Long-term hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Postmenopausal Fracture History and Survival After Reproductive Cancer Diagnosis

Background

Postmenopausal bone fracture's have been proposed as a marker of lifetime estrogen exposure and have been associated with decreased risk of breast and endometrial cancer. It is plausible that prediagnostic fractures may be related to survival of estrogen-sensitive cancers.

Methods

We evaluated a cohort of breast (n = 6411), endometrial (n = 1127), and ovarian (n = 658) cancer cases diagnosed between 1992 and 2010 while participating in the Women’s Health Initiative. Postmenopausal fracture history was assessed from baseline reports of fractures after age 55 years and incident fractures that occurred at least one year prior to cancer diagnosis during study follow-up. Using Cox regression, we compared women with and without a history of fractures with respect to overall and cancer-specific survival. Estimates were adjusted for participant factors, including hormone therapy use; hormone receptor status was not included in our analysis.

Results

Among women with breast cancer, a history of prediagnostic fractures at any site was associated with poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 1.43). A history of hip, forearm, or spine fractures, or hip fracture alone, was associated with increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.58, and HR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.27 to 3.32, respectively). Fracture history was associated neither with cancer-specific survival among breast cancer survivors, nor with overall or disease-specific mortality among endometrial and ovarian cancer survivors.

Conclusions

Postmenopausal breast cancer patients with a history of fractures, especially of the hip, are more likely to die of any cause than breast cancer survivors without a fracture history. Identifying and intervening in fracture risk factors should be standard of care for all women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Pre-diagnosis oophorectomy, estrogen therapy and mortality in a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer

Introduction

Pre-diagnosis oophorectomy and estrogen therapy could impact mortality due to breast cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) among breast cancer survivors. Elective bilateral oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions is not uncommon among US women.

Methods

We examined the association between pre-diagnosis total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAHBSO) and both overall and cause-specific mortality in the Collaborative Breast Cancer Studies cohort. Medical history and prior estrogen use were collected during standardized telephone interviews. Vital status, including date and cause of death, was obtained by linkage with the National Death Index. Multivariate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cause-specific mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Seventeen percent (N = 1,778) of breast cancer survivors (mean age at diagnosis = 63.5) reported pre-diagnosis TAHBSO. During follow-up (mean = 9.5 years), 2,856 deaths occurred, including 1,060 breast cancer deaths and 459 CVD deaths. Breast cancer deaths occurred a median of 5.1 years after diagnosis; CVD deaths occurred further from diagnosis (median = 9.7 years). Women who reported pre-diagnosis TAHBSO had a 16% decrease in all-cause mortality (HR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) compared to those with an intact uterus and ovaries. This overall decrease reflected a 27% lower breast cancer mortality among women who never used postmenopausal hormones (HR = 0.73; CI: 0.55, 0.96) and 43% lower CVD risk among women who reported using estrogen (HR = 0.57; CI: 0.39, 0.83) after TAHBSO.

Conclusions

Information on prior TAHBSO and estrogen use can inform risk of death from both breast cancer and cardiovascular disease among breast cancer survivors.

Modification of breast cancer risk according to age and menopausal status: a combined analysis of five population-based case-control studies

While several risk factors for breast cancer have been identified, studies have not consistently shown whether these factors operate more strongly at certain ages or for just pre- or postmenopausal women. We evaluated whether risk factors for breast cancer differ according to age or menopausal status. Data from five population-based case-control studies conducted during 1988-2008 were combined and analyzed. Cases (N = 23,959) and population controls (N = 28,304) completed telephone interviews. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals and tests for interaction by age and menopausal status. Odds ratios for first-degree family history of breast cancer were strongest for younger women-reaching twofold elevations-but were still statistically significantly elevated by 58-69 % among older women. Obesity was inversely associated with breast cancer among younger women and positively associated with risk for older women (interaction P < 0.0001). Recent alcohol intake was more strongly related to breast cancer risk among older women, although consumption of 3 or more drinks/day among younger women also was associated with elevated odd ratios (P < 0.0001). Associations with benign breast disease and most reproductive/menstrual factors did not vary by age. Repeating analysis stratifying by menopausal status produced similar results. With few exceptions, menstrual and lifestyle factors are associated with breast cancer risk regardless of age or menopausal status. Variation in the association of family history, obesity, and alcohol use with breast cancer risk by age and menopausal status may need to be considered when determining individual risk for breast cancer.

Body mass index and breast cancer risk according to postmenopausal estrogen-progestin use and hormone receptor status

To assess the joint relationships among body mass index, menopausal status, and breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype and estrogen-progestin medication use, we conducted a meta-analysis of 89 epidemiologic reports published in English during 1980-2012 identified through a systematic search of bibliographic databases. Pooled analysis yielded a summary risk ratio of 0.78 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67, 0.92) for hormone receptor-positive premenopausal breast cancer associated with obesity (body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) ≥30 compared with <25). Obesity was associated with a summary risk ratio of 1.39 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.70) for receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer. For receptor-negative breast cancer, the summary risk ratios of 1.06 (95% CI: 0.70, 1.60) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.22) associated with obesity were null for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, respectively. Elevated postmenopausal breast cancer risk ratios associated with obesity were limited to women who never took estrogen-progestin therapy, with risk ratios of 1.42 (95% CI: 1.30, 1.55) among never users and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.42) among users; too few studies were available to examine this relationship according to receptor subtype. Future research is needed to confirm whether obesity is unrelated to receptor-negative breast cancer in populations of postmenopausal women with low prevalence of hormone medication use.

Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The etiology of breast cancer might be explained by 2 mechanisms, namely, differentiation and proliferation of breast epithelial cells mediated by hormonal factors. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to update effects of risk factors for both mechanisms. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to January 2011. Studies that assessed association between oral contraceptives (OC), hormonal replacement therapy (HRT), diabetes mellitus (DM), or breastfeeding and breast cancer were eligible. Relative risks with their confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. A random-effects method was applied for pooling the effect size. The pooled odds ratios of OC, HRT, and DM were 1.10 (95% CI = 1.03-1.18), 1.23 (95% CI = 1.21-1.25), and 1.14 (95% CI = 1.09-1.19), respectively, whereas the pooled odds ratio of ever-breastfeeding was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.58-0.89). Our study suggests that OC, HRT, and DM might increase risks, whereas breastfeeding might lower risks of breast cancer.

Racial disparities in advanced-stage colorectal cancer survival

PURPOSE

African-Americans (AA) have a higher incidence of and lower survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with European Americans (EA). In the present study, statewide, population-based data from South Carolina Central Cancer Registry are used to investigate the relationship between race and age on advanced-stage CRC survival.

METHODS

The study population was comprised of 3,865 advanced pathologically documented colon and rectal adenocarcinoma cases diagnosed between 01 January 1996 and 31 December 2006: 2,673 (69 %) EA and 1,192 (31 %) AA. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to generate median survival time and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) by race, age, and gender. Factors associated with survival were evaluated by fitting Cox proportional hazards regression models to generate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % CI.

RESULTS

We observed a significant interaction between race and age on CRC survival (p = 0.04). Among younger patients (<50 years), AA race was associated with a 1.34 times (95 % CI 1.06-1.71) higher risk of death compared with EA. Among older patients, we observed a modest increase in risk of death among AA men compared with EA [HR 1.16 (95 % CI 1.01-1.32)] but no difference by race between women [HR 0.94 (95 % CI 0.82-1.08)]. Moreover, we observed that the disparity in survival has worsened over the past 15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Future studies that integrate clinical, molecular, and treatment-related data are needed for advancing understanding of the racial disparity in CRC survival, especially for those <50 years old.

Postoophorectomy estrogen use and breast cancer risk

OBJECTIVE

To estimate whether the protective effect of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy on breast cancer risk is mitigated by estrogen therapy use after surgery.

METHODS

In pooled data from four population-based case-control studies spanning 1992-2007, we examined estrogen use after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAHBSO) and subsequent breast cancer risk. We identified cases of postmenopausal invasive breast cancer in women (n=10,449) aged 50-79 years from three state tumor registries and age-matched control group participants without breast cancer (n=11,787) from driver's license and Medicare lists. Total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and estrogen use were queried during structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Breast cancer risk comparisons were made relative to women who experienced natural menopause and never used hormones. Overall, breast cancer risk increased 14% among women currently using estrogens after TAHBSO (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.28), 32% for estrogen durations less than 10 years (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.57), and 22% for estrogen initiation within 5 years of TAHBSO (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09-1.37). Among women who underwent early TAHBSO (younger than 40 years), 24-30% decreases in breast cancer risk were observed among both never (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.88) and current (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.96) estrogen users.

CONCLUSION

Unopposed estrogen use does not negate the reduction in breast cancer risk associated with early (younger than 40 years) bilateral oophorectomy. However, initiating estrogen therapy after TAHBSO at ages 45 and older can increase breast cancer risk and should be considered carefully.

Hormone replacement therapy, family history, and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND

Evidence is mixed regarding how familial predisposition to breast cancer affects the relation between hormone replacement therapy and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. We investigated whether the risk difference for invasive breast cancer attributable to estrogen plus progesterone replacement therapy is greater among women with a first-degree family history of the disease.

METHODS

This study is a longitudinal follow-up of 16,608 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years who were enrolled between 1993 and 2002 in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial of estrogen plus progesterone replacement therapy versus placebo.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-nine cases of invasive breast cancer occurred during a mean follow-up period of 5.6 years. The invasive breast cancer risk difference attributable to the hormone therapy was 0.007 among women with first-degree family history and 0.005 among the others, resulting in a negligible interaction contrast (IC = 0.002; 95% confidence interval = -0.014 to 0.018). The interaction contrast restricted to estrogen-receptor-positive invasive breast cancers was also negligible (IC = -0.006; 95% CI = -0.021 to 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Family history and estrogen plus progesterone replacement therapy have independent and noninteracting effects on the risk of invasive breast cancer among participants in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Factors influencing women's quality of life in the later half of life

BACKGROUND

Among older women in East Asia, and Taiwan in particular, there is little research on quality of life and the health care they receive to address the symptoms of menopause. This study evaluated factors which influence quality of life among post middle-age women in Taiwan.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 1250 women between 43 and 77 years of age during the year 2002. The factors investigated were demographics, menstruation status, menopausal symptoms, osteoporosis status, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). SF-36 was used to assess the health-related quality of life of these women. Correlation, multiple regression and path analysis were used to test for direct and indirect relationships among the variables.

RESULTS

There are statistical significances between menopause symptoms and quality of life across different age groups. Path analysis shows a direct positive effect of HRT and a direct negative effect of climacteric symptoms on both physical and mental components of quality of life. Age, marital status, education and osteoporosis also have direct and indirect effects, some positive and others negative, on the components of quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

When developing programs to enhance health in post middle-age women, consideration should be given to symptom relief as well as quality of life.

Interactions between intakes of alcohol and postmenopausal hormones on risk of breast cancer

Alcohol and postmenopausal hormone use are well-established modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. Alcohol may decrease the metabolic clearance of estradiol, whereby the risk of breast cancer associated with hormone use may depend on blood alcohol levels. The objective is to determine whether alcohol interacts with hormone use on risk of breast cancer. The 5,035 postmenopausal women who participated in the Copenhagen City Heart Study were asked about their alcohol intake and hormone use at baseline in 1981-1983 and were followed until 2002 in the Danish cancer registry, with <0.1% loss to follow-up. Proportional hazard models were used to analyze data. During follow-up, 267 women developed breast cancer. Alcohol consumption was associated with a small increased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio = 1.11 per drink/day, 95% CI: 0.99-1.25). Women who used hormones also had a higher risk of breast cancer (HR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.52-2.61) compared to nonhormone users. We found an interaction between these 2 factors; those who had an intake of more than 2 drinks per day and took hormones had a risk of 4.74 (95% CI: 2.61-8.59) for breast cancer compared to abstainers who did not use hormones. Alcohol was not associated with breast cancer among women who did not use hormones (HR = 0.98 per drink/day, 95% CI: 0.82-1.78). In conclusion, the interaction between alcohol and hormone use should, if confirmed in other studies, have an impact both on the prescription of hormones and on sensible drinking limits for postmenopausal women.

Historical perspectives in postmenopausal hormone therapy: defining the right dose and duration

Recommended dosages of postmenopausal estrogen therapy (ET) and estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT), like those of oral contraceptives, have decreased markedly since oral estrogens were first introduced. Recently, the movement toward lower doses of ET/ EPT has accelerated because of the results of the Women's Health Initiative, which showed that lower-dose ET/EPT may provide similar efficacy and an improved safety profile compared with higher-dose preparations. For example, lower ET/EPT doses effectively relieve vasomotor and vulvovaginal symptoms associated with menopause, prevent bone loss, protect the endometrium, and are better tolerated than commonly prescribed doses. Current guidelines suggest the use of the lowest effective dose for the shortest duration consistent with treatment goals, benefits, and risks for the individual woman. However, the impact of treatment discontinuation should be considered when advising women to use hormone therapy for relieving menopausal symptoms for the shortest possible duration.

Interactions between body mass index and hormone therapy and postmenopausal breast cancer risk (United States)

OBJECTIVE

To assess interactions between use of estrogen plus progestin hormone therapy (EPHT) and body mass index (BMI) in relation to risks of different types of breast cancer, based on histology and hormone receptor status.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based case-control study that compared 975 postmenopausal breast cancer cases to 1,007 controls. Interactions between menopausal hormone therapy (HT) and BMI in relation to risk of different breast cancer types were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Obese (BMI > or = 30.0 kg/m2) never users of HT had 1.7-fold to 2.3-fold elevated risks of ductal and ER+/PR+ tumors, respectively, compared to thinner women. BMI was not related to breast cancer risk among current HT users. Current EPHT users for > or = 5 years had 2.1 to 9.6-fold elevated risks of lobular and ER+/PR+ tumors compared to never users of HT regardless of BMI. Current EPHT users for > or = 5 years with a BMI < or = 24.9 kg/m2 also had a 2.6-fold elevated risk of ductal carcinoma. However, none of the interactions between BMI and HT use evaluated reached statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

While interactions between HT and BMI are well established, they appear to only be present among certain breast cancer types. Since obesity is related to breast cancer risk only among never users of HT, as HT use declines the relative impact of obesity on breast cancer incidence may grow.

Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials

We conducted meta-analyses to assess the impact of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) on the risk of incident invasive breast cancer (BC) in cohort studies (CS), case-control studies (CCS) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published 1989-2004. We used published data providing information upon unopposed estrogen therapy (ET), estrogen-progestin therapy (EPT) or all MHT combined. Major outcomes were MHT-associated overall risk of BC and change of risk per year used. There is a linear increase of overall risk by midterm year of case ascertainment based upon data of all study types for MHT and to a larger extent for EPT, not for ET. Effects are larger in CS than in CCS. Meta-analyses stratified by <1992 versus > or =1992 as midterm year of case ascertainment indicate larger summary risks for the latter period for all MHT analysed, in particular for EPT. Annual increases in BC risk for EPT across study types are 0-9%, for ET 0-3%. In conclusion, there is evidence that relative risks for BC risks by MHT, in particular EPT, have been increasing in recent years. Given the widespread use of MHT, and often long duration, more detailed knowledge about differential BC risks of both estrogens and progestins are necessary to minimize BC risk in symptomatic women who consider MHT.

Use of Oral Contraceptives, Alcohol, and Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer

The aim of our study was to examine how the use of oral contraceptives (OCs) interact with alcohol on breast cancer risk within the large prospective follow-up study, Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Between 1991 and 1997, women aged 30 to 70 years were drawn at random from the central person register and mailed an invitation. Follow-up information was collected throughout 2001 by linkage to national registries. Only women (n = 86,948) with complete information on alcohol consumption and duration of OC use were included in the present analysis. A total of 1,130 invasive breast cancers were diagnosed during 618,638 person-years of follow-up. Consumption of ≥10.0 g/d alcohol was associated with a breast cancer relative risk (95% confidence interval) of 1.69 (1.32-2.15), consistent with a linear relationship (P for trend &lt; 0.0001). Among alcohol consumers, an excess risk of breast cancer was observed for total duration of OC use only among women who consumed &lt;5 g/d alcohol (P for trend = 0.0009). We observed a negative interaction between duration of OC use and alcohol consumption effects (P for interaction = 0.01). After stratification on menopausal status, the association between high alcohol intake and breast cancer was more prominent among postmenopausal women than among premenopausal women (P for heterogeneity = 0.01). No interaction between alcohol and duration of OC use were significant after stratification on menopausal status. Our findings in conjunction with biological data imply that alcohol and OCs have antagonistic effects on breast cancer risk through a common pathway. Whether the interactive effect differs according to menopausal status remains unclear and needs further investigations.

The characteristics of malignant breast tumors in hormone replacement therapy users versus nonusers

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of breast cancer in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users vs. nonusers.

METHODS

We investigated the characteristics of all patients between the ages of 50 and 75 years with breast tumors. Then, an age-adjusted group of 55 nonusers was chosen to match and compare with HRT users.

RESULTS

Of the 243 patients available for evaluation, 55 (22.6%) used HRT. Disease stages in HRT users vs. nonusers were as follows: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 20% and 17.1%; stage I, 45.5% and 41.7%; stage II, 30.9% and 26.2%; stage III, 3.6% and 13.4%; and stage IV, 0% and 1.6% (P =.27). In the age-adjusted cohort, stages in nonusers were as follows: DCIS, 7.3%; stage I, 47.3%; stage II, 25.5%; stage III, 20%; and stage IV, 0% (P =.03). Tumor grades in HRT users vs. nonusers were as follows: grade I, 30.4% and 15.7%; grade II, 52.2% and 52.2%; and grade III, 17.4% and 32.1% (P =.035). Grades in cohort nonusers were as follows: I, 13.2%; II, 52.8%; and III, 34% (P =.05). In the invasive tumors, the positive estrogen receptor (ER) rates were 81.6% and 85.7% (P =.89); positive progesterone receptor (PR) rates were 53.1% and 54% (P =.95); and Her 2-neu positive rates were 18.4% and 17.6% (P =.95), respectively. No significant difference was found in intratumor DCIS, vascular invasion, and Ki-67 (P =.14,.9, and.79, respectively). The rate of lobular and favorable histological types was higher in the HRT user group: 26.6% vs. 15%.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast tumors in HRT users vs. nonusers were of a significantly lower stage and grade and accounted for a higher number of favorable histological types, but all other parameters were similar in the two groups.

Variability of breast cancer risk in observational studies of hormone replacement therapy: a meta-regression analysis

OBJECTIVES

A re-analysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies reported a significant 14% increase in the risk of breast cancer associated with the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Unlike randomized trials, these observational studies varied in design and methods. This study was conducted to explore the impact of study design factors on the rate ratio.

METHODS

We performed a meta-regression analysis of 39 epidemiological studies of HRT and breast cancer. The rate ratio of breast cancer associated with ever use of HRT was evaluated in relation to study design, study period, country, primary study objective, method of exposure measurement, age control, adjustment factors related to reproduction and menopause, and the presence of breast cancer surveillance. We used stepwise multiple regression analysis, weighted by the inverse of the variance of the logarithm of the rate ratio, to estimate ratios of rate ratios for these factors.

RESULTS

Exposure measured by personal interview and/or medical record review was associated with a 14% lower rate ratio estimate as compared with telephone interview or self-administered questionnaire (P = 0.018). Among studies that did not adjust for age at menopause, the rate ratio was 12% lower if the primary objective was HRT effect than not (P = 0.016), while it was 43% higher among studies that adjusted for age at menopause (P = 0.042). An index that included as six desirable design features, breast cancer surveillance, matching of controls, more reliable exposure information, adjustment for age at menopause and reproductive risk factors, and as primary objective the effect of HRT suggests that studies with none of these properties would lead to a rate ratio estimate of 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.29) while studies with all six properties would produce a rate ratio of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.83-1.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Design factors of epidemiological studies could be an alternative explanation for the reported 14% increase in the risk of breast cancer associated with the use of HRT.

Hormone Replacement Therapy and Lung Cancer Risk

PURPOSE

To date, there are few published data regarding the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and lung cancer risk. Therefore, we analyzed data regarding HRT use from a large case-control study designed to study genetic susceptibility to lung cancer to determine whether HRT affected risk of lung cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In a secondary analysis, we compared self-reported HRT use among 499 women with lung cancer and 519 healthy age-matched controls.

RESULTS

HRT use was associated with an overall reduced risk of 34% [odds ratio (OR), 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-0.89] of lung cancer, after adjusting for age, ethnicity, smoking status, education, body mass index, and menopausal status. The use of estrogen replacement therapy alone was associated with a 35% reduction in lung cancer risk (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.89) and the use of combination therapy (estrogen and progestin) was associated with a 39% reduction in lung cancer risk (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.92). HRT use was also associated with a statistically significantly reduced risk of lung cancer in current smokers (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.92), but the risk estimates were not statistically significant in never (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.37-1.40) or former smokers (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.46-1.15). In addition, as the cigarette pack-years increased among ever smokers, the protective effect diminished, so that light smokers appeared to benefit the most from HRT use. Decreased lung cancer risks were also evident when the data were stratified by age, ethnicity, and body mass index. The joint effects of HRT use and mutagen sensitivity suggest that HRT use modifies lung cancer risk for genetically susceptible women. HRT use was also associated with a lower risk of death and improved survival compared with the women not taking HRT. To provide a possible biological mechanism to explain our findings, we compared plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor I in users and nonusers, and demonstrated that HRT use was associated with statistically significantly lower insulin-like growth factor I levels for both cases and controls compared with non-HRT users.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest an association of HRT use with a decrease in lung cancer risk. However, there are several limitations to this secondary analysis, requiring that the data be viewed with caution, and confirmation is required in well-designed hypothesis driven studies. The biological role of HRT in lung cancer remains understudied, and only extensive research can yield new insights into the mechanisms underlying a protective effect of HRT for lung cancer.

Risk of breast cancer with progestins: critical assessment of current data

Whether progestins protect against the risk of breast cancer or enhance that risk has been a major area of controversy over the past several years. Observational studies have reported conflicting results and experimental studies examining whether progestins exert mitogenic or anti-mitogenic actions on breast tissue report divergent results. Based upon a wide range of animal, epidemiologic and clinical data, most investigators agree that estrogens contribute to the development of breast neoplasms. However, the additional effect of progestins on this risk has been the subject of substantial discussion and controversy. A variety of experiments have been carried out using human breast cancer cells grown in vitro and as xenografts in nude mice. These studies demonstrated both mitogenic and anti-mitogenic effects depending upon the precise experimental conditions. Two potential reasons for these differences include differential metabolism of progestins into inhibitory pregnenes or stimulatory 5-alpha-reduced pregnanes or the presence of a protein (GPR 30) which allows the anti-mitogenic effects of progestins to be manifest. Based upon the conflicting nature of the results in experimental studies, we believe that only data in patients provide substantial insight into the actions of progestins on the intact human breast. Studies have now demonstrated that cell proliferation and breast density is higher during the luteal than during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. In postmenopausal women, long-term exposure to estrogen plus a progestin results in a marked enhancement of proliferation of the terminal duct lobular units as well as in breast density. These data, taken together, provide substantial evidence that progestins are mitogenic on the human breast when given long term to postmenopausal women. To critically evaluate the observational studies regarding breast cancer risk from progestins, we developed a set of stringent criteria for acceptance of individual studies. Four of the five studies meeting these criteria reported a greater risk of breast cancer with combination estrogen/progestin regimens than with estrogen alone. More importantly, the first randomized, prospective, controlled trial of the risk of breast cancer with an estrogen/progestin combination (the Women's Health Initiative Study) has now been published. This study reported a 26% increased relative risk of breast cancer with the estrogen/progestin combination. Based upon these data, we believe that progestins do add to the risk of breast cancer over and above that imparted by estrogen alone. The attributable risk during use for 5 years or less is small but increases logarithmically during long-term use. The majority of data regarding progestins are derived from regimens using MPA. However, we conclude from our analysis that the burden of proof regarding progestins has now shifted. One must now prove that an estrogen/progestin combination is safe with respect to breast cancer rather than having to prove it harmful.

Modification of serum IGF-I, IGFBPs and SHBG levels by different HRT regimens

During the menopause, levels of SHBG, IGF-I and IGFBPs are significantly modified by the use of different HRT regimens.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of three different HRT regimens on serum levels of SHBG, IGF-I, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 in postmenopausal women.

METHODS

41 postmenopausal women requesting HRT were enrolled in the study. Subjects were divided in three groups according to the therapy assigned; Group A: estradiol 2 mg/day+cyproterone acetate 1 mg/day in a cyclic sequential regimen; Group B: estradiol hemihydrate 2 mg/day plus norethisterone acetate (NETA) 1 mg/day in a continuous combined regimen; Group C: estradiol hemihydrate 1 mg/day plus NETA 0.5 mg/day in a continuous combined regimen. Blood samples were drawn before the start of hormonal treatment and after 6 months of HRT. Levels of SHBG, IGF-I, IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 in the serum were measured by means of a specific immunoassay.

RESULTS

In group A, a significant increase of SHBG, no change of IGFBPs and a significant decrease of IGF-I were observed; in group B and in group C, no significant variations for any of the parameters were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of cyproterone acetate to oral estradiol determines a significant reduction of IGF-I levels and an increase of SHBG; nevertheless, it does not seem to influence the serum levels of the IGF-I binding proteins. The treatment with oral continuous combined estrogens plus androgenic progestins, at low doses, produces minor, not significant, changes in the circulating levels of IGF-I, SHBG and IGFBPs.

Progestins and breast cancer

The relationship between the use of menopausal hormone therapy (ERT, unopposed estrogen therapy; HRT, combined estrogen and progestin therapy) and the development of breast cancer remains controversial. Mechanistic studies examining progestins in human breast cancer cell lines have demonstrated a biphasic cellular response to progesterone; initial exposure to hormone results in a proliferative burst with sustained exposure resulting in growth inhibition. To date, there is no definitive evidence that progestins act in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. Epidemiologic studies have produced inconsistent results, and data from randomized, placebo-controlled trials are limited. Although recent results from the continuous combined therapy arm of the Women's Health Initiative trial showed a small increase in the risk of invasive breast cancer in women on therapy for 5 years or more, a clear consensus regarding the relationship between HRT and breast cancer risk cannot yet be drawn from existing data. Studies have consistently documented that HRT use is associated with improved mortality and survival rates for women with breast cancer. Large-scale, randomized studies on different progestin regimens are needed to critically assess the effect of progestin on breast cancer.

Breast cancer and post-menopausal hormone therapy

From the introduction of post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) there has been great concern that HRT could possibly increase the risk of breast cancer. Prolonged exposure to endogenous oestrogens undeniably increases the risk of breast cancer. Questions that are important and until now only partly answered, are the following. Are oestrogens tumour promoters, as they induce mitosis, lead to proliferation and, therefore, accelerated growth of clinically occult pre-existing tumours? In addition to this, are they genotoxic mutagenic carcinogens, or could they initiate tumours by way of accumulation of incessant DNA-replication damage mechanism? Opinions vary as to the effect of the addition of a progestogen. There is a multitude of different progestogens which could bind with differing affinity to progesterone receptor PR-A or PR-B, and which have different physiological functions via differential gene regulation. The action of a progestogen on the oestrogen-induced cellular mitotic activity could be synergistic or antagonistic (by different pathways: oestrogen receptor downregulation, activating of metabolic pathways within the breast or stimulation of apoptosis)? Over 60 observational studies and two randomized trials provide evidence that the small but significant increase in risk appears with long-term current post-menopausal hormone use. The addition of a progestogen does not decrease the risk as seen with oestrogens alone and might increase the risk further. It is not clear whether there is a difference in risk with sequentially combined versus continuously combined HRT. Many questions nevertheless still remain. Is the risk increase limited to lean women only? What about risk-modifying factors such as alcohol use and a positive family history for breast cancer? Are tumours detected under HRT less aggressive, is there a better prognosis and is the mortality not increased while morbidity is? And is HRT contraindicated for women with a positive family history for breast cancer or in those women who have been treated for breast cancer? And finally, are there alternative options for these women?

Role of progestogen in hormone therapy for postmenopausal women: position statement of The North American Menopause Society

OBJECTIVE

To create an evidence-based position statement regarding the role of progestogen in postmenopausal hormone therapy (estrogen plus a progestogen, or EPT) for the management of menopause-related symptoms.

DESIGN

NAMS followed the general principles established for evidence-based guidelines to create this document. Clinicians and researchers acknowledged to be experts in the field of postmenopausal hormone therapy were enlisted to review the evidence obtained from the medical literature and develop a position statement for approval by the NAMS Board of Trustees.

RESULTS

The primary role of progestogen in postmenopausal hormone therapy is endometrial protection. Unopposed estrogen therapy (ET) is associated with a significantly increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Adding the appropriate dose and duration of progestogen to ET has been shown to lower that risk to the level found in never-users of ET. The clinical goal of progestogen in EPT is to provide endometrial protection while maintaining estrogen benefits and minimizing progestogen-induced side effects, particularly uterine bleeding. EPT discontinuance correlates with uterine bleeding-women with more days of amenorrhea have higher rates of continuance. All US Food and Drug Administration-approved progestogen formulations will provide endometrial protection if the dose and duration are adequate. Progestogens may diminish the beneficial effects of ET on cardiovascular risk factors. However, no EPT (or ET) regimen should be initiated for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular heart disease. Some progestogens may negatively affect mood. Adding progestogen to ET does not decrease the breast cancer risk, although it does not seem to increase mortality. Progestogen increases mammographic density, which is reversed after discontinuation of use. Progestogen has limited effect on the bone-enhancing action of ET. In general, the side effects of added progestogen are mild, although they may be severe in a small percentage of women.

CONCLUSIONS

Progestogen should be added to ET for all postmenopausal women with an intact uterus to prevent the elevated risk of estrogen-induced endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. There is no consensus on a preferred regimen for all women. By changing the progestogen type, route, or regimen, clinicians can individualize therapy to minimize side effects, especially uterine bleeding, and limit any effects on ET benefits while providing adequate endometrial protection.

Estrogen and colon cancer: current issues

Carcinoma of the colon is common and its incidence varies according to the geographical location and dietary habits. The aims of this paper are, first, to review the current epidemiological data on the incidence and mortality of colon cancer in postmenopausal women using hormone replacement therapy (HRT); second, to review the published data on the prevalence of estrogen receptors in healthy and malignant colonic tissue; and third, to examine the available evidence of gene silencing as applicable to this and other neoplastic conditions. Estrogen use confers overall protection, with a reduction in the incidence of colon adenoma and carcinoma of about 30%. Estrogen use reduces the colon cancer-related mortality. The risk of colon cancer is decreased among current and recent users of postmenopausal HRT but the molecular mechanisms involved remain unclear. Estrogen acts either on a single major transformation step in the oncogenetic process, or is involved in multiple events that avert the course of this transformation. Aberrant methylation of the CpG islands in the promoter regions of the estrogen receptor gene, as well as of other genes, is equivalent to the silencing of that gene, with the consequence of inactivation, or reduced expression, of a number of genes downstream, including tumor suppressor genes. This epigenetic mechanism, when reversed, suppresses the growth of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. The ubiquitous distribution of the estrogen receptor genes and their isoforms, in a tissue-specific manner, opens new avenues for the understanding of cellular behavior in health and disease.

Norethisterone acetate in combination with estrogen: effects on the skeleton and other organs. A review

This article is focused on the use of norethisterone acetate as progestogen in hormone replacement therapy. Emphasis is made on the fact that the primary reason for adding a progestogen to hormone replacement therapy is to protect the endometrium against hyperplasia. In this paper we review data that demonstrate that hormone replacement therapy that includes norethisterone acetate has positive effects on the postmenopausal bone metabolism and that it increases bone mass more than expected and more than treatment with alendronate. All available evidence is reviewed to show that norethisterone acetate, if given in the correct dosage, does not influence serum lipids and lipoproteins in any negative way. It is furthermore shown that norethisterone acetate seems to be superior compared to other progestogens to provide optimum bleeding control and endometrial protection. Also, hormone replacement therapy combinations with norethisterone acetate efficiently alleviate hot flushes. Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer and the role of progestogens are discussed.

Hormone replacement therapy and breast carcinoma risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic women

BACKGROUND

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) alleviates menopausal symptoms and prevents osteoporosis, but there is concern that long-term use may have an adverse impact on breast carcinoma risk. Epidemiologic studies report inconsistent findings regarding the relationship between HRT and postmenopausal breast carcinoma risk and there is little information on the HRT-associated risk among minority women.

METHODS

To investigate the effects of HRT on breast carcinoma risk among Hispanic women, we examined data from the New Mexico Women's Health Study (NMWHS), a statewide case-control study comprising 366 postmenopausal women with breast carcinoma and 403 controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

After adjustment for sociodemographic, medical, and reproductive factors, we found an increased risk associated with long-term users of estrogen replacement therapy (ERT; OR for ERT use longer than 140 months was 2.57, 95%CI, 1.25-5.28, compared with ERT use shorter than 17 months). In addition, there was a positive trend with the duration of ERT use (P < 0.01). Hispanic postmenopausal women appeared to be at a significantly greater risk than non-Hispanic white women (OR for ERT use longer than 140 months in Hispanics was 5.53, 95%CI, 1.47-20.87; OR in non-Hispanics was 2.65, 95%CI, 0.95-7.34, compared with ERT use shorter than 17 months). In contrast, no significant association was observed for combined estrogen-progesterone use in either Hispanic or non-Hispanic women.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicated that postmenopausal women had significantly increased breast carcinoma risk for long-term ERT use. The risks among Hispanic women were substantially higher than among non-Hispanic white women although they were not statistically significant.

Hereditary Breast Cancer: Risk Assessment Is the Easy Part

Individuals who seek genetic testing to determine hereditary risk of breast cancer may not be aware that genetic testing is uninformative in many high-risk families or that they may be at increased risk of other cancers as well. Many mistakenly believe that current genetic testing provides definitive information about the magnitude of cancer risk to carriers. This article describes the assessment of hereditary risk by pedigree analysis, epidemiology, and genetic testing within the cancer risk assessment and counseling setting, and discusses other information that helps patients to make informed health care decisions. Because the risk of ovarian cancer is increased in many families at high risk of breast cancer, information about prophylactic oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy is essential. A case history is presented to show the efficacy of cancer risk assessment and counseling when genetic testing is uninformative.

Progesterone receptors--animal models and cell signalling in breast cancer. Implications for breast cancer of inclusion of progestins in hormone replacement therapies

Progestins are included in menopausal hormone replacement therapy to counteract the increased risk for endometrial cancer associated with estrogen replacement therapy. Studies of hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk and of changes in mammographic density according to different regimens of hormone replacement therapy suggest that, for the most part, estrogen-progestin replacement therapy has a more adverse effect on breast cancer risk than does estrogen replacement therapy. Many questions remain unresolved, however, including risk associated with different regimens of estrogen-progestin replacement therapy, and whether the effects vary according to tumor characteristics, such as histology, extent of disease, and hormone receptor status.

Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: putting the risk into perspective

Data on hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk come from a number of observational studies (mostly American studies). Those published up to 1995 were reanalyzed by the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (CGHFBC). They involved populations where exceedingly high estrogen doses were used as first-line therapy, and a progestin was added in a minority of women. Overall, the CGHFBC reanalysis found that the relative risk increased by 0.023 for each year of use (with an absolute excess risk of two or six cases out of 1000 women treated for 5 or 10 years, respectively). Further American studies, published in 2000 and involving populations where lower doses were used, showed a risk increase of 0.01 per year of estrogen-only use. Both the CGHFBC reanalysis and the further studies did not find an increase of risk in treated overweight women. Possibly, overweight women already have a maximal estrogenic stimulus on the breast due to extraglandular estrogen production. An additional explanation could be that oral estrogens, through their hepatocellular effects, reverse some biological features of obesity (e.g. decreased sex hormone binding globulin level and increased insulin-like growth factor-I bioactivity) that potentially increase breast cancer risk, so balancing the estrogen stimulation. The CGHFBC reanalysis did not show a substantial difference in breast cancer risk between the majority using estrogen alone and the small minority using estrogen plus progestin. Conversely, Swedish studies and the recent American studies suggest that the risk increase could be higher with the addition of a progestin, compared with estrogen-only use. The biological effect of progesterone/progestins on the breast tissue is controversial. Even if the observed increase in risk could be partially ascribed to non-progesterone-like effects of some progestins (e.g. opposing the hepatocellular effects of oral estrogens) and also (in the American studies) to use-bias, a detrimental action due to progesterone-like effects cannot be excluded. However, the theoretical possibility exists that low doses of oral estrogens, plus a progestin providing progesterone-like effects only, will be shown to be associated with a limited breast cancer risk increase.

The wisdom of hormone-replacement therapy in survivors of ovarian and endometrial cancer

This article reviews the relationship between estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the development of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancers. The wisdom of HRT in survivors of ovarian and endometrial cancers is reviewed by critically analyzing recent data. Because of methodological limitations in the reported studies, there are no definite data to support the safety of ERT and HRT in survivors of ovarian or endometrial cancer.

Media coverage of women's health issues: is there a bias in the reporting of an association between hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer?

Media coverage of scientific research plays a major role in shaping public opinion and influencing medical practice. When an association is controversial, such as with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and breast cancer, it is important that a balanced picture of the scientific literature be reported. The objective of this study was to assess whether scientific publications that do and do not support an HRT/breast cancer association were cited in the media in proportions similar to those with which they appear in the scientific literature. Scientific publications reporting on the HRT/breast cancer association published from January 1, 1995, to June 30, 2000, were identified through a systematic Medline search. Media reports from newspapers, magazines, television, and radio that reported on HRT and breast cancer were retrieved from an online database. Investigators independently recorded characteristics of the scientific publications and media reports. A total of 32 scientific publications were identified: 20 (62.5%) concluded there was an increased risk of breast cancer associated with HRT (positive publications), and 12 (37.5%) concluded there was no evidence for an association (null publications). Nearly half (47%) of the scientific publications were not cited by the media. There were 203 media citations of scientific publications: 82% were of positive publications and 18% were of null publications, representing a significant excess of citations of positive publications (p < 0.01). Media coverage of this controversial issue is based on a limited sample of the scientific publications. Moreover, the excess of media citations for positive scientific publications suggests a bias against null scientific publications.

Postmenopausal hormone use, screening, and breast cancer: characterization and control of a bias

Previous investigators have suggested that screening-related biases may explain associations between postmenopausal hormone use and breast cancer. To investigate these biases, we studied postmenopausal women in the Nurses' Health Study from 1988 to 1994. Hormone use is associated with increased subsequent screening. Among women not screened in the previous 2 years, the probability difference, comparing current hormone users with others, for having mammography in the following 2 years is 19.5%; among women previously screened, the difference is 4.9%. These differences persist after control for other factors. If the increase in screening is causal, screening by mammogram could be intermediate in the causal pathway to breast cancer diagnosis. To deal with this problem, we restrict attention to a subset of the cohort in which the effect of postmenopausal hormone use on screening is small (women previously screened). In this subset, the rate ratio comparing breast cancer rates among current postmenopausal hormone users with others is 1.28. In a sensitivity analysis, the bias could not by itself plausibly account for the associations in our data. Our data provide evidence of an association between postmenopausal hormone use and breast cancer that is not solely the product of a detection bias.

High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Mammographic parenchymal patterns are of particular interest because the denser patterns reduce screening sensitivity as well as increasing breast cancer risk, and because they have been shown to be affected by exogenous oestrogens.

METHODS

We designed a case-control study comprising 200 cases with high-risk (P2 and DY) pattern and 200 controls with low-risk (N1 and P1) pattern. Mammograms were evaluated according to the Wolfe classification.

RESULTS

Parity, body mass index (BMI) and current smoking were inversely and independently associated, whereas late age of menarche and history of benign breast disease were positively associated with high-risk mammographic patterns. Current-users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) were more than twice as likely to have a high-risk pattern than never-users (OR = 2.48, 95% CI : 1.32-4.61). Women who used HRT for more than 5 years were almost three times more likely to have a high-risk pattern than never-users (OR = 2.77, 95% CI : 1.11-6.91). Relative to never-users, women who started HRT before the menopause were more than twice as likely to have a high-risk pattern (OR = 2.53, 95% CI : 1.31-4.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Careful clinical and mammographical follow-up might be appropriate in women undergoing HRT. The HRT-induced mammographic pattern might be regarded as a new baseline and changes with respect to this new pattern could then be monitored over time.

Hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of lobular and ductal breast carcinoma in middle-aged women

BACKGROUND

In the majority of studies, long term, recent use of hormone replacement therapy has been associated with an increased risk of breast carcinoma. However, little attention has been paid to the possibility that the magnitude of this association may vary according to the histologic type of breast carcinoma.

METHODS

In this population-based case-control study, interviews were conducted with 537 female residents of King County, Washington who were ages 50-64 years and who had been diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma between January 1, 1988 and June 30, 1990. Interviews with 492 randomly selected King County women without a history of breast carcinoma served as a basis for comparison. Analyses were performed separately for women with lobular and for those with ductal tumors.

RESULTS

Compared with nonusers of menopausal hormones, those who currently were using combined estrogen and progestin hormone replacement therapy (CHRT) and had done so for at least 6 months had an elevated risk of lobular breast carcinoma (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.1-5.8), but no change in their risk of ductal breast carcinoma was noted (OR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1. 1). The OR associated with current use of unopposed estrogen for at least 6 months was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.5-3.9) for lobular tumors and 0.7 (95% CI, 0.4-1.1) for ductal tumors. Similar results were found when cases of invasive tumor were analyzed separately.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that CHRT use increases the risk of lobular, but not ductal, breast carcinoma in middle-aged women.

Menopausal hormones and breast cancer in a biracial population

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the association between menopausal hormones and breast cancer in a biracial population.

METHODS

Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for breast cancer associated with hormone use among 397 cases and 425 controls, all menopausal women.

RESULTS

Odds ratios for ever use of hormones were 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5, 1.2) for White women and 0.7 (95% CI = 0.4, 1.2) for Black women. Risk was not increased with longer duration of use or more recent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer risk was not increased among White or Black women who used menopausal hormones, despite patterns of use varying considerably between races.

Mammographic density changes in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: is effect of hormone replacement therapy predictable?

BACKGROUND

Mammographic density adversely affects diagnostic accuracy and may be a risk factor for breast cancer. Mammographic density is affected by hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

OBJECTIVE

To assess mammographic density in postmenopausal women with and without HRT.

METHOD

Part I. Mammographic density was determined in 1232 postmenopausal women attending a breast screening clinic. Density was compared between HRT users and nonusers in three age groups. When available, previous mammograms were assessed for interval density change. Part II. Density change in 162 women during transition from premenopause to postmenopause was recorded. HRT effect was assessed.

RESULTS

Part I. There was no density difference between postmenopausal HRT-users and nonusers younger than age 55. Thereafter, the density was significantly less in nonusers. In the majority of HRT-users the density remained at pretreatment levels but density increased in 8% of women after HRT was started. Part II. Of 117 HRT nonusers followed over menopause 38% had a density decrease before age 55. Of those started on HRT, 80% had no density change, 18% decreased density and 2% increased density.

CONCLUSIONS

The density decreases significantly after age 55 with the greatest change occurring between age 55 and 64. This decrease does not occur in the majority of HRT-users. Usually HRT maintains the density present at the time HRT is started. Density decreases after HRT is started in some women suggesting refractoriness to hormones. In fewer than 8% of women density increases commensurate with HRT. Any adverse effect of HRT may depend on the receptivity of the epithelial elements which, in turn, may be reflected by the mammographic density at the time HRT is started.

HRT and breast cancer risk: a clue for interpreting the available data

Epidemiological and biological data on HRT and breast cancer risk are reviewed. Some aspects deserve consideration. (1) The majority of epidemiological data have been gathered from populations where high estrogen doses (> or = 1.25 mg daily of conjugated estrogens) were used as first line therapy. (2) HRT does not increase the risk in overweight women, even in the series in which a risk increase (in longterm users) is found. This could be as a result of the fact that oral estrogens, through their metabolic and hepatocellular effects, reverse some biological features of obesity (e.g. increased insulin-like growth factor I activity and decreased sex hormone binding globulin level) which potentially increase breast cancer risk, so balancing the estrogen stimulation. (3) The progestin addition seems to increase the risk when the 19 nor-testosterone derivatives are used. These androgenic compounds contrast the metabolic and hepatocellular effects of oral estrogens. To sum up, the possibility does exist that even the longterm use of oral estrogens at the right ('low') dose, with the addition of a non-androgenic progestin, will be shown to be associated with a very limited breast cancer risk increase.

Postmenopausal hormone replacement in the woman with a reproductive risk factor for breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

to assess the interaction between postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and various reproductive risk factors for breast cancer such as early menarche, late menopause, late first delivery and nulliparity.

DESIGN

three cohort studies and fourteen case control studies, published between 1975 and 1997, provided relative risks (RRs) of HRT use in women with, as well as in those without, a reproductive risk factor for breast cancer.

METHODS

using an additive RR model reported before, we investigated whether the RR for breast cancer in women with a combination of HRT and a given reproductive risk factor result from a simple addition of RRs of HRT on the one hand, and of the pre-existing reproductive risk factor on the other hand, or that synergism between both risk factors occurs.

RESULTS

simple addition of RRs was shown in the case of early menarche and late menopause. Less increase of risk, suggesting antagonism, was found for both late first delivery and nulliparity in combination with HRT use.

CONCLUSION

we could not observe any synergistic effect of the combined risks of any of the following reproductive risk factors for breast cancer: early menarche, late menopause, late first delivery or nulliparity on the one hand, with the risk resulting from HRT use on the other hand. Therefore, as far as the risk of breast cancer is concerned, the use of HRT appears not to be highly detrimental in women with a reproductive breast cancer risk factor, as it results in not more than a simple addition of risks at the most.

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer risk in a nationally representative cohort

BACKGROUND

The relative risk of breast cancer associated with the use of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) continues to be debated. We used a nationally representative cohort to study the issue.

METHODS

This analysis utilized data from the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Subjects were interviewed in 1971 through 1974 and four waves of follow-up interviews were conducted through 1992. Survival analysis of 5,761 postmenopausal women provided estimates of the relative risk of breast cancer in users of HRT when compared with non-users, controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

There were 219 incident cases of breast cancer in 73,253 person-years of follow-up. The incidence rate was 326 per 100,000 person-years in women who had never used HRT and 255 per 100,000 in women who had ever used HRT. There was no statistically significant association between the HRT use and subsequent development of breast cancer: relative risk (RR) = 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.6, 1.1. There was no trend in RR by length of HRT use: less than 3 years HRT use, RR = 0.9; 3 to 9 years , RR = 0.5; 10 or more years, RR = 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, based on a nationally representative cohort followed for up to 22 years, failed to find an increased risk of breast cancer associated with the use of HRT. It provides further evidence that if there is an increased risk of breast cancer associated with HRT use, this risk is small.

Predictors of breast cancer in women recalled following screening

BACKGROUND

Established risk factors are associated with between 25 and 56% of breast cancer cases, but the relative importance and relevance to different age groups is unclear.

METHODS

This case-control study examines established risk factors in 298 women with breast cancer and 1926 women without breast cancer aged 40-87 who were recalled for assessment following routine mammography.

RESULTS

The cancer group were significantly older than the non-cancer group (F1,222 = 107.6; P < 0.0001). Postmenopausal obesity increased the odds of developing breast cancer (OR: 2.35; CI: 1.33-4.16). The breast cancer group were more likely to have used oral contraceptives (OR: 1.50; CI: 1.09-2.05), and women who used contraceptives for more than 10 years in total were at the highest risk (OR: 1.73; CI: 1.13-2.65). Daily consumption of alcohol was also associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer (OR: 1.62; CI: 1.13-2.33). Reproductive factors and a family history of breast cancer did not affect the odds of developing breast cancer and the reasons for these findings are explored.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the effects of weight reduction in reducing postmenopausal breast cancer risk should be assessed.