2
|
Xiang G, He X, Giardine BM, Isaac KJ, Taylor DJ, McCoy RC, Jansen C, Keller CA, Wixom AQ, Cockburn A, Miller A, Qi Q, He Y, Li Y, Lichtenberg J, Heuston EF, Anderson SM, Luan J, Vermunt MW, Yue F, Sauria MEG, Schatz MC, Taylor J, Göttgens B, Hughes JR, Higgs DR, Weiss MJ, Cheng Y, Blobel GA, Bodine DM, Zhang Y, Li Q, Mahony S, Hardison RC. Interspecies regulatory landscapes and elements revealed by novel joint systematic integration of human and mouse blood cell epigenomes. Genome Res 2024; 34:1089-1105. [PMID: 38951027 PMCID: PMC11368181 DOI: 10.1101/gr.277950.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
Knowledge of locations and activities of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) is needed to decipher basic mechanisms of gene regulation and to understand the impact of genetic variants on complex traits. Previous studies identified candidate CREs (cCREs) using epigenetic features in one species, making comparisons difficult between species. In contrast, we conducted an interspecies study defining epigenetic states and identifying cCREs in blood cell types to generate regulatory maps that are comparable between species, using integrative modeling of eight epigenetic features jointly in human and mouse in our Validated Systematic Integration (VISION) Project. The resulting catalogs of cCREs are useful resources for further studies of gene regulation in blood cells, indicated by high overlap with known functional elements and strong enrichment for human genetic variants associated with blood cell phenotypes. The contribution of each epigenetic state in cCREs to gene regulation, inferred from a multivariate regression, was used to estimate epigenetic state regulatory potential (esRP) scores for each cCRE in each cell type, which were used to categorize dynamic changes in cCREs. Groups of cCREs displaying similar patterns of regulatory activity in human and mouse cell types, obtained by joint clustering on esRP scores, harbor distinctive transcription factor binding motifs that are similar between species. An interspecies comparison of cCREs revealed both conserved and species-specific patterns of epigenetic evolution. Finally, we show that comparisons of the epigenetic landscape between species can reveal elements with similar roles in regulation, even in the absence of genomic sequence alignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanjue Xiang
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
| | - Xi He
- Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Belinda M Giardine
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Kathryn J Isaac
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Dylan J Taylor
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Rajiv C McCoy
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Camden Jansen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Cheryl A Keller
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Alexander Q Wixom
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - April Cockburn
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Amber Miller
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Qian Qi
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
| | - Yanghua He
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
- Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, University of Hawaìi at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
| | - Yichao Li
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
| | - Jens Lichtenberg
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Elisabeth F Heuston
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Stacie M Anderson
- Flow Cytometry Core, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Jing Luan
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - Marit W Vermunt
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - Feng Yue
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60611, USA
| | - Michael E G Sauria
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Michael C Schatz
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - James Taylor
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
- Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
| | - Berthold Göttgens
- Wellcome and MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0AW, United Kingdom
| | - Jim R Hughes
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas R Higgs
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom
| | - Mitchell J Weiss
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA
| | - Gerd A Blobel
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
| | - David M Bodine
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Qunhua Li
- Department of Statistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Genome Sciences Institute, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Shaun Mahony
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Genome Sciences Institute, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| | - Ross C Hardison
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA;
- Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Genome Sciences Institute, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
- Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xiang G, He X, Giardine BM, Isaac KJ, Taylor DJ, McCoy RC, Jansen C, Keller CA, Wixom AQ, Cockburn A, Miller A, Qi Q, He Y, Li Y, Lichtenberg J, Heuston EF, Anderson SM, Luan J, Vermunt MW, Yue F, Sauria MEG, Schatz MC, Taylor J, Gottgens B, Hughes JR, Higgs DR, Weiss MJ, Cheng Y, Blobel GA, Bodine DM, Zhang Y, Li Q, Mahony S, Hardison RC. Interspecies regulatory landscapes and elements revealed by novel joint systematic integration of human and mouse blood cell epigenomes. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.04.02.535219. [PMID: 37066352 PMCID: PMC10103973 DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.02.535219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Knowledge of locations and activities of cis-regulatory elements (CREs) is needed to decipher basic mechanisms of gene regulation and to understand the impact of genetic variants on complex traits. Previous studies identified candidate CREs (cCREs) using epigenetic features in one species, making comparisons difficult between species. In contrast, we conducted an interspecies study defining epigenetic states and identifying cCREs in blood cell types to generate regulatory maps that are comparable between species, using integrative modeling of eight epigenetic features jointly in human and mouse in our Validated Systematic Integration (VISION) Project. The resulting catalogs of cCREs are useful resources for further studies of gene regulation in blood cells, indicated by high overlap with known functional elements and strong enrichment for human genetic variants associated with blood cell phenotypes. The contribution of each epigenetic state in cCREs to gene regulation, inferred from a multivariate regression, was used to estimate epigenetic state Regulatory Potential (esRP) scores for each cCRE in each cell type, which were used to categorize dynamic changes in cCREs. Groups of cCREs displaying similar patterns of regulatory activity in human and mouse cell types, obtained by joint clustering on esRP scores, harbored distinctive transcription factor binding motifs that were similar between species. An interspecies comparison of cCREs revealed both conserved and species-specific patterns of epigenetic evolution. Finally, we showed that comparisons of the epigenetic landscape between species can reveal elements with similar roles in regulation, even in the absence of genomic sequence alignment.
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiang G, Guo Y, Bumcrot D, Sigova A. JMnorm: a novel joint multi-feature normalization method for integrative and comparative epigenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:e11. [PMID: 38055833 PMCID: PMC10810286 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Combinatorial patterns of epigenetic features reflect transcriptional states and functions of genomic regions. While many epigenetic features have correlated relationships, most existing data normalization approaches analyze each feature independently. Such strategies may distort relationships between functionally correlated epigenetic features and hinder biological interpretation. We present a novel approach named JMnorm that simultaneously normalizes multiple epigenetic features across cell types, species, and experimental conditions by leveraging information from partially correlated epigenetic features. We demonstrate that JMnorm-normalized data can better preserve cross-epigenetic-feature correlations across different cell types and enhance consistency between biological replicates than data normalized by other methods. Additionally, we show that JMnorm-normalized data can consistently improve the performance of various downstream analyses, which include candidate cis-regulatory element clustering, cross-cell-type gene expression prediction, detection of transcription factor binding and changes upon perturbations. These findings suggest that JMnorm effectively minimizes technical noise while preserving true biologically significant relationships between epigenetic datasets. We anticipate that JMnorm will enhance integrative and comparative epigenomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guanjue Xiang
- CAMP4 Therapeutics Corp., One Kendall Square, Building 1400 West, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Yuchun Guo
- CAMP4 Therapeutics Corp., One Kendall Square, Building 1400 West, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - David Bumcrot
- CAMP4 Therapeutics Corp., One Kendall Square, Building 1400 West, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Alla Sigova
- CAMP4 Therapeutics Corp., One Kendall Square, Building 1400 West, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nagano M, Hu B, Yokobayashi S, Yamamura A, Umemura F, Coradin M, Ohta H, Yabuta Y, Ishikura Y, Okamoto I, Ikeda H, Kawahira N, Nosaka Y, Shimizu S, Kojima Y, Mizuta K, Kasahara T, Imoto Y, Meehan K, Stocsits R, Wutz G, Hiraoka Y, Murakawa Y, Yamamoto T, Tachibana K, Peters J, Mirny LA, Garcia BA, Majewski J, Saitou M. Nucleome programming is required for the foundation of totipotency in mammalian germline development. EMBO J 2022; 41:e110600. [PMID: 35703121 PMCID: PMC9251848 DOI: 10.15252/embj.2022110600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Germ cells are unique in engendering totipotency, yet the mechanisms underlying this capacity remain elusive. Here, we perform comprehensive and in-depth nucleome analysis of mouse germ-cell development in vitro, encompassing pluripotent precursors, primordial germ cells (PGCs) before and after epigenetic reprogramming, and spermatogonia/spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). Although epigenetic reprogramming, including genome-wide DNA de-methylation, creates broadly open chromatin with abundant enhancer-like signatures, the augmented chromatin insulation safeguards transcriptional fidelity. These insulatory constraints are then erased en masse for spermatogonial development. Notably, despite distinguishing epigenetic programming, including global DNA re-methylation, the PGCs-to-spermatogonia/SSCs development entails further euchromatization. This accompanies substantial erasure of lamina-associated domains, generating spermatogonia/SSCs with a minimal peripheral attachment of chromatin except for pericentromeres-an architecture conserved in primates. Accordingly, faulty nucleome maturation, including persistent insulation and improper euchromatization, leads to impaired spermatogenic potential. Given that PGCs after epigenetic reprogramming serve as oogenic progenitors as well, our findings elucidate a principle for the nucleome programming that creates gametogenic progenitors in both sexes, defining a basis for nuclear totipotency.
Collapse
|