Effects of the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamavir on otologic manifestations of experimental human influenza

A Brief History of Human Challenge Studies (1900-2021) Emphasising the Virology, Regulatory and Ethical Requirements, Raison D'etre, Ethnography, Selection of Volunteers and Unit Design

Venetian quarantine 400 years ago was an important public health measure. Since 1900 this has been refined to include "challenge" or deliberate infection with pathogens be they viruses, bacteria, or parasites. Our focus is virology and ranges from the early experiments in Cuba with Yellow Fever Virus to the most widespread pathogen of our current times, COVID-19. The latter has so far caused over four million deaths worldwide and 190 million cases of the disease. Quarantine and challenge were also used to investigate the Spanish Influenza of 1918 which caused over 100 million deaths. We consider here the merits of the approach, that is the speeding up of knowledge in a practical sense leading to the more rapid licensing of vaccines and antimicrobials. At the core of quarantine and challenge initiatives is the design of the unit to allow safe confinement of the pathogen and protection of the staff. Most important though is the safety of volunteers. We can see now, as in 1900, that members of our society are prepared and willing to engage in these experiments for the public good. Our ethnology study, where the investigator observed the experiment from within the quarantine, gave us the first indication of changing attitudes amongst volunteers whilst in quarantine. These quarantine experiments, referred to as challenge studies, human infection studies, or "controlled human infection models" involve thousands of clinical samples taken over two to three weeks and can provide a wealth of immunological and molecular data on the infection itself and could allow the discovery of new targets for vaccines and therapeutics. The Yellow Fever studies from 121 years ago gave the impetus for development of a successful vaccine still used today whilst also uncovering the nature of the Yellow Fever agent, namely that it was a virus. We outline how carefully these experiments are approached and the necessity to have high quality units with self-contained air-flow along with extensive personal protective equipment for nursing and medical staff. Most important is the employment of highly trained scientific, medical and nursing staff. We face a future of emerging pathogens driven by the increasing global population, deforestation, climate change, antibiotic resistance and increased global travel. These emerging pathogens may be pathogens we currently are not aware of or have not caused outbreaks historically but could also be mutated forms of known pathogens including viruses such as influenza (H7N9, H5N1 etc.) and coronaviruses. This calls for challenge studies to be part of future pandemic preparedness as an additional tool to assist with the rapid development of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, immunomodulators and new vaccines.

Antiviral Drugs in Influenza

Flu is a serious health, medical, and economic problem, but no therapy is yet available that has satisfactory results and reduces the occurrence of these problems. Nearly 20 years after the registration of the previous therapy, baloxavir marboxil, a drug with a new mechanism of action, recently appeared on the market. This is a promising step in the fight against the influenza virus. This article presents the possibilities of using all available antiviral drugs specific for influenza A and B. We compare all currently recommended anti-influenza medications, considering their mechanisms of action, administration, indications, target groups, effectiveness, and safety profiles. We demonstrate that baloxavir marboxil presents a similar safety and efficacy profile to those of drugs already used in the treatment of influenza. Further research on combination therapy is highly recommended and may have promising results.

The human viral challenge model: accelerating the evaluation of respiratory antivirals, vaccines and novel diagnostics

The Human Viral Challenge (HVC) model has, for many decades, helped in the understanding of respiratory viruses and their role in disease pathogenesis. In a controlled setting using small numbers of volunteers removed from community exposure to other infections, this experimental model enables proof of concept work to be undertaken on novel therapeutics, including vaccines, immunomodulators and antivirals, as well as new diagnostics.Crucially, unlike conventional phase 1 studies, challenge studies include evaluable efficacy endpoints that then guide decisions on how to optimise subsequent field studies, as recommended by the FDA and thus licensing studies that follow. Such a strategy optimises the benefit of the studies and identifies possible threats early on, minimising the risk to subsequent volunteers but also maximising the benefit of scarce resources available to the research group investing in the research. Inspired by the principles of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) now commonly applied in the preclinical phase, HVC studies allow refinement and reduction of the subsequent development phase, accelerating progress towards further statistically powered phase 2b studies. The breadth of data generated from challenge studies allows for exploration of a wide range of variables and endpoints that can then be taken through to pivotal phase 3 studies.We describe the disease burden for acute respiratory viral infections for which current conventional development strategies have failed to produce therapeutics that meet clinical need. The Authors describe the HVC model's utility in increasing scientific understanding and in progressing promising therapeutics through development.The contribution of the model to the elucidation of the virus-host interaction, both regarding viral pathogenicity and the body's immunological response is discussed, along with its utility to assist in the development of novel diagnostics.Future applications of the model are also explored.

Randomized controlled trials for influenza drugs and vaccines: a review of controlled human infection studies

OBJECTIVES

Controlled human infection, the intentional infection of healthy volunteers, allows disease pathogenesis to be studied and vaccines and therapeutic interventions to be evaluated in a controlled setting. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of countermeasures for influenza that used the experimental human infection platform was performed. The primary objective was to document the scope of trials performed to date and the main efficacy outcome in the trials. The secondary objective was to assess safety and identify serious adverse events.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for randomized controlled influenza human challenge studies with predetermined search terms. Review papers, papers without outcomes, community-acquired infections, duplicated data, pathogenesis studies, and observational studies were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-six randomized controlled trials published between 1947 and 2014 fit the study inclusion criteria. Two-thirds of these trials investigated antivirals and one-third investigated influenza vaccines. Among 2462 subjects inoculated with influenza virus, the incidence of serious adverse events was low (0.04%). These challenge studies helped to down-select three antivirals and one vaccine that were subsequently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled human infection studies are an important research tool in assessing promising influenza vaccines and antivirals. These studies are performed quickly and are cost-effective and safe, with a low incidence of serious adverse events.

[Modulation of transcriptomic signature of the infected host: a new therapeutic strategy for the management of severe viral infections? Example of the flu]

Ces dernières décennies ont été marquées par l’émergence ou la réémergence de virus responsables d’épidémies ou de pandémies plus ou moins sévères. Les stratégies préventives sont prises à défaut, et l’arsenal antiviral curatif est limité d’autant plus que les résistances virales peuvent apparaître rapidement. Par ailleurs, le développement de nouvelles molécules nécessite un délai incompatible avec la réponse rapide nécessaire lors d’une épidémie d’envergure ou d’une pandémie. C’est la raison pour laquelle de nouvelles approches thérapeutiques sont nécessaires. Un concept novateur est le repositionnement de molécules déjà sur le marché en exploitant leur capacité à inverser la réponse transcriptomique cellulaire de l’hôte infecté. En identifiant des molécules qui visent l’hôte et non le virus, cette stratégie permet d’avoir un large spectre d’action et d’être potentiellement actif sur de nouveaux variants. La mise en place de cette stratégie nécessite de caractériser les réponses cellulaires spécifiques de l’infection virale d’intérêt, de cribler in silico des molécules candidates, de les tester sur modèles cellulaires et animaux, avant d’envisager des essais cliniques chez l’homme. Nous présenterons cette démarche en prenant pour exemple l’infection grippale.

Accelerating Influenza Research: Vaccines, Antivirals, Immunomodulators and Monoclonal Antibodies. The Manufacture of a New Wild-Type H3N2 Virus for the Human Viral Challenge Model

BACKGROUND

Influenza and its associated diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends influenza vaccination for everyone over 6 months of age. The failure of the flu vaccine in 2014-2015 demonstrates the need for a model that allows the rapid development of novel antivirals, universal/intra-seasonal vaccines, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies and other novel treatments. To this end we manufactured a new H3N2 influenza virus in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice for use in the Human Viral Challenge Model.

METHODS AND STRAIN SELECTION

We chose an H3N2 influenza subtype, rather than H1N1, given that this strain has the most substantial impact in terms of morbidity or mortality annually as described by the Centre for Disease Control. We first subjected the virus batch to rigorous adventitious agent testing, confirmed the virus to be wild-type by Sanger sequencing and determined the virus titres appropriate for human use via the established ferret model. We built on our previous experience with other H3N2 and H1N1 viruses to develop this unique model.

HUMAN CHALLENGE AND CONCLUSIONS

We conducted an initial safety and characterisation study in healthy adult volunteers, utilising our unique clinical quarantine facility in London, UK. In this study we demonstrated this new influenza (H3N2) challenge virus to be both safe and pathogenic with an appropriate level of disease in volunteers. Furthermore, by inoculating volunteers with a range of different inoculum titres, we established the minimum infectious titre required to achieve reproducible disease whilst ensuring a sensitive model that can be translated to design of subsequent field based studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02525055.

Longitudinal study of influenza molecular viral shedding in Hutterite communities

BACKGROUND

The nature of influenza viral shedding during naturally acquired infection is not well understood.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted in Hutterite colonies in Alberta, Canada. Flocked nasal swabs were collected during 3 influenza seasons (2007-2008 to 2009-2010) from both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals infected with influenza. Samples were tested by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction for influenza A and influenza B, and the viral load (VL) was determined for influenza A positive samples.

RESULTS

Eight hundred thirty-nine participants were included in the cohort; 25% (208) tested positive for influenza viruses. They experienced 238 episodes of viral shedding, of which 23 (10%) were not accompanied by symptoms. For seasonal and pandemic H1N1, VL peaked at or before onset of acute respiratory infection. For H3N2, VL peaked 2 days after the onset of acute respiratory infection, which corresponded to peaks in systemic and respiratory symptom scores. Although the duration of shedding was shorter for asymptomatic participants, the peak level of VL shedding was similar to that of symptomatic participants. Viral loads for children and adults revealed similar patterns.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular viral shedding values follow symptom scores, but timing of peak VL varies by subtype. Asymptomatic infections are infrequent.

Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies

The dynamics of viral shedding and symptoms following influenza virus infection are key factors when considering epidemic control measures. The authors reviewed published studies describing the course of influenza virus infection in placebo-treated and untreated volunteers challenged with wild-type influenza virus. A total of 56 different studies with 1,280 healthy participants were considered. Viral shedding increased sharply between 0.5 and 1 day after challenge and consistently peaked on day 2. The duration of viral shedding averaged over 375 participants was 4.80 days (95% confidence interval: 4.31, 5.29). The frequency of symptomatic infection was 66.9% (95% confidence interval: 58.3, 74.5). Fever was observed in 37.0% of A/H1N1, 40.6% of A/H3N2 (p = 0.86), and 7.5% of B infections (p = 0.001). The total symptoms scores increased on day 1 and peaked on day 3. Systemic symptoms peaked on day 2. No such data exist for children or elderly subjects, but epidemiologic studies suggest that the natural history might differ. The present analysis confirms prior expert opinion on the duration of viral shedding or the frequency of asymptomatic influenza infection, extends prior knowledge on the dynamics of viral shedding and symptoms, and provides original results on the frequency of respiratory symptoms or fever.

Evolving role of leukotrienes in the pathogenesis of viral infections, including otitis media

Otitis media (OM) is one of the most common childhood disorders and has been associated with an alarming rise in prevalence. Because medical therapy with antibiotics, antihistamines, decongestants, and corticosteroids has no demonstrable efficacy in the treatment of OM, the mainstay of treatment is surgical intervention. Although effective, surgical treatment is quite expensive and exposes patients to the risks associated with general anesthesia. Results of recent studies suggest that locally produced leukotrienes may play a role in the pathogenesis of OM. As such, a potential candidate for treatment of OM is the leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, which has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of asthma and/or allergic rhinitis. If proven effective, this drug's safety/convenience profiles and indication for children as young as 6 months of age would make it suitable for treatment of OM, and perhaps even prophylaxis of OM in at-risk populations.

A 'small-world-like' model for comparing interventions aimed at preventing and controlling influenza pandemics

BACKGROUND

With an influenza pandemic seemingly imminent, we constructed a model simulating the spread of influenza within the community, in order to test the impact of various interventions.

METHODS

The model includes an individual level, in which the risk of influenza virus infection and the dynamics of viral shedding are simulated according to age, treatment, and vaccination status; and a community level, in which meetings between individuals are simulated on randomly generated graphs. We used data on real pandemics to calibrate some parameters of the model. The reference scenario assumes no vaccination, no use of antiviral drugs, and no preexisting herd immunity. We explored the impact of interventions such as vaccination, treatment/prophylaxis with neuraminidase inhibitors, quarantine, and closure of schools or workplaces.

RESULTS

In the reference scenario, 57% of realizations lead to an explosive outbreak, lasting a mean of 82 days (standard deviation (SD) 12 days) and affecting 46.8% of the population on average. Interventions aimed at reducing the number of meetings, combined with measures reducing individual transmissibility, would be partly effective: coverage of 70% of affected households, with treatment of the index patient, prophylaxis of household contacts, and confinement to home of all household members, would reduce the probability of an outbreak by 52%, and the remaining outbreaks would be limited to 17% of the population (range 0.8%-25%). Reactive vaccination of 70% of the susceptible population would significantly reduce the frequency, size, and mean duration of outbreaks, but the benefit would depend markedly on the interval between identification of the first case and the beginning of mass vaccination. The epidemic would affect 4% of the population if vaccination started immediately, 17% if there was a 14-day delay, and 36% if there was a 28-day delay. Closing schools when the number of infections in the community exceeded 50 would be very effective, limiting the size of outbreaks to 10% of the population (range 0.9%-22%).

CONCLUSION

This flexible tool can help to determine the interventions most likely to contain an influenza pandemic. These results support the stockpiling of antiviral drugs and accelerated vaccine development.

Zanamivir in the treatment of influenza

Influenza is a common illness, affecting many people every winter, with a considerable impact on mortality, hospital admissions, healthcare utilisation and sickness absence from work and school. Influenza management is currently focused on annual vaccinations for those in certain risk groups. Risk is determined by age and chronic illness, particularly diabetes, chronic respiratory and cardiac disease, and persons immunocompromised from disease or concomitant therapy. Amantadine (and in some countries, rimantadine is available but has not been widely used, because it is only effective against influenza A infections. The use of amantadines for treatment has been associated with the rapid emergence of resistant viruses capable of transmission, compromising its potential as a prophylactic, as well as a treatment. Side effects are well recognised and are a particular problem in the most vulnerable elderly populations, where dose restriction is necessary and prior knowledge of creatinine clearance desirable. The potential market for a new influenza treatment is large and the potential role of neuraminidase inhibitors in addressing this market has been covered in several review articles [1-4]. This review reports on the introduction of zanamivir (Relenza) to the market with particular reference to experience in the UK.

Neuraminidase inhibitors in pediatric patients: potential place in influenza therapy

Influenza is responsible for annual epidemics, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The development and use of antiviral agents is one of the recent strategies used to control influenza. Zanamivir and oseltamivir are members of a new class of antiviral agents, the neuraminidase inhibitors, that are effective in the treatment of influenza. These drugs have been evaluated in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in children. Efficacy was shown by shortened duration of influenza-related symptoms in children treated with neuraminidase inhibitors. Seasonal prophylaxis in adults, and administration to household contacts of influenza-infected persons has decreased the incidence of influenza infection and illness. Adverse effects of zanamivir are minimal, while oseltamivir is associated with gastrointestinal upset, which does not usually require the medication to be ceased. No serious adverse events have been reported in children receiving these medications. Caution should be exercised in the use of zanamivir in children with asthma due to the potential development of bronchospasm and respiratory distress. Development of resistance to these medications is reported to occur less frequently than with amantadine. Resistance to zanamivir has been rarely detected during clinical trials, while up to 5.5% of influenza strains isolated from children after treatment were reported to be resistant to oseltamivir. Due to the role children play in the spread of influenza within the community, use of these medications may help control influenza epidemics.

Prevention of otitis media caused by viral upper respiratory tract infection: vaccines, antivirals, and other approaches

Otitis media (OM) imposes significant morbidity on the pediatric age group and a large financial burden on the general population. Because standard medical treatments are not highly efficacious in resolving the accompanying middle ear (ME) inflammation, a goal of current research is OM prevention. Past studies show that new episodes of OM are usually a complication of viral upper respiratory infection (vURI), and therefore, a rational approach to achieving that goal is to develop intervention strategies that target vURI-associated OM. However, past experiences with antibiotics show that, in the absence of well-defined treatment protocols that maximize expected efficacy, the adoption of prophylactic or active treatments for OM can have negative consequences for the patient and for the general population. In this review, we discuss the hypothesized mechanisms by which a vURI is translated into an acute OM episode and describe different strategies for aborting that process. Limitations to deployment of each strategy are outlined.

Viral otitis media

Acute otitis media (AOM) and viral upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) represent the two most common diseases affecting the human population, and account for substantial patient morbidity and health care costs. Epidemiologic and experimental studies suggest that URIs play a causal role in the pathogenesis of AOM. Specifically, viruses can either invade the middle ear (ME) space and invoke an inflammatory response that culminates in ME effusion formation and consequent symptoms, or URIs might cause eustachian-tube dysfunction, resulting in negative ME pressures and subsequent ME effusion (hydrops ex vacuo theory). The events responsible for the inflammatory response of the human ME following viral exposure have not been well characterized. Although many prophylactic and therapeutic interventions have been evaluated for the treatment of AOM, the information on virus-specific interventions is sparse. In this article, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of viral otitis media are reviewed.

Perspectives on antiviral use during pandemic influenza

Antiviral agents could potentially play a major role in the initial response to pandemic influenza, particularly with the likelihood that an effective vaccine is unavailable, by reducing morbidity and mortality. The M2 inhibitors are partially effective for chemoprophylaxis of pandemic influenza and evidence from studies of interpandemic influenza indicate that the neuraminidase inhibitors would be effective in prevention. In addition to the symptom benefit observed with M2 inhibitor treatment, early therapeutic use of neuraminidase inhibitors has been shown to reduce the risk of lower respiratory complications. Clinical pharmacology and adverse drug effect profiles indicate that the neuraminidase inhibitors and rimantadine are preferable to amantadine with regard to the need for individual prescribing and tolerance monitoring. Transmission of drug-resistant virus could substantially limit the effectiveness of M2 inhibitors and the possibility exists for primary M2 inhibitor resistance in a pandemic strain. The frequency of resistance emergence is lower with neuraminidase inhibitors and mathematical modelling studies indicate that the reduced transmissibility of drug-resistant virus observed with neuraminidase inhibitor-resistant variants would lead to negligible community spread of such variants. Thus, there are antiviral drugs currently available that hold considerable promise for response to pandemic influenza before a vaccine is available, although considerable work remains in realizing this potential. Markedly increasing the quantity of available antiviral agents through mechanisms such as stockpiling, educating health care providers and the public and developing effective means of rapid distribution to those in need are essential in developing an effective response, but remain currently unresolved problems.

Zanamivir and oseltamivir: two new options for the treatment and prevention of influenza

BACKGROUND

Influenza infection is responsible for thousands of hospitalizations and deaths in the United States each year. Until recently, management options were limited to vaccination or use of the antiviral agents amantadine and rimantadine. Two antiviral drugs, zanamivir and oseltamivir, have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of influenza A and influenza B.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the published data on the pharmacology and clinical utility of zanamivir and oseltamivir in the treatment and prevention of influenza A and influenza B illness.

METHODS

To identify relevant literature, a search of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and the Iowa Drug Information Service was conducted for the period from 1969 to 2000. The search terms used were influenza, neuraminidase, zanamivir, oseltamivir; amantadine, and rimantadine. The reference lists of the articles so obtained were used to identify additional publications.

RESULTS

Zanamivir and oseltamivir inactivate viral neuraminidase, an enzyme responsible for cleaving sialic acid residues on newly formed virions as they bud off from the host cell. This inhibition results in aggregation of virions on the surface of the host cell, which limits the extent of infection and speeds recovery from illness. Clinical studies have shown that neuraminidase inhibitors can decrease the median duration of influenza-related symptoms by approximately 1 day if initiated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms of influenza.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supports the use of zanamivir and oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza; however, additional studies are needed to clarify their utility and tolerability in pediatric and high-risk patients, as well as their utility in the prevention of influenza.

Influenza virus and rhinovirus-related otitis media: potential for antiviral intervention

Adults frequently develop eustachian tube dysfunction and middle ear pressure (MEP) abnormalities during natural and experimental influenza and human rhinovirus (HRV) infections. Oral rimantadine treatment did not reduce the otologic manifestations of experimental influenza in adults or natural influenza in children. However, intranasal zanamivir and oral oseltamivir significantly reduced MEP abnormalities during experimental influenza in adults, and oseltamivir treatment appears to reduce the likelihood of otitis media in children with acute influenza. Investigational anti-HRV agents, including intranasal tremacamra, intranasal AG7088, and oral pleconaril, warrant study in this regard. Depending on the virus, early antiviral therapy has the potential to impact the risk of otitis media following respiratory tract infections.

Prevention of acute otitis media by prophylaxis and treatment of influenza virus infections

Human experimental challenge studies with influenza virus infection and controlled intervention trials have demonstrated beyond doubt the role of influenza virus infection in the pathogenesis of acute otitis media. Influenza virus infections not only disrupt eustachian tube function, but also impair recovery from infection and facilitate attachment of bacterial pathogens to respiratory epithelial cells. Immunization of young children with either inactivated or live, attenuated influenza vaccine will significantly reduce the incidence of acute otitis media. Early treatment of influenza with antiviral medication will reduce eustachian tube dysfunction that results from influenza virus infection. Influenza produces high morbidity in children that could be averted by universal immunization with attenuated nasal spray vaccine.

Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors

Neuraminidase promotes influenza virus release from infected cells and facilitates virus spread within the respiratory tract. Several potent and specific inhibitors of this enzyme have been developed, and two (zanamivir and oseltamivir) have been approved for human use. Unlike amantadine and rimantadine that target the M2 protein of influenza A viruses, these drugs inhibit replication of both influenza A and B viruses. Zanamivir is delivered by inhalation because of its low oral bioavailability whereas oseltamivir is administered by mouth. Early treatment with either drug reduces the severity and duration of influenza symptoms and associated complications. Both agents are effective for chemoprophylaxis. Because of a broader antiviral spectrum, better tolerance, and less potential for emergence of resistance than is seen with the M2 inhibitors, the neuraminidase inhibitors represent an important advance in the treatment of influenza.

Pulmonary function and airway responsiveness in mild to moderate asthmatics given repeated inhaled doses of zanamivir

Zanamivir is a potent and specific inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidase, that is now approved for the treatment, and is currently under development for the prophylaxis of influenza. To assess the safety of this drug in asthmatics, 13 subjects with mild/moderate asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1)> or =70% predicted, reversibility of FEV1 to salbutamol > or =15%, concentration of methacholine causing a drop of 20% in the FEV1 (PC20FEV1)< or =8 mg ml(-1)], were recruited to a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, two way cross-over study. Subjects received 10 mg zanamivir as a dry powder (2 x 5 mg blisters via a Diskhaler Sovnn Plastics Ltd., Berkshire, U.K.), or a matching placebo, twice daily on day 1 and then four times daily from day 2 to day 14, in two separate periods separated by a washout period of 7 days. PC20FEV1 to methacholine was determined pre-study, on day 1 after the evening dose and on day 14 after the last dose of the study drug. FEV1 was measured pre-study and at regular intervals on days 1 and 14. Laboratory safety tests were performed on days 1, 7 and 15. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and any adverse events were recorded in a diary card. Eleven subjects completed the study. One was withdrawn due to non-compliance, and one due to an adverse event that occurred during the placebo period. On day 1 the geometric mean PC20 for zanamivir was 36% lower than for placebo [ratio to placebo 0.64, (90% CI 0.44, 0.93)] and on day 14 this was 33% lower with zanamivir [ratio to placebo 0.67 (90% CI 0.38, 1.15)]. Both these confidence intervals were within the pre-defined interval of 'no clinically significant effect' of 0.25-4 (i.e. a change of two doubling doses of methacholine PC20FEV1 which was considered clinically significant). The time weighted mean FEV1 was 0.15 l (5.4%) lower for zanamivir on day 1 compared to placebo (90% CI 0.03, 0.28; P=0.050) and 0.01 l higher compared to placebo on day 14 (90%CI -0.12, 0.10; P=0.912). The day 1 changes were not associated with any significant symptoms or requirement for rescue bronchodilator therapy. Furthermore there was no apparent treatment difference over the 14 day dosing period in FEV1 data (90% CI: -0.11, 0.05, P=057). The mean morning PEFR was 4 l min(-1) less for zanamivir than for placebo (90% CI: -11, 3) and mean evening PEFR was 9 l min(-1) less (90% CI: -24, 5). The study treatments were well tolerated by the subjects with no clinically significant adverse events attributable to zanamivir treatment. Zanamivir inhaled as a dry powder does not significantly affect the pulmonary function and airway responsiveness of subjects with mild/moderate asthma and therefore its use in such patients subjects is not precluded.

Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults

OBJECTIVES

Influenza is an acute respiratory infection associated with raised temperature, headache, muscle ache and cough. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs) in preventing cases of influenza and shortening or reducing the severity of influenza in healthy adults. A further objective was to estimate the frequency of adverse effects associated with NI administration.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched Medline, the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), manufacturers' databases, Embase (1991 to 1998) and reference lists of articles in May 1999. We also contacted manufacturers, researchers in the field, and authors of studies evaluated in the review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised or quasi-randomised placebo-controlled studies of NIs in healthy adults. Studies assessing protection or treatment from exposure to naturally occurring and experimental influenza were considered. The main outcomes were numbers and/or severity of influenza cases and the number and seriousness of adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers applied the inclusion criteria to the retrieved studies, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials with 1180 adults were included. Overall the methodological quality of the studies appeared to be good. As a preventive measure, NIs when compared to placebo were 74% effective (95% confidence interval 50% to 87%) in preventing naturally occurring cases of clinically defined influenza, and 60% effective (95% confidence interval 76% to 33%) in preventing cases of laboratory confirmed influenza. As a treatment, NIs shorten the duration of symptoms by one day - weighted mean difference 1 (95% confidence interval -1.3 to -0.6). The time gained in returning to normal activities is half a day - weighted mean difference -0.5 ( 95% confidence interval -1.1 to -0.1) for laboratory cases of influenza. The adverse event profile (local nasal irritation) of Zanamivir appears no better than placebo - odds ratio 1.19 ( 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 3.62). Compared with rimantadine in a preventive role, Oseltamivir has a significantly lower incidence of adverse effects and significantly higher incidence of nausea. For treatment, the adverse event profile shows that gastrointestinal symptoms are significantly worse in NIs than placebo - Peto odds ratio 2.32 ( 95% confidence interval 1.55 to 3.47).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

NIs are effective for the prevention and treatment of influenza. Overall NIs are safe, although Oseltamivir causes significant nausea.

Antiviral agents in the critically ill child

The treatment for most viral infections in children primarily is supportive. Severe viral illnesses and significant secondary complications that require treatment in the intensive care unit may occur in immunocompromised patients and also in infants and children who were previously healthy. Antiviral agents with specific activity against certain respiratory viruses, herpesviruses, and enteric viruses are available. New drugs are under development, and their use in pediatric patients is a subject of active research. The clinician's knowledge of the mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, and side effects of these drugs is an important tool for their judicious use in the treatment of the critically ill child. Copyright © 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company

Respiratory viral infections in the elderly

Viral respiratory infections represent a significant challenge for those interested in improving the health of the elderly. Influenza continues to result in a large burden of excess morbidity and mortality. Two effective measures, inactivated influenza vaccine, and the antiviral drugs rimantadine and amantadine, are currently available for control of this disease. Inactivated vaccine should be given yearly to all of those over the age of 65, as well as younger individuals with high-risk medical conditions and individuals delivering care to such persons. Live, intranasally administered attenuated influenza vaccines are also in development, and may be useful in combination with inactivated vaccine in the elderly. The antiviral drugs amantadine and rimantadine are effective in the treatment and prevention of influenza A, although rimantadine is associated with fewer side-effects. Recently, the inhaled neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir, which is active against both influenza A and B viruses, was licensed for use in uncomplicated influenza. The role of this drug in treatment and prevention of influenza in the elderly remains to be determined. Additional neuraminidase inhibitors are also being developed. In addition, to influenza, respiratory infections with respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus have been identified as potential problems in the elderly. With increasing attention, it is probable that the impact of these infections in this age group will be more extensively documented. Understanding of the immunology and pathogenesis of these infections in elderly adults is in its infancy, and considerable additional work will need to be performed towards development of effective control measures.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous zanamivir in preventing experimental human influenza A virus infection

Zanamivir is a potent inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases and is active topically in experimental and natural human influenza. We conducted this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenously administered zanamivir. Susceptible volunteers were randomized to receive either saline or zanamivir (600 mg) intravenously twice daily for 5 days beginning 4 h prior to intranasal inoculation with approximately 10(5) 50% tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) of influenza A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1) virus. Reductions in the frequency of viral shedding (0% versus 100% in placebo, P < 0.005) and seroconversion (14% versus 100% in placebo, P < 0.005) and decreases in viral titer areas under the curve (0 versus 11.6 [median] log10 TCID50. day/ml in placebo, P < 0.005) were observed in the zanamivir group, as were reductions in fever (14% versus 88% in placebo, P < 0.05), upper respiratory tract illness (0% versus 100% in placebo, P < 0.005), total symptom scores (1 versus 44 [median] in placebo, P < 0.005), and nasal-discharge weight (3.9 g versus 17.5 g [median] in placebo, P < 0.005). Zanamivir was detectable in nasal lavage samples collected on days 2 and 4 (unadjusted median concentrations, 10.5 and 12.0 ng/ml of nasal wash, respectively). This study demonstrates that intravenously administered zanamivir is distributed to the respiratory mucosa and is protective against infection and illness following experimental human influenza A virus inoculation.

Approaches and strategies for the treatment of influenza virus infections

Influenza A and B viruses belong to the Orthomyxoviridae family of viruses. These viruses are responsible for severe morbidity and significant excess mortality each year. Infection with influenza viruses usually leads to respiratory involvement and can result in pneumonia and secondary bacterial infections. Vaccine approaches to the prophylaxis of influenza virus infections have been problematic owing to the ability of these viruses to undergo antigenic shift by exchanging genomic segments or by undergoing antigenic drift, consisting of point mutations in the haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes as a result of an error-prone viral polymerase. Historically, antiviral approaches for the therapy of both influenza A and B viruses have been largely unsuccessful until the elucidation of the X-ray crystallographic structure of the viral NA, which has permitted structure-based drug design of inhibitors of this enzyme. In addition, recent advances in the elucidation of the structure and complex function of influenza HA have resulted in the discovery of a number of diverse compounds that target this viral protein. This review article will focus largely on newer antiviral agents including those that inhibit the influenza virus NA and HA. Other novel approaches that have entered clinical trials or been considered for their clinical utility will be mentioned.

Upper respiratory tract infections

In reviewing recent advances in upper respiratory tract infections, we focus on five key topics. First, the use of ribavirin in the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus infection has been limited to the immunosuppressed. Prophylaxis in high-risk patients with specific immunoglobulin is effective and a new monoclonal antibody shows promise. Second, the efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors in the treatment of influenza has become established. There are unresolved concerns about early implementation of therapy without a firm diagnosis; resource implications are enormous. Third, an outbreak of influenza due to avian influenza virus (H5N1) raised the possibility of a new pandemic. However, there was minimal person-to-person spread although much was learned about pathogenesis of infection. Fourth, evidence favoring the use of ciprofloxacin rather than rifampicin for meningococcal chemoprophylaxis is reviewed. Efficacy in eradicating nasopharyngeal carriage is excellent. Finally, the management of sore throat has been considered. This remains controversial but evidence supporting antibiotic therapy in adults is lacking. If treatment is indicated in childhood, shorter courses of antibiotics may be effective.

New approaches to influenza chemotherapy. Neuraminidase inhibitors

Epidemic influenza continues to be associated with significant morbidity in the general population, and mortality in the elderly and other high risk patients. Although the case fatality rate averages less than 0.01%, tens of thousands of deaths occur each year. Control through immunisation programmes has not been possible due to incomplete protective efficacy and antigenic variations that occur frequently. Currently available anti-influenza medications (amantadine and rimantadine) have had limited success due to underutilisation, lack of activity against influenza B, the rapid development of viral resistance to the drugs, and adverse effects. A new class of antiviral agents designed to inhibit influenza neuraminidase, an important surface glycoprotein, is currently under active development for use in the prophylaxis and treatment of influenza A and B infections. Two of these compounds, zanamivir (GG167) and GS4104 (the ethyl ester prodrug of GS4071) have reached clinical trials. Most studies of zanamivir have involved topical administration by inhalation of dry powder aerosols and/or intranasal doses of aqueous solutions. These routes rapidly provide high local concentrations at the sites of delivery. GS4104 is administered orally, which allows for greater ease of administration, and probably more uniform distribution of the parent compound GS4071 in the respiratory tract. Both have shown potent inhibitory activity against influenza in animal models and experimental human influenza with excellent tolerability profiles. Zanamivir treatment has been shown to reduce the severity and duration of naturally occurring, uncomplicated influenza illness in adults. Clinical resistance to these drugs has not been recognised as a significant problem to date, although strains resistant to each agent have been produced in the laboratory. This class of agents shows considerable promise as a novel approach to prophylaxis and treatment of influenza infections. Ongoing studies should provide the data needed to allow the addition of 1 or more of the neuraminidase inhibitors to the clinician's anti-influenza armamentarium.

Safety and Efficacy of Once Daily Intranasal Zanamivir in Preventing Experimental Human Influenza a Infection

Zanamivir, a potent inhibitor of influenza A and B virus neuraminidases, is protective against experimental human influenza when given intranasally twice daily. We conducted two studies to assess the pharmacokinetics and protective efficacy of a reduced frequency dosing regimen of topical zanamivir. In the first study, 36 uninfected volunteers received a single dose of zanamivir by intranasal spray (6.4 mg), intranasal drops (16 mg) or dry powder oral inhalation (10 mg). At 4 h, median nasal wash concentrations were 50-fold higher after intranasal dosing than after inhalation. Substantial levels (spray group, median 4596 ng/ml; drop group, 1239 ng/ml) were detected in nasal wash 48 h after intranasal dosing. In the double-blinded efficacy study, 47 sero-susceptible volunteers were randomized to receive either placebo or zanamivir intranasal spray (6.4 mg). Among the 43 subjects evaluated, decreases in viral shedding occurred in the group receiving one dose of zanamivir 4 h prior to inoculation, whereas no significant benefit was observed in those receiving a single dose 48 h prior to challenge. In the group given three daily doses, reductions were seen in viral shedding and infection. In the two regimens providing zanamivir 4 h prior to inoculation, significant reductions in nasal mucus weight were observed. Decreases in total symptom scores and the incidence of upper respiratory illness also occurred, but they did not reach statistical significance. The efficacy of a single dose of zanamivir given 4 h prior to inoculation supports the hypothesis that influenza virus neuraminidase is essential for initial virus spread through respiratory secretions. These findings indicate that once daily dosing of zanamivir is protective against experimental influenza A infection.

Approaches to antiviral chemotherapy for acute respiratory infections

The causative agents of acute respiratory infections (ARI) in infants and children are mostly thought to be viruses. Some ARI in adult patients may be caused by bacteria but most often the causes are virus infections. When ARI affect immunocompromised patients or the elderly the mortality rates are significantly higher than in immunocompetent individuals. Many types of viruses cause ARI. Among them, influenza viruses A and B and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are thought to be the most important because of the severity of illness after infection and their high communicability in the human population. Recently, several novel antiviral drugs against ARI have been developed and some are proceeding in clinical trials. This review covers current investigations into antiviral compounds targeted at several points in the virus life-cycle. This includes PM-523, which broadly inhibits ortho- and paramyxo-viruses, two neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza virus, neutralizing antibody to RSV and chimeric soluble ICAM-1-IgA molecules targeted against rhinoviruses.