Comparison of short-and long-term outcomes between endovascular and open repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of endovascular versus open repair for the treatment of patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA).

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies was performed. Outcome data, including postoperative mortality and morbidity, operative details, all-cause survival, freedom from aortic-related survival and freedom from aortic-related re-intervention, were independently extracted by two authors in a standardized way.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies comprising 49 972 patients (22 049 endovascular repair; 27 923 open repair) were included. Endovascular repair was associated with a significantly lower postoperative mortality rate [odd ratio (OR): 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.72; I 2  = 72.58%] and morbidity. In terms of long-term survival, endovascular repair yielded better freedom from aortic-related survival [hazard ratio (HR): 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.93, P = 0.012] but inferior freedom from aortic-related reintervention (HR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.45-3.04, P < 0.001). Landmark analysis revealed that the open repair group experienced better all-cause survival beyond 16 months (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.53-1.75, P < 0.001). In addition, in the subgroup of patients with intact DTAA, those who underwent open repair exhibited a higher rate of postoperative mortality (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88; I 2  = 83.34%) but had better all-cause survival beyond 7 months (HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.61-1.84, P < 0.001) than those who underwent endovascular repair.

CONCLUSION

Among patients treated for DTAA, endovascular repair was associated with better freedom from aortic-related survival, a lower risk for postoperative mortality and morbidity, and shorter lengths of intervention, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay than those who underwent open repair. Open repair yielded significantly better long-term all-cause survival and freedom from aortic-related re-intervention than endovascular repair.

Tabular review of contemporary open surgical repair experiences for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is one of the most challenging operations due to extensive surgical dissection and exposure, risk of complications and need for reconstruction of the aorta and its branches. In the last two decades, endovascular techniques have evolved and now are considered a viable alternative to open surgical repair in patients with suitable anatomy. Regardless of which technique is selected, open or endovascular, reduction of postoperative morbidity and mortality requires large clinical volume, optimal patient selection and a multidisciplinary team that can take care of the surgical, anesthetic, critical care and postoperative issues that occur after these operations. The aim of this article is to summarize the clinical data on open surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in a schematic tabular format.

Comparative analysis of long-term outcomes in thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between Marfan syndrome patients and non-Marfan syndrome patients

BACKGROUND

A consensus on the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without MFS.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 230 consecutive patients who underwent TAAA repair between 2012 and 2022, including of 69 MFS patients and 161 non-MFS patients. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality. The secondary endpoint was a composite of early adverse events, including early mortality, permanent stroke, permanent paraplegia, permanent renal failure, and reoperation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of MFS on early composite adverse events, and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to evaluate the association between MFS and overall mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with non-MFS patients, MFS patients were younger (mean, 31.9 ± 8.5 years vs 44.8 ± 12.3 years; P < .001), had less comorbid coronary artery disease (0 vs 8.1%; P = .034), more frequently underwent Crawford extent III repair (56.5% vs 34.8%; P = .002) and applied normothermic iliac perfusion (91.3% vs 81.4%; P = .057). There was no significant difference in the rate of early composite adverse events between the MFS and non-MFS groups (23.2% vs 14.3%; P = .099), which was verified by multivariable logistic regression analyses with multiple models. Overall mortality was significantly lower in the MFS group compared to the non-MFS group (P = .026, log-rank test), with 1-, 5-, and 10-year cumulative mortality of 4.4% versus 8.7%, 8.1% versus 17.2%, and 20.9% versus 36.4%, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression analyses across different models further confirmed MFS as a significant protective factor for overall mortality (model 1: hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.73; P = .007; model 2: HR, 0.32, 95% CI, 0.13-0.75; P = .009; model 3: HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.95; P = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite varying risk profiles, MFS patients undergoing open TAAA repair can achieve comparable or even superior outcomes to non-MFS patients with tailored surgical strategies, meticulous perioperative care, and close follow-up surveillance, especially in the long term.

A unique technique for thoracoabdominal aortic repair for 10 years: Normothermic iliac perfusion

BACKGROUND

The modality of thoracoabdominal aortic repair (TAAR) is mainly based on left heart bypass (LHB) in western countries, while in our team, it is mainly based on a unique technique, normothermic iliac perfusion, and there is a lack of systematic reports and long-term results. To describe the operative technique and summarize the patient characteristics and outcomes of TAAR with normothermic iliac perfusion in our team in the last decade. Meanwhile, to explore the influence of different previous surgical history on prognosis.

METHODS

137 consecutive patients who received TAAR with normothermic iliac perfusionby single surgeon from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Operative details were described and data were grouped according to previous surgical history. Early operative mortality and adverse events were summarized. Survival over time was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve.

RESULTS

The average age of the cohort was 42.39 ± 11.76 years old, 70.07% were male. 63 (46%) patients had no previous surgery, 53 (39%) patients had total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (TAR_FET), and 21 (15%) patients had thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Operative mortality was 4.38%, the incidence of early paraplegia was 6.57%, and previous surgery had no significant effect on prognosis (p = .294). Cumulative survival was 92.1% at 3 years and 90.8% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The normothermic iliac perfusionfor TAAR is feasible regardless of previous surgery, as long as there are no complicating factors. And the early outcomes are satisfactory and the long-term outcomes are reliable.

The Complementary Roles of Open and Endovascular Repair of Extent I - III Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in a United Kingdom Aortic Centre

OBJECTIVE

A multidisciplinary approach offering both open surgical repair (OSR) and complex endovascular aortic repair (cEVAR) is essential if patients with thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are to receive optimal care. This study reports early and midterm outcomes of elective and non-elective OSR and cEVAR for extent I - III TAAA in a UK aortic centre.

METHODS

Retrospective study of consecutive patients treated between January 2009 and December 2021. Primary endpoint was 30 day/in hospital mortality. Secondary endpoint was Kaplan-Meier estimates of midterm survival. Data are presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]).

RESULTS

In total, 296 patients (176 men; median age 71 years [IQR 65, 76]; median aneurysm diameter 66 mm [IQR 61, 75]) underwent repair (222 elective, 74 non-elective). OSR patients (n = 66) were significantly younger with a higher incidence of heritable disease and chronic dissection, while cEVAR patients (n = 230) had a significantly higher prevalence of coronary, pulmonary, and renal disease. Overall, in hospital mortality after elective and non-elective repair was 3.2% (n = 7) and 23.0% (n = 17), respectively, with no significant difference between treatment modalities (elective OSR 6.5% vs. cEVAR 2.3%, p = .14; non-elective OSR 25.0% vs. cEVAR 20.3%, p = .80). Major non-fatal complications occurred in 15.3% (33/215) after elective repair (OSR 39.5%, 17/43, vs. cEVAR 9.3%, 16/172; p < .001) and 14% (8/57) after non-elective repair (OSR 26.7%, 4/15, vs. cEVAR 9.5%, 4/42; p = .19). Median follow up was 52 months (IQR 23, 78). Estimated survival ± standard error at 1, 3, and 5 years for the entire cohort was 89.6 ± 2.0%, 76.6 ± 2.9%, and 69.0% ± 3.2% after elective repair, and 67.6 ± 5.4%, 52.1 ± 6.0%, and 41.0 ± 6.2% after non-elective repair. There was no difference in 5 year survival comparing modalities after elective repair for patients younger than 70 years and those with post-dissection aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach offering OSR and cEVAR can deliver comprehensive care for extent I - III TAAA with low early mortality and good midterm survival. Further studies are required to determine the optimal complementary roles of each treatment modality.

Risk profile and operative outcomes in patients with and without Marfan syndrome undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES

To compare operative and long-term outcomes between patients with and without Marfan syndrome undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

METHODS

We identified all consecutive patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 1997 and 2022. Primary outcome was composite of major adverse events. Secondary outcomes were individual complications and long-term survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term survival. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with major adverse events.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-four patients underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ninety (13.1%) had Marfan syndrome, whereas 594 (86.9%) did not. Marfan patients were younger (46 years [range, 36-56 years] vs 69 years [range, 61-76 years]; P < .001). Extent II or III aneurysms (57 out of 90 [63.3%] vs 211 out of 594 [35.6%]; P < .001) and type I or III chronic dissection (77 out of 90 [85.3%] vs 242 out of 594 [40.8%]; P < .001) were more common. Cardiovascular risk factors were less frequent in Marfan patients. There was no difference in major adverse events between groups (12 out of 90 [13.3%] vs 100 out of 594 [16.8%]; P = .49). Operative mortality was similar between groups (3 out of 90 [3.3%] vs 28 out of 594 [4.7%]; P = .75). Unweighted survival at 10 years was 78.7% vs 46.8% (P = .001). Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in long-term survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.32-1.99; P = .62; Log-rank P = .12). At multivariable analysis, renal insufficiency (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.43-3.68; P < .01) and urgent/emergency procedure (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.35-3.48; P < .01) were associated with major adverse events, whereas Marfan syndrome was not (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.69-3.49; P = .28).

CONCLUSIONS

Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair can be performed with similar operative outcomes in patients with and without Marfan syndrome despite differing risk profiles. Operative/perioperative strategies must be tailored to specific needs of each patient to optimize outcomes.

Multicenter trans-Atlantic experience with fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

This multicenter international study aimed to describe outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repairs (FB-EVAR) in a cohort of patients treated for chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAAs).

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical data of all consecutive patients treated by FB-EVAR for repair of extent I to III PD-TAAAs in 16 centers from the United States and Europe (2008-2021). Data were extracted from institutional prospectively maintained databases and electronic patient records. All patients received off-the-shelf or patient-specific manufactured fenestrated-branched stent grafts. Endpoints were any cause mortality and major adverse events at 30 days, technical success, target artery (TA) patency, freedom from TA instability, minor (endovascular with <12 Fr sheath) and major (open or ≥12 Fr sheath) secondary interventions, patient survival, and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM).

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients (76% male; median age, 67 years [interquartile range, 61-73 years]) were treated for extent I (7%), extent II (55%), and extent III (35%) PD-TAAAs by FB-EVAR. The median aneurysm diameter was 65 mm (interquartile range, 59-73 mm). Eighteen patients (7%) were octogenarians, 212 (86%) were American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥3, and 21 (9%) presented with contained ruptured or symptomatic aneurysms. There were 917 renal-mesenteric vessels targeted by 581 fenestrations (63%) and 336 directional branches (37%), with a mean of 3.7 vessels per patient. Technical success was 96%. Mortality and rate of major adverse events at 30 days was 3% and 28%, including disabling complications such as new onset dialysis in 1%, major stroke in 1%, and permanent paraplegia in 2%. Mean follow-up was 24 months. Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimated patient survival at 3 and 5 years was 79% ± 6% and 65% ± 10%. KM estimated freedom from ARM was 95% ± 3% and 93% ± 5% at the same intervals. Unplanned secondary interventions were needed in 94 patients (38%), including minor procedures in 64 (25%) and major procedures in 30 (12%). There was one conversion to open surgical repair (<1%). KM estimated freedom from any secondary intervention was 44% ± 9% at 5 years. KM estimated primary and secondary TA patency were 93% ± 2% and 96% ± 1% at 5 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FB-EVAR for chronic PD-TAAAs was associated with high technical success and a low rate of mortality (3%) and disabling complications at 30 days. Although the procedure is effective in the prevention of ARM, patient survival was low at 5 years (65%), likely due to the significant comorbidities in this cohort of patients. Freedom from secondary interventions at 5 years was 44%, although most procedures were minor. The significant rate of reinterventions highlights the need for continued patient surveillance.

Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Intervention in Patients With Connective Tissue Disease

Importance

Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma.

Objective

To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022.

Exposure

All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair.

Results

In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.