Infectious Proctitis due to Human Mpox

Survey of pain and stigma experiences in people diagnosed with mpox in Baltimore, Maryland during 2022 global outbreak

A high prevalence of mpox in men who have sex with men and in people with HIV, plus visually striking and contagious lesions, have raised concerns for mpox stigma. 24 PCR-confirmed mpox patients were surveyed over the course of three months, utilizing an mpox stigma scale adapted from the HIV Stigma Scale plus assessment of pain, analgesic efficacy, and healthcare experiences. Participants were cis-male (100%), with male sexual partners (96%), mostly African-American (88%), and living with HIV (79%). Patients answered 4-16 of 24 (mean 10) stigma questions affirmatively, particularly related to negative effects of mpox on the LGBTQ community. 79% reported pain, most commonly of limbs and perianal area, with perianal pain being rated most severe. The most effective pain relief occurred with opioids (100% major relief, n = 2) and tecovirimat (63% major relief, 25% moderate, n = 16). Patients were satisfied with care provided at the studied clinics, but had negative experiences at all other mentioned sites.

Mpox: The Reemergence of an Old Disease and Inequities

Mpox, previously known as monkeypox, is caused by an Orthopoxvirus related to the variola virus that causes smallpox. Prior to 2022, mpox was considered a zoonotic disease endemic to central and west Africa. Since May 2022, more than 86,000 cases of mpox from 110 countries have been identified across the world, predominantly in men who have sex with men, most often acquired through close physical contact or during sexual activity. The classical clinical presentation of mpox is a prodrome including fever, lethargy, and lymphadenopathy followed by a characteristic vesiculopustular rash. The recent 2022 outbreak included novel presentations of mpox with a predominance of anogenital lesions, mucosal lesions, and other features such as anorectal pain, proctitis, oropharyngeal lesions, tonsillitis, and multiphasic skin lesions. We describe the demographics and clinical spectrum of classical and novel mpox, outlining the potential complications and management.

Pockenvirusinfektionen in der Dermatologie: Poxvirus infections in dermatology - the neglected, the notable, and the notorious

Die Familie Poxviridae umfasst derzeit 22 Gattungen, die Wirbeltiere infizieren können. Humanpathogene Pockenviren gehören den Gattungen Ortho‐, Para‐, Mollusci‐ und Yatapoxvirus an. Bis zur Eradikation der Variola vera im Jahr 1979 waren die Pocken, im Volksmund auch Blattern genannt, eine schwerwiegende Gesundheitsbedrohung für die Bevölkerung. Noch heute sind Dermatologen mit zahlreichen Pockenvirusinfektionen konfrontiert, wie den Bauernhofpocken, die als Zoonosen nach Tierkontakten in ländlichen Gebieten oder nach Massenversammlungen auftreten können. In den Tropen können Erkrankungen durch Tanapox‐ oder Vaccinia‐Viren zu den Differenzialdiagnosen gehören. Dellwarzen sind weltweit verbreitet und werden in bestimmten Fällen als sexuell übertragbare Pockenvirusinfektion angesehen. In jüngster Zeit hatten sich Mpox (Affenpocken) zu einer gesundheitlichen Notlage von internationaler Tragweite entwickelt, die eine rasche Identifizierung und angemessene Behandlung durch Dermatologen und Infektiologen erfordert. Fortschritte und neue Erkenntnisse über Epidemiologie, Diagnose, klinische Manifestationen und Komplikationen sowie Behandlung und Prävention von Pockenvirusinfektionen erfordern ein hohes Maß an Fachwissen und interdisziplinärer Zusammenarbeit in den Bereichen Virologie, Infektiologie und Dermatologie. Dieser CME‐Artikel bietet einen aktualisierten systematischen Überblick, um praktizierende Dermatologen bei der Identifizierung, Differenzialdiagnose und Behandlung klinisch relevanter Pockenvirusinfektionen zu unterstützen.

Poxvirus infections in dermatology - the neglected, the notable, and the notorious

The family Poxviridae currently comprises 22 genera that infect vertebrates. Of these, members of the Ortho-, Para-, Mollusci- and Yatapoxvirus genera have been associated with human diseases of high clinical relevance in dermatology. Historically, smallpox had been a notorious health threat until it was declared eradicated by the World Health Organization in 1979. Today, dermatologists are confronted with a variety of poxviral infections, such as farmyard pox, which occurs as a zoonotic infection after contact with animals. In the tropics, tanapox or vaccinia may be in the differential diagnosis as neglected tropical dermatoses. Molluscum contagiosum virus infection accounts for significant disease burden worldwide and is classified as a sexually transmitted infection in certain scenarios. Recently, mpox (monkeypox) has emerged as a public health emergency of international concern, requiring rapid recognition and appropriate management by dermatologists and infectious disease specialists. Advances and new insights into the epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical manifestations and complications, treatment, and prevention of poxviral infections require a high level of expertise and interdisciplinary skills from healthcare professionals linking virology, infectious diseases, and dermatology. This CME article provides a systematic overview and update to assist the practicing dermatologist in the identification, differential diagnosis, and management of poxviral infections.

A Case of Concurrent Mpox and Chlamydial Proctitis in a Patient With HIV

The monkeypox (mpox) outbreak that began in May 2022 spread globally with a wide range of presentations. Mpox proctitis has been recognized as one of the severe forms of the virus during this outbreak. We present the case of a 33-year-old male with well-controlled HIV engaging in receptive anal intercourse presented with profuse rectal bleeding, tenesmus, and anal pain in July 2022. His symptoms persisted despite treatment for his rectal chlamydia with doxycycline. Rectal imaging with computed tomography demonstrated impressive inflammation. Contrast-enhanced images highlighted rectal wall thickening and submucosal edema. Diffuse lymphadenopathy of the anorectal region was also clearly seen. He received symptomatic treatment with tecovirimat resulting in the resolution of his symptoms and complaints. Subsequent rectal imaging displayed improvement and decreased inflammation. A better understanding of various presentations, imaging characteristics, and management is necessary to curb further dissemination.

Mpox Pain Management with Topical Agents: A Case Series

With the recent spread in monkeypox cases, continuous efforts are made to manage the disease efficiently. Pain at the site of monkeypox lesions and in areas of skin breakdown can be severe. The origin of pain is likely neuropathic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued general guidelines to control pain with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, gabapentin, and topical agents such as corticosteroids and lidocaine. Guidelines circulated by the World Health Organization (WHO) suggest acetaminophen, tramadol, opioids, and/or topical lidocaine for symptomatic pain management. No first line agent with proven beneficial effect has been recommended in these patients. We present two patients' painful experiences with Monkeypox and suggest lessons learned.

Near obstructing painful anorectal mass and facial rash in a man with monkeypox: A case report

BACKGROUND

Monkeypox (MPX) is a zoonotic infection that is endemic in Western and Central Africa along the Congo River basin. It has a high case fatality rate especially in younger age groups. It belongs to the virus family orthopoxvirus like smallpox. It is transmitted from wild animals to humans but human to human transmission has been established. It is often a self-limited infection in endemic regions. Recently, attention has been given to MPX with the spread of infection to Europe and the United States of America (USA). There is currently sporadic infection of MPX in the USA especially amongst men who have sex with men (MSM). It is a serious life-threatening infection in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome co-infected individuals especially those who are treatment naïve with severe immunosuppression.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a 38-year old man who presented with rectal pain, and anal, torso, and facial rash. Abdominal computed tomography scan showed a near obstructive rectal mass with peri-anal fistula. MPX was positive. He was started on tecovirimat (TPOXX) and HAART therapy. Additional treatment provided included vaccinia immunoglobulin following his clinical deterioration.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights a rare presentation of MPX with peri-anal fistula and near obstructive rectal mass, and the significance of MPX as a differential diagnosis in proctitis in MSM in addition to other sexually transmitted infection like gonorrhea and chlamydia.

Monkeypox-induced proctitis: a case report of an emerging complication

PURPOSE

At the outset of the 2022 human monkeypox virus outbreak, the World Health Organization described the self-limited disease as a rash illness associated with nonspecific symptoms such as fever, myalgias, and lymphadenopathy. Historically, the infection caused by this zoonotic virus has presented with rashes primarily on the face, palms, and soles of feet. However, emerging case report literature from the 2022 recent outbreak highlighted more atypical presentations ranging from ocular manifestations to myocarditis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a case of a 32-year-old African American male with a past medical history of poorly controlled acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and external hemorrhoids that presented for worsening rectal pain. The patient was afflicted with diffuse skin lesions even present on his hemorrhoids. Initial imaging significant circumferential rectal thickening consistent with proctitis. Subsequent polymerase chain reaction testing confirmed active monkeypox infection, and a 14-day course of twice daily tecovirimat 600 mg was initiated to treat disseminated monkeypox infection. After improved pain control and starting antiviral treatment, the patient was discharged two days later.

CONCLUSION

As more cases of monkeypox-associated proctitis emerge, clinicians should keep this disease in their differential due to the growing atypical presentations that have diverged from previous patterns to avoid the risk of misdiagnosing another sexually transmitted infection. Additionally, appropriate medical management is still not definitive and requires further development of evidence-based protocols to treat such patients.

Successful Outcome after Treatment with Cidofovir, Vaccinia, and Extended Course of Tecovirimat in a Newly-Diagnosed HIV Patient with Severe Mpox: A Case Report

Purpose: To report a case of severe mpox in a newly diagnosed HIV patient concerning for Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) and/or tecovirimat resistance and to describe the management approach in the setting of refractory disease. Case: 49-year-old man presented with 2 weeks of perianal lesions. He tested positive for mpox PCR in the emergency room and was discharged home with quarantine instructions. Three weeks later, the patient returned with disseminated firm, nodular lesions in the face, neck, scalp, mouth, chest, back, legs, arms, and rectum, with worsening pain and purulent drainage from the rectum. The patient reported being on 3 days of tecovirimat treatment, which was prescribed by the Florida department of health (DOH). During this admission, he was found to be HIV positive. A pelvic CT scan revealed a 2.5 cm perirectal abscess. Treatment with tecovirimat was continued for 14 days, along with an empiric course of antibiotics for treatment of possible superimposed bacterial infection upon discharge. He was seen in the outpatient clinic and initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) with TAF/emtricitabine/bictegravir. Two weeks after starting ART, the patient was readmitted for worsening mpox rash and rectal pain. Urine PCR also returned positive for chlamydia, for which the patient was prescribed doxycycline. He was discharged on a second course of tecovirimat and antibiotic therapy. Ten days later, the patient was readmitted for the second time due to worsening symptoms and blockage of the nasal airway from progressing lesions. At this point, there were concerns for tecovirimat resistance, and after discussion with CDC, tecovirimat was reinitiated for the third time, with the addition of Cidofovir and Vaccinia, and showed an improvement in his symptoms. He received three doses of cidofovir and two doses of Vaccinia, and the patient was then discharged to complete 30 days of tecovirimat. Outpatient follow-up showed favorable outcomes and near resolution. Conclusion: We reported a challenging case of worsening mpox after Tecovirimat treatment in the setting of new HIV and ART initiation concerning IRIS vs. Tecovirimat resistance. Clinicians should consider the risk of IRIS and weigh the pros and cons of initiating or delaying ART. In patients not responding to first-line treatment with tecovirimat, resistance testing should be performed, and alternative options should be considered. Future research is needed to establish guidance on the role of Cidofovir and Vaccinia immune globulin and the continuation of tecovirimat for refractory mpox.

Human Monkeypox Experience in a Tertiary Level Hospital in Milan, Italy, between May and October 2022: Epidemiological Features and Clinical Characteristics

Background: Monkeypox virus (mpxv) started to spread to Europe and North America at the beginning of the current outbreak in May 2022, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared Human Monkeypox (mpox) as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) in July 2022. The aim of this observational analysis is to describe demographical data, symptoms presentation and clinical course till outcome of individuals diagnosed with mpox, between May and October 2022, at our open-access Sexual Health Clinic in IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital in Milan, Italy. Methods: Among people who accessed our Sexual Health Clinic, we considered, as suspected diagnosis of mpox, individuals with consistent symptoms and epidemiological criteria. Following the physical examination, oropharyngeal, anal, genital and cutaneous swabs, plus plasma, urine and seminal fluid were collected as biological materials to detect mpxv DNA. We also performed a screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Results: Overall, 140 individuals with mpox were included in this study. Median age was 37 (interquartile, IQR 33, 43) years old. Males were 137 (98%) and men who have sex with men (MSM) were 134 (96%). As risk factors, we detected travels abroad in 35 (25%) individuals and close contact with mpox cases in 49 (35%). There were 66 (47%) people living with HIV (PLWH). Most frequent symptoms were fever (59%), lymphadenopathy (57%), cutaneous (77%), genital (42%), anal (34%) and oral (26%) lesions, proctitis (39%), sore throat (22%) and generalized rash (5%). At mpox diagnosis, we also observed N. gonorrhoeae in 18 (13%) cases, syphilis in 14 (10%) and C. trachomatis in 12 (9%). Two (1%) people received a concomitant diagnosis of HIV infection. We attended to 21 (15%) complications, with nine (6%) cases of hospitalization including six (IQR 3,7) median hospital days. Forty-five (32%) patients were treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 37 (26%) with antibiotics and eight (6%) with antiviral drugs. Conclusions: Similarly to other international cohorts, sexual transmission was most frequently present, and concomitant STIs were common. Symptoms were heterogenous, self-resolving and responsive to therapy. Hospitalization was necessary in few patients. There is uncertainty about the future development of mpox and further studies (e.g., potential disease reservoirs, other possible means of transmission, predictors of severe disease) are still needed.

Lymphofollicular lesions associated with monkeypox (Mpox) virus proctitis

In the recent 2022 monkeypox (Mpox) global outbreak, cases have been mostly documented among men who have sex with men. Proctitis was reported in almost 14% of cases. In this study, four Mpox-confirmed cases requiring hospitalizations for severe proctitis were characterized by clinical, virological, microbiological, endoscopic, and histological aspects. The study showed the presence of lymphofollicular lesions associated with Mpox virus rectal infection for the first time.

Human Mpox Virus Proctitis With Persistent Rectal Ulcers on Sigmoidoscopy

The 2022 Mpox outbreak has caused public health concerns worldwide. Mpox infection often manifests as papular skin lesions; other systemic complications have also been reported. We present the case of a 35-year-old man with HIV who presented with rectal pain and hematochezia and was found to have severe ulceration and exudate on sigmoidoscopy consistent with Mpox proctitis.

Clinical Characteristics of Human Mpox (Monkeypox) in 2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Since May 2022, large numbers of human mpox (previously known as monkeypox) cases have been reported in non-endemic regions. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate clinical characteristics of the current mpox outbreak. Our systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for publications between 1 January and 11 November 2022. Random-effects models were used to pool results. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022355590. Skin lesions (95.2%, 95% CI [93.3-96.9%]), fever (58.4%, [54.9-61.8%]) and lymphadenopathy (53.0%, [48.7-57.3%]) were the most common symptoms. The most common dermatological manifestations were anogenital lesions (65.7%, [57.8-73.0%]), and the most common lymphadenopathy was inguinal (46.8%, [40.6-53.0%]). There were no differences in symptoms including malaise, fever, headache, and genital, anal, and oropharyngeal lesions according to HIV infection status. Median age of patients varied from 15 to 57.5 years (median, 35 years). The median proportion of men who had sex with men (MSM) was 100.0% (20.6-100.0%). The median proportion of patients who reported recent sexual exposure was 99.2% (14.3-100.0%). The median proportion of PLHIV was 42.2% (0.0-100.0%). Skin lesions, fever, inguinal lymphadenopathy, and anogenital lesions were the most common symptoms of mpox reported in the current outbreak. Existing guidelines should be updated to reflect these clinical manifestations and groups at highest risk of infection, MSM in particular.

Level of Knowledge Regarding Mpox among Peruvian Physicians during the 2022 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction: Due to the high incidence of mpox in Peru and the poor knowledge about this disease among healthcare workers in non-endemic countries, it is crucial to determine the knowledge status of Peruvian physicians. Methodology: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional study based on an online survey from August to September 2022. Physicians who had a medical license and lived and practiced medicine in Peru were included. To evaluate the factors associated with a higher level of knowledge, we used crude (cPR) and adjusted (aPR) prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using Poisson regression. Results: We included 463 physicians. The mean age was 36.6 (SD: 10.3) years, and most were male (58.1%). Regarding knowledge, the median knowledge score was 14 [IQR: 13 to 15] out of 17 points. In terms of knowledge gaps, only 60.7% of the participants knew that there was an FDA-approved vaccine for mpox, 49.0% of participants knew about mpox proctitis and 33.3% acknowledged that it could be transmitted by the bite of an infected rodent. We found that taking care of patients with mpox (aPR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.13 to 1.72) was associated with higher knowledge (>p50), while living in the eastern macro-region (aPR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.93) was associated with lower knowledge (≤p50). Conclusions: Our study showed a high level of knowledge about mpox among Peruvian physicians. However, educational campaigns may be necessary, especially for physicians from the eastern region and those who do not have clinical experience with mpox.

Detection of Monkeypox Virus according to The Collection Site of Samples from Confirmed Cases: A Systematic Review

Due to the rapid evolution of the monkeypox virus, the means by which the monkeypox virus is spread is subject to change. Therefore, the present study aims to analyze the detection of the monkeypox virus according to the collection site of samples from confirmed monkeypox cases. A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases until 5 October 2022. A total of 1022 articles were retrieved using the search strategy. After removing duplicates (n = 566) and examining by title, abstract, and full text, 65 studies reporting monkeypox case reports were included with a detailed description of risk factors, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), site of monkeypox virus-positive specimens, location of skin lesions, and diagnostic test. A total of 4537 confirmed monkeypox cases have been reported, of which 98.72% of the cases were male with a mean age of 36 years, 95.72% had a sexual behavior of being men who have sex with men, and 28.1% had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The most frequent locations of lesions in patients diagnosed with monkeypox were: 42.85% on the genitalia and 37.1% in the perianal region. All confirmed monkeypox cases were diagnosed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and the most frequent locations of samples collected for diagnosis that tested positive for monkeypox virus were: 91.85% from skin lesions, 20.81% from the oropharynx, 3.19% from blood, and 2.43% from seminal fluid. The disease course of the cases with monkeypox was asynchronous, with no severe complications, and most patients did not report specific treatment but simply followed a symptomatic treatment.

Imaging features of anorectal proctitis in monkeypox infection

The monkeypox outbreak of 2022 saw the first community-sustained transmission of the monkeypox virus outside of Africa, and rapidly developed into multi-country spread. A common presenting sign of monkeypox infection during this outbreak has been rectal pain due to proctitis. Proctitis with large hypoattenuated anorectal ulcers on CT scan should invoke consideration for monkeypox infection in young homosexual or bisexual men with associated skin eruptions.