Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in 678 triple-negative primary breast cancers; results from the geparquinto study (GBG 44)

On-treatment biopsies to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer (BC) have better outcomes, potentially warranting less extensive surgical and systemic treatments. Early prediction of treatment response could aid in adapting therapies.

METHODS

On-treatment biopsies from 297 patients with invasive BC in three randomized, prospective neoadjuvant trials were assessed (GeparQuattro, GeparQuinto, GeparSixto). BC quantity, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and the proliferation marker Ki-67 were compared to pre-treatment samples. The study investigated the correlation between residual cancer, changes in Ki-67 and TILs, and their impact on pathologic complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Among the 297 samples, 138 (46%) were hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2-), 87 (29%) were triple-negative (TNBC), and 72 (24%) were HER2+. Invasive tumor cells were found in 70% of on-treatment biopsies, with varying rates across subtypes (HR+/HER2-: 84%, TNBC: 62%, HER2+: 51%; p < 0.001). Patients with residual tumor on-treatment had an 8% pCR rate post-treatment (HR+/HER2-: 3%, TNBC: 19%, HER2+: 11%), while those without any invasive tumor had a 50% pCR rate (HR+/HER2-: 27%; TNBC: 48%, HER2+: 66%). Sensitivity for predicting residual disease was 0.81, with positive and negative predictive values of 0.92 and 0.50, respectively. Increasing TILs from baseline to on-treatment biopsy (if residual tumor was present) were linked to higher pCR likelihood in the overall cohort (OR 1.034, 95% CI 1.013-1.056 per % increase; p = 0.001) and with a longer DFS in TNBC (HR 0.980, 95% CI 0.963-0.997 per % increase; p = 0.026). Persisting or increased Ki-67 was associated with with lower pCR probability in the overall cohort (OR 0.957, 95% CI 0.928-0.986; p = 0.004) and shorter DFS in TNBC (HR 1.023, 95% CI 1.001-1.047; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

On-treatment biopsies can predict patients unlikely to achieve pCR post-therapy. This could facilitate therapy adjustments for TNBC or HER2 + BC. They also might offer insights into therapy resistance mechanisms. Future research should explore whether standardized or expanded sampling enhances the accuracy of on-treatment biopsy procedures. Trial registration GeparQuattro (EudraCT 2005-001546-17), GeparQuinto (EudraCT 2006-005834-19) and GeparSixto (EudraCT 2011-000553-23).

An Analysis of PIK3CA Hotspot Mutations and Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Breast Cancer from Four Prospective Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

The PI3K signaling pathway is frequently dysregulated in breast cancer, and mutations in PIK3CA are relevant for therapy resistance in HER2-positive (HER2pos) breast cancer. Mutations in exons 9 or 20 may have different impacts on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy-based treatment regimens.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We investigated PIK3CA mutations in 1,691 patients with early breast cancer who were randomized into four neoadjuvant multicenter trials: GeparQuattro (NCT00288002), GeparQuinto (NCT00567554), GeparSixto (NCT01426880), and GeparSepto (NCT01583426). The role of different PIK3CA exons and hotspots for pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and patient survival were evaluated for distinct molecular subgroups and anti-HER2 treatment procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 302 patients (17.9%) of the full cohort of 1,691 patients had a tumor with a PIK3CA mutation, with a different prevalence in molecular subgroups: luminal/HER2-negative (HER2neg) 95 of 404 (23.5%), HER2pos 170 of 819 (20.8%), and triple-negative breast cancer 37 of 468 patients (7.9%). We identified the mutations in PIK3CA exon 20 to be linked with worse response to anti-HER2 treatment (OR = 0.507; 95% confidence interval, 0.320-0.802; P = 0.004), especially in hormone receptor-positive HER2-positive breast cancer (OR = 0.445; 95% confidence interval, 0.237-0.837; P = 0.012). In contrast, exon 9 hotspot mutations p.E452K and p.E545K revealed no noteworthy differences in response therapy. Luminal/HER2neg patients show a trend to have worse treatment response when PIK3CA was mutated. Interestingly, patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant treatment had better survival rates when PIK3CA was mutated.

CONCLUSIONS

The PIK3CA hotspot mutation p.H1047R is associated with worse pCR rates following NACT in HER2pos breast cancer, whereas hotspot mutations in exon 9 seem to have less impact.

Safety and efficacy of anlotinib combined with taxane and lobaplatin in neoadjuvant treatment of clinical stage II/III triple-negative breast cancer in China (the neoALTAL trial): a single-arm, phase 2 trial

Background

Anlotinib is a new type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1/2/3, platelet-derived growth factor receptors α/β, and fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-4 and c-Kit, with a broad spectrum of inhibitory effects on tumor angiogenesis and growth. It has been proven effective in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, but its efficacy in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. This phase 2 study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with TNBC.

Methods

Patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC were treated with 5 cycles of anlotinib (12 mg, d1-14, q3w) plus 6 cycles of taxanes (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 ,d1, q3w or nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2, d1 and d8, q3w) and lobaplatin (30 mg/m2, d1, q3w), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR; ypT0/is ypN0) and the secondary endpoints include breast pCR (bpCR), axillary pCR (apCR), residual cancer burden (RCB), objective response rate (ORR), survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints were efficacy biomarkers based on Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Immunohistochemical (FUSCC IHC) classification for TNBC and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of DNA from tumor tissue and blood samples of patients with 425-gene panel. This trial is registered with www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100043027).

Findings

From Jan 2021 to Aug 2022, 48 patients were assessed and 45 were enrolled. All patients received at least one dose of study treatment and underwent surgery. The median age was 48.5 years (SD: 8.7), 71% were nodal involved, and 20% had stage III. In the intention-to-treat population, 26 out of 45 patients achieved pCR (57.8%; 90% CI, 44.5%-70.3%), and 39 achieved residual cancer burden class 0-I (86.7%; 95% CI, 73.2%-94.9%). The bpCR and apCR rate were 64.4% (29/45) and 71.9% (23/32), respectively. No recurrence or metastasis occurred during the short-term follow-up. Based on the FUSCC IHC-based subtypes, the pCR rates were 68.8% (11/16) for immunomodulatory subtype, 58.3% (7/12) for basal-like immune-suppressed subtype and 33.3% (4/12) for luminal androgen receptor subtype, respectively. NGS revealed that the pCR were 77% (10/13) and 50% (14/28) in MYC-amplified and wild-type patients, respectively, and 78% (7/9) and 53% (17/32) in gBRCA1/2-mutated and wild-type patients, respectively. The median follow-up time of the study was 14.9 months (95% CI: 13.5-16.3 months). There was no disease progression or death during neoadjuvant therapy. No deaths occurred during postoperative follow-up. In the safety population (N = 45), Grade 3 or 4 treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 29 patients (64%), and the most common events were neutropenia (38%), leukopenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (25%), anemia (13%), and hypertension (13%), respectively.

Interpretation

The addition of anlotinib to neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity for patients with clinical stage II/III TNBC.

Funding

Chongqing Talents Project, Chongqing Key Project of Technology Innovation and Application Development and Chongqing Outstanding Youth Natural Science Foundation.

Different Chemotherapy Regimens and Pathologic Complete Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis of Phase 3 Trials

Background and Objectives: Currently, the standard treatment for non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) consists of a systemic neoadjuvant (or perioperative) anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy, delivered either sequentially or concomitantly. We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the relative efficacy of different neoadjuvant treatments for TNBC in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR). Materials and Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from database inception to 1 November 2023. Randomized clinical trials were used that enrolled adults with stage I-III TNBC and provided data on pCR defined as residual ypT0/TisN0M0. Between-group comparisons were estimated using risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The primary outcome was the pCR rate. Results: 1129 citations were screened, and 12 randomized clinical trials were included. In Bayesian comparisons, all regimens, except anthracycline/taxanes plus gemcitabine or capecitabine, resulted in a higher pCR than the standard regimen in both direct and indirect comparisons. In particular, immunotherapy-based regimens resulted in more than double the pCR compared to historical regimens (RR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) and ranked as being the optimal regimen with a probability of 97%. Disease-free survival was better for immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.36, 95% 1.21-2.09) than for historical regimens. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirmed that incorporating immunotherapy with neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy is the best option to guarantee remarkable pathologic downstaging and improve clinical outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer: A prospective cohort study with propensity-matched analysis

Optimizing neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is still an urgent problem to be solved in the clinic. In this prospective cohort study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin (Apa+ddTCb) vs dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimens alone (ddTCb) in neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced TNBC. TNBC patients with clinical stage I-IIIC were enrolled to receive neoadjuvant Apa+ddTCb therapy. Enrolled patients who underwent surgery were matched with TNBC patients who received neoadjuvant ddTCb therapy by propensity score matching. 25 locally advanced TNBC patients were enrolled for neoadjuvant Apa+ddTCb therapy. The overall clinical ORR achieved 88.00% and DCR achieved 100.0% after 6 cycles. For 23 patients who received surgery, 69 TNBC patients who received neoadjuvant ddTCb therapy were matched. The pCR rate (60.9% vs 30.4%, P = .009) and the BCS rate (47.8% vs 21.7%, P = .016) were significantly improved in the Apa+ddTCb group. The incidence of adverse events, especially those related to antiangiogenic therapy, was higher in the Apa+ddTCb group. Further immunohistochemical analysis suggested that the expression levels of VEGF, EGFR, p-VEGFR2 and CK17 were significantly decreased after receiving neoadjuvant therapy in the Apa+ddTCb group, and the baseline CK17 expression level in non-pCR patients was significantly higher than those in the pCR patients. Progression-free survival was not reached yet. Apa+ddTCb regimen achieved an improved efficacy and acceptable adverse events compared with ddTCb regimen, which might be a promising strategy in the neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced TNBC.

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line neoadjuvant treatments in triple-negative breast cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Neoadjuvant treatment options for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are abundant, but the efficacy of different combinations of treatment options remains unclear. Our network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of various neoadjuvant treatment options in patients with TNBC. Literature reports published before March 31, 2022, were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, main oncology conference of the European Society of Medical Oncology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium databases. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare direct and indirect evidence, respectively. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR). Comparison of efficiency between different treatment regimens was made by HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Overall, 26 studies, including 9714 TNBC patients, were assessed in this network meta-analysis. Results indicated that the pCR of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-containing regimens is better than other joint regimens. PCR rate of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens containing bevacizumab, platinum, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors was higher than those of standard chemotherapy agents. By performing a conjoint analysis of the pCR rate and safety endpoints, we found that immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-containing regimens were well balanced in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Considering the efficacy and acceptable adverse events, neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum may be considered as an option for patients with TNBC.

Endorsement of TNBC Biomarkers in Precision Therapy by Nanotechnology

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease which accounts globally for approximately 1 million new cases annually, wherein more than 200,000 of these cases turn out to be cases of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). TNBC is an aggressive and rare breast cancer subtype that accounts for 10-15% of all breast cancer cases. Chemotherapy remains the only therapy regimen against TNBC. However, the emergence of innate or acquired chemoresistance has hindered the chemotherapy used to treat TNBC. The data obtained from molecular technologies have recognized TNBC with various gene profiling and mutation settings that have helped establish and develop targeted therapies. New therapeutic strategies based on the targeted delivery of therapeutics have relied on the application of biomarkers derived from the molecular profiling of TNBC patients. Several biomarkers have been found that are targets for the precision therapy in TNBC, such as EGFR, VGFR, TP53, interleukins, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, c-MET, androgen receptor, BRCA1, glucocorticoid, PTEN, ALDH1, etc. This review discusses the various candidate biomarkers identified in the treatment of TNBC along with the evidence supporting their use. It was established that nanoparticles had been considered a multifunctional system for delivering therapeutics to target sites with increased precision. Here, we also discuss the role of biomarkers in nanotechnology translation in TNBC therapy and management.

Comprehensive Profiling of Cancer-Associated Cells in the Blood of Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Predict Pathological Complete Response

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can affect pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancers; the resection that follows identifies patients with residual disease who are then offered second-line therapies. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) in the blood can be used as potential biomarkers for predicting pCR before resection. CTCs are of epithelial origin that undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to become more motile and invasive, thereby leading to invasive mesenchymal cells that seed in distant organs, causing metastasis. Additionally, CAMLs in the blood of cancer patients are reported to either engulf or aid the transport of cancer cells to distant organs. To study these rare cancer-associated cells, we conducted a preliminary study where we collected blood from patients treated with NAC after obtaining their written and informed consent. Blood was collected before, during, and after NAC, and Labyrinth microfluidic technology was used to isolate CTCs and CAMLs. Demographic, tumor marker, and treatment response data were collected. Non-parametric tests were used to compare pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate and multivariate models were used where CTCs and CAMLs were analyzed for predicting pCR. Sixty-three samples from 21 patients were analyzed. The median(IQR) pre-NAC total and mesenchymal CTC count/5 mL was lower in the pCR vs. non-pCR group [1(3.5) vs. 5(5.75); p = 0.096], [0 vs. 2.5(7.5); p = 0.084], respectively. The median(IQR) post-NAC CAML count/5 mL was higher in the pCR vs. non-pCR group [15(6) vs. 6(4.5); p = 0.004]. The pCR group was more likely to have >10 CAMLs post-NAC vs. non-pCR group [7(100%) vs. 3(21.4%); p = 0.001]. In a multivariate logistic regression model predicting pCR, CAML count was positively associated with the log-odds of pCR [OR = 1.49(1.01, 2.18); p = 0.041], while CTCs showed a negative trend [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.44(0.18, 1.06); p = 0.068]. In conclusion, increased CAMLs in circulation after treatment combined with lowered CTCs was associated with pCR.

Identifying breast cancer patients at risk of relapse despite pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy

This retrospective pooled analysis aims to identify factors predicting relapse despite a pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with breast cancer (BC). 2066 patients with a pCR from five neoadjuvant GBG/AGO-B trials fulfill the inclusion criteria of this analysis. Primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS); secondary endpoints is distant DFS (DDFS) and overall survival (OS). After a median follow-up of 57.6 months, DFS is significantly worse for patients with positive lymph nodes (cN+ vs cN0 hazard ratio [HR] 1.94, 95%CI 1.48-2.54; p < 0.001). In patients with triple-negative tumors, lobular histology (lobular vs other HR 3.55, 95%CI 1.53-8.23; p = 0.003), and clinical nodal involvement (cN+ vs cN0 HR 2.45, 95%CI 1.59-3.79; p < 0.001) predict a higher risk of DFS events. Patients with HER2-positive cT3/4 tumors have a significantly higher risk of relapse (cT3/4 vs cT1 HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.06-4.03; p = 0.033). Initial tumor load and histological type predict relapse in patients with a pCR.

Recent Advances in Targeted Nanocarriers for the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a life-threatening form of breast cancer which has been found to account for 15% of all the subtypes of breast cancer. Currently available treatments are significantly less effective in TNBC management because of several factors such as poor bioavailability, low specificity, multidrug resistance, poor cellular uptake, and unwanted side effects being the major ones. As a rapidly growing field, nano-therapeutics offers promising alternatives for breast cancer treatment. This platform provides a suitable pathway for crossing biological barriers and allowing sustained systemic circulation time and an improved pharmacokinetic profile of the drug. Apart from this, it also provides an optimized target-specific drug delivery system and improves drug accumulation in tumor cells. This review provides insights into the molecular mechanisms associated with the pathogenesis of TNBC, along with summarizing the conventional therapy and recent advances of different nano-carriers for the management of TNBC.

Nab-paclitaxel Followed by Dose-dense Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

The anti-tumor activity of nab-paclitaxel followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Asian patients remain unclear, particularly in the aggressive subtype triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this NAC regimen in TNBC.

METHODS

In this Simon's two-stage, phase II study, treatment-naïve patients with unilateral primary invasive TNBC were enrolled. Eligible patients received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 weekly on day 1 for 12 weeks, followed by dose-dense EC (epirubicin 90 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) on day 1 for four 2-week cycles. The primary endpoint was the total pathological complete response (tpCR, ypT0/is ypN0) rate.

RESULTS

A total of 55 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. After NAC, tpCR and breast pathological complete response were respectively observed in 43.1% (95% CI, 29.3-57.8) and 49.0% (95% CI, 34.8-63.4) of 51 evaluable patients for pathological response evaluation. 44 had an objective response as their best response (80.0%; 95% CI, 67.0-89.6). No correlations between clinicopathological variables and pathological/clinical response were observed. Grade 3 or more adverse events (AEs) occurred in 63.6% of 55 patients. The most frequent AEs were alopecia. No treatment-related surgical delay or death occurred.

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel followed by dose-dense EC as NAC demonstrates promising anti-tumor activity and acceptable tolerability for patients with TNBC. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799679).

Advances in the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity-Driven Effects in Breast Cancers

Obesity and associated chronic inflammation were shown to facilitate breast cancer (BC) growth and metastasis. Leptin, adiponectin, estrogen, and several pro-inflammatory cytokines are involved in the development of obesity-driven BC through the activation of multiple oncogenic and pro-inflammatory pathways. The aim of this study was to assess the reported mechanisms of obesity-induced breast carcinogenesis and effectiveness of conventional and complementary BC therapies. We screened published original articles, reviews, and meta-analyses that addressed the involvement of obesity-related signaling mechanisms in BC development, BC treatment/prevention approaches, and posttreatment complications. PubMed, Medline, eMedicine, National Library of Medicine (NLM), and ReleMed databases were used to retrieve relevant studies using a set of keywords, including "obesity," "oncogenic signaling pathways," "inflammation," "surgery," "radiotherapy," "conventional therapies," and "diet." Multiple studies indicated that effective BC treatment requires the involvement of diet- and exercise-based approaches in obese postmenopausal women. Furthermore, active lifestyle and diet-related interventions improved the patients' overall quality of life and minimized adverse side effects after traditional BC treatment, including postsurgical lymphedema, post-chemo nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Further investigation of beneficial effects of diet and physical activity may help improve obesity-linked cancer therapies.

Targeted Therapeutic Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, which is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression and the absence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression/amplification. Conventional chemotherapy is the mainstay of systemic treatment for TNBC. However, lack of molecular targeted therapies and poor prognosis of TNBC patients have prompted a great effort to discover effective targets for improving the clinical outcomes. For now, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi's) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of TNBC. Moreover, agents that target signal transduction, angiogenesis, epigenetic modifications, and cell cycle are under active preclinical or clinical investigations. In this review, we highlight the current major developments in targeted therapies of TNBC, with some descriptions about their (dis)advantages and future perspectives.

Clinical impact of PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer patients with residual tumor burden after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Studies on PD-L1 expression in breast cancer have gained importance in recent years, especially in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our aim was to analyze the differential expression of PD-L1 to explore its correlation with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and patient survival.

METHODS

PD-L1 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically (Ventana SP263 clone kit) by staining tumor specimen. PD-L1 positivity was defined as membranous staining > 1%, > 5%, > 10%, and > 20% on either tumor cell (TC) and /or immune cell (IC).

RESULTS

Fifty patients with locally advanced TNBC, who had a partial response to NACT, were included in the study. PD-L1 staining was observed in TCs in 25 patients (50%) and in ICs in 23 patients (46%) when PD-L1 > 1% was considered positive. Patients with PD-L1 positivity on ICs were more likely to respond to chemotherapy as measured by "MD Anderson Cancer Center Residual Cancer Burden Index" (14/22, 63.6% vs. 10/27, 37%, p = 0.064). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 46.3% and 51.4%, respectively. A high (> 20%) tumoral PD-L1 positivity was associated with a better DFS and DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies in the literature mostly focused on PD-L1 expression in inflammatory cells. However, our results suggest that patients with a high PD-L1 expression on TCs were more likely to have a better outcome. Since patients with residual tumor burden who express PD-L1 on TILs were more likely to respond to NACT, an immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in addition to NACT would be an important option for TNBC with locally advanced disease.

Antiangiogenic therapy reverses the immunosuppressive breast cancer microenvironment

Tumor angiogenesis induces local hypoxia and recruits immunosuppressive cells, whereas hypoxia subsequently promotes tumor angiogenesis. Immunotherapy efficacy depends on the accumulation and activity of tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs). Antangiogenic therapy could improve local perfusion, relieve tumor microenvironment (TME) hypoxia, and reverse the immunosuppressive state. Combining antiangiogenic therapy with immunotherapy might represent a promising option for the treatment of breast cancer. This article discusses the immunosuppressive characteristics of the breast cancer TME and outlines the interaction between the tumor vasculature and the immune system. Combining antiangiogenic therapy with immunotherapy could interrupt abnormal tumor vasculature-immunosuppression crosstalk, increase effector immune cell infiltration, improve immunotherapy effectiveness, and reduce the risk of immune-related adverse events. In addition, we summarize the preclinical research and ongoing clinical research related to the combination of antiangiogenic therapy with immunotherapy, discuss the underlying mechanisms, and provide a view for future developments. The combination of antiangiogenic therapy and immunotherapy could be a potential therapeutic strategy for treatment of breast cancer to promote tumor vasculature normalization and increase the efficiency of immunotherapy.

Nanotechnology-based siRNA delivery strategies for treatment of triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer characterized by absence of estrogen (ER) receptor, progesterone (PR) receptor, and human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER-2) receptor. TNBC is an aggressive disease that develops early Chemoresistance. The major pitfall associated is its poor prognosis, low overall survival, high relapse, and mortality as compared to other types of breast cancer. Chemotherapy could be helpful but do not contribute to an increase in survival of patient. To overcome such obstacles, in our article we explored advanced therapy using genes and nanocarrier along with its conjugation to achieve high therapeutic profile with reduced side effect. siRNAs are one of the class of RNA associated with gene silencing. They also regulate the expression of certain proteins that are involved in development of tumor cells. But they are highly unstable. So, for efficient delivery of siRNA, very intelligent, efficient delivery systems are required. Several nanotechnologies based non-viral vectors such as liposome, micelles, nanoparticles, dendrimers, exosomes, nanorods and nanobubbles etc. offers enormous unique properties such as nanometric size range, targeting potential with the capability to link with several targeting moieties for the gene delivery. These non-viral vectors are much safer, effective and efficient system for the delivery of genes along with chemotherapeutics. This review provides an overview of TNBC, conventional and advanced treatment approach of TNBC along with understanding of current status of several nanocarriers used for the delivery of siRNA for the treatment of TNBC.

Immunogenomic profiling and pathological response results from a clinical trial of docetaxel and carboplatin in triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who do not achieve pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of recurrence and death. Molecular characterization may identify patients unlikely to achieve pCR. This neoadjuvant trial was conducted to determine the pCR rate with docetaxel and carboplatin and to identify molecular alterations and/or immune gene signatures predicting pCR.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with clinical stages II/III TNBC received 6 cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin. The primary objective was to determine if neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin would increase the pCR rate in TNBC compared to historical expectations. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) and immune profiling on pre-treatment tumor samples to identify alterations that may predict pCR. Thirteen matching on-treatment samples were also analyzed to assess changes in molecular profiles.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight of 127 (45.7%) patients achieved pCR. There was a non-significant trend toward higher mutation burden for patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) 0/I versus RCB II/III (median 80 versus 68 variants, p 0.88). TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene, observed in 85.7% of tumors. EGFR, RB1, RAD51AP2, SDK2, L1CAM, KPRP, PCDHA1, CACNA1S, CFAP58, COL22A1, and COL4A5 mutations were observed almost exclusively in pre-treatment samples from patients who achieved pCR. Seven mutations in PCDHA1 were observed in pre-treatment samples from patients who did not achieve pCR. Several immune gene signatures including IDO1, PD-L1, interferon gamma signaling, CTLA4, cytotoxicity, tumor inflammation signature, inflammatory chemokines, cytotoxic cells, lymphoid, PD-L2, exhausted CD8, Tregs, and immunoproteasome were upregulated in pre-treatment samples from patients who achieved pCR.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin resulted in a pCR of 45.7%. WES and immune profiling differentiated patients with and without pCR.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial information: NCT02124902, Registered 24 April 2014 & NCT02547987, Registered 10 September 2015.

Utility of the CPS + EG scoring system in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is associated with superior survival. This association is strongest in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The CPS + EG system, based on pre-treatment clinical (CS) and post-treatment pathological stage (PS), oestrogen-receptor status (E) and grade (G), leads to a refined estimate of prognosis after NACT in all-comers and hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Here, we investigate if CPS + EG scoring provides a superior estimate of prognosis in TNBC to select patients for postneoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We calculated the CPS + EG score for 1795 patients with TNBC from 8 prospective German trials. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

In TNBC, patients with pCR (ypT0/is ypN0, n = 822, 45.8%) had a 5-year DFS of 86%, whereas patients with residual American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I disease (n = 383; 21.3%) had a 5-year DFS of 77.5%.CPS + EG led to superior prognostic information compared with that provided by the clinical stage, but it was inferior to the prognostic information provided by the pathological stage (c-index statistics, p < 0.001). CPS + EG did not discriminate prognosis within the two best prognostic groups (score 1 and 2; n = 362; 37.2%). In contrast, pCR status added prognostic information beyond CPS + EG. Patients with a CPS + EG score of 3 had a 5-year DFS rate of 64% overall, but those with pCR had a 5-year DFS rate of 84%, and those without pCR had a 5-year DFS rate of only 49.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

In TNBC, CPS + EG scoring provided inferior prognostic information compared with the pathological stage and was unable to identify patients without pCR and with a sufficiently good prognosis, who could avoid postneoadjuvant therapy. pCR remains the strongest and most clinically useful prognostic factor after NACT. Other biologic factors beyond pCR are needed in TNBC.

Pathological complete response of adding targeted therapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer: A systematic review

Background

The current use of targeted therapy plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is based on data extrapolated from studies in non-IBC. We conducted a systematic review to determine whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy results in a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with IBC.

Method and findings

This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO register with registration number CRD42018089465. We searched MEDLINE & PubMed, EMBASE, and EBSCO from December 1998 through July 2020. All English-language clinical studies, both randomized and non-randomized, that evaluated neoadjuvant systemic treatment with or without targeted therapy before definitive surgery and reported the pCR results of IBC patients. First reviewer extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Second reviewer confirmed the accuracy. Studies were divided into 3 groups according to systemic treatment: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, chemotherapy alone, and high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support (HSCS). Of 995 screened studies, 23 with 1,269 IBC patients met the inclusion criteria. For each of the 3 groups of studies, we computed a weighted average of the pCR rates across all studies with confidence interval (CI). The weighted averages (95% CIs) were as follows: chemotherapy with targeted therapy, 31.6% (26.4%-37.3%), chemotherapy alone, 13.0% (10.3%-16.2%), and high-dose chemotherapy with HSCS, 23.0% (18.7%-27.7%). The high pCR by targeted therapy group came from anti-HER2 therapy, 54.4% (44.3%-64.0%). Key limitations of this study included no randomized clinical studies that included only IBC patients.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus targeted therapy is more effective than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for IBC patients. These findings support current IBC standard practice in particular the use of anti-HER2 targeted therapy.

Targeted Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous entity that can be categorized according to histologic, molecular, and clinical subtypes. While chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for this disease, there are now several available targeted agents including immunotherapy, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and most recently a Food and Drug Administration-approved antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan-hziy as a third-line treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. We review several actionable targets for triple-negative breast cancer and describe promising nonimmunotherapeutic agents including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, androgen receptor inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, AKT (also known as protein kinase B) inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had been developed as a systematic approach before definitive surgery for the treatment of locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer such as inflammatory breast cancer in the past. In addition to its impact on surgery, the neoadjuvant setting has a benefit of providing the opportunity to monitor the individual drug response. Currently, the subject of NAC has expanded to include patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer because it is revealed that the achievement of a pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with excellent long-term outcomes, especially in patients with aggressive phenotype breast cancer. In addition, this approach provides the unique opportunity to escalate adjuvant therapy in those with residual disease after NAC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is a rapidly evolving topic with tremendous interest in ongoing clinical trials. Here, we review the improvements and further challenges in the NAC setting in translational breast cancer research.

Triple-negative breast cancer: new treatment strategies in the era of precision medicine

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains the most aggressive cluster of all breast cancers, which is due to its rapid progression, high probabilities of early recurrence, and distant metastasis resistant to standard treatment. Following the advances in cancer genomics and transcriptomics that can illustrate the comprehensive profiling of this heterogeneous disease, it is now possible to identify different subclasses of TNBC according to both intrinsic signals and extrinsic microenvironment, which have a huge influence on predicting response to established therapies and picking up novel therapeutic targets for each cluster. In this review, we summarize basic characteristics and critical subtyping systems of TNBC, and particularly discuss newly found prospective targets and relevant medications, which were proved promising in clinical trials, thus shedding light on the future development of precision treatment strategies.

Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response as a Surrogate for Long-Term Survival Outcomes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a common efficacy endpoint in neoadjuvant therapy trials for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have shown that pCR is strongly associated with improved long-term survival outcomes, including event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the trial-level associations between treatment effect on pCR and long-term survival outcomes are not well established. This study sought to evaluate these associations by incorporating more recent clinical trials in TNBC. Methods: A literature review identified published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of neoadjuvant therapy for TNBC that reported results for both pCR and EFS/OS. Meta-regression models were performed to evaluate the association of treatment effect on pCR and EFS/OS. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the impact of divergent study designs. Results: Ten comparisons from 8 RCTs (N=2,478 patients) were identified from the literature review. The log (odds ratio) of pCR was a significant predictor of the log (hazard ratio) of EFS (P=.003), with a coefficient of determination of 0.68 (95% CI, 0.41–0.95). There was a weaker association between pCR and OS (P=.18), with a coefficient of determination of 0.24 (95% CI, 0.01–0.77). Consistent results were found in the exploratory analysis and sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: This is the first study that has shown a trial-level association between pCR and survival outcomes in TNBC. By incorporating the most up-to-date RCTs, this study showed a significant trial-level association between pCR and EFS. A positive association between pCR and OS was also recorded.

Neo-adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: Insights from a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best regimen of neo-adjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. Recent studies have shown promising data that adding carboplatin or pembrolizumab improves the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) in TNBC. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to define the overall, most effective, neo-adjuvant systemic therapy for TNBC.

METHODS

We searched for studies comparing different neo-adjuvant regimens in patients with TNBC. We performed a network meta-analysis comparing the regimens using the random-effects model. We focused on anthracycline, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, and platinum salts (Pl). All study regimens contained a taxane. We analyzed the rate of pCR (ypT0/is, N0), and the incidence of febrile neutropenia, grade 3-grade 4 thrombocytopenia, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 13 randomized control trials for this analysis. We compared ten different classes of regimens. We found that regimens containing Pl were significantly superior to non-PI-containing regimens for the rate of pCR. Similarly, pembrolizumab-containing regimens were associated with significantly higher pCR rates. Regimens containing bevacizumab significantly increased the rate of pCR as well. However, it was equivocal as to whether the addition of Pl to pembrolizumab-containing regimen increases pCR rates. Adding anthracycline into the regimen did not show an improved rate of pCR. In the safety analysis, regimens containing Pl were associated with a significantly higher incidence of febrile neutropenia and grade 3-grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The regimen containing anthracycline plus bevacizumab plus Pl was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

For TNBC, regimens containing bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or Pl are most effective in terms of pCR rates, though it is unclear whether combining all these medications has the greatest efficacy. Additionally, the benefit of using anthracycline in the neo-adjuvant therapy regimen for TNBC is not apparent, which may warrant a further head-to-head comparison.

Molecular subtypes and precision treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive breast cancer subtype. Despite the progress made in precision treatment of cancer patients, targeted treatment is still at its early stage in TNBC, and chemotherapy remains the standard treatment. With the advances in next generation sequencing technology, genomic and transcriptomic analyses have provided deeper insight into the inter-tumoral heterogeneity of TNBC. Much effort has been made to classify TNBCs into different molecular subtypes according to genetic aberrations and expression signatures and to uncover novel treatment targets. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge regarding the molecular classification of TNBC and explore the future paradigm for using molecular classification to guide the development of precision treatment and clinical practice.

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Conventional and Advanced Therapeutic Strategies

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are deficient in estrogen, progesterone and ERBB2 receptor expression, presenting a particularly challenging therapeutic target due to their highly invasive nature and relatively low response to therapeutics. There is an absence of specific treatment strategies for this tumor subgroup, and hence TNBC is managed with conventional therapeutics, often leading to systemic relapse. In terms of histology and transcription profile these cancers have similarities to BRCA-1-linked breast cancers, and it is hypothesized that BRCA1 pathway is non-functional in this type of breast cancer. In this review article, we discuss the different receptors expressed by TNBC as well as the diversity of different signaling pathways targeted by TNBC therapeutics, for example, Notch, Hedgehog, Wnt/b-Catenin as well as TGF-beta signaling pathways. Additionally, many epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors effectively inhibit the TNBCs, but they face challenges of either resistance to drugs or relapse. The resistance of TNBC to conventional therapeutic agents has helped in the advancement of advanced TNBC therapeutic approaches including hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, as well as nanomedicine-based targeted therapeutics of drugs, miRNA, siRNA, and aptamers, which will also be discussed. Artificial intelligence is another tool that is presented to enhance the diagnosis of TNBC.

Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Hispanic/Latino (H/L) Women With Local or Locally Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of neoadjuvant and chemotherapy (NACT) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in Hispanic/Latino (H/L) women with TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the charts of patients with TNBC, stages I-III, treated at TTUHSC from 2006 to 2016. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated and compared between the treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were conducted to estimate unadjusted and adjusted effects of NACT compared to ACT.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients with TNBC, 30 (29%) received NACT and 74 (71%) ACT. Women undergoing NACT were younger, with a mean age of 50.8 years. Of the 30 patients who received NACT, 12 (40%) had pathologically complete response (pCR). Women who achieved pCR had an excellent RFS (HR=0.5, p=0.001). Women with residual cancer after NACT had worse outcome compared to patients who received ACT (HR=1.7, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

pCR to NACT is a powerful surrogate for OS in H/L women with TNBC.

Controversial issues in the neoadjuvant treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), as a collective group of heterogenous tumours, displays the highest rate of distant recurrence and lowest survival from metastatic disease across breast cancer subtypes. However, a subset of TNBC display impressive primary tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, translating to reduction in future relapse and increased overall survival. Maximizing early treatment response is crucial to improving the outlook in this subtype. Numerous systemic therapy strategies are being assessed in the neoadjuvant setting and the current paradigm of generic chemotherapy components in regimens for high-risk breast cancers, regardless of biological subtype, is changing. Therapeutic approaches with evidence of benefit include platinum drugs, polyadenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, immunotherapy and second adjuvant therapy for those not achieving pathological complete response. Importantly, molecular testing can identify subgroups within TNBC, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) homologous recombination repair deficiency, lymphocyte-predominant tumours, and TNBC type 4 molecular subtypes. Clinical trials that address the interaction between these biomarkers and treatment approaches are a priority, to identify subgroups benefiting from additional therapy.

Druggable Molecular Targets for the Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is still the most common cancer among women worldwide. Amongst the subtypes of BC, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by deficient expression of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors. These patients are therefore not given the option of targeted therapy and have worse prognosis as a result. Consequently, much research has been devoted to identifying specific molecular targets that can be utilized for targeted cancer therapy, thereby limiting the progression and metastasis of this invasive tumor, and improving patient outcomes. In this review, we have focused on the molecular targets in TNBC, categorizing these into targets within the immune system such as immune checkpoint modulators, intra-nuclear targets, intracellular targets, and cell surface targets. The aim of this review is to introduce and summarize the known targets and drugs under investigation in phase II or III clinical trials, while introducing additional possible targets for future drug development. This review brings a tangible benefit to cancer researchers who seek a comprehensive comparison of TNBC treatment options.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

Different neoadjuvant chemotherapies are available for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) benefit and safety of treatment regimens. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed to compare direct and indirect evidence, respectively. Twenty-three studies involving 12 regimens namely standard chemotherapeutic agents, bevacizumab (B)-, platinum salts (P)-, B plus P (BP)-, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (Pi)-, P plus Pi (PPi)-, capecitabine (Ca)-, gemcitabine (Ge)-, zoledronic acid (Za)-, everolimus (E)-, P plus E (PE)-, and gefitinib (G)-containing regimens. The results showed that P-, B-, PPi-, and Za-containing regimens achieved higher pCR than standard chemotherapeutic agents. BP-containing regimens had a better pCR than B-containing regimens. In indirect comparisons, Za-, BP-, P-, and B-containing regimens were the top four strategies with the highest probability for pCR. Benefit-risk analysis showed that B-containing regimens had the highest acceptability of being the best treatment for better pCR achievement with fewer SAEs. The addition of P, B, BP, PPi, and Za to standard chemotherapeutic agents enhanced the pCR, but a balance between efficacy and safety should be carefully considered. B-containing regimens might be the best choice for neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to its better efficacy and tolerability.

Triple-negative breast cancer: recent treatment advances

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype renowned for its capacity to affect younger women, metastasise early despite optimal adjuvant treatment and carry a poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy has focused on combinations of systemic agents to optimise pathological complete response. Treatment algorithms now guide the management of patients with or without residual disease, but metastatic TNBC continues to harbour a poor prognosis. Innovative, multi-drug combination systemic therapies in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings have led to significant improvements in outcomes, particularly over the past decade. Recently published advances in the treatment of metastatic TNBC have shown impressive results with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and immunotherapy agents. Immunotherapy agents in combination with traditional systemic chemotherapy have been shown to alter the natural history of this devastating condition, particularly in patients whose tumours are positive for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1).

Treatment patterns, health care resource use and outcomes in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer in Germany: retrospective chart review study (OBTAIN)

Background: There is limited data on the real-life situation and outcomes of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in Germany. The aim of this chart review was to describe the current treatment patterns, resource use and outcomes in this patient group. Methods: Retrospective data collection in 30 gyneco-oncological sites (hospitals and office-based) across Germany between January and April 2017. Index date was defined as initiation of treatment with gemcitabine, vinorelbin, capecitabine or eribulin therapy following discontinuation of taxane and/or anthracycline therapy. Results: In the 91 evaluable patients, median time between primary diagnosis and index date was 20.9 months (range 0-187 months). Ten percent of patients had no distant metastases, while 57% had newly diagnosed metastases. Cancer stage at index date was mostly IV (82 patients). A number of 135 different regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) were used. For first-line chemo treatment, 29 patients received monotherapy and 54 patients combination therapy. Bevacizumab and paclitaxel were also the most frequently used single substances among all therapy lines together and for first-line therapy. While taxanes were at least occasionally administered for second-line therapy, no patient received taxanes for third-line therapy. Chemotherapy modifications in terms of dose reduction or treatment interruption were rare. However, the therapy was terminated in more than two thirds of all cases. Fifty-nine patients were hospitalized at least once. For first-, second- and third-line therapy, median overall survival was 19.1/10.8/14.6 months, and median progression-free survival was 7.7/2.5/5.6 months. Conclusion: In clinical routine, a wide variety of treatment approaches is applied, while outcomes in terms of survival are poor. New treatment options are needed for this challenging tumor type.

Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Pooled Retrospective Analysis of Three Prospective Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

The impact of locoregional radiotherapy (RT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and mastectomy in breast cancer patients is currently unclear. Several publications have suggested that patients with a favorable response to NACT might not benefit from RT after mastectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of three prospective randomized NACT trials was performed. Information on the use of RT was available for 817 breast cancer patients with non-inflammatory breast cancer who underwent mastectomy after NACT within the GeparTrio, GeparQuattro, and GeparQuinto-trials. RT was administered to 676 of these patients (82.7%).

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence (LRR) was 15.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.0-22.8%) in patients treated without RT and 11.3% in patients treated with RT (95% CI 8.7-14.3%). In the multivariate analysis, RT was associated with a lower risk of LRR (hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-1.0; p = 0.05). This effect was shown especially in patients with cT3/4 tumors, as well as in patients who were cN+ before neoadjuvant therapy, including those who converted to ypN0 after neoadjuvant therapy. In the bivariate analysis, disease-free survival was significantly worse in patients who received RT, however this was not confirmed in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that RT reduces the LRR rates in breast cancer patients who receive a mastectomy after NACT without an improvement in DFS. Prospective randomized controlled trials such as the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-51/RTOG 1304 trial will analyze whether RT has any benefit in patients who have a favorable response after NACT.

Stem Cells Inhibition by Bevacizumab in Combination with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer

Preclinical works have suggested cytotoxic chemotherapies may increase the number of cancer stem cells (CSC) whereas angiogenesis inhibition may decrease CSC proliferation. We developed a proof of concept clinical trial to explore bevacizumab activity on breast CSC. Breast cancer patients requiring preoperative chemotherapy were included in this open-label, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase II trial. All received FEC-docetaxel combination, and patients randomized in the experimental arm received concomitant bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was to describe ALDH1 (Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1) positive tumor cells rate before treatment and after the fourth cycle. Secondary objectives included safety, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, disease-free survival (DFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Seventy-five patients were included. ALDH1+ cells rate increase was below the predefined 5% threshold in both arms for the 32 patients with two time points available. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events rates were similar in both arms. A non-significant increase in pCR was observed in the bevacizumab arm (42.6% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.06), but survival was not improved (OS: p = 0.89; DFS: p = 0.45; and RFS: p = 0.68). The increase of ALDH1+ tumor cells rate after bevacizumab-based chemotherapy was less than 5%. However, as similar results were observed with chemotherapy alone, bevacizumab impact on breast CSC cells cannot be confirmed.

Bevacizumab in the neoadjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Several randomized clinical trials have suggested the effectiveness of bevacizumab (Bev) in early and advanced breast cancer; however, due to the increased toxicity and lack of a clear long-term survival benefit, there is currently no defined role for Bev in breast cancer in the USA, while it has been approved in Europe. We herein sought to conduct a meta-analysis of large randomized trials comparing the efficacy and long-term outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Bev compared with chemotherapy without Bev in human epidermal factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. A search was conducted through PubMed and Ovid Medline databases. Among the 279 articles identified, 5 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the present analysis. A total of 2,268 patients treated with Bev and 2,278 treated without Bev were analyzed. Pathological complete response (pCR) was obtained in 35% of patients treated with Bev and in 26% of those treated without Bev. A statistically significant increase (26%) in the incidence of pCR was observed in the Bev-treated group. However, patients treated with Bev exhibited no significant difference in the risk of disease recurrence or death. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis addressing the long-term outcomes of Bev in combination with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. The results confirmed the significant benefit of Bev combined with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone on breast cancer response, in both triple-negative and hormone receptor-positive cases. However, this benefit does not translate into a long-term disease-free or definitive overall survival advantage. Optimizing patient selection is desirable for maximizing the long-term benefits of Bev, while reducing cost and treatment-related adverse effects. Future efforts directed toward the discovery of predictive markers would be crucial for identifying the subset(s) of breast cancer patients who are most likely to benefit from Bev therapy.

Recent therapeutic trends and promising targets in triple negative breast cancer

Breast cancer accounts for 25% of all types of cancer in women, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises around 15~20% of breast cancers. Conventional chemotherapy and radiation are the primary systemic therapeutic strategies; no other FDA-approved targeted therapies are yet available as for TNBC. TNBC is generally characterized by a poor prognosis and high rates of proliferation and metastases. Due to these aggressive features and lack of targeted therapies, numerous attempts have been made to discover viable molecular targets for TNBC. Massive cohort studies, clinical trials, and in-depth analyses have revealed diverse molecular alterations in TNBC; however, controversy exists as to whether many of these changes are beneficial or detrimental in caner progression. Here we review the complicated tumorigenic processes and discuss critical findings and therapeutic trends in TNBC with a focus on promising therapeutic approaches, the clinical trials currently underway, and potent experimental compounds under preclinical and evaluation.

Time series analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab-treated breast carcinomas reveals a systemic shift in genomic aberrations

Background

Chemotherapeutic agents such as anthracyclines and taxanes are commonly used in the neoadjuvant setting. Bevacizumab is an antibody which binds to vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and inhibits its receptor interaction, thus obstructing the formation of new blood vessels.

Methods

A phase II randomized clinical trial of 123 patients with Her2-negative breast cancer was conducted, with patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil (5FU)/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) and taxane), with or without bevacizumab. Serial biopsies were obtained at time of diagnosis, after 12 weeks of treatment with FEC ± bevacizumab, and after 25 weeks of treatment with taxane ± bevacizumab. A time course study was designed to investigate the genomic landscape at the three time points when tumor DNA alterations, tumor percentage, genomic instability, and tumor clonality were assessed. Substantial differences were observed with some tumors changing mainly between diagnosis and at 12 weeks, others between 12 and 25 weeks, and still others changing in both time periods.

Results

In both treatment arms, good responders (GR) and non-responders (NR) displayed significant difference in genomic instability index (GII) at time of diagnosis. In the combination arm, copy number alterations at 25 loci at the time of diagnosis were significantly different between the GR and NR. An inverse aberration pattern was also observed between the two extreme response groups at 6p22-p12 for patients in the combination arm. Signs of subclonal reduction were observed, with some aberrations disappearing and others being retained during treatment. Increase in subclonal amplification was observed at 6p21.1, a locus which contains the VEGFA gene for the protein which are targeted by the study drug bevacizumab. Of the 13 pre-treatment samples that had a gain at VEGFA, 12 were responders. Significant decrease of frequency of subclones carrying gains at 17q21.32-q22 was observed at 12 weeks, with the peak occurring at TMEM100, an ALK1 receptor signaling-dependent gene essential for vasculogenesis. This implies that cells bearing amplifications of VEGFA and TMEM100 are particularly sensitive to this treatment regime.

Conclusions

Taken together, these results suggest that heterogeneity and subclonal architecture influence the response to targeted treatment in combination with chemotherapy, with possible implications for clinical decision-making and monitoring of treatment efficacy.

Trial registration

NCT00773695. Registered 15 October 2008

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0601-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Outcome for triple negative breast cancer in a retrospective cohort with an emphasis on response to platinum-based neoadjuvant therapy

Purpose

The rate of pathological complete response (pCR) for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is increased when carboplatin is added to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, while phase III trial data showing a survival benefit are awaited, carboplatin is not yet standard-of-care for TNBC. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of pCR and the outcome for those treated with carboplatin and to examine the predictors of response to therapy.

Methods

The retrospective series comprised 333 consecutive patients with TNBC (median follow-up time, 43 months). Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 51% (n = 168) of patients and 29% (n = 97) received anthracycline–taxane NACT with carboplatin given to 9% (n = 31) of patients.

Results

Overall, 25% (n = 78) of patients experienced a breast cancer recurrence and 22% (n = 68) died from disease. A pCR breast and pCR breast/axilla was more common in those who received carboplatin (n = 18, 58% and n = 17, 55%, respectively) compared those who did not (n = 23, 36% and n = 18, 28%, respectively) (p = 0.041 and p = 0.011, respectively). By multivariable analysis, carboplatin and high tumor grade were independent predictors of pCR breast/axilla (OR_non-pCR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.54; p = 0.002; and OR_non-pCR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.01–0.27; p < 0.001, respectively). pCR breast/axilla was an independent predictor of DFS (HR_non-pCR=6.23; 95% CI 1.36–28.50; p = 0.018), metastasis-free survival (HR_non-pCR = 5.08; 95% CI 1.09–23.65; p = 0.038) and BCSS (HR_non-pCR = 8.52; 95% CI 1.09–66.64; p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Carboplatin therapy and high tumor grade are associated with a significant increase in the rate of pCR, which is an independent predictor of outcome. These data support the use of carboplatin in NACT for TNBC, while results from phase III studies are awaited.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-5066-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Targeted and immuno-biology driven treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer: current knowledge and future perspectives

Introduction: Accounting for about 15% of breast cancer patients, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is responsible for 25% of disease related deaths, more frequent distant spread and visceral metastasis. However, improving survival in TNBC failed and primary resistance, immunological ignorance and tumor heterogeneity limit clinical activity of novel therapies. In view of recent molecular, genetic and immunologic insights, this review aims to describe the current status of immunological and targeted treatments from a hypothesis driven perspective. Areas covered: Recent preclinical studies and ongoing clinical trials for immune directed and targeted treatments of TNBC are summarized, including immune-checkpoint blockade, resistance mechanisms, inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), combinatorial strategies as well as preclinical, hypothesis generating studies. Expert commentary: Sustained responses have been observed with immune-checkpoint blockade and PARP inhibitors demonstrated remarkable efficacy in germline BRCA mutated TNBC. In order to generate clinical success of many other, to date ineffective, targeted and immune therapies, the integration of multidimensional, large amounts of data, will be essential and likely accelerate treatment progress of TNBC.

Precision medicine based on tumorigenic signaling pathways for triple-negative breast cancer

As a clinically heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor clinical outcome and a high relapse rate. Conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy are effective treatments for patients with TNBC. However, the prognosis of TNBC remains unsatisfactory. Therefore, a large volume of research has explored the molecular markers and oncogenic signaling pathways associated with TNBC, including the cell cycle, DNA damage response and androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathways, to identify more efficient targeted therapies. However, whether these predicted pathways are effective targets has yet to be confirmed. In the present review, potentially carcinogenic signaling pathways in TNBCs from previous reports were considered, and ultimately five tumorigenic signaling pathways were selected, specifically receptor tyrosine kinases and downstream signaling pathways, the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and associated pathways, the immunoregulatory tumor microenvironment, DNA damage repair pathways, and AR and coordinating pathways. The conclusions of the preclinical and clinical trials of each pathway were then consolidated. Although a number of signaling pathways in TNBC have been considered in preclinical and clinical trials, the aforementioned pathways account for the majority of the malignant behaviors of TNBC. Identifying the alterations to different carcinogenic signaling pathways and their association with the heterogeneity of TNBC may facilitate the development of optimal precision medical approaches for patients with TNBC, potentially improving the efficiency of anticancer therapy.

Genetic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15% to 20% of breast cancer cases and is characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor 2 receptors. Though TNBC is a highly heterogenic and aggressive disease, TNBC patients have better response to neoadjuvant therapy compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Nevertheless, patients with residual disease have a very poor prognosis, with higher probability of relapse and lower overall survival in the first years after diagnosis. TNBC has 6 subtypes with distinct molecular signatures with different prognoses and probably different responses to therapy. The precise stratification of TNBC is therefore crucial for the development of potent standardized and targeted therapies. In spite of intensive research into finding new molecular biomarkers and designing personalized therapeutic approaches, BRCA mutational status is the only clinically validated biomarker for personalized therapy in TNBC. Recent studies have reported several promising biomarkers that are currently being validated through clinical trials. The objective of this review was to summarize the clinically relevant genetic markers for TNBC that could serve as diagnostic, prognostic, or predictive or could improve personalized therapeutic strategies.

The Effect of Perioperative Bevacizumab on Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Locally Advanced HER-2 Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Multiple trials demonstrated that adding Bevacizumab to the standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER-2 negative breast cancer increases pathological complete response. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate that effect on survival.

Methods

We performed a systematic search for randomized trials measuring the effect of adding either neoadjuvant or adjuvant Bevacizumab to the standard chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer surgical candidates. The Mantel-Haenszel method and random effect model were used to analyze the data. A total of 7 randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis with a mean follow-up of 45 months.

Results

No statistically significant difference in overall survival was found after adding Bevacizumab to the standard chemotherapy in the overall study population, HR=0.9, 95% CI (90.72-1.13), estrogen/ progesterone positive subgroup, HR=0.99, 95% CI (0.72-1.35), or in triple negative breast cancer, HR=0.88, 95% CI (0.77-1.01). However, there was a small but significant improvement in disease-free survival in triple negative breast cancer with a HR of 0.88, 95% CI (0.78-0.98), but not in estrogen/ progesterone receptor positive tumors, HR=1.01, 95% CI (0.81-1.26).

Conclusions

The addition of Bevacizumab along with the standard chemotherapy would not improve overall survival in breast cancer surgical candidates, however, due to a small but significant improvement on disease-free survival in triple negative breast cancer, that would not eliminate the possibility of a certain subgroup of the latter who might benefit from adding Bevacizumab.

Current concepts and future directions in neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer

Preoperative administration of chemotherapy is a widespread treatment approach in early stage breast cancer whenever chemotherapy is indicated in principle. In addition, neoadjuvant treatment is today regarded as the preferred way of delivering systemic therapy in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. While preoperative chemotherapy allows for disease downstaging and increases breast conservation rates, achieving pathologic complete remission (pCR) is usually regarded as the most pertinent aim as pCR predicts for improved long-term outcome in high-risk breast cancer subtypes. A multitude of clinical trials therefore have focused on strategies to increase pCR rates. This short review summarizes outcomes of selected studies investigating the addition of further chemotherapeutic drugs or biologically targeted agents to standard regimens and provides an overview of novel strategies currently under clinical evaluation.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a dose-dense schedule in real life and putative role of PIK3CA mutations

Background

Dose-dense chemotherapy is one of the treatments of choice for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer (BC). Activating mutations in PIK3CA gene predict worse response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive patients, while their role is less clearly defined for HER2-negative tumors.

Methods

We conducted a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant, sequential, dose-dense anthracycline/taxane chemotherapy, plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients and investigated the correlation of pre-treatment PIK3CA mutation status with pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term outcome in a real-life setting.

Results

we established a dose-dense docetaxel recommended dose of 60 mg/m² and 65 mg/m², with or without trastuzumab, respectively, according to HER2-status, following dose-dense epirubicin-cyclophosphamide (90/600 mg/m²), every 2 weeks. The overall pCR rate was 21.4%; median disease-free survival (DFS) was 52 months and median overall survival (OS) was not yet reached. PIK3CA mutation status was not significantly associated with the pCR rate: 18% for both mutated and wild-type patients. The pCR rate was: 25% in the mutated and 24% in the wild-type (p 0.560) cohort of the HER2-positive subgroup; 33% both in the mutant and wild-type cohort of the triple-negative subgroup; no pCR neither in the mutant nor in the wild-type cohort of the HR-positive/HER2-negative subgroup. Among the HER2-positive population, a trend toward worse DFS was observed in case of mutation, as opposed to the triple negative population.

Conclusions

This study proposes an effective and safe neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline/taxane schedule and suggests that PIK3CA mutation analysis can be usefully performed in real-life clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Established Concepts and Emerging Strategies

In the last decade, the systemic treatment approach for patients with early breast cancer has partly shifted from adjuvant treatment to neoadjuvant treatment. Systemic treatment administration started as a 'one size fits all' approach but is currently customized according to each breast cancer subtype. Systemic treatment in a neoadjuvant setting is at least as effective as in an adjuvant setting and has several additional advantages. First, it enables response monitoring and provides prognostic information; second, it downstages the tumor, allowing for less extensive surgery, improved cosmetic outcomes, and reduced postoperative complications such as lymphedema; and third, it enables early development of new treatment strategies by using pathological complete remission as a surrogate outcome of event-free and overall survival. In this review we give an overview of the current standard of neoadjuvant systemic treatment strategies for the three main subtypes of breast cancer: hormone receptor-positive, triple-negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive. Additionally, we summarize drugs that are under investigation for use in the neoadjuvant setting.