Management of atrial fibrillation for older people with frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Multidimensional prognostic index domain phenotypes identified using latent class analysis and mortality in the EURopean study of Older Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation (EUROSAF)

BACKGROUND

The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), an established tool to predict adverse outcomes, classifies frailty using an aggregate-weighted tripartite scoring system based on eight domains (low-, moderate-, or severe-risk). However, this approach may fail to capture specific patient phenotypes that can be characterised by separate MPI domains and for whom health outcome risk also differs.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify latent patient phenotypes based on MPI domain data and to determine their association with mortality in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Using data from the EURopean study of Older Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation (EUROSAF), we used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify phenotypes using individual MPI domains and Cox regression models to examine their association with 12-month mortality.

RESULTS

Four MPI domain phenotypes were identified in N=2,019 AF patients (mean (SD) age=82.9 (7.5) years; 57% females): phenotype 1 (relatively fit, few comorbidities; n=672, 33%), phenotype 2 (functionally impaired, polypharmacy, comorbidities; n=685, 34%), phenotype 3 (multidimensional frailty, comorbidities; n=161, 8%), and phenotype 4 (relatively fit, polypharmacy, comorbidities; n=501, 25%). Compared to phenotype 1, 12-month mortality was higher in phenotype 3 (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR):4.68, 95%CI=3.41-6.43), phenotype 2 (aHR:1.98, 95%CI=1.53-2.57), and phenotype 4 (aHR:1.44, 95%CI=1.07-1.94).

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of older AF patients, LCA identified four MPI domain phenotypes with different risk of mortality. Pending confirmatory studies, the identified sub-groups might allow more targeted interventions to improve outcomes in this population.

Relationship Between Frailty and Risk of Falls Among Hospitalised Older People with Cardiac Conditions: An Observational Cohort Study

Background/Objective: Ageing favours the onset of cardiovascular diseases, frailty, and risk of falls. In the hospital setting, 47.7% of patients may be frail, and the incidence of falls may be as high as five per thousand. This study seeks to determine the relationship between frailty, risk of falls, and length of hospital stays in hospitalised older adults with heart disease. Methods: An observational study was conducted of a cohort of patients aged ≥60 years admitted to a cardiology unit (2022-2024). Frailty was assessed using Fried's phenotype, risk of falls using the J.H. Downton scale, and level of dependency using the Barthel index. Clinical variables, anthropometric measurements, and length of stay were analysed. Statistical analysis: quantitative variables were expressed as means and standard deviations, and categorical variables as frequencies. Associations were analysed using Student's t-tests, chi-squared tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests for comparisons of three or more groups. Relationships between frailty, risk of falls, and other variables were examined using univariate binary logistic regression, with a 95% confidence interval and statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 144 patients were recruited (mean age = 73.08 years [SD = 7.95]) (women = 33.30%). Frailty was associated with waist circumference in men (p = 0.01) and diastolic blood pressure in women (p = 0.05). Frailty was further linked to Downton scores (odds ratio [OR] = 1.565; 95% CI: 1.156-2.120; p = 0.004), age (OR = 1.114; 95% CI: 1.058-1.173; p = 0.000), Barthel index (OR = 0.902; 95% CI: 0.854-0.953; p = 0.000), and length of stay (OR = 1.101; 95% CI: 1.021-1.186; p = 0.012). Conclusions: Frailty appears to be related to Downton scores and impacts the length of hospital stays in older adults hospitalised with cardiac conditions.

Atrial fibrillation management in older hospitalized patients: Evidence of a poor oral anticoagulants prescriptive attitude from the Italian REPOSI registry

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases in older patients which also show a high thromboembolic risk. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended to prevent cardioembolic events and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improved anti-thrombotic treatment. However, the benefits/risks of anticoagulant in older patients still need to be completely defined. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the treatment with OACs in older AF hospitalized patients, and to identify factors influencing OAC therapy or discontinuation using the REgistro Politerapie SIMI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors of OACs treatment and discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate one-year mortality by treatment groups. AF patients were 1,128(26.5 %) at discharge and 1,098(97.3 %) required OAC treatment; about half of them (N = 528;48.1 %) were no-OACs users; 236(21.5 %) and 334(30.4 %) used DOACs and VKA, respectively. Increasing DOACs use was observed during the study period. Predictors of OACs treatment were: BMI (OR:1.04; 95 %CI:1.01-1.07), Barthel index (OR:1.01; 95 %CI:1.01-1.02), medications number (OR:1.07; 95 %CI:1.01-1.13). Conversely, a lower probability was found in patients with a high CIR.S (OR:0.59; 95 %CI:0.36-0.97) and neoplasm (OR:0.57; 95 %CI:0.37-0.88). Hospital stay (OR:1.02; 95 %CI:1.01-1.05), neoplasm (OR:2.25; 95 %CI:1.07-4.70) and INR (OR:1.21; 95 %CI:1.05-1.40) increased OACs discontinuation. A lower discontinuation was observed in dyslipidemic patients (OR:0.18; 95 %CI:0.04-0.82) and heart failure (OR:0.38; 95 %CI:0.21-0.70). Among AF patients, 157(14.3 %) died during the follow-up year. Age (HR = 1.05; 95 %CI = 1.03-1.08) and CIR.S (HR = 2.54; 95 %CI = 1.53-4.21) were associated with a greater mortality risk. In conclusion, critical issues related to the underuse and discontinuation of OACs therapy in hospitalized older patients were highlighted.

Clinical outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to multimorbidity status changes over time and the impact of ABC pathway compliance: a nationwide cohort study

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly have associated comorbidities. The primary aim was to determine the effect of increasing numbers of comorbidity on clinical outcomes. The secondary aims were (1) the association of comorbidities with oral anticoagulants (OAC) discontinuation, and quality control, (2) the impact of holistic care based on the ABC pathway on clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause death, ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, major bleeding, and heart failure. A total of 3405 patients were enrolled; mean age 67.8 ± 11.3 years, 41.8% female. Compared to low comorbidity group [n = 897 (26.3%)], hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the composite outcome in the high [n = 929 (27.3%)] and moderate comorbidity [n = 1579 (46.4%)] groups were 5.40 (4.20-6.94) and 2.54 (1.97-3.27), respectively. ABC pathway adherence was associated with reduction of the composite outcome overall (HR 0.63; 0.54-0.74). High comorbidity adversely impacted on OAC use, OAC discontinuation, and quality of warfarin control. If quality of anticoagulation control was included as part of the ABC pathway adherence, the reduction in composite outcome risk was greater (HR 0.46; 0.36-0.58). During 3-year follow-up, 33.9% changed from low- to the moderate-high comorbidity groups and 22.3% changed from moderate- to the high comorbidity group. In conclusion, comorbidity burden in AF patients is an important determinant of clinical outcomes, and changed over time. OAC use, OAC discontinuation, and quality of OAC control were impacted by comorbidity burden. ABC pathway adherence was associated with a reduced risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

Frailty prevalence in older adults with atrial fibrillation: A cross-sectional study in a resource-limited setting

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Frailty is a common condition among older adults and is associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes, including mortality, disability, dysmobility, falls, and hospitalization. In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), these risks are further exacerbated. However, evidence linking AF and frailty, particularly in the South American context, is limited. This study aimed to assess frailty and other geriatric conditions in older outpatients with atrial fibrillation in a resource-limited setting in Lima, Peru.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we included adults aged 60 years and older diagnosed with atrial fibrillation who were attending outpatient check-ups. Patients who were hospitalized, receiving chemotherapy induction, or presenting with acute infections or exacerbations were excluded. Standardized questionnaires were used to assess frailty, cognitive impairment, and functional dependence. Statistical analysis was performed using R Studio version 4.3.1, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Among the 200 patients who agreed to participate (mean age 74.76 ± 8.42 years, 41% females), 28.5% exhibited frailty, and 46.5% were classified as prefrail. Frailty and prefrailty were significantly associated with older age (p<0.01), female gender (p = 0.01), illiteracy (p<0.01), heart failure (p<0.01), falls (p<0.05), cognitive impairment (p<0.01), and functional dependence (p<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between frailty and cognitive impairment (p<0.05), frailty and functional dependence (p<0.05), and cognitive impairment and functional dependence (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of older outpatients with atrial fibrillation were identified as frail, while half were classified as prefrail. In this population, frailty frequently coexists with cognitive impairment and functional dependence, highlighting the need for timely screening and the implementation of evidence-based interventions for individuals with atrial fibrillation in resource-limited settings.

Actioning atrial fibrillation identified by ambulance services in England: a qualitative exploration

OBJECTIVES

To explore the acceptability and feasibility of detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) by emergency medical services (EMS) and identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing a formal pathway to facilitate follow-up in primary care, which could reduce the risk of AF-related stroke.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using focus groups and one-to-one interviews guided by a semistructured topic guide.

SETTING

North East England.

PARTICIPANTS

Focus groups with 18 members of the public and one-to-one online interviews with 11 healthcare and service providers (six paramedics and five experts representing cardiology, general practice (GP), public health, research, policy and commissioning).

RESULTS

All participant groups were supportive of a role of EMS in identifying AF as part of routine assessment and formalising the response to AF detection. However, this should not create delays for EMS since rate-controlled AF is non-urgent and alternative community mechanisms exist to manage it. Public participants were concerned about communication of the AF diagnosis and whether this should be 'on scene' or in a subsequent GP appointment. Paramedics reported frequent incidental identification of AF, but it is not always clear 'on scene' that this is a new diagnosis, and there is variation in practice regarding whether (and how) this is communicated to the GP. Paramedics also focused on ensuring the safety of non-conveyed patients and a perceived need for an 'active' reporting process, so that a finding of AF was actioned. Field experts felt that a formal pathway would be useful and favoured a simple intervention without adding to time pressures unnecessarily.

CONCLUSIONS

There is support for the development of a formal pathway to ensure follow-up for people with AF that is incidentally detected by EMS. This has the potential to improve anticoagulation rates and reduce the risk of stroke.

Cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: one year outcomes from the cryo global registry

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Moreover, global utilization of CBA in this population (≥ 80 years old) has not been reported. This study's objectives were to determine the use, efficacy, and safety of CBA to treat octogenarians suffering from AF.

METHODS

In this sub-analysis of the Cryo Global Registry, 12-month outcomes of treating AF via CBA in octogenarians were compared to patients < 80 years old. Efficacy was evaluated as time to a ≥ 30 s atrial arrhythmia (AA) recurrence. Healthcare utilization was determined via repeat ablations and hospitalizations. Improvement upon disease burden was evaluated through patient reporting of symptoms and the EQ-5D-3L quality of life (QoL) survey.

RESULTS

The octogenarian cohort (n = 101) had a higher prevalence of females (51.5% vs 35.7%) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.2 ± 1.3 vs 2.0 ± 1.5) compared to the control cohort (n = 1573, both p < 0.01). Even when adjusting for baseline characteristics and antiarrhythmic drug usage, freedom from AA recurrence at 12 months (80.6% vs 78.9%, HRadj:0.97 [95% CI:0.59-1.58], p = 0.90) was comparable between octogenarians and control, respectively. Similar serious adverse event rates were observed between octogenarians (5.0%) and control (3.2%, p = 0.38). The groups did not differ in healthcare utilization nor reduction of AF-related symptoms from baseline to follow-up, but both experienced an improvement in QoL at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite more age-related comorbidities, CBA is a safe and effective treatment for AF in octogenarians, with efficacy and adverse events rates akin to ablations performed in younger patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02752737.

Multidisciplinary Approach in Atrial Fibrillation: As Good as Gold

Atrial fibrillation (AF) represents the most common sustained arrhythmia necessitating dual focus: acute complication management and sustained longitudinal oversight to modulate disease progression and ensure comprehensive patient care over time. AF is a multifaceted disorder; due to such a great number of potential exacerbating conditions, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) should manage AF patients by cooperating with a cardiologist. Effective management of AF patients necessitates the implementation of a well-coordinated and tailored care pathway aimed at delivering optimized treatment through collaboration among various healthcare professionals. Management of AF should be carefully evaluated and mutually agreed upon in consultation with healthcare providers. It is crucial to recognize that treatment may evolve due to the emergence of new risk factors, symptoms, disease progression, and advancements in treatment modalities. In the context of multidisciplinary AF teams, a coordinated approach involves assembling a diverse team tailored to meet individual patients' unique needs based on local services' availability.

Comparison of cardiac function and structure after left atrial appendage occlusion without versus with ablation in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study

The Aim of this study was to investigate the long-term impact of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) on cardiac function and structure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). 157 patients with NVAF who underwent LAAO or combined with ablation were included and divided into simple LAAO group or combined group. Long term impact of LAAO on cardiac function and structure were evaluated. Results showed that the procedures were performed successfully with 6.4% complications. During follow-up, there was a significant decrease of left atrial anteroposterior diameter (LAAD) at 6 months and a significant increase of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) at 12 months after LAAO. A significant decrease in plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was noted at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after procedure. There was a significant decrease of LAAD, LVEDD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension (LVESD) and NT-proBNP levels in combined group at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post- procedure, while an increase of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Meanwhile, no significant change of LAAD, LVEDD, LVESD, NT-proBNP and LVEF was seen in simple LAAO group at 3 months follow-up, but a decrease of NT-proBNP during 6 months and 12 months follow-up. Compared with simple LAAO group, combined group was associated with a significant increase of residual flow. In conclusion, LAAO has no significant effect on cardiac structure and function but can significantly reduce NT-proBNP. The improvement of cardiac structure and function in combined therapy comes from the result of ablation, not LAAO.

Role of Clinical Pharmacy anticoagulation service on Apixaban prescribing appropriateness in atrial fibrillation in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate DAOC dosing is precuarious and frequently encountered. Apixaban is the most reported DOAC to be inappropriately dosed. We examined the effect of adding a Clinical Pharmacist to the cardiology team rounds to the standard practice in Apixaban prescription patterns in a tertiary center in KSA.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of clinical pharmacy services on Apixaban dose appropriateness upon discharge in Atrial Fibrillation patient pobulation.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation using a quasi-experiment of pre-post design to evaluate Apixaban dose appropriateness using clinical pharmacy services. Clinical pharmacist was added to the team to evaluate and change the regimen according to FDA dosing. Data were collected for 9 months for each, patients were followed up for efficacy and safety outcomes for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 550 patients were initially collected after follow-up, the number of patients was in the pre-phase cohort (NO CCP; n= 112) from July 2018 to the March 2019 and compared to post phase cohort (CCP, n=103) from July 2019 to March 2020. 215 Patients were included, For primary end point, CCP cohort had significantly appropriate prescriptions of apixaban compared to Non-CCP (90.2 % vs 71.5 %, p<0.001)., no differences in thromboembolic and hemorrhagic adverse events betewwn 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team approach including clinical pharmacy services is effective in increasing the appropriate use of Apixaban upom discharge without apparent increased risk of bleeding or Adverse events.

Impact of frailty in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

Background

The relationships between frailty and clinical outcomes in elderly Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) after catheter ablation (CA) have not been established. We evaluated the frailty rate of patients undergoing CA for NVAF, examined whether CA for NVAF improves frailty, and analyzed the CA outcomes of patients with and without frailty.

Methods

Elderly Japanese patients (≥65 years; mean age: 72.8 years) who participated in the real-world ablation therapy with anti-coagulants in management of atrial fibrillation registry and who responded to the frailty screening index survey were included (n = 213). Frailty and AF recurrence were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months after CA.

Results

Twenty-six patients (12.8%) were frail, 109 (53.7%) were pre-frail, and 68 (33.5%) were robust. Cardiovascular (frailty: 0.5%/person-year; pre-frailty: 0.1%/person-year; robust: 0.1%/person-year) and cardiac (frailty: 0.5%/person-year; pre-frailty: 0.1%/person-year; robust: 0.1%/person-year) events, as well as major bleeding (frailty: 0.3%/person-year; pre-frailty: 0.1%/person-year; robust: 0.1%/person-year), were numerically more frequent in the frailty group. No deaths from cardiovascular or stroke/systemic thromboembolic events occurred. A large proportion of patients did not experience 3-month (frailty: 96.2%; pre-frailty: 96.3%; robust: 88.2%) or 6-month (frailty: 88.5%; pre-frailty: 91.7%; robust: 86.8%) AF recurrence after CA. Weight loss, walking speed, and fatigue improved in the frailty and pre-frailty groups after CA.

Conclusion

Japanese patients aged ≥65 years with frailty or pre-frailty had improved frailty screening index components, such as weight loss, walking speed and fatigue, after CA. Therefore, elderly patients with frailty or pre-frailty may benefit from CA for NVAF.

The hospital frailty risk score effectively predicts adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in the intensive care unit

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are significant global public health problems associated with advancing age. However, the relationship between frailty and older patients with AF in the intensive care unit (ICU) has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to investigate whether the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) is associated with adverse outcomes in older patients with AF in the ICU.

Methods

This was the first retrospective analysis of older patients with AF admitted to the ICU between 2008 and 2019 at a tertiary academic medical center in Boston. The HFRS was used to measure frailty severity. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital and 30-day mortality and the incidence of sepsis and ischemic stroke.

Results

There were 7,792 participants aged approximately 80 years, almost half (44.9%) of whom were female. Among this group, 2,876 individuals were identified as non-frail, while 4,916 were classified as frail. The analysis revealed a significantly greater incidence of in-hospital (18.8% compared to 7.6%) and 30-day mortality (24.5% versus 12.3%) in the frail group. After accounting for potential confounding factors, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that frail participants had a 1.56-fold greater risk of mortality within 30 days (95% CI = 1.38-1.76, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Frailty is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with AF admitted to the ICU. Therefore, prioritizing frailty assessment and implementing specific intervention strategies to improve prognostic outcomes are recommended.

Frailty and associated outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: findings from the NCDR LAAO registry

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and may have clinical implications in an advanced age population with atrial fibrillation undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). We sought to develop a novel frailty scale to predict worse outcomes in patients undergoing LAAO.

METHODS

Patients in the NCDR LAAO Registry between 2016 and 2021 receiving percutaneous LAAO devices were categorized as non-frail (0 points), pre-frail (1-3 points), or frail (4-5 points) based on a 5-point scale representing multiple domains of frailty: hemoglobin <13.0 g/dL in male, <12.0 g/dL in female; creatinine ≥1.2 mg/dL; albumin <3.5 g/dL; body mass index <20 kg/m2; and increased risk of falls.

RESULTS

Of 57,728 patients, 44,360 (76.8%) were pre-frail and 7693 (13.3%) were frail. Compared to non-frail, pre-frail and frail patients were older, had a higher burden of co-morbidities, and more disability based on the Modified Rankin Scale. Compared to non-frail patients after adjustment, frail patients were at higher risk of in-hospital major complication (OR 1.29, 95% 1.02-1.62, p = 0.01), any complication (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52, p = 0.0005), and death (OR 5.79, 95% CI 1.75-19.17, p = 0.001), while no difference was observed in pre-frail patients. At 45-day follow-up, there was no difference in the risk of complications in frail patients as compared to non-frail, although mortality was significantly higher (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.97-4.85, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

A simple and practical frailty scale accurately predicts adverse events in patients undergoing LAAO. The 13% of patients considered frail were at significantly higher risk of in-hospital adverse events and 45-day mortality.

Screening for atrial fibrillation in care homes using pulse palpation and the AliveCor Kardia Mobile® device: a comparative cross-sectional pilot study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke in older people. Exacerbated by age and co-morbidities, residents of care homes are more likely to develop AF and less likely to receive oral anticoagulants.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of AF using the design and methodology of the Pharmacists Detecting Atrial Fibrillation (PDAF) study in a care home setting.

METHOD

A cross-sectional AF screening pilot study within four UK care homes, three residential and one residential/nursing. Screening followed the original PDAF protocol: a manual pulse check, followed by a single-Lead ECG (SLECG, AliveCor Kardia Mobile (KMD)) delivered by a pharmacist. All recorded SLECG were reviewed by a cardiologist and any residents requiring follow-up investigations were referred to their general practitioner.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of 112 care home residents participated. From 52 SLECGs recorded, the cardiologist interpreted 13.5% (7/52) as having possible AF of which 9.6% (5/52) were previously unknown. One resident with previously unknown AF received anticoagulation.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown a need for AF screening in care homes and that elements of the PDAF screening protocol are transferable in this setting. Early diagnosis and treatment of AF are essential to reduce the risk of stroke in this population.

One-year morbidity and mortality in patients treated with standard-dose and low-dose apixaban after acute large vessel occlusion stroke

Although low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for patients at high risk of bleeding complications, it remains unclear whether the dose reduction in real-world setting is also appropriate in patients after large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. This study hypothesized that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and LVO receiving low-dose DOACs have an increased risk of ischemic and hemorrhagic events. The study aimed to assess 1 year morbidity and mortality in patients treated with standard-dose and low-dose apixaban after LVO stroke. A post hoc analysis was performed using the acute LVO registry data, which enrolled patients with AF and LVO who received apixaban within 14 days of stroke onset. The incidences of ischemic events (ischemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, and systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and death from any cause were compared between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. Of 643 patients diagnosed with LVO, 307 (47.7%) received low-dose apixaban. After adjustment for clinically relevant variables, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-6.02), major bleeding events (aHR: 1.17, 95% CI 0.50-2.73), and death from any cause (aHR: 1.95, 95% CI 0.78-4.89) between patients receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of ischemic events, major bleeding events, or death from any cause between patients with AF and LVO receiving standard- and low-dose apixaban.

Predictors and Outcomes of Oral Anticoagulant Deprescribing in Geriatric Inpatients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate prevalence and predictors of oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) deprescribing in older inpatients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and its association with 1-year incidence of major clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Inpatients aged ≥75 years with known AF on OAT at admission discharged from 3 Italian acute geriatric wards between January 2014 and July 2018.

METHODS

Data from a routine Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), along with OAT status at discharge were recorded. One-year incidence of all-cause death, stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (MB/CRNMB) were retrieved from administrative databases. Associations were explored through multilevel analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1578 patients (median age 86 years, 56.3% female), OAT deprescription (341 patients, 21.6%) was associated with bleeding risk, functional dependence and cognitive impairment, and inversely, with previous SSE and chronic AF. Incidences of death, SSE, and MB/CRNMB were 56.6%, 1.5%, and 4.1%, respectively, in OAT-deprescribed patients, and 37.6%, 2.9%, and 4.9%, respectively, in OAT-continued patients, without significant differences between groups. OAT deprescription was associated with all-cause mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.68-1.85], along with older age, comorbidity burden, cognitive impairment, and functional dependence, but with neither SSE nor MB/CRNMB incidence, as opposed to being alive and free from SSE and MB/CNRMB, respectively (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.25-1.82, and aOR 0.95 95% CI 0.49-1.85, respectively). Conversely, OAT deprescription was associated with higher odds of being dead than alive both in patients free from SSE and in those free from MB/CRNMB.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

CGA-based OAT deprescribing is common in acute geriatric wards and is not associated with increased SSE. The net clinical benefit of OAT in geriatric patients is strongly related with the competing risk of death, suggesting that functional and cognitive status, as well as residual life expectancy, should be considered in clinical decision making in this population.

Low-dose Rivaroxaban: is it a safe alternative in Chinese older patients?

PURPOSE

10 mg rivaroxaban is widely used in the Chinese mainland. This study aims to explore the association between 10 mg once daily rivaroxaban and all-cause mortality in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

This observational study enrolled 1131 NVAF patients at the cardiovascular department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. One-year outcomes included all-cause mortality and bleeding were recorded. Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis were utilized in the study.

RESULTS

In total, 1131 patients (402 no anticoagulants, and 729 rivaroxaban) were included. Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that low-dose rivaroxaban (10 mg, HR: 0.14, 95% CI:(0.07-0.28), P<0.001; 15 mg, HR: 0.20, 95% CI:(0.09-0.43), P<0.001; 20 mg, HR: 0.22, 95% CI:(0.05-0.96), P = 0.044) exhibited lower mortality risk compared to untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

10 mg once daily rivaroxaban may provide survival benefits for elderly patients with NVAF.

Index and Repeat Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Older versus Younger Patients: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis

Catheter ablation is a well-established rhythm control therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the prevalence of AF increases dramatically with age, the prognosis and safety profile of index and repeat ablation procedures remain unclear in the older population. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the arrhythmia recurrence, reablation and complication rates in older patients. Secondary endpoints were the identification of independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence and reablation, including information on pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection and other atrial foci. Older (n=129, ≥70 years) and younger (n=129, <70 years) patients were compared using a propensity-score matching analysis based on age, gender, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, dilated left atrium, severe obstructive sleep apnea, cardiac disease, left systolic ventricular function, AF pattern and ablation technique. Arrhythmia recurrence and reablation were evaluated in both groups using a Cox regression analysis in order to identify predictors. During a 30-month follow-up period, there were no significant differences between older and younger patients in the arrhythmia-free survival (65.1% and 59.7%; log-rank test p=0.403) and complication (10.1% and 10.9%; p>0.999) rates after the index ablation. However, the reablation rate was significantly different (46.7% and 69.2%; p<0.05, respectively). In those patients who underwent reablation procedure (redo subgroups), there were no differences in the incidence of PV reconnection (38.1% redo-older and 27.8% redo-younger patients; p=0.556). However, the redo-older patients had lower reconnected PVs per patient (p<0.01) and lower atrial foci (2.3 and 3.7; p<0.01) than the redo-younger patients. A further important finding was that age was not an independent predictor of arrhythmia recurrence or reablation. Our data reveal that the AF index ablation in older patients had a similar efficacy and safety profile to younger patients. Therefore, age alone must not be considered a prognostic factor for AF ablation but the presence of limiting factors such as frailty and multiple comorbidities.

Atrial fibrillation: comorbidities, lifestyle, and patient factors

Modern anticoagulation therapy has dramatically reduced the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, AF still impairs quality of life, increases the risk of stroke and heart failure, and is linked to cognitive impairment. There is also a recognition of the residual risk of thromboembolic complications despite anticoagulation. Hence, AF management is evolving towards a more comprehensive understanding of risk factors predisposing to the development of this arrhythmia, its' complications and interventions to mitigate the risk. This review summarises the recent advances in understanding of risk factors for incident AF and managing these risk factors. It includes a discussion of lifestyle, somatic, psychological, and socioeconomic risk factors. The available data call for a practice shift towards a more individualised approach considering an increasingly broader range of health and patient factors contributing to AF-related health burden. The review highlights the needs of people living with co-morbidities (especially with multimorbidity), polypharmacy and the role of the changing population demographics affecting the European region and globally.

Impact of frailty on the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation: a nationwide cohort study

AIMS

Data on non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) use in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are scarce. Therefore, the impact of frailty on AF-related outcomes and benefit-risk profiles of NOACs in patients with frailty were investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AF patients initiating anticoagulation between 2013 and 2019 were included using Belgian nationwide data. Frailty was assessed with the Claims-based Frailty Indicator. Among 254 478 anticoagulated AF patients, 71 638 (28.2%) had frailty. Frailty was associated with higher all-cause mortality risks [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.43-1.54)], but not with thromboembolism or bleeding. Among subjects with frailty (78 080 person-years of follow-up), NOACs were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism (stroke/SE) [aHR 0.77, 95%CI (0.70-0.86)], all-cause mortality [aHR 0.88, 95%CI (0.84-0.92)], and intracranial bleeding [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.66-0.91)], a similar major bleeding risk [aHR 1.01, 95%CI (0.93-1.09)], and higher gastrointestinal bleeding risk [aHR 1.19, 95%CI (1.06-1.33)] compared with VKAs. Major bleeding risks were lower with apixaban [aHR 0.84, 95%CI (0.76-0.93)], similar with edoxaban [aHR 0.91, 95%CI (0.73-1.14)], and higher with dabigatran [aHR 1.16, 95%CI (1.03-1.30)] and rivaroxaban [aHR 1.11, 95%CI (1.02-1.21)] compared with VKAs. Apixaban was associated with lower major bleeding risks compared with dabigatran [aHR 0.72, 95%CI (0.65-0.80)], rivaroxaban [aHR 0.78, 95%CI (0.72-0.84)] and edoxaban [aHR 0.74, 95%CI (0.65-0.84)], but mortality risk was higher compared with dabigatran and edoxaban.

CONCLUSION

Frailty was an independent risk factor of death. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants had better benefit-risk profiles than VKAs in patients with frailty, especially apixaban, followed by edoxaban.

Associations of medicine use and ejection fraction with the coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia in a sample of heart failure outpatients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Frailty and sarcopenia have been extensively studied in heart failure (HF) patients, but their coexistence is unknown. The aim of this work is to describe the coexistence of these conditions in a sample of HF outpatients and its association with the use of medication and left-ventricular ejection fraction.

METHODS

Participants in this cross-sectional study were recruited from a HF outpatients' clinic in northern Portugal. Frailty phenotype was assessed according to Fried et al. Sarcopenia was evaluated according to the revised consensus of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People.

RESULTS

A total of 136 HF outpatients (33.8% women, median age 59 years) integrated this study. Frailty and sarcopenia accounted for 15.4% and 18.4% of the sample, respectively. Coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia was found in 8.1% of the participants, while 17.6% had only one of the conditions. In multivariable analysis (n = 132), increasing age (OR = 1.13;95%CI = 1.06,1.20), being a woman (OR = 65.65;95%CI = 13.50, 319.15), having heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (OR = 5.61; 95%CI = 1.22, 25.76), and using antidepressants (OR = 11.05; 95%CI = 2.50, 48.82), anticoagulants (OR = 6.11; 95%CI = 1.69, 22.07), furosemide (OR = 3.95; 95%CI = 1.07, 14.55), and acetylsalicylic acid (OR = 5.01; 95%CI = 1.10, 22.90) were associated with increased likelihood of having coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia, while using statins showed the inverse effect (OR = 0.06; 95%CI = 0.01, 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

The relatively low frequency of coexistence of frailty and sarcopenia signifies that each of these two conditions still deserve individual attention from health professionals in their clinical practice and should be screened separately. Being a woman, older age, having HFpEF, using anticoagulants, antidepressants, loop diuretics and acetylsalicylic acid, and not using statins, were associated with having concomitant frailty and sarcopenia. These patients can potentially benefit from interventions that impact their quality of life such as nutritional and mental health interventions and exercise training.

Hemorrhagic Coagulation Disorders and Ischemic Stroke: How to Reconcile Both?

Coagulation and fibrinolytic system disorders are conditions in which the blood's ability to clot is impaired, resulting in an increased risk of thrombosis or bleeding. Although these disorders are the expression of two opposing tendencies, they can often be associated with or be a consequence of each other, contributing to making the prognosis of acute cerebrovascular events more difficult. It is important to recognize those conditions that are characterized by dual alterations in the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems to reduce the prognostic impact of clinical conditions with difficult treatment and often unfortunate outcomes. Management of these individuals can be challenging, as clinicians must balance the need to prevent bleeding episodes with the potential risk of clot formation. Treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis, considering the specific bleeding disorder, its severity, and the patient's general medical condition. This review aims to deal with all those forms in which coagulation and fibrinolysis represent two sides of the same media in the correct management of patients with acute neurological syndrome. Precision medicine, personalized treatment, advanced anticoagulant strategies, and innovations in bleeding control represent future directions in the management of these complex pathologies in which stroke can be the evolution of two different acute events or be the first manifestation of an occult or unknown underlying pathology.

Frailty, Home Time, and Health Care Costs in Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Oral Anticoagulants

Importance

There are no data on patient-centered outcomes and health care costs by frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking oral anticoagulants (OACs).

Objective

To compare home time, clinical events, and health care costs associated with OACs by frailty levels in older adults with AF.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This community-based cohort study assessed Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries 65 years or older with AF from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019. Data analysis was performed from January to December 2022.

Exposures

Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin use were measured from prescription claims. Frailty was measured using a validated claims-based frailty index.

Main outcomes and measures

Outcome measures were (1) home time (days alive out of the hospital and skilled nursing facility) loss greater than 14 days; (2) a composite end point of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, or death; and (3) total cost per member per year after propensity score overlap weighting.

Results

The weighted population comprised 136 551 beneficiaries, including 45 950 taking apixaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.3% female), 45 320 taking rivaroxaban (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 51.9% female), and 45 281 taking warfarin (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [7.3] years; 52.0% female). Compared with apixaban, rivaroxaban was associated with increased risk of home time lost greater than 14 days (risk difference per 100 persons, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.5-2.1]), composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 21.3 [95% CI, 16.4-26.2]), and total cost (mean difference, $890 [95% CI, $652-$1127]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Use of warfarin relative to apixaban was associated with increased home time lost (risk difference per 100 persons, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.9-3.5]) and composite end point (rate difference per 1000 person-years, 29.4 [95% CI, 24.5-34.3]), with greater differences among the beneficiaries with frailty. Compared with apixaban, warfarin was associated with lower total cost (mean difference, -$1166 [95% CI, -$1396 to -$937]) but higher cost when excluding OAC cost (mean difference, $1409 [95% CI, $1177 to $1642]) regardless of frailty levels.

Conclusions and Relevance

In older adults with AF, apixaban was associated with increased home time and lower rates of clinical events than rivaroxaban and warfarin, especially for those with frailty. Apixaban was associated with lower total cost compared with rivaroxaban but higher cost compared with warfarin due to higher OAC cost. These findings suggest that apixaban may be preferred for older adults with AF, particularly those with frailty.

Outcome of novel oral anticoagulant versus warfarin in frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies

BACKGROUND

Frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are thought to be at a higher risk for cerebral infarction and death than patients who are not frail, making preventive interventions important. Anticoagulants should be used in frailty patients with AF. However, there are limited data about anticoagulants in frail patients with AF. Therefore, we concucted this meta-analysis to find the best anticoagulation strategy.

METHODS

Systematic electronic searches were conducted on 4 July 2022 4 July 2022, in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Relevant and eligible cohort studies were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Furthermore, we performed a publication bias analysis and subgroup analysis to explore the source of heterogeneity.

RESULT

3 publications (10 cohorts, 188573 participants) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed that ischemic strokes (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.71 to 0.79; I2 = 60.2%), systemic embolism (HR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.87; I  = 68.6%), major bleeding(HR: 0.76; 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.89; I2 = 97.4%), intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.57; 95%CI: 0.45 to 0.71; I2 = 54.6%) and cardiovascular death(HR: 0.61; 95%CI: 0.51 to 0.70; I2 = 83.2%) were lower in NOACs as compared with warfarin. Regarding gastrointestinal bleeding, meta-analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 0.97; 95%CI: 0.69 to 1.36; I2 = 95.9%).   .

CONCLUSION

NOAC was more effective and safety than warfarin in frail patients with AF.

Implication of different frailty criteria in older people with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

the prevalence of physical and multidimensional frailty and their prognostic impact on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluated frailty in a cohort of patients with AF according to different criteria, and studied the prevalence and its prognostic impact on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

in this multicenter prospective cohort, 197 inpatients ≥ 65 years old with AF were recruited from September 2018 to April 2019.We used Fried Frailty phenotype (Fried) to assess physical frailty, and comprehensive geriatric assessment-frailty index (CGA-FI) to assess multidimensional frailty. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization.

RESULTS

the prevalence of frailty was determined as 34.5% by Fried, 42.6% by CGA-FI. Malnutrition and ≥ 7 medications were independently associated with frailty. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the presence of frailty by CGA-FI had significantly lower all-cause mortality or rehospitalization survival rate (log-rank P = 0.04) within 1 year. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for age and sex showed that the frailty by CGA-FI was significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.10-2.90). However, those associations were absent with the physical frailty. After broader multivariate adjustment, those associations were no longer statistically significant for both types of frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

in older people with AF, Multidimensional frailty is more significantly associated with a composite of all-cause mortality or rehospitalization within 1 year than physical frailty, but these association are attenuated after multivariate adjustment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800017204; date of registration: 07/18/2018.

Cardiometabolic Disorders Are Important Correlates of Vulnerability in Hospitalized Older Adults

With an increasingly aging population worldwide, the concept of multimorbidity has attracted growing interest over recent years, especially in terms of frailty, which leads to progressive multisystem decline and increased adverse clinical outcomes. The relative contribution of multiple disorders to overall frailty index in older populations has not been established so far. This study aimed to assess the association between the vulnerable elders survey-13 (VES-13) score, which is acknowledged to be one of the most widely used measures of frailty, and the most common accompanying diseases amongst hospitalized adults aged 60 years old and more. A total of 2860 participants with an average age of 83 years were included in this study. Multiple logistic regression with adjustment for age and nutritional status was used to assess the independent impact of every particular disease on vulnerability. Diabetes mellitus type 2, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, fractures, eyes disorders, depression, dementia, pressure ulcers, and urinary incontinence were associated with higher scores of VES-13. Hospital admission of older subjects with those conditions should primarily draw attention to the risk of functional decline, especially while qualifying older patients for further treatment in surgery and oncology. At the same time, lipid disorders, gastrointestinal diseases, higher body mass index, and albumins level were related to a lower risk of being vulnerable, which may be attributed to a younger age and better nutritional status of those patients.

Frailty Predicts Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Women but Not in Men: The Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study

INTRODUCTION

Frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common aging problems and increasing globally. The association(s) between frailty and AF has been inconclusive. The purpose of this prospective population-based cohort was to investigate the associations between frailty and incident AF in older men and women.

METHODS

In total 839 participants, women (n = 458) and men (n = 381), aged 61-74 years from the Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study were included (March 1, 1998, to December 31, 2001). At the baseline, frailty prevalence was 49.3% (n = 414), and non-frailty 50.7% (n = 425) of the total population. Frailty was ascertained with the presence of 3-5 and prefrailty 1-2 of the following criteria: weight loss (highest 20% over 7 years), self-reported tiredness, weakness (measured by handgrip strength), slow walking speed (walking pace), and low physical activity (lowest 20%). AF events were obtained by record linkages from the national computerized hospitalization registry in Finland up to December 31, 2019. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression estimated the hazard ratio (HR) of incident events, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

During the mean follow-up of 14.2 years, 288 AF cases (169 women; 119 men) occurred. After adjustment for possible confounders, the HRs (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for AF was 1.46 (1.48-1.85) in the frail population, compared to the non-frail group. The association was observed only among older frail women (multivariable-adjusted HR 1.78, 95% CI [1.28-2.48]) (p for interaction = 0.04). No statistically significant associations were observed between frailty and future AF incident among men (multivariable-adjusted HRs 1.12, 95% CI (0.77-1.63)).

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based epidemiological cohort, the risk of developing AF was increased in women affected by frailty at baseline but not in men.

Managing older people with atrial fibrillation and preventing stroke: a review of anticoagulation approaches

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), but prescribing decisions in older people are complicated. Clinicians must assess the net clinical benefit of OAC in the context of multiple chronic conditions, polypharmacy, frailty and life expectancy. The under-representation of high-risk, older adult sub-populations in clinical trials presents the challenge of choosing the right OAC, where a 'one-size-fits-all' approach cannot be taken.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses OAC approaches for stroke prevention in older people with AF and presents a prescribing aid to support clinicians' decision-making. High-risk older adults with multiple chronic conditions, specifically chronic kidney disease, dementia/cognitive impairment, previous stroke/transient ischemic attack or intracranial hemorrhage, polypharmacy, frailty, low body weight, high falls risk, and those aged ≥75 years are considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Non-vitamin K antagonist OACs are the preferred first-line OAC in older adults with AF, including high-risk subpopulations, after individual assessment of stroke and bleeding risk, except those with mechanical heart valves and moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis. Head-to-head comparisons of NOACs are not available, therefore the choice of drug (and dose) should be based on an individual's risk (stroke and bleeding) and incorporate their treatment preferences. Treatment decisions must be person-centered and principles of shared decision-making applied.

Retrospective Cross-sectional Analysis of Older Adults Living with Frailty and Anticoagulant Use for Atrial Fibrillation

Background

Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is recommended for most individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF), including those who are frail. Based on previous literature, those who are frail may be less likely to be prescribed OAC, and up to one-third may receive an inappropriate dose if prescribed a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of frail ambulatory older adults with AF who are prescribed OAC, compare the rates of OAC use across the frailty spectrum, assess the appropriateness of DOAC dosing, and identify if frailty and geriatric syndromes impact OAC prescribing patterns.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional review of individuals with AF referred to an ambulatory clinic for older adults living with frailty and/or geriatric syndromes. Rockwood clinical frailty score of ≥4 was used to define frailty and DOAC appropriateness was assessed based on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines.

Results

Two hundred and ten participants were included. The mean age was 84 years, 49% were female and the median frailty score was 5. Of the 185 participants who were frail, 82% were prescribed an OAC (83% with frailty score of 4, 85% with a frailty score of 5, and 78% with a frailty score of 6). Of those prescribed a DOAC, 70% received a guideline-approved dose.

Conclusions

Over 80% of ambulatory older adults with frailty and AF were prescribed an OAC. However, of those prescribed a DOAC, 30% received an unapproved dose, suggesting more emphasis should be placed on initial and ongoing dosage selection.

EHRA expert consensus document on the management of arrhythmias in frailty syndrome, endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Latin America Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), and Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of Southern Africa (CASSA)

There is an increasing proportion of the general population surviving to old age with significant chronic disease, multi-morbidity, and disability. The prevalence of pre-frail state and frailty syndrome increases exponentially with advancing age and is associated with greater morbidity, disability, hospitalization, institutionalization, mortality, and health care resource use. Frailty represents a global problem, making early identification, evaluation, and treatment to prevent the cascade of events leading from functional decline to disability and death, one of the challenges of geriatric and general medicine. Cardiac arrhythmias are common in advancing age, chronic illness, and frailty and include a broad spectrum of rhythm and conduction abnormalities. However, no systematic studies or recommendations on the management of arrhythmias are available specifically for the elderly and frail population, and the uptake of many effective antiarrhythmic therapies in these patients remains the slowest. This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document focuses on the biology of frailty, common comorbidities, and methods of assessing frailty, in respect to a specific issue of arrhythmias and conduction disease, provide evidence base advice on the management of arrhythmias in patients with frailty syndrome, and identifies knowledge gaps and directions for future research.

Frailty and comorbidity burden in Atrial Fibrillation

Background

With the aging of the population, the characterization of frailty and comorbidity burden is increasingly taking on particular importance. The aims of the present study are to analyze such conditions in a population affected by Atrial Fibrillation (AF), matching it with a population without AF, and to recognize potential independent factors associated with such common cardiovascular disease.

Methods

This study included subjects consecutively evaluated over 5 years at the Geriatric Outpatient Service, University Hospital of Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy. A sum of 1981 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The AF-group was made up of 330 people, and another 330 people were randomly selected to made up the non-AF-group. The sample was subjected to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA).

Results

In our sample, severe comorbidity burden (p = 0.01) and frailty status (p = 0.04) were significantly more common in patients with AF than without AF, independently on gender and age. Furthermore, the 5-years follow-up demonstrated that survival probability was significantly higher in AF-group (p = 0.03). The multivariate analysis (AUC: 0.808) showed that the presence of AF was independently positively associated with a history of coronary heart disease (OR: 2.12) and cerebrovascular disease (OR: 1.64), with the assumption of Beta Blockers (OR: 3.39), and with the number of drugs taken (OR: 1.12), and negatively associated with the assumption of antiplatelets (OR: 0.09).

Conclusions

Elderly people with AF are frailer, have more severe comorbidities, and take more drugs, in particular beta blockers, than people without AF, who conversely have a higher survival probability. Furthermore, it is necessary to pay attention to antiplatelets, especially in AF-group, in order to avoid dangerous under- or over-prescriptions.

Prevalence and treatment of atrial fibrillation in older adults

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent cardiac arrhythmia with an impact on morbidity and mortality found in the geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study is the first to investigate the prevalence, treatment and comorbidities of AF in a large cohort of older adults.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Older adults with AF hospitalized between 2010 and 2018. The mean age of the 10,700 AF patients in 2018 was 83.2 ± 6.4 years. The frequency of anticoagulation in older adults with AF between 2010 and 2018 was analyzed. The relationship between comorbidities and anticoagulation in 2018 was examined. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify possible predictive factors for anticoagulation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AF in 35,887 hospitalized older adults was 29.8% in 2018. The mean CHA₂DS₂VASc score was 4.4 ± 1.3 (male 3.8 ± 1.3, female 4.7 ± 1.2). From 2010 to 2018, the frequency of anticoagulation for patients with AF rose from 32.1% to 64.2%. Statistically significant differences in the examined characteristics between anticoagulated and not anticoagulated patients were found. Furthermore, there were no predictive factors for anticoagulation in multivariate logistic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized older adults have an increased prevalence of AF compared to the general population. Despite the higher risk of bleeding, older adults were more frequently anticoagulated in the observation period, preferably with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Patients without anticoagulation had more diagnoses and were worse in functional tests. This study suggests that the decision to give anticoagulants to older adults should be personalized.

Use of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Spain

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have substantially improved anticoagulation. However, data on NOAC use among elderly patients are scarce. We sought to describe NOAC use among elderly AF patients in Spain. We performed a non-interventional, multicenter, multispecialty, cross-sectional study in elderly (≥75 years) AF patients treated with NOACs for stroke prevention. Patients' characteristics by NOAC treatment were compared using standardized differences (SDD). NOAC dosing was classified according to the Spanish summary of products characteristics (SmPC) into appropriate (recommended dose) and inappropriate (under and overdosed). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore factors associated with inappropriate dosing. 500 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 81.5 (4.7) years, and 50% were women. Mean (SD) creatinine clearance was 57.4 mL/min (18.8), and 23.6% were frail. Dabigatran treatment totaled 38.4%, rivaroxaban 15.2%, apixaban 33.2%, and edoxaban 13.2%. Almost one-fourth of elderly patients treated with NOACs in Spain were inappropriately dosed (underdosing 14.4% and overdosing 9.6%). Underdosing was significantly associated with weight (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.0-1.1), while higher a EHRA score decreased the risk of underdosing (OR = 0.47, 95%CI = 0.2-1.0). Overdosing was significantly associated with a history of ischemic stroke (OR = 2.95, 95%CI = 1.1-7.7). Addressing incorrect dosing among elderly AF patients is relevant to improve patient outcomes.

Oral Anticoagulant Use and Appropriateness in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Complex Clinical Conditions: ACONVENIENCE Study

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia in older patients. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the antithrombotic treatment of choice, irrespective of age, certain factors may limit their use. The aim of the ACONVENIENCE study was to consult the opinion of a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the appropriateness of using OACs in elderly patients (>75 years) with NVAF associated with certain complex clinical conditions. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, and application of a two-round Delphi survey. The agreement of 79 panellists on 30 Delphi-type statements was evaluated, and their opinion on the appropriateness of different oral anticoagulants in 16 complex clinical scenarios was assessed. A total of 27 consensus statements were agreed upon, including all statements addressing anticoagulation in older patients and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications, and most of those addressing frailty, dementia, risk of falling, and complex cardiac situations. It was almost unanimously agreed upon that advanced age should not influence the anticoagulation decision. Apixaban was the highest-rated therapeutic option in 14/16 situations, followed by edoxaban. There is a high degree of agreement on anticoagulation in older patients with NVAF. Age should not be the single limiting factor when prescribing OACs, and the decision should be made based on net clinical benefit and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Apixaban, followed by edoxaban, was considered the most appropriate treatment in the various complex clinical situations examined.

Impact of frailty models on the prescription of oral anticoagulants and on the incidence of stroke, bleeding, and mortality in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Frailty is common in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Current guidelines recommend oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) except in case of severe frailty or reduced life expectancy, but definitive evidence on which "frailty" tools may help to identify older AF patients expected to derive little or no benefit from OAT is still lacking. Some persistent uncertainties may derive from the different clinical implications that the two major models of frailty, namely the frail phenotype (FP) and the deficit accumulation model (DAM), underlie. We thus conducted a systematic review of published studies to examine the association of the presence of frailty, categorized according to the FP and DAM, with 1) OAT prescription and 2) incidence of clinical outcomes (all-cause mortality, stroke and/or systemic embolism and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) in patients receiving OAT.

METHODS

Embase and MEDLINE were searched from inception until May 31st, 2022, for studies using a validated tool to identify frailty in subjects aged 65 years or older with a diagnosis of non-valvular AF; only studies on patients prescribed an OAT were considered eligible for the analyses involving clinical outcomes. The protocols for each review question have been registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42022308623 and CRD42022308628).

FINDINGS

Twenty-three studies exploring the association between frailty and OAT prescription on a total of 504 719 subjects were included. Patients with increasing severity of DAM frailty showed consistently lower OAT prescription rates than non-frail patients, whereas use of OAT did not significantly differ between patients with the FP compared with non-frail subjects. Eleven studies exploring the association between frailty and clinical outcomes on a total of 41 985 individuals receiving oral anticoagulation were included. Compared with non-frail subjects, a higher risk of all-cause mortality and clinical outcomes could be observed for AF patients prescribed with OAT with severe frailty according to the DAM, with inconclusive findings for the FP. High levels of heterogeneity were observed in both groups of studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the great heterogeneity among different validated frailty measures, indiscriminately relying on "frailty" should not be regarded as the gold standard for clinical decision-making about stroke prevention in older AF patients. Present findings suggest that severe frailty according to the DAM is associated with less use of OAT and increased risk of all-cause mortality, thereby representing at the moment the most reasonable tool to efficiently recognize patients with limited life expectancy and for whom there is so far scant, if any, evidence of a clinical benefit of OAT.

Clinical Complexity Domains, Anticoagulation, and Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Report from the GLORIA-AF Registry Phase II and III

BACKGROUND

 Clinical complexity is common in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. We assessed the impact of clinical complexity on oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment patterns and major adverse outcomes in a contemporary cohort of AF patients.

METHODS

 The GLORIA-AF Phase II and III Registry enrolled newly diagnosed AF patients with at least one stroke risk factor. Among patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2, we defined four domains of perceived clinical complexity: frail elderly (age ≥75 years and body mass index <23 kg/m²), chronic kidney disease (CKD, creatinine clearance <60 mL/min), history of bleeding, and those with ≥2 of the above conditions. We evaluated the associations between clinical complexity domains and antithrombotic treatment prescription, risk of OAC discontinuation, and major adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

 Among the 29,625 patients included (mean age 69.6 ± 10.7 years, 44.2% females), 9,504 (32.1%) presented with at least one complexity criterion. Clinical complexity was associated with lower OAC prescription, with stronger associations in frail elderly (odds ratio [OR]: 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.62) and those with ≥2 complexity domains (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.44-0.57). Risk of OAC discontinuation was higher among frail elderly (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.00-1.69), CKD (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02-1.20), and those with ≥2 complexity domains (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.23-1.57). Clinical complexity was associated with higher risk of the primary outcome of all-cause death, thromboembolism, and major bleeding, with the highest magnitude in those with ≥2 criteria (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.43-1.86).

CONCLUSION

 In AF patients, clinical complexity influences OAC treatment management, and increases the risk of poor clinical outcomes. These patients require additional efforts, such as integrated care approach, to improve their management and prognosis.

Epidemiology and impact of frailty in patients with atrial fibrillation in Europe

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a medical syndrome characterised by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors. Data regarding the relationship between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still inconsistent.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to perform a comprehensive evaluation of frailty in a large European cohort of AF patients.

METHODS

A 40-item frailty index (FI) was built according to the accumulation of deficits model in the AF patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Association of baseline characteristics, clinical management, quality of life, healthcare resources use and risk of outcomes with frailty was examined.

RESULTS

Among 10,177 patients [mean age (standard deviation) 69.0 (11.4) years, 4,103 (40.3%) females], 6,066 (59.6%) were pre-frail and 2,172 (21.3%) were frail, whereas only 1,939 (19.1%) were considered robust. Baseline thromboembolic and bleeding risks were independently associated with increasing FI. Frail patients with AF were less likely to be treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.89), especially with non-vitamin K antagonist OACs and managed with a rhythm control strategy, compared with robust patients. Increasing frailty was associated with a higher risk for all outcomes examined, with a non-linear exponential relationship. The use of OAC was associated with a lower risk of outcomes, except in patients with very/extremely high frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of AF patients, there was a high burden of frailty, influencing clinical management and risk of adverse outcomes. The clinical benefit of OAC is maintained in patients with high frailty, but not in very high/extremely frail ones.

Impact of oral anticoagulation on the association between frailty and clinical outcomes in people with atrial fibrillation: nationwide primary care records on treatment analysis

AIMS

People with atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently live with frailty, which increases the risk of mortality and stroke. This study reports the association between oral anticoagulation (OAC) and outcomes for people with frailty, and whether there is overall net benefit from treatment in people with AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective open cohort electronic records study. Frailty was identified using the electronic frailty index. Primary care electronic health records of 89 996 adults with AF and CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2 were linked with secondary care and mortality data in the Clinical Practice Research Database (CPRD) from 1 January 1998 to 30 November 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were stroke, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, transient ischaemic attack, and falls. Of 89 996 participants, 71 256 (79.2%) were living with frailty. The prescription of OAC increased with degree of frailty. For patients not prescribed OAC, rates of the primary outcome increased alongside frailty category. Prescription of OAC was associated with a reduction in the primary outcome for each frailty category [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, no OAC as reference; fit: vitamin K antagonist (VKA) 0.69, 0.64-0.75, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) 0.42, 0.33-0.53; mild frailty: VKA 0.52, 0.50-0.54, DOAC 0.57, 0.52-0.63; moderate: VKA 0.54, 0.52-0.56, DOAC 0.57, 0.52-0.63; severe: VKA 0.48, 0.45-0.51, DOAC 0.58, 0.52-0.65], with cumulative incidence function effects greater for DOAC than VKA.

CONCLUSION

Frailty among people with AF is common. The OAC was associated with a reduction in the primary endpoint across all degrees of frailty.

Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and frailty are a considerable group in clinical practice. However, existing studies provide insufficient evidence of anticoagulation strategies for these patients. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and safety outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for these patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting the data about the DOACs and warfarin therapy among frail AF patients were included. The search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to March 2022. Frailty was defined using the most widely used claims-based frailty index or the cumulative deficit model-based frailty index.

RESULTS

A total of 4 studies involving 835,520 patients were included. Compared with warfarin, DOACs therapy reduced the risks of stroke or systemic embolism (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.69-0.90), ischemic stroke (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.71-0.87), hemorrhagic stroke (HR = 0.52, 95%CI: 0.35-0.76), and all-cause death (HR = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.96). In safety outcomes, DOACs was significantly associated with reduced risks of major bleeding (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.64-0.97) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.52-0.65) compared to warfarin, but there were no statistically differences in gastrointestinal bleeding (HR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.73-1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs exerted superior effectiveness and safety outcome than warfarin in AF patients with frailty.

Incidence of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and oral anticoagulant prescribing in England, 2009 to 2019: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for ischaemic stroke, and AF incidence is expected to increase. Guidelines recommend using oral anticoagulants (OACs) to prevent the development of stroke. However, studies have reported the frequent underuse of OACs in AF patients. The objective of this study is to describe nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) incidence in England and assess the clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with the underprescribing of OACs.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) database to identify patients with NVAF aged ≥18 years and registered in English general practices between 2009 and 2019. Annual incidence rate of NVAF by age, deprivation quintile, and region was estimated. OAC prescribing status was explored for patients at risk for stroke and classified into the following: OAC, aspirin only, or no treatment. We used a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model to estimate relative risk ratios (RRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the factors associated with OAC or aspirin-only prescribing compared to no treatment in patients with NVAF who are recommended to take OAC. The multivariable regression was adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, baseline treatment, frailty, bleeding risk factors, and takes into account clustering by general practice. Between 2009 and 2019, 12,517,191 patients met the criteria for being at risk of developing NVAF. After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 192,265 patients had an incident NVAF contributing a total of 647,876 person-years (PYR) of follow-up. The overall age-adjusted incidence of NVAF per 10,000 PYR increased from 20.8 (95% CI: 20.4; 21.1) in 2009 to 25.5 (25.1; 25.9) in 2019. Higher incidence rates were observed for older ages and males. Among NVAF patients eligible for anticoagulation, OAC prescribing rose from 59.8% (95% CI: 59.0; 60.6) in 2009 to 83.2% (95% CI: 83.0; 83.4) in 2019. Several conditions were associated with lower risk of OAC prescribing: dementia [RRR 0.52 (0.47; 0.59)], liver disease 0.58 (0.50; 0.67), malignancy 0.74 (0.72; 0.77), and history of falls 0.82 (0.78; 0.85). Compared to white ethnicity, patients from black and other ethnic minorities were less likely to receive OAC; 0.78 (0.65; 0.94) and 0.76 (0.64; 0.91), respectively. Patients living in the most deprived areas were less likely to receive OAC 0.85 (0.79; 0.91) than patients living in the least deprived areas. Practices located in the East of England were associated with higher risk of prescribing aspirin only over no treatment than practices in London (RRR 1.22; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.45). The main limitation of this study is that these findings depends on accurate recording of conditions by health professionals and the inevitable residual confounding due to lack of data on certain factors that could be associated with under-prescribing of OACs.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of NVAF increased between 2009 and 2015, before plateauing. Underprescribing of OACs in NVAF is associated with a range of comorbidities, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors, demonstrating the need for initiatives to reduce inequalities in the care for AF patients.

Frailty prevalence and impact on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,187,000 patients

Frailty is a clinical syndrome characterized by a reduced physiologic reserve, increased vulnerability to stressors and an increased risk of adverse outcomes. People with atrial fibrillation (AF) are often burdened by frailty due to biological, clinical, and social factors. The prevalence of frailty, its management and association with major outcomes in AF patients are still not well quantified. We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE, from inception to September 13th, 2021, for studies reporting the prevalence of frailty in AF patients. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021235854). 33 studies were included in the systematic review (n = 1,187,651 patients). The frailty pooled prevalence was 39.7 % (95 %CI=29.9 %-50.5 %, I² =100 %), while meta-regression analyses showed it is influenced by age, history of stroke, and geographical location. Meta-regression analyses showed that OAC prescription was influenced by study-level mean age, baseline thromboembolic risk, and study setting. Frail AF patients were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (OR=5.56, 95 %CI=3.46-8.94), ischemic stroke (OR=1.59, 95 %CI=1.00-2.52), and bleeding (OR=1.64, 95 %CI=1.11-2.41), when compared to robust individuals. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the prevalence of frailty was high in patients with AF. Frailty may influence the prognosis and management of AF patients, thus requiring person-tailored interventions in a holistic or integrated approach to AF care.

Effect of Integrated Care on Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Aims

The integrated management was evidenced to improve the hospitalization and its associated complications in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but the strategies of integrated care varied and results were inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of integrated care on AF-related outcomes with comparison with usual care.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles published until 10th January 2022. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials to study the effect of integrated care on AF-related outcomes. Meta-analysis with a random-effect model was used to calculate risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by comparing the integrated care with usual care.

Results

A total of five studies with 6,486 AF patients were selected. By synthesizing available data, integrated care effectively reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.42-0.69), cardiovascular hospitalization (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55-0.94), and cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.78) when compared with usual care; however, there was no superior effect on preventing AF-related hospitalization (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.72-1.02), cerebrovascular events (RR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.75-1.70), and major bleeding (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 0.86-1.94) when comparing integrated care with usual care.

Conclusion

Integrated care can reduce the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular hospitalizations in AF patients compared with usual care, while the benefit was not observed in other outcomes.

Frailty in patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in older adults. Whether frailty predicts adverse outcomes after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between frailty and clinical outcomes after percutaneous LAAC.

METHODS

We identified patients 65 years and older in Medicare fee-for-service claims who underwent LAAC between October 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Patients were identified as frail on the basis of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), a validated frailty measure centered on health resource utilization, with the cohort stratified into low (<5), intermediate (5-15), and high (>15) risk groups.

RESULTS

Of the 21,787 patients who underwent LAAC, 10,740 (49.3%) were considered frail (HFRS >5), including 3441 (15.8%) in the high-risk group. The mortality rate (up to 1095 days) were 16.1% in the low-risk group, 26.7% in the intermediate-risk group, and 41.1% in the high-risk group (P < .001). After adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities, HFRS >15 (compared with HFRS <5) was associated with a higher risk of long hospital stay (odds ratio [OR] 8.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.94-11.57), 30-day readmission (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.58-2.05), 30-day mortality (OR 5.68, 95% CI 3.40-9.40), and 1-year mortality (OR 2.83, 95% CI 2.39-3.35). In restricted cubic spline models, the adjusted OR for all outcomes monotonically increased with increasing HFRS.

CONCLUSION

Frailty is common in patients undergoing LAAC and is associated with increased risks of long hospital stay, readmissions, and short-term mortality.

Use and Prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multidisciplinary Consensus Document

In the last twelve years the clinical management of patients with atrial fibrillation has been revolutionised by the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants. Despite the large amount of evidence produced, some populations remain relatively poorly explored regarding the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants, such as the oldest and/or frailest individuals. Frailty is clinical syndrome characterized by a reduction of functions and physiological reserves which results in individuals having higher vulnerability. While current evidence underlines a relationship between atrial fibrillation and frailty, particularly in determining a higher risk of adverse outcomes, data regarding effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in frailty atrial fibrillation patients are still lacking, leaving uncertainty about how to guide prescription in this specific subgroup. On these premises, this multidisciplinary consensus document explains why it would be useful to integrate the clinical evaluation performed through comprehensive geriatric assessment to gather further elements to guide prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in such a high-risk group of patients.

Impact of geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation prescription in older adults with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in older adults. CHA2DS2-VASC (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 (doubled), diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (doubled), vascular disease, age 65-74, female) and HASBLED(Hypertension, Abnormal Renal/Liver Function, Stroke, Bleeding History or Predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/Alcohol Concomitantly) are the most established risk stratification tools in assessing suitability for anticoagulation in AF. However, there are no established screening tools for geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation risks in older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the association of anticoagulation prescription with geriatric syndromes.

METHODS

Older adults 65 years and above admitted to a tertiary hospital with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASC score ≥ 2. Data on demographics, function (modified Barthel's Index (MBI)), cognition (mini-cog), frailty (Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) and FRAIL), geriatric syndromes (EFS), sarcopenia (SARC-F), HASBLED and CHA2DS2-VASC were collected.

RESULTS

150 patients aged 65 and above (mean age 79.4 ± 7.1 years) with AF were recruited. 101 (67%) participants were anticoagulated, in univariate analysis comparing those who were anticoagulated with those who were not, age (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99), chronic kidney disease (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.19-0.80), frailty (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60-0.98) and functional status by Barthel's Index (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57-0.97) were significantly associated with anticoagulation prescription. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.88-0.99) and CKD (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16-0.76) remained significant. There was no significant difference in CHA2DS2-VASC, HASBLED, MBI or falls between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and CKD were significantly associated with anticoagulation prescription in patients with AF. Further studies on the impact of geriatric syndromes on anticoagulation prescription and outcomes in older adults are needed with specific guidelines for patients with geriatric syndromes and AF.

Prevalence of Frailty and Associations with Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Frailty is often cited as a factor influencing oral anticoagulation (OAC) prescription in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We sought to determine the prevalence of frailty and its association with OAC prescription in older veterans with NVAF.

METHODS

We used ICD-9 codes in Veterans Affairs (VA) records and Medicare claims data to identify patients with NVAF and CHA2DS2VASC ≥2 receiving care between February 2010 and September 2015. We examined rates of OAC prescription, further stratified by direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Participants were characterized into 3 categories: non-frail, pre-frail, and frail based on a validated 30-item EHR-derived frailty index. We examined relations between frailty and OAC receipt; and frailty and type of OAC prescribed in regression models adjusted for factors related to OAC prescription.

RESULTS

Of 308,664 veterans with NVAF and a CHA2DS2VASC score ≥2, 121,839 (39%) were prescribed OAC (73% VKA). The mean age was 77.7 (9.6) years; CHA2DS2VASC and ATRIA scores were 4.6 (1.6) and 5.0 (2.9) respectively. Approximately a third (38%) were frail, another third (32%) were pre-frail, and the remainder were not frail. Veterans prescribed OAC were younger, had higher bleeding risk, and were less likely to be frail than participants not receiving OAC (all p's<0.001). After adjustment for factors associated with OAC use, pre-frail (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91) and frail (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.64-0.68) veterans were significantly less likely to be prescribed OAC than non-frail veterans. Of those prescribed OAC, pre-frail (OR:1.27, 95% CI: 1.22-1.31) and frail (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.67-1.83) veterans were significantly more likely than non-frail veterans to be prescribed a DOAC than a VKA.

CONCLUSIONS

There are high rates of frailty among older veterans with NVAF. Frailty using an EHR-derived index is associated with decreased OAC prescription.

Born to Age: When Adult Congenital Heart Disease Converges With Geroscience

Advances in imaging, catheter-based interventions, congenital heart disease surgery, and clinical management of congenital heart disease (CHD) have yielded a dramatic change in age distribution of the CHD population. This implores clinicians and researchers to gain a better understanding of aging, as this will be the cornerstone to how we plan and manage this rapidly evolving group of patients. In this article, we first review the demographic changes in the CHD population and then describe the systemic complications of disease observed in young patients with CHD, following which we discuss general concepts in aging that may be transferable to the CHD population. Finally, we review inflammation and its potential impact on aging. We provide a new lens on aging in CHD and its functional consequences in CHD, with the goal of stimulating an exchange of knowledge between geroscientists and CHD.