Virological, immunological, and clinical impact of switching from protease inhibitors to nevirapine or to efavirenz in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection and long-lasting viral suppression

Ocular Complications in Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: A Case Report

Our article aims to report the ocular adverse effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In case 1, a 26-year-old male patient presented with a diminution of vision. In the absence of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis and a surge in CD4 count of more than 100 cells/µL over four months, he was diagnosed as a case of immune recovery uveitis (IRU). He responded well to topical steroids and cycloplegics. In case 2, while dry eye is a common adverse effect of HAART, our 53-year-old female patient progressed to a visually distressing stage of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. She responded to lubricants and continues to be on the same. In case 3, a 14-year-old female patient's vision succumbed to Stevens-Johnson syndrome due to nevirapine in the absence of timely intervention. Though uncommon, debilitating ocular adverse effects may be seen with HAART. Further studies and reporting are required for an increased awareness among physicians and patients.

Factors associated with viral suppression and rebound among adult HIV patients on treatment: a retrospective study in Ghana

Background

Viral suppression remains the most desired outcome in the management of patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS) and this can be achieved by an effective Antiretroviral Therapy (ART). However, some patients who achieve viral suppression may experience viral rebound with dire consequence. We evaluated viral suppression and rebound and their associated factors among adult patients on ART in Kumasi, Ghana.

Methods

This hospital-based retrospective study was conducted at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Ghana. We reviewed the medical records of 720 HIV patients on ART. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 26.0 and GraphPad prism version 8.0. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Proportions of patients with viral suppression and viral rebound were 76.1% and 21.0% respectively. Being diagnosed at WHO stage I [aOR = 11.40, 95% CI (3.54–36.74), p < 0.0001], having good adherence to ART [aOR = 5.09, 95% CI (2.67–9.73), p < 0.0001], taking Nevirapine-based regimen [aOR = 4.66, 95% CI (1.20–18.04), p = 0.0260] and increasing duration of treatment (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with higher odds of viral suppression. However, being diagnosed at WHO stage II (aOR = 7.39, 95% CI 2.67–20.51; p < 0.0001) and stage III (aOR = 8.62, 95% CI 3.16–23.50; p < 0.0001), having poor adherence (aOR = 175.48, 95% CI 44.30–695.07; p < 0.0001), recording baseline suppression value of 20–49 copies/mL (aOR = 6.43, 95% CI 2.72–15.17; p < 0.0001) and being treated with Zidovudine/Lamivudine/Efavirenz (aOR = 6.49, 95% CI 1.85–22.79; p = 0.004) and Zidovudine/Lamivudine/Nevirapine (aOR = 18.68, 95% CI 1.58–220.90; p = 0.02) were independently associated with higher odds of viral rebound.

Conclusion

Approximately 76% viral suppression rate among HIV patients on ART in Kumasi falls below the WHO 95% target by the year 2030. Choice of ART combination, drug adherence, WHO clinical staging and baseline viral load are factors associated with suppression or rebound. These clinical characteristics of HIV patients must be monitored concurrently with the viral load.

Risks of cardio-vascular diseases among highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) treated HIV seropositive volunteers at a treatment centre in Lagos, Nigeria

Introduction

highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has led to a decline in HIV-induced morbidity and mortality in recent years. However, it has been opined that this has led to elevated risks of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). This study assessed the risks of CVDs among HAART experienced individuals living with HIV.

Methods

a cross sectional study involving 196 adults consisting of 118 HAART experienced and 78 HAART naïve was conducted. Anthropometric and blood pressure measurements were recorded for all participants. Blood samples obtained from the volunteers were used to determine glucose, creatinine, HIV viral load, CD4 count and lipid profile using standard methods. Lipid ratios, atherogenic indices and QRISK3 risk score were calculated.

Results

the median CD4 lymphocyte, mean body mass index (BMI) and HDL-c in HAART experienced participants were higher (P<0.05) than HAART naive individuals. The QRISK3 risk score and creatinine were higher (p<0.05) among HAART experienced group. In HAART experienced group, the risk of hypertension, increased low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and QRISK3 were 3.7, 2.0, 2.38 and 3.85 times (p<0.05) higher respectively than in HAART naive. Atherogenic coefficient (AC) increase was more prevalent among male (p<0.05) participants. Risk of chronic renal disease (eGFR), hypertension and CVD (as measured by QRISK3) was higher (p<0.05) among the female and older participants respectively.

Conclusion

the risk of CVDs and renal disease appeared to be higher among HAART experienced volunteers and older (>45 years) volunteers. The risk of renal disease appeared higher in females.

A Paradigm Shift in the Development of Anti-Candida Drugs

BACKGROUND

The considerable increase in the incidence of Candida infection in recent times has prompted the use of numerous antifungal agents, which has resulted in the development of resistance towards various antifungal agents. With rising Candida infections, the need for design and development of novel antifungal agents is in great demand. However, new therapeutic approaches are very essential in preventing the mortality rate and improving the patient outcome in those suffering from Candida infections.

OBJECTIVE

The present review objective is to describe the burden, types of Candidiasis, mechanism of action of antifungal agents and its resistance and the current novel approaches used to combat candidiasis.

METHODS

We have collected and analyzed 135 different peer-reviewed literature studies pertinent to candidiasis. In this review, we have compiled the major findings from these studies.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The review describes the concerns related to candidiasis, its current treatment strategy, resistance mechanisms and imminent ways to tackle the problem. The review explored that natural plant extracts and essential oils could act as sources of newer therapeutic agents, however, the focus was on novel strategies, such as combinational therapy, new antibodies, utilization of photodynamic therapy and adaptive transfer primed immune cells with emphasis on the development of effective vaccination.

Clinical Utility of Current NNRTIs and Perspectives of New Agents in This Class under Development

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly reduced the number of deaths caused by AIDS. However, the antiviral efficacy of HAART comprising protease inhibitors (PIs) and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is frequently accompanied by a decrease in patients' quality of life. PI-based therapies often fail due to poor adherence caused by heavy pill burden, complex dosing schedules and undesirable side effects. The current trend is to switch from PI-based to PI-sparing regimens consisting of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and NRTIs. Despite some encouraging results from NNRTI-containing therapies, two major concerns in using the currently available NNRTIs remain: 1) low genetic barrier to the emergence of resistance and 2) cross-resistance due to single mutations that often render the whole class of NNRTIs ineffective. Clearly, new and improved NNRTIs are needed to address these concerns.

Outcome of neuropsychiatric symptoms related to an antiretroviral drug following its substitution by nevirapine: the RELAX study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate the improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms attributed to an antiretroviral drug after that drug was substituted with nevirapine. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact on patient adherence and quality of life.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was carried out that included patients with HIV-1 plasma suppression for whom an antiretroviral drug was substituted with nevirapine because of central nervous system (CNS) side effects, a Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score > 5 or a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score ≥ 10, and who had not initiated psychoactive drug treatment during the prior 6 weeks. Evaluations were carried out at baseline and 1 and 3 months after the switch using the PSQI, HADS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 30 items (MOS-SF-30) and Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ).

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients were included in the study. The drug substituted was mainly efavirenz (89.9%), and reasons for the switch included sleep disturbances (75.2%), anxiety (65.1%), depression (38.7%), attention disturbances (31%), and other reasons (31%), with a mean of 2.4 neuropsychiatric disturbances per patient. A statistically significant improvement was observed in all the tests evaluating neuropsychiatric symptoms and adherence at 1 and 3 months. The CD4 lymphocyte count remained stable (P = 0.096). Three (2.3%) patients had a detectable plasma HIV-1 RNA at the end of the study. Nine patients (6.9%) withdrew because of nevirapine-related toxicity (rash in seven patients and hypertransaminasaemia in two patients, none of which were > grade 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The switch to nevirapine from a drug causing neuropsychiatric disturbances (primarily efavirenz) in subjects with virological suppression was effective in resolving those disturbances, with an improvement in all the parameters studied. This led to better adherence to treatment and quality of life, with no detrimental effect on their immunological and virological control.

Quality of life in patients treated with first-line antiretroviral therapy containing nevirapine or efavirenz in Uganda: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND

The goal of antiretroviral therapy (ART) is to suppress viral replication, reduce morbidity and mortality, and improve quality of life (QoL). For resource-limited settings, the World Health Organization recommends a first-line regimen of two-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors and one non-nucleoside transcriptase inhibitor (nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV)). There are few data comparing the QoL impact of NVP versus EFV. This study assessed the change in QoL and factors associated with QoL among HIV patients receiving ART regimens based on EFV or NVP.

METHODS

We enrolled 640 people with HIV eligible for ART who received regimens including either NVP or EFV. QoL was assessed at baseline, three months and six months using Physical Health Summary (PHS) and Mental Health Summary (MHS) scores and the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI). Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations, with ART regimen as the primary exposure, to identify associations between patient and disease factors and QoL.

RESULTS

QoL increased on ART. The mean QoL scores did not differ significantly for regimens based on NVP versus EFV during follow-up for MHS and GPGI regardless of CD4 stratum and for PHS among patients with a CD4 count >250 cells/μL. The PHS-adjusted β coefficients for ART regimens based on EFV versus NVP by CD4 count strata were as follows: -1.61 (95% CI -2.74, -0.49) for CD4 count <100 cells/μL; 0.82 (0.22, 1.43) for CD4 count 101-250 cells/μL; and -1.33 (-5.66, 3.00) for CD4 count >250 cells/μL. The corresponding MHS-adjusted β coefficients were as follows: -0.39 (-1.40, 0.62) for CD4 < 100 cells/μL; 0.16 (-0.66, 0.98) for CD4 count 101-250 cells/μL; and -0.75 (-2.01, 0.51) for CD4 count >250 cells/μL. The GPGI-adjusted odds ratios for EFV versus NVP were 0.51 (0.25, 1.04) for CD4 count <100 cells/μL, 0.98 (0.60, 1.58) for CD4 count 101-250 cells/μL, 1.39 (0.66, 2.90) for CD4 > 250 cells/μL. QoL improved among patients on EFV over the 6-month follow-up period (MHS p < 0.001; PHS p = 0.04, p = 0.028). Overall, patients with depression (PHS p < 0.001; GPGI p < 0.001) had lower scores and women had lower MHS (on NVP, p = 0.001). Other factors associated with lower QoL included alcohol use, low education level and advanced HIV disease.

CONCLUSIONS

ART improves QoL. The results support use of either NVP or EFV. Patients initiating ART should be assessed for depression and managed appropriately. Women may require extra support to improve their QoL.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of NNRTI Within the Central Nervous System

PURPOSE

To find out about the long-term safety and efficacy of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) within the central nervous system (CNS) in the context of reports suggesting a higher incidence of severe neuropsychiatric disorders resulting from HIV treatment with efavirenz (EFV).

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of a large cohort with regular neuropsychiatric follow-up. We compared 414 patients on EFV and 320 on nevirapine (NVP) with regard to CD4 cell count, HIV plasma viral burden, CNS dysfunction described by psychomotor speed, HIV dementia scale, neuropsychological tests assessing memory and attention, self-reported psychiatric and somatic complaints, depression, and psychosis.

RESULTS

No significant differences between both types of NNRTI treatment regimens were found with regard to duration of therapy and reasons for withdrawal: virological failure, neurological failure, and neuropsychiatric side effects including the manifestation of depression, psychosis, insomnia, or other self-reported complaints.

CONCLUSION

The present data do not provide evidence for a higher incidence of light and/or severe neuropsychiatric side effects associated with NNRTI treatment.

Limitations of a Simplification Antiretroviral Strategy for HIV-Infected Patients with Decreasing Adherence to a Protease Inhibitor Regimen

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term efficacy of a simplification strategy in the clinical setting when used to improve adherence.

METHOD

Prospective study of 70 patients included in a regimen with ddI plus 3TC plus an NNRTI, after viral suppression with a PI-containing regimen, due to decreasing adherence. Adherence to PI was calculated as the percentage of doses taken last week before inclusion, and patients were stratified as high and low adherence (95% and <95% of doses).

RESULTS

Overall, 19 patients (27%) related adherence to PI <95% at inclusion (6 patients [9%], with adherence <80%). Mean adherence improved, with only 8% of patients presenting values <95%. At 104 weeks, 88% of patients on therapy had viral load suppression, but only 43% by ITT analysis. The main cause of therapy change or withdrawal was toxicity or drug interactions (26%). Notably, 16% of patients were lost to follow-up or left therapy, especially in the group of initially low adherent (26% vs. 12%, p = .02).

CONCLUSION

The use of a simplification strategy could be associated with long-term high risk of treatment failure, when used to improve adherence in the clinical setting.

Lipid-lowering effect and efficacy after switching to etravirine in HIV-infected patients with intolerance to suppressive HAART

PURPOSE

Etravirine (ETR) has shown a good lipid profile in previous studies. The aim of this study was to determine the virologic, immunologic, and lipid outcome in HIV-infected patients switching to an ETR-based antiretroviral regimen due to intolerance or toxicity.

METHODS

Observational cohort study of 125 HIV-infected patients who switched therapy to an ETR-based regimen. The lipid profile, including total triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was compared after 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients changed from efavirenz (n = 34; 28%) and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (PI/r; 67 cases: 21 atazanavir, 21 lopinavir, 11 fosamprenavir, 14 darunavir). Hyperlipidemia was the cause in only 22 patients (18%). At 24 weeks, a significant decrease was observed in mean TC level (-8%), LDL-C (-8%), TC:HDL ratio (-6%), and TG level (-20%). For patients receiving previously efavirenz, there was a significant reduction in TC (-23 mg/dL; -13%) and LDL-C (-25 mg/dL; -21%) levels and a trend to a better TG level (-38 mg/dL; -21%;P = .06). In the case of prior PI/r therapy, there was also a significant reduction in TC (-14 mg/dL; -6%) and TG levels (-58 mg/dL; -16%), mostly in prior lopinavir- or fosamprenavir-based therapy (TC -15%; TG -53%). Median CD4+ count increased from 513 to 621 cells/µL (P = .03), and there were only 3 cases of virologic failure (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients switching to an ETR-containing regimen, there is a significant improvement of lipids and maintenance of immunologic and virologic response. This lipid-lowering effect was irrespective of the presence of previous hyperlipidemia and for patients receiving different antiretroviral drugs.

Randomised study to assess the efficacy and safety of once-daily etravirine-based regimen as a switching strategy in HIV-infected patients receiving a protease inhibitor-containing regimen. Etraswitch study

Background

Etravirine (ETR) was approved for patients with virological failure and antiretroviral resistance mutations. It has also shown antiviral efficacy in antiretroviral-naïve patients. However, data on the switching from protease inhibitors (PI) to ETR are lacking.

Methods

HIV-1-infected patients with suppressed viral load (VL) during a PI-containing regimen (>12 months) and no previous virological failure were randomized to switch from the PI to ETR (400 mg/day, dissolved in water) (ETR group, n = 22) or to continue with the same regimen (control group, n = 21). Percentage of patients with VL≤50 copies/mL were assessed at week 48, as well as changes in CD4 T-cell counts and metabolic profile.

Results

We included 43 patients [72.9% male, 46.3 (42.2; 50.6) years]. Two patients receiving ETR (grade-1 diarrhea and voluntary discontinuation) and another in the control group (simplification) discontinued therapy early. No patients presented virological failure (two consecutive VL>50 copies/mL); treatment was successful in 95.2% of the control group and 90.9% of the ETR group (intention-to-treat analysis, missing = failure) (p = 0.58). CD4+ T-cell counts did not significantly vary [+49 cells/µL in the ETR group (p = 0.25) and −4 cells/µL in the control group (p = 0.71)]. The ETR group showed significant reductions in cholesterol (p<0.001), triglycerides (p = <0.001), and glycemia (p = 0.03) and higher satisfaction (0–10 scale) (p = 0.04). Trough plasma concentrations of ETR were similar to observed in studies using ETR twice daily.

Conclusion

Switch from a PI-based regimen to a once-daily combination based on ETR maintained undetectable VL during 48 weeks in virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients while lipid profile and patient satisfaction improved significantly.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01034917

Serious Non-AIDS events: Immunopathogenesis and interventional strategies

Despite the major advances in the management of HIV infection, HIV-infected patients still have greater morbidity and mortality than the general population. Serious non-AIDS events (SNAEs), including non-AIDS malignancies, cardiovascular events, renal and hepatic disease, bone disorders and neurocognitive impairment, have become the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the antiretroviral therapy (ART) era. SNAEs occur at the rate of 1 to 2 per 100 person-years of follow-up. The pathogenesis of SNAEs is multifactorial and includes the direct effect of HIV and associated immunodeficiency, underlying co-infections and co-morbidities, immune activation with associated inflammation and coagulopathy as well as ART toxicities. A number of novel strategies such as ART intensification, treatment of co-infection, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs and agents that reduce microbial translocation are currently being examined for their potential effects in reducing immune activation and SNAEs. However, currently, initiation of ART before advanced immunodeficiency, smoking cessation, optimisation of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment of HCV infection are most strongly linked with reduced risk of SNAEs or mortality. Clinicians should therefore focus their attention on addressing these issues prior to the availability of further data.

[Consensus Statement by GeSIDA/National AIDS Plan Secretariat on antiretroviral treatment in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (Updated January 2013)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) guidelines for HIV-1 infected adult patients.

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations a panel composed of members of the GeSIDA/National AIDS Plan Secretariat (Grupo de Estudio de Sida and the Secretaría del Plan Nacional sobre el Sida) reviewed the efficacy and safety advances in clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in medical journals (PubMed and Embase) or presented in medical scientific meetings. The strength of the recommendations and the evidence which support them are based on a modification of the criteria of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

RESULTS

cART is recommended in patients with symptoms of HIV infection, in pregnant women, in serodiscordant couples with high risk of transmission, in hepatitisB co-infection requiring treatment, and in HIV nephropathy. cART is recommended in asymptomatic patients if CD4 is <500cells/μl. If CD4 are >500cells/μl cART should be considered in the case of chronic hepatitisC, cirrhosis, high cardiovascular risk, plasma viral load >100.000 copies/ml, proportion of CD4 cells <14%, neurocognitive deficits, and in people aged >55years. The objective of cART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. The first cART should include 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTI) nucleoside analogs and a third drug (a non-analog RTI, a ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor, or an integrase inhibitor). The panel has consensually selected some drug combinations, for the first cART and specific criteria for cART in acute HIV infection, in tuberculosis and other HIV related opportunistic infections, for the women and in pregnancy, in hepatitisB or C co-infection, in HIV-2 infection, and in post-exposure prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

These new guidelines update previous recommendations related to first cART (when to begin and what drugs should be used), how to monitor, and what to do in case of viral failure or adverse drug reactions. cART specific criteria in comorbid patients and special situations are similarly updated.

Neurotoxicity of antiretroviral therapy

The neurological outcome of HIV infection has changed dramatically in the era of HAART. Despite effective suppression of plasma viral load and a substantial decrease in the incidence of HIV-associated dementia, neurocognitive impairment and peripheral neuropathy remain widespread. The neurotoxic side effects of antiretroviral (ARV) agents are among several contributing factors to this continued prevalence. Effective penetration of the CNS by ARV agents is paramount to treating neurological symptoms as well as systemic infection, but may also exacerbate the severity of drug-related neurotoxicity. The neurotoxic side effects of ARV agents vary widely between and within drug classes. The risks and benefits of combination regimens continue to evolve as more effective treatment protocols are developed.

Lipid profiles in young HIV-infected children initiating and changing antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Both HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy are associated with dyslipidemias in adults, but there are fewer data on outcomes in young children. Here we examined lipid profile changes in a cohort of young children before and after suppression on an initial ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r)-based regimen and after switch to a nevirapine (NVP)-based regimen.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-five HIV-infected children who initiated LPV/r-based therapy when <24 months of age at 1 site in Johannesburg, South Africa, and who achieved viral suppression (<400 copies/mL sustained for ≥ 3 months) were randomized to either continue on the LPV/r-based regimen (n = 99) or to switch to a NVP-based regimen (n = 96). Nonfasting concentrations of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglycerides (TG) were measured pretreatment, at randomization when suppressed, and at 9, 20, and 31 months postrandomization.

RESULTS

Median age at treatment initiation was 9 months, and the initial regimen was maintained for an average of 9 months before randomization. TC, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL increased from pretreatment to randomization (P < 0.0001) and TC/HDL ratio and TG decreased (P < 0.0001). After switching to NVP, HDL was significantly higher (P < 0.02) and TC/HDL and TG significantly lower (P < 0.0001) through 31 months postswitch relative to remaining on the LPV/r-based regimen.

CONCLUSION

Initiating antiretroviral therapy was associated with changes to a more favorable lipid profile in young children. Switching from a LPV/r-based regimen to a NVP-based regimen accentuated and continued these improvements. Investigation of safe and effective methods for managing dyslipidemias in children of different ages in resource-limited settings is warranted.

[Consensus document of Gesida and Spanish Secretariat for the National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) regarding combined antiretroviral treatment in adults infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (January 2012)]

This consensus document has been prepared by a panel consisting of members of the AIDS Study Group (Gesida) and the Spanish Secretariat for the National Plan on AIDS (SPNS) after reviewing the efficacy and safety results of clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in medical journals, or presented in medical scientific meetings. Gesida has prepared an objective and structured method to prioritise combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in naïve patients. Recommendations strength (A, B, C) and the evidence which supports them (I, II, III) are based on a modification of the Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria. The current antiretroviral treatment (ART) of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs. ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection, in pregnancy, in serodiscordant couples with high transmission risk, hepatitis B fulfilling treatment criteria, and HIV nephropathy. Guidelines on ART treatment in patients with concurrent diagnosis of HIV infection and an opportunistic type C infection are included. In asymptomatic patients ART is recommended on the basis of CD4 lymphocyte counts, plasma viral load and patient co-morbidities, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4 counts <350 cells/μL; 2) when CD4 counts are between 350 and 500 cells/μL, therapy will be recommended and only delayed if patient is reluctant to take it, the CD4 are stabilised, and the plasma viral load is low; 3) therapy could be deferred when CD4 counts are above 500 cells/μL, but should be considered in cases of cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, high cardiovascular risk, plasma viral load >10(5) copies/mL, proportion of CD4 cells <14%, and in people aged >55 years. ART should include 2 reverse transcriptase inhibitors nucleoside analogues and a third drug (non-analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor or integrase inhibitor). The panel has consensually selected and given priority to using the Gesida score for some drug combinations, some of them co-formulated. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited after ART failures, but an undetectable viral load may be possible nowadays. Adverse events are a fading problem of ART. Guidelines in acute HIV infection, in women, in pregnancy, and to prevent mother-to-child transmission and pre- and post-exposition prophylaxis are commented upon. Management of hepatitis B or C co-infection, other co-morbidities, and the characteristics of ART in HIV-2 infection are included.

Metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected Taiwanese patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: prevalence and associated factors

OBJECTIVES

Metabolic complications related to antiretroviral therapy are rarely investigated among HIV-infected patients in Asian countries. We investigated the prevalence of and factors associated with metabolic syndrome among HIV-infected patients who are ethnic Chinese in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART).

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed to collect information on the demographic and clinical characteristics and antiretroviral therapy prescribed in 877 HIV-infected patients at a university hospital in Taiwan from May 2008 to April 2009. The modified Adult Treatment Panel III criteria were used to define metabolic syndrome after adjusting for the waist circumference criteria for Asians.

RESULTS

Of the 877 patients, 75.3% were male homosexuals, 80.7% were receiving HAART and 88.7% had CD4 counts ≥ 200 cells/mm(3). Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed in 210 patients (26.2%). After adjusting for age, gender, smoking status, family history of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and hypertension, and baseline CD4 and plasma HIV RNA load, use of protease inhibitors (PIs) was significantly associated with the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.10-2.43). In addition, exposure to PI for ≥ 3 years, to HAART for ≥ 6 years and to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) for ≥ 6 years was significantly associated with the presence of metabolic syndrome with an adjusted OR of 1.96 (95% CI 1.13-3.42), 1.78 (95% CI 1.03-3.07), and 1.91 (95% CI 1.11-3.30), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-fourth of HIV-infected Taiwanese patients developed metabolic syndrome in the HAART era. Receipt of HAART and prolonged exposure to PI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor(s) were associated with metabolic syndrome.

Antiretroviral therapy for children in resource-limited settings: current regimens and the role of newer agents

WHO antiretroviral treatment guidelines for HIV-infected children have influenced the design of treatment programmes in resource-limited settings. This review analyses the latest WHO first- and second-line regimen recommendations. The recommendation to use lopinavir/ritonavir-containing first-line regimens in young children with prior non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) exposure is based on good quality evidence. Recent research suggests that lopinavir/ritonavir-containing first-line regimens should be extended to all young children, irrespective of prior NNRTI exposure. Strategies for overcoming the adverse metabolic effects of rifampicin-containing anti-tuberculosis therapy on antiretroviral therapy regimens have been under-researched in HIV-infected children, creating uncertainty about global recommendations. Preferred second-line recommendations are largely predictable. The exception is that NNRTI-containing second-line regimens are recommended for children previously exposed to NNRTIs and who subsequently did not respond to lopinavir/ritonavir-containing first-line therapy. In these patients, second-line regimens containing newer protease inhibitors (PIs) such as darunavir and tipranavir, or integrase inhibitors such as raltegravir, should be evaluated. Newer antiretroviral agents including second-generation NNRTIs and PIs, C-C chemokine receptor type 5 inhibitors, and integrase inhibitors may assist in further refinement of existing regimen options.

Hypertriglyceridemia, Metabolic Syndrome, and Cardiovascular Disease in HIV-Infected Patients: Effects of Antiretroviral Therapy and Adipose Tissue Distribution

The use of combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) in HIV-infected patients has resulted in a dramatic decline in AIDS-related mortality. However, mortality due to non-AIDS conditions, particularly cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems to increase in this population. CART has been associated with several metabolic risk factors, including insulin resistance, low HDL-cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia and postprandial hyperlipidemia. In addition, HIV itself, as well as specific antiretroviral agents, may further increase cardiovascular risk by interfering with endothelial function. As the HIV population is aging, CVD may become an increasingly growing health problem in the future. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors is warranted in this population. This paper reviews the contribution of both, HIV infection and CART, to insulin resistance, postprandial hyperlipidemia and cardiovascular risk in HIV-infected patients. Strategies to reduce cardiovascular risk are also discussed.

Nevirapine induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome in an HIV infected patient

Nevirapine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is widely prescribed as a part of the combination therapy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because of its efficacy and good tolerability. Here, we report a case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) secondary to nevirapine. The patient had a diffuse, exfoliating exanthema with generalized bullous eruptions that involved the face, trunk and both extremities with elevated hepatic alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase enzyme activities. The condition improved with stoppage of nevirapine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen, so we attributed this adverse event to nevirapine. A strict vigilance of adverse drug reaction is required in HAART.

Nevirapine once daily: pharmacology, metabolic profile and efficacy data of the new extended-release formulation

INTRODUCTION

Nevirapine (NVP), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, has been an important component of HIV infection treatment for many years. Currently, twice-a-day dosing is required for the successful application of NVP immediate release (IR), but there is potential for a more convenient once-a-day antiretroviral combination.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this article is to review the recent data on once-daily NVP extended release (XR) looking at all the important pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic and clinical data on NVP IR/XR through a systematic MEDLINE database search as well as a review of abstracts presented at international HIV meetings on NVP XR studies up to December 2010. The article provides the reader with an overview of all the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic aspects of NVP IR/XR, as well as its preclinical and clinical efficacy and its safety.

EXPERT OPINION

NVP XR is as effective as NVP IR among HIV-infected patients with a similar safety profile. NVP XR requires careful monitoring during initiation, but its favorable lipid profile may be of clinical benefit in reducing the risk for coronary artery disease in HIV-infected patients who are receiving long-term antiretroviral therapy. Further research is needed to predict short-term toxicity.

HIV and HAART-Associated Dyslipidemia

Effective highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) infection has led to marked improvement in life-expectancy for those infected with HIV. Despite reductions in the incidence of AIDS with effective treatment, patients continue to experience considerable morbidity and mortality from non-AIDS illness such as premature cardiovascular disease, liver failure and renal failure. These morbidities, particularly premature cardiovascular disease, are thought to be related to a combination of the effects of an ageing HIV-infected population coupled with long-term effects of HIV infection and antiretroviral therapy (ART). One of the principle drivers behind the well documented increase in the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients is dyslipidemia.

This review will focus on the clinical presentation of HIV and ART-associated dyslipidemia, what is known of its patho-physiology, including associations with use of specific antiretroviral medications, and suggest screening and management strategies.

Long-term CD4+ T-cell count evolution after switching from regimens including HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) plus protease inhibitors to regimens containing NRTI plus non-NRTI or only NRTI

Background

Data regarding CD4+ recovery after switching from protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens to regimens not containing PI are scarce.

Methods

Subjects with virological success on first-PI-regimens who switched to NNRTI therapy (NNRTI group) or to nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI)-only (NRTI group) were studied. The effect of the switch on the ongoing CD4+ trend was assessed by two-phase linear regression (TPLR), allowing us to evaluate whether a change in the CD4+ trend (hinge) occurred and the time of its occurrence. Furthermore, we described the evolution of the frequencies in CD4-count classes across four relevant time-points (baseline, before and immediately after the switch, and last visit). Finally, we explored whether the CD4+ counts evolved differently in patients who switched to NNRTI or NRTI-only regimens by considering: the overall CD4+ trends, the time to CD4+≥ 500/mm³ after the switch, and the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the CD4+ after the switch.

Results

Eight hundred and ninety-six patients, followed for a median of 2,121 days, were included. At TPLR, hinges occurred in 581/844 (68.9%), but in only 40/581 (6.9%) within a time interval (180 days) compatible with a possible relationship to the switch; furthermore, in 19/40 cases, CD4+ counts appeared to decrease after the hinges. In comparison with the NNRTI group, the NRTI group showed CD4+ count greater at baseline (P = 0.0234) and before the switch (P ≤ 0.0001), superior CD4+ T-cell increases after HAART was started, lower probability of not achieving CD4+ ≥ 500/mm³ (P = 0.0024), and, finally, no significant differences in the CD4+ T-cell AUC after the switch after adjusting for possible confounders (propensity score and pre-switch AUC). Persistence at CD4+ < 200/mm³ was observed in 34/435 (7.5%) patients, and a decrease below this level was found in only 10/259 (3.9%) with baseline CD4+ ≥ 350/mm³.

Conclusions

Switching from first-line PI to NNRTI- or NRTI-based regimens did not seem to impair CD4+ trend over long-term follow-up. Although the greater CD4+ increases in patients who switched to the NRTI-only regimen was due to higher CD4+ counts before the switch, several statistical analyses consistently showed that switching to this regimen did not damage the ongoing immune-reconstitution. Lastly, the observation that CD4+ T-cell counts remained low or decreased in the long term despite virological success merits further investigation.

Cardiovascular risk factors in patients on long-term treatment with nevirapine- or efavirenz-based regimens

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cardiovascular risk among patients treated for more than 5 years with regimens based on nevirapine or efavirenz.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 276 patients were retrospectively evaluated, 156 of whom were treated with nevirapine and 120 with efavirenz, by examining traditional risk factors and detecting the presence of subclinical carotid lesions with colour-Doppler ultrasonography.

RESULTS

When comparing the data at baseline and follow-up in the nevirapine group, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) and triglycerides showed a significant decrease, while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased. Ultrasound data, obtained in a subgroup of 67 patients, did not show significant changes for those treated with nevirapine. In the efavirenz group, total cholesterol, LDLc, triglycerides, glycaemia, body mass index and the number of patients with a pathological ultrasound significantly increased. When comparing the two groups at baseline and follow-up, nevirapine patients had significantly higher values of total cholesterol, LDLc and triglycerides at baseline, while total cholesterol and LDLc differed non-significantly at follow-up; triglycerides became significantly lower in the nevirapine arm with respect to the efavirenz group. Glycaemia was comparable between the two groups at baseline, while it was significantly lower in the nevirapine group at follow-up. The number of pathological ultrasound findings was significantly higher in the efavirenz group at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with nevirapine demonstrated a better lipid and glucose profile and a lower tendency to develop subclinical atherosclerotic lesions.

Lipid Metabolism and Cardiovascular Risk in HIV-1 Infection and HAART: Present and Future Problems

Many infections favor or are directly implicated with lipid metabolism perturbations and/or increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). HIV itself has been shown to increase lipogenesis in the liver and to alter the lipid profile, while the presence of unsafe habits, addiction, comorbidities, and AIDS-related diseases increases substantially the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the HIV-infected population. Antiretroviral therapy reduces such stimuli but many drugs have intrinsic toxicity profiles impacting on metabolism or potential direct cardiotoxicity. In a moment when the main guidelines of HIV therapy are predating the point when to start treating, we mean to highlight the contribution of HIV-1 to lipid alteration and inflammation, the impact of antiretroviral therapy, the decisions on what drugs to use to reduce the probability of having a cardiovascular event, the increasing use of statins and fibrates in HIV-1 infected subjects, and finally the switch strategies, that balance effectiveness and toxicity to move the decision to change HIV drugs. Early treatment might reduce the negative effect of HIV on overall cardiovascular risk but may also evidence the impact of drugs, and the final balance (reduction or increase in CHD and lipid abnormalities) is not known up to date.

Reuse of nevirapine in exposed HIV-infected children after protease inhibitor-based viral suppression: a randomized controlled trial

CONTEXT

Protease inhibitor (PI)-based therapy is recommended for infants infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were exposed to nevirapine for prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission. However, there are limitations of continuing PI-based therapy indefinitely and reuse of nevirapine has many advantages.

OBJECTIVE

To test whether nevirapine-exposed infants who initially achieve viral suppression with PI-based therapy can maintain viral suppression when switched to nevirapine-based therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Randomized trial conducted between April 2005 and May 2009 at a hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, among 195 children who achieved viral suppression less than 400 copies/mL for 3 or more months from a cohort of 323 nevirapine-exposed children who initiated PI-based therapy before 24 months of age.

INTERVENTIONS

Control group children continued to receive ritonavir-boosted lopinavir, stavudine, and lamivudine (n = 99). Switch group children substituted nevirapine for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (n = 96).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Children were followed up for 52 weeks after randomization. Plasma HIV-1 RNA of greater than 50 copies/mL was the primary end point. Confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL was used as a criterion to consider regimen changes for children in either group (safety end point).

RESULTS

Plasma viremia greater than 50 copies/mL occurred less frequently in the switch group (Kaplan-Meier probability, 0.438; 95% CI, 0.334-0.537) than in the control group (0.576; 95% CI, 0.470-0.668) (P = .02). Confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL occurred more frequently in the switch group (0.201; 95% CI, 0.125-0.289) than in the control group (0.022; 95% CI, 0.004-0.069) (P < .001). CD4 cell response was better in the switch group (median CD4 percentage at 52 weeks, 34.7) vs the control group (CD4 percentage, 31.3) (P = .004). Older age (relative hazard [RH], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.08-2.72) was associated with viremia greater than 50 copies/mL in the control group. Inadequate adherence (RH, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.18-14.57) and drug resistance (RH, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.40-11.65) before treatment were associated with confirmed viremia greater than 1000 copies/mL in the switch group.

CONCLUSION

Among HIV-infected children previously exposed to nevirapine, switching to nevirapine-based therapy after achieving viral suppression with a ritonavir-boosted lopinavir regimen resulted in lower rates of viremia greater than 50 copies/mL than maintaining the primary ritonavir-boosted lopinavir regimen.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00117728.

Better health-related quality of life after switching from a virologically effective regimen to a regimen containing efavirenz or nevirapine

Switching antiretroviral therapy has been shown as safe and effective, but its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL) was rarely measured. Our objective was to assess changes in HRQL after switching to an non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) containing regimen among NNRTI-naive HIV-infected patients with viral load (VL) <500 copies/mL. In this prospective observational study, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression, Symptoms checklist, specific World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQoL) and generic SF-12v2 HRQL questionnaires were used to assess anxiety, depression, symptoms, and HRQL at baseline and months 1 (M1), 6 (M6), and 12 (M12). The statistical significance of changes in the frequency of anxiety and depression was determined with the McNemar test. Mean changes in the number of symptoms and in HRQL scores were compared using Wilcoxon's paired test. Data were available for 239 patients at baseline (162 with a switch to nevirapine) and for 164 patients at M6. The median age of the patients was 42 years and 67% of patients were male. The proportion of anxious patients diminished at M6 (11%, P=0.02) but not yet at M1. There was no change in the frequency of depression. Significant reductions (p<0.01) were observed at M6 in the mean number of all symptoms (-3.3), lipodystrophy symptoms (-0.8), other symptoms (-2.5), bothersome symptoms (-1.7), bothersome lipodystrophy symptoms (-0.4), and bothersome other symptoms (-1.3). HRQL as assessed with WHOQoL, improved in the physical, independence, and spirituality domains, with a small effect sizes at M6. Both for symptoms and HRQL, these changes were already significant at M1 and persisted at M12. This study shows that in patients with controlled VL, switching to an NNRTI regimen was associated with less anxiety, fewer perceived symptoms, and a small improvement in HRQL, while maintaining virological suppression.

[AIDS Study Group/Spanish AIDS Plan consensus document on antiretroviral therapy in adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection (updated January 2010)]

OBJECTIVE

This consensus document is an update of antiretroviral therapy recommendations for adult patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

METHODS

To formulate these recommendations a panel made up of members of the Grupo de Estudio de Sida (Gesida, AIDS Study Group) and the Plan Nacional sobre el Sida (PNS, Spanish AIDS Plan) reviewed the advances in the current understanding of the pathophysiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the efficacy and safety of clinical trials, and cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals or presented at scientific meetings. Three levels of evidence were defined according to the data source: randomized studies (level A), cohort or case-control studies (level B), and expert opinion (level C). The decision to recommend, consider or not to recommend ART was established in each situation.

RESULTS

Currently, the treatment of choice for chronic HIV infection is the combination of three drugs of two different classes, including 2 nucleosides or nucleotide analogs (NRTI) plus 1 non-nucleoside (NNRTI) or 1 boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r), but other combinations are possible. Initiation of ART is recommended in patients with symptomatic HIV infection. In asymptomatic patients, initiation of ART is recommended on the basis of CD4 lymphocyte counts, plasma viral load and patient co-morbidities, as follows: 1) therapy should be started in patients with CD4 counts below 350 cells/microl; 2) When CD4 counts are between 350 and 500 cells/microl, therapy should be started in case of cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis C, high cardiovascular risk, HIV nephropathy, HIV viral load above 100,000 copies/ml, proportion of CD4 cells under 14%, and in people aged over 55; 3) Therapy should be deferred when CD4 are above 500 cells/microl, but could be considered if any of previous considerations concurs. Treatment should be initiated in case of hepatitis B requiring treatment and should be considered for reduce sexual transmission. The objective of ART is to achieve an undetectable viral load. Adherence to therapy plays an essential role in maintaining antiviral response. Therapeutic options are limited after ART failures but undetectable viral loads maybe possible with the new drugs even in highly drug experienced patients. Genotype studies are useful in these situations. Drug toxicity of ART therapy is losing importance as benefits exceed adverse effects. Criteria for antiretroviral treatment in acute infection, pregnancy and post-exposure prophylaxis are mentioned as well as the management of HIV co-infection with hepatitis B or C.

CONCLUSIONS

CD4 cells counts, viral load and patient co-morbidities are the most important reference factors to consider when initiating ART in asymptomatic patients. The large number of available drugs, the increased sensitivity of tests to monitor viral load, and the ability to determine viral resistance is leading to a more individualized therapy approach in order to achieve undetectable viral load under any circumstances.

Antiretroviral therapy and cardiovascular risk: are some medications cardioprotective?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review addresses the associations between coronary heart disease and antiretroviral medications, with a specific focus on medications that appear to have neutral or positive effects on coronary heart disease risk factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have linked combination antiretroviral therapy with an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Often implicated are the effects of these medications on the metabolic risk factors for coronary heart disease, specifically lipids and glucose homeostasis. Many newer antiretrovirals have fewer metabolic side effects, and antiretrovirals in general may be cardioprotective by reducing inflammation. Whether use of specific antiretroviral regimens will translate into improved cardiovascular outcomes remains to be seen.

SUMMARY

Some antiretrovirals appear to be at least neutral with regards to coronary heart disease risk, but it is not clear if any are truly cardioprotective. Nonetheless, it is prudent to consider regimens with limited metabolic side effects in patients with pre-established coronary heart disease risk.

Impact of switching antiretroviral therapy on lipodystrophy and other metabolic complications: a review

Following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), metabolic and morphological complications known as HIV associated lipodystrophy syndrome (HALS) have been increasingly common. The approaches to target these complications span from resistance exercise, diet and use of the antidiabetics metformin or glitazones to high dose recombinant human growth hormone therapy or switching antiretroviral regimen. When looking at the effect of switching therapy, focus has been addressed to protease inhibitor (PI) based regimens, as PI was the first component of HAART recognized to be correlated with the disfiguring body-alterations known as HALS. More recently, however, regimens containing nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) have attracted attention. Reviewing switch studies regarding metabolic parameters and body shape changes, certain trends emerge. Switching from PI, the metabolic complications such as dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance seem to be partly reversible, whereas the morphologic alterations appear to be unchanged. In studies in which NRTI's are switched, dyslipidaemia appears unaffected, but a modest improvement in peripheral lipoatrophy has been reported. However the results are often inconsistent and difficult to interpret, mostly because of limitations in study design, patient number and duration of follow-up. The need for larger, controlled, randomized, long-term studies is evident.

Performance of 11 biomarkers for liver fibrosis assessment in HIV/HBV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 11 biochemical scores to estimate liver fibrosis in HIV/HBV co-infection.

METHODS

Performance was evaluated using the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve method. The Kappa index was used to study overall agreement with liver biopsy results. Interpretative algorithms were established by optimizing sensitivity and specificity and the percentage of correctly classified patients.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients (F0-F1, n = 47; F2, n = 28; F3, n = 17; F4, n = 16) were considered for the evaluation of serum biomarker performance. The AUROCs of the Fibrotest, Hepascore, Fibrometer, and Zeng's scores ranged from 0.74 to 0.77 for significant fibrosis (> or = F2), from 0.79 to 0.84 for advanced fibrosis (> or = F3) and from 0.87 to 0.92 for cirrhosis (F4). Thresholds defined for each stage of fibrosis were close to those previously published for the Fibrotest and Hepascore. Strict concordance with biopsies correctly classified 50% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrotest, Fibrometer, Hepascore, and Zeng's score were the most accurate non-invasive biochemical scores for liver fibrosis assessment in HIV/HBV co-infection. Global performance of biomarkers was not significantly improved by a decision tree combining the results of two biochemical scores.

Outcome of protease inhibitor substitution with nevirapine in HIV-1 infected children

BACKGROUND

Protease inhibitors (PIs) have been associated with metabolic complications. There is a trend to switch to simpler therapy to improve these disturbances. We report a case-series describing the effects in metabolic abnormalities in seven HIV-infected children, previously treated with protease inhibitor (PI) after switching to nevirapine.

METHODS

Seven children with stable PI-containing regimen and a long lasting HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml were switched to nevirapine. All patients were naïve to non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. PIs were switched to nevirapine. Preentry nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors were maintained. The substitution of PIs with nevirapine was made when the patient showed hyperlipidemia or lipodystrophy or the physician and/or the patient's willingness to simplify. Clinical, laboratory data and anthropometric parameters were assessed every 3 months. Dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry scans (DXA) was performed at baseline and at 12 months.

RESULTS

Seven HIV-infected children were enrolled. Median age: 130 months (99,177). Median baseline CD4%: 32%. All had HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/ml. Median length of preentry PI-therapy was 47 months (28, 91). Median age at the beginning of nevirapine was 120 months (99,177). Median decrease in cholesterol in 7.2 mmol/L was observed (P = 0.09), from baseline to 12 months. HDL-cholesterol increased in 5.1 mmol/L (P = 0.03) throughout the study period. No significant changes were observed in DXA with regard to body fat, but changes in total body bone mineral content and lean body content were significant. CD4% remained stable. All patients but one maintained viral load < 50 copies/ml at 12 months. The patient with virologic failure referred bad adherence. Children referred to take medication more easily.

CONCLUSION

PI substitution with nevirapine improved lipid profile in our patients, although this strategy did not show significant changes in body fat or lipodystrophy.

Use of Diet, Nutritional Supplements and Exercise in HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Combination Antiretroviral Therapies: A Systematic Review

Background

The use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has improved the prognosis of HIV infection, but it has also been linked to a spectrum of body composition changes and metabolic alterations known as the lipodystrophy syndrome. Nutritional status could influence body composition changes.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of published peer-reviewed data on the effects of diet, nutrition support and exercise on body composition and metabolic complications in patients receiving cART.

Results

Few controlled studies, most of them with small sample size, were found. Oral nutritional support increases protein and energy intake, and results in body weight and fat mass gains. Resistance exercise, with or without an aerobic component, increases lean mass and can improve insulin resistance. Low-fat diets or exercise can result in loss of fat mass, and they should be used with caution in subjects with lipoatrophy.

Conclusions

Nutritional support and exercise result in small but significant body composition changes and can be used as complementary interventions. There is a need for further research on nutritional interventions in HIV-infected patients receiving cART.

Efavirenz to nevirapine switch in HIV-1-infected patients with dyslipidemia: a randomized, controlled study

Many antiretroviral therapies, including efavirenz, are associated with increased serum concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In a small 52-week randomized study, we found that switching from efavirenz to nevirapine was associated with significantly decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, compared with continuation of efavirenz therapy (P<.04). A switch to nevirapine was associated with no severe adverse events.

Efavirenz: a review

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that in most treatment guidelines is recommended to be taken combined with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as a preferred first-line regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The antiretroviral efficacy of efavirenz-based combination regimens is good, as has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Efavirenz has a long plasma half-life, which allows for once-daily dosing, but, as a consequence of this and the low genetic barrier, it is also prone to select for viral resistance when adherence to therapy is suboptimal. The most frequently encountered side effects are neuropsychiatric symptoms. These side effects are usually transient, but have been shown to persist for up to 2 years after initiation of therapy in some patients. This review outlines important and recent pharmacological and clinical data, which explain why efavirenz became a component of preferred treatment regimens today.

Reasons for discontinuation of nevirapine-containing HAART: results from an unselected population of a large clinical cohort

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the frequency of and predictive factors for nevirapine-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) discontinuation.

METHODS

All patients receiving nevirapine as a component of HAART at our centre were retrospectively evaluated for efficacy and tolerability. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the influence of baseline characteristics on the outcome and Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates to evaluate time-dependent variables.

RESULTS

Between January 1999 and June 2006, 582 patients (72% males) received 744 nevirapine-based HAART regimens. Naive patients counted for 83 of these regimens; of the remaining 661 regimens administered to experienced patients, 306 were failing virologically and 355 were undergoing simplification strategies. A once-a-day schedule was used in 136 patients. The likelihood of maintaining the nevirapine-based regimen was statistically (P < 0.0001 in both cases) influenced by the patient's status (mean KM estimate of 812 days for virological failures, 1294 for naive patients and 1657 for treatment simplifications) and by the dosing schedule (once-daily 1315 days; twice-daily 1198 days). The most frequent reason for treatment discontinuation was resistance (17.5%) followed by reduced tolerability (16.3%), patient's decision (14%) and treatment strategies such as structured treatment interruptions (13.8%). During 10.2% of treatments, a grade 3 or greater increase in aminotransferase levels was observed, reflecting an overall incidence rate equal to 5.3 cases per 100 person-years. This lead to treatment discontinuation in 3.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Nevirapine, especially when used in simplification strategies, enables doctors to extend the use of HAART over a long period of time. The risk of drug-induced hepatotoxicity is low, but nevirapine should be used with caution in patients co-infected with hepatitis C virus or with elevated liver function tests. As with any decision to prescribe a drug, a careful evaluation of the potential risks and benefits of using nevirapine must be made for each individual.

Alteraciones lipídicas y riesgo cardiovascular asociado a la terapia antirretroviral

Dyslipidemia is common in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) and it is often associated with the use of specific antiretroviral drugs. The phenotypic profile can include elevated triglycerides or cholesterol alone, or mixed patterns with varying changes in LDL and HDL lipoproteins, which imply different levels of cardiovascular risk. Growing evidence indicates that ART-associated hyperlipidemia accelerates the development of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in HIV-infected patients. In recent years, a number of retrospective database reviews and prospective cohort studies have reported a higher incidence of coronary events in patients receiving ART, which seems to be closely related with the presence of dyslipidemia and the duration of exposure to ART. Although the clinical benefit of treating ART-related dyslipidemia remains unproven, most experts recommend a policy of cardiovascular disease prevention and management similar to that used in non-HIV-infected individuals. In addition, the use of antiretrovirals associated with a more favorable lipid profile is considered. Clinical experience with lipid-lowering therapy in HIV-infected patients is still limited, but there is increasing data confirming its efficacy and safety in this setting. Drug interactions should be taken into account when statins are used in patients receiving protease inhibitors.

Evaluation of nevirapine-switch strategies for HIV treatment

Despite the benefits of protease inhibitor (PI)-based HIV treatment, issues of tolerability, dosing frequency, pill count and long-term metabolic complications necessitate evaluation of alternate treatment strategies. The weight of evidence demonstrates that a switch from a PI-based regimen to one containing nevirapine can be accomplished safely while maintaining virological suppression. There is no immunological cost. There is probably an overall benefit in terms of the metabolic milieu.