Preferences Across Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modalities Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States: A Latent Class Analysis Study

Minority adolescents' HIV PrEP awareness and preferences in Alabama

OBJECTIVE

In the southern United States, adolescents are at elevated risk for HIV acquisition. In Alabama, school-based sexual health and HIV prevention education is strictly regulated and does not address the unique needs of sexual and gender minority (SGM) teenagers. To inform public health efforts, we assessed SGM adolescents' HIV prevention pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) awareness and modality preferences by gender, race, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Survey data were collected in 2023-2024 from SGM adolescents aged 14-17 years, lived in Alabama, with male sex assigned at birth (N = 206). Recruitment occurred online and in-person at a charter school. Data were analyzed using chi-squares and analysis of variance, controlling for age. Over half of respondents were sexually active, but only 26% had ever been tested for HIV. Half knew about PrEP. Of those with PrEP awareness, 41.9% were aware of daily pills; 32.3% of long-acting injectable PrEP. Pill-based PrEP was highly endorsed. Trans- and gender-non-conforming adolescents reported a greater preference for on-demand pill-based PrEP compared to men who have sex with men (p =.01). Non-Hispanics had a greater preference for a 6-month long-acting injectable option compared to Hispanic adolescents (p =.04). Findings suggest the need for HIV prevention interventions tailored to southern contexts and adolescent knowledge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not Applicable.

Latino Sexual Minority Men's Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modality Preferences: A Latent Class Analysis

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective HIV prevention tool available in several modalities (e.g., daily oral, injectable, implants, rectal douching). The Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative, a national initiative that began in 2019 as a partnership among the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal agencies (e.g., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Health), seeks to increase PrEP engagement for groups experiencing HIV inequities, including Latino sexual minority men (LSMM). Given the limited research on PrEP modality preferences among LSMM, this study aimed to explore and characterize these preferences. LSMM (n = 214) not using PrEP and living in South Florida participated in the DÍMELO study, which examined PrEP engagement among LSMM in South Florida. Authors employed latent class analysis (LCA) to identify groups of LSMM based on their PrEP modality preferences and examined predictors of class membership. LCA results led to a three-class solution with participants who were: (1) reluctant to use most PrEP modalities (30.5%), (2) PrEP willing, with constraints (36.0%), and (3) enthusiastically accepting of all PrEP modalities (33.5%). LSMM in the reluctant class (Class 1) showed minimal interest in most PrEP modalities. The constrained class (Class 2) displayed interest in daily oral, on-demand, and quarterly injectable PrEP while the enthusiastic class (Class 3) demonstrated high interest in all modalities except rectal douching. Key predictors of PrEP modality preferences were altruism, community normalization of PrEP, and migration history. Understanding LSMM's PrEP modality preferences can enhance the reach of PrEP to LSMM, a group the EHE initiative prioritizes. The current findings suggest the need to tailor PrEP outreach efforts to promote various PrEP modalities based on LSMM's preferences.

Adolescent Youth Survey on HIV Prevention and Sexual Health Education in Alabama: Protocol for a Web-Based Survey With Fraud Protection Study

BACKGROUND

In Alabama, the undiagnosed HIV rate is over 20%; youth and young adults, particularly those who identify as sexual and gender minority individuals, are at elevated risk for HIV acquisition and are the only demographic group in the United States with rising rates of new infections. Adolescence is a period marked by exploration, risk taking, and learning, making comprehensive sexual health education a high-priority prevention strategy for HIV and sexually transmitted infections. However, in Alabama, school-based sexual health and HIV prevention education is strictly regulated and does not address the unique needs of sexual and gender minority teenagers.

OBJECTIVE

To understand knowledge gaps related to sexual health, HIV prevention, and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), we conducted the Alabama Youth Survey with individuals aged 14-17 years. In the survey, we also evaluated young sexual and gender minority individuals' preferences related to prevention modalities and trusted sources of health information.

METHODS

Between September 2023 and March 2024, we conducted a web-based survey with 14- to 17-year-olds who are assigned male at birth, are sexually attracted to male youth, and lived in Alabama. Half of the study's participants were recruited through community partners, the Magic City Acceptance Academy and Magic City Acceptance Center. The other half were recruited on the web via social media. A 7-step fraud and bot detection protocol was implemented and applied to web-based recruitment to reduce the likelihood of collecting false information. Once data are ready, we will compute frequencies for each measure and construct summary scores of scales, such as HIV and PrEP knowledge, to determine internal consistency. Using multivariable logistic regression, we will examine associations between personal characteristics of survey respondents and key constructs using SPSS 29 (IBM Corp) or SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute).

RESULTS

Analyses are ongoing (N=206) and will conclude in June 2025. Preliminary results include a sample mean age of 16.21 (SD 0.88) years; about a quarter identified as transgender or gender nonconforming, with 6% stating their gender as a transgender woman. A total of 30% self-reported their race as African American or Black; 12% were Hispanic or Latinx. More than half reported being sexually active in the past 6 months. Primary data analyses will be completed in mid-2025. If findings are promising, results will be used as preliminary data to support the development of an intervention to address knowledge gaps and prevention preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

If the study is successful, it will yield information on HIV knowledge, PrEP awareness, PrEP preferences, and related outcomes among sexual and gender minority teenagers in Alabama, an underserved, hard-to-reach, but also high-priority population for public health efforts to Ending the HIV Epidemic.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/63114.

Exploring pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) modality preferences among black cisgender women attending family planning clinics in Chicago via a cross-sectional mixed-methods study

Background

Despite pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) demonstrated effectiveness, black cisgender women continue to be at an elevated risk for HIV acquisition and uptake of daily oral PrEP is low in this population in the USA. As advancements in PrEP delivery options continue, it is important to understand women's acceptability of these additional options, specifically black cisgender women, in order to inform uptake and adherence among this population at increased need of HIV prevention options.

Setting

A cross-sectional survey among black cisgender women ages 13-45 (inclusive) attending women's health clinics in Chicago, Illinois, USA, prior to the approval of cabotegravir long-acting injectable.

Methods

Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and bivariate analysis was used to detect differences between categorical and outcome variables using χ2 test. Responses to open-ended questions were thematically coded to explore black cisgender women's attitudes and preferences between the three methods of PrEP delivery including vaginal ring, long-acting injectable and a combined method that would prevent both pregnancy and HIV.

Results

In total, 211 cisgender women and adolescents responded to the survey. Both injections and combination pills were popular among participants, with 64.5% and 67.3% expressing interest in these forms of PrEP, respectively. The least popular method was the vaginal ring option, with 75.4% of respondents indicating that they would not consider using this modality. Overall, responses were not statistically different between the two surveys administered (χ2 p values for injection PrEP method 0.66, combination PrEP method 0.93 and ring PrEP method 0.66) suggesting that the popularity of each method was not dependent on clinic location or the age of participants.

Conclusion

This research provides important insights into the preferences and attitudes of different PrEP modalities among black cisgender women. As different modalities continue to be approved for use among cisgender women, more research is needed to investigate the acceptability and preferences of these different modalities in order to improve uptake and adherence among this population.

Willingness and preferences for long-acting injectable PrEP among US men who have sex with men: a discrete choice experiment

INTRODUCTION

Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) was shown to be safe and effective in multiple clinical trials. Increasing uptake and persistence among populations with elevated risk for HIV acquisition, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM), is critical to HIV prevention.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aims to understand potential users' preferences for LA-PrEP, with audience segmentation.

DESIGN

Willingness to use and preferences for LA-PrEP were measured in HIV-negative, sexually active MSM in the 2020 American Men's Internet Survey. Respondents answered a discrete choice experiment with paired profiles of hypothetical LA-PrEP characteristics with an opt-out option (no LA-PrEP). Conditional and mixed logit models were run; the final model was a dummy-coded mixed logit that interacted with the opt-out.

SETTING

US national online sample.

RESULTS

Among 2506 MSM respondents, most (75%) indicated a willingness to use LA-PrEP versus daily oral PrEP versus no PrEP. Respondents were averse to side effects and increasing costs and preferred increasing levels of protection. Respondents preferred a 2-hour time to obtain LA-PrEP vs 1 hour, with a strong aversion to 3 hours. Overall, there was an aversion to opting out of LA-PrEP, with variations: those with only one partner, no/other insurance or who were Black, Indigenous or People of Colour were significantly less likely to prefer LA-PrEP, while those who were Hispanic/Latino, college educated and <40 years significantly preferred LA-PrEP.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of MSM expressed a preference for LA-PrEP over daily oral pills. Most respondents chose LA-PrEP regardless of cost, clinic time, side effects or protection level; however, preferences varied by sociodemographics. These varied groups likely require tailored intervention strategies to achieve maximum LA-PrEP uptake and persistence.

Latent class analysis of barriers to HIV testing services and associations with sexual behaviour and HIV status among adolescents and young adults in Nigeria

INTRODUCTION

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) face multiple barriers to accessing healthcare services, which can interact, creating complex needs that often impact health behaviours, leading to increased vulnerability to HIV. We aimed to identify distinct AYA subgroups based on patterns of barriers to HIV testing services and assess the association between these barrier patterns and sexual behaviour, socio-demographics, and HIV status.

METHODS

Data were from Nigeria's AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS, 2018) and included 18,612 sexually active AYA aged 15-24 years who had never been tested for HIV and reported barriers to accessing HIV testing services. A Latent class analysis (LCA) model was built from 12 self-reported barrier types to identify distinct subgroups of AYA based on barrier patterns. Latent class regressions (LCR) were conducted to compare the socio-demographics, sexual behaviour, and HIV status across identified AYA subgroups. Sex behaviour characteristics include intergenerational sex, transactional sex, multiple sex partners, condom use, and knowledge of partner's HIV status.

RESULTS

Our LCA model identified four distinct AYA subgroups termed 'low-risk perception' (n = 7,361; 39.5%), 'consent and proximity' (n = 5,163; 27.74%), 'testing site' (n = 4,996; 26.84%), and 'cost and logistics' (n = 1,092; 5.87%). Compared to adolescents and young adults (AYA) in the low-risk perception class, those in the consent and proximity class were more likely to report engaging in intergenerational sex (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02-1.35), transactional sex (aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.23-1.84), and have multiple sex partners (aOR 1.75, 95% CI 1.39-2.20), while being less likely to report condom use (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99). AYA in the testing site class were more likely to report intergenerational sex (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.39) and transactional sex (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.26-1.85). AYA in the cost and logistics class were more likely to engage in transactional sex (aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.58-2.84) and less likely to report condom use (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-0.98). There was no significant relationship between barrier subgroup membership and HIV status. However, being female, aged 15-24 years, married or cohabiting, residing in the Southsouth zone, and of Christian religion increased the likelihood of being HIV infected.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of barriers to HIV testing are linked with differences in sexual behaviour and sociodemographic profiles among AYA, with the latter driving differences in HIV status. Findings can improve combination healthcare packages aimed at simultaneously addressing multiple barriers and determinants of vulnerability to HIV among AYA.

Perspectives on Injectable HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: A Qualitative Study of Health Care Providers in the United States

The introduction of injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has the potential to significantly change the biomedical HIV prevention landscape. However, effective implementation will require health care providers to adopt, prescribe, and administer injectable PrEP within clinical settings. This study qualitatively examined challenges and benefit of injectable PrEP implementation from the perspective of health care providers. From April to August 2022, we conducted 19 in-depth interviews with current PrEP-prescribing health care providers in New York State, including 3 physician assistants, 5 physicians, and 11 nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed to report semantic-level themes regarding injectable PrEP implementation. More than half of participants (61%) were aware of injectable PrEP; only 21% had experience prescribing it. Qualitative findings highlighted five themes. Three themes represented implementation challenges, including speculative concerns about side effects, appointment compliance, and practical and logistical considerations. The remaining two themes described benefits of injectable PrEP relative to oral PrEP, which included greater convenience and enhanced privacy. Findings from this qualitative study make significant applied contributions to the sparse knowledge on health care provider perspectives of injectable PrEP post-US Food and Drug Administration approval and their concerns and considerations regarding implementation in real-world clinical settings.

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum for HIV Risk Populations: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical strategy for HIV prevention. This umbrella review is aimed at providing a comprehensive summary of the current status of each stage of the PrEP care cascade. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Additionally, a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist were used to evaluate their methodological and reporting quality, respectively. A total of 30 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. According to the results of methodological quality assessment, 3 reviews were rated as low, while 27 as critically low. Furthermore, the results of the reporting quality evaluation revealed a mean score of 23.03 for the included reviews. Across all the reviews, awareness of PrEP was generally moderate in all populations, and the acceptability was even higher compared with awareness. Unfortunately, the PrEP uptake among different groups was even less optimal, although the adherence was almost above moderate, and several barriers that hindered the utilization of PrEP were identified, and the most common are as follows: cost, stigma, lack of knowledge, mistrust, low risk perception, and more. Although PrEP has proven to be an effective prevention method to date, the promotion of PrEP failed to achieve the anticipated outcome. To reinforce the generalization of and use of PrEP, and effectively control HIV transmission, it is urgent to identify the underlying causes of low uptake rates so that efficient interventions can be implemented.

Variation in Preferences for Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among US Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Latent Class Analysis

Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) is efficacious, with a good safety profile, and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2021. Understanding variations in potential user preferences for LA PrEP may inform implementation and subsequently improve uptake and community-level effectiveness. HIV-negative, sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) aged ≥15 years were recruited online for the 2019 American Men's Internet Survey, before LA PrEP approval. Respondents completed a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) with hypothetical LA PrEP attributes (out-of-pocket cost, perceived side effects, injection frequency, perceived stigma, service location). Latent class analysis segmented respondents into groups based on their preferences for the attributes presented, and relative importance of preference weights and willingness-to-pay were calculated. While the majority had never used daily oral PrEP, 73% of the 2489 respondents were very or somewhat likely to use LA PrEP. Three latent classes were identified from 2241 respondents in the DCE. The "side effects-averse" class was the largest group (64% of respondents) and placed 61% relative importance on side effects. The "ambivalent" class (20% of respondents) placed higher importance on stigma (17% of relative importance) than other classes. The "cost-conscious" class (16% of respondents) placed higher relative importance (62%) on cost compared with other attributes and classes. Perceived side effects were an important hypothetical barrier for LA PrEP uptake among a large proportion of potential MSM users. Minimizing out-of-pocket costs is likely to increase uptake and may be important to equitable access. Tailored communication strategies are recommended for the different groups of potential LA PrEP users.

Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention: Perspectives on the Benefits and Barriers from Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Men and Health System Stakeholders in Ontario, Canada

One hope surrounding long-acting HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is reaching new users who could most benefit, as well as improving the experiences of oral PrEP users who may desire to switch modalities. Gay, bisexual, queer, and other men who have sex with men (GBQM) continue to make up over half of new HIV diagnoses in Canada, and oral PrEP uptake has plateaued among this population. Approval of injectable PrEP is anticipated, but there is a paucity of research to inform health promotion and implementation. Between June and October 2021, we conducted 22 in-depth interviews with GBQM oral PrEP users and non-PrEP users living in Ontario, Canada. We also conducted small focus groups or individual interviews with 20 key stakeholders (health care providers, public health officials, community-based organization staff). Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed in NVivo using thematic analysis. Only about one-third of GBQM had heard of injectable PrEP. Many PrEP users perceived greater convenience, adherence, and confidentiality with injectable PrEP. Some PrEP users did not anticipate switching because of needle discomfort or feeling more "in control" with oral PrEP. None of the non-PrEP users said that injectable PrEP would make them start PrEP. Injectable PrEP may offer additional convenience for GBQM; however, it did not appear to affect participants' PrEP decision-making significantly. Stakeholders noted that injectable PrEP may improve access, support adherence, and benefit marginalized groups. Some clinicians expressed concerns about the time/personnel required to make injectable PrEP available. System-level challenges in implementing injectable PrEP, including cost, must also be addressed.

Readiness to Provide Oral and Injectable PrEP for Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Among Healthcare Providers and Clinics in the U.S. Northeast

PURPOSE

To examine readiness to provide oral and injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) and to explore decision-making for HIV prevention strategies (e.g., condom use, daily and event-driven oral PrEP, and injectable PrEP) among healthcare providers.

METHODS

Between February and April 2022, we recruited 31 prescribing providers (M.Ds, D.Os, P.As, and N.Ps) practicing in primary care and specialized clinics in the U.S. Northeast for focus groups or individual interviews. Focus groups and interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Most providers specialized in Pediatrics (42%) or Adolescent Medicine (23%) and 58% had previously prescribed PrEP. Main barriers to PrEP readiness were low PrEP knowledge, limited time for visits, and competing clinical priorities. Organizational factors such as routine HIV/STI testing, PrEP-specific electronic health records templates, and specialized staff (e.g., PrEP navigators) promoted PrEP readiness. Providers held positive attitudes toward injectable PrEP to promote adherence among SGMY, yet barriers to implementation of this modality were identified (e.g., patient anxiety about needles, additional staffing needs). Providers described event-driven oral PrEP as an option for SGMY with episodic HIV risk. Assurances of conditional confidentiality, including preventing disclosure of sensitive information through insurance forms, and shared decision-making facilitated conversations about HIV prevention with SGMY.

DISCUSSION

Future PrEP implementation efforts for SGMY should consider combined efforts targeting provider knowledge about PrEP modalities (e.g., decision aids) and clinic organizational factors (e.g., routine HIV/STI testing, resources to assist providers and patients in navigating the multiple steps between prescription and adherence to PrEP).

The need for a health equity framework in next-generation pre-exposure prophylaxis implementation

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective for prevention of HIV transmission and plays an important role in efforts to end the HIV epidemic within the next decade. However, disparities in access to PrEP might be fuelling disparities in the burden of HIV in the USA. The advent of next-generation PrEP formulations that do not involve daily regimens (eg, long-acting cabotegravir) holds potential to facilitate medication adherence, but if the roll-out of these formulations does not consider disparities in access, HIV disparities might be further widened. On the basis of US epidemiological data and informed by the Theory of Fundamental Causes of Health Disparities, we propose an equity-promoting framework to guide the implementation of daily oral and next-generation PrEP. Multilevel efforts to bolster equity in PrEP care include generating demand for next-generation PrEP formulations among marginalised groups, expanding the availability of health services providing oral and next-generation PrEP, and addressing structural and financial barriers to HIV prevention care. The aim of these strategies is to realise the potential of next-generation PrEP to provide people at high risk with effective options to prevent HIV acquisition, thereby helping to reduce both overall HIV transmission and health disparities in the USA.