Parent-Child Communication and Adjustment Among Children With Advanced and Non-Advanced Cancer in the First Year Following Diagnosis or Relapse

Paternal Contributions to Biopsychosocial Outcomes of Children With Cancer: A Scoping Review

Though children with cancer experience better outcomes with supportive caregivers and family environments, these findings are predominantly informed by maternal perspectives. Given fathers' increasing involvement, this scoping review examined paternal contributions to the biopsychosocial outcomes of their children with cancer. English, full-text publications from any time before October 4, 2022 including at least one search term from these three groups were included: pediatric oncology diagnosis ≤18 years old, fathers/parents, child biopsychosocial outcomes. Title and abstract screening, full-text reviews, data extraction, and quality assessments were completed by at least two reviewers. Results are presented using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Review guidelines. Of 10,116 studies screened, 29 were included. Most studies were poor (38%) or fair (45%) quality. Seventy-six percent presented significant associations between father contributions and child biopsychosocial outcomes, including child mental state, coping, behavioral adjustment, relationship quality in adulthood, and adherence. Fathers' contributions were ambiguously related to children's quality of life and physical wellbeing. Limited findings suggest fathers contribute in significant, positive ways to their child with cancer's biopsychosocial outcomes. Findings underscore research gaps and suggest greater efforts should be made to include fathers in pediatric oncology research, interventions, and clinical practice.

Advance Care Planning Conversations in Pediatric Patients with Refractory Oncologic Disease

Advance care planning (ACP) involves longitudinal communication between the patient and physician to explore the patient's wishes and goals while relaying accurate diagnostic and prognostic information to support informed and shared medical decision-making. In pediatrics, it also uniquely involves the parents or legal guardians as the primary medical decision-makers. ACP ideally leads to the implementation of advanced directives (ADs) and can be a difficult concept to discuss with pediatric patients and families with refractory oncologic disease, given the distinctive burdens that accompany this population. Many obstacles can delay the initiation of these conversations with these families, although existing literature supports beginning ACP conversations at the time of initial diagnosis and treatment. Parents or legal guardians often serve as the sole decision maker for pediatric patients but there has also been a shift in the literature to include children/adolescents in conversations regarding ADs and other aspects of end-of-life (EOL) care, an essential aspect of patient-centered ACP. This guidance is unfortunately not often translated into clinical practice. In this review, we aim to define and discuss the current status, obstacles, and benefits surrounding early initiation of ACP conversations with children or adolescents with advanced cancer and their families. We also discuss how physicians and the medical team, including pediatric palliative care, can increase the degree of pediatric patient involvement in ACP and EOL discussions, as developmentally appropriate, and mitigate delays in discussing ACP with these families and patients.

Multi-center randomized controlled trial on advance care planning for adolescents with cancer and their parents: Impact on parent-adolescent communication

PURPOSE

This study evaluates whether the Benefits of Obtaining Ownership Systematically Together in pediatric Advance Care Planning (BOOST pACP) intervention improves parent-adolescent communication compared to care as usual.

METHODS

In this multi-center parallel-group superiority trial, adolescent patients (10-18 years old) diagnosed with cancer and their parent(s) were randomized with a 1:1 allocation to a pACP intervention or care as usual. The primary endpoint was the adolescents' assessment of quality of parent-adolescent communication at 3 months, and the secondary was quality of parent-adolescent communication at 7 months.

RESULTS

Forty-nine families were enrolled (28% enrollment rate) between March 2021 and March 2023. No significant differences in parent-adolescent communication were observed between the BOOST and care as usual groups at 3 months (T1) (baseline-adjusted mean difference = 1.4; 95% CI -4.1 to 6.9; p = 0.608), effect size 0.13. Similarly, at 7 months (T2) differences were not significant (baseline-adjusted mean difference = 5.2; 95% CI -0.6 to 11.0; p = 0.077), effect size 0.49 (and 0.67 for father-adolescent communication). No significant differences in anxiety scores of adolescents and parents were found and no adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The BOOST pACP intervention did not significantly improve parent-adolescent communication for adolescents with cancer and their parents at 3 months after baseline. However, the results indicate it might have a clinical impact in later stages of the follow-up period. Limitations of this study are the underpowered sample size and the lack of validated questionnaires for specific ACP communication.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN, number 33228289 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN33228289.

Psychometric evaluation of the german version of the parent-adolescent communication scale

The quality of dyadic Parent-Child Communication (PCC) between parents and their adolescent children may be important for the adolescent's general development and mental health during adolescence. Since German instruments for measuring PCC are still lacking, this study aimed to validate the German translation of the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS), an internationally established self-report questionnaire. To examine the theoretical-based two-factor model of the PACS in a German population sample of 1044 parent-adolescent dyads, confirmatory factor analyses were used. Moreover, the cross-group measurement invariance of the instrument was assessed. Two clinical samples were used to assess discriminative validity. Bland-Altman plots were used to asses parent-adolescent agreement. The two-factor structure of the PACS was supported. Scalar measurement invariance was established for parent age groups and adolescent gender but not for adolescent age groups and parent gender. Convergent and divergent validity were established. Discriminative validity was only established for the adolescent version in the adolescent psychiatry sample. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory, and rater agreement was medium. The German translation of the PACS is a reliable and valid measurement to assess parent-adolescent communication quality per self-report. Research directions include the concordance discrepancy in clinical samples and further investigation of changes in parents' and adolescents' perspectives on communication problems and open communication. Registration: NCT05332236 (clinicaltrials.gov), first registered 2022-04-11.

Transitions in patterns of family resilience and their associations with parent-child interaction: A longitudinal study using latent transition analysis among families of children with chronic illness

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate transitions in patterns of family resilience among Chinese families of children with chronic illness over a one-year period, as well as their relationship to parent-child interaction.

METHODS

A representative sample of parents of children with chronic illness was drawn from two hospitals in Zhejiang Province, China, using convenience sampling. A total of 214 parents were assessed for family resilience, parent-adolescent communication, and child-parent relationships at three time points with a one-year interval: baseline (T1), 6 months (T2), and 12 months (T3) after the baseline survey.

RESULTS

Latent profile analysis identified three distinct patterns, including (1) low family resilience, (2) moderate family resilience, and (3) high family resilience. The latent transition analysis revealed four transition patterns: stable low (72.4 %), stable moderate-high (22.5 %), improved from low to either high or moderate (4.2 %), and worsened from high to moderate (0.9 %). A one-way ANOVA revealed significant effects of the transition patterns of family resilience on open family communication, intimacy, and conflict within parent-child relationships.

CONCLUSIONS

The high proportion within the "stable low" transition pattern and the enduring stability of family resilience over time underscore the significance of early intervention efforts aimed at enhancing family resilience or mitigating its decline among families of children with chronic illness.

Parent Views on Parent and Child-reported Outcomes in Pediatric Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Research on concurrent parent and patient-reported outcomes has primarily focused on reaching agreement. However, little is known about how to interpret and address discrepancies, which are not uncommon, between both viewpoints.

OBJECTIVES

To explore parents' perspectives on reporting about child symptoms and quality of life (QoL) concurrently with their child in the context of pediatric advanced cancer.

METHODS

This qualitative study was embedded in the PediQUEST Response Study, a randomized controlled trial of timely palliative care integration in children with advanced cancer. Over 18 weeks, study dyads (children ≥5 years old and one parent) completed weekly e-PROs assessing symptoms and QoL. Using a grounded theory approach, we ran a secondary analysis of end-of-study semi-structured parent interviews to examine their views on concurrent reporting of symptoms.

RESULTS

Out of 110 randomized dyads included in this analysis, 77 parents completed an exit interview. Most were White non-Hispanic mothers. Parent reflections on concurrent reporting of child symptoms and QoL are summarized in the following themes: symptom experience is subjective, parent and child viewpoints are unique, parents ask fewer questions as they adapt to child treatment, and children may hesitate to share symptoms. To better grasp their child's experience, parents developed proactive communication strategies.

CONCLUSION

Interviewed parents acknowledged that parent report and child self-report are distinct and complementary. Their perspectives provide guidance to clinicians and researchers about the implementation and interpretation of concurrent outcomes measurement in pediatric advanced cancer care.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT03408314.

Family communication and courageous coping in Korean adolescents and young adults: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population during a critical developmental transition that can benefit from the adoption of courageous coping. Parental support is crucial in enhancing adjustment and coping skills. The linkage between parent-adolescent communication (PAC) and the use of courageous coping (UCC), however, remains unclear. This study examined the association between PAC and UCC and possible mediators of this relationship among Korean AYAs with cancer.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, correlational study, self-report data were collected from 144 AYAs aged 11-26 years. A path analytic approach was employed using a hierarchical regression model to test for the direct relationship between PAC and UCC and the indirect effects of a proposed primary mediator (family cohesion) and two intermediary mediators (uncertainty of illness, hope) on PAC-UCC relationship.

RESULTS

The mean age of the sample was 17 years (SD = 3.8), with 42% currently receiving cancer treatment. Greater PAC was significantly associated with increased UCC (mother figure: p = .0024, father figure: p  = .0042). Increased family cohesion significantly mediated the PAC-UCC relationship, indicated by a diminished PAC-UCC relationship after controlling for family cohesion (mother: p = .2753; father: p = .8107). Mediated mediation models indicated that increased hope stemming from decreased uncertainty was the mechanism through which family cohesion impacted the PAC-UCC relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings underscore that greater PAC can facilitate UCC among Korean AYAs with cancer and provide insights for therapeutic parent-child communication. Results further demonstrate the complex mediating role of fostering family cohesion, reducing uncertainty, and fostering hope can play in the PAC-UCC relationship.

Facilitators and barriers to parent-child communication in pediatric palliative care: An integrative review

Objectives

This study aimed to identify facilitators and barriers to parent-child communication in pediatric palliative care, providing insights for medical professionals developing targeted interventions to enhance parent-child communication and improve its effectiveness.

Methods

Whittemore and Knafl's integrative review method was employed to guide a systematic search for literature in six databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library). Peer-reviewer articles published in the English language from inception to December 2023. All of the identified studies were screened, extracted, and analyzed independently by two researchers.

Results

Twenty-four articles were included. The findings of the relevant studies were analyzed using thematic analysis. Four themes were identified as facilitators: legacy-making, resilience training programs, guidance from the healthcare team, and positive communication. Seven themes were identified as barriers: denial, being unprepared and evasive, mutual protection, being overwhelmed by painful emotions and overloaded with information, incorrect views of medical professionals and parents, negative communication, and cultural context.

Conclusions

Parents and professionals should avoid myths about protecting the child and encourage open communication that respects the child's wishes. The specialized pediatric palliative care team should carefully monitor parent-child communication, determine if any obstacles exist, and design more interventions to enhance it.

Who, What, Where, and How? The State of Family Science in Pediatric Palliative Care

CONTEXT

Families are vital providers and recipients of pediatric palliative care (PPC) services. Understanding the scope and nature of evidence at the intersection of family science and PPC research is necessary to develop family-focused interventions that enhance child and family health.

OBJECTIVES

Explore and describe the family-level impact of pediatric serious illness.

METHODS

We conducted a librarian-assisted scoping review using Arskey and O'Malley's approach. We searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases for empirical publications from 2016 to 2021 that focused on families navigating serious pediatric illness published in English. Two reviewers assessed eligibility, with discrepancies resolved by a third. We used Covidence and REDCap for data management and extraction.

RESULTS

We screened 10,983 abstracts; 309 abstracts were included in full text screening. The final group of 52 citations was analyzed by the entire team. Most research was conducted in Western Europe and North America. The perspectives of parents of children with cancer were most frequently described; voices of seriously ill youth and their siblings were less often presented. Most of the research was descriptive qualitative, followed by descriptive quantitative. Few studies were mixed methods, inferential, or interpretive. Studies most often described parent, youth, and family experience with illness and less often explored family processes and relationships. Irrespective of the approach (i.e., qualitative, quantitative), few studies focused on families as the analytic unit or used family-level analysis techniques. Study participants were usually from local dominant populations and less often from historically marginalized communities.

CONCLUSION

The robust, descriptive, and individual-level evidence describing family impact of serious pediatric illness provides a solid foundation for future research priorities. Stronger integration of family techniques and diverse family voices in pediatric palliative care research can clarify family processes, illuminate structural barriers, and inform interventions that are responsive to family needs. These steps will enhance the education, policy, and clinical provision of PPC to all who would benefit, thereby advancing health equity for children living with serious illness and their families.

Impact of sociodemographic factors, stress, and communication on health-related quality of life in survivors of pediatric cancer

BACKGROUND

While most research has largely focused on medical risks associated with reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in survivors, sociodemographic and family factors may also play a role. Thus, we longitudinally examined sociodemographic factors and family factors associated with survivor HRQOL, including adolescent's cancer-specific stress, mother's general stress, and mother-adolescent communication.

METHODS

Mothers (N = 80) and survivors (ages 10-23, N = 50) were assessed 5 years following initial diagnosis. Mothers completed measures regarding sociodemographic background adolescent's cancer-specific stress, mother's general stress, mother-adolescent communication, and adolescent HRQOL. Survivors also reported on their own HRQOL. Two hierarchical multiple regressions examined predictors of (a) mother's report of adolescent HRQOL, and (b) survivor's self-report of HRQOL.

RESULTS

The final model predicting mother-reported adolescent HRQOL was significant, F(5,74) = 21.18, p < .001, and explained 59% of the variance in HRQoL. Significant predictors included adolescent stress (β = -.37, p < .001), mothers' stress (β = -.42, p < .001), and communication (β = .19, p = .03). The final model predicting survivor-reported HRQOL was also significant, F(5,44) = 5.16, p < .01 and explained 24% of the variance in HRQOL. Significant predictors included adolescent stress (β = -.37, p = .01) and communication (β = -.31, p = .04). Sociodemographic factors were not a significant predictor of HRQOL in any model.

CONCLUSION

Family stress and communication offer potential points of intervention to improve HRQOL of pediatric cancer survivors from mother and survivor perspectives. While additional research is needed, healthcare professionals should encourage stress management and strong mother-child communication to enhance survivors' long-term HRQOL. Such interventions may be complimentary to efforts targeting the known sociodemographic factors that often affect health.

Therapeutic Parent-Child Communication and Health Outcomes in the Childhood Cancer Context: A Scoping Review

Family communication has been thought to be an important area to support children's adjustment to a cancer diagnosis. However, the characteristics of therapeutic parent-child communication that contribute to better patient outcomes and the specific patient health outcomes have been less explored. This current review explored the characteristics of therapeutic parent-child communication and its physical and psychological health outcomes. A total of 5034 articles were initially identified, and only 10 articles remained for inclusion in this review after application of the exclusion criteria. Most studies used a cross-sectional design and measured verbal communication characteristics and its psychological outcomes, but no physical outcomes. The characteristics of therapeutic verbal communication (openness, maternal validation, quality of information shared, etc.) and nonverbal communication (eye contact, close physical distance, and acknowledging behaviors) were identified. The psychological health outcomes included less distress, a lower level of PTSS, less internalizing and externalizing of symptoms, increased levels of social emotional competencies, better peer relationships, and more cooperation during the procedure at the individual level. Increased family cohesion and family adaptation were family-level outcomes. Longitudinal studies are needed to identify what qualities of communication predict better psychological outcomes so that interventions can be developed and tested. In addition, physical outcomes should be evaluated.

A systematic review of the association between parent-child communication and adolescent mental health

Background

This systematic review addresses how adolescent-rated parent-child communication (PCC) quality is related to adolescent mental health.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and APA PsycInfo, including peer-reviewed quantitative studies examining associations between adolescent-rated dyadic PCC quality and general as well as specific measures of adolescent mental health. Qualitative and case studies were excluded, as were studies reporting only parent-rated communication quality or instruments assessing other constructs than dyadic PCC. We screened 5314 articles, of which 37 were included in the review. We assessed study quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results

We synthesized the findings in a table and narratively, reporting the main outcomes organized according to mental health constructs. The included studies were mainly cross-sectional. The results showed that adolescent-rated PCC quality is negatively associated with mental health constructs, demonstrating small to large effects across different mental health constructs and populations. The associations were found for general mental health and specific domains, including depression, anxiety, psychosis, suicidal ideation, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and addictive internet use/gaming.

Conclusions

The findings demonstrate that PCC is a relevant variable to consider in assessing adolescent mental health and preventive efforts. Limitations include the exclusive focus on adolescent-reported PCC questionnaires since parent- and observer-rated instruments may lead to different results. Also, PCC is related to other constructs, such as dyadic relationships, that were not included in this review. We conclude that PCC is a relevant variable to consider in mental health research. Our findings suggest that PCC may be considered in mental health practice, both in terms of assessing its quality and potentially by tailoring interventions to enhance PCC. These may represent a mean to promote adolescent mental health.

Taiwanese fathers' experiences of caring for their children during childhood cancer treatment

PURPOSE

Parents must manage their own stress and help their child with cancer during the treatment process, both physically and emotionally. With the increased involvement of fathers in caring for the family, how fathers adjust to the stress and play a role in care responsibilities is unknown. This study aimed to explore the fathers' experiences of caring for their ill child during the cancer diagnosis and treatment process.

METHOD

This study adopted a qualitative descriptive design and conducted in-depth interviews with 21 fathers with a diagnosed child recruited from a northern Taiwan medical center. Data were managed and analysed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Two main categories in the Taiwanese fathers' experiences of caring for their ill child during the cancer diagnosis and treatment process emerged: 1) the maintainer of family stability, and 2) thoughts and value adjustment. Each main category consists of 3-4 generic categories. They make the necessary adjustments between work and family, actively participate in caring for the entire family, and redefine family values. They convey information about the illness to their children, pay attention to the physical and psychological development of the child with cancer, and cherish the time spent together as a family.

CONCLUSIONS

During the cancer treatment process, fathers play the roles of the protector and maintainer of family stability and adjust their attitudes and thoughts toward the family members and family life. Healthcare professionals can offer the fathers comprehensive support and improve the family's overall well-being during this demanding period.

A Systematic Review of Parent-Child Communication Measures: Instruments and Their Psychometric Properties

Parent-child communication represents an important variable in clinical child and family psychology due to its association with a variety of psychosocial outcomes. To give an overview of instruments designed to measure the quality of parent-child communication from the child's (8-21 years) perspective and to assess the psychometric quality of these instruments, we performed a systematic literature search in Medline and PsycInfo (last: February 25, 2022). Peer-reviewed journal articles published in English with a child-rated instrument measuring the quality of parent-child communication were included. Initial screening for eligibility and inclusion, subsequent data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by couples of review team members. Based on the screening of 5115 articles, 106 studies reported in 126 papers were included. We identified 12 parent-child communication instruments across the studies. The Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS) was used in 75% of the studies. On average, the evidence for psychometric quality of the instruments was low. Few instruments were used in clinical and at-risk samples. Several instruments are available to rate parent-child communication from the child's perspective. However, their psychometric evidence is limited and the theoretical foundation is largely undocumented. This review has limitations with regard to selection criteria and language bias.Registration PROSPERO: CRD42021255264.

Family Communication About Cancer in Korea: A Dyadic Analysis of Parent-Adolescent Conversation

Parent-adolescent communication is important in the context of childhood cancer. However, we know little about the communication experiences between Korean adolescents and their parents. Here, we conducted a secondary analysis of interview data from a qualitative descriptive study to explore Korean parent-adolescent communication experiences as a unit. Specifically, our dyadic analysis of individual interviews with seven Korean adolescents with cancer and at least one parent included inductive analysis at the individual level and cross-analysis to generate themes. The main theme was "Experience the same thing, but see it differently," along three subthemes: (1) different expectations for parent-adolescent communication, (2) different views on communication challenges, and (3) limited sharing and no progress in the conversation. Overall, our findings provide insights into different communication expectations and preferences between Korean adolescents and parents, and reasons for communication challenges, while emphasizing the individualized assessment of parent-adolescent communication between them.

How does parent-child communication affects posttraumatic stress disorder and growth in adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic? The mediating roles of self-compassion and disclosure

BACKGROUND

Research suggests that family factors play an important role in adolescent posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and posttraumatic growth (PTG). Parent-child communication has attracted particular attention. However, it remains unclear whether parent-child communication affects PTSD and PTG via unique or shared underlying mechanisms. The study aim was to examine the effect of parent-child communication on PTSD and PTG via self-compassion and self-disclosure.

METHODS

Self-report questionnaires were administered to 683 adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Open parent-child communication was positively associated with PTG and negatively associated with PTSD via two 1-step indirect paths of self-compassion and self-disclosure, and by one 2-step indirect path of self-compassion to self-disclosure. Problematic parent-child communication was negatively associated with PTG and positively associated with PTSD via two 1-step indirect paths of self-compassion and self-disclosure.

LIMITATIONS

First, pandemics differ from other disasters, generalizing these findings to other traumatized populations must be cautious. Then, this was a cross-sectional study, so longitudinal effects could not be examined and causal relationships cannot be confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Different types of parent-child communication have different influencing mechanisms on PTSD and PTG. Therefore, distinct intervention strategies are needed targeted to these two psychological reactions.

The BOOST paediatric advance care planning intervention for adolescents with cancer and their parents: development, acceptability and feasibility

Background

Although advance care planning (ACP) has been widely recommended to support patient and family engagement in understanding the patient’s values, preferences and goals of care, there are only a few models in paediatric oncology that capture ACP as a process of behaviour change. We aimed to develop and test the acceptability and feasibility of BOOST pACP (Benefits of Obtaining Ownership Systematically Together in paediatric Advance Care Planning) – an intervention to improve ACP in adolescents with cancer, their parents and paediatric oncologists.

Methods

Several methods informed the intervention development process: 1) Problem identification: interviews with 11 healthcare professionals working in paediatric oncology; 2) Identification of evidence: literature review of existing pACP tools and barriers and facilitators in performing pACP; 3) Logic model and 4) Intervention design: collaborative expert meetings with researchers and professionals in pACP; 5a) Acceptability test of the materials: interviews with nine healthcare professionals, four adolescents and young adults with cancer and six parents; 5b) Feasibility test of core intervention components with three families, including interviews about their experiences.

Results

The BOOST pACP intervention was iteratively developed and adapted, based on feedback from families, healthcare professionals, and pACP experts (e.g., components were changed, deleted, and added; formulation of themes and associated questions were amended to enhance acceptability). The core components of the BOOST pACP intervention include: four ACP conversation sessions with the adolescent and/or parent(s) provided by a trained facilitator, structured by interactive conversation cards covering different ACP themes, followed by a transfer of information from the intervention facilitator to the paediatric oncologist. Core intervention components were deemed feasible by all participating families.

Conclusion

The BOOST pACP intervention was developed by close involvement of both adolescent patients and their parents, healthcare professionals and pACP experts. The final intervention and supporting materials are considered appropriate and feasible. Its effectiveness in improving parent-adolescent communication on ACP themes is currently being tested in a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Researchers aiming to develop a complex psychosocial intervention for a vulnerable target group could use the step-by-step approach described in this paper.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03247-9.

Measuring family communication in pediatric nursing: Psychometric properties of the Parent-Child Communication Scale - Child Report (PCCS-CR)

PURPOSE

Communication quality is an essential indicator of family functioning and represents an important outcome after pediatric nursing interventions. However, few well-documented child-report questionnaires for family communication exist. We aimed to document the psychometric properties of a previously developed child-rated family communication scale for use in pediatric nursing.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We examined the Parent-Child Communication Scale - Child Report (PCCS-CR) in terms of factor structure, convergent validity against the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures scale (ECR-RS), and known-groups validity between a sample of siblings of children with pediatric health conditions and controls. The sample comprised 101 siblings of children with a pediatric health condition and 44 controls (M age = 11.5 years, SD = 2.2).

RESULTS

We confirmed a two-factor structure of the PCCS-CR. One factor is communication from the child to the parent, labelled child communication (e.g., "I discuss problems with my parents") and the other is communication from the parent to the child, labelled parent communication (e.g., "My parent is a good listener"). Convergent validity of the PCCS-CR was demonstrated through correlations with ECR-RS (r = -0.73 to -0.22, p ≤ .05). Further, construct validity through differences between families with and without a child with a pediatric health condition was demonstrated (g = 0.36-0.83, p ≤ .052).

CONCLUSION

The PCCS-CR appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of parent-child communication from the child's point of view.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The PCCS-CR can be administered in pediatric nursing care and can be used to target and measure the outcomes of interventions aimed at enhancing family functioning.

End of life communication among caregivers of children with cancer: A qualitative approach to understanding support desired by families

OBJECTIVES

Clinicians and parents are encouraged to have open and honest communication about end of life with children with cancer, yet there remains limited research in this area. We examined family communication and preferred forms of support among bereaved caregivers of children with cancer.

METHODS

Bereaved caregivers were recruited through a closed social media group to complete an online survey providing retrospective reports of end of life communication with their child and preferences for communication support from health-care providers. The sample of 131 participants was mostly female (77.9%; n = 102) with an average age of 49.15 (SD = 8.03) years. Deceased children were of an average age of 12.42 years (SD = 6.01) and nearly 90% of children died within 5 years of diagnosis.

RESULTS

Most caregivers spoke with their child about their prognosis (61.8%; n = 131) and death (66.7%; n = 99). Half of children (48%; n = 125) asked about death, particularly older children (51.9% ≥12 years; p = 0.03). Asking about dying was related to having conversations about prognosis (p ≤ 0.001) and death (p ≤ 0.001). Most caregivers (71.8%; n = 94) wanted support to talk to their children. Fewer wanted providers to speak to children directly (12.2%; n = 16) or to be present while caregivers spoke to the child (19.8%; n = 26). Several themes emerged from a content analysis of open-ended responses regarding preferences for provider support.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Most caregivers discussed issues pertaining to end of life irrespective of demographic or medical factors. Qualitative themes provide insight into support desired by families to help with these difficult conversations.

Insecure Attachment to Parents and PTSD among Adolescents: The Roles of Parent-Child Communication, Perceived Parental Depression, and Intrusive Rumination

Based on attachment theory and a social-cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), this study examined the roles of parent-child communication, perceived parental depression, and intrusive rumination in the association between insecure attachment to parents and PTSD among adolescents following the Jiuzhaigou earthquake. In this study, 620 adolescents were recruited to complete self-report questionnaires. The results showed that the direct association between anxious attachment and PTSD was significant, but that between avoidant attachment and PTSD was non-significant. In addition, both anxious and avoidant attachment had indirect associations with PTSD via the mediating effects of parent-child communication openness and problems, perceived parental depression, and intrusive rumination. However, the specific paths between anxious and avoidant attachment and PTSD were different. The findings indicated that insecure attachment among adolescents following the earthquake was predictive for their PTSD, and the mechanisms underlying the association between anxious attachment and PTSD and the association between avoidant attachment and PTSD were distinct. To alleviate PTSD, more attention should be paid to improving the quality of parent-child communication for adolescents with avoidant attachment to parents, and to reducing negative cognition in adolescents with anxious attachment.

Effect of time on quality of parent-child communication in pediatric cancer

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of childhood cancer results in new parent-child communication challenges. Little is known about how communication changes over time after diagnosis or relapse. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of time since diagnosis and relapse on quality of parent-child communication. We hypothesized that there would be a positive correlation between time and quality of parent-child communication.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in children (7-17 years) with relapsed/refractory cancer and their caregivers, who spoke English, were not cognitively impaired, and had internet access. Parents were recruited through Facebook ads. Parents and children completed the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale (PACS), a 20-item measure of communication quality, with openness and problem subscales. Spearman's rho (r_s ) coefficients assessed correlations between PACS scores and time since diagnosis/relapse.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant negative correlation between parent PACS scores and time since child's cancer diagnosis (r_s  = -0.21, p = .02), indicating a tendency for overall worsening communication as time since diagnosis increased. There was a positive correlation between the parent PACS problem scores and time since diagnosis (r_s  = +0.22, p = .01), indicating more problematic communication as time since diagnosis increased. Correlations of time since relapse and PACS scores were small and not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Parent-child communication worsens over time following a child's cancer diagnosis with more communication problems, contrary to our hypothesis. Future studies are needed to evaluate intervention timing to best support parent-child communication beyond the new-diagnosis period.

Advance care planning for adolescents with cancer and their parents: study protocol of the BOOST pACP multi-centre randomised controlled trial and process evaluation

BACKGROUND

Research has highlighted the need for evidence-based interventions to improve paediatric advance care planning (pACP) in adolescents with cancer. Although adolescents express the desire and ability to share their values, beliefs and preferences for treatment, there is a lack of structured multicomponent interventions to improve parent-adolescent communication on different ACP themes including those not limited to end-of-life care. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation, context and mechanisms of impact of a novel ACP program in paediatric oncology.

METHODS

We will conduct a multi-centre parallel-group randomised controlled superiority trial with embedded mixed-methods process evaluation in Flanders, Belgium. Adolescents aged 10-18 who have cancer, and their parent(s) will be recruited via all four university hospitals in Flanders, Belgium, and support groups. Families will be randomised to receive care as usual or the multicomponent BOOST pACP program, consisting of three conversation sessions between an external facilitator and the adolescent and parent(s). The primary endpoint is improved parent-adolescent communication from the perspective of the adolescent. Secondary endpoints are adolescents' and parents' attitudes, self-efficacy, intention and behaviour regarding talking about ACP themes with each other, parents' perspective of shared decision making in the last clinical encounter, and the paediatric oncologist's intention and behaviour regarding talking about ACP themes with the family. Measurements will be performed at baseline, at 3 months and at 7 months using structured self-reported questionnaires. We will perform a process evaluation in the intervention group, with measurement throughout and post-intervention, using structured diaries filled out by the facilitators, interviews with facilitators, interviews with involved paediatric oncology teams, and audio-recordings of the BOOST pACP conversations.

DISCUSSION

The BOOST pACP program has been developed to stimulate conversations on ACP themes between parent(s) and the adolescents, simultaneously lowering the threshold to discuss similar themes with healthcare professionals, initiating a process of normalization and integration of ACP in standard care. This combined outcome and process evaluation aims to contribute to building the necessary evidence to improve ACP in paediatric oncology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study is registered at ISRCTN, ISRCTN33228289 . Registration date: January 22, 2021.

Longitudinal understanding of prognosis among adolescents with cancer

OBJECTIVE

Despite calls to increase prognosis communication for adolescents with cancer, limited research has examined their perceptions of prognosis as compared with their parents. We assessed adolescents' understanding of their prognosis relative to parents and oncologists.

METHODS

Families of adolescents (aged 10-17) were recruited at two pediatric institutions following a new diagnosis or relapse. Seventy-four adolescents, 68 mothers, and 40 fathers participated at enrollment; 76 adolescents, 69 mothers, and 35 fathers participated one year later. The adolescent's primary oncologist reported on prognosis only at enrollment. Participants rated the likelihood of the adolescent's survival in five years, as well as reporting prognosis communication and sources of information.

RESULTS

Most oncologists (65%) and fathers (63%) discussed prognosis in numerical terms with the adolescent at baseline, which was greater than mother report (49%) of discussions of numerical prognosis with adolescents. Adolescents reported a better prognosis than oncologists, but comparable with mothers at diagnosis and one year. Adolescents' prognosis estimates were stable over time (P > .05). At diagnosis, adolescent-father (P = 0.025) and adolescent-oncologist (P < 0.001) discrepancies were larger for youth with advanced than non-advanced cancer. Adolescents whose parents received numerical prognosis estimates from the oncologist, and whose fathers reported providing numerical prognosis estimates had more accurate understandings of prognosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent prognosis estimates were comparable with those of parents at diagnosis and one year but more favorable than that of oncologists. Although additional research is needed, results suggest discrepancies in prognosis estimates between family members and oncologists, particularly for adolescents with advanced cancer.

Improved Parent-Child Communication following a RCT Evaluating a Legacy Intervention for Children with Advanced Cancer

Although legacy-building is a priority for quality palliative care, research has rarely examined effects of legacy interventions in children, particularly their impact on parent-child communication.We examined the impact of a web-based legacy intervention on parent-child communication. We hypothesized that compared to usual care, legacy-making would improve quality of parent-child communication.Between 2015 and 2018, Facebook advertisements were used to recruit families of children (ages 7-17) with relapsed/refractory cancer. Parent-child dyads were randomly assigned to the intervention or usual care group. The intervention website guided children to create digital storyboards over 2 weeks by directing them to answer legacy questions about themselves and upload photographs, videos, and music. Families received a copy of the child's final digital story. Children and parents completed the Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale pre- (T1) and post-intervention (T2). Linear regressions tested for differences in change from T1 to T2 between the groups controlling for T1 values using an alpha of p < .05. Intervention effects were measured using Cohen's d. Ninety-seven parent-child dyads were included for analysis. Changes in parent-child communication were not statistically significantly different between the groups, yet meaningful intervention effects were observed. The strongest effects were observed for improving father-child communication (Cohen's d = -0.22-0.33). Legacy-making shows promise to facilitate improved parent-child communication, particularly for fathers. Future studies should include fathers and measure expression of feelings and parent-child interaction. Providers should continue to facilitate family communication for children with advanced disease and realize that legacy interventions may impact mother-child versus father-child communication differently.

Hilfreiche psychosoziale Unterstützung für Eltern in der pädiatrischen Onkologie

Hintergrund

Krebserkrankungen im Kindes- und Jugendalter haben Auswirkungen auf die gesamte Familie – auch für die betroffenen Eltern hinsichtlich psychischer Aspekte. Gegenwärtig existieren nur wenige Untersuchungen zu den Anforderungen an hilfreiche psychosoziale Unterstützungsangebote für Eltern.

Ziel der Arbeit

Zur Gewinnung weiterer Erkenntnisse für die psychosoziale Versorgung wurden Eigenschaften und inhaltliche Komponenten von hilfreichen psychosozialen Unterstützungsangeboten für Eltern mit an Krebs erkrankten Kindern untersucht.

Methodik

Im Rahmen einer qualitativen Studie wurden N = 15 Expert_innen verschiedener Disziplinen und Standorte aus Akut- und Rehakliniken sowie ambulant tätige Kolleg_innen eingeschlossen. Die Durchführung basierte auf einem teilstrukturierten Interviewleitfaden. Die Auswertung erfolgte anhand der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse.

Ergebnisse

Grundsätzlich erachteten die eingeschlossenen Expert_innen niedrigschwellige und flexible Angebote als ideale psychosoziale Unterstützungsform. Hinsichtlich des optimalen Zeitpunkts zeigte sich hingegen ein heterogenes Bild. Inhaltlich wurden häufig die Förderung der Familienkohäsion, der Kommunikationsfähigkeiten sowie der Selbstfürsorge, aber auch Erziehungsthemen und angenehme gemeinsame Aktivitäten in der Gemeinschaft als essenziell angesehen.

Diskussion

Die psychosoziale Versorgung von Eltern mit an Krebs erkrankten Kindern ist herausfordernd, da die Langzeitverläufe individuell und dynamisch fluktuierend beschrieben werden. Eine Kombination aus verschiedenen Interventionsformaten (Präsenztermine vs. E‑Health-Module, Gruppen‑, Einzel- oder partnerschaftliche Sitzungen, strukturiert vs. themenoffen) scheint am praktikabelsten zu sein.

Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process

INTRODUCTION

Including children in medical conversations is considered the standard of care for children with cancer. However, previous qualitative research has raised concerns about how the child's presence impacts the parent's communication experience. The current study examines the frequency and impact of child presence during a serious medical conversation on the parent's communication experience in pediatric oncology.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed questionnaires assessing the child's presence during the initial conversation with the oncologist about diagnosis and treatment and parental communication experiences. Primary oncologists completed a survey question about the child's prognosis.

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of children were present during the initial conversation, with lowest rates among children aged 3-6 (44%) and 7-12 (44%). Child presence was not associated with parents' reports that they received prognostic information (p = 0.20), high-quality information (p = 0.19), or high-quality communication about the child's cancer (p = 1.0).

DISCUSSION

The parent's communication experience is not diminished by the choice to include the child. Given the bioethical imperative to include children in conversations about serious illness whenever possible, this concern should not be used to exclude children, but rather to give parents additional time of their own when needed to fully process decisions.

Are we meeting the informational needs of cancer patients and families? Perception of physician communication in pediatric oncology

BACKGROUND

High-quality oncology care is marked by skillful communication, yet little is known about patient and family communication perceptions or content preferences. Our study sought to elicit pediatric oncology patient and parent perceptions of early cancer communication to establish whether informational needs were met and identify opportunities for enhanced communication throughout cancer care.

METHOD

An original survey instrument was developed, pretested, and administered to 129 patients, age 10-18 years, and their parents at 3 cancer centers between 2011 and 2015. Statistical analysis of survey items about perceived communication, related associations, and patient/parent concordance was performed.

RESULTS

A greater percentage of participants reported "a lot" of discussion about the physical impact of cancer (patients, 58.1% [n = 75]; parents, 69.8% [n = 90]) compared with impact on quality of life (QOL) (patients, 44.2% [n = 57]; parents, 55.8% [n = 72]) or emotional impact (patients, 31.8% [n = 41]; parents, 43.4% [n = 56]). One fifth of patients (20.9% [n = 27]) reported they had no up-front discussion about the emotional impact of cancer treatment. Parents indicated a desire for increased discussion regarding impact on family life (27.9% [n = 36]), long-term QOL (27.9% [n = 36]), and daily activities (20.2% [n = 26]). Patients more frequently than parents indicated a desire for increased physician/patient discussion around the impact on daily activities (patients, 40.3% [n = 52]; parents, 21.7% [n = 28]; P < .001), long-term QOL (patients, 34.9% [n = 45]; parents, 16.3% [n = 21]; P < .001), pain management (patients, 23.3% [n = 30]; parents, 7% [n = 9]; P < .001), physical symptom management (patients, 24% [n = 31]; parents, 7.8% [n = 10]; P < .001), short-term QOL (patients, 23.3% [n = 30]; parents, 9.3% [n = 12]; P = .001), and curative potential (patients, 21.7% [n = 28]; parents, 8.5% [n = 11]; P = .002, P values calculated using McNemar's test).

CONCLUSION

Oncologists may not be meeting the informational needs of many patients and some parents/caregivers. Communication could be enhanced through increased direct physician-patient communication, as well as proactive discussion of emotional symptoms and impact of cancer on QOL.

Partnership between families of children with muscular dystrophy and healthcare professionals: From parents' perspective

PURPOSES

At present, there is still controversy between parents of children with muscular dystrophy (MD) and healthcare professionals on care issues. Partnerships can connect the affected children and their families to appropriate healthcare services, to jointly face the care environment together and thereby improve the quality of life of children with MD. Therefore, the objective of this study is to explore partnerships between families and healthcare professionals from the perspectives of parents of children with MD.

METHOD

Husserl's phenomenological research was applied to explore the basic structures of parents' descriptions of MD. Through purposive sampling, we conducted in-depth interviews with parents, and analyzed the data according to the theory of Giorgi. Nineteen parents (10 mothers, nine fathers) participated in this study. The precision of the research results was tested by applying the four standards of Lincoln and Guba.

RESULTS

This study identified five constituents: feasible resources and detailed care information; the provision of an integrated medical care across systems; family and home as key elements in critical care; respect and care for family care demands; and finally; feedback and support from families.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that partnerships were established by healthcare professionals, enhancing the care capacity of the families, developing the preventive medicine of MD, and enhancing children's potential for self-care within the families. Hospital policies should include the promotion of family partnership care. The findings can help healthcare professionals recognize the life experiences of children with MD when providing medical care.