Treatment of methanol and isopropanol poisoning with intravenous fomepizole

Awareness raising and dealing with methanol poisoning based on effective strategies

Intoxication with methanol most commonly occurs as a consequence of ingesting, inhaling, or coming into contact with formulations that include methanol as a base. Clinical manifestations of methanol poisoning include suppression of the central nervous system, gastrointestinal symptoms, and decompensated metabolic acidosis, which is associated with impaired vision and either early or late blindness within 0.5-4 h after ingestion. After ingestion, methanol concentrations in the blood that are greater than 50 mg/dl should raise some concern. Ingested methanol is typically digested by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), and it is subsequently redistributed to the body's water to attain a volume distribution that is about equivalent to 0.77 L/kg. Moreover, it is removed from the body as its natural, unchanged parent molecules. Due to the fact that methanol poisoning is relatively uncommon but frequently involves a large number of victims at the same time, this type of incident occupies a special position in the field of clinical toxicology. The beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an increase in erroneous assumptions regarding the preventative capability of methanol in comparison to viral infection. More than 1000 Iranians fell ill, and more than 300 of them passed away in March of this year after they consumed methanol in the expectation that it would protect them from a new coronavirus. The Atlanta epidemic, which involved 323 individuals and resulted in the deaths of 41, is one example of mass poisoning. Another example is the Kristiansand outbreak, which involved 70 people and resulted in the deaths of three. In 2003, the AAPCC received reports of more than one thousand pediatric exposures. Since methanol poisoning is associated with high mortality rates, it is vital that the condition be addressed seriously and managed as quickly as feasible. The objective of this review was to raise awareness about the mechanism and metabolism of methanol toxicity, the introduction of therapeutic interventions such as gastrointestinal decontamination and methanol metabolism inhibition, the correction of metabolic disturbances, and the establishment of novel diagnostic/screening nanoparticle-based strategies for methanol poisoning such as the discovery of ADH inhibitors as well as the detection of the adulteration of alcoholic drinks by nanoparticles in order to prevent methanol poisoning. In conclusion, increasing warnings and knowledge about clinical manifestations, medical interventions, and novel strategies for methanol poisoning probably results in a decrease in the death load.

Delayed Treatment With 4-Methylpyrazole Protects Against Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Mice by Inhibition of c-Jun n-Terminal Kinase

Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the most common cause of hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure in the United States and many western countries. However, the only clinically approved antidote, N-acetylcysteine, has a limited therapeutic window. 4-Methylpyrazole (4MP) is an antidote for methanol and ethylene glycol poisoning, and we have recently shown that cotreatment of 4MP with APAP effectively prevents toxicity by inhibiting Cyp2E1. To evaluate if 4MP can be used therapeutically, C57BL/6J mice were treated with 300 mg/kg APAP followed by 50 mg/kg 4MP 90 min later (after the metabolism phase). In these experiments, 4MP significantly attenuated liver injury at 3, 6, and 24 h after APAP as shown by 80%-90% reduction in plasma alanine aminotransferase activities and reduced areas of necrosis. 4MP prevented c-Jun c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and its mitochondrial translocation, and reduced mitochondrial oxidant stress and nuclear DNA fragmentation. 4MP also prevented JNK activation in other liver injury models. Molecular docking experiments showed that 4MP can bind to the ATP binding site of JNK. These data suggest that treatment with 4MP after the metabolism phase effectively prevents APAP-induced liver injury in the clinically relevant mouse model in vivo mainly through the inhibition of JNK activation. 4MP, a drug approved for human use, is as effective as N-acetylcysteine or can be even more effective in cases of severe overdoses with prolonged metabolism (600 mg/kg). 4MP acts on alternative therapeutic targets and thus may be a novel approach to treatment of APAP overdose in patients that complements N-acetylcysteine.

4-Methylpyrazole protects against acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in mice and in primary human hepatocytes

Liver injury due to acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is the major cause of acute liver failure in the United States. While treatment with N-acetylcysteine is the current standard of care for APAP overdose, anecdotal evidence suggests that administration of 4-methylpyrazole (4MP) may be beneficial in the clinic. The objective of the current study was to examine the protective effect of 4MP and its mechanism of action. Male C57BL/6J mice were co-treated with 300 mg/kg of APAP and 50 mg/kg of 4MP. The severe liver injury induced by APAP at 6 h as indicated by elevated plasma alanine aminotransferase activities, centrilobular necrosis, and nuclear DNA fragmentation was almost completely eliminated by 4MP. In addition, 4MP largely prevented APAP-induced activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), mitochondrial translocation of phospho-JNK and Bax, and the release of mitochondrial intermembrane proteins. Importantly, 4MP inhibited the generation of APAP protein adducts and formation of APAP-glutathione (GSH) conjugates and attenuated the depletion of the hepatic GSH content. These findings are relevant to humans because 4MP also prevented APAP-induced cell death in primary human hepatocytes. In conclusion, early treatment with 4MP can completely prevent liver injury after APAP overdose by inhibiting cytochrome P450 and preventing generation of the reactive metabolite.

Antidote Use in the Critically Ill Poisoned Patient

The proper use of antidotes in the intensive care setting when combined with appropriate general supportive care may reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with severe poisonings. The more commonly used antidotes that may be encountered in the intensive care unit ( N-acetylcysteine, ethanol, fomepizole, physostigmine, naloxone, flumazenil, sodium bicarbonate, octreotide, pyridoxine, cyanide antidote kit, pralidoxime, atropine, digoxin immune Fab, glucagon, calcium gluconate and chloride, deferoxamine, phytonadione, botulism antitoxin, methylene blue, and Crotaline snake antivenom) are reviewed. Proper indications for their use and knowledge of the possible adverse effects accompanying antidotal therapy will allow the physician to appropriately manage the severely poisoned patient.

Fomepizole in the treatment of acute methanol poisonings: experience from the Czech mass methanol outbreak 2012-2013

OBJECTIVE

During an outbreak of mass methanol poisonings in the Czech Republic in 2012-2013, fomepizole was applied as an alternative antidote to ethanol. We present the laboratory data, clinical features, adverse reactions, and treatment outcomes in all patients treated with fomepizole.

METHODS

Combined retrospective and prospective case series study in 25 patients, median age 50 (16-73) years, 18 males and 7 females.

RESULTS

There were 24% fatalities, 36% survivors without health impairment, and 40% survivors with sequelae. All the patients who died were comatose on admission; the mortality was 50% among patients in a coma. The median intensive care unit length of stay was six (2-22) days. The median total dose of fomepizole was 2 (1-9) g. Complications were observed in 7/25 cases: aspiration pneumonia (4), sepsis (2), bleeding (2), malignant arrhythmia (1), delirium tremens (1), and rebound of acidosis (1). The patients who survived without impairment were less acidotic than those who died or survived with sequelae (P<0.01). No difference in serum methanol and formate was found between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence whether fomepizole is a more efficient antidote than ethanol with regards to the hospital mortality. The possibility of delirium tremens in the patients with a history of chronic alcohol abuse has to be taken in consideration. The benefits of fomepizole were indirect: no need to monitor serum ethanol's level during the hemodialysis in severely poisoned patients and less working overload on ICU doctors treating several poisoned patients simultaneously.

A systematic review of ethanol and fomepizole use in toxic alcohol ingestions

Objectives. The optimal antidote for the treatment of ethylene glycol or methanol intoxication is not known. The objective of this systematic review is to describe all available data on the use of ethanol and fomepizole for methanol and ethylene glycol intoxication. Data Source. A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted. Study Selection. Published studies involving the use of ethanol or fomepizole, or both, in adults who presented within 72 hours of toxic alcohol ingestion were included. Our search yielded a total of 145 studies for our analysis. There were no randomized controlled trials, and no head-to-head trials. Data Extraction. Variables were evaluated for all publications by one independent author using a standardized data collection form. Data Synthesis. 897 patients with toxic alcohol ingestion were identified. 720 (80.3%) were treated with ethanol (505 Me, 215 EG), 146 (16.3%) with fomepizole (81 Me, 65 EG), and 33 (3.7%) with both antidotes (18 Me, 15 EG). Mortality in patients treated with ethanol was 21.8% for Me and 18.1% for EG. In those administered fomepizole, mortality was 17.1% for Me and 4.1% for EG. Adverse events were uncommon. Conclusion. The data supporting the use of one antidote is inconclusive. Further investigation is warranted.

A case of mixed intoxication with isopropyl alcohol and propanol-1 after ingestion of a topical antiseptic solution

We report a mixed intoxication with isopropyl alcohol and propanol-1 in a hospitalized patient who ingested, on two separate days, two 100 ml bottles of a topical antiseptic solution containing isopropyl alcohol and propanol-1. Eight hours after the second ingestion, plasma concentrations of isopropanol, propanol-1 and acetone were 37 mg/dL, <10 mg/dL, and 227 mg/dl, respectively. Despite a lack of severe toxicity, 4-methylpyrazole (fomepizole) was initiated. This case points out the need to limit access to alcohol-containing antiseptic solutions on wards where alcoholic and psychotic patients are hospitalized.

Expert opinion: fomepizole may ameliorate the need for hemodialysis in methanol poisoning

Fomepizole is now the antidote of choice in methanol poisoning. The use of fomepizole may also change the indications for hemodialysis in these patients. We have addressed this change in a review of articles on methanol poisonings. Review of the literature (through PubMed) combined with our own experiences from two recent methanol outbreaks in Estonia and Norway. The efficiency of dialysis during fomepizole treatment was reported in only a few reports. One recent study challenged the old indications, suggesting a new approach with delayed or even no hemodialysis. Methanol-poisoned patients on fomepizole treatment may be separated into two categories: 1) The critically ill patient, with severe metabolic acidosis (base deficit >15 mM) and/or visual disturbances should be given buffer, fomepizole and immediate hemodialysis: dialysis removes the toxic anion formate, and assists in correcting the metabolic acidosis, thereby also reducing formate toxicity. The removal of methanol per se is not important in this setting because fomepizole prevents further production of formic acid. 2) The stable patient, with less metabolic acidosis and no visual disturbances, should be given buffer and fomepizole. This treatment allows for the possibility to delay, or even drop, dialysis in this setting, because patients will not develop more clinical features from methanol poisoning when fomepizole and bicarbonate is given in adequate doses. Indications and triage for hemodialysis in methanol poisonings should be modified. Delayed hemodialysis or even no hemodialysis may be an option in selected cases.

Poisoning with 1-propanol and 2-propanol

1-Propanol and 2-propanol are isomers of an alcohol with three carbons. They are colorless liquids with a sweet odor. 1-Propanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase to propionic acid and presents with metabolic acidosis and elevated anion gap, whereas 2-propanol is metabolized by alcohol dehydrogenase to acetone and presents with rapidly developing (within 3-4 h after exposure) ketosis and ketonuria but without metabolic acidosis. We report a patient who simultaneously ingested a lethal dose of 1-propanol and 2-propanol as a hand disinfectant in hospital. The patient lost consciousness and stopped breathing within half an hour after ingestion. He was intubated and artificially ventilated. Initial laboratory results showed mixed acidosis with elevated anion gap, but ketonuria appeared only 12 h after admission and 6 h following the regaining of consciousness. Therefore, laboratory results in simultaneous poisoning with two isomers of alcohol are not just a sum of laboratory results obtained in isolated poisoning with each isomer because they influence each other's metabolism: 1-propanol retards the metabolism of 2-propanol to acetone. In conclusion, 1-propanol and 2-propanol poisoning presents early with mixed acidosis and elevated anion gap and only later with ketonuria.

Effect of selected alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors on human hepatic lactate dehydrogenase activity - an in vitro study

Metabolic acidosis severely complicates methanol and ethylene glycol intoxications. Acidosis is caused by acid metabolites and can be intensified by lactate elevation. Lactate concentration depends on the NADH(2)/NAD ratio. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, E.C.1.1.1.27.) supplies more lactate when the level of NADH(2) is elevated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) inhibitors and substrates: cimetidine, EDTA, 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP), Ukrain and ethanol on LDH activity. The activity of LDH was determined spectrophotometrically in human liver homogenates incubated with cimetidine, EDTA, 4-MP and Ukrain at concentrations of 2 x 10(-6), 10(-5) and 5 x 10(-5) m as well as ethanol at concentrations of 12.50, 25.00, 50.00 mm. The LDH activity was significantly increased by 10(-5) and 5 x 10(-5) m concentrations of cimetidine and 4-MP, and by all concentrations of ethanol. The most effective change of LDH activity of about 26% (P<0.01) was observed at the highest concentration of ethanol. Ukrain inhibited LDH activity at both concentrations, i.e. 10(-5) and 5 x 10(-5) m (P<0.05). However, EDTA did not significantly influence LDH activity. The data showed that ethanol and 4-MP, the main antidotes in methanol or ethylene glycol poisoning, may increase liver LDH activity - an undesirable effect during the therapy of patients intoxicated with these alcohols. On the other hand, the decrease of LDH activity in the presence of Ukrain is a promising finding but definitely requires further investigation.

Compliance With Poison Center Fomepizole Recommendations is Suboptimal in Cases of Toxic Alcohol Poisoning

We sought to examine hospital compliance with poison center antidotal alcohol dehydrogenase inhibition recommendations in cases of ethylene glycol (EG) and methanol (ME) ingestion. A 2-year analysis of all potential EG and ME ingestion cases reported to a regional poison center was conducted. Excluded from analysis were exposures without an ingestion, without a confirmatory EG or ME serum assay, or without complete medical charting. During the study period, 579 EG or ME exposures were reported to the poison center: 133 cases met study eligibility as an ingestion. Of the 133 cases, 102 (77%) had complete data and were included in the analysis. Immediate alcohol dehydrogenase inhibition was recommended by the poison center in 79 of the 102 cases. Fomepizole was recommended in 61/79 (77%); ethanol was recommended as an alternative therapeutic choice in 32/61 (52%) of these cases if fomepizole was not immediately available. Ethanol alone was recommended in 18/79 (23%). Fomepizole was eventually administered in 39/61 (64%) cases where recommended. The mean time to antidote administration was 3 times longer in cases where a choice in antidote was given [57 min (95% confidence interval, 43-70) vs. 146 min (95% confidence interval, 93-200)]. Despite its ease of administration, fomepizole is used less frequently than recommended by poison center staff. Delays to antidote administration occurred more commonly in cases where the poison center gave a choice in antidotal therapy.

Effect of selected alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors on the human heart lactate dehydrogenase activity--an in vitro study

Metabolic acidosis complicates methanol, ethylene glycol and other alcohol intoxications. It is caused firstly by acid metabolites and secondly by the lactate elevation. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH; EC 1.1.1.1) inhibitors and substrates: 4-methylpyrazole (4-MP), cimetidine, EDTA, ethanol and methanol on lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; EC 1.1.1.27) activity. The activity of LDH was determined spectrophotometrically in in vitro human heart homogenates with the mentioned compounds at 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 mM concentrations of 4-MP, cimetidine, EDTA, and 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 mM of ethanol and methanol. The LDH activity was significantly inhibited by 0.1 mM (p<0.05) and 1.0 mM (p<0.01) 4-MP and 1.00 mM EDTA (p<0.05). Higher LDH activity vs. control was observed in the samples incubated with all studied ethanol and methanol concentrations but these differences were not statistically significant. Thus, 4-MP was found to be the most effective inhibitor of LDH of all compounds tested. Therefore, such effect of 4-MP seems to be an additional advantage in methanol and ethylene glycol intoxications.

Human skeletal muscle lactate dehydrogenase activity in the presence of some alcohol dehydrogenase inhibitors

Methanol, ethylene glycol and other alcohol intoxications are complicated by severe acidosis which could be caused by formation of metabolic acids and additionally lactic acid production. An increasing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide reduced/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidized (NADH/NAD) ratio during alcohol biotransformation is responsible for the induction of lactic acidosis. The main purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the effect of 4-methylpyrazole, cimetidine, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt, ethanol and methanol on lactate dehydrogenase (E.C. 1.1.1.27) activity and to discuss this issue. The activity of the enzyme was determined spectrophotometrically, in vitro using human enzyme skeletal muscle homogenates. 4-Methylpyrazole, cimetidine and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt at concentrations 0.01, 0.1, 1.0 mM and 12.5, 25.0, 50.0 mM of ethanol and methanol were studied. Our results showed that cimetidine increased lactate dehydrogenase activity as compared to the control at all tested concentrations. Such activity was noted for 4-methylpyrazole at 0.1 mM and higher concentration. By contrast, no significant effect on lactate dehydrogenase activity in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt, methanol and ethanol was observed.

Current recommendations for treatment of severe toxic alcohol poisonings

BACKGROUND

Ethylene glycol (EG) and methanol are responsible for accidental, suicidal, and epidemic poisonings, resulting in death or permanent sequelae. Toxicity is due to the metabolic products of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase. Conventional management of these intoxications consists of ethanol and hemodialysis. Fomepizole, a potent ADH inhibitor, has largely replaced antidotal ethanol use in France and two recent prospective U.S. trials definitively established its efficacy. Fomepizole appears safer than ethanol and while no comparative study of efficacy exists, fomepizole is recommended as the first-line antidote.

FOCUS

Fomepizole, administered early in EG intoxication, prevents renal injury. In the absence of renal failure, EG clearance is rapid, avoiding the need for prolonged fomepizole administration. The long elimination half-life of methanol poisonings, with absent hemodialysis, necessitates prolonged administration of fomepizole. In the U.S. trials, patients were dialyzed when plasma EG or methanol concentrations were >/=0.5 g/l. However, EG-poisoned patients treated with fomepizole prior to the onset of significant acidosis may not require hemodialysis. Indeed, fomepizole may also obviate the need for hemodialysis in selected methanol-poisoned patients, in the absence of neurological and ocular impairment or severe acidosis. When dialysis is indicated, 1 mg.kg.h continuous infusion of fomepizole should be provided to compensate for its elimination.

CONCLUSIONS

Fomepizole is an effective and safe first-line recommended antidote for EG and methanol intoxication. In selected patients, fomepizole may obviate the need for hemodialysis.

The influence of L-carnitine on methanol biotransformation in rats

There persists a need for potent and safe inhibitors of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), to effectively treat methanol poisoning by slowing its rate of biotransformation to there toxic products, formaldehyde and formic acid. Only a few former papers have reported on the significant effectiveness of L-carnitine in treating ethanol poisoning as well as alcohol abuse. As are no reports on the effectiveness of L-carnitine in treating methanol poisoning till now, the current studies were conducted to investigate the influence of L-carnitine on both oxydative metabolism and elimination of methanol in rats. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 3 months with the body weight of 200-230 g were divided into 6 groups at random, with two of the groups considered to be control. Rats were given drinking water (control) or methanol in two different doses of 3220 mg/kg b.m. or 6440 mg/kg b.m. intragastrically and 0.9% NaCl (control) or 6.2 mmol/kg b.m. of L-carnitine intraperitionelly. Within 96 hours after the administration of methanol and 0.9% NaCl or L-carnitine, the urine was collected and then the animals were decapitated. To determine methanol there were taken blood samples for clot, and to determine carnitine and its derivatives blood was taken into heparinized test tubes. During the autopsy liver was also secured. In all the experimental time points stated the methanol concentrations in blood, urine and liver homogenate were determined by a head-space gas chromatography.

American Academy of Clinical Toxicology practice guidelines on the treatment of methanol poisoning

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Almost all cases of acute methanol toxicity result from ingestion, though rarely cases of poisoning have followed inhalation or dermal absorption. The absorption of methanol following oral administration is rapid and peak methanol concentrations occur within 30-60minutes.

MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY

Methanol has a relatively low toxicity and metabolism is responsible for the transformation of methanol to its toxic metabolites. Methanol is oxidized by alcohol dehydrogenase to formaldehyde. The oxidation of formaldehyde to formic acid is facilitated by formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Formic acid is converted by 10-formyl tetrahydrofolate synthetase to carbon dioxide and water. In cases of methanol poisoning, formic acid accumulates and there is a direct correlation between the formic acid concentration and increased morbidity and mortality. The acidosis observed in methanol poisoning appears to be caused directly or indirectly by formic acid production. Formic acid has also been shown to inhibit cytochrome oxidase and is the prime cause of ocular toxicity, though acidosis can increase toxicity further by enabling greater diffusion of formic acid into cells.

FEATURES

Methanol poisoning typically induces nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and mild central nervous system depression. There is then a latent period lasting approximately 12-24 hours, depending, in part, on the methanol dose ingested, following which an uncompensated metabolic acidosis develops and visualfunction becomes impaired, ranging from blurred vision and altered visual fields to complete blindness.

MANAGEMENT

For the patient presenting with ophthalmologic abnormalities or significant acidosis, the acidosis should be corrected with intravenous sodium bicarbonate, the further generation of toxic metabolite should be blocked by the administration of fomepizole or ethanol and formic acid metabolism should be enhanced by the administration of intravenous folinic acid. Hemodialysis may also be required to correct severe metabolic abnormalities and to enhance methanol and formate elimination. For the methanol poisoned patient without evidence of clinical toxicity, the first priority is to inhibit methanol metabolism with intravenous ethanol orfomepizole. Although there are no clinical outcome data confirming the superiority of either of these antidotes over the other, there are significant disadvantages associated with ethanol. These include complex dosing, difficulties with maintaining therapeutic concentrations, the need for more comprehensive clinical and laboratory monitoring, and more adverse effects. Thus fomepizole is very attractive, however, it has a relatively high acquisition cost.

CONCLUSION

The management of methanol poisoning includes standard supportive care, the correction of metabolic acidosis, the administration of folinic acid, the provision of an antidote to inhibit the metabolism of methanol to formate, and selective hemodialysis to correct severe metabolic abnormalities and to enhance methanol and formate elimination. Although both ethanol and fomepizole are effective, fomepizole is the preferred antidote for methanol poisoning.

Outcomes of Severe Methanol Intoxication Treated with Hemodialysis: Report of Seven Cases and Review of Literature

To identify factors associated with the outcome of severe methanol intoxication treated with hemodialysis, we analyzed the clinical course of 7 patients admitted with serum methanol level higher than 50 mg/dL, and therefore requiring hemodialysis. Four patients (group A) had adverse outcomes (1 death, 3 severe neurological deficits and/or blindness) and 3 patients (group B) had no adverse outcomes. Compared to group B, group A appeared to have a longer delay between ingestion of methanol and arrival at the emergency department (ED), a longer wait in the ED until ethanol infusion was started (3.6 ± 2.7 vs 1.3 ± 0.9 hr, p < 0.05), and, on admission, higher serum methanol (504 ± 219 vs 321 ± 228 mg/dL, p < 0.05), higher serum osmolality (460.5 ± 98.2 vs 397.6 ± 52.3 mOsm/kg, p < 0.05), higher serum osmolal gap (162.6 ± 76.7 vs 105.6 ± 52.9 mOsm/kg, p < 0.05), lower arterial pH (6.86 ± 0.08 vs 7.38 ± 0.16, p < 0.01), lower serum bicarbonate (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 19.9 ± 5.7 mmol/L, p < 0.01), and higher serum anion gap (36.5 ± 1.3 vs 14.3 ± 6.7 mEq/L, p < 0.01). Delay in the ED until hemodialysis was started did not differ (group A 6.4 ± 2.6 hr, group B 5.3 ± 3.5 hr), while duration of hemodialysis until serum methanol levels became permanently undetectable was longer in group A (15.0 ± 0.5 vs 8.4 ± 4.4 hr, p < 0.01). The ingested dose of methanol and the delay between ingestion and initiation of therapy to block methanol metabolism (ethanol infusion) and remove methanol from the body (hemodialysis) appear to be the critical factors influencing the outcome of methanol intoxication. Early diagnosis and initiation of treatment before substantial parts of the ingested methanol have been metabolized are of paramount importance in ensuring a favorable outcome.