1
|
Vijayarajan V, Hsu A, Cheng YY, Shu MWS, Hyun K, Sy R, Chow V, Brieger D, Kritharides L, Ng ACC. Outcomes Following Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older: A Statewide Population Cohort Study. Can J Cardiol 2024; 40:389-398. [PMID: 37898173 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients ≥ 80 years of age are underrepresented in major implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials, and real-world data are lacking. In this study, we sought to assess ICD utilisation, outcomes, and their predictors, in an unselected statewide population including patients ≥ 80 years old. METHODS We extracted details of ICDs implanted from 2009 to 2018 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia from the Centre for Health Record Linkage administrative data sets. Analysis was stratified into age groups of < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years. RESULTS A total of 9304 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 13.1 years; 12.1% ≥ 80 years) had de novo ICD placement at an average rate of 1163 ± 122 patients per annum, with more implants in men in all age groups. After adjusting for NSW population size by sex, age group, and calendar year, mean implantation rates were 5.5 ± 0.6, 63.2 ± 8.6, and 52.7 ± 10.8 per 100,000 persons per annum in patients aged < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 0.4% and did not differ among age groups. However, 1-year mortality was 2.1%, 5.9%, and 10.7%, in those < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years of age, respectively (P < 0.001), with hazard ratios for those aged ≥ 80 years of 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-6.0) and those aged 60-79 years of 2.6 (95% CI 1.9-3.5) relative to those aged < 60 years (both P < 0.001) after adjusting for ICD indications, sex, implantation year, referral source, and comorbidities. In those aged ≥ 80 years, age > 83 years, congestive cardiac failure, chronic renal failure, neurodegenerative disease, and a higher Charlson comorbidity index score were each independent predictors of 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS ICD use in patients aged ≥ 80 years and 60-79 years was 10-fold that in patients aged < 60 years, and perioperative outcomes were good in all ages, but there was substantially increased 1-year mortality in those aged ≥ 80 years. Careful selection based on age and comorbidity may further reduce 1-year mortality in patients ≥ 80 years old receiving ICDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijayatubini Vijayarajan
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Arielle Hsu
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yeu-Yao Cheng
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Wei Shun Shu
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karice Hyun
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raymond Sy
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vincent Chow
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Brieger
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leonard Kritharides
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Austin Chin Chwan Ng
- Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mkoko P, Solomon K, Chin A. Two decades of implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and follow-up at a South African referral centre: trends, indications and long-term outcomes in a resource-limited setting. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA 2022; 23:19. [PMID: 35937563 PMCID: PMC9340675 DOI: 10.1186/s42444-022-00070-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
More than two-thirds of cardiovascular deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Sudden cardiac deaths (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of cardiovascular deaths. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are an important therapeutic strategy for detecting and terminating ventricular arrhythmias in patients at risk of SCD. The profile of patients treated with ICDs in South Africa is unknown. Further, with changing lines of evidence, the implantation trends are undetermined. The objectives of this study were to determine the profile of ICD recipients and implantation trends in a South African quaternary hospital.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of all patients implanted with ICDs at Groote Schuur Hospital from 01 January 1998 to 31 December 2020. A standardised data collection form was used to collect baseline demographic data, information on clinical presentation and ICD follow-up data for the history of ICD shock therapies.
Results
A total of 253 ICDs were implanted; 75% for secondary prevention and 25% for primary prevention. 67.2% of the implanted ICDs were single-chamber ICDs, dual-chamber ICDs were implanted in 12.3% and Cardiac resynchronisation with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in 20.6%. There was an upward trajectory of ICD implantations during the study period. Increasing numbers of dual-chamber devices and CRT-D were implanted over time. ICD recipients had a mean (standard deviation) age of 50 (14) years and were predominantly male (69%). Primary prevention ICD recipients were younger than secondary prevention recipients, with a mean (SD) age of 46 (14) years versus 51 (14) years, p = 0.019. The secondary prevention group presented with ventricular tachycardia in 81%, ventricular fibrillation in 13% and cardiopulmonary resuscitation without documented heart rhythm in 5.3% (10/190). After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 44 (15; 93) months, there was an overall mortality rate of 16.2%, with no mortality difference between the primary and secondary prevention patient groups.
Conclusion
There is an increase in the annual number of ICDs implanted at a South African referral centre. ICDs are predominantly implanted for secondary prevention. However, over time the number of devices implanted for primary prevention is steadily increased. During follow-up, there was no mortality difference between the primary prevention and the secondary prevention groups.
Collapse
|
3
|
Zecchin M, Torre M, Carrani E, Sampaolo L, Ciminello E, Ortis B, Ricci R, Proclemer A, Sinagra G, Boriani G. Seventeen-year trend (2001-2017) in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator utilization based on hospital discharge database data: An analysis by age groups. Eur J Intern Med 2021; 84:38-45. [PMID: 32933841 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To analyze temporal trends (2001 -2017) of Pacemakers (PM) and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators (ICD) procedures in Italy, according to the national Hospital Discharge Database (HDD). METHODS Frequency and implant rate (IR) in the Italian population were analyzed by age groups (<50, 50-79, ≥80 years). RESULTS From 2001 (2009 for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator - CRT-D) to 2017, first PM implants (1stPM) increased from 36,823 (637/million inhabitants) to 49,716 (820/million), ICD implants from 3,141 (54/million) to 24,255 (400/million) and CRT-D from 2,915 (49/million, 16.5% of ICD) to 8,595 (142/million, 35.4% of ICD). ICD implants due to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation decreased from 55.6% to 13.5% and from 15.9% to 4.5% respectively, while the proportion increased among patients with heart failure (from 22.9% to 46.8%), hypertension (from 11.1% to 15.0%), diabetes (from 6.5% to 10.9%), and renal insufficiency (from 4.4% to 7.6%). Both PM and ICD procedures markedly increased in patients ≥80 years old. However, while IR for ICDs increased from 82/million to 1,038/million inhabitants, IR of 1stPM only changed from 6,111/million to 6,212/million as the population in this age group nearly doubled in Italy. CONCLUSION Since 2001, the increase of 1stPM in Italy was mainly due to the ultra-octogenarian population growth. No differences were observed for IR in each PM age group, while the absolute number and IR increased in all groups (especially ≥80 years old) for ICDs and CRT-Ds. An increase in comorbidities and a reduction in implants for secondary prevention were observed in the ICD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Zecchin
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Enrico Ciminello
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Roma, Italy; "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Ortis
- Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Renato Ricci
- Associazione Italiana Aritmologia e Cardiostimolazione, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kabutoya T, Mitsuhashi T, Shimizu A, Nitta T, Mitamura H, Kurita T, Abe H, Nakazato Y, Sumitomo N, Kadota K, Kimura K, Okumura K. Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation - The JID-CAD Study. Circ Rep 2021; 3:69-76. [PMID: 33693292 PMCID: PMC7939950 DOI: 10.1253/circrep.cr-20-0122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:
There has been no large multicenter clinical trial on the prognosis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the present study was to compare differences in the prognoses of Japanese patients with CAD between primary and secondary prevention, and to identify potential predictors of prognosis. Methods and Results:
We investigated 392 CAD patients (median age 69 years, 90% male) treated with ICD/CRT-D enrolled in the Japan Implantable Devices in CAD (JID-CAD) Registry. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapies. Endpoints were assessed by dividing patients into primary prevention (n=165) and secondary prevention (n=227) groups. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 2.1±0.9 years. The primary endpoint was similar in the 2 groups (P=0.350). Conclusions:
The mortality rate in Japanese patients with CAD who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention was not lower than that of patients who underwent ICD/CRT-D implantation as secondary prevention, despite the lower cardiac function in the patients undergoing ICD/CRT-D implantation as primary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoyuki Kabutoya
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Jichi Medical University Shimotsuke Japan
| | | | | | - Takashi Nitta
- Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School Tokyo Japan
| | | | - Takashi Kurita
- Cardiology, Kindai University School of Medicine Osaka-Sayama Japan
| | - Haruhiko Abe
- Department of Heart Rhythm Management, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Kitakyushu Japan
| | - Yuji Nakazato
- Cardiology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital Urayasu Japan
| | - Naokata Sumitomo
- Pediatric Cardiology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Hidaka Japan
| | | | - Kazuo Kimura
- Division of Cardiology, Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan
| | - Ken Okumura
- Division of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Kumamoto Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin AY, Lupercio F, Ho G, Pollema T, Pretorius V, Birgersdotter-Green U. Safety and Efficacy of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Extraction in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Heart Rhythm O2 2020; 1:250-258. [PMID: 33604584 PMCID: PMC7889020 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transvenous lead extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) has been proven safe in the general patient population with the advances in extraction techniques. Octogenarians present a unique challenge given their comorbidities and the perceived increase in morbidity and mortality. Objective To assess the safety and outcomes of CIED extraction in octogenarians to younger patients. Methods We performed an extensive literature search and systematic review of studies that compared CIED extraction in octogenarians versus non-octogenarians. We separately assessed the rate of complete procedure success, clinical success, procedural mortality, major and minor complications. Risk ratio (RR) 95% confidence intervals were measured using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The random effects model was used due to heterogeneity across study cohorts. Results Seven studies with a total of 4,182 patients were included. There was no difference between octogenarians and non-octogenarians in complete procedure success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.02, p = 0.19) and clinical success (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.01, p = 0.13). There was also no difference in procedural mortality (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.46 - 4.39, p = 0.54), major complication (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.68 - 2.88, p = 0.36), and minor complication (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.90 - 2.29, p = 0.13). Conclusion In this study, there was no evidence to suggest a difference in procedural success and complication rates between octogenarians and younger patients. Transvenous lead extraction can be performed safely and effectively in the elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Y Lin
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Florentino Lupercio
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Gordon Ho
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Travis Pollema
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Victor Pretorius
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Malekpour M, Dehghani-Tafti F, Ratki SKR, Seifpoor Z, Namiranian N, Shafiee M, Mali S, Seyed Hosseini SM. Yazd Province of Iran ICD Registry for the Years 2014-2016. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2020; 19:90-93. [PMID: 32011358 DOI: 10.1097/hpc.0000000000000211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the trends in the care of patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in our region and to analyze whether the quality of care is the same as the other centers or not? METHODS Adult patients with an indication for ICD implants were enrolled in our registry and followed over a 19-43-month period. RESULTS The ICD implantation rate was 100/million per year. The mean age of patients treated with ICD was 62.36 (±12.93) years old and the majority of patients were men (77.6%). Most patients had ischemic heart failure (65.2%). Nearly half of the patients had NYHA class III (53.8%) and the mean of ejection fraction was 26.7 (±9.8%). ICDs were frequently implanted for primary prevention (71.9%). Single chamber ICDs (ICD-VR) were chosen in 25.2%, dual-chamber ICDs in 37.1% (ICD-DR) and biventricular ICDs (CRT-D) in 37.6%, respectively. Complications related to ICD implantation occurred in about 7.49% of all procedures. During follow-up period death occurred in 14.8% of our patients. Also, 13.3% of patients received ICD shock which was appropriate in 71% of patients. CONCLUSIONS In comparison between our registry and NCDR registry, baseline patient characteristics and ICD type were almost the same, but the complication rate was higher. There is still a need to perform a large multicenter registry in our community to improve our knowledge in this Era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maliheh Malekpour
- From the Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Faezeh Dehghani-Tafti
- From the Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Seid Kazem Razavi Ratki
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Zeinolabedin Seifpoor
- From the Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Nasim Namiranian
- Yazd Diabetes Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Shafiee
- From the Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Shahryar Mali
- From the Yazd Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gasparini M, Kloppe A, Lunati M, Varma N, Martinez-Ferrer JB, Hersi A, Gulaj M, Wijffels MCEF, Arenal A, Mangoni di Santo Stefano L, Proclemer A. Sex differences in implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy according to arrhythmia detection times. Heart 2019; 106:520-526. [PMID: 31826936 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs), long-detection times safely reduce unnecessary and inappropriate therapies. We aimed to evaluate ICD treatment of ventricular arrhythmias in women, compared with men, also taking into account ICD detection. METHODS The Advance III trial randomised patients implanted with an ICD for primary or secondary prevention in two arms-long and nominal ventricular arrhythmias detection times before therapy delivering (number of intervals needed to detect (NID) 30/40 and 18/24, respectively). The main endpoint of this post hoc analysis was the incidence of ICD therapies evaluated through Kaplan-Meier method and univariate Cox regression models. RESULTS Overall, 1902 patients (304 women, 65±11 years) were randomised. Women showed a lower risk of ICD therapy (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.93, p=0.022); this difference was observed only in the long-detection arm (HR 0.37, p=0.013) and not in the short detection arm (HR 0.82, p=0.414). No significant sex differences were observed concerning inappropriate therapies and mortality rate. Long-detection settings significantly reduced overall ICD therapies and appropriate ICD therapies, both in women (overall HR 0.31, p=0.007; appropriate HR 0.33, p=0.033) and in men (overall HR 0.69, p=0.006; appropriate HR 0.73, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS In patients with ICDs, the strategy of setting a long-detection time to treat ventricular arrhythmias (NID 30/40) reduces overall delivered therapies, both in women and men, when compared with nominal setting (NID 18/24). The reduction was significantly higher in women. Overall, women were less likely to experience ICD therapies than men; this result was only observed in the long-detection arm. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00617175.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Gasparini
- Electrophysiology and Pacing Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Axel Kloppe
- Cardiology and Angiology, Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Maurizio Lunati
- Cardiology Department, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Niraj Varma
- Cardiology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Ahmed Hersi
- College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia
| | - Marcin Gulaj
- Department of Cardiology, MSWiA Hospital, Bialystok, Poland
| | | | - Angel Arenal
- Cardiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Alessandro Proclemer
- Department of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Poli S, Boriani G, Zecchin M, Facchin D, Gasparini M, Landolina M, Ricci RP, Lanera C, Gregori D, Proclemer A. Favorable Trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Service Life in a Large Single-Nation Population: Insights From 10-Year Analysis of the Italian Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8:e012759. [PMID: 31340695 PMCID: PMC6761663 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.012759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are widely employed for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Despite technological improvements, patients often need to undergo generator replacement, which entails the risk of periprocedural complications. Our aim was to estimate the service life of ICDs over a 10-year interval and to assess the main causes of replacement on the basis of data from the National ICD Registry of the Italian Society of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). Methods and Results The registry includes data from over 400 hospitals in Italy. We included all patients who underwent device replacement from calendar years 2007 to 2016. The median service life of the ICDs and its trend over the years was estimated across the 3 types of devices (single-chamber, dual-chamber, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator) and the indication to implantation. The causes of replacement were also analyzed. We included 29 158 records from 27 676 patients (80.9% men; mean age at device replacement 65.8±12.0 years). The median service life was 57.3 months (interquartile range 27.8 months). Over the years, service life showed an increasing trend. The majority of patients underwent elective replacement because of battery end of life, and over the years there was a significant reduction of replacement for recalls, erosion/infections, and cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrading. Conclusions Our data from a large single-nation population showed that the trend of ICD service life, independently from ICD type, indication, and settings, significantly improved over time. Moreover, there was a striking reduction of interventions for upgrading and infection/erosion. This favorable trend has important clinical, organizational, and financial implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Poli
- Cardiology DivisionAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB FoundationUdineItaly
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology DivisionDepartment of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural SciencesUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaPoliclinico di ModenaModenaItaly
| | - Massimo Zecchin
- Cardiovascular DepartmentAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di TriesteTriesteItaly
| | - Domenico Facchin
- Cardiology DivisionAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB FoundationUdineItaly
| | - Maurizio Gasparini
- Electrophysiology and Pacing UnitHumanitas Research HospitalIRCCSRozzanoItaly
| | | | | | - Corrado Lanera
- Biostatistic UnitDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of PadovaItaly
| | - Dario Gregori
- Biostatistic UnitDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of PadovaItaly
| | - Alessandro Proclemer
- Cardiology DivisionAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine and IRCAB FoundationUdineItaly
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks-incidence, effect, and implications for driver licensing. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2017; 49:271-280. [PMID: 28730420 PMCID: PMC5543197 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-017-0272-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have an ongoing risk of sudden incapacitation that may cause traffic accidents. However, there are limited data on the magnitude of this risk after inappropriate ICD therapies. We studied the rate of syncope associated with inappropriate ICD therapies to provide a scientific basis for formulating driving restrictions. Methods Inappropriate ICD therapy event data between 1997 and 2014 from 50 Japanese institutions were analyzed retrospectively. The annual risk of harm (RH) to others posed by a driver with an ICD was calculated for private driving habits. We used a commonly employed annual RH to others of 5 in 100,000 (0.005%) as an acceptable risk threshold. Results Of the 4089 patients, 772 inappropriate ICD therapies occurred in 417 patients (age 61 ± 15 years, 74% male, and 65% secondary prevention). Patients experiencing inappropriate therapies had a mean number of 1.8 ± 1.5 therapy episodes during a median follow-up period of 3.9 years. No significant differences were found in the age, sex, or number of inappropriate therapies between patients receiving ICDs for primary or secondary prevention. Only three patients (0.7%) experienced syncope associated with inappropriate therapies. The maximum annual RH to others after the first therapy in primary and secondary prevention patients was calculated to be 0.11 in 100,000 and 0.12 in 100,000, respectively. Conclusions We found that the annual RH from driving was far below the commonly cited acceptable risk threshold. Our data provide useful information to supplement current recommendations on driving restrictions in ICD patients with private driving habits. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10840-017-0272-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
10
|
Niederländer CS, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas P. Quality criteria for medical device registries: best practice approaches for improving patient safety – a systematic review of international experiences. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 14:49-64. [DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2017.1268911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Susanne Niederländer
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health (IZPH), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christine Kriza
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health (IZPH), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter Kolominsky-Rabas
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health (IZPH), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kanoupakis EM, Fanourgiakis JA, Mavrakis HE, Kallergis EM, Simantirakis EN, Crysostomakis SI, Saloustros IG, Chlouverakis GI, Vardas PE. Long-term clinical outcomes in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients on the island of Crete. Hellenic J Cardiol 2016; 57:S1109-9666(16)30147-6. [PMID: 27639320 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2016.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current study is to disseminate long-term "real-world" data on mortality and device therapies in primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients on the island of Crete. METHODS We analyzed data for all consecutive patients who received an ICD in our tertiary university hospital from 1993 until December 2013. Follow-up visits were performed every 6 months or more frequently when indicated. Survival status was recorded, and all stored episodes during interrogation were registered and classified as appropriate or inappropriate. RESULTS In total, 854 patients received an ICD; 623 (73%) for primary and 231 (27%) for secondary prevention. Most of these patients (490) suffered from ischemic cardiomyopathy. During the mean follow-up of 12.4±7.8 years, 218 (25.5%) patients died; 19.7% in the primary prevention group (p=0.008) and 41.1% in the secondary prevention group. Overall, 248 patients (29%) received appropriate therapy; however, the percentage was significantly higher in the secondary prevention group (44.2%) than in primary prevention group (23.4%). The cumulative incidence of inappropriate therapies during the mean follow-up period was 11.6%. Lead-related complications were noted in 49 patients (5.7%), while only 13 patients (1.5%) suffered device-related infections. CONCLUSIONS The long-term data related to clinical outcomes in ICD recipients in our center are in accordance with those of other international centers and confirm the high efficacy and safety of these devices in preventing sudden cardiac death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John A Fanourgiakis
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Hercules E Mavrakis
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | | | | | - Ilias G Saloustros
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | | | - Panos E Vardas
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
CHANG PHILIPM, POWELL BRIAND, JONES PAULW, CARTER NATHAN, HAYES DAVIDL, SAXON LESLIEA. Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Programming Characteristics, Shocked Rhythms, and Survival Among Patients Under Thirty Years of Age. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016; 27:1183-1190. [DOI: 10.1111/jce.13038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - BRIAN D. POWELL
- Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute; Charlotte North Carolina USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Expósito V, Rodríguez-Mañero M, González-Enríquez S, Arias MA, Sánchez-Gómez JM, Andrés La Huerta A, Bertomeu-González V, Arce-León Á, Barrio-López MT, Arguedas-Jiménez H, Seara JG, Rodriguez-Entem F. Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator in elderly patients: results of a Spanish multicentre study. Europace 2015; 18:1203-10. [PMID: 26566939 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euv337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Currently, there continues to be a lack of evidence regarding outcomes associated with device-based therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in elderly patients, even more in primary-prevention indications. We aimed to describe the follow-up in terms of efficacy and safety of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in a large cohort of elderly patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Retrospective multicentre study performed in 15 Spanish hospitals. Consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation before 2011 were included. One hundred and sixty-two of 1174 patients (13.8%) ≥75 years were considered as 'elderly'. When compared with those patients <75, this subgroup presented more co-morbid conditions, including hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , and renal failure, and more previous hospitalizations due to heart failure (HF). During a mean follow-up of 104.4 ± 3.3 months, 162 patients (14%) died, 120 in the younger age (12.4%), and 42 (24.4%) in the elderly. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed an increased probability of death with increasing age (17, 24, 28, and 69% at 12, 24, 48, and 60 months of follow-up in the elderly group). There was neither difference regarding the rate of appropriate nor inappropriate ICD intervention. CONCLUSION In a real-world scenario, elderly patients comprise ∼15% of ICD implantations for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although the rate of appropriate therapy is similar between groups, the benefit of ICD is attenuated for a major increase in mortality risk among those patients ≥75 years at the moment of device implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Expósito
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Av. Hospital s/n, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Valzania C, Torbica A, Tarricone R, Leyva F, Boriani G. Implant rates of cardiac implantable electrical devices in Europe: A systematic literature review. Health Policy 2015; 120:1-15. [PMID: 26632502 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2014] [Revised: 10/02/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, indications for cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs) have broadened; however, budget constraints can significantly impact patient access to these life-saving health technologies. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic literature review on the implant rates of pacemakers, cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in Europe over the last decade to provide insight into the possible reasons for differences across regions or countries. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched to find studies describing CIED implant rates in Europe. Fifty-eight studies were included. RESULTS An overview showed a recent rise in CIED implants, with large geographic differences. The ratio between the regions with the highest and lowest implant rates within the same country ranged between 1.3 and 3.4 for pacemakers and between 1.7 and 44.0 for defibrillators. The ratio between the countries with the highest and lowest implant rates ranged between 2.3 and 87.5 for pacemakers, between 3.1 and 1548.0 for defibrillators, and between 4.1 and 221.0 for resynchronization therapy devices. Implant rate variability appears to be influenced by health care, economic, demographic, and cultural factors. CONCLUSION Publications on CIED implant rates in Europe show a wide variability within and across countries, the determinants of which are only partially investigated. Policy making should improve regarding equity of access to better care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cinzia Valzania
- Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- CERGAS, Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Tarricone
- CERGAS, Department of Policy Analysis and Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francisco Leyva
- Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston University Medical School, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- Institute of Cardiology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Cardiology Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena , Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen CY, Stevenson LW, Stewart GC, Bhatt DL, Desai M, Seeger JD, Williams L, Jalbert JJ, Setoguchi S. Real world effectiveness of primary implantable cardioverter defibrillators implanted during hospital admissions for exacerbation of heart failure or other acute co-morbidities: cohort study of older patients with heart failure. BMJ 2015; 351:h3529. [PMID: 26174233 PMCID: PMC4501450 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h3529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness of primary implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in elderly patients receiving the device during a hospital admission for exacerbation of heart failure or other acute co-morbidities, with an emphasis on adjustment for early mortality and other factors reflecting healthy candidate bias rather than the effect of the ICD. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Linked data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD registry, nationwide heart failure registry, and Medicare claims data 2004-09. POPULATION 23,111 patients aged ≥ 66 who were admitted to hospital for exacerbation of heart failure or other acute co-morbidities and eligible for primary ICDs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All cause mortality and sudden cardiac death. Latency analyses with Cox regression were used to derive crude hazard ratios and hazard ratios adjusted for high dimension propensity score for outcomes after 180 days from index implantation or discharge. RESULTS Patients who received an ICD during a hospital admission had lower crude mortality risk than patients who did not receive an ICD (40% v 60% at three years); however, with conditioning on 180 day survival and with adjustment for high dimension propensity score, the apparent benefit with ICD was no longer evident for sudden cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.17) and had a diminished impact on total mortality (0.91, 0.82 to 1.00). There were trends towards a benefit with ICD in reducing mortality or sudden cardiac death in patients who had had a myocardial infarction more than 40 days previously, left bundle branch block, or low serum B type natriuretic peptide; however, these trends did not reach significance. CONCLUSION After adjustment for healthy candidate bias and confounding, the benefits of primary ICD therapy seen in pivotal trials were not apparent in patients aged 66 or over who received ICDs during a hospital admission for exacerbation of heart failure or other acute co-morbidities. Future research is warranted to further identify subgroups of elderly patients who are more likely to benefit from ICDs. Recognition of those patients whose dominant risk factors are from decompensated heart failure and non-cardiac co-morbidities will allow better focus on ICDs in those patients for whom the device offers the most benefit and provides meaningful prolonging of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Ying Chen
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Lynne Warner Stevenson
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Garrick C Stewart
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - John D Seeger
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Lauren Williams
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Jessica J Jalbert
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Kramer DB, Matlock DD, Buxton AE, Goldstein NE, Goodwin C, Green AR, Kirkpatrick JN, Knoepke C, Lampert R, Mueller PS, Reynolds MR, Spertus JA, Stevenson LW, Mitchell SL. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use in Older Adults: Proceedings of a Hartford Change AGEnts Symposium. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 8:437-46. [PMID: 26038525 DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Kramer
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.).
| | - Daniel D Matlock
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Alfred E Buxton
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Nathan E Goldstein
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Carol Goodwin
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Ariel R Green
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - James N Kirkpatrick
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Christopher Knoepke
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Rachel Lampert
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Paul S Mueller
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Matthew R Reynolds
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - John A Spertus
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Lynne W Stevenson
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.B.K., A.E.B., S.L.M.); Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA (D.B.K., S.L.M.); University of Colorado, CO (D.D.M.); Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York (N.E.G.); American Geriatrics Society, New York (C.G.); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (A.R.G.); University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (J.N.K.); University of Denver, CO (C.K.); Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (R.L.); Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (P.S.M.); Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, MA (M.R.R.); Mid-American Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (J.A.S.); and Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (L.W.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Barra S, Providência R, Paiva L, Heck P, Agarwal S. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the elderly: rationale and specific age-related considerations. Europace 2014; 17:174-86. [PMID: 25480942 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the increasingly high rate of implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in elderly patients, data supporting their clinical and cost-effectiveness in this age stratum are ambiguous and contradictory. We comprehensively reviewed the state-of-the-art data regarding the applicability, safety, clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the ICD in elderly patients, and analysed which patients in this age stratum are more likely to get a survival benefit from this therapy. Although peri-procedural risk may be slightly higher in the elderly, this procedure is still relatively safe in this age group. In terms of correcting potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, the effectiveness of ICD therapy is comparable in older and younger individuals. However, the assumption of persistent ICD benefit in the elderly population is questionable, as any advantage of the device on arrhythmic death may be largely attenuated by a higher total non-arrhythmic mortality. While septuagenarians and octogenarians have higher annual all-cause mortality rates, ICD therapy may remain effective in highly selected patients at high risk of arrhythmic death and with minimum comorbidities despite advanced age. ICD intervention among the elderly, as a group, may not be cost-effective, but the procedure may reach cost-effectiveness in those expected to live >5-7 years after implantation. Biological age rather than chronological age per se should be the decisive factor in making a decision on ICD selection for survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sérgio Barra
- Cardiology Department, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK
| | - Rui Providência
- Cardiology Department, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luís Paiva
- Cardiology Department, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Patrick Heck
- Cardiology Department, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK
| | - Sharad Agarwal
- Cardiology Department, Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Datino T, Miracle Blanco Á, Núñez García A, González-Torrecilla E, Atienza Fernández F, Arenal Maíz Á, Hernández-Hernández J, Ávila Alonso P, Eidelman G, Fernández-Avilés F. Safety of Outpatient Implantation of the Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014; 68:579-84. [PMID: 25435093 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2014.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Strategies are needed to reduce health care costs and improve patient care. The objective of our study was to analyze the safety of outpatient implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted in 401 consecutive patients who received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator between 2007 and 2012. The rate of intervention-related complications was compared between 232 patients (58%) whose implantation was performed in the outpatient setting and 169 patients (42%) whose intervention was performed in the inpatient setting. RESULTS The mean age (standard deviation) of the patients was 62 (14) years; 336 (84%) were male. Outpatients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction and a higher percentage had an indication for primary prevention of sudden death, compared to inpatients. Only 21 outpatients (9%) required subsequent hospitalization. The rate of complications until the third month postimplantation was similar for outpatients (6.0%) and inpatients (5.3%); P = .763. In multivariate analysis, only previous anticoagulant therapy was related to the presence of complications (odds ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-7.4; P < .01), mainly due to an increased rate of pocket hematomas. Each outpatient implantation saved approximately €735. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators is safe and reduces costs. Close observation is recommended for patients receiving chronic anticoagulation therapy due to an increased risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomás Datino
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ángel Miracle Blanco
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Núñez García
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esteban González-Torrecilla
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Atienza Fernández
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ángel Arenal Maíz
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Hernández-Hernández
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Ávila Alonso
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriel Eidelman
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Fernández-Avilés
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gadler F, Valzania C, Linde C. Current use of implantable electrical devices in Sweden: data from the Swedish pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry. Europace 2014; 17:69-77. [PMID: 25336667 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The National Swedish Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Registry collects prospective data on all pacemaker and ICD implants in Sweden. We aimed to report the 2012 findings of the Registry concerning electrical devices implantation rates and changes over time, 1 year complications, long-term device longevity and patient survival. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-four Swedish implanting centres continuously contribute implantation of pacemakers and ICDs to the Registry by direct data entry on a specific website. Clinical and technical information on 2012 first implants and postoperative complications were analysed and compared with previous years. Patient survival data were obtained from the Swedish population register database. In 2012, the mean pacemaker and ICD first implantation rates were 697 and 136 per million inhabitants, respectively. The number of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) first implantations/million capita was 41 (CRT pacemakers) and 55 (CRT defibrillators), with only a slight increase in CRT-ICD rate compared with 2011. Most device implantations were performed in men. Complication rates for pacemaker and ICD procedures were 5.3 and 10.1% at 1 year, respectively. Device and lead longevity differed among manufacturers. Pacemaker patients were older at the time of first implant and had generally worse survival rate than ICD patients (63 vs. 82% after 5 years). CONCLUSION Pacemaker and ICD implantation rates seem to have reached a level phase in Sweden. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT implantation rates are very low and do not reflect guideline indications. Gender differences in CRT and ICD implantations are pronounced. Device and patient survival rates are variable, and should be considered when deciding device type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Gadler
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cinzia Valzania
- Cardiovascular Department, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cecilia Linde
- Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Burch AWT, Wong CX, Sullivan T, Brooks AG, Leong DP, Lau DH, Sun MT, Roberts-Thomson KC, Sanders P. Trends in the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators in Australia: a 10-year nationwide study from 2000-2009. Intern Med J 2013; 43:888-95. [DOI: 10.1111/imj.12201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. W. T. Burch
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - C. X. Wong
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - T. Sullivan
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - A. G. Brooks
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - D. P. Leong
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - D. H. Lau
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - M. T. Sun
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - K. C. Roberts-Thomson
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| | - P. Sanders
- Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders; University of Adelaide; Adelaide Australia
- Royal Adelaide Hospital; Adelaide Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Proclemer A, Dagres N, Marinskis G, Pison L, Lip GY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Current practice in Europe: how do we manage patients with ventricular tachycardia? European Heart Rhythm Association survey. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 15:167-9. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Proclemer
- Cardiology Department of Cardiothoracic Science, University Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Second Cardiology Department, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Germanas Marinskis
- Clinic of Heart Diseases, Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių klinikos, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Laurent Pison
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Gregory Y.H. Lip
- University of Birmingham Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, City Hospital Birmingham, England, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Proclemer A, Muser D, Campana A, Zoni-Berisso M, Zecchin M, Locatelli A, Brieda M, Gramegna L, Santarone M, Chiodi L, Mazzone P, Rebellato L, Facchin D. Indication to cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and outcome in real world primary prevention. Data from the IRIDE [Italian registry of prophylactic implantation of defibrillators] study. Int J Cardiol 2012; 168:1416-21. [PMID: 23287697 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2012] [Revised: 12/10/2012] [Accepted: 12/12/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Several trials demonstrated the life saving role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The aim was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and 4-year outcome of consecutive patients treated in clinical practice by prophylactic ICD implantation on the basis of class I recommendations and up-to-date ICD programming. METHODS AND RESULTS IRIDE multi-center, prospective and observational study enrolled 604 consecutive patients (mean age: 66 ± 10 years) treated by ICD between 01/01/2006 and 30/06/2010. Main characteristics were similarly distributed among the inclusion criteria of MADIT II (24%), SCD-HeFT (24%), COMPANION (26%) and MADIT-CRT (18%) trials, while a small number of patients met the MUSTT and MADIT (7%) inclusion criteria. Single-chamber ICDs were implanted in 168 (28%) patients, dual-chamber in 167 (28%) and biventricular in 269 (43%) patients. ATP programming was activated in 546 (90%) patients. Overall survival and rate of appropriate ICD intervention by ATP and/or shock at 12-24-36-48 months of follow-up were 94%, 89%, 80%, 75% and 16%, 28%, 37% and 50%, respectively. No difference in mortality rate between the groups who received or did not receive appropriate ICD interventions was demonstrated (p=ns). CONCLUSIONS The IRIDE study confirms the effectiveness in real world practice of ICD implantation in patients at risk of SCD. The life saving role of ICD therapy increases as the duration of follow-up is prolonged and the survival benefit is similar in patients who received or did not receive appropriate device treatment, thus suggesting a beneficial effect of up-to-date device programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Proclemer
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "S. Maria della Misericordia" and IRCAB Foundation, SOC Cardiologia, Udine, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Botto GL, Dicandia CD, Mantica M, La Rosa C, D'Onofrio A, Bongiorni MG, Molon G, Verlato R, Villani GQ, Scaccia A, Raciti G, Occhetta E. Clinical characteristics, mortality, cardiac hospitalization, and ventricular arrhythmias in patients undergoing CRT-D implantation: results of the ACTION-HF study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012; 24:173-81. [PMID: 23130781 DOI: 10.1111/jce.12023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The characteristics and outcomes of patients who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation in current clinical practice may differ from those of reference trial populations. Study objectives were to assess 2-year outcomes in a population implanted with a CRT plus defibrillator device in accordance with the standard of care and to evaluate any independent association between clinical variables and outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 406 patients enrolled at 35 centers in Italy were followed up prospectively for 2 years. All patient management decisions were left to the treating physician's discretion, in accordance with clinical practice. ACTION-HF patients had a better baseline clinical status than patients enrolled in the COMPANION study: shorter HF history (1 vs 3.5 years, P < 0.01), less advanced NYHA functional class (III-IV: 73% vs 100%, P < 0.01), higher LVEF (26% vs 21%, P < 0.01), higher SBP (122 vs 112 mmHg, P < 0.01), and less diabetes (27% vs 41%, P < 0.01). This status was reflected in lower mortality (11.5% vs 26%) and a lower incidence of appropriate ICD shocks (12.1% vs 19.3%). AF history was an independent predictor of the combination of all-cause mortality and cardiac-cause hospitalization (HR: 3.31; P < 0.001). Recurrent or new atrial arrhythmias were independently associated with the development of ventricular arrhythmias (HR: 3.4; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This population appears clinically less compromised and had a lower incidence of adverse clinical outcomes than those of reference trials. However, we recorded a substantial burden of atrial arrhythmias, which was independently associated with a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.
Collapse
|
25
|
Proclemer A, Dobreanu D, Pison L, Lip GYH, Svendsen JH, Lundqvist CB. Current practice in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest management: a european heart rhythm association EP network survey. Europace 2012; 14:1195-8. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
26
|
GROARKE JOHN, BEIRNE AVRIL, BUCKLEY UNA, O’DWYER ELISABETH, SUGRUE DECLAN, KEELAN TED, O’NEILL JAMES, GALVIN JOE, MAHON NIALL. Deficiencies in Patients’ Comprehension of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2012; 35:1097-102. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03448.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
SADARMIN PRAVEENP, WONG KELVINCK, RAJAPPAN KIM, BASHIR YAVER, BETTS TIMOTHYR. Questionnaire Survey of Cardiologists’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Guideline Application of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2012; 35:672-80. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03373.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Registro Español de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable. VII Informe Oficial del Grupo de Trabajo de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2010). Rev Esp Cardiol 2011; 64:1023-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2011] [Accepted: 08/04/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
29
|
Stefano B, Pietro RR, Maurizio G, Maurizio L, Renato M, Maurizio L, Pietro R, Alessandro P, Gianluca B, Monica M, Sergio C, Massimo S. Defibrillation testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in Italian current practice: the Assessment of Long-term Induction clinical ValuE (ALIVE) project. Am Heart J 2011; 162:390-7. [PMID: 21835302 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2010] [Accepted: 04/07/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical practice with regard to defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation varies considerably, even among experienced implanting centers. International guidelines do not as yet mandate DFT testing. OBJECTIVE The objective of this project is to assess current clinical decision making regarding DFT testing during ICD implantation. METHODS The ALIVE project collected data on DFT testing from a multicenter network of Italian clinicians sharing a common system for the collection, management, analysis, and reporting of clinical and diagnostic data from patients with Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN) implantable devices. RESULTS Data on 2,082 consecutive patients implanted with a Medtronic ICD in 111 Italian centers, over the period 2007 to 2010, were analyzed. Defibrillation threshold testing was performed in 33% of cases (678/2,082). The main reasons for performing the test were physician's clinical practice ("I always perform DFT") (80%) and secondary prevention implantation (12%). The main reasons for not performing DFT testing were centers' practice (44%), primary prevention (31%), and device replacement (15%). In 22 patients, ventricular fibrillation induction was not achieved; 656 patients completed DFT testing: 633 patients (96%) performed a single test, 19 patients (3%) performed a second induction test, and 4 patients (0.6%) underwent an additional induction test. CONCLUSIONS The preliminary results of the ALIVE project show that a great number of implant procedures are performed without DFT testing in the common practice of the participating centers. We also measured an inhomogeneous, center-dependent DFT testing behavior, which suggests the importance of defining a common guideline for ICD implant testing. Follow-up data on our patients will provide more information on the clinical value of the test.
Collapse
|
30
|
Lazarus A, Biondi N, Thebaut JF, Durand-Zaleski I, Chauvin M. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in France: practices and regional variability. Europace 2011; 13:1568-73. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
|
31
|
Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2009-A World Society of Arrhythmia's Project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2011; 34:1013-27. [PMID: 21707667 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 619] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Harry G Mond
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Landolina M, Gasparini M, Lunati M, Iacopino S, Boriani G, Bonanno C, Vado A, Proclemer A, Capucci A, Zucchiatti C, Valsecchi S, Ricci RP, Santini M. Long-Term Complications Related to Biventricular Defibrillator Implantation. Circulation 2011; 123:2526-35. [DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.015024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background—
Long-term data on device-related untoward events in patients receiving defibrillators for resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) are lacking. We quantified the frequency of repeat invasive procedures and the nature of long-term complications in current clinical practice and examined possible predictors of device-related events and their association with long-term patient outcome.
Methods and Results—
We analyzed data from 3253 patients who underwent de novo successful implantation of CRT-D and were followed up for a median of 18 months (25th to 75th percentiles: 9 to 30) in 117 Italian centers. Device-related events were reported in 416 patients, and, specifically, surgical interventions for system revision were described in 390 patients. Four years after the implantation procedure, 50% of patients underwent surgical revision for battery depletion and 14% for unanticipated events. For comparison, at 4 years battery depletion occurred in 10% and 13% of patients who received single- and dual-chamber defibrillators at the study centers, and unanticipated events were reported as 4% and 9%, respectively. In CRT-D, infections occurred at a rate of 1.0%/y, and the risk of infections increased after device replacement procedures (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 4.09;
P
=0.045). Left ventricular lead dislodgements were reported at a rate of 2.3%/y and were predicted by longer fluoroscopy time and higher pacing threshold on implantation. Device-related events were not associated with a worse clinical outcome; indeed, the risk of death was similar in patients with and without surgical revision (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.56 to 1.47;
P
=0.682).
Conclusions—
In current clinical practice device-related events are more frequent in CRT-D than in single- or dual-chamber defibrillators, and are frequently managed by surgical intervention for system revision. However, a worse clinical outcome is not associated with these events.
Clinical Trial Registration—
URL:
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov
. Unique identifier: NCT01007474.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Landolina
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Maurizio Gasparini
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Maurizio Lunati
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Saverio Iacopino
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Giuseppe Boriani
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Carlo Bonanno
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Antonello Vado
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Alessandro Proclemer
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Alessandro Capucci
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Chantal Zucchiatti
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Sergio Valsecchi
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Renato P. Ricci
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| | - Massimo Santini
- From the Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo IRCCS, Pavia (M. Landolina); IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan (M.G.); Niguarda Hospital, Milan (M. Lunati); Villa S. Anna, Catanzaro (S.I.); University of Bologna and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna (G.B.); San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza (C.B.); A.S. Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (A.V.); S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine (A.P.); Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona (A.C.); Medtronic Italia, Rome (C.Z., S
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Implantation and patient profiles for pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators in France (2008-2009). Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2011; 104:332-42. [PMID: 21693370 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2011] [Revised: 04/06/2011] [Accepted: 04/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ageing population and the extension of indications will in all probability result in an increasing number of cardiac device implantations. METHODS Patients implanted in 2008 and 2009 were identified by means of the French National Hospital Discharge database to establish the implantation rate and the National Health Insurance (NHI) Information System database for patient profiles (76% of the population). RESULTS Of the 64,306 pacemaker implantations (1003.7 per million inhabitants [pmi]) in 2009, 21.4% were single chamber, 75.4% double chamber and 3.2% triple chamber (CRT-P). Of the 9028 cardioverter-defibrillator implantations (140.8 pmi) in 2009, 30.1% were single chamber, 27.5% double chamber and 42.5% triple chamber (CRT-D), accounting for 65% of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implants. Among NHI beneficiaries, 58.6% of cardioverter-defibrillators were implanted for primary prevention. Between 2008 and 2009, CRT-P implantations increased by 8.8% and CRT-D implantations by 29.3%. Regional variations in implantation rates were observed regarding single-chamber pacemakers (15-33%) and CRT-D among CRT (46.2-73.8%). Pacemaker implantations cost €158.4 million overall, 4.5% of which was for CRT-P; cardioverter-defibrillator implantations cost €96 million, 49% of which was for CRT-D. For NHI beneficiaries, 11.9% of CRT-P patients and 6.5% of CRT-D patients already had a device of the same type implanted in the 3 preceding years. CONCLUSION The results confirm the increase in cardioverter-defibrillator implantations in France. The implantation rate remains lower than that in the USA but falls within the European average. Reasons behind significant regional variations in implantation rates need further study.
Collapse
|
34
|
Lubinski A, Bissinger A, Boersma L, Leenhardt A, Merkely B, Oto A, Proclemer A, Brugada J, Vardas PE, Wolpert C. Determinants of geographic variations in implantation of cardiac defibrillators in the European Society of Cardiology member countries--data from the European Heart Rhythm Association White Book. Europace 2011; 13:654-62. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eur066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
|
35
|
Alzueta J, Linde A, Barrera A, Peña J, Peinado R. Registro Español de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable. VI Informe Oficial del Grupo de Trabajo de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2009). Rev Esp Cardiol 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(10)70273-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
36
|
Boriani G, Berti E, Biffi M, Marino M, Sassone B, Villani GQ, Bottoni N, Malavasi VL, Melandri F, Barbato G, Talamonti E, Marconi M. Implantable electrical devices for prevention of sudden cardiac death: data on implant rates from a 'real world' regional registry. Europace 2010; 12:1224-1230. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/euq176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
|
37
|
|
38
|
Giammaria M, Bruna C, Gnavi R. Trend in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and relation to need. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2010; 11:265-70. [DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0b013e3283356693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
39
|
Vijgen J, Botto G, Camm J, Hoijer CJ, Jung W, Le Heuzey JY, Lubinski A, Norekvål TM, Santomauro M, Schalij M, Schmid JP, Vardas P. Consensus Statement: Consensus Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: Updated Recommendations for Driving by Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2010; 9:3-14. [PMID: 20170847 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2010.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Vijgen
- Department of Cardiology, Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Botto
- Department of Cardiology, St. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
| | - John Camm
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Sciences, St. George's University, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Werner Jung
- Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Villingen, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
| | | | - Andrzej Lubinski
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
| | - Tone M. Norekvål
- Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Martin Schalij
- Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Paul Schmid
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Panos Vardas
- Department of Cardiology, Heraklion University Hospital, Heraklion Crete, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kurtz SM, Ochoa JA, Lau E, Shkolnikov Y, Pavri BB, Frisch D, Greenspon AJ. Implantation Trends and Patient Profiles for Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in the United States: 1993-2006. PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY: PACE 2010; 33:705-11. [PMID: 20059714 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02670.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 165] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven M Kurtz
- Exponent, Inc., and Implant Research Center, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Heath Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kawata H, Noda T, Kurita T, Yamagata K, Yamada Y, Okamura H, Satomi K, Shimizu W, Suyama K, Aihara N, Isobe M, Kamakura S. Clinical Effect of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Replacements - When Should You Resume Driving After an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Replacement? -. Circ J 2010; 74:2301-7. [DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hiro Kawata
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | - Takashi Noda
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Takashi Kurita
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Kenichiro Yamagata
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Yuko Yamada
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Hideo Okamura
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Kazuhiro Satomi
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Kazuhiro Suyama
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Naohiko Aihara
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Mitsuaki Isobe
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University
| | - Shiro Kamakura
- Division of Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Registro Español de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable. V Informe Oficial del Grupo de Trabajo de Desfibrilador Automático Implantable de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2008). Rev Esp Cardiol 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(09)73128-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
43
|
Proclemer A, Ghidina M, Gregori D, Facchin D, Rebellato L, Zakja E, Gulizia M, Esente P. Trend of the main clinical characteristics and pacing modality in patients treated by pacemaker: data from the Italian Pacemaker Registry for the quinquennium 2003-07. Europace 2009; 12:202-9. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
44
|
Vijgen J, Botto G, Camm J, Hoijer CJ, Jung W, Le Heuzey JY, Lubinski A, Norekvål TM, Santomauro M, Schalij M, Schmid JP, Vardas P. Consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association: updated recommendations for driving by patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Europace 2009; 11:1097-1107. [PMID: 19525498 DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have an ongoing risk of sudden incapacitation that might cause harm to others while driving a car. Driving restrictions vary across different countries in Europe. The most recent recommendations for driving of ICD patients in Europe were published in 1997 and focused mainly on patients implanted for secondary prevention. In recent years there has been a vast increase in the number of patients with an ICD and in the percentage of patients implanted for primary prevention. The EHRA task force on ICD and driving was formed to reassess the risk of driving for ICD patients based on the literature available. The recommendations are summarized in the following table and are further explained in the document. [table: see text] Driving restrictions are perceived as difficult for patients and their families, and have an immediate consequence for their lifestyle. To increase the adherence to the driving restrictions, adequate discharge of education and follow-up of patients and family are pivotal. The task force members hope this document may serve as an instrument for European and national regulatory authorities to formulate uniform driving regulations.
Collapse
|
45
|
Brignole M. Are complications of implantable defibrillators under-estimated and benefits over-estimated? Europace 2009; 11:1129-33. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
46
|
Nielsen JC. National registry data on implantable cardioverter defibrillator treatment: what are they useful for? Europace 2008; 11:405-6. [DOI: 10.1093/europace/eup007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|