Pharmacokinetics of the cardioprotector ADR-529 (ICRF-187) in escalating doses combined with fixed-dose doxorubicin

In vitro to clinical translation of combinatorial effects of doxorubicin and dexrazoxane in breast cancer: a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling approach

Dexrazoxane (DEX) is the only drug clinically approved to treat Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC), however its impact on the anticancer efficacy of DOX is not extensively studied. In this manuscript, a proof-of-concept in vitro study is carried out to quantitatively characterize the anticancer effects of DOX and DEX and determine their nature of drug-drug interactions in cancer cells by combining experimental data with modeling approaches. First, we determined the static concentration-response of DOX and DEX in breast cancer cell lines, JIMT-1 and MDA-MB-468. With a three-dimensional (3D) response surface analysis using a competitive interaction model, we characterized their interaction to be modestly synergistic in MDA-MB-468 or modestly antagonistic in JIMT-1 cells. Second, a cellular-level, pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed to capture the time-course effects of the two drugs which determined additive and antagonistic interactions for DOX and DEX in MDA-MB-468 and JIMT-1, respectively. Finally, we performed in vitro to in vivo translation by utilizing DOX and DEX clinical dosing regimen that was previously identified to be maximally cardioprotective, to drive tumor cell PD models. The resulting simulations showed that a 10:1 DEX:DOX dose ratio over three cycles of Q3W regimen of DOX results in comparable efficacy based on MDA-MB-468 (additive effect) estimates and lower efficacy based on JIMT-1 (antagonistic effect) estimates for DOX + DEX combination as compared to DOX alone. Thus, our developed cell-based PD models can be used to simulate different scenarios and better design preclinical in vivo studies to further optimize DOX and DEX combinations.

Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Anthracycline antibiotics are among the most effective and widely used antineoplastic drugs. Their usefulness is limited by a cumulative dose-related cardiotoxicity, whose precise mechanisms are not clear as yet. The principal role is possibly exerted by free oxygen radicals generated by “redox-cycling“ of anthracycline molecule and/or by the formation of anthracycline-ferric ion complexes. The iron catalyzes the hydroxyl radical production via Haber-Weiss reaction. The selective toxicity of ANT against cardiomyocytes results from high accumulation of ANT in cardiac tissue, appreciable production of oxygen radicals by mitochondria and relatively poor antioxidant defense systems. Other additional mechanisms of the anthracycline cardiotoxicity have been proposed - calcium overload, histamine release and impairment in autonomic regulation of heart function. The currently used methods for an early identification of anthracycline cardiotoxicity comprise ECG measurement, biochemical markers, functional measurement and morphologic examination. Among a plenty of studied cardioprotective agents only dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) has been approved for clinical use. Its protective effect likely consists in intracellular chelating of iron. However, in high doses dexrazoxane itself may cause myelotoxicity. This fact encourages investigation of new cardioprotectants with lower toxicity. Orally active iron chelators and flavonoids attract more attention. Modification of dosage schedule and synthesis of new anthracycline analogues may represent alternative approaches to mitigate anthracycline cardiotoxicity while preserving antitumour activity.

Effect of Sodium 2,3-Dimercaptopropane-1-Sulphonate (DMPS) on Chronic Daunorubicin Toxicity in Rabbits: Comparison with Dexrazoxane

A possible protective action of DMPS (a dithiol chelating agent) against chronic daunorubicin toxicity in rabbits in comparison with dexrazoxane was investigated. The rabbits were divided into five groups: control (saline, 1 ml/kg i.v.), daunorubicin (3 mg/kg i.v.), DMPS (50 mg/kg i.v.); the remaining two groups were pre-treated either with dexrazoxane (60 mg/kg i.p.) or DMPS (50 mg/kg i.v.) 30 min before administration of daunorubicin (3 mg/kg i.v.). Drugs were given once a week for 10 weeks. Routine biochemical parameters were determined in weeks 1, 5 and 11. In the 11th week, invasive haemodynamic parameters were measured, then the rabbits underwent autopsy, cardiac tissue was examined by light microscopy and scored semiquantitatively. The contents of calcium, potassium, magnesium, iron and selenium were measured in the left heart ventricle. DMPS administered alone was well tolerated and did not cause any major signs of toxicity. It decreased the cardiac content of calcium, but did not affect the iron concentration. In contrast to dexrazoxane, DMPS pre-treatment did not prevent the decline in body weight in weeks 8–11 caused by daunorubicin, actually worsened mortality (26.7% vs 40.0%), did not ameliorate daunorubicin-induced nephrotic syndrome, and did not prevent the occurrence of the severe myocardial lesions. Unlike dexrazoxane, a lack of protective effect of DMPS against chronic daunorubicin toxicity in rabbits was demonstrated. The underlying cause may consist in the fact that DMPS does not efficiently chelate tissue iron and thus may not prevent the formation of oxygen free radicals.

Molecular Mechanisms of the Cardiotoxicity of the Proteasomal-Targeted Drugs Bortezomib and Carfilzomib

Bortezomib and carfilzomib are anticancer drugs that target the proteasome. However, these agents have been shown to exhibit some specific cardiac toxicities by as yet unknown mechanisms. Bortezomib and carfilzomib are also being used clinically in combination with doxorubicin, which is also cardiotoxic. A primary neonatal rat myocyte model was used to study these cardiotoxic mechanisms. Exposure to submicromolar concentrations of bortezomib and carfilzomib resulted in significant myocyte damage and induced apoptosis. Both bortezomib and carfilzomib inhibited the chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity of myocyte lysate in the low nanomolar concentration range and exhibited time-dependent inhibition kinetics. The high sensitivity of myocytes, which were determined to contain high specific levels of chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity, to the damaging effects of bortezomib and carfilzomib was likely due to the inhibition of proteasomal-dependent ongoing sarcomeric protein turnover. A brief preexposure of myocytes to non-toxic nanomolar concentrations of bortezomib or carfilzomib greatly increased doxorubicin-mediated damage, which suggests that the combination of doxorubicin with either bortezomib or carfilzomib may produce more than additive cardiotoxicity. The doxorubicin cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane partially protected myocytes from doxorubicin plus bortezomib or carfilzomib treatment, in spite of the fact that bortezomib and carfilzomib inhibited the dexrazoxane-induced decreases in topoisomerase IIβ protein levels in myocytes. These latter results suggest that the doxorubicin cardioprotective effects of dexrazoxane and the doxorubicin-mediated cardiotoxicity were not exclusively due to targeting of topoisomerase IIβ.

Pharmacokinetics of the Cardioprotective Drug Dexrazoxane and Its Active Metabolite ADR-925 with Focus on Cardiomyocytes and the Heart

Dexrazoxane (DEX), the only cardioprotectant approved against anthracycline cardiotoxicity, has been traditionally deemed to be a prodrug of the iron-chelating metabolite ADR-925. However, pharmacokinetic profile of both agents, particularly with respect to the cells and tissues essential for its action (cardiomyocytes/myocardium), remains poorly understood. The aim of this study is to characterize the conversion and disposition of DEX to ADR-925 in vitro (primary cardiomyocytes) and in vivo (rabbits) under conditions where DEX is clearly cardioprotective against anthracycline cardiotoxicity. Our results show that DEX is hydrolyzed to ADR-925 in cell media independently of the presence of cardiomyocytes or their lysate. Furthermore, ADR-925 directly penetrates into the cells with contribution of active transport, and detectable concentrations occur earlier than after DEX incubation. In rabbits, ADR-925 was detected rapidly in plasma after DEX administration to form sustained concentrations thereafter. ADR-925 was not markedly retained in the myocardium, and its relative exposure was 5.7-fold lower than for DEX. Unlike liver tissue, myocardium homogenates did not accelerate the conversion of DEX to ADR-925 in vitro, suggesting that myocardial concentrations in vivo may originate from its distribution from the central compartment. The pharmacokinetic parameters for both DEX and ADR-925 were determined by both noncompartmental analyses and population pharmacokinetics (including joint parent-metabolite model). Importantly, all determined parameters were closer to human than to rodent data. The present results open venues for the direct assessment of the cardioprotective effects of ADR-925 in vitro and in vivo to establish whether DEX is a drug or prodrug.

Mechanisms of Action and Reduced Cardiotoxicity of Pixantrone; a Topoisomerase II Targeting Agent with Cellular Selectivity for the Topoisomerase IIα Isoform

Pixantrone is a new noncardiotoxic aza-anthracenedione anticancer drug structurally related to anthracyclines and anthracenediones, such as doxorubicin and mitoxantrone. Pixantrone is approved in the European Union for the treatment of relapsed or refractory aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study was undertaken to investigate both the mechanism(s) of its anticancer activity and its relative lack of cardiotoxicity. Pixantrone targeted DNA topoisomerase IIα as evidenced by its ability to inhibit kinetoplast DNA decatenation; to produce linear double-strand DNA in a pBR322 DNA cleavage assay; to produce DNA double-strand breaks in a cellular phospho-histone γH2AX assay; to form covalent topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in a cellular immunodetection of complex of enzyme-to-DNA assay; and to display cross-resistance in etoposide-resistant K562 cells. Pixantrone produced semiquinone free radicals in an enzymatic reducing system, although not in a cellular system, most likely due to low cellular uptake. Pixantrone was 10- to 12-fold less damaging to neonatal rat myocytes than doxorubicin or mitoxantrone, as measured by lactate dehydrogenase release. Three factors potentially contribute to the reduced cardiotoxicity of pixantrone. First, its lack of binding to iron(III) makes it unable to induce iron-based oxidative stress. Second, its low cellular uptake may limit its ability to produce semiquinone free radicals and redox cycle. Finally, because the β isoform of topoisomerase II predominates in postmitotic cardiomyocytes, and pixantrone is demonstrated in this study to be selective for topoisomerase IIα in stabilizing enzyme-DNA covalent complexes, the attenuated cardiotoxicity of this agent may also be due to its selectivity for targeting topoisomerase IIα over topoisomerase IIβ.

Dexrazoxane Diminishes Doxorubicin-Induced Acute Ovarian Damage and Preserves Ovarian Function and Fecundity in Mice

Advances in cancer treatment utilizing multiple chemotherapies have dramatically increased cancer survivorship. Female cancer survivors treated with doxorubicin (DXR) chemotherapy often suffer from an acute impairment of ovarian function, which can persist as long-term, permanent ovarian insufficiency. Dexrazoxane (Dexra) pretreatment reduces DXR-induced insult in the heart, and protects in vitro cultured murine and non-human primate ovaries, demonstrating a drug-based shield to prevent DXR insult. The present study tested the ability of Dexra pretreatment to mitigate acute DXR chemotherapy ovarian toxicity in mice through the first 24 hours post-treatment, and improve subsequent long-term fertility throughout the reproductive lifespan. Adolescent CD-1 mice were treated with Dexra 1 hour prior to DXR treatment in a 1:1 mg or 10:1 mg Dexra:DXR ratio. During the acute injury period (2-24 hours post-injection), Dexra pretreatment at a 1:1 mg ratio decreased the extent of double strand DNA breaks, diminished γH2FAX activation, and reduced subsequent follicular cellular demise caused by DXR. In fertility and fecundity studies, dams pretreated with either Dexra:DXR dose ratio exhibited litter sizes larger than DXR-treated dams, and mice treated with a 1:1 mg Dexra:DXR ratio delivered pups with birth weights greater than DXR-treated females. While DXR significantly increased the "infertility index" (quantifying the percentage of dams failing to achieve pregnancy) through 6 gestations following treatment, Dexra pretreatment significantly reduced the infertility index following DXR treatment, improving fecundity. Low dose Dexra not only protected the ovaries, but also bestowed a considerable survival advantage following exposure to DXR chemotherapy. Mouse survivorship increased from 25% post-DXR treatment to over 80% with Dexra pretreatment. These data demonstrate that Dexra provides acute ovarian protection from DXR toxicity, improving reproductive health in a mouse model, suggesting this clinically available drug may provide ovarian protection for cancer patients.

Cardiotoxicity of anticancer treatments

Patients with cancer can experience adverse cardiovascular events secondary to the malignant process itself or its treatment. Patients with cancer might also have underlying cardiovascular illness, the consequences of which are often exacerbated by the stress of the tumour growth or its treatment. With the advent of new treatments and subsequent prolonged survival time, late effects of cancer treatment can become clinically evident decades after completion of therapy. The heart's extensive energy reserve and its ability to compensate for reduced function add to the complexity of diagnosis and timely initiation of therapy. Additionally, modern oncological treatment regimens often incorporate multiple agents whose deleterious cardiac effects might be additive or synergistic. Treatment-related impairment of cardiac contractility can be either transient or irreversible. Furthermore, cancer treatment is associated with life-threatening arrhythmia, ischaemia, infarction, and damage to cardiac valves, the conduction system, or the pericardium. Awareness of these processes has gained prominence with the arrival of strategies to monitor and to prevent or to mitigate the effects of cardiovascular damage. A greater understanding of the mechanisms of injury can prolong the lives of those cured of their malignancy, but left with potentially devastating cardiac sequelae.

The catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane induces DNA breaks, ATF3 and the DNA damage response in cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitor dexrazoxane has been associated not only with improved cancer patient survival but also with secondary malignancies and reduced tumour response.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We investigated the DNA damage response and the role of the activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) accumulation in tumour cells exposed to dexrazoxane.

KEY RESULTS

Dexrazoxane exposure induced topoisomerase IIα (TOP2A)-dependent cell death, γ-H2AX accumulation and increased tail moment in neutral comet assays. Dexrazoxane induced DNA damage responses, shown by enhanced levels of γ-H2AX/53BP1 foci, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated), ATR (ATM and Rad3-related), Chk1 and Chk2 phosphorylation, and by p53 accumulation. Dexrazoxane-induced γ-H2AX accumulation was dependent on ATM. ATF3 protein was induced by dexrazoxane in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, which was abolished in TOP2A-depleted cells and in cells pre-incubated with ATM inhibitor. Knockdown of ATF3 gene expression by siRNA triggered apoptosis in control cells and diminished the p53 protein level in both control and dexrazoxane -treated cells. This was accompanied by increased γ-H2AX accumulation. ATF3 knockdown also delayed the repair of dexrazoxane -induced DNA double-strand breaks.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

As with other TOP2A poisons, dexrazoxane induced DNA double-strand breaks followed by activation of the DNA damage response. The DNA damage-triggered ATF3 controlled p53 accumulation and generation of double-strand breaks and is proposed to serve as a switch between DNA damage and cell death following dexrazoxane treatment. These findings suggest a mechanistic explanation for the diverse clinical observations associated with dexrazoxane.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel anthracycline derivative 5-imino-13-deoxydoxorubicin (GPX-150) in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

5-imino-13-deoxydoxorubicin (DIDOX; GPX-150) is a doxorubicin analog modified in two locations to prevent formation of cardiotoxic metabolites and reactive oxygen species. Preclinical studies have demonstrated anti-cancer activity without cardiotoxicity. A phase I study was performed in order to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of GPX-150 in patients with metastatic solid tumors.

METHODS

GPX-150 was administered as an intravenous infusion every 21 days for up to 8 cycles. An accelerated dose escalation was used for the first three treatment groups. The dosing groups were (A) 14 mg/m(2), (B) 28 mg/m(2), (C), 56 mg/m(2), (D) 84 mg/m(2), (E) 112 mg/m(2), (F) 150 mg/m(2), (G) 200 mg/m(2), and (H) 265 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic samples were drawn during the first 72 h of cycle 1.

RESULTS

The MTD was considered to be reached at the highest dosing level of 265 mg/m(2) since dose reduction was required in 5 of 6 patients for neutropenia. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, anemia, fatigue, and nausea. No patients experienced cardiotoxicity while on the study. The best overall response was stable disease in four (20 %) patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed an AUC of 8.0 (±2.6) μg · h/mL, a clearance of 607 (±210) mL/min/m(2) and a t1/2β of 13.8 (±4.6) hours.

CONCLUSIONS

GPX-150 administered every 21 days has an acceptable side effect profile and no cardiotoxicity was observed. Further investigation is needed to determine the efficacy of GPX-150 in anthracycline-sensitive malignancies.

Synthesis and analysis of novel analogues of dexrazoxane and its open-ring hydrolysis product for protection against anthracycline cardiotoxicity in vitro and in vivo

Topoisomerase II beta, rather than (or along with) iron chelation, may be a promising target for cardioprotection.

Pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in pregnant women

PURPOSE

Our objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of doxorubicin during pregnancy compared to previously published data from non-pregnant subjects.

METHODS

During mid- to late-pregnancy, serial blood and urine samples were collected over 72 h from seven women treated with doxorubicin for malignancies. PK parameters were estimated using non-compartmental techniques. Pregnancy parameters were compared to those previously reported non-pregnant subjects.

RESULTS

During pregnancy, mean (±SD) doxorubicin PK parameters utilizing 72 h sampling were: clearance (CL), 412 ± 80 mL/min/m(2); steady-state volume of distribution (Vss), 1,132 ± 476 L/m(2); and terminal half-life (T1/2), 40.3 ± 8.9 h. The BSA-adjusted CL was significantly decreased (p < 0.01) and T1/2 was not different compared to non-pregnant women. Truncating our data to 48 h, PK parameters were: CL, 499 ± 116 ml/min/m(2); Vss, 843 ± 391 L/m(2); and T1/2, 24.8 ± 5.9 h. The BSA-adjusted CL in pregnancy compared to non-pregnant data was significantly decreased in 2 of 3 non-pregnant studies (p < 0.05, < 0.05, NS). Vss and T1/2 were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In pregnant subjects, we observed significantly lower doxorubicin CL in our 72 h and most of our 48 h sampling comparisons with previously reported non-pregnant subjects. However, the parameters were within the range previously reported in smaller studies. At this time, we cannot recommend alternate dosage strategies for pregnant women. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism of doxorubicin pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy and optimize care for pregnant women.

Oxidative stress, redox signaling, and metal chelation in anthracycline cardiotoxicity and pharmacological cardioprotection

SIGNIFICANCE

Anthracyclines (doxorubicin, daunorubicin, or epirubicin) rank among the most effective anticancer drugs, but their clinical usefulness is hampered by the risk of cardiotoxicity. The most feared are the chronic forms of cardiotoxicity, characterized by irreversible cardiac damage and congestive heart failure. Although the pathogenesis of anthracycline cardiotoxicity seems to be complex, the pivotal role has been traditionally attributed to the iron-mediated formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In clinics, the bisdioxopiperazine agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) reduces the risk of anthracycline cardiotoxicity without a significant effect on response to chemotherapy. The prevailing concept describes dexrazoxane as a prodrug undergoing bioactivation to an iron-chelating agent ADR-925, which may inhibit anthracycline-induced ROS formation and oxidative damage to cardiomyocytes.

RECENT ADVANCES

A considerable body of evidence points to mitochondria as the key targets for anthracycline cardiotoxicity, and therefore it could be also crucial for effective cardioprotection. Numerous antioxidants and several iron chelators have been tested in vitro and in vivo with variable outcomes. None of these compounds have matched or even surpassed the effectiveness of dexrazoxane in chronic anthracycline cardiotoxicity settings, despite being stronger chelators and/or antioxidants.

CRITICAL ISSUES

The interpretation of many findings is complicated by the heterogeneity of experimental models and frequent employment of acute high-dose treatments with limited translatability to clinical practice.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Dexrazoxane may be the key to the enigma of anthracycline cardiotoxicity, and therefore it warrants further investigation, including the search for alternative/complementary modes of cardioprotective action beyond simple iron chelation.

Utility of dexrazoxane for the reduction of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity

Dexrazoxane is a derivative of the powerful metal-chelating agent ethyl enediamine tetra acetic acid. Its cardioprotective effect is thought to be due to its ability to chelate iron and reduce the number of metal ions complexed with anthracycline and, consequently, decrease the formation of superoxide radicals. Preclinical studies have confirmed that dexrazoxane has significant activity as a cardioprotective agent against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane is well-tolerated, with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity in Phase I trials. The cardioprotective utility of dexrazoxane has been further illustrated in a number of randomized trials. In addition no significant difference in survival has been observed between the dexrazoxane and control arms of these trials but, in one, a significantly lower response rate was observed in the dexrazoxane compared to placebo arm. Further trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of dexrazoxane in hematological malignancies as well as the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Its use in the paediatric setting and in the management of elderly patients with cardiac comorbidity also requires investigation. Recently, interest has focused on the use of dexrazoxane as an antidote for anthracycline extravasation. In addition the general cytoprotective activity of this drug requires further assessment, as well as selectivity in this context.

Dexrazoxane prevents doxorubicin-induced long-term cardiotoxicity and protects myocardial mitochondria from genetic and functional lesions in rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Doxorubicin causes a chronic cardiomyopathy in which reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate over time and are associated with genetic and functional lesions of mitochondria. Dexrazoxane is a cardioprotective iron chelator that interferes with ROS production. We aim to analyze the effects of dexrazoxane on mitochondria in the prevention of doxorubicin-induced chronic myocardial lesions.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Wistar rats (11 weeks of age) were injected with intravenous doxorubicin (0.8 mg kg(-1) weekly for 7 weeks) with or without simultaneous dexrazoxane (8 mg kg(-1)). Animals were killed at 48 weeks. Cardiomyopathy was scored clinically and histologically and cardiac mitochondria were analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

Compared to control rats receiving saline, rats treated with doxorubicin alone developed a clinical, macroscopic, histological and ultrastructural cardiomyopathy with low cytochrome c-oxidase (COX) activity (26% of controls). The expression of the mtDNA-encoded COX II subunit was reduced (64% of controls). Myocardia exhibited a high production of ROS (malondialdehyde 338% and superoxide 787% of controls). Mitochondria were depleted of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA copy number 46% of controls) and contained elevated levels of mtDNA deletions. Dexrazoxane co-administration prevented all these effects of doxorubicin on mitochondria, except that hearts co-exposed to doxorubicin and dexrazoxane had a slightly lower mtDNA content (81% of controls) and mtDNA deletions at low frequency.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Dexrazoxane prevented doxorubicin induced late-onset cardiomyopathy and also protected the cardiac mitochondria from acquired ultrastructural, genetic and functional damage.

Dexrazoxane prevents myocardial ischemia/reperfusion-induced oxidative stress in the rat heart

INTRODUCTION

Dexrazoxane (Dex), used clinically to protect against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, possesses iron-chelating properties. The present study was designed to examine whether Dex could inhibit the ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) induced damage to the rat heart.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolated perfused rat hearts were exposed to global ischemia (37 degrees C) and 60 min reperfusion. Dex was perfused for 10 min prior to the ischemia, or administered intraperitoneally (150 mg) 30 min prior to anesthesia of the rats. I/R caused a significant hemodynamic function decline in control hearts during the reperfusion (e.g., the work index LVDP X HR declined to 42.7+/-10%). Dex (200 microM) applied during the preischemia significantly increased the hemodynamic recovery following reperfusion (LVDP X HR recovered to 55.7+/-8.8%, p<0.05 vs. control). Intraperitoneal Dex, too, significantly increased the hemodynamic recovery of the reperfused hearts. I/R caused an increase in oxidation of cytosolic proteins, while Dex decreased this oxidation.

DISCUSSION

The decrease in proteins carbonylation and correlative hemodynamic improvement suggests that Dex decreases I/R free radical formation and reperfusion injury.

Thrombopoietin protects against in vitro and in vivo cardiotoxicity induced by doxorubicin

BACKGROUND

Doxorubicin (DOX) is an important antineoplastic agent. However, the associated cardiotoxicity, possibly mediated by the production of reactive oxygen species, has remained a significant and dose-limiting clinical problem. Our hypothesis is that the hematopoietic/megakaryocytopoietic growth factor thrombopoietin (TPO) protects against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and might involve antiapoptotic mechanism exerted on cardiomyocytes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In vitro investigations on H9C2 cell line and spontaneously beating cells of primary, neonatal rat ventricle, as well as an in vivo study in a mouse model of DOX-induced acute cardiomyopathy, were performed. Our results showed that pretreatment with TPO significantly increased viability of DOX-injured H9C2 cells and beating rates of neonatal myocytes, with effects similar to those of dexrazoxane, a clinically approved cardiac protective agent. TPO ameliorated DOX-induced apoptosis of H9C2 cells as demonstrated by assays of annexin V, active caspase-3, and mitochondrial membrane potential. In the mouse model, administration of TPO (12.5 microg/kg IP for 3 alternate days) significantly reduced DOX-induced (20 mg/kg) cardiotoxicity, including low blood cell count, cardiomyocyte lesions (apoptosis, vacuolization, and myofibrillar loss), and animal mortality. Using Doppler echocardiography, we observed increased heart rate, fractional shortening, and cardiac output in animals pretreated with TPO compared with those receiving DOX alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These data have provided the first evidence that TPO is a protective agent against DOX-induced cardiac injury. We propose to further explore an integrated program, incorporating TPO with other protocols, for treatment of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity and other forms of cardiomyopathy.

Dexrazoxane : a review of its use for cardioprotection during anthracycline chemotherapy

Dexrazoxane (Cardioxane, Zinecard, a cyclic derivative of edetic acid, is a site-specific cardioprotective agent that effectively protects against anthracycline-induced cardiac toxicity. Dexrazoxane is approved in the US and some European countries for cardioprotection in women with advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer receiving doxorubicin; in other countries dexrazoxane is approved for use in a wider range of patients with advanced cancer receiving anthracyclines. As shown in clinical trials, intravenous dexrazoxane significantly reduces the incidence of anthracycline-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) and adverse cardiac events in women with advanced breast cancer or adults with soft tissue sarcomas or small-cell lung cancer, regardless of whether the drug is given before the first dose of anthracycline or the administration is delayed until cumulative doxorubicin dose is > or =300 mg/m2. The drug also appears to offer cardioprotection irrespective of pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Importantly, the antitumour efficacy of anthracyclines is unlikely to be altered by dexrazoxane use, although the drug has not been shown to improve progression-free and overall patient survival. At present, the cardioprotective efficacy of dexrazoxane in patients with childhood malignancies is supported by limited data. The drug is generally well tolerated and has a tolerability profile similar to that of placebo in cancer patients undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy, with the exception of a higher incidence of severe leukopenia (78% vs 68%; p < 0.01). Dexrazoxane is the only cardioprotective agent with proven efficacy in cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy and is a valuable option for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in this patient population.

Metabolism of the one-ring open metabolites of the cardioprotective drug dexrazoxane to its active metal-chelating form in the rat

Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) is clinically used as a doxorubicin cardioprotective agent and may act by preventing iron-based oxygen free radical damage through the iron-chelating ability of its fully hydrolyzed metabolite ADR-925 (N,N'-[(1S)-1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl]-bis[(N-(2-amino-2-oxoethyl)]glycine). Dexrazoxane undergoes initial metabolism to its two one-ring open intermediates and is then further metabolized to its active metal ion-binding form ADR-925. The metabolism of these intermediates to the ring-opened metal-chelating product ADR-925 has been determined in a rat model to identify the mechanism by which dexrazoxane is activated. The plasma concentrations of both intermediates rapidly decreased after their i.v. administration to rats. A maximum concentration of ADR-925 was detected 2 min after i.v. bolus administration, indicating that these intermediates were both rapidly metabolized in vivo to ADR-925. The kinetics of the initial appearance of ADR-925 was consistent with formation rate-limited metabolism of the intermediates. After administration of dexrazoxane or its two intermediates, ADR-925 was detected in significant levels in both heart and liver tissue but was undetectable in brain tissue. The rapid rate of metabolism of the intermediates was consistent with their hydrolysis by tissue dihydroorotase. The rapid appearance of ADR-925 in plasma may make ADR-925 available to be taken up by heart tissue and bind free iron. These studies showed that the two one-ring open metabolites of dexrazoxane were rapidly metabolized in the rat to ADR-925, and thus, these results provide a mechanism by which dexrazoxane is activated to its active metal-binding form.

Dexrazoxane Protects against Myelosuppression from the DNA Cleavage–Enhancing Drugs Etoposide and Daunorubicin but not Doxorubicin

PURPOSE

The anthracyclines daunorubicin and doxorubicin and the epipodophyllotoxin etoposide are potent DNA cleavage-enhancing drugs that are widely used in clinical oncology; however, myelosuppression and cardiac toxicity limit their use. Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) is recommended for protection against anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Because of their widespread use, the hematologic toxicity following coadministration of dexrazoxane and these three structurally different DNA cleavage enhancers was investigated: Sensitivity of human and murine blood progenitor cells to etoposide, daunorubicin, and doxorubicin +/- dexrazoxane was determined in granulocyte-macrophage colony forming assays. Likewise, in vivo, B6D2F1 mice were treated with etoposide, daunorubicin, and doxorubicin, with or without dexrazoxane over a wide range of doses: posttreatment, a full hematologic evaluation was done.

RESULTS

Nontoxic doses of dexrazoxane reduced myelosuppression and weight loss from daunorubicin and etoposide in mice and antagonized their antiproliferative effects in the colony assay; however, dexrazoxane neither reduced myelosuppression, weight loss, nor the in vitro cytotoxicity from doxorubicin.

CONCLUSION

Although our findings support the observation that dexrazoxane reduces neither hematologic activity nor antitumor activity from doxorubicin clinically, the potent antagonism of daunorubicin activity raises concern; a possible interference with anticancer efficacy certainly would call for renewed attention. Our data also suggest that significant etoposide dose escalation is perhaps possible by the use of dexrazoxane. Clinical trials in patients with brain metastases combining dexrazoxane and high doses of etoposide is ongoing with the aim of improving efficacy without aggravating hematologic toxicity. If successful, this represents an exciting mechanism for pharmacologic regulation of side effects from cytotoxic chemotherapy.

METABOLISM OF THE CARDIOPROTECTIVE DRUG DEXRAZOXANE AND ONE OF ITS METABOLITES BY ISOLATED RAT MYOCYTES, HEPATOCYTES, AND BLOOD

The metabolism of the antioxidant cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) and one of its one-ring open metabolites to its active metal ion binding form N,N'-[(1S)-1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl-]bis[(N-(2-amino-2-oxoethyl)]glycine (ADR-925) has been investigated in neonatal rat myocyte and adult rat hepatocyte suspensions, and in human and rat blood and plasma with a view to characterizing their hydrolysis-activation. Dexrazoxane is clinically used to reduce the iron-based oxygen free radical-mediated cardiotoxicity of the anticancer drug doxorubicin. Dexrazoxane may act through its hydrolysis product ADR-925 by removing iron from the iron-doxorubicin complex, or binding free iron, thus preventing oxygen radical formation. Our results indicate that dexrazoxane underwent partial uptake and/or hydrolysis by myocytes. A one-ring open metabolite of dexrazoxane underwent nearly complete dihydroorotase-catalyzed metabolism in a myocyte suspension. Hepatocytes that contain both dihydropyrimidinase and dihydroorotase completely hydrolyzed dexrazoxane to ADR-925 and released it into the extracellular medium. Thus, in hepatocytes, the two liver enzymes acted in concert, and sequentially, on dexrazoxane, first to produce the two ring-opened metabolites, and then to produce the metabolite ADR-925. We also showed that the hydrolysis of one of these metabolites was promoted by Ca2+ and Mg2+ in plasma, and thus, further metabolism of these intermediates likely occurs in the plasma after they are released from the liver and kidney. In conclusion, these studies provide a nearly complete description of the metabolism of dexrazoxane by myocytes and hepatocytes to its presumably active form, ADR-925.

The iron chelating cardioprotective prodrug dexrazoxane does not affect the cell growth inhibitory effects of bleomycin

The clinical use of bleomycin is limited by a dose-dependent pulmonary toxicity. Bleomycin is thought to be growth inhibitory by virtue of its ability to oxidatively damage DNA through its complex with iron. Our previous preclinical studies showed that bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity can be reduced by pretreatment with the doxorubicin cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane. Dexrazoxane is thought to protect against iron-based oxygen radical damage through the iron chelating ability of its hydrolyzed metabolite ADR-925, an analog of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). ADR-925 quickly and effectively displaced either ferrous or ferric iron from its complex with bleomycin. This result suggests that dexrazoxane may have the potential to antagonize the iron-dependent growth inhibitory effects of bleomycin. A study was undertaken to determine if dexrazoxane could antagonize bleomycin-mediated cytotoxicity using a CHO-derived cell line (DZR) that was highly resistant to dexrazoxane through a threonine-48 to isoleucine mutation in topoisomerase IIalpha. Dexrazoxane is also a cell growth inhibitor that acts through its ability to inhibit the catalytic activity of topoisomerase II. Thus, the DZR cell line allowed us to examine the cell growth inhibitory effects of bleomycin in the presence of dexrazoxane without the confounding effect of dexrazoxane inhibiting cell growth. The cell growth inhibitory effects of bleomycin were unaffected by pretreating DZR cells with dexrazoxane. These results suggest that dexrazoxane may be clinically used in combination with bleomycin as a pulmonary protective agent without adversely affecting the antitumor activity of bleomycin.

Feasibility and pharmacokinetic study of infusional dexrazoxane and dose-intensive doxorubicin administered concurrently over 96 h for the treatment of advanced malignancies

PURPOSE

Dexrazoxane administration prior to short infusion doxorubicin prevents anthracycline-related heart damage. Since delivery of doxorubicin by 96-h continuous intravenous infusion also reduces cardiac injury, we studied delivering dexrazoxane and doxorubicin concomitantly by prolonged intravenous infusion.

METHODS

Patients with advanced malignancies received tandem cycles of concurrent 96-h infusions of dexrazoxane 500 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 165 mg/m2, and 24 h after completion of chemotherapy, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (5 microg/kg) and oral levofloxacin (500 mg) were administered daily until the white blood cell count reached 10,000 microl(-1). Plasma samples were analyzed for dexrazoxane and doxorubicin concentrations.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled; eight patients had measurable disease. Two partial responses were observed in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma. The median number of days of granulocytopenia (<500 microl(-1)) was nine and of platelet count <20,000 microl(-1) was seven. Six patients received a single cycle because of progression (one), stable disease (four), or reversible, asymptomatic 10% decrease in cardiac ejection fraction (two). Principal grade 3/4 toxicities included hypotension (two), anorexia (four), stomatitis (four), typhlitis (two), and febrile neutropenia (seven), with documented infection (three). One death from neutropenic sepsis occurred. Dexrazoxane levels ranged from 1270 to 2800 nM, and doxorubicin levels ranged from 59.1 to 106.9 nM.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that tandem cycles of concurrent 96-h infusions of dexrazoxane and high-dose doxorubicin can be administered with minimal cardiac toxicity, and have activity in patients with recurrent sarcomas. However, significant non-cardiac toxicities indicate that the cardiac sparing potential of this approach would be maximized at lower dose levels of doxorubicin.

Anthracyclines: Molecular Advances and Pharmacologic Developments in Antitumor Activity and Cardiotoxicity

The clinical use of anthracyclines like doxorubicin and daunorubicin can be viewed as a sort of double-edged sword. On the one hand, anthracyclines play an undisputed key role in the treatment of many neoplastic diseases; on the other hand, chronic administration of anthracyclines induces cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure usually refractory to common medications. Second-generation analogs like epirubicin or idarubicin exhibit improvements in their therapeutic index, but the risk of inducing cardiomyopathy is not abated. It is because of their janus behavior (activity in tumors vis-à-vis toxicity in cardiomyocytes) that anthracyclines continue to attract the interest of preclinical and clinical investigations despite their longer-than-40-year record of longevity. Here we review recent progresses that may serve as a framework for reappraising the activity and toxicity of anthracyclines on basic and clinical pharmacology grounds. We review 1) new aspects of anthracycline-induced DNA damage in cancer cells; 2) the role of iron and free radicals as causative factors of apoptosis or other forms of cardiac damage; 3) molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxic synergism between anthracyclines and other anticancer agents; 4) the pharmacologic rationale and clinical recommendations for using cardioprotectants while not interfering with tumor response; 5) the development of tumor-targeted anthracycline formulations; and 6) the designing of third-generation analogs and their assessment in preclinical or clinical settings. An overview of these issues confirms that anthracyclines remain "evergreen" drugs with broad clinical indications but have still an improvable therapeutic index.

Cardiotoxicity of cytotoxic drugs

Cardiotoxicity is a well-known side effect of several cytotoxic drugs, especially of the anthracyclines and can lead to long term morbidity. The mechanism of anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity seems to involve the formation of free radicals leading to oxidative stress. This may cause apoptosis of cardiac cells or immunologic reactions. However, alternative mechanisms may play a role in anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity. Cardiac protection can be achieved by limitation of the cumulative dose. Furthermore, addition of the antioxidant and iron chelator dexrazoxane to anthracycline therapy has shown to be effective in lowering the incidence of anthracycline induced cardiotoxicity. Other cytotoxic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and the taxoids are associated with cardiotoxicity as well, although little is known about the possible mechanisms. Recently, it appeared that some novel cytotoxic drugs such as trastuzumab and cyclopentenyl cytosine also show cardiotoxic side effects.

The oral iron chelator ICL670A (deferasirox) does not protect myocytes against doxorubicin

The oral iron chelating agent ICL670A (deferasirox) and the clinically approved cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) were compared for their ability to protect neonatal rat cardiac myocytes from doxorubicin-induced damage. Doxorubicin is thought to induce oxidative stress on the heart muscle through iron-mediated oxygen radical damage. While dexrazoxane was able to protect myocytes from doxorubicin-induced lactate dehydrogenase release, ICL670A, in contrast, depending upon the concentration, synergistically increased or did not affect the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin. This occurred in spite of the fact that ICL670A quickly and efficiently removed iron(III) from its complex with doxorubicin, and rapidly entered myocytes and displaced iron from a fluorescence-quenched trapped intracellular iron-calcein complex. Continuous exposure of ICL670A to either myocytes or Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells resulted in cytotoxicity while treatment of CHO cells with the ferric complex of ICL670A did not. These results suggest that ICL670A was cytotoxic either by removing or withholding iron from critical iron-containing proteins. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to show that neither ICL670A nor its ferric complex were able to generate free radicals in either oxidizing or reducing systems suggesting that its cytotoxicity is not due to radical generation.

Prevention of doxorubicin-induced damage to rat heart myocytes by arginine analog nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and their enantiomers

The clinical use of the widely used anticancer drug doxorubicin is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. Doxorubicin can be reduced to its semiquinone free radical form by nitric oxide synthases (NOS). The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from doxorubicin-treated neonatal cardiac rat myocytes was used as a model of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. The NOS inhibitors N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) protected myocytes from doxorubicin as did their non-inhibitory enantiomers D-NAME and D-NMMA. Thus, these agents did not protect by inhibiting NOS. L-NAME, which does not act at the reductase domain of NOS, also had no effect on the production of the doxorubicin semiquinone by myocytes. Nitric oxide (NO) EPR spin trapping experiments showed that L-NAME reacted with various biological reducing agents to produce NO. Ascorbic acid was highly effective in reacting with L-NAME to produce NO, while glutathione, NADPH, and NADH were much less effective. Thus, these guanadino-substituted analogs of L-arginine likely protected through their ability to slowly produce NO by reaction with intracellular ascorbic acid. Thus, some caution must be exercised in their use. NO may exert its protective effects either by directly acting as an antioxidant or through some other NO-dependent pathway.

The metabolites of the cardioprotective drug dexrazoxane do not protect myocytes from doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity

The clinically approved cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) and two of its hydrolyzed metabolites (a one-ring open form of dexrazoxane and ADR-925) were examined for their ability to protect neonatal rat cardiac myocytes from doxorubicin-induced damage. Dexrazoxane may protect against doxorubicin-induced damage to myocytes through its strongly metal-chelating hydrolysis product ADR-925, which could act by displacing iron bound to doxorubicin or chelating free or loosely bound iron, thus preventing site-specific iron-based oxygen radical damage. The results of this study showed that whereas dexrazoxane was able to protect myocytes from doxorubicin-induced lactate dehydrogenase release, neither of the metabolites displayed any protective ability. Dexrazoxane also reduced apoptosis in doxorubicin-treated myocytes. The ability of dexrazoxane and its three metabolites to displace iron from a fluorescence-quenched trapped intracellular iron-calcein complex was also determined to see whether the metabolites were taken up by myocytes. Although ADR-925 was taken up in the absence of calcium in the medium, in the presence of calcium, its uptake was greatly slowed, presumably because it formed a complex with calcium. Both of the one-ring open metabolites were taken up by myocytes and displaced iron from its complex with calcein. These results suggest either that the anionic metabolites do not have the same access to iron pools in critical cellular compartments, that their uptake is slowed in the presence of calcium, or, less likely, that dexrazoxane protects by some other mechanism.

Catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitors in cancer therapy

The nuclear enzyme DNA topoisomerase II is a major target for antineoplastic agents. All topoisomerase II-directed agents are able to interfere with at least one step of the catalytic cycle. Agents able to stabilize the covalent DNA topoisomerase II complex (also known as the cleavable complex) are traditionally called topoisomerase II poisons, while agents acting on any of the other steps in the catalytic cycle are called catalytic inhibitors. Thus, catalytic topoisomerase II inhibitors are a heterogeneous group of compounds that might interfere with the binding between DNA and topoisomerase II (aclarubicin and suramin), stabilize noncovalent DNA topoisomerase II complexes (merbarone, ICRF-187, and structurally related bisdioxopiperazine derivatives), or inhibit ATP binding (novobiocin). Some, such as fostriecin, may also have alternative biological targets. Whereas topoisomerase II poisons are used solely for their antitumor activities, catalytic inhibitors are utilized for a variety of reasons, including their activity as antineoplastic agents (aclarubicin and MST-16), cardioprotectors (ICRF-187), or modulators in order to increase the efficacy of other agents (suramin and novobiocin). In this review, the mechanism and biological activity of different catalytic inhibitors is described, with emphasis on therapeutically used compounds. We will then discuss future development and applications of this interesting class of compounds.

Dihydroorotase catalyzes the ring opening of the hydrolysis intermediates of the cardioprotective drug dexrazoxane (ICRF-187)

The enzyme kinetics of the hydrolysis of the one-ring open metabolites of the antioxidant cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane [ICRF-187; (+)-1,2-bis(3,5-dioxopiperazin-1-yl)propane] to its active metal ion binding form ADR-925 [N,N'-[(1S)-1-methyl-1,2-ethanediyl]bis[N-(2-amino-2-oxoethyl)glycine] by dihydroorotase (DHOase) has been investigated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A spectrophotometric detection HPLC assay for dihydroorotate was also developed. Dexrazoxane is clinically used to reduce the iron-based oxygen free radical-mediated cardiotoxicity of the anticancer drug doxorubicin. DHOase was found to catalyze the ring opening of the metabolites with an apparent V(max) that was 11- and 27-fold greater than its natural substrate dihydroorotate. However, the apparent K(m) for the metabolites was 240- and 550-fold larger than for dihydroorotate. This report is the first that DHOase might be involved in the metabolism of a drug. Furosemide inhibited DHOase, but the neutral 4-chlorobenzenesulfonamide did not. Because dihydroorotate, the one-ring open metabolites, and furosemide all have a carboxylate group, it was concluded that a negative charge on the substrate strengthened binding to the positively charged active site. The presence of DHOase in the heart may explain the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane. Thus, dihydropyrimidinase and DHOase acting in succession on dexrazoxane and its metabolites to form ADR-925 provide a mechanism by which dexrazoxane is activated to exert its cardioprotective effects. The ADR-925 thus formed may either remove iron from the iron-doxorubicin complex, or bind free iron, thus preventing oxygen radical formation.

Deferiprone protects against doxorubicin-induced myocyte cytotoxicity

The iron chelating hydroxypyridinone deferiprone (CP20, L1) and the clinically approved cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) were examined for their ability to protect neonatal rat cardiac myocytes from doxorubicin-induced damage. Doxorubicin is thought to induce oxidative stress on the heart muscle, both through reductive activation to its semiquinone form, and by the production of hydroxyl radicals mediated by its complex with iron. The results of this study showed that both deferiprone and dexrazoxane were able to protect myocytes from doxorubicin-induced lactate dehydrogenase release. Deferiprone quickly and efficiently removed iron(III) from its complex with doxorubicin. In addition, this study also showed that deferiprone rapidly entered myocytes and displaced iron from a fluorescence-quenched trapped intracellular iron-calcein complex, suggesting that in the myocyte, deferiprone should also be able to displace iron from its complex with doxorubicin. It was shown by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy that under hypoxic conditions myocytes were able to reduce doxorubicin to its semiquinone free radical. Deferiprone also greatly reduced hydroxyl radical production by the iron(III)-doxorubicin complex in the xanthine oxidase/xanthine superoxide generating system. Together these results suggest that deferiprone may protect against doxorubicin-induced damage to myocytes by displacing iron bound to doxorubicin, or chelating free or loosely bound iron, thus preventing site-specific iron-based oxygen radical damage.

Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: current practice and prospects of prophylaxis

Cardiotoxicity is a potential side effect of few chemotherapeutic agents. The anthracycline class of cytotoxic antibiotics are the most famous, but other chemotherapeutic agents can also cause serious cardiotoxicity and are not so well recognised. Examples include cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, mitomycin and fluorouracil. Prediction and hence prophylaxis has always been a difficult task. Ideal monitoring techniques, upon which efficient prophylaxis depends, are yet to be determined. Current prophylaxis relies upon early detection of systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction. While somewhat useful, in some cases by the time defects are detected progression of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy is beyond prevention. Prophylaxis would be much more efficient if a biochemical marker of myocardiocyte damage could be reliably used to stop further chemotherapy at the correct time before irreversible progressive 'macroscopic' damage becomes evident upon imaging. Work is currently progressing to identify the role of markers such as troponins and natriuretic peptides in this regard.

Dexrazoxane pre-treatment protects skinned rat cardiac trabeculae against delayed doxorubicin-induced impairment of crossbridge kinetics

1. Dexrazoxane (DXR, ICRF-187) has been shown both in animal studies and clinical trials to provide a substantial cardioprotection when co-administered with anthracycline drugs like Doxorubicin (DOX). In a previous study, we showed that chronic DOX treatment in rats is associated with a clear impairment of the crossbridge kinetics and shift in myosin iso-enzymes. 2. The present study was adopted to investigate whether the cardioprotective action of DXR involves preservation of the normal actin-myosin interaction. Rats were treated for 4 weeks with either DOX at a weekly dose of 2 mg kg(-1) (i.v.), or were pre-injected with DXR (40 mg kg(-1), i.v.) at a 20 : 1 dose ratio 30 min prior to the DOX infusion. Rats receiving saline or DXR alone were included in the experiments. Cardiac trabeculae were isolated 4 weeks after the last infusion and were skinned with detergent. 3. Crossbridge turnover kinetics were studied after application of rapid length perturbations of varying amplitudes in Ca(2+)-activated preparations. DXR treatment offered a significant protection against the DOX-induced impairment of the crossbridge kinetics in isolated cardiac trabeculae. Time constants describing transitions between different crossbridge states were restored to normal in both the quick release protocol and the slack-test. DXR prevented the shift from the 'high ATPase' alpha-myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform towards the 'low-ATPase' beta-MHC isoform in the ventricles. 4. We conclude that pre-administration of DXR in rats greatly reduces the deleterious effects of chronic DOX treatment on the trabecular actin - myosin crossbridge cycle. Preventing direct deleterious effects on the actin - myosin crossbridge system may provide a new target for preventing or reducing DOX-related cardiotoxicity and may enable patients to continue the treatment beyond currently imposed limits.

The doxorubicin cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) induces endopolyploidy in rat neonatal myocytes through inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II

Dexrazoxane (ICRF-187), which is clinically used to reduce doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, is also a potent catalytic inhibitor of DNA topoisomerase II. In this study we showed that dexrazoxane inhibited the division of neonatal rat ventricular myocytes in culture, and resulted in nuclear multilobulation (demonstrated by three-dimensional reconstruction of confocal images) and marked increases in nuclear size and DNA ploidy levels (as shown by flow cytometry). It was concluded that dexrazoxane interfered with cell division in cardiac myocytes by virtue of its ability to inhibit topoisomerase II.

High-performance liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of topoisomerase II inhibitors

Various methods for separating eleven different types of topoisomerase II (TOPO-2) inhibitors, including epipodophyllotoxins, anthracyclines, anthracenediones, anthrapyrazoles, anthracenebishydrazones, indole derivatives, aminoacridines, benzisoquinolinediones, isoflavones, bisdioxopiperazines and thiobarbituric acids, are summarized. Proper sample preparation and storage is critical to the successful analysis of some TOPO-2 inhibitors due to difficulties associated with adsorption, instability and complex biological components. Solid-phase and liquid-liquid extractions are widely used to separate TOPO-2 inhibitors from biological samples, although simple deproteinization followed by direct analysis of the supernatant is preferable to extraction based on its speed and simplicity. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is the favored method for the bioanalysis of TOPO-2 inhibitors. UV or diode array detection is generally employed for early pharmacokinetic studies, while fluorescence or electrochemical detection is used more frequently for analytes with fluorescent or oxidative-reductive properties. For analyses requiring highly sensitive and/or specific detection, electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS or ESI-MS-MS) provides a suitable alternative. A comprehensive compilation of the HPLC techniques currently used to separate TOPO-2 inhibitors will aid the future development of analytical methods for new TOPO-2 inhibitors.

In vitro effects of dexrazoxane (Zinecard) and classical acute leukemia therapy: time to consider expanded clinical trials?

Anthracyclines have been the backbone of acute leukemia therapy in the adult for many years, but little attention has been paid to the long-term toxicity of these agents in this disease because of the poor survival of this population of patients. Recent studies have examined dose-intensified daunorubicin with dosages as high as 95 mg/m2 daily x 3 in this population with the attendant concerns of both acute and chronic toxicity. We have examined three human leukemia cell lines in vitro, treated with either daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, with or without cytosine arabinoside in the presence of dexrazoxane to determine whether such treatment would be synergistic or antagonistic. AML-193, CRF-SB, and Molt-4 cell lines were grown to confluence, plated into microtiter dishes and incubated for 72 h with varying concentrations of the above drugs. Cytotoxicity was determined by the MTT assay, and synergy or antagonism by median effect analysis. Dexrazoxane demonstrated additive or synergistic cytotoxic effects (CI <1) under most conditions. The triplet of daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and dexrazoxane showed profound synergy in all three cell lines. These effects occurred at clinically achievable levels. If high dosages of anthracyclines are contemplated in this population, these preclinical data suggest that the addition of dexrazoxane to classical therapy is not antagonistic and thus may allow an investigation of the role of dexrazoxane as a cardiac protectant.

The displacement of iron(III) from its complexes with the anticancer drugs piroxantrone and losoxantrone by the hydrolyzed form of the cardioprotective agent dexrazoxane

Piroxantrone and losoxantrone are new DNA topoisomerase II-targeting anthrapyrazole antitumor agents that display cardiotoxicity both clinically and in animal models. A study was undertaken to see whether dexrazoxane or its hydrolysis product ADR-925 could remove iron(III) from its complexes with piroxantrone or losoxantrone. Their cardiotoxicity may result from the formation of iron(III) complexes of losoxantrone and piroxantrone. Subsequent reductive activation of their iron(III) complexes likely results in oxygen-free radical-mediated cardiotoxicity. Dexrazoxane is in clinical use as a doxorubicin cardioprotective agent. Dexrazoxane presumably acts through its hydrolyzed metal ion binding form ADR-925 by removing iron(III) from its complex with doxorubicin, or by scavenging free iron(III), thus preventing oxygen-free radical-based oxidative damage to the heart tissue. ADR-925 was able to remove iron(III) from its complexes with piroxantrone and losoxantrone, though not as efficiently or as quickly as it could from its complexes with doxorubicin and other anthracyclines. This study provides a basis for utilizing dexrazoxane for the clinical prevention of anthrapyrazole cardiotoxicity.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants

PURPOSE

Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth

Stereoselective metabolism of dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) and levrazoxane (ICRF-186)

A chiral HPLC method has been developed to separate razoxane (ICRF-159) in blood plasma into its enantiomers dexrazoxane (ICRF-187) and levrazoxane (ICRF-186). Dexrazoxane is clinically used as a doxorubicin cardioprotective agent and little is known of its in vivo metabolism. After intravenous administration of 20 mg/kg of razoxane to rats, the razoxane was eliminated from the plasma with a half-time of approximately 20 min. The levrazoxane:dexrazoxane ratio continuously increased with time to a value of 1.5 at 150 min, indicating that dexrazoxane is metabolized faster than levrazoxane. These results, confirmed with studies on liver supernatants, are consistent with the hypothesis that dihydropyrimidine amidohydrolase in the liver and kidney is responsible for the preferential metabolism of dexrazoxane in the rat compared to levrazoxane. It is possible that on a dose-per-dose basis marginally higher therapeutic levels of levrazoxane might be achieved in the heart tissue for a longer time compared to dexrazoxane due to dihydropyrimidine amidohydrolase-based metabolism in the liver and kidney. However, given the relatively small difference in elimination of the two enantiomers, it would be difficult to predict from this study whether or not dexrazoxane or levrazoxane might be more efficacious in reducing cardiotoxicity.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of paclitaxel plus doxorubicin and dexrazoxane in patients with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerable dose (MTD) of paclitaxel given as a 3-hour intravenous (IV) infusion that could be used in conjunction with doxorubicin and dexrazoxane, and to determine the effect of dexrazoxane on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and doxorubicin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with advanced breast cancer received dexrazoxane (600 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 15 minutes), followed 15 minutes later by doxorubicin (60 mg/m2 IV), followed 15 minutes later by paclitaxel (150 or 175 mg/m2 by IV infusion over 3 hours) in cohorts of three to six patients using a standard phase I design without (group A) and with (group B) granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Treatment continued until there was a substantial decrease in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), congestive heart failure, progressive disease, or physician discretion to discontinue.

RESULTS

The MTD of paclitaxel was 150 mg/m2, and adjunctive therapy with G-CSF was required to prevent febrile neutropenia. Dexrazoxane had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel or doxorubicin. After a median cumulative doxorubicin dose of 360 mg/m2 (range, 60 to 870 mg/m2), no patient developed congestive heart failure or had a decrease in LVEF below normal. An objective response occurred in all five patients with locally advanced breast cancer and in eight of 20 patients (40%; 95% confidence interval, 19% to 61%) with metastatic breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

When combined with doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) and dexrazoxane (600 mg/m2), paclitaxel given as a 3-hour infusion had an MTD of 150 mg/m2, and G-CSF was required to prevent febrile neutropenia. Dexrazoxane had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel or doxorubicin. No patient in this trial had a decrease in the LVEF below normal, compared with about 20% to 50% of patients treated with doxorubicin and paclitaxel without dexrazoxane in other trials.

Dexrazoxane. A review of its use as a cardioprotective agent in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy

Dexrazoxane has been used successfully to reduce cardiac toxicity in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy for cancer (predominantly women with advanced breast cancer). The drug is thought to reduce the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines by binding to free and bound iron, thereby reducing the formation of anthracycline-iron complexes and the subsequent generation of reactive oxygen species which are toxic to surrounding cardiac tissue. Clinical trials in women with advanced breast cancer have found that patients given dexrazoxane (about 30 minutes prior to anthracycline therapy; dexrazoxane to doxorubicin dosage ratio 20:1 or 10:1) have a significantly lower overall incidence of cardiac events than placebo recipients (14 or 15% vs 31%) when the drug is initiated at the same time as doxorubicin. Cardiac events included congestive heart failure (CHF), a significant reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction and/or a > or = 2-point increase in the Billingham biopsy score. These results are supported by the findings of studies which used control groups (patients who received only chemotherapy) for comparison. The drug appears to offer cardiac protection irrespective of pre-existing cardiac risk factors. In addition, cardiac protection has been shown in patients given the drug after receiving a cumulative doxorubicin dose > or = 300 mg/m2. It remains to be confirmed that dexrazoxane does not affect the antitumour activity of doxorubicin: although most studies found that clinical end-points (including tumour response rates, time to disease progression and survival duration) did not differ significantly between treatment groups, the largest study did show a significant reduction in response rates in dexrazoxane versus placebo recipients. Dexrazoxane permits the administration of doxorubicin beyond standard cumulative doses; however, it is unclear whether this will translate into prolonged survival. Preliminary results (from small nonblind studies) indicate that dexrazoxane reduces cardiac toxicity in children and adolescents receiving anthracycline-based therapy for a range of malignancies. The long term benefits with regard to prevention of late-onset cardiac toxicity remain unclear. With the exception of severe leucopenia [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) grade 3/4 toxicity], the incidence of haematological and nonhaematological adverse events appears similar in patients given dexrazoxane to that in placebo recipients undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Although preliminary pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown dexrazoxane to be a cost-effective agent in women with advanced breast cancer, they require confirmation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexrazoxane is a valuable drug for protecting against cardiac toxicity in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Whether it offers protection against late-onset cardiac toxicity in patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy in childhood or adolescence remains to be determined. Further clinical experience is required to confirm that it does not adversely affect clinical outcome, that it is a cost-effective option, and to determine the optimal treatment regimen.

Dexrazoxane: A New Cardioprotective Agent

Objective:

To review the literature discussing the use of dexrazoxane (e.g., Zinecard, ICRF-187) to prevent doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Data Sources:

Pertinent English-language reports of studies in humans were retrieved from a MEDLINE search (January 1980-January 1997); search terms included chelating agents, razoxane, dexrazoxane, Zinecard, ICRF-187, ADR-529, and ICRF-159.

Study Selection:

Representative articles discussing the chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, dosing, and administration of dexrazoxane and those discussing clinical trials were selected.

Data Extraction:

Data were extracted and analyzed if the information was relevant and consistent. Studies were selected for review in the text on the basis of study design and clinical end points.

Data Synthesis:

Dexrazoxane is a chemoprotective agent developed to prevent cardiac tissue toxicity. Dexrazoxane exerts a cardioprotective effect with some clinically significant toxicities; it may also interfere with the antitumor activity of doxorubicin. Until there are sufficient data to support its use in first-line supportive care therapy, dexrazoxane should be reserved for use in patients responding to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy but who have risk factors for cardiac toxicity or have received a cumulative doxorubicin bolus dose of 300 mg/m2.

Conclusions:

The management of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity has led to the development of supportive care drugs that specifically counteract the dose-limiting toxicities. Dexrazoxane may not completely eliminate the concern about doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity, but it may open new avenues for continuing doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.