Abdominal wall infections with in situ mesh

Microbiological epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of infected meshes after prosthetic abdominal wall repair

INTRODUCTION

Infectious complications of parietal mesh after prosthetic abdominal wall repair are rare. Their management is complex. Furthermore, the emergence of bacterial resistance, the presence of a foreign material, the need to continue an extended antibiotic therapy, and the choice of an appropriate treatment are crucial. The objective of this study is to access the microbiological epidemiology of infected parietal meshes in order to optimize the empirical antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2021, a monocentric and retrospective study was performed in patients hospitalized for infected parietal meshes at Avicenne hospital, in Paris area. Clinical and microbiological data such as antibiotic susceptibility were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with infected parietal meshes have been hospitalized during this period. Meshes were in preaponevrotic positions (n=10; 38%), retromuscular (n=6; 23%) and intraperitoneal (n=10; 38%). Among the 22 (84.6%) documented cases of infections, 17 (77.3%) were polymicrobial. A total of 54 bacteria were isolated, 48 of which had an antibiogram available. The most frequently isolated bacteria were: Enterobacterales (n=19), Enterococcus spp. (n=11) and Staphylococcus aureus (n=6), whereas anaerobes were poorly isolated (n=3). Concerning these isolated bacteria, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, metronidazole-associated cefotaxime, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem were susceptible in 45.5%, 68.2%, 63.6%, 77.2%, of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights that infections of abdominal parietal meshes may be polymicrobial and the association amoxicillin-clavulanic acid cannot be used as a probabilist antibiotic therapy because of the high resistance rate in isolated bacteria. The association piperacillin-tazobactam appears to be a more adapted empirical treatment to preserve carbapenems, a broad-spectrum antibiotic class.

Antibacterial polypropylene mesh fixation with a cyanoacrylate adhesive improves its response to infection

BACKGROUND

Antibacterial meshes for hernia repair seek to avoid infection in the patient. As these biomaterials are especially prone to bacteria settling at their sutured borders, this study examines whether the use of a cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive could improve mesh behavior at the fixation zones.

METHODS

First, antibacterial polypropylene meshes were prepared by soaking in 0.05% chlorhexidine, and the response of n-hexyl cyanoacrylate to contamination with Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 was assessed in vitro. Then, in a preclinical model, partial defects (5 x 3 cm) were created in the abdominal wall of 18 New Zealand White rabbits and repaired with mesh to establish the following 3 study groups: (1) mesh without chlorhexidine fixed with cyanoacrylate, (2) antibacterial mesh fixed with sutures, and (3) antibacterial mesh fixed with cyanoacrylate (n = 6 each). The implants were inoculated with 10⁶ CFU/mL of S aureus. At 14 days after surgery, bacterial adhesion to the implant and its integration within host tissue were determined through microbiological, histological and immunohistochemical procedures.

RESULTS

As observed in vitro, the cyanoacrylate gave rise to a 1.5-cm bacteria-free margin around the prosthetic mesh. In vivo, the tissue adhesive prevented bacterial adhesion to the fixation zones, reducing infection of chlorhexidine-free meshes and optimizing the efficacy of the antibacterial meshes compared with those fixed with sutures.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that cyanoacrylate fixation does not affect mesh integration into the host tissue. Likewise, the antibacterial behavior and tissue response of a chlorhexidine-treated polypropylene mesh is improved when cyanoacrylate is used for its fixation.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Long-Term Mesh Explantation Due to Infection in More than 100,000 Hernia Operation Patients

BACKGROUND

Infectious complications after hernia operation are potentially disastrous, often requiring long-term antibiotic administration, debridement, and mesh explantation. Our objective was to describe the long-term incidence and risk factors for synthetic mesh explantation due to infection after hernia operation in a large cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study using Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program and chart review of veterans undergoing abdominal or groin hernia repair with synthetic mesh implantation during 2008-2015. The main outcome was mesh explantation due to infection within 5 years.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 103,869 hernia operations, of which 74.3% were inguinal, 10.7% umbilical, and 15.0% ventral. Explantation incidence was highest among ventral (1.5%). Median explantation interval overall was 208 days. In multivariable logistic regression, all obesity levels from pre-obesity to obesity class III were associated with higher explantation risk. American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification of 3 to 5 was associated with odds ratio (OR) of 1.7 (95% CI, 1.28 to 2.26), as was longer operative duration (OR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.51 to 2.21), and contaminated or dirty surgical wound classification (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.64). Umbilical repair (OR 6.11; 95% CI, 4.14 to 9.02) and ventral repair (OR 14.35; 95% CI, 10.39 to 19.82) were associated with higher risk compared with inguinal. Open repair was associated with a higher risk compared with laparoscopic (OR 3.57; 95% CI, 2.52 to 5.05). Deep incisional surgical site infection within 30 days of operation was more likely to result in long-term mesh explantation (29.2%) than either superficial (6.4%) or organ space infection (22.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mesh explantation for infection is most common after ventral hernia repair. Risk factor optimization is crucial to minimize such an end point.

Biodegradable rifampicin-releasing coating of surgical meshes for the prevention of bacterial infections

Polypropylene mesh implants are routinely used to repair abdominal wall defects or incisional hernia. However, complications associated with mesh implantation, such as mesh-related infections, can cause serious problems and may require complete surgical removal. Hence, the aim of the present study was the development of a safe and efficient coating to reduce postoperative mesh infections. Biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide acid) microspheres loaded with rifampicin as an antibacterial agent were prepared through single emulsion evaporation method. The particle size distribution (67.93±3.39 μm for rifampicin-loaded microspheres and 64.43±3.61 μm for unloaded microspheres) was measured by laser diffraction. Furthermore, the encapsulation efficiency of rifampicin (61.5%±2.58%) was detected via ultraviolet–visible (UV/Vis) spectroscopy. The drug release of rifampicin-loaded microspheres was detected by UV/Vis spectroscopy over a period of 60 days. After 60 days, 92.40%±3.54% of the encapsulated rifampicin has been continuously released. The viability of BJ fibroblasts after incubation with unloaded and rifampicin-loaded microspheres was investigated using an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay, which showed no adverse effects on the cells. Furthermore, the antibacterial impact of rifampicin-loaded microspheres and mesh implants, coated with the antibacterial microspheres, was investigated using an agar diffusion model with Staphylococcus aureus. The coated mesh implants were also tested in an in vivo mouse model of staphylococcal infection and resulted in a 100% protection against mesh implant infections or biofilm formation shown by macroscopic imaging, scanning electron microscopy, and histological examinations. This effective antibacterial mesh coating combining the benefit of a controlled drug delivery system and a potent antibacterial agent possesses the ability to significantly reduce postoperative implant infections.

Oral, intestinal, and skin bacteria in ventral hernia mesh implants

Background

In ventral hernia surgery, mesh implants are used to reduce recurrence. Infection after mesh implantation can be a problem and rates around 6–10% have been reported. Bacterial colonization of mesh implants in patients without clinical signs of infection has not been thoroughly investigated. Molecular techniques have proven effective in demonstrating bacterial diversity in various environments and are able to identify bacteria on a gene-specific level.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to detect bacterial biofilm in mesh implants, analyze its bacterial diversity, and look for possible resemblance with bacterial biofilm from the periodontal pocket.

Methods

Thirty patients referred to our hospital for recurrence after former ventral hernia mesh repair, were examined for periodontitis in advance of new surgical hernia repair. Oral examination included periapical radiographs, periodontal probing, and subgingival plaque collection. A piece of mesh (1×1 cm) from the abdominal wall was harvested during the new surgical hernia repair and analyzed for bacteria by PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. From patients with positive PCR mesh samples, subgingival plaque samples were analyzed with the same techniques.

Results

A great variety of taxa were detected in 20 (66.7%) mesh samples, including typical oral commensals and periodontopathogens, enterics, and skin bacteria. Mesh and periodontal bacteria were further analyzed for similarity in 16S rRNA gene sequences. In 17 sequences, the level of resemblance between mesh and subgingival bacterial colonization was 98–100% suggesting, but not proving, a transfer of oral bacteria to the mesh.

Conclusion

The results show great bacterial diversity on mesh implants from the anterior abdominal wall including oral commensals and periodontopathogens. Mesh can be reached by bacteria in several ways including hematogenous spread from an oral site. However, other sites such as gut and skin may also serve as sources for the mesh biofilm.

Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design

Surgical mesh has become an indispensable tool in hernia repair to improve outcomes and reduce costs; however, efforts are constantly being undertaken in mesh development to overcome postoperative complications. Common complications include infection, pain, adhesions, mesh extrusion and hernia recurrence. Reducing the complications of mesh implantation is of utmost importance given that hernias occur in hundreds of thousands of patients per year in the United States. In the present review, the authors present the different types of hernia meshes, discuss the key properties of mesh design, and demonstrate how each design element affects performance and complications. The present article will provide a basis for surgeons to understand which mesh to choose for patient care and why, and will explain the important technological aspects that will continue to evolve over the ensuing years.

Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design

Surgical mesh has become an indispensable tool in hernia repair to improve outcomes and reduce costs; however, efforts are constantly being undertaken in mesh development to overcome postoperative complications. Common complications include infection, pain, adhesions, mesh extrusion and hernia recurrence. Reducing the complications of mesh implantation is of utmost importance given that hernias occur in hundreds of thousands of patients per year in the United States. In the present review, the authors present the different types of hernia meshes, discuss the key properties of mesh design, and demonstrate how each design element affects performance and complications. The present article will provide a basis for surgeons to understand which mesh to choose for patient care and why, and will explain the important technological aspects that will continue to evolve over the ensuing years.

Evidence for Replacement of an Infected Synthetic by a Biological Mesh in Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair

Introduction

The incidence of deep infection using a synthetic mesh in inguinal hernia repair is low and reported to be well below 1%. This is in contrast to incisional hernia surgery where the reported incidence is 3% respective 13% comparing laparoscopic to open mesh repair reported in a Cochrane review. Main risk factors were long operation time, surgical site contamination, and early wound complications. An infected mesh can be preserved using conservative treatment were negative pressure wound therapy (VAC^®) could play an important role. If strategy fails, the mesh needs to be removed. This review aims to look at evidence for situations were a biological mesh would work as a replacement of a removed infected synthetic mesh.

Materials and methods

A literature search of the Medline database was performed using the PubMed search engine. Twenty publications were found relevant for this review.

Results

For studies reviewed three options are presented: removal of the infected synthetic mesh alone, replacement with either a new synthetic or a new biological mesh. Operations were all performed at specialist centers. Removal of the mesh alone was an option limited to inguinal hernias. In ventral/incisional hernias, the use of a biological mesh for replacement resulted in a very high recurrence rate, if bridging was required. Either a synthetic or a biological mesh seems to work as a replacement when fascial closure can be achieved. Evidence is though very low.

Conclusion

When required, either a synthetic or a biological mesh seems to work as a replacement for an infected synthetic mesh if the defect can be closed. It is, however, not recommended to use a biological mesh for bridging. Mesh replacement surgery is demanding and is recommended to be performed in a specialist center.

Emerging Trends in Abdominal Wall Reinforcement: Bringing Bio-Functionality to Meshes

Abdominal wall hernia is a recurrent issue world-wide and requires the implantation of over 1 million meshes per year. Because permanent meshes such as polypropylene and polyester are not free of complications after implantation, many mesh modifications and new functionalities have been investigated over the last decade. Indeed, mesh optimization is the focus of intense development and the biomaterials utilized are now envisioned as being bioactive substrates that trigger various physiological processes in order to prevent complications and to promote tissue integration. In this context, it is of paramount interest to review the most relevant bio-functionalities being brought to new meshes and to open new avenues for the innovative development of the next generation of meshes with enhanced properties for functional abdominal wall hernia repair.

First case of mesh infection due to Coccidioides spp. and literature review of fungal mesh infections after hernia repair

Fungal mesh infections are a rare complication of hernia repairs with mesh. The first case of Coccidioides spp. mesh infection is described, and a systematic literature review of all known fungal mesh infections was performed. Nine cases of fungal mesh infection are reviewed. Female and male patients are equally represented, median age is 49.5 years, and critical illness and preinfection antibiotic use were common. Fungal mesh infections are rare, but potentially fatal, complications of hernias repaired with mesh.

Gentamicin for prevention of intraoperative mesh contamination: demonstration of high bactericide effect (in vitro) and low systemic bioavailability (in vivo)

INTRODUCTION

Mesh infection is a severe complication after incisional hernia repair and occurs in 1-3 % of all open mesh implantations. For this reason, topical antimicrobial agent applied directly to the mesh is often used procedure. So far, however, this procedure lacks a scientific basis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two different meshes (Parietex™, Covidien; Ultrapro™, Ethicon Johnson & Johnson) were incubated with increasing amounts of three different Staphylococcus aureus strains (ATCC 25923; Mu50; ST239) with or without gentamicin and growth ability were determined in vitro. To further address the question of the systemic impact of topic gentamicin, serum levels were analyzed 6 and 24 h after implantation of gentamicin-impregnated multifilament meshes in 19 patients.

RESULTS

None of the gentamicin-impregnated meshes showed any bacterial growth in vitro. This effect was independent of the mesh type for all the tested S. aureus strains. In the clinical setting, serum gentamicin levels 6 h after implantation of the gentamicin-impregnated meshes were below the through-level (range 0.4-2.9 mg/l, mean 1.2 ± 0.7 mg/l). After 24 h the gentamicin serum levels in all patients had declined 90-65 % of the 6 h values.

CONCLUSION

Local application of gentamicin to meshes can completely prevent the growth of even gentamicin-resistant S. aureus strains in vitro. The systemic relevance of gentamicin in the clinical controls showed to be very low, without reaching therapeutic concentrations.

Long-term outcome of biologic graft: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Biologic grafts have been shown to support tissue regeneration in various animal models. Very few reports in the literature exist to show tissue remodeling in patients after placement of a biologic graft.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 69-year-old Caucasian man with a history of small bowel carcinoid resection and concurrent recurrent ventral hernia repair with component separation and underlay biologic graft placement who underwent re-operation for metastatic carcinoid tumor to his liver. Complete incorporation of the biologic graft was observed. Tissue analysis of the incised midline fascia revealed tissue remodeling at the site of the previous abdominal wall defect.

CONCLUSION

Placement of a biologic graft in ventral hernia repair supports tissue regeneration similar to that previously reported in animal models.

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) has established itself as a well-accepted option in the treatment of hernias. Clear benefits have been established regarding the superiority of LVHR in terms of fewer wound infections compared with open repairs. Meticulous technique and appropriate patient selection are critical to obtain the reported results.

Primary Closure of the Abdominal Wall After “Open Abdomen” Situation

“Open abdomen” is a strategy used to avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome. It has reduced mortality both in trauma and non-trauma abdominal catastrophes but also has created a challenging clinical problem. Traditionally, open abdomen is closed in two phases; primarily with a free skin graft and later with a flap reconstruction. A modern trend is to close the abdomen within the initial hospitalization. This requires multi-professional co-operation. Temporary abdominal closure methods, e.g. negative pressure wound therapy alone or combined with mesh-mediated traction, have been developed to facilitate direct fascial closure. Components separation technique, mesh reinforcement or bridging of the fascial defect with mesh and perforator saving skin undermining can be utilized in the final closure if needed. These techniques can be combined. Choice of the treatment depends on the condition of the patient and size of the fascia and skin defect, and the state of the abdominal contents.

In this paper we review the literature on the closure of an open abdomen and present the policy used in our institution in the open abdomen situations.

Ventral hernia repair with synthetic, composite, and biologic mesh: characteristics, indications, and infection profile

BACKGROUND

A variety of mesh materials are available for ventral hernia repair (VHR), each with a unique set of characteristics. Surgeons are offered an ever-expanding selection of products, making a review of the available materials timely.

METHODS

Current surgical literature is reviewed to describe the different types of synthetic mesh, the indications for the use of each type, their relative risks of infection, and other benefits and shortcomings. We also review clinical studies demonstrating outcomes, efficacy, and use of the meshes in different surgical settings, including laparoscopic hernia repair and special situations such as infection or large abdominal wall defects.

RESULTS

Three main types of prosthetic mesh are available. Synthetic mesh, such as polypropylene (PP) or polyester, is characterized by high tensile strength and vigorous tissue ingrowth, but is unsuitable for intra-abdominal placement because of its tendency to induce bowel adhesions. Composite, or barrier-coated, mesh is a dual-sided prosthetic having a synthetic parietal side to promote a strong repair and a visceral surface that repels tissue ingrowth and decreases adhesion formation. Biologic mesh is a collagen-based human, porcine, or bovine scaffold that may be implanted in the extra- or intra-peritoneal position. Biologic mesh is used frequently in the setting of infected or contaminated surgical incisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Synthetic PP mesh is an appropriate, durable material for extra-peritoneal placement in uncomplicated, clean VHR. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and composite meshes are suitable for intraperitoneal placement during laparoscopic VHR. Biologic meshes may be appropriate for contaminated fields or other special situations, but there is no consensus on when or how to use them.

Musculature tissue engineering to repair abdominal wall hernia

Hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations in surgical clinics. Tissue engineering provides insights for the treatment of abdominal wall hernias and other disorders involving deficiencies in the musculature. The present review summarizes the mechanisms of muscle development and regeneration and provides an overview of tissue engineering strategies for the construction of muscles.

[Management of mesh-related infections]

Infections of an implanted hernia mesh are a major challenge. The incidence of mesh infections after incisional hernia repair is about 1% for endoscopic techniques and can be more than 15% in open techniques. Intraoperative mesh contamination is considered to be the primary cause. All woven or knitted hernia meshes have recesses where bacteria may adhere and establish colonies. The bacterial spectrum for mesh infection includes skin pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA), Streptococcus spp., as well as E. coli, Enterococcus and Mycobacteria. The therapy approach needs to be tailored to the morphological findings and the treatment for uncomplicated phlegmon is broad spectrum antibiotic therapy. If there is encapsulated fluid accumulation, CT-controlled drainage and daily infusion of antiseptics via the drain is a good option. For dermal necrosis, mesh fistula, exposed mesh or enterocutaneous fistula, a precise CT evaluation is necessary to tailor the operation. Vacuum systems are gaining increased acceptance in conditioning the local findings. For most patients the therapeutic concept will be based on individual decisions. If parts of a formerly infected mesh remain in the patient, a lifelong follow-up is necessary.

Lysostaphin-Coated Mesh Prevents Staphylococcal Infection and Significantly Improves Survival in a Contaminated Surgical Field

Mesh and wound infections during hernia repair are predominantly caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Human acellular dermis (HAD) is known to lose its integrity in the face of large bacterial loads. The goal of this study was to determine if lysostaphin (LS), a naturally occurring anti-Staphylococcal protein, can protect HAD mesh from S. aureus infection. HAD samples, 3 cm X 3 cm, were implanted in the onlay fashion on the anterior abdominal wall of rats (n = 75). Subjects were grouped based on presence of antimicrobial bound to HAD (none or LS) and presence of S. aureus inoculum (sterile, 106, 108 CFU). At 60 days, meshes were explanted, and bacterial growth, histology, and mesh tensile strength were examined. None of the controls receiving bacterial inoculation without LS survived to 60 days. All LS-HAD sterile and LS-106 animals survived to explantation. The LS-HAD 108 group had a mortality rate of 50 per cent. All surviving LS-treated animals (n = 25) had negative wound and mesh cultures. Blinded gross and histologic evaluation and measured tensile strengths between all LS groups were comparable. Animals implanted with LS-HAD had a dramatically improved rate of survival. All animals surviving to 60 days had completely cleared S. aureus from their wounds with maintenance of mesh integrity and tensile strength. These findings strongly suggest the clinical use of LS-treated mesh in contaminated fields may translate into a more durable hernia repair.

Mesh infection in ventral incisional hernia repair: incidence, contributing factors, and treatment

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic mesh infection is a catastrophic complication of ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repair.

METHODS

The current surgical literature was reviewed to determine the incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and treatment of mesh infections.

RESULTS

Mesh infections tend to present late. Diagnosis depends on high clinical suspicion and relies on culture of the fluid surrounding the mesh or of the mesh itself. Risk factors may include a high body mass index (obesity); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; prior surgical site infection; use of larger, microporous, or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh; performance of other procedures via the same incision at the time of repair; longer operative time; lack of tissue coverage of the mesh; enterotomy; and enterocutaneous fistula. The best treatment is prevention. Treatment of mesh infection is evolving on a case-by-case basis from explantation toward mesh salvage, to prevent complications such as hernia recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Higher-quality reporting on mesh infection in VIH repair must be achieved through better classification and quantification of these infections. Tactics to avoid mesh infection should be based on best evidence and high-quality prospective trials and observational studies.

Evaluation of human acellular dermis versus porcine acellular dermis in an in vivo model for incisional hernia repair

Incisional hernias commonly occur following abdominal wall surgery. Human acellular dermal matrices (HADM) are widely used in abdominal wall defect repair. Xenograft acellular dermal matrices, particularly those made from porcine tissues (PADM), have recently experienced increased usage. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of HADM and PADM in the repair of incisional abdominal wall hernias in a rabbit model. A review from earlier work of differences between human allograft acellular dermal matrices (HADM) and porcine xenograft acellular dermal matrices (PADM) demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.05) in mechanical properties: Tensile strength 15.7 MPa vs. 7.7 MPa for HADM and PADM, respectively. Cellular (fibroblast) infiltration was significantly greater for HADM vs. PADM (Armour). The HADM exhibited a more natural, less degraded collagen by electrophoresis as compared to PADM. The rabbit model surgically established an incisional hernia, which was repaired with one of the two acellular dermal matrices 3 weeks after the creation of the abdominal hernia. The animals were euthanized at 4 and 20 weeks and the wounds evaluated. Tissue ingrowth into the implant was significantly faster for the HADM as compared to PADM, 54 vs. 16% at 4 weeks, and 58 vs. 20% for HADM and PADM, respectively at 20 weeks. The original, induced hernia defect (6 cm²) was healed to a greater extent for HADM vs. PADM: 2.7 cm² unremodeled area for PADM vs. 1.0 cm² for HADM at 20 weeks. The inherent uniformity of tissue ingrowth and remodeling over time was very different for the HADM relative to the PADM. No differences were observed at the 4-week end point. However, the 20-week data exhibited a statistically different level of variability in the remodeling rate with the mean standard deviation of 0.96 for HADM as contrasted to a mean standard deviation of 2.69 for PADM. This was significant with P < 0.05 using a one tail F test for the inherent variability of the standard deviation. No significant differences between the PADM and HADM for adhesion, inflammation, fibrous tissue or neovascularization were noted.