In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Clinical Isolates of Gram-negative Bacilli With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance and Multidrug-resistant Phenotypes-Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, United States 2015-2017

Genomic epidemiology and ceftazidime-avibactam high-level resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China from 2010 to 2022

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistance is a huge threat in the clinic; however, the underlying mechanism responsible for high-level CZA resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolates remains unknown. In this study, a total of 5,763 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected from 2010 to 2022 to investigate the ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) high-level resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) isolates in China. Fifty-six PER-producing isolates were identified, including 50 isolates carrying blaPER-1 in PA, and 6 isolates carrying blaPER-4. Of these, 82.1% (46/56) were classified as DTR-PA isolates, and 76.79% (43/56) were resistant to CZA. Importantly, blaPER-1 and blaPER-4 overexpression led to 16-fold and >1024-fold increases in the MICs of CZA, respectively. WGS revealed that the blaPER-1 gene was located in two different transferable IncP-2-type plasmids and chromosomes, whereas blaPER-4 was found only on chromosomes and was carried by a class 1 integron embedded in a Tn6485-like transposon. Overexpression of efflux pumps may be associated with high-level CZA resistance in blaPER-1-positive strains. Kinetic parameter analysis revealed that PER-4 exhibited a similar kcat/Km with ceftazidime and a high (∼3359-fold) IC50 value with avibactam compared to PER-1. Our study found that overexpression of PER-1 combined with enhanced efflux pump expression and the low affinity of PER-4 for avibactam contributes to high-level resistance to CZA. Additionally, the Tn6485-like transposon plays a significant role in disseminating blaPER. Urgent active surveillance is required to prevent the further spread of high-level CZA resistance in DTR-PA isolates.

Global trends in carbapenem- and difficult-to-treat-resistance among World Health Organization priority bacterial pathogens: ATLAS surveillance program 2018-2022

OBJECTIVES

To report trends in carbapenem resistance and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) among clinical isolates of Gram-negative priority pathogens collected by the ATLAS global surveillance program from 2018 to 2022.

METHODS

Reference broth microdilution testing was performed in a central laboratory for 79,214 Enterobacterales, 30,504 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 13,500 Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates collected by a constant set of 157 medical centres in 49 countries in Asia Pacific (APAC), Europe (EUR), Latin America (LATAM), Middle East-Africa (MEA), and North America (NA) regions. MICs were interpreted by 2023 CLSI M100 breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified for meropenem-nonsusceptible (MIC ≥2 mg/L) Enterobacterales isolates.

RESULTS

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) detection increased (P < 0.05) in APAC, EUR, LATAM, and MEA regions and decreased in NA, while annual DTR percentages increased in all five regions. Carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA; decreased in MEA region) and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (CRAB; decreased in MEA region and increased in EUR) remained relatively stable over time in all regions, although notably, annual percentages of CRAB and DTR A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex isolates were consistently >25 percentage points lower in NA than in other regions. For all regions except NA, the majority of changes in CRE percentages could be attributed to hospital-acquired infections. Among meropenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales, KPC was the most frequent carbapenemase in NA and EUR each year. NDM was the most prevalent carbapenemase detected in 2022 in other global regions.

CONCLUSION

CRE, CRPA, CRAB, and DTR rates vary among global regions over time highlighting the need for continuing surveillance to inform treatment strategies and antimicrobial stewardship.

Moving towards a standardized definition of antimicrobial resistance: a comparison of the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) versus multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates (CANWARD, 2016-2021)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates demonstrating difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes were evaluated by broth microdilution. Susceptibility was lower for all antimicrobials versus DTR relative to MDR isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and imipenem-relebactam susceptibility was 35.9%, 64.5%, and 47.0% for DTR isolates and 60.5%, 80.6%, and 71.5% for MDR isolates.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical Gram-negative isolates-SMART United States 2019-21

Background

Ongoing national and international surveillance efforts are critical components of antimicrobial stewardship, resistance monitoring, and drug development programs. In this report, we summarize the results of ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and comparator agent testing against 10 509 Enterobacterales and 2524 Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected by USA clinical laboratories in 2019-21 as part of the SMART global surveillance programme.

Methods

MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2023 CLSI M100 breakpoints.

Results

Most Enterobacterales were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible (>99%), meropenem susceptible (99%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible (94%). Non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales were also highly susceptible to imipenem/relebactam (99%). Ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 94% of Escherichia coli and 89% of Klebsiella pneumoniae with ceftriaxone non-susceptible/non-carbapenem-resistant phenotypes. Against P. aeruginosa, ceftolozane/tazobactam (97% susceptible) was more active than ceftazidime/avibactam (95%) and imipenem/relebactam (91%). MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes were identified in 13% and 7% of P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained active against 78% of MDR P. aeruginosa (13% and 23% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively) and against 74% of DTR P. aeruginosa (24% and 37% higher than ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam, respectively). Length of hospital stay at the time of specimen collection, ward type and infection type resulted in percent susceptible value differences of >5% across isolate demographic strata for some antimicrobial agent/pathogen combinations.

Conclusions

We conclude that in the USA, in 2019-21, carbapenem (meropenem) resistance remained uncommon in Enterobacterales and ceftolozane/tazobactam was more active than both ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/relebactam against P. aeruginosa.

Perspectives on the use of ceftolozane/tazobactam: a review of clinical trial data and real-world evidence

Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are common healthcare-associated infections linked to high morbidity and mortality. Gram-negative pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, exhibit multidrug resistance and are recognized as major public health concerns, particularly among critically ill patients with HABP/VABP. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel combination antibacterial agent comprising ceftolozane (a potent antipseudomonal cephalosporin) and tazobactam (a β-lactamase inhibitor). Phase III trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of ceftolozane/tazobactam to comparators, leading to the approval of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and nosocomial pneumonia. In this article, we review the clinical trial evidence and key real-world effectiveness data of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of serious healthcare-associated Gram-negative infections, focusing on patients with HABP/VABP.

Comparative study of the etiology of nosocomial bacteremic pneumonia in ventilated and non-ventilated patients: a 10-year experience in an institution

IMPORTANCE

This study on bacteremic nosocomial pneumonia (bNP) demonstrates the importance of this condition both in patients undergoing and not undergoing mechanical ventilation. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacterales, and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli are all causative agents in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), with a predominance of S. aureus in HAP and of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in VAP. Mortality in this condition is very high. Therefore, new therapeutic and preventive approaches should be sought.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam in Children with Confirmed or Suspected Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: A Phase 1b, Open-Label, Single-Dose Clinical Trial

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved for the treatment of serious gram-negative bacterial infections in adults. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a single dose of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (with a fixed 2:1 ratio of imipenem/cilastatin to relebactam, and with a maximum dose of 15 mg/kg imipenem and 15 mg/kg cilastatin [≤500 mg imipenem and ≤500 mg cilastatin] and 7.5 mg/kg relebactam [≤250 mg relebactam]) in children with confirmed/suspected gram-negative bacterial infections receiving standard-of-care antibacterial therapy. In this phase 1, noncomparative study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03230916), PK parameters from 46 children were analyzed using both population modeling and noncompartmental analysis. The PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) target for imipenem was percent time of the dosing interval that unbound plasma concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT>MIC) of ≥30% (MIC = 2 mcg/mL). For relebactam, the PK/PD target was a free drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) normalized to MIC (at 2 mcg/mL) of ≥8.0 (equivalent to an AUC from time zero extrapolated to infinity of ≥20.52 mcg·h/mL). Safety was assessed up to 14 days after drug infusion. For imipenem, the ranges for the geometric mean %fT>MIC and maximum concentration (Cmax ) across age cohorts were 56.5%-93.7% and 32.2-38.2 mcg/mL, respectively. For relebactam, the ranges of the geometric mean Cmax and AUC from 0 to 6 hours across age cohorts were 16.9-21.3 mcg/mL and 26.1-55.3 mcg·h/mL, respectively. In total, 8/46 (17%) children experienced ≥1 adverse events (AEs) and 2/46 (4%) children experienced nonserious AEs that were deemed drug related by the investigator. Imipenem and relebactam exceeded plasma PK/PD targets; single doses of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were well tolerated with no significant safety concerns identified. These results informed imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dose selection for further pediatric clinical evaluation.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from sub-Saharan Africa: ATLAS Global Surveillance Program 2017-2021

OBJECTIVES

To report the in vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales (n = 3905) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1,109) isolates, collected from patients in sub-Saharan Africa (four countries) in 2017-2021, to a panel of 10 antimicrobial agents with a focus on ceftazidime-avibactam activity against resistant phenotypes and β-lactamase carriers.

METHODS

MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using both 2022 CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets using multiplex PCR assays.

RESULTS

Among Enterobacterales, 96.2% of all isolates were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible (MIC90, 0.5 µg/mL), including all serine carbapenemase-positive (n = 127), 99.6% of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative (n = 730), 91.9% of multidrug resistant (MDR; n = 1817), and 42.7% of DTR (difficult-to-treat resistance; n = 171) isolates. Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) genes were identified in most (n = 136; 91.2%) ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates (3.5% of all Enterobacterales isolates). Ceftazidime-avibactam percent susceptible values ranged from 99.5% (Klebsiella species other than Klebsiella pneumoniae) to 92.5% (K. pneumoniae) for the various Enterobacterial taxa examined. Greater than 90% of Enterobacterales isolates from each country (Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Nigeria, South Africa) were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible. Among P. aeruginosa, 88.9% of all isolates were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible (MIC90, 16 µg/mL). Most (88.5%) MBL-negative, meropenem-resistant (n = 78), 68.1% of MDR (n = 385), and 19.2% of DTR isolates (n = 99) were ceftazidime-avibactam-susceptible. MBL genes were identified in 43.1% of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant isolates (n = 53; 4.8% of all P. aeruginosa isolates). Country-specific ceftazidime-avibactam percent susceptible values for P. aeruginosa ranged from 94.1% (Cameroon) to 76.2% (Nigeria).

CONCLUSION

Reference in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing demonstrated that most recent Enterobacterales (96%) and P. aeruginosa (89%) clinical isolates from four sub-Saharan African countries were ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

Temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators in Taiwan-SMART 2012-2021

OBJECTIVES

To determine the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from hospitalised patient samples in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 with an additional focus on the temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA).

METHODS

P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 3013) were collected annually by clinical laboratories in northern (two medical centres), central (three medical centres), and southern Taiwan (four medical centres) as part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 CLSI breakpoints. Molecular β-lactamase gene identification was performed on selected non-susceptible isolate subsets in 2015 and later.

RESULTS

Overall, 520 (17.3%) CRPA isolates were identified. The prevalence of CRPA increased from 11.5%-12.3% (2012-2015) to 19.4%-22.8% (2018-2021) (P ≤ 0.0001). Medical centres in northern Taiwan reported the highest percentages of CRPA. C/T, first tested in the SMART program in 2016, was highly active against all P. aeruginosa (97% susceptible), with annual susceptibility rates ranging from 94% (2017) to 99% (2020). Against CRPA, C/T inhibited >90% of isolates each year, with the exception of 2017 (79.4% susceptible). Most CRPA isolates (83%) were molecularly characterised, and only 2.1% (9/433) carried a carbapenemase (most commonly, VIM); all nine carbapenemase-positive isolates were from northern and central Taiwan.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CRPA increased significantly in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 and warrants continued monitoring. In 2021, 97% of all P. aeruginosa and 92% of CRPA in Taiwan were C/T susceptible. Routine in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa against C/T, and other newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, appears prudent.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of E. coli Isolates from Intra-Abdominal Infections in the Asia-Pacific Region: Trends in Ciprofloxacin, Ceftriaxone, Cefepime, and Piperacillin/Tazobactam Susceptibility

Purpose

To investigate the antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates in patients diagnosed with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) in the Asia-Pacific region.

Patients and Methods

This study was conducted at 50 medical hospitals across 9 countries/regions as part of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program from 2014 to 2018. Nonduplicate isolates of aerobic and facultative gram-negative bacilli were collected and processed for further antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Results

A total of 10,709 isolates were collected, with E. coli (n=4737, 44.2%) being the leading pathogen causing IAIs, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=2429, 22.7%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=931, 8.7%). Community-associated (CA) E. coli isolates generally exhibited higher susceptibility rates for most antibiotics than hospital-associated (HA) isolates. In countries/regions other than Hong Kong, South Korea, and Singapore, HA isolates displayed lower susceptibility rates for multiple classes (≥4) of antibiotics. Among the commonly used antibiotics in IAIs, the overall susceptibility rate for ciprofloxacin was low, with an average of 41.3%. Ceftriaxone susceptibility rates in all selected countries were below 80% starting in 2018, ranging from 23.3% to 75.8%. The cefepime susceptibility rates varied across regions, with consistently reduced susceptibility ranging from 45.5% to 57.8% in India, Thailand, and Vietnam. Piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated effectiveness against E. coli isolates in almost all countries except India, with a downward trend observed in the Philippines and Taiwan. Carbapenems remained effective against more than 90% of E. coli isolates, except in India.

Conclusion

Prudent use of fluoroquinolones and ceftriaxone is advised when treating both CA and HA IAIs in the Asia-Pacific region. The low susceptibility rate of cefepime in India, Thailand, and Vietnam needs careful consideration in its administration. Moreover, the increase in nonsusceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam in the Philippines and Taiwan poses a potential risk that should be closely monitored.

Trimeric Tobramycin/Nebramine Synergizes β-Lactam Antibiotics against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

β-Lactam antibiotics remain one of the most effective therapeutics to treat infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). However, since ancient times, bacteria have developed multiple resistance mechanisms toward this class of antibiotics including overexpression of β-lactamases, suppression of porins, outer membrane impermeability, overexpression of efflux pumps, and target modifications. To cope with these challenges and to extend the lifetime of existing β-lactam antibiotics, β-lactamase inhibitors are combined with β-lactam antibiotics to prevent antibiotic inactivation by β-lactamases. The combination therapy of an outer membrane permeabilizer with β-lactam antibiotics is an alternative approach to overcoming bacterial resistance of β-lactams in GNB. This approach is of particular interest for pathogens with highly impermeable outer membranes like Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Previous studies have shown that outer membrane permeabilizers can be designed by linking tobramycin and nebramine units together in the form of dimers or chimeras. In this study, we developed trimeric tobramycin and nebramine-based outer membrane permeabilizers presented on a central 1,3,5-triazine framework. The resultant trimers are capable of potentiating outer membrane-impermeable antibiotics but also β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Furthermore, the microbiological susceptibility breakpoints of ceftazidime, aztreonam, and imipenem were reached by a triple combination consisting of an outer-membrane permeabilizer/β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor in β-lactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. Overall, our results indicate that trimeric tobramycins/nebramines can rescue clinically approved β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations from resistance.

Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Treating Gram-Negative Severe Infections in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not enough data exist to inform the optimal duration and type of antimicrobial therapy against GN infections in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a literature search through PubMed and Cochrane using the following keywords: "multi-drug resistant (MDR)", "extensively drug resistant (XDR)", "pan-drug-resistant (PDR)", "difficult-to-treat (DTR) Gram-negative infection," "antibiotic duration therapy", "antibiotic combination therapy" "antibiotic monotherapy" "Gram-negative bacteremia", "Gram-negative pneumonia", and "Gram-negative intra-abdominal infection".

RESULTS

Current literature data suggest adopting longer (≥10-14 days) courses of synergistic combination therapy due to the high global prevalence of ESBL-producing (45-50%), MDR (35%), XDR (15-20%), PDR (5.9-6.2%), and carbapenemases (CP)/metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing (12.5-20%) Gram-negative (GN) microorganisms (i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii). On the other hand, shorter courses (≤5-7 days) of monotherapy should be limited to treating infections caused by GN with higher (≥3 antibiotic classes) antibiotic susceptibility. A general approach should be based on (i) third or further generation cephalosporins ± quinolones/aminoglycosides in the case of MDR-GN; (ii) carbapenems ± fosfomycin/aminoglycosides for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); and (iii) the association of old drugs with new expanded-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors for XDR, PDR, and CP microorganisms. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in combination with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic antibiotics, and the presence of resistance risk predictors (linked to patient, antibiotic, and microorganism) should represent variables affecting the antimicrobial strategies for treating GN infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strategies of therapy described in the results, clinicians must remember that all treatment decisions are dynamic, requiring frequent reassessments depending on both the clinical and microbiological responses of the patient.

Case Commentary: When Voldemort Meets Sauron: Treatment Considerations for Emerging Dual-Carbapenemase-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections caused by extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat due to limited effective treatment options. In this issue, a patient with a corneal infection caused by a Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM)- and Guiana extended-spectrum β-lactamase (GES)-coproducing P. aeruginosa strain associated with the recent artificial tears-related outbreak in the United States is described. This resistance genotype/phenotype further compromises therapeutic options, and this report provides insights into diagnostic and treatment approaches for clinicians dealing with infections due to this highly resistant P. aeruginosa.

An overview of gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance: definition, prevalence, and treatment options

INTRODUCTION

Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) is a newly proposed resistance phenotype characterized by resistance to all first-line drugs. The emergence of DTR as a new resistance phenotype has significant implications for clinical practice. This new concept has the potential to be widely used instead of traditional phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

This study carried out a detailed analysis about the definition, application, and evolution of various resistance phenotypes. We collected all the research articles on Gram-negative bacteria with difficult-to-treat resistance (GNB-DTR), analyzed the DTR in each region and each bacterial species. The advantages and doubts of DTR, the dilemma of GNB-DTR infections and the potential therapeutic strategies are summarized in the review.

EXPERT OPINION

Available studies show that the prevalence of GNB-DTR is not optimistic. Unlike traditional resistance phenotypes, DTR is more closely aligned with the clinical treatment perspective and can help with the prompt selection of an appropriate treatment plan. Currently, potential treatment options for GNB-DTR include a number of second-line drugs and novel antibiotics. However, the definition of first-line drugs is inherently dynamic. Therefore, the DTR concept based on first-line drugs needs to be continuously updated and refined, considering the emergence of new antibiotics, resistance characteristics, and pathogen prevalence in different regions.

Difficult-to-treat resistant gram-negative blood stream infections - the beginning of a superbug era - a prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem resistant gram-negative bacterial infections are a growing concern worldwide. However, India is already in the era of a shortage of effective antibiotics for the management of these infections. Moreover, Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR) gram-negative infections, which are not much studied, further complicate the scenario. This study emphasized the incidence and outcomes of DTR infections.

METHODOLOGY

This is a single-center prospective observational study. The study included hospitalised patients aged ≥18 years with gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections (GNBSI). Blood cultures with the growth of contaminants and/or single positive culture taken from the femoral site were excluded. Incidences of DTR infections and outcomes in the form of 30-day mortality were analysed.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty patients with GNBSI episodes were recorded. The Incidence of DTR GNBSI was 37.9% (91/240). Multivariate analysis found that Hospital-acquired infections, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factors for DTR GNBSI. The most common DTR GNB isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae (31/49, 63.3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (26/52, 50%). The adjusted relative risk of mortality was remarkably high in DTR GNBSI (aRR 3.9; 95% CI 1.9-7.9) as compared to CR+/DTR- GNBSI (aRR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-1.0) and ESCR/CS GNBSI (aRR 1.1; 95% CI 0.5-2.4).

CONCLUSION

DTR GNB infections are growing concern in India and this need to be evaluated in multicentric studies. Moreover, DTR GNBSI was associated with significantly higher mortality and there is need of further empowerment of antibiotic stewardship practices.

Susceptibility profile and β-lactamase content of global Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam and/or imipenem/relebactam-SMART 2016-21

Objectives

To determine susceptibility profiles and β-lactamase content for ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant and imipenem/relebactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected in eight global regions during 2016-21.

Methods

Broth microdilution MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints. PCR to identify β-lactamase genes or WGS was performed on selected isolate subsets.

Results

Ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant [from 0.6% (Australia/New Zealand) to 16.7% (Eastern Europe)] and imipenem/relebactam-resistant [from 1.3% (Australia/New Zealand) to 13.6% (Latin America)] P. aeruginosa varied by geographical region. Globally, 5.9% of isolates were both ceftolozane/tazobactam resistant and imipenem/relebactam resistant; 76% of these isolates carried MBLs. Most ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible isolates carried ESBLs (44%) or did not carry non-intrinsic (acquired) β-lactamases (49%); 95% of imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates did not carry non-intrinsic β-lactamases. Isolates that carried indicators of strong PDC (Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase) up-regulation without a mutation known to expand the spectrum of PDC, or non-intrinsic β-lactamases, showed an 8-fold increase in ceftolozane/tazobactam modal MIC; however, this rarely (3%) resulted in ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. Isolates with a PDC mutation and an indicator for PDC upregulation were ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible (MIC,  ≥ 8 mg/L). MICs ranged widely (1 to >32 mg/L) for isolates with a PDC mutation and no positively identified indicator for PDC up-regulation. Imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic β-lactamases frequently (91%) harboured genetic lesions implying OprD loss of function; however, this finding alone did not account for this phenotype. Among imipenem-non-susceptible isolates without non-intrinsic β-lactamases, implied OprD loss only shifted the distribution of imipenem/relebactam MICs up by 1-2 doubling dilutions, resulting in ∼10% imipenem/relebactam-resistant isolates.

Conclusions

P. aeruginosa with ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant/imipenem/relebactam-susceptible and imipenem/relebactam-resistant/ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible phenotypes were uncommon and harboured diverse resistance determinants.

Participant- and Disease-Related Factors as Independent Predictors of Treatment Outcomes in the RESTORE-IMI 2 Clinical Trial: A Multivariable Regression Analysis

Background

In the RESTORE-IMI 2 trial, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in treating hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. This post hoc analysis was conducted to determine independent predictors of efficacy outcomes in the RESTORE-IMI 2 trial, to assist in treatment decision making.

Methods

A stepwise multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify variables that were independently associated with day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM), favorable clinical response at early follow-up (EFU), and favorable microbiologic response at end of treatment (EOT). The analysis accounted for the number of baseline infecting pathogens and in vitro susceptibility to randomized treatment.

Results

Vasopressor use, renal impairment, bacteremia at baseline, and Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores ≥15 were associated with a greater risk of day 28 ACM. A favorable clinical response at EFU was associated with normal renal function, an APACHE II score <15, no vasopressor use, and no bacteremia at baseline. At EOT, a favorable microbiologic response was associated with IMI/REL treatment, normal renal function, no vasopressor use, nonventilated pneumonia at baseline, intensive care unit admission at randomization, monomicrobial infections at baseline, and absence of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex at baseline. These factors remained significant after accounting for polymicrobial infection and in vitro susceptibility to assigned treatment.

Conclusions

This analysis, which accounted for baseline pathogen susceptibility, validated well-recognized patient- and disease-related factors as independent predictors of clinical outcomes. These results lend further support to the noninferiority of IMI/REL to piperacillin/tazobactam and suggests that pathogen eradication may be more likely with IMI/REL.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02493764.

Chimeric Tobramycin-Based Adjuvant TOB-TOB-CIP Potentiates Fluoroquinolone and β-Lactam Antibiotics against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

According to the World Health Organization, antibiotic resistance is a global health threat. Of particular importance are infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria including Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which limited treatment options exist. Multiple and simultaneously occurring resistance mechanisms including outer membrane impermeability, overexpression of efflux pumps, antibiotic-modifying enzymes, and modification of genes and antibiotic targets have made antibiotic drug development more difficult against these pathogens. One strategy to cope with these challenges is the use of outer membrane permeabilizers that increase the intracellular concentration of antibiotics when used in combination. In some circumstances, this approach can rescue antibiotics from resistance or repurpose currently marketed antibiotics. Tobramycin-based hybrid antibiotic adjuvants that combine two outer membrane-active components have been previously shown to potentiate antibiotics by facilitating transit through the outer membrane, resulting in increased antibiotic accumulation within the cell. Herein, we extended the concept of tobramycin-based hybrid antibiotic adjuvants to tobramycin-based chimeras by engineering up to three different membrane-active antibiotic warheads such as tobramycin, 1-(1-naphthylmethyl)-piperazine, ciprofloxacin, and cyclam into a central 1,3,5-triazine scaffold. Chimera 4 (TOB-TOB-CIP) consistently synergized with ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and moxifloxacin against wild-type and fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa. Moreover, the susceptibility breakpoints of ceftazidime, aztreonam, and imipenem were reached using the triple combination of chimera 4 with ceftazidime/avibactam, aztreonam/avibactam, and imipenem/relebactam, respectively, against β-lactamase-harboring P. aeruginosa. Our findings demonstrate that tobramycin-based chimeras form a novel class of antibiotic potentiators capable of restoring the activity of antibiotics against P. aeruginosa.

Cost-effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia

Aim: This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) for treating hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) in an 'early adjustment prescribing scenario'. Methods: An economic model was constructed to compare two strategies: continuation of empiric piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) versus early adjustment to IMI/REL. A decision tree was used to depict the hospitalization period, and a Markov model used to capture long-term outcomes. Results: IMI/REL generated more quality-adjusted life years than PIP/TAZ, at an increased cost per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $17,529 per QALY is below the typical US willingness-to-pay threshold. Conclusion: IMI/REL may represent a cost-effective treatment for payers and a valuable option for clinicians, when considered alongside patient risk factors, local epidemiology, and susceptibility data.

Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Heteroresistance

Abstract Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that can cause various life-threatening infections. Several unique characteristics make it the ability of survivability and adaptable and develop resistance to antimicrobial agents through multiple mechanisms. Heteroresistance, which is a subpopulation-mediated resistance, has received increasing attention in recent years. Heteroresistance may lead to unexpected treatment failure if not diagnosed in time and treated properly. Therefore, heteroresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections pose considerable problems for hospital-acquired infections. However, the clinical prevalence and implications of Pseudomonas aeruginosa heteroresistance have not been reviewed. Results: In this work, the aspects of the clinically reported heteroresistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to commonly used antibiotic agents are reviewed. The prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical relevance of each reported heteroresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa are discussed.

Clinical characteristics, microbiology and outcomes of a cohort of patients treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam in acute care inpatient facilities, Houston, Texas, USA

Background

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against a variety of Gram-negative bacteria, including MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This agent is approved for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. However, most real-world outcome data come from small observational cohorts. Thus, we sought to evaluate the utilization of ceftolozane/tazobactam at multiple tertiary hospitals in Houston, TX, USA.

Methods

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of patients receiving at least 48 h of ceftolozane/tazobactam therapy from January 2016 through to September 2019 at two hospital systems in Houston. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were collected, including the infecting bacterial isolate, when available. The primary outcome was composite clinical success at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and clinical disposition at 14 and 30 days post ceftolozane/tazobactam initiation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the primary outcome and mortality. Recovered isolates were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and underwent WGS.

Results

A total of 263 patients were enrolled, and composite clinical success was achieved in 185 patients (70.3%). Severity of illness was the most consistent predictor of clinical success. Combination therapy with ceftolozane/tazobactam and another Gram-negative-active agent was associated with reduced odds of clinical success (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63). Resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam was noted in 15.4% of isolates available for WGS; mutations in ampC and ftsI were common but did not cluster with a particular ST.

Conclusions

Clinical success rate among this patient cohort treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam was similar compared with previous experiences. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remains an alternative agent for treatment of susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa.

Methods to appraise available evidence and adequacy of data from a systematic literature review to conduct a robust network meta-analysis of treatment options for patients with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia

We aimed to determine if available evidence from a previously conducted systematic literature review was sufficient to conduct a robust network meta-analysis (NMA) using the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Practice Task Force NMA study questionnaire to evaluate suitability, relevance, and credibility of available randomized-controlled trials (RCT) of antibacterial therapies for treatment of patients with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). We assessed feasibility and reliability of an NMA for a connected network of RCTs, and then relevance and credibility of the connected network for informing decision-making. This previously conducted systematic literature review using Cochrane dual-reviewer methodology, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and PICOTS (population, interventions, comparators, outcomes, timing, and setting) criteria identified 25 citations between 2001 and 2018; 18 were unique RCTs. Trial design characteristics, outcome definitions, assessment time points, and analyses populations varied across studies. Using "clinical response," an efficacy end point to health technology assessment agencies, we assessed potential network credibility, which collapsed from the overall data set to four studies and five interventions. This did not include closed loop(s) needed to assess consistency. Of the studies reporting clinical response, >70% of patients were ventilated at baseline with mean Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores from 14.7 to 17.5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (range, 18.4-64.1%) and Klebsiella spp. (range, 1.6-49%) were the most common causative pathogens. We identified relevant RCTs for most standard-of-care agents approved for HABP/VABP, which provided a comprehensive evidence base. In summary, our appraisal of available evidence for the clinical response outcome among adult patients with HABP/VABP does not support the conduct of a scientifically robust and clinically meaningful NMA. Although this data is vital to registration, there are significant limitations in these trials for health technology assessments, payor decisions, guidelines, and protocol decisions.

Clinical Outcomes, Microbiological Characteristics and Risk Factors for Difficult-to-Treat Resistance to Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection

Purpose

This study aimed to identify the clinical outcomes, microbiological features and risk factors for difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) infection.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at Peking University Third Hospital from January 2020 to March 2021. DTR was defined as resistance to ≥1 carbapenem, ≥1 extended-spectrum cephalosporin, and ≥1 fluoroquinolone. Hypervirulent Kp (HvKp) was defined as peg-344-, iroB-, iucA-, rmpA-, or rmpA2-positive. Clinical data were collected. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and string tests were performed to determine resistance and hypermucoviscosity phenotype. Whole genome sequencing was performed to analyze the sequence type (ST), capsular serotypes, resistance and virulence genes. Risk factors for 30-day mortality were analyzed.

Results

Fifty DTR-Kp (50.0%) strains were identified among 100 patients. Compared to non-DTR-Kp group, a significant number of patients with DTR-Kp infection experienced ICU admission (44.0% versus 10.0%, P<0.001) and mechanical ventilation after Kp detection (26.0% versus 10.0%, P=0.037). Notably, the percentage of hvKp among the DTR-Kp isolates increased consistently over the 15 months evaluated. Most DTR-Kp strains belonged to ST11 (82.0%), followed by ST15 (12.0%), ST86 (2.0%), ST996 (2.0%), and ST3157 (2.0%). DTR-Kp isolates possessed various resistance genes, such as bla_KPC-2, bla_TEM-1D and fosA3 (90.0%, 80.0% and 72.0%, respectively). Importantly, the yersiniabactin genes were significantly clustered in DTR group (48/50, 96.0%). The 30-day mortality was significantly higher in patients with DTR-Kp infection than non-DTR-Kp group (38.0% versus 8.2%, P=0.001). DTR-Kp infection (odds ratio [OR] = 4.196) was an independent risk factor for the 30-day mortality of Kp-infected patients. Additionally, cerebrovascular disease (OR = 2.780) and Charlson comorbidity index (OR= 1.584) were independent risk factors for DTR-Kp infections.

Conclusion

DTR-hvKp is rapidly emerging. The DTR-Kp strains harbored various resistance genes and high rates of yersiniabactin siderophore genes. DTR-Kp infection was an independent risk factor for mortality, suggesting that enhanced awareness essential.

In Vitro Activity of New β-Lactam–β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations and Comparators against Clinical Isolates of Gram-Negative Bacilli: Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019

Novel β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) are in clinical development for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) (defined as resistance to all tested β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) Gram-negative bacilli. This study evaluated the in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, cefepime-tazobactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and other comparators against 4,042 nonduplicate Gram-negative clinical isolates collected from different regions of China (46 hospitals) in 2019. Based on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) breakpoints, cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 98.5% of Enterobacterales and 98.9% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Against carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacilli, cefepime-zidebactam demonstrated better activity against Enterobacterales (96% and 97.2%, respectively) and P. aeruginosa (98.2% and 96.9%, respectively). Among the 379 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates, the most common carbapenemase genes detected were bla_KPC-2 (64.1%) and bla_NDM (30.9%). Cefepime-zidebactam showed an MIC₉₀ of ≤2 mg/L for 98.8% of bla_KPC-positive isolates and 89.7% of bla_NDM-positive isolates. Ceftazidime-avibactam also showed efficient in vitro activity against Enterobacterales (93.6%) and P. aeruginosa (87.7%). Ceftazidime-avibactam was active against 97.5% of bla_KPC-positive isolates and 100% of bla_OXA-232-positive isolates. Cefepime-zidebactam inhibited 97.3% of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates with an MIC_50/90 of 16/32 mg/L. Our study systematically evaluated the in vitro activities of these new BLBLIs against a variety of Gram-negative bacilli, provided preclinical data for the approval of these BLBLIs in China, and supported cefepime-zidebactam and ceftazidime-avibactam as potential efficient therapies for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and DTR isolates.

IMPORTANCEEnterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii are the most common Gram-negative bacilli to cause nosocomial infections throughout the world. Due to their large public health and societal implications, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB), carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA), and carbapenem-resistant and third-generation-cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were regarded by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global priority for investment in new drugs in 2017. The present study showed the potent in vitro activity of these novel BLBLIs and other comparators against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, including carbapenem-resistant or difficult-to-treat resistant phenotypes. Polymyxins, tigecycline, and ceftazidime-avibactam (except for bla_NDM-positive isolates) were available for the treatment of infections caused by CRE isolates. Currently, cefepime-zidebactam and other BLBLIs have not yet been approved for use in China. Here, our study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activities of BLBLIs against Gram-negative bacillus isolates, especially CRE, before clinical use.

New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam

Imipenem (IMI)/cilastatin/relebactam (REL) (I/R) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with expanded microbiologic activity against carbapenem-resistant non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (CR-NME) and difficult-to-treat (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Relebactam, a bicyclic diazabicyclooctane, has no direct antimicrobial activity but provides reliable inhibition of many Ambler class A and class C enzymes. It is currently approved for the treatment of adult patients with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) and those with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) when limited or no alternative treatments are available. Given the number of recently approved β-lactams with expanded activity against highly resistant Gram-negative pathogens, this review summarizes the published literature on I/R, with a focus on its similar and distinguishing characteristics relative to those of other recently approved agents. Overall, available data support its use for the treatment of patients with HABP/VABP, cUTI, and cIAI due to CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa. Data indicate that I/R retains some activity against CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa isolates that are resistant to the newer β-lactams and vice versa, suggesting that susceptibility testing be performed for all the newer agents to determine optimal treatment options for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections. Further comparative PK/PD and clinical studies are warranted to determine the optimal role of I/R, alone and in combination, for the treatment of patients with highly resistant Gram-negative infections. Until further data are available, I/R is a potential treatment for patients with CR-NME and DTR P. aeruginosa infections when the benefits outweigh the risks.

Imipenem/Relebactam Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Extensively Drug Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Inhibitor-Resistant β-Lactamases and Their Increasing Importance

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a major clinical challenge. Many isolates are carbapenem resistant, which severely limits treatment options; thus, novel therapeutic combinations, such as imipenem-relebactam (IMI/REL), ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI), ceftolozane-tazobactam (TOL/TAZO), and meropenem-vaborbactam (MEM/VAB) were developed. Here, we studied two extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa isolates, collected in the United States and Mexico, that demonstrated resistance to IMI/REL. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) showed that both isolates contained acquired GES β-lactamases, intrinsic PDC and OXA β-lactamases, and disruptions in the genes encoding the OprD porin, thereby inhibiting uptake of carbapenems. In one isolate (ST17), the entire C terminus of OprD deviated from the expected amino acid sequence after amino acid G388. In the other (ST309), the entire oprD gene was interrupted by an ISPa1328 insertion element after amino acid D43, rendering this porin nonfunctional. The poor inhibition by REL of the GES β-lactamases (GES-2, -19, and -20; apparent K_i of 19 ± 2 μM, 23 ± 2 μM, and 21 ± 2 μM, respectively) within the isolates also contributed to the observed IMI/REL-resistant phenotype. Modeling of REL binding to the active site of GES-20 suggested that the acylated REL is positioned in an unstable conformation as a result of a constrained Ω-loop.

New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review

P. aeruginosa is still one of the most threatening pathogens responsible for serious hospital-acquired infections. It is intrinsically resistant to many antimicrobial agents and additional acquired resistance further complicates the management of such infections. High rates of combined antimicrobial resistance persist in many countries, especially in the eastern and south-eastern parts of Europe. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology, latest data, and clinical evidence on the current and new available drugs active against P. aeruginosa isolates with limited treatment options. The latest evidence and recommendations supporting the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, characterized by targeted clinical activity against a significant proportion of P. aeruginosa strains with limited treatment options, are described based on a review of the latest microbiological and clinical studies. Cefiderocol, with excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates, good stability to all β-lactamases and against porin and efflux pumps mutations, is also examined. New carbapenem combinations are explored, reviewing the latest experimental and initial clinical evidence. One section is devoted to a review of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotics in the pipeline, such as cefepime-taniborbactam and cefepime-zidebactam. Finally, other “old” antimicrobials, mainly fosfomycin, that can be used as combination strategies, are described.

In vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam plus aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase producing, OprD-deficient Pseudomonas aeruginosa with varying levels of Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase production

BACKGROUND

Limited treatment options exist for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Imipenem/relebactam plus aztreonam may be an option.

METHODS

Ten OprD(-) P. aeruginosa isolates (3 parent strains; 7 MBL-producers) were evaluated using checkerboard methodology and Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI). Isolates exhibiting synergy in checkerboard studies (FICI ≤0.5) were evaluated using 24-hour static concentration time-kill. Bacteria in late log-phase growth were diluted to 1 × 10⁶ cfu/mL and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Samples were drawn at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours. Physiologic fC_max, fC_ss,avg and fC_min of imipenem (26.7, 5.6, 0.5 mg/L), relebactam (13.1, 4, 0.8 mg/L) and aztreonam (62, 29, 8 mg/L) were used. Synergy in time-kill studies was defined as >2 log₁₀ cfu/mL reduction compared to the most active individual agent.

RESULTS

Synergy was observed in five isolates in checkerboard studies, including three of seven MBL-producing isolates. Isolates which were OprD(-) and harboured inducible Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinases (PDCs) did not show synergy as defined by FICI, however aztreonam MICs were significantly reduced with the combination. In time-kill studies, ATM alone was as active as combination regimens for MBL-producing isolates with deleted or inducible PDC production. For strains exhibiting constitutive PDC production, I/R plus ATM was synergistic at fC_ss,avg concentrations but exhibited similar activity to ATM at fC_min and fC_max concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/relebactam plus aztreonam appears to exhibit synergy for some MBL-producing P. aeruginosa at physiologic concentrations. Further study of the effect of dynamic concentrations is needed to understand fully the utility of this combination.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Difficult-to-Treat Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Cystitis, Pyelonephritis, and Prostatitis: A Narrative Review

Urinary tract infections, including cystitis, acute pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, are among the most common diagnoses prompting antibiotic prescribing. The rise in antimicrobial resistance over the past decades has led to the increasing challenge of urinary tract infections because of multidrug-resistant and "difficult-to-treat resistance" among Gram-negative bacteria. Recent advances in pharmacotherapy and medical microbiology are modernizing how these urinary tract infections are treated. Advances in pharmacotherapy have included not only the development and approval of novel antibiotics, such as ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, and glycylcyclines, but also the re-examination of the potential role of legacy antibiotics, including older aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. Recent advances in medical microbiology allow phenotypic and molecular mechanism of resistance testing, and thus antibiotic prescribing can be tailored to the mechanism of resistance in the infecting pathogen. Here, we provide a narrative review on the clinical and pre-clinical studies of drugs that can be used for difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria, with a particular focus on data relevant to the urinary tract. We also offer a pragmatic framework for antibiotic selection when encountering urinary tract infections due to difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative bacteria based on the organism and its mechanism of resistance.

In Vitro Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens to Cefiderocol in Five Consecutive Annual Multinational SIDERO-WT Surveillance Studies, 2014 to 2019

We report in vitro susceptibility data from five consecutive annual SIDERO-WT surveillance studies (2014 to 2019) for cefiderocol and comparators tested against Gram-negative clinical isolates from North America and Europe. CLSI broth microdilution was used to determine MICs for Enterobacterales (n = 31,896), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 7,700), Acinetobacter baumannii complex (n = 5,225), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 2,030), and Burkholderia cepacia complex (n = 425). MICs were interpreted by CLSI-approved clinical breakpoints (February 2021). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.8, 96.7, 91.6, and 97.7% of all Enterobacterales, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 μg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 99.9, 99.8, 100, and 99.8% of all P. aeruginosa, meropenem-nonsusceptible, ceftazidime-avibactam-nonsusceptible, and ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, respectively, at ≤4 μg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). Cefiderocol inhibited 96.0% of all A. baumannii complex isolates and 94.2% of meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates at ≤4 μg/mL (susceptible breakpoint) and 98.6% of S. maltophilia isolates at ≤1 μg/mL (susceptible breakpoint). B. cepacia complex isolates were tested with a MIC50 of ≤0.03 μg/mL and MIC90 of 0.5 μg/mL. Annual cefiderocol percent susceptible rates for Enterobacterales (North America range, 99.6 to 100%/year; Europe range, 99.3 to 99.9%/year) and P. aeruginosa (North America range, 99.8 to 100%; Europe range, 99.9 to 100%) were unchanged from 2014 to 2019. Annual percent susceptible rates for A. baumannii complex demonstrated sporadic, nondirectional differences (North America range, 97.5 to 100%; Europe range, 90.4 to 97.5%); the wider range for Europe (∼7%) was due to isolates from Russia. Annual percent susceptible rates for S. maltophilia showed minor, nondirectional differences (North America range, 96.4 to 100%; Europe range, 95.6 to 100%). We conclude that clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (99.8% susceptible), P. aeruginosa (99.9%), A. baumannii (96.0%), and S. maltophilia (98.6%) collected in North America and Europe from 2014 to 2019 were highly susceptible to cefiderocol.

Dose optimisation of antibiotics used for meningitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Central nervous system (CNS) infections such as ventriculitis and meningitis are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In part, this may be due to increased difficulties in achieving a therapeutic antibiotic concentration at the site of infection due to both the pharmacokinetic (PK) changes observed during critical illness and the reduced antibiotic penetration through the blood brain barrier. This paper reviews the pharmacodynamics (PD) and CNS PKs of antibiotics used for Gram-negative bacterial CNS infections to provide clinicians with practical dosing advice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent PK studies have shown that currently used intravenous antibiotic dosing regimens may not achieve a therapeutic exposure within the CNS, even for reportedly 'susceptible' bacteria per the current clinical meningitis breakpoints. Limited data exist for new β-lactam antibiotic/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, which may be required for multidrug resistant infections. Intraventricular antibiotic administration, although not a new concept, has further evidence demonstrating improved patient outcomes compared with intravenous therapy alone, despite the ongoing paucity of PK studies guiding dosing recommendations.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should obtain the bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration when treating patients with CNS Gram-negative bacterial infections and consider the underlying PK/PD principles when prescribing antibiotics. Therapeutic drug monitoring, where available, should be considered to guide dosing. Intraventricular therapy should also be considered for patients with ventricular drains to optimise clinical outcomes.

New antibiotics for the treatment of nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the current literature on novel agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant nonfermenting Gram-negative bacteria (NF-GNB) infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some novel agents have recently become available that are expected to replace classical polymyxins as the first-line options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant NF-GNB infections.

SUMMARY

In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of the differential activity of various recently approved agents against NF-GNB most encountered in the daily clinical practice, as well as the results from phase-3 randomized clinical trials and large postapproval observational studies, with special focus on NF-GNB. Since resistance to novel agents has already been reported, the use of novel agents needs to be optimized, based on their differential activity (not only in terms of targeted bacteria, but also of resistance determinants), the local microbiological epidemiology, and the most updated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data. Large real-life experiences remain of crucial importance for further refining the optimal treatment of NF-GNB infections in the daily clinical practice.

Novel β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations versus Alternative Antibiotics in Adults with Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: An Integrated Analysis of 3 Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and EBSCO databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before September 13, 2020. Only RCTs comparing the treatment efficacy of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with other antibiotics for HAP/VAP in adult patients were included in this integrated analysis.

RESULTS

Three RCTs were included, and no significant difference in clinical cure rate of the test of cure (TOC) was observed between the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and comparators (odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.81-1.27; I² = 35%). The 28-day all-cause mortality was 16.2% and 17.6% for patients receiving the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination and those receiving comparators, respectively, and no significant difference was noted (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.16; I² = 11%). Compared with the comparators, the novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination was associated with a similar microbiological response (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.73-1.54; I² = 64%) and a similar risk of AEs (treatment-emergent AEs [TEAEs]: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.83-1.30; I² = 0%; serious AEs: OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.79-1.63; I² = 68%; treatment discontinuation for TEAE: OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.62-1.31; I² = 11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and microbiological responses of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in the treatment of HAP/VAP were similar to those of other available antibiotics. These combinations also shared a similar safety profile to that of comparators.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem in patients with ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia: subset analysis of the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled phase 3 trial

Background

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) at double the dose approved for other infection sites. Among nosocomial pneumonia subtypes, ventilated HABP (vHABP) is associated with the lowest survival. In the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled trial, participants with vHABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) than those receiving meropenem. We conducted a series of post hoc analyses to explore the clinical significance of this finding.

Methods

ASPECT-NP was a multinational, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating vHABP and VABP; study design, efficacy, and safety results have been reported previously. The primary endpoint was 28-day ACM. The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at test-of-cure. Participants with vHABP were a prospectively defined subgroup, but subgroup analyses were not powered for noninferiority testing. We compared baseline and treatment factors, efficacy, and safety between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in participants with vHABP. We also conducted a retrospective multivariable logistic regression analysis in this subgroup to determine the impact of treatment arm on mortality when adjusted for significant prognostic factors.

Results

Overall, 99 participants in the ceftolozane/tazobactam and 108 in the meropenem arm had vHABP. 28-day ACM was 24.2% and 37.0%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference: 0.2, 24.8) and 18.2% and 36.6%, respectively, in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (95% CI 2.5, 32.5). Clinical cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 50.5% and 44.4%, respectively (95% CI − 7.4, 19.3). Baseline clinical, baseline microbiologic, and treatment factors were comparable between treatment arms. Multivariable regression identified concomitant vasopressor use and baseline bacteremia as significantly impacting ACM in ASPECT-NP; adjusting for these two factors, the odds of dying by day 28 were 2.3-fold greater when participants received meropenem instead of ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Conclusions

There were no underlying differences between treatment arms expected to have biased the observed survival advantage with ceftolozane/tazobactam in the vHABP subgroup. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors found to impact ACM significantly in this trial, the mortality risk in participants with vHABP was over twice as high when treated with meropenem compared with ceftolozane/tazobactam.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070757. Registered 25 February, 2014, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02070757.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03694-3.

Variability of Beta-Lactam Broth Microdilution for Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Pseudomonas aeruginosa is critical to determine suitable treatment options. Commercial susceptibility tests are typically calibrated against the reference method, broth microdilution (BMD). Imprecision of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained by BMD for the same isolate on repeat testing is known to exist. Factors that impact the extent of variability include concentration of the inoculum, operator effects, contents of the media, inherent strain properties, and the testing process or materials. We evaluated the variability of BMD for anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams (aztreonam, cefepime, ceftazidime, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam) tested against a collection of P. aeruginosa isolates. Multiple replicate BMD tests were performed and MICs were compared to assess reproducibility, including the impact of the inoculum and operator. Overall, essential agreement (EA) was ≥ 90% for all beta-lactams tested. Absolute agreement (AA) was as low as 70% for some beta-lactams. Variability from the inoculum and operators impacted the reproducibility of MICs. Piperacillin-tazobactam exhibited the highest degree of variability with 74% AA and 94%% EA. The implications of MIC variability are extensive as the MIC is essential for multiple facets of microbiology, such as the development of new compounds and susceptibility tests, dose optimization and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for individual patients.

The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included.

Results

Overall, four RCTs including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs was 51.3% (748/1458) in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group, which was comparable to the control group, 49.9% [714/1430; odd's ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.25; I ² = 0%]. In addition, no difference was observed between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups in terms of the risk of serious AEs (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93-1.61; I ² = 15.5%) and the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; I ² = 0%). The rate of all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; I ² = 0%). The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile (C. difficile) colitis, where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group [0.72% (10/1376) versus 0.14% (2/1391), OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.23-11.97; I ² = 0%].

Conclusion

Ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment is as tolerable as comparative treatment options for acute bacterial infections in adult patients, however it has an increased risk of C. difficile infection. As a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in common clinical practice.

Plain language summary

The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam (an antibiotics) for the treatment of acute bacterial infections Objective(s): Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an effective antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. This study conducts a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety (side effects) of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients compared with other drugs. Methods: We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group). Results: The rate of treatment related adverse events (AEs) was similar in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group (51.3%) and control group (49.9%). There was also no difference in risk of serious adverse events, the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs, and all-cause mortality. The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile colitis (a cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea), where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group. Conclusion: In conclusion, as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in clinical practice.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against a Spanish nationwide collection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

BACKGROUND

Imipenem/relebactam is a novel carbapenem/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, developed to act against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against a Spanish nationwide collection of CPE by testing the susceptibility of these isolates to 16 widely used antimicrobials and to determine the underlying β-lactam resistance mechanisms involved and the molecular epidemiology of carbapenemases in Spain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical CPE isolates (n = 401) collected for 2 months from 24 hospitals in Spain were tested. MIC50, MIC90 and susceptibility/resistance rates were interpreted in accordance with the EUCAST guidelines. β-Lactam resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology were characterized by WGS.

RESULTS

For all isolates, high rates of susceptibility to colistin (86.5%; MIC50/90 = 0.12/8 mg/L), imipenem/relebactam (85.8%; MIC50/90 = 0.5/4 mg/L) and ceftazidime/avibactam (83.8%, MIC50/90 = 1/≥256 mg/L) were observed. The subgroups of isolates producing OXA-48-like (n = 305, 75.1%) and KPC-like enzymes (n = 44, 10.8%) were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (97.7%, MIC50/90 = 1/2 mg/L) and imipenem/relebactam (100.0%, MIC50/90 = ≤0.25/1 mg/L), respectively.The most widely disseminated high-risk clones of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae across Spain were found to be ST11, ST147, ST392 and ST15 (mostly associated with OXA-48) and ST258/512 (in all cases producing KPC).

CONCLUSIONS

Imipenem/relebactam, colistin and ceftazidime/avibactam were the most active antimicrobials against all CPEs. Imipenem/relebactam is a valuable addition to the antimicrobial arsenal used in the fight against CPE, particularly against KPC-producing isolates, which in all cases were susceptible to this combination.

Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered during the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) program in Spain (2016-2018)

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the susceptibility to ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators in Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates recovered from intraabdominal (IAI), urinary (UTI), respiratory (RTI) and bloodstream infection (BSI) in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) study.

METHODS

The susceptibility of 5,351 isolates collected in 11 Spanish hospitals (2016-2018) were analysed (EUCAST-2020 criteria) by broth microdilution and were phenotypically studied for the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). Ceftolozane-tazobactam and/or carbapenem resistant isolates were genetically characterized for ESBL and carbapenemases.

RESULTS

Escherichia coli was the most frequent pathogen (49.3% IAI, 54.9% UTI, 16.7% RTI and 50% BSI), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.9%, 19.1%, 13.1% and 15.4%, respectively). P. aeruginosa was isolated in 9.3%, 5.6%, 32% and 9%, respectively. The frequency of isolates with ESBLs (2016-2017) was: 30.5% K. pneumoniae, 8.6% E. coli, 2.3% Klebsiella oxytoca and 0.7% Proteus mirabilis. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was very active against non-ESBL-(99.3% susceptible) and ESBL-(95.2%) producing E. coli being less active against K. pneumoniae (98% and 43.1%, respectively) isolates. CTX-M-15 was the most prevalent ESBL in E. coli (27.5%) and K. pneumoniae (51.9%) frequently associated with OXA-48-like carbapenemase. Overall, 93% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam, preserving this activity (>75%) in isolates resistant to other beta-lactams except in those resistant to meropenen or ceftazidime-avibactam. GES-5, PER-1, VIM-1/2 were the most prevalent enzymes in isolates resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceftolozane-tazobactam showed high activity rates against isolates recovered in the SMART study although it was affected in K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa isolates with ESBL and/or carbapenemases.

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015-18

Objectives

To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent, 2015–18, collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from Middle Eastern and African countries with a focus on isolates from ICUs and with MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes.

Methods

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 4608 isolates of Enterobacterales (997 isolates from ICU patients) and 1358 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (374 isolates from ICU patients) was performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. MICs were interpreted using both CLSI (2020) and EUCAST (2020) MIC breakpoints.

Results

Most isolates of Enterobacterales (Middle East: ICU, 99.1% susceptible, non-ICU, 99.1%; Africa: ICU, 96.9% susceptible, non-ICU, 98.3%) and P. aeruginosa (Middle East: ICU, 93.4%, non-ICU, 92.1%; Africa: ICU, 89.8%; non-ICU, 94.1%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, MDR rates were similar for Enterobacterales (27.8%–36.0% of isolates) and P. aeruginosa (25.0%–36.4%) while DTR rates were lower for Enterobacterales (1.6%–1.8%) than for P. aeruginosa (5.2%–7.4%). Percentage susceptible rates for ceftazidime/avibactam for MDR Enterobacterales were 96.8%–97.5% (Middle East) and 92.5%–94.3% (Africa) while rates for P. aeruginosa were 70.1%–80.0% (Middle East) and 69.5%–78.2% (Africa). 60.5%–65.8% (Middle East) and 38.9%–52.2% (Africa) of isolates of Enterobacterales with DTR phenotypes were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible as were 29.2%–31.1% (Middle East) and 28.2%–35.8% (Africa) of DTR P. aeruginosa.

Conclusions

Overall, the isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa tested from Middle Eastern and African countries were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Most MDR and many DTR isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.

Mobile Carbapenemase Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa is one of the major concerns in clinical settings impelling a great challenge to antimicrobial therapy for patients with infections caused by the pathogen. While membrane permeability, together with derepression of the intrinsic beta-lactamase gene, is the global prevailing mechanism of carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, the acquired genes for carbapenemases need special attention because horizontal gene transfer through mobile genetic elements, such as integrons, transposons, plasmids, and integrative and conjugative elements, could accelerate the dissemination of the carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. This review aimed to illustrate epidemiologically the carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, including the resistance rates worldwide and the carbapenemase-encoding genes along with the mobile genetic elements responsible for the horizontal dissemination of the drug resistance determinants. Moreover, the modular mobile elements including the carbapenemase-encoding gene, also known as the P. aeruginosa resistance islands, are scrutinized mostly for their structures.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) is an intravenously administered combination of the carbapenem imipenem, the renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor cilastatin, and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Relebactam is a potent inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases, conferring imipenem activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible strains. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adults and other gram-negative infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis] and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. In pivotal phase II and III trials, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with HABP/VABP and to imipenem/cilastatin in patients with cUTIs and cIAIs. It was also effective in imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of imipenem/cilastatin. Available evidence indicates that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an effective and generally well tolerated option for gram-negative infections in adults, including critically ill and/or high-risk patients, and a potential therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Resistance and Mechanisms in Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is one of the most difficult health care-associated infections to treat due to the ability of the organism to acquire a multitude of resistance mechanisms and express the multidrug resistance phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, addresses an unmet medical need in patients with these multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

This study established the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and its genotypic resistance mechanisms by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in 195 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CNSPA) clinical isolates recovered from Singapore between 2009 and 2020. C/T susceptibility rates were low, at 37.9%. Cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed, although susceptibility to the agent was slightly higher, at 41.0%. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that C/T resistance was largely mediated by the presence of horizontally acquired β-lactamases, especially metallo-β-lactamases. These were primarily disseminated in well-recognized high-risk clones belonging to sequence types (ST) 235, 308, and 179. C/T resistance was also observed in several non-carbapenemase-producing isolates, in which resistance was likely mediated by β-lactamases and, to a smaller extent, mutations in AmpC-related genes. There was no obvious mechanism of resistance observed in five isolates. The high C/T resistance highlights the limited utility of the agent as an empirical agent in our setting. Knowledge of local molecular epidemiology is crucial in determining the potential of therapy with novel agents.

IMPORTANCEPseudomonas aeruginosa infection is one of the most difficult health care-associated infections to treat due to the ability of the organism to acquire a multitude of resistance mechanisms and express the multidrug resistance phenotype. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, addresses an unmet medical need in patients with these multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections. Our findings demonstrate geographical variation in C/T susceptibility owing to the distinct local molecular epidemiology. This study adds on to the growing knowledge of C/T resistance, particularly mutational resistance, and will aid in the design of future β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors. WGS proved to be a useful tool to understand the P. aeruginosa resistome and its contribution to emerging resistance in novel antimicrobial agents.

New Carbapenemase Inhibitors: Clearing the Way for the β-Lactams

Carbapenem resistance is a major global health problem that seriously compromises the treatment of infections caused by nosocomial pathogens. Resistance to carbapenems mainly occurs via the production of carbapenemases, such as VIM, IMP, NDM, KPC and OXA, among others. Preclinical and clinical trials are currently underway to test a new generation of promising inhibitors, together with the recently approved avibactam, relebactam and vaborbactam. This review summarizes the main, most promising carbapenemase inhibitors synthesized to date, as well as their spectrum of activity and current stage of development. We particularly focus on β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations that could potentially be used to treat infections caused by carbapenemase-producer pathogens of critical priority. The emergence of these new combinations represents a step forward in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, especially in regard to metallo-β-lactamases and carbapenem-hydrolysing class D β-lactamases, not currently inhibited by any clinically approved inhibitor.

The role of new antimicrobials for Gram-negative infections in daily clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss a possible clinical reasoning for treating resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections in daily clinical practice, as well as developing a research agenda for the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Novel agents, both belonging to β-lactams and to other classes of antimicrobials, have recently become available, likely replacing polymyxins or polymyxin-based combination regimens as the preferred choices for the first-line treatment of severe resistant GNB infections in the near future.

SUMMARY

The peculiar characteristics of novel agents for severe resistant GNB infections have abruptly made the structure of previous therapeutic algorithms somewhat obsolete, in view of the differential activity of most of them against different classes of carbapenemases. Furthermore, other agents showing activity against resistant GNB are in late phase of clinical development. Optimizing the use of novel agents in order both to guarantee the best available treatment to patients and to delay the emergence and spread of resistance is an important task that cannot be postponed, especially considering the unavailability of well tolerated and fully efficacious options for treating resistant GNB infections that we faced in the last 15 years.

A Critical Evaluation of Newer β-Lactam Antibiotics for Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections

OBJECTIVE

This article critically evaluates common Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistance mechanisms and the properties newer β-lactam antimicrobials possess to evade these mechanisms.

DATA SOURCES

An extensive PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov search was conducted (January 1995 to July 2020) to identify relevant literature on epidemiology, resistance mechanisms, antipseudomonal agents, newer β-lactam agents, and clinical data available pertaining to P aeruginosa.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant published articles and package inserts were reviewed for inclusion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Therapeutic options to treat P aeruginosa infections are limited because of its intrinsic and acquired resistance mechanisms. The goal was to identify advances with newer β-lactams and characterize improvements in therapeutic potential for P aeruginosa infections.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) P aeruginosa isolates are increasingly encountered from a variety of infections. This review highlights potential activity gains of newer β-lactam antibacterial drugs and the current clinical data to support their use. Pharmacists will be asked to recommend or evaluate the use of these agents and need to be aware of information specific to P aeruginosa, which differs from experience derived from Enterobacterales infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Newer agents, including ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, and cefiderocol, are useful for the treatment of MDR P aeruginosa infections. These agents offer improved efficacy and less toxicity compared with aminoglycosides and polymyxins and can be used for pathogens that are resistant to first-line antipseudomonal β-lactams. Selection of one agent over another should consider availability, turnaround of susceptibility testing, and product cost. Efficacy data specific for pseudomonal infections are limited, and there are no direct comparisons between the newer agents.