Proton pump inhibitors: use and misuse in the clinical setting

A Simple Prediction Model for Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Hospital-Based Administrative Database Study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Few prediction scores for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), a potentially life-threatening nosocomial diarrhea, combine high accuracy with simplicity. A simple prediction score for routine clinical practice is needed.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all inpatients aged ≥ 18 at a secondary care hospital in Japan. The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of patients from January 2016 to December 2020 and January 2021 to September 2022, respectively. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved using electronic medical records and an administrative database. The primary outcome was to derive and validate an accurate, simple prediction score for primary hospital-onset CDI. A derived prediction score by logistic regression analysis was calibrated and validated.

RESULTS

CDI developed in 102 of 25 517 and 25 of 6259 patients in the derived and validation cohorts (2.7 cases/10 000 patient-days). The derived model for predicting CDI, including antibiotic use, acid suppressant (proton pump inhibitors or vonoprazan) use, Charlson comorbidity index, and Barthel index, yielded c-statistics of 0.89 and 0.82 in the derivation and validation cohort. The model was well calibrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple prediction score enables early medical intervention and modification of treatment plans to reduce the risk of developing primary hospital-onset CDI.

Identification of the Potential Pharmacotherapeutic Risk in Hospitalized Geriatric Patients

INTRODUCTION

Geriatric patients need carefully tailored pharmacotherapeutic approaches to minimize the risks of inappropriate treatment and hospitalizations. In Slovakia, there is a lack of studies documenting the medication use patterns in hospitalized geriatric patients. The primary outcome of our study was to identify potential pharmacotherapeutic risks in hospitalized geriatric patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records from 122 patients (65 years and older) hospitalized in the geriatric department. Potential pharmacotherapeutic risk was assessed by identifying potential drug-drug interactions (PDIs) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). PDIs were identified using the Lexicomp® database, and PIMs were evaluated using the EU(7)-PIM list. PDIs were classified into five severity categories: A (unknown), B (minor), C (moderate), D (major), and X (contraindicated). Patients' medication was labeled as "PDIs in the therapy" or "PIMs in the therapy" based on the presence of PDIs or PIMs. If PDIs were identified, the patient was labeled "PDI in therapy"; if PIMs were found, the label "PIMs in the therapy" was applied.

RESULTS

Polypharmacy (61.5%, 75 patients) and hyperpolypharmacy (16.4%, 20 patients) were highly prevalent. PDIs were identified in 80.3% of patients (98 patients). Out of the total 417 PDIs, eight were contraindicated (type X) and 47 were classified as major (type D) interactions. PIMs were used by 73.8% of patients (90 patients), with the most common being pantoprazole (37.7%, 46 patients), alprazolam (27.8%, 34 patients), and digoxin (15.6%, 19 patients). We found a moderate relationship between the number of used drugs and the number of PIMs (ρ = 0.574, R2 = 0.8697, p < 0.001). The mean number of hospitalizations was higher in patients with PDI in therapy (p < 0.001), had a weak relationship with the number of PDIs (p < 0.05), and did not correlate with the number of used drugs or PIMs. Only 6.6% of patients (eight patients) had no potential pharmacotherapeutic risk, while 32% (39 patients) had mild risk (PDIs or PIMs), and 61.5% (75 patients) had high risk (both PDIs and PIMs in the therapy).

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore the urgent need for medication reviews by hospital pharmacists and the active promotion of drug deprescription among clinicians.

Inappropriate prescribing of drugs for peptic ulcer and gastro-esophageal reflux disease remains a matter of concern: Results from the LAPTOP-PPI cluster randomized trial

Background

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most commonly and inappropriately prescribed drugs by general practitioners (GPs), resulting in increased risk of adverse outcomes for patients and in avoidable costs for Italy's National Health Service (NHS). This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a low-cost and easily implementable informative intervention directed at GPs to enhance the appropriate prescription of PPIs.

Methods

The LAPTOP-PPI study is a pragmatic, cluster-randomized controlled trial designed to improve the appropriateness of PPI prescriptions among community-dwelling individuals aged ≥65 years. In June 2021, GPs in the Local Health Units (LHUs) of Bergamo (Northern Italy) and Caserta (Southern Italy) were randomly allocated to either an intervention group (summary reports on prescribing habits, scientific documents on the Italian Medicine Agency's therapeutic indications, strategies for PPI de-prescribing, along with educational materials for patients), and a control group (standard practice). PPI appropriateness was assessed through an algorithm specifically designed and based on NHS prescription appropriateness and reimbursement criteria. Intervention efficacy was evaluated by comparing data from the baseline period (July 1 to 31 December 2019) with those from the follow-up period (July 1 to 31 December 2021), 6 months after randomization. The analysis was performed on the intention-to-treat principle and according to GP level. To estimate the effectiveness of the intervention, we used a difference-in-differences (DID) approach.

Results

Overall, 942 GPs (540 from Bergamo and 402 from Caserta LHUs) were included in the analysis. At baseline, 171,978 patients aged ≥65 received drug prescriptions for acid-related diseases and were assessable for evaluation of appropriateness. At follow-up, this number was 137,699. The overall inappropriateness rate at baseline among GPs included in the analysis was 57.4% (std.dev. 8.4%) in the intervention arm and 57.6% (std.dev. 8.8%) in the control arm; 6 months after the intervention delivery, they were 59.2% (std.dev. 8.0%) and 58.5% (std.dev. 7.3%), respectively.

Conclusion

Given their widespread use, improving the prescription quality of PPIs is a major concern. Educational interventions for GPs and patients are routine strategies to address inappropriateness, but they appear to be insufficient for independently improving prescribing practice, especially in a critical situation such as the post-pandemic period.

Risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion in critically ill patients undergoing endoscopy for percutaneous gastrostomy: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for gastric ulcer is commonly prescribed in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of the study was to assess the current prevalence and risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion in ICU patients receiving standard pharmacologic prophylaxis undergoing endoscopy for percutaneous gastrostomy implantation.

METHODS

Patients hospitalized in the mixed medical-surgical ICU undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) were analyzed. We excluded patients receiving either no or high doses of intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI), only patients receiving standard doses of PPI were included. Data retrieved from the electronic medical records included: demographics, risk factors for gastric mucosa lesion (use of stimulants, comorbidities, medications, treatment methods in the ICU, laboratory derangements) and endoscopic findings. The study compared a group of patients with gastric mucosa lesions (cases) vs. patients without gastric mucosa lesions (controls). Inter-group comparisons between cases and controls were performed. Depending on the type of distribution continuous variables were assessed using two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney test, whereas categorical variables with Chi-squared or Fisher exact test. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients with no prophylaxis (n = 8) or receiving high doses (> 40 mg per day) of proton pump inhibitor (n = 2) were excluded. There were 182 patients receiving standard intravenous dose of PPI, 63 (34.6%) women and 119 (65.4%) men, with median age 61.5 (interquartile range IQR 46.0-70.0) years. Majority of patients (n = 169, 92.9%) were receiving pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism. There were 53 (29.1%) patients with gastric mucosa lesion. The only risk factor that was significantly different between cases and controls was history of gastric ulcer (p = 0.04) with OR 3.8 (95% CI 1.1-12.5; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of various risk factors for gastric ulceration may not predict gastric mucosa lesion in ICU patients receiving standard pharmacological prophylaxis undergoing endoscopy for PEG implantation. We found that history of gastric ulcer may be a risk factor for gastric ulceration in the ICU patients. Patients with history of gastric ulcer might benefit from higher than standard doses of anti-ulcer medication when hospitalized in the ICU.

In Vitro Protective Effects of a Standardized Extract of Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. Cladodes and Olea europaea L. Leaves Against Indomethacin-Induced Intestinal Epithelial Cell Injury

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can induce serious adverse effects in gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa, increasing intestinal permeability and leading to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, apoptosis and inflammation. As proton pump inhibitors are effective in protecting against NSAID-induced gastropathy but not NSAID-induced enteropathy, current research is focused on natural products as protective substances for therapy and prevention of intestinal injury. Herein, through the use of an in vitro model based on intestinal epithelial cell (Caco-2) damage caused by indomethacin (INDO), we examined the protective activity of a commercially available standardized extract (OFI+OE) from Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill. cladodes and Olea europaea L. leaves. Pre-treatment with OFI+OE prevented INDO-induced intestinal epithelial barrier damage, as demonstrated by TEER measurement, fluorescein permeability, and tight junction protein expression. The extract showed positive effects against INDO-induced oxidative stress and correlated activation of apoptosis, decreasing pro-apoptotic markers BAX and Caspase-3 and increasing anti-apoptotic factor Bcl-2. Moreover, the extract inhibited the NF-κB pathway and pro-inflammatory cascade. In conclusion, these data support the use of OFI+OE extract as a natural strategy for therapy and prevention of intestinal mucosal damage, demonstrating its beneficial effects against INDO-induced intestinal damage, through modulation of oxidative, apoptotic, and inflammatory pathways.

Identification of novel signal of proton pump inhibitor-associated drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: a disproportionality analysis

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed for treating upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, eradicating Helicobacter pylori, and stress ulcer prophylaxis, among other digestive system diseases. Recent case reports provided limited evidence of a correlation between PPIs and drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). However, there is currently no established association between PPIs and DRESS.

AIM

This research aimed to identify the associations between PPIs and DRESS using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHOD

A retrospective investigation of DRESS associated with six PPIs used FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q3 2023. Data mining algorithms were used to identify adverse events in the FAERS database that met the following criteria: (1) proportional reporting ratio (PRR) ≥ 2; (2) reporting odds ratio (ROR) > 1; (3) 95% confidence interval (CI) of ROR > 1; (4) Chi-square (χ2) ≥ 4 and case count ≥ 3.

RESULTS

There were 495 reports of PPI-related DRESS, including pantoprazole (174, 35.2%), omeprazole (103, 20.8%), lansoprazole (103, 20.8%), esomeprazole (101, 20.4%), rabeprazole (8, 1.6%), and dexlansoprazole (6, 1.2%). The results indicated a significant association of three PPIs (pantoprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole) with DRESS. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that only pantoprazole remained significantly associated with DRESS after 10 concomitant drugs had been removed (ROR: 3.00, PRR: 2.99, and information component [IC]: 1.57).

CONCLUSION

This study identified the signals suggesting a potential association between DRESS and six PPIs. However, more investigation of epidemiological data is required to validate of these conclusions.

Proton pump inhibitors and gastrointestinal symptoms among patients with COVID-19 infection

INTRODUCTION

The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is anticipated to elevate an individual's susceptibility to enteric infections as a result of altering the gut flora. The influence of PPIs on the clinical manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still uncertain. This study aims to investigate the impact of PPI usage on the clinical manifestation of COVID-19, namely its gastrointestinal symptoms.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional cohort study involving COVID-19 patients. Patients were interviewed using a predesigned questionnaire that asked about their demographics, clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection, and the extent and type of PPIs in use. PPI usage was confirmed by reviewing patients' electronic medical records. The primary outcome was to establish any association between the use of PPI and the symptoms and clinical presentation of COVID-19.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 254 participants, 69 (27.2%) were considered PPI users. Patients who were on PPI medications reported a significantly lower rate of myalgia (27.5% vs 51.9%; p = 0.0006) and heartburn (5.7% vs 15.6%; p = 0.03) but had a significantly higher rate of abdominal pain (27.5% vs 13.5%; p = 0.001) and diarrhoea (28.9% vs 14.5%, p = 0.02) when compared to those who were not using PPIs. Patients on PPIs were also shown to have significantly higher odds of developing diarrhoea (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.08 to 3.93, p = 0.02) and abdominal pain (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.93, p = 0.03), but a lower risk of developing myalgia (OR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9, p = 0.02) when compared to non-PPI users.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the use of PPIs could impact COVID-19 clinical presentation toward more gastrointestinal manifestations. Further studies investigating the link between other acid suppression medications and COVID-19 manifestations and severity should be carried out.

Helicobacter pylori, esophageal precancerous lesions, and proton pump inhibitor overuse

This article reviews the cohort study published in the World Journal of Gastroenterology, which reported low rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection among esophageal cancer (EC) patients, coupled with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) overuse. These findings suggest a potential protective role of H. pylori against EC and indicate a possible association between PPI use and increased cancer risk. In light of these findings, our article examines the complex relationship between H. pylori and esophageal precancerous lesions, exploring the potential underlying mechanisms. We also address growing concerns regarding PPI overuse, including its potential effects on cancer therapy efficacy and the risk of drug interactions. Ultimately, this article highlights the urgent need for further research to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PPIs in cancer patients and to better understand their broader implications.

The silent epidemic: Inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors among hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

There is an increasing trend to inappropriately prescribe proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in different clinical settings despite the reported adverse outcomes. This study aimed to assess (1) the prevalence of potentially inappropriate use of PPIs and its associated risk factors among hospitalized patients, at pre-admission and discharge and (2) the prevalence of valid indications of PPIs use without prescription.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational study was performed at a single center, examining the records of patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the Family Medicine inpatient service over a one-year period. The appropriateness of PPIs use was assessed against a set of pre-approved indications.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 34.67 % were taking PPIs upon admission, increasing to 43.67 % at discharge (p < 0.001). Inappropriate PPI use was identified in 51.92 % at pre-admission and 57.25 % at discharge. Multivariate analysis identified significant factors contributing to inappropriate PPI use: polypharmacy at both admission and discharge (OR = 4.587, p = 0.031), and the presence of two or more comorbidities at discharge (OR = 5.421, p = 0.011; OR = 13.005, p = 0.037). Age ≤65 was associated with increased inappropriate use only at discharge (p < 0.003). Conversely, appropriate prescribing was noted in patients over 65 and those on antiplatelet therapy, aligning with clinical guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals a high prevalence of inappropriate PPI use among hospitalized patients, notably increasing from admission to discharge. Key contributors to inappropriate PPI usage included polypharmacy and high comorbidity scores at discharge, particularly in patients under 65. This emphasizes the need for targeted interventions to optimize PPI prescribing practices in clinical settings.

Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are some of the most frequently prescribed medications, but they are often used inappropriately, either being prescribed without a clear indication or continued for longer than necessary. In such cases, deprescribing is recommended. However, despite its proven effectiveness, the implementation of deprescribing in clinical practice remains inconsistent and varied, making it challenging to identify the most effective strategies. The goal is to provide a comprehensive outline of deprescribing interventions for PPI therapy implemented across various settings and by different healthcare professionals. Methods: The study is designed to be a systematic review of the published literature. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched from 1 January 1989 (the first PPI on the market) to 30 September 2024 for articles assessing PPI deprescribing in adult patients, focusing on the implementation rate (primary outcome) or effects on symptoms (secondary outcome). Results: After screening, 66 studies were included, predominantly pragmatic trials (N = 32) or randomized controlled trials (N = 25). We found a variety of interventions promoting PPI deprescription. Collaborative efforts involving multiple healthcare professionals, the use of algorithms for clinical decision-making, and patient involvement have proven to be key elements in the most effective strategies. Discontinuing therapy may not be advisable in cases of recurrent symptoms, suggesting that on-demand therapy could be a recommended approach. Deprescribing is particularly relevant for individuals with mild illnesses and symptoms, where tapering can effectively mitigate the rebound symptoms often associated with abrupt discontinuation. Conclusions: Given the current prevalence of inappropriate PPI prescribing, it is imperative to raise awareness among both physicians and patients about the importance of the deprescribing process, which should be tailored to the specific needs of each patient, considering his/her medical history, current health status, and personal preferences.

Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding the Inappropriate Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Among Students of Umm Al-Qura University in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly prescribed to manage various upper gastrointestinal conditions such as dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and peptic ulcer disease. However, concerns are increasing regarding their excessive and inappropriate use, particularly in cases where there is no clear medical indication. Inappropriate use can lead to unnecessary side effects and complications, emphasizing the need for better awareness of appropriate PPI use. Objectives This study aimed to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Umm Al-Qura University (UQU) students in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, regarding the inappropriate use of PPIs, highlighting the necessity of targeted educational interventions to improve awareness and promote safe PPI practices. Methods A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 534 UQU students, aged 18-30, from both health-related and non-health-related majors. Participants were selected through convenience sampling, with the questionnaire distributed via Google Forms across various channels. Data were prepared using Microsoft Excel and analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V. 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The survey revealed a significant lack of awareness about the potential side effects of PPIs, with 48.1% of participants (n=247) exhibiting low awareness, 30.9% (n=165) demonstrating high awareness, and 21% (n=112) showing moderate understanding. A chi-squared test confirmed that this awareness distribution significantly differed from what was expected, χ²(2, n=534)=60.48, p<0.001. In terms of behavior, 70.4% of participants adhered to good practices regarding PPI use, following appropriate guidelines such as using PPIs only when prescribed, following the correct dosage, and avoiding self-medication. Additionally, 21.3% (n=114) displayed moderate behavior, and 8.2% demonstrated poor behavior by engaging in practices such as using PPIs without medical supervision or not adhering to the recommended dosage and duration. A chi-squared test indicated significant differences in the behavior distribution, χ²(2, n=534)=344.14, p<0.001. Conclusion While most respondents displayed good behavior regarding PPI usage, there remains a significant gap in knowledge and attitudes. Addressing these gaps through targeted educational interventions, such as workshops, e-learning modules, and awareness campaigns, could promote the safe and effective use of PPIs among students in Saudi Arabia. The next steps would involve implementing these programs in collaboration with healthcare professionals and university departments, with effectiveness measured through follow-up surveys, behavior assessments, and analysis of PPI usage trends over time.

Pharmacological management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: state of the art in 2024

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic disease of the esophagus characterized by the regurgitation of stomach contents into the esophagus, causing troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Among patients with GERD, around 30% of patients have visible mucosal damage, while 70% have normal esophageal mucosa. Accordingly, the optimal pharmacological treatment of GERD should address different disease manifestations, including symptoms, the mucosal damage when present, and possible chronic complications, including strictures, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

Available medical treatments for GERD include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs), histamine receptor antagonists (H2-RAs), prokinetics, and mucosal protectants, such as alginates, hyaluronic acid/chondroitin-sulfate, and poliprotect. Each compound has its own advantages and disadvantages, and knowledge of expected benefits and tips for their use is paramount for the success of treatment. In addition, the appropriateness of indications for initiating treatment is also crucial to achieve positive results when managing GERD patients.

EXPERT OPINION

PPIs, PCABs, H2-RAs, prokinetics, and mucosal protectants can all be used in patients with GERD, but careful assessment of patients' characteristics as well as advantages and disadvantages of each therapeutic compound is essential to ensure successful treatment of GERD.

Current status and influencing factors of prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors in internal medicine inpatients receiving glucocorticoid therapy

Background

The actual situation and influencing factors of prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in internal medicine inpatients receiving glucocorticoid therapy are rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the current status and influencing factors of prophylactic use of PPIs in internal medicine inpatients receiving glucocorticoid therapy to provide a basis for rational prophylactic use of PPIs.

Methods

Internal medicine inpatients receiving glucocorticoid therapy from February 2023 to September 2023 were included. Information on the prophylactic use of PPIs was collected and analyzed by clinical pharmacists. Associated factors with prophylactic use of PPIs were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

Results

980 inpatients were finally included in our study, of which 271 (27.7%) inpatients received prophylactic use of PPIs. Among the inpatients prescribed PPIs, 90 inpatients received a standard dose of PPIs twice a day. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥80 years [OR = 7.009, 95% CI (1.424, 34.495), p = 0.017], history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [OR = 2.047, 95% CI (1.338, 3.133), p = 0.001], low platelet count [OR = 0.997, 95% CI (0.994, 0.999), p = 0.004], number of concomitant diseases [OR = 1.104, 95% CI (1.056, 1.153), p < 0.001], junior doctors [OR = 1.755, 95% CI (1.248, 2.468), p = 0.001], glucocorticoid dose (higher than 50 mg, measured by methylprednisolone) [OR = 2.455, 95% CI (1.371, 4.395), p = 0.003], antiplatelet agents [OR = 2.567, 95% CI (1.456, 4.524), p = 0.001], immunosuppressants [OR = 1.477, 95% CI (1.014, 2.153), p = 0.042], and betahistine [OR = 5.503, 95% CI (1.124, 26.950), p = 0.035] were associated with more prophylactic use of PPIs.

Conclusion

The prophylactic use of PPIs in internal medicine inpatients receiving glucocorticoid therapy is common in China. Clinical pharmacists will take targeted measures to promote the rational use of PPIs according to the results of this study.

Proton pump inhibitors, bone and phosphocalcic metabolism

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid-related gastrointestinal disorders; however, concerns have arisen about their prolonged and inappropriate use. Although generally considered safe, recent evidence has linked PPI use with an increased risk of kidney disease, stomach cancer, pneumonia, dementia, cardiovascular events and potential bone health problems. This systematic review examines the effects of PPIs on bone health, including osteoporosis and changes in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism, through a comprehensive analysis of the recent literature. The relationship between PPIs, bone mineral density and fracture risk, especially in populations with comorbidities, is complex and we propose a focus based on recent data. Studies of the effect of PPI use on bone mineral density have shown mixed results and require further investigation. Observational studies have indicated an increased risk of fractures, particularly vertebral fractures, associated with PPI use. Recent meta-analyses have confirmed an association between PPI use and hip fractures with a dose-dependent effect. More recently, PPIs have been associated with serious disturbances in phosphocalcic and magnesium metabolism that require careful management and discontinuation. Proton pump inhibitor-induced hypomagnesemia (PPIH) is a well-established phenomenon. In addition, hypocalcemia secondary to severe hypomagnesemia has been described. Despite growing evidence of PPI-related risks, further research is essential to better understand the complex mechanisms, as most data are from observational studies and do not establish a causal relationship. This review emphasizes the need for judicious prescription practices, particularly in long-term use scenarios and rheumatological contexts.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Prescription in Nursing Home Residents: Prevalence, Appropriateness, and Associated Factors-A Secondary Data Analysis from Three German Regions and the Impact of Guideline Recommendations

Despite reliable evidence of adverse drug effects, the substantially increased prescription rates of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) remain at a high level. This study analyzed the appropriateness of PPI prescriptions among residents of nursing homes in three regions of Germany. Baseline data of a cluster-randomized controlled trial were used to determine the prevalence of PPI prescriptions, the validity of indications, and the adequacy of the prescribed dosages according to 1. their drug approvals and 2. valid recommendation guidelines. Regression analyses were conducted to assess associated factors. A total of 437 residents in 37 nursing homes were included (mean age 83 ± 9.2 years, 72% women). The PPI prescription prevalence was 44% (n = 193). In 52/193 (27%) there was no adequate indication, and in 54 (39%) of 138 indicated PPI prescriptions it was overdosed. Yet, in only less than one-third (28%) of "adequate" prescriptions, the indication was according to the PPI approvals, whereas the majority (72%) were off-label indications in line with valid guideline recommendations. Non-indicated PPI prescription was associated with the total number of prescribed drugs (OR 1.32; 95% CI 1.18-1.62; p = 0.013). There were no associations with age, level of care dependency, cognitive impairment, prescription of psychotropic drugs, number of chronic diseases, number of physicians' consultations, or study region. To conclude, in 55%, the high prescription prevalence among residents was either not indicated or overdosed. In total, only 20% (39/193) of cases of PPI use complied with the approved indications. There is a need for quality control of 1. PPI administration in German nursing homes, and 2. of guideline recommendations expanding the off-label PPI use by 72% within the indication scale, predominantly from wide prescription for low-dose ASA.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: New Insights and Treatment Approaches

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a significant global health concern, with increasing prevalence and a substantial impact on quality of life. This narrative review explores recent advances in our understanding of GERD pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. The complex interplay of factors contributing to GERD, including lower esophageal sphincter dysfunction, transient sphincter relaxations, and esophageal motility disorders, is discussed. Emerging diagnostic techniques, such as high-resolution manometry and impedance-pH monitoring, have enhanced our ability to accurately identify and characterize GERD. The review highlights the evolving landscape of GERD treatment, from conventional approaches like lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors to novel strategies including potassium-competitive acid blockers, endoscopic therapies, and minimally invasive surgical techniques. The potential role of the microbiome in GERD pathogenesis and as a therapeutic target is examined. The concept of personalized medicine in GERD management is explored, considering genetic factors, biomarkers, and individual patient profiles. Complications of GERD, including erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma, are reviewed, emphasizing the importance of early detection and appropriate management. The economic burden and impact on the quality of due to GERD are also addressed. This comprehensive review underscores the multifaceted nature of GERD and the need for a personalized, multidisciplinary approach to its management. It highlights ongoing research efforts and emerging therapies that promise to improve outcomes for GERD patients, while also identifying areas requiring further investigation to optimize diagnosis and treatment strategies.

An update on oral antiplatelet drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors: what are the risks?

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin and anti-P2Y12 are widely prescribed in cardiovascular patients, often in combination with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to limit the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleedings. The potential interaction between PPIs and antiplatelet agents has been widely discussed, but doubts remain as to whether PPIs may reduce the cardiovascular protection provided by aspirin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel.

AREAS COVERED

Many pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies have confirmed the interaction, especially between PPIs and clopidogrel, but with uncertain consequences on clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the evidence for the widespread combined use of oral antiplatelet drugs and PPIs, to outline the current evidence supporting or opposing drug-drug interaction, and to discuss the clinical implications of such interactions.

EXPERT OPINION

A large body of evidence describes the PK/PD interaction of antiplatelet drugs with PPIs and its potential role in increasing clinical cardiovascular adverse events, but no solid clinical data have confirmed these effects. In the light of the published studies, there seems to be no restriction on the choice of PPI with aspirin, prasugrel, and/or ticagrelor. The choice of a PPI with no (or minimal) interference with the hepatic cytochrome P450 2C19 is preferred in patients receiving clopidogrel.

Physicians' perceptions and awareness of adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors and impact on prescribing patterns

Background: Heightened scrutiny surrounds the inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) due to concerns regarding potential serious adverse effects (AEs). Understanding the impact of these AEs on real-world practice is crucial. This study aimed to assess physicians' perceptions, experiences, awareness, and beliefs regarding published data on potential AEs associated with PPIs. Additionally, it sought to determine alterations in PPI prescribing patterns resulting from these AEs, explore attitudes towards PPI use, and ascertain recommendations for PPI use in clinical scenarios with varying levels of risk for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Method: A quantitative, cross-sectional study utilized a self-administered questionnaire, inviting 282 physicians from 55 primary healthcare centers and 334 internal medicine physicians from seven governmental hospitals to participate. Results: With a response rate of 87.8% (541/616), 74% (95% CI: 70.2-77.7) of respondents were somewhat or very familiar with published data on PPI AEs. Among the familiar, 69.5% (CI: 65.2-73.5) had somewhat or very much changed their PPI prescribing patterns. General concerns about AEs when prescribing PPIs were reported by 62% (CI: 56.7-65.1). Respondents displayed awareness of a median (IQR) of 15 (9) different AEs associated with long-term PPI use, including osteoporosis or osteopenia (90.2%), hypomagnesemia (81.5%), vitamin B12 deficiency (80.6%), and bone fracture (80.0%). Respondents believed that PPIs elevate the risk for a median (IQR) of 7 (6) different AEs, with osteoporosis or osteopenia (81.8%) being the most common, followed by hypomagnesemia (67.1%), and vitamin B12 deficiency (62.3%). The most common strategies for PPI de-escalation were PPI discontinuation (61%) and using PPI on-demand/as-needed (57.9%). The majority (87.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that PPI overuse is prevalent in Kuwait and 78.2% emphasized the necessity for large-scale education on rational PPI use for medical staff and the public. In the UGIB prevention scenarios, 43.6% recommended appropriately the PPI discontinuation in the minimal-risk scenario, while 56% recommended appropriately the PPI continuation in the high-risk scenario. Associations and comparative analyses revealed predictors influencing physicians' practices and attitudes toward PPI usage. Conclusion: These findings lay the foundation for future research and targeted interventions aimed at optimizing PPI prescribing practices and ensuring patient safety.

Acute COPD exacerbations and in-hospital treatment-related problems: An observational study

BACKGROUND

Treatment-related problems (TRPs) interfere with the ability to attain the desired goals of treatment, adding cost to healthcare systems. Patients hospitalized with acute conditions are at particular risk to experience TRPs. Data investigating such burden in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is generally scarce with no studies ever conducted in Jordan. This study aimed to investigate and categorize TRPs among patients hospitalized with AECOPD in Jordan, and to estimate their cost savings and cost avoidance.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study. Patients' cases of AECOPD admitted to the study site from Jan 2017 to Jul 2021 were identified from the electronic clinical database and screened for eligibility. TRPs were identified/categorized using AbuRuz tool and assessed for their severity. Cost saving was estimated by calculating all the extra costs. Cost avoidance was estimated according to Nesbit method.

RESULTS

A total of 1243 (mean±SD 3.1±1.5) and 503 (mean±SD 1.3±1.2) TRPs were identified during hospitalization and at discharge respectively, of which 49.4% and 66.7% were classified as "unnecessary drug therapy". In 54.5% of the cases, systemic corticosteroid was administered for a period longer than recommended. Most of the TRPs were of moderate severity. The total direct cost saving, and cost avoidance were estimated to be 15,745.7 USD and 340,455.5 USD respectively.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and cost of TRPs among AECOPD patients is a concern requiring attention. The study results implicate integrating interventions such as embracing clinical pharmacists' role in the respiratory care units to optimize patients' management.

The Association of Proton Pump Inhibitors and QT Interval Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced QT interval prolongation has been reported to be related to life-threatening polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are prescribed widely for hospitalized patients; the QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes caused by PPIs were reported. We conducted a study to determine the association between PPI treatment and QT interval prolongation in critically ill patients.

METHODS

This study included patients with electrocardiography (ECG) reports from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database (MIMIC-III). Patients younger than 18 years, missing baseline laboratories and with QT interval prolongation before intensive care unit (ICU) admission were excluded. The end point was the diagnosis of QT interval prolongation reported by ECG.

RESULTS

This study included 24,512 ICU patients. Of them, 11,327 patients were treated with PPIs, 4181 with histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and 6351 without acid suppression therapy (non-AST); the incidence of QT interval prolongation were 8.5%, 3.3% and 3.4% respectively. After adjustment for demographics, electrolytes, comorbidities and medications, PPIs were associated a higher risk of QT interval prolongation compared with H2RAs (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.36 - 2.03) and non-AST (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.31 - 1.82), while there was not significant difference between H2RAs and non-AST (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 - 1.17). In the propensity score matching population, the results were consistent. Pantoprazole (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.52 - 3.03) and lansoprazole (OR 1.80, 95% CI: 1.18 - 2.76) showed a higher QT prolongation risk than omeprazole. Several drugs caused higher QT prolongation risk when used in combination with PPIs.

CONCLUSION

In ICU patients, the association between PPI prescription and increased risk of QT interval prolongation was independent of known QT-prolonging factors; pantoprazole and lansoprazole had a higher risk compared with omeprazole. The combination of PPIs and other QT-prolonging drugs should be avoided.

Risk Factors and Prognosis Analysis of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Acute Severe Cerebral Stroke

GOALS

We aim to explore the relationship between the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). We develop a nomogram model to predict mortality in critically ill stroke patients.

STUDY

This is a retrospective study based on the MIMIC IV database. We extracted clinical information including demographic data, comorbidities, and laboratory indicators. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess and identify risk factors for the occurrence of UGIB and for the in-hospital mortality of critically ill stroke patients. The resulting model was used to construct a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Five thousand seven hundred sixteen patients from the MIMIC-IV database were included in our analysis. UGIB occurred in 109 patients (1.9%), whereas the PPI use rate was as high as 60.6%. Chronic liver disease, sepsis, shock, anemia, and increased level of urea nitrogen were independent risk factors for the occurrence of UGIB in severe stroke patients. We identified age, heart failure, shock, coagulopathy, mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulation, simplified acute physiology score-II, and Glasgow coma score as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in severe stroke patients. The C-index for the final nomograms was 0.852 (95% confidence interval: 0.840, 0.864).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the overall rate of UGIB in severe stroke patients is low, whereas the rate of PPI usage is high. In our study, PPI was not identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of UGIB and UGIB was not associated with all-cause mortality. More clinical trials are needed to evaluate the benefits of using PPI in critically ill stroke patients.

Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review

Objective. Commonly recommended drugs for adults and children include proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), proven effective for treating peptic diseases like stomach ulcers, GERD, and Helicobacter pylori infections in children over 1-year-old. Yet, prolonged PPI use carries higher risks of adverse reactions, prompting this study's analysis. Methods. We have performed a systematic review of 30 articles, which include a total of 762 505 pediatric patients. Results. Adverse effects were encountered in 6.98% of the population. The 5 most common adverse effects were respiratory tract complications, gastrointestinal complications, urinary tract infections, asthma, and ENT infections. Conclusion. Hence, PPIs should be prescribed only when necessary, and physicians should prioritize patient education when considering their use.

Prevalence and differences in the co-administration of drugs known to interact: an analysis of three distinct and large populations

BACKGROUND

The co-administration of drugs known to interact greatly impacts morbidity, mortality, and health economics. This study aims to examine the drug-drug interaction (DDI) phenomenon with a large-scale longitudinal analysis of age and gender differences found in drug administration data from three distinct healthcare systems.

METHODS

This study analyzes drug administrations from population-wide electronic health records in Blumenau (Brazil; 133 K individuals), Catalonia (Spain; 5.5 M individuals), and Indianapolis (USA; 264 K individuals). The stratified prevalences of DDI for multiple severity levels per patient gender and age at the time of administration are computed, and null models are used to estimate the expected impact of polypharmacy on DDI prevalence. Finally, to study actionable strategies to reduce DDI prevalence, alternative polypharmacy regimens using drugs with fewer known interactions are simulated.

RESULTS

A large prevalence of co-administration of drugs known to interact is found in all populations, affecting 12.51%, 12.12%, and 10.06% of individuals in Blumenau, Indianapolis, and Catalonia, respectively. Despite very different healthcare systems and drug availability, the increasing prevalence of DDI as patients age is very similar across all three populations and is not explained solely by higher co-administration rates in the elderly. In general, the prevalence of DDI is significantly higher in women - with the exception of men over 50 years old in Indianapolis. Finally, we show that using proton pump inhibitor alternatives to omeprazole (the drug involved in more co-administrations in Catalonia and Blumenau), the proportion of patients that are administered known DDI can be reduced by up to 21% in both Blumenau and Catalonia and 2% in Indianapolis.

CONCLUSIONS

DDI administration has a high incidence in society, regardless of geographic, population, and healthcare management differences. Although DDI prevalence increases with age, our analysis points to a complex phenomenon that is much more prevalent than expected, suggesting comorbidities as key drivers of the increase. Furthermore, the gender differences observed in most age groups across populations are concerning in regard to gender equity in healthcare. Finally, our study exemplifies how electronic health records' analysis can lead to actionable interventions that significantly reduce the administration of known DDI and its associated human and economic costs.

Analysis of inappropriate prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors during the perioperative period: an observational study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and characteristics of inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to prevent stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) during the perioperative period and its associated factors are rarely reported. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of inappropriate prophylactic use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) during the perioperative period and identify its associated factors in a tertiary care and academic teaching hospital in China and to provide evidence for regulation authorities and pharmacists to take targeted measures to promote rational drug use.

METHODS

Inpatients who underwent surgical operations and received prophylactic use of PPIs from June 2022 to November 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The appropriateness of perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs was evaluated by clinical pharmacists. Associated factors with inappropriate perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Four-hundred seventy-two patients were finally included in this study, of which 131 (27.75%) patients had at least one problem with inappropriate perioperative prophylactic use of PPIs. The three most common problems were drug use without indication (52.0%), inappropriate usage and dosage (34.6%), and inappropriate duration of medication (6.7%). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that oral dosage form of PPIs [OR = 18.301, 95% CI (7.497, 44.671), p < 0.001], discharge medication of PPIs [OR = 11.739, 95% CI (1.289, 106.886), p = 0.029], and junior doctors [OR = 9.167, 95% CI (3.459, 24.299), p < 0.001] were associated with more inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs. Antithrombotics [OR = 0.313, 95% CI (0.136, 0.721), p = 0.006] and prolonged postoperative hospital stay (longer than 15 days) [OR = 0.262, 95% CI (0.072, 0.951), p = 0.042] were associated with less inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The inappropriate prophylactic use of PPIs during the perioperative period is common. Regulation authorities and pharmacists should take more targeted measures to promote the rational prophylactic use of PPIs during the perioperative period.

BEHIND THE PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR PRESCRIPTION: AN INTERNATIONAL SURVEY ON PHYSICIAN PRACTICES AND KNOWLEDGE

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed worldwide, often resulting in their overuse. Consequently, it is essential to identify the likely causes of this overuse to facilitate their appropriate prescription.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess physician prescribing patterns, their knowledge of PPIs, and factors affecting their knowledge.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted among Latin American and Spanish physicians, collecting the following data: professional information, patterns of PPI usage, familiarity with published evidence, and the management approach in three hypothetical case-scenarios. Participant knowledge was categorized as sufficient or insufficient based on the results of the case scenarios. Subsequently, subgroup analysis was performed based on physician training level, years in practice, specialty, and time since the last PPI literature review.

RESULTS

A total of 371 physicians participated in the survey. Thirty-eight percent frequently prescribe PPIs, primarily for prophylactic purposes (57.9%). Eighty percent were unfamiliar with PPI deprescribing strategies, and 54.4% rarely reviewed the ongoing indication of patients taking a PPI. Sixty-four percent demonstrated sufficient knowledge in the case-scenarios. A significant association was observed between specialty type (medical vs surgical: 69.4% vs 46.8%, P<0.001), the timing of the PPI indication literature review (<5 years vs >5 years: 71.4% vs 58.7%, P=0.010), and sufficient knowledge.

CONCLUSION

While most participants prescribed PPIs regularly and for prophylaxis purposes, the majority were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies and rarely reviewed ongoing indications. Sufficient knowledge is correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliation.

BACKGROUND

• The study aims to evaluate physician prescribing patterns, assess their knowledge of proton pump inhibitors, and identify factors influencing their knowledge.

BACKGROUND

• An online survey of Latin American and Spanish physicians assessed proton pump inhibitor usage patterns and case-scenario responses, categorizing knowledge, and conducting subgroup analysis based on training, experience, specialty, and literature review timing.

BACKGROUND

• Thirty-eight percent of surveyed physicians commonly prescribed proton pump inhibitors, and among them, 80% were unfamiliar with deprescribing strategies, with 54.4% rarely reviewing ongoing indications.

BACKGROUND

• Sufficient knowledge was correlated with recent literature reviews and medical specialty affiliations.

Associations between Proton-Pump Inhibitor Usage, Allergy, and Asthma: An Analysis of NHANES 2005-2006

INTRODUCTION

Acid suppression medications, such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastrointestinal disorders. However, concerns regarding potential long-term side effects are brought up by the overuse of PPIs. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between PPI usage, allergy, and asthma in the general US population.

METHODS

Data of individuals aged ≥20 years who had information on PPI use and questionnaires on allergy and asthma in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2006 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between PPI use, prevalent allergy, and asthma.

RESULTS

A total of 4,481 participants (representing 198,543,007 US individuals after weighting) were included in the analyses. PPI use was not significantly associated with the presence of allergy or asthma in the general study population after adjustment. However, in females without steroid exposure, PPI use was significantly associated with increased odds of allergy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.002-2.86), among which esomeprazole use was significantly associated with increased odds of allergy (aOR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.30-5.54) and lansoprazole with increased odds of asthma (aOR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.50-7.87) as compared to no PPI use. Duration of PPI use was not significantly associated with allergy or asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

In US women without steroid exposure, PPI use is associated with increased likelihood of prevalent allergy and asthma.

Timely Cessation of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Critically Ill Patients Impacts Morbidity and Mortality: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the drugs most commonly used in critically ill patients. Although mainly applied temporarily for stress ulcer prophylaxis, their application is frequently not terminated. Potential adverse effects of PPI treatment could impact the outcome in case of unnecessary and, therefore, avoidable long-term continuation. We tested the hypotheses that nonindicated PPI therapy continued beyond hospital discharge is associated with increased morbidity, rehospitalization rate, and mortality.

DESIGN

Nationwide retrospective cohort study considering critically ill patients treated on German ICUs between January, 2017, and December, 2018 with a 2-year follow-up.

SETTING

A total of 591,207 patient datasets of a German healthcare insurer were screened.

PATIENTS

We identified 11,576 ICU patients who received PPI therapy for the first time during their index ICU stay without having an indication for its continuation.

INTERVENTIONS

The cohort was stratified into two groups: 1) patients without further PPI therapy and 2) patients with continuation of PPI therapy beyond 8 weeks after hospital discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Frequency of predescribed adverse events associated with PPI therapy, 1-year rehospitalization rate, and 2-year mortality were determined. The proportion of patients with continued PPI therapy without an objectifiable indication was 41.7% (4,825 of 11,576 patients). These patients had a 27% greater risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR] 1.27; 95% CI, 1.15-1.39; p < 0.001) and a 17% greater risk of cardiovascular events (OR 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; p < 0.001). Continued PPI therapy was associated with a 34% greater risk of rehospitalization (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.47) and a nearly 20% greater 2-year mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.27; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that an unnecessary continuation of PPI therapy after hospital discharge may significantly impact morbidity and mortality. To avoid potentially harmful overuse of a PPIs, intensivists should ensure timely cessation of a temporarily indicated PPI therapy.

Association between the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort

We investigated the association of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with the risk of stroke and ischemic heart disease (IHD). The Korean National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening cohort from 2002 to 2003, the participants of which were followed up until 2019, was used. In study I, 45,905 participants who were diagnosed with stroke were matched with 91,810 control I participants. The history of PPI medication was examined. In study II, 40,928 participants who were diagnosed with IHD were matched with 81,856 control II participants. In both study I and study II, the previous history of PPI medication was examined. A propensity score overlap-weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the overlap-weighted odds ratios (ORs) of PPI use for stroke (study I) and IHD (study II). Current PPI use was linked with higher odds for stroke in study I. The odds for stroke were higher in groups with a longer duration of PPI use (OR = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.92-1.00] < 1.55 [1.50-1.61] < 1.62 [1.57-1.68] for < 30 days, 30 to 180 days, and ≥180 days of PPI use). Previous PPI use was linked with higher odds for IHD in study II. The odds for stroke were higher in groups with a longer duration of PPI use (OR = 1.13 [95% CI = 1.08-1.18] < 2.12 [2.04-2.21] < 2.60 [2.51-2.69] for <30 days, 30 to 180 days, and ≥180 days of PPI use). Current PPI medication is associated with a high risk of stroke and IHD. A longer duration of PPI medication was related to a higher risk of stroke and IHD. However, a prior history of PPI medication was not linked with a high risk of stroke or IHD.

Co-Administration of Proton Pump Inhibitors May Negatively Affect the Outcome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treated with Vedolizumab

Concomitant medications may alter the effect of biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease. The aim was to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitors on remission rates in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with the gut-selective vedolizumab. Patients from the Hungarian nationwide, multicenter vedolizumab cohort were selected for post hoc analysis. Primary outcomes were the assessment of clinical response and endoscopic and clinical remission at weeks 14 and 54. Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of the combined effect of concomitant steroid therapy and other factors, such as smoking, on remission. A total of 108 patients were identified with proton pump inhibitor data from 240 patients in the original cohort. Patients on steroids without proton pump inhibitors were more likely to have a clinical response at week 14 than patients on concomitant PPI (95% vs. 67%, p = 0.005). Non-smokers with IBD treated with VDZ were more likely to develop a clinical response at week 14 than smokers, particularly those not receiving PPI compared with patients on co-administered PPI therapy (81% vs. 53%, p = 0.041, and 92% vs. 74%, p = 0.029, respectively). We found that the use of PPIs in patients treated with VDZ may impair the achievement of response in certain subgroups. Unnecessary PPI prescriptions should be avoided.

Multidisciplinary Consensus for Rationalizing the Use of Acid Suppressants in Children and Adults: CONFOR

The use of acid suppression therapy (AST) is a common approach for managing a wide spectrum of acid peptic disorders. Histamine type 2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most widely prescribed AST in routine clinical practice. However, an exponential surge in the prescriptions of PPIs, such as Omeprazole, Esomeprazole, Pantoprazole, Lansoprazole in recent years and their associated adverse effects have raised concern about their inappropriate and overuse, both in children and adults. To address these issues, a three-step modified Delphi polling process was employed to establish best practice consensus statements for rationalizing the use of acid suppressants. A multidisciplinary expert panel of 13 health professionals across medical specialties, including gastroenterologists, hepatologists, pediatric gastroenterologists, pediatricians, otolaryngologists, cardiologists, nephrologists, gynecologist and orthopedists actively contributed to this collaborative process of consensus development. The expert panel proposed 21 consensus statements providing best practice points on the general use and safety of acid suppressants based on a comprehensive review of scientific literature and clinical expertise. The panel also collaboratively developed a PPI deprescribing algorithm. Altogether, this consensus paper offers evidence-based recommendations and guidance for the rational use of acid suppressants with a blueprint for deprescribing PPIs. This consensus paper contributes to aiding primary care practitioners in improving patient outcomes and minimizing healthcare costs. Additionally, it enhances patient safety and curtail inappropriate usage.

How to cite this article

Prabhoo RY, Pai UA, Wadhwa A, et al. Multidisciplinary Consensus for Rationalizing the Use of Acid Suppressants in Children and Adults: CONFOR. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2024;14(1):99-119.

The Impact of Sex on the Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is responsible for substantial gastrin elevation secondary to reduced intragastric acidity. Due to the increasing global prevalence of PPI users, concerns have been raised about the clinical significance of continuous gastrin elevation and its potential long-term side effects. Hypergastrinemia secondary to PPIs has trophic effects on gastric mucosa, leading to enterochromaffin-like cell hyperplasia and gastric (fundic) polyp formation, and it is believed to provoke acid rebound following PPI withdrawal that induces PPI overutilization. Previous studies have found higher gastrin release following PPI therapy in females compared with males, and sex differences have also been demonstrated in pharmacokinetic parameters and dose requirements for acid reflux. It is conceivable that females might be at increased risk of PPI overuse, because they often receive higher milligram-per-kilogram doses. The prevalence of PPI use is more common among females, and the female sex is a risk factor for adverse drug reactions. This non-systematic review outlines the current knowledge of the impact of biological sex on the response to PPIs. The aim is to highlight the female sex as a potential risk factor that could be a step toward precision medicine and should be considered in future research on the response to PPI treatment.

Physicians' views on pharmacists' involvement in hospital deprescribing: A qualitative study on proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacists have a pivotal role in the management of the patient's medication. However, it is necessary to know how pharmacist-mediated deprescribing could be implemented in a hospital setting according to hospital physicians.

OBJECTIVE

To explore physicians' views on the involvement of hospital pharmacists in the deprescribing process using the example of PPIs.

METHODS

A qualitative study using two focus groups with hospital physicians was conducted to determine their attitudes regarding deprescribing initiated by the hospital pharmacist. The interviews were recorded and transcribed using the NVivo analysis software. A thematic analysis led to a categorization of all the verbatims.

RESULTS

Hospital doctors are reluctant to deprescribe drugs initiated by a colleague and feel that it is the responsibility of the general practitioner (GP), who fails to do so due to lack of time. In this situation, the hospital pharmacist is in the best position to deprescribe because of his/her expertise in drug therapy. This should be a discussion between the hospital pharmacist, the hospital doctor, the GP and the patient. Deprescribing should always be adapted to the patient's context.

CONCLUSION

Hospital physicians are open to a pharmacist-mediated, patient-centred approach to deprescribing as long as the GP is involved.

Emergency Department Pain Management in the Older Adult

Pain assessment and management in older adults is complex and requires evaluation and consideration of the type of pain, the acuity of the condition, comorbidities, and medications. Many older adults do not receive appropriate therapy for painful conditions in the emergency department (ED). This brief review article is focused on pharmacologic agents, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and approaches in the management of painful conditions seen in older adults in the emergency department. Recommendations for specific painful conditions such as fragility fractures are discussed.

Association of proton pump inhibitor use with risk of kidney stones: an analysis of cross-sectional data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018)

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have suggested a potential link between use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of kidney stones, attributed to alterations in urine mineral levels. Our study aimed to investigate the association between PPI use and kidney stones in US adults.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2018).

PARTICIPANTS

27 075 individuals with complete information on PPI use and history of kidney stones were included in this study.

OUTCOMES AND ANALYSES

Non-linear analysis, logistic regression analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to estimate the relationship between PPI use and the occurrence and recurrence of kidney stones, after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between PPI use and kidney stones (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.60), with a 4% increase in the prevalence of kidney stones for each additional year of PPI use (p<0.001). Similarly, PPI use was significantly associated with recurrent kidney stones (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.13), with a 7% increase in the recurrence of kidney stones for each additional year of PPI use (p<0.001). Furthermore, these associations remained significant even after conducting propensity score matching analysis on a subset of PPI users and non-users (all p≤0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that the effects of PPI use on kidney stones differed by age, sex, race and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that long-term use of PPI was associated with a higher risk of both the presence and recurrence of kidney stones.

Assessment of Awareness and Knowledge of Proton Pump Inhibitors Among the General Population in the Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia

OBJECTIVE

This descriptive observational cross-sectional study aimed to assess the general population's awareness, attitudes, and behaviours towards proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage, as well as their knowledge about associated side effects, in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

An autonomous online survey was conducted from June 15, 2023, to September 1, 2023, using social media. The survey targeted adult residents of Qassim and collected a total of 1090 respondents. Data analysis employed descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and probit regression using R version 4.3.1 (RStudio, Boston, MA). A significance level of p<0.05 was utilized to interpret the results.

RESULTS

A total of 1050 samples, limited to residents of Qassim, were analyzed. Significant associations were observed between awareness of PPIs and factors such as side effects (adjOR = 1.19, 99% CI: 1.08-1.31), widespread PPI use (adjOR = 1.24, 99% CI: 1.12-1.38), PPI usage (adjOR = 2.47, 99% CI: 2.18-2.82), and optimal PPI timing (adjOR = 1.30, 99% CI: 1.13-1.50). Additionally, age, educational attainment, and employment in the medical field significantly influenced awareness gaps related to potential side effects, PPI prevalence, adherence to medical prescriptions, and optimal timing for PPI usage.

CONCLUSION

The current study concludes that a significant portion of individuals in the Qassim region lack awareness regarding the potential side effects of PPI usage. Comprehensive healthcare education is required to bridge awareness gaps regarding PPIs and foster informed medication practices. By grasping the intricacies of individual perceptions, medical engagement, and demographic factors, healthcare providers and policymakers can collaboratively empower individuals in the Qassim region to make informed choices regarding their health and medication usage.

Inappropriate proton-pump inhibitor prescribing in primary care - an observational study with quality circles

INTRODUCTION

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) should be deprescribed when an indication is lacking or the dose is too high. Academic and media reports have tried to raise awareness and thereby reduce the inappropriate prescribing of PPIs. However, pharmacoepidemiologic studies have shown an unchanged frequency of such inappropriate prescribing over time. Little is known about whether or how general practitioners (GPs) adapt their prescribing practices once their awareness of inappropriate PPI prescribing has been raised.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate PPI prescribing (too high dose or no indication) in a consecutive sample of patients in Swiss primary care settings. Our goal was then to evaluate how GPs managed the patients with potentially inappropriate PPI prescribing over 12 months after flagging these patients.

METHODS

In this observational study, 11 GPs from the canton of Bern in Switzerland used their medical records to identify 20 patients who had been prescribed a PPI for ≥8 weeks and flagged potentially inappropriate PPI prescribing in their records. After 12 months, we asked the same GPs whether the PPI prescriptions of those patients had changed and, if so, how.

RESULTS

Of 1,376 patients consecutively screened, 206 (15%) had been prescribed a PPI for ≥8 weeks. Of these 206 patients, 85 (41%) had a potentially inappropriate PPI prescription. Of these 85 patients, 55 (65%) had no indication for PPI, and 30 (35%) had a too-high dose. After one year, only 29 (35%) of the 84 flagged potentially inappropriate PPIs were stopped or reduced. The most frequently mentioned reasons that deprescribing was not possible were a lack of discussion with the patient (no contact or no time), the presence of symptoms requiring the PPI, or the unwillingness of the patient to deprescribe.

CONCLUSION

In the Swiss primary care setting, the rate of potentially inappropriate PPI prescribing is high. Having GPs flag potentially inappropriate PPI prescribing did not result in PPI deprescribing in most patients over 12 months. Our findings suggest that more personalised and targeted interventions are necessary to successfully implement the deprescribing of potentially inappropriate PPIs. We see the need to co-design interventions with patients and providers and test behavioural change techniques to enable the deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs.

Experimental validation for mechanisms of Qizhiweitong particles against Chronic Non-atrophic gastritis based on metabolomics and network pharmacology

Qizhiweitong particles (QZWT), a classic Chinese herbal prescription derived from the Sinisan decoction in Shang Han Za Bing Lun, has definitive clinical efficacy in treating Chronic Non-atrophic Gastritis (CNG) in China. However, its mechanism of action at the metabolic level remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the mechanisms of QZWT against CNG based on non-targeted metabolomics combined with network pharmacology and experimentally validated by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). First, CNG model rats were established by free drinking ammonia water combined with starvation and satiety disorder for 12 weeks. Taking gastric tissue as the object, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry based metabolomics and network pharmacology were conducted to identify the key compounds, core targets and pathways that mediate the effects of QZWT against CNG. Furthermore, the targets from network pharmacology and the metabolites from metabolomics were jointly analyzed to select crucial metabolism pathways by MetaScape. Finally, the key metabolic enzymes and metabolites were experimentally validated by ELISA. The results indicated that there were 29 differential metabolites were identified and considered to be metabolic biomarkers of QZWT in the treatment of CNG. Among them, 8 of the differential metabolites showed a significant reduction in the content of QZWT groups. Arachidonic acid (AA) metabolic and glycerophospholipid (GP) metabolic are the most crucial metabolic pathways for QZWT to treat CNG. QZWT regulated AA and GP metabolism by synergetic reducing the level of AA, Phospholipid acid and Lysophosphatidic acid and inhibiting the enzyme activity of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 1 and prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. And a compound-reaction-enzyme-gene network of mechanism for QZWT against CNG was established. In conclusion, this study reveals the complicated mechanisms of QZWT against CNG. Our work presents a novel strategy to identify the potential mechanisms of pharmacological effects derived from a compound prescription of TCM.

Impact of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clopidogrel on Recurrent Stroke and Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. We investigated whether concomitant PPI use influenced the risk of recurrence in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

This study used two databases for two different designs, the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database for a self-controlled case series design, and the national sample cohort of the NHIS data base converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model version for a cohort study based on large-scale propensity score matching.

RESULTS

In the PPI co-prescription group, recurrent hospitalization with stroke occurred in 17.6% of the 8201 patients with history of stroke, and recurrent MI occurred in 17.1% of the 1216 patients with history of MI within1 year. According to the self-controlled case series, the overall relative risk (RR) of recurrent stroke was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.83-2.38); the RR showed an increasing trend parallel to the time from the beginning of PPI co-prescription. In the cohort study, there was a higher incidence of recurrent stroke in the PPI co-prescription group (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.76, p = 0.04). The overall RR of recurrent MI was 1.47 (95% CI; 1.02-2.11) in the self-controlled case series; however, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent MI in the cohort study (HR:1.42, 95% CI:0.79-2.49, p = 0.23). The impact of individual PPIs on stroke and MI showed different patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

A PPI co-prescription >4 weeks with clopidogrel was associated with hospitalization of recurrent stroke within 1 year of initial diagnosis; however, its association with recurrent MI remains inconclusive. The influence of individual PPIs should be clarified in the future.

Encouraging appropriate use of proton pump inhibitors: existing initiatives and proposals for the future

INTRODUCTION

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have revolutionized the management of acid-related disorders, representing today the mainstay treatment of these conditions. However, despite their large range of indications and usefulness, the remarkable expansion of their use in the last two decades cannot be explained by the increasing prevalence of acid-related diseases only. An inappropriate prescription for clinical conditions in which the pathogenetic role of acid has not been documented has been described, with the natural consequence of increasing the costs and the potential risk of iatrogenic harm due to adverse events and complications recently emerged.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize current indications of PPIs administration, potential adverse events associated with their chronic utilization, and misuse of PPIs. Moreover, we describe existing and possible initiatives for improving the use of PPIs, and some proposals for the future.

EXPERT OPINION

PPI deprescribing is the preferred and most effective approach to reduce the use of PPIs, rather than adopting sharp discontinuation, probably due to fewer withdrawal symptoms. Nonetheless, large knowledge gaps still exist in clinical practice regarding the optimal approach of PPI deprescribing in various clinical scenarios. Further prospective well-designed international studies are eagerly warranted to improve our perspectives on controlling global PPI inappropriate use.

Choosing Wisely in Gastroenterology: five new recommendations from the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO)

BACKGROUND

'Choosing Wisely' is an international campaign against inappropriateness in medical practices that aims to promote a rational and evidence-based use of resources. The Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) joined the Campaign in 2017 releasing five recommendations.

AIMS

To identify five new recommendations for a correct, evidence-based approach to the management of gastrointestinal diseases.

METHODS

All AIGO members were asked to identify practices or interventions that, even though diffuse in clinical practice, do not provide benefit for patients. The proposed items were then revised, divided by topic and ranked. After a systematic review of the literature for each item, five new recommendations were identified.

RESULTS

The five recommendations are: do not request surveillance investigations for patients with pancreatic cysts who are poor surgical candidates, irrespective of cysts nature and characteristics; do not request esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with recent onset of upper gastrointestinal symptoms younger than 50 years, without alarm features; do not request surveillance colonoscopy for asymptomatic colonic diverticular disease without changes in symptoms; do not perform food intolerance tests except for those scientifically validated; do not prescribe proton pump inhibitors to patients with liver cirrhosis, outside of established indications.

CONCLUSION

The Choosing Wisely recommendations will reduce unnecessary testing and treatments, increasing patient safety and overall healthcare quality.

The impact of pharmacist intervention on the intravenous-to-oral switch therapy of proton pump inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery

BACKGROUND

The prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been widely concerned due to both huge increase in medical costs and possible long-term adverse events (AEs) caused by the improper route of drug administration. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on the clinical outcome and safety of switching from intravenous (IV) to oral PPIs therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, single-center, pre- intervention (early -stage)- and intervention (later -stage) study was performed in a Chinese hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 1736 patients were included in the study. After 12 months of interventions, significant improvements in the number of rational IV to oral switch in patients with oral switch indications were found. The median duration of oral therapy was increased, while the duration of PPIs therapy was decreased. Pharmacist interventions led to significant reductions in mean PPI costs, mean total drug costs, mean hospitalization costs, and the risk for long-term adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study provides important evidence on the beneficial effect of pharmacist interventions on promoting an optimal IV to oral switch of PPIs and substantial cost saving by shortening the duration of IV PPIs therapy and reducing the risk for long-term AEs.

How safe are heartburn medications and who should use them?

INTRODUCTION

Heartburn is a frequent symptom occurring in daily clinical practice and is mainly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, it can be stimulated by various factors and diseases other than GERD can present with heartburn. Therefore, physicians must be very careful in distinguishing GERD from non-GERD conditions in their patients, particularly when heartburn is refractory to anti-reflux medications.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this narrative review was to analyze the medical literature regarding the prevalence of heartburn and the various clinical disorders which can be present with this symptom. The type of medications usually adopted for treating heartburn and their grade of safety have been reviewed using an extensive computerized (Medline/PubMed) search with particular focus on the last 20 years.

EXPERT OPINION

Many drugs can be used for relieving heartburn in patients with GERD, although PPIs are the pharmacological agents with the greatest efficacy. However, it must be highlighted that many non-GERD conditions may present clinically with this symptom whose intensity does not differ between GERD and functional esophageal disorders, which represent about 50% of all patients with suspected GERD. It is very important to identify these functional conditions because their treatment differs completely from that of GERD.

Proton Pump Inhibitors, Kidney Damage, and Mortality: An Updated Narrative Review

Since their approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1989, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become one of the most highly utilized drugs in the United States, assuming a position as one of the top 10 most prescribed medications in the country. The purpose of PPIs is to limit the amount of gastric acid secreted by the parietal cells via irreversible inhibition of the H+/K+-ATPase pump, therefore maintaining an elevated gastric acid pH of greater than 4 for 15-21 h. Even though PPIs have many clinical uses, they are not without their adverse effects, mimicking achlorhydria. Besides electrolyte abnormalities and vitamin deficiencies, long-term use of PPIs has been linked to acute interstitial nephritis, bone fractures, poor COVID-19 infection outcomes, pneumonia, and possibly an increase in all-cause mortality. The causality between PPI use and increased mortality and disease risk can be questioned since most studies are observational. Confounding variables can greatly affect an observational study and explain the wide-ranging associations with the use of PPIs. Patients on PPIs are generally older, obese, sicker with a higher number of baseline morbidities, and on more medications than the compared PPI non-users. These findings suggest that PPI users are at a higher risk of mortality and complications based on pre-existing conditions. This narrative review aims to update readers on the concerning effects that proton pump inhibitor use can have on patients and give providers a resource to create informed decisions on appropriate PPI use.

Maintenance Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Associated with Increased All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has increased over the last decades and has been associated with multiple adverse events and potentially even overall survival.

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the association between proton pump inhibitor maintenance use and all-cause and cause-specific mortality, addressing confounding by indication and duration of use.

METHODS

This Swedish population-based cohort study included all adult (N = 935,236) PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist maintenance users (≥ 180 days use) during 2005-2014. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all-cause and cause-specific mortality comparing the risk among PPI/H2RA users to that of the Swedish background population, stratified by age, sex, calendar period, indication and duration of use. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to compare PPI use to H2RA use, expressed as incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

PPI and histamine-2 receptor antagonist use were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (SMR = 1.35; 1.34-1.36; SMR = 1.31; 1.27-1.36, respectively). The highest SMRs were found in the youngest age groups. In direct comparison, PPI use showed a higher mortality risk than histamine-2 receptor antagonist use (incidence rate ratios = 1.42; 1.38-1.46). PPIs were related to increased cancer (SMR = 1.21; 1.20-1.22), and cardiovascular mortality (SMR = 1.36; 1.35-1.37). Increased SMRs were observed for most indications. Longer duration of use was associated with a higher mortality among PPI users but not among histamine-2 receptor antagonist users.

CONCLUSION

Maintenance PPI use was associated with an increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality, and the risk increased with prolonged duration.

The association between proton pump inhibitor use and risk of post-hospitalization acute kidney injury: a multicenter prospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) are among the most commonly used drugs to treat acid-related gastrointestinal disorders in the USA. Although PPI use has been linked to acute interstitial nephritis, the side effects of post-hospitalization acute kidney injury (AKI) and the progression of kidney disease still are controversial. We conducted a matched cohort study to examine the associations between PPI use and the side effects, especially in post-hospitalization AKI.

METHODS

We investigated 340 participants from the multicenter, prospective, matched-cohort ASSESS-AKI study, which enrolled participants from December 2009 to February 2015. After the baseline index hospitalization, follow-up visits were conducted every six months, and included a collection of self-reported PPI use by participants. Post-hospitalization AKI was defined as the percentage increase from the nadir to peak inpatient SCr value was ≥ 50% and/or absolute increase ≥ 0.3 mg/dL in peak inpatient serum creatinine compared with baseline outpatient serum creatinine. We applied a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model to test the relationship between PPI use and post-hospitalization AKI. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models also were conducted to examine the association between PPI use and the risk of progression of kidney disease.

RESULTS

After controlling for demographic variables, baseline co-morbidities and drug use histories, there was no statistically significant association between PPI use and risk of post-hospitalization AKI (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% CI, 0.38 to 1.45). Stratified by AKI status at baseline, no significant relationships were confirmed between PPI use and the risk of recurrent AKI (RR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.11 to 1.56) or incidence of AKI (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.76). Similar non-significant results also were observed in the association between PPI use and the risk of progression of kidney diseases (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 0.51 to 4.36).

CONCLUSION

PPI use after the index hospitalization was not a significant risk factor for post-hospitalization AKI and progression of kidney diseases, regardless of the AKI status of participants at baseline.

Adverse Effects Associated with Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Proton Pump Inhibitors are used widely to manage many gastric acid-related conditions such as gastroesophageal disease, gastritis, esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, peptic ulcer disease, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori eradication, around the globe. This review article focuses on adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. Various observational studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses have established the adverse effects associated with the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors including renal disorders (acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease), cardiovascular risks (major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke), fractures, infections (Clostridium difficile infection, community-acquired pneumonia, and Coronavirus disease 2019), micronutrient deficiencies (hypomagnesemia, anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia), hypergastrinemia, cancers (gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer), hepatic encephalopathy, and dementia. Clinicians including prescribers and pharmacists should be aware of the adverse effects of taking proton pump inhibitors for an extended period of time. In addition, the patients taking proton pump inhibitors for long-term should be monitored for the listed adverse effects. The American Gastroenterological association recommends a few non-pharmacological measures and the use of histamine 2 blockers to lessen gastrointestinal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflex disease and the utilization of proton pump inhibitors treatment if there is a definitive indication. Additionally, the American Gastroenterological association's Best Practice Advice statements emphasize deprescribing when there is no clear indication for proton pump inhibitors therapy.

Prescriptive Appropriateness: Inhospital Adherence to Proton Pump Inhibitors Deprescription Flow Chart

The prescriptive appropriateness of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) in polypharmacy is controversial. PPIs are often overprescribed and the risk of prescribing errors and adverse drug reactions increases for each additional drug added to therapy. Hence, guided deprescription should be considered and easily implementable in ward practice. This observational prospective study evaluated the implementation of a validated PPIs deprescription flow chart to real-life internal ward activity through the presence of a clinical pharmacologist as an enhancing additional factor by assessment of inhospital prescriber's adherence to the proposed flow chart. Patients' demographics and prescribing trends of PPIs prescriptions were analyzed by descriptive statistics. The final analysis of data included ninety-eight patients (forty-nine male and forty-nine female), aging 75.6 ± 10.6 years; 55.1% of patients had home-PPIs prescriptions, while 44.9% received inhospital-PPIs prescriptions. Evaluation of prescriber's adherence to the flow chart revealed that the percentage of patients with a prescriptive/deprescriptive pathway conforming to that of the flow chart was 70.4%, with low symptomatologic recurrences. The clinical pharmacologists' presence and influence in ward activity may have contributed to this finding, since continuous training of the prescribing physicians is deemed a success-related factor in the deprescribing strategy. Multidisciplinary management of PPIs deprescription protocols shows high adherence by prescribers in real-life hospital settings and low recurrence events.

Deprescribing Strategies: A Prospective Study on Proton Pump Inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most controversially prescribed drugs in polypharmacy. This observational prospective study assessed the PPI prescriptive trend during hospitalization before and after implementation of a prescribing/deprescribing algorithm in a real-life hospital setting and the related clinical-economic benefit at discharge. PPI prescriptive trends were compared between three quarters of 2019 (9 months) and the same period of 2018 by a chi-square test with a Yate's correction. The proportions of treated patients in the two years (1120 discharged patients in 2018 and 1107 in 2019) were compared by the Cochran-Armitage trend test. DDDs (defined daily doses) were compared between 2018 and 2019 by the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and normalizing DDD/DOT (days of therapy) and DDD/100 bd (bed days) for each patient. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on PPI prescriptions at discharge. The distribution of patients with PPIs at discharge was significantly different in the two years (p = 0.0121). There was a downward trend in the number of PPI prescriptions (29.9%) in the third trimester of 2019 compared to the others of the same year (first trimester: 34.1%, second trimester: 36.0%) and by contrast with the same periods of 2018 (29.4, 36.0, and 34.7%) (p = 0.0124). DDDs/patient did not differ between 2018 and 2019 nor across the three trimesters. However, both DDD/DOT and DDD/100 bd showed a decrease in the third trimester of 2019, with a marked difference for DDD/DOT (p = 0.0107). The reduction in consumption detected in the last phase of 2019 in terms of DDD/DOT was 0.09 with a consequent containment of pharmaceutical spending. The development and implementation of multidisciplinary prescribing/deprescribing protocols in both hospital and community settings could lead to a reduction in the misuse of PPIs, with significant savings in healthcare resources.