Health Insurance Coverage Disruptions and Cancer Care and Outcomes: Systematic Review of Published Research

Defining the Role of Social Vulnerability in the Treatment and Survival of Localized Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether variations in the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are associated with disparities in colon cancer surgery and mortality.

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer mortality is influenced by health care access, which is affected by individual and community-level factors. Prior studies have not used the SVI to compare surgical access and survival in localized colon cancer patients. Further, it is unclear whether those >65 years are more vulnerable to variations in SVI.

METHODS

We queried the Texas and California Cancer Registries from 2004 to 2017 to identify patients with localized colonic adenocarcinoma and categorized patients into <65 and ≥65 years. Our outcomes were survival and access to surgical intervention. The independent variable was census tract SVI, with higher scores indicating more social vulnerability. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards for analysis.

RESULTS

We included 73,923 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD: 13.0), mean SVI of 47.2 (SD: 27.6), and 51.1% males. After adjustment, increasing SVI was associated with reduced odds of undergoing surgery (odds ratio: 0.996; 95% CI: 0.995-0.997; P < 0.0001) and increased mortality (hazard ratio: 1.002; 95% CI: 1.001-1.002; P < 0.0001). Patients <65 years were more sensitive to variation in SVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased social vulnerability was associated with reduced odds of receiving surgery for early-stage colon cancer, as well as increased mortality. These findings amplify the need for policy changes at the local, state, and federal levels to address community-level vulnerability to improve access to surgical care and reduce mortality.

Implementation of clinical pharmacogenetic testing in medically underserved patients: a narrative review

As an emerging health technology, pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing has the capacity to improve medication therapy. However, implementation in medically underserved populations (MUPs) remains limited, which has the potential to increase healthcare disparities. While there is no single accepted definition for MUPs, demographic, socioeconomic, cultural, and geographic factors can lead to reduced access to healthcare, which contributes to disparate health outcomes in these populations. In the case of PGx testing, as MUPs have an increased risk of adverse drug events, have lower numbers of healthcare encounters, and are prescribed more medications which can be guided by PGx testing, additional benefits from PGx testing may occur in MUPs. Study of the acceptability and perceptions of PGx testing in MUPs, as reported in literature, provides support for the development of successful PGx testing implementations. Additionally, a few limited pilot PGx testing implementations in MUPs have assessed feasibility. However, further studies establishing the feasibility and effectiveness of PGx testing implementations in MUPs will enable more widespread PGx testing in those who are medically underserved. Thus, this narrative review explores the impact of medical underservice on health, PGx testing's potential impact on MUPs, and the research and early clinical implementations of PGx in MUPs.

The Financial Toxicity of Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer: An Analysis of the 1997-2023 National Health Interview Survey

Patients with hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers may experience financial toxicity as a result of diagnosis and treatment. We characterized the prevalence and predictors of financial toxicity among United States (U.S.) HPB cancer patients using the National Health Interview Survey. Outcomes were delaying medical care due to cost or being unable to afford necessary medical care within the past 12 months. Prevalence was estimated in univariable analyses and sociodemographic predictors were identified in multivariable analyses. Among 5,630,270 U.S. adults with self-reported HPB cancer, 567,531 (10.1%) delayed medical care due to cost and 474,632 (8.4%) were unable to afford necessary medical care within the past 12 months. Uninsured patients were more likely to delay care due to cost (aOR 14.38, 95% CI 4.81-43.01) or to be unable to afford necessary medical care (aOR 19.93, 95% CI 6.45-61.55). Non-White race (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.06-3.81) was a risk factor for delaying care due to cost, whereas household income < 200% of the federal poverty level (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.20-6.04) was associated with inability to afford necessary medical care. Patients who had received surgery within the past 12 months were not at higher odds of either financial toxicity outcome. Targeted interventions to mitigate financial toxicity among at-risk patients are warranted to alleviate the financial burden of HPB cancer care.

Geographic Access to Cancer Care and Treatment and Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Importance

Data on the impact of geographic access to cancer care on early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment and outcomes are limited.

Objective

To examine the associations of geographic access to cancer care with guideline-recommended treatment and outcomes in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This population-based cohort study included patients with early-stage NSCLC newly diagnosed between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2015, followed up through December 31, 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Data analysis was performed from March to November 2024.

Exposures

Geographic access to thoracic surgeons and radiation oncologists was quantified using the 2-step floating catchment area algorithm and categorized into quintile 1 (least access) through quintile 5 (greatest access).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Multilevel logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) of receipt of surgery and radiotherapy. Hazard ratios (HRs) of lung cancer-specific mortality were estimated using Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard regression.

Results

Among 65 259 patients, the mean (SD) age was 69.4 (10.1) years; 33 114 patients (50.7%) were female, 1071 (1.6%) were uninsured, and 7541 (11.6%) were enrolled in Medicaid. The least (vs greatest) geographic access to thoracic surgeons (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; P < .001 for trend) and radiation oncologists (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.18; P < .001 for trend) was associated with higher lung cancer mortality. Patients in counties with the least (vs greatest) access to thoracic surgeons were less likely to undergo surgery (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P < .001 for trend); this association was much stronger in Asian than non-Hispanic White patients and in Medicaid-insured than non-Medicaid-insured patients. Although there was no significant association overall, geographic access to radiation oncologists was significantly associated with radiotherapy use in older (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95), Hispanic (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), and uninsured (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, geographic access to cancer care was associated with guideline-recommended treatment for early-stage NSCLC and outcomes, particularly in socially marginalized patients, underscoring the importance of ensuring appropriate geographic allocations of cancer care resources and addressing travel barriers to health care to improve NSCLC treatment, prognosis, and equity.

Association Between Medicaid Coverage Continuity and Survival in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Pediatric and Adolescent Cancers

PURPOSE

Many patients with cancer do not gain Medicaid coverage until a cancer diagnosis, which can reduce access to early cancer detection and timely treatment, potentially driving inferior survival. Little is known about whether continuous Medicaid coverage prediagnosis through postdiagnosis (v gaining Medicaid at/after diagnosis) provides survival benefits for pediatric/adolescent oncology patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients newly diagnosed with cancer at age 21 years or younger in a large pediatric health system between 2007 and 2016. Electronic medical records (EMRs) were linked to Medicaid administrative data to differentiate insurance continuity patterns during the 6 months preceding through the 6 months after cancer diagnosis (assessment window): continuous Medicaid, newly gained Medicaid (at or after diagnosis), and other Medicaid enrollment patterns. For patients not linked to Medicaid data, we used EMR-reported insurance types at diagnosis. We followed patients from 6 months postdiagnosis up to 5 years, death, or December 2020, whichever came first. Multivariable regressions estimated all-cause and cancer-specific survival, controlling for sociodemographic and cancer-related factors.

RESULTS

Among 1,800 patients included in the analysis, 1,293 (71.8%) had some Medicaid enrollment during the assessment window; among them, 47.6% had continuous Medicaid and 36.3% had newly gained Medicaid. Patients not linked with Medicaid data had private (26.9%) or other/no insurance (1.2%) at diagnosis. Compared with patients with continuous Medicaid, those with newly gained Medicaid had higher risks of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.81]; P = .008) and cancer-specific death (HR, 1.46 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.90]; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Continuous Medicaid coverage throughout cancer diagnosis is associated with survival benefits for pediatric/adolescent patients. This finding has critical implications as millions of American individuals have been losing coverage since the unwinding of the Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision.

Association Between Medicaid Expansion and Insurance Status, Risk Group, Receipt, and Refusal of Treatment Among Men with Prostate Cancer

Background: Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been associated with increased Medicaid coverage among prostate cancer patients, the association between Medicaid expansion with risk group at diagnosis, time to treatment initiation (TTI), and the refusal of locoregional treatment (LT) among patients requires further exploration. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients aged 40 to 64 years diagnosed with localized prostate cancer from 2011 to 2016. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used to compare changes in insurance status, risk group at diagnosis, TTI, and the refusal of LT among patients residing in Medicaid expansion versus non-expansion states. In a secondary analysis, we used DID to compare changes in the above outcomes among racial minorities versus White patients living in expansion states. Results: Of the 112,434 patients with prostate cancer in our analysis, 50,958 patients lived in Medicaid expansion states, and 61,476 patients lived in non-expansion states. In the adjusted analysis, we found that the proportion of uninsured patients (adjusted DID: -0.87%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -1.28 to -0.46) and patients who refused radiation therapy (adjusted DID: -0.71%; 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.47) decreased more in expansion states compared to non-expansion states. Similarly, we observed that the racial disparity of select outcomes in expansion states narrowed, as racial minorities experienced larger absolute decreases in uninsured status and the refusal of radiation therapy (RT) regimens than White patients following ACA implementation (p < 0.01 for all). However, residence in a Medicaid expansion state was not associated with changes in risk group at diagnosis, TTI, nor the refusal of LT (p > 0.01 for all); racial disparities in TTI were also exacerbated in expansion states following ACA implementation. Conclusions: The association between Medicaid expansion and prostate cancer outcomes and disparities remains unclear. While ACA implementation was associated with increased insurance coverage and decreased refusal of RT, there was no significant association with earlier risk group at diagnosis, TTI within 180 days, or refusal of LT. Similarly, racial minorities in expansion states had larger decreases in uninsured status and the refusal of RT regimens, as well as smaller increases in intermediate-/high-risk disease at presentation than White patients following ACA implementation, but experienced no significant changes in TTI. More research is needed to understand how Medicaid expansion affects cancer outcomes and whether these effects are borne equitably among different populations.

Health insurance continuity and mortality in children, adolescents, and young adults with blood cancer

BACKGROUND

Many uninsured patients do not receive Medicaid coverage until a cancer diagnosis, potentially delaying access to care for early cancer detection and treatment. We examined the association of Medicaid enrollment timing and patterns with survival among children, adolescents, and young adults with diagnosed blood cancers, where disease onset can be acute and early detection is critical.

METHODS

We identified 28 750 children, adolescents, and young adults (birth to 39 years of age) with newly diagnosed blood cancers from the 2006-2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program-Medicaid data. Enrollment patterns included continuous Medicaid enrollment (preceding through diagnosis), newly gained Medicaid coverage (at or shortly after diagnosis), other noncontinuous Medicaid enrollment, and private/other insurance. We assessed cumulative incidence of death from diagnosis, censoring at last follow-up, 5 years after diagnosis, or December 2018, whichever occurred first. Multivariable survival models estimated the association of insurance enrollment patterns with risk of death.

RESULTS

One-fourth (26.1%) of the cohort was insured by Medicaid; of these patients, 41.1% had continuous Medicaid enrollment, 34.9% had newly gained Medicaid, and 24.0% had other or noncontinuous enrollment. The cumulative incidence of all-cause death 5 year after diagnosis was highest in patients with newly gained Medicaid (30.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 28.4% to 31.9%), followed by other noncontinuous enrollment (23.2%, 95% CI = 21.3% to 25.2%), continuous Medicaid enrollment (20.5%, 95% CI = 19.1% to 21.9%), and private/other insurance (11.2%, 95% CI = 10.7% to 11.7%). In multivariable models, newly gained Medicaid was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.53) and cancer-specific death (hazard ratio = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.68) compared with continuous Medicaid.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous Medicaid coverage is associated with survival benefits among pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with diagnosed blood cancers; however, fewer than half of Medicaid-insured patients have continuous coverage before diagnosis.

The Association of Care Fragmentation on Overall Survival for Early Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Optimal treatment of stage I-III breast cancer requires multimodal therapies. Patients can receive these therapies at one or multiple facilities. Herein, we evaluated the association of receiving treatment at more than one facility and distance to that facility on overall survival.

METHODS

The 2004-2019 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with stage I-III breast cancer who received at least two modalities of treatment. "Coordinated care" was designated when a patient received all modalities of treatment at the same facility and "fragmented care" was designated when a patient received treatment at two or more facilities. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with fragmented care. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods.

RESULTS

A total of 536,896 patients met the study criteria, of which 317,038 (59.1%) patients received coordinated care and 219,848 (40.9%) patients received fragmented care. Decreased mortality was seen with fragmented care in stage II and III patients (hazard ratio (HR): 0.92 and 0.94 respectively; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88-0.97, 0.89-0.99; P < 0.001), and receipt of care at an Academic/Research Program (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.93). Unexpectedly, living greater than 50 miles away from the treating facility was also associated with decreased mortality (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.90]), although this represented a small minority of patients (N = 30,290, 6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with early-stage breast cancer, receipt of fragmented care and greater distance to treating facility were not associated with worse outcomes. These results support patients' receipt of some care locally, underscoring the need for effective communication across the clinical care team.

Treatment Access among Younger Medicaid Beneficiaries with Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Continuous Medicaid coverage prior to a cancer diagnosis has been associated with earlier detection and better outcomes, for patients with solid tumors. In this study, we aimed to determine if this was observed among patients with multiple myeloma, a hematologic cancer where there are no routine screening tests and most are diagnosed through acute medical events.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is an analysis of the Merative MarketScan Multistate Medicaid Database, a claims-based dataset. In total, 1105 patients < 65 years old were included in the analyses. Among them, 66% had continuous enrollment (at least 6 months enrollment prior to myeloma), and 34% had discontinuous enrollment (2-6 months enrollment prior to myeloma). Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate the association between continuous enrollment status and receipt of myeloma treatment within 1 year of index date.

RESULTS

Only 54% of all Medicaid enrollees received myeloma therapy and only 12% received stem cell transplant within the 1st year. Those with continuous enrollment were less likely to receive any treatment (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.70; P < .001) and to receive stem cell transplant (aHR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32-0.81; P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Patients with continuous Medicaid coverage prior to diagnosis were less likely to receive myeloma therapy. Future studies should examine whether myeloma patients with continuous Medicaid enrollment have more chronic financial instability and/or higher medical needs and, thus, have higher barriers to care.

Medicaid coverage continuity is associated with lymphoma stage among children and adolescents/young adults

ABSTRACT

Lymphoma is the third leading cause of cancer among children and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) in the United States, with later-stage diagnoses often being linked to worse outcomes. Continuous health insurance coverage is crucial for facilitating early cancer detection and diagnosis. Among Medicaid-insured children and AYAs diagnosed with lymphoma, this study examines whether the timing of Medicaid enrollment and coverage continuity are associated with stage at diagnosis. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicaid data, we identified children and AYAs (aged 0-39 years) newly diagnosed with lymphoma between 2007 and 2013 in 12 states that were linked to the administrative Medicaid data. Medicaid enrollment patterns were categorized into continuous Medicaid (preceding and through diagnosis), newly gained Medicaid (at or shortly after diagnosis), and other Medicaid enrollment patterns. Late-stage disease was defined as Ann Arbor stage IV (vs stage I-III). Multiple logistic regressions were estimated, with marginal effects (MEs) reported. Of 3524 patients identified, 37.8% had continuous Medicaid, followed by newly gained Medicaid (35.2%) and other Medicaid enrollment patterns (27.0%). Compared with patients continuously enrolled in Medicaid, those with newly gained Medicaid and with other Medicaid enrollment patterns were 54% (ME, 13.9 percentage points [ppt]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5-19.2; P < .001) and 18% (ME, 4.6 ppt; 95% CI, 2.2-7.0; P < .001) more likely to present with stage IV lymphoma, respectively. Overall, having continuous Medicaid coverage before diagnosis was associated with a lower likelihood of late-stage lymphoma at diagnosis; however, only 3 in 8 Medicaid-insured children and AYAs with lymphoma were continuously enrolled in Medicaid before their diagnosis.

National survey of financial burden and experience among patients with cancer and autoimmune disease receiving charitable copay assistance

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the role that charitable copay assistance (CPA) plays in addressing access to care and financial distress. The study sought to evaluate financial distress and experience with CPA among patients with cancer and autoimmune disease.

METHODS

This is a national cross-sectional self-administered anonymous electronic survey conducted among recipients of CPA to cover the costs of a drug for cancer or autoimmune disease. Self-reported financial distress as measured by Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity as well as health care spending and experience with financial barriers to care were evaluated, as were perspectives on policy questions related to CPA and costs of care.

RESULTS

Among 1566 respondents (1108 with cancer and 458 with autoimmune disease, median age 71, 51% female, 89% White, 69% household income <$60,000), 53% reported mild and 31% moderate/severe financial distress, despite CPA. Eighteen percent reported missing recommended care because of costs. Most respondents (96%) had Medicare, 55% reported supplemental insurance, and 66% believed that insurance would prevent them from facing high costs of health care. A total of 52% reported paying more than $100 monthly in drug costs and 41% spending more than 10% of monthly income on health care. Financial distress was similar among patients with cancer and autoimmune diseases. In multivariable regression analysis, younger age, less education, unemployment, higher comorbidity, and lower income were independently associated with higher financial distress.

CONCLUSIONS

This study informs policy debate over the role of CPA foundations in the U.S. health insurance safety net and highlights the inadequacy of Medicare to guarantee access to care for older patients with chronic illness.

Association of health insurance coverage disruptions and breast and colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Health insurance coverage is critical for ensuring access to recommended health care in the United States. This study investigated the associations of health insurance coverage disruptions, also known as coverage churn, and receipt of breast and colorectal cancer screening.

METHODS

Adults who were age-eligible and younger than 65 years (range, 50-64 years) for breast (n = 17,128 women) and colorectal (n = 32,562 individuals) cancer screening were identified from 5 years of the National Health Interview Survey. Adults were categorized into five groups based on insurance type at survey (private, public, none) and prior coverage disruptions within the past year. Screening outcomes included: (1) ever-screened, (2) past-year screening, and (3) guideline-concordant screening. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between insurance coverage disruptions and cancer screening.

RESULTS

Among adults who had coverage at the time of the survey, 3.1% with private insurance and 6.5% with public insurance reported prior coverage disruptions. Individuals without health insurance coverage had the lowest level of screening. Among individuals who had private coverage, prior disruptions were associated with lower guideline-concordant screening in adjusted analyses (breast cancer screening: adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89; colorectal cancer screening: aPR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.86); among those who had public coverage, prior disruptions were also associated with lower guideline-concordant breast cancer screening (aPR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89) and colorectal cancer screening (aPR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Health insurance coverage disruptions were associated with lower past-year and guideline-concordant breast and colorectal cancer screening. The current findings underscore the importance of stable health insurance coverage to improve cancer screening and early detection when treatment is most effective.

The lasting impact of the ACA: how Medicaid expansion reduces outcome disparities in AYAs with leukemia and lymphoma

The Affordable Care Act (ACA), fully implemented in 2014, introduced reforms to Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), aiming to enhance health care access for vulnerable populations. Key provisions that can influence health outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with blood cancers include Medicaid expansion, which covers adults with income less than or equal to 138% of the federal poverty level based on modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), streamlined eligibility and enrollment processes, CHIP and Medicaid integration, and dependent coverage reform. Non-MAGI eligibility pathways based on age, disability, or waiver programs provide alternative routes for Medicaid coverage. By improving insurance coverage, providing affordable care and financial protection, and addressing health-related social needs such as transportation to care, Medicaid expansion has the potential to mitigate outcome disparities along the continuum of AYA blood cancer care. However, challenges persist due to coverage gaps in nonexpansion states, complexities in administrative processes to maintain continuous coverage, and barriers to accessing specialists for complex, AYA-focused multidisciplinary cancer care. The ending of the COVID-19 public health emergency's Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Provision has disrupted coverage for many AYAs. Given limited research evaluating the impact of the ACA on AYA blood cancer outcomes, more evidence is needed to guide future policies tailored to this vulnerable population. Despite encouraging progress following the ACA, continued collaborative efforts between policymakers, health care providers, patient advocates, and researchers are essential for identifying targeted strategies to ensure continuous and affordable coverage, access to specialized and coordinated care, and fewer disparities in AYA blood cancer outcomes.

Addressing Breast Cancer Disparities: A Comprehensive Approach to Health Equity

This article addresses the persistent disparities in breast cancer outcomes across different racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups despite advancements in diagnosis and treatment. The disparities are rooted in various factors, including access to care, socioeconomic status, and cultural barriers. The article emphasizes the need for targeted interventions, such as expanding insurance coverage, mobile mammography units, and culturally tailored outreach programs to promote health equity. Achieving this requires comprehensive strategies addressing systemic and social determinants of health.

Racial Disparities in Patients with Metastatic Tumors of the Spine: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in access and delivery of care have been shown to disproportionately affect certain racial groups. Studies have been conducted to assess these disparities within the spinal metastasis population, but the extent of their effects in the setting of other socioeconomic measures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to understand the effect of racial disparities on outcomes in patients with metastatic spine disease.

METHODS

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed, where a comprehensive online search was performed using Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct using MeSH terms related to metastatic spine tumor surgery and racial disparities up to February 2023. Two independent reviewers screened and analyzed articles to include studies assessing the following primary outcomes: clinical presentation, treatment type, postoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, survival and/or mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and advance care planning.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies were included in final analysis; 12 were retrospective cohort studies (Level of evidence III) and 1 was a prospective study (Level of evidence II). Postoperative complications were the most studied outcome in 46% of studies (6 of 13), followed by survival in 31% (4 of 13), and treatment type also in 31% (4 of 13). Overall, race was found to be significantly associated with at least one evaluated outcome in 69% of studies (9 of 13). Racial disparities were found in the incidence of cord compression, non-routine discharge, and treatment type in patients with metastatic spine disease. No differences were found on rates of post-operative ambulation, advance care planning, readmission, or survival; inconsistent results were seen for postoperative complications and length of stay. Nine studies (69%) included at least one other measure of socioeconomic status in multivariate analysis, with the two most common being insurance type and income.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some studies suggest race to be associated with presenting characteristics, treatment type and outcome of patients with spinal metastases, there was significant variability in the inclusion of measures of socioeconomic status in study analyses. As such, the association between race and outcomes in oncologic spine surgery remains unclear.

Increased Early-Mortality in Children With Solid Tumors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

Measures to control COVID-19 transmission disrupted childhood cancer care. Data on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on childhood cancer mortality are lacking. This study describes the impact of the pandemic on childhood cancer early-mortality (≤ 24 months).

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort was conducted in 10 Colombian cities. Children with newly diagnosed cancer registered in the Childhood Cancer Clinical Outcomes Surveillance System (VIGICANCER) were included. Our primary outcome was cumulative mortality at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The exposed cohort (EC = March 25, 2020-December 31, 2021) was compared with a historic cohort (HC = January 1, 2017-March 24, 2020). Covariates included sociodemographics, place of residence, health insurance type, and tumor classification.

RESULTS

The cohort included 4124 children, comprised of 1627 children in the EC and 2497 children in the HC. Hematolymphoid, central nervous system, and extracranial solid tumors represented 57%, 15%, and 28% of patients, respectively. Participants' median age was 6.7 years (IQR, 3.2-11.3), 54% were male, 7% were Afro-descendant, and 47% had public insurance. In the EC, the 6-month and 24-month mortality adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) in children with solid tumors was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.7) and 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.7), respectively, and in children with bone tumors 4.0 (95% CI, 1.2-13.0) and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.2-3.6), respectively. These associations persisted after accounting for metastatic disease. Six-month mortality aHRs for retinoblastoma, bone tumors, and soft tissue sarcomas due to progressive disease were 4.3 (95% CI, 1.3-14.5), 4.0 (95% CI, 1.4-11.3), and 5.4 (95% CI, 2.2-13.5), respectively. In the EC, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for metastatic solid tumors vs. nonmetastatic was 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-1.8) and in children with retinoblastoma and public insurance the 24-month mortality aHR was 4.9 (95% CI, 1.1-21.7).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed increased early-mortality for solid tumors, particularly bone tumors and retinoblastoma, likely attributed to more advanced-stage presentation and loss of treatment effectiveness due to healthcare disruptions. Early-mortality was higher in patients with public insurance, a vulnerable population that warrants attention.

Insurance, legal, and financial hardships of childhood and adolescent cancer survivors-a systematic review

PURPOSE

Childhood and adolescent cancer survivors (CACS) experience medical and psychosocial adverse effects. Attention widens to include issues such as socio-bureaucratic hardships. This systematic review synthesized the available evidence on insurance, legal, and financial hardships to better understand the broader picture of socio-bureaucratic hardships as distinct but interrelated types of hardships.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and PsycINFO was conducted for publications related to childhood and adolescent cancer; survivors; and insurance, legal, and financial hardships. Narrative data synthesis was performed on the extracted data.

RESULTS

This review included N = 58 publications, originating from 14 different countries, most from the last decade (n = 39). We found that a considerable proportion of CACS experience insurance and financial hardships, including foregoing medical care due to financial constraints, problems paying medical bills, and difficulties accessing loans or insurances. Legal hardships, such as workplace discrimination, were less frequently investigated and reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the many interrelated socio-bureaucratic hardships faced by CACS. It is important that these hardships are not underestimated or neglected. Our findings can serve as a basis for enhancing and expanding supportive care services and help inform collaborative efforts from research, policy, and practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This review emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing the socio-bureaucratic challenges that extend beyond medical care. Survivors should be informed about available options and be aware of their legal rights to identify instances of injustice and seek appropriate support.

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Treatment

Currently, eight million people in the United States suffer from cancer and it is a major global health concern. Early detection and interventions are urgently needed for all cancers, including colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer worldwide. Based on the diagnostic efforts to general awareness and lifestyle choices, it is understandable why colorectal cancer is so prevalent today. There is a notable lack of awareness concerning the impact of this cancer and its connection to lifestyle elements, as well as people sometimes mistaking symptoms for a different gastrointestinal condition. Artificial intelligence (AI) may assist in the early detection of all cancers, including colorectal cancer. The usage of AI has exponentially grown in healthcare through extensive research, and since clinical implementation, it has succeeded in improving patient lifestyles, modernizing diagnostic processes, and innovating current treatment strategies. Numerous challenges arise for patients with colorectal cancer and oncologists alike during treatment. For initial screening phases, conventional methods often result in misdiagnosis. Moreover, after detection, determining the course of which colorectal cancer can sometimes contribute to treatment delays. This article touches on recent advancements in AI and its clinical application while shedding light on why this disease is so common today.

Survivorship after adolescent and young adult cancer: models of care, disparities, and opportunities

Survivors of adolescent and young adult (AYA; age 15-39 years at diagnosis) cancer are a growing population with the potential to live for many decades after treatment completion. Survivors of AYA cancer are at risk for adverse long-term outcomes including chronic conditions, secondary cancers, impaired fertility, poor psychosocial health and health behaviors, and financial toxicity. Furthermore, survivors of AYA cancer from racially minoritized and low socioeconomic status populations experience disparities in these outcomes, including lower long-term survival. Despite these known risks, most survivors of AYA cancer do not receive routine survivorship follow-up care, and research on delivering high-quality, evidence-based survivorship care to these patients is lacking. The need for survivorship care was initially advanced in 2006 by the Institute of Medicine. In 2019, the Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework (QCSCF) was developed to provide an evidence-based framework to define key components of optimal survivorship care. In this commentary focused on survivors of AYA cancer, we apply the QCSCF framework to describe models of care that can be adapted for their unique needs, multilevel factors limiting equitable access to care, and opportunities to address these factors to improve short- and long-term outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Health insurance among survivors of childhood cancer following Affordable Care Act implementation

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased private nonemployer health insurance options, expanded Medicaid eligibility, and provided preexisting health condition protections. We evaluated insurance coverage among long-term adult survivors of childhood cancer pre- and post-ACA implementation.

METHODS

Using the multicenter Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, we included participants from 2 cross-sectional surveys: pre-ACA (2007-2009; survivors: n = 7505; siblings: n = 2175) and post-ACA (2017-2019; survivors: n = 4030; siblings: n = 987). A subset completed both surveys (1840 survivors; 646 siblings). Multivariable regression models compared post-ACA insurance coverage and type (private, public, uninsured) between survivors and siblings and identified associated demographic and clinical factors. Multinomial models compared gaining and losing insurance vs staying the same among survivors and siblings who participated in both surveys.

RESULTS

The proportion with insurance was higher post-ACA (survivors pre-ACA 89.1% to post-ACA 92.0% [+2.9%]; siblings pre-ACA 90.9% to post-ACA 95.3% [+4.4%]). Post-ACA insurance increase in coverage was higher among those aged 18-25 years (survivors: +15.8% vs +2.3% or less ages 26 years and older; siblings +17.8% vs +4.2% or less ages 26 years and older). Survivors were more likely to have public insurance than siblings post-ACA (18.4% vs 6.9%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1 to 2.6). Survivors with severe chronic conditions (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 3.0 to 7.3) and those living in Medicaid expansion states (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 3.4) had increased odds of public insurance coverage post-ACA. Among the subset completing both surveys, low- and mid-income survivors (<$40 000 and <$60 000, respectively) experienced insurance losses and gains in reference to highest household income survivors (≥$100 000), relative to odds of keeping the same insurance status.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-ACA, more childhood cancer survivors and siblings had health insurance, although disparities remain in coverage.

Health-related social needs, medical financial hardship, and mortality risk among cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors may face challenges affording food, housing, and other living necessities, which are known as health-related social needs (HRSNs). However, little is known about the associations of HRSNs and mortality risk among adult cancer survivors.

METHODS

Adult cancer survivors were identified from the 2013-2018 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and linked with the NHIS Mortality File with vital status through December 31, 2019. HRSNs, measured by food insecurity, and nonmedical financial worries (e.g., housing costs), was categorized as severe, moderate, and minor/none. Medical financial hardship, including material, psychological, and behavioral domains, was categorized as 2-3, 1, or 0 domains. Using age as the time scale, the associations of HRSNs and medical financial hardship and mortality risk were assessed with weighted adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old (n = 5855), 25.5% and 18.3% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively; among survivors 65-79 years old (n = 5918), 15.6% and 6.6% reported moderate and severe levels of HRSNs, respectively. Among cancer survivors 18-64 years old, severe HRSNs was associated with increased mortality risk (hazards ratio [HR], 2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.93, p < .001; reference = minor/none) in adjusted analyses. Among cancer survivors 65-79 years old, 2-3 domains of medical financial hardship was associated with increased mortality risk (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.13-2.20, p = .007; reference = 0 domain).

CONCLUSIONS

HSRNs and financial hardship are associated with increased mortality risk among cancer survivors; comprehensive assessment of HRSN and financial hardship connecting patients with relevant services can inform efforts to mitigate adverse consequences of cancer.

Associations of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility Policies With Mammography

PURPOSE

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) addresses food insecurity for low-income households, which is associated with access to care. Many US states expanded SNAP access through policies eliminating the asset test (ie, restrictions based on SNAP applicant assets) and/or broadening income eligibility. The objective of this study was to determine whether state SNAP policies were associated with the use of mammography among women eligible for breast cancer screening.

METHODS

Data for income-eligible women 40 to 79 years of age were obtained from the 2006 to 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Difference-in-differences analyses were conducted to compare changes in the percentage of mammography in the past year from pre- to post-SNAP policy adoption (asset test elimination or income eligibility increase) between states that and did not adopt policies expanding SNAP eligibility.

RESULTS

In total, 171,684 and 294,647 income-eligible female respondents were included for the asset test elimination policy and income eligibility increase policy analyses, respectively. Mammography within 1 year was reported by 58.4%. Twenty-eight and 22 states adopted SNAP asset test elimination and income increase policies, respectively. Adoption of asset test elimination policies was associated with a 2.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-4.15; P = .043) percentage point increase in mammography received within 1 year, particularly for nonmetropolitan residents (4.14 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.07-7.21 percentage points; P = .008), those with household incomes <$25,000 (2.82 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.68-4.97 percentage points; P = .01), and those residing in states in the South (3.08 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.17-5.99 percentage points; P = .038) or that did not expand Medicaid under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3.35 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.36-6.34; P = .028). There was no significant association between mammography and state-level policies broadening of SNAP income eligibility.

CONCLUSIONS

State policies eliminating asset test requirements for SNAP eligibility were associated with increased mammography among low-income women eligible for breast cancer screening, particularly for those in the lowest income bracket or residing in nonmetropolitan areas or Medicaid nonexpansion states.

Do patients need additional coverage for chronic ailments? Insights from hospital data

BACKGROUND

Eliminating financial barriers and improving healthcare accessibility pertain to be key elements of the United Nation's sustainable development goals. These have directed health policymakers to advocate private health insurance as a health promotion strategy to enable patients to obtain absolute and affordable medical care when needed. Against this backdrop, the current study investigates the coverage trend and financial risk-protective nature of private health insurance plans.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We examined 12 months' hospital billing data of private health insurance holders with cancer, cardiac, neurological, and renal diseases. The billing and insurance claim data of 5002 patients were extracted from the billing section of a tertiary care teaching hospital located in southern India from April 2022 through March 2023. Five per cent of patients from each disease condition were selected through proportionate random sampling for analysis (n = 250). The cost incurred and reimbursement trend under various cost heads were investigated by examining the cost incurred by the patient during the hospitalization and comparing it with the amount reimbursed by the insurance company.

RESULTS

The scrutiny exhibits that private health insurance fails to provide comprehensive coverage, resulting in under-insurance among subscribers. Reimbursement received for each cost category is also discussed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has used institutional data instead of large survey data or patient data.

CONCLUSION

The research concludes by soliciting policymakers, healthcare providers, and insurers to develop strategies to enhance the affordability and accessibility of healthcare to promote health and wellness.

High Community-Level Social Vulnerability is Associated with Worse Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) After Resection of Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Although social vulnerability has been associated with worse postoperative and oncologic outcomes in other cancer types, these effects have not been characterized in patients with soft tissue sarcoma. This study evaluated the association of social vulnerability and oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

The authors conducted a single-institution cohort study of adult patients with primary and locally recurrent extremity or truncal soft tissue sarcoma undergoing resection between January 2016 and December 2021. The social vulnerability index (SVI) was measured on a low (SVI 1-39%, least vulnerable) to high (60-100%, most vulnerable) SVI scale. The association of SVI with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS

The study identified 577 patients. The median SVI was 44 (interquartile range [IQR], 19-67), with 195 patients categorized as high SVI and 265 patients as low SVI. The median age, tumor size, histologic subtype, grade, comorbidities, stage, follow-up time, and perioperative chemotherapy and radiation utilization were similar between the high and low SVI cohorts. The patients with high SVI had worse OS (p = 0.07) and RFS (p = 0.016) than the patients with low SVI. High SVI was independently associated with shorter RFS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.54) but not with OS (HR, 1.47; 95% CI 0.84-2.56).

CONCLUSION

High community-level social vulnerability appears to be independently associated with worse RFS for patients undergoing resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma. The effect of patient and community-level social risk factors should be considered in the treatment of patients with extremity sarcoma.

Challenges and Solutions to Support Oncology Professionals Serving Underserved Populations With Cancer in the United States: Results From the ASCO Serving the Underserved Task Force

PURPOSE

Little data exist regarding approaches to support oncology professionals who deliver cancer care for underserved populations. In response, ASCO developed the Serving the Underserved Task Force to learn from and support oncology professionals serving underserved populations.

METHODS

The Task Force developed a 28-question survey to assess oncology professionals' experiences and strategies to support their work caring for underserved populations. The survey was deployed via an online link to 600 oncology professionals and assessed respondent and patient demographic characteristics, clinic-based processes to coordinate health-related social services, and strategies for professional society support and engagement. We used chi-square tests to evaluate whether there were associations between percent full-time equivalent (FTE) effort serving underserved populations (<50% FTE v ≥50% FTE) with responses.

RESULTS

Of 462 respondents who completed the survey (77% response rate), 79 (17.1%) were Asian; 30 (6.5%) Black; 43 (9.3%) Hispanic or Latino/Latina; and 277 (60%) White. The majority (n = 366, 79.2%) had a medical doctor degree (MD). A total of 174 (37.7%) had <25% FTE, 151 (32.7%) had 25%-50% FTE, and 121 (26.2%) had ≥50% FTE effort serving underserved populations. Most best guessed patients' sociodemographic characteristics (n = 388; 84%), while 42 (9.2%) used data collected by the clinic. Social workers coordinated most health-related social services. However, in clinical settings with high proportions of underserved patients, there was greater reliance on nonclinical personnel, such as navigators (odds ratio [OR], 2.15 [95% CI, 1.07 to 4.33]) or no individual (OR, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.14 to 5.72]) for addressing mental health needs and greater reliance on physicians or advance practice practitioners (OR, 2.54 [95% CI, 1.11 to 5.81]) or no individual (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.09 to 3.35]) for addressing childcare or eldercare needs compared with social workers. Prioritization of solutions, which did not differ by FTE effort serving underserved populations, included a return-on-investment model to support personnel, integrated health-related social needs screening, and collaboration with the professional society on advocacy and policy.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight crucial strategies that professional societies can implement to support oncology clinicians serving underserved populations with cancer.

Association of Medicare eligibility with access to and affordability of care among older cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Older cancer survivors have substantial needs for ongoing care, but they may encounter difficulties accessing care due to cost concerns. We examined whether near-universal insurance coverage through Medicare-a key source of health insurance coverage in this population-is associated with improvements in care access and affordability among older cancer survivors around age 65.

METHODS

In a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors (aged 50-80) from 2006-2018 National Health Interview Survey, we employed a quasi-experimental, regression discontinuity design to estimate changes in insurance coverage, delayed/skipped care due to cost, and worries about or problems paying medical bills at age 65.

RESULTS

Medicare coverage sharply increased from 8.3% at age 64 to 98.2% at age 65, ensuring near-universal insurance coverage (99.5%). Medicare eligibility at age 65 was associated with reductions in delayed/skipped care due to cost (discontinuity, - 5.7 percentage points or pp; 95% CI, - 8.1, - 3.3; P < .001), worries about paying for medical bills (- 7.7 pp; 95% CI, - 12.0, - 3.2; P = .001), and problems paying medical bills (- 3.2 pp; 95% CI, - 6.1, - 0.2; P = .036). However, a sizable proportion reported any access or affordability problems (29.7%) between ages 66 and 80.

CONCLUSIONS

Near-universal Medicare coverage at age 65 was associated with a reduction-but not elimination-of access and affordability problems among cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

These findings reaffirm the role of Medicare in improving access and affordability for older cancer survivor and highlight opportunities for reforms to further alleviate financial burden of care in this population.

American Cancer Society's report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2023

In 2021, the American Cancer Society published its first biennial report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States. In this second report, the authors provide updated data on racial, ethnic, socioeconomic (educational attainment as a marker), and geographic (metropolitan status) disparities in cancer occurrence and outcomes and contributing factors to these disparities in the country. The authors also review programs that have reduced cancer disparities and provide policy recommendations to further mitigate these inequalities. There are substantial variations in risk factors, stage at diagnosis, receipt of care, survival, and mortality for many cancers by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and metropolitan status. During 2016 through 2020, Black and American Indian/Alaska Native people continued to bear a disproportionately higher burden of cancer deaths, both overall and from major cancers. By educational attainment, overall cancer mortality rates were about 1.6-2.8 times higher in individuals with ≤12 years of education than in those with ≥16 years of education among Black and White men and women. These disparities by educational attainment within each race were considerably larger than the Black-White disparities in overall cancer mortality within each educational attainment, ranging from 1.03 to 1.5 times higher among Black people, suggesting a major role for socioeconomic status disparities in racial disparities in cancer mortality given the disproportionally larger representation of Black people in lower socioeconomic status groups. Of note, the largest Black-White disparities in overall cancer mortality were among those who had ≥16 years of education. By area of residence, mortality from all cancer and from leading causes of cancer death were substantially higher in nonmetropolitan areas than in large metropolitan areas. For colorectal cancer, for example, mortality rates in nonmetropolitan areas versus large metropolitan areas were 23% higher among males and 21% higher among females. By age group, the racial and geographic disparities in cancer mortality were greater among individuals younger than 65 years than among those aged 65 years and older. Many of the observed racial, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in cancer mortality align with disparities in exposure to risk factors and access to cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment, which are largely rooted in fundamental inequities in social determinants of health. Equitable policies at all levels of government, broad interdisciplinary engagement to address these inequities, and equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as increasing health insurance coverage, are needed to reduce cancer disparities.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act on the Gap Between American Indians and Whites in Breast Cancer Management and Prognosis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) death rates in the USA have not significantly declined for American Indians (AIs) in comparison to Whites. Our objective was to determine whether Medicaid Expansion as part of the Affordable Care Act led to improved BC outcomes for AIs relative to Whites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. Included were BC patients who were AI and White; 40 to 64 years of age; diagnosed in 2009 to 2016; lived in states that expanded Medicaid in January 2014, and states that did not expand Medicaid. Our outcomes were stage at diagnosis, insurance status, timely treatment, and 3-year mortality.

RESULTS

There were 359,484 newly diagnosed BC patients, 99.49% White, 0.51% AI. Uninsured rates declined more in the expansion states than in the nonexpansion states (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.15-0.97, P < 0.001). Lower rates of Stage I BC diagnosis was found in AIs compared to Whites (46.58% vs. 55.33%, P < .001); these differential rates did not change after Medicaid expansion. Rates of definitive treatment initiation within 30 days of diagnosis declined after Medicaid expansion (P < .001); there was a smaller decline in the expansion states (OR 1.118, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.15, P < .001). Three year mortality was not different between expansion and nonexpansion states post Medicaid expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

In newly diagnosed BCs, uninsured rates declined more in the states that expanded Medicaid in January 2014. Timely treatment post Medicaid expansion declined less in states that expanded Medicaid. There was no differential benefit of Medicaid expansion in the 2 races.

Unwinding of Medicaid Continuous Enrollment Exposes Millions to Disrupted Care-"Be Kind, Rewind"

This Viewpoint discusses the causes and consequences of Medicaid unwinding and disenrollment and proposes solutions to minimize disenrollment and improve coverage uptake and health care access.

County-level variation in healthcare coverage and ischemic heart disease mortality

BACKGROUND

Healthcare coverage has been shown to have implications in the prevalence of coronary artery disease. We explore the impact of lack of healthcare coverage on ischemic heart disease (IHD) mortality in the US.

METHODS

We obtained county-level IHD mortality and healthcare coverage data from the CDC databases for a total of 3,119 US counties. The age-adjusted prevalence of current lack of health insurance among individuals aged 18 to 64 years were obtained for the years 2018 and 2019 and were placed into four quartiles. First (Q1) and fourth quartile (Q4) had the least and highest age-adjusted prevalence of adults without health insurance, respectively. IHD mortality rates, adjusted for age through the direct method, were obtained for the same years and compared among quartiles. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression for each demographic variable was conducted with the quartiles as an ordinal predictor variable and the age-adjusted mortality rate as the outcome variable.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 172,942 deaths related to ischemic heart disease between 2018 and 2019. Overall AAMR was higher in Q4 (92.79 [95% CI, 92.35-93.23]) compared to Q1 (83.14 [95% CI, 82.74-83.54]), accounting for 9.65 excess deaths per 100,000 person-years (slope = 3.47, p = 0.09). Mortality rates in Q4 for males (126.20 [95% CI, 125.42-126.98] and females (65.57 [95% CI, 65.08-66.05]) were higher compared to Q1 (115.72 [95% CI, 114.99-116.44] and 57.48 [95% CI, 57.04-57.91], respectively), accounting for 10.48 and 8.09 excess deaths per 100,000 person-years for males and females, respectively. Similar trends were seen among Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations. Northeastern, Southern, and Western regions had higher AAMR within Q4 compared to Q1, with higher prevalence of current lack of health insurance accounting for 49.2, 8.15, and 29.04 excess deaths per 100,000 person-years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A higher prevalence of adults without healthcare coverage may be associated with increased IHD mortality rates. Our results serve as a hypothesis-generating platform for future research in this area.

Building Data Infrastructure for Disease-Focused Health Economics Research

BACKGROUND

Data infrastructure for cancer research is centered on registries that are often augmented with payer or hospital discharge databases, but these linkages are limited. A recent alternative in some states is to augment registry data with All-Payer Claims Databases (APCDs). These linkages capture patient-centered economic outcomes, including those driven by insurance and influence health equity, and can serve as a prototype for health economics research.

OBJECTIVES

To describe and assess the utility of a linkage between the Colorado APCD and Colorado Central Cancer Registry (CCCR) data for 2012-2017.

RESEARCH DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASURES

This cohort study of 91,883 insured patients evaluated the Colorado APCD-CCCR linkage on its suitability to assess demographics, area-level data, insurance, and out-of-pocket expenses 3 and 6 months after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

The linkage had high validity, with over 90% of patients in the CCCR linked to the APCD, but gaps in APCD health plans limited available claims at diagnosis. We highlight the advantages of the CCCR-APCD, such as granular race and ethnicity classification, area-level data, the ability to capture supplemental plans, medical and pharmacy out-of-pocket expenses, and transitions in insurance plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Linked data between registries and APCDs can be a cornerstone of a robust data infrastructure and spur innovations in health economics research on cost, quality, and outcomes. A larger infrastructure could comprise a network of state APCDs that maintain linkages for research and surveillance.

Disparities in survival of hematologic malignancies in the context of social determinants of health: a systematic review

Social determinants of health (SDHs) have been reported as relevant factors responsible for health inequity. We sought to assess clinical data from observational studies conducted in the United States evaluating the impact of SDHs on the outcomes of patients with hematologic malignancies. Thus, we performed a systematic review in 6 databases on 1 September 2021, in which paired reviewers independently screened studies and included data from 41 studies. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools and analyzed the data using a descriptive synthesis. The most common SDH domains explored were health care access and quality (54.3%) and economic stability (25.6%); others investigated were education (19%) and social and community context (7.8%). We identified strong evidence of 5 variables significantly affecting survival: lack of health insurance coverage or having Medicare or Medicaid insurance, receiving cancer treatment at a nonacademic facility, low household income, low education level, and being unmarried. In contrast, the reports on the effect of distance traveled to the treatment center are contradictory. Other SDHs examined were facility volume, provider expertise, poverty, and employment rates. We identified a lack of data in the literature in terms of transportation, debt, higher education, diet, social integration, environmental factors, or stress. Our results underscore the complex nature of social, financial, and health care barriers as intercorrelated variables. Therefore, the management of hematologic malignancies needs concerted efforts to incorporate SDHs into clinical care, research, and public health policies, identifying and addressing the barriers at a patient-based level to enhance outcome equity (PROSPERO CRD42022346854).

A health equity framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models

Over the past 2 decades, population simulation modeling has evolved as an effective public health tool for surveillance of cancer trends and estimation of the impact of screening and treatment strategies on incidence and mortality, including documentation of persistent cancer inequities. The goal of this research was to provide a framework to support the next generation of cancer population simulation models to identify leverage points in the cancer control continuum to accelerate achievement of equity in cancer care for minoritized populations. In our framework, systemic racism is conceptualized as the root cause of inequity and an upstream influence acting on subsequent downstream events, which ultimately exert physiological effects on cancer incidence and mortality and competing comorbidities. To date, most simulation models investigating racial inequity have used individual-level race variables. Individual-level race is a proxy for exposure to systemic racism, not a biological construct. However, single-level race variables are suboptimal proxies for the multilevel systems, policies, and practices that perpetuate inequity. We recommend that future models designed to capture relationships between systemic racism and cancer outcomes replace or extend single-level race variables with multilevel measures that capture structural, interpersonal, and internalized racism. Models should investigate actionable levers, such as changes in health care, education, and economic structures and policies to increase equity and reductions in health-care-based interpersonal racism. This integrated approach could support novel research approaches, make explicit the effects of different structures and policies, highlight data gaps in interactions between model components mirroring how factors act in the real world, inform how we collect data to model cancer equity, and generate results that could inform policy.

Social Determinants of Health in Imaging-based Cancer Screening: A Case-based Primer with Strategies for Care Improvement

Health disparities, preventable differences in the burden of disease and disease outcomes often experienced by socially disadvantaged populations, can be found in nearly all areas of radiology, including emergency radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, image-guided interventions, and imaging-based cancer screening. Disparities in imaging-based cancer screening are especially noteworthy given the far-reaching population health impact. The social determinants of health (SDoH) play an important role in disparities in cancer screening and outcomes. Through improved understanding of how SDoH can drive differences in health outcomes in radiology, radiologists can effectively provide patient-centered, high-quality, and equitable care. Radiologists and radiology practices can become active partners in efforts to assist patients along their imaging journey and overcome existing barriers to equitable cancer screening care for traditionally marginalized populations. As radiology exists at the intersection of diagnostic imaging, image-guided diagnostic intervention, and image-guided treatment, radiologists are uniquely positioned to design these strategies. Cost-effective and socially conscious strategies that address barriers to equitable care can improve both public health and equitable health outcomes. Potential strategies include championing supportive health policy, reducing out-of-pocket costs, increasing price transparency, improving education and outreach efforts, ensuring that appropriate language translation services are available, providing individualized assistance with appointment scheduling, and offering transportation assistance and childcare. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

County-level disparities in care for patients with glioblastoma

OBJECTIVE

Racial and socioeconomic disparities in neuro-oncological care for patients with brain tumors remain underexplored. This study aimed to analyze county-level disparities in glioblastoma (GBM) care in the United States, focusing on access to surgery and the use of adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

METHODS

Using repeated cross-sectional data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 17 database; the Area Health Resources File; and the American Community Survey, from 2010 to 2019, the authors performed multivariate regression analyses to understand the associations between county-level racial and socioeconomic characteristics, as well as the rates of surgery performed, delays in surgery, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for newly diagnosed GBM.

RESULTS

In total, 29,609 GBM patients from 602 different US counties over a decade were included in this study. Counties with lower rates of surgery for GBM were associated with a higher percentage of Black residents (coefficient [CE] -0.001, 95% CI -0.002 to 0; p < 0.05) and being located in the Midwest (CE -0.132, 95% CI -0.195 to -0.069; p < 0.001) or West (CE -0.127, 95% CI -0.189 to -0.065; p < 0.001) relative to the Northeast. Counties with delayed surgical treatment were more likely to lack neurosurgeons (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.52, 95% CI 1.77-3.60; p < 0.001), have a higher percentage of Black residents (aOR 1.011, 95% CI 1.00-1.02; p < 0.05), and be located in the Midwest (aOR 3.042, 95% CI 1.12-8.24; p < 0.05) or West (aOR 3.175, 95% CI 1.12-8.97 p < 0.05). Counties with high rates of adjuvant radiation therapy were less likely to have higher percentages of Black residents (aOR 0.987, 95% CI 0.980-0.995; p < 0.01) and uninsured individuals (aOR 0.962, 95% CI 0.937-0.987; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Counties without neurosurgeons and those with a higher percentage of Black patients have delays in surgical care and demonstrate lower overall rates of surgery and adjuvant therapy for GBM. This study underscores the need for targeted interventions and policies that address structural barriers in healthcare access, improve equitable distribution of the neurosurgery workforce, and ensure timely and comprehensive GBM care to all populations.

Cross-border utilization of cancer care by patients in the US and Mexico - a survey of Mexican oncologists

BACKGROUND

The US-Mexico border is the busiest in the world, with millions of people crossing it daily. However, little is known about cross-border utilization of cancer care, or about the reasons driving it. We designed a cross sectional online survey to understand the type of care patients with cancer who live in the US and Mexico seek outside their home country, the reasons why patients traveled across the border to receive care, and the barriers faced when seeking cross-border care.

RESULTS

The online survey was sent to the 248 cancer care providers working in the six Mexican border states who were registered members of the Mexican Society of Oncology. Responses were collected between September-November 2022. Sixty-six providers (response rate 26%) completed the survey. Fifty-nine (89%) reported interacting with US-based patients traveling to Mexico to receive various treatment modalities, with curative surgery (n = 38) and adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 31) being the most common. Forty-nine (74%) reported interacting with Mexico-based patients traveling to the US to receive various treatment modalities, with immunotherapy (n = 29) and curative surgery (n = 27) being the most common. The most frequently reported reason US-based patients sought care in Mexico was inadequate health insurance (n = 45). The most frequently reported reason Mexico-based patients sought care in the US was patients' perception of superior healthcare (n = 38).

CONCLUSIONS

Most Mexican oncologists working along the Mexico-US border have interacted with patients seeking or receiving binational cancer care. The type of care sought, as well as the reasons for seeking it, differ between US and Mexico-based patients. These patterns of cross-border healthcare utilization highlight unmet needs for patients with cancer in both countries and call for policy changes to improve outcomes in border regions.

Cancer-related cognitive impairment in racial and ethnic minority groups: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Disparities in cognitive function among racial and ethnic groups have been reported in non-cancer conditions, but cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) in racial and ethnic minority groups is poorly understood. We aimed to synthesize and characterize the available literature about CRCI in racial and ethnic minority populations.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review in the PubMed, PsycInfo, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. Articles were included if they were published in English or Spanish, reported cognitive functioning in adults diagnosed with cancer, and characterized the race or ethnicity of the participants. Literature reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, and gray literature were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventy-four articles met the inclusion criteria, but only 33.8% differentiated the CRCI findings by racial or ethnic subgroups. There were associations between cognitive outcomes and the participants' race or ethnicity. Additionally, some studies found that Black and non-white individuals with cancer were more likely to experience CRCI than their white counterparts. Biological, sociocultural, and instrumentation factors were associated with CRCI differences between racial and ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that racial and ethnic minoritized individuals  may be disparately affected by CRCI. Future research should use standardized guidelines for measuring and reporting the self-identified racial and ethnic composition of the sample; differentiate CRCI findings by racial and ethnic subgroups; consider the influence of structural racism in health outcomes; and develop strategies to promote the participation of members of racial and ethnic minority groups.

Patterns in the prevalence and wealth-based inequality of cervical cancer screening in India

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of deaths due to cancer among women in India. This study assesses the prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women in the 30 to 49 years age-group and its relation to demographic, social and economic factors. The equity in the prevalence of screening is studied with respect to the women's household wealth.

METHODS

Data from the fifth National Family Health Survey are analyzed. The adjusted odds ratio is used to assess the prevalence of screening. The Concentration Index (CIX) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) are analyzed to assess the inequality.

RESULTS

The average national prevalence of cervical cancer screening is found to be 1.97% (95% C.I, 1.8-2.1), ranging from 0.2% in West Bengal and Assam to 10.1% in Tamil Nadu. Screening is significantly more prevalent among the following demographics: educated, higher age group, Christian, scheduled caste, Government health insurance coverage, and high household wealth. Significantly lower prevalence is found among Muslim women, women from scheduled tribes, general category castes, non-Government health insurance coverage, high parity, and those who use oral contraceptive pills and tobacco. Marital status, place of residence, age at first sexual activity, and IUD usage are not significant influencers. At the national level, CIX (0.22 (95% C.I, 0.20-0.24)) and SII (0.018 (95% C.I, 0.015-0.020)) indicate significantly higher prevalence of screening among women from the wealthier quintiles. Significantly higher screening prevalence among wealthier quintiles in the North-East (0.1), West (0.21) and Southern (0.05) regions and among the poor quintiles in the Central (-0.05) region. Equiplot analysis shows a "top inequality pattern" in the North, North-East and Eastern regions, with overall low performance where the rich alone manage to avail screening. The Southern region exhibits an overall progress in screening prevalence with the exception of the poorest quintile, which is left behind. Pro-poor inequality exists in the Central region, with significantly higher prevalence of screening among poor.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of cervical cancer screening is very low (2%) in India. Cervical cancer screening is substantially higher among women with education and Government Health insurance coverage. Wealth-based inequality exists in the prevalence of cervical cancer screening and the prevalence is concentrated among the women from wealthier quintiles.

Shared Decision Making in the Care of Patients With Cancer

Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care that is suitable for the care of patients with cancer. It involves a collaborative conversation seeking to respond sensibly to the problematic situation of the patient, cocreating a plan of care that makes sense intellectually, practically, and emotionally. Genetic testing to identify whether a patient has a hereditary cancer syndrome represents a prime example of the importance for SDM in oncology. SDM is important for genetic testing because not only results affect current cancer treatment, cancer surveillance, and care of relatives but also these tests generate both complex results and psychological concerns. SDM conversations should take place without interruptions, disruptions, or hurry and be supported, where available, by tools that assist in conveying the relevant evidence and in supporting plan development. Examples of these tools include treatment SDM encounter aids and the Genetics Adviser. Patients are expected to play a key role in making decisions and implementing plans of care, but several evolving challenges related to the unfettered access to information and expertise of varying trustworthiness and complexity in between interactions with clinicians can both support and complicate this role. SDM should result in a plan of care that is maximally responsive to the biology and biography of each patient, maximally supportive of each patient's goals and priorities, and minimally disruptive of their lives and loves.

Evaluation of the association between health insurance status and healthcare utilization and expenditures among adult cancer survivors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Health care expenditures for cancer care has increased significantly over the past decade and is further projected to rise. This study examined the associations between health insurance status and total direct health care expenditures and health care utilization among cancer survivors living in the United States.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of cancer survivors aged ≥18 years, identified from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey (MEPS) during 2017 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes specific for cancer. Health insurance was categorized into Private, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression was used to examine the association between log expenditures and health insurance. Negative binomial regression with log link was used to obtain adjusted incident rate ratios (AIRR) for health care utilization. Survey weights were used to produce nationally representative estimates of the US population.

RESULTS

A total of 1140 (weighted = 13.9 million) cancer survivors were identified. Compared to the adjusted mean annual health care expenditures for the private group ($14,265; 95% confidence interval (CI): $12,645 to $16,092), the adjusted mean annual health care expenditures for the Medicare group were higher ($15,112; 95%CI: $13,361 to $17,092). As compared to the private group, the average annual expenditures for uninsured cancer survivors ($2315; 95%CI:1038 to $3501) was significantly lower and so was their health care utilization. Adjusted rates of ER visits for Medicaid were twice (AIRR:2.04; SE:0.28; p = 0.001) as compared to privately insured.

CONCLUSIONS

A difference in the average total direct expenditures between uninsured and privately insured patients was found. Uninsured had the lowest health care utilization while Medicaid reported significantly higher number of ER visits. Despite differences in program structures, health care expenditures across insurance types were similar. Lower utilization of health care services among uninsured suggests cost maybe a barrier to accessing care.

Building Better Patient Care in Mississippi Radiation Oncology: Why Mississippi Needs a Collaborative Quality Initiative

OBJECTIVES

Cancer is an insidious and devastating disease that affects many people. Progress in mortality rate has not been realized universally across the United States, and challenges remain in how to best make up the ground that has been lost in these areas, one of which is Mississippi. Radiation therapy is a significant contributor to cancer control rates and certain challenges exist specifically regarding this treatment modality.

METHODS

The challenges of radiation oncology in Mississippi have been reviewed and discussed, with the proposal of a potential collaboration between clinical practitioners and payors to provide optimal and cost-effective radiation therapy to patients in Mississippi.

RESULTS

A similar model to that proposed has been reviewed and evaluated. This model is discussed based on its potential validity and usefulness in Mississippi.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant barriers exist in the state of Mississippi to patients receiving a consistent standard of care, regardless of their location and socioeconomic status. A collaborative quality initiative has been shown to be a boon to this endeavor elsewhere and stands to have a similar impact in Mississippi.

Hepatopancreatobiliary malignancies: time to treatment matters

Background

Initiation of oncologic care is often delayed, yet little is known about delays in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers or their impact. This retrospective cohort study describes trends in time to treatment initiation (TTI), assesses the association between TTI and survival, and identifies predictors of TTI in HPB cancers.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with cancers of the pancreas, liver, and bile ducts between 2004 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used to investigate the association between TTI and overall survival for each cancer type and stage. Multivariable regression identified factors associated with longer TTI.

Results

Of 318,931 patients with HPB cancers, median TTI was 31 days. Longer TTI was associated with increased mortality in patients with stages I-III extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer and stages I-II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients treated within 3-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days had median survivals of 51.5, 34.9, and 25.4 months (log-rank P<0.001), respectively, for stage I EHBD cancer, and 18.8, 16.6, and 15.2 months for stage I pancreatic cancer, respectively (P<0.001). Factors associated with increased TTI included stage I disease (+13.7 days vs. stage IV, P<0.001), treatment with radiation only (β=+13.9 days, P<0.001), Black race (+4.6 days, P<0.001) and Hispanic ethnicity (+4.3 days, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Some HPB cancer patients with longer time to definitive care experienced higher mortality than patients treated expeditiously, particularly in non-metastatic EHBD cancer. Black and Hispanic patients are at risk for delayed treatment. Further research into these associations is needed.

Barriers to early diagnosis of cervical cancer: a mixed-method study in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer, a major public health problem in many developing countries, is usually associated with a poor survival related to an advanced disease at diagnosis. In Côte d'Ivoire and other developing countries with high cervical cancer prevalence, little is known about factors associated with advanced cervical cancer stages in a context of limited access to screening services.

METHODS

From May to July 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a mixed, quantitative and qualitative method. Information on socio-demographic and history of the disease was extracted from a rapid case ascertainement study performed by the cancer registry of Côte d'Ivoire that enrolled all women diagnosed with cervical cancer between July 2018 and June 2019. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted among a subset of these women (12 women) and six healthcare providers to further capture barriers to early cervical cancer diagnosis. Factors associated with an advanced stage III, IV (according to FIGO classification) were estimated by a logistic regression model. Qualitative data were analyzed using a thematic analysis technique guided by the treatment pathway model and triangulated with quantitative data.

RESULTS

In total, 95 women with cervical cancer [median age = 51 (IQR 42-59)] years, were included. Among them, 18.9% were living with HIV and only 9.5% were covered by a health insurance. The majority (71.5%) were diagnosed with advanced cervical cancer. Being HIV-uninfected (aOR = 5.4; [1.6-17.8], p = 0.006) and being uninsured (aOR = 13.1; [2.0-85.5], p = 0.007) were independently associated with advanced cervical cancer in multivariable analysis. Qualitative data raised additional factors potentially related to advanced cervical cancer stages at diagnosis, including the lack of patient information on cervical cancer by healthcare providers and inadequate national awareness and screening campaigns.

CONCLUSION

In a context of challenges in access to systematic cervical cancer screening in Côte d'Ivoire, access to health insurance or integrated healthcare program appear to be key determinants of early diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Area-level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Cancer Survival in Metropolitan Detroit

BACKGROUND

Racial segregation is linked to poorer neighborhood quality and adverse health conditions among minorities, including worse cancer outcomes. We evaluated relationships between race, neighborhood social disadvantage, and cancer survival.

METHODS

We calculated overall and cancer-specific survival for 11,367 non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and 29,481 non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals with breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer using data from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. The area deprivation index (ADI) was used to measure social disadvantage at the census block group level, where higher ADI is associated with poorer neighborhood factors. Associations between ADI and survival were estimated using Cox proportional hazards mixed-effects models accounting for geographic grouping and adjusting for demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Increasing ADI quintile was associated with increased overall mortality for all four cancer sites in multivariable-adjusted models. Stratified by race, these associations remained among breast (NHW: HR = 1.16, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.20, P < 0.0001), colorectal (NHW: HR = 1.11, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.09, P = 0.00378), prostate (NHW: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.18, P < 0.0001), and lung cancers (NHW: HR = 1.06, P < 0.0001; NHB: HR = 1.07, P = 0.00177). Cancer-specific mortality estimates were similar to overall mortality. Adjustment for ADI substantially attenuated the effects of race on mortality for breast [overall proportion attenuated (OPA) = 47%, P < 0.0001; cancer-specific proportion attenuated (CSPA) = 37%, P < 0.0001] prostate cancer (OPA = 51%, P < 0.0001; CSPA = 56%, P < 0.0001), and colorectal cancer (OPA = 69%, P = 0.032; CSPA = 36%, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Area-level socioeconomic disadvantage is related to cancer mortality in a racially diverse population, impacting racial differences in cancer mortality.

IMPACT

Understanding the role of neighborhood quality in cancer survivorship could improve community-based intervention practices.

Incarceration History and Health Insurance and Coverage Changes in the U.S

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the association of incarceration history and health insurance coverage and coverage changes in the U.S.

METHODS

Individuals with and without incarceration history were identified from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 with follow-up through 2017-2018 (n=7,417). Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the associations between incarceration history and health insurance and coverage changes in the past 12 months. This study also assessed variation in associations by incarceration duration, frequency, and recency and reoffence history. Analysis was conducted in 2022.

RESULTS

Individuals with incarceration history were more likely to be uninsured (AOR=1.69; 95% CI=1.55, 1.85) and to experience year-long uninsurance (AOR=1.34; 95% CI=1.12, 1.59) and were less likely to have stable health insurance coverage (AOR=1.30; 95% CI=1.08, 1.56) than individuals without incarceration history. Longer duration and more frequent incarcerations were associated with a higher likelihood of lack of and unstable insurance coverage and year-long uninsurance.

CONCLUSIONS

People with an incarceration history had worse access to health insurance coverage. Targeted programs to improve health insurance coverage may reduce disparities associated with incarceration.

Cancer Disparities among Pacific Islanders: A Review of Sociocultural Determinants of Health in the Micronesian Region

It is well appreciated that the social determinants of health are intimately related with health outcomes. However, there is a paucity of literature that explores these themes comprehensively for the indigenous people within Micronesia. Certain Micronesia-specific factors, such as transitions from traditional diets, the consumption of betel nut, and exposure to radiation from the nuclear bomb testing in the Marshall Islands, have predisposed certain Micronesian populations to an increased risk of developing a variety of malignancies. Furthermore, severe weather events and rising sea levels attributed to climate change threaten to compromise cancer care resources and displace entire Micronesian populations. The consequences of these risks are expected to increase the strain on the already challenged, disjointed, and burdened healthcare infrastructure in Micronesia, likely leading to more expenses in off-island referrals. A general shortage of Pacific Islander physicians within the workforce reduces the number of patients that can be seen, as well as the quality of culturally competent care that is delivered. In this narrative review, we comprehensively underscore the health disparities and cancer inequities faced by the underserved communities within Micronesia.

A Survey of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network on Approaches Toward Addressing Patients' Transportation Insecurity

BACKGROUND

Addressing patients' social determinants of health is a national priority for cancer treatment centers. Transportation insecurity is one major challenge for patients undergoing active cancer treatment, and missing treatments can result in worse cancer treatment outcomes, including worse morbidity and mortality. How cancer treatment centers are addressing transportation insecurity is understudied.

METHODS

In January and February 2022, the NCCN Best Practices Committee conducted a survey of NCCN's 31 Member Institutions (currently 32 member institutions as of April 2022) to assess how centers were addressing patient transportation insecurity: how they screen for transportation insecurity, coordinate transportation, and fund transportation initiatives, and their plans to address transportation insecurity in the future.

RESULTS

A total of 25 of 31 (81%) NCCN Member Institutions responded to the survey, of which 24 (96%) reported supporting the transportation needs of their patients through screening, coordinating, and/or funding transportation. Patients' transportation needs were most often identified by social workers (96%), clinicians (83%), or patients self-declaring their needs (79%). Few centers (33%) used routine screening approaches (eg, universal screening of social risk factors) to systematically identify transportation needs, and 54% used the support of technology platforms or a vendor to coordinate transportation. Transportation was predominantly funded via some combination of philanthropy (88%), grants (63%), internal dollars (63%), and reimbursement from insurance companies (58%). Over the next 12 months, many centers were either going to continue their current transportation programs in their current state (60%) or expand existing programs (32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Many NCCN Member Institutions are addressing the transportation needs of their patients. Current efforts are heterogeneous. Few centers have systematic, routine screening approaches, and funding relies on philanthropy more so than institutional dollars or reimbursement from insurers. Opportunities exist to establish more structured, scalable, and sustainable programs for patients' transportation needs.

Economic and humanistic burden of HPV-related disease in Indonesia: A qualitative analysis

The burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV-related cancers and genital warts is increasing in developing countries, including Indonesia. The objective of this study was to qualitatively explore the humanistic and economic burden of these HPV-related diseases in patients in Indonesia. In 2021, in-depth interviews and focus groups were conducted with patients (N = 18) with HPV-related diseases and healthcare professionals (HCPs; N = 10) specialised in treating these patients. Interviews explored the physical, mental, social, and economic burden of HPV-related diseases. Patients emphasised the psychological and social burden of HPV-related diseases, which negatively impacted their mental state and close relationships. Treatment for HPV-related diseases was also associated with a substantial cost, which health insurance only partially alleviated. HCPs understood the physical negative impact of HPV-related diseases, but some understated patients' social, psychological, and financial burden. This research underscores the substantial economic and humanistic burden of HPV-related diseases that could be prevented by vaccination. In addition, it highlights the need for novel interventions to reduce negative psychosocial consequences of HPV-related diseases in Indonesia. Increased HCP education of the broader humanistic impacts of HPV-related diseases may improve patient support and increase awareness for preventive strategy.

Prostate cancer aggressiveness and financial toxicity among prostate cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Financial toxicity (FT) is a growing concern among cancer survivors that adversely affects the quality of life and survival. Individuals diagnosed with aggressive cancers are often at a greater risk of experiencing FT. The objectives of this study were to estimate FT among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors after 10-15 years of diagnosis, assess the relationship between PCa aggressiveness at diagnosis and FT, and examine whether current cancer treatment status mediates the relationship between PCa aggressiveness and FT.

METHODS

PCa patients enrolled in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP) were recontacted for long-term follow-up. The prevalence of FT in the PCaP cohort was estimated. FT was estimated using the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity, a validated measure of FT. The direct effect of PCa aggressiveness and an indirect effect through current cancer treatment on FT was examined using causal mediation analysis.

RESULTS

More than one-third of PCa patients reported experiencing FT. PCa aggressiveness was significantly independently associated with high FT; high aggressive PCa at diagnosis had more than twice the risk of experiencing FT than those with low or intermediate aggressive PCa (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.14-3.96). The proportion of the effect of PCa aggressiveness on FT, mediated by treatment status, was 10%, however, the adjusted odds ratio did not indicate significant evidence of mediation by treatment status (aOR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.95-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive PCa was associated with high FT. Future studies should collect more information about the characteristics of men with high FT and identify additional risk factors of FT.