Current and future advances in genetic testing in systemic autoinflammatory diseases

Chromosome aberrations and autoimmunity: Immune-mediated diseases associated with 18p deletion and other chromosomal aberrations

Recent advances in genomic methodologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Specific structural variants (SVs), such as substantial DNA deletions or insertions, including chromosomal aberrations, have been implicated in diseases of immune dysregulation. Regrettably, SVs are frequently overlooked in next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeted-gene panels, whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS). In view of a case of chromosome 18p deletion syndrome, characterized by hypogammaglobulinemia and an autoinflammatory phenotype, we provide a comprehensive review on chromosome aberrations associated with multiple immune-mediated conditions, highlighting the clinical aspects of the various chromosome aberrations associated with immune-mediated diseases. Further investigations and development of functional tests should contribute to elucidate the mechanistic connection between chromosome aberrations and Primary Immune Regulatory Disorders (PIRD), bringing novel perspectives in the field of autoinflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Molecular genetics in adult-onset Still's disease: next-generation sequencing in 24 patients and literature review

Objective

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels are increasingly used for the diagnosis of monogenic systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs). However, their role in patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) remains unknown. This study aims to assess the usefulness of NGS panels in AOSD patients to improve diagnosis and management of the disease.

Methods

This observational, multicenter study included all patients with AOSD diagnosis who underwent NGS panel testing in northern Spain. Clinical manifestations, laboratory parameters, complications, and therapeutic responses were recorded.

Results

A total of 24 patients (16 men, 8 women) with an average age of 42.2 ± 17.9 (mean ± SD) years, in whom NGS was performed, fulfilled the Yamaguchi and/or Fautrel criteria for AOSD. The most common symptoms, apart from fever, were skin rash (75%), asthenia (91.7%), and articular manifestations (91.7%). All patients had elevated acute-phase reactant levels and hyperferritinemia. Almost all patients received oral glucocorticoids as initial therapy. Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) were used in 17 (70.8%) patients and biologic therapy in 13 (54.1%) patients. Genetic variants were observed in 5 (20.8%) patients. None of them were classified as pathogenic. Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were identified in NOD2 (c.2104C>T and c.2251G>A), TNFRSF1A (c.224C>T), TNFAIP3 (c.1939A>C), and SCN9A (c.2617G>A). Atypical manifestations and/or therapeutic refractoriness were observed in patients carrying genetic variants, except for one patient with the TNFAIP3 VUS. Four out of five patients with VUS had a severe and refractory course of the disease and required biologic therapy.

Conclusion

NGS was useful to rule out the presence of pathogenic genetic variants related to other SAIDs and to detect VUS that may help identify patients at risk for atypical and severe manifestations and poor response to conventional therapy.

Identification of a 5-Plex Cytokine Signature that Differentiates Patients with Multiple Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

Patients with non-infectious systemic inflammation may suffer from one of many diseases, including hyperinflammation (HI), autoinflammatory disorders (AID), and systemic autoimmune disease (AI). Despite their clinical overlap, the pathophysiology and patient management differ between these disorders. We aimed to investigate blood biomarkers able to discriminate between patient groups. We included 44 patients with active clinical and/or genetic systemic inflammatory disease (9 HI, 27 AID, 8 systemic AI) and 16 healthy controls. We quantified 55 serum proteins and combined multiple machine learning algorithms to identify five proteins (CCL26, CXCL10, ICAM-1, IL-27, and SAA) that maximally separated patient groups. High ICAM-1 was associated with HI. AID was characterized by an increase in SAA and decrease in CXCL10 levels. A trend for higher CXCL10 and statistically lower SAA was observed in patients with systemic AI. Principal component analysis and unsupervised hierarchical clustering confirmed separation of disease groups. Logistic regression modelling revealed a high statistical significance for HI (P = 0.001), AID, and systemic AI (P < 0.0001). Predictive accuracy was excellent for systemic AI (AUC 0.94) and AID (0.91) and good for HI (0.81). Further research is needed to validate findings in a larger prospective cohort. Results will contribute to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic inflammatory disorders and can improve diagnosis and patient management.

TNFRSF11A variants contribute to systemic autoinflammatory diseases: A case series of 12 patients

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence suggests that variants in TNFRSF11A gene, encoding RANK, may contribute to systemic autoinflammatory disease (SAID).

AIM/METHODS

To estimate the prevalence of TNFRSF11A variants in a cohort of patients with SAIDs screened for 26 related genes and describe the disease phenotypic expression.

RESULTS

A total of 12 out of 167 patients, 7 males, aged (median) 38 years at disease onset, yielded at least one TNFRSF11A rare variant. All patients carried a coexisting variant in at least one other SAID-related gene, most frequently MEFV (6 patients), but also TNFRSF1A, NOD2, NLRP3, NLRP7, MVK, IL36RN, RBCK1, PLCG2 and PSMB8. SAID episodes lasting (median) 9 days manifested with high grade fever (91%), myalgias (75%), malaise (67%), serositis (58%), arthralgias/arthritis (58%), gastrointestinal involvement (33%), and rash (25%), and responded to corticosteroids. The most common initial clinical diagnosis was TNF-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS), which was, however, confirmed, in only one patient. The emergence of MEFV variations supported the diagnosis of atypical Familial Mediterranean Fever in two cases, whereas the diagnosis of Yao syndrome was speculated in two patients with NOD2 variants. The presence of atypical disease and the inability of defining diagnosis in the remaining 7 patients, supported the possible involvement of TNFRSF11A variants in the phenotypic expression of SAIDs.

CONCLUSION

TNFRSF11A variants, occurring in 7% of SAID patients always in combination with other SAID-related gene variants, contribute to the development of an autoinflammatory syndrome resembling to TRAPS. Additional studies to confirm novel pathogenic SAID pathways are clearly warranted.

Autoinflammatory Diseases: A Review

Autoinflammatory disease (AID) is a vast spectrum of disorders characterized by recurrent attacks of sterile inflammation. Since the first cloning of the familial Mediterranean fever gene in 1997, there has been a rapid rate of discovery of new AIDs. As of 2022, there have been 485 inborn errors of immunity documented by the International Union of Immunological Societies, for which many display aspects of autoinflammation. The pathophysiology of AIDs is complex. Although many are caused by rare mutations in genes that govern innate immunity, others are polygenic, where disease expression is thought to be triggered by environmental factors in genetically predisposed hosts. AIDs range in prevalence from common entities like gout to ultrarare monogenic diseases. Whereas AIDs were initially studied in pediatric populations, it is now apparent that they can present in adulthood and even in the elderly. AIDs can be clinically challenging given their rarity, as well as the heterogeneity in presentation and underlying etiology. Although the care of AIDs can span medical disciplines, the rheumatologist often plays a central role given the inflammatory nature of these illnesses. In this review, we explore the current understanding of the pathophysiology of these complex conditions and propose a classification system for AIDs. We place an emphasis on AIDs that present to the adult rheumatologist and discuss important AIDs that can mimic more classic rheumatic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammatory arthritis. Finally, we offer an approach to the clinical assessment, diagnosis, and management of AIDs.

Inflammatory turmoil within: an exploration of autoinflammatory disease genetic underpinnings, clinical presentations, and therapeutic approaches

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) arise from dysregulated innate immune system activity, which leads to systemic inflammation. These disorders, encompassing a diverse array of genetic defects classified as inborn errors of immunity, are significant diagnostic challenges due to their genetic heterogeneity and varied clinical presentations. Although recent advances in genetic sequencing have facilitated pathogenic gene discovery, approximately 40% of SAIDs patients lack molecular diagnoses. SAIDs have distinct clinical phenotypes, and targeted therapeutic approaches are needed. This review aims to underscore the complexity and clinical significance of SAIDs, focusing on prototypical disorders grouped according to their pathophysiology as follows: (i) inflammasomopathies, characterized by excessive activation of inflammasomes, which induces notable IL-1β release; (ii) relopathies, which are monogenic disorders characterized by dysregulation within the NF-κB signaling pathway; (iii) IL-18/IL-36 signaling pathway defect-induced SAIDs, autoinflammatory conditions defined by a dysregulated balance of IL-18/IL-36 cytokine signaling, leading to uncontrolled inflammation and tissue damage, mainly in the skin; (iv) type I interferonopathies, a diverse group of disorders characterized by uncontrolled production of type I interferons (IFNs), notably interferon α, β, and ε; (v) anti-inflammatory signaling pathway impairment-induced SAIDs, a spectrum of conditions characterized by IL-10 and TGFβ anti-inflammatory pathway disruption; and (vi) miscellaneous and polygenic SAIDs. The latter group includes VEXAS syndrome, chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis/chronic nonbacterial osteomyelitis, Schnitzler syndrome, and Still's disease, among others, illustrating the heterogeneity of SAIDs and the difficulty in creating a comprehensive classification. Therapeutic strategies involving targeted agents, such as JAK inhibitors, IL-1 blockers, and TNF inhibitors, are tailored to the specific disease phenotypes.

Principles of clinical genetics for rheumatologists: clinical indications and interpretation of broad-based genetic testing

Advances in DNA sequencing technologies, especially next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is the basis for whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS), have profoundly transformed immune-mediated rheumatic disease diagnosis. Recently, substantial cost reductions have facilitated access to these diagnostic tools, expanded the capacity of molecular diagnostics and enabled the pursuit of precision medicine in rheumatology. Understanding the fundamental principles of genetics and diversity in genetic variant classification is a crucial milestone in rheumatology. However, despite the growing availability of DNA sequencing platforms, a significant number of autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs), neuromuscular disorders, hereditary collagen diseases, and monogenic bone diseases remain unsolved, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) pose a formidable challenge to addressing these unmet needs in the coming decades. This article aims to provide an overview of the clinical indications and interpretation of comprehensive genetic testing in the medical field, addressing the related complexities and implications.

Genetically transitional disease: conceptual understanding and applicability to rheumatic disease

In genomic medicine, the concept of genetically transitional disease (GTD) refers to cases in which gene mutation is necessary but not sufficient to cause disease. In this Perspective, we apply this novel concept to rheumatic diseases, which have been linked to hundreds of genetic variants via association studies. These variants are in the 'grey zone' between monogenic variants with large effect sizes and common susceptibility alleles with small effect sizes. Among genes associated with rare autoinflammatory diseases, many low-frequency and/or low-penetrance variants are known to increase susceptibility to systemic inflammation. In autoimmune diseases, hundreds of HLA and non-HLA genetic variants have been revealed to be modest- to moderate-risk alleles. These diseases can be reclassified as GTDs. The same concept could apply to many other human diseases. GTD could improve the reporting of genetic testing results, diagnostic yields, genetic counselling and selection of therapy, as well as facilitating research using a novel approach to human genetic diseases.

The discovery of NLRP3 and its function in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and innate immunity

From studies of individual families to global collaborative efforts, the NLRP3 inflammasome is now recognized to be a key regulator of innate immunity. Activated by a panoply of pathogen-associated and endogenous triggers, NLRP3 serves as an intracellular sensor that drives carefully coordinated assembly of the inflammasome, and downstream inflammation mediated by IL-1 and IL-18. Initially discovered as the cause of the autoinflammatory spectrum of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), NLRP3 is now also known to play a role in more common diseases including cardiovascular disease, gout, and liver disease. We have seen cohesion in results from clinical studies in CAPS patients, ex vivo studies of human cells and murine cells, and in vivo murine models leading to our understanding of the downstream pathways, cytokine secretion, and cell death pathways that has solidified the role of autoinflammation in the pathogenesis of human disease. Recent advances in our understanding of the structure of the inflammasome have provided ways for us to visualize normal and mutant protein function and pharmacologic inhibition. The subsequent development of targeted therapies successfully used in the treatment of patients with CAPS completes the bench to bedside translational loop which has defined the study of this unique protein.

Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management of IL-1-Mediated Autoinflammatory Diseases (CAPS, TRAPS, MKD, and DIRA)

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) are a group of rare genetic and nongenetic immune dysregulatory disorders associated with high morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Therefore, early diagnosis and initiation of targeted treatment is vital in SAID patients to control the disease activity and prevent long-term immune-mediated damage. A specific group of genetically defined SAIDs is associated with increased inflammasome-mediated production of active interleukin (IL)-1. Even though progress in immunobiology and genetics has brought forth diagnostic tools and novel treatments that have been described in the literature extensively, many challenges remain in the clinical setting. Some challenges that health care providers may face on a day-to-day basis include the requirement of a multidisciplinary approach due to the complexity of these diseases, limited evidence-based treatment options, and barriers to access available therapies. Primarily, IL-1 inhibitors anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept are used to control the inflammation in these patients, with the goal of achieving sustainable remission. Recently published provisional points to consider from the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) provide diagnosis, management, and monitoring recommendations for four IL-1-mediated autoinflammatory diseases: cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS), tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), and deficiency of the IL-1 receptor antagonist (DIRA). The goal of this paper is to aid health care professionals by providing a practical approach to diagnosis and management of these four IL-1 mediated SAIDs on the basis of the recent EULAR/ACR recommendations.

Systemic autoinflammatory disorders

Inflammation is a physiologic defense mechanism against an out-side attack. Usually, it resolves after the removal of noxious causes, but systemic autoinflammatory disorders (SAIDs) have recurrent or repeated acute inflammation through uncontrolled gene function, which can present as gain-of-function or loss-of-function of a gene during inflammation. Most SAIDs are hereditary autoinflammatory diseases and develop by dysregulation of innate immunity through various pathways including inflammasomes, endoplasmic reticulum stress, nuclear factor-κB dysregulation, and interferon production. The clinical manifestations include periodic fever with various skin findings such as neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, or vasculitic lesions. Some SAID cases stem from immunodeficiency or allergic reactions related to monogenic mutation. The diagnosis of SAIDs is based on clinical findings of systemic inflammation and genetic confirmation, and have to exclude infections or malignancies. Moreover, a genetic study is essential for clinical features to be suspect SAID with or without a family history. Treatment is based on understanding the immunopathology of SAID, and targeted therapy to control disease flares, reduce recurrent acute phases and prevent serious complications. Diagnosing and treating SAID requires understanding its comprehensive clinical features and pathogenesis related to genetic mutation.

Empiric treatment for persistent fever from suspected autoinflammatory disease: Experience from an undiagnosed diseases program

BACKGROUND

Patients with persistent fevers of undetermined etiology often undergo extensive evaluation without a diagnosis. Autoinflammatory syndromes may not always be considered in the differential, as these are rare entities, there are no consensus clinical criteria and genetic testing can only capture a few of these diseases. We aimed to describe the experience and value of an undiagnosed diseases program in the evaluation and management of patients who present with persistent fevers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on eleven patients who presented with persistent fevers to the Undiagnosed Diseases Program (UDP) at University of Alabama at Birmingham. All patients received extensive testing prior to referral and were seen by multiple subspecialists. The primary outcome of complete remission was resolution of episodes of fever and malaise in response to empiric biological anti-inflammatory treatment.

RESULTS

All patients received genetic testing and further diagnostic evaluation by the UDP. Even without confirmed genetic testing, they were empirically started on anti-inflammatory therapies (including colchicine, IL-1 inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors). Ten patients have achieved complete remission on empiric treatment. Three patients were given formal diagnoses. No patients have had any major adverse events from therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This is a pilot study suggesting the role for empiric treatment trials of biologics for patients with suspected autoinflammatory diseases. As the differential diagnosis of patients with persistent fevers is broad, and the diagnosis of autoinflammatory diseases often comes with some degree of uncertainty, evaluation by a center with expertise in diagnosing these conditions can help determine which patients should have empiric trials of biologics.

Periodic Fever, Aphthous Stomatitis, Pharyngitis, and Adenitis Syndrome and Syndrome of Unexplained Recurrent Fevers in Children and Adults

Children and adults with autoinflammatory disorders, who often experience recurrent fevers, rashes, cold-induced symptoms, conjunctivitis, lymphadenopathy, recurrent infections, aphthous stomatitis, and abnormal blood cell counts, may present to the allergist/immunologist because the symptoms mimic allergies and disorders of immunity. In recent years, there has been increased recognition of non-monogenic autoinflammatory disorders, including periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis syndrome and syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fevers. For many clinical practitioners, the natural history, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnoses, and preferred therapies remain challenging because of the presumed rarity of patients and the evolving field of autoinflammation. Here, we aim to provide a practical framework for the clinical allergist/immunologist to evaluate and treat this patient population.

Genetic testing in autoinflammatory diseases - past, current and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Autoinflammatory diseases (AID) are a group of rare monogenic illnesses, leading to uncontrolled activation of the innate immune system and presenting with recurrent flares of systemic and localized inflammation. Diagnosis is confirmed by the detection of a class IV or class V gene variant in an AID-related gene and improvements in sequencing techniques have enabled the discovery of new entities. The aim of our study is to explore the diagnostic yield of evolving genetic testing methods for AID and to determine whether increasing gene panels generate a higher diagnostic rate.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 2620 patients that underwent sequencing for a clinical suspicion of AID in Belgium, between January 2015 and December 2020. Sequencing was performed through a 10-gene panel between 2015 and 2017, a 25-gene panel between 2018 and 2020 and mendeliome technology with a 66- and a 502- in silico gene panel in 2020.

RESULTS

The rate of genetic diagnoses increased along with the expansion of the gene panel with a diagnostic yield of 15% with 10 genes, 16% with 25 genes and 23% with 502 genes.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first nationwide study for autoinflammatory genetic testing and the first use of mendeliome technology for AID diagnosis. Although we confirmed that the bigger the gene panel, the higher the diagnostic rate, this technology generated inevitably a higher financial and human cost although the majority of diagnoses remained amongst the four original hereditary recurrent fevers (HRFs).

IL-1 and autoinflammatory disease: biology, pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting

Over 20 years ago, it was first proposed that autoinflammation underpins a handful of rare monogenic disorders characterized by recurrent fever and systemic inflammation. The subsequent identification of novel, causative genes directly led to a better understanding of how the innate immune system is regulated under normal conditions, as well as its dysregulation associated with pathogenic mutations. Early on, IL-1 emerged as a central mediator for these diseases, based on data derived from patient cells, mutant mouse models and definitive clinical responses to IL-1 targeted therapy. Since that time, our understanding of the mechanisms of autoinflammation has expanded beyond IL-1 to additional innate immune processes. However, the number and complexity of IL-1-mediated autoinflammatory diseases has also multiplied to include additional monogenic syndromes with expanded genotypes and phenotypes, as well as more common polygenic disorders seen frequently by the practising clinician. In order to increase physician awareness and update rheumatologists who are likely to encounter these patients, this review discusses the general pathophysiological concepts of IL-1-mediated autoinflammation, the epidemiological and clinical features of specific diseases, diagnostic challenges and approaches, and current and future perspectives for therapy.

Cutaneous signs and mechanisms of inflammasomopathies

The emerging group of autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) is caused by a dysregulation of the innate immune system while lacking the typical footprint of adaptive immunity. A prominent subgroup of AIDs are inflammasomopathies, which are characterised by periodic flares of cutaneous signs as well as systemic organ involvement and fever. The range of possible skin lesions is vast, ranging from urticarial, erysipelas-like and pustular rashes to erythematous patches, violaceous plaques and eventual necrosis and ulceration. This review provides a structured overview of the pathogenesis and the clinical picture with a focus on dermatological aspects of inflammasomopathies. Current treatment options for these conditions are also discussed.

Genetic epidemiology of autoinflammatory disease variants in Indian population from 1029 whole genomes

Background

Autoinflammatory disorders are the group of inherited inflammatory disorders caused due to the genetic defect in the genes that regulates innate immune systems. These have been clinically characterized based on the duration and occurrence of unprovoked fever, skin rash, and patient’s ancestry. There are several autoinflammatory disorders that are found to be prevalent in a specific population and whose disease genetic epidemiology within the population has been well understood. However, India has a limited number of genetic studies reported for autoinflammatory disorders till date. The whole genome sequencing and analysis of 1029 Indian individuals performed under the IndiGen project persuaded us to perform the genetic epidemiology of the autoinflammatory disorders in India.

Results

We have systematically annotated the genetic variants of 56 genes implicated in autoinflammatory disorder. These genetic variants were reclassified into five categories (i.e., pathogenic, likely pathogenic, benign, likely benign, and variant of uncertain significance (VUS)) according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Association of Molecular pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines. Our analysis revealed 20 pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants with significant differences in the allele frequency compared with the global population. We also found six causal founder variants in the IndiGen dataset belonging to different ancestry. We have performed haplotype prediction analysis for founder mutations haplotype that reveals the admixture of the South Asian population with other populations. The cumulative carrier frequency of the autoinflammatory disorder in India was found to be 3.5% which is much higher than reported.

Conclusion

With such frequency in the Indian population, there is a great need for awareness among clinicians as well as the general public regarding the autoinflammatory disorder. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive population scale genetic epidemiological study being reported from India.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43141-021-00268-2.

A comprehensive interaction study provides a potential domain interaction network of human death domain superfamily proteins

Human death domain superfamily proteins (DDSPs) play important roles in many signaling pathways involved in cell death and inflammation. Disruption or constitutive activation of these DDSP interactions due to inherited gene mutations is closely related to immunodeficiency and/or autoinflammatory diseases; however, responsible gene mutations have not been found in phenotypical diagnosis of these diseases. In this study, we comprehensively investigated the interactions of death-fold domains to explore the signaling network mediated by human DDSPs. We obtained 116 domains of DDSPs and conducted a domain-domain interaction assay of 13,924 reactions in duplicate using amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay. The data were mostly consistent with previously reported interactions. We also found new possible interactions, including an interaction between the caspase recruitment domain (CARD) of CARD10 and the tandem CARD-CARD domain of NOD2, which was confirmed by reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation. This study enables prediction of the interaction network of human DDSPs, sheds light on pathogenic mechanisms, and will facilitate identification of drug targets for treatment of immunodeficiency and autoinflammatory diseases.

Anakinra and canakinumab for patients with R92Q-associated autoinflammatory syndrome: a multicenter observational study from the AIDA Network

BACKGROUND

This study aims at describing the therapeutic outcome of patients carrying the R92Q variant in the TNFRSF1A gene treated with anakinra (ANA) or canakinumab (CAN) and identifying any factors predictive of complete response to IL-1 inhibition.

METHODS

Clinical data of patients treated with ANA or CAN for recurrent inflammatory attacks due to the presence of the R92Q variant were retrospectively collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Data about 20 treatment courses with IL-1 inhibitors (16 with ANA and 4 with CAN) from 19 patients were collected. Mean age at disease onset was 20.2 ± 14.8 years. In 5 cases (26%) the R92Q variant was found in a family member affected by recurrent fever. The therapeutic response was complete in 13(68%) and partial in 2 patients (11%); treatment failure was observed in 4 cases (21%). Median AIDAI decreased from 10 (interquartile range [IQR] = 28) to 0 (IQR = 1) at the 12-month follow-up visit (p < 0.001). Mean ESR and median CRP dropped respectively from 40.8 ± 24.8 to 9.1 ± 4.5 mm/h (p < 0.001) and from 3.0 (IQR = 1.9) to 0.3 (IQR = 0.3) mg/dl (p < 0.001) after 12 months of treatment. A steroid-sparing effect was observed from the third month of treatment (p < 0.01). Thirteen patients (65%) were still on treatment at the last follow-up visit (median duration of treatment 17 (IQR = 38) months). The presence of R92Q mutation in a symptomatic relative (p = 0.022), the relapsing remitting disease course (p < 0.001) and the presence of migratory erythematous skin rashes during fever attacks (p = 0.005) were associated with complete efficacy of IL-1 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

R92Q patients showed a favourable response to ANA and CAN, particularly when the mutation segregated in a family member and when a relapsing-remitting disease course or TNF-α receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) typical skin rash were observed. In the subgroup of patients not taking advantage of IL-1 blockage different molecular mechanisms underlying the autoinflammatory picture are likely to exist.

Undifferentiated recurrent fevers in pediatrics are clinically distinct from PFAPA syndrome but retain an IL-1 signature

Autoinflammatory disorders of the innate immune system present with recurrent episodes of inflammation often beginning in early childhood. While there are now more than 30 genetically-defined hereditary fever disorders, many patients lack a clear diagnosis. Many pediatric patients are often grouped with patients with periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome despite failing to meet diagnostic criteria. Here, we categorize these patients as syndrome of undifferentiated recurrent fever (SURF), and identify the unique features which distinguish them from the PFAPA syndrome. SURF patients were more likely to report gastrointestinal symptoms of nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, and experienced inconsistent responses to on-demand steroid therapy compared to PFAPA patients. For this previously undefined cohort, an optimal course of therapy remains uncertain, with medical and surgical therapies largely driven by parental preference. A subset of patients with SURF underwent tonsillectomy with complete resolution. Flow cytometric evaluation demonstrates leukocytic populations distinct from PFAPA patients, with reduced CD3+ T cell numbers. SURF patient tonsils were predominantly characterized by an IL-1 signature compared to PFAPA, even during the afebrile period. Peripheral blood signatures were similar between groups suggesting that PFAPA and SURF patient tonsils have localized, persistent inflammation, without clinical symptoms. These data suggest that SURF is a heterogenous syndrome on the autoinflammatory disease spectrum.

Knowledge and attitudes regarding genetic testing among Jordanians: An approach towards genomic medicine

Background

The twenty first century can be called the genomic era referring to the rapid development of genetics, and the beginning of genomic medicine. An initial step towards genomic medicine is to evaluate the knowledge and attitude towards genetic testing among different populations. The aims of this study were to assess the genetic knowledge and attitude towards genetic testing among the Jordanian population and patients with immune diseases. In addition, we evaluated the association between knowledge, attitude and several demographic factors of the population.

Methods

This study was performed using an online questionnaire that was distributed to respondents from different regions of Jordan.

Results

A total of 1149 participants were recruited from the Jordanian population. Overall factual genetic knowledge of the participants was good (65.4%), with education level, working or studying in a health-related field and household average monthly income being significant predictors of factual knowledge scores (P = 0.03, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). However, factual knowledge results revealed that scores of questions related to diseases were significantly higher than scores of gene-related scientific facts (P < 0.01). Participants of our study reported to have low perceived knowledge on medical uses (39.5%) and social consequences (23.9%) of genetic testing. Regarding the participants’ attitudes, favorable attitudes towards genetic testing were prevailing (91.5%). Favorable attitudes were more prominent among higher educated participants, and participants with higher scores of factual knowledge.

Conclusion

Despite the fact that our Jordanian-based study revealed a good level of genetic knowledge as well as a favorable attitude towards genetic testing, we realized an imbalance of knowledge between gene-related scientific facts and disease-related concepts as well as between factual and perceived genetic knowledge, which indicates the necessity of increasing the awareness about genetic testing in order to ensure that individuals can take informed decisions that help in the employment of personalized medicine.

Management of Monogenic IL-1 Mediated Autoinflammatory Diseases in Childhood

Monogenic Interleukin 1 (IL-1) mediated autoinflammatory diseases (AID) are rare, often severe illnesses of the innate immune system associated with constitutively increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Clinical characteristics include recurrent fevers, inflammation of joints, skin, and serous membranes. CNS and eye inflammation can be seen. Characteristically, clinical symptoms are coupled with elevated inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA). Typically, AID affect infants and children, but late-onset and atypical phenotypes are described. An in-depth understanding of autoinflammatory pathways and progress in molecular genetics has expanded the spectrum of AID. Increasing numbers of genetic variants with undetermined pathogenicity, somatic mosaicisms and phenotype variability make the diagnosis of AID challenging. AID should be diagnosed as early as possible to prevent organ damage. The diagnostic approach includes patient/family history, ethnicity, physical examination, specific functional testing and inflammatory markers (SAA, CRP) during, and in between flares. Genetic testing should be performed, when an AID is suspected. The selection of genetic tests is guided by clinical findings. Targeted and rapid treatment is crucial to reduce morbidity, mortality and psychosocial burden after an AID diagnosis. Management includes effective treat-to-target therapy and standardized, partnered monitoring of disease activity (e.g., AIDAI), organ damage (e.g., ADDI), patient/physician global assessment and health related quality of life. Optimal AID care in childhood mandates an interdisciplinary team approach. This review will summarize the current evidence of diagnosing and managing children with common monogenic IL-1 mediated AID.

Pediatric recurrent fever and autoinflammation from the perspective of an allergist/immunologist

Autoinflammatory diseases are monogenic and polygenic disorders due to dysregulation of the innate immune system. The inherited conditions have been clustered with primary immunodeficiencies in the latest practice parameters; however, these diseases have unique clinical presentations, genetics, and available therapies. Given the presentation of fevers, rashes, and mucosal symptoms observed in many of these syndromes, patients are likely to present to an allergist/immunologist. Although there has been attention in the literature to diagnosis and treatment of rare, genetically defined autoinflammatory disorders, physicians are challenged by increasing numbers of patients with intermittent or periodic fevers who face unnecessary morbidities due to a lack of a diagnosis. The broad differential of diseases presenting with fever includes autoinflammatory syndromes, infections associated with immunodeficiency and/or allergies complicated by infection, and less commonly, autoimmune disorders or malignancy. To address this challenge, we review the history of the medical approach to fever, current diagnostic paradigms, and controversies in management. We describe the spectrum of disorders referred to a recurrent fever disorders clinic established in an Allergy/Immunology division at a tertiary pediatric care center. Finally, we provide practical recommendations including historical features and initial laboratory investigations that can help clinicians appropriately manage these patients.

Cutaneous clues to diagnose autoinflammatory diseases

Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs) are a group of disorders characterized by recurrent episodes of systemic inflammation. Suspecting the diagnosis can be difficult and many of the clinical manifestations are common to different diseases. Although most of the cutaneous manifestations are non-specific, it is important to know them because sometimes they can lead to the diagnosis. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the main cutaneous lesions of autoinflammatory diseases to aid in their diagnosis.