Comparison of molecular cytokeratin 19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (CK19 RT-PCR) and immunocytochemical detection of micrometastatic breast cancer cells in hematopoietic harvests

Human mammaglobin: a superior marker for reverse-transcriptase PCR in detecting circulating tumor cells in breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women in the USA and the second most common cause of death in females who develop cancer. Recently, the detection of circulating tumor cells has emerged as a promising tool for monitoring the progression of clinically occult micrometastases in breast cancer patients. Sensitive molecular techniques, primarily based upon the reverse-transcriptase PCR, using various molecules as markers, have been developed to detect circulating tumor cells. Among those molecules, human mammaglobin mRNA has been found to be the most specific marker for the hematogenous spread of breast cancer cells. In this article, we review the current knowledge regarding the use of reverse-transcriptase PCR for detecting human mammaglobin mRNA as a biomarker for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer patients, and evaluate the clinical implications of human mammaglobin since it was first isolated in 1996.

Detection of Survivin-expressing circulating cancer cells in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients by a RT-PCR ELISA

Survivin mRNA expression was detected in 69.2%-93.8% of primary breast carcinomas, but is rarely expressed in normal breast tissues and hematopoietic cells. The objective of this study was to investigate the significance that the detection of Survinin-expressing circulating breast cancer cells in the peripheral blood has on clinical outcomes. The detection method was based on a RT-PCR ELISA technique developed in our laboratory. Sixty-seven breast cancer patients in various stages and 135 normal healthy women were investigated. Survivin-expressing circulating cancer cells were detected in the peripheral blood samples from 34 (50.7%) out of 67 breast cancer patients, but not in the healthy women that were used as controls. The presence of Survivin-expressing circulating breast cancer cells was found to be significantly associated with various clinicopathological parameters such as vessel infiltration, histological grade, tumor size, nodal status, ER/PgR status, Her-2 status and clinical stages of the disease (P < 0.01). During a follow-up period of 36 months, 9 out of 11 (81.8%) breast cancer patients that had a positive Survivin-expressing at the time of the initial assay test suffered a relapse of the disease, whereas recurrence was only found in 2 out of 6 (33.3%) breast cancer patients that had a negative Survivin-expression. Thus, the detection of circulating cancer cells expressing Survivin mRNA could provide valuable information for the prediction of metastasis and recurrence of breast cancer.

RT-PCR determination of maspin and mammaglobin B in peripheral blood of healthy donors and breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of two markers, maspin and mammaglobin B, singly or in combination, to detect breast cancer. To define better the potential and limits of the two markers for diagnostic purposes, blood positivity was analyzed in relation to clinical, pathological and biological tumor characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The markers were determined in peripheral blood (PB) samples from 27 healthy donors and 140 previously untreated patients using nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

RESULTS

Positivity for maspin in blood samples was observed in 24% of patients with an 89% specificity. For mammaglobin B, positivity was observed in 7% of patients and never in healthy donors. The presence of maspin was correlated with cell proliferation of the primary tumor (P = 0.015), whereas mammaglobin B positivity correlated with pathological stage (P = 0.013). The presence of either marker was significantly related to nodal status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that the two markers in association could represent a potentially useful non-invasive tool to detect breast cancer. The validation of these markers as indicators of high risk of relapse is ongoing in a series of patients with an adequate follow-up.

Occult tumor cells detected in autologous blood stem cell harvests have no impact on 5 year outcomes for breast cancer patients with 4-9 positive nodes treated with adjuvant high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation

Breast cancer cells have been detected in autologous blood stem cell collections of early stage breast cancer patients, but their clinical significance is undefined. From October 1993 to August 1998, 32 consecutive Stage II breast cancer patients with 4-9-positive nodes underwent stem cell apheresis. The patients were treated with cyclophosphamide 1.75 gm/m(2), etoposide 400 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days, followed by infusion of the autologous cells. Cytospins of cells from each apheresis collections and from an aliquot of three pooled collections were examined for cytokeratin expression using an immunocytochemical assay. The cells were considered positive for tumor if at least one cell with tumor morphology stained positively for cytokeratin. Negative aliquots were confirmed with RT-PCR. Six patients (19%) had positive collections. In total, 24 patients (75%) were disease free a median of 61 (30-86) months after transplant. Eight patients relapsed at a median of 17 (8-27) months after transplant. Four of the disease-free patients and two of the relapsed patients had positive apheresis collections. There was no significant correlation between the presence of detectable tumor cells in the graft product and outcome.

Detection and quantification of small numbers of circulating tumour cells in peripheral blood using laser scanning cytometer (LSC)

The detection of circulating tumour cells disseminated from solid tumours requires extremely sensitive methods. Molecular genetic methods, which are most sensitive, are not applicable to solid tumours because no tumour-specific genetic markers are available. Detection of disseminated tumour cells by immunocytochemistry is time-consuming, whereas fluorimetry is fast and quantitative. The laser scanning cytometer (LSC) provides an automated microscopic procedure for screening up to 5x10(4) cells in suitable time. Using this system together with an enrichment procedure which allows up to ten thousand-fold enrichment, we have quantified minimal numbers of tumour cells. In a model system, breast cancer cell line cells diluted into peripheral blood mimicked seeding of tumour cells into the periphery. After staining with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-epithelial antibody, slides were screened for positive events directly or after enrichment with antibody-coated magnetic beads. One positive cell was unequivocally detectable in 10(4) cells and 50 out of 60 tumour cells were reliably recovered from a 20 ml blood volume, equal to 1-2 cells per 10(7), after magnetic bead enrichment. This method allows quantitation of tumour cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow in reasonable time and will, for the first time, enable extensive investigation of the seeding behaviour of tumours.

Epithelial cells in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer of the head and neck: incidence, detection and possible clinical significance

In this study amplification of cytokeratin-19 mRNA by Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to detect circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with cancer of the head and neck before, during and after radiation therapy. Detection of cytokeratin-19-positive cells coincided with local failure, distant metastasis and anemia.

A real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect breast carcinoma cells in peripheral blood

BACKGROUND

The detection of occult carcinoma cells in patients with breast cancer has been shown to predict disease recurrence and metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To improve on molecular detection of breast carcinoma cells in blood, we have developed a sensitive and quantitative assay using real-time quantitative RT-PCR identifying transcripts of the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) gene.

RESULTS

This real-time quantitative RT-PCR is sensitive, accurate and has a high reproducibility within a wide dynamic range, which permits simultaneous quantitative analysis of samples with varying input concentrations. Furthermore, the procedure offers several technical advantages over classic quantitative PCR methods (competitive RT-PCR, Northern blotting) such as decreased likelihood of contamination due to absence of post-PCR manipulations, high sample throughput because of absence of post-PCR processing time (no agarose gel electrophoresis). In this pilot study, we detected significantly elevated CK19 transcript levels in < 10% of the volunteers, in +/- 30% of stage I-IIIa patients preoperatively and in > 70% of the and stage IV breast cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyses using this real time quantitative RT-PCR for CK19 mRNA may prove to have clinical implications in the assessment of circulating tumour cells in peripheral blood, micrometastases in bone marrow or lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. Application of this technique in a clinical population may improve diagnosis and monitoring of metastatic breast cancer and its validation is currently ongoing.

Detection of circulating breast cancer cells by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

The confounding problem in treatment of breast cancer is the metastasis of breast tumour. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been recently used in the detection of circulating breast cancer cells. This review reports on the development of this assay as well as its advantages and disadvantages. We feel that cytokeratin 20 and beta -human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) mRNA are the best markers for the detection of circulating breast cancer cells. We suggest that the multiple RNA marker RT-PCR assay can help to increase both sensitivity and specificity of detection, and that quantitative RT-PCR assay is more effective than the qualitative assay in the detection of circulating breast cancer cells.

Detection of circulating tumor cells and micrometastases in stage II, III, and IV breast cancer patients utilizing cytology and immunocytochemistry

Evaluation for circulating tumor cells and bone marrow micrometastases has generated considerable interest due to a potential association with disease recurrence and poor prognosis. In this study, we examined bone marrow and apheresis samples from Stage II, III, and IV patients (n 120) enrolled in various clinical breast cancer trials at the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute. For each patient sample, two Diff-Quik-stained cytospins were reviewed for morphology, and approximately 1 x 10(6) cells were analyzed for the expression of cytokeratins using an avidin-biotin immunoperoxidase method. Keratin-positive malignant cells appearing as single cells or in small clusters were detected in bone marrow samples from Stage IV patients only (9/68, 13%) and detected in apheresis samples from both Stage III and IV patients (13/245, 5%). These findings indicate that the combination of cytomorphology with immunocytochemistry can be utilized for the investigation of circulating tumor cells and bone marrow micrometastases, and that positive results appear to correlate with high tumor stage/burden.

RT-PCR-based detection of occult disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with solid tumors. An overview

Despite recent progress in early detection and local curative therapy, patients with primary epithelial cancer quite frequently relapse with incurable metastasis. Early disseminated tumor cells that may be seminal for distant failure and are undetectable by current diagnostic methods have been identified by immunocytochemical techniques in bone marrow of cancer patients using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratins. Recently, promising new molecular approaches, namely, reverse transcriptase--polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, have been suggested as a potential technique for the detection of minimal residual tumor burden by targeting mRNA transcribed from epithelial genes in bone marrow, peripheral blood, or lymph nodes. Several studies using RT-PCR thus far indicate a highly sensitive and specific staging tool, although the prognostic value is still controversial. However, limitations may arise from ectopic expression of marker mRNA in hematopoietic cells and deficient expression in circulating tumor cells. The present review focuses on the relevant literature and demonstrates the range of current applications of RT-PCR-based assays for detecting disseminated tumor cells in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with solid tumors. We will both summarize technical evaluations of published molecular approaches and discuss the widely disparate results on PCR findings in clinical studies.

Competitive cytokeratin 19 RT-PCR for quantification of breast cancer cells in blood cell suspensions

Detection of residual tumor cells in BM and PBPC products has been correlated with worse outcome of breast cancer patients. Still, there is a considerable demand for studies investigating the influence of the actual tumor cell number on prognosis, as quantification routinely has been cumbersome and time consuming and, thus, was evaded. We developed and evaluated a competitive RT-PCR-ELISA assay for cytokeratin 19 (CK19) with standard curve quantification that allows quantification of multiple samples within a working day; mRNA isolation, RT-PCR reaction, and automated ELISA detection were carried out using commercial kits. Results were expressed as OD420nm ratios of CK19 and an internal competitor. Values were then converted into tumor cell numbers using a standard curve of MCF-7 tumor cells. The assay had high specificity because of primers and capture probes with great heterogeneity to both published pseudogenes, which was confirmed by BLAST sequence alignment. We achieved a sensitivity of detecting 1 tumor cell per 10(6) mononuclear cells (MNC). Between-batch precision (n = 8) for quantification was consistent and reasonable, with a coefficient of variation around 25%. Therefore, this assay should be suitable and sufficient for routine quantification of tumor cell numbers in BM or PBPC samples.

Comparison of progenitor cell collection on day 4 or day 5 after steady-state stimulation with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: influence on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination

To determine the influence of apheresis timing on CD34+ cell yield, subpopulation, and breast cancer cell contamination, 48 women with breast cancer were stimulated from steady-state hematopoiesis in a prospective but nonrandomized study with 2 x 5 microg/kg G-CSF s.c. alone, and apheresis was started either on day 4 (n = 24) or day 5 (n = 24). Forty-eight women with breast cancer (stage II/III, n = 30; stage IV; n = 12; inflammatory, n = 6) and a median age of 44 years were well balanced between the two groups. In group I, aphersis was started on day 4 and additionally performed on day 5 after G-CSF stimulation, and in group II, apheresis was started on day 5. CD34+ cell count and CD34+ cell subpopulation were determined according to international criteria. Breast cancer cell contamination was detected by immunocytology. The median CD34+ cell harvest on day 4 was 3.3 x 10(6)/kg body weight (range 0.5-12.8) and 6 x 10(6)/kg BW (range 0.3-30) for patients starting on day 5 (p = 0.01). Those patients starting on day 4 achieved a median CD34+ cell count of 4 x 10(6)/kg (range 0.7-13) on day 5 (NS). Twenty-one percent of group I and 71% of group II achieved >5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis, whereas <2.5 x 10(6)/kg BW CD34+ cells in the first apheresis were observed in 38% of group I and 16% of group II. No differences were observed between the CD34+ cell subpopulations, CD34+/CD38+ (10.5% versus 10.5%) and CD34+/Thyl+ (1.5% versus 1.8%). The CD34+ cell harvest from consecutive collecting on days 4 and 5 was nearly identical to the harvest starting on day 5 (6.4 versus 6 x 10(6)/kg). Collecting CD34+ progenitor cells after stimulation with G-CSF alone on day 5 results in a significantly higher cell yield than starting collecting on day 4. No differences in respect to breast cancer cell contamination and CD34+ cell subpopulation were observed.

Detection of circulating tumour cells in patients with breast or ovarian cancer by molecular cytogenetics

Detection of micrometastases in patients with solid tumours may aid the establishment of prognosis and development of new therapeutic approaches. This study was designed to investigate the presence and frequency of tumour cells in the peripheral blood (PB) of patients with breast or ovarian cancer by using a combination of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Separated tumour cell and PB-samples from 48 patients (35 breast cancers, 12 ovarian tumours, one uterine sarcoma) were analysed for the presence of numerical aberrations of chromosomes 7, 12, 17 and 17 q11.2-q12. Twenty-five patients had primary disease and 23 had relapsed. The technique allows the detection of one tumour cell in 106 normal cells. Circulating tumour cells were detected in 35/48 cases (17 patients had relapsed and 13 primary carcinoma with lymph node or solid metastases) by the expression of anti-cytokeratin and the presence of numerical chromosomal abnormalities. PB-tumour cells of patients with a primary carcinoma and without solid metastases had a significantly lower percentage of chromosomal aberrations, especially for chromosome 12 (P = 0.035; P = 0.038) compared to those with relapsed disease and solid metastases. Detection and quantification of minimal residual disease may monitor the response to cytotoxic or hormonal therapy and may identify women at risk of relapse.

Detection and clinical importance of micrometastatic disease

Metastatic relapse in patients with solid tumors is caused by systemic preoperative or perioperative dissemination of tumor cells. The presence of individual tumor cells in bone marrow and in peripheral blood can be detected by immunologic or molecular methods and is being regarded increasingly as a clinically relevant prognostic factor. Because the goal of adjuvant therapy is the eradication of occult micrometastatic tumor cells before metastatic disease becomes clinically evident, the early detection of micrometastases could identify the patients who are most (and least) likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. In addition, more sensitive methods for detecting such cells should increase knowledge about the biologic mechanisms of metastasis and improve the diagnosis and treatment of micrometastatic disease. In contrast to solid metastatic tumors, micrometastatic tumor cells are appropriate targets for intravenously applied agents because macromolecules and immunocompetent effector cells should have access to the tumor cells. Because the majority of micrometastatic tumor cells may be nonproliferative (G0 phase), standard cytotoxic chemotherapies aimed at proliferating cells may be less effective, which might explain, in part, the failure of chemotherapy. Thus, adjuvant therapies that are aimed at dividing and quiescent cells, such as antibody-based therapies, are of considerable interest. From a literature search that used the databases MEDLINE(R), CANCERLIT(R), Biosis(R), Embase(R), and SciSearch(R), we discuss the current state of research on minimal residual cancer in patients with epithelial tumors and the diagnostic and clinical implications of these findings.

Tumour cell detection in G-CSF mobilised stem cell harvests of patients with breast cancer

Peripheral blood stem cells were mobilised with G-CSF from steady-state haemopoiesis after previous anthracyclin-containing standard dose chemotherapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer. 48 samples were obtained from patients with stage II-III breast cancer and > or = 10 lymph nodes, 15 samples from patients with chemotherapy sensitive metastatic disease, and 13 samples from women with inflammatory breast cancer. 44 samples were first or single leukaphereses and 32 samples were second or third harvests. Aliquots were searched for contaminating tumour cells by immunocytochemistry (IC) and cytokeratin-19 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction rtPCR). The median count of MNCs examined by IC was 2 x 10(6); cDNA prepared from 2 x 10(7) cells was subjected to PCR. Fifty-nine samples were examined by immunocytochemistry, 36 samples by rtPCR, and 19 samples by both techniques. Samples investigated by IC and rtPCR were judged as positive if there was at least one positive test. On the whole, 42/79 (55.3%) of the samples were positive with an insignificant trend to a higher positivity rate in second or subsequent leukaphereses (52.3% vs 59.3%). The median tumour cell load per 10(6) MNCs was low with 0.5 (0-7) cells in all, and a total of 2.2 (0.5-7) cells in positive specimen. Differences in the cancer cell load of first and subsequent leukaphereses and between subgroups of patients were not found. PCR and IC gave consistent results in 63.2%. This phenomenon can be explained by the greater sensitivity of the molecular method and by a Poisson distribution of coharvested tumour cells in samples. Tumour cell contamination in G-CSF mobilised stem cells from patients with breast cancer from steady state haemopoiesis after preceding anthacyclin-containing chemotherapy is frequent, but the tumour cell load is low. To allow a comparison of different studies dealing with cancer cell contamination in stem cells, standardisation of assays is necessary.