New therapies versus first-generation biologic drugs in psoriasis: a review of adverse events and their management

Indirect Comparison Between Bimekizumab and Brodalumab for the Management of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A 36-Week Real-Life Study

INTRODUCTION

Bimekizumab and brodalumab are characterized by a different mechanism of action if compared to the other anti-interleukin (IL)-17s which target IL-17A. Indeed, brodalumab acts on IL-17RA whereas bimekizumab acts on IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-17AF cytokines. Currently, despite real-life data on the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab and brodalumab have been reported, data comparing these two drugs are absent. However, these data are mandatory to evaluate whether a different target of the same IL can be correlated with a different profile in terms of effectiveness and safety. Moreover, it should be underlined that bimekizumab and brodalumab stood out as the psoriasis treatments with the fastest onset of action, delivering quicker therapeutic responses compared to other drugs acting on IL-17.

METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study was carried out enrolling patients affected by moderate to severe psoriasis undergoing treatment with brodalumab or bimekizumab. At baseline, clinical demographic details were collected. Clinical improvement [Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA)] was collected at weeks 4, 16, and 36. Safety data were analyzed at the same timepoints.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were enrolled in the study [bimekizumab: 53 (42.40%); brodalumab: 72 (57.6%)]. Psoriasis severity at baseline was similar between the two cohorts. Both PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow-up for both treatment cohorts. The bimekizumab group reached a higher percentage of PASI90/PASI100 response at each timepoint as compared to the brodalumab cohort. In particular, the percentage of PASI100 response was significantly higher in the bimekizumab group as compared to the brodalumab cohort at week 4 (41.5% vs 23.6%, p < 0.05) and at week 16 (67.9% vs 48.6%). Discontinuation for ineffectiveness was higher in the brodalumab cohort (8.3%) as compared to the bimekizumab group (3.8%), without statistical significance. As regards safety, two cases of eczematous reactions (bimekizumab: 2, brodalumab: 0), and five cases of candidiasis (bimekizumab: 4, brodalumab: 1) were collected. Overall, 3 (5.7%) and 1 (1.4%) patients discontinued bimekizumab and brodalumab because of adverse events, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed the efficacy and safety of both bimekizumab and brodalumab, up to 36 weeks of treatment. Although both drugs showed a significant improvement of the investigated scores from week 4, some differences in terms of PASI90 and PASI100 responses (higher for bimekizumab at each follow-up, with only PASI100 response significantly higher at week 4 and 16) were registered. No statistical significance was found for safety data and treatment failure.

Topical histone deacetylase inhibitor remetinostat improves IMQ-induced psoriatic dermatitis via suppressing dendritic cell maturation and keratinocyte differentiation and inflammation

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by excessive proliferation of keratinocytes and infiltration of immune cells. Although psoriasis has entered the era of biological treatment, there is still a need to explore more effective therapeutic targets and drugs due to the presence of resistance and adverse reactions to biologics. Remetinostat, an HDAC inhibitor, can maintain its potency within the skin with minimal systemic effects, making it a promising topical medication for treating psoriasis. But its effectiveness in treating psoriasis has not been evaluated. In this study, the topical application of remetinostat significantly improved psoriasiform inflammation in an imiquimod-induced mice model by inhibiting CD86 expression of CD11C+I-A/I-E+ dendritic cells (DCs) in the skin. Moreover, remetinostat could dampen the maturation and activation of bone marrow-derived DCs in vitro, as well as the expression of psoriasis-related inflammatory mediators by keratinocytes. In addition, remetinostat could promote keratinocyte differentiation without affecting its proliferation. Our findings demonstrate that remetinostat improves psoriasis by inhibiting the maturation and activation of DCs and the differentiation and inflammation of keratinocytes, which may facilitate the potential application of remetinostat in anti-psoriasis therapy.

Saffron as a Promising Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory illness of the gastrointestinal tract (GI), characterized by recurrent episodes of inflammation and tissue destruction. It affects an increasing number of individuals worldwide who suffer from Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite substantial advances in understanding the underlying causes of IBD, the available treatments remain restricted and are sometimes accompanied by severe consequences. Consequently, there is an urgent need to study alternate therapeutic options. This review assesses the present drugs, identifies their limitations, and proposes the use of saffron, a natural plant with great therapeutic potential based on preclinical and clinical investigations. Saffron has gained attention for its potential therapeutic benefits in treating various ailments due to its established bioactive compounds possessing antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This review covers how saffron impacts the levels of calprotectin, an inflammatory marker, for various inflammatory responses in multiple diseases including IBD. Data from clinical trials were assessed to determine the efficacy and safety of using saffron to counter inflammation in multiple diseases. Studies have shown that saffron may protect against inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) through several mechanisms by inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6), reducing oxidative stress through antioxidant effects, enhancing mucosal barrier function by upregulating tight junction proteins, and modulating the gut microbiota composition to promote beneficial bacteria while suppressing pathogenic ones; these combined actions contribute to its therapeutic potential in managing and alleviating the symptoms of IBD. This will enable future research endeavors and expedite the translation of saffron-based interventions into clinical practice as a valuable adjunctive therapy or a potential alternative to conventional treatments, thereby enhancing the quality of life for individuals suffering from inflammatory diseases including IBD.

Ixekizumab and brodalumab indirect comparison in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: results from an Italian single-centre retrospective study in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Eleven biologic drugs are currently approved for psoriasis management. Real-life studies are needed to guide clinicians in choosing a tailored-tail therapy. The aim of our retrospective study is to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and brodalumab in psoriasis patients.

METHODS

A single-centre real-life retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate-to-severe psoriatic patients under biologic treatment with ixekizumab or brodalumab. For each patient, clinical and demographic data were collected and the effectiveness and safety of brodalumab and ixekizumab treatment were evaluated at weeks 4, 12 and 24. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were used for psoriasis severity.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were included in the study: 98(70.5%) and 41(29.5%) patients received ixekizumab and brodalumab, respectively. Mean PASI and BSA significantly reduced at each follow up for both ixekizumab and brodalumab groups. Even if ixekizumab reached higher rates of PASI90 and PASI100 than brodalumab (PASI90: 43.8%vs39.0% PASI100: 20.4%vs17.1% at week4 and PASI90: 83.6%vs75.6% PASI100: 71.5%vs60.9% at week24), these results were not statistically significant. Adverse events, mainly mild, were registered in 25.5% of ixekizumab and 26.8% of brodalumab group, respectively. Discontinuation rate was higher for brodalumab (17.1%vs9.1%), without statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety for ixekizumab and brodalumab.

Safety of therapies using ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis who have had hepatitis B virus infection

Biological therapies used in psoriasis treatment pose a risk of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This risk occurs not only in patients with HB surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) but also in patients with past or occult HBV infection (with negative HBsAg, positive HB core antibodies (HBcAb), and positive HBV deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA]). Ustekinumab (UST) is a biologic agent acts by blocking the IL-12/23 pathway. Thus, hindering this response may lead to HBV reactivation. UST therapy is associated with mild HBV-r risk; however, there is insufficient data to confirm that hypothesis. Herein, we present observations on the safety of UST therapy in patients with psoriasis and serologically proved past HBV infection. One-hundred and six consecutive patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated with biological therapy between May 2013 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Out of 106 patients, there were five who reported having past HBV. Those five patients were tested for the presence of HBsAg, HBcAb, HBsAb as well as HBV DNA at baseline and at the end of the follow-up period. HBV reactivation was defined as changing of "undetectable" to "detectable" viremia. All five patients were treated with UST. Five patients in our cohort group were found to have resolved HBV infection: HBsAg (-), HBcAb (+), and HBV DNA (-); 4/5 were HBsAb (+) and 1/5 HBsAb (-). None of the patients experienced an increase in their liver function tests values and no signs of hepatitis or HBV reactivation were observed at any point during the study. All the patients were HBsAg and HBV DNA negative at the end of the follow-up period. The average treatment time was 82.4 (28, 96) weeks. The average follow-up time was 75.2 (31, 176) weeks. Based on the available literature and the results from our observations, UST therapy seems to be a safe option for patients with resolved HBV infection.

Therapeutic Potential of TNF-α Inhibition for Alzheimer's Disease Prevention

Background:

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasingly prevalent and over 99% of drugs developed for AD have failed in clinical trials. A growing body of literature suggests that potent inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) have potential to improve cognitive performance.

Objective:

In this review, we summarize the evidence regarding the potential for TNF-α inhibition to prevent AD and improve cognitive function in people at risk for dementia.

Methods:

We conducted a literature review in PubMed, screening all articles published before July 7, 2019 related to TNF blocking agents and curcumin (another TNF-α inhibitor) in the context of AD pathology. The keywords in the search included: AD, dementia, memory, cognition, TNF-α, TNF inhibitors, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and curcumin.

Results:

Three large epidemiology studies reported etanercept treated patients had 60 to 70% lower odds ratio (OR) of developing AD. Two small-randomized control trials (RCTs) demonstrated an improvement in cognitive performance for AD patients treated with etanercept. Studies using animal models of dementia also reported similar findings with TNF blocking agents (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, Theracurmin), which appeared to improve cognition. A small human RCT using Theracurmin, a well-absorbed form of curcumin that lowers TNF-α, showed enhanced cognitive performance and decreased brain levels of amyloid-β plaque and tau tangles.

Conclusion:

TNF-α targeted therapy is a biologically plausible approach to the preservation of cognition, and warrants larger prospective RCTs to further investigate potential benefits in populations at risk of developing AD.

Comparative safety and benefit-risk profile of biologics and oral treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A network meta-analysis of clinical trial data

BACKGROUND

The comparative safety and benefit-risk profiles of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatment have not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term (12-16 weeks) and long-term (48-56 weeks) safety and benefit-risk profiles of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatments.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of phase II-IV randomized controlled trials of moderate-to-severe psoriasis treatments was conducted (cutoff: July 1, 2020). Any adverse events (AEs), any serious AEs, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were compared using Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs).

RESULTS

Fifty-two and 7, respectively, randomized controlled trials were included in the short- and long-term NMAs, respectively. In the short-term NMA, the rates of any AEs were the lowest for tildrakizumab (posterior median: 46.0%), certolizumab (46.2%), and etanercept (49.1%). The rates of any serious AE were the lowest for certolizumab (0.8%), risankizumab (1.2%), and etanercept (1.6%). The rates of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were the lowest for risankizumab (0.5%), tildrakizumab (1.0%), and guselkumab (1.5%). In the long-term NMA, risankizumab had the lowest rates of all 3 outcomes (67.5%, 4.4%, and 1.0%, respectively) and the most favorable benefit-risk profile.

LIMITATIONS

The results may not be generalizable to real-world populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-interleukin 23 agents were associated with low rates of safety events. Risankizumab had the most favorable benefit-risk profile in the long term.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of secukinumab vs ixekizumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis after 1 year of treatment: Real-world practice

There are no studies which directly compare efficacy in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) response of secukinumab and ixekizumab. The main aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of both drugs used to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients over 52 weeks. Secondary objectives were to identify which factors related to prior biologic treatment influenced their efficacy and analyze data obtained at 12 weeks. A retrospective observational study was carried out, in which a group of the first 59 patients treated with secukinumab after its commercialization, was compared with another group of the first 29 patients treated with ixekizumab. The PASI 75, 90, and 100 response obtained at 52 weeks was 64.4%, 49.2%, and 41.4% for secukinumab and 75.9%, 62.1%, and 41.4% for ixekizumab, respectively, with no statistically significant differences. Regarding previous biological treatment, both treatments showed a decrease in efficacy as the number of prior biologics increases. No differences were found between secukinumab and ixekizumab in bio-naïve or bio-experienced patients, with the exception of a higher PASI 75 response at week 52 for ixekizumab in those patients with two or more previous biologics (P = .039) Secukinumab and ixekizumab have demonstrated high efficacy and safety, with no statistically significant differences.

Interleukin-17 and lupus: enough to be a target? For which patients?

The involvement of the interleukin (IL)-17 axis in many inflammatory and autoimmune diseases is now well established, and this has led to the development of successful targeted therapies. Its role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is less described, since SLE is characterized by the impairment of many other immune actors. However, results from animal models and patients strongly suggest that IL-17 and its producing cells are involved in SLE pathogenesis. Circulating levels of IL-17 are increased in lupus, and tissue staining shows the presence of IL-17-producing cells in organ lesions. Through different mechanisms, the IL-17 axis promotes autoantibody production, immune complex deposition, complement activation and then tissue damage. There are also many interactions with other immune and non-immune actors, which account for the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations and disease heterogeneity. SLE treatment faces challenges with many disappointing trials and persistent unmet needs. The identification of subsets of SLE patients with an IL-17-driven disease now constitutes the key priority before starting trials. More preclinical studies are needed to improve the selection of the right patients able to respond and tolerate the many inhibitors that are already available.