1
|
Ryu H, Li X, Lee TH, Kim TM, Choi SH, Park CK, Lee ST, Park SH, Won JK, Jang BS, Kim IH, Lee JH. Distribution and failure patterns of primary central nervous system lymphoma related to the hippocampus: implications for hippocampal avoidance irradiation. J Neurooncol 2025; 173:95-104. [PMID: 39969784 PMCID: PMC12041158 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-025-04965-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hippocampal injury from WBRT contributes to neurocognitive decline in brain malignancy patients. HA-WBRT may mitigate this by reducing hippocampal radiation exposure, but its feasibility in PCNSL remains unassessed regarding hippocampal involvement and failure rates. This study evaluates hippocampal involvement at diagnosis and after treatment in PCNSL patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 278 immunocompetent PCNSL patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2021. Following high-dose methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, patients either received consolidation therapy, including RT, cytarabine alone, or autologous stem cell transplantation or underwent observation. Hippocampus was outlined on T1 MRI images and expanded by a 5 mm margin to create the hippocampal avoidance region (HAR). Hippocampal failure was defined as recurrence or progression at HAR. The median follow-up was 38.7 months (range 3.1-239.4 months). RESULTS Of the 278 patients diagnosed with PCNSL, 39.9% presented initial lesions at HAR. After induction therapy, 212 evaluable patients received consolidation treatments or observation. Intracranial failures occurred in 47.6% (n = 101), with 66.3% (n = 67) occurring outside the HAR and 33.7% (n = 34) inside the HAR. Unifocal disease (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96, p = 0.025) was associated with a lower risk of hippocampal failures, while initial HAR involvement significantly increased the risk (HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.18-4.47, p = 0.018). Patients with unifocal disease outside the HAR had the lowest 3-year hippocampal failure rate (6.2%). RT that included the hippocampus did not significantly affect hippocampal failure rates in patients without initial HAR lesions (p = 0.282), with three-year rates of 9.2 vs. 14.6% for other treatments. However, among patients with initial HAR involvement, RT including the hippocampus significantly reduced hippocampal failure rates compared to other approaches (p = 0.002). Hippocampal failure rates were comparable, with conventional WBRT at 14.6% and HA-WBRT at 19% in patients without initial HAR lesions (p = 0.734). CONCLUSION The routine application of the HA-WBRT strategy is not supported due to the high risk of hippocampal failures in general and requires further investigation to establish its feasibility and safety in well-defined subgroups. Our results suggest that the HA-WBRT strategy could be evaluated for select PCNSL patients with unifocal lesions or those located outside the HAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyejo Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggii-Do, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hong Choi
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Kee Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon Tae Lee
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hye Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Kyung Won
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Bum-Sup Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernandez-Gil BI, Schiapparelli P, Navarro-Garcia de Llano JP, Otamendi-Lopez A, Ulloa-Navas MJ, Michaelides L, Vazquez-Ramos CA, Herchko SM, Murray ME, Cherukuri Y, Asmann YW, Trifiletti DM, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Effects of PreOperative radiotherapy in a preclinical glioblastoma model: a paradigm-shift approach. J Neurooncol 2024; 169:633-646. [PMID: 39037687 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04765-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE PreOperative radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used in the treatment of brain metastasis and different cancer types but has never been used in primary glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we aim to establish, describe, and validate the use of PreOperative RT for the treatment of GBM in a preclinical model. METHODS Rat brains were locally irradiated with 30-Gy, hypofractionated in five doses 2 weeks before or after the resection of intracranial GBM. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined survival. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was performed, and nuclei size and p21 senescence marker were measured in both resected and recurrent rodent tumors. Immunohistochemistry assessed microglia/macrophage markers, and RNAseq analyzed gene expression changes in recurrent tumors. Akoya Multiplex Staining on two human patients from our ongoing Phase I/IIa trial served as proof of principle. RESULTS PreOperative RT group median survival was significantly higher than PostOperative RT (p < 0.05). Radiation enlarged cytoplasm and nuclei in PreOperative RT resected tumors (p < 0.001) and induced senescence in PostOperative RT recurrent tumors (p < 0.05). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) suggested a more proliferative profile in PreOperative RT group. PreOperative RT showed lower macrophage/microglia recruitment in recurrent tumors (p < 0.01) compared to PostOperative RT. Akoya Multiplex results indicated TGF-ß accumulation in the cytoplasm of TAMs and CD4 + lymphocyte predominance in PostOperative group. CONCLUSIONS This is the first preclinical study showing feasibility and longer overall survival using neoadjuvant radiotherapy before GBM resection in a mammalian model. This suggests strong superiority for new clinical radiation strategies. Further studies and trials are required to confirm our results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven M Herchko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Melissa E Murray
- Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yesesri Cherukuri
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Yan W Asmann
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiegreffe S, Sarria GR, Layer JP, Dejonckheere E, Nour Y, Schmeel FC, Anton Giordano F, Schmeel LC, Popp I, Grosu AL, Gkika E, Stefaan Dejonckheere C. Incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal brain metastases and impact on hippocampal-avoiding radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110331. [PMID: 38772476 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms "Hippocampus", "Brain Neoplasms", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included. RESULTS Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17). CONCLUSION The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shari Wiegreffe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Julian Philipp Layer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany; Institute of Experimental Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Egon Dejonckheere
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 5037 Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Younèss Nour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Frank Anton Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - Ilinca Popp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, University Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tseng CL, Zeng KL, Mellon EA, Soltys SG, Ruschin M, Lau AZ, Lutsik NS, Chan RW, Detsky J, Stewart J, Maralani PJ, Sahgal A. Evolving concepts in margin strategies and adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma: A new future is on the horizon. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S3-S16. [PMID: 38437669 PMCID: PMC10911794 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment after maximal safe resection for glioblastoma (GBM). Despite advances in molecular profiling, surgical techniques, and neuro-imaging, there have been no major breakthroughs in radiotherapy (RT) volumes in decades. Although the majority of recurrences occur within the original gross tumor volume (GTV), treatment of a clinical target volume (CTV) ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 cm beyond the GTV remains the standard of care. Over the past 15 years, the incorporation of standard and functional MRI sequences into the treatment workflow has become a routine practice with increasing adoption of MR simulators, and new integrated MR-Linac technologies allowing for daily pre-, intra- and post-treatment MR imaging. There is now unprecedented ability to understand the tumor dynamics and biology of GBM during RT, and safe CTV margin reduction is being investigated with the goal of improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this review is to discuss margin strategies and the potential for adaptive RT for GBM, with a focus on the challenges and opportunities associated with both online and offline adaptive workflows. Lastly, opportunities to biologically guide adaptive RT using non-invasive imaging biomarkers and the potential to define appropriate volumes for dose modification will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - K Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angus Z Lau
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalia S Lutsik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Rachel W Chan
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman J Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pertz M, Schlömer S, Seidel C, Hentschel B, Löffler M, Schackert G, Krex D, Juratli T, Tonn JC, Schnell O, Vatter H, Simon M, Westphal M, Martens T, Sabel M, Bendszus M, Dörner N, Wick A, Fliessbach K, Hoppe C, Klingner M, Felsberg J, Reifenberger G, Gramatzki D, Weller M, Schlegel U. Long-term neurocognitive function and quality of life after multimodal therapy in adult glioma patients: a prospective long-term follow-up. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:353-366. [PMID: 37648934 PMCID: PMC10522752 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04419-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Multimodal therapies have significantly improved prognosis in glioma. However, in particular radiotherapy may induce long-term neurotoxicity compromising patients' neurocognition and quality of life. The present prospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate associations of multimodal treatment with neurocognition with a particular focus on hippocampal irradiation. METHODS Seventy-one glioma patients (WHO grade 1-4) were serially evaluated with neurocognitive testing and quality of life questionnaires. Prior to (baseline) and following further treatment (median 7.1 years [range 4.6-11.0] after baseline) a standardized computerized neurocognitive test battery (NeuroCog FX) was applied to gauge psychomotor speed and inhibition, verbal short-term memory, working memory, verbal and non-verbal memory as well as verbal fluency. Mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose was determined in a subgroup of 27 patients who received radiotherapy according to radiotherapy plans to evaluate its association with neurocognition. RESULTS Between baseline and follow-up mean performance in none of the cognitive domains significantly declined in any treatment modality (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, combined radio-chemotherapy, watchful-waiting), except for selective attention in patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Apart from one subtest (inhibition), mean ipsilateral hippocampal radiation dose > 50 Gy (Dmean) as compared to < 10 Gy showed no associations with long-term cognitive functioning. However, patients with Dmean < 10 Gy showed stable or improved performance in all cognitive domains, while patients with > 50 Gy numerically deteriorated in 4/8 domains. CONCLUSIONS Multimodal glioma therapy seems to affect neurocognition less than generally assumed. Even patients with unilateral hippocampal irradiation with > 50 Gy showed no profound cognitive decline in this series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Pertz
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 105, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Sabine Schlömer
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Clemens Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bettina Hentschel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Markus Löffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schackert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tareq Juratli
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Joerg Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Simon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Bethel, University Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Martens
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Asklepios St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Sabel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Dörner
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Antje Wick
- Neurology Clinic and National Centre for Tumour Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Hoppe
- Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marcel Klingner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jörg Felsberg
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Dorothee Gramatzki
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General Neurology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Schlegel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Hirslanden Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shaaban SG, LeCompte MC, Kleinberg LR, Redmond KJ, Page BR. Recognition and Management of the Long-term Effects of Cranial Radiation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:880-891. [PMID: 37145381 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01078-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Cranial radiation is ubiquitous in the treatment of primary malignant and benign brain tumors as well as brain metastases. Improvement in radiotherapy targeting and delivery has led to prolongation of survival outcomes. As long-term survivorship improves, we also focus on prevention of permanent side effects of radiation and mitigating the impact when they do occur. Such chronic treatment-related morbidity is a major concern with significant negative impact on patient's and caregiver's respective quality of life. The actual mechanisms responsible for radiation-induced brain injury remain incompletely understood. Multiple interventions have been introduced to potentially prevent, minimize, or reverse the cognitive deterioration. Hippocampal-sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy and memantine represent effective interventions to avoid damage to regions of adult neurogenesis. Radiation necrosis frequently develops in the high radiation dose region encompassing the tumor and surrounding normal tissue. The radiographic findings in addition to the clinical course of the patients' symptoms are taken into consideration to differentiate between tissue necrosis and tumor recurrence. Radiation-induced neuroendocrine dysfunction becomes more pronounced when the hypothalamo-pituitary (HP) axis is included in the radiation treatment field. Baseline and post-treatment evaluation of hormonal profile is warranted. Radiation-induced injury of the cataract and optic system can develop when these structures receive an amount of radiation that exceeds their tolerance. Special attention should always be paid to avoid irradiation of these sensitive structures, if possible, or minimize their dose to the lowest limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif G Shaaban
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Michael C LeCompte
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Lawrence R Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 401 North Broadway, Suite 1440, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Brandi R Page
- Department of Radiation Oncology-National Capitol Region, Johns Hopkins Medicine, 6420 Rockledge Drive Suite 1200, Bethesda, MD, 20817, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Voon NS, Manan HA, Yahya N. Remote assessment of cognition and quality of life following radiotherapy for glioma: deep-learning-based predictive models and MRI correlates. J Neurooncol 2023; 162:407-415. [PMID: 37014593 PMCID: PMC10071464 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04303-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioma irradiation often unavoidably damages the brain volume and affects cognition. This study aims to evaluate the relationship of remote cognitive assessments in determining cognitive impairment of irradiated glioma patients in relation to the quality of life and MRI changes. METHODS Thirty patients (16-76 aged) with two imaging (pre- and post-RT) and completed cognitive assessments were recruited. Cerebellum, right and left temporal lobes, corpus callosum, amygdala and spinal cord were delineated and their dosimetry parameters were collected. Cognitive assessments were given post-RT via telephone (Telephone Interview Cognitive Status (TICS), Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA), Telephone Mini Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (Tele-MACE)). Regression models and deep neural network (DNN) were used to evaluate the relationship between brain volume, cognition and treatment dose in patients. RESULTS Cognitive assessments were highly inter-correlated (r > 0.9) and impairment was shown between pre- and post-RT findings. Brain volume atrophy was shown post-RT, and cognitive impairments were correlated with radiotherapy-associated volume atrophy and dose-dependent in the left temporal lobe, corpus callosum, cerebellum and amygdala. DNN showed a good area under the curve for cognitive prediction; TICS (0.952), T-MoCA (0.909) and Tele-MACE (0.822). CONCLUSIONS Cognition can be evaluated remotely in which radiotherapy-related brain injury is dose-dependent and volume-dependent. Prediction models can assist in the early identification of patients at risk for neurocognitive decline following RT for glioma, thus facilitating potential treatment interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noor Shatirah Voon
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia
- National Cancer Institute, Ministry of Health, Jalan P7, Presint 7, 62250, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Hanani Abdul Manan
- Functional Image Processing Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Noorazrul Yahya
- Diagnostic Imaging and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, National University of Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Aziz, Kuala Lumpur, 50300, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sekely A, Bernstein LJ, Campbell KL, Mason WP, Laperriere N, Kalidindi N, Or R, Ramos R, Climans SA, Pond GR, Ann Millar B, Shultz D, Tsang DS, Zadeh G, Edelstein K. Neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neurooncol Pract 2023; 10:89-96. [PMID: 36659968 PMCID: PMC9837779 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In addition to poor survival rates, individuals with glioblastoma (GBM) are at risk of neurocognitive impairment due to multiple factors. This study aimed to characterize neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in newly diagnosed GBM patients; and to examine whether neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep, and depressive symptoms influence neurocognitive performance. Methods This study was part of a prospective, inception cohort, single-arm exercise intervention in which GBM patients underwent a neuropsychological assessment shortly after diagnosis (median 4 weeks; ie, baseline) and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months later, or until tumor progression. Here, we present baseline data. Forty-five GBM patients (mean age = 55 years) completed objective neurocognitive tests, and self-report measures of neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms. Results Compared to normative samples, GBM patients scored significantly lower on all neurocognitive tests, with 34 (76%) patients exhibiting neurocognitive impairment. Specifically, 53% exhibited impairment in memory retention, 51% in executive function, 42% in immediate recall, 41% in verbal fluency, and 24% in attention. There were high rates of clinically elevated sleep disturbance (70%), fatigue (57%), depressive symptoms (16%), and neurobehavioral symptoms (27%). A multivariate regression analysis revealed that depressive symptoms are significantly associated with neurocognitive impairment. Conclusions GBM patients are vulnerable to adverse outcomes including neurocognitive impairment, neurobehavioral symptoms, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms shortly after diagnosis, prior to completing chemoradiation. Those with increased depressive symptoms are more likely to demonstrate neurocognitive impairment, highlighting the need for early identification and treatment of depression in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Sekely
- Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori J Bernstein
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kristin L Campbell
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Warren P Mason
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Normand Laperriere
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Navya Kalidindi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosemarylin Or
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronald Ramos
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seth A Climans
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory R Pond
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barbara Ann Millar
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Shultz
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kim Edelstein
- Graduate Department of Psychological Clinical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dinkel JG, Lahmer G, Mennecke A, Hock SW, Richter-Schmidinger T, Fietkau R, Distel L, Putz F, Dörfler A, Schmidt MA. Effects of Hippocampal Sparing Radiotherapy on Brain Microstructure-A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12070879. [PMID: 35884686 PMCID: PMC9312994 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Hippocampal-sparing radiotherapy (HSR) is a promising approach to alleviate cognitive side effects following cranial radiotherapy. Microstructural brain changes after irradiation have been demonstrated using Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI). However, evidence is conflicting for certain parameters and anatomic structures. This study examines the effects of radiation on white matter and hippocampal microstructure using DTI and evaluates whether these may be mitigated using HSR. A total of 35 tumor patients undergoing a prospective randomized controlled trial receiving either conventional or HSR underwent DTI before as well as 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 (±3) months after radiotherapy. Fractional Anisotropy (FA), Mean Diffusivity (MD), Axial Diffusivity (AD), and Radial Diffusivity (RD) were measured in the hippocampus (CA), temporal, and frontal lobe white matter (TL, FL), and corpus callosum (CC). Longitudinal analysis was performed using linear mixed models. Analysis of the entire patient collective demonstrated an overall FACC decrease and RDCC increase compared to baseline in all follow-ups; ADCC decreased after 6 months, and MDCC increased after 12 months (p ≤ 0.001, 0.001, 0.007, 0.018). ADTL decreased after 24 and 30 months (p ≤ 0.004, 0.009). Hippocampal FA increased after 6 and 12 months, driven by a distinct increase in ADCA and MDCA, with RDCA not increasing until 30 months after radiotherapy (p ≤ 0.011, 0.039, 0.005, 0.040, 0.019). Mean radiation dose correlated positively with hippocampal FA (p < 0.001). These findings may indicate complex pathophysiological changes in cerebral microstructures after radiation, insufficiently explained by conventional DTI models. Hippocampal microstructure differed between patients undergoing HSR and conventional cranial radiotherapy after 6 months with a higher ADCA in the HSR subgroup (p ≤ 0.034).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes G. Dinkel
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Godehard Lahmer
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Angelika Mennecke
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Stefan W. Hock
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Tanja Richter-Schmidinger
- Psychiatrische und Psychotherapeutische Klinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Luitpold Distel
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Florian Putz
- Strahlenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (G.L.); (R.F.); (L.D.); (F.P.)
| | - Arnd Dörfler
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
| | - Manuel A. Schmidt
- Neuroradiologisches Institut des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (J.G.D.); (A.M.); (S.W.H.); (A.D.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tohidinezhad F, Di Perri D, Zegers CML, Dijkstra J, Anten M, Dekker A, Van Elmpt W, Eekers DBP, Traverso A. Prediction Models for Radiation-Induced Neurocognitive Decline in Adult Patients With Primary or Secondary Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2022; 13:853472. [PMID: 35432113 PMCID: PMC9009149 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although an increasing body of literature suggests a relationship between brain irradiation and deterioration of neurocognitive function, it remains as the standard therapeutic and prophylactic modality in patients with brain tumors. This review was aimed to abstract and evaluate the prediction models for radiation-induced neurocognitive decline in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors. Methods MEDLINE was searched on October 31, 2021 for publications containing relevant truncation and MeSH terms related to “radiotherapy,” “brain,” “prediction model,” and “neurocognitive impairments.” Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results Of 3,580 studies reviewed, 23 prediction models were identified. Age, tumor location, education level, baseline neurocognitive score, and radiation dose to the hippocampus were the most common predictors in the models. The Hopkins verbal learning (n = 7) and the trail making tests (n = 4) were the most frequent outcome assessment tools. All studies used regression (n = 14 linear, n = 8 logistic, and n = 4 Cox) as machine learning method. All models were judged to have a high risk of bias mainly due to issues in the analysis. Conclusion Existing models have limited quality and are at high risk of bias. Following recommendations are outlined in this review to improve future models: developing cognitive assessment instruments taking into account the peculiar traits of the different brain tumors and radiation modalities; adherence to model development and validation guidelines; careful choice of candidate predictors according to the literature and domain expert consensus; and considering radiation dose to brain substructures as they can provide important information on specific neurocognitive impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariba Tohidinezhad
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dario Di Perri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jeanette Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Monique Anten
- Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter Van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Traverso
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Connor M, Kim MM, Cao Y, Hattangadi-Gluth J. Precision Radiotherapy for Gliomas: Implementing Novel Imaging Biomarkers to Improve Outcomes With Patient-Specific Therapy. Cancer J 2021; 27:353-363. [PMID: 34570449 PMCID: PMC8480523 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Gliomas are the most common primary brain cancer, yet are extraordinarily challenging to treat because they can be aggressive and infiltrative, locally recurrent, and resistant to standard treatments. Furthermore, the treatments themselves, including radiation therapy, can affect patients' neurocognitive function and quality of life. Noninvasive imaging is the standard of care for primary brain tumors, including diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring for treatment response. This article explores the ways in which advanced imaging has and will continue to transform radiation treatment for patients with gliomas, with a focus on cognitive preservation and novel biomarkers, as well as precision radiotherapy and treatment adaptation. Advances in novel imaging techniques continue to push the field forward, to more precisely guided treatment planning, radiation dose escalation, measurement of therapeutic response, and understanding of radiation-associated injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Connor
- From the Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Jona Hattangadi-Gluth
- From the Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego, Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boerma M, Davis CM, Jackson IL, Schaue D, Williams JP. All for one, though not one for all: team players in normal tissue radiobiology. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 98:346-366. [PMID: 34129427 PMCID: PMC8781287 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As part of the special issue on 'Women in Science', this review offers a perspective on past and ongoing work in the field of normal (non-cancer) tissue radiation biology, highlighting the work of many of the leading contributors to this field of research. We discuss some of the hypotheses that have guided investigations, with a focus on some of the critical organs considered dose-limiting with respect to radiation therapy, and speculate on where the field needs to go in the future. CONCLUSIONS The scope of work that makes up normal tissue radiation biology has and continues to play a pivotal role in the radiation sciences, ensuring the most effective application of radiation in imaging and therapy, as well as contributing to radiation protection efforts. However, despite the proven historical value of preclinical findings, recent decades have seen clinical practice move ahead with altered fractionation scheduling based on empirical observations, with little to no (or even negative) supporting scientific data. Given our current appreciation of the complexity of normal tissue radiation responses and their temporal variability, with tissue- and/or organ-specific mechanisms that include intra-, inter- and extracellular messaging, as well as contributions from systemic compartments, such as the immune system, the need to maintain a positive therapeutic ratio has never been more urgent. Importantly, mitigation and treatment strategies, whether for the clinic, emergency use following accidental or deliberate releases, or reducing occupational risk, will likely require multi-targeted approaches that involve both local and systemic intervention. From our personal perspective as five 'Women in Science', we would like to acknowledge and applaud the role that many female scientists have played in this field. We stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before, some of whom are fellow contributors to this special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Boerma
- Division of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Catherine M. Davis
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Isabel L. Jackson
- Division of Translational Radiation Sciences, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Dörthe Schaue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jacqueline P. Williams
- Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Redmond KJ, Milano MT, Kim MM, Trifiletti DM, Soltys SG, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. Reducing Radiation-Induced Cognitive Toxicity: Sparing the Hippocampus and Beyond. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:1131-1136. [PMID: 33714520 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lombard A, Digregorio M, Delcamp C, Rogister B, Piette C, Coppieters N. The Subventricular Zone, a Hideout for Adult and Pediatric High-Grade Glioma Stem Cells. Front Oncol 2021; 10:614930. [PMID: 33575218 PMCID: PMC7870981 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.614930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Both in adult and children, high-grade gliomas (WHO grades III and IV) account for a high proportion of death due to cancer. This poor prognosis is a direct consequence of tumor recurrences occurring within few months despite a multimodal therapy consisting of a surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is increasing evidence that glioma stem cells (GSCs) contribute to tumor recurrences. In fact, GSCs can migrate out of the tumor mass and reach the subventricular zone (SVZ), a neurogenic niche persisting after birth. Once nested in the SVZ, GSCs can escape a surgical intervention and resist to treatments. The present review will define GSCs and describe their similarities with neural stem cells, residents of the SVZ. The architectural organization of the SVZ will be described both for humans and rodents. The migratory routes taken by GSCs to reach the SVZ and the signaling pathways involved in their migration will also be described hereafter. In addition, we will debate the advantages of the microenvironment provided by the SVZ for GSCs and how this could contribute to tumor recurrences. Finally, we will discuss the clinical relevance of the SVZ in adult GBM and pediatric HGG and the therapeutic advantages of targeting that neurogenic region in both clinical situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Lombard
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Neurosurgery, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Marina Digregorio
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Clément Delcamp
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Bernard Rogister
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Neurology, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Caroline Piette
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Natacha Coppieters
- Laboratory of Nervous System Disorders and Therapy, Groupement Interdisciplinaire de Génoprotéomique Appliquée (GIGA)-Neurosciences Research Centre, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Voshart DC, Wiedemann J, van Luijk P, Barazzuol L. Regional Responses in Radiation-Induced Normal Tissue Damage. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030367. [PMID: 33498403 PMCID: PMC7864176 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Normal tissue side effects remain a major concern in radiotherapy. The improved precision of radiation dose delivery of recent technological developments in radiotherapy has the potential to reduce the radiation dose to organ regions that contribute the most to the development of side effects. This review discusses the contribution of regional variation in radiation responses in several organs. In the brain, various regions were found to contribute to radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction. In the parotid gland, the region containing the major ducts was found to be critical in hyposalivation. The heart and lung were each found to exhibit regional responses while also mutually affecting each other's response to radiation. Sub-structures critical for the development of side effects were identified in the pancreas and bladder. The presence of these regional responses is based on a non-uniform distribution of target cells or sub-structures critical for organ function. These characteristics are common to most organs in the body and we therefore hypothesize that regional responses in radiation-induced normal tissue damage may be a shared occurrence. Further investigations will offer new opportunities to reduce normal tissue side effects of radiotherapy using modern and high-precision technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniëlle C. Voshart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; (D.C.V.); (J.W.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems–Section Molecular Cell Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Wiedemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; (D.C.V.); (J.W.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems–Section Molecular Cell Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter van Luijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; (D.C.V.); (J.W.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems–Section Molecular Cell Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: (P.v.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Lara Barazzuol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands; (D.C.V.); (J.W.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells & Systems–Section Molecular Cell Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: (P.v.L.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|