1
|
Bai Y, Chen H, Gu L, Shi B, Wang Z, Duanmu Y, Hu Y, Wang Y, Zhang C, Su Z. Identification of metabolites associated with capecitabine‑induced hand‑foot syndrome using untargeted metabolomics in patients with cancer. Mol Med Rep 2025; 32:203. [PMID: 40377002 PMCID: PMC12117538 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2025.13568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2025] [Indexed: 05/18/2025] Open
Abstract
Hand‑foot syndrome (HFS) is defined as a major adverse reaction to capecitabine; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In total, 85 patients who were taking oral capecitabine were included in the present study and these patients were divided into HFS‑positive and HFS‑negative groups. Serum samples were collected from patients and an untargeted metabolomics analysis was conducted using ultra‑high performance liquid chromatography‑mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of metabolites in the serum of patients that developed HFS in response to capecitabine treatment. A total of 193 differential metabolites were identified, with 134 upregulated and 59 downregulated. Bioinformatics analysis revealed four novel metabolites that may be associated with HFS. Subsequent in vitro experiments were conducted to explore the damaging effects of capecitabine and its associated metabolites on human adult keratinocyte cell line, TPA‑treated (HaCaT) cells. Results of the present study revealed that aciclovir and lamivudine affected cellular damage at the highest level. In conclusion, the present study aimed to systematically and comprehensively describe the metabolites present in patients with capecitabine‑induced HFS and may further the current understanding of the capecitabine pathways that play a key role in HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuru Bai
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Hong Chen
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Leying Gu
- Department of Basic Medicine, College of Health and Nursing, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214063, P.R. China
| | - Bo Shi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Yuanyuan Duanmu
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Ying Hu
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Chaoyi Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| | - Zhaotian Su
- Department of Oncology, Nanjing Jiangning Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211100, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hosokawa I, Higuchi R, Homma Y, Takayashiki T, Ome Y, Matsuyama R, Takano S, Uemura S, Yabushita Y, Honda G, Endo I, Ohtsuka M. A Multicenter Retrospective Study on Adjuvant S-1 Chemotherapy Versus Observation Following Major Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2025; 32:1784-1794. [PMID: 39623190 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16546-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is poor even after curative resection, highlighting the need for effective adjuvant chemotherapy. The efficacy of adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy following major hepatectomy for PHC is unclear, and thus the aim of this study was to elucidate this. METHODS Consecutive patients with PHC who underwent major hepatectomy (hemihepatectomy or trisectionectomy extending to segment 1 with extrahepatic bile duct resection) at three high-volume centers in Japan from 2007 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with Clavien-Dindo grade V complications, pStage 0, I, or IVB disease, and those who underwent adjuvant radiation therapy were excluded from analysis. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients who underwent adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy with those who underwent observation. RESULTS Overall, 373/480 patients were eligible, of whom 81 underwent adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy and 146 underwent observation. In the global cohort, DSS was similar in the S-1 and observation groups (p = 0.18), while in the matched cohort (S-1, n = 44; observation, n = 44), DSS was similar between the S-1 and observation groups (p = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD), CA19-9 levels of ≥ 300 U/mL at operation, and lymph node (LN) metastasis were independent predictors of poor survival following major hepatectomy for PHC. In subgroup analysis of patients with LN metastasis, DSS was better in the S-1 group than in the observation group (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy following major hepatectomy might be effective in PHC patients with LN metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isamu Hosokawa
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryota Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Takayashiki
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ome
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigetsugu Takano
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Uemura
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Yabushita
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garcia JJ, Beers A, Reid P, Miragliotta S, Ward S, Williams SA, Barnard M, Bourque M, Trepanier C, Griffin A. Economic Model of Uridine Triacetate Versus Supportive Care for the Treatment of Patients with Life-Threatening Early-Onset Severe Toxicity. Clin Drug Investig 2025; 45:111-123. [PMID: 39985748 PMCID: PMC11876218 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-025-01426-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early-onset severe toxicity following the administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine occurs in approximately 10-30% of patients receiving fluoropyrimidine therapy in the USA and is fatal to at least 0.5% of patients treated. Supportive care measures used to manage symptoms of toxicity are associated with extended hospital length of stay, high cost of care, and poor survival. Uridine triacetate is indicated as an emergency treatment for patients who exhibit early-onset, severe or life-threatening toxicity, and has been shown to significantly improve clinical outcomes. Despite its life-saving capability to reverse early-onset severe toxicity, uridine triacetate may be underutilized. PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the economic impact of uridine triacetate as a rescue therapy for adult patients from the US hospital payer perspective for early-onset severe toxicity, who are expected to die without treatment. METHODS A decision tree model was developed to compare inpatient survival, hospital length of stay, and inpatient healthcare resource utilization for patients treated with and without uridine triacetate. Costs associated with hospitalization, including supportive care measures and monitoring were evaluated, considering medications and procedures commonly used to manage various severe toxicities experienced (e.g., gastrointestinal, hematological, etc.). The model compared the hypothetical current practice, in which approximately half of patients expected to die from early-onset severe toxicity receive uridine triacetate in addition to supportive care, with the proposed future practice in which all eligible patients receive uridine triacetate during their hospital stay. Hypothetical practical scenarios for US institutions were also considered. RESULTS For each adult patient hospitalized for early-onset severe or life-threatening toxicity who would be expected to die without treatment, adoption of uridine triacetate as a rescue treatment was associated with clinical benefits, including increased inpatient survival (48.5%) and a 7.3-day reduction in total hospital length of stay per patient. Treatment of each additional patient with uridine triacetate was associated with an incremental cost of US$25,247 per patient. Seventy percent of the drug cost was offset by reduction in inpatient healthcare resources utilization. This cost offset is likely underestimated as it does not include additional savings from potential reimbursements associated with changes in hospital length of stay, readmissions and discounting. Hypothetical scenarios demonstrated that model outputs were most sensitive to changes in length of stay and hospitalization costs. CONCLUSION Optimal treatment with uridine triacetate for all hospitalized patients in the USA expected to die from early-onset severe toxicity has the potential to improve inpatient survival at a minimal inpatient budget increase. The majority of the drug cost is offset by a reduction in the length of hospital stay and associated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge J Garcia
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Paige Reid
- BTG International Inc, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
| | | | - Suzanne Ward
- BTG International Inc, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
| | | | | | - Megan Bourque
- Value and Evidence, EVERSANA, Burlington, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baby B, Sam N, M P N, Anjaneyan G, M P R. Therapy-related hand-foot syndrome: a review. J Chemother 2024:1-12. [PMID: 39651796 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2024.2437336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 11/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024]
Abstract
Anti-tumor drugs cause hand-foot syndrome through a variety of pathogenic mechanisms. Some chemotherapeutic medications that can cause HFS include 5FU, doxorubicin, capecitabine, high dose cytarabine, and others. These medications each have a unique mechanism resulting in HFS. The histopathological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and variations in gender, ethnicity, or genetic makeup might also impact the development of HFS as an adverse drug reaction. Even though the disease might not become life-threatening, it is nevertheless vital to manage it with therapeutic interventions or by withholding the medication in order to enhance the patient's outcome. Current developments in pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic approaches for managing symptoms also emphasis the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilha Baby
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Nevin Sam
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Narmadha M P
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Gopikrishnan Anjaneyan
- Department of Dermatology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| | - Rakesh M P
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baltussen JC, van den Bos F, Slingerland M, Binda TRR, Liefers GJ, van den Hout WB, Fiocco M, Verschoor AJ, Cloos-van Balen M, Holterhues C, Houtsma D, Jochems A, Spierings LEAMM, van Bodegom-Vos L, Mooijaart SP, Gelderblom H, Speetjens FM, de Glas NA, Portielje JEA. DOSAGE study: protocol for a phase III non-inferiority randomised trial investigating dose-reduced chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer in older patients. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e089882. [PMID: 39142680 PMCID: PMC11331880 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treating older adults with chemotherapy remains a challenge, given their under-representation in clinical trials and the lack of robust treatment guidelines for this population. Moreover, older patients, especially those with frailty, have an increased risk of developing chemotherapy-related toxicity, resulting in a decreased quality of life (QoL), increased hospitalisations and high healthcare costs. Phase II trials have suggested that upfront dose reduction of chemotherapy can reduce toxicity rates while maintaining efficacy, leading to fewer treatment discontinuations and an improved QoL. The DOSAGE aims to show that upfront dose-reduced chemotherapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is non-inferior to full-dose treatment in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), with adaption of the treatment plan (monotherapy or doublet chemotherapy) based on expected risk of treatment toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The DOSAGE study is an investigator-initiated phase III, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in patients aged≥70 years with metastatic colorectal cancer eligible for palliative chemotherapy. Based on toxicity risk, assessed using the Geriatric 8 (G8) tool, patients will be stratified to either doublet chemotherapy (fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin) or fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Patients classified as low risk will be randomised between a fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction of 25%. Patients classified as high risk will be randomised between fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in either full-dose or with an upfront dose reduction. In the dose-reduced arm, dose escalation after two cycles is allowed. The primary outcome is PFS. Secondary endpoints include grade≥3 toxicity, QoL, physical functioning, number of treatment cycles, dose reductions, hospital admissions, overall survival, cumulative received dosage and cost-effectiveness. Considering a median PFS of 8 months and non-inferiority margin of 8 weeks, we shall include 587 patients. The study will be enrolled in 36 Dutch Hospitals, with enrolment scheduled to start in July 2024. This study will provide new evidence regarding the effect of dose-reduced chemotherapy on survival and treatment outcomes, as well as the use of the G8 to choose between doublet chemotherapy or monotherapy. Results will contribute to a more individualised approach in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, potentially leading to improved QoL while maintaining survival benefits. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This trial has received ethical approval by the ethical committee Leiden Den Haag Delft (P24.018) and will be approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of the participating institutions. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06275958.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joosje C Baltussen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Trishika R R Binda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit-Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Medical Decision Making, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Fiocco
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan J Verschoor
- Department of Medical Oncology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa Cloos-van Balen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Groene Hart Ziekenhuis, Gouda, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Cynthia Holterhues
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Danny Houtsma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk Jochems
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Centrum Haaglanden Westeinde, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section of Medical Decision Making, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhan Y, Cheng X, Mei P, Tan S, Feng W, Jiang H. Safety of first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:893. [PMID: 39048944 PMCID: PMC11270896 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12662-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer through network meta-analysis. METHODS The literature from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was searched from the inception of the databases to August 15, 2023, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to screen studies. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool (RoB 2.0) was used to evaluate the quality of the included literature. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 15.0 and R4.3.1 software to compare the incidence of adverse events (AEs) among different treatment regimens. RESULTS A total of 53 randomized controlled trials, involving 17,351 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), were ultimately included, encompassing 29 different therapeutic approaches. According to SUCRA rankings, the CAPOX regimen is most likely to rank first in terms of safety, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen is most likely to rank last. In terms of specific AEs, the CAPOX regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs (bevacizumab and cetuximab), is associated with a reduced risk of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia, as well as an increased risk of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea. The FOLFOX regimen, with or without bevacizumab, is linked to an increased risk of neutropenia and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The FOLFIRI/CAPIRI + bevacizumab regimen is associated with a reduced risk of peripheral sensory neuropathy. S-1 and S-1 + oxaliplatin are well-tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal reactions. The FOLFOXIRI regimen, whether used alone or in combination with targeted drugs, is associated with various AEs. CONCLUSION In summary, the CAPOX regimen may be the safest option among the first-line systemic treatment regimens for mCRC patients, while the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab regimen may be associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanrong Zhan
- Rudong People's Hospital / Affiliated Rudong Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226400, China.
| | - Xianwen Cheng
- Ankang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ankang, Shaanxi, 725000, China
| | - Pingping Mei
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 201203, China
| | - Shufa Tan
- Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| | - Wenzhe Feng
- Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China.
| | - Hua Jiang
- Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, 712000, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ziemons J, Hillege LE, Aarnoutse R, de Vos-Geelen J, Valkenburg-van Iersel L, Mastenbroek J, van Geel R, Barnett DJM, Rensen SS, van Helvoort A, Dopheide LHJ, Roeselers G, Penders J, Smidt ML, Venema K. Prebiotic fibre mixtures counteract the manifestation of gut microbial dysbiosis induced by the chemotherapeutic 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in a validated in vitro model of the colon. BMC Microbiol 2024; 24:222. [PMID: 38918717 PMCID: PMC11200995 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-024-03384-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is used as an antineoplastic agent in distinct cancer types. Increasing evidence suggests that the gut microbiota might modulate 5-FU efficacy and toxicity, potentially affecting the patient's prognosis. The current experimental study investigated 5-FU-induced microbiota alterations, as well as the potential of prebiotic fibre mixtures (M1-M4) to counteract these shifts. METHODS A pooled microbial consortium was derived from ten healthy donors, inoculated in an in vitro model of the colon, and treated with 5-FU, with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures for 72 h. Four different prebiotic fibre mixtures were tested: M1 containing short-chain galacto-oligosaccharides (sc GOS), long-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (lcFOS), and low viscosity pectin (lvPect), M2 consisting of arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, and resistant starch, M3 which was a mixture of scGOS and lcFOS, and M4 containing arabinoxylan, beta-glucan, pectin, resistant starch, and inulin. RESULTS We identified 5-FU-induced changes in gut microbiota composition, but not in microbial diversity. Administration of prebiotic fibre mixtures during 5-FU influenced gut microbiota composition and taxa abundance. Amongst others, prebiotic fibre mixtures successfully stimulated potentially beneficial bacteria (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Anaerostipes, Weissella, Olsenella, Senegalimassilia) and suppressed the growth of potentially pathogenic bacteria (Klebsiella, Enterobacter) in the presence of 5-FU. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetate increased slightly during 5-FU, but even more during 5-FU with prebiotic fibre mixtures, while propionate was lower due to 5-FU with or without prebiotic fibre mixtures, compared to control. The SCFA butyrate and valerate did not show differences among all conditions. The branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA) iso-butyrate and iso-valerate were higher in 5-FU, but lower in 5-FU + prebiotics, compared to control. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that prebiotic fibre mixtures represent a promising strategy to modulate 5-FU-induced microbial dysbiosis towards a more favourable microbiota, thereby possibly improving 5-FU efficacy and reducing toxicity, which should be evaluated further in clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Ziemons
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Lars E Hillege
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Romy Aarnoutse
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Liselot Valkenburg-van Iersel
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Mastenbroek
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robin van Geel
- CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - David J M Barnett
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander S Rensen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM - School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ardy van Helvoort
- NUTRIM - School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - John Penders
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases, and Infection Prevention, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- NUTRIM - School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Euregional Microbiome Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Venema
- Euregional Microbiome Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Centre for Healthy Eating & Food Innovation, Maastricht University - Campus Venlo, Venlo, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Santhosh A, Sharma A, Bakhshi S, Kumar A, Sharma V, Malik PS, Pramanik R, Gogia A, Prasad CP, Sehgal T, Gund S, Dev A, Cheung WY, Pandey RM, Kumar S, Gupta I, Batra A. Topical Diclofenac for Prevention of Capecitabine-Associated Hand-Foot Syndrome: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1821-1829. [PMID: 38412399 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a dose-limiting side effect of capecitabine. Celecoxib prevents HFS by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) that is upregulated because of the underlying associated inflammation. However, systemic side effects of celecoxib have limited routine prescription. Topical diclofenac inhibits COX-2 locally with minimal risk of systemic adverse events. Therefore, we conducted this study to assess the efficacy of topical diclofenac in the prevention of capecitabine-induced HFS. METHODS In this single-site phase III randomized double-blind trial, we enrolled patients with breast or GI cancer who were planned to receive capecitabine-based treatment. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive topical diclofenac or placebo gel for 12 weeks or until the development of HFS, whichever occurred earlier. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HFS (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5), which was compared between the two groups using simple logistic regression. RESULTS In total, 264 patients were randomly assigned to receive topical diclofenac gel (n = 131) or placebo (n = 133). Grade 2 or 3 HFS was observed in 3.8% of participants in the diclofenac group compared with 15.0% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11.2%; 95% CI, 4.3 to 18.1; P = .003). Grade 1-3 HFS was lower in the diclofenac group than in the placebo group (6.1% v 18.1%; absolute risk difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 4.1 to 19.6). Capecitabine dose reductions because of HFS were less frequent in the diclofenac group (3.8%) than in the placebo group (13.5%; absolute risk difference, 9.7%; 95% CI, 3.0 to 16.4). CONCLUSION Topical diclofenac prevented HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. This trial supports the use of topical diclofenac to prevent capecitabine-associated HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhil Santhosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Atul Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Akash Kumar
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute Jhajjar, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | - Vinod Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute Jhajjar, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Raja Pramanik
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Ajay Gogia
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | | | - Tushar Sehgal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Sneha Gund
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Arundhathi Dev
- Department of Medical Oncology (LAB), BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - R M Pandey
- Department of Biostatistics, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| | - Saran Kumar
- Kusuma School of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Ishaan Gupta
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Atul Batra
- Department of Medical Oncology, BRAIRCH, AIIMS, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kinos S, Hagman H, Halonen P, Soveri LM, O'Reilly M, Pfeiffer P, Frödin JE, Sorbye H, Heervä E, Liposits G, Kallio R, Ålgars A, Ristamäki R, Salminen T, Bärlund M, Shah CH, McDermott R, Röckert R, Flygare P, Kwakman J, Teske A, Punt C, Glimelius B, Österlund P. Detailed analysis of metastatic colorectal cancer patients who developed cardiotoxicity on another fluoropyrimidine and switched to S-1 treatment (subgroup analysis of the CardioSwitch-study). Acta Oncol 2024; 63:248-258. [PMID: 38698698 PMCID: PMC11332541 DOI: 10.2340/1651-226x.2024.24023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The CardioSwitch-study demonstrated that patients with solid tumors who develop cardiotoxicity on capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment can be safely switched to S-1, an alternative fluoropyrimidine (FP). In light of the European Medicines Agency approval of S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), this analysis provides more detailed safety and efficacy information, and data regarding metastasectomy and/or local ablative therapy (LAT), on the mCRC patients from the original study. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 European centers. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch. For this analysis, safety data are reported for 78 mCRC patients from the CardioSwitch cohort (N = 200). Detailed efficacy and outcomes data were available for 66 mCRC patients. RESULTS Data for the safety of S-1 in mCRC patients were similar to the original CardioSwitch cohort and that expected for FP-based treatment, with no new concerns. Recurrent cardiotoxicity (all grade 1) with S-1-based treatment occurred in 4/78 (5%) mCRC patients; all were able to complete FP treatment. Median progression-free survival from initiation of S-1-based treatment was 9.0 months and median overall survival 26.7 months. Metastasectomy and/or LAT was performed in 33/66 (50%) patients, and S-1 was successfully used in recommended neoadjuvant/conversion or adjuvant-like combination regimens and schedules as for standard FPs. INTERPRETATION S-1 is a safe and effective FP alternative when mCRC patients are forced to discontinue 5-FU or capecitabine due to cardiotoxicity and can be safely used in the standard recommended regimens, settings, and schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sampsa Kinos
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Helga Hagman
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Päivi Halonen
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Leena-Maija Soveri
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mary O'Reilly
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jan-Erik Frödin
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eetu Heervä
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology, Oulu University and University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Annika Ålgars
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Raija Ristamäki
- Department of Oncology, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tapio Salminen
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maarit Bärlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Carl-Henrik Shah
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ray McDermott
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Petra Flygare
- Department of Oncology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Sweden
| | - Johannes Kwakman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arco Teske
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Punt
- Depatment of Epidemiology, Jules Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherland
| | | | - Pia Österlund
- Department of Oncology, Tays Cancer Center, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; rTema Cancer, Department of GI-cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Nassau SCMW, Bol GM, van der Baan FH, Roodhart JML, Vink GR, Punt CJA, May AM, Koopman M, Derksen JWG. Harnessing the Potential of Real-World Evidence in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Where Do We Stand? Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:405-426. [PMID: 38367182 PMCID: PMC10997699 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01186-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) are primarily based on the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the gold standard methodology to evaluate safety and efficacy of oncological treatments. However, generalizability of trial results is often limited due to stringent eligibility criteria, underrepresentation of specific populations, and more heterogeneity in clinical practice. This may result in an efficacy-effectiveness gap and uncertainty regarding meaningful benefit versus treatment harm. Meanwhile, conduct of traditional RCTs has become increasingly challenging due to identification of a growing number of (small) molecular subtypes. These challenges-combined with the digitalization of health records-have led to growing interest in use of real-world data (RWD) to complement evidence from RCTs. RWD is used to evaluate epidemiological trends, quality of care, treatment effectiveness, long-term (rare) safety, and quality of life (QoL) measures. In addition, RWD is increasingly considered in decision-making by clinicians, regulators, and payers. In this narrative review, we elaborate on these applications in CRC, and provide illustrative examples. As long as the quality of RWD is safeguarded, ongoing developments, such as common data models, federated learning, and predictive modelling, will further unfold its potential. First, whenever possible, we recommend conducting pragmatic trials, such as registry-based RCTs, to optimize generalizability and answer clinical questions that are not addressed in registrational trials. Second, we argue that marketing approval should be conditional for patients who would have been ineligible for the registrational trial, awaiting planned (non) randomized evaluation of outcomes in the real world. Third, high-quality effectiveness results should be incorporated in treatment guidelines to aid in patient counseling. We believe that a coordinated effort from all stakeholders is essential to improve the quality of RWD, create a learning healthcare system with optimal use of trials and real-world evidence (RWE), and ultimately ensure personalized care for every CRC patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sietske C M W van Nassau
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
| | - Guus M Bol
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke H van der Baan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanine M L Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Geraldine R Vink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, PO Box 85500, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen W G Derksen
- Department of Epidemiology & Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smabers LP, Wensink E, Verissimo CS, Koedoot E, Pitsa KC, Huismans MA, Higuera Barón C, Doorn M, Valkenburg-van Iersel LB, Cirkel GA, Brousali A, Overmeer R, Koopman M, Braat MN, Penning de Vries B, Elias SG, Vries RG, Kranenburg O, Boj SF, Roodhart JM. Organoids as a biomarker for personalized treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: drug screen optimization and correlation with patient response. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024; 43:61. [PMID: 38414064 PMCID: PMC10898042 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-024-02980-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The inability to predict treatment response of colorectal cancer patients results in unnecessary toxicity, decreased efficacy and survival. Response testing on patient-derived organoids (PDOs) is a promising biomarker for treatment efficacy. The aim of this study is to optimize PDO drug screening methods for correlation with patient response and explore the potential to predict responses to standard chemotherapies. METHODS We optimized drug screen methods on 5-11 PDOs per condition of the complete set of 23 PDOs from patients treated for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PDOs were exposed to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. We compared medium with and without N-acetylcysteine (NAC), different readouts and different combination treatment set-ups to capture the strongest association with patient response. We expanded the screens using the optimized methods for all PDOs. Organoid sensitivity was correlated to the patient's response, determined by % change in the size of target lesions. We assessed organoid sensitivity in relation to prior exposure to chemotherapy, mutational status and sidedness. RESULTS Drug screen optimization involved excluding N-acetylcysteine from the medium and biphasic curve fitting for 5-FU & oxaliplatin combination screens. CellTiter-Glo measurements were comparable with CyQUANT and did not affect the correlation with patient response. Furthermore, the correlation improved with application of growth rate metrics, when 5-FU & oxaliplatin was screened in a ratio, and 5-FU & SN-38 using a fixed dose of SN-38. Area under the curve was the most robust drug response curve metric. After optimization, organoid and patient response showed a correlation coefficient of 0.58 for 5-FU (n = 6, 95% CI -0.44,0.95), 0.61 for irinotecan- (n = 10, 95% CI -0.03,0.90) and 0.60 for oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 11, 95% CI -0.01,0.88). Median progression-free survival of patients with resistant PDOs to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was significantly shorter than sensitive PDOs (3.3 vs 10.9 months, p = 0.007). Increased resistance to 5-FU in patients with prior exposure to 5-FU/capecitabine was adequately reflected in PDOs (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Our study emphasizes the critical impact of the screening methods for determining correlation between PDO drug screens and mCRC patient outcomes. Our 5-step optimization strategy provides a basis for future research on the clinical utility of PDO screens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidwien P Smabers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emerens Wensink
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maarten A Huismans
- Molecular Cancer Research, Center for Molecular Medicine, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Geert A Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Anneta Brousali
- Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology (UPORT), UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon N Braat
- Department of Radiology, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Penning de Vries
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Onno Kranenburg
- Utrecht Platform for Organoid Technology (UPORT), UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Division of Imaging and Cancer, UMCU, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeanine M Roodhart
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chantharakhit C, Sujaritvanichpong N. Predictive factors for the development of capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: a retrospective observational cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:73-77. [PMID: 38222767 PMCID: PMC10783358 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000001487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common condition that significantly affects patients' quality of life. The exact underlying mechanisms are currently not clearly understood. Therefore, the study of predictive factors for HFS is of critical importance. Materials and methods This prognostic factor research used a retrospective observational cohort as the study design. Data collected from the medical records of 205 patients treated with capecitabine between January 2019 and June 2022 were subjected to univariable and multivariable regression analysis to determine the predictive factors for the development of grade 2 and grade 3 HFS. Results The incidence of grade 2 and grade 3 HFS was 26.8%. The independent predictive factors, such as age over 60 years (OR 4.80, 95% CI: 2.16-10.68, P<0.001), capecitabine dose greater than 3000 mg/day (OR 2.47, 95% CI: 1.09-5.59, P=0.030), and the number of cycles five or more in the total capecitabine regimen (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.29-6.71, P=0.01), were significantly associated with the development of grade 2 and grade 3 HFS. Conclusions Independent predictive factors for the development of grade 2 and grade 3 HFS in patients treated with capecitabine include age over 60, capecitabine dose greater than 3000 mg/day, and patients who plan to undergo five or more cycles in the total capecitabine regimen. This knowledge can be valuable for guiding clinical monitoring and follow-up of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaichana Chantharakhit
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Buddhasothorn Hospital, Chachoengsao, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Parikh PM, Sahoo TP, Biswas G, Talwar V, SP S, Panda SS, CB A, Shetty N, Ramesh A, Ghosh J, Shetty VV, Naik R, Singh A, Gupta G, Parekh B. Practical Consensus Guidelines for the Use of S-1 in GI Malignancies. South Asian J Cancer 2024; 13:77-82. [PMID: 38721104 PMCID: PMC11076077 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025] Open
Abstract
Purvish M ParikhS-1 (5-fluorouracil prodrug [tegafur] in combination with 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine [CDHP] and potassium oxonate [OXO]) was first approved in 1999. In order to make it easy for community oncologists, we decided to put together this expert consensus guideline for its use in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. A total of 15 subject matter experts used modified Delphi method to discuss, analyze, and vote on key aspects regarding practical approach to use of S-1 in GI cancers, a process involving 6 months of work. The consensus guidelines specify how S-1 use can be optimized in patients with colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic tumors. The voting for the 17 key points resulted in a majority consensus for all the statements (approval ranging from 13/15 [87%] to 15/15 [100%]). S-1 is a combination of three drugs (tegafur, CDHP, and OXO) specifically designed to reduce toxicity and enhance efficacy; clinical data and meta-analysis confirm both factors; and it is recommended as standard of care for GI cancers. S-1 is approved and one of the standards of care for all lines of therapy in colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancers. S-1 with oxaliplatin is the standard of care for gastric cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Purvish M Parikh
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Mahatma Gandhi University of Medical Sciences & Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Tarini P. Sahoo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Silverline Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Ghanashyam Biswas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sparsh Hospitals & Critical Care Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Vineet Talwar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, Delhi, India
| | - Somashekhar SP
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Soumya Surath Panda
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Avinash CB
- Department of Medical Oncology, ClearMedi Radiant Hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
| | - Nishita Shetty
- Department of Medical Oncology, Father Muller Medical College Hospital, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Anita Ramesh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Joydeep Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Vijith Vital Shetty
- Department of Medical Oncology, K S Hegde Medical Academy, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Radheshyam Naik
- Department of Medical Oncology, HCG Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Karnataka, India
| | - Gaurav Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Optimus Oncology Center, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Bhavesh Parekh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Marengo CIMS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujrat, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Siak PY, Heng WS, Teoh SSH, Lwin YY, Cheah SC. Precision medicine in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comprehensive review of past, present, and future prospect. J Transl Med 2023; 21:786. [PMID: 37932756 PMCID: PMC10629096 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04673-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is an aggressive malignancy with high propensity for lymphatic spread and distant metastasis. It is prominent as an endemic malignancy in Southern China and Southeast Asia regions. Studies on NPC pathogenesis mechanism in the past decades such as through Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection and oncogenic molecular aberrations have explored several potential targets for therapy and diagnosis. The EBV infection introduces oncoviral proteins that consequently hyperactivate many promitotic pathways and block cell-death inducers. EBV infection is so prevalent in NPC patients such that EBV serological tests were used to diagnose and screen NPC patients. On the other hand, as the downstream effectors of oncogenic mechanisms, the promitotic pathways can potentially be exploited therapeutically. With the apparent heterogeneity and distinct molecular aberrations of NPC tumor, the focus has turned into a more personalized treatment in NPC. Herein in this comprehensive review, we depict the current status of screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in NPC. Subsequently, based on the limitations on those aspects, we look at their potential improvements in moving towards the path of precision medicine. The importance of recent advances on the key molecular aberration involved in pathogenesis of NPC for precision medicine progression has also been reported in the present review. Besides, the challenge and future outlook of NPC management will also be highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pui Yan Siak
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Win Sen Heng
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Sharon Siew Hoon Teoh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Yu Yu Lwin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Medicine, Mandalay, Myanmar
| | - Shiau-Chuen Cheah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, UCSI University, Bandar Springhill, 71010, Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang B, Xie X, Wu Z, Lv D, Hu J, Chen Y, Li J, Luo S, Li J, Luo J, Zhang S. DNA damage-mediated cellular senescence promotes hand-foot syndrome that can be relieved by thymidine prodrug. Genes Dis 2023; 10:2557-2571. [PMID: 37554214 PMCID: PMC10404883 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a widely recognized dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity effect of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy agents that impairs clinical benefits and treatment outcomes. Even though the cause and pathophysiology of HFS are relatively widely reported, how the toxicity of fluoropyrimidine translates into persistent inflammation has not been studied. Additionally, prevention and treatment strategies for HFS based on its mechanistic occurrence and development are scarce. In our study, we demonstrated that cGAS-STING signaling pathway-mediated cellular senescence played a critical role in the inflammatory reaction and provided a therapeutic solution for HFS. Mechanistically, DNA damage, as the primary cytotoxic cause, in keratinocytes induces cell cycle arrest, activates the cGAS-STING signaling pathway, and subsequently mediates cellular senescence, ultimately fueling a robust secondary inflammatory response that results in HFS. More importantly, the thymidine prodrug thymidine diacetate was proven to be effective in preventing HFS by compensating for thymidylate deficiency to facilitate the replication and repair of DNA and thus causing the escape from cellular senescence. These data highlight the importance of DNA damage-mediated cellular senescence in the etiology of HFS and provide a potential therapeutic anchor point for fluoropyrimidine-induced HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingxue Yang
- School of Pharmacy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Xinran Xie
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Zhaoyu Wu
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Dazhao Lv
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Jiajun Hu
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Yuyun Chen
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Jiaxing Li
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Shuyue Luo
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Jiacheng Li
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Jie Luo
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Shiyi Zhang
- School of Pharmacy and School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abudureheiyimu N, Wu Y, Li Q, Zhang P, Ma F, Yuan P, Luo Y, Fan Y, Chen S, Cai R, Li Q, Han Y, Xu H, Wang Y, Wang J, Xu B. Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER 2023; 3:115-120. [PMID: 39035725 PMCID: PMC11256714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jncc.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. Methods Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.11, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group. Conclusions The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilupai Abudureheiyimu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yun Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Pin Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Yuan
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Fan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shanshan Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ruigang Cai
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qiao Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hangcheng Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Punt C, Heinemann V, Maughan T, Cremolini C, Van Cutsem E, McDermott R, Bodoky G, André T, Osterlund P, Teske A, Pfeiffer P. Fluoropyrimidine-induced hand-foot syndrome and cardiotoxicity: recommendations for the use of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101199. [PMID: 37018874 PMCID: PMC10163153 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are an essential part of the majority of systemic regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The use of the oral FP S-1 has been approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, with or without bevacizumab, for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC in whom it is not possible to continue treatment with another FP due to hand-foot syndrome (HFS) or cardiovascular toxicity (CVT). Subsequently, this indication has been included in the 2022 ESMO guidelines for metastatic CRC. Recommendations for use in daily practice are not available. PATIENTS AND METHODS Based on peer-reviewed published data on the use of S-1 in Western patients with metastatic CRC who switched from infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine to S-1 for reasons of HFS or CVT, recommendations for its use were formulated by an international group of medical oncologists with expertise in the treatment of metastatic CRC and a cardio-oncologist. RESULTS In patients who experience pain and/or functional impairment due to HFS during treatment with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU, a switch to S-1 is recommended without prior dose reduction of capecitabine/5-FU. S-1 should preferably be initiated at full dose when HFS has decreased to grade ≤1. In patients with cardiac complaints, in whom an association with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU treatment cannot be excluded, capecitabine/5-FU should be discontinued and a switch to S-1 is recommended. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations should guide clinicians in daily practice in the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC with FP-containing regimens.
Collapse
|
18
|
Huang J, Ye S, Feng S, Zheng M, Zhong M. Prevalence of hand-foot syndrome following chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:61. [PMID: 36872385 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04345-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically evaluate the prevalence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy. METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched, from their inception to September 20, 2022, to identify studies on the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. Comprehensive retrieval of literature was performed using the literature tracing method. We calculated the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy based on meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS A total of 20 studies were included, involving 4773 cases. Meta-analysis of the random effects model showed that the total prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy was 49.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.332, 0.651). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the most frequent grades of HFS were grades 1 and 2, accounting for 40.1% (95% CI: 0.285, 0.523) of cases; this rate was markedly higher than that of grades 3 and 4 (5.8%; 95% CI: 0.020, 0.112). The meta-regression results illustrated that the type of research, country of the study population, type of drug, and year of publication were not sources of heterogeneity in this setting (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION The present findings showed that the prevalence of HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy was high. Healthcare professionals should provide knowledge to such patients regarding the prevention and management of HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjuan Huang
- Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Sihua Ye
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No 151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shaolan Feng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No 151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Minqi Zheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No 151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meihua Zhong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No 151, Yanjiang Rd, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de With M, van Doorn L, Maasland DC, Mulder TAM, Oomen-de Hoop E, Mostert B, Homs MYV, El Bouazzaoui S, Mathijssen RHJ, van Schaik RHN, Bins S. Capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome: A pharmacogenetic study beyond DPYD. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 159:114232. [PMID: 36630849 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Occurrence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS) during capecitabine treatment often results in treatment interruptions (26 %) or treatment discontinuation (17 %), and can severely decrease quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in capecitabine metabolism - other than DPYD - are associated with an increased risk for capecitabine-induced HFS. METHODS Patients treated with capecitabine according to standard of care were enrolled after providing written informed consent for genotyping purposes. Prospectively collected blood samples were used to extract genomic DNA, which was subsequently genotyped for SNPs in CES1, CES2 and CDA. SNPs and clinical baseline factors that were univariably associated with HFS with P ≤ 0.10, were tested in a multivariable model using logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 446 patients eligible for analysis, 146 (32.7 %) developed HFS, of whom 77 patients (17.3 %) experienced HFS ≥ grade 2. In the multivariable model, CES1 1165-33 C>A (rs2244613, minor allele frequency 19 %) and CDA 266 + 242 A>G (rs10916825, minor allele frequency 35 %) variant allele carriers were at higher risk of HFS ≥ grade 2 (OR 1.888; 95 %CI 1.075-3.315; P = 0.027 and OR 1.865; 95 %CI 1.087-3.200; P = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We showed that CES1 1165-33 C>A and CDA 266 + 242 A>G are significantly associated with HFS grade 2 and grade 3 in patients treated with capecitabine. Prospective studies should assess whether this increased risk can be mitigated in carriers of these SNPs, when pre-emptive genotyping is being followed by dose adjustment or by alternative treatment by a fluoropyrimidine that is not substrate to CES1, such as S1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam de With
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Dep. of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Leni van Doorn
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Demi C Maasland
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa A M Mulder
- Dep. of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Oomen-de Hoop
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bianca Mostert
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Y V Homs
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Samira El Bouazzaoui
- Dep. of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Dep. of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Bins
- Dep. of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chiang NJ, Chen LT. Adjuvant therapy in biliary tract cancers: oral fluoropyrimidine as a beginning. Lancet 2023; 401:170-171. [PMID: 36681404 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02323-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nai-Jung Chiang
- Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Tzong Chen
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan; Centre for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Derksen JWG, Smit KC, May AM, Punt CJA. Systematic review and non-inferiority meta-analysis of randomised phase II/III trials on S-1-based therapy versus 5-fluorouracil- or capecitabine-based therapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2022; 166:73-86. [PMID: 35279472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is increasingly used in Western countries for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a non-inferiority meta-analysis on the efficacy of S-1-based therapy versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- or capecitabine-based therapy in the treatment of patients with mCRC. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Opengrey were searched for randomised clinical trials until May 2021. Data were extracted for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events. Pooled effect estimates, stratified by treatment line, with corresponding 99% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. For PFS, a pre-defined non-inferiority margin (ΔNI) of 1.25 was selected. RESULTS Ten studies (n = 2117) were included, of which six studies reported PFS and OS data and 10 studies reported ORR data. S-1-based therapy was shown to be non-inferior to 5-FU/capecitabine-based therapy in terms of PFS (HRtotal 0.95, 99% CI 0.83-1.08) with its CI upper limit well below ΔNI, and at least as efficacious in terms of OS (HRtotal 0.93, 99% CI 0.81-1.07), and ORR (RRtotal 1.06, 99% CI 0.90-1.24). CONCLUSIONS S-1-based therapy is non-inferior to 5-FU/capecitabine-based therapy in the treatment of mCRC regarding PFS and at least as efficacious as 5-FU/capecitabine-based therapy in terms of ORR and OS. These data support the use of S-1 in mCRC patients who are intolerant to 5-FU/capecitabine-based treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen W G Derksen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Karel C Smit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
First-line trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: final survival analysis in the TASCO1 study. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1548-1554. [PMID: 35440667 PMCID: PMC9130487 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01737-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Therapeutic options are limited in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The use of trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab (TT-B) in this setting was evaluated in the TASCO1 trial; here, we present the final overall survival (OS) results. Methods TASCO1 was an open-label, non-comparative phase II trial. Patients (n = 153) were randomised 1:1 to TT-B (trifluridine/tipiracil 35 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12, and bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle) or capecitabine plus bevacizumab (C-B; capecitabine, 1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1–14 and bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle). Final OS was analysed when all patients had either died or withdrawn from the study. Adjusted multivariate regression was used to investigate the effects of pre-specified variables on OS. Results At 1 September 2020, median OS was 22.3 months (95% CI: 18.0–23.7) with TT-B and 17.7 months (95% CI: 12.6–19.8) with C-B (adjusted HR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.55–1.10). No variables negatively affected OS with TT-B. Safety results were consistent with prior findings. Conclusions TT-B is a promising therapeutic regimen in mCRC patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Clinical trial information NCT02743221 (clinicaltrials.gov)
Collapse
|
23
|
Punt CJ, Kwakman JJ, Mol L, on-behalf-of-the-PLCRC-working-group, Roodhart J, Hendriks M, Speetjens F, van Iersel L, Trajkovic-Vidakovic M, Spierings L, Helgason H, Creemers GJ, de Groot JW, van Dodewaard-de Jong J, Los M, Koornstra R, Baars A, Koopman M, Vink G. Long-term safety data on S-1 administered after previous intolerance to capecitabine-containing systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:229-235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
24
|
Osterlund P, Kinos S, Pfeiffer P, Salminen T, Kwakman J, Frödin JE, Shah C, Sorbye H, Ristamäki R, Halonen P, Soveri L, Heervä E, Ålgars A, Bärlund M, Hagman H, McDermott R, O’Reilly M, Röckert R, Liposits G, Kallio R, Flygare P, Teske A, van Werkhoven E, Punt C, Glimelius B. Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100427. [PMID: 35798468 PMCID: PMC9291631 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Zou Y, Liu S, Wu J, Sun Z. Severe ileum bleeding following adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer: a case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:332. [PMID: 34809643 PMCID: PMC8609886 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02443-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Capecitabine is a prodrug that is enzymatically converted to its active form, fluorouracil (also called 5-fluorouracil), which is commonly used as adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients. Severe gastrointestinal bleeding induced by capecitabine is rare. Here, we are presenting the first case report of surgery specimen assisted diagnosis of this uncommon condition. CASE PRESENTATION A 63-year-old Chinese male with a history of colon adenocarcinoma and right hemicolectomy presented with severe lower gastrointestinal bleeding 2 days after finishing capecitabine administration during the first cycle of XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy. Because of the negative findings of active bleeding points by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or colonoscopy, emergency laparotomy and partial enterectomy were performed. The bloody diarrhea had resolved after surgery and a terminal ileitis was diagnosed after pathological examination of the surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS Terminal ileitis induced by capecitabine is likely to be underreported. It should be considered more often as a cause of severe gastrointestinal bleeding during or after treatment with capecitabine agents. Emergency surgery may achieve satisfactory outcomes if endoscopic hemostasis is ineffective. HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS CASE 1. Gastrointestinal bleeding following capecitabine treatment in colorectal cancer patients might be life-threatening. 2. Terminal ileitis induced by capecitabine should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. 3. Awareness of the risk factors such as deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, advanced age, or right colectomy may aid in reducing capecitabine-related morbidity. 4. When severe bleeding occurs, emergency surgery may achieve satisfactory outcomes if medical and endoscopic interventions are ineffective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Zou
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.,Tongji Cancer Research Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.,Tongji Cancer Research Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jianhong Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.,Tongji Cancer Research Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Zhen Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. .,Tongji Cancer Research Institute, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College in Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Capecitabine in combination with panitumumab is not the treatment of choice in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 13:114-115. [PMID: 34507891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
27
|
Doi H, Yokoyama H, Beppu N, Fujiwara M, Harui S, Kakuno A, Yanagi H, Hishikawa Y, Yamanaka N, Kamikonya N. Neoadjuvant Modified Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Delayed Surgery for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4112. [PMID: 34439265 PMCID: PMC8394890 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes and predictive factors of neoadjuvant modified short-course radiotherapy (mSC-RT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Data from 97 patients undergoing mSC-RT followed by radical surgery for LARC were retrospectively analyzed. A 2.5 Gy dose twice daily up to a total dose of 25 Gy in 10 fractions was administered through mSC-RT, and this was delivered with oral chemotherapy in 95 (97.9%) patients. Radical surgery was performed 6 (range, 3-13) weeks after mSC-RT. The median follow-up among surviving patients was 43 (8-86) months. All patients completed neoadjuvant radiotherapy with no acute toxicity grade ≥ 3. Three- and five-year local control rates were 96.3% and 96.3%, respectively. Three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 92.7% and 79.8%, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed that poor OS was associated with no concurrent administration of capecitabine, C-reactive-protein-to-albumin ratio ≥ 0.053, carcinoembryonic antigen ≥ 3.4 ng/mL, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 1.83 (P = 0.045, 0.001, 0.041, and 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses indicated that NLR ≥ 1.83 was independently associated with poor OS (p = 0.018). mSC-RT followed by delayed surgery for LARC was deemed feasible and resulted in good clinical outcomes, whereas poor OS was associated with high NLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Doi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka 589-8511, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Naohito Beppu
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Masayuki Fujiwara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| | - Shogo Harui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
| | - Ayako Kakuno
- Department of Pathology, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan;
| | - Hidenori Yanagi
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
| | - Yoshio Hishikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
| | - Naoki Yamanaka
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (N.B.); (H.Y.); (N.Y.)
| | - Norihiko Kamikonya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Meiwa Cancer Clinic, 3-39 Agenaruocho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8186, Japan; (H.Y.); (M.F.); (S.H.); (Y.H.); (N.K.)
- Department of Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Hyogo, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Selection of Oral Therapeutics in China for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:55. [PMID: 34097129 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00852-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Intravenous administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy has been the backbone of treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC) for decades. The availability of oral capecitabine has improved the tolerability and simplified combination schedules. In addition to capecitabine, several other oral drugs have proven efficacy, particularly in palliative treatment lines. Clinical guidelines describe several available third-line treatment options for metastatic CRC (mCRC), but few insights are provided to guide the selection and sequence. In this review, we describe the available evidence and most recent data concerning oral drugs with proven efficacy in CRC, including antiangiogenetic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR TKIs), inhibitors blocking EGFR/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and modified fluoropyrimidine, and share recommendations and insights on selecting third-line oral therapies for mCRC in China. In general, third-line treatment options for mCRC are mainly regorafenib, fruquintinib, and chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction, while FTD/TPI was rarely used in China probably due to poor accessibility. Fruquintinib is preferred in patients with poor performance status (PS), elder age, and severe organ dysfunction, compared to regorafenib. New drugs of clinical trials were more recommended for the patients with BRAF mutant tumor, and those with good previous treatment efficacy tended to be recommended for chemo/targeted therapy reintroduction. The management of mCRC is evolving, and it must be emphasized that the consideration and recommendations presented here reflect current treatment practices in China and thus might change according to new clinical data as well as the availability of new oral drugs.
Collapse
|
29
|
Huang P, Wang Z, Liu Q, Cai G. S-1 and Capecitabine for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. J BIOMATER TISS ENG 2021. [DOI: 10.1166/jbt.2021.2673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancers common tumors that develop in the large intestines. The incidence of colorectal cancer is second only to gastric and esophageal cancers. Both S-1 and capecitabine are the third-generation fluorouracil-based chemotherapeutic drugs. We hope to summarize the therapeutic
effects of tecotae and capecitabine in patients with colorectal cancer through this Meta-analysis. We performed a meta-analysis of the findings in the current literature. We performed a systematic review of outcomes associated with S-1 and capecitabine used to treat advanced colorectal cancer
based on findings from both English and Chinese publications listed in PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, EBSCO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. End-points included ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS; adverse events (grades 1–2 and 3–4) were also evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed
using RevMan 5.3. A total of 12 studies were eventually included, involving a total of 3,375 patients. Of this group, 1,683 and 1,692 patients underwent treatment with S-1 or capecitabine, respectively. There were no greatly differences with respect to ORR, DCR, or OS; however, PFS was bettered
in the group of S-1 compared to those treated with capecitabine. The incidence of leukopenia, diarrhea and anorexia were all higher among those in S-1 group compared to the capecitabine group, but a higher incidence of hand-foot syndrome was linked with use of capecitabine. Use of S-1 for
the treatment of colorectal cancer may result in superior outcomes when compared to use of capecitabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou 570311, Hainan, PR China
| | - Zhenfen Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou 570311, Hainan, PR China
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou 570311, Hainan, PR China
| | - Guohao Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou 570311, Hainan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Glimelius B, Stintzing S, Marshall J, Yoshino T, de Gramont A. Metastatic colorectal cancer: Advances in the folate-fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy backbone. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102218. [PMID: 34015686 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Notwithstanding recent treatment advances in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), chemotherapy with a combination of a fluoropyrimidine and a folate agent, often 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin, remains the backbone of treatment regimens for the majority of patients with mCRC. This is despite a recent focus on molecular-targeted treatments and patient stratification according to mutational status or expression levels of specific genes. Intracellular folate concentration was discovered to be pivotal in the cytotoxic efficacy of 5-FU, paving the way to the current standard combination therapy approach. Subsequent discovery that systemic chemotherapy agents, such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin, can further increase the efficacy of 5-FU-based treatments led to the development of several combination chemotherapy regimens, including FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI. Subsequent efforts to optimise 5-FU-based treatments have focused on 5-FU analogues, initially capecitabine and the combination drug tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) and then TAS-102, which has recently been evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for refractory colorectal cancer. Further approaches taken to improve the efficacy of 5-FU chemotherapy regimens have focused on optimising the route and dosing schedules and regulating folate metabolism. Pharmacokinetic variability caused by the requirement for metabolic conversion of leucovorin has been central to recent research, and the development of agents such as arfolitixorin which bypass the need for metabolic conversion remains promising for future therapeutic candidates. In this review, we summarise the evidence leading to the current treatment regimens employing 5-FU and leucovorin, focusing on recent approaches taken to optimise and refine treatments to improve clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology (CCM) Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - John Marshall
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
García-Alfonso P, Muñoz Martín AJ, Ortega Morán L, Soto Alsar J, Torres Pérez-Solero G, Blanco Codesido M, Calvo Ferrandiz PA, Grasso Cicala S. Oral drugs in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:17588359211009001. [PMID: 33995592 PMCID: PMC8111515 DOI: 10.1177/17588359211009001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of cancer, with an estimated 1.36 million new cases and almost 700,000 deaths annually. Approximately 21% of patients with CRC have metastatic disease at diagnosis. The objective of this article is to review the literature on the efficacy and safety of oral drugs available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several such drugs have been developed, and fluoropyrimidines are the backbone of chemotherapy in this indication. They exert their antitumour activity by disrupting the synthesis and function of DNA and RNA. Oral fluoropyrimidines include prodrugs capecitabine, tegafur, eniluracil/5-fluorouracil, tegafur/uracil, tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI). Oral drugs offer several advantages over injectable formulations, including convenience, flexibility, avoidance of injection-related adverse events (AEs) and, in some circumstances, lower costs. However, oral drugs may not be suitable for patients with gastrointestinal obstruction or malabsorption, they may result in reduced treatment adherence and should not be co-administered with drugs that interfere with absorption or hepatic metabolism. Oral fluoropyrimidines such as capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin, irinotecan or bevacizumab, are as effective as intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in first-line treatment of mCRC. Other oral fluoropyrimidines, such as FTD/TPI, are effective in patients with mCRC who are refractory, intolerant or ineligible for 5-FU. In addition, oral fluoropyrimidines are used in adjuvant treatment of mCRC. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor used in patients in whom several previous lines of therapy have failed. Frequent AEs associated with oral drugs used in the treatment of CRC include hand-foot syndrome and gastrointestinal and haematological toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar García-Alfonso
- Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Calle Doctor Esquerdo 46, Madrid, 28009, Spain
| | | | - Laura Ortega Morán
- Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Soto Alsar
- Oncología Médica, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
A Phase II Study Demonstrates No Feasibility of Adjuvant Treatment with Six Cycles of S-1 and Oxaliplatin in Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, with ERCC1 as Biomarker for Response to SOX. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13040839. [PMID: 33671266 PMCID: PMC7922275 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is currently standard of care in esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, prognosis remains dismal. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of administering six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Although six cycles of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated patients, mainly due to toxicity, efficacy results were promising compared to a propensity-score matched cohort. Exploratory biomarker analyses demonstrated potential benefit for patients with Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) negative tumor expression. A proteomics biomarker model provided valuable information for prediction of survival and pharmacokinetics of 5-FU showed a correlation with treatment-related toxicity. Although it remains unclear if additional chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity, could potentially benefit from this treatment option based on our exploratory biomarker research. Abstract We assessed the feasibility of adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy. Patients treated with nCRT (paclitaxel, carboplatin) and esophagectomy received six 21-day cycles with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (25 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1–14. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as ≥50% completing treatment. We performed exploratory propensity-score matching to compare survival, ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase (TS) immunohistochemistry analyses, proteomics biomarker discovery and 5-FU pharmacokinetic analyses. Forty patients were enrolled and 48% completed all adjuvant cycles. Median dose intensity was 98% for S-1 and 62% for oxaliplatin. The main reason for early discontinuation was toxicity (67%). The median recurrence-free and overall survival were 28.3 months and 40.8 months, respectively (median follow-up 29.1 months). Survival was not significantly prolonged compared to a matched cohort (p = 0.09). Patients with ERCC1 negative tumor expression had significantly better survival compared to ERCC1 positivity (p = 0.01). Our protein signature model was predictive of survival [p = 0.04; Area under the curve (AUC) 0.80]. Moreover, 5-FU pharmacokinetics significantly correlated with treatment-related toxicity. To conclude, six cycles adjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin were not feasible in pretreated esophageal adenocarcinoma. Although the question remains whether additional treatment with chemotherapy should be provided in the adjuvant setting, subgroups such as patients with ERCC1 negativity could potentially benefit from adjuvant SOX based on our exploratory biomarker research.
Collapse
|
33
|
Fu X, Zhang Y, Chang L, Hui D, Jia R, Liu N, Zhang H, Han G, Han Z, Li Y, Liu H, Zhu H, Li Q. The JPJDF has Synergistic Effect with Fluoropyrimidine in the Maintenance Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov 2020; 15:257-269. [PMID: 32679021 DOI: 10.2174/1574892815666200717141205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background:
Maintenance chemotherapeutic regimen with low toxicity is needed for
metastatic colorectal cancer. A recent patent has been issued on the spleen-strengthening and detoxification
prescription (JPJDF), a traditional Chinese herbal medicinal formula with anti-angiogenesis
effect. The clinical effect of JPJDF on the maintenance treatment of advanced colorectal cancer
has not been evaluated.
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of JPJDF in combination with
fluoropyrimidine compared to fluoropyrimidine alone as maintenance therapy for metastatic colorectal
cancer.
Methods:
We applied a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, single center clinical study design.
A total of 137 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were recruited. Patients received either
Fluoropyrimidine (Flu-treated group, n = 68), or Fluoropyrimidine plus JPJDF (Flu-F-treated
group, n = 69) as maintenance treatment after 6-cycle of FOLFOX4 or FOLFORI induction treatment.
The primary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS).
The secondary endpoints were safety, Performance Status (PS) score and other symptoms.
Results:
The endpoint of disease progression was observed in 91.7% of patients. The PFS was 5.0
months and 3.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. The OS was 15.0
months and 9.0 months in the Flu-F-treated and Flu-treated groups, respectively. Some common
symptoms, such as hypodynamia, anepithymia, dizziness and tinnitus and shortness of breath, were
improved in the Flu-F-treated group. There was no significant difference in the common adverse reactions
between the two groups.
Conclusion:
JPJDF and fluoropyrimidine have synergistic effect in the maintenance treatment of
mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoling Fu
- Department of Oncology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 110, Ganhe Road, Shanghai 200437, China
| | - Yanbo Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Lisheng Chang
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Dengcheng Hui
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Ru Jia
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Ningning Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Huayue Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 110, Ganhe Road, Shanghai 200437, China
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Surgery, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Zhifen Han
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Department of Oncology, Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 110, Ganhe Road, Shanghai 200437, China
| | - Hui Liu
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Huirong Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| | - Qi Li
- Department of Oncology, Shuguang Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 528, Zhangheng Road, Shanghai 201203, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chiang N, Chen M, Yang S, Hsu C, Yen C, Tsou H, Su Y, Chen J, Shan Y, Chen L. Multicentre, phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: TG1308 study. Liver Int 2020; 40:2535-2543. [PMID: 32463975 PMCID: PMC7540301 DOI: 10.1111/liv.14538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) remains the standard, frontline therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (ABTC). The JCOG1113 study suggested that gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) had noninferior median overall survival and comparable incidence of significant neutropenia as compared to GC treatments. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a modified GS regimen. METHODS The eligible patients with chemonaive, measurable ABTC received 800 mg/m2 of gemcitabine on day 1 and 80 mg/m2 /day of S-1 (80/100/120 mg for patients with body surface <1.25/ ≥1.25 and <1.5/ ≥1.5 m2 respectively). The primary endpoint was the 12-week disease control rate (12-week DCR: objective response and stable disease ≥ 12 weeks). Per the p0 = 40% and p1 = 60% (α/β = 0.05/0.2) assumption, Simon's optimal two-stage design indicated 12-week DCR in ≥ 24 of 46 evaluable patients for significant activity. Tumour responses were assessed every 6 weeks. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were enrolled and most of them had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (64.7%), metastatic disease (84.3%) and disease-related symptoms (82.4%). On intention-to-treat analysis, 11 (21.6%) patients showed partial response, whereas 21 (41.2%) showed stable disease ≥ 12 weeks. The progression-free and overall survival were 5.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.5-7.0), and 12.7 months (95% CI: 6.1-15.6) respectively. The study met its primary endpoint with a 12-week DCR of 69.6% in 46 evaluable patients. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse eventsoccurred in < 6% of patients of all individual items. The mean dose intensities of S-1 and gemcitabine were 87.1% and 92.5% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Modified GS showed moderate efficacy with a favourable safety profile in ABTC patients, thus mandating further assessment. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02425137.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nai‐Jung Chiang
- Institute of Clinical MedicineCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- National Institute of Cancer ResearchNational Health Research InstitutesTainanTaiwan
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalTainanTaiwan
| | - Ming‐Huang Chen
- Department of OncologyTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
- School of MedicineNational Yang Ming UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Shih‐Hung Yang
- Department of OncologyNational Taiwan University Hospital and Graduate Institute of OncologyNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chiun Hsu
- Department of OncologyNational Taiwan University Hospital and Graduate Institute of OncologyNational Taiwan University College of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
| | - Chia‐Jui Yen
- Institute of Clinical MedicineCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalTainanTaiwan
| | - Hsiao‐Hui Tsou
- Institute of Population Health SciencesNational Health Research InstitutesZhunanTaiwan
- Graduate Institute of BiostatisticsCollege of Public HealthChina Medical UniversityTaichungTaiwan
| | - Yung‐Yeh Su
- Institute of Clinical MedicineCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- National Institute of Cancer ResearchNational Health Research InstitutesTainanTaiwan
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalTainanTaiwan
| | - Jen‐Shi Chen
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Yan‐Shen Shan
- Institute of Clinical MedicineCollege of MedicineNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan
- Department of SurgeryNational Cheng Kung University HospitalTainanTaiwan
| | - Li‐Tzong Chen
- National Institute of Cancer ResearchNational Health Research InstitutesTainanTaiwan
- Division of Hematology and OncologyDepartment of Internal MedicineNational Cheng Kung University HospitalTainanTaiwan
- Department of Internal MedicineKaohsiung Medical University Hospital and Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy or combination therapy as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1567-1574. [PMID: 32394076 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03606-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety profile of S-1-based versus non-S-1-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in mCRC. METHODS Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Ovid databases and the Cochrane library from database set up in May 2018. The RCTs of S-1-based monotherapy or combination therapy as first-line treatment were selected. The impact of S-1-based chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by pooling data via RevMan 5.3. RESULTS Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs showed that S-1-based chemotherapy significantly improved PFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.97, P = 0.006). In subgroup analysis, there was a statistically significant increase in PFS when S-1-based chemotherapy was compared with 5-FU-based (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84-1.00, P = 0.04) or capecitabine-based chemotherapy (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, P = 0.04). The meta-analysis of OS (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.05, P = 0.36), overall response rate (ORR) (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.84-1.17, P = 0.90), and disease control rate (DCR) (HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.87-3.00, P = 0.13) showed no statistical significance between S-1-based and non-S-1-based chemotherapy. The statistically significant differences in the meta-analysis indicated less incidence of graded 3-4 leucopenia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.71, P = 0.006) and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58, P = 0.001) in the S-1-based chemotherapy, and there was no statistically significant difference for other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS S-1-based chemotherapy in mono or combined therapy was an attractive alternative to standard first-line regimen for patients of mCRC.
Collapse
|
36
|
Komorowski AS, MacKay HJ, Pezo RC. Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5035-5050. [PMID: 32452660 PMCID: PMC7367648 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trial reports often emphasize efficacy over harms, leading to misinterpretation of the risk-to-benefit ratio of new therapies. Clear and sufficiently detailed reporting of methods and results is especially important in the abstracts of trial reports, as readers often base their assessment of a trial on such information. In this study, we evaluated the quality of adverse event (AE) reporting and abstract quality in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies in breast and colorectal cancer. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of RCTs, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 2005 to September 2018. Phase III RCTs evaluating systemic therapies in breast or colorectal cancer were included. Each article was independently reviewed by two investigators using a standardized data extraction form based on guidelines developed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariable linear regression were used to analyze data. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Of 166 RCTs identified, 99.4% reported harms in the manuscript body, and 59.6% reported harms in the abstract. Reporting was restricted to severe harms in 15.6% of RCTs. Statistical comparison of AE rates went unreported in 59.0% of studies. Information regarding AEs leading to dose reductions, treatment discontinuations, or study withdrawals went unreported in 59.3%, 18.7%, and 86.8% of studies, respectively. Recently published RCTs (P = .009) and those sponsored at least partially by for-profit companies (P = .003) had higher abstract quality scores. CONCLUSIONS Breast and colorectal cancer phase III RCTs inadequately report CONSORT-compliant AE data. Improved guideline adherence and abstract reporting is required to properly weigh benefits and harms of new oncologic therapies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019140673.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S. Komorowski
- Division of Medical MicrobiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonONCanada
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
| | - Helen J. MacKay
- Division of Medical OncologySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | - Rossanna C. Pezo
- Division of Medical OncologySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Aparicio T, Canouï-Poitrine F, Caillet P, François E, Cudennec T, Carola E, Albrand G, Bouvier AM, Petri C, Couturier B, Phelip JM, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Paillaud E. Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG). Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:493-505. [PMID: 32029404 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.12.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several guidelines dedicated to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Since 2013 no recent guidelines are specifically dedicated to older patients and based on a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Task Force with digestive oncologists, geriatricians and methodologists from the SoFOG was formed in 2016 to update recommendations on medical treatment of mCRC based on a systematic review of publications from 2000 to 2018. Search strategy has followed a standardized protocol from the formulation of clinical questions and definition of a search algorithm to the selection of complete articles for recommendations. RESULTS The four selected key questions were: For which older patients with mCRC can we considered: (1) Any chemotherapy, (2) Mono or poly-chemotherapy, (3) Anti-angiogenic therapy, (4) Other targeted therapy. Main recommendations for older patients are: (1) Omission of chemotherapy should be discussed with a geriatrician for patients with severe comorbidities, advanced dementia, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or severe loss of autonomy. (2) If tumor response is not the main aim, a mono-chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil combined with bevacizumab is recommended as first-line. (3) For patients with symptoms related to metastases or with a planned metastasis ablation, a doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibody in the context of a RAS wild type tumor is recommended as first-line. Preliminary data suggest that regorafenib may be used, in its registered indication, in patients under 80 with a performance status of 0 and no autonomy alterations and that trifluridine-tipiracil may be used with a tight supervising of hematological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Center, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Tristan Cudennec
- Department of Geriatry, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, University Versailles - Saint Quentin, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Elisabeth Carola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Public Sud de l'Oise Hospital, Creil, France
| | - Gilles Albrand
- Department of Geriatry, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR1231 EPICAD University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Camille Petri
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Bérengère Couturier
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Etienne Hospital, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Keikes L, Koopman M, Stuiver MM, Lemmens VEPP, van Oijen MGH, Punt CJA. Practice variation on hospital level in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in The Netherlands: a population-based study. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:395-403. [PMID: 32048563 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1722320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Population-based data on the implementation of guidelines for cancer patients in daily practice are scarce, while practice variation may influence patient outcomes. Therefore, we evaluated treatment patterns and associated variables in the systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the Netherlands.Material and methods: We selected a random sample of adult mCRC patients diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 from the National Cancer Registry in 20 (4 academic, 8 teaching and 8 regional) Dutch hospitals. We examined the influence of patient, demographic and tumour characteristics on the odds of being treated with systemic therapy according to the current guideline and assessed its association with survival.Results: Our study population consisted of 2222 mCRC patients of whom 1307 patients received systemic therapy for mCRC. Practice variation was most obvious in the use of bevacizumab and anti-EGFR therapy in patients with (K)RAS wild-type tumours. Administration rates did not differ between hospital types but fluctuated between individual hospitals for bevacizumab (8-92%; p < .0001) and anti-EGFR therapy (10-75%; p = .05). Bevacizumab administration was inversely correlated to higher age (OR:0.2; 95%CI: 0.1-0.3) comorbidity (OR:0.6; 95%CI: 0.5-0.8) and the presence of metachronous metastases (OR:0.5; 95%CI: 0.3-0.7), but patient characteristics did not differ between hospitals with low or high bevacizumab administration rates. The hazard ratios for exposure to bevacizumab and anti-EGFR therapy were 0.8 (95%CI: 0.7-0.9) and 0.6 (95%CI: 0.5-0.8), respectively.Discussion: We identified significant inter-hospital variation in targeted therapy administration for mCRC patients, which may affect outcome. Age and comorbidity were inversely correlated with non-administration of bevacizumab but did not explain inter-hospital practice variation. Our data suggest that practice variation is based on individual strategy of hospitals rather than guideline recommendations or patient-driven decisions. Individual hospital strategies are an additional factor that may explain the observed differences between real-life data and results obtained from clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Keikes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn M. Stuiver
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valery E. P. P. Lemmens
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn G. H. van Oijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Liao X, Huang L, Yu Q, He S, Li Q, Huang C, Yuan X. SNPs in the COX-2/PGES/EP signaling pathway are associated with risk of severe capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2020; 85:785-792. [PMID: 32193619 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-020-04053-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Capecitabine is a widely used 5-fluorouracil oral prodrug. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), one of the most common adverse events of capecitabine, impacts patients' quality of life seriously. The pathogenesis of HFS remains unclear but was usually considered as a type of inflammation conducted by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The COX-2/PGES/EP signaling pathway plays an important role in the inflammatory reaction. We hypothesized that the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in this pathway may be associated with the risk of HFS induced by capecitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using DNA from blood samples of 225 patients, we genotyped 19 SNPs in 6 core genes (COX-2, PGES, EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 was used to grade hand-foot syndrome. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the correlations between genotype variants and occurrence of HFS. The cumulative incidence of HFS was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Among the 225 participants, 58.6% (132/225) patients developed into HFS, including 41.3% (93/225) grade 1 HFS, 10.2% (23/225) grade 2 HFS and 7.1% (16/225) grade 3 HFS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the AG/GG genotype of rs3810255 to be associated with a significantly higher risk of grade 2/3 HFS, while the AG/AA genotype of rs17131450 to be associated with a significantly lower risk of grade 2/3 HFS (OR = 3.646, P = 0.011; and OR = 0.266, P = 0.036; respectively). CONCLUSION Our study showed that rs3810255 AG/GG genotypes and rs17131450 GG genotypes to be associated with high risk of capecitabine-induced HFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Liao
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.,Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Liu Huang
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qianqian Yu
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Siyuan He
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qianxia Li
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Chao Huang
- Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xianglin Yuan
- Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kwakman JJ, Elshot YS, Punt CJ, Koopman M. Management of cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced hand-foot syndrome. Oncol Rev 2020; 14:442. [PMID: 32431787 PMCID: PMC7232019 DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2020.442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Improvements in systemic cancer treatments have resulted in more patients surviving for prolonged periods of time on treatment. This has made treatment-related toxicity and quality of life concerns increasingly relevant. Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common skin reaction to systemic therapy that should be anticipated with chemotherapeutic treatments such as pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, docetaxel, and fluoropyrimidines. In this review we discuss current knowledge of the diagnosis, incidence, pathogenesis, and management of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). Although HFS is not life threatening, it can cause significant discomfort and impairment of function, especially in elderly patients, and may seriously impact quality of life. The incidence of HFS is dependent on the chemotherapeutic drug used, the treatment schedule, and the median duration of treatment. Effective measures for prevention and treatment of HFS include systemic and topical treatments, dose reductions, and switching to other drugs in the same class that are associated with lower rates of HFS. These approaches allow patients to continue cancer treatment while reducing negative impacts on quality of life. Awareness and early recognition are important to ensure timely treatment and avoidance of dose reductions or treatment discontinuation. We provide useful recommendations to guide the management of HFS in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes J.M. Kwakman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, room F4-224; P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, the Netherlands. +31636155930.
| | - Yannick S. Elshot
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - Cornelis J.A. Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lombardi P, Marandino L, De Luca E, Zichi C, Reale ML, Pignataro D, Di Stefano RF, Ghisoni E, Mariniello A, Trevisi E, Leone G, Muratori L, La Salvia A, Sonetto C, Leone F, Aglietta M, Novello S, Scagliotti GV, Perrone F, Di Maio M. Quality of life assessment and reporting in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of phase III trials published between 2012 and 2018. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 146:102877. [PMID: 31981880 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, our aim was to describe quality of life (QoL) prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in colorectal cancer phase III trials. METHODS We included all phase III trials evaluating anticancer drugs in colorectal cancer patients published between 2012 and 2018 by 11 major journals. RESULTS Out of the 67 publications identified, in 41 (61.2 %) QoL was not listed among endpoints. Out of 26 primary publications of trials including QoL among endpoints, QoL results were not reported in 10 (38.5 %). Overall, no QoL data were available in 51/67 (76.1 %) primary publications. In particular, in the metastatic setting, QoL data were not available in 12/18 (66.7 %) trials with primary endpoint overall survival, and in 20/29 (69.0 %) trials with other primary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS QoL was absent in a high proportion of recently published phase III trials in colorectal cancer, even in trials of second or further lines, where attention to QoL should be particularly high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Emmanuele De Luca
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Clizia Zichi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Reale
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Daniele Pignataro
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Rosario F Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ghisoni
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Annapaola Mariniello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Elena Trevisi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Leonardo Muratori
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Cristina Sonetto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Francesco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"-IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Krok-Schoen JL, Canin B, Parker I, MacKenzie AR, Koll T, Vankina R, Hsu CD, Jang B, Pan K, Lund JL, Starbuck E, Shahrokni A. The underreporting of phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data of older patients with cancer: A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:369-379. [PMID: 31932259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inspired by the American Society of Clinical Oncology's recommendations to strengthen the evidence base for older adults with cancer, the purpose of this systematic review is to identify the reporting of treatment efficacy and adverse events specific to older adults with cancer in Phase III chemo-therapeutic clinical trials. This review also investigates the frequency with which these data points were reported in the literature to identify gaps in reporting and opportunities to expand the knowledge base on clinical outcomes for older adults with cancer. METHODS Chemo-therapeutic clinical trial data published from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017 was reviewed. Manuscripts (n = 929) were identified based on keyword searches of EMBASE and PubMed. After removal of duplicates (n = 116) and articles that did not meet this study's inclusion criteria (n = 654), 159 articles were identified for review. RESULTS Reviewed papers were published in 36 different scientific journals and included twenty-five different cancer types. Of the 159 articles, 117 (73.6%) reported age-specific medians and 75 (47.2%) included stratifications of data by age. Treatment efficacy was reported in 96.2% of the articles with 39.9% reporting effectiveness of treatment by age. Reporting of adverse events was included in 84.9% of the articles with only 8.9% reporting these events stratified by age. CONCLUSION Results suggest inadequate reporting of treatment efficacy and adverse events as well as basic descriptive statistics about the age distribution of study subjects. Conscious efforts are needed to address these deficiencies at every level of planning and conducting clinical trials as wells as reporting outcomes stratified by age. Ultimately, standardized reporting could lead to improved treatment decisions and outcomes for older adults with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Thuy Koll
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, USA
| | | | | | - Brian Jang
- Tulane University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | - Edith Starbuck
- University of Cincinnati Libraries, University of Cincinnati, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
S-1 in Patients with Advanced Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: Results from the Safety Compliance Observatory on Oral fluoroPyrimidines (SCOOP) Study. Drugs R D 2019; 19:141-148. [PMID: 30825156 PMCID: PMC6544585 DOI: 10.1007/s40268-019-0265-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives S-1-based regimens have been shown to be as effective as other fluoropyrimidine-based regimens with a better safety profile in patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. However, real-world data on S-1 in European patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma are lacking. The Safety Compliance Observatory on Oral fluoroPyrimidines (SCOOP) study evaluated safety and relative dose intensities for patients treated with S-1-based regimens for advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma as part of daily practice. Methods Overall, data for 125 patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were collected at 21 centers in five countries in Europe. Demographics, treatment, and adverse-event data were recorded over a planned treatment of six cycles. Results Most patients (87%) received combination treatment of S-1 plus a platinum compound. Adverse events related to S-1 treatment were mostly grade 1 or 2 while reported grade 3–4 serious adverse events related to S-1 occurred in 12 patients and were most often grade 3 neutropenia (n = 4, 3.2%) or diarrhea (n = 5, 4%). The most common adverse events of any grade that were attributable to S-1 treatment included neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. No patients experienced mucositis, dehydration, or febrile neutropenia, whereas 2% (3/125) of patients experienced hand-foot syndrome. Conclusion The overall relative dose intensity was 70%. In a real-world setting, patients with advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma tolerated S-1 treatment well with high compliance rates. The SCOOP study provides valuable information on S-1 relative dose intensity that can be used for treatment decision making.
Collapse
|
44
|
Morizane C, Okusaka T, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, Ueno M, Ikeda M, Ozaka M, Okano N, Sugimori K, Fukutomi A, Hara H, Mizuno N, Yanagimoto H, Wada K, Tobimatsu K, Yane K, Nakamori S, Yamaguchi H, Asagi A, Yukisawa S, Kojima Y, Kawabe K, Kawamoto Y, Sugimoto R, Iwai T, Nakamura K, Miyakawa H, Yamashita T, Hosokawa A, Ioka T, Kato N, Shioji K, Shimizu K, Nakagohri T, Kamata K, Ishii H, Furuse J. Combination gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin for advanced/recurrent biliary tract cancer: the FUGA-BT (JCOG1113) randomized phase III clinical trial. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1950-1958. [PMID: 31566666 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is the standard treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC); however, it causes nausea, vomiting, and anorexia, and requires hydration. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) reportedly has equal to, or better, efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of GS to GC for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC in terms of overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We undertook a phase III randomized trial in 33 institutions in Japan. Eligibility criteria included chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent or unresectable BTC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 - 1, and adequate organ function. The calculated sample size was 350 with a one-sided α of 5%, a power of 80%, and non-inferiority margin hazard ratio (HR) of 1.155. The primary end point was OS, while the secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), adverse events (AEs), and clinically significant AEs defined as grade ≥2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis, or diarrhea. RESULTS Between May 2013 and March 2016, 354 patients were enrolled. GS was found to be non-inferior to GC [median OS: 13.4 months with GC and 15.1 months with GS, HR, 0.945; 90% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-1.15; P = 0.046 for non-inferiority]. The median PFS was 5.8 months with GC and 6.8 months with GS (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.70-1.07). The RR was 32.4% with GC and 29.8% with GS. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated. Clinically significant AEs were observed in 35.1% of patients in the GC arm and 29.9% in the GS arm. CONCLUSIONS GS, which does not require hydration, should be considered a new, convenient standard of care option for patients with advanced/recurrent BTC. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER This trial has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm), number UMIN000010667.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Morizane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo.
| | - T Okusaka
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Tokyo
| | - J Mizusawa
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - H Katayama
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - M Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Medical Oncology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama
| | - M Ikeda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa
| | - M Ozaka
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo
| | - N Okano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - K Sugimori
- Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama
| | - A Fukutomi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka
| | - H Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama
| | - N Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya
| | - H Yanagimoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata
| | - K Wada
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo
| | - K Tobimatsu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe
| | - K Yane
- Center for Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo
| | - S Nakamori
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka
| | - H Yamaguchi
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke
| | - A Asagi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama
| | - S Yukisawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya
| | - Y Kojima
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo
| | - K Kawabe
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka
| | - Y Kawamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo
| | - R Sugimoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka
| | - T Iwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara
| | - K Nakamura
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba
| | - H Miyakawa
- Department of Bilio-Pancreatology, Sapporo Kousei General Hospital, Sapporo
| | - T Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa
| | - A Hosokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, University of Toyama, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama
| | - T Ioka
- Department of Cancer Survey and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka
| | - N Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba
| | - K Shioji
- Department of Internal medicine, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata
| | - K Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo
| | - T Nakagohri
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara
| | - K Kamata
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka
| | - H Ishii
- Clinical Research Center, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - J Furuse
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bridgewater J. Systemic treatment of biliary tract cancer: now we have the evidence. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1851-1852. [PMID: 31638143 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
|
46
|
Baek SK, Lee KT, Bae SB, Lee SC. Evaluating the recent developments in palliative chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Korean J Intern Med 2019; 34:1188-1196. [PMID: 31346151 PMCID: PMC6823574 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2019.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased. CRC is the third most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in Korea. Palliative chemotherapy can be used to shrink tumors and ease symptoms caused by the cancer when cure is not possible. It is important to identify chemotherapeutic agents that can be used to effectively treat metastatic CRC (mCRC) and thus improve the survival and quality of life of patients with mCRC. This review aimed to evaluate the recent developments in palliative chemotherapy for mCRC and the biological or targeted agents used based on genetic alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Kyung Baek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Taek Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sang Byung Bae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sang-Cheol Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Chen J, Wang J, Xu T. Comparison of efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16667. [PMID: 31348323 PMCID: PMC6709012 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of S-1 and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS Eligible prospective clinical trials were searched and available data were extracted. Odds ratio and hazard ratio of available outcomes including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were pooled for analysis. RESULTS A total of 6 studies including 828 patients were included. The results of pooled analysis showed no statistical difference in short-term efficacy including ORR (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-1.19; P = .48) or DCR (95% CI: 0.65-1.29; P = .61), or long-term efficacy including PFS (95% CI: 0.75-1.08; P = .26) or OS (95% CI: 0.78-1.13; P = .50). Symptoms of diarrhea at any grade were more prevalent (95% CI: 1.21-2.29; P = .002) in patients treated with S-1, while hand-foot syndrome (HFS) at any grade (95% CI: 0.24-0.48; P < .0001) or high grade (95% CI: 0.09-0.48; P < .0001) was more frequent in capecitabine group. AEs including leucopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, oral mucositis, stomatitis, elevated alanine transaminase, or peripheral neuropathy showed no statistical difference between S-1 and capecitabine group (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis reveals that S-1 has comparable efficacy, lower risk of HFS and higher incidence of diarrhea compared to capecitabine for treatment in patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tiancai Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Winther SB, Liposits G, Skuladottir H, Hofsli E, Shah CH, Poulsen LØ, Ryg J, Osterlund P, Berglund Å, Qvortrup C, Glimelius B, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P. Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (S-1 plus oxaliplatin) versus full-dose monotherapy (S-1) in older vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NORDIC9): a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:376-388. [PMID: 30852136 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older or vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are seldom included in randomised trials. The multicentre NORDIC9 trial evaluated reduced-dose combination chemotherapy compared with full-dose monotherapy in older, vulnerable patients. METHODS This randomised, open-label phase 2 trial was done in 23 Nordic oncology clinics and included patients aged 70 years or older with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer who were not candidates for full-dose combination chemotherapy. Patients were block randomised (1:1) using a web-based tool to full-dose S-1 (30 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with irinotecan (250 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks or 180 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 2 weeks) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 (20 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with S-1 (20 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14) and irinotecan (180 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks). Use of bevacizumab (7·5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) was optional. Treatment allocation was not masked and randomisation was stratified for institution and bevacizumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Survival analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done on the treated population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2014-000394-39, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS From March 9, 2015, to Oct 11, 2017, 160 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR 76-81) were randomly assigned to full-dose monotherapy (n=83) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (n=77). At data cutoff (Sept 1, 2018; median follow-up 23·8 months [IQR 18·8-30·9]), 81 (98%) patients in the full-dose monotherapy group and 71 (92%) patients in the reduced-dose combination group had progressed or died. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (6·2 months [95% CI 5·3-8·3]) than with full-dose monotherapy (5·3 months [4·1-6·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·52-0·99]; p=0·047). Toxicity was evaluated in 157 patients who received treatment. Significantly more patients in the full-dose monotherapy group (51 [62%] of 82 patients) experienced at least one grade 3-4 adverse event than in the reduced-dose combination group (32 [43%] of 75 patients; p=0·014). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea (12 [15%] vs two [3%]; p=0·018), fatigue (ten [12%] vs three [4%]; p=0·083), and dehydration (five [6%] vs none; p=0·060) were more frequent in the full-dose monotherapy group than in the reduced-dose combination group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients during first-line treatment and three patients during second-line treatment (two in the full-dose monotherapy group vs one in the reduced-dose combination group in both cases). INTERPRETATION Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for older, vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was more effective and resulted in less toxicity than full-dose monotherapy with S-1. Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy could be a preferred treatment for this population. FUNDING Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Nordic Group, the Danish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer Society, Academy of Geriatric Research (AgeCare), and Region of Southern Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Braendegaard Winther
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Halla Skuladottir
- Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| | - Eva Hofsli
- Department of Oncology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Finland
| | - Åke Berglund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Camilla Qvortrup
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kwakman JJM, van Werkhoven E, Simkens LHJ, van Rooijen JM, van de Wouw YAJ, Tije AJT, Creemers GJM, Hendriks MP, Los M, van Alphen RJ, Polée MB, Muller EW, van der Velden AMT, van Voorthuizen T, Koopman M, Mol L, Punt CJA. Updated Survival Analysis of the Randomized Phase III Trial of S-1 Versus Capecitabine in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2019; 18:e229-e230. [PMID: 30782413 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2019.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes J M Kwakman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke H J Simkens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Johan M van Rooijen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yes A J van de Wouw
- Department of Medical Oncology, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Albert J Ten Tije
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mathijs P Hendriks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marco B Polée
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Erik W Muller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Mol
- Clinical Trial Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P. Do we make progress in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1422-1426. [PMID: 30384805 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1535189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|