Recurrent serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register

Pneumococcal vaccine uptake in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a single centre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines recommend pneumococcal vaccination in individuals who are over the age of 65 or are immunosuppressed due to a disease or treatment. The objective of this study was to assess vaccine uptake rates in people with inflammatory arthritis for the pneumococcal, influenza and Covid-19 vaccines and factors determining uptake.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single centre cohort study in the UK of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis between October and December 2023. Data were collected for age, gender, co-morbidities, immunosuppressive therapies and dates of vaccines. Logistic regression was used to evaluate predictors of vaccine uptake, with adjustments for demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and six individuals were identified; 46% were receiving treatment with conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD), 26% were on biologic monotherapy, and 23% were on both biologic and csDMARDs. Three hundred and sixteen individuals (35%) received a pneumococcal vaccine, lower than uptake for influenza (63%) and Covid-19 (87%) vaccines. Predictors of pneumococcal vaccine uptake included age, with older patients more likely to be vaccinated (odds ratio [OR] for age ≥ 65 years: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.21, 2.29). Those on biologic therapy demonstrated higher likelihood of vaccination (OR for biologic therapy: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.33, 2.47). Additional Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation Green Book indicators also positively influenced vaccine uptake (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.33).

CONCLUSION

Pneumococcal vaccine uptake in inflammatory rheumatic diseases is low, especially in younger patients and those not on biologic therapy. The study highlights the need for a focused approach, distinct from strategies for other vaccines, to address this public health challenge.

Development and validation of a prediction model for serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To develop a prediction model for serious infections (SIs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab in Japan and to evaluate the model's performance compared to previously developed models, i.e., 'DANBIO' and 'postmarketing surveillance' (PMS).

METHOD

This non-interventional retrospective cohort study utilized the Medical Data Vision database in Japan. The study population was derived from patients ≥ 18 years with RA who initiated tocilizumab between April 2008 and July 2021. SIs were assessed during the 1-year follow-up from tocilizumab initiation. The candidate predictors were identified based on previous studies, known risk factors, potentially relevant factors, and data availability. The prediction model was developed using logistic regression. The model's performance was compared with previously developed models using cross-entropy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of the 6501 RA patients, 4.57% experienced SIs during the 1-year follow-up. The model included 17 predictors for SI (e.g., age (odds ratio 1.013 (95% confidence interval 1.002-1.024)), history of SIs (2.569 (1.636-3.745)), diverticulitis (2.183 (1.000-3.989))). The model showed a lower cross-entropy and a higher AUC (0.1488; 0.712) compared to DANBIO (0.1932; 0.591) and PMS (0.1561; 0.565) models, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value using 5% threshold were 72%, 64%, 7%, and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The model developed in this study seems to have the potential to inform the risk of SIs in RA patients treated with tocilizumab and may help the early identification of patients at risk of SIs to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Severe Respiratory Infections in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: An Observational Study of 528 Patients from a Single University Hospital

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of infections. This may be linked to disease-related factors, immunosuppressive therapy and the presence of comorbidities. Background/Objectives: In an unselected group of RA patients, our aims were to assess the following: (a) the incidence and (b) features of diseases and (c) the predictive factors of severe respiratory infection (SRI). Methods: An observational and retrospective study of all patients with RA included in the vaccination program of our hospital between October 2011 and October 2018 was conducted. The follow-up continued until December 2020. Patients with SRI, defined as those that required hospitalization or at least one dose of intravenous antibiotic treatment in the emergency room, were (a) compared with those not requiring hospital admission and (b) studied for predictive factors of SRI (multivariate analysis adjusted for age and sex). The vaccination program in our hospital includes vaccination against influenza, S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Information on the patients, infections and hospitalizations was retrospectively retrieved from the hospital and general physician records. Results: We studied 528 RA patients (409 women/119 men) with a mean age of 58.9 ± 13.2 years. A total of 55 patients (10.4%) suffered 89 SRIs. The median [IQR] number of hospitalizations per patient was 1.5 [1-2]. Patients with an SRI were older, had had RA for longer and had more comorbidities (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and interstitial lung disease). These patients had more ACPA positivity, more extra-articular manifestations and high disease activity at the time of their vaccination. Treatment with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and leflunomide was seen in a higher number of patients. Predictive factors for SRI were age; time of evolution of RA; associated comorbidities, especially hypertension and diabetes; extra-articular manifestations, especially interstitial lung disease; and treatment with glucocorticoids, methotrexate and leflunomide. Conclusions: Despite being included in a vaccination program, about 10% of our patients required hospitalization due to an SRI. The main predictive factors were certain comorbidities, interstitial lung disease and treatment with glucocorticoids. Predicting SRI in RA patients remains an unmet need.

Decreased in-hospital mortality in shock patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to those without: a retrospective analysis of a critical care database

Inflammatory response is a natural protective response in infection or injury. The immune imbalance of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and the use of anti-rheumatic immune drugs may affect the inflammatory response process of shock. The evidence of the impact of RA on short-time mortality in shock patients is limited. This study was a retrospective observational study from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV). Patients diagnosed with shock were selected from the database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between RA and in-hospital mortality. Subgroup analysis of the association between in-hospital mortality and RA was performed in septic shock, cardiogenic shock, and other types of shock. A total of 8233 ICU patients with shock were identified. After adjusting for confounding variables, RA was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.91). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that RA was associated with a decreased risk of in-hospital death in the septic shock group but not in cardiogenic shock or other types of shock. RA was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital death in shock patients. This association was only observed in septic shock but not in cardiogenic shock and other types of shock. Key Points • Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with shock, particularly in those with septic shock. • This study utilized propensity score matching to accurately compare outcomes between RA and non-RA shock patients, ensuring balanced baseline characteristics. • Findings suggest that the immune modulation inherent to RA or the impact of anti-rheumatic drugs might influence the survival outcomes in shock scenarios. • The protective effect of RA on in-hospital mortality was not observed in patients with cardiogenic shock or other types of shock, indicating a specific interaction in septic shock contexts.

National Analysis of Preexisting Immunosuppressive Conditions and Infection-Related Readmissions Among Sepsis Survivors

BACKGROUND

Recurrent episodes of infection and subsequent sepsis are a frequent cause of readmission after sepsis hospitalization. Although persistent immune dysregulation initiated during the sepsis episode may play a role, the impact of preexisting immune suppression (including HIV, organ transplantation, and cancer) and common chronic diseases associated with immune suppression (diabetes and chronic kidney disease) on the risk of recurrent infections after sepsis is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of preexisting immune-suppressive conditions (PISCs) and other common chronic diseases on infection-related readmissions after a sepsis admission.

METHODS

Using the US 2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified a retrospective cohort of adult patients with an unplanned sepsis index admission from April to September, excluding patients with sepsis during the preceding 90 days. We followed all sepsis survivors for subsequent infection-related admissions for 90 days. We identified clinical conditions using International Classification of Diseases coding.

RESULTS

We identified 649 029 unique unplanned sepsis admissions over 6 months; 189 604 (29.2%) had sepsis with PISC, and 459 425 (70.8%) had sepsis without PISC. Overall, sepsis survivors were older (median age, 70 years), and 145 156 (22.4%) experienced at least 1 infection-related readmission within 90 days. The incidence of infection-related readmission among sepsis survivors with PISC was 26.1%, whereas it was 20.8% for those without PISC. The excess risk of infection-related readmissions attributed to PISC was 5.3%, whereas the excess risk attributed to diabetes and chronic kidney disease was 3.7% and 4.7%, respectively. The background risk attributed to new-onset sepsis among participants with none of these conditions was 16.3%. Multivariable regression analysis adjusting for age, gender, and acute illness factors indicated that odds of infection-related readmission were strongly associated with PISC (odds ratio 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.32), closely followed by chronic kidney disease (1.28 [1.27-1.32]) and diabetes (1.17 [1.16-1.19]).

CONCLUSION

The risk of subsequent infection is higher among patients with PISC, although chronic kidney disease and diabetes are also important risk factors for subsequent infection and sepsis readmissions.

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions, and adverse drug reactions among systemic sclerosis patients: A cross-sectional risk factor study

OBJECTIVES

Polypharmacy, drug-drug interactions (DDI) and related adverse drug reaction (ADR) are understudied in SSc. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence and determinants of DDI and ADR in a real-life prospective cohort of SSc patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the drug prescriptions of SSc patients admitted to the daily scleroderma clinic between January 2020 and April 2022. DDI were identified using 2 prescription analysis applications, and adjudicated related ADRs occurring during a one-year follow-up were reported. Risk factors for DDI and ADR were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight SSc patients were included. The median number of medications per patient was 6 [4-9]. Seventy-one (65.7 %) patients had 5 or more medications, and 23 (21.3 %) had 10 or more. Seventy-two (66.7 %) patients had DDIs on their prescriptions at inclusion. Patients with DDIs had more medications than patients without DDIs (7 [5-10] versus 3 [2-5], p < 0.0001). Six (8.3) patients experienced ADRs during the one-year follow-up. Patients with ADRs had more medications (14 [10-18] versus 7 [5-10] p < 0.001) and more DDIs (12 [7-32] versus 3 [1-6]; p < 0.001) than patients without ADRs. Multivariate analysis confirmed that the number of prescribed medications was independently positively associated with DDIs (OR: 2.25 [1.52-3.32], p < 0.0001) as well as with ADRs (OR: 1.68 [1.17-2.40], p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SSc patients are significantly exposed to polypharmacy, DDIs and related ADRs, particularly in cases of severe illness, and especially if 5 or more medications are prescribed.

[Influence of underlying disease and immunosuppression on the immunocompetence in inflammatory rheumatic diseases]

Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have a higher risk of infections in comparison to the general population. For this patient group, in addition to cardiovascular diseases, infections play an important role with respect to morbidity and mortality. Even if it is difficult to make concrete statements with respect to individual diseases, it can be assumed that there is a lower risk of infections in inflammatory joint diseases in comparison to connective tissue diseases and vasculitides. The increased risk of infections is determined by multiple factors, whereby the underlying factors are classified into three main categories: patient-related factors (age, comorbidities, lifestyle), disease-related factors (immunological dysfunction as part of the disease pathophysiology) and drug-related factors (type and dosage of the immunosuppression and/or immunomodulation). An improved understanding of the complexity of these associations enables the optimization of treatment and disease control taking the individual risk factors into account, with the aim of a significant reduction in the risk of infections.

Polypharmacy prevalence and associated factors in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A single-centre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

This single-centre cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing the medical records and questionnaire data of 261 systemic lupus erythematosus patients at a teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as the regular administration of five or more oral medications; excessive polypharmacy consisted of the regular use of 10 or more oral medications. This study investigated (1) the prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, (2) the distribution of medication types, and (3) the factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients who exhibited polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 70% and 19%, respectively. Polypharmacy was associated with older age, long duration of systemic lupus erythematosus, high disease activity, and administration of glucocorticoids or immunosuppressive agents. Excessive polypharmacy was associated with a higher updated Charlson comorbidity index, history of visits to multiple internal medicine clinics, and presence of public assistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus are related to medical aspects such as disease severity and comorbidities in addition to social aspects such as hospital visitation patterns and economic status.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a single-centre, cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify factors associated with polypharmacy, including social aspects, among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We conducted this single-centre, cross-sectional study at a 715-bed regional tertiary care teaching hospital in Japan from 1 September to 30 November 2020. Polypharmacy was defined as having five or more medications administered orally regularly, and excessive polypharmacy was defined as having 10 or more medications administered orally regularly. The prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy, distribution of medication types, and factors associated with polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were investigated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

RESULTS

The proportions of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were 61% and 15%, respectively, in 991 patients. Polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy were associated with older age (odds ratio, 1.03 and 1.03, respectively), high Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (odds ratio, 1.45 and 2.03, respectively), medication with glucocorticoids (odds ratio, 5.57 and 2.42, respectively), high Charlson comorbidity index (odds ratio, 1.28 and 1.36, respectively), and a history of hospitalisation in internal medicine (odds ratio, 1.92 and 1.87, respectively) and visits to other internal medicine clinics (odds ratio, 2.93 and 2.03, respectively). Moreover, excessive polypharmacy was associated with the presence of public assistance (odds ratio, 3.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy are associated with a history of hospitalisation and glucocorticoid medication in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, medications during hospitalisation should be monitored, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued. Key points • The proportion of polypharmacy (five or more medications administered orally regularly) was 61%. • The proportion of excessive polypharmacy (10 or more medications administered orally regularly) was 15%. • Medications during hospitalisation should be reviewed and examined, and glucocorticoids should be discontinued.

Chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in a general population sample

Chronic comorbid conditions are common in adults with asthma, and some may influence a patient's asthma exacerbation risk. We explored associations between eighteen chronic comorbid conditions and asthma exacerbation occurrence in adults with asthma in a cross-sectional study nested within a cohort study using data from the two-yearly US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program. Data of 2387 adults with self-reported doctor-diagnosed current asthma from the 2007 to 2018 NHANES surveys were selected. Investigated chronic comorbidities were: angina pectoris; congestive heart failure; coronary heart disease; depression; diabetes mellitus; soft and hard drug use; gastroesophageal reflux; gout; history of heart attack; history of stroke; hypercholesterolemia; hypertension; kidney failure; liver conditions; obesity; rheumatoid arthritis; and thyroid problems. Outcome was defined as asthma exacerbation category: no, moderate, or severe exacerbation(s) in the past year. Ordinal logistic regression analysis with correction for potential confounders was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for moderate or severe exacerbations. Observed associations with increased severe asthma exacerbation occurrence were: obesity (OR = 1.67; 95% confidence interval 1.24, 2.26), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.55; 1.04, 2.30). History of stroke (OR = 1.95; 1.22, 3.11) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 1.33; 1.00, 1.75) showed associations with increased moderate exacerbation occurrence. Age-stratified analysis showed soft drug use, obesity, depression, thyroid problems, and rheumatoid arthritis to be associated with moderate and/or severe exacerbation occurrence in one or more 10-year age strata. In conclusion, several chronic comorbid conditions were associated with asthma exacerbation occurrence, which confirms but also complements previous studies. Our observations contribute to understanding exacerbation risk estimation and, ultimately, personalized asthma management.

Serious Infection Rates Among Patients with Select Autoimmune Conditions: A Claims-Based Retrospective Cohort Study from Taiwan and the USA

INTRODUCTION

Serious infections are an important concern for patients with autoimmune conditions. We sought to estimate serious infection rates among patients with select autoimmune conditions relative to the general population in Taiwan and the USA.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study estimated setting-specific standardized serious infection incidence rates and ratios among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, including extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, rheumatoid arthritis and primary membranous nephropathy, compared with the general population using insurance claims for hospitalizations between 2000 and 2013. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for serious infections, adjusting for age, sex, index year, prior serious infection, comorbidities and medications.

RESULTS

In Taiwan, serious infection rates were 22.7, 28.7, 70.6, 43.4 and 215.3 per 1000 person-years among the general population and among cohorts of patients with primary membranous nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, respectively. In the USA, serious infection rates were 2.6, 9.0, 15.6, 21.0 and 63.3 per 1000 person-years among the general population and among cohorts of patients with primary membranous nephropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, extra-renal lupus and lupus nephritis, respectively. Patients had significantly higher serious infection rates than the general population in both settings, largely driven by bacterial, respiratory, urinary tract and opportunistic infections. Patients with lupus nephritis had the highest burden of serious infections relative to the general population, with 7- to 25-fold higher adjusted hazard ratios in Taiwan and the USA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a significant excess serious infection burden among patients with targeted autoimmune conditions compared with the general populations in Taiwan and the USA.

The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Biologic (bDMARD) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARD) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have broadened the treatment options and are increasingly used for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). These agents block different pro-inflammatory cytokines or specific intracellular signaling pathways that promote inflammation and can place patients at risk of serious infections. We aimed to review the incidence of opportunistic infections (OIs) in patients with PsA who were treated with these agents.

Methods: We searched PubMed and EMBASE through 14 April 2022 for randomized clinical trials evaluating bDMARD or tsDMARD in the treatment of PsA. Trials were eligible if they compared the effect of a bDMARD or tsDMARD with placebo and provided safety data. We used the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the risk of bias among trials, and stratified the studies by mechanism of action (MOA) of the agents studied.

Results: We included 47 studies in this analysis. A total of 17,197 patients received at least one dose of an agent of interest. The cumulative incidence of OIs by MOA was as follows: 1) JAK inhibitors: 2.72% (95% CI: 1.05%–5.04%), 2) anti-IL-17: 1.18% (95% CI: 0.60%–1.9%), 3) anti-IL-23: 0.24% (95% CI: 0.04%–0.54%), and 4) anti-TNFs: 0.01% (95% CI: 0.00%–0.21%). Based on their MOA, these agents are known to increase the risk of certain serious infections. The cumulative incidence of herpes zoster infection following treatment with JAK inhibitors (JAKi) was 2.53% (95% CI: 1.03%–4.57%) and the cumulative incidence of opportunistic Candida spp. infections following treatment with anti-IL-17, was 0.97% (95% CI: 0.51%–1.56%).

Conclusion: The overall incidence of OIs among patients with PsA who were treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents is low. However, careful monitoring is warranted for specific OIs such as herpes zoster infection following JAKi treatment, mucocutaneous candidiasis following anti-IL-17 treatment, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection following anti-TNF treatment.

Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

Polypharmacy is commonly associated with adverse health outcomes. There are currently no meta-analyses of the prevalence of polypharmacy or factors associated with polypharmacy. We aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies with no restrictions on date. We included observational studies that reported on the prevalence of polypharmacy among individuals over age 19. Two reviewers extracted study characteristics including polypharmacy definitions, study design, setting, geography, and participant demographics. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scales. The main outcome was the prevalence of polypharmacy and factors associated with polypharmacy prevalence. The pooled prevalence estimates of polypharmacy with 95% confidence intervals were determined using random effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to evaluate factors associated with polypharmacy such as polypharmacy definitions, study setting, study design and geography. Meta-regression was conducted to assess the associations between polypharmacy prevalence and study year.

Results

106 full-text articles were identified. The pooled estimated prevalence of polypharmacy in the 54 studies reporting on polypharmacy in all medication classes was 37% (95% CI: 31-43%). Differences in polypharmacy prevalence were reported for studies using different numerical thresholds, study setting, and publication year. Sex, study geography, study design and geographical location were not associated with differences in polypharmacy prevalence.

Discussion

Our review highlights that polypharmacy is common particularly among older adults and those in inpatient settings. Clinicians should be aware of populations who have an increased likelihood of experiencing polypharmacy and efforts should be made to review the appropriateness of prescribed medications and occurrence of adverse effects potentially associated with polypharmacy.

Conclusions and implications

Clinicians should be aware of the common occurrence of polypharmacy and undertake efforts to minimize inappropriate polypharmacy whenever possible.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03279-x.

Drug Survival of Biologic Therapy in Elderly Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared With Nonelderly Patients: Results From the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry

OBJECTIVE

Although the proportion of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is increasing, the persistency of biologic therapy in elderly patients requires additional investigation. This study evaluated the drug survival of biologic therapy and associated factors in elderly compared with nonelderly patients.

METHODS

This longitudinal observational study included RA patients who were enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry (NCT01965132, started from January 1, 2013) between 2013 and 2015. We compared the retention rate of biologic therapy between elderly (age ≥70 years) and nonelderly (age <70 years) patients, and investigated the causes and predictors of biologic withdrawal in both groups.

RESULTS

Of 682 patients, 122 were aged 70 years or older. The retention rate of biologic therapy at 24 months was 57.8% and 46.5% in nonelderly and elderly patients, respectively (p = 0.027). Biologic withdrawal due to adverse events and inefficacy within 24 months was not significantly different between the 2 groups, although adverse events were more common in elderly patients (20.6% vs 12.8%, p = 0.360). Drug withdrawal due to patient refusal was more common in elderly patients (9.8% vs 1.8%, p < 0.001). In elderly patients, biologic withdrawal was associated with current smoking and older age at disease onset, whereas the use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, nonuse of methotrexate, and combination of corticosteroid were important in nonelderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly RA patients are more likely to discontinue biologic agents within 24 months. To increase the retention rate of biologic therapy, rheumatologists should consider patient characteristics before and during biologic therapy.

Are patients with rheumatic diseases on immunosuppressive therapies protected against preventable infections? A cross-sectional cohort study

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of infections, prevalence of hospitalisation due to infections, the vaccination status and perceived screening of infections prior to the start of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) of a patient cohort with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD).

Methods

Consecutive CIRD patients reporting to our specialised centre were prospectively included (n=975) in this cross-sectional study. Data on comorbidities including infections, treatment, vaccination status, screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and hepatitis B (HepB) were collected. Antibodies against measles and HepB were measured by ELISA. The vaccination status was assessed by a predefined vaccination score (0–26) categorising patients into four immunisation states: low (0–6), moderate (7–13), good (14–20), high (21–26).

Results

All patients on bDMARDs (n=499) were screened for LTBI, and 469 for HepB (94%). All LTBI patients (n=16) received isoniazid (3.2%) and 16 chronic HepB patients received lamivudine (3.4%). Protective measles specific IgG-antibodies were found in 901 patients (92.4%). Although 629 patients were educated about vaccination strategies (64.5%), only 540 showed a vaccination card (55.4%). Only 49% of patients had undergone pneumococcal vaccination and less than 30% were protected against HepB and influenza, while 7.6% have not protective antibody titres against measles. No patient met the German national vaccination recommendations requiring a complete documentation of vaccines. The mean vaccination score was 13.3±4.2 with 5.7% of patients having a low, 43.9% a moderate, 47.0% a good and 3.3% a high score.

Conclusions

The majority of CIRD patients are n0t sufficiently vaccinated against pneumococci, HepB, influenza and measles. Although CIRD patients and general practitioners regularly receive professional information about the need of vaccination, vaccination rates were low to moderate. Interdisciplinary quality projects should be planned to change that inacceptable result.

Incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for potentially preventable infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have high infection rates. Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster (HZV), and influenza are common and potentially preventable causes of morbidity and mortality. Vaccinations have been shown to reduce the rates of these infections. In this study, we aim to determine incidence, mortality, and national costs of hospital admissions for Streptococcus pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections in patients with RA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the adult RA hospitalizations in 2016 from the National Inpatient Sample database. We limited the RA cases to hospitalizations with a principal discharge diagnosis of S. pneumoniae, HZV, and influenza infections. The total number of discharges, age, length of stay, mortality, and hospital charges were recorded.

RESULTS

In 2016, 552,230 adult hospitalizations had either a primary or secondary diagnosis of RA. Among this group, there were 1120 hospitalizations for influenza, 590 hospitalizations for herpes zoster, and 785 hospitalizations for S. pneumoniae. These infections constituted 0.5% of RA hospitalizations and were a more common cause of hospitalizations when compared to non-RA hospitalizations. Aggregate annual national hospital charges reached $124 million and an aggregate annual LOS of 13,750 days.

CONCLUSION

Infections, such as influenza, HZV, and S. pneumoniae, remain a common cause of inpatient morbidity and mortality among RA patients. Additionally, the economic burden of these infections is significant. Universal vaccination programs in RA patients, as well as other interventions aiming to improve quality of care of this susceptible population, should be further studied to reduce hospitalizations, cost, morbidity, and mortality. Key Points • Streptococcus pneumoniae, herpes zoster, and influenza infections remain an important preventable cause of hospitalizations among RA patients and carry significant economic burden.

Sublingual Bacterial Vaccination Reduces Recurrent Infections in Patients With Autoimmune Diseases Under Immunosuppressant Treatment

Introduction

Conventional or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the mainstay of treatment for systemic autoimmune disease (SAD). Infectious complications are a major concern in their use.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical benefit of sublingual mucosal polybacterial vaccines (MV130 and MV140), used to prevent recurrent respiratory and urinary tract infections, in patients with SAD and secondary recurrent infections following conventional or biologic DMARDs.

Methods

An observational study in SAD patients with recurrent respiratory tract infections (RRTI) and/or recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI) was carried out. All patients underwent mucosal (sublingual) vaccination with MV130 for RRTI or with MV140 for RUTI daily for 3 months. Clinical evaluation was assessed during 12 months of follow-up after the first dose, i.e., 3 months under treatment and 9 months once discontinued, and compared with the previous year.

Results

Forty-one out of 55 patients completed 1-year follow-up. All patients were on either conventional or biologic DMARDs. A significant decrease in the frequency of RUTI (p<0.001), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) (p=0.009) and upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) (p=0.006) at 12-mo with respect to the previous year was observed. Antibiotic prescriptions and unscheduled medical visits decreased significantly (p<0.020) in all groups. Hospitalization rate also declined in patients with RRTI (p=0.019). The clinical benefit demonstrated was concomitant to a significant increase in both anti-S. pneumoniae IgA and IgG antibodies following MV130 vaccination.

Conclusions

Sublingual polybacterial vaccines prevent recurrent infections in patients with SAD under treatment with immunosuppressant therapies, supporting a broad non-specific anti-infectious effect in these patients.

Incidence, risk factors and validation of the RABBIT score for serious infections in a cohort of 1557 patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Predicting serious infections (SI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is crucial for the implementation of appropriate preventive measures. Here we aimed to identify risk factors for SI and to validate the RA Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score in real-life settings.

METHODS

A multi-centre, prospective, RA cohort study in Greece. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and comorbidities were documented at first evaluation and one year later. The incidence of SI was recorded and compared with the expected SI rate using the RABBIT risk score.

RESULTS

A total of 1557 RA patients were included. During follow-up, 38 SI were recorded [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.3/100 patient-years]. Patients who developed SI had longer disease duration, higher HAQ at first evaluation and were more likely to have a history of previous SI, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. By multivariate analysis, longer disease duration (IRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.1), history of previous SI (IRR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.7, 10.1), diabetes (IRR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.14), chronic lung disease (IRR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.35, 7.27) and daily prednisolone dose ≥10 mg (IRR: 4.77; 95% CI: 1.47, 15.5) were independent risk factors for SI. Using the RABBIT risk score in 1359 patients, the expected SI incidence rate was 1.71/100 patient-years, not different from the observed (1.91/100 patient-years; P = 0.97).

CONCLUSION

In this large real-life, prospective study of RA patients, the incidence of SI was 2.3/100 patient-years. Longer disease duration, history of previous SI, comorbidities and high glucocorticoid dose were independently associated with SI. The RABBIT score accurately predicted SI in our cohort.

Nonserious Infections in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results From the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the frequency and predictors of nonserious infections (NSI) and compare incidence across biologic agents within the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis (BSRBR-RA).

METHODS

The BSRBR-RA is a prospective observational cohort study. An NSI was defined as an infection that did not require hospitalization or intravenous therapy. Infections were captured from clinician questionnaires and patient diaries. Individuals were considered "at risk" from the date of initiation of biologic treatment for up to 3 years. Drug exposure was defined by agent: tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), interleukin-6 (IL-6) inhibitor, B cell depletion (rituximab), or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) alone. A multiple-failure Cox model was used with multivariable adjustment. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation.

RESULTS

There were 17,304 NSI in 8,145 patients, with an event rate of 27.0 per person per year (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 26.6-27.4). Increasing age, female sex, comorbidity burden, glucocorticoid therapy, higher Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, and higher Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index were associated with an increased risk of NSI. There was a significant reduction in NSI risk with csDMARDs compared to biologic treatments. Compared to TNFi, IL-6 inhibition and rituximab were associated with a higher NSI risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.45 [95% CI 1.29-1.63] and adjusted hazard ratio 1.28 [95% CI 1.14-1.45], respectively), while the csDMARD cohort had a lower risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI 0.59-0.70]). Within the TNFi class, adalimumab was associated with a higher NSI risk than etanercept (adjusted hazard ratio 1.11 [95% CI 1.05-1.17]).

CONCLUSION

NSI occur frequently in RA, and predictors mirror those reported with serious infections. All biologics are associated with a greater risk of NSI, with differences observed between agents. While unmeasured confounding must be considered, the magnitude of effect is large, and a relationship between NSI and targeted immunomodulatory therapy likely exists.

Identifying rheumatic disease patients at high risk and requiring shielding during the COVID-19 pandemic

Rheumatology teams care for patients with diverse, systemic autoimmune diseases who are often immunosuppressed and at high risk of infections. The current COVID-19 pandemic has presented particular challenges in caring for and managing this patient group. The office of the chief medical officer (CMO) for England contacted the rheumatology community to provide expert advice on the identification of extremely vulnerable patients at very high risk during the COVID-19 pandemic who should be 'shielded'. This involves the patients being asked to strictly self-isolate for at least 12 weeks with additional funded support provided for them to remain at home. A group of rheumatologists (the authors) have devised a pragmatic guide to identifying the very highest risk group using a rapidly developed scoring system which went live simultaneous with the Government announcement on shielding and was cascaded to all rheumatologists working in England.

The association between lymphopenia and serious infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship between occurrence of serious infection (SI) and lymphocyte counts in patients with RA using data from a single centre.

METHODS

We used routinely captured data from a single tertiary rheumatology centre to explore the relationship between lymphopenia and SI risk. Adult RA patients were included over a 5-year follow-up period. Admissions due to confirmed SI were considered. SI rate with 95% confidence intervals was calculated. The association between SI with baseline lymphocyte counts, time-averaged lymphocyte counts throughout all follow-up, and a nadir lymphocyte count was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. The relationship between lymphopenia over time and SI was analysed using a mixed-effect model of lymphocyte counts prior to SI.

RESULTS

This analysis included 1095 patients with 205 SIs during 2016 person-years of follow-up. The SI rate was 4.61/100 patient-years (95% CI: 3.76, 5.65). Compared with patients with nadir lymphocyte counts >1.5 × 109 cells/l, nadir lymphopenia <1 × 109 cells/l was significantly associated with higher SI risk (HR 3.28; 95% CI: 1.59, 6.76), increasing to HR 8.08 (95% CI: 3.74, 17.44) in patients with lymphopenia <0.5 × 109 cells/l. Lymphocyte counts were observed to be reduced in the 30-day period prior to SI.

CONCLUSION

Lymphocyte counts below <1.0 × 109 cells/l were associated with higher SI risk in RA patients; the strongest association between lymphopenia and SI was observed when lymphocyte counts were below <0.5 × 109 cells/l. Lymphopenia may be used as a measure to stratify patients at risk of SI.

Serious infections in patients with self-reported psoriatic arthritis from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) treated with biologics

Background

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have increased risk of adverse events, including serious infections (SI), compared with psoriasis patients.

Methods

Patients eligible for, or receiving conventional systemic and biologic agents for psoriasis were followed prospectively using PSOLAR. Cohorts included: ustekinumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; infliximab; etanercept; adalimumab; non-biologic/methotrexate (MTX) (reference group); and non-biologic/non-MTX. Multivariate analyses using Cox hazard regression were used to identify factors associated with time to first SI. Rates of SI in PSOLAR psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA and possible risks with biologic therapy were evaluated.

Results

PSOLAR enrolled 4315 psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA. The overall population (N = 2401) included patients (n): 628 ustekinumab; 1413 TNF inhibitors; 258 infliximab; 481 etanercept; 674 adalimumab; 54 other biologics, 98 non-biologic/MTX; 208 non-biologic/non-MTX. Overall, 138 SI were reported with incidence rates per 100 patient-years as follows: a) ustekinumab: 1.00; b) TNF inhibitors: 2.22; c) infliximab: 2.12; d) etanercept: 2.58; e) adalimumab: 1.99; f) non-biologic/MTX: 3.01; g) and non-biologic/non-MTX: 2.31. Age, time-dependent disease activity Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of 4, 5, history of infection, and diabetes were associated with increased risk for SI (p < 0.05) in self-reported PsA patients. Biologic groups, other than ustekinumab, had numerically higher rates of SI.

Conclusions

PSOLAR psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA in the TNF inhibitors, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, and MTX cohorts had numerically higher SI rates than the ustekinumab cohort, although not statistically significant. Age, PGA 4, 5, history of infection, and diabetes were associated with an increased risk for SI, irrespective of biologic exposure.

Trial registration

NCT00508547; Registered July 30, 2007.

The role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

Registries characterize the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic interventions in daily clinical practice. Data from registries enable mining the records of tens of thousands of patients towards determining the effectiveness, safety, and cost-benefit of any given therapeutic. The strengths of registries include real-life settings, greater power than clinical trials to detect rare events, and the study of multiple outcomes and several research questions. Registries also have their weaknesses. They are expensive, less accurate than clinical trials, affected by channelling bias, often require links to external sources or use historic and selected control cohorts or combine datasets to increase power, and have the risk of multiple confounders. Since the beginning of biological era, registries were developed to profile emerging treatments. This article reviews the role of registries in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

Biologic prescribing decisions following serious infection: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register-Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objectives

To establish whether the decision to stop, continue or switch TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy to a biologic drug with an alternative mode of action following a serious infection (SI) impacts upon the risk of recurrent SI in patients with RA.

Methods

Patients recruited to the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register-RA with at least one episode of SI while on TNFi were included. The biologic treatment decision following SI was considered. A multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify predictors of recurrent SI and whether biologic treatment choices influenced future SI risk.

Results

In total, 1583 patients suffered at least one SI while on TNFi. Most patients (73%) were recorded as continuing TNFi 60 days after an index SI. The rate of recurrent SI was 25.6% per annum (95% CI: 22.5, 29.2%). The rate of recurrent SI was highest in patients who stopped their TNFi (42.6% per annum, 95% CI: 32.5, 55.7%) and lowest in those who switched biologic drug class (12.1% per annum, 95% CI: 3.9, 37.4%). Compared with patients stopping biologic therapy, patients who continued or switched drug class had significantly lower risk of recurrent SI (drug continuation hazard ratio = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.74; drug switch hazard ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.95).

Conclusions

Patients who continued or switched their TNFi post-index SI had a lower risk of recurrent SI infection compared with those who stopped the drug. This may be explained by better control of disease activity with reintroduction of biologic therapy, a driving factor for SI or alternatively channelling fitter patients to restart biologic therapy.

Impact of Host Genetics and Biological Response Modifiers on Respiratory Tract Infections

Host susceptibility to respiratory tract infections (RTI) is dependent on both genetic and acquired risk factors. Repeated bacterial and viral RTI, such as pneumonia from encapsulated microorganisms, respiratory tract infections related to respiratory syncytial virus or influenza, and even the development of bronchiectasis and asthma, are often reported as the first symptom of primary immunodeficiencies. In the same way, neutropenia is a well-known risk factor for invasive aspergillosis, as well as lymphopenia for Pneumocystis, and mycobacterial infections. However, in the last decades a better knowledge of immune signaling networks and the introduction of next generation sequencing have increased the number and diversity of known inborn errors of immunity. On the other hand, the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha has revealed new risk groups for infections, such as tuberculosis. The use of biological response modifiers has spread to almost all medical specialties, including inflammatory diseases and neoplasia, and are being used to target different signaling networks that may mirror some of the known immune deficiencies. From a clinical perspective, the individual contribution of genetics, and/or targeted treatments, to immune dysregulation is difficult to assess. The aim of this article is to review the known and newly described mechanisms of impaired immune signaling that predispose to RTI, including new insights into host genetics and the impact of biological response modifiers, and to summarize clinical recommendations regarding vaccines and prophylactic treatments in order to prevent infections.

B Lymphocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis and the Effects of Anti-TNF-α Agents on B Lymphocytes: A Review of the Literature

PURPOSE

The aim of this article was to review published research related to B lymphocytes in rheumatoid arthritis, their role in the pathogenesis of the disease, the effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors on B lymphocytes, the risk for infection, and responses to vaccines.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted to review recent advances related to B lymphocytes and the effects of anti-TNF-α on B lymphocytes in rheumatoid arthritis.

FINDINGS

B lymphocytes play an important role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. In this review, we summarize the major mechanisms by which B lymphocytes play a pathologic role in the development and propagation of the disease, as B lymphocytes are recruited to the synovial fluid, where they contribute to local inflammation through the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators (cytokines, chemokines, micro-RNAs) and present antigens to T cells. We discuss the effects of TNF-α, either direct or indirect, on B lymphocytes expressing receptors for this cytokine. We also show that total B-cell numbers have been reported to be reduced in the blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus healthy controls, but are significantly increased up to normal levels in patients undergoing anti-TNF-α therapy. As for B-cell subsets, controversial results have been reported, with studies showing decreased frequencies of total memory B cells (and memory subsets) and others showing no differences in patients versus healthy controls. Studies investigating the effects of anti-TNF-α therapy have also given controversial results, with therapy found to increase (or not) the frequency of memory B lymphocytes, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus healthy controls. Those highly variable results could have been due to differences in patient characteristics and limited numbers of subjects. Finally, we summarize the effects of blocking TNF-α with anti-TNF-α agents on possible infections that patients with rheumatoid arthritis may contract, as well as on responses to vaccination.

IMPLICATIONS

B lymphocytes play a significant role in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, and B cell-depletion therapy has a major effect on the course of the disease. The advances in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis include the development of targeted therapies. Anti-TNF-α therapies are widely used despite potentially serious adverse events. The data on the effects of anti-TNF-α therapies on B lymphocytes are limited and conflicting. There is a need for larger studies to better understand the effects of newly discovered therapies on the different cells of the immune system.