Trends and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in elderly women

Overnight to Outpatient: A Single Institution's Experience With Mastectomy and Reconstruction Before and After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic

PURPOSE

Minimizing resource use while optimizing patient outcomes has become an ever-growing component in modern healthcare, especially in the era of COVID-19. One essential component of this is deciding whether patients need hospital admission following elective procedures. The aim of this study is to investigate operative factors and patient outcomes when mastectomies with or without reconstruction are performed as ambulatory procedures versus planned inpatient admissions.

METHODS

Patient charts for those undergoing mastectomy with or without reconstruction were retrospectively analyzed ranging from March 2019 until February 2021. Factors such as demographic information, operative type, operating room time, cancer stage, total stay time in the medical environment, and postoperative complications were assessed and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patient charts were reviewed, 46 from before the COVID-19 pandemic and 43 from after the start of the pandemic. No differences were observed in demographic factors between the 2 groups. After surgical cases resumed a significant proportion, 79%, of mastectomies with or without reconstruction were performed in the ambulatory center, versus just 2% pre-COVID-19. Similarly, of all of these cases performed, only 19% resulted in hospital admission versus the previous rate of 100% (P < 0.00001). Together, these changes resulted in a significant reduction in length of stay of 39.77 ± 19.2 hours pre-COVID-19 versus 14.81 ± 18.4 hours afterward (P < 0.00001). Unfortunately, a higher number of patients who received surgery after the start of the pandemic elected to forego immediate reconstruction 49% versus 72% (P = 0.032). Most importantly, there were no observable differences found in 7-day readmission, reoperation, or emergency department visit between groups. There was also no difference in 30-day complication rate between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Mastectomy with or without reconstruction can be safely performed in the ambulatory setting without additional risk of complications or negative patient factors. This divergence from traditional the protocol of inpatient overnight admission may contribute positively toward patient comfort, minimize the use of healthcare costs and resources, and allow for increased scheduling flexibility for patient and provider alike.

Breast Sarcomas-How Different Are They from Breast Carcinomas? Clinical, Pathological, Imaging and Treatment Insights

Breast sarcoma (BS) is a very rare and poorly studied condition. This has led to a lack of studies with a high level of evidence and to low efficacy of current clinical management protocols. Here we present our experience in treating this disease in the form of a retrospective case series study including discussion of clinical, imaging, and pathological features and treatment. We also compare the main clinical and biological features of six cases of BS (phyllodes tumors were excluded) with a cohort of 184 patients with unilateral breast carcinoma (BC) from a previous study performed at our institution. Patients with BS were diagnosed at a younger age, presented no evidence of lymph node invasion or distant metastases, had no multiple or bilateral lesions, and underwent a shorter length of hospital stay versus the breast carcinoma group. Where recommended, adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of an anthracycline-containing regimen, and adjuvant external radiotherapy was delivered in doses of 50 Gy. The comparison data obtained from our BS cases and the ones with BC revealed differences in diagnosis and treatment. A correct pathological diagnosis of breast sarcoma is essential for the right therapeutic approach. We still have more to learn about this entity, but our case series could add value to existing knowledge in a meta-analysis study.

Home Recovery After Mastectomy: Review of Literature and Strategies for Implementation American Society of Breast Surgeons Working Group

BACKGROUND

Practices regarding recovery after mastectomy vary significantly, including overnight stay versus discharge same day. Expanded use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) algorithms and the recent COVID pandemic have led to increased number of patients who undergo home recovery after mastectomy (HRAM).

METHODS

The Patient Safety Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons created a multispecialty working group to review the literature evaluating HRAM after mastectomy with and without implant-based reconstruction. A literature review was performed regarding this topic; the group then developed guidance for patient selection and tools for implementation.

RESULTS

Multiple, retrospective series have reported that patients discharged day of mastectomy have similar risk of complications compared with those kept overnight, including risk of hematoma (0-5.1%). Multimodal strategies that improve nausea and analgesia improve likelihood of HRAM. Patients who undergo surgery in ambulatory surgery centers and by high-volume breast surgeons are more likely to be discharged day of surgery. When evaluating unplanned return to care, the only significant factors are African American race and increased comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of current literature demonstrates that HRAM is a safe option in appropriate patients. Choice of method of recovery should consider patient factors, such as comorbidities and social situation, and requires input from the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative education regarding pain management, drain care, and after-hour access to medical care are crucial components to a successful program. Additional investigation is needed as these programs become more prevalent to assess quality measures such as unplanned return to care, complications, and patient satisfaction.

Same‐day mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection is safe for most patients with breast cancer

Background and Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of same‐day mastectomy, with or without a sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and/or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

In this retrospective study, we reviewed 913 consecutive women who underwent a simple mastectomy for breast cancer between the years 2014 and 2019 and were treated either with same‐day surgery (SDS) or an overnight stay (OS) regime. We reviewed all surgical complications, any unplanned return to care (RTC) and the rehospitalization rate for 30 postoperative days.

Results

A total of 259 patients (28%) were treated with SDS and 654 patients (72%) with an OS regime. There was no difference in RTC (odds ratio: 0.79 [95% confidence interval: 0.53–1.18], p = 0.26) or any major complications between the groups. None of the investigated subgroups, such as patients with previous neoadjuvant therapy, diabetes, obesity (up to a body mass index of 40 kg/m²), the American Society of Anaesthesiologist Class of 3, or elderly patients aged 75–84 years, showed an increased complication rate when treated with the SDS regime.

Conclusion

A same‐day simple mastectomy is safe with SNB and/or ALND. It can be performed safely for most patients with stable co‐morbidities.

Indications for readmission following mastectomy for breast cancer: An assessment of patient and operative factors

We investigated the impact of patient and operative factors on 30-day hospital readmission following mastectomy for breast cancer. Using the 2011 HCUP California State Inpatient Database, we evaluated readmissions in adult women undergoing mastectomy for invasive, in situ, or history of breast cancer. Clinical data assessment was performed using ICD-9-CM codes and the Elixhauser comorbidity index. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to analyze patient and operative factors and associations with 30-day hospital readmission. Of 6214 women undergoing mastectomy, 306 (4.9%) were readmitted within 30 days postoperatively, most commonly for surgical site infection (130, 42.5%) and hematoma (29, 9.5%). 30-day readmission was associated with increasing index length of stay (LOS), comorbidities, and non-private insurance (P < .05). Age, mastectomy type (unilateral vs bilateral, with vs without lymph node assessment), immediate reconstruction, and port placement during the index procedure did not significantly influence the odds of 30-day readmission. Multivariable logistic regression showed increased odds of readmission with index LOS > 2 days (OR 1.81, P < .01), metastatic disease (OR 2.16, P = .01), and Medicare insurance (OR 1.72, P < .01). Index LOS > 2 days, metastatic disease, and Medicare insurance are significant predictors of 30-day readmission following mastectomy for breast cancer. Surgical site infection and wound complications were the most common diagnoses requiring readmission and resulted in over half of readmissions in our study population at 30 days.

Evaluation of algorithms to identify incident cancer cases by using French health administrative databases

PURPOSE

Administrative databases are increasingly being used in cancer observational studies. Identifying incident cancer in these databases is crucial. This study aimed to develop algorithms to estimate cancer incidence by using health administrative databases and to examine the accuracy of the algorithms in terms of national cancer incidence rates estimated from registries.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of 463 033 participants on 1 January 2012 in the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires (EGB; a representative sample of the French healthcare insurance system). The EGB contains data on long-term chronic disease (LTD) status, reimbursed outpatient treatments and procedures, and hospitalizations (including discharge diagnoses, and costly medical procedures and drugs). After excluding cases of prevalent cancer, we applied 15 algorithms to estimate the cancer incidence rates separately for men and women in 2012 and compared them to the national cancer incidence rates estimated from French registries by indirect age and sex standardization.

RESULTS

The most accurate algorithm for men combined information from LTD status, outpatient anticancer drugs, radiotherapy sessions and primary or related discharge diagnosis of cancer, although it underestimated the cancer incidence (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 0.85 [0.80-0.90]). For women, the best algorithm used the same definition of the algorithm for men but restricted hospital discharge to only primary or related diagnosis with an additional inpatient procedure or drug reimbursement related to cancer and gave comparable estimates to those from registries (SIR 1.00 [0.94-1.06]).

CONCLUSION

The algorithms proposed could be used for cancer incidence monitoring and for future etiological cancer studies involving French healthcare databases. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Influence of physician, patient, and health care system characteristics on the use of outpatient mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States. Breast cancer surgeries can be performed on either an inpatient or ambulatory basis. This systematic review of literature on outpatient mastectomy examines what is known about the factors that influence the use of this procedure, existing public policies, and strategies to promote the appropriate use of outpatient mastectomy.

METHODS

Factors associated with the utilization of outpatient mastectomy were categorized and discussed under the following headings: "patient level," "physician level," and "system level."

RESULTS

Potential contributing factors to the use of outpatient mastectomy at the patient level were race, educational level, comorbid conditions, cancer stage, and health insurance. Contributing factors at the provider level were demographics, surgeon specialty, and whether physician is an American or international graduate. The associated factors at the system level were state policy and legislation and hospital characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence in the research literature suggests that the use of outpatient mastectomy is a function of interactions between patient and physician characteristics, managed care influences, and the state policies and laws.

Patterns and Trends in Immediate Postmastectomy Reconstruction in California: Complications and Unscheduled Readmissions

BACKGROUND

Immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy are increasing but remain low. Little is known about hospital readmissions after these procedures. The authors studied unscheduled readmissions after immediate reconstruction.

METHODS

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project California State database, the authors identified patients undergoing mastectomy only or with immediate reconstruction for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer from 2005 to 2009. Immediate reconstruction included tissue expander/implant and autologous tissue reconstructions. The authors evaluated temporal trends in immediate reconstruction and factors associated with 30-day unscheduled readmissions after reconstruction.

RESULTS

The cohort contained 48,414 patients (mastectomy only, 35,648; immediate reconstruction, 12,766; tissue expander/implant, 10,437; autologous tissue, 2329). Readmission rates were not significantly different between mastectomy only and immediate reconstruction (3.55 percent versus 3.39 percent; p = 0.39); however, autologous tissue reconstruction was associated with a significantly higher readmission rate compared with tissue expander/implant reconstruction (4.08 percent versus 3.24 percent; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate reconstruction does not result in higher readmission rates compared with mastectomy only. All women undergoing mastectomy should be offered consultation for reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Reoperation for Complications after Lumpectomy and Mastectomy for Breast Cancer from the 2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP)

BACKGROUND

Hospital readmissions and reoperations are quality indicators of patient care. In 2012, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) began reporting details regarding unplanned reoperations within 30 days of initial procedure. The main objective of this study was to identify reoperation rates as a result of complications and evaluate complications by type of breast surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer were identified from the 2012 ACS-NSQIP Participant User File. Breast procedures were categorized as mastectomy or lumpectomy, each with or without immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). All reoperations and complication-related reoperations were categorized on the basis of procedure and diagnosis codes, and rates were compared by breast procedure by Chi square tests.

RESULTS

Of 18,500 patients, 781 (4 %) required an unplanned reoperation within 30 days (single reoperation in 747, 2+ reoperations in 34). Mean time to first reoperation was 13.4 days and varied by procedure. A majority (73 %) of ACS-NSQIP coded unplanned reoperations were due to complications. Rates of reoperation due to complication were highest in mastectomy with IBR (7 %). Most common complications requiring reoperation were bleeding, followed by infection and wound-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned reoperations after breast cancer surgery are more frequent after mastectomy with IBR than other breast operations. Bleeding is the most common complication requiring reoperation.

Factors Affecting the Postsurgical Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the most common cause of mortality in women worldwide. In addition to the increasing incidence of breast cancer, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after breast cancer surgery has been decreasing. Because LOS is key in determining hospital usage, the decrease in the use of hospital facilities may have implications on healthcare planning. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting postoperative LOS in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-six in patients with breast cancer, who had been treated between July 2013 and December 2014 in the General Surgery Clinic of Dicle University, were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients, treatment methods, histopathological features of the tumor, concomitant diseases, whether they underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy or not, and the length of drain remaining time were retrospectively recorded.

RESULTS

There was a correlation between drain remaining time, totally removed lymph node, the number of metastatic lymph node, and LOS. LOS of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was longer. The patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery had a shorter LOS. Linear regression analysis revealed that the drain remaining time and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were independent risk factors for LOS.

CONCLUSION

Consideration should be given to cancer screening to diagnose the patients before lymph node metastasis occurs. In addition, drains should be avoided unless required and, if used, they should be removed as early as possible for shortening LOS.

Assessing Outcomes and Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Tissue Expander Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

With the rising cost of healthcare delivery and bundled payments for episodes of care, there has been impetus to minimize hospitalization and increase utilization of outpatient surgery mechanisms. Given the increase in outpatient mastectomy and immediate tissue expander (TE)-based reconstruction and the paucity of data on its comparative safety to inpatient procedures, we sought to understand the risk for early postoperative complications in an outpatient model compared with more traditional inpatient status using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

METHODS

NSQIP data files from 2005 to 2012 were queried to identify patients undergoing immediate TE-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Patients were stratified by whether they received outpatient or inpatient care and then propensity score matched based on preoperative baseline characteristics to produce matched cohorts. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine whether outpatient versus inpatient status conferred differing risk for 30-days complications.

RESULTS

Of the 2014 patients who met criteria, 1:1 propensity matching yielded 634 patients in each of the matched cohorts. Overall complications (5.2 vs. 5.4 %), overall surgical complications (4.3 vs. 3.9 %), overall medical complications (1.3 vs. 2.1 %), and return to the operating room (6.6 vs. 7.3 %) were similar between outpatient and inpatients cohorts (p > .2), respectively. There was a small, but significant increased risk of organ/space SSI in outpatients (1.9 vs. 0.5 %, p = .02) and trend for increased risk for pulmonary embolus (PE) and urinary tract infection (UTI) in inpatients (0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16; 0.3 vs. 0 %, p = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies suggest that outpatient TE confers similar safety profiles to inpatient TE with regards to 30-day postoperative overall complications, medical and surgical morbidity, and return to the operating room. A slightly increased risk for surgical site infection must be balanced against potential risk for known inpatient-related complications such as UTI and PE.

Adopting ambulatory breast cancer surgery as the standard of care in an asian population

Introduction. Ambulatory surgery is not commonly practiced in Asia. A 23-hour ambulatory (AS23) service was implemented at our institute in March 2004 to allow more surgeries to be performed as ambulatory procedures. In this study, we reviewed the impact of the AS23 service on breast cancer surgeries and reviewed surgical outcomes, including postoperative complications, length of stay, and 30-day readmission. Methods. Retrospective review was performed of 1742 patients who underwent definitive breast cancer surgery from 1 March 2004 to 31 December 2010. Results. By 2010, more than 70% of surgeries were being performed as ambulatory procedures. Younger women (P < 0.01), those undergoing wide local excision (P < 0.01) and those with ductal carcinoma-in situ or early stage breast cancer (P < 0.01), were more likely to undergo ambulatory surgery. Six percent of patients initially scheduled for ambulatory surgery were eventually managed as inpatients; a third of these were because of perioperative complications. Wound complications, 30-day readmission and reoperation rates were not more frequent with ambulatory surgery. Conclusion. Ambulatory breast cancer surgery is now the standard of care at our institute. An integrated workflow facilitating proper patient selection and structured postoperativee outpatient care have ensured minimal complications and high patient acceptance.

Racial disparities in the use of outpatient mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities exist within many domains of cancer care. This study was designed to identify differences in the use of outpatient mastectomy (OM) based on patient race.

METHODS

We identified patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File (during the years 2007-2010) who underwent a mastectomy. The association between mastectomy setting, patient race, patient age, American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification, functional status, mastectomy type, and hospital teaching status was determined using the chi-square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was developed to assess the relative odds of undergoing OM by race, with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 47,318 patients enrolled in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File who underwent a mastectomy during the study time frame. More than half (62.6%) of mastectomies were performed in the outpatient setting. All racial minorities had lower rates of OM, with 63.8% of white patients; 59.1% of black patients; 57.4% of Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander patients; and 43.9% of American Indian or Alaska Native patients undergoing OM (P < 0.001). After adjustment for multiple confounders, black patients, American Indian or Alaska Native patients, and those of unknown race were all less likely to undergo OM (odds ratio [OR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.93; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41-0.72; and OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76, respectively) compared with white patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities exist in the use of OM among racial minorities. Further studies are needed to identify the role of cultural preferences, physician attitudes, and insurer encouragements that may influence these patterns of use.

Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction rates after mastectomy have been reported to range from 25-40%; however, most studies have focused on patients treated in an inpatient setting. We sought to determine the utilization of outpatient mastectomy and use of breast reconstruction in Southern California.

METHODS

Postmastectomy reconstruction rates were determined from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 2006-2009 using CPT codes and similarly from an inpatient database using ICD-9 codes. Reconstruction rates were compared between the inpatient and outpatient setting. For the outpatient setting, univariate and multivariate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for relative odds of immediate reconstruction versus mastectomy alone.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients undergoing outpatient mastectomy ranged from 20.4 to 23.9% of the total number of all patients undergoing mastectomy. Whereas immediate inpatient reconstruction increased from 29.2 to 41.6% (overall rate 35.5%), the proportion of outpatients undergoing reconstruction only increased from 7.7 to 10.3% (overall rate 9.1%). Similar to the inpatient setting, in multivariate analysis, age, insurance status, race/ethnicity, and type of hospital were significantly associated with the use of reconstruction in the outpatient setting.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of patients undergo outpatient mastectomy with low rates of reconstruction. Although the choice of an outpatient mastectomy may certainly represent a selection bias for those not choosing reconstruction, an increase in the use of outpatient mastectomy may result in decreases in the use of postmastectomy reconstruction.

Trends in outpatient breast cancer surgery among Medicare fee-for-service patients in the United States from 1993 to 2002

The practice of outpatient breast cancer surgery has been controversial in the United States. This study aimed to update time trends and geographic variation in outpatient breast cancer surgery among elderly Medicare fee-for-service women in the United States. Using the 1993–2002 linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)–Medicare claims data and the Area Resource Files, we identified 2 study samples, including the women whose breast cancers were the first-ever-diagnosed cancer at age 65 years or older from 9 regions continuously covered by the SEER registries since 1993. The first sample included the women receiving unilateral mastectomy for stage 0–IV cancer; the second included the women receiving the breast-conserving surgery with lymph node dissection (BCS/LND) for stage 0–II cancer. The proportions of patients receiving outpatient surgery increased from 3.2% to 19.4% for mastectomy and from 48.9% to 77.8% for BCS/LND from 1993 to 2002. We observed substantial geographic variation in the average proportion of the patients receiving outpatient surgery in the studied areas across the 10-year period, ranging from 3.9% in Connecticut to 27.2% in Utah for mastectomy and from 54.7% in Hawaii to 78.1% in Seattle, Washington, for BCS/LND. As the popularity of outpatient breast cancer surgery continues to grow, more evidence-based analyses related to quality and outcomes of outpatient breast cancer surgery among various populations are needed in order to facilitate the public debates about state and federal mandated health benefit legislations.

Initial experiences with a multidisciplinary approach to decreasing the length of hospital stay for patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the introduction of a short-stay pathway would result in a significant reduction in length of stay for patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy, without a negative impact on patient safety.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As part of a quality improvement project, a multidisciplinary committee designed a 1-day stay program for unilateral mastectomy patients. The study period was the first year after the 1-day pathway had routinely been implemented. We report on consecutive patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy ± tissue expander at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients discharged on postoperative day 1. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, reoperations, readmissions, and urgent-care visits within 7 days.

RESULTS

Over a 12-month period, 537 patients underwent unilateral mastectomy. Of those, 82.7% (444/537) were performed on a 1-day hospitalization basis, compared with 9.6% in 2008, before implementation of the 1-day plan. The 30-day complication rate was 6.1% (33/537). Overall, 2.6% of all patients had reoperation for hematoma (14/537), 0.9% had to be readmitted (5/537), and 1.5% (8/537) attended the urgent-care department. If all patients had stayed in the hospital for more than 1 day, none of the readmissions and only 2 urgent-care visits would have been prevented.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a 1-day stay following mastectomy is easy to implement and safe for patients if a multidisciplinary team is involved in planning and implementation.

Spillover effects of state mandated benefit laws: the case of outpatient breast cancer surgery

This paper examines the "spillover effects" of state laws that mandate inpatient coverage for breast cancer surgery. It looks at outpatient utilization of two types of breast cancer surgery among Medicare fee-for-service patients, who are exempt from state regulation. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registries and Medicare claims, we performed difference-in-differences analyses of patients in nine states from 1993 to 2002. The analyses show that state laws had a significant impact on only the likelihood of outpatient mastectomy, which was reduced by five percentage points. Such a spillover effect may diminish the expected impact of federal coverage laws for inpatient breast cancer surgery, which have been proposed to achieve similar ends.

Implementation of a short-stay programme after breast cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

: Short-stay breast cancer surgery (24 h or day case) is not common practice in Europe. This before-after comparative study was carried out to test the feasibility of systematically implementing a care programme incorporating short-stay admission using strategies tailored to individual hospital needs, and to assess safety and facilitating factors.

METHODS

: Patients with breast cancer from four Dutch hospitals participated. The intervention concerned the programme developed by the Maastricht University Medical Centre. This was implemented through local multidisciplinary meetings and educational outreach visits.

RESULTS

: Of 421 eligible patients, 324 (77.0 per cent) gave consent to participate. The proportion of patients who had short-stay treatment increased from 45.3 per cent before to 82.2 per cent after implementation of the programme (P < 0.001). No increase was observed in the rate of complications, readmissions, reoperations or number of visits to the emergency department. Factors associated with an increased chance of short-stay treatment were: breast-conserving surgery, having children and being employed. Being aged over 64 years showed a trend towards a decreased chance.

CONCLUSION

: Introducing a care programme incorporating short stay following breast cancer surgery in four hospitals was feasible and safe.

Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery

BACKGROUND

Optimization of postoperative outcome requires the application of evidence-based principles of care carefully integrated into a multimodal rehabilitation program.

OBJECTIVE

To assess, synthesize, and discuss implementation of "fast-track" recovery programs.

DATA SOURCES

Medline MBASE (January 1966-May 2007) and the Cochrane library (January 1966-May 2007) were searched using the following keywords: fast-track, enhanced recovery, accelerated rehabilitation, and multimodal and perioperative care. In addition, the synthesis on the many specific interventions and organizational and implementation issues were based on data published within the past 5 years from major anesthesiological and surgical journals, using systematic reviews where appropriate instead of multiple references of original work.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Based on an increasing amount of multinational, multicenter cohort studies, randomized studies, and meta-analyses, the concept of the "fast-track methodology" has uniformly provided a major enhancement in recovery leading to decreased hospital stay and with an apparent reduction in medical morbidity but unaltered "surgery-specific" morbidity in a variety of procedures. However, despite being based on a combination of evidence-based unimodal principles of care, recent surveys have demonstrated slow adaptation and implementation of the fast-track methodology.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal evidence-based care within the fast-track methodology significantly enhances postoperative recovery and reduces morbidity, and should therefore be more widely adopted. Further improvement is expected by future integration of minimal invasive surgery, pharmacological stress-reduction, and effective multimodal, nonopioid analgesia.

Outpatient mastectomy and breast reconstructive surgery

BACKGROUND

In the United States, post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is a state (all 51 jurisdictions) and federally mandated benefit. Outpatient mastectomy, which could lower use of breast reconstruction, may raise concerns about whether patients receive adequate post-mastectomy care.

METHODS

Using linked surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER)-Medicare data, we identified Medicare fee-for-service women aged 65-69 years, diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer, and receiving unilateral mastectomy from 1998-2002. The corresponding surgery delivery settings were determined from claims data. The outcome of interest was reconstruction within 4 months of diagnosis. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association of outpatient mastectomy with the likelihood of post-mastectomy reconstruction, controlling for patient's characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the 3,419 patients in the sample, 717 (21%) patients received outpatient mastectomy. The proportions of patients receiving reconstruction were 13% for inpatient mastectomy patients and 4% for outpatient mastectomy patients. Outpatient mastectomy patients were younger and had less comorbidities than inpatient mastectomy patients. Multivariable regression analysis suggested that outpatient mastectomy patients were less likely to receive reconstruction (odds ratio = 0.247; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.166-0.368). Additional analysis suggests that African American patients were less likely than white patients to undergo reconstruction (odds ratio = 0.515; 95% CI: 0.293-0.906) and that this ethnic difference was more manifest among patients undergoing inpatient mastectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that outpatient mastectomy was associated with lower use of breast reconstruction. A better understanding of choice of delivery setting of mastectomy with a focus on younger and minority breast cancer patients should be explored in future research.

Introduction of a breast cancer care programme including ultra short hospital stay in 4 early adopter centres: framework for an implementation study

Background

Whereas ultra-short stay (day care or 24 hour hospitalisation) following breast cancer surgery was introduced in the US and Canada in the 1990s, it is not yet common practice in Europe. This paper describes the design of the MaDO study, which involves the implementation of ultra short stay admission for patients after breast cancer surgery, and evaluates whether the targets of the implementation strategy are reached. The ultra short stay programme and the applied implementation strategy will be evaluated from the economic perspective.

Methods/design

The MaDO study is a pre-post-controlled multi-centre study, that is performed in four hospitals in the Netherlands. It includes a pre and post measuring period of six months each with six months of implementation in between in at least 40 patients per hospital per measurement period.

Primary outcome measure is the percentage of patients treated in ultra short stay. Secondary endpoints are the percentage of patients treated according to protocol, degree of involvement of home care nursing, quality of care from the patient's perspective, cost-effectiveness of the ultra short stay programme and cost-effectiveness of the implementation strategy. Quality of care will be measured by the QUOTE-breast cancer instrument, cost-effectiveness of the ultra short stay programme will be measured by means of the EuroQol (administered at four time-points) and a cost book for patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness of the implementation strategy will be measured by determination of the costs of implementation activities.

Discussion

This study will reveal barriers and facilitators for implementation of the ultra short stay programme. Moreover, the results of the study will provide information about the cost-effectiveness of the ultra short stay programme and the implementation strategy.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77253391.

External Validation of Medicare Claims for Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Compared With Medical Chart Reviews

BACKGROUND

Although Medicare claims data have been increasingly used to examine the patterns and outcomes of cancer chemotherapy, their external validity has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to validate Medicare claims for chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We completed medical chart reviews for 1228 women who were diagnosed with breast cancer at age 65 and older between 1993 and 1999 in New Mexico that were linked with Medicare claims data, achieving an estimated sensitivity of more than 90% and a 0.05 level of precision.

RESULTS

Of the 150 subjects identified by Medicare claims as receiving chemotherapy within 6 months of diagnosis, 75% were confirmed by medical records as having received chemotherapy. Of the remaining 25% of cases without chart verification, (1) 33 cases had 7 or more claims for chemotherapy and also had specific chemotherapy drugs indicated in Medicare data, representing 22% (33/150) of all cases that received chemotherapy according to Medicare claims and (2) 4 cases had 1 to 6 claims for chemotherapy, representing 3% (4/150) of all cases with claims for chemotherapy. Of those 1078 subjects who did not receive chemotherapy according to Medicare claims, more than 99% were confirmed by chart reviews. Observed agreement on chemotherapy between Medicare claims and chart reviews was 94% and overall reliability (kappa) was 0.69 (95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.76).

CONCLUSIONS

Of cases identified as receiving chemotherapy by Medicare claims, 97% had strong evidence and only 3% had weak evidence for receiving this therapy.

Population-Based Assessment of Surgical Treatment Trends for Patients With Melanoma in the Era of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Purpose

The surgical staging of melanoma dramatically changed with the introduction of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. In this study, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data were examined to determine how surgical treatment is being carried out and whether SLN biopsy is being performed in melanoma patients in conformance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Patients and Methods

The SEER database (1998 to 2001) was searched for all patients with invasive melanoma. NCCN guidelines were used to define optimal stage-specific surgical treatment. Treatment trends in patients with stages I to III disease were summarized, and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with nonadherence with treatment guidelines.

Results

A total of 21,867 melanoma patients were identified; 18,499 of these patients met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients diagnosed with stage III melanoma increased by 55.7% over the study period, and this corresponded to a 53% increase in the number of SLN biopsies performed annually. The odds ratios for nonadherence were 2.32, 2.27, and 1.54 for stages IB, II, and III disease, respectively, compared with stage IA melanoma. Multivariate analyses revealed that age more than 65 years, marital status, minority populations, and primary tumor location were associated with nonadherence with guidelines. Treatment patterns among tumor registries also varied significantly.

Conclusion

Stage migration is evident in the SEER registries in consort with increasing use of SLN biopsy. Although treatment trends are improving, SLN biopsy continues to be underused, particularly in the elderly and minority populations, in patients with truncal and head/neck melanomas, and also in some geographic regions of the United States.

Post-operative care and patient satisfaction after ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate patient information provided, the management of post-operative symptoms and post-operative care, and patient satisfaction with ambulatory breast surgery over a 1-year period.

METHODS

From January to December 2000, all breast cancer patients undergoing conservative breast surgery were offered surgery as an outpatient procedure at the Ambulatory Surgery Unit.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty six patients underwent outpatient surgery. None were readmitted during the first night or the first week. Two hundred and nineteen patients completed a questionnaire. One hundred and sixty nine patients (group 1) underwent wide local excision (WLE) and 50 (group 2), WLE and axillary lymphadenectomy. Patients in group 2 experienced more pain at discharge from the hospital (p < or = 0.01) and during the first week after discharge (p < or = 0.00001) than patients in group 1. The mean overall satisfaction score was 8.97 on a scale of 1-10. Post-operative information provided by the surgeon before discharge from the hospital was rated 8.90 on a scale of 1-10 while information provided by the nurse was rated 9.33 (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients is safe and popular with patients, however, post-operative pain presents problem.

Efficacy of an in-home nursing intervention following short-stay breast cancer surgery

This randomized controlled trial (n = 240) was designed to test the efficacy of a sub-acute home nursing intervention following short-stay surgery for breast cancer. Intervention participants received the in-home nursing protocol, whereas non-intervention participants received agency nursing care or no nursing care. Data, collected via questionnaire, telephone interview, and chart audit, included surgical recovery/self-care knowledge, functional status, anxiety, quality of life (QOL), and health service utilization. There were no significant group differences on postoperative functional status, anxiety, QOL, further surgeries, or complications. Intervention participants were more likely to receive instruction on surgical self-care (p <or=.001) and report improved social/family QOL (p <or=.05), with fewer home visits (p <or=.001). These findings suggest that a targeted nursing protocol may, at reasonable cost, improve QOL and enhance health-related knowledge.

Geographic variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of colorectal carcinoma screening procedures

OBJECTIVES

To study geographic variation in the use of recommended screening procedures for colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

All Medicare claims for fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, barium enema and two reference procedures, upper endoscopy, and upper gastrointestinal series in patients > or = 65 yr were obtained from the 1997-1999 physician-supplier and outpatient files. State-level procedure rates and the change in rates from 1997 to 1999 were calculated.

RESULTS

The median annual rates were as follows: FOBT, 14.54%; flexible sigmoidoscopy, 3.03%; colonoscopy, 6.22%; barium enema, 2.21%; upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, 4.88%; and upper gastrointestinal series, 2.78%. Whereas there was at least a 50% difference between the 25th and 75th percentiles for state rates of FOBT and sigmoidoscopy, the variation in other procedures was more modest. State-level rates of colonoscopy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were highly correlated (r = 0.79; p < 0.0001), as were the rates of barium enema and upper gastrointestinal series (r = 0.68; p < 0.0001). Universal increases in colonoscopy use (median +25.0%) and decreases in barium enema use (median -20.9%) from 1997 to 1999 were observed among individual states.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variation at the state level in the use of some, but not all colorectal procedures, as well as fairly consistent temporal trends. The etiology of the differences is not clear, but the correlation in the rates of selected procedures suggests the presence of local practice patterns.

Breast cancer surgery trends and outcomes: results from a national department of veterans affairs study

BACKGROUND

This study examined trends and outcomes for breast cancer surgery performed at Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined breast cancer operations performed in VA hospitals from October 1991 to September 1997. Data from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, surgical pathology reports, discharge data, and outpatient data were used. Surgical outcomes included postoperative length of stay, 30-day morbidity rates, 1-year surgery-related readmission rates, and mortality. An expert panel of breast cancer clinicians identified surgery-related hospital readmissions. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to identify patient, provider, and hospital characteristics associated with postoperative length of stay, and 30-day morbidity.

RESULTS

From October 1991 to September 1997 1,333 breast operations were performed, ranging from 1 to 38 on average per hospital; 478 operations were for breast cancer. Among breast cancer surgery patients, 25% were men. Thirty-day morbidity rates, 1-year hospital readmission rates, and mortality were very low for both men and women. Postoperative length of stay averaged 6.8 days. Lower income, longer operation times, and older age increased the likelihood of 30-day morbidity. Lower functional status, older age, longer operation time, and lower average annual volume of procedures increased postoperative length of stay. Documentation of the extent of disease and surgical margin in pathology reports was poor in medical records.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital stays were longer, and morbidity and readmission rates for patients having breast cancer operations at VA hospitals were comparable to those reported for private sector hospitals.

Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery

Surgical injury can be followed by pain, nausea, vomiting and ileus, stress-induced catabolism, impaired pulmonary function, increased cardiac demands, and risk of thromboembolism. These problems can lead to complications, need for treatment in hospital, postoperative fatigue, and delayed convalescence. Development of safe and short-acting anaesthetics, improved pain relief by early intervention with multimodal analgesia, and stress reduction by regional anaesthetic techniques, beta-blockade, or glucocorticoids have provided important possibilities for enhanced recovery. When these techniques are combined with a change in perioperative care a pronounced enhancement of recovery and decrease in hospital stay can be achieved, even in major operations. The anaesthetist has an important role in facilitating early postoperative recovery by provision of minimally-invasive anaesthesia and pain relief, and by collaborating with surgeons, surgical nurses, and physiotherapists to reduce risk and pain.

Ambulatory mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory mastectomy has been a topic of heated political debate with little analysis of clinical data.

METHODS

Based on extensive satisfaction surveys, an ideal surgical treatment experience was developed that decreased nausea, increased preoperative education, and reduced perioperative narcotic usage. Using this new algorithm, patients treated by a single surgeon were given the choice of overnight stay versus discharge to home with visiting nurse care.

RESULTS

From March 1 to October 31, 2001, 92 mastectomies or lumpectomy/axillary dissections were performed in 87 patients. One patient chose to remain in the center overnight. All others were discharged in less than 2.5 hours postoperatively. Perioperative complications fell to 20% of those of the prior year. Hospital charges fell 79.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite lay reservations about ambulatory mastectomy, a detailed approach can result in markedly reduced health care costs without incurring additional morbidity or mortality.

The case identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care

PURPOSE

The delivery of quality care to all patients with cancer has been named as a national priority within the American health care system. This article addresses the issues critical to case identification in cancer quality measurement and recommends possible strategies for accurately identifying a population of cancer patients.

METHODS

We present the measurement issues associated with the basic challenges of case identification strategies for quality measurement. We discuss two basic challenges: (1) accurately identifying all patients with the defining characteristics (eg, a diagnosis of breast cancer), and (2) identifying only patients with these characteristics.

RESULTS

Possible options for identifying newly diagnosed patients include using claims or other administrative data, cancer registries, cancer registry rapid case ascertainment, pathology laboratories, and physicians' offices. In the published literature, the sensitivity of claims varies from 75% to 95%, whereas central registries must have a 90% completeness rate to be certified. Most of these approaches, however, involve limitations to obtaining valid and comparable data across multiple settings.

CONCLUSION

Using an existing data collection system staffed by skilled data collectors and managers should result in substantially more accurate and timely data. Registry officials and the government agencies that provide their support should be encouraged to adopt quality-of-care analyses as an important purpose of the registry system and to enhance their capacity to rapidly ascertain cases, collect the appropriate identifying information needed for patient contact, and verify stage at diagnosis. In order to meet the growing demand for timely, accurate information about quality of care, registries are likely to require additional support so they can enhance their capacity to rapidly ascertain cases, collect the appropriate identifying information needed for patient contact, and verify stage at diagnosis.

Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview

Comorbidity, additional disease beyond the condition under study that increases a patient's total burden of illness, is one dimension of health status. For investigators working with observational data obtained from administrative databases, comorbidity assessment may be a useful and important means of accounting for differences in patients' underlying health status. There are multiple ways of measuring comorbidity. This paper provides an overview of current approaches to and issues in assessing comorbidity using claims data, with a particular focus on established indices and the SEER-Medicare database. In addition, efforts to improve measurement of comorbidity using claims data are described, including augmentation of claims data with medical record, patient self-report, or health services utilization data; incorporation of claims data from sources other than inpatient claims; and exploration of alternative conditions, indices, or ways of grouping conditions. Finally, caveats about claims data and areas for future research in claims-based comorbidity assessment are discussed. Although the use of claims databases such as SEER-Medicare for health services and outcomes research has become increasingly common, investigators must be cognizant of the limitations of comorbidity measures derived from these data sources in capturing and controlling for differences in patient health status. The assessment of comorbidity using claims data is a complex and evolving area of investigation.

Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of modifying perioperative care in noncardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality, and other outcome measures.

BACKGROUND

New approaches in pain control, introduction of techniques that reduce the perioperative stress response, and the more frequent use of minimal invasive surgical access have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated.

METHODS

We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms fast track surgery, accelerated care programs, postoperative complications and preoperative patient preparation; and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to include in this review. This information was supplemented with our own research on the mediators of the stress response in surgical patients, the use of epidural anesthesia in elective operations, and pilot studies of fast track surgical procedures using the multimodality approach.

RESULTS

The introduction of newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced both morbidity and mortality in surgical patients. In the future, most elective operations will become day surgical procedures or require only 1 to 2 days of postoperative hospitalization. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast track surgical programs.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of an operation, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of "fast track" surgery programs represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a "pain and risk free" perioperative course.

Safety of ambulatory surgery

Elective surgical procedures are moving from hospital-affiliated and freestanding ambulatory centers to the physician office. Anesthetic risk has decreased dramatically during the past decade; however, perioperative safety is ill defined when the surgical procedure is performed in the physician office. Perioperative risk may vary depending on the surgical location (hospital, freestanding unit, or physician office). Regulation of office-based surgery is now being addressed by specialty organizations and Departments of Health or Boards of Medical Examiners. A comprehensive study of perioperative risk for patients receiving office-based surgical care is needed.

Observation interval for evaluating the costs of surgical interventions for older women with a new diagnosis of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the episodic costs of surgical treatments for breast cancer.

METHODS

The surgical treatment period as the 6 weeks following diagnosis is defined. Using a sample of 205 women aged 65 and older and their Medicare claim files, the cost of treatment is estimated and the progression from first to subsequent surgical procedures during the 6-week interval is demonstrated with a decision tree. Two equations are then estimated: the probability of mastectomy versus breast conserving surgery (BCS) as first surgery using Probit regression and the log of total charges using a generalized linear regression model.

RESULTS

It was found that only stage predicts the probability of mastectomy versus BCS and that 54% of women receiving BCS undergo a second surgery. Once all treatments in the initial surgical period are accounted, the difference between the adjusted cost of mastectomy alone and BCS followed by a second surgery was not statistically significant. Only a successful first BCS is statistically significantly (P <0.05) less costly than a mastectomy alone ($4,955 vs. $9,049).

CONCLUSIONS

By defining a 6-week surgical treatment episode it is shown that BCS followed by subsequent surgeries is the more costly option for initial treatment. Given the high prevalence of second surgeries, previous work may have underestimated the costs of surgical interventions for breast cancer.

Medicare fees and small area variations in breast-conserving surgery among elderly women

This study used data from Medicare files, the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey of Hospitals, and the 1990 census to investigate whether Medicare fees for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MST) affected the rate of BCS across 799 3-digit ZIP code areas in 1994. The full model, which was based on the conceptual framework of the supply of and demand for different treatments, explained 51 percent of the variation in BCS rates. Medicare fees were statistically significant and had the hypothesized effects: a 10 percent higher BCS fee was associated with a 7 to 10 percent higher BCS rate, while a 10 percent higher MST fee was associated with a 2 to 3 percent lower proportion receiving BCS. Other significant economic variables were proximity to a radiation therapy hospital, a teaching hospital or a cancer center, and the percentage of elderly women with incomes below the poverty rate, which were negatively related to the BCS rate. Variations in age, race, and metropolitan populations had small or insignificant effects. The single most important was the percentage of cases with one or more comorbidities.

Trend data on medical encounters: tracking a moving target

The National Health Care Survey (NHCS), conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics, consists of separate data collection activities that can be used to track the number and content of health care encounters in the United States. Tracking even something as simple as the number of encounters, however, is complicated by the fact that the content of these encounters changes over time. Results from the NHCS indicate that the U.S. population has been receiving more drugs, more cardiac procedures, more ambulatory surgery, more therapies in nursing homes, and more home health care over time. Policymakers and researchers who examine health care trends should be wary about judging whether the number of length of encounters is positive or negative without also examining the content of these encounters.

Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes

BACKGROUND

The authors hypothesized that insurance payer and race would influence the care and outcomes for patients with breast carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors examined treatments and adjusted risk of death (through 1997) for all incident cases of breast carcinoma occurring in Florida in 1994 (n = 11,113) by using state tumor registry data.

RESULTS

Patients lacking health insurance were less likely to receive breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with patients who had private health insurance. Among patients insured by Medicare, those belonging to a health maintenance organization (HMO) were more likely to receive BCS but less likely to receive radiation therapy after BCS. Non-Hispanic African Americans had higher mortality rates even when stage at diagnosis, insurance payer, and treatment modalities used were adjusted in multivariate models (adjusted risk ratio [RR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.61; P = 0.001). Patients who had HMO insurance had similar survival rates compared with those with fee-for-service (FFS) insurance. Among non-Medicare patients, mortality rates were higher for patients who had Medicaid insurance (RR, 1.58, 95% CI, 1.18-2.11; P = 0.002) and those who lacked health insurance (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.68; P = 0.03) compared with patients who had commercial FFS insurance. There were no insurance-related differences in survival rates, however, once stage at diagnosis was controlled.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of later stage at diagnosis, patients with breast carcinoma who were uninsured, or insured by Medicaid, had higher mortality rates. Mortality rates were also higher among non-Hispanic African Americans, a finding that was not fully explained by differences in stage at diagnosis, treatment modalities used, or insurance payer.

Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that health insurance payer and race might influence the care and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We examined treatments received for all incident cases of colorectal cancer occurring in Florida in 1994 (n = 9551), using state tumor registry data. We also estimated the adjusted risk of death (through 1997), using proportional hazards regression analysis controlling for other predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Treatments received by patients varied considerably according to their insurance payer. Among non-Medicare patients, those in the following groups had higher adjusted risks of death relative to commercial fee-for-service insurance: commercial HMO (risk ratio [RR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18, 1.67; P = .0001), Medicaid (RR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.97; P = .02), and uninsured (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.12, 1.77; P = .003). Non-Hispanic African Americans had higher mortality rates (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.37; P = .04) than non-Hispanic Whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with colorectal cancer who were uninsured or insured by Medicaid or commercial HMOs had higher mortality rates than patients with commercial fee-for-service insurance. Mortality was also higher among non-Hispanic African American patients.

Information gained from linking SEER Cancer Registry Data to state-level hospital discharge abstracts. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to link patients from the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registry to their respective inpatient discharge abstracts from an Iowa Health Care Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)-formatted database and evaluate whether this linkage provides information related to cancer treatment variation.

METHODS

Computer algorithms linked patients from the Iowa SEER Registry to discharge abstracts using 5 variables consistently defined between the databases (hospital identification, date of birth, admission date, discharge date, and zip code). Abstracts were reviewed for validity, and links not passing face validity were excluded.

SUBJECTS

Our sample contained 7,296 patients with early-stage breast cancer (I, IIa, IIb) with surgery from the Iowa SEER Registry from 1989 through 1994 with contacts only with Iowa hospitals.

RESULTS

Inpatient discharges abstracts were linked to 86.4% of the patients in our sample. More than 96% of the linked discharges for Medicare patients had a corresponding Medicare claim. Over 45% of the linked patients were not covered by Medicare. Comorbidity indexes were comparable to other published sources. Significant differences in diagnosis, comorbidities, and treatment were found across third-party payers.

CONCLUSIONS

This linkage provides a valuable source of comorbidity and insurance data and perhaps the only source of secondary clinical information for the uninsured. This linkage is best suited for cancers requiring inpatient stays for treatment and for those states where border crossing for treatment is low.

Accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for surgical treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Although a number of studies have used Medicare claims data to study trends and variations in breast cancer treatment, the accuracy and completeness of information on surgical treatment for breast cancer in the Medicare data have not been validated.

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the accuracy and completeness of Medicare claims data for breast cancer surgery to determine whether Medicare claims can serve as a source of data to augment information collected by cancer registries.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Registry-Medicare data and compared Medicare claims on surgery with the surgery recorded by the SEER registries for 23,709 women diagnosed with breast cancer at > or =65 years of age from 1991 through 1993.

RESULTS

More than 95% of women having mastectomies according to the Medicare data were confirmed by SEER. For breast-conserving surgery, 91% of cases were confirmed by SEER. The Medicare physician services claims and inpatient claims were approximately equal in accuracy on type of surgery. The Medicare outpatient claims were less accurate for breast-conserving surgery. In terms of completeness, when the 3 claims sources were combined, 94% of patients receiving breast cancer surgery according to SEER were identified by Medicare.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined Medicare claims database, which includes the inpatient, outpatient, and physician service claims, provides valid information on surgical treatment among women known to have breast cancer. The claims are a rich source of data to augment the information collected by tumor registries and provide information that can be used to follow long-term outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries.

Ambulatory surgery for breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Less than two decades ago, early discharge of mastectomy patients was found to be possible while the drains were still in place, without noticeable consequences for patients. Most reported studies focused on surgical complication rates and found no significant evidence of it. The objective of the present study was to compare inpatient to same-day discharge surgery for breast cancer, on unselected patients.

METHODS

All interviewed patients (n = 90) had routine level I and II axillary lymph node dissection under general anesthesia, combined with breast surgery for most of them. The outpatient group comprised 55 patients and the inpatient group 35. Psychological distress was assessed, as well as pain, anxiety, quality of life, emotional adjustment, recovery, social relations, stressful life events, and so on.

RESULTS

The sociodemographic characteristics of both surgery groups was quite similar, except that time from surgery to interview was about 1 year longer for inpatients. Outpatients and hospitalized patients report similar levels of pain, fear, anxiety, health assessment, and quality of life. Ambulatory patients manifest a significantly better emotional adjustment and fewer psychological distress symptoms. Inpatients reported that it took an average of 27 days to feel that they had recovered from surgery, about 10 days longer than outpatients. Inpatient return to usual activities was also about 11 days later.

CONCLUSIONS

Same-day discharge patients are not at a disadvantage compared to hospitalized patients; i.e., they report faster recovery and better psychological adjustment. Outpatient surgery may thus foster patient emotional well-being better than routine hospitalization.

The use and outcomes of outpatient mastectomy in Florida

BACKGROUND

To identify patient characteristics associated with outpatient mastectomies and their outcomes.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with mastectomies in Florida in 1994 were identified from state discharge abstracts and the state tumor registry. The relationship between clinical/demographic characteristics and the odds of having an outpatient mastectomy was identified using multiple logistic regression. Outcomes were assessed by calculating the risk of being rehospitalized within 30 days of discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty percent of mastectomies were performed on an outpatient basis. Outpatient mastectomies were more likely to be performed on women who were older, who lived in higher income communities, or who were uninsured. Health insurance type was not associated with having an outpatient mastectomy. Women undergoing outpatient mastectomy were more likely to be readmitted within 30 days of discharge; however, the excess risk was very small (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The risks from outpatient mastectomy are small. Ongoing monitoring of outcomes and assessment of patient satisfaction are needed.