Image-based Automated Species Identification: Can Virtual Data Augmentation Overcome Problems of Insufficient Sampling?

Tracing the genealogy origin of geographic populations based on genomic variation and deep learning

Assigning a query individual animal or plant to its derived population is a prime task in diverse applications related to organismal genealogy. Such endeavors have conventionally relied on short DNA sequences under a phylogenetic framework. These methods naturally show constraints when the inferred population sources are ambiguously phylogenetically structured, a scenario demanding substantially more informative genetic signals. Recent advances in cost-effective production of whole-genome sequences and artificial intelligence have created an unprecedented opportunity to trace the population origin for essentially any given individual, as long as the genome reference data are comprehensive and standardized. Here, we developed a convolutional neural network method to identify population origins using genomic SNPs. Three empirical datasets (an Asian honeybee, a red fire ant, and a chicken datasets) and two simulated populations are used for the proof of concepts. The performance tests indicate that our method can accurately identify the genealogy origin of query individuals, with success rates ranging from  93 % to 100 %. We further showed that the accuracy of the model can be significantly increased by refining the informative sites through FST filtering. Our method is robust to configurations related to batch sizes and epochs, whereas model learning benefits from the setting of a proper preset learning rate. Moreover, we explained the importance score of key sites for algorithm interpretability and credibility, which has been largely ignored. We anticipate that by coupling genomics and deep learning, our method will see broad potential in conservation and management applications that involve natural resources, invasive pests and weeds, and illegal trades of wildlife products.

Exploring the landscape of automated species identification apps: Development, promise, and user appraisal

Two decades ago, Gaston and O'Neill (2004) deliberated on why automated species identification had not become widely employed. We no longer have to wonder: This AI-based technology is here, embedded in numerous web and mobile apps used by large audiences interested in nature. Now that automated species identification tools are available, popular, and efficient, it is time to look at how the apps are developed, what they promise, and how users appraise them. Delving into the automated species identification apps landscape, we found that free and paid apps differ fundamentally in presentation, experience, and the use of biodiversity and personal data. However, these two business models are deeply intertwined. Going forward, although big tech companies will eventually take over the landscape, citizen science programs will likely continue to have their own identification tools because of their specific purpose and their ability to create a strong sense of belonging among naturalist communities.

Uncertainty-based Active Learning by Bayesian U-Net for Multi-label Cone-beam CT Segmentation

INTRODUCTION

Training of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for biomedical image analysis depends on large annotated datasets. This study assessed the efficacy of Active Learning (AL) strategies training AI models for accurate multilabel segmentation and detection of periapical lesions in cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) using a limited dataset.

METHODS

Limited field-of-view CBCT volumes (n = 20) were segmented by clinicians (clinician segmentation [CS]) and Bayesian U-Net-based AL strategies. Two AL functions, Bayesian Active Learning by Disagreement [BALD] and Max_Entropy [ME], were used for multilabel segmentation ("Lesion"-"Tooth Structure"-"Bone"-"Restorative Materials"-"Background"), and compared to a non-AL benchmark Bayesian U-Net function. The training-to-testing set ratio was 4:1. Comparisons between the AL and Bayesian U-Net functions versus CS were made by evaluating the segmentation accuracy with the Dice indices and lesion detection accuracy. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess statistically significant differences.

RESULTS

The final training set contained 26 images. After 8 AL iterations, lesion detection sensitivity was 84.0% for BALD, 76.0% for ME, and 32.0% for Bayesian U-Net, which was significantly different (P < .0001; H = 16.989). The mean Dice index for all labels was 0.680 ± 0.155 for Bayesian U-Net and 0.703 ± 0.166 for ME after eight AL iterations, compared to 0.601 ± 0.267 for Bayesian U-Net over the mean of all iterations. The Dice index for "Lesion" was 0.504 for BALD and 0.501 for ME after 8 AL iterations, and at a maximum 0.288 for Bayesian U-Net.

CONCLUSIONS

Both AL strategies based on uncertainty quantification from Bayesian U-Net BALD, and ME, provided improved segmentation and lesion detection accuracy for CBCTs. AL may contribute to reducing extensive labeling needs for training AI algorithms for biomedical image analysis in dentistry.

Species Diagnosis and DNA Taxonomy

The use of DNA has helped to improve and speed up species identification and delimitation. However, it also provides new challenges to taxonomists. Incongruence of outcome from various markers and delimitation methods, bias from sampling and skewed species distribution, implemented models, and the choice of methods/priors may mislead results and also may, in conclusion, increase elements of subjectivity in species taxonomy. The lack of direct diagnostic outcome from most contemporary molecular delimitation approaches and the need for a reference to existing and best sampled trait reference systems reveal the need for refining the criteria of species diagnosis and diagnosability in the current framework of nomenclature codes and good practices to avoid nomenclatorial instability, parallel taxonomies, and consequently more and new taxonomic impediment.