"We Are Anxious Every Day": COVID-19 Impacts on Youth with Spina Bifida

A qualitative study on the experiences of Turkish caregivers of learning clean intermittent catheterization

PURPOSE

The process of caregivers learning to implement clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) affects both children and caregivers negatively. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of caregivers performing CIC on their children with spina bifida (SB).

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was conducted with a qualitative design between June 5 and September 25, 2022, with the caregivers of 17 children. The data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire and analyzed using a thematic analysis technique. The COREQ guidelines were followed in the study.

RESULTS

The data were grouped under fourteen sub-themes: "not knowing CIC, having knowledge about CIC, positive and supportive, negative and compelling, family support, health personnel support, loneliness, sharing responsibility, taking on the role of caregiver, satisfaction, sadness, indecisiveness, limitation of social life, change in social life routine". Caregivers had both positive and negative experiences in this period.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers face various challenges during the implementation of CIC for children with SB. The results reveal the importance of identifying the performance of caregivers. Nurses who are aware of the difficulties faced by caregivers in this period can be actively involved in personalized care-oriented health education, counseling, and support for caregivers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Failure to provide adequate support to caregivers during the CIC application process causes both children and caregivers to be negatively affected in this process. For this reason, protocols or guidelines should be created by nurses in order to reduce the negative experiences of caregivers who apply CIC to their children.

A systematic review of racial health disparities among children and youth with physical disabilities

PURPOSE

Children and youth who belong to a racially minoritized group commonly experience multiple and complex forms of discrimination and health disparities. The purpose of this review was to explore racial disparities in health care and health outcomes among children and youth with physical disabilities.

METHODS

Six international databases (Ovid Medline, Healthstar, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched and screened for inclusion. A narrative synthesis was used to identify the common trends.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria, which involved 218 555 children and youth with various types of physical disabilities spanning over 29 years. We noted the following trends: (1) racial disparities in accessing or receiving care; (2) racial disparities in health outcomes and mortality rates; and (3) factors affecting racial disparities. Most studies reported at least one finding indicating that racially minoritized youth had differential access to care and/or disparities in health outcomes compared to white youth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight the concerning racial disparities among children and youth with physical disabilities within health care. There is an urgent need for advocacy and interventions at multiple levels to address the perpetual racism and racial disparities that racially minoritized youth with physical disabilities experience.Implications for rehabilitationThere is an urgent need for health care leaders and health care providers to address the systemic health inequalities in rehabilitation for racially minoritized children and youth with physical disabilities.Health care leaders and clinicians should recognize the racial disparities that racially minoritized youth with physical disabilities encounter in accessing or receiving care in addition to health outcomes.Health care leaders and decision-makers should advocate for policy change to optimize equitable and inclusive health care to enhance the well-being of racially minoritized children with disabilities.Health care providers should engage in training to understand how to recognize and address how intersectional forms of a child's identity such as disability, race, and socio-economic status can influence health care experiences and health outcomes.

Research staff's experiences of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted recruitment for a paediatric network study

PURPOSE

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, a paediatric network study with clinical sites across Canada suffered a reduction in participation. When research studies fail to meet enrolment targets, it can reduce the strength and validity of the results. This study explores research staff's experiences of how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted recruitment for a paediatric network study.

METHODS

This study was conducted using a qualitative design. Focus group sessions were used to gain the perspective of research staff involved in recruitment and transcripts were analysed using Colaizzi's seven-step method of data analysis.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed four major themes: (1) the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on research activity; (2) families of children with medical complexity perform a risk-benefit assessment when deciding whether to take part in research; (3) a trusting relationship with clinicians is a key factor in research recruitment; and (4) research needs to be flexible in order to adapt to evolving contexts.

CONCLUSION

This study identified both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19-related factors that impacted study recruitment for a paediatric network study. Understanding and addressing these challenges will mitigate the negative impacts on health outcomes that can occur when research studies fail to meet enrolment targets.

Impact of CoVID-19 pandemic on multidisciplinary follow-up and clinical outcomes among pediatric spina bifida patients

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal, multidisciplinary care of children with spina bifida was disrupted during the CoVID-19 pandemic with unclear effect.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outpatient care utilization and outcomes among children with spina bifida before and during the CoVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

A pre-post analysis (2018-2020 vs 2020-2022) comparing outpatient care utilization and clinical outcomes was performed using the onset of the CoVID-19 pandemic as a hinge point. Clinical visits and clinically significant events - ED visits, admissions, UTIs, shunt malfunctions - were tabulated from chart review, and patients not seen in the last two years were called for follow up. Differences between visits and outcomes for individuals during pre- and intra-pandemic periods were calculated, and relationships between demographic variables and care utilization as well as clinical visits and clinical outcomes were evaluated via linear regression.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients were included, 39 (18%) of whom were lost to follow up intra-pandemic. Mean in-person visits decreased from 3.7 (SD 2.8) pre-pandemic to 2.5 (SD 2.3, p < 0.00) intra-pandemic. Only six patients (0.03%) had virtual visits pre-pandemic vs 95 (44%) intra-pandemic; virtual visits did not equalize mean total visits with those pre-pandemic (3.3 [2.9], p = 0.02). Recent surgery was significantly associated with difference in clinic visits between periods (p < 0.00). Admissions (44 vs 29%, p < 0.00), ED visits (55 vs 43.5%, p < 0.00), and shunt malfunctions (21 vs 12.6%, p = 0.01) were significantly higher pre-pandemic; UTI incidence was similar (34 vs 31%, p = 0.41). Clinic visits were significantly positively associated with ED visits (p = 0.02), admissions (p < 0.00), and shunt malfunctions (p = 0.04). Nearly half (40.5%) of patients lost to follow up were contacted; 30% of patients reported difficulty accessing appointments and 17% accessing supplies during the pandemic.

DISCUSSION

Despite an increase in telehealth visits during the pandemic, there was a decrease in mean total clinic visits compared to pre-pandemic. Adverse events did not increase during the pandemic period as expected; incidence of all evaluated outcomes was higher pre-pandemic. Additionally, outpatient care utilization during the pandemic was positively associated with ED presentation and shunt malfunction and did not appear to protect against other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Though clinical follow-up for pediatric spina bifida patients decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, clinical outcomes did not acutely worsen. Clinic visits were supplemented but not entirely replaced by telemedicine in this period and were associated with poorer clinical outcomes, possibly reflecting an increase in patients' and families' threshold to engage in outpatient care during the pandemic.

Examining the psychometric properties of the CEFIS-AYA using item response theory

OBJECTIVE

The COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scale, Adolescent and Young Adult Version (CEFIS-AYA; Schwartz, L. A., Lewis, A. M., Alderfer, M. A., Vega, G., Barakat, L. P., King-Dowling, S., Psihogios, A. M., Canter, K. S., Crosby, L., Arasteh, K., Enlow, P., Hildenbrand, A. K., Kassam-Adams, N., Pai, A., Phan, T. L., Price, J., Schultz, C. L., Sood, E., Wood, J., & Kazak, A. (2022). COVID-19 exposure and family impact scales for adolescents and young adults. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 47, 631-640. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsac036) was developed to assess the pandemic's effects on adolescents and young adults (AYA). Via principal component analysis, measure developers examined the structure and reliability of the CEFIS-AYA and identified seven exposure and five impact components. This study built upon prior work through use of item response theory (IRT) models to characterize the dimensionality of the CEFIS-AYA, determine the strength of relations between items and underlying trait(s), and examine associations between trait scores and pandemic-related distress.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data collected between July 2020 and July 2021 from three studies of emerging adults (ages 18-29; N = 834).

RESULTS

The CEFIS-AYA structure was multidimensional, with the strongest support for five traits. Trait 1 represented pandemic impact on social/emotional functioning and self-care. Trait 2 reflected other pandemic disruptions. Trait 3 represented pandemic disruptions to education and/or other milestones. Trait 4 represented pandemic impact on physical well-being. Trait 5 assessed pandemic disruptions to work/financial circumstances. Item loadings and parameters indicated variability in how consistently trait level was associated with item endorsement. Trait scores did not predict distress, except that increases in Trait 3 were associated with lower distress.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study examined the psychometric properties of the CEFIS-AYA among emerging adults using a statistical framework better suited for modeling categorical data. The identified dimensional structure was relatively consistent with the initial psychometric evaluation of the CEFIS-AYA, albeit more parsimonious. However, replication is critical in light of sample demographic characteristics.

The Psychosocial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Families of Youth of Color: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Prospectively examine racial and ethnic disparities in exposure to COVID-19-related stressors and their impact on families.

METHODS

A racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse cohort of caregivers of youth (n = 1,581) representative of the population served by a pediatric healthcare system completed the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales in Oct/Nov 2020 and March/April 2021. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine exposure to COVID-19-related events (Exposure), impact of the pandemic on family functioning and well-being (Impact), and child and parent distress (Distress) across time and as a function of race and ethnicity, adjusting for other sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

Exposure and Distress increased over time for all participants. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors, caregivers of Black and Hispanic youth reported greater Exposure than caregivers of White youth and caregivers of Black youth had a greater increase in Exposure over time than caregivers of White youth. Caregivers of White youth reported greater Impact than caregivers of Black and Other race youth.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family psychosocial functioning varied by race and ethnicity. Although exposure to COVID-19-related events was greater among Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black families, those of marginalized races reported less family impact than non-Hispanic White families, suggesting resiliency to the pandemic. Research should examine such responses to public health crises in communities of color, with a focus on understanding protective factors. These findings suggest the importance of culturally tailored interventions and policies that support universal psychosocial screenings during times of public health crises.

The feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment to understand urinary and fecal incontinence experiences in adults with spina bifida: A 30-day study

In this paper, we evaluate the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to understand urinary (UI) and fecal (FI) incontinence in adults with spina bifida (SB). As part of a larger 30-day prospective study to understand the incontinence in adults with SB (N = 89), participants completed end-of-day EMA diaries assessing the frequency and context of UI and FI. We used these data to assess the method feasibility across six dimensions: (a) compliance, or data entry which is consistent with study protocol and substantially complete; (b) reactivity, or behavior change attributed to study participation; (c) participant acceptability, or convenience and ease of method beneficial to compliance; (d) data capture, or the volume of incontinence behaviors collected; (e) the accuracy of incontinence reports; and f) participant-provided feedback for future studies. Participants were highly compliant with diary entry protocol and schedule: submitting 95.7% (2576/2700) of the expected total daily entries. The average completion time was two minutes. Neither the total number of submissions nor the completion time varied by demographic characteristics or health history. A sufficient volume of incontinence and affective outcomes were captured, with small downtrends in reporting of UI and affect over time. Exit survey recall was highly correlated with diary reports. Participants found the methodology to be acceptable, reported their experiences honestly, enjoyed and felt comfortable participating in the study and would engage in similar study in the future. Accurate information about the daily context of UI and FI is a key factor in the success of intervention or education programs relying on this information. Our findings demonstrate that EMA is a feasible way to describe UI and FI in adults with SB.

Psychosocial Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Racially/Ethnically Diverse Youth With Diabetes

OBJECTIVE

This study examined caregiver perceived impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on a diverse sample of U.S. youth with diabetes and their families.

METHODS

Caregivers of youth with diabetes completed an electronic survey in English or Spanish at two sites. Participants provided demographic and disease characteristics and completed the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS). Glycemic health was assessed via Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from medical chart review. Analysis of variance and analyses of covariance were utilized to examine racial/ethnic differences in glycemic health and in COVID-19 Exposure, Impact, and Distress scales. Hierarchical linear regression was conducted to predict HbA1c. Thematic analysis was conducted on open-ended responses regarding the effects of COVID-19 on youth and families' overall and diabetes-related well-being.

RESULTS

Caregivers (n = 114) of youth with diabetes (M = 12.6 ± 3.5 years) completed study measures. Mean HbA1c for Non-Hispanic White youth was lowest and significantly different from Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black youth. Exposure to COVID-19 stressors differed by race/ethnicity (p < .05) with Hispanic caregivers reporting greatest exposure. CEFIS scales did not predict HbA1c after controlling for demographic/disease variables. Caregivers described child/family changes during COVID (e.g., more time together, health-related hypervigilance), as well as differences in diabetes management during COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate differences in COVID-19 exposure but did not demonstrate other racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 impact or distress. Household income was the most important predictor of glycemic health. Addressing structural inequalities experienced by youth with diabetes and their families is critical. Recommendations to support families with diabetes are made.

Stress and mental health in adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis 1 year after the COVID pandemic: Findings from an Italian sample

BACKGROUND

The spread of COVID-19 was associated with increased stress and new mental health concerns for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), already at increased risk for depression and anxiety. This study assessed stress and mental health in adolescents and young adults with CF 1 year from when the pandemic began.

METHODS

Sixty-six pwCF (mean age = 24; range 14-36) completed a new measure of the impact of COVID-19 (COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scale-Adolescence and Young Adult; CEFIS-AYA); the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. The Italian translation of the CEFIS-AYA was performed.

RESULTS

On the CEFIS-AYA, the mean Exposure score was 5.2 (SD = 2.6) out of 28. The mean Impact score was 1.8 (SD = 0.7; negative valence &gt; 2.5). Individuals were more sedentary and undertaking less exercise. Average stress rating was 5.9 (SD = 2), indicating moderate stress. No significant differences were found between those who did (N = 12) and who did not have a COVID infection (N = 54). A high percentage of participants scored above the clinical cut-off for depression (45%) and anxiety (41%), with a low proportion reporting moderate-severe symptomatology.

CONCLUSION

After 1 year, the pandemic was having a less significant impact on patients' daily lives. Sedentary activity and reduced exercise were common. Despite expectations that this group was particularly vulnerable, depression and anxiety scores were similar to the rates described for this population before the pandemic. Overall, these results suggested that pwCF are highly resilient and nearly 1 year after the onset of COVID-19, have returned to similar daily activities and emotional health.

COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales for Adolescents and Young Adults

OBJECTIVE

To understand the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on adolescents and young adults (AYAs), we adapted the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS; Kazak et al., 2021) for AYAs. Here, we report on the development, structure, and psychometric properties of the CEFIS-AYA.

METHODS

The CEFIS-AYA was developed by a multidisciplinary, multi-institutional team using a rapid iterative process. Data from 3,912 AYAs from 21 programs at 16 institutions across the United States were collected from May 2020 to April 2021. We examined the underlying structure of the CEFIS-AYA using principal component analysis (PCA), calculated internal consistencies, and explored differences in scores by gender and age.

RESULTS

Participants reported exposure to a range of COVID-19-related events (M = 9.08 events, of 28). On the bidirectional 4-point Impact scale, mean item scores were mostly above the midpoint, indicating a slightly negative impact. Kuder-Richardson 20/Cronbach's Alpha was good for Exposure (α = .76) and excellent for Impact (α = .93). PCA identified seven factors for Exposure (Severe COVID-19, Loss of Income, Limited Access to Essentials, COVID-19 Exposure, Disruptions to Activities, Disruptions to Living Conditions, and Designation as an Essential Worker) and five for Impact (Self and Family Relationships, Physical Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Social Well-Being, and Distress). Gender and age differences in CEFIS-AYA scores were identified.

DISCUSSION

Initial reliability data are strong and support use of the CEFIS-AYA for measuring the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on AYAs in research and clinical care.

Associations and Disease-Disease Interactions of COVID-19 with Congenital and Genetic Disorders: A Comprehensive Review

Since December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic, which originated in Wuhan, China, has resulted in over six million deaths worldwide. Millions of people who survived this SARS-CoV-2 infection show a number of post-COVID complications. Although, the comorbid conditions and post-COVID complexities are to some extent well reviewed and known, the impact of COVID-19 on pre-existing congenital anomalies and genetic diseases are only documented in isolated case reports and case series, so far. In the present review, we analyzed the PubMed indexed literature published between December 2019 and January 2022 to understand this relationship from various points of view, such as susceptibility, severity and heritability. Based on our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review on COVID-19 and its associations with various congenital anomalies and genetic diseases. According to reported studies, some congenital disorders present high-risk for developing severe COVID-19 since these disorders already include some comorbidities related to the structure and function of the respiratory and cardiovascular systems, leading to severe pneumonia. Other congenital disorders rather cause psychological burdens to patients and are not considered high-risk for the development of severe COVID-19 infection.

Validation of the COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales

Objective

The COVID-19 Exposure and Family Impact Scales (CEFIS) were developed in Spring 2020 to assess effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on families and caregivers. Initial psychometric properties were promising. The current study examined the factor structure and evaluated convergent and criterion validity of the CEFIS in a new sample.

Methods

In October and November 2020, caregivers (N = 2,531) of youth (0–21 years) scheduled for an ambulatory care visit at Nemours Children’s Hospital, Delaware completed the CEFIS and measures of convergent (PROMIS Global Mental Health Scale, Family Assessment Device) and criterion validity (PTSD Checklist—Civilian). Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the CEFIS. Bivariate correlations and logistic regression were used to examine convergent and criterion validity.

Results

Factor analysis supported the original six- and three-factor structures for the Exposure and Impact scales, respectively. Second-order factor analyses supported the use of Exposure, Impact, and Distress total scores. Higher scores on the CEFIS Exposure, Impact, and Distress scales were associated with increased mental health concerns and poorer family functioning. Higher scores on all CEFIS scales were also associated with greater odds of having clinically significant posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Conclusions

The CEFIS is a psychometrically sound measure of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on family and caregiver functioning and may also be useful in identifying families who would benefit from psychological supports.

Think globally, act locally: Quality improvement as a catalyst for COVID-19 related care during the transitional years

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed distinctive challenges to adolescents and young adults living with spina bifida, especially those from ethic minority populations. With this public health challenge in mind, developing a customized electronic health record to leverage registry data to promote and quantify COVID-19 vaccination uptake among this population is feasible. We provide a brief description of our activities in customizing an electronic health record to track vaccination uptake among adolescents and young adults with spina bifida (AYASB); and the lessons learned, in hopeful support of those scaling-up vaccination delivery across the globe for AYASB as they transition to adult-centered care. Thus, as providers think globally and act locally, COVID-19 immunization efforts can be implemented while providing culturally appropriate transition policies and services for individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities.