Sources of Information and Support for Breastfeeding: Alignment with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Strategies

Access to lactation consult services during the COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on breastfeeding outcome variables

BACKGROUND

Inpatient lactation consultation and social influences affect breastfeeding (BF) choices and sustainability. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced barriers to BF initiation and continuation including access to lactation support and social connection. Equitable access to lactation support can reduce health disparities.

RESEARCH AIM

The study aimed to (1) determine the prevalence of professional lactation support during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) explore the influence of this pandemic on the equitable accessibility to lactation support services, and (3) identify changes in BF rates and access to lactation support at three different phases of the pandemic (early, middle, and late).

METHODS

Patients receiving prenatal care at a mid-sized academic medical institution in Central Pennsylvania were recruited and surveyed and this data was collected and combined with data from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

88% of patients received a lactation consultation during birth hospitalization. Having COVID-19 during pregnancy did not change access to lactation consultation post-partum (p = 0.0961). Neither BF exclusivity during the three phases of the pandemic nor the number of lactation consult visits were statistically different (p = 0.2263; p = 0.0958 respectively). Multiple regression models assessing BF exclusivity in the hospital found significant associations with having a lactation consult (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.04, 6.04), having an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.11, 0.73), and having reported social support during pregnancy (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01,1.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Social support during pregnancy and having a lactation consult visit during birth hospitalization remained critical factors for BF exclusivity. This study highlights the importance of having professional lactation support on both BF exclusivity and continuation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Informational Sources About Breastfeeding Associated with Breastfeeding Initiation: Insights into Racial Disparities

Background: Breastfeeding provides essential nutrition and disease protection for infants while reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes and breast cancer in mothers. Despite these benefits, significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in breastfeeding initiation, particularly among Black women. This study examines racial differences in the receipt of breastfeeding information from varying sources and their association with breastfeeding initiation. Methods: Data were obtained from the Phase 8 Core Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System for 2016-2020 (n = 163,724). The analysis focused on comparing the likelihood of breastfeeding initiation (yes/no) across racial groups and the impact of receiving breastfeeding information from varying clinical (mother's doctor/nurse/baby's doctor, etc.) and social sources (support group/family/friends, etc.). Univariate and multivariable analysis was conducted in SAS 9.4. Results: Black women consistently exhibited lower odds of breastfeeding initiation compared with other racial groups, across all informational sources. The study found that while information from both clinical and social sources increased breastfeeding initiation overall, Black women remained less likely to initiate breastfeeding than White women (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Systemic barriers, including racism and bias in health care, contribute to the racial disparities in breastfeeding initiation. Culturally tailored interventions and improved health care provider training are necessary to address these gaps. Future efforts should aim to bridge the divide between clinical and social breastfeeding information sources to improve breastfeeding rates among minority women.

Information Seeking Behavior and Strategies to Increase Milk Supply Among Breastfeeding Mothers in the United States

Background: Some breastfeeding mothers try to increase their milk supply through pharmaceutical, dietary, and behavioral strategies that vary in effectiveness. Information seeking behaviors may influence which strategies mothers use. Objective: To describe where mothers obtain information about increasing milk supply, describe the perceived influence of each information source on decision-making about strategies for increasing milk supply, and explore associations between information sources and mothers' use of galactagogues (i.e., pharmaceutical and dietary strategies) and behavioral strategies. Methods: Women who were currently breastfeeding and living in the United States were recruited through Facebook advertisements to complete an online survey between December 2020 and February 2021. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and chi-square tests compared participants' use of galactagogues and behavioral strategies by information sources. Results: Participants were 1,351 breastfeeding mothers (81% non-Hispanic white; 47% first-time breastfeeding; 21% Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participants). Nearly all participants (97%) obtained information about increasing milk supply from at least one source, most commonly lactation consultants (68%), Facebook (61%), search engines (50%), websites (47%), and nurses (41%). There was high variability in the perceived influence of each source on decision-making. Galactagogue use was higher among participants who obtained information from the internet (Yes: 68% vs. No: 43%, p < 0.000), social media (Yes: 65% vs. No: 40%, p < 0.000), family and friends (Yes: 65% vs. No: 53%, p < 0.000), and lactation consultants (Yes: 63% vs. No: 54%, p < 0.002). Behavioral strategies were more commonly reported among participants who accessed these same sources, maternal health care professionals (Yes: 98% vs. No: 91%, p < 0.000), and pediatricians (Yes: 98% vs. No: 94%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Breastfeeding mothers commonly obtained information about increasing milk supply from a variety of sources. Information sources accessed were associated with mothers' use of galactagogues and behavioral strategies for increasing milk supply.

Influence of social determinants of health on breastfeeding intent in the United States

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding rates in the United States are suboptimal despite public health recommendations that infants are fed breastmilk for their first year of life. This study aimed to characterize the influence of social determinants of health on intended breastfeeding duration.

METHODS

This case-control study analyzed breastfeeding intent in 421 postpartum women. Data on social determinants and medical history were obtained from medical records and participant self-report. Logistic regression estimated the influence of demographic factors and social determinants on intent to breastfeed for durations of <6 months, 6-12 months, and at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Thirty-five percent of mothers intended to breastfeed for at least 6 months, and 15% for 1 year. Social determinants that negatively predicted breastfeeding intent included not owning transportation and living in a dangerous neighborhood (p < 0.05). Women were more likely to intend to breastfeed for 12 months if they had knowledge of breastfeeding recommendations (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.19, 95% confidence interval [CI 2.67-14.34]), an identifiable medical provider (aOR 2.64 [CI 1.22-5.72]), familial support (aOR 2.80 [CI 1.01-7.80]), or were married (aOR 2.55 [CI 1.01-6.46]). Sociodemographic factors that negatively influenced breastfeeding intent included non-Hispanic Black race, no high school diploma, cigarette use, income below $20,000, fewer than five prenatal visits, and WIC or Medicaid enrollment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who lack familial support, an identifiable healthcare provider, or knowledge of breastfeeding guidelines are less likely to intend to breastfeed. Public health initiatives should address these determinants to improve breastfeeding and infant outcomes.

Early introduction of complementary foods/drinks and milk feeding type in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC)

Infants younger than 4 months are not ready for complementary foods/drinks (any solid or liquid other than breast milk or infant formula). Almost half of US infants participate in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC), which provides nutrition education and support to low-income families. We describe the prevalence of early introduction (<4 months) of complementary foods/drinks and examine the association of milk feeding type (fully breastfed, partially breastfed or fully formula fed) with early introduction of complementary foods/drinks. We used data from 3310 families in the longitudinal WIC Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2. We described the prevalence of early introduction of complementary foods/drinks and modeled the association of milk feeding type at Month 1 with early introduction of complementary foods/drinks using multi-variable logistic regression. Thirty-eight percent of infants were introduced early to complementary foods/drinks (<4 months). In adjusted models, infants who were fully formula fed or partially breastfed at Month 1 were 75% and 57%, respectively, more likely to be introduced early to complementary foods/drinks compared with fully breastfed infants. Almost two in five infants were given complementary foods/drinks early. Formula feeding at Month 1 was associated with higher odds of early introduction of complementary foods/drinks. There are opportunities to support families participating in WIC to prevent early introduction of complementary foods/drinks and promote child health.

Race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information source and breastfeeding rates among U.S. women

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence of the impact of breastfeeding information on breastfeeding rates, it is unknown if information sources and impact vary by race/ethnicity, thus this study assessed race/ethnicity-specific associations between breastfeeding information sources and breastfeeding.

METHODS

We used data from the 2016-2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Race/ethnicity-stratified multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate associations between information source (e.g., family/friends) and breastfeeding rates (0 weeks/none, < 10 weeks, or ≥ 10 weeks; < 10 weeks and ≥ 10 weeks = any breastfeeding). All analyses were weighted to be nationally representative.

RESULTS

Among 5,945,018 women (weighted), 88% reported initiating breastfeeding (≥ 10 weeks = 70%). Information from family/friends (< 10 weeks: aORs = 1.58-2.14; ≥ 10 weeks: aORs = 1.63-2.64) and breastfeeding support groups (< 10 weeks: aORs = 1.31-1.76; ≥ 10 weeks: aORs = 1.42-2.77) were consistently associated with breastfeeding and duration across most racial/ethnic groups; effects were consistently smaller among Alaska Native, Black, and Hispanic women (vs White women). Over half of American Indian and one-quarter of Black women reported not breastfeeding/stopping breastfeeding due to return to school/work concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between breastfeeding information source and breastfeeding rates vary across race/ethnicity. Culturally tailored breastfeeding information and support from family/friends and support groups could help reduce breastfeeding disparities. Additional measures are needed to address disparities related to concerns about return to work/school.

Facilitators, Barriers, and Best Practices for In-Person and Telehealth Lactation Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To explore the perspectives of lactation support providers delivering breastfeeding education via in-person and telehealth consultations and assess the impact of COVID-19 on the provision of breastfeeding education.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive study using purposive sampling.

SETTING

Massachusetts-based lactation support providers who provided in-person and/or telehealth consultations in various practice settings (e.g., inpatient; outpatient; private practice; and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children).

PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen Massachusetts-based lactation support providers, ages 36 to 68 years.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants completed an online demographic and employment characteristics survey and virtual key informant interviews, from which six main themes were defined.

RESULTS

The six main themes included Common Questions Asked by Clients, Prenatal and Postpartum Consultation Topics, Facilitators for Telehealth Versus In-Person Consultations, Barriers for Telehealth Versus In-Person Consultations, Best Practices, and COVID-19 Adaptations. From participant interviews, common subthemes emerged. The primary adaptation due to COVID-19 was shifting to telehealth. Content in lactation consultations was similar via in-person and telehealth sessions. Typical content areas included breast pumping and mother's milk supply. A notable difference was the lack of physical examinations for women and newborns in telehealth sessions. Scheduling flexibility was a key facilitator of telehealth consultations, whereas the inability to provide hands-on assistance and chaotic home environments were common barriers. In-person facilitators included weighing newborns to assess feeding success and insurance billing coverage, whereas unsupportive family members were noted as a barrier. Diversity, equity, and inclusion-related barriers (e.g., language barriers, lack of reflective diversity, lack of stable Internet access) were observed in both settings. Best practices for in-person and telehealth consultations included meeting mothers where they are and focusing on mothers' goals.

CONCLUSION

Practice adaptations adopted during the pandemic and best practice recommendations may be useful for lactation support providers and other health care professionals caring for breastfeeding dyads.

Informing State-Wide Coalition Efforts to Implement and Integrate Nutrition Best Practices in Early Care and Education: Focus Group Insights from Child Care Providers

A healthy diet in early childhood is an important contributor to ensuring lifelong health and in reducing risk for obesity. The child care environment is critical to supporting nutrition as a majority of young children less than 5 years of age are enrolled in out-of-home care. In order to better understand barriers to implementing and integrating nutrition best practices, we conduced focus groups with child care providers (n = 25) in Illinois. Providers from low-income communities, rural communities, and communities of color were prioritized. Focus group participants reported several challenges including the high cost of nutritious food, picky eating, and their perception that parents did not set good examples at home. Many providers identified the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) as a critical resource in helping them implement best practices. Providers discussed needing and wanting more training, more money for food, and more parental support. These results indicate support for additional resources and sustained training and technical assistance to address perceived challenges. The evidence of the importance of CACFP in helping providers engage in nutrition best practices indicates support for expansion and strengthening of the program.