HX008: a humanized PD-1 blocking antibody with potent antitumor activity and superior pharmacologic properties

Translate Pharmacokinetics of PD-1/PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies from Cynomolgus Monkey to Human: Comparison of Different Approaches

Antibodies blocking programmed death-1 (PD-1) and its natural ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have been proved to be promising strategies in recent years. Hundreds of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are under development worldwide. Prediction of human pharmacokinetics (PK) in the preclinical stage is critical for designing dosing regimens in first-in-human studies. This study aims to predict the PK of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in human by scaling of monkey data. A systematic literature search of published articles on the PK of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in cynomolgus monkey and in human was conducted. Allometric scaling (AS), the species time-invariant (STIV) method, as well as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling were investigated. Six antibodies (avelumab, atezolizumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and zimberelimab) were included for investigation. The exponents used in this study were 0.85 and 1 for clearance (CL) and distribution volume (V), respectively, both for AS and STIV methods. The generic PBPK model for macromolecules in PK-Sim was used without further modifications. The dissociation constant of the antibody for binding to FcRn (KD) in endosome space for human was assumed to be two-fold of that for monkey. Predicted human CLs for the majority of drugs were within the observed range, while Vs were not well predicted using the AS method. The STIV method and the generic PBPK model can be employed to translate concentration-time curves of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies from cynomolgus monkey to human with comparable efficacy. The results of this study provide reference for the early development of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies.

Pucotenlimab in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high solid tumors: A multicenter phase 2 study

We report a multicenter, phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy of pucotenlimab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, and potential biomarkers for response. Overall, 100 patients with previously treated, advanced solid tumors centrally confirmed as dMMR or MSI-H received pucotenlimab at 200 mg every 3 weeks. The most common cancer type is colorectal cancer (n = 71). With a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the objective response rate is 49.0% (95% confidence interval 38.86%-59.20%) as assessed by the independent review committee, while the median progression-free survival and overall survival have not been reached. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 18 patients. For the biomarker analysis, responders are enriched in patients with mutations in the KMT2D gene. Pucotenlimab is an effective treatment option for previously treated advanced dMMR/MSI-H solid tumors, and the predictive value of KMT2D mutation warrants further research. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03704246.

A Photoactive Supramolecular Complex Targeting PD-L1 Reveals a Weak Correlation between Photoactivation Efficiency and Receptor Expression Levels in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Models

Photo-immunotherapy uses antibodies conjugated to photosensitizers to produce nanostructured constructs endowed with targeting properties and photo-inactivation capabilities towards tumor cells. The superficial receptor density on cancer cells is considered a determining factor for the efficacy of the photodynamic treatment. In this work, we propose the use of a photoactive conjugate that consists of the clinical grade PD-L1-binding monoclonal antibody Atezolizumab, covalently linked to either the well-known photosensitizer eosin or the fluorescent probe Alexa647. Using single-molecule localization microscopy (direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, dSTORM), and an anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody labelled with Alexa647, we quantified the density of PD-L1 receptors exposed on the cell surface in two human non-small-cell lung cancer lines (H322 and A549) expressing PD-L1 to a different level. We then investigated if this value correlates with the effectiveness of the photodynamic treatment. The photodynamic treatment of H322 and A549 with the photo-immunoconjugate demonstrated its potential for PDT treatments, but the efficacy did not correlate with the PD-L1 expression levels. Our results provide additional evidence that receptor density does not determine a priori the level of photo-induced cell death.

BCG-Unresponsive Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Treatment Landscape and Novel Emerging Molecular Targets

Urothelial carcinoma (UC), the sixth most common cancer in Western countries, includes upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder carcinoma (BC) as the most common cancers among UCs (90-95%). BC is the most common cancer and can be a highly heterogeneous disease, including both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) forms with different oncologic outcomes. Approximately 80% of new BC diagnoses are classified as NMIBC after the initial transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBt). In this setting, intravesical instillation of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the current standard treatment for intermediate- and high-risk patients. Unfortunately, recurrence occurs in 30% to 40% of patients despite adequate BCG treatment. Radical cystectomy (RC) is currently considered the standard treatment for NMIBC that does not respond to BCG. However, RC is a complex surgical procedure with a recognized high perioperative morbidity that is dependent on the patient, disease behaviors, and surgical factors and is associated with a significant impact on quality of life. Therefore, there is an unmet clinical need for alternative bladder-preserving treatments for patients who desire a bladder-sparing approach or are too frail for major surgery. In this review, we aim to present the strategies in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, focusing on novel molecular therapeutic targets.

Humanized Mouse Models for Immuno-oncology Drug Discovery

Breakthroughs in cancer treatment with immunotherapeutics have provided long-term patient benefits for many different types of cancer. However, complete response is not achieved in many patients and tumor types, and the mechanisms underlying this lack of response are poorly understood. Despite this, numerous new targets, therapeutics, and drug combinations are being developed and tested in clinical trials. Preclinical models that recapitulate the complex human tumor microenvironment and the interplay between tumor and immune cells within the cancer-immunity cycle are needed to improve our understanding and screen new therapeutics for efficacy and safety/toxicity. Humanized mice, encompassing human tumors and human immune cells engrafted on immunodeficient mice, have been widely used for many years in immuno-oncology, with developments to improve both the humanization and the translational value central to the next generation of models. In this overview, we discuss recent advances in humanized models relevant to immuno-oncology drug discovery, the advantages and limitations of such models, the application of humanized models for efficacy and safety assessments of immunotherapeutics, and the potential opportunities. © 2023 Crown Bioscience. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab-chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer: a United States payer perspective

OBJECTIVES

Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, was approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug administration as a first-line systemic therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer patients. The current study aimed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab-chemotherapy combination versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line therapy from a US payer perspective.

METHODS

An economic evaluation was conducted using a partitioned survival model in Microsoft Excel® using data from the CheckMate 649 trial. Three discrete mutually exclusive health states (progression-free, post-progression, and death) were included in the model. The health state occupancy was calculated using the overall survival and progression-free survival curves derived from the CheckMate 649 trial. Cost, resource use, and health utility estimates were estimated from a US payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the uncertainty of the model parameters.

RESULTS

Nivolumab-chemotherapy provided additional 0.25 life years compared to chemotherapy alone and the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.701 and 0.561, respectively, producing a gain of 0.140 QALYs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $574,072/QALY.

CONCLUSION

From the US payer perspective, at a willingness to pay threshold of $US150,000/QALY, nivolumab-chemotherapy was not found to be cost-effective as a first-line therapy for locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer.

Mouse models for immuno-oncology

Realizing the clinical promise of cancer immunotherapy is hindered by gaps in our knowledge of in vivo mechanisms underlying treatment response as well as treatment limiting toxicity. Preclinical in vivo model systems and technologies are required to address these knowledge gaps and to surmount the challenges faced in the clinical application of immunotherapy. Mice are commonly used for basic and translational research to support development and testing of immune interventions, including for cancer. Here, we discuss the advantages and the limitations of current models as well as future developments.

HX009, a novel BsAb dual targeting PD1 x CD47, demonstrates potent anti-lymphoma activity in preclinical models

Both PD1/PD-L1 and CD47 blockades have demonstrated limited activity in most subtypes of NHL save NK/T-cell lymphoma. The hemotoxicity with anti-CD47 agents in the clinic has been speculated to account for their limitations. Herein we describe a first-in-class and rationally designed bispecific antibody (BsAb), HX009, targeting PD1 and CD47 but with weakened CD47 binding, which selectively hones the BsAb for tumor microenvironment through PD1 interaction, potentially reducing toxicity. In vitro characterization confirmed: (1) Both receptor binding/ligand blockade, with lowered CD47 affinity; (2) functional PD1/CD47 blockades by reporter assays; (3) T-cell activation in Staphylococcal-enterotoxin-B-pretreated PBMC and mixed-lymphocyte-reaction. In vivo modeling demonstrated antitumor activity in Raji-B and Karpass-229-T xenograft lymphomas. In the humanized mouse syngeneic A20 B-lymphoma (huCD47-A20) HuGEMM model, which has quadruple knocked-in hPD1xhPD-L1xhCD47xhSIRPα genes and an intact autologous immune-system, a contribution of effect is demonstrated for each targeted biologic (HX008 targeting PD1 and SIRPα-Fc targeting CD47), which is clearly augmented by the dual targeting with HX009. Lastly, the expression of the immune-checkpoints PD-L1/L2 and CD47 seemed co-regulated among a panel of lymphoma-derived-xenografts, where HX009 maybe more effective in those with upregulated CD47. Our data warrants HX009's further clinical development for treating NHLs.

Safety and efficacy of Pucotenlimab (HX008) - a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody in patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma: a single-arm, multicenter, phase II study

BACKGROUND

Pucotenlimab is a novel recombinant humanized anti-PD-1 (Programmed death-1) monoclonal antibody, which belongs to the human IgG4/kappa subtype, and can selectively block the binding of PD-1 with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2.

METHODS

In this phase 2 trial, patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma who had failed conventional treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, interferon, IL-2, et al.) were recruited. The patients were administrated with Pucotenlimab of 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reasons. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

One-hundred and nineteen patients were enrolled and followed up for 19.32 (ranging from 15.901 to 24.608) months by the cutoff date of July 30^th, 2021. The ORR was 20.17% (24/119, 95% CI, 13.370%-28.506%) based on both independent review committee (IRC) and the investigator's assessment per RECIST v1.1. The median PFS were 2.89 (95% CI, 2.037-4.074) months and 2.46 (95% CI, 2.004-4.008) months based on IRC and investigator's assessment, respectively, per RECIST v1.1. The median OS was 16.59 (95% CI, 13.963-26.973) months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 77.3% (92/119) of the patients. The incidence of Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 15.1% (18/119). In addition, none of the patients died because of TRAEs. As for biomarker analysis, Eotaxin (CCL11) and MCP-1 (CCL2) were related to treatment response, while TNF-α and VEGF were related to treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Pucotenlimab as a ≥ 2^nd line therapy showed promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity for patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04749485 (registered retrospectively on 11/02/2021).

Application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in immunotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide. With the development of immunotherapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer has improved. At present, ICIs combined with other therapies or dual ICI strategies in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer have shown clinical effectiveness and controllable safety. In addition, predictive biomarkers facilitate the precise selection of patients. Therefore, it is crucial to explore rational combinations and reliable predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy. This article reviews the recent advances in ICIs and relevant predictive biomarkers in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Antibodies to watch in 2023

In this 14th installment of the annual Antibodies to Watch article series, we discuss key events in commercial monoclonal antibody therapeutics development that occurred in 2022 and forecast events that might occur in 2023. As of mid-November, 12 antibody therapeutics had been granted first approvals in either the United States or European Union (tebentafusp (Kimmtrak), faricimab (Vabysmo), sutimlimab (Enjaymo), relatlimab (Opdualag), tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld), mosunetuzumab (Lunsumio), teclistamab (TECVAYLI), spesolimab (SPEVIGO), tremelimumab (Imjudo; combo with durvalumab), nirsevimab (Beyfortus), mirvetuximab soravtansine (ELAHERE™), and teplizumab (TZIELD)), including 4 bispecific antibodies and 1 ADC. Based on FDA action dates, several additional product candidates could be approved by the end of 2022. An additional seven were first approved in China or Japan in 2022, including two bispecific antibodies (cadonilimab and ozoralizumab). Globally, at least 24 investigational antibody therapeutics are undergoing review by regulatory agencies as of mid-November 2022. Our data show that, with antibodies for COVID-19 excluded, the late-stage commercial clinical pipeline grew by ~20% in the past year to include nearly 140 investigational antibody therapeutics that were designed using a wide variety of formats and engineering techniques. Of those in late-stage development, marketing application submissions for at least 23 may occur by the end of 2023, of which 5 are bispecific (odronextamab, erfonrilimab, linvoseltamab, zanidatamab, and talquetamab) and 2 are ADCs (datopotamab deruxtecan, and tusamitamab ravtansine).

Tumor Suppression by PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction Blockage in Mice Model

Background

Overexpression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in tumor cells and subsequent interaction with the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) in tumor-infiltrating T cells cause an immune evasion of the tumor from cytotoxic T-cells. Therefore, inhibiting such interaction by a recombinant PD-1 can hinder tumor growth and extend the survival rate.

Methods

The mouse extracellular domain of PD-1 (mPD-1) was expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) strain and purified using nickel affinity chromatography. The binding ability of the purified protein to human PD-L1 was studied using ELISA. Finally, the tumor-bearing mice were used to evaluate the potential antitumor effect.

Results

The recombinant mPD-1 showed a significant binding capacity to human PD-L1 at the molecular level. The tumor size significantly decreased in the tumor-bearing mice after the intra-tumoral injections of mPD-1. Moreover, the survival rate increased significantly after eight weeks of monitoring. The histopathology revealed the necrosis in the tumor tissue of the control group compared to the mPD-1 received mice.

Conclusions

Our outcomes propose that interaction blockade between PD-1 and PD-L1 is a promising approach for targeted tumor therapy.

IMGT ® Nomenclature of Engineered IGHG Variants Involved in Antibody Effector Properties and Formats

The constant region of the immunoglobulin (IG) or antibody heavy gamma chain is frequently engineered to modify the effector properties of the therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. These variants are classified in regards to their effects on effector functions, antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody-dependent phagocytosis (ADCP), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) enhancement or reduction, B cell inhibition by the coengagement of antigen and FcγR on the same cell, on half-life increase, and/or on structure such as prevention of IgG4 half-IG exchange, hexamerisation, knobs-into-holes and the heteropairing H-H of bispecific antibodies, absence of disulfide bridge inter H-L, absence of glycosylation site, and site-specific drug attachment engineered cysteine. The IMGT engineered variant identifier is comprised of the species and gene name (and eventually allele), the letter 'v' followed by a number (assigned chronologically), and for each concerned domain (e.g, CH1, h, CH2 and CH3), the novel AA (single letter abbreviation) and IMGT position according to the IMGT unique numbering for the C-domain and between parentheses, the Eu numbering. IMGT engineered variants are described with detailed amino acid changes, visualized in motifs based on the IMGT numbering bridging genes, sequences, and structures for higher order description.

Phase 1b clinical trial of pucotenlimab (HX008), a novel anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in the first-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Background

Pucotenlimab, also called HX008, is a humanized anti-PD-1 antagonist IgG4 mAb. It blocks programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and programmed death ligand-2 (PD-L2). In the CBCSG 006 trial, gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) has shown impressive antitumor activity as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). The phase 1b study was conducted to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of pucotenlimab when combined with GP in patients with mTNBC in the first-line setting.

Methods

Eligible patients with mTNBC with ≥6 months of DFI (disease-free interval) who have never received antitumor therapy for metastatic disease were screened. Participants received pucotenlimab at 3 mg/kg (d1, q3w) plus gemcitabine at 1,250 mg/m2 (d1, 8, q3w) and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 (d1, q3w). Eligible patients received up to six cycles of pucotenlimab along with GP chemotherapy, while pucotenlimab could be maintained until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred or withdrawal of informed consent. This study was registered in China under registration number CTR20191353.

Results

Between July 2019 and March 2020, 31 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 50 (range 28–68) years. Among 31 patients who were evaluated, 25 (80.6%) experienced objective response and the other six (19.4%) experienced stable disease (SD). As of 4 August, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.0 months (95% CI, 6.2–9.2). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included neutropenia (74.1%), anemia (35.5%), thrombocytopenia (32.3%), hypocalcemia (9.7%), hypokalemia (9.7%), and alanine aminotransferase increased (6.5%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Pucotenlimab plus GP demonstrated promising activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with mTNBC in the first-line setting.

The Efficacy and Safety of Sintilimab Combined With Nab-Paclitaxel as a Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

Background

Unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer patients have a poor prognosis. PD-1 monotherapy regimen and PD-1 combined chemotherapy regimen have become the standard third- and first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer, respectively. However, the status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer has not been established. The combination of chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody has been demonstrated to have a synergistic effect. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel in the second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (GC)/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced GC/GEJ cancer that progressed after first-line systemic therapies with sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel from April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and eligible for response assessment. Complete response (CR) was not observed, 15 patients achieved partial response (PR), 16 patients had stable disease (SD) and 9 patients had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 15 (38.5%) and 31 (79.5%), respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months (95%CI: 3.072-7.728). PFSs between different subgroups were analyzed. The results showed that gender, age, Human epidermal growth factor receptors 2 (HER2) status, PD-L1 expression, primary tumor site and chemotherapy cycles had no significant effect on PFS. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were of grade 1-2 and manageable. The common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included anemia (12.8%), neutropenia (12.8%), leukopenia (10.3%), hand-foot syndrome (7.7%), thrombocytopenia (7.7%). The potential immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were grade 1 pneumonia (1 pts [2.6%]) and grade 4 hepatitis (1 pts [2.6%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

These results indicate that sintilimab combined with nab-paclitaxel exhibits good anti-tumor activity and an acceptable safety profile as a second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. These results warrant further investigation and evaluation to identify patients who can benefit more from the combined treatment strategy.

The Current State of Treatment and Future Directions in Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma

Malignant melanoma is the leading cause of death among cutaneous malignancies. While its incidence is increasing, the most recent cancer statistics show a small but clear decrease in mortality rate. This trend reflects the introduction of novel and more effective therapeutic regimens, including the two cornerstones of melanoma therapy: immunotherapies and targeted therapies. Immunotherapies exploit the highly immunogenic nature of melanoma by modulating and priming the patient's own immune system to attack the tumor. Treatments combining immunotherapies with targeted therapies, which disable the carcinogenic products of mutated cancer cells, have further increased treatment efficacy and durability. Toxicity and resistance, however, remain critical challenges to the field. The present review summarizes past treatments and novel therapeutic interventions and discusses current clinical trials and future directions.

Rapid, sensitive and cost-effective determination of immune checkpoint inhibitor activity using a magnetic bead-based binding assay

Immune checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are effective immunno-therapeutic agents for cancer. Rapid and sensitive determination of the blocking activity of ICIs is important for ICIs development and immunological research. Among various immune checkpoint (IC) binding assays, cell-based binding assays are widely regarded, and the functional ELISA is a convenient alternative. However, these methodologies are limited by time-consuming preparation of cell lines stably expressing IC molecules, or long turnaround time with high cost. In this study, two magnetic bead based binding assays were developed to evaluate activity of ICIs, which was determined by a soluble ligand/bead immobilized receptor based binding assay (sL/bR binding assay) that assessed efficacy to block binding of one soluble IC ligand on its cognate receptor immobilized beads, or by a soluble receptor/bead immobilized ligand based binding assay (sR/bL binding assay) that assessed efficacy to block binding of soluble IC receptor on its cognate ligand immobilized beads. Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of ICIs were calculated to determine ICIs activity. The sL/bR binding assay accurately determined the activity of two TIGIT blocking antibodies, since the relative blocking activity of two TIGIT antibodies determined by the sL/bR binding assay established in this study and that by the cell based binding assay were almost identical. In contrast, the sR/bL binding assay showed significantly improved sensitivity to determine activity of two PD-1 blocking antibodies than the sL/bR binding assay that was tested in this study and previous reports. Moreover, both amount of the used recombinant protein of ICI receptor/ligand and turnaround time of the two binding assays were more than 10 times less than those of the functional ELISA. These data indicate that the two magnetic bead based binding assays are sensitive, rapid and cost-effective methods to determine blocking activity of ICIs.

Phase I study of pucotenlimab (HX008), an anti-PD-1 antibody, for patients with advanced solid tumors

Background:

Pucotenlimab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) anti programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) with a S228P hinge mutation and an engineered Fc domain. Preclinical data suggests that pucotenlimab exerts antitumor effects. In this phase I study, which was prospectively registered on www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn (CTR20180125), the safety, maximum tolerated dose, preliminary antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of pucotenlimab were evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods:

Patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies were recruited. In a 3+3 dose escalation study, 13 patients received pucotenlimab intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred at doses of 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 200 mg. 17 additional patients were assigned in the expansion period.

Results:

A total of 30 patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were proteinuria (40%), fatigue (36.7%), weight loss (26.7%), fever (26.7%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (26.7%), rash (23.3%), and anorexia (20.0%). Partial responses occurred in five patients, with an objective response rate of 16.7%. Pharmacokinetics analysis showed rapid absorption followed by slow terminal elimination, with a mean half-life of 17.1–23.5 days across all dose groups.

Conclusions:

Pucotenlimab had an acceptable toxicity profile at doses up to 10 mg/kg and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Based on the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile, 3 mg/kg Q3W or 200 mg Q3W are optimal for further drug development.

Anti-PD-1 antibody HX008 combined with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine for advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase Ib trial

Anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody is approved as an option for third-line treatment of advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer in several countries, but no anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody treatment is yet approved for first-line treatment of advanced G/GEJ cancer. We report a phase Ib trial of HX008, a highly selective, humanized anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, plus oxaliplatin and capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer. Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic G/GEJ cancer were enrolled. All patients received HX008 3 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks (up to 6 cycles), and capecitabine 1000 mg/m² orally twice daily for 14 days continuous dosing followed by a 7-day break. The primary end point was the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. In total, 35 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 12.7 months. Most frequent (>10%) grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were anemia (27.5%), neutropenia (20%), thrombocytopenia (17.1%), leukopenia (17.1%) and fatigue (17.3%). Objective response rate was 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 42.1-76.1%). Disease control rate was 77.1% (95% CI 59.9-89.6). Median time to response and duration of response were 1.4 months (range 1.3-2.9) and 12.3 months (range 1.4-17.9+), respectively. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.4-not reached). These results demonstrated that HX008 combined with oxaliplatin plus capecitabine was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging efficacy as first-line treatment for advanced G/GEJ cancer. This study was registered in china, register number was CTR20181270.

HX008, an anti-PD1 antibody, plus irinotecan as second-line treatment for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan is used as second-line treatment in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer. The role of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) antibody plus irinotecan, in this setting and population is unclear.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial was conducted in 11 Chinese hospitals. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed advanced G/GEJ cancer that refractory to, or intolerant of, first-line chemotherapy with a platinum and/or fluoropyrimidine. Subjects received HX008 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus irinotecan 160 mg/m² intravenously every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1.

RESULTS

Between October 2018 and September 2019, a total of 58 patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer were enrolled in this study. Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range 7.4-18.9) months. Confirmed ORR was observed in 16 patients, for an ORR of 27.6% (95% CI 16.1% to 39.1%); 19 patients experienced stable disease, leading to a disease control rate of 60.3% (95% CI 46.4% to 73.0%). ORR in patients with PD-ligand 1 (L1) positive (Combined Positive Score (CPS) ≥1) and negative (CPS＜1) tumors was 38.5% (5/13) and 37.5% (3/8), respectively. Median duration of response was 8.0 months (range 1.5-12.5), 6 of 16 (37.5%) responses were ongoing. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.2 to 5.5). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR) (95% CI 8.7 to NR). Patients with PD-L1 positive tumors tended to have longer OS than those with PD-L1 negative tumors, but the difference was not statistically significant (NR vs 8.7 months, p=0.1858).The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (32.8%), leukopenia (31.0%), anemia (17.2%), decreased appetite (8.6%), vomit (6.9%), nausea (6.9%) and fatigue (5.2%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of HX008 and irinotecan demonstrated promising activity and manageable safety as second-line treatment in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer, which warrants further study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03704246.