Applying the WHO conceptual framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety to a surgical population

Australian Dentist's Knowledge and Perceptions of Factors Affecting Radiographic Interpretation

BACKGROUND

Errors of interpretation of radigraphic images, also known as interpretive errors, are a critical concern as they can have profound implications for clinical decision making. Different types of interpretive errors, including errors of omission and misdiagnosis, have been described in the literature. These errors can lead to unnecessary or harmful treat/or prolonged patient care. Understanding the nature and contributing factors of interpretive errors is important in developing solutions to minimise interpretive errors. By exploring the knowledge and perceptions of dental practitioners, this study aimed to shed light on the current understanding of interpretive errors in dentistry.

METHODS

An anonymised online questionnaire was sent to dental practitioners in New South Wales (NSW) between September 2020 and March 2022. A total of 80 valid responses were received and analysed. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

The study found that participants commonly reported interpretive errors as occurring 'occasionally', with errors of omission being the most frequently encountered type. Participants identified several factors that most likely contribute to interpretive errors, including reading a poor-quality image, lack of clinical experience and knowledge, and excessive workload. Additionally, general practitioners and specialists held different views regarding factors affecting interpretive errors.

CONCLUSION

The survey results indicate that dental practitioners are aware of the common factors associated with interpretive errors. Errors of omission were identified as the most common type of error to occur in clinical practice. The findings suggest that interpretive errors result from a mental overload caused by factors associated with image quality, clinician-related, and image interpretation. Managing and identifying solutions to mitigate these factors are crucial for ensuring accurate and timely radiographic diagnoses. The findings of this study can serve as a foundation for future research and the development of targeted interventions to enhance the accuracy of radiographic interpretations in dentistry.

Adverse events leading to intensive care unit admission in a low-and-middle-income-country: A prospective cohort study and a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Adverse events (AE) are frequent in critical care and could be even more prevalent in LMIC due to a shortage of ICU beds and Human resources. There is limited data on how relevant AE are among the reasons for ICU admission, being all of which published by High-Income-Countries services. Our main goal is to describe the rate of adverse events-related ICU admissions and their preventability in a LMIC scenario, comparing our results with previous data.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study, during a one-year period, in two general ICUs from a tertiary public academic hospital. Our exposure of interest was ICU admission related to an AE in adult patients, we further characterized their preventability and clinical outcomes. We also performed a systematic review to identify and compare previous published data on ICU admissions due to AE.

RESULTS

Among all ICU admissions, 12.1% were related to an AE (9.8% caused by an AE, 2.3% related but not directly caused by an AE). These ICU admissions were not associated with a higher risk of death, but most of them were potentially preventable (70.9% of preventability rate, representing 8.6% of all ICU admissions). The meta-analysis resulted in a proportion of ICU admissions due to AE of 11% (95% CI 6%-16%), with a preventability rate of 54% (95% CI 42%-66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective cohort, adverse events were a relevant reason for ICU admission. This result is consistent with data retrieved from non-LMIC as shown in our meta-analysis. The high preventability rate described reinforces that quality and safety programs could work as a tool to optimize scarce resources.

Innovative approaches to analysing aged care falls incident data: international classification for patient safety and correspondence analysis

Falls in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) are common and can have significant health consequences. Understanding how and why falls occur in RACFs is an essential step to design targeted fall prevention and intervention programmes; however, little is known about falls' mechanisms in RACFs. This study aims to use international incident classification systems and novel analysis techniques to describe factors that contribute to falls requiring hospitalization in RACFs. Retrospective data of falls assessed by nurses as requiring hospitalization from 429 residents in 22 Australian RACFs in 2019 were used. Data were reviewed using a modified version of the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS), which categorizes patient safety into incident types and contributing factors using a three-tiered structure. The ICPS codes were summarized using the descriptive statistics. The association between assigned ICPS codes were analysed using correspondence analysis. Six hundred and three falls assessed as requiring hospitalization were classified into 659 incident types, with the most common incident type being 'patient incidents' (injury sustained/adverse effect in the health care system) (603, 91.5%) at Level 1, 'falls' (601, 91.2%) at Level 2, and 'falls involving bedrooms' (214, 32.5%) at Level 3. The 603 falls had 1082 contributing factors, with the most common contributing factor being 'patient factors' (events affected by factors associated with the patient) (982, 90.8%) at Level 1, 'patient not elsewhere classified' (characteristics of the patient contributed to the incident not classified elsewhere) (571, 52.8%) at Level 2, and 'loss of balance' (361, 33.4%) at Level 3. In a correspondence analysis, three dimensions were responsible for 81.2% of the variation in falls incidents and environmental and organizational factors were important factors contributing to falls. The application of the ICPS demonstrated that personal factors (e.g. pre-existing physical and psychological health or impairment) were the most common contributing factors to falls assessed as requiring hospitalization, while the correspondence analysis highlighted the role of environmental and organizational factors. The results signal the need for more research into multifactorial falls prevention interventions in RACFs.

Challenges to the Implementation of the World Health Organization's International Classification for Patient Safety in Slovenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Slovenia lags behind international recommendations for reporting and learning from patient safety incidents and risk management in health care. To counter this, the country established the SenSys project, which receives technical support from the European Commission's Structural Reform Support Service, in cooperation with the Danish Patient Safety Authority, and pertains to an initiative to improve health care. A subproject of the SenSys project works to adapt and implement the International Classification for Patient Safety of the World Health Organization (ICPS-WHO). This article presents a case study of the national research process to identify the necessary Slovenian national adaptation and upgrade of the ICPS-WHO, the ICPS-SL, particularly regarding types of patient safety incidents. Our aim was to reflect on how we used the insights from different research elements and learned from different aspects of our project/system development.

METHODS

We used the SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards of Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) to present our case study. The methods used to collect information on the necessary adaptations to establish an optimal ICPS-SL included a literature review, qualitative analysis of national consultation meetings, and a 2-cycle Delphi study. This process took place between January 2018 and August 2019, and we found 18 useful articles. Participants such as providers, users, and national bodies from national consultation meetings were all key stakeholders.

RESULTS

The relevant stakeholders agreed upon changes to the ICPS-WHO to implement in the ICPS-SL as an integrated part of a Slovenia's incident reporting and learning system. Notably, they implemented changes in terminology in the translation of some English terms. They also added or hierarchically reordered some patient safety incident types: for example, they added the nation-specific point "treatment of pain" as a type of patient safety incident. The stakeholders will also partially integrate the following indicators: monitoring systems, vigilance systems, and complaint systems.

CONCLUSION

Different research elements contributed to the ICPS-SL's new knowledge and more reliable development. We emphasized a cooperative process with a consensus-building approach while linking the knowledge, experience, and needs of various stakeholders. All interested parties adopted this process, aiming to establish conditions for national learning from patient safety incidents and better preventive action for health care quality and safety. Vertical and horizontal multidisciplinary teamwork was a focal point as well. Technical assistance proved especially useful. It is now necessary to clinically test the ICPS-SL classification framework as Slovenia's internationally harmonized standard, and have the Health Council adopt it for use both online and in practice.

The value of Pediatric Early Warning Score combined with SBAR in neonatal pneumonia nursing: A retrospective cohort study

To observe the effect of the Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) score combined with the situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) shift communication system in neonates with severe pneumonia in the pediatric intensive care unit. A total of 230 neonates admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit of our hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were enrolled in this study. Participants were divided into an experimental group (110 patients, PEWS score combined with SBAR shift communication system) and a control group (120 patients, routine diagnosis and treatment and shift change). The early recognition rate, incidence of handover problems, and prognosis of critically ill children in the 2 groups were analyzed. Compared to the control group, the correct recognition rate of disease observation and early recognition rate of critically ill children in the experimental group were significantly higher, and the incidence of handover problems was significantly lower (P < .05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of asphyxia, heart failure, and toxic encephalopathy between both groups. The application of the PEWS score combined with the SBAR shift communication system can facilitate timely identification of deterioration of the condition of children with severe pneumonia, reduce handover problems, and help to implement interventions or rescue according to the changes in a patient's condition, which may be beneficial in improving the patient's prognosis.

[The analysis of CIRSmedical.de using Natural Language Processing]

BACKGROUND

CIRSmedical.de is a publicly accessible, cross-institutional reporting and learning system, which is organized by the German Agency for Quality in Medicine (ÄZQ). CIRSmedical.de has existed since 2005 and has published more than 6,000 event reports. Up to now it has been common practice to analyse these reports in detail or carry out systematic evaluations focusing on specific topics. A systematic evaluation of all case reports has not yet been conducted. Natural Language Processing (NLP) is an analysis strategy from the field of Artificial Intelligence for indexing texts. The examination of case reports using NLP was carried out to describe the characteristics of event reports and comments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this analysis 6,480 case reports from CIRSmedical.de (as of December 10, 2019) were provided by the ÄZQ as Excel files. Several free text fields were included in the analysis as well as the feedback of the CIRS team (expert commentary). Text lengths, reporting behaviour, sentiment values and keywords were examined. The algorithms for the analysis were developed with the programming language Python and the corresponding libraries NLTK and SpaCy.

RESULTS

The comparison of report lengths depending on the different subject groups presented a heterogeneous picture, in terms of both the number of reports and the number of words. There are more than 4,000 reports from the field of anaesthesiology, whereby text lengths vary particularly strongly with a right-skewed distribution. There are only a few reports from the field of psychotherapy, and these are also very short. The different professional groups (nurses, doctors, other staff) write reports of about the same length. Reports and expert commentaries also differ in terms of sentiment values. Due to the length of the comments, they are more negative in terms of sentiment. Keywords can be identified but show a high heterogeneity.

DISCUSSION

Systematic analysis using NLP allows for the description of text properties in event reports and comments. It is now possible to draw a conclusion about the reporters' intention, focus and mood when they report in CIRS. The sentiment analysis is an indication of the mood which the texts convey, both as a report and as a commentary. Text length analysis draws attention to different problems and tendencies: event reports are usually much shorter. Texts that are too short, however, run the risk that the information will not be readily usable for analysis. Comments are often longer, but here one faces the opposite problem: texts that are too long may not be read. The examination of texts by means of NLP helps to rethink the reason for and the form of input, both when reporting and when commenting. It is a first step in the automatic, supportive classification of texts and an improvement of the interaction between reporters and the system.

A retrospective analysis of near-miss incidents at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Riyadh, KSA

Objective

This study seeks to establish an error-free reporting system that enhances patient safety and organisational culture. It investigates the prevalence of near-miss incident reporting systems by healthcare professionals in the General Surgery Department.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Riyadh, KSA. A sample of 253 medical records, ranging from January 2018 to December 2020, belonging to secondary patients was obtained using the near-miss Datix reporting and occurrence variance reporting system. The demographic variable data of registered patients were based on their age group (18–80 years), length of stay, date of admission, medication prescribed for more than four days, and whether they underwent surgical interventions. The cases were documented after the occurrence of a near-miss incident using a convenience sampling technique.

Results

In terms of prevalence in the near-miss main categories, medical errors were 248 (98.2%), workplace violations were two (0.80%), and others was one (0.40%). The number of incidence in the subcategories were: prescribing, 227 (89.7%); dispensing, 16 (6.30%) wrong dose/strength, 118 (46.6%), male, 123 (48.6%), and female, 130 (51.4%). The mean age and S.D. of patients was 1.94 ± 0.88 years and the demographic nationality as 1.16 ± 0.37. The one-sample t-test value for the main categories was −235 (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Near-misses are recognised as essential targets for continuous quality improvement tools to mitigate preoperative incidents in hospitals. These findings can benefit the advancement of techniques for improving guidelines related to compliance and effective communication to improve the preoperative safety of patients.

Proactive risk assessment of intrahospital transport of critically ill patients from emergency department to intensive care unit in a teaching hospital and its implications

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the effects of the health failure mode and effect analysis (HFMEA) used in intrahospital transport (IHT) of critically ill patients from emergency department (ED) to the intensive care unit (ICU).

BACKGROUND

Patients who were transported from ED to ICU is highly critical. IHT of these patients is potentially risky, which may associate with adverse events (AEs). The concern of safe IHT can be addressed by performing proactive risk assessments using HFMEA and implementing the findings after the ED of our hospital being reconstructed.

DESIGN

A qualitative action research study combined with a quantitative cross-sectional method.

METHODS

According to the HFMEA method, the failure modes of IHT were identified and analysed, and the effect of alterations was verified. We built a project team, drawn up a IHT flow chart, defined steps of IHT, classified the failure modes, calculated risk priority number and analysed by the decision tree, then formulated an action plan and verified the effects of the alterations. Incidence of AEs of transport was compared before and after HFMEA.SQUIRE 2.0 checklist was chosen on reporting the study process.

RESULTS

The HFMEA outlined a total of 5 major steps and 16 sub-steps in the IHT process. From this, 64 potential failure modes were identified, with 17 modes having a RPN score higher than 8. Determined by the decision tree, there were 20 priority control failure modes, of which 16 involved 8 IHT alterations. Notable work-flow alterations included use of a three-stage hierarchical transport strategy based on patients' condition assisted by the intelligent assessment system. Incidence of AEs was significantly decreased from 19.64% to 7.14% after the implementation of HFMEA (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Application of the HFMEA in optimising IHT process can improve the safety of transportation, which is worthy of promotion. Hierarchical transport scheme can reduce the incidence of AEs in IHT of critical emergency patients, which mainly includes the integration and construction of the transport team, equipment configuration and patient information system based on the classification of patients' condition.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses play a crucial role in the IHT process. HFMEA can be adopted for proactive risk assessment of critically ill patients' IHT from ED to ICU which involves multiple processes. The IHT hierarchical strategy based on the results of failure mode analysis should be more widely used to further verify its clinical effects.

The surgical debrief: Just another checklist or an instrument to drive cultural change?

INTRODUCTION

Post-procedural debrief is recommended to improve patient safety. We examined operating room (OR) clinicians' perceptions of the impact of a multi-disciplinary debrief on OR culture.

METHODS

A survey was administered to 182 OR clinicians at a major academic medical center. Attitudes toward the surgical debrief and its effect on patient safety and OR culture were evaluated.

RESULTS

Majority of clinicians (58.2%) believed creating a culture of safety in the OR was a shared care team responsibility, however, surgical attendings and trainees were more likely to assign this responsibility to the surgical attending. Few circulating nurses and trainees felt comfortable initiating a surgical debrief. Overall clinicians agreed that a debrief would impact both patient safety outcomes and OR culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians felt implementation of a surgical debrief would positively affect the OR culture of safety by improving interdisciplinary communication and influencing the power hierarchy that exists in many ORs.

Factors influencing the patient safety climate in intensive care units: cross-sectional study

Background

Measuring the patient safety climate of a health service provides important information about the safety status at a given time. This study aimed to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate in Intensive Care Units.

Methods

An analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2017 and 2018 in two adult Intensive Care Units of a Brazilian Teaching Hospital. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire instrument was applied with the multidisciplinary teams to determine the factors influencing the patient safety climate. Data were double entered into a database and processed using the R (version 3.5.0) statistical software. Position, central tendency and dispersion measures were taken and absolute and relative frequencies, mean and confidence intervals were calculated for the quantitative variables. Linear regression was performed to verify the effect of variables on the SAQ domains. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected for multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 84 healthcare providers participated in the study. The mean Safety Attitudes Questionnaire score was 59.5, evidencing a negative climate. The following factors influenced the safety climate: time since course completion, professional category, type of employment contract, complementary professional training, and weekly workload.

Conclusions

The factors identified indicate items for planning improvements in communication, teamwork, work processes, and management involvement, aiming to ensure care safety and construct a supportive safety climate.

Patient safety incidents in radiology: frequency and distribution of incident types

BACKGROUND

Patient safety incidents may be a valuable source of information to learn from and to prevent future errors.

PURPOSE

To determine the distribution of patient safety incident types in radiology according to the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS), and to comprehensively review those incidents that were either harmful or serious in terms of risk of patient harm and reoccurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The most recent five-year database (2014-2019) of a radiology incident reporting system was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patient safety incidents were included. Top three ICPS incident types were clinical administration (119/480, 24.8%), resources/organizational management (112/480, 23.3%), and clinical process/procedure (91/480, 19.0%). Harm severities were none in 457 (95.2%) cases, mild in 14 (2.9%), moderate in 4 (0.8%), severe in 3 (0.6%), and unknown in one case. Subsequent Prevention Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis (PRISMA) reviews were performed in 4 (0.8%) cases. The three patient safety incidents that caused severe harm (of which one underwent PRISMA review) involved resources/organizational management (n = 1), clinical process/procedure (n = 1), and medication/IV fluids (n = 1). Three other cases (with no harm in two cases and moderate harm in one case) that underwent PRISMA review involved resources/organizational management (n = 2) and medical device/equipment/property (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Radiology-related patient safety incidents predominantly occur in three ICPS domains (clinical administration, resources/organizational management, and clinical process/procedure). Harmful/serious incidents are relatively rare. The standardly and transparently reported findings from this study may be used for healthcare quality improvement, benchmarking purposes, and as a primer for future studies.

Challenges in providing surgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic: Qualitative study among Operating Department Practitioners in Pakistan

The surgical theatre is associated with the highest mortality rates since the onslaught of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, Operating Department Practitioners (ODPs) are neglected human resources for health in regards to both professional development and research for patient safety; even though they are key practitioners with respect to infection control during surgeries. Therefore, this study aims to describe challenges faced by ODPs during the pandemic. The secondary aim is to use empirical evidence to inform the public health sector management about both ODP professional development and improvement in surgical procedures, with a specific focus on pandemics. A qualitative study has been conducted. Data collection was based on an interview guide with open-ended questions. Interviews with 39 ODPs in public sector teaching hospitals of Pakistan who have been working during the COVID-19 pandemic were part of the analysis. Content analysis was used to generate themes. Ten themes related to challenges faced by ODPs in delivering services during the pandemic for securing patient safety were identified: (i) Disparity in training for prevention of COVID-19; (ii) Shortcomings in COVID-19 testing; (iii) Supply shortages of personal protective equipment; (iv) Challenges in maintaining physical distance and prevention protocols; (v) Human resource shortages and role burden; (vi) Problems with hospital administration; (vii) Exclusion and hierarchy; (viii) Teamwork limitations and other communication issues; (ix) Error Management; and (x) Anxiety and fear. The public health sector, in Pakistan and other developing regions, needs to invest in the professional development of ODPs and improve resources and structures for surgical procedures, during pandemics and otherwise.

Adverse Events Associated With Laser Use in the Upper Airway

OBJECTIVE

Surgical lasers are used extensively in head and neck surgery. Laser use in the upper airway offers many advantages but also presents risks to patients and operators that are not reported comprehensively. This study aims to summarize device malfunctions, patient complications, and subsequent interventions related to laser use in the upper airway.

METHODS

The US Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for reports of surgical laser adverse events from January 2010 to March 2020. Data were extracted from reports pertaining to the upper airway.

RESULTS

Sixty-two reports involving upper airway laser use in an operating room were identified, from which 95 events were extracted. Of these, 40 (42.1%) were adverse events to patients, 2 (2.1%) adverse events to operators, and 53 (55.8%) device malfunctions. Dislodgement of laser fiber in the airway (23 [57.5%]), burn (8 [20%]), and scar (5 [12.5%]) were the most common adverse events to patients. Two incidents of eye exposure through unfiltered microscope lenses were the only adverse events to operators. Fiber break (26 [49.1%]) and flare (12 [22.6%]) were the most common device malfunctions.

DISCUSSION

Surgical lasers have demonstrated utility in head and neck surgery but are associated with risks. This study discusses adverse events and device malfunctions associated with airway laser surgery and emphasizes shortcomings in current reporting.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Standardized reporting and multi-institutional research are needed to better understand adverse events related to surgical laser use and to allow accurate estimation of their prevalence.

A mixed methods analysis of lithium-related patient safety incidents in primary care

Background:

Lithium is a drug with a narrow therapeutic range and has been associated with a number of serious adverse effects. This study aimed to characterise primary care lithium-related patient safety incidents submitted to the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) database with respect to incident origin, type, contributory factors and outcome. The intention was to identify ways to minimise risk to future patients by examining incidents with a range of harm outcomes.

Methods:

A mixed methods analysis of patient safety incident reports related to lithium was conducted. Data from healthcare organisations in England and Wales were extracted from the NRLS database. An exploratory descriptive analysis was undertaken to characterise the most frequent incident types, the associated chain of events and other contributory factors.

Results:

A total of 174 reports containing the term ‘lithium’ were identified. Of these, 41 were excluded and, from the remaining 133 reports, 138 incidents were identified and coded. Community pharmacies reported 100 incidents (96 dispensing related, two administration, two other), general practitioner (GP) practices filed 22 reports and 16 reports originated from other sources. A total of 99 dispensing-related incidents were recorded, 39 resulted from the wrong medication dispensed, 31 the wrong strength, 8 the wrong quantity and 21 other. A total of 128 contributory factors were identified overall; for dispensing incidents, the most common related to medication storage/packaging (n = 41), and ‘mistakes’ (n = 22), whereas no information regarding contributory factors was provided in 41 reports.

Conclusion:

Despite the established link between medication packaging and the risk of dispensing errors, our study highlighted storage and packaging as the most commonly described contributory factors to dispensing errors. The absence of certain relevant data limited the ability to fully characterise a number of reports. This highlighted the need to include clear and complete information when submitting reports. This, in turn, may help to better inform the further development of interventions designed to reduce the risk of incidents and improve patient safety.

A characterisation of lithium-related patient safety incidents in primary care

Lithium is an effective treatment for certain mental illnesses, but has a number of harmful side effects. Safety incidents related to medicines in the UK are reported to the National Reporting and Learning System database (NRLS), and concerns relating to lithium have previously been highlighted. This study aimed to characterise lithium incidents reported to the NRLS that occurred in a primary care setting. Reports relating to lithium and submitted between 2002 and 2013 were reviewed, and the information coded. A total of 174 reports containing the term ‘lithium’ were identified. Of these, 41 were excluded and, from the remaining 133 reports, 138 incidents were identified and coded with respect to incident origin, type, contributory factors and outcome. A total of 100 incidents were reported by community pharmacies (96 of which related to medicine dispensing), general practitioner (GP) practices filed 22 reports and 16 reports originated from other sources. Of the dispensing-related incidents, 39 resulted from the wrong medication dispensed, 31 the wrong strength, 8 the wrong quantity and 21 other. A total of 128 contributory factors were identified overall; for dispensing incidents, the most common related to medication storage/packaging (n = 41), and ‘mistakes’ (n = 22) whereas no information regarding contributory factors was provided in 41 reports. Despite the established link between medication packaging and the risk of dispensing errors, our study highlighted storage and packaging as the most commonly cited contributory factors to dispensing errors. The absence of certain relevant data limited the ability to fully characterise a number of reports. This highlighted the need to include clear and complete information when submitting reports. This, in turn, may help to better inform the further development of interventions designed to reduce incident numbers and improve patient safety.

Using the WHO International Classification of patient safety framework to identify incident characteristics and contributing factors for medical or surgical complication deaths

This study aimed to operationalise and use the World Health Organisation's International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS) to identify incident characteristics and contributing factors of deaths involving complications of medical or surgical care in Australia. A sample of 500 coronial findings related to patient deaths following complications of surgical or medical care in Australia were reviewed using a modified-ICPS (mICPS). Over two-thirds (69.0%) of incidents occurred during treatment and 27.4% occurred in the operating theatre. Clinical process and procedures (55.9%), medication/IV fluids (11.2%) and healthcare-associated infection/complications (10.4%) were the most common incident types. Coroners made recommendations in 44.0% of deaths and organisations undertook preventive actions in 40.0% of deaths. This study demonstrated that the ICPS was able to be modified for practical use as a human factors taxonomy to identify sequences of incident types and contributing factors for patient deaths. Further testing of the mICPS is warranted.

Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring communication within and between the professional groups licensed practical nurses and registered nurses in anaesthetic clinics

BACKGROUND

The most common cause of clinical incidents and adverse events in relation to surgery is communication error. There is a shortage of studies on communication between registered nurses and licenced practical nurses as well as of instruments to measure their perception of communication within and between the professional groups. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the adapted ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire, designed to also measure communication within and between two professional groups: licensed practical nurses and registered nurses. Specifically, the aim was to examine the instrument's construct validity using confirmatory factor analysis and its internal consistency using Cronbach's Alpha.

METHODS

A cross-sectional and correlational design was used. The setting was anaesthetic clinics in two Swedish hospitals. A total of 316 questionnaires were delivered during spring 2011, of which 195 were analysed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency using Cronbach's Alpha. To assess items with missing values, we conducted a sensitivity analysis of two sets of data, and to assess the assumption of normally distributed data, we used Bayesian estimation.

RESULTS

The results support the construct validity and internal consistency of the adapted ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire. Model fit indices for the confirmative factor analysis were acceptable, and estimated factor loadings were reasonable. There were no large differences between the estimated factor loadings when comparing the two samples, suggesting that items with missing values did not alter the findings. The estimated factor loadings from Bayesian estimation were very similar to the maximum likelihood results. This indicates that confirmative factor analysis using maximum likelihood produced reliable factor loadings. Regarding internal consistency, alpha values ranged from 0.72 to 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

The tests of the adapted ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire indicate acceptable construct validity and internal consistency, both of which need to be further tested in new settings and samples.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current controlled trials http://www.controlled-trials.com Communication and patient safety in anaesthesia and intensive care. Does implementation of SBAR make any differences? Identifier: ISRCTN37251313, retrospectively registered (assigned 08/11/2012).

The patient safety practices of emergency medical teams in disaster zones: a systematic analysis

INTRODUCTION

Disaster zone medical relief has been criticised for poor quality care, lack of standardisation and accountability. Traditional patient safety practices of emergency medical teams (EMTs) in disaster zones were not well understood. Improving the quality of healthcare in disaster zones has gained importance within global health policy. Ascertaining patient safety practices of EMTs in disaster zones may identify areas of practice that can be improved.

METHODS

A systematic search of OvidSP, Embase and Medline databases; key journals of interest; key grey literature texts; the databases of the WHO, Médecins Sans Frontieres and the International Committee of the Red Cross; and Google Scholar was performed. Descriptive studies, case reports, case series, prospective trials and opinion pieces were included with no limitation on date or language of publication.

RESULTS

There were 9685 records, evenly distributed between the peer-reviewed and grey literature. Of these, 30 studies and 9 grey literature texts met the inclusion criteria and underwent qualitative synthesis. From these articles, 302 patient safety statements were extracted. Thematic analysis categorised these statements into 84 themes (total frequency 632). The most frequent themes were limb injury (9%), medical records (5.4%), surgery decision-making (4.6%), medicines safety (4.4%) and protocol (4.4%).

CONCLUSION

Patient safety practices of EMTs in disaster zones are weighted toward acute clinical care, particularly surgery. The management of non-communicable disease is under-represented. There is widespread recognition of the need to improve medical record-keeping. High-quality data and institutional level patient safety practices are lacking. There is no consensus on disaster zone-specific performance indicators. These deficiencies represent opportunities to improve patient safety in disaster zones.

Adverse Events in the Operating Room: Definitions, Prevalence, and Characteristics. A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Adverse events occur commonly in the operating room (OR) and often contribute to morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare spending. Validated frameworks to measure and report postoperative outcomes have long existed to facilitate exchanges of structured information pertaining to postoperative complication rates in order to improve patient safety. However, systematic evidence regarding measurement and reporting of intraoperative adverse events (iAE) is still lacking.

METHODS

We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published up to June 2016 that measured and reported iAE. We presented the terms and definitions used to describe iAE. We identified the types of reported iAE and summarized them into discrete categories. We reported frequencies of iAE by detection methods.

RESULTS

Of the 47 included studies, 30 were cross-sectional, 14 were case-series, and 3 were cohort studies. The studies used 16 different terms and 22 unique definitions to describe 74 types of iAE. Frequencies of iAE appeared to vary depending on the detection methods, with higher numbers reported when direct observation in the OR was used to detect iAE. Twenty studies assessed severity of iAE, which were mostly based on whether they resulted in postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study systematically reviewed the current evidence on prevalence and characteristics of iAE that were detected by direct observation, reviews of patient charts, administrative data and incident reports, and surveys and interviews of healthcare providers. Our findings suggest that direct observation method has the most potential to identify and characterize iAE in detail.

Written reports of adverse events in acute care-A discourse analysis

Adverse health care events are a global public health issue despite major efforts, and they have been acknowledged as a complex concern. The aim of this study was to explore the construction of unsafe care using accounts of adverse events concerning the patient, as reported by patients, relatives, and health care professionals. Twenty-nine adverse events reported in an acute care setting in a Swedish university hospital were analyzed through discourse analysis, where the construction of what was considered to be real and true in the descriptions of unsafe care was analyzed. In the written reports about unsafe events, the patient was spoken of in three different ways: (a) the patient as a presentation of physical signs, (b) the patient as suffering and vulnerable, and (c) the patient as unpredictable. When the patient's voice was subordinate to physical signs, this was described as being something that conflicted with patient safety. The conclusion was that the patient's voice might be the only sign available in the early stages of adverse events. Therefore, it is crucial for health care professionals to give importance to the patient's voice to prevent patients from harm and not unilaterally act only upon abnormal physical signs.

Quality improvement priorities for safer out-of-hours palliative care: Lessons from a mixed-methods analysis of a national incident-reporting database

Background:

Patients receiving palliative care are often at increased risk of unsafe care with the out-of-hours setting presenting particular challenges. The identification of improved ways of delivering palliative care outside working hours is a priority area for policymakers.

Aim:

To explore the nature and causes of unsafe care delivered to patients receiving palliative care from primary-care services outside normal working hours.

Design:

A mixed-methods cross-sectional analysis of patient safety incident reports from the National Reporting and Learning System. We characterised reports, identified by keyword searches, using codes to describe what happened, underlying causes, harm outcome, and severity. Exploratory descriptive and thematic analyses identified factors underpinning unsafe care.

Setting/participants:

A total of 1072 patient safety incident reports involving patients receiving sub-optimal palliative care via the out-of-hours primary-care services.

Results:

Incidents included issues with: medications (n = 613); access to timely care (n = 123); information transfer (n = 102), and/or non-medication-related treatment such as pressure ulcer relief or catheter care (n = 102). Almost two-thirds of reports (n = 695) described harm with outcomes such as increased pain, emotional, and psychological distress featuring highly. Commonly identified contributory factors to these incidents were a failure to follow protocol (n = 282), lack of skills/confidence of staff (n = 156), and patients requiring medication delivered via a syringe driver (n = 80).

Conclusion:

Healthcare systems with primary-care-led models of delivery must examine their practices to determine the prevalence of such safety issues (communication between providers; knowledge of commonly used, and access to, medications and equipment) and utilise improvement methods to achieve improvements in care.

Cultura de segurança no processo de doação de órgãos: revisão de literatura

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o desenvolvimento da cultura de segurança no processo de doação de órgãos e transplantes na literatura científica. Métodos Revisão integrativa da literatura a partir das bases de dados CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science e na biblioteca eletrônica SciELO, de 2012 a 2016, com sintaxe de palavras-chaves e descritores para cada base, sendo selecionados 14 artigos para análise. Resultados Foram detectados 1.659 estudos, desses, 33 foram lidos na íntegra, sendo definido para coleta dos dados 14 estudos. As informações obtidas foram analisadas criticamentre e agrupadas em duas categorias: Na Categoria 1 – Cultura de segurança no uso de medicamentos no período pós-transplante: destaca-se como fundamental o envolvimento da equipe multidisciplinar na orientação da alta hospitalar no transplante e ainda, os principais fatores de erros no uso dos fármacos. Na Categoria 2 – Cultura de segurança nas unidades transplantadoras: apresenta-se questões relacionadas à segurança dos pacientes submetidos aos transplantes nos períodos pré e intra-operatórios. Conclusão Por meio desse estudo, observou-se que a temática da cultura de segurança no processo de doação e transplante de órgãos está incipiente na literatura sendo necessário desenvolvimento de estudos bem delineados e relacionando à cultura de segurança do paciente em todas as etapas do processo de doação e transplantes.

Narrative feedback from OR personnel about the safety of their surgical practice before and after a surgical safety checklist intervention

Objective

To examine narrative feedback to understand surgical team perceptions about surgical safety checklists (SSCs) and their impact on the safety of surgical practice.

Design

We reviewed free-text comments from surveys administered before and after SSC implementation between 2011 and 2013. We categorized feedback thematically and as positive, negative or neutral.

Setting

South Carolina hospitals participating in a statewide collaborative on checklist implementation.

Participants

Surgical teams from 11 hospitals offering free-text comments in both pre-and post-implementation surveys.

Intervention

Implementation of the World Health Organization SSC.

Main Outcome Measure

Differences in comments made before and after implementation and by provider role; types of complications averted through checklist use.

Results

Before SSC implementation, the proportion of positive comments among provider roles differed significantly (P = 0.04), with more clinicians offering negative comments (87.9%, (29/33)) compared to other surgical team members (58.3% (7/12) to 60.9% (14/23)), after SSC implementation, these proportions did not significantly differ (clinicians 77.8% (14/18)), other surgical team members (50% (2/4) to 76.9% (20/26)) (P = 0.52). Distribution of negative comments differed significantly before and after implementation (P = 0.01); for example, there were more negative comments made about checklist buy-in after implementation (51.3 % (20/39)) compared to before implementation (24.5% (13/53)). Surgical team members most frequently reported that checklist use averted complications involving antibiotic administration, equipment and side/site of surgery.

Conclusions

Narrative feedback suggested that SSC implementation can facilitate patient safety by averting complications; however, buy-in is a persistent challenge. Presenting information on the impact of the SSC on lives saved, teamwork and complications averted, adapting the SSC to fit the local context, demonstrating leadership support and engaging champions to promote checklist use and address concerns could improve checklist adoption and efficacy.

Comparison of two methods to estimate adverse events in the IBEAS Study (Ibero-American study of adverse events): cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design

BACKGROUND

Adverse events (AEs) epidemiology is the first step to improve practice in the healthcare system. Usually, the preferred method used to estimate the magnitude of the problem is the retrospective cohort study design, with retrospective reviews of the medical records. However this data collection involves a sophisticated sampling plan, and a process of intensive review of sometimes very heavy and complex medical records. Cross-sectional survey is also a valid and feasible methodology to study AEs.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to compare AEs detection using two different methodologies: cross-sectional versus retrospective cohort design.

SETTING

Secondary and tertiary hospitals in five countries: Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, Mexico and Peru.

PARTICIPANTS

The IBEAS Study is a cross-sectional survey with a sample size of 11 379 patients. The retrospective cohort study was obtained from a 10% random sample proportional to hospital size from the entire IBEAS Study population.

METHODS

This study compares the 1-day prevalence of the AEs obtained in the IBEAS Study with the incidence obtained through the retrospective cohort study.

RESULTS

The prevalence of patients with AEs was 10.47% (95% CI 9.90 to 11.03) (1191/11 379), while the cumulative incidence of the retrospective cohort study was 19.76% (95% CI 17.35% to 22.17%) (215/1088). In both studies the highest risk of suffering AEs was seen in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients. Comorbid patients and patients with medical devices showed higher risk.

CONCLUSION

The retrospective cohort design, although requires more resources, allows to detect more AEs than the cross-sectional design.

Underlying influence of perception of management leadership on patient safety climate in healthcare organizations - A mediation analysis approach

Objective

We aim to draw insights on how medical staff's perception of management leadership affects safety climate with key safety related dimensions-teamwork climate, job satisfaction and working conditions.

Design/Setting

A cross-sectional survey using Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) was performed in a medical center in Taichung City, Taiwan. The relationships among the dimensions in SAQ were then analyzed by structural equation modeling with a mediation analysis.

Participants

2205 physicians and nurses of the medical center participated in the survey. Because not all questions in the survey are suitable for entire hospital staff, only the valid responses (n = 1596, response rate of 72%) were extracted for analysis.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Key measures are the direct and indirect effects of teamwork climate, job satisfaction, perception of management leadership, and working conditions on safety climate.

Results

Outcomes show that effect of perception of management leadership on safety climate is significant (standardized indirect effect of 0.892 with P-value 0.002) and fully mediated by other dimensions, where 66.9% is mediated through teamwork climate, 24.1% through working conditions and 9.0% through job satisfaction.

Conclusions

Our findings point to the importance of management leadership and the mechanism of its influence on safety climate. To improve safety climate, the implication is that commitment by management on leading safety improvement needs to be demonstrated when it implements daily supportive actions for other safety dimensions. For future improvement, development of a management system that can facilitate two-way trust between management and staff over the long term is recommended.

Sources of unsafe primary care for older adults: a mixed-methods analysis of patient safety incident reports

Background

older adults are frequent users of primary healthcare services, but are at increased risk of healthcare-related harm in this setting.

Objectives

to describe the factors associated with actual or potential harm to patients aged 65 years and older, treated in primary care, to identify action to produce safer care.

Design and Setting

a cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of a national (England and Wales) database of patient safety incident reports from 2005 to 2013.

Subjects

1,591 primary care patient safety incident reports regarding patients aged 65 years and older.

Methods

we developed a classification system for the analysis of patient safety incident reports to describe: the incident and preceding chain of incidents; other contributory factors; and patient harm outcome. We combined findings from exploratory descriptive and thematic analyses to identify key sources of unsafe care.

Results

the main sources of unsafe care in our weighted sample were due to: medication-related incidents e.g. prescribing, dispensing and administering (n = 486, 31%; 15% serious patient harm); communication-related incidents e.g. incomplete or non-transfer of information across care boundaries (n = 390, 25%; 12% serious patient harm); and clinical decision-making incidents which led to the most serious patient harm outcomes (n = 203, 13%; 41% serious patient harm).

Conclusion

priority areas for further research to determine the burden and preventability of unsafe primary care for older adults, include: the timely electronic tools for prescribing, dispensing and administering medication in the community; electronic transfer of information between healthcare settings; and, better clinical decision-making support and guidance.

Development of a risk assessment tool to predict fall-related severe injuries occurring in a hospital

Inpatient falls are the most common adverse events that occur in a hospital, and about 3 to 10% of falls result in serious injuries such as bone fractures and intracranial haemorrhages. We previously reported that bone fractures and intracranial haemorrhages were two major fall-related injuries and that risk assessment score for osteoporotic bone fracture was significantly associated not only with bone fractures after falls but also with intracranial haemorrhage after falls. Based on the results, we tried to establish a risk assessment tool for predicting fall-related severe injuries in a hospital. Possible risk factors related to fall-related serious injuries were extracted from data on inpatients that were admitted to a tertiary-care university hospital by using multivariate Cox' s regression analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis. We found that fall risk score and fracture risk score were the two significant factors, and we constructed models to predict fall-related severe injuries incorporating these factors. When the prediction model was applied to another independent dataset, the constructed model could detect patients with fall-related severe injuries efficiently. The new assessment system could identify patients prone to severe injuries after falls in a reproducible fashion.

SBAR improves communication and safety climate and decreases incident reports due to communication errors in an anaesthetic clinic: a prospective intervention study

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine staff members' perceptions of communication within and between different professions, safety attitudes and psychological empowerment, prior to and after implementation of the communication tool Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation (SBAR) at an anaesthetic clinic. The aim was also to study whether there was any change in the proportion of incident reports caused by communication errors.

DESIGN

A prospective intervention study with comparison group using preassessments and postassessments. Questionnaire data were collected from staff in an intervention (n=100) and a comparison group (n=69) at the anaesthetic clinic in two hospitals prior to (2011) and after (2012) implementation of SBAR. The proportion of incident reports due to communication errors was calculated during a 1-year period prior to and after implementation.

SETTING

Anaesthetic clinics at two hospitals in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

All licensed practical nurses, registered nurses and physicians working in the operating theatres, intensive care units and postanaesthesia care units at anaesthetic clinics in two hospitals were invited to participate.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of SBAR in an anaesthetic clinic.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

The primary outcomes were staff members' perception of communication within and between different professions, as well as their perceptions of safety attitudes. Secondary outcomes were psychological empowerment and incident reports due to error of communication.

RESULTS

In the intervention group, there were statistically significant improvements in the factors 'Between-group communication accuracy' (p=0.039) and 'Safety climate' (p=0.011). The proportion of incident reports due to communication errors decreased significantly (p<0.0001) in the intervention group, from 31% to 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing the communication tool SBAR in anaesthetic clinics was associated with improvement in staff members' perception of communication between professionals and their perception of the safety climate as well as with a decreased proportion of incident reports related to communication errors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN37251313.

Prospects for comparing European hospitals in terms of quality and safety: lessons from a comparative study in five countries

PURPOSE

Being able to compare hospitals in terms of quality and safety between countries is important for a number of reasons. For example, the 2011 European Union directive on patients' rights to cross-border health care places a requirement on all member states to provide patients with comparable information on health-care quality, so that they can make an informed choice. Here, we report on the feasibility of using common process and outcome indicators to compare hospitals for quality and safety in five countries (England, Portugal, The Netherlands, Sweden and Norway).

MAIN CHALLENGES IDENTIFIED

The cross-country comparison identified the following seven challenges with respect to comparing the quality of hospitals across Europe: different indicators are collected in each country; different definitions of the same indicators are used; different mandatory versus voluntary data collection requirements are in place; different types of organizations oversee data collection; different levels of aggregation of data exist (country, region and hospital); different levels of public access to data exist; and finally, hospital accreditation and licensing systems differ in each country.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that if patients and policymakers are to compare the quality and safety of hospitals across Europe, then further work is urgently needed to agree the way forward. Until then, patients will not be able to make informed choices about where they receive their health care in different countries, and some governments will remain in the dark about the quality and safety of care available to their citizens as compared to that available in neighbouring countries.

Detecting inpatient falls by using natural language processing of electronic medical records

BACKGROUND

Incident reporting is the most common method for detecting adverse events in a hospital. However, under-reporting or non-reporting and delay in submission of reports are problems that prevent early detection of serious adverse events. The aim of this study was to determine whether it is possible to promptly detect serious injuries after inpatient falls by using a natural language processing method and to determine which data source is the most suitable for this purpose.

METHODS

We tried to detect adverse events from narrative text data of electronic medical records by using a natural language processing method. We made syntactic category decision rules to detect inpatient falls from text data in electronic medical records. We compared how often the true fall events were recorded in various sources of data including progress notes, discharge summaries, image order entries and incident reports. We applied the rules to these data sources and compared F-measures to detect falls between these data sources with reference to the results of a manual chart review. The lag time between event occurrence and data submission and the degree of injury were compared.

RESULTS

We made 170 syntactic rules to detect inpatient falls by using a natural language processing method. Information on true fall events was most frequently recorded in progress notes (100%), incident reports (65.0%) and image order entries (12.5%). However, F-measure to detect falls using the rules was poor when using progress notes (0.12) and discharge summaries (0.24) compared with that when using incident reports (1.00) and image order entries (0.91). Since the results suggested that incident reports and image order entries were possible data sources for prompt detection of serious falls, we focused on a comparison of falls found by incident reports and image order entries. Injury caused by falls found by image order entries was significantly more severe than falls detected by incident reports (p<0.001), and the lag time between falls and submission of data to the hospital information system was significantly shorter in image order entries than in incident reports (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By using natural language processing of text data from image order entries, we could detect injurious falls within a shorter time than that by using incident reports. Concomitant use of this method might improve the shortcomings of an incident reporting system such as under-reporting or non-reporting and delayed submission of data on incidents.

A content validated questionnaire for assessment of self reported venous blood sampling practices

BACKGROUND

Venous blood sampling is a common procedure in health care. It is strictly regulated by national and international guidelines. Deviations from guidelines due to human mistakes can cause patient harm. Validated questionnaires for health care personnel can be used to assess preventable "near misses"--i.e. potential errors and nonconformities during venous blood sampling practices that could transform into adverse events. However, no validated questionnaire that assesses nonconformities in venous blood sampling has previously been presented. The aim was to test a recently developed questionnaire in self reported venous blood sampling practices for validity and reliability.

FINDINGS

We developed a questionnaire to assess deviations from best practices during venous blood sampling. The questionnaire contained questions about patient identification, test request management, test tube labeling, test tube handling, information search procedures and frequencies of error reporting. For content validity, the questionnaire was confirmed by experts on questionnaires and venous blood sampling. For reliability, test-retest statistics were used on the questionnaire answered twice. The final venous blood sampling questionnaire included 19 questions out of which 9 had in total 34 underlying items. It was found to have content validity. The test-retest analysis demonstrated that the items were generally stable. In total, 82% of the items fulfilled the reliability acceptance criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The questionnaire could be used for assessment of "near miss" practices that could jeopardize patient safety and gives several benefits instead of assessing rare adverse events only. The higher frequencies of "near miss" practices allows for quantitative analysis of the effect of corrective interventions and to benchmark preanalytical quality not only at the laboratory/hospital level but also at the health care unit/hospital ward.