Role of proteinuria reduction in the progression of IgA nephropathy

Immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety for IgA nephropathy treatment

Background

Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants and supportive treatment in reducing the risk of proteinuria and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) patients were still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgAN in order to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Methods

We conducted an online search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to collect randomized control trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgA for relevant literature published from the databases' inception to August 21, 2021. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies and analyzed by Revman 5.4 software, and Stata 15.0 statistical software was adopted for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 10,622 related studies were retrieved, and 11 RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 809 cases. The primary outcome measures for immunosuppressants or corticosteroids were better than those for supportive therapy: proteinuria [weighted mean difference (WMD) =-0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.63, -0.44, Z =10.79, P<0.001] and ESKD [relative risk (RR) =0.189, 95% CI: 0.059, 0.605, Z =2.81, P=0.005]. The secondary outcome measures were also better than that for supportive treatment: glomerular filtration rate [standardized mean difference (SMD) =0.32, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.54, Z =2.48, P=0.013]. The incidence of adverse reactions was consistent with that of supportive treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant (RR =1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.59, Z =0.28, P=0.777).

Discussion

Current evidence shows that immunosuppressants and corticosteroids can significantly reduce the risk of proteinuria and ESKD in IgAN patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need to verify above conclusion. In addition, we hope that more rationally designed multicenter RCTs that are not limited to short-term treatment outcomes will be conducted in the future.

Intensity of Macrophage Infiltration in Glomeruli Predicts Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with IgA Nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The lack of a tool for predicting the response to immunosuppressive therapy in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) limits patient-specific risk stratification and early treatment decision making. Models for predicting response to immunosuppression in IgAN that can be applied at the time of kidney biopsy are needed.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study involved 621 Chinese patients with IgAN who were at high risk for disease progression and had persistent proteinuria ≥1 g/d, despite 3 months of optimized supportive care with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Participants received immunosuppressive therapy for a median of 18 months. We used immunochemistry to identify macrophage and lymphocyte infiltrates in biopsy specimens and digital image analysis to quantify them. The outcome was response to immunosuppression, defined as complete or partial remission within 12 months of immunosuppression.

RESULTS

Kidney infiltration of CD68 + and CD206 + macrophages increased in patients with IgAN. Having higher levels of glomerular CD206 + macrophage infiltration was associated with a 40-fold increased probability of response to immunosuppression in adjusted analysis compared with having lower levels. Patients with a higher intensity of glomerular CD68 + infiltrates had a 13-fold increase in probability of responding to immunosuppression. Intensity of glomerular CD206 + and CD68 + macrophage infiltration predicted the response to immunosuppression (area under the curve [AUC], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.88). The AUC increased to 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.91) in a model combining the infiltration score of CD206 + and CD68 + infiltrates with the MEST-C score and clinical data at biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity of glomerular macrophage infiltration predicted response to immunosuppressive therapy in patients with IgAN who were at high risk of progression, and may help physicians identify patients who will benefit from such treatment.

Association of Treatment Effects on Early Change in Urine Protein and Treatment Effects on GFR Slope in IgA Nephropathy: An Individual Participant Meta-analysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

An early change in proteinuria is considered a reasonably likely surrogate end point in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and can be used as a basis for accelerated approval of therapies, with verification in a postmarketing confirmatory trial. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) slope is a recently validated surrogate end point for chronic kidney disease progression and may be considered as the end point used for verification. We undertook a meta-analysis of clinical trials in IgAN to compare treatment effects on change in proteinuria versus change in estimated GFR (eGFR) slope.

STUDY DESIGN

Individual patient-level meta-analysis.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS

Individual data of 1,037 patients from 12 randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized trials of IgAN with proteinuria measurements at baseline and 6 (range, 2.5-14) months and at least a further 1 year of follow-up for the clinical outcome.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

For each trial, we estimated the treatment effects on proteinuria and on the eGFR slope, computed as the total slope starting at baseline or the chronic slope starting 3 months after randomization. We used a Bayesian mixed-effects analysis to relate the treatment effects on proteinuria to effects on GFR slope across these studies and developed a prediction model for the treatment effect on the GFR slope based on the effect on proteinuria.

RESULTS

Across all studies, treatment effects on proteinuria accurately predicted treatment effects on the total slope at 3 years (median R2 = 0.88; 95% Bayesian credible interval [BCI], 0.06-1) and on the chronic slope (R2 = 0.98; 95% BCI, 0.29-1). For future trials, an observed treatment effect of approximately 30% reduction in proteinuria would confer probabilities of at least 90% for nonzero treatment benefits on the total and chronic slopes of eGFR. We obtained similar results for proteinuria at 9 and 12 months and total slope at 2 years.

LIMITATIONS

Study population restricted to 12 trials of small sample size, leading to wide BCIs. There was heterogeneity among trials with respect to study design and interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide new evidence supporting that early reduction in proteinuria can be used as a surrogate end point for studies of chronic kidney disease progression in IgAN.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Monotherapy Agents for IgA Nephropathy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive monotherapy agents were evaluated for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) using a network meta-analysis approach. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to October 1, 2019, using immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN, were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Relative risks (RRs) or standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random-effects model. The primary outcomes were clinical remission, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and serious adverse events (SAEs). The secondary outcomes were urinary protein excretion and serum creatinine. Results: Twenty-five RCTs with 2,005 participants were deemed eligible. Six medications were evaluated: corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporine, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Steroids (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.93), MMF (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.15-3.65), TAC (RR 3.67, 95% CI 1.06-12.63), and HCQ (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.05-10.09) significantly improved clinical remission rates compared to supportive care alone. Only steroids reduced the risk of ESRD (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.98); however, there were significantly more SAEs than in the control group (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.37-6.13). No significantly different effects in serum creatinine levels were found among the therapies. MMF showed no significant improvement in remission when excluding studies with a follow-up of fewer than 2 years in the sensitivity analysis (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.40-4.92). The effect of TAC in the decrease of proteinuria was reversed after discontinuing medication for 3 months; the long-term effects of HCQ could not be evaluated due to the short follow-up duration. Conclusion: Corticosteroids might induce remission and increase renal survival in IgAN; however, adverse reactions should be taken into consideration. MMF, TAC, and HCQ might improve the remission of proteinuria when treating IgAN, but showed no superiority compared to steroids, and the long-term effects require further study.

Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerulonephritis world-wide. IgA nephropathy causes end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 15% to 20% of affected patients within 10 years and in 30% to 40% of patients within 20 years from the onset of disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of immunosuppression strategies for the treatment of IgA nephropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 9 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of treatment for IgA nephropathy in adults and children and that compared immunosuppressive agents with placebo, no treatment, or other immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study risk of bias and extracted data. Estimates of treatment effect were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. Treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Risks of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies involving 3933 randomised participants were included. Six studies involving children were eligible. Disease characteristics (kidney function and level of proteinuria) were heterogeneous across studies. Studies evaluating steroid therapy generally included patients with protein excretion of 1 g/day or more. Risk of bias within the included studies was generally high or unclear for many of the assessed methodological domains. In patients with IgA nephropathy and proteinuria > 1 g/day, steroid therapy given for generally two to four months with a tapering course probably prevents the progression to ESKD compared to placebo or standard care (8 studies; 741 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.65; moderate certainty evidence). Steroid therapy may induce complete remission (4 studies, 305 participants: RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.01; low certainty evidence), prevent doubling of serum creatinine (SCr) (7 studies, 404 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.65; low certainty evidence), and may lower urinary protein excretion (10 studies, 705 participants: MD -0.58 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.33;low certainty evidence). Steroid therapy had uncertain effects on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), death, infection and malignancy. The risk of adverse events with steroid therapy was uncertain due to heterogeneity in the type of steroid treatment used and the rarity of events. Cytotoxic agents (azathioprine (AZA) or cyclophosphamide (CPA) alone or with concomitant steroid therapy had uncertain effects on ESKD (7 studies, 463 participants: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.20; low certainty evidence), complete remission (5 studies; 381 participants: RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.30; very low certainty evidence), GFR (any measure), and protein excretion. Doubling of serum creatinine was not reported. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had uncertain effects on the progression to ESKD, complete remission, doubling of SCr, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. Death was not reported. Calcineurin inhibitors compared with placebo or standard care had uncertain effects on complete remission, SCr, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. ESKD and death were not reported. Mizoribine administered with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment had uncertain effects on progression to ESKD, complete remission, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. Death and SCr were not reported. Leflunomide followed by a tapering course with oral prednisone compared to prednisone had uncertain effects on the progression to ESKD, complete remission, doubling of SCr, GFR, protein excretion, and infection. Death and malignancy were not reported. Effects of other immunosuppressive regimens (including steroid plus non-immunosuppressive agents or mTOR inhibitors) were inconclusive primarily due to insufficient data from the individual studies in low or very low certainty evidence. The effects of treatments on death, malignancy, reduction in GFR at least of 25% and adverse events were very uncertain. Subgroup analyses to determine the impact of specific patient characteristics such as ethnicity or disease severity on treatment effectiveness were not possible.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In moderate certainty evidence, corticosteroid therapy probably prevents decline in GFR or doubling of SCr in adults and children with IgA nephropathy and proteinuria. Evidence for treatment effects of immunosuppressive agents on death, infection, and malignancy is generally sparse or low-quality. Steroid therapy has uncertain adverse effects due to a paucity of studies. Available studies are few, small, have high risk of bias and generally do not systematically identify treatment-related harms. Subgroup analyses to identify specific patient characteristics that might predict better response to therapy were not possible due to a lack of studies. There is no evidence that other immunosuppressive agents including CPA, AZA, or MMF improve clinical outcomes in IgA nephropathy.

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Immunosuppressive agents have been widely used in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN), but the efficacy and safety remain controversial. The recent STOP-IgAN and TESTING studies have again focused attention on the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN. This study investigated the benefits and risks of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and article reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immunosuppressive agents with any other non-immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of proteinuria, creatinine (Cr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and adverse events in patients with IgAN, and trial sequential analyses were also performed for outcomes.

Results

Twenty-nine RCTs (1957 patients) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. Steroids (weighted mean difference [WMD] –0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] –1.2 to − 0.20), non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (NSI) (WMD –0. 43, 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.31), and combined steroidal and non-steroidal immunosuppressive agents (S&NSI) (WMD –1.46, 95% CI − 2.13 to − 0.79) therapy significantly reduced proteinuria levels compared with the the control group. Steroid treatment significantly reduced the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (relative risk [RR] 0.39, CI 0.19 to 0.79) compared with the control group. The immunosuppressive therapy group showed significant increases in gastrointestinal, hematological, dermatological, and genitourinary side effects, as well as impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes. Hyperkalemia was more common in the control group.

Conclusion

Immunosuppressive therapy can significantly reduce proteinuria and ESRD risk in patients with IgAN, but with a concomitant increase in adverse reactions. Therefore, care is required in the application of immunosuppressive agents in IgAN.

Early Change in Urine Protein as a Surrogate End Point in Studies of IgA Nephropathy: An Individual-Patient Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of change in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for randomized trials in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) has previously not been thoroughly evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Individual patient-level meta-analysis.

SETTING & POPULATION

Individual-patient data for 830 patients from 11 randomized trials evaluating 4 intervention types (renin-angiotensin system [RAS] blockade, fish oil, immunosuppression, and steroids) examining associations between changes in urine protein and clinical end points at the individual and trial levels.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized controlled trials of IgAN with measurements of proteinuria at baseline and a median of 9 (range, 5-12) months follow-up, with at least 1 further year of follow-up for the clinical outcome.

PREDICTOR

9-month change in proteinuria.

OUTCOME

Doubling of serum creatinine level, end-stage renal disease, or death.

RESULTS

Early decline in proteinuria at 9 months was associated with lower risk for the clinical outcome (HR per 50% reduction in proteinuria, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32-0.48) and was consistent across studies. Proportions of treatment effect on the clinical outcome explained by early decline in proteinuria were estimated at 11% (95% CI, -19% to 41%) for RAS blockade and 29% (95% CI, 6% to 53%) for steroid therapy. The direction of the pooled treatment effect on early change in proteinuria was in accord with the direction of the treatment effect on the clinical outcome for steroids and RAS blockade. Trial-level analyses estimated that the slope for the regression line for the association of treatment effects on the clinical end points and for the treatment effect on proteinuria was 2.15 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.10-4.32).

LIMITATIONS

Study population restricted to 11 trials, all having fewer than 200 patients each with a limited number of clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this analysis offer novel evidence supporting the use of an early reduction in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for clinical end points in IgAN in selected settings.

Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerulonephritis world-wide and a cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 15% to 20% of patients within 10 years and in 30% to 40% of patients within 20 years from the onset of disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2003.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of immunosuppression for the treatment of IgAN.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review update we searched the Specialised Register to 19 February 2015 through contact with the Trials Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of treatment for IgAN in adults and children and that compared immunosuppressive agents with placebo, no treatment, or other immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study risk of bias and extracted data for population characteristics, interventions and outcomes including mortality, infection, hospitalisation, ESKD requiring renal replacement therapy (dialysis or kidney transplantation), doubling of serum creatinine, remission of proteinuria, and end of treatment urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate.Estimates of treatment effect and hazards were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. Treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 32 studies comprising 1781 participants. Risk of bias within the included studies was generally high: 22 studies (69%) did not describe the method used to generate the randomisation sequence; 24 (75%) did not describe the methods used to conceal allocation; performance bias was not reported or high in 30 studies (94%); detection bias was unclear in 31 studies (97%); attrition bias was low in 14 studies (44%), unclear in eight (25%) and high in 12 studies (38%); reporting bias was low in 21 studies (67%) and high in 10 studies (31%); and four studies received industry funding or were terminated early (13%).Steroids lowered risks of progression to ESKD (6 studies, 341 participants: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.80), and doubling of serum creatinine (6 studies, 341 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.69), lowered urinary protein excretion (6 studies, 263 participants: MD -0.49 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.25); and preserved glomerular filtration rate (4 studies, 138 participants: MD 17.87 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI 4.93 to 30.82) compared to no treatment or placebo. Combining steroids plus renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitors lowered the risk of progression to ESKD (2 studies, 160 participants: RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.59) and reduced urinary protein excretion (1 study, 38 participants: MD -0.20 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.14) compared with RAS inhibitors or steroids alone. Cytotoxic agents (azathioprine) plus steroid regimens plus dipyridamole increased remission of proteinuria (1 study, 78 participants: RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.52) compared to steroids alone but had uncertain effects on other outcomes.Mycophenolate mofetil plus RAS inhibitors lowered the risk of progression to ESKD (1 study, 40 participants: RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.90), improved remission of proteinuria (1 study, 40 participants: RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.39) and reduced urinary protein excretion (1 study, 40 participants: MD -1.26 g/24 h, 95% CI -1.46 to -1.06). Effects of other immunosuppressive regimens (including cyclosporin, leflunomide) were inconclusive primarily due to insufficient data from the individual studies. Subgroup analyses to determine the impact of patient characteristics on treatment effectiveness were not possible.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The optimal management of IgAN remains uncertain although corticosteroid therapy may lower the risks of kidney disease progression and need for dialysis or transplantation. Evidence for treatment effects of immunosuppressive agents on mortality, infection, and cancer is generally sparse or low-quality and insufficient to guide clinical practice. Available RCTs are few, small, have high risk of bias - particularly selective reporting - and generally do not systematically identify treatment-related harms. Subgroup analyses to identify specific patient characteristics that might predict better response to therapy were not possible. Larger placebo-controlled studies of corticosteroid therapy or mycophenolate mofetil which are sufficiently powered to evaluate patient-relevant end points including adverse events and that examine the optimal duration of treatment are now required in populations with IgAN with a range of kidney function.

Steroids in the treatment of IgA nephropathy to the improvement of renal survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that steroids can improve kidney survival and decrease the risk of proteinuria in patients with Immunoglobulin A nephropathy, but the overall benefit of steroids in the treatment of Immunoglobulin A nephropathy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits and risks of steroids for renal survival in adults with Immunoglobulin A nephropathy.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We searched the Cochrane Renal Group Specialized Register, Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. All eligible studies were measuring at least one of the following outcomes: end-stage renal failure, doubling of serum creatinine and urinary protein excretion. Fifteen relevant trials (n = 1542) that met our inclusion criteria were identified. In a pooled analysis, steroid therapy was associated with statistically significant reduction of the risk in end-stage renal failure (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.79), doubling of serum creatinine (RR = 0.34, 95%CI = 0.15 to 0.77) and reduced urinary protein excretion (MD = -0.47 g/day, 95%CI = -0.64 to -0.31).

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

We identified that steroid therapy was associated with a decrease of proteinuria and with a statistically significant reduction of the risk in end-stage renal failure. Moreover, subgroup analysis also suggested that long-term steroid therapy had a higher efficiency than standard and short term therapy.

Proteinuria-reducing effects of tonsillectomy alone in IgA nephropathy recurring after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been conducted to determine the efficacy of tonsillectomy in suppressing IgA nephropathy recurring after the kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of the 405 kidney recipients who received allograft transplants at our institution between 1998 and 2005, 63 (63 of 405, 16%) were diagnosed as having recurrence of IgA nephropathy in the kidney graft. Among the 63 patients, our subjects in this study were 28 patients who were confirmed to have recurrence of IgA nephropathy by histopathological examination, and who had persistent urinary protein excretion levels of more than 300 mg/day despite medical treatments. Sixteen patients (group 1) underwent tonsillectomy alone, whereas the remaining 12 patients (group 2) did not receive tonsillectomy. The degree of proteinuria, kidney graft function, and blood pressure were analyzed retrospectively in the two patient groups.

RESULTS

The urinary protein excretion decreased dramatically after the tonsillectomy in all of the 16 patients of group 1 (880+/-630 mg/day to 280+/-220 mg/day, P<0.01) but none of group 2. The reduction in urinary protein excretion after tonsillectomy was especially marked in the patients with mild mesangial changes, such as minor glomerular abnormalities, when compared with that in patients with severe mesangial changes, such as diffuse proliferative glomerular abnormalities (mean percent decrease in the urinary protein excretion rate at 12 months after tonsillectomy; 31% minor glomerular abnormalities vs. 62% diffuse proliferative glomerular abnormalities, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that in patients receiving oral immunosuppressive therapy for recurrence of IgA nephropathy after the kidney transplantation, reduction of the urinary protein excretion can be expected with tonsillectomy alone, without accompanying pulsed steroid therapy.

The improvement of renal survival with steroid pulse therapy in IgA nephropathy

Background. The benefits of steroid therapy in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) have not been established.

Methods. The effect of steroids on kidney survival was retrospectively investigated in 702 patients with IgAN by multivariate analyses.

Results. There were 295 men and 407 women. The median follow-up period was 62 months. One hundred and ninety-four patients were treated with oral steroids (oral steroid group). Thirty-four patients were treated with methylprednisolone (mPSL) pulse therapy (pulse steroid group) followed by oral prednisolone (PSL). In 474 patients, no steroid was used (no steroid group). The urinary protein-creatinine ratio and histological grade were significantly different among treatment groups and were highest in the pulse steroid group followed by the oral steroid group and lowest in the no steroid patients. Serum creatinine was significantly higher in the pulse steroid group than in other two groups. Eighty-five patients developed end-stage renal failure (ESRF) requiring haemodialysis. In multivariate analysis, steroid pulse therapy significantly decreased the risk of ESRF while oral steroid treatment did not improve renal survival in this cohort.

Conclusion. We found that pulse steroid therapy improved kidney survivals in IgAN. Since the clinical findings and histological grade were the most severe in patients treated with mPSL pulse therapy, such therapy may prevent progression of IgAN.

Severity of tubulointerstitial inflammation and prognosis in immunoglobulin A nephropathy

Many risk factors for progression in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) have been found. We focused on renal leukocyte infiltrations and cytokines in IgAN. The subjects were 204 IgAN patients. Renal histopathological changes were semiquantitatively graded. Expression of tubulointerstitial Leukocyte common antigen (LCA), CD3, CD68, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and IL-10 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. These parameters were correlated with progression of IgAN. The significance of these correlations was tested by a multivariate analysis. Glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial inflammation, and hyaline arteriolosclerosis correlated with progression in all patients and also in patients with initially normal serum creatinine. Tubulointerstitial LCA, CD3, CD68, and IL-1beta expression correlated with progression. CD3 had the strongest correlation. In the multivariate analysis, tubulointerstitial CD3, hypertriglyceridemia, elevated serum creatinine concentration, and interstitial fibrosis were independently associated with progressive disease in all patients, and tubulointerstitial CD3 expression and hyaline arteriolosclerosis in patients with initially normal serum creatinine. We found parameters reflecting tubulointerstitial inflammation to predict deterioration of renal function in IgAN. This was also seen in patients whose serum creatinine was normal at the time of renal biopsy. Our findings show that, an immunohistochemical evaluation of tubulointerstitial inflammation seems to be a useful tool in determining the prognosis in IgAN.

Clinical trial to evaluate omega-3 fatty acids and alternate day prednisone in patients with IgA nephropathy: report from the Southwest Pediatric Nephrology Study Group

This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial evaluated the role of prednisone and omega 3 fatty acids (O3FA) in patients with IgA nephropathy. Entry criteria were (1) biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy, (2) estimated GFR > or = 50 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and (3) moderate to severe proteinuria. Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive prednisone 60 mg/m2 every other day for 3 mo, then 40 mg/m2 every other day for 9 mo, then 30 mg/m2 every other day for 12 mo (prednisone group); 32 were randomly assigned to receive O3FA 4 g/d for 2 yr (1.88 g eicosapentaenoic acid, 1.48 g docosahexaenoic acid; O3FA group); and 31 were randomly assigned to receive placebo (placebo group). Most (73%) patients completed 2 yr of treatment. Randomly assigned patients who were hypertensive were given enalapril 2.5 to 40 mg/d. The primary end point was time to failure, defined as estimated GFR <60% of baseline. An overall significance level of 0.10 was used. The three groups were comparable at baseline except that the O3FA group had higher urine protein to creatinine (UP/C) ratios than the placebo group (P = 0.003). Neither treatment group showed benefit over the placebo group with respect to time to failure, with 14 patient failures overall (two in the prednisone group, eight in the O3FA group, and four in the placebo group). The primary factor associated with time to failure was higher baseline UP/C ratios (P = 0.009). Superiority of prednisone or O3FA over placebo in slowing progression of renal disease was not demonstrated in this study. However, the relatively short follow-up period, inequality of baseline UP/C ratios, and small numbers of patients precludes definitive conclusions.

Controlled, prospective trial of steroid treatment in IgA nephropathy: a limitation of low-dose prednisolone therapy

BACKGROUND

No accepted therapy has been established for progressive immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of low-dose prednisolone therapy was performed in patients with IgA nephropathy with moderate histological characteristics. Forty-three patients in the steroid group and 47 patients in the control group were included in the study. The initial dose of prednisolone was 20 mg/d, gradually tapered to 5 mg/d during 2 years.

RESULTS

Baseline urine protein-creatinine ratio (UP-UCR) was significantly greater in the steroid group than in controls. Follow-up duration was 65 +/- 25 months in the steroid group and 64 +/- 23 months in controls. Changes in UP-UCR from baseline, ie, UP-UCR at last follow-up minus UP-UCR at baseline, were significantly lower in the steroid group than in controls (steroid group, -0.84 +/- 1.78; controls, 0.26 +/- 1.65; P = 0.0034). Kidney survival was similar in both groups. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to clinical course. There were 28 improved patients and 15 unimproved patients in the steroid group and 27 improved patients and 20 unimproved patients in the control group. In the steroid group, UP-UCR was significantly greater in the unimproved than improved subgroup (3.1 +/- 2.6 versus 1.8 +/- 1.5).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that our protocol had an antiproteinuric effect, but could not improve kidney survival. Because the effect of steroid therapy to prevent the progression of IgA nephropathy is believed to be linked closely to reduction in urinary protein, an insufficient dose of prednisolone in our protocol may be the reason for the discrepancy between the effect on proteinuria and kidney survival.

Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a world-wide disease and the cause of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in 15 to 20% of patients within 10 years and in 30 to 40% of individuals within 20 years from the apparent onset of disease. No specific treatment has yet been established but many approaches have been investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of immunosuppressive treatment for IgAN.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Renal Group's specialized register (May 2003), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002) MEDLINE (1966 - September 2002), EMBASE (1988 - September 2002) and handsearched reference lists of retrieved articles and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing treatment of IgAN with immunosuppressive agents against placebo, no treatment, other immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen eligible RCTs involving 623 patients were identified. All identified RCTs had a placebo, no treatment or warfarin/dipyridamole control group. Seven trials used steroids, three used alkylating agents/cyclosporin and three used combinations of steroids and alkylating agents/cyclosporin. No trial directly compared steroids versus alkylating agents/cyclosporin. Quality was sub-optimal. Steroids were associated with a lower risk of progression to ESRF (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.80) and lower urinary protein excretion (WMD -0.49 g/24h, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.12). Urinary protein excretion was lower for patients treated with alkylating agents/cyclosporin compared to placebo/no treatment (WMD -0.94 g/24h, 95% CI -1.43 to -0.46). There was no significant reduction of urinary protein excretion with combination treatment of steroids and alkylating agents compared with placebo/no treatment.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The optimal management of IgAN remains uncertain. The RCTs identified were small, of sub-optimal methodological quality and tended to only report favorable and surrogate outcomes without a thorough reporting of treatment harms. All outcomes favor the use of immunosuppressive interventions, with steroids appearing to be the most promising. Further study, in the form of RCTs, is necessary to ascertain which patients would benefit from these interventions, whether they are the ones with early signs of renal dysfunction or those with more advanced renal impairment.