A novel PRD I and TG binding activity involved in virus-induced transcription of IFN-A genes

Critical role of interferon-α constitutively produced in human hepatocytes in response to RNA virus infection

Several viruses are known to infect human liver and cause the hepatitis, but the interferon (IFN) response, a first-line defense against viral infection, of virus-infected hepatocytes is not clearly defined yet. We investigated innate immune system against RNA viral infection in immortalized human hepatocytes (HuS-E/2 cells), as the cells showed similar early innate immune responses to primary human hepatocytes (PHH). The low-level constitutive expression of IFN-α1 gene, but not IFN-β and IFN-λ, was observed in both PHH and HuS-E/2 cells in the absence of viral infection, suggesting a particular subtype(s) of IFN-α is constitutively produced in human hepatocytes. To examine the functional role of such IFN-α in the antiviral response, the expression profiles of innate immune-related genes were studied in the cells with the treatment of neutralization against type I IFN receptor 2 (IFNAR2) or IFN-α itself to inhibit the constitutive IFN-α signaling before and after virus infection. As the results, a clear reduction of basal level expression of IFN-inducible genes was observed in uninfected cells. When the effect of the inhibition on the cells infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) was examined, the significant decrease of IFN stimulated gene expression and the enhancement of initial HCV replication were observed, suggesting that the steady-state production of IFN-α plays a role in amplification of antiviral responses to control the spread of RNA viral infection in human hepatocytes.

Regulation of the type I IFN induction: a current view

The type I IFN-alpha/beta gene family was identified about a quarter of a century ago as a prototype of many cytokine gene families, which led to the subsequent burst of studies on molecular mechanisms underlying cytokine gene expression and signaling. Although originally discovered for their activity to confer an antiviral state on cells, more evidence has recently been emerging regarding IFN-alpha/beta actions on cell growth, differentiation and many immunoregulatory activities, which are of even greater fundamental biological significance. Indeed, much attention has recently been focused on the induction and function of the IFN-alpha/beta system regulated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are critical for linking the innate and adaptive immunities. The understanding of the regulatory mechanisms of IFN-alpha/beta gene induction by TLRs and viruses is an emerging theme, for which much new insight has been gained over the past few years.

Positive and negative control of virus-induced interferon-A gene expression

Transcriptional regulation is a consequence of the combination of both activation and repression for establishing specific patterns of eukaryotic gene expression. The regulation of the expression of type I interferon (IFN-A and -B) multigene family is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level and has been widely studied as a model to understand the mechanisms of stable repression, transient expression and postinduction repression of genes. The positive and negative regulatory elements required for this on/off switch have been defined within a complex 5' upstream region of their transcription start site. The differential expression pattern of IFN-A genes is thought to involve both substitutions in the virus responsive element (VRE-A) and presence or absence of the distal negative regulatory element (DNRE) which is delimited upstream of the VRE-A. The interferon regulatory factors (IRF)-3 and -7 binding to the VRE-A and interacting as homodimers or heterodimers participate in the virus-induced transcriptional activation of IFN-A family. This data and the presence of homeodomain protein pituitary homeobox 1 (Pitx1) binding to the distal DNRE, negatively regulating the IRF-3 and IRF-7 activities and interacting physically with IRF-3 and IRF-7 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation and repression of the IFN-A genes.

Essential role of IRF-3 in lipopolysaccharide-induced interferon-beta gene expression and endotoxin shock

Type I interferons (IFN-alpha/beta) affect many aspects of immune responses. Many pathogen-associated molecules, including bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and virus-associated double-stranded RNA, induce IFN gene expression through activation of distinct Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Although much has been studied about the activation of the transcription factor IRF-3 and induction of IFN-beta gene by the LPS-mediated TLR4 signaling, definitive evidence is missing about the actual role of IRF-3 in LPS responses in vitro and in vivo. Using IRF-3 deficient mice, we show here that IRF-3 is indeed essential for the LPS-mediated IFN-beta gene induction. Loss of IRF-3 also affects the expression of profile of other cytokine/chemokine genes. We also provide evidence that the LPS/TLR4 signaling activates IRF-7 to induce IFN-beta, if IRF-7 is induced by IFNs prior to LPS simulation. Finally, the IRF-3-deficient mice show resistance to LPS-induced endotoxin shock. These results place IRF-3 as a molecule central to LPS/TLR4 signaling.

Impairment of interferon-induced IRF-7 gene expression due to inhibition of ISGF3 formation by trichostatin A

Two members of the signal transducer and activator of transcription family, STAT1 and STAT2, form, together with interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF-9), the ISGF3 complex that activates the expression of the interferon-stimulated genes (ISG). The ISGF3 complex also participates in the virus-induced alpha/beta interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) gene amplification cascade by up-regulating IRF-7 gene expression. Here, we show that treatment of cells with trichostatin A (TSA), a deacetylase inhibitor, inhibits the virus-induced activation of IFN-alpha/beta promoters and dramatically reduces the ability of different ISG promoters to respond to IFN stimulation. Impairment of IFN-alpha/beta and ISG expression by TSA in infected cells is due to the blockage of interferon-stimulated ISGF3 complex formation, which leads to the abolition of IRF-7 gene expression. We also show that the TSA-dependent inhibition of ISGF3 is related to impaired nuclear accumulation of STAT2. Our data suggest that an acetylation/deacetylation mechanism participates in the regulation of cellular distribution and function of STAT2 in IFN-alpha/beta signaling.

Repression by homeoprotein pitx1 of virus-induced interferon a promoters is mediated by physical interaction and trans repression of IRF3 and IRF7

Interferon A (IFN-A) genes are differentially expressed after virus induction. The differential expression of individual IFN-A genes is modulated by the specific transcription activators IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and IRF-7 and the homeoprotein transcription repressor Pitx1. We now show that repression by Pitx1 does not appear to be due to the recruitment of histone deacetylases. On the other hand, Pitx1 inhibits the IRF3 and IRF7 transcriptional activity of the IFN-A11 and IFN-A5 promoters and interacts physically with IRF3 and IRF7. Pitx1 trans-repression activity maps to specific C-terminal domains, and the Pitx1 homeodomain is involved in physical interaction with IRF3 or IRF7. IRF3 is able to bind to the antisilencer region of the IFN-A4 promoter, which overrides the repressive activity of Pitx1. These results indicate that interaction between the Pitx1 homeodomain and IRF3 or IRF7 and the ability of the Pitx1 C-terminal repressor domains to block IFN-A11 and IFN-A5 but not IFN-A4 promoter activities may contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation, repression, and antirepression of the IFN-A genes.

Selective expression of type I IFN genes in human dendritic cells infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Type I IFN regulates different aspects of the immune response, inducing a cell-mediated immunity. We have recently shown that the infection of dendritic cells (DC) with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) induces IFN-alpha. In this work we have monitored a rapid induction of IFN-beta followed by the delayed production of the IFN-alpha1 and/or -alpha13 subtypes. The Mtb infection rapidly activates the NF-kappaB complex and stimulates the phosphorylation of IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-3, events known to induce IFN-beta expression in viral infection. In turn, the autocrine production of IFN-beta induces the IFN-stimulated genes that contain binding sites for activated STATs in their promoters. Among the IFN-stimulated genes induced in DC through STAT activation are IRF-1 and IRF-7. The expression of IRF-1 appears to be dependent on the sequential activation of NF-kappaB and STAT-1. Once expressed, IRF-1 may further stimulate the transcription of IFN-beta. Induction of IRF-7 is also regulated at the transcriptional level through the binding of phosphorylated STAT-1 and STAT-2, forming the IFN-stimulated gene factor-3 complex. In turn, the IRF-1 and IRF-7 expression appears to be required for the delayed induction of the IFN-alpha1/13 genes. Although correlative, our results strongly support the existence of a cascade of molecular events in Mtb-infected DC. Upon infection, constitutively expressed NF-kappaB and IRF-3 are activated and likely contribute to the rapid IFN-beta expression. In turn, IFN-beta-induced IRF-1 and IRF-7 may cooperate toward induction of IFN-alpha1/13 if infection persists and these factors are activated.

Regulation of virus-induced interferon-A genes

Different members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family are early activated by viral infection of eukaryotic cells. The IRFs participate in the virus-induced transcriptional regulation of different genes, including the multigenic interferon-A (IFN-A) family, members of which are involved in the establishment of an antiviral state, cell growth inhibition or apoptosis. This study presents the recent progress in the field of virus-induced transactivation and repression of IFN-A gene promoters. Data presented on the modular organization of IFN-A gene promoters and their transactivation dependent on IRF-3 and IRF-7 provide a new insight on the cooperativity mechanisms among the different IRF family members. Data on the transcriptional repression of virus-induced interferon-A promoters by the homeodomain protein Pitx1 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation, repression and antirepression of the IFN-A genes.

Preferential binding sites for interferon regulatory factors 3 and 7 involved in interferon-A gene transcription

Transcription of the murine interferon-A4 (IFN-A4) gene is mediated by a virus responsive element (VRE-A4) located in the promoter proximal [-120 to -43] region. VRE-A4 contains four DNA modules (A to D) which cooperate for maximal IFN-A4 activation following virus infection. The differential expression between the highly expressed IFN-A4 and the weakly inducible IFN-A11 gene promoters is essentially due to point mutations within the C and D modules of the virus-responsive element VRE-A11. We now demonstrate that in murine L929 and human 293 cells, transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7, which are potent activators of virus-induced type I IFN transcription, differentially affect IFN-A4 and IFN-A11 promoter activities. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprinting data, our studies demonstrate that the AB modules correspond to a preferential site for IRF-7, whereas the C module is preferentially recognized by IRF-3. Furthermore, transfection of reporter constructs driven by four copies of different GAAANN hexameric motifs found within VRE-A4 indicates that the NN residues of these hexameric sequences define the preferential binding sites for IRF-3 or IRF-7. Together, these experiments clarify the molecular basis for differential expression of IFN-A genes following virus infection by delineating the sequence requirements for IRF association with the virus responsive elements of the IFN-A genes.

Expression of herpes simplex virus ICP0 inhibits the induction of interferon-stimulated genes by viral infection

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutant d109 does not express any of the immediate-early (IE) proteins and persists in cells for a prolonged length of time. As has been shown by Nicholl et al. (J. Gen. Virol. 81:2215-2218, 2000) and Mossman et al. (J. Virol. 75:750-758, 2001) using other mutants defective for IE gene expression, infection with d109 induced the expression of a number of interferon-stimulated genes. Induction of these genes was significantly greater at multiplicities of infection (MOI) of 10 PFU/cell or greater, and the resulting antiviral effect was only seen at MOIs greater than 10 PFU/cell. Using mutants defective for sets of IE genes established that the lack of ICP0 expression was necessary for high levels of interferon-stimulated gene expression in HEL cells. The induction of interferon-stimulated genes by d109 could also be inhibited by infection with an E1-:E3-:E4- adenovirus expressing levels of ICP0 that are comparable to those expressed within the first hour of wild-type virus infection. Lastly, the addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 to cells infected with a mutant that expresses ICP0, d106, also resulted in the induction of interferon-stimulated genes. Thus, ICP0 may function through the proteasome very early in HSV infection to inhibit a cellular antiviral response induced by the virion.

The virus-induced factor VIF differentially recognizes the virus-responsive modules of the mouse IFNA4 gene promoter

Maximal activation of murine infection-A4 (IFNA4) gene transcription following viral infection requires the presence of four cooperating DNA sequences (denoted A to D), which make up the virus responsive element VRE-A4. The B, C, and D modules, when tandemized, form binding sites for the virus-induced factor (VIF), a multiprotein complex that is detected early after viral infection in the nuclei of mouse L929 cells. We now demonstrate that IFN regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) is a component of VIF and that VIF is different from the previously identified virus-activated complexes containing IRF-3 and coactivators of transcription, such as CREB binding protein (CBP) or p300. We also show that the C module is critical for both IRF-3-mediated and virus-induced transcription of the murine IFNA4 gene. Consistently, DNase I footprinting experiments and EMSA performed with increasing amounts of recombinant GST-IRF-3(DBD) fusion proteins demonstrate that cooperativity between the modules facilitate the binding of IRF-3 and recruitment of transcription coactivators on the IFNA4 promoter. These results indicate that VIF differentially recognizes the virus-responsive modules of VRE-A4 and further actualize our previous model concerning the differential expression of murine IFNA genes.

Identification of distinct signaling pathways leading to the phosphorylation of interferon regulatory factor 3

Infection of host cells by viruses leads to the activation of multiple signaling pathways, resulting in the expression of host genes involved in the establishment of the antiviral state. Among the transcription factors mediating the immediate response to virus is interferon regulatory factor-3 (IRF-3) which is post-translationally modified as a result of virus infection. Phosphorylation of latent cytoplasmic IRF-3 on serine and threonine residues in the C-terminal region leads to dimerization, cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation, association with the p300/CBP coactivator, and stimulation of DNA binding and transcriptional activities. We now demonstrate that IRF-3 is a phosphoprotein that is uniquely activated via virus-dependent C-terminal phosphorylation. Paramyxoviridae including measles virus and rhabdoviridae, vesicular stomatitis virus, are potent inducers of a unique virus-activated kinase activity. In contrast, stress inducers, growth factors, DNA-damaging agents, and cytokines do not induce C-terminal IRF-3 phosphorylation, translocation or transactivation, but rather activate a MAPKKK-related signaling pathway that results in N-terminal IRF-3 phosphorylation. The failure of numerous well characterized pharmacological inhibitors to abrogate virus-induced IRF-3 phosphorylation suggests the involvement of a novel kinase activity in IRF-3 regulation by viruses.

Distinct and essential roles of transcription factors IRF-3 and IRF-7 in response to viruses for IFN-alpha/beta gene induction

Induction of the interferon (IFN)-alpha/beta gene transcription in virus-infected cells is an event central to innate immunity. Mice lacking the transcription factor IRF-3 are more vulnerable to virus infection. In embryonic fibroblasts, virus-induced IFN-alpha/beta gene expression levels are reduced and the spectrum of the IFN-alpha mRNA subspecies altered. Furthermore, cells additionally defective in IRF-7 expression totally fail to induce these genes in response to infections by any of the virus types tested. In these cells, a normal profile of IFN-alpha/beta mRNA induction can be achieved by coexpressing both IRF-3 and IRF-7. These results demonstrate the essential and distinct roles of thetwo factors, which together ensure the transcriptional efficiency and diversity of IFN-alpha/beta genes for the antiviral response.

Repression of virus-induced interferon A promoters by homeodomain transcription factor Ptx1

Interferon A (IFN-A) genes are differentially expressed after virus induction. The differential expression of individual IFN-A genes is modulated by substitutions in the proximal positive virus responsive element A (VRE-A) of their promoters and by the presence or absence of a distal negative regulatory element (DNRE). The functional feature of the DNRE is to specifically act by repression of VRE-A activity. With the use of the yeast one-hybrid system, we describe here the identification of a specific DNRE-binding protein, the pituitary homeobox 1 (Ptx1 or Pitx1). Ptx1 is detectable in different cell types that differentially express IFN-A genes, and the endogenous Ptx1 protein binds specifically to the DNRE. Upon virus induction, Ptx1 negatively regulates the transcription of DNRE-containing IFN-A promoters, and the C-terminal region, as well as the homeodomain of the Ptx1 protein, is required for this repression. After virus induction, the expression of the Ptx1 antisense RNA leads to a significant increase of endogenous IFN-A gene transcription and is able to modify the pattern of differential expression of individual IFN-A genes. These studies suggest that Ptx1 contributes to the differential transcriptional strength of the promoters of different IFN-A genes and that these genes may provide new targets for transcriptional regulation by a homeodomain transcription factor.

Reconstitution of virus-mediated expression of interferon alpha genes in human fibroblast cells by ectopic interferon regulatory factor-7

Type I interferons constitute an important part of the innate immune response against viral infection. Unlike the expression of interferon (IFN) B gene, the expression of IFNA genes is restricted to the lymphoid cells. Both IFN regulatory factor 3 and 7 (IRF-3 and IRF-7) were suggested to play positive roles in these genes expression. However, their role in the differential expression of individual subtypes of human IFNA genes is unknown. Using various IFNA reporter constructs in transient transfection assay we found that overexpression of IRF-3 in virus infected 2FTGH cells selectively activated IFNA1 VRE, whereas IRF-7 was able to activate IFNA1, A2, and A4. The binding of recombinant IRF-7 and IRF-3 to these VREs correlated with their transcriptional activation. Nuclear proteins from infected and uninfected IRF-7 expressing 2FTGH cells formed multiple DNA-protein complexes with IFNA1 VRE, in which two unique DNA-protein complexes containing IRF-7 were detected. In 2FTGH cells, virus stimulated expression of IFNB gene but none of the IFNA genes. Reconstitution of IRF-7 synthesis in these cells resulted, upon virus infection, in the activation of seven endogenous IFNA genes in which IFNA1 predominated. These studies suggest that IRF-7 is a critical determinant for the induction of IFNA genes in infected cells.

Interferon regulatory factors: the next generation

Interferons are a large family of multifunctional secreted proteins involved in antiviral defense, cell growth regulation and immune activation. Viral infection induces transcription of multiple IFN genes, a response that is in part mediated by the interferon regulatory factors (IRFs). The initially characterized members IRF-1 and IRF-2 are now part of a growing family of transcriptional regulators that has expanded to nine members. The functions of the IRFs have also expanded to include distinct roles in biological processes such as pathogen response, cytokine signaling, cell growth regulation and hematopoietic development. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the novel discoveries in the area of IRF transcription factors and the important roles of the new generation of IRFs--particularly IRF-3, IRF-4 and IRF-7.

Structural and functional analysis of interferon regulatory factor 3: localization of the transactivation and autoinhibitory domains

The interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF-3) gene encodes a 55-kDa protein which is expressed constitutively in all tissues. In unstimulated cells, IRF-3 is present in an inactive cytoplasmic form; following Sendai virus infection, IRF-3 is posttranslationally modified by protein phosphorylation at multiple serine and threonine residues located in the carboxy terminus. Virus-induced phosphorylation of IRF-3 leads to cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of phosphorylated IRF-3, association with the transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300, and stimulation of DNA binding and transcriptional activities of virus-inducible genes. Using yeast and mammalian one-hybrid analysis, we now demonstrate that an extended, atypical transactivation domain is located in the C terminus of IRF-3 between amino acids (aa) 134 and 394. We also show that the C-terminal domain of IRF-3 located between aa 380 and 427 participates in the autoinhibition of IRF-3 activity via an intramolecular association with the N-terminal region between aa 98 and 240. After Sendai virus infection, an intermolecular association between IRF-3 proteins is detected, demonstrating a virus-dependent formation of IRF-3 homodimers; this interaction is also observed in the absence of virus infection with a constitutively activated form of IRF-3. Substitution of the C-terminal Ser-Thr phosphorylation sites with the phosphomimetic Asp in the region ISNSHPLSLTSDQ between amino acids 395 and 407 [IRF-3(5D)], but not the adjacent S385 and S386 residues, generates a constitutively activated DNA binding form of IRF-3. In contrast, substitution of S385 and S386 with either Ala or Asp inhibits both DNA binding and transactivation activities of the IRF-3(5D) protein. These studies thus define the transactivation domain of IRF-3, two domains that participate in the autoinhibition of IRF-3 activity, and the regulatory phosphorylation sites controlling IRF-3 dimer formation, DNA binding activity, and association with the CBP/p300 coactivator.

Triggering the interferon response: the role of IRF-3 transcription factor

The interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRF) consist of a growing family of related transcription proteins first identified as regulators of the IFN-alpha/beta gene promoters, as well as the IFN-stimulated response element (ISRE) of some IFN-stimulated genes. IRF-3 was originally identified as a member of the IRF family based on homology with other IRF family members and on binding to the ISRE of the IFN-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) promoter. Several recent studies have focused attention on the unique molecular properties of IRF-3 and its role in the regulation of IFN gene expression. IRF-3 is expressed constitutively in a variety of tissues, and the relative levels of IRF-3 mRNA do not change in virus-infected or IFN-treated cells. Following virus infection, IRF-3 is posttranslationally modified by protein phosphorylation at multiple serine and threonine residues, located in the carboxy-terminus of IRF-3. Phosphorylation causes the cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of IRF-3, stimulation of DNA binding, and increased transcriptional activation, mediated through the association of IRF-3 with the CBP/p300 coactivator. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent investigations demonstrating the important role of IRF-3 in cytokine gene transcription. These studies provide the framework for a model in which virus-dependent phosphorylation of IRF-3 alters protein conformation to permit nuclear translocation, association with transcriptional partners, and primary activation of IFN and IFN-responsive genes.

Differential viral induction of distinct interferon-alpha genes by positive feedback through interferon regulatory factor-7

Interferon (IFN) genes are among the earliest transcriptional responses to virus infection of mammalian cells. Although the regulation of the IFNbeta gene has been well characterized, the induction of the large family of IFNalpha genes has remained obscure. We report that the IFNalpha genes can be divided into two groups: an immediate-early response gene (IFNalpha4) which is induced rapidly and without the need for ongoing protein synthesis; and a set of genes that display delayed induction, consisting of at least IFNalpha2, 5, 6 and 8, which are induced more slowly and require cellular protein synthesis. One protein that must be synthesized for induction of the delayed gene set is IFN itself, presumably IFNalpha4 or IFNbeta, which stimulates the Jak-Stat pathway through the IFN receptor, resulting in activation of the transcription factor interferon-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3). Among the IFN-stimulated genes induced through this positive feedback loop is the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) protein, IRF7. Induction of IRF7 protein in response to IFN and its subsequent activation by phosphorylation in response to virus-specific signals, involving two C-terminal serine residues, are required for induction of the delayed IFNalpha gene set.

Primary activation of interferon A and interferon B gene transcription by interferon regulatory factor 3

The family of interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRFs) encodes DNA-binding transcription factors, some of which function as modulators of virus-induced signaling. The IRF-3 gene is constitutively expressed in many tissues and cell types, and neither virus infection nor IFN treatment enhances its transcription. In infected cells, however, IRF-3 protein is phosphorylated at the carboxyl terminus, which facilitates its binding to the CBP/p300 coactivator. In the present study, we demonstrate that overexpression of IRF-3 significantly enhances virus-mediated transcription of the IFNA and IFNB genes in infected cells as well as IFN synthesis. IRF-3-mediated activation of IFN genes depends in part on carboxyl-terminal phosphorylation of a cluster of Ser/Thr residues, because a mutant with Ser/Thr to Ala substitutions activates the IFN promoter less efficiently. However, overexpression of IRF-3 in human 2FTGH cells alone results in the induction of an antiviral state, which depends on functional IFN signaling, because IRF-3 does not induce an antiviral state in mutant 2FTGH cells defective in either JAK-1 or p48 functions; also no antiviral effect of IRF-3 could be demonstrated in Vero cells that lack the IFNA and IFNB genes. This finding indicates that the observed antiviral activity of IRF-3 in 2FTGH cells results mainly from the induction of IFNs. Furthermore, E1A protein inhibited IRF-3-mediated stimulation of the IFNA4 promoter in transient expression assays; this inhibition could be reversed partially by overexpression of CBP/p300 and was not demonstrated with the mutant of E1A that does not bind p300. These results identify IRF-3 and CBP/p300 as integral components of the virus-induced complex that stimulates type 1 IFN gene transcription. The observation that adenovirus E1A antagonizes IRF-3 mediated activation suggests that E1A and IRF-3 may compete for binding to CBP/p300 and implicates a novel mechanism by which adenovirus may overcome the antiviral effects of the IFN pathway.

Type I interferon gene expression: differential expression of IFN-A genes induced by viruses and double-stranded RNA

The family of interferon regulatory transcription factors (IRF) participates in the virus-induced and dsRNA-stimulated transcriptional regulation of either type I IFN genes or a definite set of genes which can also be activated by IFN. In this review, we place emphasis on the role of IRF-3 that associates with the coactivators CBP and/or p300, together or not with IRF-7. These complexes bind to the PRDI, PRDI-like domains or to a number of ISRE sequences located in the promoter of these virus-inducible genes. We also discuss the involvement of the IRF-3-related complexes in the differential regulation of IFN-A genes.

Transcriptional repression of type I IFN genes

Transcriptional regulation is a consequence of the combination of both activation and repression for establishing specific patterns of eukaryotic gene expression. The regulation of the expression of type I interferon (IFN-A and IFN-B) multigene family is controlled primarily at the transcriptional level and has been widely studied as a model for understanding the mechanisms of stable repression, transient virus induction and postinduction repression of the genes. The positive and negative regulatory elements required for this on/off switch have been defined within a complex 5' upstream region of their transcription start site. The differential expression pattern of type I IFN genes is thought to involve both substitutions in the virus responsive element (VRE) and presence or absence of negatively acting sequences surrounding the VRE. In this review we discuss several mechanisms of negative regulation due to the existence of common or specific elements in the IFN-B and IFN-A genes and we summarize recent studies on transcriptional repressors that bind to these promoters.

Virus-dependent phosphorylation of the IRF-3 transcription factor regulates nuclear translocation, transactivation potential, and proteasome-mediated degradation

The interferon regulatory factors (IRF) consist of a growing family of related transcription proteins first identified as regulators of the alpha beta interferon (IFN-alpha/beta) gene promoters, as well as the interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE) of some IFN-stimulated genes. IRF-3 was originally identified as a member of the IRF family based on homology with other IRF family members and on binding to the ISRE of the ISG15 promoter. IRF-3 is expressed constitutively in a variety of tissues, and the relative levels of IRF-3 mRNA do not change in virus-infected or IFN-treated cells. In the present study, we demonstrate that following Sendai virus infection, IRF-3 is posttranslationally modified by protein phosphorylation at multiple serine and threonine residues, which are located in the carboxy terminus of IRF-3. A combination of IRF-3 deletion and point mutations localized the inducible phosphorylation sites to the region -ISNSHPLSLTSDQ- between amino acids 395 and 407; point mutation of residues Ser-396 and Ser-398 eliminated virus-induced phosphorylation of IRF-3 protein, although residues Ser-402, Thr-404, and Ser-405 were also targets. Phosphorylation results in the cytoplasm-to-nucleus translocation of IRF-3, DNA binding, and increased transcriptional activation. Substitution of the Ser-Thr sites with the phosphomimetic Asp generated a constitutively active form of IRF-3 that functioned as a very strong activator of promoters containing PRDI-PRDIII or ISRE regulatory elements. Phosphorylation also appears to represent a signal for virus-mediated degradation, since the virus-induced turnover of IRF-3 was prevented by mutation of the IRF-3 Ser-Thr cluster or by proteasome inhibitors. Interestingly, virus infection resulted in the association of IRF-3 with the CREB binding protein (CBP) coactivator, as detected by coimmunoprecipitation with anti-CBP antibody, an interaction mediated by the C-terminal domains of both proteins. Mutation of residues Ser-396 and Ser-398 in IRF-3 abrogated its binding to CBP. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which virus-inducible, C-terminal phosphorylation of IRF-3 alters protein conformation to permit nuclear translocation, association with transcriptional partners, and primary activation of IFN- and IFN-responsive genes.

Virus infection induces the assembly of coordinately activated transcription factors on the IFN-beta enhancer in vivo

We have identified a virus-activated factor (VAF) that binds to a regulatory element shared by different virus-inducible genes. We provide evidence that VAF contains two members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family of transcriptional activator proteins (IRF-3 and IRF-7), as well as the transcriptional coactivator proteins p300 and CBP. Remarkably, VAF, as well as recombinant IRF-3 and IRF-7 proteins, binds very weakly to the interferon-beta (IFN-beta) gene promoter in vitro. However, in virus-infected cells, both proteins are recruited to the endogenous IFN-beta promoter as part of a protein complex that includes ATF-2/c-Jun and NF-kappa B. These observations provide a unique example of the coordinate activation of multiple transcriptional activator proteins and their highly cooperative assembly into a transcriptional enhancer complex in vivo.

Regulation of type I interferon gene expression by interferon regulatory factor-3

The genes of the family of interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRF) encode DNA binding transcriptional factors that are involved in modulation of transcription of IFN and interferon-induced genes (ISG). The presence of IRF binding sites in the promoter region of IFNA and IFNB genes indicates that IRF factors recognizing these sites play an important role in the virus-mediated induction of these genes. We have described a novel human gene of this family, IRF-3, that is constitutively expressed in a variety of cell types. IRF-3 binds to the interferon-sensitive response element (ISRE) present in the ISG15 gene promoter and activates its transcriptional activity. In the present study, we examined whether IRF-3 can modulate transcriptional activity of IFNA and IFNB promoter regions. Our results demonstrate that IRF-3 can bind to the IRF-like binding sites present in the virus-inducible region of the IFNA4 promoter and to the PRDIII region of the IFNB promoter but cannot alone stimulate their transcriptional activity in the human cell line, 293. However, the fusion protein generated from the IRF-3 binding domain and the RelA(p65) activation domain effectively activates both IFNA4 and IFNB promoters. Cotransfection of IRF-3 and RelA(p65) expression plasmids activates the IFNB gene promoter but not the promoter of IFNA4 gene that does not contain the NF-kB binding site. Surprisingly, activation of the IFNA4 gene promoter by virus and IRF-1 in these cells was inhibited by IRF-3. These data indicate that in 293 cells IRF-3 does not stimulate expression of IFN genes but can cooperate with RelA(p65) to stimulate the IFNB promoter.

The growing family of interferon regulatory factors

Interferons (IFN) exert their multiple biological effects through the induction of expression of over 30 genes encoding proteins with antiviral, antiproliferative and immunomodulatory functions. Among the many IFN-inducible proteins are the Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRFs), a family of transcription regulators, originally consisting of the well-characterized IRF-1 and IRF-2 proteins; the family has now expanded to over 10 members and is still growing. The present review provides a detailed description of recently characterized IRF family members. Studies analyzing IRF-expressing cell lines and IRF knockout mice reveal that each member of the IRF family exerts distinct roles in biological processes such as pathogen response, cytokine signalling, cell growth regulation and hematopoietic development. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which the IRFs affect these important cellular events and IFN expression will contribute to a greater understanding of events leading to various viral, immune and malignant disease states and will suggest novel strategies for antiviral and immune modulatory therapy.

Silencer activity in the interferon-A gene promoters

Interferon-A (IFN-A) differential gene expression is modulated by a complex interplay between cis-acting DNA elements and the corresponding specific trans-regulating factors. Substitutions in the proximal virus-responsive element of the interferon-A (IFN-A) promoters contribute to their differential gene expression. The 5' distal silencing region in the weakly virus-inducible murine IFN-A11 gene has been previously delimited. DNase I footprinting experiments and transient gene expression assays demonstrate identical silencing activity in equivalent regions of the genes for IFN-A11 and IFN-A4 promoters. A minimal 20-mer distal negative regulatory element (DNRE) in both promoters is necessary and sufficient for the silencing and a region in the highly inducible IFN-A4 promoter located between the silencer and the virus-responsive element overrides the silencer activity. Mutations in the central region of the DNRE, causing derepression, also altered the formation of one of the two major DNA-protein complexes. One of these contains a protein related to or identical to the high mobility group I(Y) proteins, while the other complex contains a major protein present in uninduced and virus-induced cells with a molecular mass of 38 kDa, which may be related to the silencer activity. Similar DNREs are present in other virus-uninducible IFN-A promoters, and these data suggest that a common silencer may mediate the transcriptional repression in different genes of this family.

Synergism between multiple virus-induced factor-binding elements involved in the differential expression of interferon A genes

Comparative transfection analysis of murine interferon A4 and interferon A11 promoter constructs transiently transfected in mouse L929 and human HeLa S3 cells infected with Newcastle disease virus showed that the second positive regulatory domain I-like domain (D motif), located between nucleotides -57 and -46 upstream of the transcription start site, contributes to the activation of virus-induced transcription of the interferon (IFN)-A4 gene promoter by cooperating with the positive regulatory domain I-like and TG-like domains previously described. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay performed with the virus-inducible fragments containing these motifs indicated that the binding activity that we have denoted as virus-induced factor (Génin, P., Bragança, J., Darracq, N., Doly, J., and Civas, A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 5055-5063) is different from interferon-stimulated gene factor 3. It binds to the D motif but not to the virus-unresponsive form of the D motif disrupted by a G-57 --> C substitution. We show that the low levels of IFN-A11 gene expression are caused essentially by the lack of two inducible enhancer domains disrupted by the A-78 --> G and the G-57 --> C substitutions. These data suggest a model taking account of the differential regulation of IFN-A gene family members. They also suggest that virus-induced factor may correspond to the primary transcription factor directly activated by virus that is involved in the initiation of IFN-A gene transcription.

Constitutive activation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen 1 gene transcription by IRF1 and IRF2 during restricted EBV latency

The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA1 gene promoter active in the type I program of restricted viral latency was recently identified and shown to reside in the viral BamHI Q fragment. This promoter, Qp, is active in a wide variety of cell lines and has an architecture reminiscent of eukaryotic housekeeping gene promoters (B. C. Schaefer, J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:10565-10569, 1995; B. C. Schaefer, J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck, Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:364-377, 1997). Here we demonstrate by deletion analysis that the important cis-acting elements regulating Qp are clustered in a relatively small region (ca. 80 bp) surrounding the site of transcription initiation. Immediately upstream of the site of initiation is a region which is protected from DNase I digestion by crude nuclear extracts. Electrophoretic mobility shift analyses (EMSA) employing probes spanning this region demonstrated the presence of two major protein complexes. Deletion analysis of Qp demonstrated that at least one of these complexes plays an important role in Qp activity. Evidence that interferon response factor 2 (IRF2) is a major constituent of the most prominent EMSA complex and that IRF1 may be a minor component of this complex is presented. Transfections into IRF1-/-, IRF2-/-, and IRF1,2-/- fibroblasts demonstrated that absence of both IRF1 and IRF2 reduced Qp activity to approximately the same extent as mutation of the IRF-binding site in Qp, strongly implicating IRF2, and perhaps IRF1, in the regulation of Qp activity. Notably, transcription from Qp was not inducible by either alpha or gamma interferon in EBV-negative B cells but rather was shown to be constitutively activated by IRF1 and IRF2. This observation suggests that IRF1 and IRF2 have a previously unrecognized role as constitutive activators of specific genes. Additionally, data presented indicate that a protein complex containing the nonhistone architectural protein HMG-I(Y) binds to the region identified as the major transcription initiation site for Qp. This observation raises the possibility that HMG-I(Y)-induced DNA bending plays a role in the initiation of transcription from Qp.

The murine DUB-1 gene is specifically induced by the betac subunit of interleukin-3 receptor

Cytokines regulate cell growth and differentiation by inducing the expression of specific target genes. We have recently isolated a cytokine-inducible, immediate-early cDNA, DUB-1, that encodes a deubiquitinating enzyme. The DUB-1 mRNA was specifically induced by the receptors for interleukin-3, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin-5, suggesting a role for the beta common (betac subunit known to be shared by these receptors. In order to identify the mechanism of cytokine induction, we isolated a murine genomic clone for DUB-1 containing a functional promoter region. The DUB-1 gene contains two exons, and the nucleotide sequence of its coding region is identical to the sequence of DUB-1 cDNA. Various regions of the 5' flanking region of the DUB-1 gene were assayed for cytokine-inducible activity. An enhancer region that retains the beta c-specific inducible activity of the DUB-1 gene was identified. Enhancer activity was localized to a 112-bp fragment located 1.4 kb upstream from the ATG start codon. Gel mobility shift assays revealed two specific protein complexes that bound to this minimal enhancer region. One complex was induced by betac signaling, while the other was noninducible. Finally, the membrane-proximal region of human betac was required for DUB-1 induction. In conclusion, DUB-1 is the first example of an immediate-early gene that is induced by a specific subunit of a cytokine receptor. Further analysis of the DUB-1 enhancer element may reveal specific determinants of a betac-specific signaling pathway.

Identification of distal silencing elements in the murine interferon-A11 gene promoter

The murine interferon-A11 (Mu IFN-A11) gene is a member of the IFN-A multigenic family. In mouse L929 cells, the weak response of the gene's promoter to viral induction is due to a combination of both a point mutation in the virus responsive element (VRE) and the presence of negatively regulating sequences surrounding the VRE. In the distal part of the promoter, the negatively acting E1E2 sequence was delimited. This sequence displays an inhibitory effect in either orientation or position on the inducibility of a virus-responsive heterologous promoter. It selectively represses VRE-dependent transcription but is not able to reduce the transcriptional activity of a VRE-lacking promoter. In a transient transfection assay, an E1E2-containing DNA competitor was able to derepress the native Mu IFN-A11 promoter. Specific nuclear factors bind to this sequence; thus the binding of trans-regulators participates in the repression of the Mu IFN-A11 gene. The E1E2 sequence contains an IFN regulatory factor (IRF)-binding site. Recombinant IRF2 binds this sequence and anti-IRF2 antibodies supershift a major complex formed with nuclear extracts. The protein composing the complex is 50 kDa in size, indicating the presence of IRF2 or antigenically related proteins in the complex. The Mu IFN-A11 gene is the first example within the murine IFN-A family, in which a distal promoter element has been identified that can negatively modulate the transcriptional response to viral induction.