European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care

Clinical outcomes of pediatric kidney replacement therapy after childhood cancer-An ESPN/ERA Registry study

Cancer and its treatment may lead to kidney injury and the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We identified 287 pediatric KRT patients with a history of malignancy from the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology/European Renal Association Registry. Of these, 197 had cancer as a primary cause of KRT (group 1) and 90 had a malignancy diagnosis before KRT (group 2). Two matched controls without malignancy were randomly selected for each patient. Data were complemented with a questionnaire. Median time to kidney transplantation (KT) from KRT initiation was 2.4 (IQR: 1.5-4.7), 1.5 (IQR: 0.4-3.3), 3.6 (IQR: 1.3 to Q3 not reached), and 1.1 (IQR: 0.3-3.6) years for group 1, their controls, group 2, and their controls, respectively. Overall 10-year mortality for those on KRT was higher among cancer patients vs controls in group 1: 16% vs 9% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI: 1.21-3.37) and in group 2: 23% vs 14% (adjusted hazard ratio 2.32, 95% CI: 1.11-4.85). In contrast, 10-year patient survival after the first KT was comparable to controls (93% vs 96%; 100% vs 94%, in groups 1 and 2, respectively). In summary, childhood cancer survivors' KT was delayed, and their overall mortality when on KRT was increased, but once transplanted, their long-term outcome was similar to other KT recipients.

Care pathways for patients with cognitive impairment and chronic kidney disease

Various epidemiological datasets and pathophysiological hypotheses have highlighted a significant link between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cognitive impairment (CI); each condition can potentially exacerbate the other. Here, we review the mutual consequences of CKD and CI on health outcomes and care pathways and highlight the complexities due to the involvement of different specialists. Our narrative review covers (i) the burden of CI among patients with CKD, (ii) the impact of CI on kidney health, (iii) access to kidney replacement therapy for people with CI, (iv) resources in cognitive care and (v) potential models for integrated 'nephro-cognitive' care. CI (ranging from mild CI to dementia) has a significant impact on older adults, with a high prevalence and a strong association with CKD. Furthermore, CI complicates the management of CKD and leads to a higher mortality rate, poorer quality of life and higher healthcare costs. Due to difficulties in symptom description and poor adherence to medical guidelines, the presence of CI can delay the treatment of CKD. Access to care for patients with both CKD and CI is hindered by physical, cognitive and systemic barriers, resulting in less intensive, less timely care. Multidisciplinary approaches involving nephrologists, geriatricians, neurologists and other specialists are crucial. Integrated care models focused on person-centred approaches, shared decision-making and continuous co-management may improve outcomes. Future research should focus on the putative beneficial effects of these various strategies on both clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Nonindexed versus Body Surface Area-Indexed Measured GFR Determinations as a Criterion of Living Donor Acceptance

Key Points

Living kidney donors with discordant values of measured GFR were at increased risk of developing eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Careful consideration should be given when assessing potential LKDs with large differences in their nonindexed and body surface area–indexed measured GFR.

Background

When GFR is measured (measured GFR [mGFR]) using iohexol plasma clearance, results are reported both as nonindexed (ml/min) and body surface area (BSA) indexed to 1.73 m2. When these two values differ, there is no consensus as to which is preferable to use to determine suitability for living kidney donor. We sought to compare the difference between nonindexed and BSA-indexed mGFR in LKDs and the association with postdonation eGFR.

Methods

Between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2023, 627 adult living kidney donors (LKD) at the University of Minnesota had predonation mGFR by iohexol plasma clearance and a minimum 6-month follow-up. LKD acceptance was based on a nonindexed mGFR ≥80 ml/min (age younger than 60 years) or ≥75 ml/min (age 60 years and older). Primary outcomes included eGFR at 1 year postdonation and sustained eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2.

Results

Among 627 LKDs, 561 (90%) had both a nonindexed and BSA-indexed mGFR above the age-based threshold (concordant), while 66 (11%) had nonindexed measurements above and BSA indexed below (discordant). Compared with concordant LKDs, discordant LKDs were older (median: 54.1 versus 42.8 years, P < 0.001) and had higher body mass indices (28.0 versus 26.1, P < 0.001). At 1 year postdonation, mean eGFR was higher among concordant LKDs, although the difference in relative change from predonation eGFR measurements was similar. During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, six of 66 discordant LKDs (9%) experienced sustained eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2 compared with five of 561 concordant LKDs (0.9%) (hazard ratio, 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.21 to 35.6).

Conclusions

Discordant LKDs had lower eGFR measurements postdonation and experienced a higher risk of eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m2.

Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Provides Incremental Prognostic Value in Patients on the Kidney Transplant Waiting List

The approach to cardiovascular risk assessment before renal transplantation is still controversial. Therefore, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who are candidates for kidney transplantation (KTx).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 356 ESRD clinical transplantations for review, only patients (NCT01064674) admitted to our transplant center between August 2009 and July 2012. Cardiovascular risk assessment at the time of listing was based on the Münster Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Score (MCRSS), additionally including evaluation by DSE and MPS in all ESRD patients. Coronary angiography was conducted in patients at high risk according to the MCRSS and in those where noninvasive stress testing revealed stress-induced ischemia or wall motion abnormalities.

RESULTS

During long-term follow-up until October 2020, 2.43 cardiovascular events/100 person-years (nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death) occurred, and the overall patient survival was 71.9%. Mild perfusion deficits identified by MPS, unlike wall motion abnormalities detected by DSE, showed incremental prognostic value for event-free survival in patients with low MCRSS risk.

CONCLUSION

We therefore propose a modified MCRSS-based approach including MPS as a reasonable risk stratification approach for cardiovascular risk assessment of ESRD patients applying for KTx.

Genetic Assessment of Living Kidney Transplant Donors: A Survey of Canadian Practices

Background

Kidney failure is a prevalent condition with tendency for familial clustering in up to 27% of the affected individuals. Living kidney donor (LKD) transplantation is the optimal treatment option; however, in Canada, more than 45% of LKDs are biologically related to their recipients which subjects recipients to worse graft survival and donors to higher future risk of kidney failure. Although not fully understood, this observation could be partially explained by genetic predisposition to kidney diseases. Genetic testing of potential LKDs may improve risk assessment and inform the safety of donation. The strategies to evaluate these donors are still evolving. In Canada, little is known about the practice of assessing for genetic conditions among LKDs.

Aim

The aim was to examine the Canadian practices regarding LKDs genetic assessment.

Methods

Questionnaires were sent to 23 Canadian adult transplant centers to examine their protocols for LKDs genetic assessment.

Design

The questionnaire comprised of 10 sections and 21 questions including case scenarios of different LKD encounters. Major domains of the survey addressed general demographics, information sharing practices, effect of mode of inheritance on candidacy decision, having a policy for LKD genetic evaluation, and case scenarios covering the following conditions: autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Alport syndrome, Fabry disease, familial focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD), sickle cell, and apolipoprotein L1 mutation (APOL1).

Participants

The questionnaire was sent to the living-donor assessment committee representative (nephrologist) in adult and pediatric kidney transplant centers across Canada.

Results

In total, 16 of 23 Canadian centers responded to the survey. Of the 8 surveyed genetic conditions, ADPKD, Alport syndrome, and aHUS were the most frequently encountered. More centers have specific policies for donor evaluation for ADPKD (25%) and aHUS (21.4%) vs none to very few for other genetic conditions. The most cited guidelines are Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), Canadian Society of Nephrology/Canadian Society of Transplantation (CSN/CST), and the Canadian Blood Services' Kidney Paired Donation Protocol.

Conclusions

Canadian transplant centers follow a case-by-case approach rather than a standard protocol for genetic assessment of LKDs given that current guideline recommendations are based on expert opinion due to a lack of a reliable body of evidence. With the expected rise in utilization of the increasingly available genetic testing, early multidisciplinary assessment including medical geneticists has the potential to improve personalized management. Studies examining long-term donor and graft outcomes are needed to construct the basis for evidence-based recommendations and inform the safety of donations.

Age Is Just a Number for Older Kidney Transplant Patients

The rise in the mean age of the global population has led to an increase in older kidney transplant (KT) patients. This demographic shift, coupled with the ongoing organ shortage, requires a nuanced understanding of which older adults are most suitable for KT. Recognizing the increased heterogeneity among older adults and the limitations of solely relying on chronological age, there is a need to explore alternative aging metrics beyond chronological age. In this review, we discuss the impact of older age on access to KT and postoperative outcomes. Emphasizing the need for a comprehensive evaluation that extends beyond chronological age, we explore alternative aging metrics such as frailty, sarcopenia, and cognitive function, underscoring their potential role in enhancing the KT evaluation process. Most importantly, we aim to contribute to the ongoing discourse, fostering an optimized approach to KT for the rapidly growing population of older adults.

Timing of Renal Transplant in Survivor Children with Relapse of Wilms Tumor: A Case Series Study

Introduction

Children with Wilms tumor can rarely experience late relapse of disease. Sometimes bilateral nephrectomy is necessary; as a consequence, the patient needs hemodialysis while waiting for renal transplantation. The waiting time to transplantation after cancer has always been a debated issue.

Case Presentation

We present 2 cases of late relapse of Wilms tumor who underwent bilateral nephrectomy. Patient 1 was put in the attending list for renal transplant after 5 years to stop treatment, attending the conventional time; however, she died before transplant because of complications in SARS-COVID-19 infection. Patient 2 underwent a renal transplant sooner compared to the conventional time, improving her quality of life and alive.

Conclusion

If bilateral nephrectomy is necessary in oncological patients, the timing of renal transplant should be discussed by multidisciplinary team. In our cases, the different time to renal transplantation was associated with different outcomes. Clinicians should have common lines about the time of renal transplantation in pediatric oncology; however, a personalized planning could be suggested after discussion among specialists, evaluating case to case. The presented field needs more knowledge and further larger case series are necessary to evaluate outcome related to the timing of renal transplant; in this view, collaboration between oncology centers is strongly required.

The evaluation of kidney transplant candidates prior to waitlisting: a scoping review

Before patients with kidney failure can undergo kidney transplantation, their suitability is assessed through a transplantation work-up. Variation in the transplantation work-up could contribute to inefficiency and inequality in accessing the transplant waiting list and kidney transplantation. We conducted a scoping review on the evaluation of kidney transplant candidates prior to waitlisting, investigating: (i) content of the transplantation work-up; (ii) contraindications to waitlisting; and (iii) organization of the transplantation work-up. A systematic search was conducted in Ovid Medline and Ovid EMBASE in collaboration with a medical information specialist. Studies investigating practice patterns since 2013 related to the evaluation of adults receiving their first kidney graft from a deceased donor were included. Results from 20 studies showed substantial variation in the evaluation of kidney transplant candidates. The content of the transplantation work-up differed between studied centers, yet common domains included screening for infections, heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and malignancy. Commonly reported contraindications to waitlisting were obesity and age-related factors. However, strict cut-off for BMI and age were used less. The organization of the transplantation work-up differed across studied centers with regard to referral and waitlisting decisions, screening and prioritization, and the setting of the transplantation work-up. Literature on the evaluation of kidney transplant candidates is limited, but our findings suggest substantial variation in pre-waitlisting practices among centers. This may contribute to differences in kidney transplantation access and outcomes between countries. Further research on pre-transplantation practices, specifically regarding the standardization of the transplantation work-up, is needed.

Effect of Pre-Transplant Renal Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapy on Post-Transplant Outcomes: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

The management of anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in stage V chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients undergoing renal transplantation remains controversial. Some centers advocate for the use of reversal agents or procoagulants preoperatively, while others suggest that transplantation can proceed safely without halting these treatments. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in the first 72 hours post-transplant in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy compared to a control group without such treatments. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 168 kidney transplant patients at our center from June 2018 to February 2022, with a follow-up period of 6 months post-transplant. Among these, 147 patients were included: 8.2% were anticoagulated, 16.3% were on antiplatelet therapy, and 75.5% received neither treatment. Patients on anticoagulants or antiplatelets were generally older, had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular history, and experienced longer dialysis times. Anticoagulated patients exhibited longer cold ischemia times and increased rates of hyperimmunization, alongside prolonged hospital stays. The overall incidence of hemorrhagic complications in the first 3 days post-transplant was low across all groups: 9% in the control group, 8.3% in anticoagulated patients, and 8.4% in antiplatelet-treated patients, with no significant differences. Blood transfusion rates were 75% for anticoagulated patients, 62.5% for antiplatelet patients, and 51.7% for controls (P = .214). Renal function at 6 months was similar across groups (P = .477), though acute rejection rates were higher in anticoagulated patients (16.6% vs. 4.2% vs. 2.7%; P = .067). No significant differences were found in hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications among the groups.

Impact of pre-transplant malignancy on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients: an updated meta-analysis with systematic review

PURPOSE

Kidney transplantation is the optimal therapy for end-stage renal disease, but pre-transplant malignancy (PTM) is a concern due to the increased risk of cancer recurrence with immunosuppression. While advancements in immunosuppression and cancer treatments have improved kidney recipient and graft survival, the impact of PTM on survival remains unclear and warrants comprehensive assessment.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were identified through searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to 1st May 2024 for outcomes including all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, graft survival, death-censored graft survival, and de novo malignancy.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in meta-analyses for various outcomes. Kidney transplant recipients with PTM had significantly higher all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] = 1.45 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-1.78]}, cancer-specific mortality [HR = 2.66 (95% CI 1.50-4.72)], risk of post-transplant de novo malignancy [HR = 1.66 (95% CI 1.22-2.25)] and worse graft survival [HR = 1.13 (95% CI 1.05-1.21)] compared to those without PTM. However, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival [HR = 1.09 (95% CI 0.82-1.45)].

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney transplant recipients with PTM experienced an increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, graft loss, and post-transplant de novo malignancy compared to those without PTM. Careful assessment, focused screening, and tailored management protocols are necessary for this high-risk group of patients.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Transplantation: Update 2024

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Panel on Renal Transplantation released an updated version of the renal transplantation (RT) guidelines. This report aims to present the 2024 EAU guidelines on RT.

METHODS

A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise covering all areas of RT guidelines published between May 31, 2020 and April 1, 2023 was performed. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery for living donor nephrectomy. One should not base decisions regarding the acceptance of a donor organ on histological findings alone, since this might lead to an unnecessary high rate of discarded grafts. For the ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique. A list of RT patients with a history of appropriately treated low-stage/grade renal cell carcinoma or prostate cancer should be made without additional delay. In the potential donor kidney, the main surgical tumoral approach is ex vivo tumor excision and finally transplantation. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy of a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or antithymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (www.uroweb.org/guidelines).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. Implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key to minimizing rejection and achieving long-term graft survival.

Pulmonary hypertension and chronic kidney disease: prevalence, pathophysiology and outcomes

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or kidney failure, with an estimated prevalence of up to 78% in those referred for right-heart catheterization. PH is independently associated with adverse outcomes in CKD, raising the possibility that early detection and appropriate management of PH might improve outcomes in at-risk patients. Among patients with PH, the prevalence of CKD stages 3 and 4 is estimated to be as high as 36%, and CKD is also independently associated with adverse outcomes. However, the complex, heterogenous pathophysiology and clinical profile of CKD-PH requires further characterization. CKD is often associated with elevated left ventricular filling pressure and volume overload, which presumably leads to pulmonary vascular stiffening and post-capillary PH. By contrast, a distinct subgroup of patients at high risk is characterized by elevated pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular dysfunction in the absence of pulmonary venous hypertension, which may represent a right-sided cardiorenal syndrome defined in principle by hypervolaemia, salt avidity, low cardiac output and normal left ventricular function. Current understanding of CKD-PH is limited, despite its potentially important ramifications for clinical decision making. In particular, whether PH should be considered when determining the suitability and timing of kidney replacement therapy or kidney transplantation is unclear. More research is urgently needed to address these knowledge gaps and improve the outcomes of patients with or at risk of CKD-PH.

Impact of Pelvic Calcification Severity on Renal Transplant Outcomes: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Background: Vascular calcifications (VC) are increasingly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to assess the incidence of iliac artery calcifications in kidney transplant (KT) patients and explore the relationship between iliac VC burden measured by pelvic calcification score (PCS) and renal transplant outcomes. Methods: This prospective study involved 79 KT recipients. VC quantification, using a pre-transplant computed tomography (CT) scan, was performed by assessing calcifications in the common and external iliac arteries bilaterally, resulting in an overall PCS ranging from 0 (no calcifications) to 44 (extensive calcifications). Based on PCS values, patients were divided into three equal-sized groups: PCS Group 1 (PCS 0-4), PCS Group 2 (PCS 5-19), and PCS Group 3 (PCS > 19). Post-transplant outcomes tracked for at least 1 year were patient and graft survival, graft function (urea, creatinine, MAG-3 clearance), and incidence of MACE during the first post-transplant year. Results: Calcifications were present in at least one arterial segment in 61 patients (77.2%). One-year patient survival was 95%, and one-year graft survival was 92.4%. Patients in PCS Group 3 had significantly lower one-year patient and graft survival compared to those in PCS Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively). MACE and renal function indicators 1-year post-transplant were similar across all PCS groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that a significant majority of KT recipients exhibited iliac VC during pre-transplant CT assessments. Patients in PCS Group 3 exhibited significantly lower one-year patient and graft survival rates compared to those in PCS Groups 1 and 2, indicating that this subgroup may require more intensive post-transplant monitoring and management.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Open Renal Transplantation in Obese Patients: A Correlation Study between BMI and Early and Late Complications with Implementation of a Prognostic Risk Score

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a global epidemic that affects millions worldwide and can be a deterrent to surgical procedures in the population waiting for kidney transplantation. However, the literature on the topic is controversial. This study evaluates the impact of body mass index (BMI) on complications after renal transplantation, and identifies factors associated with major complications to develop a prognostic risk score.

METHODS

A correlation analysis between BMI and early and late complications was first performed, followed by a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The 302 included patients were divided into obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2) groups. Correlation analysis showed that delayed graft function (DGF) was the only obesity-associated complication (p = 0.044). Logistic regression analysis identified female sex, age ≥ 57 years, BMI ≥ 25 and ≥30 kg/m2, previous abdominal and/or urinary system surgery, and Charlson morbidity Score ≥ 3 as risk factors for significant complications. Based on the analyzed data, we developed a nomogram and a prognostic risk score.

RESULTS

The model's area (AUC) was 0.6457 (95% IC: 0.57; 0.72). The percentage of cases correctly identified by this model retrospectively applied to the entire cohort was 73.61%.

CONCLUSIONS

A high BMI seems to be associated with an increased risk of DGF, but it does not appear to be a risk factor for other complications. Using an easy-to-use model, identification, and stratification of individualized risk factors could help to identify the need for interventions and, thus, improve patient eligibility and transplant outcomes. This could also contribute to maintaining an approach with high ethical standards.

Surgical Strategies for Renal Transplantation: A Pictorial Essay

This pictorial essay aims to navigate through the complexities and challenges of renal transplantation (RT), by weaving together visual imagery with clinical insights within a comprehensive illustrative surgical guide. Herein, we provide a detailed visual exploration of the intricate anatomy and surgical processes necessary for both renal graft retrieval from the donor and also for an adequate implantation in the recipient. Regarding graft retrieval, after reviewing the relevant retroperitoneal surgical anatomy, and donor nephrectomy techniques, graft preservation and optimal backbench graft dissection principles were meticulously analyzed. Thereafter, the recipient surgical strategy for graft implantation was addressed, focusing on preoperative preparations, the site of implantation selection, exposure, operative bed dissection, graft revascularization, and urinary tract reconstruction. Careful donor and recipient selection, meticulous surgical execution, and rigorous postoperative management clearly hold a pivotal role in optimizing patient outcomes. Fostering a deeper understanding of the surgical nuances and clinical management practices that contribute to successful results post-RT, we hope to provide a useful practical tool for clinicians about to embark on the treacherous road of RT surgery. Innovative technologies and surgical practices that have already significantly improved the safety and effectiveness of RT stand testament to the importance of further scientific inquiry, conceptual developments, and clinical integration. Moving forward, it is essential that the medical community continues to refine these strategies and advocate for equitable access to transplantation, ensuring that advancements in the field translate into real-world benefits for all patients grappling with ESRD. The collaborative efforts of multidisciplinary teams are essential in addressing the complex clinical challenges associated with RT, with the ultimate goal of improving patient survival, enhancing graft longevity, and reducing healthcare disparities.

Etelcalcetide use During Maintenance Hemodialysis and Incidence of Parathyroidectomy After Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Etelcalcetide is an i.v. calcimimetic agent, effectively reducing parathyroid hormone levels in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The clinical impact of discontinuing etelcalcetide at the time of kidney transplantation is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients on HD meeting predefined criteria who received a kidney transplant at our institution between January 1, 2015, and December 12, 2022. The incidence of parathyroidectomy and the evolution of calcium, phosphate, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels after transplantation was analyzed according to the type of calcimimetic treatment before transplantation (cinacalcet vs. etelcalcetide vs. none).

RESULTS

Overall, 372 patients (aged 53 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 42-62 years) were included. At the time of transplantation, 35, 75, and 262 patients were under etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, or no calcimimetic, respectively. After 1064 (IQR: 367-1658) days, the incidences of parathyroidectomy in the etelcalcetide, cinacalcet, no calcimimetic groups were 29%, 12%, and 1%, respectively (P < 0.001). Etelcalcetide was associated with an increased incidence of parathyroidectomy after adjustment for age, sex, and HD vintage (hazard ratio [HR]: 97.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.1-493.9, P < 0.001). The incidence of parathyroidectomy was related to etelcalcetide dosage (6/11 [54.6%] in patients with ≥ 10 mg vs. 4/24 [16.7%] in patients with < 10 mg, P = 0.02). Moreover, peak calcium levels were higher (P < 0.001) and parathyroidectomy was performed earlier (median 80 vs. 480 days, P < 0.001) in the etelcalcetide compared with the cinacalcet group. Long-term graft function, graft loss, and mortality were similar.

CONCLUSION

Etelcalcetide use during maintenance HD is associated with an increased incidence of early parathyroidectomy after transplantation compared to cinacalcet or no calcimimetic.

Benchmark Outcomes in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Multicenter Analysis of 80 996 Transplants From 126 Centers

BACKGROUND

We defined clinically relevant benchmark values in deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT), to assess the best achievable results in low-risk patient cohorts from experienced centers.

METHODS

We identified the "ideal" cases from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files from centers performing ≥50 KT per year between 2010 and 2018. Cases have been selected based on the kidney donor profile index values (<35%), a cold ischemia time (CIT) ≤18 h, a HLA mismatch ≤4, and excluding blood group (ABO) incompatible, dual and combined transplants. The outcomes of the benchmark cohort have been compared with a group of patients excluded from the benchmark cohort because but not meeting 1 or more of the abovementioned criteria.

RESULTS

The 171 424 KT patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files were screened and 8694 benchmark cases of a total of 80 996 KT (10.7%) from 126 centers meeting the selection criteria were identified. The benchmarks for 1-, 3-, and 5-y patient survival are ≥97%, ≥92.5%, and ≥86.7%, and ≥95.4%, ≥87.8%, and ≥79.6% for graft survival. Benchmark cutoff for hospital length of stay is ≤5 d, ≤23.6% for delayed graft function, and ≤7.5% and ≤9.1% for 6-mo and 1-y incidence of acute rejection. Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial graft survivals were 96.6%, 91.1%, and 84.2% versus 93.5%, 85.4%, and 75.5% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-y actuarial patient survivals were 98.1%, 94.8%, and 90.0% versus 96.6%, 91.1%, and 83.0% in the benchmark and comparison groups, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, we quantified the best achievable postoperative results in an ideal scenario in deceased donor KT, aimed at improving the clinical practice guided by the comparison of center performances with the ideal outcomes defined.

Cognitive decline related to chronic kidney disease as an exclusion factor from kidney transplantation: results from an international survey

Background and hypothesis

There seems to be a lack of consensus on the necessity and the modality of psychological and specifically cognitive assessment of candidates for kidney transplantation. Both points are often delegated to individual hospitals/centres, whereas international guidelines are inconsistent. We think it is essential to investigate professionals' opinions to advance towards a consistent clinical practice.

Methods

This paper presents the results of an international survey among clinical professionals, mainly nephrologists from the CONNECT (Cognitive decline in Nephro-Neurology: European Cooperative Target) network and beyond (i.e. from personal contacts of CONNECT members). The survey investigated their opinions about the question of whether cognitive decline in patients with chronic kidney disease may affect their eligibility for kidney transplantation.

Results

Our results show that most clinicians working with patients affected by chronic kidney disease think that cognitive decline may challenge their eligibility for transplantation despite data that suggest that, in some patients, cognitive problems improve after kidney transplantation.

Conclusion

We conclude that three needs emerge as particularly pressing: defining agreed-on standards for a multifaceted and multifactorial assessment (i.e. including both clinical/medical and psychosocial factors) of candidates with chronic kidney disease to kidney transplantation; further investigating empirically the causal connection between chronic kidney disease and cognition; and further investigating empirically the possible partial reversibility of cognitive decline after kidney transplantation.

Optimizing the kidney donor pool: transplanting donor kidneys after partial nephrectomy of masses or cysts

Background

A limiting factor in expanding the kidney donor pool is donor kidneys with renal tumors or cysts. Partial nephrectomy (PN) to remove these lesions prior to transplantation may help optimize organ usage without recurrence of malignancy or increased risk of complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all recipients of a living or deceased donor graft between February 2009 and October 2022 in which a PN was performed prior to transplant due to the presence of one or more concerning growths. Donor and recipient demographics, perioperative data, donor allograft pathology, and recipient outcomes were obtained.

Results

Thirty-six recipients received a graft in which a PN was performed to remove suspicious masses or cysts prior to transplant. Majority of pathologies turned out to be a simple renal cyst (65%), followed by renal cell carcinoma (15%), benign multilocular cystic renal neoplasm (7.5%), angiomyolipoma (5%), benign renal tissue (5%), and papillary adenoma (2.5%). No renal malignancy recurrences were observed during the study period (median follow-up: 67.2 months). Fourteen complications occurred among 11 patients (30.6% overall) during the first 6mo post-transplant. Mean eGFR (± standard error) at 36 months post-transplant was 51.9 ± 4.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (N = 23). Three death-censored graft losses and four deaths with a functioning graft and were observed.

Conclusion

PN of renal grafts with suspicious looking masses or cysts is a safe option to optimize organ usage and decrease the kidney non-use rate, with no observed recurrence of malignancy or increased risk of complications.

Collaborative Approach Toward Transplant Candidacy for Obese Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

An elevated BMI is a major cause of transplant preclusion for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This phenomenon exacerbates existing socioeconomic and racial disparities and increases the economic burden of maintaining patients on dialysis. Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) in such patients is not widely available. Our center created a collaborative program to undergo weight loss surgery before obtaining a kidney transplant.

STUDY DESIGN

We studied the outcomes of these patients after MBS and transplant surgery. One hundred eighty-three patients with ESRD were referred to the bariatric team by the transplant team between January 2019 and June 2023. Of these, 36 patients underwent MBS (20 underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 16 underwent sleeve gastrectomy), and 10 underwent subsequent transplantation, with another 15 currently waitlisted. Both surgical teams shared resources, including dieticians, social workers, and a common database, for easy transition between teams.

RESULTS

The mean starting BMI for all referrals was 46.4 kg/m 2 and was 33.9 kg/m 2 at the time of transplant. The average number of hypertension medications decreased from 2 (range 2 to 4) presurgery to 1 (range 1 to 3) postsurgery. Similarly, hemoglobin A1C levels improved, with preoperative averages at 6.2 (range 5.4 to 7.6) and postoperative levels at 5.2 (range 4.6 to 5.8) All transplants are currently functioning, with a median creatinine of 1.5 (1.2 to 1.6) mg/dL (glomerular filtration rate 46 [36.3 to 71]).

CONCLUSIONS

A collaborative approach between bariatric and transplant surgery teams offers a pathway toward transplant for obese ESRD patients and potentially alleviates existing healthcare disparities. ESRD patients who undergo MBS have unique complications to be aware of. The improvement in comorbidities may lead to superior posttransplant outcomes.

Native nephrectomy in advanced pediatric kidney disease: indications, timing, and surgical approaches

In pediatric kidney failure, native kidneys may pose a risk to successful transplant outcomes. The indications and timing of native nephrectomy represent a controversial management decision. A lack of high-quality, outcomes-based data has prevented development of evidence-based guidelines for intervention. In this article, we review the published literature on medical indications for native nephrectomy and current knowledge gaps. In addition, we provide a surgical perspective regarding timing and approach.

Pros and cons of live kidney donation in prediabetics: A critical review and way forward

There is shortage of organs, including kidneys, worldwide. Along with deceased kidney transplantation, there is a significant rise in live kidney donation. The prevalence of prediabetes (PD), including impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, is on the rise across the globe. Transplant teams frequently come across prediabetic kidney donors for evaluation. Prediabetics are at risk of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events, stroke, neuropathy, retinopathy, dementia, depression and nonalcoholic liver disease along with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Unfortunately, most of the studies done in prediabetic kidney donors are retrospective in nature and have a short follow up period. There is lack of prospective long-term studies to know about the real risk of complications after donation. Furthermore, there are variations in recommendations from various guidelines across the globe for donations in prediabetics, leading to more confusion among clinicians. This increases the responsibility of transplant teams to take appropriate decisions in the best interest of both donors and recipients. This review focuses on pathophysiological changes of PD in kidneys, potential complications of PD, other risk factors for development of type 2 diabetes, a review of guidelines for kidney donation, the potential role of diabetes risk score and calculator in kidney donors and the way forward for the evaluation and selection of prediabetic kidney donors.

Coronary Artery Disease Assessment and Cardiovascular Events in Middle-Aged Patients on Hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether, in younger patients on dialysis with longer life expectancy, assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) could identify individuals at higher risk of events and revascularization might improve outcomes in selected patients contrary to what had been observed in elderly patients.

METHODS

From August 1997 to January 2019, 2265 patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease were prospectively referred for cardiovascular assessment. For this study, we selected 1374 asymptomatic patients aged between 18 and 64 years. After clinical risk stratification and cardiac scintigraphy by single-photon emission computed tomography, 866 patients underwent coronary angiography. The primary end point was the composite incidence of nonfatal/fatal major adverse cardiovascular events during a follow-up period of 0.1 to 189.7 months (median, 26 months). The secondary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The primary end point occurred in 327 (23.8%) patients. Clinically stratified high-risk patients had a 3-fold increased risk of the primary end point. The prevalence of abnormal findings on perfusion scans was 29.2% (n=375), and significant CAD was found in 449 (51.8%) of 866 patients who underwent coronary angiography. An abnormal finding on myocardial perfusion scan and the presence of CAD were significantly associated with a 74% and 22% increased risk of cardiovascular events, respectively. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting (n=99), there was an 18% reduction in the risk of all-cause death relative to patients receiving medical treatment (P=.03).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of middle-aged, asymptomatic patients on dialysis, assessment of CAD identified individuals at higher risk of events, and coronary intervention was associated with reducing the risk of death in selected patients.

Obesity in Renal Transplantation

Obesity has surged as a formidable global public health concern, with its prevalence nearly tripling over the past 40 years. Concurrently, the burden of kidney disease remains substantial, with obesity emerging as a significant risk factor. Transplantation is a life-saving intervention for patients with end-stage kidney disease living with obesity. However, it introduces a dual-edged sword, decreasing the risk of mortality related to dialysis while still leaving cardiovascular disease as one of the leading causes of death in transplant recipients. The relationship between obesity and transplantation is a multifaceted challenge demanding concerted efforts from health-care providers, researchers, and policymakers to navigate. While transplantation offers hope and improved quality of life for many, the weight of obesity cannot be underestimated. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the intricate interplay between obesity and transplantation, with a particular focus on kidney transplantation. Through this review article, we want to reiterate the critical role of weight management, lifestyle modifications, and medical interventions in optimizing transplantation outcomes for individuals with obesity. By comprehensively addressing these issues, we aim to contribute to the development of a holistic approach that minimizes the risks while maximizing the benefits of transplantation for this vulnerable population.

Renal failure following insulin purging in atypical anorexia nervosa and type 1 diabetes mellitus

Objective

Anorexia nervosa (AN) and atypical anorexia nervosa (AAN) are severe and complex eating disorders that can be prevalent among individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Insulin purging, characterized by the intentional underuse / omission of insulin to control weight, is under-recognized in medicine and is a purging strategy of patients with AN or AAN and comorbid T1DM. Often, this can lead to renal failure, necessitating a (pancreas-) kidney transplantation. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the interplay between AN/AAN and T1DM and summarizes the evidence in literature.

Methods

A narrative review is presented on basis of a detailed case study of a 32-year-old female with end-stage renal failure seeking (pancreas-) kidney transplantation displaying etiology, diagnosis, comorbidities, complications, and treatment of AN and AAN with emphasis on those patients with T1DM.

Results

Insulin purging in patients with AN/AAN and coexisting T1DM can exacerbate T1DM complications, including accelerating the onset of end-stage renal failure. A multidisciplinary approach including nutrition treatment and psychotherapeutic techniques was considered necessary for treatment, focusing on psychosomatic in-patient care before and after organ transplantation.

Conclusion

Insulin purging in patients with AAN and T1DM poses severe health risks, including accelerated renal complications. For those considering transplantation, insulin purging has explicitly to be diagnosed and a holistic treatment addressing both the renal condition and psychosomatic symptoms/disorders is crucial for successful post-transplant outcomes.

Obesity and Kidney Transplantation-How to Evaluate, What to Do, and Outcomes

Obesity is a growing issue that is spreading worldwide; its prevalence is ever increasing in patients with end-stage renal disease and represents a potential barrier to transplantation. The lack of unanimous guidelines exacerbates the current disparity in treatment, which can affect outcomes, leading to a significantly longer time on the waiting list. Multidisciplinary and multimodal management (encompassing several healthcare professionals such as nephrologists, transplant physicians and surgeons, primary care providers, and nurses) is of paramount importance for the optimal management of this patient population in a continuum from waitlisting to transplantation. Development of this guideline followed a standardized protocol for evidence review. In this review, we report on our clinical experience in transplantation of obese patients; strategies to manage this condition, including bariatric surgery, suitable timing for transplantation among this patient population, and clinical experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy; and simultaneous robotic kidney transplantation to achieve optimal outcomes.

An evaluation of the contribution of routine ultrasound when performed with multiphase CT in renal donor imaging assessment

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the contribution of routine ultrasound when performed with computed tomography in identifying exclusion criteria in potential living kidney donors.

METHODS

We performed a 10-year retrospective cohort study including all cases of potential renal donors at our center. For each case, the donor workup ultrasound (US) and multiphase computed tomography (MPCT) original reports and imaging were reviewed by a fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist in consultation with a transplant urologist and placed into one of 3 groups: (1) no significant US contribution, (2) US was useful to characterize an incidental finding (either US exclusive or US aided in CT interpretation) but did not impact donor eligibility, and (3) an US exclusive finding contributed to donor exclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 432 potential live renal donors were evaluated (mean age 41, 263 women). In total, 340 (78.7%, group 1) cases had no significant US contribution. In 90 cases (20.8%, group 2), US helped to characterize one or more incidental findings but did not contribute to donor exclusion. In 1 (0.2%, group 3) case, an US exclusive finding (suspected medullary nephrocalcinosis) contributed towards donor exclusion.

CONCLUSION

US provided limited contribution to renal donor eligibility decisions when performed routinely with MPCT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Routine ultrasound could potentially be omitted in the live renal donor workup, with alternative strategies including a selective approach to incorporating ultrasound and an expanded role of dual-energy CT.

KEY POINTS

• Ultrasound is performed routinely with CT for renal donor assessment in some jurisdictions; however, this practice has come into question particularly with advances in dual-energy CT. • Our study found that routine use of ultrasound provided limited contribution, primarily assisting CT in characterization of benign findings with only 1/432 (0.2%) potential donors in a 10-year period excluded based in part on an ultrasound exclusive finding. • The role of ultrasound can be narrowed to a targeted approach for certain at-risk patients, and can be further reduced if dual-energy CT is utilized.

Catecholamine Vasopressor Exposure Is Associated With Early Poor Allograft Function and Adverse Events in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Hypoperfusion leads to allograft injury during kidney transplantation. Catecholamine vasopressors are used to maintain blood pressure in the perioperative period but have demonstrated negative outcomes in the deceased-donor kidney transplant population. Little is known regarding living donor kidney transplants (LDKTs) and vasopressor use. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence of vasopressor use in LDKT and characterize its effects on allograft function and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study included adult patients who underwent an isolated LDKT between August 1, 2017, and September 1, 2018. Patients were divided into those who received perioperative vasopressors and those who did not. The primary objective was to compare allograft function between LDKT recipients that received vasopressors and those who did not. Secondary outcomes included safety endpoints and the identification of clinical variables associated with vasopressor use.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients received an LDKT during the study period. Of those, 25 (37%) received perioperative vasopressors, and 42 (62%) did not. Poor graft function, as defined by the development of slow or delayed graft function, occurred more frequently in patients receiving perioperative vasopressors compared with those who did not (6 [24%] vs 1 [2.4%], P = .016). In multivariable regression modeling, only perioperative vasopressors were statistically significantly associated with poor graft function. In addition, patients exposed to vasopressors experienced more postoperative arrhythmias (8 [32%] vs 1 [4.8%], P = .0025).

CONCLUSION

Using perioperative vasopressors was independently associated with worsened early renal allograft function, including delayed graft function and adverse events in the LDKT population.

Impact of newly diagnosed prostate cancer at time of evaluation for renal transplantation

Systematic screening for prostate cancer is widely recommended in candidates for renal transplant at the time of listing. There are concerns that overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancer may result in reducing access to transplant without demonstrated oncological benefits. The objective of the study was to assess the outcome of newly diagnosed prostate cancer in candidates for transplant at the time of listing, and its impact on transplant access and transplant outcomes according to treatment options. This retrospective study was conducted over 10 years in 12 French transplant centers. Patients included were candidates for renal transplant at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Demographical and clinical data regarding renal disease, prostate cancer, and transplant surgery were collected. The primary outcome of the study was the interval between prostate cancer diagnosis and active listing according to treatment options. Overall median time from prostate cancer diagnosis to active listing was 25.0 months [16.4-40.2], with statistically significant differences in median time between the radiotherapy and the active surveillance groups (p = .03). Prostate cancer treatment modalities had limited impact on access and outcome of renal transplantation. Active surveillance in low-risk patients does not seem to compromise access to renal transplantation, nor does it impact oncological outcomes.

Preemptive kidney transplantation: why, when, and how?

Among renal replacement therapies, preemptive kidney transplantation (PKT) presents the best clinical, social, and economic results. However, it is still infrequently chosen as first therapy for patients with irreversible kidney failure. Initiatives in different parts of the world were developed to identify the reasons why PKT is still not widely used and to facilitate the access of patients with end-stage kidney disease to the advantages associated with it. This article addresses the main advantages and difficulties of PKT and discusses when it should be indicated and how to prepare potential recipients for PKT.

Comparison of GFR measurement with a two-blood sample technique using [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. creatinine-based equations in potential kidney donors

INTRODUCTION

Accurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for selection of kidney donors. Nuclear medicine methods are considered accurate in measuring GFR but are not always easily available. The four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) formulas are common equations for estimating GFR and are recommended for initial assessment of kidney donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these GFR estimation equations compared with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA) clearance.

METHODS

We compared GFR estimation by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA clearance using a two-blood sample method with estimation by MDRD4, CKD-EPI, and FAS creatinine-based equations in a population of healthy potential kidney donors.

RESULTS

A total of 195 potential kidney donors (68.2% female; mean age 49 years, range 21-75 years) were included in this study. Mean [99mTc]Tc-DTPA measured GFR (mGFR) was 101.5 ± 19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. All three equations underestimated the GFR value measured by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: -11.5 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD-EPI: -5.0 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; FAS: -8.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy within 30% and 10% of the measured GFR value was highest for CKD-EPI.

CONCLUSION

The CKD-EPI equation showed better performance in estimating GFR in healthy potential kidney donors, proving to be a more accurate tool in the initial assessment of kidney donors. However, creatinine-based equations tended to underestimate kidney function. Therefore, GFR should be confirmed by another method in potential kidney donors.

Utility of geriatric assessments in evaluation of older adults for kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

While kidney transplantation has favorable outcomes in patients aged 65 years and older, many are not referred for evaluation despite having no contraindications. We wanted to determine whether incorporating geriatrics and geriatric assessments (GA), as part of kidney transplant evaluation at the University of Chicago Medicine, would help identify suitable candidates and improve transplantation outcomes among older adults.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2016, as part of their multi-disciplinary transplant evaluation, 171 patients underwent an initial GA with the study geriatrician, who rated them on a five-point scale from "poor" to "excellent," and presented their cases to multidisciplinary transplant review meetings. Patients were followed until June 1st, 2021. Predictor variables included geriatric recommendation, clinical characteristics, and demographics. Outcomes of interest were mortality, receipt of transplant, and waitlist placement.

RESULTS

Compared to patients rated "poor," "marginal," or "fair," we found that patients that the geriatrician recommended as "good" or "excellent" were more likely to be waitlisted and receive a transplant. Favorably rated patients were also less likely to be removed from the waitlist due to becoming medically unfit, meaning worsening medical morbidity, frailty, and cognitive status.

CONCLUSION

Including geriatricians to perform GAs as part of the transplant evaluation process can help identify suitable elderly candidates.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Comparação da medição da TFG com uma técnica com duas amostras de sangue usando [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. equações baseadas em creatinina em potenciais doadores de rim

RESUMO Introdução: Determinar precisamente a taxa de filtração glomerular (TFG) é crucial para seleção de doadores de rim. Métodos de medicina nuclear são considerados precisos na medição da TFG, mas nem sempre estão facilmente disponíveis. As fórmulas Modification of Diet in Renal Disease de 4 variáveis (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), e Full Age Spectrum (FAS) são equações comuns para estimar a TFG, sendo recomendadas para avaliação inicial dos doadores. Este estudo visou avaliar o desempenho destas equações de estimativa da TFG em comparação com o clearance do tecnécio-99m-ácido dietilenotriaminopentacético ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA). Métodos: Comparamos a TFG por clearance de [99mTc]Tc-DTPA usando um método com duas amostras de sangue com estimativa da TFG pelas equações MDRD4, CKD-EPI e FAS baseadas em creatinina em uma população de potenciais doadores saudáveis. Resultados: Incluiu-se 195 potenciais doadores de rim (68,2% mulheres; idade média de 49 anos, intervalo 21–75 anos). A TFG média medida por [99mTc]Tc-DTPA foi 101,5 ± 19,1 mL/min/1,73m2. As três equações subestimaram o valor da TFG medida por [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: –11,5 ± 18,8 mL/min/1,73 m2; CKD-EPI: –5,0 ± 17,4 mL/min/1,73 m2; FAS: –8,3 ± 17,4 mL/min/1,73 m2). A precisão dentro de 30% e 10% do valor da TFG medida foi maior para CKD-EPI. Conclusão: A equação CKD-EPI mostrou melhor desempenho na estimativa da TFG em potenciais doadores de rim saudáveis, revelando-se uma ferramenta mais precisa na avaliação inicial dos doadores. Entretanto, equações baseadas em creatinina tendem a subestimar a função renal. Portanto, a TFG deve ser confirmada por outro método em potenciais doadores.

Pre-kidney Donation Pregnancy Complications and Long-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and diabetes are contraindications for living kidney donation in young candidates. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of women who had these pregnancy-related complications and subsequently became donors. In the general population, gestational hypertension (GHtn), preeclampsia/eclampsia, and gestational diabetes (GDM) are associated with long-term risks.

METHODS

Donors with the specified predonation complication were matched to contemporary control donors with pregnancies without the complication using nearest neighbor propensity score matching. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression with covariates for gravidity, blood pressure, glucose, body mass index, age, and creatinine at donation, donation year, race, relationship with recipient, and family history of disease. Long-term incidence of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30, eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were compared between groups using proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 1862 donors with predonation pregnancies, 48 had preeclampsia/eclampsia, 49 had GHtn without preeclampsia, and 43 had GDM. Donors had a long interval between first pregnancy and donation (median, 18.5 y; interquartile range, 10.6-27.5) and a long postdonation follow-up time (median, 18.0; interquartile range, 9.2-27.7 y). GHtn was associated with the development of hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.83); GDM was associated with diabetes (hazard ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-6.99). Pregnancy complications were not associated with eGFR <30 or eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 .

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that women with predonation pregnancy-related complications have long-term risks even with a normal donor evaluation. Donor candidates with a history of pregnancy-related complications should be counseled about these risks.

Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance

Understanding and communicating the risk of pregnancy complications post-living kidney donation is imperative as the majority of living kidney donors (LKD) are women of childbearing age. We aimed to identify all original research articles examining complications in post-donation pregnancies and compared the quality and consistency of related guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, society webpages, and guideline registries for English-language publications published up until December 18, 2020. Ninety-three articles were screened from which 16 studies were identified, with a total of 1399 post-donation pregnancies. The outcome of interest, post-donation pregnancy complications, was not calculable, and only a narrative synthesis of the evidence was possible. The absolute risk of pre-eclampsia increased from ~1%-3% pre-donation (lower than the general population) to ~4%-10% post-donation (comparable to the general population). The risks of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes were no different between post-donation and pre-donation pregnancies. Guidelines and consensus statements were consistent in stating the need to inform LKDs of their post-donation pregnancy risk, however, the depth and scope of this guidance were variable. While the absolute risk of pregnancy complications remains low post-donation, a concerted effort is required to better identify and individualize risk in these women, such that consent to donation is truly informed.

Transplante renal preemptivo: por que, quando e como?

Resumo Entre as terapias renais substitutivas, o transplante renal preemptivo (TRP) apresenta os melhores resultados clínicos, sociais e econômicos. No entanto, ainda é raramente escolhido como primeira terapia para pacientes com falência renal irreversível. Foram desenvolvidas iniciativas em diferentes partes do mundo para identificar as razões pelas quais o TRP ainda não é amplamente utilizado e para facilitar o acesso de pacientes com doença renal em estágio terminal às vantagens associadas ao mesmo. Este artigo aborda as principais vantagens e dificuldades do TRP e discute quando ele deve ser indicado e como preparar potenciais receptores para o TRP.

Cardiac Imaging and Management of Cardiac Disease in Asymptomatic Renal Transplant Candidates: A Current Update

Given the high cardiovascular risk accompanying end-stage kidney disease, it would be of paramount importance for the clinical nephrologist to know which screening method(s) identify high-risk patients and whether screening asymptomatic transplant candidates effectively reduces cardiovascular risk in the perioperative setting as well as in the longer term. Within this review, key studies concerning the above questions are reported and critically analyzed. The lack of unified screening criteria and of a prognostically sufficient screening cardiovascular effect for renal transplant candidates sets the foundation for a personalized patient approach in the near future and highlights the need for well-designed studies to produce robust evidence which will address the above questions.

Donor obesity and weight gain after transplantation: two still overlooked threats to long-term graft survival

The effect of donor obesity on kidney transplantation success has long been an overlooked clinical research area. Even though there is no strict guideline in most countries prohibiting donation from obese individuals, most candidates with a body mass index >35-40 kg/m² are rejected due to concerns regarding long-term renal functional deterioration in the donor. The effects of excessive fat mass on renal function and allograft survival have been analysed by several longitudinal and follow-up studies. These studies have documented the deleterious effect on long-term graft outcomes of excessive body mass in living kidney donors and de novo obesity or pre-existing obesity worsening after transplantation on kidney outcomes. However, there is a paucity of clinical trials aimed at countering overweight and obesity in living and deceased kidney donors and in transplant patients. In this review we will briefly discuss the mechanism whereby fat excess induces adverse kidney outcomes and describe the effects on graft function and survival in living obese donors.

A roadmap to parathyroidectomy for kidney transplant candidates

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder may persist after successful kidney transplantation. Persistent hyperparathyroidism has been identified in up to 80% of patients throughout the first year after kidney transplantation. International guidelines lack strict recommendations about the management of persistent hyperparathyroidism. However, it is associated with adverse graft and patient outcomes, including higher fracture risk and an increased risk of all-cause mortality and allograft loss. Secondary hyperparathyroidism may be treated medically (vitamin D, phosphate binders and calcimimetics) or surgically (parathyroidectomy). Guideline recommendations suggest medical therapy first but do not clarify optimal parathyroid hormone targets or indications and timing of parathyroidectomy. There are no clear guidelines or long-term studies about the impact of hyperparathyroidism therapy. Parathyroidectomy is more effective than medical treatment, although it is associated with increased short-term risks. Ideally parathyroidectomy should be performed before kidney transplantation to prevent persistent hyperparathyroidism and improve graft outcomes. We now propose a roadmap for the management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients eligible for kidney transplantation that includes the indications and timing (pre- or post-kidney transplantation) of parathyroidectomy, the evaluation of parathyroid gland size and the integration of parathyroid gland size in the decision-making process by a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists, radiologists and surgeons.

Pretransplant BMI Significantly Affects Perioperative Course and Graft Survival after Kidney Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis

Background. The number of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with overweight and obesity is increasing. It was shown that obesity is related to inferior patient and graft survival. We aimed to analyze intraoperative parameters and postoperative short and long-term course of kidney transplantation (KT) in body mass index (BMI)-stratified cohorts of KTRs. Methods. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively built database of 433 KTRs from 2014 to 2017 from a single transplant center was performed. The objective of the study was to analyze the association between BMI at the time of transplantation with intraoperative parameters, adverse events in early postoperative course, and the overall mortality and graft loss in BMI-stratified cohorts: normal (18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25−29.9 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). Results. Obesity was related to longer total procedure time (p = 0.0025) and longer warm ischemia time (p = 0.0003). The postoperative course in obese patients was complicated by higher incidence of DGF (delayed graft function), early surgical complications (defined as surgical complications <30 days from KT), reoperation rate, vascular complications, incidence of lymphocele and wound dehiscence. There was no difference between the normal weight and overweight KTRs. The one-month kidney function (p = 0.0001) and allograft survival (p = 0.029) were significantly inferior in obese patients with no difference between normal weight and overweight patients. One-year death-censored graft survival was better in patients with BMI < 30 (88.6 vs. 94.8% p = 0.05). BMI was a significant predictor of graft loss in univariate (p = 0.04) but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.09). Conclusion. Pretransplant obesity significantly affects the intraoperative and postoperative course of kidney transplantation and graft function and survival. The course of transplantation of overweight is comparable to normal BMI KTRs, and presumably pretransplant weight reduction to the BMI < 30 kg/m2 may improve the short-term postoperative course of transplantation as well as may improve graft survival. Thus, pretransplant weight reduction in obese KTRs may significantly improve the results of kidney transplantation. Metabolic surgery may play a role in improving results of KT.

Timing of the pre-transplant workup for renal transplantation: is there room for improvement?

Background

Since patient survival after kidney transplantation is significantly improved with a shorter time on dialysis, it is recommended to start the transplant workup in a timely fashion.

Methods

This retrospective study analyses the chronology of actions taken during the care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 who were waitlisted for a first kidney transplant at the Antwerp University Hospital between 2016 and 2019. We aimed to identify risk factors for a delayed start of the transplant workup (i.e. after dialysis initiation) and factors that prolong its duration.

Results

Of the 161 patients included, only 43% started the transplant workup before starting dialysis. We identified the number of hospitalization days {odds ratio [OR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.89]; P < 0.001}, language barriers [OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06-0.61); P = 0.005] and a shorter nephrology follow-up before CKD stage 5 [OR 0.99 (95% CI 1.0-0.98); P = 0.034] as factors having a significant negative impact on the probability of starting the transplant screening before dialysis. The workup took a median of 8.6 months (interquartile range 5-14) to complete. The number of hospitalization days significantly prolonged its duration.

Conclusion

The transplant workup was often started too late and the time needed to complete it was surprisingly long. By starting the transplant workup in a timely fashion and reducing the time spent on the screening examinations, we should be able to register patients on the waiting list before or at least at the start of dialysis. We believe that such an internal audit could be of value for every transplant centre.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy living donor nephrectomy: Technique and results of a monocentric retrospective series

INTRODUCTION

Robot-assisted nephrectomy for living kidney donation (LKD) has been described in the literature as a safe and reproducible technique in high volume centers with extensive robotic surgery experience. Any surgical procedure in a healthy individual ought to be safe in regards to complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Robotic-assisted Living Donor Nephrectomy (RLDN) experience in a robotic surgery expert center.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from 11/2011 and 12/2019. In total, 118 consecutive Living Donor (LD) kidney transplants were performed at our institution. All the procedures were performed by robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. Extraction was performed by iliac (IE), vaginal (VE) or umbilical extraction (UE). The left kidney was preferred even if the vascular anatomy was not modal.

RESULTS

For donors: the median operative time was 120min with 50mL of blood loss. The median warm ischemia time was 4min, with a non-significant shorter duration with the UE (4min) in comparison with IE or VE (5min). Nine patients had postoperative complications including 1 grade II (blood transfusion) and 1 grade IIIb (vaginal bleeding after VE). None of our procedures were converted to open surgeries and no deaths were reported. For the recipients: 1.7% presented delayed graft function; their median GFR at 1 year was 61mL/min/1.73m².

CONCLUSION

RLDN in an expert center appears to be a safe technique. The advantages of the robot device in terms of ergonomy don't hamper the surgical outcomes. Donor, recipient and graft survivals seem comparable to the reported laparoscopic outcomes in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

The Combined Roles of Race/Ethnicity and Substance Use in Predicting Likelihood of Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic minorities face known disparities in likelihood of kidney transplantation. These disparities may be exacerbated when coupled with ongoing substance use, a factor also reducing likelihood of transplantation. We examined whether race/ethnicity in combination with ongoing substance use predicted incidence of transplantation.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled between March 2010 and October 2012 at the time of transplant evaluation. Substance use data were retrieved from transplant evaluations. Following descriptive analyses, the primary multivariable analyses evaluated whether, relative to the referent group (White patients with no substance use), racial/ethnic minority patients using any substances at the time of evaluation were less likely to receive transplants by the end of study follow-up (August 2020).

RESULTS

Among 1152 patients, 69% were non-Hispanic White, 23% non-Hispanic Black, and 8% Other racial/ethnic minorities. White, Black, and Other patients differed in percentages of current tobacco smoking (15%, 26%, and 18%, respectively; P = 0.002) and illicit substance use (3%, 8%, and 9%; P < 0.001) but not heavy alcohol consumption (2%, 4%, and 1%; P = 0.346). Black and Other minority patients using substances were each less likely to receive transplants than the referent group (hazard ratios ≤0.45, P ≤ 0.021). Neither White patients using substances nor racial/ethnic minority nonusers differed from the referent group in transplant rates. Additional analyses indicated that these effects reflected differences in waitlisting rates; once waitlisted, study groups did not differ in transplant rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of minority race/ethnicity and substance use may lead to unique disparities in likelihood of transplantation. To facilitate equity, strategies should be considered to remove any barriers to referral for and receipt of substance use care in racial/ethnic minorities.