Biomarkers in benign breast disease: risk factors for breast cancer

Genomic Changes in Normal Breast Tissue in Women at Normal Risk or at High Risk for Breast Cancer

Sporadic breast cancer develops through the accumulation of molecular abnormalities in normal breast tissue, resulting from exposure to estrogens and other carcinogens beginning at adolescence and continuing throughout life. These molecular changes may take a variety of forms, including numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities, epigenetic changes, and gene expression alterations. To characterize these abnormalities, a review of the literature has been conducted to define the molecular changes in each of the above major genomic categories in normal breast tissue considered to be either at normal risk or at high risk for sporadic breast cancer. This review indicates that normal risk breast tissues (such as reduction mammoplasty) contain evidence of early breast carcinogenesis including loss of heterozygosity, DNA methylation of tumor suppressor and other genes, and telomere shortening. In normal tissues at high risk for breast cancer (such as normal breast tissue adjacent to breast cancer or the contralateral breast), these changes persist, and are increased and accompanied by aneuploidy, increased genomic instability, a wide range of gene expression differences, development of large cancerized fields, and increased proliferation. These changes are consistent with early and long-standing exposure to carcinogens, especially estrogens. A model for the breast carcinogenic pathway in normal risk and high-risk breast tissues is proposed. These findings should clarify our understanding of breast carcinogenesis in normal breast tissue and promote development of improved methods for risk assessment and breast cancer prevention in women.

Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer

Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) and ductal lavage (DL) are research techniques developed to (1) assess short-term breast cancer risk in asymptomatic women who are at increased risk for breast cancer and (2) track cytological response to risk reduction strategies. RPFNA and DL provide minimally invasive methods to repeatedly sample epithelial cells and research tools to investigate the biological origins of breast cancer in high-risk women. This review gives an overview of the strengths and limitations of both RPFNA and DL for risk assessment and breast cancer prevention in asymptomatic high-risk women.

Reproducibility of random periareolar fine needle aspiration in a multi-institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Random periareolar fine needle aspiration (RPFNA) is a research technique developed to assess short-term breast cancer risk in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Although there is increasing acceptance of RPFNA, neither the reproducibility nor the inter-institutional compatibility of RPFNA has been established. To address these key limitations, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) Prevention Group tested the reproducibility of RPFNA in a multi-institutional cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Sixty-three high-risk women from five CALGB institutions (Duke, Ohio State, Roswell Park, Dana Farber, and Vermont) underwent RPFNA from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. Duplicate bilateral RPFNA was performed on each woman by a single investigator on a single day. Masood Cytology Index score was assessed by a single blinded cytopathologist.

RESULTS

There was a high degree of statistical agreement in the Masood Cytology Index scores of duplicate RPFNA samples from the same breast, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.8312 (P < 0.0001). Importantly, although there was agreement in duplicate samples from the same breast, there was lack of agreement between duplicate samples from the opposite breast.

CONCLUSIONS

This multi-institutional study shows that RPFNA is a highly reproducible measure of breast cytology in a cooperative group cross-sectional trial. RPFNA did not show a high degree of agreement between breasts, suggesting that breast cancer risk and progression may occur at different rates in individual breasts from a single woman. These studies provide proof-of-principle for future RPFNA-based cooperative group prevention studies.

Plasminogen activator system localization in 60 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND

The lack of prognostic factors in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that reliably identifies biologically aggressive tumors adversely affects optimal management. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) system, comprised of its receptor, uPAR, and its inhibitor (PAI-1), are critical elements for tumor invasion and their expression in invasive breast cancer can predict clinical outcome. Expression of the uPA system in DCIS may be relevant in defining histological subsets of DCIS with invasive potential.

METHODS

Localization of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 was investigated immunohistochemically in 60 DCIS tumors. FISH experiments were performed to determine whether uPA was present in cancer cells themselves or derived from stromal elements.

RESULTS

uPA was ubiquitously expressed in the malignant ductal epithelium of 95% (57/60) of DCIS tumors studied. uPA-mRNA was detected in the malignant ductal epithelium but not the adjacent normal ductal epithelium and stromal elements. uPAR was expressed in 27% (6/22) of high-grade and 24% (9/38) of non-high-grade DCIS. In comparing coexpression, uPA and uPAR were coexpressed in only 25% (15/60) of tumors. PAI-1 was infrequently expressed in high grade (3/22) and absent in non-high-grade DCIS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies the presence of uPA, uPAR, and PAI-1 in both high-grade and non-high-grade DCIS. It may be speculated that coexpression of uPA and its receptor may identify subsets of DCIS with an increased risk for progression to invasive disease. If so, then expression of uPA system components may have prognostic and therapeutic significance in DCIS.

Phenotypic changes of p53, HER2, and FAS system in multiple normal tissues surrounding breast cancer

To determine whether phenotypic field changes occur in tissues adjacent to carcinoma, we assayed, by immunohistochemistry, the expression of HER-2, p53, Fas, and FasL in 72 breast cancers (BC) and multiple autologous peritumoral tissues (PTTs) sampled up to 5 cm distance and in 44 benign breast tumors (BBTs). About 5% and 3% of the PTTs and 4.5% and 6.8% of BBTs showed alterations in HER2 and p53 expression, respectively. Of interest, gene amplification was observed in 50% of HER2 positive PTTs, but not in any HER2 positive BBTs. Fas, highly expressed in BBTs and downregulated in BC, maintained its expression in PTTs, whereas FasL, usually negative in BBTs, was upregulated in BC as well as in the PTTs closest (1 cm) to the invasive lesion. Our data suggest that FasL could be a potential novel biomarker of transformation, which may identify, along with HER2 and p53, precursor lesions in a genetically altered breast tissue.

Hsp90: an emerging target for breast cancer therapy

Rapidly evolving insights into the specific molecular genetic abnormalities that drive the growth and metastasis of breast cancer have led to the development of targeted therapeutics that do not rely on the generalized disruption of DNA metabolism and cell division for activity. Of particular interest are inhibitors of cellular signal transduction pathways involving tyrosine kinases as well as selective modulators of steroid hormone signaling, histone acetylation, angiogenesis and tumor cell apoptosis. Unique within this array of promising new agents, however, are compounds that target heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90). This molecular chaperone associates with a distinct, but surprisingly diverse, set of proteins that are referred to as Hsp90 client proteins. Hsp90 binds to these clients, and plays a key role in regulating their stability and function. Many of the proteins chaperoned by Hsp90 are involved in breast cancer progression and resistance to therapy, including the estrogen receptor, receptor tyrosine kinases of the erbB family, Akt, and mutant p53. Several small molecule inhibitors of Hsp90 have been identified that can deplete cellular levels of multiple oncogenic client proteins simultaneously by enhancing their ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated degradation. The activity of Hsp90 inhibitors has been well validated in preclinical breast cancer models, both in single-agent studies and in combination with conventional chemotherapy. One of these inhibitors, 17-allylamino, 17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG, NSC 330507) has recently completed phase I testing. The agent was well tolerated at drug exposures that were shown to cause modulation of Hsp90 client protein levels. Given the redundancy and complexity of the molecular abnormalities present in most breast cancers, the ability of Hsp90 inhibitors to alter the activity of multiple oncogenic targets may prove of unique therapeutic benefit.

Chemoprevention of breast cancer: implications for postmenopausal women

Estrogen administration is associated with reduction in perimenopausal symptoms and the risk for several conditions affecting postmenopausal women. As estrogen administration also increases the risk for breast cancer, a common dilemma facing many women and their physicians is whether to use estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that antagonises estrogenic effects in breast tissue but retains some estrogen agonist properties in other organs, or neither. For women with average to moderate risk of breast cancer and with perimenopausal symptoms, ERT may be the best short-term choice. For very high-risk women (>1% per year) with menopausal symptoms, alternatives to ERT might be offered and tried first. A diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer within the last 2 to 5 years should be considered a relative contraindication for ERT unless the tumour was estrogen receptor negative. High-risk women without menopausal symptoms are the best candidates for the only currently approved drug for breast cancer risk reduction, tamoxifen. Although the drug is approved for women with a 5-year risk of breast cancer > or = 1.7% (0.34% per year), postmenopausal women most likely to experience a favourable benefit/risk ratio are those with a Gail estimated risk of >0.5% per year without a uterus or >1% per year if they retain their uterus. Tamoxifen should not be used in women with prior history of thromboembolic or precancerous uterine conditions. Tamoxifen is often used in Europe in conjunction with transdermal ERT in hysterectomised women without obvious loss of efficacy or increased risk of thromboembolism. Raloxifene is a second generation SERM with estrogen-like agonist effects on bone but with less uterine estrogen agonist activity than tamoxifen. Raloxifene may have less potent breast antiestrogenic effects than tamoxifen, particularly in a moderate- to high-estrogen environment. Raloxifene is approved for use in reducing risk of osteoporosis, but not breast cancer. Whether it is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women is the subject of a current trial. All women regardless of breast cancer risk are advised to employ nonpharmacological risk reduction measures, including normalisation of bodyweight, exercise, adequate calcium and vitamin D intake, and avoidance of smoking and alcohol. The preventive options are best weighed during an individualised consultation where a woman's menopausal symptoms and risk for breast cancer and other diseases can be examined, and the options for improving postmenopausal health can be discussed.

Beyond tamoxifen new endpoints for breast cancer chemoprevention, new drugs for breast cancer prevention

Although tamoxifen appears to markedly reduce breast cancer risk in women with a prior diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia or in situ carcinoma, it is not clear what other groups of women receive substantial benefit. Major breast chemoprevention priorities are to (1) develop new agents that (a) have fewer side effects, (b) are effective in ER--as well as tamoxifen-resistant precancerous tissue, and (c) are compatible with hormone therapy; and (2) develop efficient clinical strategies including prognostic and predictive morphologic and molecular biomarkers. Breast tissue may be repeatedly sampled for evidence of intraepithelial neoplasia by fine needle aspiration, ductal lavage, or needle biopsy to select candidates at highest short-term risk as well as to monitor response in small proof of principle studies prior to a large cancer incidence trial. Molecular marker expression may also be used to select a cohort most likely to respond to a particular agent. A large number of new agents are attractive as potential prevention agents and some are already in clinical prevention testing. Compounds which should be effective in ER + precancerous tissue but may have a better side-effect profile include new selective estrogen receptor modulators which lack uterine estrogen agonist activity, isoflavones, aromatase inactivators/inhibitors for postmenopausal women, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone regimens for premenopausal women. Retinoids, rexinoids, and deltanoids may be efficacious in ER+ tissue resistant to tamoxifen. Agents which should theoretically have activity in ER- or ER+ precancerous tissue include polyamine synthesis inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, combined demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors, as well as metalloprotease and angiogenesis inhibitors. Sample Phase I and Phase II clinical trial designs are reviewed using modulation of molecular markers and breast intraepithelial neoplasia as the major endpoints.

Pathology of preinvasive and excellent-prognosis breast cancer

Our review of recent developments in breast cancer emphasizes clinical utility of tissue samples from patients. We highlight indicators of increased cancer risk and lesions without metastatic capacity at time of detection (but of sufficient risk of attaining metastatic capacity that treatment is mandated, ie, ductal carcinoma in situ). This review also includes invasive lesions with little capacity for metastatic behavior and indicators of low malignant potential. Histologic criteria for their recognition, as well as biologic and clinical characterization, are discussed. Several papers reviewing the usefulness of histologic grading, emphasizing mitotic counts and definitions of microinvasion, are included.

Historical and epidemiologic background of human premalignant breast disease

Premalignant breast disease in humans is a concept that admits to a broad range of elements and possible determinants predicting the likelihood of developing breast cancer. Most of these elements are relative, such as the risk of breast cancer for women that is 130 times that of men and peaks at a younger age by about 10 years. Breast cancer is clearly a stochastic, multifactorial process that evolves over many years in which we must make predictions by likelihood. This review will present the most specially defined and reliably proven of these elements, highlighting anatomic and molecular factors.

Short-term breast cancer prediction by random periareolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model

BACKGROUND

: Biomarkers are needed to refine short-term breast cancer risk estimates from epidemiologic models and to measure response to prevention interventions. The purpose of our study was to determine whether the cytologic appearance of epithelial cells obtained from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates or molecular marker expression in these cells was associated with later breast cancer development.

METHODS

: Four hundred eighty women who were eligible on the basis of a family history of breast cancer, prior precancerous biopsy, and/or prior invasive cancer were enrolled in a single-institution, prospective trial. Their risk of breast cancer according to the Gail model was calculated, and random periareolar fine-needle aspiration was performed at study entry. Cells were characterized morphologically and analyzed for DNA aneuploidy by image analysis and for the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53 protein, and HER2/NEU protein by immunocytochemistry. All statistical tests are two-sided.

RESULTS

: At a median follow-up time of 45 months after initial aspiration, 20 women have developed breast cancer (invasive disease in 13 and ductal carcinoma in situ in seven). With the use of multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis, subsequent cancer was predicted by evidence of hyperplasia with atypia in the initial fine-needle aspirate and a 10-year Gail projected probability of developing breast cancer. Although expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, estrogen receptor, p53, and HER2/NEU was statistically significantly associated with hyperplasia with atypia, it did not predict the development of breast cancer in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

: Cytomorphology from breast random periareolar fine-needle aspirates can be used with the Gail risk model to identify a cohort of women at very high short-term risk for developing breast cancer. We recommend that cytomorphology be studied for use as a potential surrogate end point in prevention trials.

Transforming growth factor-beta and breast cancer risk in women with mammary epithelial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transforming growth factors-beta (TGF-betas) regulate mammary epithelial cell division. Loss of expression of TGF-beta receptor II (TGF-beta-RII) is related to cell proliferation and tumor progression. Breast epithelial hyperplastic lesions lacking atypia (EHLA) are associated with a mild elevation in breast cancer risk. We investigated the expression of TGF-beta-RII in EHLA and the risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study of women with biopsy-confirmed EHLA who did not have a history of breast cancer or atypical hyperplasia of the breast. Case patients (n = 54) who subsequently developed invasive breast cancer were matched with control patients (n = 115) who did not. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of breast biopsy specimens of all 169 patients with EHLA were studied by immunohistochemical analysis with antibodies against TGF-beta-RII. All P values are two-sided.

RESULTS

Women with breast EHLA and 25%-75% TGF-beta-RII-positive cells or less than 25% TGF-beta-RII-positive cells had odds ratios of invasive breast cancer of 1.98 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-4.1) or 3.41 (95% CI = 1.2-10.0), respectively (P for trend =.008). These risks are calculated with respect to women with EHLA that had greater than 75% TGF-beta-RII expression. Women with a heterogeneous pattern of TGF-beta-RII expression in their normal breast lobular units and either greater than 75%, 25%-75%, or less than 25% positive cells in their EHLA had odds ratios for breast cancer risk of 0.742 (95% CI = 0.3-1.8), 2.85 (95% CI = 1.1-7.1), or 3.55 (95% CI = 1.0-10.0), respectively (P for trend =.003). These risks are relative to women with a homogeneous pattern of expression in their normal lobular units and greater than 75% positive cells in their EHLA.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that loss of TGF-beta-RII expression in epithelial cells of EHLA is associated with increased risk of invasive breast cancer.

Pathology of preinvasive and excellent-prognosis breast cancer

Evaluation of tissue and cellular samples for diagnosis, risk assessment, and prognosis in breast cancer is the subject of this review. We emphasize indicators of elevated risk for breast cancer and carcinomas in situ and indicators of good prognosis in invasive breast cancer. The importance of ductal carcinoma in situ to considerations in breast conservation and prevention is highlighted. Special types of breast cancer, immunohistochemistry, histologic grading, and the relevance of core biopsy to diagnostic certainty are considered. We also add a brief note about the escalating role of nodal micrometastases and sentinel node biopsy in the definition of minimal regional disease.