Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the perioperative setting; where next?

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and Optimisation Services in Older Kidney Patients: Results from the First UK-Wide Transplant Centre and Renal Unit Survey Study

Background: Demand for renal replacement therapy (including dialysis, transplantation and supportive care) in patients over 60 is increasing. Concerns regarding poorer outcomes and decision-making in this cohort have been raised. Evidence suggests these relate to frailty, multimorbidity and cognitive impairment, all seen frequently in older age. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary methodology proven to improve outcomes relating to this triad and could be transformative for older kidney patients. This national UK survey aims to describe (1) attitudes/beliefs of renal physicians and transplant surgeons in the UK toward the CGA for older potential kidney transplant recipients and those being considered for dialysis or supportive care; (2) provision of CGA services for these patients in the UK; (3) barriers and enablers to the provision of these CGA services in the UK. Methods: The UK's 72 renal units (RUs) and 23 adult kidney transplant centres (TCs) were invited to complete online surveys electronically using a protected link (24 April 2024-31 August 2024). Results: The response rate was 100%. Only six RUs offered CGA services. However, respondents overwhelmingly advocated CGA for older patients being considered for transplant (RUs 47/55, TCs 17/19), dialysis (RUs 52/54) and supportive care (RUs 51/54). Lack of funding to support CGA-OS (45/51), lack of available staff to deliver CGA (44/51) and time constraints (36/51) were reported barriers to implementing CGA by RUs. TCs identified lack of funding (13/18) and published evidence (12/18) as the main barriers. Conclusions: Transplant surgeons and renal physicians alike support CGA for older kidney patients, but only six UK units currently offer the service to these patients. Research developing and implementing CGA for this population is essential to optimise outcomes and influence policy at the national level.

Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease: A Key to Personalized Care and Shared Decision-Making-A Narrative Review

As the global population ages, so too does the prevalence of older people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Helping people age well with CKD and supporting older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) to make personalized decisions regarding kidney replacement therapy (KRT) or conservative care (CC) are an essential component of care. However, these factors are relatively underreported in both the fields of nephrology and geriatric medicine, and prospective, randomized evidence is lacking. This narrative review article, authored by both nephrologists and geriatricians, discusses specific geriatric issues that arise in older people with CKD and why they matter. The available evidence for KRT or CC in older people with frailty is outlined. The importance of performing a comprehensive geriatric assessment, or a modified nephrogeriatric assessment, to ensure a systematic evaluation of the person's medical problems and life needs, goals, and values is described. We consider different models of nephrogeriatric care and how they may be implemented. Kidney supportive care-addressing an individual's symptoms and overall well-being alongside the more traditional nephrological principles of preventing disease progression and optimizing risk-is highlighted throughout the article. We outline ways of identifying the later stages of a person's disease journey, when transition to palliative care is indicated, and elaborate methods of preparing patients for this through multidisciplinary advance care planning. Finally, we discuss practice and systems for nephrogeriatric care in five different European countries and consider future directions, challenges, and highlights in this rapidly evolving, increasingly relevant field.

Implementing a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) service: A guide for clinical leaders

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to translate previous implementation science research describing the implementation of perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services into a format that is comprehensible and relevant to clinical leaders contemplating implementing a POPS service.

METHODS

We conducted a multistage expert end-user review process to design a POPS implementation guide. Our expert research team created a draft POPS service implementation guide using previous implementation science research that described the core elements and implementation of a POPS service. Next, we invited multidisciplinary (allied health, anaesthetics, geriatric medicine, nursing and surgery) clinical leaders in perioperative medicine (n = 12) from five contextually different health services to review the guide. These clinical leaders then participated in two rounds of review and refinement of the implementation guide.

RESULTS

The first draft of the POPS service implementation guide was reviewed by clinical leaders (n = 4) with participants querying implementation science-based language and concepts, the format of the guide and its practical use. We revised the guide accordingly, and the next draft was reviewed by the second group of clinical leaders (n = 8). Feedback from the second group review was supportive of the guide's comprehensibility and relevance, and only minor changes were made to the final version of the POPS service implementation guide.

CONCLUSIONS

We used an implementation science-based approach to create a POPS service implementation guide that is comprehensible and relevant to clinical leaders in perioperative care. The next steps are to use the guide and assess its utility to support implementation of a POPS service.

Muscling in and Making Space: 'Demonstrable Claims' and 'Jurisdictional Clipping' in the Reconfiguration of Professional Jurisdictions in the Surgical Care of Older People

This paper examines the micro-processes of jurisdictional change in the eco-systems of healthcare work. This qualitative study investigated the expansion of geriatrician involvement in the perioperative pathway for older people. This study shows how, in response to opposition from surgeons and anaesthetists, geriatricians developed linked strategies that involved claiming the medical needs of surgical patients, and simultaneously integrating geriatric expertise into the non-surgical peripheries of the pathway. By progressively demonstrating their ability to mitigate risks and improve surgical outcomes, geriatricians acquired an expanded role in the care pathway. This paper develops the concepts of 'demonstrable claims' and 'jurisdictional clipping' to explain the strategies of jurisdictional expansion. It also problematises these strategies by suggesting that role expansion was controlled and contained by more powerful incumbent groups, whereby the expansion of work was limited to temporal and spatial peripheries that were less valued by surgeons or anaesthetists.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment, and related interventions, to improve outcomes for older patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment for people with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, particularly those living with frailty. Increasing frailty is associated with poorer outcomes post-TAVI. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) has been shown in other settings to improve outcomes in those with frailty, including perioperatively. This systematic review aims to determine whether CGA, or interventions targeting its components, improves outcomes for older people undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on 09/01/23 and then the search was rerun on the 16/04/24. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022299955). Included studies had to evaluate either CGA, or a single- or multi-domain intervention targeting components of CGA, in those aged ≥ 65.

RESULTS

From 4091 papers, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies assessed CGA pre-TAVI and reported mixed improvements in functional independence but no change in length of stay or post-operative delirium, although both studies had a serious risk of bias. Fifteen papers described an exercise-based intervention, and 1 paper detailed a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy-based intervention. Seven studies evaluated a multi-component intervention. There were conflicting results reported for the multi-component and single-component interventions. All studies had at least a moderate risk of bias.

CONCLUSION(S)

There is a lack of evidence to determine whether CGA, or related interventions, improve outcomes for older adults undergoing-TAVI. The evidence for perioperative CGA, and the results of this review, support the need for well-designed trials evaluating whether CGA improves outcomes post-TAVI for older adults living with frailty.

Impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Frailty, malnutrition and low socioeconomic status may mutually perpetuate each other in a self-reinforcing and interdependent manner. The intertwined nature of these factors may be overlooked when investigating impacts on perioperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the impact of frailty, malnutrition and socioeconomic status on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

A multicentre cohort study involving six Australian tertiary hospitals was undertaken. All consecutive surgical patients who underwent an operation were included. Frailty was defined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, malnutrition by the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and low socioeconomic status by the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage. Linear mixed-effects and binary logistic generalised estimated equation models were performed for the outcomes: inpatient mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission and re-operation.

RESULTS

A total of 21 976 patients were included. After controlling for confounders, malnutrition and socioeconomic status, patients at high risk of frailty have a mean hospital length of stay 3.46 times longer (mean ratio = 3.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.20, 3.73; P value < .001), odds of 30-day readmission 2.4 times higher (odds ratio = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.19, 2.63; P value < .001) and odds of in-hospital mortality 12.89 times greater than patients with low risk of frailty (odds ratio = 12.89; 95% CI: 4.51, 36.69; P value < .001). Elevated MUST scores were also significantly associated with worse outcomes, but to a lesser extent. Socioeconomic status had no association with outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative risk evaluation should consider both frailty and malnutrition as separate, significant risk factors. Despite strong causal links with frailty and malnutrition, socioeconomic disadvantage is not associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Additional studies regarding the prospective identification of these patients with implementation of strategies to mitigate frailty and malnutrition and assessment of perioperative risk are required.

Using Systems Engineering and Implementation Science to Design an Implementation Package for Preoperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Among Older Adults Having Major Abdominal Surgery: Protocol for a 3-Phase Study

BACKGROUND

Older Americans, a growing segment of the population, have an increasing need for surgical services, and they experience a disproportionate burden of postoperative complications compared to their younger counterparts. A preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (pCGA) is recommended to reduce risk and improve surgical care delivery for this population, which has been identified as vulnerable. The pCGA optimizes multiple chronic conditions and factors commonly overlooked in routine preoperative planning, including physical function, polypharmacy, nutrition, cognition, mental health, and social and environmental support. The pCGA has been shown to decrease postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay in a variety of surgical specialties. Although national guidelines recommend the use of the pCGA, a paucity of strategic guidance for implementation limits its uptake to a few academic medical centers. By applying implementation science and human factors engineering methods, this study will provide the necessary evidence to optimize the implementation of the pCGA in a variety of health care settings.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this paper is to describe the study protocol to design an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package for use among older adults before major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This protocol uses systems engineering methods to develop, tailor, and pilot-test a user-centered pCGA implementation package, which can be adapted to community-based hospitals in preparation for a multisite implementation trial. The protocol is based upon the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development and aligns with the goal to develop behavioral interventions with an eye to real-world implementation. In phase 1, we will use observation and interviews to map the pCGA process and identify system-based barriers and facilitators to its use among older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery. In phase 2, we will apply user-centered design methods, engaging health care providers, patients, and caregivers to co-design a pCGA implementation package. This package will be applicable to a diverse population of older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery at a large academic hospital and an affiliate community site. In phase 3, we will pilot-test and refine the pCGA implementation package in preparation for a future randomized controlled implementation-effectiveness trial. We anticipate that this study will take approximately 60 months (April 2023-March 2028).

RESULTS

This study protocol will generate (1) a detailed process map of the pCGA; (2) an adaptable, user-centered pCGA implementation package ready for feasibility testing in a pilot trial; and (3) preliminary pilot data on the implementation and effectiveness of the package. We anticipate that these data will serve as the basis for future multisite hybrid implementation-effectiveness clinical trials of the pCGA in older adults undergoing major abdominal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The expected results of this study will contribute to improving perioperative care processes for older adults before major abdominal surgery.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/59428.

The implementation of a perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery service: a qualitative case study

BACKGROUND

The international scale and spread of evidence-based perioperative medicine for older people undergoing surgery (POPS) services has not yet been fully realised. Implementation science provides a structured approach to understanding factors that act as barriers and facilitators to the implementation of POPS services. In this study, we aimed to identify factors that influence the implementation of POPS services in the UK.

METHODS

A qualitative case study at three UK health services was undertaken. The health services differed across contextual factors (population, workforce, size) and stages of POPS service implementation maturity. Semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled clinicians (perioperative medical, nursing, allied health, and pharmacy) and managers (n = 56) were conducted. Data were inductively coded, then thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS

Fourteen factors across all five CFIR domains were relevant to the implementation of POPS services. Key shared facilitators included stakeholders understanding the rationale of the POPS service, with support from their networks, POPS champions, and POPS clinical leads. We found substantial variation and flexibility in the way that health services responded to these shared facilitators and this was relevant to the implementation of POPS services.

CONCLUSIONS

Health services planning to implement a POPS service should use health service-specific strategies to respond flexibly to local factors that are acting as barriers or facilitators to implementation. To support implementation of a POPS service, we recommend health services prioritise understanding local networks, identifying POPS champions, and ensuring that stakeholders understand the rationale for the POPS service. Our study also provides a structure for future research to understand the factors associated with 'unsuccessful' implementation of a POPS service, which can inform ongoing efforts to implement evidence-based perioperative models of care for older people.

Stakeholders' experiences of comprehensive geriatric assessment in an inpatient hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review and meta-ethnography

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is considered the gold standard approach to improving a range of outcomes for older adults living with frailty admitted to hospital. To date, research has predominantly focused on quantitative syntheses of the international evidence with limited focus on qualitative synthesis of stakeholder perspectives. This review aims to resolve this research gap by identifying and synthesising qualitative studies reporting multiple stakeholders' experiences of inpatient CGA.

METHODS

A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted. Qualitative or mixed methods studies that included qualitative findings on the experiences of CGA in an inpatient hospital setting from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCP), older adults, and those important to them were included. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (Registration: CRD42021283167) and the 10-item Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist was used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Results were synthesised as a meta-ethnography.

RESULTS

Eleven studies, which reported on the experiences of 153 HCPs, 91 older adults and 57 caregivers were included. The studies dated from 2011 to 2021 and three key themes were identified: (1) HCPs, older adults and caregivers report conflicting views on CGA as a holistic process, (2) most HCPs, but only some older adults and caregivers view CGA goalsetting and care planning as collaborative, and (3) all stakeholders value care continuity during the transition from hospital to home but often fail to achieve it.

CONCLUSION

While HCPs, older adults, and caregivers' values and ambitions related to CGA broadly align, their experiences often differ. The identified themes highlight organisational and relational factors, which positively and negatively influence CGA practices and processes in an inpatient hospital setting.

Geriatric anesthesia: Demographics, epidemiology, state of the art at international level, educational needs, and future perspectives

Population aging has induced in the last year a corresponding aging inside the surgical population, currently accounting for 45%.50% of the total surgical population in the majority of the advanced countries. This has induced a number of new challenges in the daily anesthesia practice, ranging from the need of implementing specific education in the field of geriatric medicine, organizational adjustments aimed to adapt our preoperative evaluation methodology to the needs older patients present, and a careful redesign of the whole perioperative course for these patients. Today's anesthesiologists are called to became familiar with the aging processes and their impact on the patho.physiological perioperative course, with the concept of functional impairment and frailty and with the dimensions of polypathology, polymedication, and reduced functional reserves. The introduction of new trends such as the team-based approach and interdisciplinary culture are essential to overcome these emerging criticalities.

Development and validation of an international preoperative risk assessment model for postoperative delirium

BACKGROUND

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent complication in older adults, characterised by disturbances in attention, awareness and cognition, and associated with prolonged hospitalisation, poor functional recovery, cognitive decline, long-term dementia and increased mortality. Early identification of patients at risk of POD can considerably aid prevention.

METHODS

We have developed a preoperative POD risk prediction algorithm using data from eight studies identified during a systematic review and providing individual-level data. Ten-fold cross-validation was used for predictor selection and internal validation of the final penalised logistic regression model. The external validation used data from university hospitals in Switzerland and Germany.

RESULTS

Development included 2,250 surgical (excluding cardiac and intracranial) patients 60 years of age or older, 444 of whom developed POD. The final model included age, body mass index, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, history of delirium, cognitive impairment, medications, optional C-reactive protein (CRP), surgical risk and whether the operation is a laparotomy/thoracotomy. At internal validation, the algorithm had an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) with CRP and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82) without CRP. The external validation consisted of 359 patients, 87 of whom developed POD. The external validation yielded an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm is named PIPRA (Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment), has European conformity (ce) certification, is available at http://pipra.ch/ and is accepted for clinical use. It can be used to optimise patient care and prioritise interventions for vulnerable patients and presents an effective way to implement POD prevention strategies in clinical practice.

Geriatric care for surgical patients: results and reflections from a cross-sectional survey in acute Belgian hospitals

PURPOSE

To explore geriatric care for surgical patients in Belgian hospitals and geriatricians' reflections on current practice.

METHODS

A web-based survey was developed based on literature review and local expertise, and was pretested with 4 participants. In June 2021, the 27-question survey was sent to 91 heads of geriatrics departments. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-four surveys were completed, corresponding to a response rate of 59%. Preoperative geriatric risk screening is performed in 25 hospitals and systematically followed by geriatric assessment in 17 hospitals. During the perioperative hospitalisation, 91% of geriatric teams provide non-medical and 82% provide medical advice. To a lesser extent, they provide geriatric protocols, geriatric education and training, and attend multidisciplinary team meetings. Overall, time allocation of geriatric teams goes mainly to postoperative evaluations and interventions, rather than to preoperative assessment and care planning. Most surgical patients are hospitalised on surgical wards, with reactive (73%) or proactive (46%) geriatric consultation. In 36 hospitals, surgical patients are also admitted on geriatric wards, predominantly orthopaedic/trauma, abdominal and vascular surgery. Ninety-eight per cent of geriatricians feel that more geriatric input for surgical patients is needed. The most common reported barriers to further implement geriatric-surgical services are shortage of geriatricians and geriatric nurses, and unadjusted legislation and financing.

CONCLUSION

Geriatric care for surgical patients in Belgian hospitals is mainly reactive, although geriatricians favour more proactive services. The main opportunities and challenges for improvement are to resolve staff shortages in the geriatric work field and to update legislation and financing.

Updating the British Geriatrics Society recommended undergraduate curriculum in geriatric medicine: a curriculum mapping and nominal group technique study

BACKGROUND

medical education must adapt to meet the challenges and demands of an ageing population, ensuring that graduates are equipped to look after older patients with complex health and social care needs. Recommended curricula in geriatric medicine in the United Kingdom and Europe offer guidance for optimal undergraduate education in ageing. The UK version, written by the British Geriatrics Society (BGS), requires updating to take account of innovations in the specialty, changing guidance from the General Medical Council (GMC), and the need to support medical schools preparing for the introduction of the national Medical Licensing Assessment (MLA).

METHODS

the BGS recommended curriculum was mapped to the most recent European curriculum (2014) and the MLA content map, to compare and contrast between current recommendations and nationally mandated guidance. These maps were used to guide discussion through a virtual Nominal Group Technique (NGT), including 21 expert stakeholders, to agree consensus on the updated BGS curriculum.

RESULTS

the curriculum has been re-structured into seven sections, each with 1-2 overarching learning outcomes (LOs) that are expanded in multiple sub-LOs. Crucially, the curriculum now reflects the updated GMC/MLA requirements, having incorporated items flagged as missing in the mapping stages.

CONCLUSION

the combined mapping exercise and NGT have enabled appropriate alignment and benchmarking of the UK national curriculum. These recommendations will help to standardise and enhance teaching and learning around the care of older persons with complexity.

Perioperative care for older people

Increasing numbers of older people are undergoing surgery with benefits including symptom relief and extended longevity. Despite these benefits, older people are more likely than younger patients to experience postoperative complications, which are predominantly medical as opposed to surgical. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and optimisation offers a systematic approach to risk assessment and risk modification in the perioperative period. Clinical evidence shows that Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and optimisation reduces postoperative medical complications and is cost effective in the perioperative setting. These benefits have been observed in patients undergoing elective and emergency surgery. Challenges in the implementation of perioperative Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and optimisation services are acknowledged. These include the necessary involvement of a wide stakeholder group, limited available geriatric medicine workforce and ensuring fidelity to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment methodology with adaptation to the local context. Addressing these challenges needs a cross-specialty, interdisciplinary approach underpinned by evidence-based medicine and implementation science with upskilling to facilitate innovative use of the extended workforce. Future delivery of quality patient-centred perioperative care requires proactive engagement with national audit, collaborative guidelines and establishment of networks to share best practice.

New horizons in the perioperative care of older adults

Older adults undergoing surgery have high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Age-related physiological changes and prevalence of geriatric syndromes such as frailty increase the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes. Geriatricians utilise comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and management to identify and manage geriatric syndromes, and deliver patient-centred perioperative care. Perioperative models of CGA are established for older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Recent trials support the benefits of perioperative models of CGA for non-orthopaedic surgery, and have influenced current care recommendations for older surgical patients. Areas for further action include addressing the implementation gap between recommended evidence-based perioperative care and routine perioperative care, evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of perioperative models of CGA for patients living with frailty, and embedding routine use of patient-reported outcome measures to inform quality improvement.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Exercise Capacity in Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients Referred to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program is essential for patients before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aimed to explore the values of CGA and exercise capacity in CR for patients referred to TAVI. A retrospective analysis was conducted in 90 patients referred to TAVI from January to October 2019. CR strategies started before TAVI. The association between clinical characteristics, CGA, and change in six-minute walk distance (Δ6MWD) was analyzed with multivariate regression models. Most of patients had cognitive impairment (50%), malnutrition (61%), and frailty (83%). After the CR, the proportion of cognitive impairment, malnutrition, and frail patients was significantly decreased by 21%, 40%, and 57%, respectively (p = 0.002, p <0.001, p <0.001). The 6MWD at a month after discharge (291.9 ± 98.8 m) was significantly improved than that at discharge after TAVI (218.8 ± 114.3m, p <0.001). The multivariate regression analysis indicated body mass index (BMI; Δ6MWD:12.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.3 to 23.8, p = 0.045), frailty (Δ6MWD: -57.9, 95% CI -81.8 to -34.1, p <0.001) and malnutrition (Δ6MWD: -25.1, 95% CI -47.0 to -3.2, p = 0.026) as the associated predictors of Δ6MWD. In conclusion, functional status in patients referred to TAVI could be improved by CGA-based CR. BMI, frailty, and malnutrition were associated with the efficacy of CR on exercise capacity. CGA can play the important role in the evaluation and making strategies for CR in patients.

The work of older people and their informal caregivers in managing an acute health event in a hospital at home or hospital inpatient setting

Background

There is limited understanding of the contribution made by older people and their caregivers to acute healthcare in the home and how this compares to hospital inpatient healthcare.

Objectives

To explore the work of older people and caregivers at the time of an acute health event, the interface with professionals in a hospital and hospital at home (HAH) and how their experiences relate to the principles underpinning comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA).

Design

A qualitative interview study within a UK multi-site participant randomised trial of geriatrician-led admission avoidance HAH, compared with hospital inpatient care.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 34 older people (15 had received HAH and 19 hospital care) alone or alongside caregivers (29 caregivers; 12 HAH, 17 hospital care), in three sites that recruited participants to a randomised trial, during 2017–2018. We used normalisation process theory to guide our analysis and interpretation of the data.

Results

Patients and caregivers described efforts to understand changes in health, interpret assessments and mitigate a lack of involvement in decisions. Practical work included managing risks, mobilising resources to meet health-related needs, and integrating the acute episode into longer-term strategies. Personal, relational and environmental factors facilitated or challenged adaptive capacity and ability to manage.

Conclusions

Patients and caregivers contributed to acute healthcare in both locations, often in parallel to healthcare providers. Our findings highlight an opportunity for CGA-guided services at the interface of acute and chronic condition management to facilitate personal, social and service strategies extending beyond an acute episode of healthcare.

Special needs of frail people undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery

There are now over 30 000 emergency laparotomies under taken in the UK every year, a figure that is increasing year on year. Over half of these people are aged over 70 years old. Frailty is commonly seen in this population and becomes increasingly common with age and is seen in over 50% of elderly emergency laparotomies in people aged over 85 years old. In older people who undergo surgery one third will have died within one year of surgery, a figure which is worse in frail individuals. For those that do survive, post-operative morbidity is worse and 30% of frail older people do not return to their own home. In the UK, the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) is leading the way in providing the evidence base in this population group. Beyond collecting data on every Emergency Laparotomy undertaken in the UK, it is also key in driving improvement in care. Their most recent report highlights that only 23% of patients over 70 years received geriatric involvement following surgery. More encouragingly, the degree of multidisciplinary geriatric involvement seems to be increasing. In the research setting, well designed studies focusing on the older frail emergency laparotomy patient are underway. It is anticipated that these studies will better define outcomes following surgery, improving the communication and decision making between patients, relatives, carers and their surgical teams.