Fertility-Sparing Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy with Trastuzumab Result in Complete Remission in a Young Woman with Rare Primary Mucinous Ovarian Cancer due to ERBB2 Co-amplification with CDK12 and Chromosome 11q13.3 Amplicon: A Case Report and Literature Review

Primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) is a rare tumor, accounting for approximately 3% of all epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs), with clinical risk factors and biologic features distinct from that of EOC. The prognosis for women with recurrent and high-grade PMOC remains poor, likely related to a poor response to conventional chemotherapy for EOC. A 27-year-old Chinese woman sought medical attention in January 2021 for abdominal distention from a large pelvic mass. After extensive investigations and workup, she was diagnosed with PMOC of the right ovary. Following multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions, the patient underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) (abdominal left adnexectomy, right partial oophorectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection, para-aortic lymph node dissection, omentectomy) as she yearned to preserve her fertility and the contralateral ovary appeared normal. Deep genetic analyses revealed ERBB2 co-amplification with CDK12 and chromosome 11q13.3 amplicon. Treatment with fertility-sparing surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab results in complete remission. This novel strategy utilizing precise diagnostics and characterization of the histo-type of rare tumors allowed personalized targeting with optimum drug response for women who yearn fertility preservation and remission from the disease, especially when there is very limited clinical experience on management of such rare ovarian tumors.

Recurrent ovarian cancer in Africa: Rate and associated factors at a gynecologic oncology treatment center in Ethiopia-A cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the recurrence rate of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and associated factors in an Ethiopian tertiary setting.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on recurrent ovarian cancer at St. Paul's College Millennium Medical College (Ethiopia). Data were collected through chart review using a structured questionnaire. SPSS version 26 was used to analyze the data. Descriptive analysis, bivariate, and multivariate regression analysis were performed as appropriate. Percentages, frequencies, odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to present the results' significance.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients with EOC were reviewed. The recurrence rate of ovarian cancer (OC) among these patients was 86.1% (a total of 173 patients developed recurrent disease). The commonest site of recurrence was the pelvis (89.1%, 180/202) and the majority of patients with recurrence were platinum sensitive, accounting for 63.8% (129/202) of cases. Age ≥40 years (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 23.3, CI: 4.3-31.5), macroscopic residual disease (AOR, 5.2, CI: 1.96-17.68), and FIGO Stage III/IV (AOR, 22.11, CI: 8.3-39.13) were associated with recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence rate of OC in this study was higher than previous reports. Advanced age at first presentation, extent of residual disease after surgery, and FIGO Stage III and IV disease were associated with disease recurrence.

O-RADS MRI SCORE: An Essential First-Step Tool for the Characterization of Adnexal Masses

The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system on magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score is now a well-established tool to characterize pelvic gynecological masses based on their likelihood of malignancy. The main added value of O-RADS MRI over O-RADS US is to correctly reclassify lesions that were considered suspicious on US as benign on MRI. The crucial issue when characterizing an adnexal mass is to determine the presence/absence of solid tissue and thus need to perform gadolinium injection. O-RADS MR score was built on a multivariate analysis and must be applied as a step-by-step analysis: 1) Is the mass an adnexal mass? 2) Is there an associated peritoneal carcinomatosis? 3) Is there any significant amount of fatty content? 4) Is there any wall enhancement? 5) Is there any internal enhancement? 6) When an internal enhancement is detected, does the internal enhancement correspond to solid tissue or not? 7) Is the solid tissue malignant? With its high value to distinguish benign from malignant adnexal masses and its high reproducibility, the O-RADS MRI score could be a valuable tool for timely referral of a patient to an expert center for the treatment of ovarian cancers. Finally, to make a precise diagnosis allowing optimal personalized treatment, the radiologist in gynecological imaging will combine the O-RADS MRI score with many other clinical, biological, and other MR criteria to suggest a pathological hypothesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma: A survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian cancer with limited evidence to support clinical care.

AIMS

We undertook a clinician survey to better understand current practice in treating MOC in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine any features associated with variation in care. In addition, we aimed to understand future research priorities.

METHODS

A RedCap survey was distributed to clinician members of the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Questions included respondent demographics, three case studies and future research priorities. Clinicians were asked questions specific to their speciality.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 47) were commonly experienced gynae-oncology specialists, most often surgical (38%) or medical (30%) oncologists. There was good consensus for surgical approaches for stage I disease; however, variation in practice was noted for advanced or recurrent MOC. Variation was also observed for medical oncologists; in early-stage disease there was no clear consensus on whether to offer chemotherapy, or which regimen to recommend. For advanced and recurrent disease a wide range of chemotherapy options was considered, with a trend away from an ovarian-type toward gastrointestinal (GI)-type regimens in advanced MOC. This practice was reflected in future research priorities, with 'Is a GI chemotherapy regimen better than an ovarian regimen?' the most highly ranked option, followed by 'Should stage 1C patients receive chemotherapy?'

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of respondents limited the analyses, it was clear that chemotherapy selection was a key point of divergence for medical oncologists. Future research is needed to establish well-evidenced guidelines for clinical care of MOC.

Epithelial ovarian cancer in younger age versus older age groups: Survival and clinicopathological features

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze the survivals and clinicopathological features of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in younger age patients and to determine the impact of age on survival.

METHODS

EOC patients aged ≤40 years were matched to patients aged >40 years at a 1:4 ratio. Disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinicopathological and treatment features were compared between patients aged ≤40 and >40 years.

RESULTS

A total of 763 EOC patients were reviewed. During a median follow-up period of 41 (range, 1-195) months, EOC patients aged ≤40 and >40 years did not show any statistically significant difference in median DSS (120 versusversus 84.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.58, 1.06); however, the median PFS was better in patients aged ≤40 years (median PFS not reached versusversus 41 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.5, 0.85). Age ≤40 years was an independent favorable prognostic factor for DSS at 3 years after diagnosis. In contrast, younger age was an independent poor prognostic factor prior to this time point. EOC patients aged ≤40 years exhibited a significantly higher rate of early-stage disease, a higher proportion of mucinous subtype, and lower cancer antigen-125 level.

CONCLUSION

Overall, EOC patients in the younger age group were associated with more favorable prognostic factors and showed better PFS, but not DSS, than those in the older age group. Younger age was identified as an unfavorable prognostic factor within 3 years of diagnosis and became a favorable prognostic factor after 3 years.

Fertility sparing treatment for bilateral borderline ovarian tumor: a case report and management strategy explication

A bilateral adnexal mass with suspected carcinosis could be a challenging experience for the gynecologist especially in fertile age and in patients with a desire for pregnancy. A 26-year-old patient who came to the outpatient clinical observation for bilateral, multilocular pelvic masses, with more than 4 papillary structures, color score 2, hypomobile compared to the uterus and rectum, respectively of 65 and 68mm in maximum diameter, free liquid in the abdomen and suspected of ovarian neoplasm. Positive tumor markers and a strong desire of a fertility sparing treatment (FST). A 2-step surgical approach managed to perform a diagnosis of bilateral ovarian borderline tumor with implants and a fertility sparing surgery. Harvesting and cryopreserving oocytes prior to the cytoreductive intervention was successfully performed.

All-cause and cancer-specific mortality after fertility-sparing surgery for stage IA and IC epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare all-cause and cancer-specific mortality between women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) versus standard surgery for stage IA and IC epithelial ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Reproductive aged patients (18-45) with stage IA or IC epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2015 were identified in the California Cancer Registry. FSS was defined as retention of the contralateral ovary and the uterus, and standard surgery included at least removal of both ovaries and the uterus. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was cancer-specific mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to create two groups balanced on covariates of interest. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to model survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1119 women who met inclusion criteria, 390 (34.9%) underwent FSS. IPTW yielded a balanced cohort of 394 women who underwent FSS and 723 women who underwent standard surgery. Among patients who underwent FSS, there were 45 deaths corresponding to an 85.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.92) 10-year all-cause survival probability, compared to 81 deaths and 86.4% 10-year all-cause survival probability (95% CI 0.83-0.90) among patients who underwent standard surgery. FSS was not associated with increased all-cause mortality (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.72-1.49) or cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.50, 95%CI 0.97-2.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Among reproductive-aged patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer fertility-sparing surgery was not associated with an increased risk of death compared to standard surgery.

Construction and validation of prognostic nomogram and clinical characteristics for ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: an SEER-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEC) is the second most commonly occurring ovarian epithelial malignancy, but the associated prognostic factors remain obscure. This study aimed to analyze independent prognostic factors for patients with OEC and to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of these patients.

METHODS

Clinical information of patients with OEC (2000-2019) was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors, and nomogram models were constructed using independent prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the accuracy and validity of the nomogram. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the differences in OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 4628 patients with OEC were included, being divided into training (n = 3238) and validation (n = 1390) sets (7:3 ratio). On multivariate Cox analysis, AJCC stage, age, tumor size, differentiation, chemotherapy, and lymph node resection were significant predictors of survival outcomes (P < 0.05). Resection of 1-3 lymph nodes in early-stage OEC patients did not significantly prolong OS (P > 0.05), but resection of ≥ 4 lymph nodes in early-stage improved OS and CSS (P < 0.05). The OS of early-stage patients was not related to whether or not they received chemotherapy (P > 0.05). Lymph node resection and chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced OEC (P < 0.05). The c-index of nomogram prediction model was 0.782. ROC with good discrimination, calibration plots with high consistency, and DCA with large net benefit rate result in large clinical value.

CONCLUSION

AJCC stage, differentiation, tumor size, age, chemotherapy, and lymph node dissection were prognostic factors of OEC. The constructed nomogram prediction model can effectively predict the prognosis of OEC patients and improve the accuracy of clinical decision-making.

Ovarian preservation in gynecologic oncology: current indications and techniques

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Early menopause represents a relevant clinical issue for women. Nevertheless, this issue should be balanced with the risks of ovarian metastasis, ovarian recurrence, and the risk of recurrence in hormone-sensitive gynecological cancers. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview on current indications and techniques of ovarian preservation in patients with gynecological cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The potential discussion about ovarian conservation could be proposed to patients with FIGO-stage IA grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer aged 40 years or less, FIGO-stage IB1-IB2 node-negative cervical cancer with squamous cell carcinoma and HPV-associated adenocarcinoma, FIGO-stage IA-IC grade 1-2 serous, endometrioid, mucinous expansile pattern ovarian cancer, any stage germ cell ovarian tumors, and FIGO-stage IA sex cord-stromal tumors. Technique to perform ovarian transposition in cervix cancer is also reported.

SUMMARY

Ovarian conservation is a surgical approach that involves preserving one or both ovaries during the treatment of gynecologic cancers. This approach has gained popularity in recent years, as it offers several benefits to the patient, including the preservation of hormonal function and fertility. The decision to perform ovarian conservation depends on several factors, such as the stage and type of cancer, the patient's age, fertility desire, and should be carefully discussed with patients.

Current limits of conservative treatment in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fertility-sparing surgery in ovarian cancer is an increasing need in gynecology-oncology clinical practice because of the frequent childbearing delay in developed countries. As the evidence in literature is based on observational studies, this review focuses on summarizing the most recent and relevant evidence for the conservative management of young patients with ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging surgery is mandatory in epithelial ovarian tumors. In sex cord-stromal tumors, fertility-sparing surgery is only recommended in FIGO stage IA. Due to its good prognosis, conservative treatment is possible in some cases of advanced disease of germ cell tumors and borderline tumors. Cystectomy is a reasonable option in serous borderline tumors but is not recommended in other tumor subtypes. Successful conception rates after fertility-sparing surgery ranges from 30 to 60%.

SUMMARY

Fertility-sparing surgery is a well tolerated option in young women with early-stage ovarian cancer with acceptable reproductive outcomes.

Could uterine conservation be an option in presumed early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer?

PURPOSE

In early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), patients usually undergo a hysterectomy. However, in fertility sparing surgery (FSS), carefully selected patients could conserve their uterus. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and epidemiologic characteristics associated with uterine involvement in patients with early-stage EOC, outside of FSS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, study from 2003 to 2019 and included all patients with a presumed early-stage EOC (FIGO I) who underwent a hysterectomy. The incidence of uterine involvement, predictive factors of uterine involvement, and the impact of uterine involvement on survival (recurrence-free survival and overall survival) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients had an early-stage EOC. Of these, six had an uterine involvement (7%). The populations of patients with or without uterine involvement did not differ except for CA 125 at diagnosis (136 ± 138 versus 356 ± 723, p = 0.04, respectively). No patient or tumor characteristics were predictive of uterine involvement. Uterine involvement was not associated with recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.26, IC95% 0.36-4.4, p = 0.72) or overall survival (HR = 0.7, IC95% 0.1-6.1, p = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Due to the small size of our sample, no conclusion can be drawn, yet it could be hypothesized that, for selected patients, a systematic hysterectomy could be discussed, notably in restaging surgery.

Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary in a 14-year-old girl: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Ovarian epithelial tumors are common in adults, and their peak incidence of onset is over 40 years of age. In children, most ovarian tumors are germ cell-derived, whereas epithelial tumors are rare and mostly benign.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report describes a case of a 14-year-old Chinese girl with ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. She was admitted with a small amount of bloody vaginal discharge during the past month. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis showed a large solid cystic mass lesion in the left ovary. Tumor marker levels were within normal limits ( CA-125: 22.3 U/mL, HE4: 28.5 pmol/L, HCG: < 1.20 mIU/ml, AFP: 3.3 ng/ml, CEA: 2.2 ng/ml, CA19-9: < 2.0 U/mL). Laparoscopic exploration revealed a large left ovarian tumor. The patient underwent left salpingo-oophorectomy, and showed no significant issues during follow-up, as well as no evidence of recurrence or metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first pediatric case of ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in China. Given the scarcity of reports addressing the clinical management of this condition, the present study provides a useful contribution to its further understanding in light of developing future treatment strategies.

Reproductive Results in Cancer Survivors after Fertility Sparing Management: The Need for the Standardization of Definitions

In fertility-sparing management (FSM), two different issues can be distinguished: the risk of recurrence/death and the chance of childbearing. Survival is the principal outcome in oncology, and definitions of overall survival and progression-free survival are therefore well defined and widely accepted. The introduction of FSM to clinical practice was determined by the desire of young cancer patients to still have children. Initially, in small groups of patients, any pregnancy and/or childbirth were considered successes. Nowadays, FSM occupies an important place in cancer treatment, with thousands of young women treated successfully. However, in contrast to survival, no definition has been established for evaluating the reproductive outcomes of FSM. This review article evaluates the current pregnancy and birth rates of cancer patients. Differences between fertility-sparing and conservative treatment are analyzed, and improper and confusing interchangeable applications of these terms are pointed out. Additionally, various reasons for choosing FSM as a treatment method-which are not directly related to fertility preservation (treatment mismatch)-are presented. Uniform definitions of reproduction after FSM should be established to enable the comparison of results and facilitate the counseling of patients regarding the chances of reproduction.

Executive Summary of the Ovarian Cancer Evidence Review Conference

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention awarded funding to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to develop educational materials for clinicians on gynecologic cancers. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in evidence review from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology and content experts from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology to review relevant literature, best practices, and existing practice guidelines as a first step toward developing evidence-based educational materials for women's health care clinicians about ovarian cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at a virtual meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in February 2022. This article is the executive summary of the relevant literature and existing recommendations to guide clinicians in the prevention, early diagnosis, and special considerations of ovarian cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps are noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.

Minimally Invasive Staging of Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer versus Open Surgery in Terms of Feasibility and Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Epithelial ovarian cancer is women's fourth most common oncological cause of death. One of the main prognostic factors in ovarian cancer is the tumor stage. For instance, surgical staging of the disease is focal when choosing the best therapeutic option for each case. Although open surgery is the prevalent approach for staging and treating ovarian cancer, the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has found recent application in staging or restaging cases of early disease. Our work compares oncological outcomes after MIS staging for FIGO I epithelial ovarian cancer with the laparotomic approach. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations, we systematically searched the Pub Med and Scopus databases in February 2023. No temporal nor geographical limitation was made. We included the articles containing data about Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), Recurrence Rates (RR), and Upstaging Rates (UpR). We used comparative studies for the meta-analysis. After the database search and article selection, 19 works matched the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Eleven of these were comparative studies between MIS and Open Surgical Staging (OSS) approaches for ovarian cancer staging and were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis did not show a statistically significant difference between the MIS and the OSS group concerning DFS, OS, and RR. Only Upstaging Rate ≥ FIGO Stage II was statistically significative higher in the OSS group. Likewise, MIS is confirmed to be an approach with a lower profile of surgical complications. In conclusion, our study did not show one approach to be safer than the other. However, the lack of dedicated studies limits the evidence of our study. For instance, we recommend adequately selecting the specimen, minimizing the risk of spillage, and optimizing surgical staging.

Safety of fertility sparing management in invasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of fertility-sparing surgery in invasive mucinous ovarian carcinomas (MOC).

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of MOCs diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 at two tertiary cancer centers. Pathology was reviewed to rule out metastasis from gastrointestinal tract. The demographics and survival outcomes were compared between women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who underwent radical surgery (at least hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy +/- staging). Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to evaluate the effect of fertility sparing surgery on survival.

RESULTS

Of 134 with stage I disease, 42 (31%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Compared to women who underwent radical surgery, these women were younger with low grade, early-stage disease. Two patients (5%) in the fertility-sparing cohort experienced a recurrence and 1 of these 2 patients died due to disease progression. There was no difference in either OS or RFS between those that underwent fertility-sparing surgery and radical surgery. In a multivariable analysis adjusting for age and use of adjuvant chemotherapy, fertility-sparing surgery was not significantly associated with OS (HR 0.18; 95% CI 0.01-2.78) or RFS (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.03-1.45). There were 4 patients (9%) with documented full-term delivery with median interval to conception of 11 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Fertility-sparing surgery in stage I MOC is not associated with worse outcomes compared to radical surgery and is reasonable to offer to those with early stage disease who wish to retain fertility.

Computed Tomography Indicators for Differentiating Stage 1 Borderline Ovarian Tumors from Stage I Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors

Preoperative diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is of increasing concern. This study aimed to determine computed tomography (CT) features in differentiating stage 1 BOTs from stage I malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs). A total of 170 ovarian masses (97 BOTs and 73 MEOTs) from 141 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative CT imaging were retrospectively analyzed. Two readers independently and retrospectively reviewed quantitative and qualitative CT features. Multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that a larger tumor size (p = 0.0284 for reader 1, p = 0.0391 for reader 2) and a smaller solid component (p = 0.0007 for reader 1, p = 0.0003 for reader 2) were significantly associated with BOTs compared with MEOTs. In the subanalysis of cases with a solid component, smaller (p = 0.0092 for reader 1, p = 0.0014 for reader 2) and ill-defined (p = 0.0016 for reader 1, p = 0.0414 for reader 2) solid component was significantly associated with BOTs compared with MEOTs. Tumor size and the size and margin of the solid component were useful for differentiating stage 1 BOTs from stage 1 MEOTs on CT images.

Diffusion-weighted imaging-based radiomics in epithelial ovarian tumors: Assessment of histologic subtype

Background

Epithelial ovarian tumors (EOTs) are a group of heterogeneous neoplasms. It is importance to preoperatively differentiate the histologic subtypes of EOTs. Our study aims to investigate the potential of radiomics signatures based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for categorizing EOTs.

Methods

This retrospectively enrolled 146 EOTs patients [34 with borderline EOT(BEOT), 30 with type I and 82 with type II epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)]. A total of 390 radiomics features were extracted from DWI and ADC maps. Subsequently, the LASSO algorithm was used to reduce the feature dimensions. A radiomics signature was established using multivariable logistic regression method with 3-fold cross-validation and repeated 50 times. Patients with bilateral lesions were included in the validation cohort and a heuristic selection method was established to select the tumor with maximum probability for final consideration. A nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical characteristics was also developed. Receiver operator characteristic, decision curve analysis (DCA), and net reclassification index (NRI) were applied to compare the diagnostic performance and clinical net benefit of predictive model.

Results

For distinguishing BEOT from EOC, the radiomics signature and nomogram showed more favorable discrimination than the clinical model (0.915 vs. 0.852 and 0.954 vs. 0.852, respectively) in the training cohort. In classifying early-stage type I and type II EOC, the radiomics signature exhibited superior diagnostic performance over the clinical model (AUC 0.905 vs. 0.735). The diagnostic efficacy of the nomogram was the same as that of the radiomics model with NRI value of -0.1591 (P = 0.7268). DCA also showed that the radiomics model and combined model had higher net benefits than the clinical model.

Conclusion

Radiomics analysis based on DWI, and ADC maps serve as an effective quantitative approach to categorize EOTs.

O-RADS Ultrasound Version 1: A Scenario-Based Review of Implementation Challenges

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) ultrasound (US) risk stratification and management system was first published by the American College of Radiology in 2020. It provides standardized terminology for evaluation of ovarian and adnexal masses, aids risk stratification, and provides management guidelines for different categories of lesions. This system has been validated by subsequent research and found to be a useful diagnostic and management tool. However, as noted in the system's governing concepts, in some clinical scenarios, such as patients with acute symptoms or with a history of ovarian malignancy, O-RADS US does not apply, or the system's standard management may be adjusted. Additional scenarios, such as an adnexal mass in pregnancy, present challenges in the application of O-RADS US to assist diagnosis and management. The purpose of this article is to highlight 10 clinical scenarios in which O-RADS US version 1 may not apply, may be difficult to apply, or may require modified management. Additional scenarios in which O-RADS US can be appropriately applied are also described.

Reproductive and oncological outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We meta-analyzed available evidence on fertility, survival, and cancer recurrence in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) after fertility-sparing surgery (FSS).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify studies reporting reproductive and oncological outcomes of patients with stage I EOC who underwent FSS. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled rates of disease outcomes, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity in the data.

RESULTS

We included 23 observational retrospective studies involving 1126 patients. The pooled pregnancy rate was 30% (95% CI, 0.26-0.34), while the pooled natural conception rate was 26% (95% CI, 0.20-0.33). The pooled live birth rate was 27% (95% CI, 0.22-0.32). The pooled rate of EOC recurrence was 12% (95% CI, 0.09-0.14), which did not differ significantly from the rate among patients who underwent radical surgery (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.45-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

FSS is associated with good oncological outcomes but less than satisfactory reproductive outcomes. All in all, the procedure appears to be a safe alternative to radical surgery for EOC patients who want to preserve fertility.

Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes After Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Stage I Mucinous Ovarian Carcinoma

Background

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has been widely used for patients with early-stage mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the reproductive outcomes as well as the impact of growth pattern on oncological outcomes after FSS. This study aims to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with stage I primary MOC after FSS.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 159 women with histologically confirmed unilateral stage I MOC treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 1997 and 2019. Sixty-seven cases were pathologically reviewed for the growth pattern. Seventy-eight patients had FSS, defined as conservation of the uterus and at least part of one ovary, while 81 underwent radical surgery (RS). Oncofertility outcomes were compared between the groups and clinicopathological factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients in the FSS group were contacted to collect data on reproductive outcomes.

Results

Eighteen patients developed recurrent disease during a median follow-up of 69 months, including 12 in the FSS and six in the RS group. There was one death each in the FSS and RS groups. There was no significant difference in DFS between the groups. CA125 >35 U/ml, stage IC, and incomplete staging were correlated with worse DFS according to multivariate analysis (P=0.001; 0.020 (stage IC) and 0.004 (incomplete staging) respectively). There was no significant difference in DFS between patients with stage IA and stage IC1 in the FSS group, while DFS was poorer in patients with stage IC2/3 than stage IA (P=0.028). In addition, DFS was significantly poorer in patients who underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) compared with those receiving USO plus staging surgery (P=0.015). There was a tendency towards poorer DFS in the infiltrative tumors compared with the expansile tumors (P=0.056). Of 23 patients who attempted to conceive, 21 (91.3%) achieved 27 pregnancies, including 26 spontaneous pregnancies and one following assisted reproductive technology. Twenty patients gave birth to 24 healthy babies, including 21 full-term and three premature births. The live-birth rate was 88.9%.

Conclusions

FSS is a suitable option for young women with unilateral stage I expansile MOC, with acceptable oncological outcomes and meaningful pregnancy rates. Re-staging should be proposed in patients who undergo incomplete staging surgery.

Oncologic and pregnancy outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for stage I, low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate oncologic outcomes in patients with stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer treated with fertility-sparing compared with conventional surgery and to describe reproductive outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out of patients aged 18-45 with stage I, grade 1 and 2 (low-grade) endometrioid ovarian cancer treated at two cancer centers between July 2001 and December 2019. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test for categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Recurrence-free and overall survival were calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves and compared for fertility-sparing and conventional surgery using the log rank test. Pregnancy outcomes are described.

RESULTS

There were 230 patients with endometrioid ovarian cancer. After exclusion of patients with stage greater than I and those older than 45 years, there were 31 patients with stage I cancer aged 18-45. Of these patients, 11 (35.5%) underwent fertility-sparing surgery and 20 (64.5%) underwent conventional surgery. The median follow-up was 6.0 years (range 1.8-17.3). The median age was 36 years (range 26-42) in the fertility-sparing group and 42 years (range 35-45) in the conventional surgery group (p=0.001), with no difference in other clinical and pathologic characteristics. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was 90.9% (95% CI 73.9% to 100%) for the fertility-sparing group and 84.0% (95% CI 67.3% to 100%) for the conventional surgery group (p=0.65). The 5-year overall survival was 100% for patients in the fertility-sparing group and 92.6% (95% CI 78.7% to 100%) for patients treated with conventional surgery (p=0.49). Four (12.9%) patients had disease recurrence: three (15%) after conventional surgery and one (9.1%) in the contralateral ovary after fertility-sparing surgery and embryo cryopreservation. After fertility-sparing surgery, seven (63.6%) patients attempted pregnancy, of which five (71.4%) conceived with four (57.1%) using in vitro fertilization. Of the five patients who conceived, there were three spontaneous abortions and five live births.

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery appears safe and may be considered in young women with stage I, low-grade endometrioid ovarian cancer when fertility preservation is desired.

Fertility Preserving Surgery Outcomes for Ovarian Malignancy: Data from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in Central London

Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) appears to be a safe means of treating early-stage ovarian cancer based on relatively limited evidence. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to aid women in counselling about their potential fertility outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the reproductive outcomes and prognosis of women who have undergone FSS for ovarian malignancy. Between 1 June 2008 and 1 June 2018, a retrospective review of a clinical database was conducted to identify all consecutive patients who underwent FSS in a central London gynaecological oncology centre. All patients with a histological diagnosis of ovarian malignancy (excluding borderline ovarian tumours) were eligible. All identified patients were then prospectively called into a follow up and asked to complete a questionnaire about their fertility outcomes. A total of 47 women underwent FSS; 36 were included in this study. The mean age was 30.3 years (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 27.6 to 33.0 years). During the study period, 17/36 (47.2%) of the women had attempted to conceive following surgery, with a successful live birth rate of 52.9% (9/17). The mean time of recurrence was 125.3 months (95% CI: 106.5−144.1 months). The mean time to death was 139.5 months (95% CI: 124.3−154.8). The cancer grade, tumour stage and use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) were the main factors significantly associated with the risk of recurrence and death. In conclusion, this study suggests that a large proportion of women will not attempt to conceive following FSS. For those who do attempt to conceive, the likelihood of achieving a live birth is high. However, careful counselling about the higher risk of recurrence and worse survival for women with high grade cancer, disease Stage > IA and potentially those who undergo ART is essential before contemplating FFS.

Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes

Simple Summary

Approximately one million new cases of cancer are diagnosed in women of reproductive age every year. In the last few decades, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have improved the survival rate. However, the adverse effects of anticancer therapy on the ovaries and uterus have a significant impact on future fertility and may affect the quality of life of cancer survivors. Unfortunately, evidence about the trend of ovarian reserve loss over time is insufficient for predicting the duration of the fertile period. Currently, impaired fertility in cancer survivors is a growing issue that is complicated by an increasing number of women delaying childbearing. This review focuses on the detrimental effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery on reproductive functions and describes the mechanisms causing reduced fertility in cancer survivors. Moreover, in this review, the available fertility preservation strategies to guarantee the chance of motherhood in cancer survivors are illustrated.

Abstract

The incidence of cancer in reproductive-aged women is 7%, but, despite the increased number of cancer cases, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have raised the survival rate. Furthermore, in the last four decades, there has been a rising trend of delaying childbearing. There has been an increasing number of couples referred to Reproductive Medicine Centers for infertility problems after one partner has been treated for cancer. In these cases, the main cause of reduced fertility derives from treatments. In this review, we describe the effects and the risks of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in women with cancer, and we will focus on available fertility preservation techniques and their efficacy in terms of success in pregnancy and live birth rates.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Surgical Staging of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancers: A Report of Two Cases

Surgical staging is essential in the management of ovarian cancers. This staging has traditionally been performed by laparotomy, but minimally invasive techniques are increasingly employed. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a promising technique in the field of gynecological oncology. We report 2 cases of vNOTES surgical staging for suspicious ovarian tumors. We operated on 2 patients aged of 81 and 62 years for low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and ovarian cystadenofibroma, respectively. We performed surgical staging with a pure vNOTES technique for the first patient and used a hybrid approach for the second. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed. We suggest that vNOTES is a feasible and effective approach to surgically manage early-stage ovarian cancers.

Prognosis in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma: focusing on the five pathological findings indicating metastatic mucinous carcinoma to the ovary

Objective

Pathological features indicating metastatic mucinous carcinoma to the ovary (MMCO) have been rarely reported in primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC). However, little is known about how often they are observed in PMOC and how they relate to patient prognosis. In this study, we investigated the pathological features indicating MMCO in a large cohort of PMOCs and analyzed their association with patient prognosis.

Methods

We reviewed surgically treated PMOC patients diagnosed at the Seoul National University Hospital from 1995 to 2019, according to the updated WHO classification, and investigated the presence of pathological features indicating MMCO.

Results

A total of 144 patients with PMOCs were included. The 5 pathological findings indicating MMCO, including an infiltrative invasive pattern, the absence of benign or borderline components, a smaller tumor size, the presence of signet ring cells and the presence of extracellular mucin were observed in PMOC (21.6%, 43.1%, 20.8%, 4.3% and 12.9%, respectively), and were significantly correlated with poor overall and progression-free survival rates in PMOC. The patient’s prognosis worsened as the extent of the infiltrative invasive pattern increased (p<0.001). In addition, the prognostic power was stronger when the 5 pathological factors were analyzed together (new grouping system) than when analyzed individually (p<0.001) and the new grouping system was identified as an independent prognostic factor regardless of FIGO stage.

Conclusion

Five pathological findings indicating MMCO in PMOC were significantly associated with poor prognosis in PMOC patients. Also, the new grouping system combining these findings was identified as an independent prognostic factor.

Pathologic features indicating metastatic mucinous carcinoma to the ovary (MMCO) have been rarely reported in primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas (PMOCs). We found the 5 pathological findings indicating MMCO in PMOC were significantly associated with poor prognosis in PMOC patients.

Long-term post-recurrence survival outcomes in young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate long-term post-recurrence survival outcomes in young women receiving fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) to verify the feasibility of the limited surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (OvCa).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a regional multicenter retrospective study from January 1986 and March 2020, using clinical data corrected under the central pathological review system. Patients with recurrent tumor after surgery for stage I epithelial OvCa, aged equal or younger than 45 years were included for this study. We evaluated effect of FSS regarding long-term post-recurrence survival with statistical adjustment of propensity score-based method.

RESULTS

With the Kaplan-Meier method, original and adjusted survival curves were estimated for recurrence-after survival of patients with (n = 14) and without FSS (n = 26). Median time to disease-specific death was 18.6 months. In both original and adjusted cohorts, there were no significant difference between the two groups (log rank test; P > 0.05). Hazard ratio of disease-specific death was 1.264 (95% confidence interval, 0.563-2.836; P = 0.570) in original and 1.354 (95% confidence interval, 0.702-2.611; P = 0.366) in adjusted population. This result indicated that patients with FSS was not associated with poorer prognosis for recurrence-after survival than those without. When comparing patients not receiving FSS, patients receiving FSS with recurrence at spared ovary followed not significantly different survival outcome as well as those with extra-ovarian recurrence.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference of long-term post-recurrence survival outcomes between patients of epithelial OvCa with and without FSS in young women of reproductive age.

Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system-magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS-MRI) score decreases the incidence of indeterminate adnexal masses from 18% to 31% with ultrasound till 10.8% to 12.5% with MRI. Further improvement of this score may be useful to improve patients' management.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the added value of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of adnexal masses classified according to the O-RADS-MRI score.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective cohort study with retrospective DWI analysis.

POPULATION

Among 402 recruited patients, surgery was done only in 163 women (median-age: 51 years) with 201 indeterminate adnexal masses, which were included in the final analysis.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Standardized MRI (1.5 and 3-T) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging) were used.

ASSESSMENT

Two radiologists classified the adnexal masses according to O-RADS-MRI and they were blinded to the pathology report. Two methods of quantitative analysis were applied using region-of-interest apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ROI-ADC) and whole-lesion ADC-histogram (WL-ADC).

STATISTICAL TESTS

Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare variables among malignant and benign lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to examine the sensitivity/specificity of each parameter. ROI-ADC and WL-ADC of lesions with O-RADS-MRI score-4 were plotted to identify thresholds of malignant lesions. The improvement of the O-RADS-MRI score after adding these thresholds was assessed by two ROC-curves. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight of the 201 lesions (28.9%) were malignant. The ROI-ADC and the WL-ADC means of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions. Forty-two lesions (20.9%) had an O-RADS-MRI score-4. In this subgroup, 76% of lesions with ROI-ADC < 1.7 × 10^-3  mm² /sec and WL-ADC < 2.6 × 10^-3  mm² /sec were malignant, whereas only 11.8% with ROI-ADC ≥ 1.7 × 10^-3  mm² /sec or a WL-ADC ≥ 2.6 × 10^-3  mm² /sec were malignant. The overall performance of the O-RADS-MRI score combined with these thresholds was improved.

DATA CONCLUSION

Integrating ADC-thresholds in O-RADS-MRI score-4 may discriminate low-to-intermediate and intermediate-to-high malignancy risk groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer

Although the incidence of the various gynecological cancers has been increasing in recent years, long-term survival is now possible for many patients thanks to advances in multimodality treatment. When treating gynecological cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who desire future pregnancy, it is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and their function to prevent loss of fertility. However, because treatment targets these organs, in the large majority of cases, patients must have these organs removed. In the subfield of oncofertility, treatment of the underlying disease takes priority, and the main principle is preventing delay in treatment. Close cooperation between obstetricians and gynecologists involved in reproductive medicine and oncologists involved in cancer treatment is necessary. In addition, it is important that clinicians work closely not only with other specialists but also with such medical professionals as nurses and counselors so that cancer patients of the AYA generation can be provided the support they need to fight their cancer with hope. Herein, we describe the current status of fertility-sparing therapy for AYA patients with gynecological cancer (cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer). In addition, we explain points to keep in mind during a patient's pregnancy after fertility preservation, the latest findings on assisted reproductive technology, and the challenges and prospects of fertility preservation therapy for patients with gynecologic cancer.

Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

(1) Background: although most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergo radical surgery, patients with early-stage disease, borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) or a non-epithelial tumor could be offered fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) depending on histologic subtypes and prognostic factors. (2) Methods: we conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and fertility outcomes of FSS in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We queried the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Cochrane (“Cochrane Reviews”) databases for articles published in English or French between 1985 and 15 January 2021. (3) Results: for patients with BOT, FSS should be offered to young women with a desire to conceive, even if peritoneal implants are discovered at the time of initial surgery. Women with mucinous BOT should undergo initial unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, whereas cystectomy is an acceptable option for women with serous BOT. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) can be initiated in patients with stage I BOT if infertility persists after surgery. For patients with EOC, FSS should only be considered after staging for women with stage IA grade 1 (and probably 2, or low-grade in the current classification) serous, mucinous or endometrioid tumors. FSS could also be offered to patients with stage IC grade 1 (or low-grade) disease. For women with serous, mucinous or endometrioid high-grade stage IA or low-grade stage IC1 or IC2 EOC, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and uterine conservation could be offered to allow pregnancy by egg donation. Finally, FSS has a large role to play in patients with non- epithelial ovarian cancer, and particularly women with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Radiomics based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative prediction of peritoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVES

To develop a radiomics signature based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to preoperatively predict peritoneal metastasis (PM) in ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with OC were divided into a training cohort including patients (n = 54) with a single lesion and a validation cohort including patients (n = 35) with bilateral lesions. Radiomics features were extracted from the T2-weighted images (T2WIs), fat-suppressed T2WIs, multi-b-value diffusion-weighted images (DWIs), and corresponding parametric maps. A radiomics signature and nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical predictors were developed and validated on the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

RESULTS

The radiomics signature generated by 6 selected features showed a favorable discriminatory ability to predict PM in OC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963 in the training cohort and an AUC of 0.928 in the validation cohort. The nomogram, comprising the radiomics signature, pelvic fluid, and CA-125 level, showed more favorable discrimination with an AUC of 0.969 in the training cohort and 0.944 in the validation cohort. Net reclassification index with values of 0.548 in the training cohort and 0.500 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics signature based on multisequence MRI serves as an effective quantitative approach to predict PM in OC patients. A nomogram of radiomics signature and clinical predictors could further improve the prediction ability of PM in patients with OC.

KEY POINTS

• Multisequence MRI-based radiomics showed a favorable discriminatory ability to predict PM in OC. • The nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical predictors was clinically useful to preoperatively predict PM in patients with OC.

Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy has been widely used for patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (eEOC). However, there is limited evidence regarding whether survival outcomes of laparoscopy are equivalent to those of laparotomy among patients with eEOC. The result of survival outcomes of laparoscopy is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to analyze the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of eEOC.

METHODS

According to the keywords, Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from January 1994 to January 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for patients with eEOC were assessed for eligibility. Only studies including outcomes of overall survival (OS) were enrolled. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata software (Version 12.0) and Review Manager (Version 5.2).

RESULTS

A total of 6 retrospective non-random studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that there was no difference between two approaches for patients with eEOC in OS (HR = 0.6, P = 0.446), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.6, P = 0.137) and upstaging rate (OR = 1.18, P = 0.54). But the recurrence rate of laparoscopic surgery was lower than that of laparotomic surgery (OR = 0.48, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy and laparotomy appear to provide comparable overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes for patients with eEOC. Further high-quality studies are needed to enhance this statement.

Outcomes after Fertility-sparing Surgery for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To compare reproductive and oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, borderline ovarian tumors, or nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma according to receipt of fertility-sparing surgery or conventional surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched from January 1, 1995, to May 29, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they (1) enrolled women of childbearing age diagnosed with ovarian cancer between the ages of 18 years and 50 years, (2) reported on oncologic and/or reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer, and (3) included at least 20 patients.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 995 studies. After duplicates were removed, we abstracted 980 unique citations. Of those screened, 167 publications were identified as potentially relevant, and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final review included 44 studies in epithelial ovarian cancer, 42 in borderline ovarian tumors, and 31 in nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma. The narrative synthesis demonstrated that overall survival does not seem to be compromised in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery compared with those undergoing conventional surgery, although long-term data are limited. Areas of controversy include safety of fertility-sparing surgery in the setting of high-risk factors (stage IC, grade 3, and clear cell histology), as well as type of surgery (salpingo-oophorectomy vs cystectomy). It seems that although there may be some fertility compromise after surgery, pregnancy and live-birth rates are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery is safe and feasible in women with early-stage low-risk ovarian cancer. Pregnancy outcomes for these patients also seem to be similar to those of the general population.

Oncologic outcomes of uterine preservation for pre-menopausal patients with stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Fertility-sparing surgery is rarely offered for patients with stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the overall survival of pre-menopausal patients with stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma who did not undergo hysterectomy.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was accessed, and patients aged ≤40 years without a history of another tumor diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with a pathological stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma, who underwent lymphadenectomy and received multi-agent chemotherapy, were identified. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test after generation of Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox model was constructed to control for tumor histology.

RESULTS

A total of 185 patients met the inclusion criteria. The rate of uterine preservation was 24.3% (45 patients). Patients who did not undergo hysterectomy were younger (median 32 vs 37 years, p<0.001) and less likely to have high-grade tumors compared with those who underwent hysterectomy. The two groups were comparable in terms of presence of co-morbidities and performance of adequate lymphadenectomy (p>0.05). Median follow-up of the present cohort was 62.3 months (95% CI 53.6 to 71.0) and a total of 22 deaths occurred. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo hysterectomy (p=0.50; 5-year overall survival rates 87.5% and 91.4%, respectively). After controlling for tumor histology, grade and substage, omission of hysterectomy was not associated with worse survival (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.22 to 2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Uterine preservation was not associated with worse survival in this cohort of pre-menopausal patients with stage II epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review

Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is increasingly being offered to women with a gynecological malignancy who wish to preserve fertility. In this systematic review, we evaluate the best evidence currently available on oncological and reproductive outcome after FSS for early stage cervical cancer, epithelial ovarian cancer, and endometrial cancer. An extensive literature search was conducted using the electronic databases Medline (OVID), Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies published up to December 2020. In total, 153 studies were included with 7544, 3944, and 1229 patients who underwent FSS for cervical, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, respectively. We assessed the different FSS techniques that are available to preserve fertility, i.e., omitting removal of the uterine body and preserving at least one ovary. Overall, recurrence rates after FSS are reassuring and therefore, these conservative procedures seem oncologically safe in the current selection of patients with low-stage and low-grade disease. However, generalized conclusions should be made with caution due to the methodology of available studies, i.e., mostly retrospective cohort studies with a heterogeneous patient population, inducing selection bias. Moreover, about half of patients do not pursue pregnancy despite FSS and the reasons for these decisions have not yet been well studied. International collaboration will facilitate the collection of solid evidence on FSS and the related decision-making process to optimize patient selection and counseling.

Minimally invasive surgical staging for early stage ovarian cancer: A long-term follow up

INTRODUCTION

The standard treatment for epithelial early stage ovarian cancer (eEOC) includes laparotomic surgical staging, according to ESGO-ESMO guidelines. In the last decade, many investigators have assessed the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) staging in properly selected patients. However, survival data related to different surgical approaches (open versus MIS) are extremely limited. The aim of this study is to analyze the long-term oncological outcomes in eEOC patients treated with MIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a multicenter observational retrospective study conducted in two tertiary oncological centers. We selected all consecutive women who underwent a laparoscopic or robotic staging for eEOC.

RESULTS

From January 2008 to December 2016, 254 eEOC patients underwent a MIS staging (188 laparoscopic staging and 66 robotic staging). Overall, 18.1% of patients were upstaged due to pathological findings. A total of 203 (79.9%) patients received platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 13-118), 39 (15.3%) patients experienced recurrence. The 5-years progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 84.0% and 93.8%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, favorable variables influencing PFS were young age (≤45 years), non-serous histotype, tumor grade 1-2, and FIGO stage IA/IB. In the multivariate analysis, only grade 3 was shown to keep its negative independent prognostic value (HR = 3.47; p = 0.004), whereas FIGO stage ≥ IC showed a trend toward significance (HR = 1.75; p = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study represents the longest follow-up of eEOC patients managed by MIS. The MIS is a valuable therapeutic option in appropriately selected patients, although a randomized controlled trial is needed.

Fertility sparing surgery for early-stage clear cell carcinoma of the ovary; A systematic review and analysis of obstetric outcomes

Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCOC), accounts for 5-25% of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases. A significant proportion of patients with CCOC are of reproductive age, wishing to preserve their fertility. The application of fertility sparing surgery (FSS) in those patients has been extensively criticized, due to the high reported recurrence rates and chemotherapy resistance. The aim of the present study was to accumulate the current knowledge on obstetric and fertility outcomes of patients with early stage CCOC who underwent fertility sparing surgery. A meticulous search of 3 electronic databases was conducted for articles published up to June 2020 relevant in the field using the terms "ovarian cancer", "clear cell", "fertility sparing", "conservative treatment". Studies that reported pregnancy and maternal outcomes after fertility sparing surgery for the management of early stage CCOC were considered eligible. A total of 5 studies which comprised of 60 patients with early stage CCOC, who underwent fertility-sparing surgery, were reviewed. Ten patients (16.6%) had disease recurrence. The total clinical pregnancy rate of 32% with a proportion of 24% of live birth rates in 12 of the included patients. The median interval from surgery to pregnancy was 41.5 months, while no evidence of disease was recorded among the patients who achieved pregnancy. No difference in survival and recurrence rates among patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who had radical surgical procedures. Fertility-sparing treatment for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Stage IA/IC CCOC seems to be an acceptable treatment option for selected premenopausal women who strongly wish to preserve their childbearing potential. However, larger studies are needed to validate the safety of the procedure.

Fertility preservation in women with early ovarian cancer

Fertility preservation is an important option to consider for young women with low-grade early ovarian cancer. Fertility-sparing surgery ("FSS") permits the conservation of the uterus and one of the ovaries. This technique is considered safe for stages IA G1, G2 and probably safe for IC G1 epithelial and non-epithelial ovarian cancers. There are still uncertainties and FSS is not fully accepted for stage IC G1, G2 and clear cell carcinoma. The difficulty in choosing the best option lies in the fact that there is a lack of prospective randomized studies, due to ethical and organizational issues. Retrospective studies and reviews showed reassuring results for FSS in terms of relapse and long term survival. The spontaneous pregnancy rate seems to decrease after FSS, but chemotherapy does not seem to have an impact on fertility rates. Compared with the general population, assisted reproductive techniques are considered safe and with similar fertility results.

Impact on Prognosis of the Surgical Route, Laparoscopy or Laparotomy, for the Surgical Staging of Early Stage Ovarian Cancer-A Study from the FRANCOGYN Group

Background and objective: according to the latest ESMO−ESGO recommendations, laparotomy is the standard surgical approach to treat and stage patients with presumed early stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). A few studies have investigated the efficacy and the safety of laparoscopy for the staging of early stage EOC, and this question is still in the center of debates. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits of the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have still to be specified. The aim of this multicenter and retrospective study is to assess the survival outcomes of laparoscopic staging in comparison with laparotomic staging for patients presenting with an early stage EOC. Methods: data of patients with early stage EOC (FIGO I-IIA) who underwent primary surgery between 2000 and 2018 were extracted from the FRANCOGYN database. OS and RFS of these two groups, constituted according to the surgical route, were compared using Log rank test. Results: of the 144 patients included, 107 patients underwent laparotomy and 37 underwent laparoscopy for a staging purpose. The median follow-up was 36.0 months (18.0 to 58.0). For the laparoscopy and the laparotomy group, the median follow-up period was 24 (11.0 to 50.0) and 42.0 (24.0 to 66.0) months, respectively, (p < 0.001). Tumor recurrence occurred in 33 (23%) patients: 2 (5.4%) in the laparoscopy group and 31 (29%) in the laparotomy group (p = 0.08). The OS rate at 5 years was 97.3% after laparoscopy and 79.8% after laparotomy (p = 0.19). Conclusions: there is no difference associated with the laparoscopic approach for the staging of early stage EOC on RFS and OS in comparison with laparotomy. MIS may be proposed as a safe and adequate alternative to laparotomy when performed by well-trained surgeons.

A Swedish Nationwide prospective study of oncological and reproductive outcome following fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of early stage epithelial ovarian cancer in young women

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is rare in women of reproductive age and fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) may be applied in early stages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of FSS for treatment of EOC.

Methods

The Swedish nationwide population-based Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer was used to identify all women 18–40 years of age diagnosed with stage I EOC between 2008 and 2015. Detailed data on surgery, staging, histopathology, and follow-up were extracted and reviewed. Cross-linking of individuals to population-based registries allowed retrieval of data on obstetrical and reproductive outcomes after FSS. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared (Kaplan-Meier method) between women who underwent FSS vs. radical surgery (RS).

Results

In total 83 women were identified; 36 who had FSS performed and 47 RS. The 5-year OS rate was 92% and no statistical differences between DFS or OS were found between women treated by FSS or RS. The recurrence rate after RS was 13% compared to 6% after FSS. Recurrences were more frequently found in women with stage IC tumor or with histologic subtypes with more aggressive behavior. In the FSS cohort, nine women gave birth to 12 healthy children, all delivered at fullterm. Only one women had received assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Conclusion

In this nationwide population-based cohort study natural fertility was maintained after FSS. Specific histologic subtypes showed greater prognostic impact on the oncological outcome than the use of FSS. Recurrences occurred after FSS, but none in the uterus, which questions the need of hysterectomy in young women with EOC.

Trial registration

This article reports the results of a healthcare intervention using the data prospectively registered in the Swedish population-based registries including the Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer, the National Death Register, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, and the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction.

Impact of young age on platinum response in women with epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of a large single-institution registry

OBJECTIVE

In young women, EOC is a rare disease with an uncertain genetic and biological substrate.

METHODS

We report a long follow-up of EOC patients treated at Gustave Roussy between 1990 and 2009. We matched young patients aged ≤30 years to randomly selected older patients aged ≥40 years according to known prognostic factors (i.e. FIGO stage, histology and surgical residual disease) and the date of diagnosis with a threshold at the year 2000 to balance the treatment procedures.

RESULTS

EOC was diagnosed in 68 patients aged ≤30 years matched with 111 patients aged ≥40 years. Low-grade (LG) (i.e. serous and endometrioid) (52%, n = 35) and mucinous (i.e. 23%, n = 16 infiltrative and 12% n = 8 expansile) tumors are prevalent. High-grade (HG) tumors are rare (7%, n = 5). Early stage diseases (53%, n = 36 FIGO I/II) are predominant. Response to platinum based chemotherapy is observed to be inferior in young patients as compared to matched older patients (ORR, 29 vs 84% p = 0.0002). For HG tumors the PFS is of 0% at 5 and 10 years in younger as compared to 30% in older patients. No difference in PFS (median 4.9 vs 9.8 ms, p = 0.58) and OS (not reached vs 15.3 ms, p = 0.47) is found overall among younger and older patients respectively. The median follow-up was 72 months (range, 11-288 months). No genetic abnormalities were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Young EOC patients are most often diagnosed at an early FIGO stage with LG serous or mucinous histology. Tumors are significantly more resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy in younger patients.

Texture Analysis of Three-Dimensional MRI Images May Differentiate Borderline and Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors

Objective

To explore the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based whole tumor texture analysis in differentiating borderline epithelial ovarian tumors (BEOTs) from FIGO stage I/II malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (MEOTs).

Materials and Methods

A total of 88 patients with histopathologically confirmed ovarian epithelial tumors after surgical resection, including 30 BEOT and 58 MEOT patients, were divided into a training group (n = 62) and a test group (n = 26). The clinical and conventional MRI features were retrospectively reviewed. The texture features of tumors, based on T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, were extracted using MaZda software and the three top weighted texture features were selected by using the Random Forest algorithm. A non-texture logistic regression model in the training group was built to include those clinical and conventional MRI variables with p value < 0.10. Subsequently, a combined model integrating non-texture information and texture features was built for the training group. The model, evaluated using patients in the training group, was then applied to patients in the test group. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic performance of the models.

Results

The combined model showed superior performance in categorizing BEOTs and MEOTs (sensitivity, 92.5%; specificity, 86.4%; accuracy, 90.3%; area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.962) than the non-texture model (sensitivity, 78.3%; specificity, 84.6%; accuracy, 82.3%; AUC, 0.818). The AUCs were statistically different (p value = 0.038). In the test group, the AUCs, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.840, 73.3%, 90.1%, and 80.8% when the non-texture model was used and 0.896, 75.0%, 94.0%, and 88.5% when the combined model was used.

Conclusion

MRI-based texture features combined with clinical and conventional MRI features may assist in differentitating between BEOT and FIGO stage I/II MEOT patients.

Evaluation of Ovarian Tumors with Multidetector Computed Tomography and Tumor Markers: Differentiation of Stage I Serous Borderline Tumors and Stage I Serous Malignant Tumors Presenting as Solid-Cystic Mass

Background

The aim of this study was to determine multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) features and tumor markers for differentiating stage I serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) from stage I serous malignant ovarian tumors (SMOTs).

Material/Methods

In total, 48 patients with stage I SBOTs and 54 patients with stage I SMOTs who underwent MDCT and tumor markers analysis were analyzed. MDCT features included location, shape, margins, texture, papillary projections, vascular abnormalities, size, and attenuation value. Tumor markers included serum cancer antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4). Parameters of clinical characteristic, MDCT features, and tumor markers were compared using a chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U tests. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to detect predictors for SMOTs. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the potential diagnostic value of the quantitative parameters. Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility for MDCT features.

Results

Median ages between patients with SBOTs and SMOTs were significantly different. Compared with SBOTs, vascular abnormalities were significantly more common in SMOTs. CA125, HE4, the maximum thickness of the wall, the maximum thickness of the septa, and the maximum diameter of the solid portions were significantly higher in patients with SMOTs. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that age, vascular abnormalities, and the maximum diameter of the solid portion were independent factors of SMOTs. ROC analysis was used to assess the potential diagnostic value for predicting SMOTs. Moderate or good interobserver reproducibility for MDCT features were identified.

Conclusions

Age, vascular abnormalities, and the maximum diameter of the solid portion were independent factors for differentiating SBOTs from SMOTs. The combined analysis of age, vascular abnormalities, and the maximum diameter of the solid portion may allow better differentiation between SBOTs and SMOTs.

Role of ultrasound in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: a review of the literature

Nowadays, no standard approaches for follow up in ovarian cancer (OC) patients exist. While the role of ultrasound (US) is well defined in primary diagnosis of OC, it is still controversial during follow-up of surgically treated OC. The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the role described in literature of US imaging in the early detection of OC recurrences. A review of the English literature present in PubMed and SCOPUS of the past 30 years regarding the use of US in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) has been performed. The following keywords were searched: "ultrasound and recurrent ovarian cancer" and "intraoperative ultrasound and recurrent ovarian cancer". A total of 15 articles were selected. US was mainly adopted in the detection of recurrent pelvic disease after debulking surgery, after fertility sparing surgery (FSS) and as an intraoperative tool for localization of OC recurrences. If introduced as a standard follow-up procedure, US may have a central role in the early detection of pelvic OC recurrence, in ovarian localization of relapses of borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) and early stages disease treated with FSS; it may also play an important role in the intraoperative localization of previously suspected secondary lesions.