Is stroke unit care portable? A systematic review of the clinical trials

Prognostic value of combining 24-hour ASPECTS and hemoglobin to red cell distribution width ratio to the THRIVE score in predicting in-hospital mortality among ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a significant global health issue, directly impacting mortality and disability. The Totaled Health Risks in Vascular Events (THRIVE) score is appreciated for its simplicity and ease of use to predict stroke clinical outcomes; however, it lacks laboratory and neuroimaging data, which limits its ability to predict outcomes precisely. Our study evaluates the impact of integrating the 24-hour Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width (HB/RDW) ratio into the THRIVE score using the multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) method (combined THRIVE-MFP model) compared to the THRIVE-c model. We aim to assess their added value in predicting in-hospital mortality (IHM) prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study from January 2015 to July 2022 examined consecutive AIS patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis. Data on THRIVE scores, 24-hour ASPECTS, and HB/RDW levels were collected upon admission. The model was constructed using logistic regression and the MFP method. The prognostic value was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC). Ischemic cerebral lesions within the middle cerebral artery territory were evaluated with non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) after completing 24 hours of intravenous thrombolysis (24-hour ASPECTS).

RESULTS

Among a cohort of 345 patients diagnosed with AIS who received intravenous thrombolysis, 65 individuals (18.8%) experienced IHM. The combined THRIVE-MFP model was significantly superior to the THRIVE-c model in predicting IHM (AuROC 0.980 vs. 0.876, p<0.001), 3-month mortality (AuROC 0.947 vs. 0.892, p<0.001), and 3-month poor functional outcome (AuROC 0.910 vs. 0.853, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined THRIVE-MFP model showed excellent predictive performance, enhancing physicians' ability to stratify patient selection for intensive neurological monitoring and guiding treatment decisions. Incorporating 24-hour ASPECTS on NCCT and HB/RDW proved valuable in mortality prediction, particularly for hospitals with limited access to advanced neuroimaging resources.

The Stroke Unit Story: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?

BACKGROUND

The concept of stroke unit care has been discussed for over 50 years, but it is only in the last 25 years that clear evidence of its effectiveness has emerged to inform these discussions.

SUMMARY

This review outlines the history of the concept of stroke units to improve recovery after stroke and their evaluation in clinical trials. It describes the first systematic review of stroke unit trials published in 1993, the establishment of a collaborative research group (the Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration), the subsequent analyses and updates of the evidence base, and the efforts to implement stroke unit care in routine settings. The final section considers some of the remaining challenges in this area of research and clinical practice. Key Messages: Good quality evidence confirms that stroke patients who are looked after in a stroke unit are more likely to survive and be independent and living at home 1 year after their stroke. The apparent benefits are independent of patient age, sex, stroke type, or initial stroke severity. The benefits are most obvious in units based in a discrete ward (stroke ward). The current challenges include integrating effective stroke units with more recent systems to deliver hyper-acute stroke interventions and implementing stroke units in lower resource regions.

Outcome Predictors of Stroke Mortality in the Neurocritical Care Unit

Background: Risk factors for medium to long-term mortality after stroke are well-established but predictors of in-hospital stroke mortality are less clearly characterized. Kazakhstan has the highest age-standardized mortality rate from ischemic stroke in the world. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with stroke who were admitted over a 3.5-years period to the neurocritical care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Results: In total, 148 critically ill patients were included in the analysis (84 ischemic stroke, 64 hemorrhagic stroke). The mean age was 63 years, 45% were male and the mean Glasgow Coma Score (±SD) at baseline was 10.3 (±3.4). The in-hospital mortality rate was similar in patients with ischemic (36%) and hemorrhagic (39%) stroke (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.48-1.60). Median survival was 38 days (range: 1-89 days) in patients with ischemic stroke and 39 days (range: 1-63 days) in patients with hemorrhagic stroke. Univariable analysis found that patients who had a lower Glasgow Coma Scale, were in coma and who had cerebral edema were more likely to die in-hospital (P = 0.04, 0.02, <0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Our analysis showed that mortality risk in critically ill patients with hemorrhagic stroke was closer to mortality risk in patients with ischemic stroke than has been reported in other analyses. Hypertension, chronic heart failure, ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were the most frequent comorbidities in patients who developed severe (life-threatening) stroke. Coma and cerebral edema on admission appear to be associated with poor outcome. This is the first publication of in-hospital stroke mortality from a Central Asian population and could form the basis for future research including development of risk scores and identifying modifiable risk factors.

Understanding and improving multidisciplinary team working in geriatric medicine

Geriatric medicine is a speciality that has historically relied on team working to best serve patients. The nature of frailty in older people means that people present with numerous comorbidities, which in turn require a team-based approach to be managed, including allied health professionals, social work and nursing alongside medicine. The 'engine room' of the speciality has thus for many years been the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting-something other specialities have discovered only recently. Yet, rather paradoxically, the speciality has been slow compared to others (e.g. trauma, surgery, cancer) to reflect more formally on how team working can be enhanced, trained and supported in geriatric teams. This paper is a reflective review, grounded on our respective expertise in geriatric medicine and improvement science, on practice and its changing patterns within geriatric medicine, and the role of MDTs within it (Part 1). It offers a perspective from behavioural safety science, which has been studying team-working in healthcare for the last 20 years (Part 2) and concludes with practical suggestions, based on evidence, on how to integrate evidence and best practice into modern geriatric medicine-to address current and future challenges (Part 3).

Impact of Complex Quality-Interventions on Patient Outcome: A Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews

Quality of care and the increasing strategies to its promotion, especially in inpatient settings, led to the question which quality-interventions work best and which do not. The aim was to summarize and critically appraise the evidence on the effects of structure- and/or process-related quality-interventions on patient outcome in predominantly controlled and inpatient settings. A systematic overview of systematic reviews after electronic searches in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and PsycINFO, supplemented by hand search and expert survey, was conducted. From a total of 1559 identified records, 37 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 26 reviews assessed process-related quality-interventions, 6 structure-related quality-interventions, and 5 combined structure- and process-related quality-interventions. In all, 19 reviews reported pooled effect estimates (meta-analysis). Based on the evidence of this systematic overview, stroke units and pathways can be recommended. Although patient-relevant improvements for interprofessional approaches and discharge planning have been reported, pooled effect estimated evidence are currently missing for these and other quality-interventions.

Early rehabilitation after hospital admission for road trauma using an in-reach multidisciplinary team: a randomised controlled trial

Objective:

To investigate the impact of an in-reach rehabilitation team for patients admitted after road trauma.

Design:

Randomised control trial of usual care versus early involvement of in-reach rehabilitation team. Telephone follow-up was conducted by a blind assessor at three months for those with minor/moderate injuries and six months for serious/severe injuries.

Setting:

Four participating trauma services in New South Wales, Australia.

Subjects:

A total of 214 patients admitted during 2012-2015 with a length of stay of at least five days.

Intervention:

Provision of rehabilitation services in parallel with ward based therapy using an in-reach team for the intervention group. The control group could still access the ward based therapy (usual care).

Main measures:

The primary outcome was acute length of stay. Secondary outcomes included percentage requiring inpatient rehabilitation, function (Functional Independence Measure and Timed Up and Go Test), psychological status (Depression Anxiety and Stress Score 21), pain (Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire) and quality of life (Short Form-12 v2).

Results:

Median length of stay in acute care was 13 days (IQR 8-21). The intervention group, compared to the control group, received more physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions (median number of sessions 16.0 versus 11.5, P=0.003). However, acute length of stay did not differ between the intervention and control groups (median 15 vs 12 days, P=0.37). There were no significant differences observed in the secondary outcomes at hospital discharge and follow-up.

Conclusion:

No additional benefit was found from the routine use of acute rehabilitation teams for trauma patients over and above usual care.

Global specialized stroke care delivery models

Stroke services still vary enormously from country to country, with many countries providing no special services at all. The aim of this article is to provide a concise overview of the various types of acute stroke delivery systems at present available and critically describe merits and shortcomings. A systematic literature review was undertaken from 1990 to July 2014. Several models for stroke services have been developed mostly in the past 3 decades, mainly in the Western world. These include state-of-the-art stroke services ranging from highly specialized stroke centers to mobile stroke units for the community. In this light, the recommendations of the structure and organization of stroke units and stroke centers by the European Stroke Organization were recently published. What differentiates the various models of stroke care delivery across the globe is the diversity of services ranging from low key conventional care to highly sophisticated facilities with life saving interventional features via integrated stroke care infrastructure. Effective in-hospital care for stroke should start in the emergency department where a swift and appropriate diagnosis should be made. The role of all brain neuroimaging procedures should have a defined a priori and proper demarcation between actions according to updated stroke care pathways and clinical protocols, which should be followed closely. These essential actions initiated by well-trained staff in the emergency department, should then be carried on in dedicated stroke facilities that is, a stroke unit.

Combined clinical and home rehabilitation: case report of an integrated knowledge-to-action study in a Dutch rehabilitation stroke unit

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is growing awareness that the poor uptake of evidence in health care is not a knowledge-transfer problem but rather one of knowledge production. This issue calls for re-examination of the evidence produced and assumptions that underpin existing knowledge-to-action (KTA) activities. Accordingly, it has been advocated that KTA studies should treat research knowledge and local practical knowledge with analytical impartiality. The purpose of this case report is to illustrate the complexities in an evidence-informed improvement process of organized stroke care in a local rehabilitation setting.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A participatory action approach was used to co-create knowledge and engage local therapists in a 2-way knowledge translation and multidirectional learning process. Evidence regarding rehabilitation stroke units was applied in a straightforward manner, as the setting met the criteria articulated in stroke unit reviews. Evidence on early supported discharge (ESD) could not be directly applied because of differences in target group and implementation environment between the local and reviewed settings. Early supported discharge was tailored to the needs of patients severely affected by stroke admitted to the local rehabilitation stroke unit by combining clinical and home rehabilitation (CCHR).

OUTCOMES

Local therapists welcomed CCHR because it helped them make their task-specific training truly context specific. Key barriers to implementation were travel time, logistical problems, partitioning walls between financing streams, and legislative procedures.

DISCUSSION

Improving local settings with available evidence is not a straightforward application process but rather a matter of searching, logical reasoning, and creatively working with heterogeneous knowledge sources in partnership with different stakeholders. Multiple organizational levels need to be addressed rather than focusing on therapists as sole site of change.

Beneficial Effects of a Semi-Intensive Stroke Unit are Beyond the Monitor

Background and Purpose: Precise mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of the stroke unit (SU) are not fully established. Studies that compare monitored stroke units (semi-intensive type, SI-SU) versus an intensive care unit (ICU)-based mobile stroke team (MST-ICU) are lacking. Although inequalities in access to stroke unit care are globally improving, acute stroke patients may be admitted to Intensive Care Units for monitoring and followed by a mobile stroke team in hospital's lacking an SU with continuous cardiovascular monitoring. We aimed at comparing the stroke outcome between SI-SU and MST-ICU and hypothesized that the benefits of SI-SU are driven by additional elements other than cardiovascular monitoring, which is equally offered in both care systems. Methods: In a single-center setting, we compared the unfavorable outcomes (dependency and mortality) at 3 months in consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage admitted to a stroke unit with semi-intensive monitoring (SI-SU) to a cohort of stroke patients hospitalized in an ICU and followed by a mobile stroke team (MST-ICU) during an equal observation period of 27 months. Secondary objectives included comparing mortality and the proportion of patients with excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Score (mRS) 0-1). Equal cardiovascular monitoring was offered in patients admitted in both SI-SU and MST-ICU. Results: 458 patients were treated in the SI-SU and compared to the MST-ICU (n = 370) cohort. The proportion of death and dependency after 3 months was significantly improved for patients in the SI-SU compared to MST-ICU (p < 0.001; aOR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.31-0.65). The shift analysis of the mRS distribution showed significant shift to the lower mRS in the SI-SU group, p < 0.001. The proportion of mortality in patients after 3 months also differed between the MST-ICU and the SI-SU (p < 0.05), but after adjusting for confounders this association was not significant (aOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.31-1.13). The proportion of patients with excellent outcome was higher in the SI-SU (59.4 vs. 44.9%, p < 0.001) but the relationship was no more significant after adjustment (aOR = 1.17; 95% CI: 0.87-1.5). Conclusions: Our study shows that moving from a stroke team in a monitored setting (ICU) to an organized stroke unit leads to a significant reduction in the 3 months unfavorable outcome in patients with an acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Cardiovascular monitoring is indispensable, but benefits of a semi-intensive Stroke Unit are driven by additional elements beyond intensive cardiovascular monitoring. This observation supports the ongoing development of Stroke Centers for efficient stroke care.

Effectiveness of commercial video gaming on fine motor control in chronic stroke within community-level rehabilitation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of commercial gaming as an intervention for fine motor recovery in chronic stroke.

METHODS

Ten chronic phase post-stroke participants (mean time since CVA = 39 mos; mean age = 72 yrs) completed a 16-session program using the Nintendo Wii for 15 min two times per week with their more affected hand (10 right handed). Functional recovery (Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT), Box and Block Test (BBT), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)), and quality of life (QOL; Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)) were measured at baseline (pre-testing), after 8 sessions (mid-testing) and after 16 sessions (post-testing).

RESULTS

Significant improvements were found with the JHFT, BBT and NHPT from pre-testing to post-testing (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, p = 0.01, respectively). As well, there was an increase in perceived QOL from pre-testing to post-testing, as determined by the SIS (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

Commercial gaming may be a viable resource for those with chronic stroke. Future research should examine the feasibility of this as a rehabilitation tool for this population.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

Stroke survivors often live with lasting effects from their injury, however, those with chronic stroke generally receive little to no rehabilitation due to a perceived motor recovery plateau. Virtual reality in the form of commercial gaming is a novel and motivating way for clients to complete rehabilitation. The Nintendo Wii may be a feasible device to improve both functional ability and perceived quality of life in chronic stroke survivors.

Interactions between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease

OPININION STATEMENT: All patients with ischemic stroke should undergo a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk. Patients with carotid artery disease, symptoms of cerebral ischemia and high cardiovascular risk profiles should be considered for noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease (CAD). Routine testing for CAD before carotid endarterctomy is not recommended. Patients with coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease should be more aggressively treated for reducing their "very high" risk of cardiovascular events. In patients candidates to carotid revascularization, a preoperative coronary angiography and coronary revascularization are not recommended. Warfarin is recommended in all patients with moderate to high risk of stroke. Novel oral anticoagulants represent an attractive alternative to warfarin. However, their place in therapy in clinical practice is not yet established. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage for stroke prophylaxis may be considered in selected patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications for oral anticoagulant therapy. Warfarin is not indicated in patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen does not seem to be superior to medical therapy for the prevention of recurrences in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospital for older adults admitted as an emergency.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the EPOC Register, Cochrane's Controlled Trials Register, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Medline, Embase, CINAHL, AARP Ageline, and handsearched high yield journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of comprehensive geriatric assessment (whether by mobile teams or in designated wards) compared with usual care. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a multidimensional interdisciplinary diagnostic process used to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person to develop a coordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long term follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent reviewers assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted published data. Two additional reviewers moderated.

RESULTS

Twenty two trials evaluating 10,315 participants in six countries were identified. For the primary outcome "living at home," patients who underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment were more likely to be alive and in their own homes at the end of scheduled follow-up (odds ratio 1.16 (95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.28; P = 0.003; number needed to treat 33) at a median follow-up of 12 months versus 1.25 (1.11 to 1.42; P < 0.001; number needed to treat 17) at a median follow-up of six months) compared with patients who received general medical care. In addition, patients were less likely to be living in residential care (0.78, 0.69 to 0.88; P < 0.001). Subgroup interaction suggested differences between the subgroups "wards" and "teams" in favour of wards. Patients were also less likely to die or experience deterioration (0.76, 0.64 to 0.90; P = 0.001) and were more likely to experience improved cognition (standardised mean difference 0.08, 0.01 to 0.15; P = 0.02) in the comprehensive geriatric assessment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive geriatric assessment increases patients' likelihood of being alive and in their own homes after an emergency admission to hospital. This seems to be especially true for trials of wards designated for comprehensive geriatric assessment and is associated with a potential cost reduction compared with general medical care.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process to determine the medical, psychological and functional capabilities of a frail elderly person in order to develop a co-ordinated and integrated plan for treatment and long-term follow up.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of CGA in hospital for older adults admitted as an emergency.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AARP Ageline, and handsearched high-yield journals.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials comparing CGA (whether by mobile teams or in designated wards) to usual care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors initially assessed eligibility and trial quality and extracted published data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials evaluating 10,315 participants in six countries were identified. Patients in receipt of CGA were more likely to be alive and in their own homes at up to six months (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.42, P = 0.0002) and at the end of scheduled follow up (median 12 months) (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.28, P = 0.003) when compared to general medical care. In addition, patients were less likely to be institutionalised (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88, P < 0.0001). They were less likely to suffer death or deterioration (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.90, P = 0.001), and were more likely to experience improved cognition in the CGA group (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.01, P = 0.02). Subgroup interaction in the primary outcomes suggests that the effects of CGA are primarily the result of CGA wards.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive geriatric assessment increases a patient's likelihood of being alive and in their own home at up to 12 months.

[From the evidence to the organisation of stroke care]

INTRODUCTION

Acute stroke care in stroke units (SU) compared to care in general medicine wards provides benefits to the patient.

DEVELOPMENT

Acute stroke care in an SU has shown benefits in reducing mortality, institutionalisation, dependency and costs compared to care in internal medicine wards, and even a lower risk of recurrence in the long term. The benefits are associated with specific treatments developed in the SU, such as thrombolytic therapy, development of clinical pathways, standardised procedures, and training and experience of professionals in the SU. This evidence should lead to the proper organisation of hospitals to ensure that all acute stroke patients may benefit from care in an SU. The introduction of SUs is a priority in Europe, although the number of stroke patients admitted to SUs is still low.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on current evidence, acute stroke patients should be cared for in an SU due to the associated clinical benefits and hospitals should organise to provide this care to patients.

A study of 90-day outcomes for a cohort of patients admitted to an Australian metropolitan acute stroke unit

This study investigated patients' 90-day outcomes poststroke following an admission to one Australian metropolitan Acute Stroke Unit (ASU) and examined premorbid risk factors associated with these outcomes. Data from patients consecutively admitted from January 2006 to July 2007 (n = 54) to an acute stroke unit within 48 hours of onset of symptoms were linked with the Quality in Acute Stroke Care research project data and were analyzed to identify associations between premorbid risk factors (atrial fibrillation, hypertension, high cholesterol, smoking and diabetes); demographic, clinical and stroke characteristics; and death, disability (modified Rankin Score ≥ 2), dependency (Barthel Index score ≥ 95) and health status (SF-36) poststroke. Within 90 days, 4 participants had died and 45.5% were classified as dependent. Of the total participants, 56.8% were classified as disabled. The SF-36 mean scores indicated that the cohort had less than optimal physical health (46.7, SD = 9.8) and mental health (46.4, SD = 13.1). Analysis of baseline variables showed that participants with atrial fibrillation were more likely to have a severe stroke (p = 0.037). Patients presenting with intracerebral haemorrhage (p = 0.017) and those with subsequent strokes (p = 0.000) had significantly lower Barthel Index scores. A lower SF-36 physical component score at 90 days was significantly associated with intracerebral haemorrhages (p = 0.018) and subsequent strokes (p = 0.026). Although most patients were alive at 90 days poststroke, there were variable levels of morbidity-associated stroke type, subsequent strokes and premorbid risk factors, particularly atrial fibrillation. The findings provide insight into the 90-day outcomes of patients discharged from an ASU, which may be of use to plan appropriate postdischarge support for this group. In particular, aggressive management of stroke risk factors to prevent recurrent stroke is warranted.

Systematic Review of Process Indicators: Including Early Rehabilitation Interventions Used to Measure Quality of Acute Stroke Care

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of disease burden. The quality of care provided in hospitals can affect outcome. Therefore, examining adherence to clinically important processes of care can help improve care delivery and patient outcomes. However, knowing which process indicators to measure is essential.

Aim

Systematically review process indicators used to evaluate acute stroke services, including early rehabilitation interventions, and assess whether published indicators conform to clinical guidelines.

Methods

Publications (1985-2006) were identified by systematically searching databases (e.g. Medline and Cochrane Library), and the internet using free text terms: ‘stroke unit’, ‘process’, ‘quality’, ‘mobilisation’, ‘acute’, and ‘early rehabilitation’. Publications describing process indicators relating to the first 2 weeks of in-patient stroke care were included. Process indicators were categorised according to six clinical process domains covering the acute stroke admission. Commonly cited indicators (≥6 publications) were then mapped to the 2003 Australian clinical guidelines.

Results

Sixty potential studies were found from title and abstract. Following full text review, 32 publications were retained. Of the 161 process indicators identified, 43 were commonly cited. Seventy-nine per cent of commonly cited indicators were found in the guidelines. The level of evidence underpinning each indicator ranged from low ‘expert opinion’ (59%), to high, ‘level 1’ (12%) evidence. Indicators related to rehabilitation were rare.

Conclusion

Many acute stroke process indicators have been published. However, a quarter did not align with current clinical guidelines. Developing an ‘ideal set’ of process indicators to reflect the evidence base seems sensible and should include rehabilitation interventions.

Stroke Units: Many Questions, Some Answers

Background The development of specialized stroke units has been a landmark innovation in acute stroke care. However, the high scientific evidence level for the recommendation for stroke units to provide clinical attention for acute stroke patients does not correspond to the level of stroke unit implementation. A narrative, nonsystematic review on published studies on stroke units was conducted, with special emphasis on those demonstrating their efficacy and effectiveness. We also attempt to provide some answers to several open questions regarding practical issues of stroke units.

Escalating Levels of Access to In-Hospital Care and Stroke Mortality

Background and Purpose— Organized stroke care is an integrated approach to managing stroke to improve stroke outcomes by ensuring that optimal treatment is offered. However, limited information is available comparing different levels of organized care. Our aim was to determine whether escalating levels of organized care can improve stroke outcomes.

Methods— Cohort study including patients with acute ischemic stroke between July 2003 and March 2005 in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (RCSN). The RCSN is the largest clinical database of patients with acute stroke patients seen at selected acute care hospitals in Canada. As stroke unit admission does not automatically imply receipt of comprehensive care, we created the organized care index to represent different levels of access to organized care ranging from 0 to 3 as determined by the presence of occupational therapy/physiotherapy, stroke team assessment, and admission to a stroke unit. The primary end point was early stroke mortality. Secondary end points include 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Results— Overall, 3631 ischemic stroke patients were admitted to 11 hospitals. Seven day stroke mortality was 6.9% (249/3631), 30-day stroke mortality was 12.6% (457/3631), and 1-year stroke mortality was 23.6% (856/3631). Risk-adjusted 7-day mortality was 2.0%, 3.2%, 7.8%, and 22.5% for organized care index of 3, 2, 1, and 0. Higher level of care was associated with lower adjusted mortality (for organized care index 3, OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.07 for 7-day mortality; OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17 for 30-day mortality; and OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.64 for 1-year mortality).

Conclusions— Higher level of access to care was associated with lower stroke mortality rates. Establishing a well-organized and multidisciplinary system of stroke care will help improve the quality of service delivered and reduce the burden of stroke.

Factors that influence the stroke care team's effectiveness in reducing the length of hospital stay

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of a quality improvement program for improving stroke care and the determinants of success at the team and hospital levels. Method- For 16 months, 23 multidisciplinary stroke service teams participated in a quality improvement collaborative designed to set up stroke services and reduce the length of hospital stay (LOHS). We monitored the LOHS and the discharge delay during the project and measured indicators of well organized stroke services at baseline and after the intervention. A multiple and multilevel regression model was used to relate the outcome variables to the team and hospital characteristics. National LOHS figures served as reference data.

RESULTS

Data regarding 4549 stroke patients were included in the analyses. The LOHS decreased significantly from 18.3 to 13.3 days. The mean LOHS varied substantially (9.2 to 20.9 days) after the intervention. Teams with higher team functioning scores showed lower LOHS scores and higher scores for the indicators of well organized stroke services. Team characteristics explain almost 40% of the variance in LOHS and 53% in the indicators of well organized stroke care.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a national quality improvement collaborative effected a significant decrease of the LOHS and a significant increase in the presence of key features of stroke services. Variation in ability to reduce the LOHS and increase key features of stroke services were related to team functioning. The data suggest that the composite of team functioning is pivotal in quality-of-care improvement and may need specific attention in any quality improvement program.

Differing management of people with advanced cancer and delirium by four sub-specialties

INTRODUCTION

Delirium in advanced cancer is prevalent, with limited prospective data to guide management. The aim was to survey current practice of specialists using two contrasting cases of delirium in cancer.

METHODS

A questionnaire was designed to identify investigations and treatment used, in relation to two cases.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (n = 270) was 30%. Place of care: Only 35% of medical oncologists would consider care at home for a patient with reversible delirium compared with 66% of other specialists.

INVESTIGATIONS

85% specialists would order basic bloods, however, medical oncologists were more likely to use oxygen saturation and head computed tomography, psychogeriatricians more likely to order thyroid function and palliative medicine specialists less likely to order chest X-ray and urine culture. Greater than 40% of specialists would do no investigations for terminal delirium.

TREATMENT

Medical oncologists use more pre-emptive therapies and more likely to use a benzodiazepine as agent of choice, and Palliative medicine specialists used significantly more neuroleptics to treat hypoactive symptoms of delirium.

DISCUSSION

The survey emphasise significant areas of variability in the management of delirium in advanced cancer. Furthermore, evidence to guide management in ways that draw on the strengths and knowledge of each specialty is urgently needed.

Stroke

Stroke is the second most common cause of death and major cause of disability worldwide. Because of the ageing population, the burden will increase greatly during the next 20 years, especially in developing countries. Advances have occurred in the prevention and treatment of stroke during the past decade. For patients with acute stroke, management in a stroke care unit, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator within 3 h or aspirin within 48 h of stroke onset, and decompressive surgery for supratentorial malignant hemispheric cerebral infarction are interventions of proven benefit; several other interventions are being assessed. Proven secondary prevention strategies are warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation, endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis, antiplatelet agents, and cholesterol reduction. The most important intervention is the management of patients in stroke care units because these provide a framework within which further study might be undertaken. These advances have exposed a worldwide shortage of stroke health-care workers, especially in developing countries.

Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008

This article represents the update of the European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management. These guidelines cover both ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attacks, which are now considered to be a single entity. The article covers referral and emergency management, Stroke Unit service, diagnostics, primary and secondary prevention, general stroke treatment, specific treatment including acute management, management of complications, and rehabilitation.

Comparison of stroke ward care versus mobile stroke teams in the Hungarian stroke database project

Although previous studies have proved that both stroke wards and mobile stroke teams are considerably better than non-specialized stroke care, an unresolved debate in vascular neurology is whether or not stroke wards provide better outcomes in some specific cases to stroke victims. Our prospective, multicenter, cohort study compared dedicated stroke wards versus specialist stroke team care at general hospital wards in 11 centers nationwide for 8743 consecutive stroke events during 18 months. Twenty-eight-day case-fatality rate was 12.6% at stroke wards versus 15.2% at stroke teams for all patients (P = 0.002), and stroke ward care also predicted better outcome when analyzed with multivariate logistic regression model (odds ratio 1.701; confidence interval: 1.025-2.822). Case-fatality rates were not significantly different in patients with modified Rankin score > or = 2 (case-fatality rate: 17.8% vs. 20.3%; P = 0.163), and over 60 (case-fatality rate: 14.8% vs. 15.9%; P = 0.250), however these patients were more probably at home after 4 weeks when treated at stroke wards (56.1% vs. 50.6%; P = 0.03, and 69.5% vs. 64.5%; P = 0.004). In our study, stroke ward admission provided lower case-fatality rate below 60 and for those independent prior to their strokes, and lower institutionalization over 60 and amongst previously dependent patients, when compared with stroke teams.

Development of complex interventions in stroke care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke care is complex, requiring input from professionals, patients and carers. Identifying and developing appropriate intervention components to meet these complex needs is difficult. The Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for developing and evaluating 'complex' (nonpharmacological) interventions aims to improve intervention development. This study uses the Framework to review complex interventions in stroke care.

METHODS

Systematic review with multiple search strategies (electronic databases, recent journals, gray literature) was used. The MRC Framework was used to guide the search strategy and assess study quality. 'Complex interventions' were defined as educational/psychosocial interventions to change knowledge, beliefs or behaviors.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven studies were included: 39 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 28 other designs. Complex interventions targeted healthcare professionals (17), and patients, carers and the general population (21 targeting primary or secondary prevention; 30 targeting adjustment and recovery after stroke). Compared with recovery studies, primary and secondary prevention studies were significantly less likely to have been evaluated in RCTs. Interventions evaluated in RCTs were significantly less likely to influence primary outcomes (26%) compared with other designs (44%). Theoretical grounding to support intervention choice was reported in 40 studies but only 14 were theoretically 'well developed'; 21 RCTs listed multiple primary outcome measures, with 10 listing 5 or more. Of these only 3 reported considering statistical power before recruitment and none was sufficiently powered.

CONCLUSIONS

Few complex interventions in stroke care have been adequately developed or evaluated. This may explain failures to demonstrate efficacy. In future, greater attention is needed to theoretical development and methodological quality.

Poststroke Survival for Black-Caribbean Populations in Barbados and South London

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are variations in mortality rates for stroke in black communities, but the factors associated with survival remain unclear.

METHODS

The authors studied population-based stroke registers with follow up in South London (270 participants, 1995 to 2002) and Barbados (578 participants, 2001 to 2003). Differences in sociodemographic factors, stroke risk factors and their management, case severity, and acute management between London and Barbados were studied. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model with stratification.

RESULTS

There were 1411 person-years of follow-up. Patients in Barbados had poorer survival (log-rank test P=0.037), particularly those with a prestroke Barthel index scores between 15 and 20 (1-year survival, 56.4% versus 74.3%; P<0.001). This disadvantage remained significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.21, P=0.005) after adjustment for age and year of stroke and stratification for stroke subtype and socioeconomic status (SES). After stratification by SES, clinical stroke subtype, and Glasgow Coma Score, and adjustment for other potential confounders, additional factors reducing survival were untreated atrial fibrillation (AF; HR, 8.54; 95% CI, 2.14 to 34.08, P=0.002), incontinence after stroke (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.79 to 3.89), and dysphagia (HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.24). Patients not admitted to the hospital had improved survival (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.58). Interaction terms between location and Barthel score, location and AF, and location and transient ischemic attack were included in the final model to reflect the greater difference in survival with a high Barthel score of 15 or more, absence of untreated AF, and having untreated transient ischemic attack.

CONCLUSIONS

Black-Caribbean people with stroke living in Barbados have worse survival than similar patients in South London, particularly if they have good mobility before the stroke. Further exploration and refinement of measurement of confounding factors such as SES and poststroke management along with exploring the cultural/environmental differences between the communities is required to understand these stark differences.