1
|
Long X, Liu S, Kang R, Sun Y, Tian M, Zhao L, Lei C, Wang H, Yang X. 2002-2022 Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli of Swine in Mainland China: A Meta-Analysis. Vet Sci 2025; 12:345. [PMID: 40284847 PMCID: PMC12031296 DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12040345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2025] [Revised: 03/23/2025] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Swine have emerged as significant reservoirs of antibiotic-resistant strains and genes. To establish a sound rationale for applying quinolone antibiotics in the swine industry, a meta-analysis was performed on the resistance rate of swine-derived Escherichia coli to quinolone antibiotics in China from 2002 to 2022. We systematically searched through three databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI, and included 53 eligible studies within the specified timeframe. Resistance rates were calculated using a random-effects model and the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation. The resistance rates observed were as follows: 37% for levofloxacin (95% CI: 27~47%), 43% for ofloxacin (95% CI: 34~51%), 54% for enrofloxacin (95% CI: 46~62%), and 50% for ciprofloxacin (95% CI: 42~58%). Further subgroup analyses illuminated that the resistance rates were higher in mainland China's eastern regions than in western regions. Additionally, there was no significant decrease in the resistance rate over time in different periods. From 2002 to 2022, Escherichia coli strains from swine in various regions of mainland China exhibited differing degrees of generalized resistance to quinolones. This poses a potential public health risk and underscores the fact that the control of quinolone antibiotics remains a prolonged and ongoing challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelin Long
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Shujun Liu
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Runmin Kang
- Sichuan Animal Science Academy, Chengdu 610066, China;
| | - Yue Sun
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Mingyue Tian
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Lijun Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Changwei Lei
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Hongning Wang
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| | - Xin Yang
- Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Animal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; (X.L.); (S.L.); (Y.S.); (M.T.); (L.Z.); (C.L.); (H.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Microbiological Safety of Food of Animal Origin from Organic Farms. J Vet Res 2021; 65:87-92. [PMID: 33817400 PMCID: PMC8009579 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2021-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The organic food sector and consumer interest in organic products are growing continuously. The safety and quality of such products must be at least equal to those of conventional equivalents, but attaining the same standards requires overcoming a particular problem identified in organic food production systems: the occurrence of bacterial pathogens such as Salmonella, Campylobacter, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and pathogenic Escherichia coli. These food-borne microorganisms were detected in the production environments of such food. The prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in organic livestock and products may be higher, but may also be the same as or lower than in like material from conventional farms. Furthermore, the incidence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria was more often detected in conventional than in organic production. The aim of this review was to present the recent information on the microbiological safety of food of animal origin produced from raw materials from organic farms.
Collapse
|
3
|
Upadhyaya I, Arsi K, Fanatico A, Wagle B, Shrestha S, Upadhyay A, Coon C, Schlumbohm M, Trushenski J, Owens-Hanning C, Riaz M, Farnell M, Donoghue D, Donoghue A. Bigheaded Carp-Based Meal as a Sustainable and Natural Source of Methionine in Feed for Ecological and Organic Poultry Production. J APPL POULTRY RES 2019. [DOI: 10.3382/japr/pfz077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
4
|
Micciche AC, Rubinelli PM, Ricke SC. Source of Water and Potential Sanitizers and Biological Antimicrobials for Alternative Poultry Processing Food Safety Applications. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS 2018. [DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
5
|
Österberg J, Wingstrand A, Nygaard Jensen A, Kerouanton A, Cibin V, Barco L, Denis M, Aabo S, Bengtsson B. Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli from Pigs in Organic and Conventional Farming in Four European Countries. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157049. [PMID: 27362262 PMCID: PMC4928804 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Organic pig production differs in many ways from conventional production of pigs, e.g., in antibiotic use, herd structure, feeding regimes, access to outdoor areas and space allowance per pig. This study investigated if these differences result in a lower occurrence of antibiotic resistance in organic slaughter pigs in Denmark, France, Italy and Sweden. Samples were taken from the colon content and/or faeces and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of ten antibiotics were determined in isolates of Escherichia coli. In addition, the proportion of tetracycline (TET) resistant E. coli in colon content and/or faeces from individual pigs was determined. In all four countries the percentage resistance to ampicillin, streptomycin, sulphonamides or trimethoprim was significantly lower in E. coli from organic pigs. In France and Italy, the percentage of isolates resistant to chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, nalidixic acid or gentamicin was also significantly lower in the E. coli from organic pigs. Resistance to cefotaxime, was not found in any country. The percentage of E. coli isolates resistant to TET as well as the proportion of TET-resistant E. coli was significantly lower in organic than in conventional pigs, except in Sweden where TET-resistance was equally low in both production types. There were also differences between countries within production type in the percentage resistance to individual antibiotics as well as the proportion of TET-resistant E. coli with lower median proportions in Sweden and Denmark compared to France and Italy. The study shows that in each of the four countries resistance in intestinal E. coli was less common in organic than in conventional pigs, but that there were also large differences in resistance between countries within each production type, indicating that both country- and production-specific factors influence the occurrence of resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Wingstrand
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Annaelle Kerouanton
- French Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France
| | - Veronica Cibin
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Legnaro, Italy
| | - Lisa Barco
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Legnaro, Italy
| | - Martine Denis
- French Agency for Food, Environment and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES), Ploufragan, France
| | - Sören Aabo
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanad YM, Johnson K, Park SH, Han J, Deck J, Foley SL, Kenney B, Ricke S, Nayak R. Molecular Characterization ofSalmonella entericaSerovars Isolated from a Turkey Production Facility in the Absence of Selective Antimicrobial Pressure. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2016; 13:80-7. [DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yasser M. Sanad
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| | - Kelly Johnson
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| | - Si Hong Park
- Center for Food Safety and Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
| | - Jing Han
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| | - Joanna Deck
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| | - Steven L. Foley
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| | - Brett Kenney
- Department of Animal and Nutritional Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Steven Ricke
- Center for Food Safety and Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas
| | - Rajesh Nayak
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Milillo S, Stout J, Hanning I, Clement A, Fortes E, den Bakker H, Wiedmann M, Ricke S. Listeria monocytogenes and hemolytic Listeria innocua in poultry. Poult Sci 2012; 91:2158-63. [DOI: 10.3382/ps.2012-02292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
8
|
Foley SL, Nayak R, Hanning IB, Johnson TJ, Han J, Ricke SC. Population dynamics of Salmonella enterica serotypes in commercial egg and poultry production. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011; 77:4273-9. [PMID: 21571882 PMCID: PMC3127710 DOI: 10.1128/aem.00598-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 265] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Fresh and processed poultry have been frequently implicated in cases of human salmonellosis. Furthermore, increased consumption of meat and poultry has increased the potential for exposure to Salmonella enterica. While advances have been made in reducing the prevalence and frequency of Salmonella contamination in processed poultry, there is mounting pressure on commercial growers to prevent and/or eliminate these human pathogens in preharvest production facilities. Several factors contribute to Salmonella colonization in commercial poultry, including the serovar and the infectious dose. In the early 1900s, Salmonella enterica serovars Pullorum and Gallinarum caused widespread diseases in poultry, but vaccination and other voluntary programs helped eradicate pullorum disease and fowl typhoid from commercial flocks. However, the niche created by the eradication of these serovars was likely filled by S. Enteritidis, which proliferated in the bird populations. While this pathogen remains a significant problem in commercial egg and poultry production, its prevalence among poultry has been declining since the 1990s. Coinciding with the decrease of S. Enteritidis, S. Heidelberg and S. Kentucky have emerged as the predominant serovars in commercial broilers. In this review, we have highlighted bacterial genetic and host-related factors that may contribute to such shifts in Salmonella populations in commercial poultry and intervention strategies that could limit their colonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Foley
- Division of Microbiology, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhang D, Hu H, Rao Q, Zhao Z. Synergistic effects and physiological responses of selected bacterial isolates from animal feed to four natural antimicrobials and two antibiotics. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2011; 8:1055-62. [PMID: 21612425 DOI: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, 20 samples from three different sources of animal feed were investigated and six bacterial isolates were identified. The susceptibility of four natural antimicrobials, namely, eugenol, cinnamaldehyde, thymol, and carvacrol, against six of these isolates was determined. Carvacrol and eugenol showed better inhibitory effects with larger zones of inhibition. The minimal inhibitory concentration for a range of antibiotics on the susceptibility of two isolates (namely, Sphingomonas paucimobilis and Klebsiella oxytoca) was investigated using the VITEK® 2 microbiological identification system. Both isolates showed a variety of resistance to 18 antibiotics. The minimal inhibitory concentration and fractional inhibitory concentration index of those two isolates for ampicillin and nitrofurantoin in combination with four phenolic compounds was determined. Synergistic interactions were found for most antimicrobial/antibiotic combinations; thymol and carvacrol were very effective (fractional inhibitory concentration ≤0.5) in combination with all antibiotics tested against S. paucimobilis and K. oxytoca, respectively. Ultra performance liquid chromatography techniques were used to investigate the physiological effects of the four natural antimicrobials against those two isolates. Two identical peaks were found to be systematically different between cinnamaldehyde-treated and -untreated cells. The identity of the peaks is unknown and further investigation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DongLai Zhang
- Institute of Agri-Food Standards and Testing Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2901 BeiDi Road, Shanghai, P.R. China.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Farzan A, Friendship RM, Dewey CE, Poppe C, Funk J. Evaluation of the Risk Factors for Shedding Salmonella with or without Antimicrobial Resistance in Swine Using Multinomial Regression Method. Zoonoses Public Health 2010; 57 Suppl 1:85-93. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01357.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Melendez S, Hanning I, Han J, Nayak R, Clement A, Wooming A, Hererra P, Jones F, Foley S, Ricke S. Salmonella enterica isolates from pasture-raised poultry exhibit antimicrobial resistance and class I integrons. J Appl Microbiol 2010; 109:1957-66. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04825.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Phenotypic and Genotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Campylobacter jejuni Isolated from Cattle, Sheep, and Free-Range Poultry Faeces. Int J Microbiol 2010; 2009:456573. [PMID: 20224816 PMCID: PMC2834959 DOI: 10.1155/2009/456573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2009] [Accepted: 12/03/2009] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 13 antimicrobial agents were determined by broth microdilution for 72 Campylobacter jejuni strains from livestock. Twenty-three (31.9%) isolates were fully susceptible; all isolates were susceptible to erythromycin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, and meropenem, and all but one to kanamycin. Resistance to quinolones was highest (52.8%), reaching similar values among poultry, dairy cattle, and sheep, but lower in beef cattle. Resistance to tetracyclines (48.6%) was mainly associated to dairy cattle and β-lactams (26.4%) to poultry. Multidrug resistance was mainly detected in dairy cattle (28.6%) and poultry (21.0%), whereas beef cattle had the highest percentage of fully susceptible isolates. Two real-time PCR assays to detect point mutations associated to quinolone (C257T in the gyrA gene) and macrolide (A2075G in the 23S rRNA genes) resistance were developed and validated on these strains. The analysis of a further set of 88 isolates by real-time PCR confirmed the absence of macrolide resistance and demonstrated the reproducibility and processability of the assay.
Collapse
|
13
|
European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Sci 2010; 84:284-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 302] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2009] [Revised: 04/26/2009] [Accepted: 05/03/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
14
|
Kijlstra A, Meerburg BG, Bos AP. Food safety in free-range and organic livestock systems: risk management and responsibility. J Food Prot 2009; 72:2629-37. [PMID: 20003752 DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.12.2629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Animal production systems that offer outdoor access to the animals have become increasingly popular in the Western world due to the growing general discontent of consumers with conventional bioindustrial farming practices. These open production systems offer improved animal welfare but may create new problems for animal health, resulting in increased food safety risks from bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections or environmental contaminants. Examples of these new problems include increased Toxoplasma gondii infections in pigs and high dioxin levels in eggs from free-range hens. In this review, the relation between positive and negative points of free-range and organic livestock production systems is discussed with reference to production in The Netherlands. We investigated how proponents of more animal welfare friendly systems deal with potential negative issues in public and whether any risk communication is used. Generally, we found that the existence of a dilemma is disputed or avoided in communication with the consumer. This avoidance could be detrimental for public trust in alternative animal production systems, should problems occur. To prevent future problems, it will be necessary to communicate about the relevant types and sources of the food safety risks to the consumers. The responsibility for protecting food safety should be properly divided among the various parties involved: producers, processors, governments, nongovernmental organizations, and consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kijlstra
- Animal Sciences Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|