal bismuth subcitrate (CBS, 125 mg/tab), or (c) CBS plus high-dose proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), esomeprazole 40 mg q.i.d. for 3 days. In the treatment groups, CBS was given: 1 dose, 1 hour before endoscopy, 1 dose, 4 hours before endoscopy, or q.i.d. 24 hours before endoscopy. The study end-points were evaluated using transmission electron microscopy to observe the morphological changes of H. pylori in antral and corpus biopsies.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven H. pylori carriers were enrolled in this trial with qualitative end-points. In the no treatment group, active budding and replication of H. pylori were observed. In the CBS group, cellular swelling, vacuolization, structural degradation, and cell wall eruption of H. pylori were observed, with no apparent association with when the CBS was given. Among those receiving high-dose PPI-plus CBS or CBS only, there were no differences in number of H. pylori present or severity of bacterial damage whether CBS was given 1, 4, or 24 hours before endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on direct morphological evaluation, the toxic effect of CBS treatment on H. pylori was demonstrated independent of acid suppression with PPI.

Correlation Analysis Among Genotype Resistance, Phenotype Resistance and Eradication Effect of Helicobacter pylori

Background

It has not been fully confirmed whether the detection of Helicobacter pylori resistance gene mutation can replace antibiotic drug sensitivity test to guide the clinical individualized treatment. Therefore, we have studied this aspect and discussed the application value of antibiotic sensitivity gene test.

Materials and Methods

The biopsy specimen of gastric mucosa from the patients examined by endoscopy and positive for rapid urease test were collected continuously for histopathological analysis, H. pylori culture, antibiotic drug sensitivity test (E-test drug sensitivity test), and antibiotic sensitivity gene test (high-throughput nucleotide sequencing). The participants received triple plus bismuth solution eradication treatment (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, twice daily for 14 days) for follow-up, and the eradication effect was determined.

Results

The 551/602 subjects, who met the inclusion criteria, were subjected to culture for H. pylori and antibiotic drug sensitivity determination; among them 506 were cultured successfully. The results showed that the resistance rates of H. pylori were 38.9% for clarithromycin and 31.0% for levofloxacin. In 489 H. pylori strains, the mutations were detected in clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance genes, indicating the genotype resistance. The resistance genes of clarithromycin and levofloxacin were consistent with phenotype resistance with respect to sensitivity (81.2% and 69.7% for clarithromycin and levofloxacin, respectively) and specificity (88.9% and 93.7% for clarithromycin and levofloxacin, respectively). The eradication rate of H. pylori in the clarithromycin-resistant group was significantly lower than that in the sensitive group (ITT: 52.1% vs 85.0%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

A correlation was established between the resistance genes of clarithromycin and levofloxacin and their phenotypic resistance and clinical efficacy. The detection of H. pylori resistance genes has a good clinical application prospect.

Primary and secondary clarithromycin resistance in Helicobacter pylori and mathematical modeling of the role of macrolides

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic widely used for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, and thus resistance to this antibiotic is a major cause of treatment failure. Here, we present the results of a retrospective observational study of clarithromycin resistance (Cla-res) in 4744 H. pylori-infected patients from Central Hungary. We use immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on fixed gastric tissue samples to determine H. pylori infection and to infer Cla-res status, respectively. We correlate this information with macrolide dispensing data for the same patients (available through a prescription database) and develop a mathematical model of the population dynamics of Cla-res H. pylori infections. Cla-res is found in 5.5% of macrolide-naive patients (primary Cla-res), with no significant sex difference. The model predicts that this primary Cla-res originates from transmission of resistant bacteria in 98.7% of cases, and derives from spontaneous mutations in the other 1.3%. We find an age-dependent preponderance of female patients among secondary (macrolide-exposed) clarithromycin-resistant infections, predominantly associated with prior use of macrolides for non-eradication purposes. Our results shed light into the sources of primary resistant cases, and indicate that the growth rate of Cla-res prevalence would likely decrease if macrolides were no longer used for purposes other than H. pylori eradication.

Clarithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic widely used for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Here, Kocsmár et al. study clarithromycin resistance and previous macrolide consumption in 4,744 H. pylori-infected patients, shedding light into the sources of primary resistant cases and the role played by prior consumption of macrolides for non-eradication purposes.

Consistency of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of first-line concomitant and sequential therapies in Korea: A nationwide multicenter retrospective study for the last 10 years

BACKGROUND

Eradication rate of standard triple therapy for H. pylori has declined to unacceptable level, and alternative regimens such as concomitant and sequential therapy have been introduced. We aimed to assess the consistency of eradication rates of concomitant and sequential therapies as for the first-line H. pylori eradication in Korea.

METHODS

A nationwide multicenter retrospective study was conducted including 18 medical centers from January 2008 to December 2017. We included 3,800 adults who had test to confirm H. pylori eradication within 1 year after concomitant or sequential therapy.

RESULTS

Concomitant and sequential therapy were prescribed for 2508 and 1292 patients, respectively. The overall eradication rate of concomitant therapy was significantly higher than that of sequential therapy (91.8% vs. 86.1%, p < .001). In time trend analysis, the eradication rates of concomitant therapy were 90.2%, 88.2%, 92.1%, 94.3%, 91.1%, and 93.4% for each year from 2012 to 2017 with an increasing trend (p = .0146), while those of ST showed no significant trend (p = .0873). Among 263 patients with second-line therapy, bismuth quadruple therapy showed significantly higher eradication rate than quinolone-based triple therapy (73.9% vs. 51.5% in ITT analysis, p = .001; 82.7% vs. 63.0% in PP analysis, p = .002).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant therapy is the best regimen for the first-line H. pylori eradication showing consistently higher eradication rate with an increasing trend for the last 10 years in Korea. Bismuth quadruple therapy should be considered for second-line therapy after eradication failure using non-bismuth quadruple therapy.

Modified bismuth quadruple therapy with low-dose metronidazole as first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is an effective alternative first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a modified twice-a-day bismuth quadruple regimen (BQT-2) with low-dose (1000 mg total) metronidazole as first-line therapy for the eradication of H pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, patients diagnosed with H pylori infection and naïve to eradication therapy were included. The modified BQT-2 therapy consisted of rabeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, and tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate 600 mg (elemental bismuth 240 mg) twice daily, given 30 minutes before morning and evening meals for 14 days. H pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³ C-urea breath test conducted at least 4 weeks after therapy completion.

RESULTS

In 66 patients who received the modified BQT-2 regimen, the compliance rate was 100% and the H pylori eradication rate was 77.3%. H pylori was successfully cultured in 50 (75.8%) patients. The resistance rates to metronidazole and clarithromycin were 30.0% and 22.0%, respectively. Eradication rates were not significantly different according to the resistance to metronidazole (metronidazole-susceptible: 74.3% [26/35], metronidazole-resistant: 73.3% [11/15]; P > .99). Most of the adverse events were mild, with 20 (30%) patients developing nausea, epigastric soreness, loose stool, asthenia, skin rash, dizziness, taste perversion, headache, or dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-a-day modified BQT-2 regimen with low-dose metronidazole was suboptimal as an alternative first-line therapy for eradicating H pylori, despite high patient compliance.

Dual Clarithromycin and Metronidazole Resistance Is the Main Cause of Failure in Ultimate Helicobacter pylori Eradication

BACKGROUND/AIM

Antimicrobial resistance significantly affects the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. We evaluated the risk factor of failure in ultimate H. pylori eradication and assessed the efficacy of current regimens to overcome antibiotic resistance.

METHODS

Patients with H. pylori infection were prospectively enrolled in a single center. They were classified into 3 groups according to the previous history of H. pylori eradication, and antibiotic susceptibility was evaluated by culture and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients were successfully cultured for H. pylori and 81 (83.5%), 7 (7.2%), and 9 (9.3%) were classified into primary resistance, 1st eradication failure, and 2nd or more eradication failure groups; the resistance to clarithromycin (CLA), metronidazole (MET), and levofloxacin increased in the 1st eradication failure (85.7, 57.1, and 42.9%) and 2nd or more eradication failure (88.9, 88.9, and 55.6%) groups. The prevalence of MDR was 21.0% (17/81), 57.1% (4/7), and 88.9% (8/9) in the primary, 1st eradication failure, and 2nd or more eradication failure groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, dual CLA/MET resistance (CLA/MET-R) (OR = 31.432, 95% CI: 3.094-319.266, p = 0.004) was an independent risk factor for ultimate H. pylori eradication failure. In patients with dual CLA/MET-R, the eradication ratio of concomitant therapy was 57.1% (4/7), whereas that of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy was 27.3% (3/11) (p = 0.350).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual CLA/MET-R was the main cause of failure in ultimate H. pylori eradication, and 7-day bismuth quadruple or concomitant regimen would not be suitable for H. pylori eradication in the dual CLA/MET-R group.

European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management: Effectiveness of First and Second-Line Treatment in Spain

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection has to rely on previous local effectiveness due to the geographical variability of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of first and second-line H. pylori treatment in Spain, where the empirical prescription is recommended. A multicentre prospective non-interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists concerning H. pylori infection (Hp-EuReg) was developed, including patients from 2013 until June 2019. Effectiveness was evaluated descriptively and through a multivariate analysis concerning age, gender, presence of ulcer, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) dose, therapy duration and compliance. Overall, 53 Spanish hospitals were included, and 10,267 patients received a first-line therapy. The best results were obtained with the 10-day bismuth single-capsule therapy (95% cure rate by intention-to-treat) and with both the 14-day bismuth-clarithromycin quadruple (PPI-bismuth-clarithromycin-amoxicillin, 91%) and the 14-day non-bismuth quadruple concomitant (PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole, 92%) therapies. Second-line therapies were prescribed to 2448 patients, with most-effective therapies being the triple quinolone (PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin/moxifloxacin) and the bismuth-levofloxacin quadruple schemes (PPI-bismuth-levofloxacin-amoxicillin) prescribed for 14 days (92%, 89% and 90% effectiveness, respectively), and the bismuth single-capsule (10 days, 88.5%). Compliance, longer duration and higher acid inhibition were associated with higher effectiveness. "Optimized" H. pylori therapies achieve over 90% success in Spain.

A comparative study of 14-day dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) and triple plus bismuth therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori infection eradication: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Favorable outcomes in treating H pylori infection using "dual therapy (proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin four times daily)" have attracted widespread attention. However, there are few reports, and the study results lack agreement. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance of naïve-treatment patients with H pylori infection on "dual therapy" with those on "triple plus bismuth (TPB) therapy."

METHODS

This is a non-inferior randomized controlled trial conducted on 760 patients with H pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to two eradication groups: dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily) and TPB therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily) for 14 days. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed about 8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome. Antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphism were determined.

RESULTS

Compared with TPB therapy, dual therapy had significantly higher eradication rates in intention-to-treat (87.1% vs 80.5%, rate difference 6.6%), modified intention-to-treat (90.9% vs 85.5%, 5.5%) and per-protocol (92.4% vs 87.8%, 4.7%) analyses, respectively. Adverse reactions in dual therapy group were significantly lower than TPB therapy group (17.6% vs 25.5%, P = .008), and dual therapy group had better compliance (96.3% vs 92.3%, P = .019). Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance were also associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) was non-inferior to, and even superior to TPB therapy as first-line H pylori eradication.

Transitioning of Helicobacter pylori Therapy from Trial and Error to Antimicrobial Stewardship

Helicobacter pylori is the only major infection for which antimicrobial therapy is not designed using the principles of antimicrobial stewardship. Traditionally, antimicrobial therapy is a susceptibility-based therapy, achieves high cure rates, and includes surveillance programs to regularly provide updated data regarding resistance, outcomes, and treatment guidelines. Current H. pylori therapies identified by trial-and-error, and treatment recommendations and guidelines are based on comparisons among regimens that rarely take into account the prevalence or effect of resistance. The majority of patients currently treated achieve suboptimal results. A paradigm shift is required to abandon current approaches and embrace antimicrobial stewardship, and therefore reliably achieve high cure rates; develop, propagate, and update best practice guidelines; and provide surveillance of local or regional susceptibility/resistance patterns. These also require timely updates to clinicians regarding the current status of resistance, antimicrobial effectiveness, and ways to prevent antimicrobial misuse to extend the useful life of currently available antibiotics. Here, we discuss the differences among current approaches to H. pylori therapy and antimicrobial stewardship and identify what is required to achieve the transition. Conceptually, the differences are significant, and the transition will likely need to be both abrupt and complete. Recommendations for therapy during the transition period are given.

Bismuth quadruple regimen with tetracycline or doxycycline versus three-in-one single capsule as third-line rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: Spanish data of the European Helicobacter pylori Registry (Hp-EuReg)

BACKGROUND

Different bismuth quadruple therapies containing proton-pump inhibitors, bismuth salts, metronidazole, and a tetracycline have been recommended as third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment after failure with clarithromycin and levofloxacin.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments with bismuth, metronidazole, and either tetracycline or doxycycline.

METHODS

Sub-study with Spanish data of the "European Registry on H pylori Management" (Hp-EuReg), international multicenter prospective non-interventional Registry of the routine clinical practice of gastroenterologists. After previous failure with clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-containing therapies, patients receiving a third-line regimen with 10/14-day bismuth salts, metronidazole, and either tetracycline (BQT-Tet) or doxycycline (BQT-Dox), or single capsule (BQT-three-in-one) were included. Data were registered at AEG-REDCap database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and fifty-four patients have been treated so far: 85 with BQT-Tet, 94 with BQT-Dox, and 275 with BQT-three-in-one. Average age was 53 years, 68% were women. Overall modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 81% (BQT-Dox: 65%, BQT-Tet: 76%, BQT-three-in-one: 88%) and 82% (BQT-Dox: 66%, BQT-Tet: 77%, BQT-three-in-one: 88%), respectively. By logistic regression, higher eradication rates were associated with compliance (OR = 2.96; 95% CI = 1.01-8.84) and no prior metronidazole use (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.15-3.33); BQT-three-in-one was superior to BQT-Dox (OR = 4.46; 95% CI = 2.51-8.27), and BQT-Tet was marginally superior to BQT-Dox (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.85-3.29).

CONCLUSION

Third-line H pylori eradication with bismuth quadruple treatment (after failure with clarithromycin and levofloxacin) offers acceptable efficacy and safety. Highest efficacy was found in compliant patients and those taking 10-day BQT-three-in-one or 14-day BQT-Tet. Doxycycline seems to be less effective and therefore should not be recommended.