Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

Cardiological adverse events in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy: Influence of comorbidities and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy-based combinations have revolutionized the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), improving overall survival (OS). However, these therapies are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly cardiological complications and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which may adversely affect outcomes. The influence of comorbid conditions such as arterial hypertension (AHT) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the incidence and prognosis of cardiological AEs in HCC patients remains understudied.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 109 HCC patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab, tremelimumab-durvalumab, or durvalumab as first-line therapy at two Spanish medical centers from 2017-2023. Patients were stratified by comorbidities, AE incidence, and cardiological risk (CARDIOSOR scale). The primary endpoints were the incidence of treatment-modifying AEs and MACE, and their association with survival.

RESULTS

Among the cohort, 50.5 % experienced AEs of special interest (AESI), with 34 % considered immune-related (irAE). MACE occurred in 7.3 % of patients, including myocarditis (3.7 %). The CARDIOSOR scale identified a higher risk of MACE in patients with AHT, T2DM, or both (OR: 5.07, p = 0.034). Early cardiological AEs were independently associated with worse OS (HR: 3.38, p = 0.04). Patients with both AHT and T2DM exhibited higher rates of MACE (16.7 %) and treatment discontinuation (25.9 %). The CARDIOSOR scale effectively stratified patients into high-risk groups, correlating with increased MACE rates and poor survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbid conditions, particularly AHT and T2DM, amplify the risk of MACE and influence treatment discontinuation. The CARDIOSOR scale is a valuable tool for personalized risk assessment, guiding tailored therapeutic strategies. Integrating cardiovascular risk management into HCC care is crucial for optimizing both oncological and cardiovascular outcomes.

Efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in immunotherapy era clinical practice

AIM

Since the development of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Dur/Tre) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), it has been used as not only an initial but also later line treatment in clinical practice. This study aimed to elucidate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) in Dur/Tre treatment cases.

METHODS

Enrolled were 183 uHCC patients treated with Dur/Tre from 2023 to May 2024 (median age, 74 years; male patients, 152; Child-Pugh class A:B, 150:33; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B:C, 59:124; initial line use, 64). Clinical factors with prognostic influence on PFS in these patients were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The median observation period was 7.2 months (interquartile range, 3.2-10.4). History of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) treatment was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS at introduction of Dur/Tre in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.040, p = 0.028) (median PFS: without vs. with = 5.6 vs. 2.7 months, p < 0.001). Although immune-mediated adverse events (imAE) occurrence was only significant in univariate analysis, when objective response and disease control rates were examined according to imAE positivity (any grade) at the time of analysis, those were noted in 14.4% and 39.2%, respectively, of patients without imAE, while in patients with imAE (any grade), they were noted in 18.2% and 56.1%, respectively (p = 0.523 and p = 0.038, respectively).

CONCLUSION

History of Atz/Bev treatment may be an independent clinical factor for poor PFS at Dur/Tre introduction.

Dynamic Peripheral T-Cell Analysis Identifies On-Treatment Prognostic Biomarkers of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Introduction

Variability in response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underscores the critical need for the development of effective biomarkers. We sought to identify peripheral blood biomarkers reflecting response to AB treatment.

Methods

We analyzed dynamic changes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a prospective, multicenter cohort of 65 patients with HCC, using flow cytometry to evaluate the T-cell population before and 3 weeks after the first AB treatment.

Results

We found a unique response of the CD8+ T cells in terms of both frequency and phenotype, in contrast to CD4+ T cells and regulatory T cells. Notably, CD8+ T cells showed significant changes in expression of Ki-67 and T-cell immunoreceptors with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT). These distinct responses were observed particularly in the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)+ subpopulation of CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, the baseline differentiation status of PD-1+CD8+ T cells, particularly the central memory T-cell subset, correlated positively with greater proliferation (higher Ki-67 expression) of PD-1+CD8+ T cells after treatment. Moreover, effector memory cells expressing CD45RA correlated negatively with the increase in TIGIT+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells. The increase in TIGIT+/CD8+ T cells was associated with the development of immune-related adverse events, whereas increase in Ki-67+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells was associated with the better objective response rate. Importantly, dynamic shifts of Ki-67+/PD-1+CD8+ T cells and TIGIT+/CD8+ T cells significantly predicted progression-free survival and overall survival, as confirmed by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the potential of dynamic changes in CD8+ T cells as an on-treatment prognostic biomarker. Our study underscores the value of peripheral blood profiling as a noninvasive and practical method for predicting the clinical outcomes of AB treatment in patients with HCC.

Clinical Characteristics of Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Their Impact on Efficacy in Solid Cancers: An Analysis of Real-World Data in Moroccan Patients

PURPOSE

Patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity induced by ICIs and explore the correlation between efficacy and toxicity in a Moroccan population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of patients with solid tumors who received pembrolizumab or atezolizumab at the National Institute of Oncology, Rabat from July 2018 to December 2023. We identified irAEs according to ASCO 2021 guidelines and graded them according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Efficacy with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined. A Cox regression model was used to determine the association between irAEs and survival.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients with solid tumors who received ICIs were included. The primary tumor types were lung (40.7%), skin (29.1%), and GI cancer (14%). The ICIs most commonly used included pembrolizumab (67.4%) and atezolizumab (32.6%). ICIs were used as monotherapy (77.9%) or in combination (22.1%). A total of 58 (67.4%) patients presented any kind of irAEs. The most common toxicities in both the monotherapy and combination groups were GI, with rates of 25.3% and 31.5%, respectively. Patients with irAEs showed significantly longer median PFS compared with those without irAEs (9 v 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.5 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.99]; P = .04). The median OS was longer in patients with irAEs than in those without irAEs but was not statistically significant (19 v 10.3 months; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.39 to 1.7]; P = .5).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that ICIs have the potential to induce irAEs in patients with solid tumors. These adverse effects were commonly GI. The development of irAEs was associated with improved effectiveness of ICI treatment across different malignancies.

Organ-specific immune-related adverse events and prognosis in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Patients who developed immune-related adverse events (irAEs) could benefit more from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than those who did not develop irAEs. This study was designed to assess whether the occurrence of irAEs or their characteristics are correlated with survival in advanced patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled a panel of cancer patients who received ICIs at a single institute. Kaplan‒Meier curves were generated to describe progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with irAEs or specific irAE characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 238 patients were enrolled, 83 (34.9%) of whom developed at least one irAE. Overall, irAE development was associated with prolonged OS (not reached vs. 17.8 months, P < 0.001), PFS (8.7 vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.003), and an improved objective response rate (24.1% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.005). Furthermore, only skin or endocrine toxicities were associated with improved OS and PFS. On the basis of the results from organ-specific irAEs, the first development of skin or endocrine toxicities as protective irAEs rather than other irAEs was an independent indicator for predicting OS (P < 0.001) and PFS (P < 0.001). A protective irAE burden score based on organ-specific irAEs was further developed to show the significant protective effect of total irAEs on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all irAEs are associated with prolonged survival. The identification of organ-specific irAEs is useful for stratifying patients who actually respond to and benefit from ICIs across different cancer types.

Serum Alpha-fetoprotein Associated with Treatment Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and a Retrospective Cohort Study

Context: Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) has been shown to be valuable in tumor staging and predicting survival outcomes. In this investigation, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis and a meta-analysis to assess the predictive significance of initial AFP levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: We searched databases from inception until 14 July 2024 to identify cohort studies involving ICI treatments in HCC patients with baseline AFP data. We also retrospectively analyzed patients with HCC treated with ICIs to assess the therapeutic effect in the high AFP (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL) group and the low AFP (AFP < 400 ng/mL) group in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Results: In the meta-analysis, a total of 34 studies, comprising 8,799 patients, were included, while the retrospective cohort study encompassed 55 patients. In the meta-analysis, the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) of AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL versus AFP < 400 ng/mL for ICI therapy indicated that the high AFP group had a poorer outcome compared to the low AFP group, with a pooled HR for OS of 1.69 (95% CI: 1.57 - 1.82, P < 0.001) and a pooled HR for PFS of 1.47 (95% CI: 1.33 - 1.63, P < 0.001). In the retrospective cohort study, higher AFP levels were associated with a lower DCR for ICIs, with a DCR of 42.9% in the high AFP group and 77.8% in the low AFP group (P = 0.008). Cox model analysis showed that higher serum AFP was an independent predictor for shorter OS (HR 3.584, 95% CI: 1.466 - 8.762, P = 0.005). The toxicity analysis also displayed a strong association between high AFP and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (P = 0.008). Conclusions: Higher serum AFP is associated with poorer efficacy of ICI treatment in HCC patients.

Association Between Multisystem Immune-related Adverse Events and Progression-free Survivals in PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Monotherapy

BACKGROUND/AIM

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in various organs, and sometimes multiply following treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study aimed to determine the association between the number of irAEs and clinical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included patients with lung cancer, melanoma, and head and neck cancer who were treated with anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) monotherapy. We evaluated the association between the number of irAEs and progression-free survival (PFS) in the simple Cox regression analysis. To eliminate the immortal-time bias, an additional landmark analysis was performed.

RESULTS

In total, 92, 69, and 37 patients were allocated to the no, single, and multisystem irAEs groups, respectively. The multisystem irAEs were associated with better PFS compared to the no irAE group. In contrast, at the 12-week landmark, multisystem irAEs were associated with poor PFS compared to the no irAEs group. Furthermore, the rate of treatment suspension owing to irAEs in the multisystem irAEs group (62.5%) was higher than that in the single irAE group (17.3%) at the 12-week landmark.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of multisystem irAEs was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer, melanoma, and head and neck cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy. However, these results may be influenced by a potential immortal-time bias. When accounting for this bias, the early development of multisystem irAEs within 12 weeks was linked to treatment suspension and poorer clinical outcomes.

Heterogeneity in adverse events related to atezolizumab-bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma reported in real-world studies

Background & Aims

Safety data for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the real-world setting remain uncertain. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab in the literature.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed for original studies reporting percentages of AEs in patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab between 2020 to 2023, using the search terms "Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab", "HCC" and "Adverse events". We summarized the incidence of AEs and performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate the incidence of AEs reported in the literature.

Results

A total of 30 studies (3,867 patients) were included. The analysis revealed heterogeneity in AE reporting, with arterial hypertension, proteinuria, and fatigue being the most frequently reported AEs whereas incidence of bleeding was reported in 66.7% of the studies and rare immune-related AEs were reported in 26.7% of the studies. The meta-analysis revealed pooled incidence rates of 79% for any grade AEs: 56% for grade 1/2 and 30% for grade ≥3. While the pooled rates of hypertension, anorexia, bleeding, pruritus, rash, and thyroid dysfunction were similar to those reported in the IMbrave150 trial, higher rates were observed in the literature for proteinuria, fatigue, ALT and AST elevations and gastrointestinal perforation. For grade ≥3 AEs, the percentages were consistent with the IMbrave150 trial, except for lower incidences of arterial hypertension and thrombosis in the literature. The exposure-adjusted incidence rates for proteinuria (55.7%), hypertension (45.3%) and fatigue (33.6%) were high. Heterogeneity was observed in the analysis of AEs across articles within the same cohorts of patients.

Conclusion

We observed a significant variability in AE reporting for atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment in HCC in the literature, underscoring the need for standardized reporting practices.

Impact and implications

Considering the demonstrated safety of atezolizumab-bevacizumab in randomized-controlled trials, this meta-analysis offers valuable insights into reported occurrences of adverse events. Our study highlights significant heterogeneity among studies, underscoring the need to improve adverse event recording. Understanding the incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events beyond clinical trials is essential for prompt intervention and may help in preventing treatment discontinuation and complications, potentially leading to better outcomes without significantly compromising quality of life due to adverse events.

The correlation between immune-related adverse events and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment by targeting the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and programmed death-1/ligand-1. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors show promising therapeutic efficacy, they often cause immune-related adverse events. Immune-related adverse events differ from the side effects of conventional chemotherapy and require vigilant monitoring. These events predominantly affect organs, such as the colon, liver, lungs, pituitary gland, thyroid and skin, with rare cases affecting the heart, nervous system and other tissues. As immune-related adverse events result from immune activation, indicating the reinvigoration of exhausted immune cells that attack both tumors and normal tissues, it is theoretically possible that immune-related adverse events may signal a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Recent retrospective studies have explored the link between immune-related adverse event development and clinical efficacy; however, the predictive value of immune-related adverse events in the immune checkpoint inhibitor response remains unclear. Additionally, studies have focused on immune-related adverse events, timing of onset and immunosuppressive treatments. This review focuses on pivotal studies of the association between immune-related adverse events and outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Analysis of Immune-Related Adverse Events of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicentre Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the emergence of atezolizumab and bevacizumab (A + B) as standard first-line systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a comprehensive understanding of the clinical significance of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remains limited. We aimed to assess the impact of irAEs on patients with HCC undergoing A + B treatment.

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study included consecutive patients with HCC who were treated with the A + B regimen from September 2020 to December 2022. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the severity of irAEs, ranging from those without any experience of irAEs to those with severe irAEs.

RESULTS

This study included 150 patients with HCC, with a mean age of 63.3 years. Among them, 93.3% of patients were classified as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C, 52.0% had portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT), and 60.7% extrahepatic spread. Patients were classified as follows: group 1 (n = 84) had no irAEs, group 2 (n = 37) had mild irAEs (grade 1-2), and group 3 (n = 29) had severe irAEs (grade ≥3). The median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) were 13.6, 5.7, and 3.6 months, respectively. Group 2 demonstrated significantly superior OS compared to group 1 (9.5 months) and group 3 (5.6 months), with a median OS of 23.0 months (p < 0.001). Furthermore, group 2 demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of PFS and TTD compared to both group 1 and group 3 (p < 0.001 for both). Multivariate analysis identified mild irAEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.353; p = 0.010), ALBI grade 1 (HR, 0.389; p = 0.006), Child-Pugh class A (HR, 0.338; p = 0.002), and the absence of PVTT (HR, 0.556; p = 0.043) as independent predictors of better OS.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights the significant impact of irAE severity on the outcomes of patients with HCC receiving A + B. Notably, the occurrence of mild irAEs was independently associated with favourable survival, suggesting their potential role as surrogate indicators of HCC prognosis.

Interleukin-7 Risk Allele, Lymphocyte Counts, and Autoantibodies for Prediction of Risk of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) therapy was the effective immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common in patients receiving ICI therapies. Our research aimed to explore the risk factors for irAE development, with attention to interleukin-7 (IL-7) risk alleles, lymphocyte counts, and autoantibodies.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients receiving AB therapy for u-HCC were recruited. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping was done for the analysis of rs16906115 polymorphism near IL-7-expressing genes using 20 μL of stored buffy coat at baseline. The association between IL-7 risk alleles, lymphocyte counts, autoantibodies, and irAE development was investigated.

RESULTS

irAEs were found in 14 (18%) patients. The incidence of irAEs did not differ significantly between the groups showing IL-7 AG/AA and the GG group (p = 0.72). The incidence in the group with a lymphocyte count of 1,130/µL or more at baseline was higher than in that with a value below 1,130/µL (p = 0.0093). The group showing IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte count >1,130/μL had a higher irAE prevalence rate than the others (p = 0.019). IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte count >1,130/μL and positivity for autoantibodies at baseline were the prognostic factors for irAE development. irAE incidence could be stratified using a combination of IL-7 AG/AA or lymphocyte counts ≥1,130/µL and positive autoantibodies (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Patients with IL-7 risk alleles, high lymphocyte counts, and autoantibodies at baseline may require careful monitoring for irAE development.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Atezolizumab: Insights from Real-World Pharmacovigilance Data

The advancement of immuno-oncology has brought about a significant shift in cancer treatment methods, with antibody-based immune checkpoint inhibitors like atezolizumab leading the way in this regard. However, the use of this checkpoint blockade can result in immune-related adverse events due to increased T-cell activity. The full spectrum of these events is not yet completely understood. In this study, the United States FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was utilized to investigate immune-related adverse events linked with the use of atezolizumab. The study identified forty-nine immune-related adverse events that affected multiple organ systems, including cardiovascular, respiratory, hematologic, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, neurologic, musculoskeletal, dermatologic, endocrine, and systemic disorders. The strongest signals for relative risk occurred for immune-mediated encephalitis (RR = 93.443), autoimmune myocarditis (RR = 56.641), immune-mediated hepatitis (RR = 49.062), immune-mediated nephritis (RR = 40.947), and autoimmune arthritis (RR = 39.382). Despite the morbidity associated with these adverse events, emerging evidence suggests potential associations with improved survival outcomes. Overall, this report sheds light on the widespread immune-related adverse events that cause significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer being treated with atezolizumab and brings attention to them for the clinicians treating these patients.

Two cases of severe oral mucositis caused by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor specific for the programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor. In this case report, we describe two cases of oral mucositis that developed following the initiation of a systemic chemotherapy regimen comprising atezolizumab and bevacizumab for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. After 2 or 3 cycles of treatment, each patient presented with mucosal ulcers in the mouth, oral pain, difficulty in speech and oral intake, and both were admitted to our hospital for management. Following rule out of other conditions such as pharyngeal ulcers, herpetic mucositis, denture or oral trauma, or necrotizing mucositis, both patients were diagnosed with oral mucositis as a severe immune-related adverse event. Oral candidiasis was observed in both cases and should be considered a risk factor for the development of oral mucositis. Chemotherapy was discontinued and treatment with prednisolone was started, along with supportive care. The oral mucositis improved, and prednisolone was gradually reduced; however, in one patient, discontinuation of chemotherapy led to a recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. The other patient was lost to follow-up. In patients with risk factors, attention must be paid to the development of oral mucositis during immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Prognostic significance of C-reactive protein in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab

AIM

C-reactive protein (CRP) is both an inflammatory and prognostic marker in various cancers. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of CRP and the prognostic factors in patients who were administered with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ + BEV) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

A total of 213 patients who received ATZ + BEV for HCC from November 2020 to March 2023 at 15 hospitals were enrolled in this retrospective study. The prognosis was analyzed by subdividing the patients based on baseline characteristics, radiologic response, and treatment lines. Accuracy of survival prediction was assessed using CRP, alpha fetoprotein (AFP), C-reactive protein and alpha fetoprotein in immunotherapy (CRAFITY), and Glasgow Prognostic Score.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with baseline CRP <1 mg/dL, those with baseline CRP ≥1 mg/dL (n = 45) had a significantly higher baseline albumin-bilirubin score and AFP levels, significantly lower disease control rate (62.2%), and significantly shorter median overall survival (hazards ratios 2.292; 95% confidence interval 1.313-5.107; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified CRP ≥1 mg/dL, AFP ≥100 ng/mL, and modified albumin-bilirubin grade as the significant prognostic factors. The baseline CRP, AFP, CRAFITY, and Glasgow Prognostic Score demonstrated higher discrimination for 1-year survival prediction after first-line ATZ + BEV administration, compared with beyond second line, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.759, 0.761, 0.805, and 0.717, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP was a significant biomarker in patients treated with ATZ + BEV for HCC. Elevated CRP levels may indicate aggressive cancer progression and potential resistance to ATZ + BEV therapy.

Impact of immune-related adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Immune checkpoint inhibitors pose the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recent data suggest that irAEs may be associated with a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to investigate and analyze the association between these adverse events and the clinical benefits in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

The study enrolled 130 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab between November 2020 and January 2023 at a single center. The relationship between irAEs and both response rate and post-treatment outcomes was investigated.

RESULTS

Out of the 130 patients, irAEs developed in 36 (27.7%) patients. The irAE group exhibited a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than the non-irAE group, with a median PFS of 8.9 compared with 4.6 months (P < 0.01). No difference was found in the overall survival between the irAE and non-irAE groups. The irAE group demonstrated significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) than the non-irAE group (97.0% vs 65.5%, P < 0.01). The analysis by irAE severity revealed that the grade 1/2 group exhibited significantly longer PFS (7.9 vs 4.6 months, P = 0.007) and higher DCR (100% vs 65.5%, P < 0.01) than the non-irAE group. Furthermore, hypothyroidism correlated with a favorable PFS (8.9 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.02), DCR (100% vs 71.3%, P = 0.03), and overall response rate (58.3% vs 18.5%, P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The presence of irAEs is associated with prolonged PFS and higher DCR. Specifically, mild irAEs (grade 1/2) and hypothyroidism displayed prolonged PFS and higher DCR.

Insights in Molecular Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active recruiting clinical trials on targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Combinations of different agents and medical therapy along with radiological interventions were analyzed for the setting of advanced HCC. Those settings were also analyzed in combination with adjuvant situations after resection or radiological treatments. We summarized the current knowledge for each therapeutic setting and combination that currently is or has been under clinical evaluation. We further discuss the results in the background of current treatment guidelines. In addition, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways for each of these investigated targets and drugs to further elucidate the molecular background and underlying mechanisms of action. Established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for patients are considered for systemic treatment: atezolizumab/bevacizumab, durvalumab/tremelimumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Combination treatment for systemic treatment and local ablative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies are under clinical investigation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated colitis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: two cases of early onset after treatment with durvalumab plus tremelimumab

The HIMALAYA trial is the first chemotherapeutic trial to demonstrate the efficacy of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). The STRIDE regimen used in this trial consists of a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitor and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor. Herein, we report two cases of ICI-colitis that occurred immediately after the initiation of the STRIDE regimen for u-HCC. A 73-year-old man and 75-year-old man with u-HCC were treated with the STRIDE regimen. Both patients developed grade 3 diarrhea (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, ver. 5.0) within 10 days of treatment initiation. Colonoscopy revealed aphthous erosions and erythema extending from the terminal ileum to the rectum in one case, while the other showed aphthous ulcers in the terminal ileum and shallow ulcers in the colorectum. Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen revealed epithelial cell apoptosis and neutrophil infiltration bodies, consistent with ICI-colitis. Prednisolone (0.5 mg/kg) was effective in both patients. Our experience suggests the need for both careful monitoring and early endoscopic examination of ICI colitis in patients with unresectable HCC treated with the STRIDE regimen.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Immune-related Adverse Events in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

Background/Aim

Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab is an approved systemic chemotherapy regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as atezolizumab, frequently lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The identification of biomarkers that can predict the occurrence of irAEs is crucial for the optimal management of patients undergoing ICI treatment.

Patients and Methods

Between October 2020 and June 2023, we conducted a study involving 69 patients with advanced HCC who received treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. We conducted an analysis of blood-based biomarkers to identify independent risk factors associated with irAEs.

Results

In our study, 12 out of 69 patients (17.4%) experienced irAEs. Our investigation into blood-based biomarkers revealed that a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <2.04 at three weeks after the initiation of treatment had high predictive power (area under the curve: 0.77) for irAEs. Furthermore, multivariate logistic analysis identified NLR at three weeks (hazard ratio=0.23; p=0.037) and non-viral infection (hazard ratio=4.47; p=0.037) as independent factors contributing to the occurrence of irAEs. Patients who developed irAEs demonstrated a more favorable overall response rate (75.0% vs. 28.1%, p=0.005), disease control rate (91.6% vs. 52.6%, p=0.016), and progression-free survival (12.1 months vs. 6.0 months, p=0.010) than those who did not experience irAEs.

Conclusion

An NLR <2.04 at three weeks after the initiation of treatment may serve as a valuable biomarker for predicting irAEs in patients with HCC undergoing atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy.

Durable Stable Disease by Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab Can Provide Long-term Survival of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Lung Metastases

BACKGROUND

Multiple bilateral lung metastases secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are mainly treated with molecular therapy. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab can provide excellent long-term survival for patients with a good response.

CASE REPORT

A 67-year-old woman underwent right hepatectomy for a primary solitary HCC, 11 cm in diameter, after portal embolization. After 2 years, she developed bilateral lung metastases with >100 nodules, <1 cm in size. She had no viral hepatitis or liver cirrhosis, and the Child-Pugh Grade was A (5 points). Lenvatinib (12 mg daily) was administered as a first-line treatment and continued for 18 months. The best response was stable disease (SD). Subsequently, intravenous atezolizumab (1,200 mg) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) was administered once every three weeks. The best response was SD, which continued for 26 months. After that, cabozantinib treatment was initiated and discontinued after one cycle. Subsequently, dual immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment (durvalumab + tremelimumab) was administered. She has had multiple, but lung-only, metastases over four years. She has been well as an outpatient with the Child-Pugh Grade of A and a performance status of 0.

CONCLUSION

Even if atezolizumab plus bevacizumab does not induce a good response, a durable SD could prolong survival in patients with metastatic HCC while maintaining liver function and a good quality-of-life.

Potential Predictive Biomarkers of Systemic Drug Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Anticipated Usefulness in Clinical Practice

In the systemic drug treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, only the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sorafenib was available for a period. This was followed by the development of regorafenib as a second-line treatment after sorafenib, and then lenvatinib, a new TKI, proved non-inferiority to sorafenib and became available as a first-line treatment. Subsequently, cabozantinib, another TKI, was introduced as a second-line treatment, along with ramucirumab, the only drug proven to be predictive of therapeutic efficacy when AFP levels are >400 ng/mL. It is an anti-VEGF receptor antibody. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the mainstay of systemic therapy and can now be used as a first-line standard treatment for HCC. However, the objective response rate for these drugs is currently only 30% to 40%, and there is a high incidence of side effects. Additionally, there are no practical biomarkers to predict their therapeutic effects. Therefore, this review provides an overview of extensive research conducted on potential HCC biomarkers from blood, tissue, or imaging information that can be used in practice to predict the therapeutic efficacy of systemic therapy before its initiation.

Predicting Outcomes of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A combination of atezolizumab with bevacizumab (AB) is the first regimen that has shown superiority compared to sorafenib and is now being used as the systemic treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Liver Cancer Clinic stage C. However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve survival or significant responses, indicating the need to identify predictive biomarkers for initial and on-treatment decisions in HCC patients receiving AB. In this manuscript, we summarized the current data from both experimental and clinical studies. This review will be beneficial for both clinicians and researchers in clinical practice as well as those designing experimental, translational, or clinical studies.