Visualization and quantitative analysis of complex formation between E. coli RNA polymerase and an rRNA promoter in vitro

Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability

The first step in gene expression in all organisms requires opening the DNA duplex to expose one strand for templated RNA synthesis. In Escherichia coli, promoter DNA sequence fundamentally determines how fast the RNA polymerase (RNAP) forms "open" complexes (RPo), whether RPo persists for seconds or hours, and how quickly RNAP transitions from initiation to elongation. These rates control promoter strength in vivo, but their structural origins remain largely unknown. Here, we use cryoelectron microscopy to determine the structures of RPo formed de novo at three promoters with widely differing lifetimes at 37 °C: λP_R (t_1/2 ∼10 h), T7A1 (t_1/2 ∼4 min), and a point mutant in λP_R (λP_R-5C) (t_1/2 ∼2 h). Two distinct RPo conformers are populated at λP_R, likely representing productive and unproductive forms of RPo observed in solution studies. We find that changes in the sequence and length of DNA in the transcription bubble just upstream of the start site (+1) globally alter the network of DNA-RNAP interactions, base stacking, and strand order in the single-stranded DNA of the transcription bubble; these differences propagate beyond the bubble to upstream and downstream DNA. After expanding the transcription bubble by one base (T7A1), the nontemplate strand "scrunches" inside the active site cleft; the template strand bulges outside the cleft at the upstream edge of the bubble. The structures illustrate how limited sequence changes trigger global alterations in the transcription bubble that modulate the RPo lifetime and affect the subsequent steps of the transcription cycle.

Structural snapshots of actively transcribing influenza polymerase

Influenza virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase uses unique mechanisms to transcribe its single-stranded genomic viral RNA (vRNA) into messenger RNA. The polymerase is initially bound to a promoter comprising the partially base-paired 3' and 5' extremities of the RNA. A short, capped primer, 'cap-snatched' from a nascent host polymerase II transcript, is directed towards the polymerase active site to initiate RNA synthesis. Here we present structural snapshots, as determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, of actively initiating influenza polymerase as it transitions towards processive elongation. Unexpected conformational changes unblock the active site cavity to allow establishment of a nine-base-pair template-product RNA duplex before the strands separate into distinct exit channels. Concomitantly, as the template translocates, the promoter base pairs are broken and the template entry region is remodeled. These structures reveal details of the influenza polymerase active site that will help optimize nucleoside analogs or other compounds that directly inhibit viral RNA synthesis.

Mechanism of transcription initiation and promoter escape by E. coli RNA polymerase

To investigate roles of the discriminator and open complex (OC) lifetime in transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP; α₂ββ'ωσ⁷⁰), we compare productive and abortive initiation rates, short RNA distributions, and OC lifetime for the λP_R and T7A1 promoters and variants with exchanged discriminators, all with the same transcribed region. The discriminator determines the OC lifetime of these promoters. Permanganate reactivity of thymines reveals that strand backbones in open regions of long-lived λP_R-discriminator OCs are much more tightly held than for shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. Initiation from these OCs exhibits two kinetic phases and at least two subpopulations of ternary complexes. Long RNA synthesis (constrained to be single round) occurs only in the initial phase (<10 s), at similar rates for all promoters. Less than half of OCs synthesize a full-length RNA; the majority stall after synthesizing a short RNA. Most abortive cycling occurs in the slower phase (>10 s), when stalled complexes release their short RNA and make another without escaping. In both kinetic phases, significant amounts of 8-nt and 10-nt transcripts are produced by longer-lived, λP_R-discriminator OCs, whereas no RNA longer than 7 nt is produced by shorter-lived T7A1-discriminator OCs. These observations and the lack of abortive RNA in initiation from short-lived ribosomal promoter OCs are well described by a quantitative model in which ∼1.0 kcal/mol of scrunching free energy is generated per translocation step of RNA synthesis to overcome OC stability and drive escape. The different length-distributions of abortive RNAs released from OCs with different lifetimes likely play regulatory roles.

Reducing Ribosome Biosynthesis Promotes Translation during Low Mg2+ Stress

The synthesis of ribosomes is regulated by both amino acid abundance and the availability of ATP, which regenerates guanosine triphosphate (GTP), powers ribosomes, and promotes transcription of rRNA genes. We now report that bacteria supersede both of these controls when experiencing low cytosolic magnesium (Mg²⁺), a divalent cation essential for ribosome stabilization and for neutralization of ATP's negative charge. We uncover a regulatory circuit that responds to low cytosolic Mg²⁺ by promoting expression of proteins that import Mg²⁺ and lower ATP amounts. This response reduces the levels of ATP and ribosomes, making Mg²⁺ ions available for translation. Mutants defective in Mg²⁺ uptake and unable to reduce ATP levels accumulate non-functional ribosomal components and undergo translational arrest. Our findings establish a paradigm whereby cells reduce the amounts of translating ribosomes to carry out protein synthesis.

The dual role of DksA protein in the regulation of Escherichia coli pArgX promoter

Gene expression regulation by the stringent response effector, ppGpp, is facilitated by DksA protein; however DksA and ppGpp can play independent roles in transcription. In Escherichia coli, the pArgX promoter which initiates the transcription of four tRNA genes was shown to be inhibited by ppGpp. Our studies on the role of DksA in pArgX regulation revealed that it can stimulate transcription by increasing the binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter and the productive transcription complex formation. However, when DksA is present together with ppGpp a severe down-regulation of promoter activity is observed. Our results indicate that DksA facilitates the effects of ppGpp to drive formation of inactive dead-end complexes formed by RNA polymerase at the ArgX promoter. In vivo, ppGpp-mediated regulation of pArgX transcription is dependent on DksA activity. The potential mechanisms of opposing pArgX regulation by ppGpp and DksA are discussed. pArgX is the first reported example of the promoter stimulated by DksA and inhibited by ppGpp in vitro when an overall inhibition occurs in the presence of both regulators. A dual role is thus proposed for DksA in the regulation of the pArgX promoter activity.

Open complex scrunching before nucleotide addition accounts for the unusual transcription start site of E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters

Most Escherichia coli promoters initiate transcription with a purine 7 or 8 nt downstream from the -10 hexamer, but some promoters, including the ribosomal RNA promoter rrnB P1, start 9 nt from the -10 element. We identified promoter and RNA polymerase determinants of this noncanonical rrnB P1 start site using biochemical and genetic approaches including mutational analysis of the promoter, Fe(2+) cleavage assays to monitor template strand positions near the active-site, and Bpa cross-linking to map the path of open complex DNA at amino acid and nucleotide resolution. We find that mutations in several promoter regions affect transcription start site (TSS) selection. In particular, we show that the absence of strong interactions between the discriminator region and σ region 1.2 and between the extended -10 element and σ region 3.0, identified previously as a determinant of proper regulation of rRNA promoters, is also required for the unusual TSS. We find that the DNA in the single-stranded transcription bubble of the rrnB P1 promoter complex expands and is "scrunched" into the active site channel of RNA polymerase, similar to the situation in initial transcribing complexes. However, in the rrnB P1 open complex, scrunching occurs before RNA synthesis begins. We find that the scrunched open complex exhibits reduced abortive product synthesis, suggesting that scrunching and unusual TSS selection contribute to the extraordinary transcriptional activity of rRNA promoters by increasing promoter escape, helping to offset the reduction in promoter activity that would result from the weak interactions with σ.

New insights into the regulatory mechanisms of ppGpp and DksA on Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-promoter complex

The stringent response modulators, guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) and protein DksA, bind RNA polymerase (RNAP) and regulate gene expression to adapt bacteria to different environmental conditions. Here, we use Atomic Force Microscopy and in vitro transcription assays to study the effects of these modulators on the conformation and stability of the open promoter complex (RPo) formed at the rrnA P1, rrnB P1, its discriminator (dis) variant and λ pR promoters. In the absence of modulators, RPo formed at these promoters show different extents of DNA wrapping which correlate with the position of UP elements. Addition of the modulators affects both DNA wrapping and RPo stability in a promoter-dependent manner. Overall, the results obtained under different conditions of ppGpp, DksA and initiating nucleotides (iNTPs) indicate that ppGpp allosterically prevents the conformational changes associated with an extended DNA wrapping that leads to RPo stabilization, while DksA interferes directly with nucleotide positioning into the RNAP active site. At the iNTPs-sensitive rRNA promoters ppGpp and DksA display an independent inhibitory effect, while at the iNTPs-insensitive pR promoter DksA reduces the effect of ppGpp in accordance with their antagonistic role.

Distinct functions of the RNA polymerase σ subunit region 3.2 in RNA priming and promoter escape

The σ subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has been implicated in all steps of transcription initiation, including promoter recognition and opening, priming of RNA synthesis, abortive initiation and promoter escape. The post-promoter-recognition σ functions were proposed to depend on its conserved region σ3.2 that directly contacts promoter DNA immediately upstream of the RNAP active centre and occupies the RNA exit path. Analysis of the transcription effects of substitutions and deletions in this region in Escherichia coli σ⁷⁰ subunit, performed in this work, suggests that (i) individual residues in the σ3.2 finger collectively contribute to RNA priming by RNAP, likely by the positioning of the template DNA strand in the active centre, but are not critical to promoter escape; (ii) the physical presence of σ3.2 in the RNA exit channel is important for promoter escape; (iii) σ3.2 promotes σ dissociation during initiation and suppresses σ-dependent promoter-proximal pausing; (iv) σ3.2 contributes to allosteric inhibition of the initiating NTP binding by rifamycins. Thus, region σ3.2 performs distinct functions in transcription initiation and its inhibition by antibiotics. The B-reader element of eukaryotic factor TFIIB likely plays similar roles in RNAPII transcription, revealing common principles in transcription initiation in various domains of life.

Distinct functions of regions 1.1 and 1.2 of RNA polymerase σ subunits from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus in transcription initiation

RNA polymerase (RNAP) from thermophilic Thermus aquaticus is characterized by higher temperature of promoter opening, lower promoter complex stability, and higher promoter escape efficiency than RNAP from mesophilic Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that these differences are in part explained by differences in the structures of the N-terminal regions 1.1 and 1.2 of the E. coli σ(70) and T. aquaticus σ(A) subunits. In particular, region 1.1 and, to a lesser extent, region 1.2 of the E. coli σ(70) subunit determine higher promoter complex stability of E. coli RNAP. On the other hand, nonconserved amino acid substitutions in region 1.2, but not region 1.1, contribute to the differences in promoter opening between E. coli and T. aquaticus RNAPs, likely through affecting the σ subunit contacts with DNA nucleotides downstream of the -10 element. At the same time, substitutions in σ regions 1.1 and 1.2 do not affect promoter escape by E. coli and T. aquaticus RNAPs. Thus, evolutionary substitutions in various regions of the σ subunit modulate different steps of the open promoter complex formation pathway, with regions 1.1 and 1.2 affecting promoter complex stability and region 1.2 involved in DNA melting during initiation.

Opening-closing dynamics of the mitochondrial transcription pre-initiation complex

Promoter recognition and local melting of DNA are key steps of transcription initiation catalyzed by RNA polymerase and initiation factors. From single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mitochondrial RNA polymerase Rpo41 and its transcription factor Mtf1, we show that the pre-initiation complex is highly dynamic and undergoes repetitive opening-closing transitions that are modulated by Mtf1 and ATP. We found that Rpo41 alone has the intrinsic ability to bend the promoter but only very briefly. Mtf1 enhances bending/opening transition and suppresses closing transition, indicating its dual roles of nucleating promoter opening and stabilizing the open state. The cognate initiating ATP prolongs the lifetime of the open state, plausibly explaining the 'ATP sensing mechanism' suggested for the system. We discovered short-lived opening trials upon initial binding of Rpo41-Mtf1 before the establishment of the opening/closing equilibrium, which may aid in promoter selection before the formation of stable pre-initiation complex. The dynamics of open complex formation provides unique insights into the interplay between RNA polymerase and transcription factors in regulating initiation.

Differential stringent control of Escherichia coli rRNA promoters: effects of ppGpp, DksA and the initiating nucleotides

Transcription of rRNAs in Escherichia coli is directed from seven redundant rRNA operons, which are mainly regulated by their P1 promoters. Here we demonstrate by in vivo measurements that the amounts of individual rRNAs transcribed from the different operons under normal growth vary noticeably although the structures of all the P1 promoters are very similar. Moreover, we show that starvation for amino acids does not affect the seven P1 promoters in the same way. Notably, reduction of transcription from rrnD P1 was significantly lower compared to the other P1 promoters. The presence of DksA was shown to be crucial for the ppGpp-dependent downregulation of all P1 promoters. Because rrnD P1 is the only rrn promoter starting with GTP instead of ATP, we performed studies with a mutant rrnD promoter, where the initiating G+1 is replaced by A+1. These analyses demonstrated that the ppGpp sensitivity of rrn P1 promoters depends on the nature and concentration of initiating nucleoside triphosphates (iNTPs). Our results support the notion that the seven rRNA operons are differentially regulated and underline the importance of a concerted activity between ppGpp, DksA and an adequate concentration of the respective iNTP.

Growth rate regulation in Escherichia coli

Growth rate regulation in bacteria has been an important issue in bacterial physiology for the past 50 years. This review, using Escherichia coli as a paradigm, summarizes the mechanisms for the regulation of rRNA synthesis in the context of systems biology, particularly, in the context of genome-wide competition for limited RNA polymerase (RNAP) in the cell under different growth conditions including nutrient starvation. The specific location of the seven rrn operons in the chromosome and the unique properties of the rrn promoters contribute to growth rate regulation. The length of the rrn transcripts, coupled with gene dosage effects, influence the distribution of RNAP on the chromosome in response to growth rate. Regulation of rRNA synthesis depends on multiple factors that affect the structure of the nucleoid and the allocation of RNAP for global gene expression. The magic spot ppGpp, which acts with DksA synergistically, is a key effector in both the growth rate regulation and the stringent response induced by nutrient starvation, mainly because the ppGpp level changes in response to environmental cues. It regulates rRNA synthesis via a cascade of events including both transcription initiation and elongation, and can be explained by an RNAP redistribution (allocation) model.

A critical role of downstream RNA polymerase-promoter interactions in the formation of initiation complex

Nucleation of promoter melting in bacteria is coupled with RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to a conserved -10 promoter element located at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble. The mechanism of downstream propagation of the transcription bubble to include the transcription start site is unclear. Here we introduce new model downstream fork junction promoter fragments that specifically bind RNAP and mimic the downstream segment of promoter complexes. We demonstrate that RNAP binding to downstream fork junctions is coupled with DNA melting around the transcription start point. Consequently, certain downstream fork junction probes can serve as transcription templates. Using a protein beacon fluorescent method, we identify structural determinants of affinity and transcription activity of RNAP-downstream fork junction complexes. Measurements of RNAP interaction with double-stranded promoter fragments reveal that the strength of RNAP interactions with downstream DNA plays a critical role in promoter opening and that the length of the downstream duplex must exceed a critical length for efficient formation of transcription competent open promoter complex.

The transcription inhibitor lipiarmycin blocks DNA fitting into the RNA polymerase catalytic site

Worldwide spreading of drug-resistant pathogens makes mechanistic understanding of antibiotic action an urgent task. The macrocyclic antibiotic lipiarmycin (Lpm), which is under development for clinical use, inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) by an unknown mechanism. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that Lpm targets the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 and the RNAP beta' subunit switch-2 element, which controls the clamping of promoter DNA in the RNAP active-site cleft. Lpm abolishes isomerization of the 'closed'-promoter complex to the transcriptionally competent 'open' complex and blocks sigma(70)-stimulated RNA synthesis on promoter-less DNA templates. Lpm activity decreases when the template DNA strand is stabilized at the active site through the interaction of RNAP with the nascent RNA chain. Template DNA-strand fitting into the RNAP active-site cleft directed by the beta' subunit switch-2 element and the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 is essential for promoter melting and for de novo initiation of RNA synthesis, and our results suggest that Lpm impedes this process.

One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex

Though opening of the start site (+1) region of promoter DNA is required for transcription by RNA polymerase (RNAP), surprisingly little is known about how and when this occurs in the mechanism. Early events at the lambdaP(R) promoter load this region of duplex DNA into the active site cleft of Escherichia coli RNAP, forming the closed, permanganate-unreactive intermediate I(1). Conversion to the subsequent intermediate I(2) overcomes a large enthalpic barrier. Is I(2) open? Here we create a burst of I(2) by rapidly destabilizing open complexes (RP(o)) with 1.1 M NaCl. Fast footprinting reveals that thymines at positions from -11 to +2 in I(2) are permanganate-reactive, demonstrating that RNAP opens the entire initiation bubble in the cleft in a single step. Rates of decay of all observed thymine reactivities are the same as the I(2) to I(1) conversion rate determined by filter binding. In I(2), permanganate reactivity of the +1 thymine on the template (t) strand is the same as the RP(o) control, whereas nontemplate (nt) thymines are significantly less reactive than in RP(o). We propose that: (i) the +1(t) thymine is in the active site in I(2); (ii) conversion of I(2) to RP(o) repositions the nt strand in the cleft; and (iii) movements of the nt strand are coupled to the assembly and DNA binding of the downstream clamp and jaw that occurs after DNA opening and stabilizes RP(o). We hypothesize that unstable open intermediates at the lambdaP(R) promoter resemble the unstable, transcriptionally competent open complexes formed at ribosomal promoters.

Allosteric control of Escherichia coli rRNA promoter complexes by DksA

The Escherichia coli DksA protein inserts into the RNA polymerase (RNAP) secondary channel, modifying the transcription initiation complex so that promoters with specific kinetic characteristics are regulated by changes in the concentrations of ppGpp and NTPs. We used footprinting assays to determine the specific kinetic intermediate, RP(I), on which DksA acts. Genetic approaches identified substitutions in the RNAP switch regions, bridge helix, and trigger loop that mimicked, reduced, or enhanced DksA function on rRNA promoters. Our results indicate that DksA binding in the secondary channel of RP(I) disrupts interactions with promoter DNA at least 25 A away, between positions -6 and +6 (the transcription start site is +1). We propose a working model in which the trigger loop and bridge helix transmit effects of DksA to the switch region(s), allosterically affecting switch residues that control clamp opening/closing and/or that interact directly with promoter DNA. DksA thus inhibits the transition to RP(I). Our results illustrate in mechanistic terms how transcription factors can regulate initiation promoter-specifically without interacting directly with DNA.

The promoter spacer influences transcription initiation via sigma70 region 1.1 of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Transcription initiation is a dynamic process in which RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter DNA act as partners, changing in response to one another, to produce a polymerase/promoter open complex (RPo) competent for transcription. In Escherichia coli RNAP, region 1.1, the N-terminal 100 residues of sigma(70), is thought to occupy the channel that will hold the DNA downstream of the transcription start site; thus, region 1.1 must move from this channel as RPo is formed. Previous work has also shown that region 1.1 can modulate RPo formation depending on the promoter. For some promoters region 1.1 stimulates the formation of open complexes; at the P(minor) promoter, region 1.1 inhibits this formation. We demonstrate here that the AT-rich P(minor) spacer sequence, rather than promoter recognition elements or downstream DNA, determines the effect of region 1.1 on promoter activity. Using a P(minor) derivative that contains good sigma(70)-dependent DNA elements, we find that the presence of a more GC-rich spacer or a spacer with the complement of the P(minor) sequence results in a promoter that is no longer inhibited by region 1.1. Furthermore, the presence of the P(minor) spacer, the GC-rich spacer, or the complement spacer results in different mobilities of promoter DNA during gel electrophoresis, suggesting that the spacer regions impart differing conformations or curvatures to the DNA. We speculate that the spacer can influence the trajectory or flexibility of DNA as it enters the RNAP channel and that region 1.1 acts as a "gatekeeper" to monitor channel entry.

Monitoring abortive initiation

Abortive initiation, when first discovered, was an enigmatic phenomenon, but fully three decades hence, it has been shown to be an integral step in the transcript initiation process intimately tied to the promoter escape reaction undergone by RNA polymerase at the initiation-elongation transition. A detailed understanding of abortive initiation-promoter escape has brought within reach a full description of the transcription initiation mechanism. This enormous progress was the result of convergent biochemical, genetic, and biophysical investigations propelled by parallel advances in quantitation technology. This chapter discusses the knowledge gained through the biochemical approach and a high resolution method that yields quantitative and qualitative information regarding abortive initiation-promoter escape at a promoter.

Analysis of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation

Bacterial promoter identification and characterization is not as straightforward as one might presume. Promoters vary widely in their similarity to the consensus recognition element sequences, in their activities, and in their utilization of transcription factors, and multiple approaches often must be used to provide a framework for understanding promoter regulation. Characterization of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation in the absence of additional regulatory factors (basal promoter function) can provide a basis for understanding the steps in transcription initiation that are ultimately targeted by nutritional or environmental factors. Promoters can be localized using genetic approaches in vivo, but the detailed properties of the RNAP-promoter complex are studied most productively in vitro. We first describe approaches for identification of bacterial promoters and transcription start sites in vivo, including promoter-reporter fusions and primer-extension. We then describe a number of methods for characterization of RNAP-promoter complexes in vitro, including in vitro transcription, gel mobility shift assays, footprinting, and filter binding. Utilization of these methods can result in determination of not only basal promoter strength but also the rates of transcription initiation complex formation and decay.

Promoter Escape by Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase

Promoter escape is the process that an initiated RNA polymerase (RNAP) molecule undergoes to achieve the initiation-elongation transition. Having made this transition, an RNAP molecule would be relinquished from its promoter hold to perform productive (full-length) transcription. Prior to the transition, this process is accompanied by abortive RNA formation-the amount and pattern of which is controlled by the promoter sequence information. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of abortive/productive transcription from several Escherichia coli promoters and their sequence variants led to the understanding that a strong (RNAP-binding) promoter is more likely to be rate limited (during transcription initiation) at the escape step and produce abortive transcripts. Of the two subelements in a promoter, the PRR (the core Promoter Recognition Region) was found to set the initiation frequency and the rate-limiting step, while the ITS (the Initial Transcribed Sequence region) modulated the ratio of abortive versus productive transcription. The highly abortive behavior of E. coli RNAP could be ameliorated by the presence of Gre (transcript cleavage stimulatory) factor(s), linking the first step in abortive RNA formation by the initial transcribing complexes (ITC) to RNAP backtracking. The discovery that translocation during the initiation stage occurs via DNA scrunching provided the source of energy that converts each ITC into a highly unstable "stressed intermediate." Mapping all of the biochemical information onto an X-ray crystallographic structural model of an open complex gave rise to a plausible mechanism of transcription initiation. The chapter concludes with contemplations of the kinetics and thermodynamics of abortive initiation-promoter escape.

Advances in bacterial promoter recognition and its control by factors that do not bind DNA

Early work identified two promoter regions, the -10 and -35 elements, that interact sequence specifically with bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). However, we now know that several additional promoter elements contact RNAP and influence transcription initiation. Furthermore, our picture of promoter control has evolved beyond one in which regulation results solely from activators and repressors that bind to DNA sequences near the RNAP binding site: many important transcription factors bind directly to RNAP without binding to DNA. These factors can target promoters by affecting specific kinetic steps on the pathway to open complex formation, thereby regulating RNA output from specific promoters.

Rapid responses of ribosomal RNA synthesis to nutrient shifts

A major challenge in systems biology is to integrate our mechanistic understanding of gene regulation to predict quantitatively how cells will respond to environmental changes. Living cells respond rapidly to the availability of nutrients in part by altering production of ribosomal RNA (rRNA), a limiting component in the biosynthesis of ribosomes. Studies of rRNA transcription by the RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli have identified regulatory roles for guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), the initiating nucleotide, and the protein DksA. To what extent findings from in vitro studies can be used to quantitatively predict in vivo responses to changing nutrient environments is unknown. We developed a mechanistic mathematical model for rRNA transcriptional responses to such changes. Our model accounts for binding of RNAP to its rRNA promoter to form a closed complex, isomerization from a closed complex to an open complex, reversible incorporation of the initiating NTP (iNTP), transcript elongation, and clearance of the promoter. Further, the model incorporates interactions between ppGpp and DksA with transcription intermediates, and it includes an empirical correction to account for salt effects. The model biophysical parameters were determined using 33 single- and multi-round transcription experiments spanning 487 in vitro measurements. By incorporating in vivo measurements of ppGpp and ATP, the model correctly predicted rRNA production rates for cellular responses to nutrient upshifts, downshifts, and outgrowth into fresh medium. Inclusion of DksA was essential in all three cases. Our work provides a foundation for using data-driven computational models to predict the kinetics of in vivo transcriptional responses.

Studies on the function of the riboregulator 6S RNA from E. coli: RNA polymerase binding, inhibition of in vitro transcription and synthesis of RNA-directed de novo transcripts

Escherichia coli 6S RNA represents a non-coding RNA (ncRNA), which, based on the conserved secondary structure and previous functional studies, had been suggested to interfere with transcription. Selective inhibition of sigma-70 holoenzymes, preferentially at extended -10 promoters, but not stationary-phase-specific transcription was described, suggesting a direct role of 6S RNA in the transition from exponential to stationary phase. To elucidate the underlying mechanism, we have analysed 6S RNA interactions with different forms of RNA polymerase by gel retardation and crosslinking. Preferred binding of 6S RNA to Esigma(70) was confirmed, however weaker binding to Esigma(38) was also observed. The crosslinking analysis revealed direct contact between a central 6S RNA sequence element and the beta/beta' and sigma subunits. Promoter complex formation and in vitro transcription analysis with exponential- and stationary-phase-specific promoters and the corresponding holoenzymes demonstrated that 6S RNA interferes with transcription initiation but does not generally distinguish between exponential- and stationary-phase-specific promoters. Moreover, we show for the first time that 6S RNA acts as a template for the transcription of defined RNA molecules in the absence of DNA. In conclusion, this study reveals new aspects of 6S RNA function.

Probing the Importance of Selected Phylum-specific Amino Acids in σA of Bacteroides fragilis, a Primary σ Factor Naturally Devoid of an N-terminal Acidic Region 1.1

The sigmaA factor of Bacteroides fragilis is the prototype of a novel subgroup of primary sigma factors that are essential for growth and ensure the initiation of transcription of the housekeeping genes. This subgroup is confined to the phyla Bacteroidetes and Chlorobi. Its members carry a specific amino acid signature and are notably characterized by a short, basic N-terminal segment instead of the typical acidic region 1.1. Using in vitro mutagenesis, we investigated the importance of this basic segment and of several residues of the signature for the function of sigmaA. We have shown that the conserved residues Phe-61 and Lys-265, located in the core binding and DNA binding subregions 2.1 and 4.2, respectively, are critical for full function of the B. fragilis holoenzyme. With respect to the unusual subregion composition of sigmaA, we have shown that truncation of the basic N-terminal segment, or reversion of its charge, strongly affects the overall transcriptional activity of B. fragilis RNA polymerase in vitro. Our results indicate that the presence of the intact basic segment is required for the formation of RNA polymerase (RNAP)-promoter open complexes, the correct architecture of the transcription bubble, and efficient promoter clearance.

Effects of DksA, GreA, and GreB on transcription initiation: insights into the mechanisms of factors that bind in the secondary channel of RNA polymerase

Escherichia coli DksA, GreA, and GreB have similar structures and bind to the same location on RNA polymerase (RNAP), the secondary channel. We show that GreB can fulfil some roles of DksA in vitro, including shifting the promoter-open complex equilibrium in the dissociation direction, thus allowing rRNA promoters to respond to changes in the concentration of ppGpp and NTPs. However, unlike deletion of the dksA gene, deletion of greB had no effect on rRNA promoters in vivo. We show that the apparent affinities of DksA and GreB for RNAP are similar, but the cellular concentration of GreB is much lower than that of DksA. When over-expressed and in the absence of competing GreA, GreB almost completely complemented the loss of dksA in control of rRNA expression, indicating its inability to regulate rRNA transcription in vivo results primarily from its low concentration. In contrast to GreB, the apparent affinity of GreA for RNAP was weaker than that of DksA, GreA affected rRNA promoters only modestly in vitro and, even when over-expressed, GreA did not affect rRNA transcription in vivo. Thus, binding in the secondary channel is necessary but insufficient to explain the effect of DksA on rRNA transcription. Neither Gre factor was capable of fulfilling two other functions of DksA in transcription initiation: co-activation of amino acid biosynthetic gene promoters with ppGpp and compensation for the loss of the omega subunit of RNAP in the response of rRNA promoters to ppGpp. Our results provide important clues to the mechanisms of both negative and positive control of transcription initiation by DksA.

rRNA Promoter Regulation by Nonoptimal Binding of σ Region 1.2: An Additional Recognition Element for RNA Polymerase

Regulation of transcription initiation is generally attributable to activator/repressor proteins that bind to specific DNA sequences. However, regulators can also achieve specificity by binding directly to RNA polymerase (RNAP) and exploiting the kinetic variation intrinsic to different RNAP-promoter complexes. We report here a previously unknown interaction with Escherichia coli RNAP that defines an additional recognition element in bacterial promoters. The strength of this sequence-specific interaction varies at different promoters and affects the lifetime of the complex with RNAP. Selection of rRNA promoter mutants forming long-lived complexes, kinetic analyses of duplex and bubble templates, dimethylsulfate footprinting, and zero-Angstrom crosslinking demonstrated that sigma subunit region 1.2 directly contacts the nontemplate strand base two positions downstream of the -10 element (within the "discriminator" region). By making a nonoptimal sigma1.2-discriminator interaction, rRNA promoters create the short-lived complex required for specific responses to the RNAP binding factors ppGpp and DksA, ultimately accounting for regulation of ribosome synthesis.

Antagonistic regulation of Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA rrnB P1 promoter activity by GreA and DksA

The Escherichia coli proteins DksA, GreA, and GreB are all structural homologs that bind the secondary channel of RNA polymerase (RNAP) but are thought to act at different levels of transcription. DksA, with its co-factor ppGpp, inhibits rrnB P1 transcription initiation, whereas GreA and GreB activate RNAP to cleave back-tracked RNA during elongational pausing. Here, in vivo and in vitro evidence reveals antagonistic regulation of rrnB P1 transcription initiation by Gre factors (particularly GreA) and DksA; GreA activates and DksA inhibits. DksA inhibition is epistatic to GreA activation. Both modes of regulation are ppGpp-independent in vivo but DksA inhibition requires ppGpp in vitro. Kinetic experiments and studies of rrnB P1-RNA polymerase complexes suggest that GreA mediates conformational changes at an initiation step in the absence of NTP substrates, even before DksA acts. GreA effects on rrnB P1 open complex conformation reveal a new feature of GreA distinct from its general function in elongation. Our findings support the idea that a balance of the interactions between the three secondary channel-binding proteins and RNAP can provide a new mode for regulating transcription.

Structural perspective on mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases

High-resolution crystallographic structures of multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) have increased our understanding of transcriptional mechanisms. Based on a thorough review of the literature, we have compiled the mutations affecting the function of multisubunit RNA polymerases, many of which having been generated and studied prior to the publication of the first high-resolution structure, and highlighted the positions of the altered amino acids in the structures of both the prokaryotic and eukaryotic enzymes. The observations support many previous hypotheses on the transcriptional process, including the implication of the bridge helix and the trigger loop in the processivity of RNAP, the importance of contacts between the RNAP jaw-lobe module and the downstream DNA in the establishment of a transcription bubble and selection of the transcription start site, the destabilizing effects of ppGpp on the open promoter complex, and the link between RNAP processivity and termination. This study also revealed novel, remarkable features of the RNA polymerase catalytic mechanisms that will require additional investigation, including the putative roles of fork loop 2 in the establishment of a transcription bubble, the trigger loop in start site selection, and the uncharacterized funnel domain in RNAP processivity.

LRP and H-NS - cooperative partners for transcription regulation atEscherichia colirRNA promoters

The synthesis of ribosomal RNAs in bacteria is tightly coupled to changes in the environment. This rapid adaptation is the result of several intertwined regulatory networks. The two proteins FIS and H-NS have previously been described to act as antagonistic transcription factors for rRNA synthesis. Here we provide evidence for another player, the regulatory protein LRP, which binds with high specificity to all seven Escherichia coli rRNA P1 promoter upstream regions (UAS). Comparison of the binding properties of LRP and H-NS, and characterization of the stabilities of the various complexes formed with the rRNA UAS regions revealed different binding modes. Binding studies with LRP and H-NS in combination demonstrated that the two proteins interacted with obvious synergism. The efficiency of LRP binding to the rRNA regulatory region is modified by the presence of the effector amino acid leucine, as has been shown for several other operons regulated by this transcription factor. The effect of LRP on the binding of RNA polymerase to the rrnB P1 promoter and in vitro transcription experiments indicated that LRP acts as a transcriptional repressor, thus resembling the activity of H-NS described previously. The results show for the first time that LRP binds to the regulatory region of bacterial rRNA promoters, and very likely contributes in combination with H-NS to the control of rRNA synthesis. From the known properties of LRP a mechanism can be inferred that couples rRNA synthesis to changes in nutritional quality.

Escherichia coli ribosomal RNA transcription: regulatory roles for ppGpp, NTPs, architectural proteins and a polymerase-binding protein

Ribosomal RNA transcription can limit the rate of Escherichia coli growth and is subject to complex regulation. Somehow, the cell is able to sense the general nutritional environment and adjust rRNA transcription so that an appropriate number of ribosomes is produced. This review discusses the current state of affairs, including recent information about the involvement of two nucleotide regulators, two architectural protein regulators, one new co-regulator and stalled ribosomes.

rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli

Ribosomal RNA transcription is the rate-limiting step in ribosome synthesis in bacteria and has been investigated intensely for over half a century. Multiple mechanisms ensure that rRNA synthesis rates are appropriate for the cell's particular growth condition. Recently, important advances have been made in our understanding of rRNA transcription initiation in Escherichia coli. These include (a) a model at the atomic level of the network of protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions that recruit RNA polymerase to rRNA promoters, accounting for their extraordinary strength; (b) discovery of the nonredundant roles of two small molecule effectors, ppGpp and the initiating NTP, in regulation of rRNA transcription initiation; and (c) identification of a new component of the transcription machinery, DksA, that is absolutely required for regulation of rRNA promoter activity. Together, these advances provide clues important for our molecular understanding not only of rRNA transcription, but also of transcription in general.

An alternative strategy for bacterial ribosome synthesis: Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription regulation

As an approach to the study of rRNA synthesis in Gram-positive bacteria, we characterized the regulation of the Bacillus subtilis rrnB and rrnO rRNA promoters. We conclude that B. subtilis and Escherichia coli use different strategies to control rRNA synthesis. In contrast to E. coli, it appears that the initiating NTP for transcription from B. subtilis rRNA promoters is GTP, promoter strength is determined primarily by the core promoter (-10/-35 region), and changes in promoter activity always correlate with changes in the intracellular GTP concentration. rRNA promoters in B. subtilis appear to be regulated by changes in the initiating NTP pools, but in some growth transitions, changes in rRNA promoter activity are also dependent on relA, which codes for ppGpp synthetase. In contrast to the situation for E. coli where ppGpp decreases rRNA promoter activity by directly inhibiting RNA polymerase, it appears that ppGpp may not inhibit B. subtilis RNA polymerase directly. Rather, increases in the ppGpp concentration might reduce the available GTP pools, thereby modulating rRNA promoter activity indirectly.

The Escherichia coli Fis promoter is regulated by changes in the levels of its transcription initiation nucleotide CTP

Expression of the Escherichia coli nucleoid-associated protein Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) is controlled at the transcriptional level in accordance with the nutritional availability. It is highly expressed during early logarithmic growth phase in cells growing in rich medium but poorly expressed in late logarithmic and stationary phase. However, fis mRNA expression is prolonged at high levels throughout the logarithmic and early stationary phase when the preferred transcription initiation site (+1C) is replaced with A or G, indicating that initiation with CTP is a required component of the regulation pattern. We show that RNA polymerase-fis promoter complexes are short lived and that transcription is stimulated over 20-fold from linear or supercoiled DNA if CTP is present during formation of initiation complexes, which serves to stabilize these complexes. Use of fis promoter fusions to lacZ indicated that fis promoter transcription is sensitive to the intracellular pool of the predominant initiating NTP. Growth conditions resulting in increases in CTP pools also result in corresponding increases in fis mRNA levels. Measurements of NTP pools performed throughout the growth of the bacterial culture in rich medium revealed a dramatic increase in all four NTP levels during the transition from stationary to logarithmic growth phase, followed by reproducible oscillations in their levels during logarithmic growth, which later decrease during the transition from logarithmic to stationary phase. In particular, CTP pools fluctuate in a manner consistent with a role in regulating fis expression. These observations support a model whereby fis expression is subject to regulation by the availability of its initiating NTP.

DksA

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription is regulated primarily at the level of initiation from rRNA promoters. The unusual kinetic properties of these promoters result in their specific regulation by two small molecule signals, ppGpp and the initiating NTP, that bind to RNA polymerase (RNAP) at all promoters. We show here that DksA, a protein previously unsuspected as a transcription factor, is absolutely required for rRNA regulation. In deltadksA mutants, rRNA promoters are unresponsive to changes in amino acid availability, growth rate, or growth phase. In vitro, DksA binds to RNAP, reduces open complex lifetime, inhibits rRNA promoter activity, and amplifies effects of ppGpp and the initiating NTP on rRNA transcription, explaining the dksA requirement in vivo. These results expand our molecular understanding of rRNA transcription regulation, may explain previously described pleiotropic effects of dksA, and illustrate how transcription factors that do not bind DNA can nevertheless potentiate RNAP for regulation.

Activation of transcription initiation from a stable RNA promoter by a Fis protein-mediated DNA structural transmission mechanism

The leuV operon of Escherichia coli encodes three of the four genes for the tRNA1Leu isoacceptors. Transcription from this and other stable RNA promoters is known to be affected by a cis-acting UP element and by Fis protein interactions with the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha-subunits of RNA polymerase. In this report, we suggest that transcription from the leuV promoter also is activated by a Fis-mediated, DNA supercoiling-dependent mechanism similar to the IHF-mediated mechanism described previously for the ilvP(G) promoter (S. D. Sheridan et al., 1998, J Biol Chem 273: 21298-21308). We present evidence that Fis binding results in the translocation of superhelical energy from the promoter-distal portion of a supercoiling-induced DNA duplex destabilized (SIDD) region to the promoter-proximal portion of the leuV promoter that is unwound within the open complex. A mutant Fis protein, which is defective in contacting the carboxyl-terminal domain of the alpha-subunits of RNA polymerase, remains competent for stimulating open complex formation, suggesting that this DNA supercoiling-dependent component of Fis-mediated activation occurs in the absence of specific protein interactions between Fis and RNA polymerase. Fis-mediated translocation of superhelical energy from upstream binding sites to the promoter region may be a general feature of Fis-mediated activation of transcription at stable RNA promoters, which often contain A+T-rich upstream sequences.

Promoter unwinding and promoter clearance by RNA polymerase: detection by single-molecule DNA nanomanipulation

By monitoring the end-to-end extension of a mechanically stretched, supercoiled, single DNA molecule, we have been able directly to observe the change in extension associated with unwinding of approximately one turn of promoter DNA by RNA polymerase (RNAP). By performing parallel experiments with negatively and positively supercoiled DNA, we have been able to deconvolute the change in extension caused by RNAP-dependent DNA unwinding (with approximately 1-bp resolution) and the change in extension caused by RNAP-dependent DNA compaction (with approximately 5-nm resolution). We have used this approach to quantify the extent of unwinding and compaction, the kinetics of unwinding and compaction, and effects of supercoiling, sequence, ppGpp, and nucleotides. We also have used this approach to detect promoter clearance and promoter recycling by successive RNAP molecules. We find that the rate of formation and the stability of the unwound complex depend profoundly on supercoiling and that supercoiling exerts its effects mechanically (through torque), and not structurally (through the number and position of supercoils). The approach should permit analysis of other nucleic-acid-processing factors that cause changes in DNA twist and/or DNA compaction.

Fis stabilizes the interaction between RNA polymerase and the ribosomal promoter rrnB P1, leading to transcriptional activation

It has been shown that Fis activates transcription of the ribosomal promoter rrnB P1; however, the mechanism by which Fis activates rrnB P1 transcription is not fully understood. Paradoxically, although Fis activates transcription of rrnB P1 in vitro, transcription from the promoter containing Fis sites (as measured from rrnB P1-lacZ fusions) is not reduced in a fis null mutant strain. In this study, we further investigated the mechanism by which Fis activates transcription of the rrnB P1 promoter and the role of Fis in rRNA synthesis and cell growth in Escherichia coli. Like all other stringent promoters investigated so far, open complex of rrnB P1 has been shown to be intrinsically unstable, making open complex stability a potential regulatory step in transcription of this class of promoters. Our results show that Fis acts at this regulatory step by stabilizing the interaction between RNA polymerase and rrnB P1 in the absence of NTPs. Mutational analysis of the Fis protein demonstrates that there is a complete correlation between Fis-mediated transcriptional activation of rrnB P1 and Fis-mediated stabilization of preinitiation complexes of the promoter. Thus, our study indicates that Fis-mediated stabilization of RNA polymerase-rrnB P1 preinitiation complexes, presumably at the open complex step, contributes prominently to transcriptional activation. Furthermore, our in vivo results show that rRNA synthesis from the P1 promoters of several rRNA operons are reduced 2-fold in a fis null mutant compared with the wild type strain, indicating that Fis plays an important role in the establishment of robust rRNA synthesis when E. coli cells are emerging from a growth-arrested phase to a rapid growth phase. Thus, our results resolve an apparent paradox of the role of Fis in vitro and in vivo in the field.

An intersubunit contact stimulating transcription initiation by E coli RNA polymerase: interaction of the alpha C-terminal domain and sigma region 4

The C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) alpha subunit (alphaCTD) stimulates transcription initiation by interacting with upstream (UP) element DNA and a variety of transcription activators. Here we identify specific substitutions in region 4.2 of sigma 70 (sigma(70)) and in alphaCTD that decrease transcription initiation from promoters containing some, but not all, UP elements. This decrease in transcription derives from a decrease in the initial equilibrium constant for RNAP binding (K(B)). The open complexes formed by the mutant and wild-type RNAPs differ in DNAse I sensitivity at the junction of the alphaCTD and sigma DNA binding sites, correlating with the differences in transcription. A model of the DNA-alphaCTD-sigma region 4.2 ternary complex, constructed from the previously determined X-ray structures of the Thermus aquaticus sigma region 4.2-DNA complex and the E. coli alphaCTD-DNA complex, indicates that the residues identified by mutation in sigma region 4.2 and in alphaCTD are in very close proximity. Our results strongly suggest that alphaCTD, when bound to an UP element proximal subsite, contacts the RNAP sigma(70) subunit, increasing transcription. Previous data from the literature suggest that this same sigma-alphaCTD interaction also plays a role in transcription factor-mediated activation.

Essential steps in the ppGpp-dependent regulation of bacterial ribosomal RNA promoters can be explained by substrate competition

Transcription of stable RNA genes is known to be dramatically reduced in the presence of guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp), the mediator of the stringent response. Using in vitro transcription systems with ribosomal RNA P1 promoters, we have analyzed which step of the initiation cycle is inhibited by the effector ppGpp. We show that formation of the ternary transcription initiation complex consisting of RNA polymerase holoenzyme, the promoter DNA, and the first initiating nucleotide triphosphate is the major step at which ppGpp exerts its regulation. Neither primary binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter nor isomerization to the open binary complexes or the subsequent promoter clearance steps contributes notably to the observed inhibition. The effect of ppGpp-dependent inhibition in the formation of the ternary transcription initiation complex could be mimicked by nucleotide derivatives known to bind to the RNA polymerase active center. Using these model compounds, almost identical inhibition characteristics were observed as seen with ppGpp. The results support the previously published model, which suggests that ppGpp-dependent inhibition is based on competition between the inhibitor molecules and NTP substrates for access to the active center of RNA polymerase.

Multiple mechanisms of transcription inhibition by ppGpp at the lambdap(R) promoter

General stress conditions in bacterial cells cause a global cellular response called the stringent response. The first event in this control is production of large amounts of a regulatory nucleotide, guanosine-3',5'-(bis)pyrophospahte (ppGpp). It was proposed recently that ppGpp acts by decreasing stability of open complexes at promoters that make short-lived open complexes, e.g. the rRNA promoters. However, here we report that the bacteriophage lambdap(R) promoter, which forms long-lived open complexes, is inhibited by ppGpp in vitro as observed in vivo. We performed a systematic investigation of the ppGpp-specific inhibition of transcription initiation at lambdap(R) and found that ppGpp does decrease stability of open complexes at lambdap(R), but only slightly. Likewise the equilbrium binding constant and rate of open complex formation by RNA polymerase at lambdap(R) are only slightly affected by ppGpp. The major effect of ppGpp-mediated inhibition is to decrease the rate of promoter escape. We conclude that ppGpp-mediated inhibition of transcription initiation is not restricted to promoters that make short-lived open complexes. Rather we conclude that the initial catalytic step of transcript formation is affected by ppGpp, specifically formation of the first phosphodiester bond is inhibited by ppGpp at lambdap(R).

The +2 NTP binding drives open complex formation in T7 RNA polymerase

Transcription initiation as catalyzed by T7 RNA polymerase consists primarily of promoter binding, strand separation, nucleotide binding, and synthesis of the first phosphodiester bond. The promoter strand separation process occurs at a very fast rate, but promoter opening is incomplete in the absence of the initiating NTPs. In this paper, we investigate how initiating NTPs affect the kinetics and thermodynamics of open complex formation. Transient state kinetic studies show that the open complex, ED(o), is formed via an intermediate ED(c), and the conversion of ED(c) to ED(o) occurs with an unfavorable equilibrium constant. In the presence of the initiating NTP that base-pairs with the template at position +2, the process of open complex formation is nearly complete. Our studies reveal that the nucleotide that drives open complex formation needs to be a triphosphate and to be correctly base-paired with the template. These results indicate that the melted template DNA in the open complex is positioned to bind the +2 NTP. The addition of +1 NTP alone does not stabilize the open complex; nor is it required for +2 NTP binding. However, there appears to be cooperativity in initiating NTP binding in that the binding of +2 NTP facilitates +1 NTP binding. The dissection of the initiation pathway provides insights into how open complex formation steps that are sensitive to the promoter sequence upstream from the initiation start site modulate the affinity of initiating NTPs and allow transcription initiation to be regulated by initiating NTP concentration.

Factors affecting start site selection at the Escherichia coli fis promoter

Transcription initiation with CTP is an uncommon feature among Escherichia coli sigma(70) promoters. The fis promoter (fis P), which is subject to growth phase-dependent regulation, is among the few that predominantly initiate transcription with CTP. Mutations in this promoter that cause a switch from utilization of CTP to either ATP or GTP as the initiation nucleotide drastically alter its growth phase regulation pattern, suggesting that the choice of the primary initiating nucleotide can significantly affect its regulation. To better understand what factors influence this choice in fis P, we made use of a series of promoter mutations that altered the nucleotide or position used for initiation. Examination of these promoters indicates that start site selection is determined by a combination of factors that include preference for a nucleotide distance from the -10 region (8 > 7 > 9 >> 6 >> 10 > 11), initiation nucleotide preference (A = G >> CTP > or = UTP), the DNA sequence surrounding the initiation region, the position of the -35 region, and changes in the intracellular nucleoside triphosphate pools. We describe the effects that each of these factors has on start site selection in the fis P and discuss the interplay between position and nucleotide preference in this important process.

FIS modulates the kinetics of successive interactions of RNA polymerase with the core and upstream regions of the tyrT promoter

We have applied laser UV photo-footprinting to characterise kinetically complexes involving the activator protein FIS, RNA polymerase and the tyrT promoter of Escherichia coli. FIS photo-footprints strongly to three binding sites upstream of the core promoter. The polymerase photo-footprints in the near-consensus -35 hexamer on the non-template strand of DNA in a fashion similar to that of stable complexes involving the lacUV5 promoter. The kinetics of the interactions of polymerase alone with the tyrT promoter differ from those observed previously at the lacUV5 promoter. In the absence of FIS, we observe an upstream polymerase-induced signal at -122 within FIS site III that occurs subsequent to changes in the core promoter region and is strongly dependent on negative supercoiling. These observations support the proposal that the upstream region of the promoter is wrapped around the polymerase. We propose that the wrapped DNA allows the polymerase to overcome, at least in part, the barrier to DNA untwisting imparted by the G+C-rich discriminator. We further suggest that FIS plays a similar role and may facilitate polymerase escape.

rRNA promoter activity in the fast-growing bacterium Vibrio natriegens

The bacterium Vibrio natriegens can double with a generation time of less than 10 min (R. G. Eagon, J. Bacteriol. 83:736-737, 1962), a growth rate that requires an extremely high rate of protein synthesis. We show here that V. natriegens' high potential for protein synthesis results from an increase in ribosome numbers with increasing growth rate, as has been found for other bacteria. We show that V. natriegens contains a large number of rRNA operons, and its rRNA promoters are extremely strong. The V. natriegens rRNA core promoters are at least as active in vitro as Escherichia coli rRNA core promoters with either E. coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) or V. natriegens RNAP, and they are activated by UP elements, as in E. coli. In addition, the E. coli transcription factor Fis activated V. natriegens rrn P1 promoters in vitro. We conclude that the high capacity for ribosome synthesis in V. natriegens results from a high capacity for rRNA transcription, and the high capacity for rRNA transcription results, at least in part, from the same factors that contribute most to high rates of rRNA transcription in E. coli, i.e., high gene dose and strong activation by UP elements and Fis.

Structural basis for H-NS-mediated trapping of RNA polymerase in the open initiation complex at the rrnB P1

The Escherichia coli H-NS protein is a nucleoid-associated protein involved in both transcription regulation and DNA compaction. Each of these processes involves H-NS-mediated bridge formation between adjacent DNA helices. With respect to transcription regulation, preferential binding sites in the promoter regions of different genes have been reported, and generally these regions are curved. Often H-NS binding sites overlap with promoter core regions or with binding sites of other regulatory factors. Not in all cases, however, transcriptional repression is the result of preferential binding by H-NS to promoter regions leading to occlusion of the RNA polymerase. In the case of the rrnB P1, H-NS actually stimulates open complex formation by forming a ternary RNAP.H-NS.DNA complex, while simultaneously stabilizing it to such an extent that promoter clearance cannot occur. To define the mechanism by which H-NS interferes at this step in the initiation pathway, the architecture of the RNAP.H-NS.DNA complex was analyzed by scanning force microscopy (SFM). The SFM images show that the DNA flanking the RNA polymerase in open initiation complexes is bridged by H-NS. On the basis of these data, we present a model for the specific repression of transcription initiation at the rrnB P1 by H-NS.

RapA, a bacterial homolog of SWI2/SNF2, stimulates RNA polymerase recycling in transcription

We report that RapA, an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP)-associated homolog of SWI2/SNF2, is capable of dramatic activation of RNA synthesis. The RapA-mediated transcriptional activation in vitro depends on supercoiled DNA and high salt concentrations, a condition that is likely to render the DNA superhelix tightly compacted. Moreover, RapA activates transcription by stimulating RNAP recycling. Mutational analyses indicate that the ATPase activity of RapA is essential for its function as a transcriptional activator, and a rapA null mutant exhibits a growth defect on nutrient plates containing high salt concentrations in vivo. Thus, RapA acts as a general transcription factor and an integral component of the transcription machinery. The mode of action of RapA in remodeling posttranscription or posttermination complexes is discussed.

Interaction of the alpha-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with DNA: rigid body nature of the protein-DNA contact

The alpha-subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase plays an important role in the activity of many promoters by providing a direct protein-DNA contact with a specific sequence (UP element) located upstream of the core promoter sequence. To obtain insight into the nature of thermodynamic forces involved in the formation of this protein-DNA contact, the binding of the alpha-subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase to a fluorochrome-labeled DNA fragment containing the rrnB P1 promoter UP element sequence was quantitatively studied using fluorescence polarization. The alpha dimer and DNA formed a 1:1 complex in solution. Complex formation at 25 degrees C was enthalpy-driven, the binding was accompanied by a net release of 1-2 ions, and no significant specific ion effects were observed. The van't Hoff plot of temperature dependence of binding was linear suggesting that the heat capacity change (Deltac(p)) was close to zero. Protein footprinting with hydroxyradicals showed that the protein did not change its conformation upon protein-DNA contact formation. No conformational changes in the DNA molecule were detected by CD spectroscopy upon protein-DNA complex formation. The thermodynamic characteristics of the binding together with the lack of significant conformational changes in the protein and in the DNA suggested that the alpha-subunit formed a rigid body-like contact with the DNA in which a tight complementary recognition interface between alpha-subunit and DNA was not formed.

Regulation of rRNA transcription correlates with nucleoside triphosphate sensing

We have previously shown that the activity of the Escherichia coli rRNA promoter rrnB P1 in vitro depends on the concentration of the initiating nucleotide, ATP, and can respond to changes in ATP pools in vivo. We have proposed that this nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) sensing might contribute to regulation of rRNA transcription. To test this model, we have measured the ATP requirements for transcription from 11 different rrnB P1 core promoter mutants in vitro and compared them with the regulatory responses of the same promoters in vivo. The seven rrnB P1 variants that required much lower ATP concentrations than the wild-type promoter for efficient transcription in vitro were defective for response to growth rate changes in vivo (growth rate-dependent regulation). In contrast, the four variants requiring high ATP concentrations in vitro (like the wild-type promoter) were regulated with the growth rate in vivo. We also observed a correlation between NTP sensing in vitro and the response of the promoters in vivo to deletion of the fis gene (an example of homeostatic control), although this relationship was not as tight as for growth rate-dependent regulation. We conclude that the kinetic features responsible for the high ATP concentration dependence of the rrnB P1 promoter in vitro are responsible, at least in part, for the promoter's regulation in vivo, consistent with the model in which rrnB P1 promoter activity can be regulated by changes in NTP pools in vivo (or by hypothetical factors that work at the same kinetic steps that make the promoter sensitive to NTPs).

Formation of intermediate transcription initiation complexes at pfliD and pflgM by sigma(28) RNA polymerase

The sigma subunit of prokaryotic RNA polymerase is an important factor in the control of transcription initiation. Primary sigma factors are essential for growth, while alternative sigma factors are activated in response to various stimuli. Expression of class 3 genes during flagellum biosynthesis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium is dependent on the alternative sigma factor sigma(28). Previously, a novel mechanism of transcription initiation at the fliC promoter by sigma(28) holoenzyme was proposed. Here, we have characterized the mechanism of transcription initiation by a holoenzyme carrying sigma(28) at the fliD and flgM promoters to determine if the mechanism of initiation observed at pfliC is a general phenomenon for all sigma(28)-dependent promoters. Temperature-dependent footprinting demonstrated that promoter binding properties and low-temperature open complex formation are similar for pfliC, pfliD, and pflgM. However, certain aspects of DNA strand separation and complex stability are promoter dependent. Open complexes form in a concerted manner at pflgM, while a sequential pattern of open complex formation occurs at pfliD. Open and initiated complexes formed by holoenzyme carrying sigma(28) are generally unstable to heparin challenge, with the exception of initiated complexes at pflgM, which are stable in the presence of nucleoside triphosphates.