Comparison of Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab Obtained by Three Commercial Assays in Patients with Crohn's Disease

Postoperative Ustekinumab Drug Levels and Disease Activity in Patients with Crohn's Disease

AIMS

This study investigated how post-operative ustekinumab levels relate to surgery type, endoscopic, biochemical, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's Disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with Crohn's Disease with a disease-related operation between 2016 and 2022 assessed outcomes based on ustekinumab levels. Patients were included if they had an ustekinumab trough level within two years post-operatively. Patients were separated into groups based on whether their ustekinumab trough levels were adequate, defined as ≥ 4 μg/mL, or suboptimal < 4 μg/mL. A subset of patients with ustekinumab levels taken within two years both before and after surgery was compared to non-surgical treatment-escalated controls outside the initial patient set. Harvey-Bradshaw index was used to evaluate clinical disease activity. Rutgeert's and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease was used to evaluate endoscopic disease activity. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin values were collected to evaluate the molecular inflammatory disease state. CBC data were used to evaluate anemia.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were identified, which had ustekinumab levels after Crohn's Disease-related surgery. Twelve of these patients had pre-operative levels and were compared to 26 non-surgical treatment-escalated controls. No relationship between ustekinumab levels and endoscopic or clinical disease activity post-operatively was found. This also held true when looking at different surgery types. Adequate levels of ustekinumab post-operatively yielded lower risk of anemia. Surgery itself did not have an impact on ustekinumab levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided new insights into how post-operative ustekinumab levels impact several factors in patients having undergone Crohn's disease-related surgery.

Single or continuous multiple intravenous re-induction in Crohn's disease patients who lost response to ustekinumab: Evidence from real-world data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Re-induction optimization of ustekinumab is effective in Crohn's disease (CD) patients who experienced a loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab. However, whether continuous multiple intravenous optimization is better than single dose re-induction remains unknown. We aimed to compare effectiveness of two strategies in CD patients with LOR to ustekinumab.

METHODS

We retrospectively included CD patients who had LOR to standardized ustekinumab therapy. They were divided into three groups according to different times (one to three) for re-induction.

RESULTS

This study included 50, 26 and 22 of 98 eligible patients in one intravenous re-induction subgroup, double intravenous re-induction subgroup and three intravenous re-induction subgroup, respectively. At week 24, 67.3%, 75.5%, 56.6%, 69.8% and 61.2% of all achieved steriod free clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic remission, endoscopic response and C-reactive protein normalization, respectively. No differences were found in all endpoints between three groups. Ustekinumab trough level at week 24 but not times of re-induction showed a tendency to predict clinical remission. No serious adverse events were found in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous re-induction was safe and effective in CD patients who experienced LOR to ustekinumab. Trough level of ustekinumab but not times of intravenous re-induction may associated with clinical efficacy.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel diseases. Position statement of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has undergone a significant transformation following the introduction of biologic drugs. Thanks to these drugs, treatment goals have evolved from clinical response and remission to more ambitious objectives, such as endoscopic or radiologic remission. However, even though biologics are highly effective, a significant percentage of patients will not achieve an initial response or may lose it over time. We know that there is a direct relationship between the trough concentrations of the biologic and its therapeutic efficacy, with more demanding therapeutic goals requiring higher drug levels, and inadequate exposure being common. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic medications, along with pharmacokinetic models, provides us with the possibility of offering a personalized approach to treatment for patients with IBD. Over the past few years, relevant information has accumulated regarding its utility during or after induction, as well as in the maintenance of biologic treatment, in reactive or proactive strategies, and prior to withdrawal or treatment de-escalation. The aim of this document is to establish recommendations regarding the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, in different clinical practice scenarios, and to identify areas where its utility is evident, promising, or controversial.

Observational Study to Compare Biological Drug Concentration Quantification Techniques and Immunogenicity in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases

Measuring biological drugs' trough concentrations and the concentrations of anti-drug antibodies is a valuable practice for treatment optimization. ELISA techniques are the gold standard for biological drug concentration quantification, but new techniques such as chemiluminescence immunoassays present some advantages. The aim of this unicentric prospective observational study is to compare the infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab and ustekinumab trough levels and anti-adalimumab and anti-infliximab antibodies concentrations obtained when using a chemiluminescent instrument (i-TRACK®, Theradiag, Croissy-Beaubourg, France) and an ELISA instrument (TRITURUS®, Griffols, Barcelona, Spain). Linear regression, Pearson or Spearman tests, Bland-Altman plots and the Cohen kappa test were applied for every sample. The correlation was excellent for both assays in the measurement of all drug concentrations. In general, values were lower when measured using i-TRACK than when using TRITURUS, especially when the values were high. Both techniques proved valuable in clinical practice for monitoring adalimumab and infliximab drug concentration. However, the results were modest for ustekinumab and vedolizumab, so caution is recommended and further research is needed. The limited number of anti-drug antibody-positive samples precluded a comparison between the techniques.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on ustekinumab

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic drug monitoring is used clinically to guide anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but its use for ustekinumab (UST) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine predictive variables of UST levels.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort of patients with IBD, UST trough levels were drawn at maintenance dosing. Relationships between UST trough levels and demographics, therapy, and outcomes were analyzed. Machine-learning models were used to infer combinatorial traits predictive of UST levels.

RESULTS

Altogether 177 patients with IBD on UST had a mean UST trough level of 4.742 μg/mL. The injection schedule correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with UST levels. Naiveté to anti-TNFs correlated with higher UST levels (P = 0.048). Univariate analysis revealed that higher inflammatory biomarkers significantly correlated to lower UST levels and a lower Simple Endoscopic Score to Crohn's Disease to adequate UST levels (P = 0.018). Multivariate analysis identified body mass index (BMI), previous anti-TNF failure, and laboratory flare as predictors of UST levels with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.72. The UST cut-off level of 5.77 μg/mL yielded a 0.79 AUROC, 80% sensitivity, and 81% specificity for predicting endoscopic remission of Crohn's disease. For the clinical remission end-point in ulcerative colitis, UST level of 4.73 μg/mL yielded a 0.69 AUROC, 53% sensitivity, and 86% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher UST levels correlated with less disease activity. BMI was an important consideration for UST response as well. Therefore, UST dose adjustments to reach target levels may optimize response.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: The Association Between Serum Ustekinumab Trough Concentrations and Treatment Response in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Optimizing therapy and monitoring response are integral aspects of inflammatory bowel disease treatment. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether serum ustekinumab trough concentrations during maintenance therapy were associated with ustekinumab treatment response in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to March 21, 2022, to identify studies using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane library. We included studies that reported the association between serum ustekinumab trough concentrations with clinical or endoscopic remission. Outcome measures were combined across studies using the random-effects model with an odds ratio (OR) for binary outcomes of endoscopic and clinical remission.

RESULTS

We identified 14 observational studies that were included in the analysis for clinical remission (919 patients, 63% with Crohn's disease) or endoscopic remission (290 patients, all with Crohn's disease). Median ustekinumab trough concentrations were higher amongst individuals achieving clinical remission compared with those not achieving remission (mean difference, 1.6 ug/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-3.01 ug/mL). Furthermore, individuals with median serum trough concentration in the fourth quartile were significantly more likely to achieve clinical (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.11-6.20) but not endoscopic remission (OR, 4.67; 95% CI, 0.86-25.19) compared with those with first quartile median trough concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this meta-analysis primarily relating to patients with Crohn's disease on maintenance ustekinumab treatment, it appears that there is an association between higher ustekinumab trough concentration and clinical outcomes. Prospective studies are required to determine whether proactive dose adjustments of ustekinumab therapy provides additional clinical benefit.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Biologic and Small-Molecule Therapies for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, necessitates long-term medical therapy to manage symptoms and prevent complications. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a strategy to optimize treatment efficacy, particularly with anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) alpha drugs. This review explores the role of TDM for non-anti-TNF advanced therapies in IBD, focusing on vedolizumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, risankizumab and ozanimod. Methods: The literature search, conducted through OVID (Medline) and PubMed, delves into proactive versus reactive TDM, timing of monitoring and methods for measuring drug levels and anti-drug antibodies. Results: While ustekinumab and vedolizumab exhibit exposure-response relationships, consensus on target levels and the role of TDM adjustments remains elusive. Limited data on risankizumab suggest a dose-dependent response, while for small molecule therapies (janus kinase inhibitors and ozanimod), the absence of real-world data and commercially available TDM tools pose challenges. Conclusion: At present, with the available data, there is a limited role for TDM in non-anti-TNF biologic and small-molecule therapies. This review underscores the need for further research to delineate the utility of TDM in guiding treatment decisions for these agents.

Clinical Outcomes of Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are characterized by abdominal pain, diarrhea, blood in stools, weight loss, and fatigue. It presents in patients with varying severity from mild to severe depending on the inflammation. Detailed analysis and guidelines are required for the safe usage of biological therapies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases as surgery is reserved for more complex cases. There is also geographical variation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) incidence and prevalence based on environmental and climate changes, and socio-demographics. Studies also show that there is more hospitalization and reduced health-related quality of life in IBD patients when compared to normal people. We conducted an extensive literature database search for articles with keywords within the last 10 years on adults >18 years of age with IBD and its treatment, especially with ustekinumab. Ustekinumab is a human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) kappa monoclonal antibody, that blocks IL-12 and IL-23 and was approved by the FDA for the treatment of moderate to severe IBD, especially in patients who are intolerant to immunomodulators or corticosteroids treatment. There are several retrospective studies that show the effectiveness of ustekinumab dosage escalation every four weeks in IBD patients. This escalation of dose not only improved the clinical outcome but also reduced the worsening of the disease. Previous studies also show the importance of considering dosage escalation before switching biological agents in the IBD treatment. Ustekinumab has also demonstrated both efficacy and safety in the induction and maintenance of the treatment of this disease. There are certain challenges and opportunities associated with ustekinumab usage in IBD patients that require further research. Ustekinumab seems to be more cost-effective in the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha-inhibitor failure population when compared to previously used biological treatment regimes.

Serum Ustekinumab Concentrations Are Associated With Improved Outcomes With the Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity for Crohn's Disease

Higher ustekinumab concentrations were associated with improved radiologic (Simplified Magnetic Resonance Index of Activity for Crohn’s Disease) and stringent biomarker (calprotectin) outcomes. The high concentration needed for these novel endpoints validates previous studies using the same assay.

Relationship Between Serum Ustekinumab Trough Concentration and Clinical and Biochemical Disease Activity: A Real-World Study in Adult Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of therapeutic drug monitoring for ustekinumab in the treatment of Crohn's disease has not been defined. This study aimed to explore the relationship of serum ustekinumab trough concentration (UTC) with clinical and biochemical disease outcomes in a real-world setting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of Crohn's disease patients treated at a single tertiary centre. Ustekinumab was given as a single intravenous induction dose, followed by maintenance subcutaneous injections every 4 to 8 weeks. Rates of clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤ 4), biochemical remission (C-reactive protein < 5 mg/l and faecal calprotectin < 150 μg/g) and complete remission were assessed at baseline and at the time of UTC testing during maintenance therapy. The association between baseline variables and UTC was tested using linear regression. We also performed an external validation analysis of UTC cut-offs established in four previously published studies.

RESULTS

This study included 43 patients. Compared to 8-weekly dosing, a 2.49- and 2.65-fold increase in UTC was associated with 6-weekly and 4-weekly dosing respectively. However, there was no significant difference in clinical, biochemical or complete remission among the dosing groups. An external validation of previously published optimal UTC cut-offs found low predictive value for our patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, dosing interval was the only determinant significantly associated with a higher UTC for patients on maintenance ustekinumab therapy. While a higher UTC may be achieved with dose escalation, it was not associated with improved rates of clinical or biochemical response in our cohort.

Approaches for the detection and analysis of anti-drug antibodies to biopharmaceuticals: A review

Antibody-based therapeutic agents and other biopharmaceuticals are now used in the treatment of many diseases. However, when these biopharmaceuticals are administrated to patients, an immune reaction may occur that can reduce the drug's efficacy and lead to adverse side effects. The immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals can be evaluated by detecting and measuring antibodies that have been produced against these drugs, or anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). Methods for ADA detection and analysis can be important during the selection of a therapeutic approach based on such drugs and is crucial when developing and testing new biopharmaceuticals. This review examines approaches that have been used for ADA detection, measurement, and characterization. Many of these approaches are based on immunoassays and antigen binding tests, including homogeneous mobility shift assays. Other techniques that have been used for the analysis of ADAs are capillary electrophoresis, reporter gene assays, surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The general principles of each approach will be discussed, along with their recent applications with regards to ADA analysis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in inflammatory bowel disease: unmet needs and future perspectives

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has emerged as a useful tool for optimising the use of biologics, and in particular anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, challenges remain and are hindering the widespread implementation of TDM in clinical practice. These barriers include identification of the optimal drug concentration to target, the lag time between sampling and results, and the proper interpretation of anti-drug antibody titres among different assays. Solutions to overcome these barriers include the harmonisation of TDM assays and the use of point-of-care testing. Other unmet needs include well designed prospective studies and randomised controlled trials focusing on proactive TDM, particularly during induction therapy. Future studies should also investigate the utility of TDM for biologics other than anti-TNF therapies in both IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, and the use of pharmacokinetic modelling dashboards and pharmacogenetics towards individual personalised medicine.

A Comprehensive Literature Review and Expert Consensus Statement on Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologics is a rapidly evolving field. We aimed to provide a consensus statement regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A modified Delphi method was applied to develop consensus statements. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding TDM of biologic therapies in IBD, and 45 statements were subsequently formulated on the potential application of TDM in IBD. The statements, along with literature, were then presented to a panel of 10 gastroenterologists with expertise in IBD and TDM who anonymously rated them on a scale of 1-10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree). An expert consensus development meeting was held virtually to review, discuss, refine, and reformulate statements that did not meet criteria for agreement or that were ambiguous. During the meeting, additional statements were proposed. Panelists then confidentially revoted, and statements rated ≥7 by 80% or more of the participants were accepted. During the virtual meeting, 8 statements were reworded, 7 new statements were proposed, and 19 statements were rerated. Consensus was finally reached in 48/49 statements. The panel agreed that reactive TDM should be used for all biologics for both primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response. It was recommended that treatment discontinuation should not be considered for infliximab or adalimumab until a drug concentration of at least 10-15 μg/mL was achieved. Consensus was also achieved regarding the utility of proactive TDM for anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. It was recommended to perform proactive TDM after induction and at least once during maintenance. Consensus was achieved in most cases regarding the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, specifically for reactive and proactive TDM of anti-tumor necrosis factors.

One-year outcomes with ustekinumab therapy in infliximab-refractory paediatric ulcerative colitis: a multicentre prospective study

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 (UNIFI) trial of ustekinumab (anti-interleukin 12/23) demonstrated efficacy even after prior biologic failure in adult ulcerative colitis (UC), but paediatric data are lacking.

AIM

To prospectively monitor efficacy and serum concentrations of ustekinumab given to children with UC refractory to other biologics.

METHODS

Children with anti-TNF refractory UC initiating ustekinumab intravenously at sites of the Canadian Children IBD Network prior to 12/2019 are included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission with subcutaneous ustekinumab at 52 weeks (Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index <10, no steroids ≥4 weeks). Ustekinumab levels were measured after week 20. Endoscopic improvement was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1, or faecal calprotectin (FCP) <250 μg/g if not re-colonoscoped.

RESULTS

At six sites between 01/2018 and 11/2019, 25 children (median [IQR] age 14.8 years [12.3-16.2], 72% female) with UC duration 2.3 years (1.1-4.2) received intravenous ustekinumab (median dose/kg of 6.4 [5.5-7.5] mg). All patients had failed prior infliximab therapy, and 12 (48%) also vedolizumab. Five patients discontinued ustekinumab after IV induction (four undergoing colectomy). On intent to treat basis, 44% achieved the primary endpoint of steroid-free remission at week 52, including nine (69%) of 13 who previously treated with anti-TNF only vs two (17%) of 12 who previously failed also by vedolizumab (P = 0.008). Seven of 11 remitters met the criteria for endoscopic improvement. The median (IQR) trough levels (μg/mL) were greater with q4 vs q8 weekly dosing (8.7 [4.6-9.9] vs 3.8 [12.7-4.8]) P = 0.02, but greater exposure was not associated with a superior rate of clinical remission. No adverse events were associated with therapy.

CONCLUSION

Ustekinumab demonstrated efficacy in this paediatric cohort with otherwise treatment-refractory UC. Treatment failure was not due to inadequate drug exposure.

Update on TDM (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring) with Ustekinumab, Vedolizumab and Tofacitinib in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The goal of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is to optimize anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although commercial assays are readily available for both ustekinumab and vedolizumab, the use of TDM with these newer biologic medications is at its infancy. The clinical utility of TDM with non-anti-TNF mechanisms of action is not clear. This review summarizes the latest available data on the pharmacokinetics of newer biologic and oral small molecules and highlights the threshold concentrations that have been associated with improved outcomes in IBD patients.

Monitoring vedolizumab and ustekinumab drug levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: hype or hope?

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a vital role in implementing precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and may contribute to increased effectiveness, lower rates of drug toxicity and cost savings. While expert panels advocate the use of reactive TDM for anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, TDM is not yet widely recommended for non-anti TNF biologicals. We provide an overview of the observational evidence of the value of TDM in case of vedolizumab and ustekinumab. We also shed light on obstacles that need to be addressed before establishing wide acceptance of TDM in the field of IBD. In this respect, new analytical techniques and modelling approaches are being developed to further optimize efficacy of TDM and to facilitate general acceptance of this tool in personalizing IBD management.