Gastric residuals in preterm babies

The Effects of Different Nursing Positions During Preterm Infants Feeding on Gastric Residual Volume and Emptying Rate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preterm infants need nutritional support due to their premature digestive system, undeveloped anatomy and functional limitations. Neonatal positioning in the proper position is one of the nurses' main principles that affect the residual volume. We performed our systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the best feeding position for preterm infants in reducing gastric residual volume and increasing the rate of gastric emptying.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science from their inception to August 2023. We included studies that assess the effect of different feeding positions for preterm infants on gastric residuals. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB2) appraised the included clinical trials. Cohort studies were assessed by the NIH tool and quasi-experimental studies by the relevant items from (Downs and Black) checklist. RevMan Version 5.4 was used for analysing the pooled data. Our study included a frequentist network meta-analysis of the aggregate data to obtain network estimates for the outcomes of interest. Network meta-analysis was done using R software.

RESULTS

We included 16 studies with 1139 premature infants, comparing six preterm feeding positions. The pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 30 min for right lateral, prone, right anterior oblique and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-12.08 [-20.09, -4.07]), (-11.14 [-18.26, -4.01]), (-9.02 [-21.66, 3.61]) and (-0.18 [-7.87, 7.5]), respectively. Moreover, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 180 min for right lateral, prone and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-0.69 [-1.29, -0.09]), (-0.56 [-1.22, 0.1]) and (0.09 [-0.63, 0.81]), respectively. Nevertheless, the pooled MD and 95% CI for GRV at 120 min for right anterior oblique, prone, right lateral and left lateral compared to supine position were as follows: (-6.09 [-11.33, -0.86]), (-5.07 [-7.71, -2.43]), (-3.08 [-5.89, -0.27]) and (-0.44 [-3.41, 2.53]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the best nursing position after preterm infants feeding for lower gastric residuals and higher gastric emptying rate is the right lateral position after 30 and 180 min post-feeding. Also, the right anterior oblique was the best after 120 min. Although the prone position can lower the GRV better than the left lateral and supine positions, it is not advisable to use this position because it raises the SIDS risk. Our results could help healthcare professionals to provide the appropriate positioning of preterm infants.

Dynamic In Vitro Gastric Digestion Behaviour of Commercial Infant Formulae Made with Cow, Goat and Sheep Milk

There are a wide range of commercial infant formulae available on the market. These are made using milk from different species, such as goat, sheep, and cow. The different protein compositions of these milks and the process used during infant-formulae manufacture, such as heat treatment, may impact the digestion of nutrients. This study compared the effect of protein composition and heat treatment on the in vitro gastric digestion behaviour of commercial infant formulae made with cow, goat, and sheep milk using a dynamic infant human gastric simulator (IHGS). During the simulated dynamic gastric digestion, the goat milk infant formula (GIF) showed earlier signs of aggregate formation compared to cow milk infant formula (CIF) and sheep milk infant formula (SIF). In addition, the microstructures of GIF chyme showed fragmented and porous structures. On the contrary, CIF formed dense protein networks that trapped oil droplets, whereas SIF exhibited a microstructure of smooth oil droplets surrounded by fewer protein networks. The different aggregation behaviours and aggregate structures of the three infant-formulae chyme were related to their different protein compositions, especially the different casein compositions. Furthermore, the open fragile structure of GIF aggregates provided easier access to pepsin, allowing it to hydrolyse protein. The results from the present study provided some information to assist in understanding the coagulation and digestion behaviours of commercial infant formulae made from different species of milk.

Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Routine monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants on gavage feeds is a common practice used to guide initiation and advancement of feeds. It is believed that an increase in or an altered gastric residual may be predictive of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). Withholding monitoring of gastric residual may take away the early indicator and thus may increase the risk of NEC. However, routine monitoring of gastric residual as a guide, in the absence of uniform standards, may lead to unnecessary delay in initiation and advancement of feeds and hence might result in a delay in establishing full enteral feeds. This in turn may increase the duration of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) and central venous line usage, increasing the risk of associated complications. Furthermore, delays in establishing full enteral feeds increase the risk of extrauterine growth restriction and neurodevelopmental impairment.

OBJECTIVES

• To assess the efficacy and safety of routine monitoring versus no monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants • To assess the efficacy and safety of routine monitoring of gastric residual based on two different criteria for interrupting feeds or decreasing feed volume in preterm infants SEARCH METHODS: We conducted searches in Cochrane CENTRAL via CRS, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL in February 2022. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi- and cluster-RCTs.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected RCTs that compared routine monitoring versus no monitoring of gastric residual and trials that used two different criteria for gastric residual to interrupt feeds in preterm infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). We calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial/harmful outcome (NNTB/NNTH) for dichotomous outcomes with significant results. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five studies (423 infants) in this updated review. Routine monitoring versus no routine monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants Four RCTs with 336 preterm infants met the inclusion criteria for this comparison. Three studies were performed in infants with birth weight of < 1500 g, while one study included infants with birth weight between 750 g and 2000 g. The trials were unmasked but were otherwise of good methodological quality. Routine monitoring of gastric residual:  - probably has little or no effect on the risk of NEC (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.57; 334 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); - probably increases the time to establish full enteral feeds (MD 3.14 days, 95% CI 1.93 to 4.36; 334 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); - may increase the time to regain birth weight (MD 1.70 days, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.39; 80 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence);  - may increase the number of infants with feed interruption episodes (RR 2.21, 95% CI 1.53 to 3.20; NNTH 3, 95% CI 2 to 5; 191 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence);  - probably increases the number of TPN days (MD 2.57 days, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.95; 334 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); - probably increases the risk of invasive infection (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.19; NNTH 10, 95% CI 5 to 100; 334 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); - may result in little or no difference in all-cause mortality before hospital discharge (RR 2.14, 95% CI 0.77 to 5.97; 273 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). Quality and volume of gastric residual compared to quality of gastric residual alone for feed interruption in preterm infants One trial with 87 preterm infants met the inclusion criteria for this comparison. The trial included infants with 1500 g to 2000 g birth weight.  Using two different criteria of gastric residual for feed interruption: - may result in little or no difference in the incidence of NEC (RR 5.35, 95% CI 0.26 to 108.27; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence);  - may result in little or no difference in time to establish full enteral feeds (MD -0.10 days, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.71; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may result in little or no difference in time to regain birth weight (MD 1.00 days, 95% CI -0.37 to 2.37; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may result in little or no difference in number of TPN days (MD 0.80 days, 95% CI -0.78 to 2.38; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may result in little or no difference in the risk of invasive infection (RR 5.35, 95% CI 0.26 to 108.27; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence); - may result in little or no difference in all-cause mortality before hospital discharge (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.13 to 76.67; 87 participants; low-certainty evidence).  - we are uncertain about the effect of using two different criteria of gastric residual on the risk of feed interruption episodes (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.13 to 76.67; 87 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-certainty evidence suggests routine monitoring of gastric residual has little or no effect on the incidence of NEC. Moderate-certainty evidence suggests monitoring gastric residual probably increases the time to establish full enteral feeds, the number of TPN days and the risk of invasive infection. Low-certainty evidence suggests monitoring gastric residual may increase the time to regain birth weight and the number of feed interruption episodes, and may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before hospital discharge. Further RCTs are warranted to assess the effect on long-term growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Review of paediatric gastrointestinal physiology relevant to the absorption of orally administered medicines

Despite much progress in regulations to improve paediatric drug development, there remains a significant need to develop better medications for children. For the design of oral dosage forms, a detailed understanding of the specific gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in children of different age categories and how they differ from GI conditions in adults is essential. Several review articles have been published addressing the ontogeny of GI characteristics, including luminal conditions in the GI tract of children. However, the data reported in most of these reviews are of limited quality because (1) information was cited from very old publications and sometimes low quality sources, (2) data gaps in the original data were filled with textbook knowledge, (3) data obtained on healthy and sick children were mixed, (4) average data obtained on groups of patients were mixed with data obtained on individual patients, and (5) results obtained using investigative techniques that may have altered the outcome of the respective studies were considered. Consequently, many of these reviews draw conclusions that may be incorrect. The aim of the present review was to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of the available original data on the ontogeny of GI luminal conditions relevant to oral drug absorption in the paediatric population. To this end, the PubMed and Web of Science metadatabases were searched for appropriate studies that examined age-related conditions in the oral cavity, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, and colon. Maturation was observed for several GI parameters, and corresponding data sets were identified for each paediatric age group. However, it also became clear that the ontogeny of several GI traits in the paediatric population is not yet known. The review article provides a robust and valuable data set for the development of paediatric in vitro and in silico biopharmaceutical tools to support the development of age-appropriate dosage forms. In addition, it provides important information on existing data gaps and should provide impetus for further systematic and well-designed in vivo studies on GI physiology in children of specific age groups in order to close existing knowledge gaps and to sustainably improve oral drug therapy in children.

Effect of different positions on gastric residuals in preterm infants initiating full enteral feeding

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to determine the effect of feeding in different positions on the gastric residual volume after feeding in preterm infants who initiated full enteral feeding.

METHODS

This quasi-experimental study was conducted with the hypothesis that testing the right lateral position leads to less gastric residual than left lateral position and the prone position leads to less gastric residual than the supine position. The data were collected in four stages from 35 preterm infants. Initially, the infants were positioned in supine position and were fed. After feeding, the infant rested in the supine position for 3 h. The stomach content was aspirated, and the volume of gastric residual was measured at the 60th, 120th, and 180th min after feeding. These steps are repeated in order of in the right lateral, left lateral, and prone position. Total gastric residual volume and type of enteral feeding were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference among the positions in terms of the volume of gastric residuals in the measurements made at 60th (P = 9.552), 120th (P = .505), and 180th min (P = .430). When the amount of decrease in the gastric residual volumes was a significant difference between all measurement times in right lateral and prone positions (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although no significant difference was determined between the positions, the smallest residual volumes were determined in the right lateral and prone positions. The amount of decrease in residual volume was significant in right lateral and prone positions.

25 Years of Research in Human Lactation: From Discovery to Translation

Researchers have recently called for human lactation research to be conceptualized as a biological framework where maternal and infant factors impacting human milk, in terms of composition, volume and energy content are studied along with relationships to infant growth, development and health. This approach allows for the development of evidence-based interventions that are more likely to support breastfeeding and lactation in pursuit of global breastfeeding goals. Here we summarize the seminal findings of our research programme using a biological systems approach traversing breast anatomy, milk secretion, physiology of milk removal with respect to breastfeeding and expression, milk composition and infant intake, and infant gastric emptying, culminating in the exploration of relationships with infant growth, development of body composition, and health. This approach has allowed the translation of the findings with respect to education, and clinical practice. It also sets a foundation for improved study design for future investigations in human lactation.

Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Routine monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants on gavage feeds is a common practice that is used to guide initiation and advancement of feeds. Some literature suggests that an increase in/or an altered gastric residual may be predictive of necrotising enterocolitis. Withholding monitoring of gastric residual may take away the early indicator and thus may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis. However, routine monitoring of gastric residual as a guide, in the absence of uniform standards, may lead to unnecessary delay in initiation and advancement of feeds and delay in reaching full enteral feeds. This in turn may increase the duration of parenteral nutrition and central venous line usage, increasing their complications. Delay in achieving full enteral feeds increases the risk of extrauterine growth restriction and neurodevelopmental impairment.

OBJECTIVES

• To assess the efficacy and safety of routine monitoring of gastric residual versus no monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants• To assess the efficacy and safety of routine monitoring of gastric residual based on two different criteria for interrupting feeds or decreasing feed volume in preterm infantsWe planned to undertake subgroup analysis based on gestational age (≤ 27 weeks, 28 weeks to 31 weeks, ≥ 32 weeks), birth weight (< 1000 g, 1000 g to 1499 g, ≥ 1500 g), small for gestational age versus appropriate for gestational age infants (classified using birth weight relative to the reference population), type of feed the infant is receiving (human milk or formula milk), and frequency of monitoring of gastric residual (before every feed, before every third feed, etc.) (see "Subgroup analysis and investigation of heterogeneity").

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 1), MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 19 February 2018), Embase (1980 to 19 February 2018), and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; 1982 to 19 February 2018). We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared routine monitoring of gastric residual versus no monitoring or two different criteria of gastric residual to interrupt feeds in preterm infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported the risk ratio and the risk difference for dichotomous data, and the mean difference for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence intervals. We used the GRADE approach to assess the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Two randomised controlled trials with a total of 141 preterm infants met the inclusion criteria for the comparison of routine monitoring versus no monitoring of gastric residual in preterm infants. Both trials were done in infants with birth weight < 1500 g.Routine monitoring of gastric residual may have little or no effect on the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (risk ratio (RR) 3.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 18.77; participants = 141; studies = 2; low-quality evidence). Routine monitoring may increase the risk of feed interruption episodes (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.07; participants = 141; studies = 2; low-quality evidence); the number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) was 3 (95% CI 2 to 6).Routine monitoring of gastric residual may increase time taken to establish full enteral feeds (mean difference (MD) 3.92, 95% CI 2.06 to 5.77 days; participants = 141; studies = 2; low-quality evidence), time taken to regain birth weight (MD 1.70, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.39 days; participants = 80; studies = 1; low-quality evidence), and number of total parenteral nutrition days (MD 3.29, 95% CI 1.66 to 4.92 days; participants = 141; studies = 2; low-quality evidence).We are uncertain as to the effect of routine monitoring of gastric residual on other outcomes such as incidence of surgical necrotising enterocolitis, extrauterine growth restriction at discharge, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease, duration of central venous line (CVL) usage, incidence of invasive infection, mortality before discharge, and duration of hospital stay. We found no data for outcomes such as aspiration pneumonia, gastroesophageal reflux, growth measures following discharge, and neurodevelopmental outcome.Only one trial with 87 preterm infants met the inclusion criteria for the comparison of using two different criteria of gastric residual to interrupt feeds while monitoring gastric residual. The trial was done in infants with birth weight of 1500 to 2000 g. We are uncertain as to the effect of using two different criteria of gastric residual on outcomes such as incidence of necrotising enterocolitis or surgical necrotising enterocolitis, time to establish full enteral feeds, time to regain birth weight, number of total parenteral nutrition days, number of infants experiencing feed interruption episodes, extrauterine growth restriction at discharge, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease, incidence of invasive infection, and mortality before discharge (very low quality evidence). We found no data on duration of CVL usage, aspiration pneumonia, gastroesophageal reflux, duration of hospital stay, growth measures following discharge, and neurodevelopmental outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Review authors found insufficient evidence as to whether routine monitoring of gastric residual reduces the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis because trial results are imprecise. Low-quality evidence suggests that routine monitoring of gastric residual increases the risk of feed interruption episodes, increases the time taken to reach full enteral feeds and to regain birth weight, and increases the number of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) days.Available data are insufficient to comment on other major outcomes such as incidence of invasive infection, parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease, mortality before discharge, extrauterine growth restriction at discharge, number of CVL days, and duration of hospital stay. Further randomised controlled trials are warranted to provide more precise estimates of the effects of routine monitoring of gastric residual on important outcomes, especially necrotising enterocolitis, in preterm infants.

Reducing time to initiation and advancement of enteral feeding in an all-referral neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

Decrease time to enteral feeding initiation and advancement.

STUDY DESIGN

In our all-referral neonatal intensive care unit, we developed an evidence-based guideline addressing feeding initiation and advancement. During 6 months before and 7 months after guideline implementation, we measured time to initiate feeding, time to 100 ml/kg/day of feeding, gastric residual measurement frequency, and incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (balancing measure).

RESULT

Two hundred twenty-three infants were studied. Time from admission to feeding initiation was shorter after guideline implementation (mean 0.5 days [95% CI: 0.4-0.7] vs. 1.1 days [95% CI: 0.7-1.5], p = 0.01). Time from admission to 100 ml/kg/day feeding was also shorter (3.6 days [95% CI: 2.8-4.4] vs. 6.2 days [95% CI: 4.4-8.1], p = 0.01). After guideline implementation, routine gastric residual measurements were discontinued.

CONCLUSION

After implementation of an enteral feeding guideline, which included discontinuation of routine gastric residual assessment, we observed a faster initiation of enteral feeding and shorter time to reach 100 ml/kg/day.

Does the Post-Feeding Position Affect Gastric Residue in Preterm Infants?

BACKGROUND

Body position affects the gastric emptying rate and hence the amount of gastric residue.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the effect of the post-feeding position of preterm infants on gastric residue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This experimental study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of a university hospital (İnönü University Turgut Özal Medical Center) in Eastern Turkey. The study included 40 preterm infants weighing less than 2,000 g, who were fed orogastrically. The preterm infants were sequentially placed in four positions and were fed before each change of position. The infants were sequentially placed in the right lateral, left lateral, supine, and prone positions; their gastric residues were measured with a nasogastric tube. The gastric residue was recorded in percentages at 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes. Ethical principles were applied in all phases of the study.

RESULTS

The lowest mean gastric residue level was observed in the right lateral position at 30 minutes (58.16 ± 12.71%) and 60 minutes (33.97 ± 15.00%). The prone position showed the lowest mean gastric residue level (1.74 ± 1.08%), followed by the right lateral (3.06 ± 1.97%), supine (3.53 ± 2.18%), and left lateral position (5.14 ± 1.85%) at 120 minutes. The final measurements were taken at 180 minutes with the right lateral position showing the lowest mean gastric residue level (0.38 ± 0.34%).

CONCLUSION

The premature infants had similar lower levels of gastric residue in the right lateral and prone positions and higher levels of gastric residue in left lateral and supine positions. The gastric emptying rate was found to be highest in the right lateral position at 30, 60, and 180 minutes and in the prone position at 120 minutes.

Abdominal circumference or gastric residual volume as measure of feed intolerance in VLBW infants

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare prefeed abdominal circumference (AC) and gastric residual volume (GRV) as a measure of feed intolerance in very-low-birth-weight infants (VLBW).

METHODS

Eighty VLBW infants were randomized to 2 groups; feed intolerance was monitored by measuring either GRV group or prefeed AC group. The primary outcome was time to full enteral feeds (180 mL · kg · day). Other main outcome measures were feed interruption days, duration of parenteral nutrition, incidence of culture positive sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis, mortality, and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) time to achieve full feeds was 10 (9-13) versus 14 (12-17.5) days in AC and GRV groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Infants in AC group had fewer feed interruption days (0 [0-2] vs 2.0 [1, 5], P < 0.001) and shorter duration of parenteral nutrition (P < 0.001). The incidence of culture-positive sepsis in AC and GRV groups was 17.5% and 30 %, respectively (P = 0.18). Duration of hospital stay and mortality were comparable in both the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Prefeed AC as a measure of feed intolerance in VLBW infants may shorten the time taken to achieve full feeds.

Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants

Despite the fact that feeding a very low birth weight (VLBW) neonate is a fundamental and inevitable part of its management, this is a field which is beset with controversies. Optimal nutrition improves growth and neurological outcomes, and reduces the incidence of sepsis and possibly even retinopathy of prematurity. There is a great deal of heterogeneity of practice among neonatologists and pediatricians regarding feeding VLBW infants. A working group on feeding guidelines for VLBW infants was constituted in McMaster University, Canada. The group listed a number of important questions that had to be answered with respect to feeding VLBW infants, systematically reviewed the literature, critically appraised the level of evidence, and generated a comprehensive set of guidelines. These guidelines form the basis of this state-of-art review. The review touches upon trophic feeding, nutritional feeding, fortification, feeding in special circumstances, assessment of feed tolerance, and management of gastric residuals, gastro-esophageal reflux, and glycerin enemas.

Positioning after feedings: what is the evidence to reduce feeding intolerances?

Nursing’s goal is to be the least invasive as the patient's condition allows. As a NICU nurse, each feeding for our patients is a priority for them to grow and develop with the idea to speed discharge to home. When infants develop reflux or have increased gastric aspirates, we are concerned that their weight will taper and their length of stay will increase. Positioning provides nurses with a noninvasive option to care for these patients. The that the right-side position is best for infants to enhance digestion stems from theories of anatomy and physics. Research strengthens this supposition for those infants needing help with decreased gastric motility. Other research supports the left lateral and prone positions for those patients with GER. In practice, a patient does not necessarily have one or the other and in fact may have both GER and slowed gastric motility at any given time. The literature supports the right lateral position for enhancing gastric emptying or motility and left lateral position for GER in the uncomplicated patient with one gastrointestinal concern. The knowledge the research provides is encouraging to provide a solution, but it does not clarify the true issues of a complex patient who can have decreased gastric motility needing the right lateral position and also suffer from symptoms of GER requiring the left lateral position (see Table). For those more complicated infants, the solution might best be choosing the prone position. The prone position should not be forgotten as the findings of many studies, although not often the first choice (best results) showed it to be consistently the second best for digestive problems. In any case, the dominant positions appear to be the right or left lateral side with the prone position considered a reasonable compromise. Further research is needed to provide a clear choice for correct positioning in the NICU population. The reality for nurses is that neonatal patients are often fed every 3 hours and their lives depend on each feeding to provide nutrients for growth. It is ideal for these patients to receive every prescribed feeding and be comfortably placed in a variety of positions. Nurses' assumption that the right lateral position is best is considered, in most cases, to be a true statement for those infants with increased gastric aspirates. For those patients with GER, the left lateral position is more highly preferred. It is important for nurses to be aware of the literature but also guide their practice based on the patient assessment and presentation of symptoms. Future knowledge may provide nurses with the data needed to perfect positioning methods for infants with feeding intolerances.

Prevention of necrotising enterocolitis: Year 2004 and beyond

The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) has not changed significantly despite the dramatic advances in perinatal-neonatal care. The absolute number of survivors of NEC is expected to rise, as prevention of prematurity, the single most important risk factor for the illness, continues to be difficult. Prevention of NEC has thus become an area of research priority. Given the role of inflammatory mediators in its pathogenesis newer immune modulators are being studied as potential agents for prevention/treatment of NEC. Caution, however, is warranted because the failure of sepsis trials in adults has clearly indicated that the concept of down-regulating the inflammatory response is deceptively simple. Clinical trials of any such promising preventative agent(s) need to be designed carefully and must include long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes as almost an entire population of high-risk preterm neonates will be exposed to their adverse effects. As new frontiers continue to be explored, the proven benefits of simple and safe interventions like antenatal glucocorticoid therapy and the preferential use of breast milk for feeding high-risk neonates must not be forgotten. Given that a single effective agent is unlikely in the near future, utilizing a package of "potentially better practices" seems to be the most appropriate strategy to prevent and minimize NEC.

Minimal enteral feeding reduces the risk of sepsis in feed-intolerant very low birth weight newborns

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimal enteral feeding (MEF) nutritional practice in feed-intolerant very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

METHODS

A retrospective design using data reported in the clinical charts of VLBW newborns consecutively observed in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that presents feed intolerance. During the study period, two feeding strategies were adopted: total parenteral nutrition (PN) (group 1) or PN plus MEF (group 2), for at least 24 h. Primary outcome was the time to reach full enteral feeding; secondary outcomes were the occurrence of sepsis, the time to regain birth weight, the length of hospitalization, the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) Bell stage >II and death.

RESULTS

In total, 102 newborns were evaluated: 51 in group 1, and 51 in group 2. Neonates in group 2 achieved full enteral nutrition earlier (8 days, interquartile range [IQR] 5) compared with subjects receiving total PN (11 days, IQR 5, p < 0.001). A reduction of sepsis episodes was observed in group 2 (15.7%) compared with group 1 (33.3%, p = 0.038). Additionally, subjects in group 2 regained their birth weight and were discharged earlier. The occurrence of NEC and death were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Minimal enteral feeding in very low birth weight infants presenting feed intolerance reduces the time to reach full enteral feeding and the risk of sepsis. This feeding practice does not increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and death.

Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review

Postnatal growth restriction and failure to thrive have been recently identified as a major issue in preterm, especially extremely-low-birth-weight neonates. An increased length of time to reach full enteral feedings is also significantly associated with a poorer mental outcome in preterm neonates at 24 months corrected age. Optimization of enteral nutrition without increasing the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) has thus become a priority in preterm neonates. A range of feeding strategies currently exists for preventing/minimizing feed intolerance in preterm neonates reflecting the dilemma surrounding the definition and significance of signs of feed intolerance due to ileus of prematurity and the fear of NEC. The results of a systematic review of current strategies for preventing/minimizing feed intolerance in preterm neonates are discussed. The need for clinical research in the area of signs of feed intolerance is emphasized to develop a scientific basis to feeding strategies. Only large pragmatic trials based on such strategies will reveal whether the benefits (improved growth and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes) of aggressive enteral nutrition can outweigh the risks of a potentially devastating illness like NEC, and of prolonged parenteral nutrition in preterm neonates.

Enteral feeding for high-risk neonates: a digest for nurses into putative risk and benefits to ensure safe and comfortable care

Enteral feeding is considered a relatively safe method of providing nutritional support to high-risk neonates. Nonetheless, there are associated risks, which can be classified as follows: factors to consider before initiating enteral feeding; feeding tube placement; delivery of milk feedings; and gastrointestinal, environmental, and technical factors. For each classification, this article highlights adverse consequences and synthesizes the literature for evidence-based nursing practice recommendations, which are summarized in the "Conclusion" section. Many gaps are identified in the research literature, and directions for future research are described to ensure safe and comfortable care for high-risk neonates receiving enteral feedings.

Gastric residuals and their relationship to necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To determine the characteristics of gastric residuals in very low birth weight (VLBW; <or=1500 g birth weight) infants with and without necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

METHODS

Case-control study compared 51 VLBW infants who had proven NEC (pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas, and/or perforation; excluding spontaneous gastrointestinal perforations) with 102 control subjects (without suspected or proven NEC) who were matched for birth weight, gestational age, race, and sex and were born January 1996 to December 2001. The age in days at diagnosis of NEC was identified in infants with NEC, and feeding characteristics were recorded for the previous 6 days. Feeding characteristics were recorded for control subjects for the corresponding time period.

RESULTS

The median birth weight was 822 g and median gestational age was 26 weeks in both groups. Feeds were started on the fifth day, with a planned increase to full feeds over 10 days (median) in both groups. Median time to full feeds was 13 days in both groups. Median age of onset of NEC was day 24. The total residuals as a percentage of total feed volume (the primary outcome), maximum residual in the previous 6 days, maximum residual as a percentage of the feed, maximum residuals over the 6 days, and the percentage of feeds with residuals were higher in the NEC group. The maximum residual (median [25th-75th centiles]) was as follows: control subjects: 2 mL per feed (0.5-3.5) or 14% of a feed (4-33); NEC group: 4.5 mL per feed (1.5-9.8) or 40% of a feed (24-61). The total residuals as percentage of feeds and the average of maximum residuals increased in the NEC group from the first 3 days to the 3 days before diagnosis of NEC, but a similar increase was not noted for control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

VLBW infants who developed NEC had more gastric residuals. However, there was overlap with the normal control subjects. Of the gastric residual data, the maximum residual seems to be the best predictor for NEC in the subsequent days.

The effect of low-dose erythromycin on whole gastrointestinal transit time of preterm infants

The aim of the study was to determine the effect of a low oral dose of erythromycin on whole gastrointestinal transit time [WGTT]. Erythromycin [EM] [1.5 mg/kg, 6 hourly] or placebo was given first over 7 days in a double blind randomized crossover study of 21 preterm infants with feed intolerance. Median [range] birth weight was 1420 [690, 2200] g and postconceptual age 32. 5 [20, 36.4] weeks. WGTT was assessed on day 3 of each treatment, by timing the transit of carmine red through the gut. Treatments were compared using Student's paired t test.

RESULTS

WGTT was significantly shorter following EM treatment as compared to placebo: mean [SD] 10.16 [4.6] h vs. 15. 9 [7.2] h, p<0.01.

CONCLUSION

Oral low-dose EM significantly shortens WGTT of feed-intolerant preterm infants.