Contraceptive efficacy of daily administration of 0.5 mg mifepristone

Effects of low doses of mifepristone on human embryo implantation process in a three-dimensional human endometrial in vitro co-culture system

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to explore the effects of two different low doses (0.5μM and 0.05μM) of mifepristone, exposed during the receptive period, on the human embryo implantation process, using a well-established three-dimensional in vitro cell culture model, specifically developed to study this process.

METHODS

An in vitro three-dimensional cell culture model was constructed using human endometrial cells isolated from the endometrium of proven fertile women, collected on cycle day LH+4. After 5 days of culture, supernumerary human embryos were added and cultured for another 5 days with mifepristone 0.5μM (n=8) or 0.05μM (n=10) or vehicle as control (n=10). The cultures were checked for embryo attachment and terminated. We studied the expression of 16 reported endometrial receptivity markers in the endometrial constructs using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

None of the embryos in 0.5μM of mifepristone attached to the endometrial constructs (p=.004), whereas 4 out of 10 in 0.05μM (p=.3698) and 7 out of 10 embryos in the control group attached to the cultures. We found that most of the studied receptivity markers were significantly altered with mifepristone exposure in a similar direction in both treatment groups. Only IL6 was significantly differentially expressed between the treatment groups (p=.017).

CONCLUSION

We report for the first time that exposure to a low concentration (0.5μM) of mifepristone during the receptive period successfully inhibits human embryo implantation process in vitro. Further, we observed a dose-dependent effect of mifepristone on endometrial receptivity at the functional level.

IMPLICATION

This study contributes new knowledge that low dose of mifepristone during the short period of receptive phase can inhibit endometrial receptivity, which further promotes mifepristone as a contraceptive agent. This could give women a treatment choice to avoid unwanted pregnancy with high efficacy and minimal side effects.

Effect of single post-ovulatory administration of levonorgestrel on gene expression profile during the receptive period of the human endometrium

The hypothesis that levonorgestrel (LNG) used as an emergency contraceptive interferes with endometrial receptivity remains unproven. We compared the endometrial gene expression profile during the receptive period after administering a single dose of LNG 1.5 mg or placebo on day 1 of the luteal phase. An endometrial biopsy was done on day LH+7 or LH+8 and samples were taken from seven volunteers, each one contributing with one cycle treated with placebo and another with LNG. The expression of 20 383 genes was determined using cDNA microarrays. Real-time RT-PCR was used 1) to confirm the differences found in DNA microarray analysis and 2) to determine the effect of LNG on transcript levels of C3, C4BPα, COX2, MAOA, S100A4, and SERPINB9, known to be upregulated during receptivity, and on cPLA2α, JAK1, JNK1, CTSL1, and GSTP1, known to respond to mifepristone. Additional endometrial biopsies were done during the pre-receptive (LH+3) and receptive (LH+7) period and samples were taken from eight untreated volunteers in order to determine the changes associated with acquisition of receptivity of 14 genes. Mean levels of PAEP, TGM2, CLU, IGF2, and IL6ST mRNAs increased after administering LNG while those of HGD, SAT1, EVA1, LOC90133, ANXA1, SLC25A29, CYB5A, CRIP1, and SLC39A14 decreased. Except for the level of ANXA1 transcript, all changes remained within the range observed in untreated controls, and none of the transcripts responding to mifepristone changed in response to LNG. Post-ovulatory administration of LNG caused minimal changes in gene expression profiling during the receptive period. Neither the magnitude nor the nature or direction of the changes endorses the hypothesis that LNG interferes with endometrial receptivity.

Clinical profile of contraceptive progestins

The term progestogen has been widely utilized to indicate the general class of agents that includes both progesterone and its synthetic analogs, whereas the term progestin refers only to synthetic progestational steroids. The development of progestins has been influenced in a major way by the search for orally active hormonal contraceptives, since it is likely that hormonal contraceptives will continue to utilize a progestin, the only possible alternative being represented by the utilization of antiprogestins. Synthetic progestogens in clinical use today belong to three main chemical families: progesterone derivatives (progesterone, retro-progesterone, 19-norprogesterone and 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone); gonane and 19-nortestosterone derivatives (norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate); a spironolactone derivative. Biological potency of progestogens varies depending on the end-point measured, usually ovulation inhibition and endometrial transformation; with both these tests, the most active compounds are all gonane derivatives, with a potency over a 100 times that of the natural hormone. When administered in adequate doses, a progestin inhibits fertility by inhibiting ovulation. This action is mainly exerted at the hypothalamic level where, physiologically, progesterone decreases the number of LH pulses. When progestogens are delivered directly to the uterine cavity, their action seems to be purely local. It has been amply proven that--even when administered in doses that do not constantly inhibit ovulation--a progestin can still remain effective as a contraceptive by acting at the level of the cervical mucus and, at least in part, of the endometrium. Progestogens utilized today differ largely in their pharmacokinetics. In general, after intake, these compounds are rapidly absorbed and distributed so that peak serum concentrations are reached between 1 and 4 h. Third-generation progestins (desogestrel, gestodene, norgestimate) have common characteristics: a higher affinity for progesterone receptors than their predecessors, a lower affinity for androgen receptors, a higher selectivity of action, a higher central inhibitory activity, a higher potency at the level of the endometrium, and an overall metabolic neutrality, in terms of effects on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. In general, progestins can induce two types of adverse effects: changes in lipid metabolism and bleeding irregularities. Whereas the newer compounds seem to have overcome the first of these adverse effects, the second remains untouched: to this day, proper cycle control can only be achieved with combined hormonal contraceptives.

Gynaecological uses of a new class of steroids: the selective progesterone receptor modulators

Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) represent a new class of synthetic steroids, which can interact with the progesterone receptor (PR) and can exert agonist, antagonist or mixed effects on various progesterone target tissues in vivo. This review evaluates the actual and potential usefulness of SPRMs in gynaecology.

Effects of the progesterone receptor modulator VA2914 in a continuous low dose on the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and endometrium in normal women: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

CONTEXT

Progestin-only pills, the main hormonal alternative to ethinyl estradiol-containing pills in women bearing vascular risk factors, are poorly tolerated due to irregular bleeding. In contrast, progesterone receptor modulators can inhibit ovulation, alter endometrial receptivity, and improve cycle control.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effects of a new progesterone receptor modulator, VA2914, administered continuously for 3 months, on ovulation and endometrial maturation.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PATIENTS

Forty-six normal women were included in a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, conducted in four referral centers.

INTERVENTION

VA2914 (2.5, 5, or 10 mg/d) was administered continuously for 84 d. Pelvic ultrasound (treatment d 67 and 77), hormonal monitoring (FSH, LH, estradiol, and progesterone on treatment d 59, 63, 67, 70, 74, 77, 80, and 84), and endometrial biopsy (treatment d 77) were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Ovulation inhibition was assessed by the absence of progesterone values above 3 ng/ml at any time during treatment month 3.

RESULTS

Anovulation was observed in 81.8% women in the 5-mg group and 80% in the 10-mg group, and amenorrhea occurred in 81.2 and 90% of cases in the 5- and 10-mg groups. We did not detect any cases of endometrial hyperplasia despite estradiol levels that remained in the physiological follicular phase range throughout treatment cycle 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous low-dose VA2914 can induce amenorrhea and inhibit ovulation without down-regulating estradiol levels or inducing endometrial hyperplasia in normal women. Long-term studies with a larger population are required to confirm the contraceptive efficacy of this regimen.

Progesterone receptor modulators and the endometrium: changes and consequences

Progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) have been used for contraceptive research, as well as for treatment of fibroids, endometriosis and heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding. Long-term treatment with these compounds results in changes to the endometrium resulting in potential confusion in trying to characterize endometrial biopsies. A meeting was held to discuss the properties of PRMs, the effects of perturbed hormonal control of the endometrium and the need for further understanding of the biology of progesterone receptor action to facilitate the development of new PRMs. A panel of pathologists was convened to evaluate endometrial changes associated with a minimum of three months of chronic treatment with PRMs. Four different agents were used in the treatment regimens but the pathologists were blinded to treatment regimen or agent. The panel agreed that the endometrial biopsies did not fit into a classification of either proliferative or secretory endometrium but exhibited an unusual architecture that could be characterized as glandular dilatation. There was little evidence of mitosis, consistent with a proposed anti-proliferative effect of PRMs. The panel concluded that the biopsies did not reveal evidence of safety concern and that pathologists and investigators familiar with endometrial effects of chronic PRM exposure should consider working with pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies to develop standard descriptions of PRM-associated endometrial changes as well as the types of histologic changes that would signal a need for intervention.

Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications

Since the discovery of the antiprogestin mifepristone, hundreds of similar compounds have been synthesized, which can be grouped in a large family of progesterone receptor ligands. This family includes pure agonists such as progesterone itself or progestins and, at the other end of the biological spectrum, pure progesterone receptor antagonists (PA). Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRM) have mixed agonist-antagonist properties, and occupy an intermediate position of the spectrum. These compounds have numerous applications in female health care. Mifepristone is used to terminate pregnancy, and as such is commercially available in many countries. The negative abortion-related image of mifepristone has clearly limited the involvement of the major pharmaceutical companies in the development of PA and SPRM. Many PA and SPRM display direct antiproliferative effects in the endometrium, although with variable actions which seem product- and dose-dependent. This property justifies their use in the treatment of myomas and endometriosis. PA also suppress late follicular development, block the LH surge and retard endometrial maturation, which renders them potential estrogen-free contraceptive drugs. SPRM such as asoprisnil are not as effective in blocking the LH surge and appear to target the endometrium directly and produce amenorrhoea. Interestingly, clinical data show that treatment with these compounds is not associated with hypo-estrogenism and bone loss. The potential clinical applications of these compounds cover a broad field and are very promising in major public health areas. These include emergency contraception, long-term estrogen-free contraception (administered alone, or in association with a progestin-only pill to improve bleeding patterns), myomas (where they induce a marked reduction in tumour volume and produce amenorrhoea) and endometriosis. Further developments might also include hormone replacement therapy in post-menopausal women, as well as the treatment of hormone-dependent tumours.

Mifepristone for luteal phase contraception

The concept of luteal phase contraception and the use of mifepristone in clinical trials, which allows for testing of its validity, as well as clinical pharmacological research designed to understand its mode of action, are reviewed. Early luteal phase administration has a variety of morphological, physiological and biochemical effects on the endometrium that are likely to interfere with embryonic-endometrial interactions. In fact, specifically designed pilot clinical trials as well as data derived from emergency contraception studies indicate that early luteal phase administration of mifepristone is highly effective in preventing pregnancy, with minimal disturbance of hormonal parameters or menstrual cyclicity. Mid and late luteal phase administration of mifepristone at doses above 25 mg are highly effective in inducing endometrial bleeding in nonconceptional cycles. However, administration of mifepristone within the period between implantation and expected menses fails to induce bleeding in a significant proportion of cases, and furthermore the bleeding induced does not insure the termination of pregnancy. While the data suggest there is potential for a once-a-month contraceptive pill, it is likely that no molecule endowed with partial agonistic properties, like mifepristone, will completely and reliably suppress the essential functions of progesterone in order to achieve contraceptive efficacy comparable to that of modern contraceptive methods.

Summary of evidence and research needs on the use of mifepristone in fertility regulation: consensus from the conference

The conference on the use of mifepristone to reduce unwanted pregnancy, sponsored by the World Health Organization, Concept Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, took place in Bellagio, Italy, between 24 and 28 September 2001. The objective of the conference was to review the scientific information and to evaluate the use of mifepristone for emergency contraception, luteal contraception and menstrual induction. Mifepristone is highly effective for emergency contraception but its advantages and disadvantages in comparison with levonorgestrel need to be further studied. Data indicate that mifepristone alone or in combination with misoprostol has potential for occasional use for women seeking help following repeated unprotected intercourse and/or when the interval between intercourse and treatment is more then 120 h. Administration of mifepristone immediately after ovulation seems to be an effective contraceptive method. However, before it can be used commonly, there is a need for a simple and inexpensive method to identify the right time in the cycle. Once-a-month treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol at the expected time of menstruation is not a practical method due to bleeding irregularities and timing of treatment. Menstrual induction with mifepristone and a suitable prostaglandin analogue is highly effective. A randomized comparison with manual vacuum aspiration is, however, needed before it can be recommended for routine use.

Mechanisms of action of mifepristone when used for emergency contraception

An emergency contraceptive method is used after coitus but before pregnancy occurs. The use of emergency contraception is largely underutilized worldwide. Recently, treatment with 10 mg mifepristone as a single dose has emerged as one of the most effective hormonal methods for emergency contraception, with very low side effects. However, the mechanism of action of mifepristone in humans when used for contraceptive purposes and especially for emergency contraception remains largely unknown. The objective of this review is to summarize available data on the effect of mifepristone on female reproductive functions relevant to emergency use of the compound. Taken together, available data from studies in humans indicate that the contraceptive effect of mifepristone used as a single low dose for emergency contraception is mainly due to impairment of ovarian function, either by blocking or postponing the luteinizing hormone surge, rather than to inhibiting of implantation.

Chronic low-dose antiprogestin impairs preimplantation embryogenesis, but not oocyte nuclear maturation or fertilization in rhesus monkeys

Continual administration of low doses of the antiprogestin ZK137316 permits ovarian/menstrual cyclicity, but prevents pregnancy in female rhesus monkeys. The sites of contraceptive action remain unknown. This study determined whether chronic, low-dose antiprogestin exposure during follicular development impairs oocyte maturation in vivo, as well as fertilization and preimplantation embryogenesis in vitro. Adult, female rhesus monkeys exhibiting normal menstrual cycles received vehicle (n=9) or 0.03 mg ZK137316 (n=8)/kg body weight i.m. daily for 3 months. Controlled ovarian stimulation with recombinant gonadotropins was initiated in the 3rd month. Oocytes collected from preovulatory follicles were evaluated for nuclear maturity and inseminated in vitro. Preimplantation embryonic development was monitored in vitro. The total number of oocytes and percentage collected at each nuclear stage were similar in both groups. More (P<0.05) atretic oocytes were recovered following antiprogestin relative to vehicle treatment. Fertilization rates and percentages of embryos that progressed to the morula stage were similar between groups, but antiprogestin-treated females exhibited less (P<0.05) normal cleavage. Embryonic development was accelerated by 1 day (P<0.05) from the 16-cell to the morula stage in the antiprogestin group relative to vehicle. Despite this, the majority of embryos became blastocysts within 6 days in vitro in the antiprogestin group, but fewer expanded (P=0.09) and hatched (P<0.05) compared to vehicle. During in vivo treatment with chronic, low-dose antiprogestin, oocytes retained their ability to resume and complete meiosis as well as fertilize following insemination in vitro. However, preimplantation embryogenesis in vitro was impaired, particularly during the later stages of blastocyst development. Thus, antiprogestin exposure during follicular development altered oocyte functions that are critical for normal preimplantation embryogenesis; this may contribute to pregnancy prevention.

Effects of mifepristone on endometrial receptivity

At the development of receptivity the endometrium undergoes specific changes. Several factors have been suggested as markers of endometrial receptivity. A common feature for most of these factors is that they are directly, or indirectly, regulated by progesterone. The effect of various doses and regimens of mifepristone on endometrial development and markers of receptivity has been studied. Timed endometrial biopsies were assessed by immunhistochemistry, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and electron microscopy. In addition the contraceptive efficacy of these regimens was investigated. Administration of 200 mg of mifepristone immediately post ovulation has a pronounced effect on endometrial development and on suggested markers of receptivity. This regimen has been shown to be an effective contraceptive method. When 10 mg is given pre or post ovulation, only minor effects on the endometrium are observed. Our studies show that mifepristone, when administered in low doses that do not affect ovulation, significantly affects some of the studied markers of endometrial receptivity and reduces pregnancy rates; however, these activities are more pronounced with the higher dose, which is more effective. Our findings provide insight into the regulation of progesterone receptors of various suggested markers of endometrial receptivity and the possibility of using mifepristone for endometrial contraception.

Low-dose antiprogestin treatment prevents pregnancy in rhesus monkeys and is reversible after 1 year of treatment

BACKGROUND

Administration of low doses of an antiprogestin to rhesus monkeys permits ovarian/menstrual cyclicity, suppresses endometrial proliferation and prevents pregnancy without adverse or toxic side-effects after 5-6 months of daily treatment. The purpose of this study was to test the reversibility with respect to restoration of fertility after 1 year of low-dose antiprogestin treatment.

METHODS

This experiment included a daily 1 year vehicle- or antiprogestin-treatment interval followed by a 9 month post-treatment interval for adult, female rhesus monkeys (n = 5/group) of proven fertility and exhibiting regular menstrual cycles. Co-habitation occurred with a male of proven fertility and vaginal swabs were taken to identify the presence of sperm during the treatment (antiprogestin females) and post-treatment intervals (vehicle and antiprogestin females).

RESULTS

Mating and vaginal sperm were evident in all antiprogestin females during, and, in both groups, after treatment. Based on ultrasonography, none of the antiprogestin-treated females became pregnant during the treatment interval. However, upon cessation of treatment, pregnancy rates were similar between antiprogestin-treated (3/5) relative to vehicle-treated (4/5) females with live, healthy infants born in both groups. There were no differences between groups in fetal measurements, gestation lengths, live birth rates and infant weights.

CONCLUSIONS

The reversal of the anti-fertility effects of chronic, low-dose antiprogestin treatment supports the clinical feasibility of potent and selective antiprogestins as potential contraceptives for women.