Effect of age on risk of second primary colorectal cancer

Associations between pathological features and risk of metachronous colorectal cancer

Survivors of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at risk of developing another primary colorectal cancer - metachronous CRC. Understanding which pathological features of the first tumour are associated with risk of metachronous CRC might help tailor existing surveillance guidelines. Population-based CRC cases were recruited from the United States, Canada and Australia between 1997 and 2012 and followed prospectively until 2022 by the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Metachronous CRC was defined as a new primary CRC diagnosed at least 1 year after the initial CRC. Those with the genetic cancer predisposition Lynch syndrome or MUTYH mutation carriers were excluded. Cox regression models were fitted to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations. Of 6085 CRC cases, 138 (2.3%) were diagnosed with a metachronous CRC over a median follow-up time of 12 years (incidence: 2.0 per 1000 person-years). CRC cases with a synchronous CRC were 3.4-fold more likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.89-5.98) than those without a synchronous tumour. CRC cases with MMR-deficient tumours had a 72% increased risk of metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.11-2.64) compared to those with MMR-proficient tumours. Compared to cases who had an adenocarcinoma histologic type, those with an undifferentiated histologic type were 77% less likely to develop a metachronous CRC (adjusted HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.94). Existing surveillance guidelines for CRC survivors could be updated to include increased surveillance for those whose first CRC was diagnosed with a synchronous CRC or was MMR-deficient.

Cost-effectiveness of surveillance with CT colonography after resection of colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Surveillance following colorectal cancer (CRC) resection uses optical colonoscopy (OC) to detect intraluminal disease and CT to detect extracolonic recurrence. CT colonography (CTC) might be an efficient use of resources in this situation because it allows for intraluminal and extraluminal evaluations with one test.

DESIGN

We developed a simulation model to compare lifetime costs and benefits for a cohort of patients with resected CRC. Standard of care involved annual CT for 3 years and OC for years 1, 4 and every 5 years thereafter. For the CTC-based strategy, we replace CT+OC at year 1 with CTC. Patients with lesions greater than 6 mm detected by CTC underwent OC. Detection of an adenoma 10 mm or larger was followed by OC at 1 year, then every 3 years thereafter. Test characteristics and costs for CTC were derived from a clinical study. Medicare costs were used for cancer care costs as well as alternative test costs. We discounted costs and effects at 3% per year.

RESULTS

For persons with resected stage III CRC, the standard-of-care strategy was more costly (US$293) and effective (2.6 averted CRC cases and 1.1 averted cancer deaths per 1000) than the CTC-based strategy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$55 500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Our analysis was most sensitive to the sensitivity of CTC for detecting polyps 10 mm or larger and assumptions about disease progression.

CONCLUSION

In a simulation model, we found that replacing the standard-of-care approach to postdiagnostic surveillance with a CTC-based strategy is not an efficient use of resources in most situations.

Second primary malignancy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

There have been no studies on implementing effective screening models for esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma survivors. We used a proportional subdistribution hazards model to estimate second primary malignancy risks among patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. We validated models using a bootstrap cross-validation method and performed decision curve analysis to evaluate their clinical utility. Age group and SEER historic stage were significantly associated with second primary malignancy risk after diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Saving positive lymph nodes and distant metastasis were significant factors in the adenocarcinoma group, and marital status, tumor location, and chemotherapy were significant factors in the squamous cell carcinoma group. Calibration plots show good concordance between predicted and actual outcomes except in high-probability areas for the risk of a second primary malignancy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Discrimination performances of the Fine-Gray models were evaluated using c-indices, which were 0.691 and 0.662 for second primary malignancies in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively. Decision curve analysis yielded a range of threshold probabilities (0.020-0.177 and 0.021-0.133 for patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, respectively) at which the clinical net benefit of the risk model was larger than those of hypothetical all-screening and no-screening scenarios. Our nomograms enable selection of patient populations at high risk for a second primary malignancy and thus will facilitate the design of prevention trials for affected populations.

Clonality and heterogeneity of metachronous colorectal cancer

Patients with metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) have been diagnosed with primary CRC more than once. Given that the genetic and microenvironment is the same in these cases, metachronous CRC is an important model for studying colorectal tumorigenesis. We performed whole exome sequencing of seven freshly frozen tumors from three patients with metachronous CRC and compared their genetic profiles. In patients with metachronous tumors of distinct genetic origins, 3.74% and 0.20% of genes were ubiquitously mutated and candidate cancer genes mutated at different sites. Tumors from the same patients were clonally unrelated, and thus druggable genes differed. In contrast, in a patient with metachronous tumors of a common genetic origin, the ubiquitously mutated genes were 61.02%, with ubiquitously mutated genes and candidate cancer genes all mutated at the same sites, tumors were clonally related, and some druggable genes were the same. Therefore, two different clonal relationships between metachronous tumors exist in CRC, one is monoclonal and the other is polyclonal. Our findings may help to advance understanding of the differences in metachronous CRCs and the genetic mechanisms of which they originate, and provide new avenues for CRC treatment.

Excessive risk of second primary cancers in young-onset colorectal cancer survivors

With an increasing trend of patients with young-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), risks of second primary cancers (SPCs) among them become a concerning issue. We aimed to define the detailed risk and site-distributed patterns of SPCs in young CRC individuals (age ≤50). A population-based cohort were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1973 and 2013. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risk (AER) were calculated to assess the risk for SPCs compared with the general population. A total of 44,106 patients, including 3245 (7.4%) the young and 40,861 (92.6%) the old, developed 50,679 secondary malignancies subsequently. With increased age, the risk of secondary cancers gradually decreased. A significant 44% excess risk of SPCs was observed in the young (SIR = 1.44, AER = 34.23), while a slightly increased risk was noted in the old (SIR = 1.02, AER = 4.29). For young survivors, the small intestine (SIR = 8.49), bile ducts (SIR = 3.77), corpus, and uterus (SIR = 2.45) were the most common sites of SPCs. Significantly, excess SIRs in the young were persisted regardless of other factors. For the young, secondary cancer-related deaths were responsible for 51.2% of overall deaths and secondary stomach, liver and bile, pancreas cancers were top three causes. An excessive risk of SPCs existed in young CRC survivors, and this trend was consistent among different subgroups. We hope our findings may inform future targeted screening strategies among young-onset CRC survivors.

The risk and survival outcome of subsequent primary colorectal cancer after the first primary colorectal cancer: cases from 1973 to 2012

Background

Among colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors, how the prior tumor location affects the risk of subsequent primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) and the outcome of those suffering from SPCRC remain unknown.

Methods

CRC cases diagnosed from 1973 to 2012 were screened for SPCRC development using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The relative risk of SPCRC was estimated using the standardized incidence ratio. Survivals were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression model.

Results

The overall risk of SPCRC increased by 27% in CRC survivors compared to that of the general population. The risk increased in patients with both prior right colon cancer (RCC) and left colon cancer (LCC), and was concentrated in the first 5 years after the prior diagnosis, and among young patients. Among the 6701 SPCRC patients identified, patients with prior RCC were more likely to be elderly, female, and with more low or undifferentiated disease than those with prior LCC or rectal cancer (ReC). The overall survivals differed by both prior tumor location (P < 0.0001) and age (P < 0.0001), and the difference by tumor location remained significant when adjusted or stratified by any other potential prognostic factor except age. The cancer specific survivals differed by age (P < 0.0001) rather than by prior tumor location (P = 0.455).

Conclusions

The overall risk of SPCRC increased among patients with both prior RCC and LCC, but not among those with ReC. The different survival outcomes in CRC survivors suffering from SPCRC were largely explained by the patient age but not by the prior tumor location.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3765-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Colorectal surveillance after segmental resection for young-onset colorectal cancer: is there evidence for extended resection?

AIM

Although sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC) usually occurs in patients aged over 50, recent evidence suggests that the incidence is increasing in younger patients. Such patients are theoretically at high risk of metachronous neoplasia and may be candidates for extended prophylactic colectomy. This study aimed to define the risk of metachronous cancer/adenomas during follow-up of younger patients who underwent segmental colectomy for CRC.

METHOD

A CRC database was used to identify patients aged under 50 who underwent surgery for CRC between 1994 and 2010. Patients diagnosed with hereditary cancer or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. The primary end-points were frequency of extended resection and the rates of metachronous cancer and high-risk adenomas during follow-up.

RESULTS

There were 284 young patients with a resectable primary tumour, of whom 280 (98.6%) underwent segmental resection, 3 (1%) extended resection and 1 (0.4%) local resection. Endoscopic follow-up was available for 150 of the patients who had segmental colectomy, with a mean age of 42.6 (±5.8) years at diagnosis and median follow-up time of 68 months (interquartile range 45-105). Out of these 150 patients, 4 (2.7%) developed metachronous colonic adenocarcinoma at 24, 71, 151 and 228 months after index surgery. Thirty additional patients had at least one adenoma identified during surveillance, and three had sessile serrated polyps. Out of the three patients undergoing extended resection, none had metachronous cancer or advanced adenomas at an average follow-up of 17 years.

CONCLUSION

A segmental colectomy or proctectomy is adequate treatment for patients presenting with CRC under the age of 50.

Risk of subsequent primary malignancies among patients with prior colorectal cancer: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The site-distribution pattern and relative risk of subsequent primary malignancies (SPMs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains to be determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A population-based cohort of 288,390 CRC patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2012 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was retrospectively reviewed. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to estimate the relative risk for SPMs.

RESULTS

The overall risk of SPMs increased in CRC patients (standardized incidence ratio 1.02) in the first 5 years after CRC diagnosis compared with that in the general population, and was negatively related to age at diagnosis. Risk increased significantly for cancers of the small intestine, ureter, colorectum, renal pelvis, endocrine system, and stomach, and decreased significantly for cancers of the gallbladder, liver, myeloma, and brain, as well as lymphoma. Patients with different prior CRC subsites showed specific sites at high risk of SPM. Prior right-sided colon cancer was associated with cancers of the small intestine, ureter, renal pelvis, thyroid, stomach, pancreas, and breast and prior left-sided colon cancer associated with secondary CRC, whereas rectal cancer was associated with cancers of the vagina, urinary bladder, and lung.

CONCLUSION

Risk of SPMs increases in CRC survivors, especially in the first 5 years after prior diagnosis. Intensive surveillance should be advocated among young patients, with specific attention to the small intestine, colorectum, renal pelvis, and ureter. The common sites at high risk of SPM originate from the embryonic endoderm. Genetic susceptibility may act as the main mechanism underlying the risk of multiple cancers.

Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer or polyp: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify personal, lifestyle, and tumor-related risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer (CRC) and polyp.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register through 15 May 2016. Estimates for associations were summarized using random effects models.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies were included in the review. For individuals who had a CRC resection, having a synchronous polyp was a risk factor for metachronous CRC or polyp (relative risk [RR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.82) and having a synchronous CRC (RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.25-2.91) and proximally located CRC (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.24-3.64) were risk factors for metachronous CRC. For individuals who had a polypectomy, larger size (RR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.11-8.57) or severe dysplasia of the initial polyp (RR, 5.15; 95% CI, 2.02-13.14), and having a synchronous polyp (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.35-4.73) were risk factors for metachronous CRC; and a family history of CRC (RR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.26-2.87), having a synchronous polyp (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.74-3.50) and a larger size (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.03-2.15) and proximal location of the initial polyp (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40) were risk factors for metachronous polyp. Meta-regression showed duration of follow-up was not a source of heterogeneity for most associations. There was no evidence that lifestyle factors were associated with metachronous CRC or polyp risk.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive list of risk factors identified for metachronous CRC or polyp may have important clinical implications.

Tumor size is an independent risk predictor for metachronous colorectal cancer

Non-hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at higher risk of developing independent metachronous CRC than cancer-naïve individuals, but the reason is unknown. We studied metachronous CRC risk factors among one thousand five Japanese CRC patients who underwent surgery for CRC. Relative hazard risk of clinical and pathological features was assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis. Observed metachronous CRC incidence was also compared with the expected cancer incidence of the general population in Japan. Twenty-seven metachronous CRCs developed in 24 patients (2.4%) during a follow-up period of 3,676 person-years. Multivariate analysis revealed two factors associated with a high metachronous CRC risk: synchronous CRC (HR = 6.13; p = 1.3x10(-4)) and tumor size ≥ 6.5 cm (HR = 4.34; p = 1x10(-3)). Patients with either synchronous or large solitary tumors exhibited a higher risk for metachronous CRC than patients with solitary small tumors (HR = 7.3; p = 4.3x10(-6)) and that the general Japanese population (SIR = 7.01; p = 3.5x10(-9)), while patients with solitary small tumors did not (SIR = 1.07; p = 0.8). If patients younger than 60 years were excluded, the observations remained unchanged, with tumor size becoming stronger predictor (HR = 5.67; p = 1.7x10(-4)) than the presence of synchronous CRC (HR = 5.34; p = 9.6x10(-4)). Our novel finding that primary tumor size is a strong independent risk factor for metachronous CRC increases the sensitivity of prediction more than twice the presence of synchronous CRC. Our data provides new insights to assess the risk for metachronous lesions that should improve the surveillance regimen for CRC.

Incidence of second primary malignancies in patients with esophageal cancer: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Development of a second primary malignancy (SPM) after an index esophageal cancer is fairly rare, primarily due to decreased survival in patients with esophageal cancer. However, with advances in early detection and therapy, the number of long-term survivors is increasing, as is the incidence of SPMs in this population.

SCOPE

We review herein the published literature on the incidence of SPMs after an index esophageal cancer as well as its associated risk factors, prognosis and surveillance. We discuss predisposing factors that may contribute to the development of SPMs, epidemiology and attempts at chemoprevention.

FINDINGS

Data from population-based studies, retrospective reviews and case reports indicate an increased risk of SPMs in patients with esophageal cancer with reported incidence rates between 8.3 and 27.1%. Index esophageal squamous cell carcinomas have a higher association with other tobacco-related cancers such as those of the head and neck and lung. They have also shown an association with second primary cancers of the breast, stomach, thyroid, and kidney. Individuals with esophageal adenocarcinomas are at a higher risk of developing second cancers of the stomach, oropharynx and lung/bronchus. Other primary cancer sites involved include the kidney, colorectum and pancreas. Common risk factors including lifestyle and genetic alterations may explain the increased incidence of second primary cancers in this patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of developing a second malignancy should be anticipated after curative treatment of esophageal cancer, and raises concerns for optimal surveillance and therapy of these patients. Recent literature suggests similar survival rates in esophageal cancer patients with and without SPMs. With the increasing incidence of SPMs in subjects with esophageal cancer, there may be benefit to close screening for and aggressive therapy of SPMs. However, further studies are needed to elucidate optimal management strategies.

Anatomic subsite of primary colorectal cancer and subsequent risk and distribution of second cancers

BACKGROUND

Individuals with a history of colorectal cancer (CRC) have an increased risk of subsequent cancer. In this study, the authors used cancer registry data to evaluate whether this increased risk of cancer after CRC differed by anatomic subsite of a first CRC.

METHODS

Individuals diagnosed with a first primary CRC between 1992 and 2009 were identified from 12 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by comparing the incidence of subsequent cancers in these patients who had an index CRC versus the cancer incidence rates in the general population. SIRs were calculated for cancers at anatomic sites within and outside the colorectum in analyses stratified by subsite of the index CRC.

RESULTS

Cancer incidence rates were significantly higher in individuals who had a previous CRC than in the general population (SIR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16). Individuals with an index CRC located between the transverse and descending colon experienced the greatest increased risk both overall (SIR, 1.29-1.33) and particularly with respect to the risk of a second CRC (SIR, 2.53-3.35). The incidence of small intestinal cancer was elevated significantly regardless of the index CRC subsite (SIR, 4.31; 95% CI, 3.70-4.77), and the incidence of endometrial cancer was elevated in those who had an index CRC in the proximal colon (SIR, 1.37-1.79).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of second cancer after CRC differs by anatomic site of the first tumor and is particularly pronounced for those with prior CRC located in the transverse to descending colon. The mechanisms underlying this pattern of second cancer risk remain unknown.

High constant incidence of second primary colorectal cancer

Patients who had a colorectal cancer have a 1.5- to 2-fold excess risk of a second colorectal cancer as compared to the general population, the excess being higher at younger age at diagnosis. To further investigate the risk and the age-relation of the incidence of second primary colorectal cancer, we considered 9,389 first colon and rectal cancers registered in the Vaud Cancer Registry, Switzerland, between 1974 and 2008, and followed-up to the end of 2008 for a total of 44,113 person-years. There were 136 second colorectal cancers versus 90.5 expected, corresponding to a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.3-1.8). The SIRs were not heterogeneous between men and women, and in strata of calendar year at diagnosis, duration of follow-up, and subsite. However, the SIR was 7.5 (95% CI 4.2-12.4) for subjects diagnosed below age 50 and declined thereafter to reach 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.6) at age 80 or over. Consequently, the incidence of second primary colorectal cancer was stable, and exceedingly high, around 300-400/100,000 between age 30-39 and 70 or over. This age pattern is consistent with the existence of a single mutational event in a population of highly susceptible individuals.

The incidence and risk factors of metachronous colorectal cancer: an indication for follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patients with colorectal cancer are at risk for developing metachronous colorectal cancer. The purpose of posttreatment surveillance is to detect and remove premalignant lesions to prevent metachronous colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of and predictive factors for metachronous colorectal cancer in patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

The data on all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer between 1995 and 2006 were obtained from the Rotterdam Cancer Registry in The Netherlands and studied for metachronous colorectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The annual incidence rate and the standardized incidence ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 10,283 patients; there were 39,974 person-years of follow-up. The mean annual incidence rate of metachronous colorectal cancer was 314/100,000 person-years at risk during 10 years of follow-up, corresponding with a mean annual incidence of 0.3% and a cumulative incidence of 1.1% at 3 years, 2.0% at 6 years, and 3.1% at 10 years. The incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer after resection of a first colorectal cancer is significantly higher than the incidence of colorectal cancer in an age- and sex-matched general population (standardized incidence ratio 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5). This difference is especially seen during the first 3 years after first colorectal cancer diagnosis (standardized incidence ratio 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). The presence of synchronous colorectal cancer was the only significant risk factor for developing metachronous colorectal cancer (relative risk 13.9, 95% CI 4.7-41.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the availability of colonoscopy, metachronous colorectal cancer is still seen during follow-up in patients with colorectal cancer; the highest risk is during the first 3 years after initial diagnosis. For this reason, a follow-up colonoscopy is useful at a short-term interval after colorectal cancer diagnosis. The presence of synchronous colorectal cancer at the time of first colorectal cancer diagnosis is the only predictive risk factor for developing metachronous colorectal cancer. Tailored surveillance programs may be considered in patients with a diagnosis of synchronous tumors.

High constant incidence rates of second primary cancers of the head and neck: a pooled analysis of 13 cancer registries

Scanty data are available on the incidence (i.e., the absolute risk) of second cancers of the head and neck (HN) and its pattern with age. We investigated this issue using data from a multicentric study of 13 population-based cancer registries from Europe, Canada, Australia and Singapore for the years 1943-2000. A total of 99,257 patients had a first primary HN cancer (15,985 tongue, 22,378 mouth, 20,758 pharyngeal, and 40,190 laryngeal cancer), contributing to 489,855 person-years of follow-up. A total of 1,294 of the patients (1.3%) were diagnosed with second HN cancers (342 tongue, 345 mouth, 418 pharynx and 189 larynx). Male incidence rates of first HN cancer steeply increased from 0.68/100,000 at age 30-34 to 46.2/100,000 at age 70-74, and leveled off at older age; female incidence increased from 0.50/100,000 at age 30-34 to 16.5/100,000 at age 80-84. However, age-specific incidence of second HN cancers after a first HN cancer in men was around 200-300/100,000 between age 40-44 and age 70-74 and tended to decline at subsequent ages (150/100,000 at age 80-84); in women, incidence of second HN cancers was around 200-300/100,000 between age 45-49 and 80-84. The patterns of age-specific incidence were consistent for different subsites of second HN cancer and sexes; moreover, they were similar for age-specific incidence of first primary HN cancer in patients who subsequently developed a second HN cancer. The incidence of second HN cancers does not increase with age, but remains constant, or if anything, decreases with advancing age.

Post-treatment surveillance in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Though the post treatment surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with curative intent is common practice, its value is controversial. In the absence of conclusive clinical data, various modalities for the routine follow-up of patients with CRC have been proposed. In practice, the guidelines across countries and regions differ and are influenced by different health care policies, resource availability and doubts about effectiveness of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of metaanalyses of available clinical trials demonstrated a survival benefit of intensified monitoring, but the questions regarding the optimal frequency of visits and the examinations to be performed remain unanswered. Furthermore, intensive monitoring of CRC survivors may be difficult to be administrated, causes discomfort and morbidity to the patient and can have serious cost-implications to the healthcare system. However, as it seems from available data, a comprehensive surveillance program does not affect the quality of patients' life. Ongoing large prospective multi-institutional randomised trials might elucidate some of the crucial questions and existing dilemmas to establish adequate surveillance strategy for CRC patients.

Clinical and pathological evaluation of patients with early and late recurrence of colorectal cancer

AIM

To compare the characteristics of primary cancer between patients with early recurrence and those with late recurrence of colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Overall 535 patients with primary colorectal cancer were reviewed and of these 130 patients with demonstrated recurrence were evaluated. Of the 130 patients, 91 had early recurrence (less than 2 years after surgery) and 39 had late recurrence (2 years or more after surgery). The clinical and pathological characteristics of primary cancer in these two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The rate of late recurrence was 30% of total recurrences (39/130). On average, patients with early recurrence were younger than patients with late recurrence (mean age 48 vs 54 years, p = 0.027). Adjacent organ involvement and Dukes stage C was more prevalent in the early recurrence group than in the late group. The liver was the main site of distant recurrence in the early recurrence group (64% of distant recurrences), whereas bone and peritoneum were the most frequent sites of metastases in the late recurrence group (58%). In Dukes C colon cancer patients the disease-free interval was significantly longer in those who received both adjuvant therapies than in those who received either radiotherapy or chemotherapy or neither of them.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that factors such as primary clinical signs, stage of primary tumor, and adjacent organ involvement are significant with respect to the time for recurrence of colorectal cancer. It is important to take these characteristics into account in patient care management after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Incidence of second cancer within 5 years of diagnosis of a breast, prostate or colorectal cancer: a population-based study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk for cancer patients of developing a new primary invasive cancer. Using data from a French Cancer Registry, we included 14,353 cancer patients (breast, colorectal or prostate cancer) diagnosed between 1989 and 1997. Observed second cancers occurring during the first 5 years after the first cancer were compared with the expected number, based on primary cancer incidence rate, by the standardized incidence ratio (SIR). Breast cancer patients had significantly elevated SIR for contralateral breast cancer (SIR=1.7), kidney cancer (SIR=3.5) and myeloid leukaemia (SIR=8.3). Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer had significantly elevated risk for small intestine (SIR=10.7) and colorectal cancer (SIR=1.6). Young age at diagnosis of breast and colorectal cancers was associated with risk of a second cancer. After prostate cancer, men had no greater risk of cancer, except for kidney cancer. Our results help to direct attention to regions especially vulnerable to secondary cancers after primary breast or colorectal cancer.

Second primary colorectal cancers (SPCRCs): experiences from a large Australian Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

We examined the rate of second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) in a cohort of 29 471 patients first diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) from 1987 to 1996, in New South Wales (NSW), Australia.

METHODS

The 5-year age group, date and site of first and subsequent CRC diagnoses as well as death dates were obtained from the NSW Central Cancer Registry. The time to SPCRC and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were generated.

RESULTS

Six hundred and sixty patients (2.1%) developed SPCRCs and the cumulative incidence at 18 years was 5.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.9% to 6.3%. The risk of SPCRC was increased in patients with a CRC history compared with the general population (SIR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.6) and inversely related to age at first diagnosis (30-49 years, SIR = 5.1, 95% CI 3.6-7.1 versus >/=80 years, SIR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4). The excess absolute risk of SPCRC was greater for females aged 50-69 years at first diagnosis than for males in the same age group. SPCRC was also increased in individuals with right-sided first primaries (SIR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.6-2.4).

CONCLUSIONS

The SPCRC rate was increased during the first 5 years after first diagnosis but remained increased for up to 10 years in females, in patients with right-sided cancers and in patients <60 years at first diagnosis. These findings support active surveillance up to 10 years in these risk groups.

Colon cancer and the elderly: from screening to treatment in management of GI disease in the elderly

Colorectal cancer is one of the commonest tumours in the Westernized world affecting mainly the elderly. This neoplasm in older individuals occurs more often in the right colon and grows more rapidly than in the young, often shows a mucinous histology and mismatch repair gene changes. Effective screening permits discovery of colorectal cancer at an early highly treatable stage and allows for detection and removal of premalignant colorectal adenomas. Screening methods that focus on cancer detection use fecal assays for the presence of blood or altered DNA, those for detection of adenomas (and early cancer) use endoscopic or computerised radiologic techniques. Broad use of screening methods has lowered colorectal cancer development by about 50%. In addition, prevention of the earliest stage of colon carcinogenesis has been shown to be effective in small prospective studies and epidemiologic surveys but have not been employed in the general population. Since 1996 the chemotherapeutic armamentarium for metastatic colorectal cancer has grown beyond 5-fluorouracil to include an oral 5-fluorouracil prodrug, capecitabine as well as irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Three targeted monoclonal antibodies (Moabs), bevacizumab (an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor Moab) and cetuximab/panitumumab, both anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, have also earned regulatory approval. Most stage IV patients are treated with all of these drugs over 2 or 3 sequential lines of palliative chemotherapy and attain median survivals approaching 24 months. Lastly, adjuvant oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for high risk resected stage II and stage III colon cancer patient has led to substantial improvement in cure rates. With appropriate care of age associated comorbidities these treatment modalities are feasible and effective in the geriatric population.

High constant incidence rates of second primary neoplasms

The incidence of contralateral breast cancer is high and constant with age, around five per 1000 women who had a primary breast cancer. For other neoplasms, the pattern of incidence of second primary neoplasms with age is less known, particularly as for only a few neoplasms the site of origin is not totally removed, and hence remains at risk of a second primary. Using the dataset from the Cancer Registry of the Swiss Canton of Vaud, we show that the incidence of second neoplasms is constant with age also after oral and pharyngeal, colorectal cancers, cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and basal cell carcinoma. The incidence of first primary oral and pharyngeal cancer increased 20-fold between age 30-39 and 70-89 years, whereas the incidence of second neoplasms did not increase with age. Rates of second colorectal cancer remained relatively constant with age, between 2.5 per 1000 at age 40-59 years and 3.8 per 1000 at 70 years and above. Likewise, for CMM, the age-specific incidence rates of second primary CMM did not vary, ranging between 1 and 2.5 per 1000 in various subsequent age groups. The pattern of incidence for second basal cell carcinoma was similar, with no clear rise with age. These patterns are compatible with the occurrence of a single mutational event in a population of susceptible individuals. A possible implication of these observations is that a variable, but potentially large, proportion of cancers arise in very high-risk individuals and the incidence, on average, increases at a high constant level at a predetermined age.

Surveillance endoscopy does not improve survival for patients with local and regional stage colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic surveillance is recommended and widely practiced after definitive treatment for colorectal cancer, yet to the authors' knowledge there is little evidence supporting its benefit. The purpose of the current study was to estimate the impact of endoscopic surveillance on colorectal cancer-specific survival for persons with localized or regional colorectal cancer. The population included Medicare patients (age >or=65 years) who were diagnosed with local or regional stage colorectal cancer between 1986 and 1996.

METHODS

The current study was a retrospective case-control study. Cases were defined as those individuals who died of colorectal cancer and controls were defined as those with colorectal cancer who did not die of colorectal cancer; controls were frequency matched to cases. Surveillance was defined as the use of colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or barium enema >or=6 months after diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to control for endoscopic procedure, race, comorbidity index at the time of diagnosis, and types of initial treatments after surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis group contained 8130 cases (29%) and 20,079 controls (71%). The average time to first bowel surveillance for those with at least 1 surveillance examination was 15.9 months after the diagnosis (median, 13 months). In the regression analysis, surveillance endoscopy was not found to be associated with improved colorectal cancer-specific survival (odds ratio of 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.06 [P=0.85]). Setting the surveillance interval to 12 months and 15 months rather than 6 months after diagnosis did not appear to influence the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance endoscopy does not appear to influence colorectal cancer-specific mortality in patients age >65 years who are diagnosed with localized or regional stage colorectal cancer.

Age, sex and the risk of grade-specific second primary colorectal cancer: evidence for the protective effect of female hormone

AIM

To investigate the interaction effects of age and sex on the risk of grade-specific second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC).

METHOD

This is a retrospective cohort study, using registry data covering the period 1973-2003 from the SEER program, National Cancer Institute. The sex-age-specific incidence rates of Grade 1, Grade 2 and Grade 3 second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) were calculated. Poisson regression models were used to estimate the interaction effects between sex and age.

RESULTS

The sex-age-specific incidence rates of Grade 1, Grade 2, and Grade 3 second primary colorectal cancer (SPCRC) increased gradually with age, especially in females. There was a significant interaction effect between sex and age on the risk of Grade 3 second primary colon cancer.

CONCLUSION

Decrease in female hormone level since menopausal age may increase the risk of a second primary colon cancer, especially a cancer with poorer differentiation.

Second neoplasms after oesophageal cancer

The authors considered the incidence of second neoplasms among 1,672 oesophageal cancers diagnosed between 1974 and 2004 in the Cancer Registries of the Swiss Cantons of Vaud and Neuchâtel, and followed-up to 2004. A total of 141 second neoplasms were observed versus 38.5 expected, corresponding to a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 3.7 (95% confidence interval: 3.1-4.3). The SIRs were statistically significant for cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx (57.3), larynx (24.3), lung (6.6) and intestines (2.6). The SIRs were higher in subjects diagnosed below age 50 and in the first year after diagnosis. The SIR of upper digestive and respiratory tract neoplasms was higher for oesophageal cancers diagnosed in the upper (87.5) and middle (68.1), as compared with the lower third (19.4). There was no rise of second oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer with advancing age, and their incidence tended indeed to decline from 100/1,000 at age 40-49 to 25/1,000 at age 70-79. There was no tendency to rise with age in the incidence of first oesophageal cancer in subjects who subsequently developed another upper digestive or respiratory tract neoplasm. The excess risks of upper digestive and respiratory tract neoplasms are attributable to increased diagnosis and registration of second neoplasms following a diagnosis of oesophageal cancer, as well as to heavy tobacco and alcohol consumption in oesophageal cancer cases. The absence of rise in incidence with age is also compatible with the existence of a subset of the population of susceptible individuals.

Second primary oral and pharyngeal cancers in subjects diagnosed with oral and pharyngeal cancer

Patients diagnosed with oral and pharyngeal (OP) cancer have a substantial excess risk of second OP cancer, but risk quantification is still uncertain and scanty information is available on the absolute excess risk of second OP cancer. We considered the risk of second OP primary cancer in a population-based series of 3,092 first primary OP cancers registered between 1974 and 2003 in the Swiss Cantons of Vaud and Neuchâtel (total population of about 786,000 inhabitants). A total of 233 second OP cancers were registered, versus 7.4 expected, corresponding to a SIR of 31.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.7-36.0). The SIR was 68.5 in the first year after diagnosis of the first primary, and declined thereafter, leveling around 20. The SIR was 30.7 when the site of first neoplasm was the oral cavity, 42.5 for the tongue and 28.1 for the oropharynx or hypo-pharynx. Corresponding values for topographies of second primaries were 28.8, 50.4 and 26.2. The cumulative risk of second OP cancer 15 years after diagnosis of first OP cancer approached 22% in men and 17% in women. The incidence of first primaries increased over 20-fold between age 30-39 and 70-79, whereas there was no rise with age for second neoplasms.

Excess risk of subsequent primary cancers among colorectal carcinoma survivors, 1975-2001

BACKGROUND

Studies of persons with colorectal cancer have reported increased risk of subsequent primary cancers. Results have not been consistent, however, and there is little information about such risk in specific races and ethnic populations.

METHODS

Using 1975-2001 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, we assembled 262,600 index cases of colorectal carcinoma to assess the occurrence of subsequent primary cancers in 13 noncolonic sites. Observed (O) subsequent cancers were compared with those expected (E) based on age-/sex-/race-/year-/site-specific rates in the SEER population. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and the absolute excess risk (AER) represent 'O / E' and 'O - E,' respectively.

RESULTS

Colorectal carcinoma patients had significantly elevated SIRs for small gut, stomach (males), kidney, and corpus uteri cancers, ranging from 1.13 for stomach cancer in males to 3.45 for small gut cancer in females. Elevated SIRs for additional sites were seen in certain population subgroups: pancreas and ovary in persons aged <50 years, and prostate in black males. The excess burden, as assessed by AER, was notable for prostate cancer in black males and for corpus uteri cancer in females aged <50 years (26.5 and 9.5 cancers per 10,000 person-years, respectively), and it persisted beyond 5 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Although significantly elevated SIRs were found for several cancers, the excess burden was notable only for cancer of the prostate in black males and of the corpus uteri in females under age 50.

High incidence of second basal cell skin cancers

We considered the risk of second basal cell cancers (BCC) of the skin using a population-based series of 1,868 BCC collected between 1976 and 1985 in the Swiss Cantons of Vaud and Neuchâtel, and followed-up to the end of 2003. Overall, 507 second BCC were observed versus 59.98 expected, corresponding to a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 8.45 (95% CI: 7.73-9.22). The SIRs were similar in men and women in subsequent calendar periods, but tended to decline with advancing age at diagnosis of first BCC, from 13.98 below age 50 to 7.13 at age 70 or over. Consequently, the rate of first BCC increased to approximately 30-fold between 7/100,000 at age 30-39 and 200/100,000 at age 70-79, but the rate of second BCC increased only about 3-fold between 31/1,000 at age 30-39 and 110/1,000 at age 70-79. The cumulative risk of second BCC was 11% at 5 years, 21% at 10 years and 40% at 20 years. This study indicates that the relative (but not the absolute) risk of second BCC is greater at younger age and declines with advancing age, and is therefore compatible with an excess baseline risk in a population of susceptible individuals.

Recidiva local en el cáncer de colon y recto

Data on the incidence of colorectal cancer are alarming and reveal that it is currently the second cause of death from cancer. Most of these deaths are due to recurrence after surgery with curative intent. The factors associated with locoregional recurrence are mainly related to the tumor's histopathological characteristics and grade of invasion. With adequate training the surgeon should not appear among these factors. In rectal cancer this training involves the technique of mesorectal excision, adequate circumferential margin and selective neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After curative resection, patients should be followed-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence. Isolated local recurrence occurs in 20-30% of patients, but even with liver or lung metastases curative surgery can be attempted and success depends on correct multidisciplinary preoperative evaluation. If the diagnosis is made when the tumor is in an incurable phase, the aim is to improve the patient's quality of life.

Proximal location of colon cancer is a risk factor for development of metachronous colorectal cancer: a population-based study

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the incidence of 1) metachronous colorectal cancer and 2) subsequent extracolonic cancers, in relation to the location (proximal or distal to the splenic flexure) of the first primary colorectal tumor.

METHODS

In this population-based study, a cancer registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between 1970 and 1999. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and those with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome were excluded from the study, as were patients with nonepithelial tumors. Location of the first tumor was established according to International Classification of Diseases-Oncology-02 classification. The registry covers a population of 500,000 residents.

RESULTS

A total of 5,006 patients had sporadic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum during this period of time, with 1,703 first primary tumors (34 percent) being located proximal to the splenic flexure. One hundred twenty occurrences of second primary colorectal cancer were observed in this population (2.39 percent). The risk for developing a second incidence of primary colorectal cancer was higher in patients whose initial tumor was located in the proximal colon (3.4 percent vs. 1.8 percent; odds ratio, 1.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.33-2.77; P < 0.001). The risk for each segment of the large bowel was as follows: cecum, 3.4 percent; right colon, 3 percent; transverse colon, 3.8 percent; left colon, 2.8 percent; sigmoid colon, 1.7 percent; and rectum, 1.8 percent. By contrast, the risk for developing a second, extracolonic tumor did not differ between patients with proximal and distal tumors (13.7 percent vs. 13.4 percent, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a first tumor located within the proximal colon are at twice the risk for developing metachronous colorectal cancer. From an epidemiologic standpoint, these data are in accordance with 1) the increasing incidence and 2) the better prognosis of proximal colon cancer in various populations. Our results confirm that proximal colon cancer is a distinct entity, which justifies the reporting of cases of colon cancer according to their location proximal or distal to the splenic flexure.

Adenoma recurrences after resection of colorectal carcinoma: results from the Southwest Oncology Group 9041 calcium chemoprevention pilot study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal adenomas are the usual precursors to carcinoma in sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancers (CRC).

METHODS

A total of 220 CRC patients (stages 0, I, and II) were randomized prospectively in a double-blind pilot study of calcium chemoprevention by using recurrent colorectal adenomas as a surrogate end point. This trial is still in progress, and we report the preliminary findings on adenoma recurrence rates.

RESULTS

Synchronous adenomas were present in 60% of patients, and cancer confined in a polyp was present in 23% of patients. The overall cumulative adenoma recurrence rate was 31% (19% in the first year, 29% for 2 years, and 35% for 3 years). The recurrence rates were greater for patients with synchronous adenomas: 38% at 3 years (P =.01). Lower stage was associated with higher adenoma recurrence rates (P =.04). Factors including age, sex, site of primary cancer, and whether the cancer was confined to a polyp were not significantly associated with differences in adenoma recurrence rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The substantial adenoma recurrence rate in patients resected of CRC justifies colonoscopic surveillance on a periodic basis. Patients with higher rates of adenoma recurrences, such as CRC with synchronous adenomas, are ideal subjects for chemoprevention trials.

Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery

OBJECTIVE

To investigate racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance after colorectal cancer surgery in a large population of Medicare patients.

DATA SOURCES

We used a large population-based dataset: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) linked to Medicare data.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study. We analyzed data from 44,768 non-Hispanic white, 2,921 black, and 4,416 patients from other racial/ethnic groups, aged 65 and older at diagnosis, who had a diagnosis of local or regional colorectal cancer between 1986 and 1996, and were followed through December 31, 1998. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to investigate the relation of race and receipt of posttreatment bowel surveillance.

DATA COLLECTION

Sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics were collected at the time of diagnosis for all members of the cohort. Surgery and bowel surveillance with colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, and barium enema were obtained from Medicare claims using ICD-9-CM and CPT-4 codes.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The chance of surveillance within 18 months of surgery was 57 percent, 48 percent, and 45 percent for non-Hispanic whites, blacks, and others, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics, blacks were 25 percent less likely than whites to receive surveillance if diagnosed between 1991 and 1996 (RR = 0.75, 95 percent CI = 0.70-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly blacks were less likely than non-Hispanic whites to receive posttreatment bowel surveillance and this result was not explained by measured racial differences in sociodemographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics. More research is needed to explore the influences of patient- and provider-level factors on racial differences in posttreatment bowel surveillance.

Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the literature regarding the impact of follow-up on colorectal cancer patient survival and, in a second phase, recommendations were developed.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, and abstracts published in the 1997 to 2002 proceedings of the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology were systematically searched for evidence. Study selection was limited to randomized trials and meta-analyses that examined different programs of follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer where five-year overall survival was reported. External review by Ontario practitioners was obtained through a mailed survey. Final approval of the practice guideline report was obtained from the Practice Guidelines Coordinating Committee.

RESULTS

Six randomized trials and two published meta-analyses of follow-up were obtained. Of six randomized trials comparing one follow-up program to a more intense program, only two individual trials detected a statistically significant survival benefit favouring the more intense follow-up program. Pooling of all six randomized trials demonstrated a significant improvement in survival favouring more intense follow-up (Relative Risk Ratio 0.80 (95%CI, 0.70 to 0.91; p = 0.0008). Although the rate of recurrence was similar in both of the follow-up groups compared, asymptomatic recurrences and re-operations for cure of recurrences were more common in patients with more intensive follow-up. Trials including CEA monitoring and liver imaging also had significant results, whereas trials not including these tests did not.

CONCLUSION

Follow-up programs for patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer do improve survival. These follow-up programs include frequent visits and performance of blood CEA, chest x-rays, liver imaging and colonoscopy, however, it is not clear which tests or frequency of visits is optimal. There is a suggestion that improved survival is due to diagnosis of recurrence at an earlier, asymptomatic stage which allows for more curative resection of recurrence. Based on this evidence and consideration of the biology of colorectal cancer and present practices, a guideline was developed. Patients should be made aware of the risk of disease recurrence or second bowel cancer, the potential benefits of follow-up and the uncertainties requiring further clinical trials. For patients at high-risk of recurrence (stages IIb and III) clinical assessment is recommended when symptoms occur or at least every 6 months the first 3 years and yearly for at least 5 years. At the time of those visits, patients may have blood CEA, chest x-ray and liver imaging. For patients at lower risk of recurrence (stages I and Ia) or those with co-morbidities impairing future surgery, only visits yearly or when symptoms occur. All patients should have a colonoscopy before or within 6 months of initial surgery, and repeated yearly if villous or tubular adenomas >1 cm are found; otherwise repeat every 3 to 5 years. All patients having recurrences should be assessed by a multidisciplinary team in a cancer centre.

Sickness and preventive medical behavior

Using data from two sources, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), I analyze the relationship between health status and the likelihood of engaging in medical screening and other preventive behavior. The results show that individuals who are in poorer health are more likely to get flu shots and cholesterol checks, but less likely to have mammograms, pap smears, breast examinations and prostate checks. There is some evidence that suggests that psychological factors such as fear and anxiety may be important reasons why sicker people are less likely to get cancer screens.