Is the contemporary care of the older persons with acute coronary syndrome evidence-based?

Ethnic disparities in STEMI outcomes among older adults: a comparative study of bedouins and jews

BACKGROUND

ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition, especially in the older population, who are at increased risk due to comorbidities and delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate the impact of ethnicity on the clinical characteristics, treatment timelines, and outcomes of older patients with STEMI in southern Israel, comparing Jewish and Bedouin populations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Soroka University Medical Center from 2016 to 2022, including older patients (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with STEMI. Patients were grouped by ethnicity: Jews and Bedouins. Data on demographics, comorbidities, treatment timelines, and clinical outcomes were collected. Statistical analysis included a comparison analysis and a multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

575 older patients diagnosed with STEMI were included in the study, of them 469 Jews (81.6%) and 106 Bedouins (18.4%). The mean age of the cohort was 74.35 ± 7.33 years, with no significant difference between Jews (74.56 years 7.53) and Bedouins (73.40 ± 5.99 years, p = 0.139). Bedouins had higher rates of diabetes (53.8% vs. 40.7%, p = 0.019) and smoking (40.6% vs. 27.9%, p = 0.015) and were less likely to arrive by ambulance (39.6% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.00). Bedouins also experienced longer median times from pain onset to first medical contact (126.5 min vs. 90.0 min, p = 0.006) and total ischemic time (240.0 min vs. 205.0 min, p = 0.003). Despite these differences, there were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (13.2% Bedouins vs. 10.9% Jews, p = 0.606), 30-day mortality (14.2% Bedouins vs. 11.5% Jews, p = 0.556), or one-year mortality (21.7% Bedouins vs. 20.9% Jews, p = 0.959). Multivariable analysis confirmed no significant association between ethnicity and mortality outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the higher prevalence of comorbidities among Bedouin patients, less likely to arrive by ambulance, and experienced longer delays in receiving care, their mortality outcomes were comparable to Jewish patients. These findings highlight the effectiveness of the acute care system in southern Israel. However, further research is needed to explore potential differences in other outcomes, such as quality of life and functional recovery, to better address healthcare disparities in this population.

Invasive versus conservative strategies for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Advances in managing non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) have yet to clarify the optimal treatment for elderly patients, whose complex health profiles and underrepresentation in trials add challenges to decision-making.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials comparing invasive versus conservative strategies in elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with NSTE-ACS through October 2024. Co-primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities, with secondary outcomes including myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, stroke, decompensated heart failure, and bleeding events. Outcomes were analyzed using both risk ratios (RR) and hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

Analysis of 11 trials (4,114 patients) showed no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.98-1.11; HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.94-1.29) or cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.85-1.12; HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.73-1.20) between strategies. The invasive approach significantly reduced subsequent revascularization (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.62; HR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.19- 0.47; p < 0.01 in both analyses) and MI risk (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.57-0.99, p = 0.04; HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49-0.83, p < 0.01), though with some levels of heterogeneity in sensitivity analyses for MI. Stroke and heart failure outcomes were comparable between strategies. However, it significantly increased the risk of both composite major and minor bleeding risk (RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.02-2.20, p = 0.04) and major bleeding alone (RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.04-3.56, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with NSTE-ACS, an invasive strategy reduces revascularization needs and, potentially, MI risk without impacting survival, but at the cost of increased bleeding risk. This supports individualized treatment decisions based on patient-specific characteristics, particularly bleeding risk and geriatric factors.

Frailty prevalence, invasive treatment frequency, and in-hospital outcome in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome in Germany (2005-2022): a nationwide registry study

Background

Frailty is a significant predictor for adverse outcomes. Yet, data on prevalence and treatment of frail patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains limited. We aimed to investigate frailty prevalence, interventional treatment frequency, and in-hospital outcome for all patients hospitalized for ACS in Germany from 2005 to 2022 and validate the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) in this population.

Methods

Data for 2005-2022 from the Statistical Federal Office included all cases with primary diagnosis of ACS treated in Germany. Patients were categorized into low, intermediate, and high frailty by HFRS. Diagnoses, procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions as well as sensitivity analyses were performed.

Findings

Between 2005 and 2022, 5,889,972 ACS patients were hospitalized in Germany. Mean age was 69 years (standard deviation (SD) ± 12.85 years) and 2,060,224 (34.98%) were female. In-hospital mortality was 6.2%. Among all, 5,001,812 (84.9%) had a low, 784,106 (13.3%) an intermediate, and 104,054 (1.8%) a high HFRS. High-frailty patients were less likely to undergo coronary intervention than low-frailty patients (47.0% vs. 70.6%, p < 0.001), had longer hospital stays (21.6 days SD 19.4 ± vs. 5.6 days SD ± 5.2, p < 0.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.34 [confidence interval (95% CI) 3.29-3.4]).

Interpretation

Nearly one-sixth of ACS-patients were frail according to HFRS. Frail patients had longer hospital stays, less often received interventional procedures, and showed substantially increased in-hospital mortality. In our aging population, frailty will play an increasing role in patient management. Frailty scores based on electronic patient records, like the HFRS, offer clinicians a tool for assessing in-hospital outcome in ACS patients, potentially enabling more individualized treatment approaches.

Funding

None.

Latest evidence on assessment and invasive management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in the older population

INTRODUCTION

Invasive management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) should be considered regardless of age, but a key challenge is deciding which patients are most likely to benefit from an invasive approach in the older population. In addition to assessment of the clinical signs and symptoms, a holistic assessment of geriatric syndromes such as frailty, multimorbidity and cognitive impairment is of increasing importance. Recent trials have validated the roles of physiological assessment and intracoronary imaging to guide revascularisation.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on the comparison between invasive and conservative management in the older population with NSTE-ACS, the clinical characteristics of the older population with NSTE-ACS, and the role of physiological assessment and intracoronary imaging to guide revascularisation in this cohort.

EXPERT OPINION

Invasive management in the older population with NSTE-ACS may not improve mortality but reduces the risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation. Decisions surrounding invasive versus conservative management should be individualized to each patient, depending on patient preference, clinical features, comorbidities and frailty. In patients where invasive management is indicated, a combination of physiological assessment and intracoronary imaging is likely to improve revascularisation outcomes, especially in the context of complex anatomical characteristics like multivessel disease.

Invasive Treatment Strategy for Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Whether a conservative strategy of medical therapy alone or a strategy of medical therapy plus invasive treatment is more beneficial in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial involving patients 75 years of age or older with NSTEMI at 48 sites in the United Kingdom. The patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a conservative strategy of the best available medical therapy or an invasive strategy of coronary angiography and revascularization plus the best available medical therapy. Patients who were frail or had a high burden of coexisting conditions were eligible. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes (cardiovascular death) or nonfatal myocardial infarction assessed in a time-to-event analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1518 patients underwent randomization; 753 patients were assigned to the invasive-strategy group and 765 to the conservative-strategy group. The mean age of the patients was 82 years, 45% were women, and 32% were frail. A primary-outcome event occurred in 193 patients (25.6%) in the invasive-strategy group and 201 patients (26.3%) in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.14; P = 0.53) over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. Cardiovascular death occurred in 15.8% of the patients in the invasive-strategy group and 14.2% of the patients in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.44). Nonfatal myocardial infarction occurred in 11.7% in the invasive-strategy group and 15.0% in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99). Procedural complications occurred in less than 1% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In older adults with NSTEMI, an invasive strategy did not result in a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (the composite primary outcome) than a conservative strategy over a median follow-up of 4.1 years. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation; BHF SENIOR-RITA ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN11343602.).

Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: How to Tackle Them?

Elderly patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) represent a growing demographic population. These patients typically present more comorbidities and experience poorer outcomes compared to younger patients. Furthermore, they are less frequently subjected to revascularization procedures and are less likely to receive evidence-based medications in both the short and long-term periods. Assessing frailty is crucial in elderly patients with ACS because it can influence management decisions, as well as risk stratification and prognosis. Indeed, treatment decisions should consider geriatric syndromes, frailty, polypharmacy, sarcopenia, nutritional deficits, prevalence of comorbidities, thrombotic risk, and, at the same time, an increased risk of bleeding. Rigorous clinical assessments, clear revascularization criteria, and tailored approaches to antithrombotic therapy are essential for guiding personalized treatment decisions in these individuals. Assessing frailty helps healthcare providers identify patients who may benefit from targeted interventions to improve their outcomes and quality of life. Elderly individuals who experience ACS remain significantly underrepresented and understudied in randomized controlled trials. For this reason, the occurrence of ACS in the elderly continues to be a particularly complex issue in clinical practice, and one that clinicians increasingly have to address, given the general ageing of populations. This review aims to address the complex aspects of elderly patients with ACS to help clinicians make therapeutic decisions when faced with such situations.

Coronary artery disease management in older adults: revascularization and exercise training

The mean age of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is steadily increasing. In older patients, there is a tendency to underutilize invasive approach, coronary revascularization, up-to-date pharmacological therapies, and secondary prevention strategies, including cardiac rehabilitation. Older adults with CAD commonly exhibit atypical symptoms, multi-vessel disease involvement, complex coronary anatomy, and a higher presence of risk factors and comorbidities. Although both invasive procedures and medical treatments are characterized by a higher risk of complications, avoidance may result in a suboptimal outcome. Often, overlooked factors, such as coronary microvascular disease, malnutrition, and poor physical performance, play a key role in determining prognosis, yet they are not routinely assessed or addressed in older patients. Historically, clinicians have relied on sub-analyses or observational findings to make clinical decisions, as older adults were frequently excluded or under-represented in clinical studies. Recently, dedicated evidence through randomized clinical trials has become available for older CAD patients. Nevertheless, the management of older CAD patients still raises several important questions. This review aims to comprehensively summarize and critically evaluate this emerging evidence, focusing on invasive management and coronary revascularization. Furthermore, it seeks to contextualize these interventions within the framework of improved risk stratification tools for older CAD patients, through user-friendly scales along with emphasizing the importance of promoting physical activity and exercise training to enhance the outcomes of invasive and medical treatments. This comprehensive approach may represent the key to improving prognosis in the complex and growing patient population of older CAD patients.

Early Invasive Strategy for Octogenarians and Nonagenarians With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Older adults with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are currently a rapidly growing population. However, their clinical presentation and outcomes remain unresolved. Methods and Results: A total of 268 consecutive AMI patients were analyzed for clinical characteristics and outcomes with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Patients aged ≥80 years (Over-80; n=100) were compared with those aged ≤79 years (Under-79; n=168). (1) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was frequently and similarly performed in both the Over-80 group and the Under-79 group (86% vs. 89%; P=0.52). (2) Killip class III-IV (P<0.01), in-hospital mortality (P<0.01), MACE (P=0.03) and all-cause mortality (P<0.01) were more prevalent in the Over-80 group than in the Under-79 group. (3) In the Over-80 group, frail patients showed a significantly worse clinical outcome compared with non-frail patients. (4) Multivariate analysis revealed Killip class III-IV was associated with MACE (odds ratio [OR]=3.51; P=0.02) and all-cause mortality (OR=9.49; P<0.01) in the Over-80 group. PCI was inversely associated with all-cause mortality (OR=0.13; P=0.02) in the Over-80 group. Conclusions: The rate of primary PCI did not decline with age. Although octogenarians/nonagenarians showed more severe clinical presentation and worse short-term outcomes compared with younger patients, particularly in those with frailty, the prognosis may be improved by early invasive strategy even in these very old patients.

The factors of quality of life among patients after myocardial infarction in Poland: a cross-sectional study. The quality of life among patients after myocardial infarction

The quality of life (QoL) is now recognised as a central indicator of the effectiveness of interventions especially in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). The QoL may be important predict poor outcomes in cardiac patients.The present work aims to increase knowledge of the level of QoL in patients after MI. Moreover, the paper analyses the QoL in relation to sociodemographic factors and the degree of functioning in chronic disease. The study was conducted among 231 patients who were hospitalized due to MI within the period of June 2021 to June 2022 in the Hospital in Racibórz in Poland. The WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Chronic Disease Functioning Scale were used. The analysis showed a statistically significant correlation (coefficient value 0.5 <|r/rho|≤ 0.7) between general functioning in chronic disease and the average QoL (rho = 0.56; p < 0.001)and somatic QoL levels(rho = 0.52; p < 0.001), as well as a moderately strong positive correlation with the QoL level on the psychological domain (rho = 0.50; p < 0.001), social domain(rho = 0.48; p < 0.001) and environmental domain (rho = 0.43; p < 0.001). The results of this study suggested that healthcare workers adopts appropriate policies for the implementation of quality of life, which can reduce the number of repetitive referrals to the hospital and costs imposed on the health system.

Health-Status Outcomes in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction: Physiology-Guided Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit-Only Strategy

BACKGROUND

The FIRE trial (Functional Assessment in Elderly Myocardial Infarction Patients With Multivessel Disease) enrolled 1445 older (aged ≥75 years) patients with myocardial infarction and multivessel disease in Italy, Spain, and Poland. Patients were randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization or treatment of the only culprit lesion. Physiology-guided complete revascularization significantly reduced ischemic adverse events at 1 year. This prespecified analysis investigated the changes between the 2 study groups in angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and frailty.

METHODS

Patients underwent validated scales at hospital discharge (baseline) and 1 year later. Angina status was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, health-related quality of life by EQ visual analog scale, physical performance by short physical performance battery, and frailty by the clinical frailty scale. Mixed models for repeated measures analysis were used to study the association between the treatment arms, time, and scales.

RESULTS

Baseline and 1-year Seattle Angina Questionnaire, EQ visual analog scale, short physical performance battery, and clinical frailty scale were collected in around two-thirds of the entire FIRE study population. The mean age was 80.9±4.6 years (female sex, 35.9%). Overall, 35.3% were admitted for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, whereas the others were admitted for non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with greater improvement in terms of angina status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, 7.3 [95% CI, 6.1-8.6] points), health-related quality of life (EQ visual analog scale, 6.2 [95% CI, 4.4-8.1] points), and physical performance (short physical performance battery, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.9-1.3] points). After 1 year, patients randomized to culprit-only revascularization experienced a deterioration in frailty status (clinical frailty scale, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.3] points), which was not observed in patients randomized to physiology-guided complete revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

The present analysis suggested that a physiology-guided complete revascularization is associated with consistent benefits in terms of angina status, quality of life, physical performance, and the absence of further deterioration of the frailty status.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03772743.

Invasive vs. conservative management of older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) are less likely to receive guideline-recommended care including coronary angiography and revascularization. Evidence-based recommendations regarding interventional management strategies in this patient cohort are scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of routine invasive vs. conservative management of NSTEACS by using individual patient data (IPD) from all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched between 1 January 2010 and 11 September 2023. RCTs investigating routine invasive and conservative strategies in persons >70 years old with NSTEACS were included. Observational studies or trials involving populations outside the target range were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. One-stage IPD meta-analyses were adopted by use of random-effects and fixed-effect Cox models. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379819).

RESULTS

Six eligible studies were identified including 1479 participants. The primary endpoint occurred in 181 of 736 (24.5%) participants in the invasive management group compared with 215 of 743 (28.9%) participants in the conservative management group with a hazard ratio (HR) from random-effects model of 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-1.22; P = .43). The hazard for MI at 1 year was significantly lower in the invasive group compared with the conservative group (HR from random-effects model 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87; P = .006). Similar results were seen for urgent revascularization (HR from random-effects model 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = .037). There was no significant difference in mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence was found that routine invasive treatment for NSTEACS in older patients reduces the risk of a composite of all-cause mortality and MI within 1 year compared with conservative management. However, there is convincing evidence that invasive treatment significantly lowers the risk of repeat MI or urgent revascularisation. Further evidence is needed from ongoing larger clinical trials.

Complications in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Contemporary Care

INTRODUCTION

With the implementation of early reperfusion therapy, the number of complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has diminished significantly. However, ACS patients are still routinely admitted to units with high-level monitoring such as the coronary or intensive care unit (CCU/ICU). The cost of these admissions is high and there is often a shortage of beds. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications in contemporary emergency department (ED) patients with ACS and to map patient management.

METHODS

This observational study was a secondary analysis of data collected in the ESC-TROP trial (NCT03421873) that included 26,545 consecutive chest pain patients ≥18 years at five Swedish EDs. Complications were defined as the following within 30 days: death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, severe ventricular arrhythmia, high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block that required a pacemaker, and mechanical complications such as papillary muscle rupture, cardiac tamponade, or ventricular septum defects (VSDs). Complications were identified via diagnosis and/or intervention codes in the database, and manual chart review was performed in cases with complications.

RESULTS

Of all 26,545 patients, 2,463 (9.3%) were diagnosed with ACS, and 151 of these (6.1%) suffered any complication within 30 days. Mean age was higher in patients with (79.2 years) than without (69.4 years) complications, and more were female (39.7% vs. 33.0%). Eighty-four (3.4% of all ACS patients) patients died, 33 (1.3%) had cardiac arrest, 22 (0.9%) respiratory failure, 13 (0.5%) high-degree AV block, 10 (0.4%) cardiogenic shock, 12 (0.5%) severe ventricular arrhythmia, and 2 each (<0.1%) had VSD or cardiac tamponade. Almost 30% of the complications were present already at the ED, and 40% of patients with complications were not admitted to the CCU/ICU. Only 80 (53%) of the patients with complications underwent coronary angiography and 62 (41%) were revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting.

CONCLUSION

With current care, serious complications occurred in only 6 out of 100 ACS patients, and 2 of these complications were present already at the ED. Four out of 10 ACS patients with complications were not admitted to the CCU/ICU and about half did not undergo coronary angiography. Further research is needed to improve risk assessment in ED ACS patients, which may allow more effective use of cardiac monitoring and hospital resources.

Differences in treatment and clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years compared with those aged ≤74 years following acute coronary syndromes: a prospective multicentre study

OBJECTIVE

This study describes the differences in treatment and clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥75 years compared with those aged ≤74 years presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and undergoing invasive management.

METHODS

A large-scale cohort study of patients with ST-elevation/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI)/unstable angina underwent coronary angiography (January 2015-December 2019). Patients were classified as older (≥75 years) and younger (≤74 years). Regression analysis was used to yield adjusted risks of mortality for older versus younger patients (adjusted for history of heart failure, hypercholesterolaemia, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ischaemic heart disease, presence of ST-elevation MI on presenting ECG, female sex and cardiogenic shock at presentation).

RESULTS

In total, 11 763 patients were diagnosed with ACS, of which 39% were aged ≥75 years. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in fewer older patients than younger patients (81.2% vs 86.2%, p<0.001). At discharge, older patients were prescribed less secondary-prevention medications than younger patients. Median follow-up was 4.57 years. Older patients had a greater risk of in-hospital mortality than younger patients (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.12, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.78, p<0.001). Older patients diagnosed with ST-elevation MI had greater adjusted odds of dying in-hospital (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.79 to 3.41, p<0.001). Older age was not an independent prognostic factor of mortality at 1 year (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.09, p=0.460) and at longer term (aHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.10, p=0.684).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients are discharged with less secondary prevention. Patients aged ≥75 years are more likely to die in-hospital than younger patients.

Role of percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern-day management of chronic coronary syndrome

Contemporary randomised trials of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) demonstrate no difference between patients treated with a conservative or invasive strategy with respect to all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction, although trials lack power to test for individual endpoints and long-term follow-up data are needed. Open-label trials consistently show greater improvement in symptoms and quality of life among patients with stable angina treated with PCI. Further studies are awaited to clarify this finding. In patients with severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and obstructive coronary artery disease in the Revascularization for Ischemic Ventricular Dysfunction trial, PCI has not been found to improve all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalisation or recovery of LV function when compared with medical therapy. PCI was, however, performed without additional hazard and so remains a treatment option when there are favourable patient characteristics. The majority of patients reported no angina, and the low burden of angina in many of the randomised PCI trials is a widely cited limitation. Despite contentious evidence, elective PCI for CCS continues to play a significant role in UK clinical practice. While PCI for urgent indications has more than doubled since 2006, the rate of elective PCI remains unchanged. PCI remains an important strategy when symptoms are not well controlled, and we should maximise its value with appropriate patient selection. In this review, we provide a framework to assist in critical interpretation of findings from most recent trials and meta-analysis evidence.

Comparison of care and outcomes for myocardial infarction by heart failure status between United Kingdom and Japan

AIMS

Prognosis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is worse when heart failure is present on admission. Understanding clinical practice in different health systems can identify areas for quality improvement initiatives to improve outcomes. In the absence of international comparison studies, we aimed to compare treatments and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by heart failure status in two healthcare-wide cohorts.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used two nationwide databases to capture admissions with STEMI in the United Kingdom (Myocardial ischemia National Audit Project, MINAP) and Japan (Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnostic Procedure Combination, JROAD-DPC) between 2012 and 2017. Participants were stratified using the HF Killip classification into three groups; Killip 1: no congestive heart failure, Killip 2-3: congestive heart failure, Killip 4: cardiogenic shock. We calculated crude rate and case mix standardized risk ratios (CSRR) for use of treatments and in-hospital death. Patients were younger in the United Kingdom (65.4 [13.6] vs. 69.1 [13.0] years) and more likely to have co-morbidities in the United Kingdom except for diabetes and hypertension. Japan had a higher percentage of heart failure and cardiogenic shock patients among STEMI during admission than that in the United Kingdom. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) rates were lower in the United Kingdom compared with Japan, especially for patients presenting with Killip 2-3 class heart failure (pPCI use in patients with Killip 1, 2-3, 4: Japan, 86.2%, 81.7%, 78.7%; United Kingdom, 79.6%, 58.2% and 79.9%). In contrast, beta-blocker use was consistently lower in Japan than in the United Kingdom (61.4% vs. 90.2%) across Killip classifications and length of hospital stay longer (17.0 [9.7] vs. 5.0 [7.4] days). The crude rate of in-hospital mortality increased with increasing Killip class group. Both the crude rate and CSRR was higher in the United Kingdom compared with Japan for Killip 2-3 (15.8% vs. 6.4%, CSRR 1.80 95% CI 1.73-1.87, P < 0.001), and similar for Killip 4 (36.9% vs. 36.3%, CSRR 1.11 95% CI 1.08-1.13, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Important differences in the care and outcomes for STEMI with heart failure exist between the United Kingdom and Japan. Specifically, in the United Kingdom, there was a lower rate of pPCI, and in Japan, fewer patients were prescribed beta blockers and hospital length of stay was longer. This international comparison can inform targeted quality improvement programmes to narrow the outcome gap between health systems.

Role and relevance of risk stratification models in the modern-day management of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes

We summarise the international guidelines surrounding risk stratification as well as discuss new emerging data for future development of a new risk model in the management of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). NSTE-ACS accounts for the bulk of acute coronary syndrome presentations in the UK, but management strategies in this group of patients have remained a subject of debate for decades. Patients with NSTE-ACS represent a heterogeneous population with a wide variation in short-term and long-term clinical outcomes, which makes a uniform, standardised treatment approach ineffective and inappropriate. Studies in the modern era have provided some guidance in treating this subset of patients: the provision of early, more potent therapies has been shown to improve outcomes in patients at a particularly elevated risk of adverse outcomes. International guidelines recommend adopting an individualised treatment approach through the use of validated risk prediction models to identify such patients at high risk of adverse outcomes. The present available evidence, however, is based on dated demographics, different diagnostic thresholds and outdated therapies. In particular, the evidence has limited applicability to female patients and older people with frailty. Moreover, the current risk models do not capture key prognostic variables, leading to an inaccurate estimation of patients' baseline risk and subsequent mistreatment. Therefore, the current risk models are no longer fit for purpose and there is a need for risk prediction scores that account for different population demographics, higher sensitivity troponin assays and contemporary treatment options.

Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics in Frail Older Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background

Angiographic and procedural characteristics stratified by frailty status are not known in older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). We evaluated angiographic and procedural characteristics in older adults with NSTEACS by frailty category, as well as associations of baseline and residual SYNTAX scores with long-term outcomes.

Methods

In this study, 271 NSTEACS patients aged ≥75 years underwent coronary angiography. Frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria. Angiographic analysis was performed using QAngio® XA Medis in a core laboratory. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) consisted of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, repeat unplanned revascularisation and significant bleeding.

Results

Mean (±SD) patient age was 80.5 ± 4.9 years. Compared with robust patients, patients with frailty had more severe culprit lesion calcification (OR 5.40; 95% CI [1.75-16.8]; p=0.03). In addition, patients with frailty had a smaller mean improvement in culprit lesion stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (50.6%; 95% CI [45.7-55.6]) than robust patients (58.6%; 95% CI [53.5-63.7]; p=0.042). There was no association between frailty phenotype and completeness of revascularisation (OR 0.83; 95% CI [0.36-1.93]; p=0.67). A high baseline SYNTAX score (≥33) was associated with adjusted (age and sex) 5-year MACE (HR 1.40; 95% CI [1.08-1.81]; p=0.01), as was a high residual SYNTAX score (≥8; adjusted HR 1.22; 95% CI [1.00-1.49]; p=0.047).

Conclusion

Frail adults presenting with NSTEACS have more severe culprit lesion calcification. Frail adults were just as likely as robust patients to receive complete revascularisation. Baseline and residual SYNTAX score were associated with MACE at 5 years.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Adult Population: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Diagnostic and therapeutic advances during the past decades have substantially improved health outcomes for patients with acute coronary syndrome. Both age-related physiological changes and accumulated cardiovascular risk factors increase the susceptibility to acute coronary syndrome over a lifetime. Compared with younger patients, outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in the large and growing demographic of older adults are relatively worse. Increased atherosclerotic plaque burden and complexity of anatomic disease, compounded by age-related cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbid conditions, contribute to the worse prognosis observed in older individuals. Geriatric syndromes, including frailty, multimorbidity, impaired cognitive and physical function, polypharmacy, and other complexities of care, can undermine the therapeutic efficacy of guidelines-based treatments and the resiliency of older adults to survive and recover, as well. In this American Heart Association scientific statement, we (1) review age-related physiological changes that predispose to acute coronary syndrome and management complexity; (2) describe the influence of commonly encountered geriatric syndromes on cardiovascular disease outcomes; and (3) recommend age-appropriate and guideline-concordant revascularization and acute coronary syndrome management strategies, including transitions of care, the use of cardiac rehabilitation, palliative care services, and holistic approaches. The primacy of individualized risk assessment and patient-centered care decision-making is highlighted throughout.

Unsolved Questions in the Revascularization of Older Myocardial Infarction Patients with Multivessel Disease

Background

In cardiology, the global phenomenon of population ageing poses new major challenges, ranging from more comorbid and frail patients to the presence of complex, calcified and multiple coronary lesions. Considering that elderly patients are under-represented in randomized clinical trials (RCT), the aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current knowledge on the revascularization of the elderly patient with myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease.

Methods

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines has been performed. The search was conducted on Pubmed (Medline), Cochrane library, Google Scholar and Biomed Central databases between January and February 2022. We selected the articles focusing on patients hospitalized for myocardial infarction (MI) with multivessel disease and aged 75 years or older. A total of 36 studies have been included.

Results

Multivessel coronary artery disease is present in around 50-60% of older patients with MI. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients older than 75 years is double compared to their younger counterpart, and the most prevalent complications after revascularization are bleeding and renal failure. In the treatment of patients with ST elevation MI (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention should be the first choice over fibrinolysis. However, it is not clear whether this population would benefit from complete revascularization or not. In patients with non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), an invasive approach with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft may be chosen, but a conservative strategy is also accepted. There are no data from large trials about the comparison of possible revascularization strategies in NSTEMI patients.

Conclusions

This systematic review shows that this field of research lacks randomized clinical trials to guide revascularization strategy in older STEMI or NSTEMI patients with MI. New results are expected from ongoing trials.

Five-year clinical outcomes in patients with frailty aged ≥75 years with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management

Aim

Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The impact of frailty on long-term clinical outcomes following invasive management of non-ST elevation ACS (NSTEACS) is unknown.

Methods and results

The multi-centre Improve Clinical Outcomes in high-risk patieNts with ACS 1 (ICON-1) prospective cohort study consisted of patients aged >75 years undergoing coronary angiography following NSTEACS. Patients were categorized by frailty assessed by Canadian Study of Health and Ageing Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Fried criteria. The primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality, unplanned revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding. Of 263 patients, 33 (12.5%) were frail, 152 (57.8%) were pre-frail, and 78 (29.7%) were robust according to CFS. By Fried criteria, 70 patients (26.6%, mean age 82.1 years) were frail, 147 (55.9%, mean age 81.3 years) were pre-frail, and 46 (17.5%, mean age 79.9 years) were robust. The composite endpoint was more common at 5 years among patients with frailty according to CFS (frail: 22, 66.7%; pre-frail: 81, 53.3%; robust: 27, 34.6%, P = 0.003), with a similar trend when using Fried criteria (frail: 39, 55.7%; pre-frail: 72, 49.0%; robust: 16, 34.8%, P = 0.085). Frailty measured with both CFS and Fried criteria was associated with the primary endpoint [age and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) compared with robust groups. CFS: 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-4.02, P = 0.008; Fried: HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.00-3.27, P = 0.048].

Conclusion

In older patients who underwent angiography following NSTEACS, frailty is associated with an increased risk of the primary composite endpoint at 5 years.

Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01933581.