A clinicopathologic study of scarring alopecia due to lichen planus: comparison with scarring alopecia in discoid lupus erythematosus and pseudopelade

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Review

Frontal fibrosing alopecia is a scarring alopecia, the prevalence of which is increasing worldwide since its first description in 1994. The reason for this emerging epidemic may be a higher exposure to an unknown trigger, although its aethiology and pathogenesis still remain enigmatic. Clinical, trichoscopic, sonographic, and histopathologic findings are allowing clinicians to understand more aspects about this type of cicatricial alopecia. Several treatments have been used in frontal fibrosing alopecia, although the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors seem to be the most promising. The aim of this report is to provide a compilation about the published data regarding frontal fibrosing alopecia in a narrative review.

Practical Direct Immunofluorescence

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.

Lichen Planopilaris in Women: A Retrospective Review of 232 Women Seen at Mayo Clinic From 1992 to 2016

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinicopathologic findings, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes of women with lichen planopilaris (LPP).

METHOD

In this retrospective review of women with LPP at Mayo Clinic from 1992 to 2016, we searched for scarring alopecia in all female patients aged 1 to 100 years from January 1, 1992, through December 31, 2016. Men were excluded from this study to more accurately determine the association of hormonal factors in LPP pathogenesis. Two hundred thirty-two patients were included as they met diagnostic criteria for LPP based on clinicopathologic correlation, with 217 having confirmatory biopsies.

RESULTS

We identified 232 women with LPP (mean age, 59.8 years). Of those, 92.7% (215) presented with hair loss; 23.7% (55) had preceding inflammation; 30.6% (71) had thyroid disease, including hypothyroidism (23.2%; 54); and 9.4% (22) had vitamin D deficiency. Incidence of depression and anxiety was 45.7% (106) and 41.8% (97), respectively. History of total abdominal hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies and hormone replacement therapy was found in 16.8% (39) and 16.4% (38), respectively. Lichen planus at other body sites occurred in 16.4% (38) of patients; and 53.2% (123) had slowing of disease progression or disease stabilization, often requiring combination therapies. In those who achieved slowing or stabilization of disease, mean time to recurrence was 1.8 year. The mean time to remission was 1.1 year.

CONCLUSION

The typical LPP patient is a 60-year-old female with vertex scarring alopecia who presents with burning, erythema, inflammation, and scale. Almost half of patients will have comorbid autoimmunity. As previously reported, LPP is associated with thyroid disease. We also found higher rates of depression, anxiety, nutritional deficiencies, and skin cancer than reported in the general population.

Plucked hair follicles from patients with chronic discoid lupus erythematosus show a disease-specific molecular signature

OBJECTIVE

When faced with clinical symptoms of scarring alopecia-the standard diagnostic pathway involves a scalp biopsy which is an invasive and expensive procedure. This project aimed to assess if plucked hair follicles (HFs) containing living epithelial cells can offer a non-invasive approach to diagnosing inflammatory scalp lesions.

METHODS

Lesional and non-lesional HFs were extracted from the scalp of patients with chronic discoid lupus erythematosus (CDLE), psoriasis and healthy controls. RNA was isolated from plucked anagen HFs and microarray, as well as quantitative real-time PCR was performed.

RESULTS

Here, we report that gene expression analysis of only a small number of HF plucked from lesional areas of the scalp is sufficient to differentiate CDLE from psoriasis lesions or healthy HF. The expression profile from CDLE HFs coincides with published profiles of CDLE from skin biopsy. Genes that were highly expressed in lesional CDLE corresponded to well-known histopathological diagnostic features of CDLE and included those related to apoptotic cell death, the interferon signature, complement components and CD8+ T-cell immune responses.

CONCLUSIONS

We therefore propose that information obtained from this non-invasive approach are sufficient to diagnose scalp lupus erythematosus. Once validated in routine clinical settings and compared with other scarring alopecias, this rapid and non-invasive approach will have great potential for paving the way for future diagnosis of inflammatory scalp lesions.

Primary cicatricial alopecia: Lymphocytic primary cicatricial alopecias, including chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and Graham-Little syndrome

Both primary and secondary forms of cicatricial alopecia have been described. The hair follicles are the specific target of inflammation in primary cicatricial alopecias. Hair follicles are destroyed randomly with surrounding structures in secondary cicatricial alopecia. This 2-part continuing medical education article will review primary cicatricial alopecias according to the working classification suggested by the North American Hair Research Society. In this classification, the different entities are classified into 3 different groups according to their prominent inflammatory infiltrate (ie, lymphocytic, neutrophilic, and mixed). Part I discusses the following lymphocytic primary cicatricial alopecias: chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus, lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, and Graham-Little syndrome.

Primary scalp alopecia: new histopathological tools, new concepts and a practical guide to diagnosis

The diagnosis of primary scalp alopecia remains one of the most challenging fields in dermatopathology. In this review, we would like to connect the established classification of primary alopecia into scarring (cicatricial) and non-scarring (non-cicatricial) with current concepts. We introduce a simplified pathway for the diagnosis of the most common causes of alopecia, including a discussion of tissue processing techniques and use of immunohistochemistry.

Scarring alopecia in discoid lupus erythematosus: a clinical, histopathologic and immunopathologic study

Scarring alopecia is a very frequent feature of chronic discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). So far in the literature, only clinic-pathologic features or histopathologic-immunopathologic traits of DLE scarring alopecia (DLESA) have been reported. We describe the most significant features of clinical morphology, histopathology, serum and tissue immunopathology of 36 DLESA patients (41.9% of all our scarring alopecia patients). Clinically, 33.3% presented a single lesion and 52.7% presented multiple lesions of scarring alopecia, while 13.8% exhibited a picture resembling Pseudopelade of Brocq, with the classic ‘footprints in the snow’ appearance. The most frequent morphologic features were sclero-atrophy (80.5%) and erythema (63.8%). The main histopathologic aspects appeared to be fibrosis (100%), follicular hyperkeratosis (91.4%), epidermal atrophy (88.5%), lymphocytic infiltrate (88.5%), thickened basement membrane (77.1%) and basal vacuolar degeneration (74.2%). Antinuclear antibodies were present in 42.8% of patients and antigastric mucosa, antithyroid and anticardiolipin antibodies in 17-21% of patients. A positive lupus band test was demonstrated in 81.8% of cases and perivascular deposit in 30.3% of patients. Histopathology alone allowed a correct diagnosis only in 68.5% of cases; in the other cases, the diagnosis was assessed also taking into account immunopathologic findings. Our study defines the clinic, histopathologic and immunopathologic features of DLESA patients and points out that a multiparametric approach is mandatory to assess the diagnosis of DLESA.

The Use of Anti-Keratin 903 Antibodies to Visualize Colloid Bodies and Diagnose Lichen Planopilaris

Cytokeratins are a major component of colloid bodies that are essentially diagnostic of lichen planopilaris (LPP). Here, the authors assess the ability of the cytokeratin 903 antibody (CK-903) to stain colloid bodies and differentiate LPP from other histologically similar appearing primary cicatricial alopecias. A retrospective review of all specimens submitted to the dermatopathology department over a 2-year window identified 18 cases of LPP and 20 cases of histologically similar appearing entities (discoid lupus erythematosus or central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia) through a combination of H&E, elastic van gieson, and periodic acid-schiff stains. All 38 samples were then prospectively stained with CK-903. Colloid bodies were identifiable in 3 of the 18 LPP cases based on H&E alone but were seen in 9 of 18 cases when CK-903 was used. There were no cases where colloid bodies were seen on H&E but not subsequently identified with CK-903. Additionally, there was no CK-903 staining in any of the 20 cases of similar appearing entities except 1 case of discoid lupus erythematosus, which is known to occasionally show colloid bodies. The authors conclude that CK-903 is a useful adjunctive tool that will allow for a quicker, less costly, and more accurate diagnosis of LPP given its ability identify colloid bodies even in the setting of significant inflammation and fibrosis and its advantages over direct immunofluorescence of low cost, short preparation time, and lack of need for a specialized fluorescent microscope.

Lichen planopilaris versus discoid lupus erythematosus: a trichoscopic perspective

Trichoscopy enables visualization of subsurface structures and color patterns of scalp and hair. Recently, its applications expanded to diagnose inflammatory conditions such as lichen planopilaris (LPP), scalp psoriasis, and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Clinically, both LPP and DLE appear similar as cicatricial alopecia on the scalp making the diagnosis difficult. Here, we report the utility of trichoscopy in the clinical diagnosis of LPP and DLE. Clinically, suspected lesions of DLE and LPP on the scalp of each patient were observed under trichoscopy. Histopathology of lesions confirmed the clinical diagnosis. Authors observed characteristic trichoscopic features in LPP as well as in DLE proving the clinical diagnosis. Hence, trichoscopy can be used to diagnose LPP and DLE clinically avoiding skin biopsy.

Follicular disorders of the face

Follicular disorders are possibly a commonly seen, though rarely reported, group of disorders, which are localized around follicles and appendages and clinically present as small papules. Classically, clinicopathological follicular plugging is seen in the "true" follicular disorders, which are appropriately referred to as follicular keratosis. Another subtype is folliculitis (infectious or noninfectious) and the follicular mimickers that clinically resemble "true" follicular disorders without the follicular keratoses. Acne vulgaris has an amalgamation of all the above lesion types. Our review is aimed at describing all the follicular disorders and gives an algorithm for diagnosing the common follicular disorders.

Expanding the spectrum of frontal fibrosing alopecia: a unifying concept

BACKGROUND

In frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA), scalp alopecia dominates the clinical picture. However, eyebrow loss and hair loss in other body sites may also occur; this has been documented clinically, but rarely histopathologically. We describe the clinicopathological findings of 13 cases of FFA, with histopathologic data from the scalp, eyebrow, and body hair.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a diagnosis of FFA, seen between 2006 and 2008, were included. Scalp biopsies were performed in all patients for histology and direct immunofluorescence (DIF). Biopsy specimens for histology were taken from the eyebrow in 6 patients and from the upper limb in 5 patients.

RESULTS

All 13 patients were female, 11 of whom were postmenopausal. The median age at onset of alopecia was 57 years. Clinical examination revealed a band of frontal hairline recession in all patients. Eyebrow loss was present clinically in all patients, with loss of body hair in 10 of 13. Histopathologic examination of the scalp, eyebrow, and upper limb skin biopsy specimens showed similar features, including a marked reduction in the number of hair follicles and a perifollicular lymphoid cell infiltrate with perifollicular fibrosis. Direct immunofluorescence was negative in all cases.

LIMITATIONS

Not all patients consented to biopsies of the eyebrows or upper limbs.

CONCLUSION

Eyebrow and peripheral body hair loss is not uncommon in FFA-a finding that is likely underreported. We have demonstrated that alopecia of the upper limbs in FFA is indeed common and, histopathologically, shows features of lichen planopilaris and scarring, similar to findings in the scalp and eyebrows. Consequently, the process of lichen planopilaris with scarring alopecia is generalized rather than localized only to the frontal scalp and eyebrows.

Basement membrane changes in lichen planopilaris

BACKGROUND

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) is an inflammatory disease that affects the scalp and tends to produce cicatricial alopecia. The inflammatory process frequently results in the disruption of the basal cell of the external root sheath of the hair follicle.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the alterations in the basement membrane zone (BMZ) in LPP by immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Skin biopsies from six patients with LPP plus six normal controls were studied by immunohistochemistry with antibodies to the following BMZ components: cytokeratin 5, cytokeratin 14, BP230 (bullous pemphigoid), BP180, plectin, laminin 5, collagen IV and collagen VII.

RESULTS

The localization and staining of the hemidesmosome, laminin and collagen components were strikingly different in the inflamed follicular epithelium when compared to the uninvolved follicles or interfollicular epithelium in active LPP lesions. The hemidesmosome-associated complexes were weakly expressed and discontinuous in involved hair follicles. The expression of laminin-5, type IV collagen and type VII collagen was disrupted and not linear along the BMZ with finger-like projections of the staining protruding into the dermis. The expression of the intermediate filaments was normal.

CONCLUSION

These alterations in the BMZ in LPP may explain the abnormal healing at follicular level which leads to irreversible hair loss and scarring in this condition.

Hair follicle stem cells in the pathogenesis of the scarring process in cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an autoimmune disease that can affect one or more internal organs (systemic LE [SLE]) as well as the skin (CLE). Common cutaneous subtypes of CLE are chronic CLE (CCLE) and subacute CLE (SCLE). CCLE is the only type of CLE which heals with scarring and this may affect any site in the body. The fact that inflammation in CCLE generally involves the bulge area of the follicles (where the stem cells reside) raises the possibility that damage to the stem cells may be one process leading to permanent loss of follicles. One of the most useful distinctive markers of the stem cells is cytokeratin 15 (CK15) and this has been used in some studies to demonstrate the involvement of the bulge region in the scarring process in primary cicatricial alopecia and DLE. The bulge region appears to be involved in the scarring process in CLE and other types of cicatricial alopecia as part of broader involvement of the hair follicles; it is secondarily affected by the surrounding inflammatory cell infiltrate. Expression of the stem cell marker CK15 diminished and was then absent indicating either damage to stem cells or differentiation to help in the repair process.

Histopathologic Evaluation of Alopecias

The alopecias can be broadly classified into non-scarring and scarring forms. The latter are divided into primary and secondary scarring types. In primary scarring alopecias, the hair follicle is the prime target of destruction as opposed to secondary scarring alopecias in which it is involved in a neighboring non-follicular process that impinges upon the follicle and ultimately destroys it. After an initial overview and a critique on the concept of scarring versus non-scarring, we outline in detail the histopathologic presentation of the major forms of alopecias. Because the correct histopathologic diagnosis often requires close clinicopathologic correlation, a brief description of the clinical presentation is included. This review also discusses important pathogenetic concepts, such as stem cell failure.

Clinical Approach to the Patient With Alopecia

Hair loss, or alopecia, is a common patient complaint and a source of significant psychological and physical distress. The majority of common hair loss disorders can be accurately diagnosed in the outpatient setting with a systematic evaluation of the patient. This review will present a clinical approach to the patient with alopecia by describing the history, clinical findings, and diagnosis of various hair loss disorders.

Value of Direct Immunofluorescence for Differential Diagnosis of Cicatricial Alopecia

BACKGROUND

There are diverse causes of cicatricial alopecia characterized by lack of follicular ostia and irreversible loss of hair. While clinical differentiation between the causes may be difficult, particularly with regard to lichen planus (LP), lupus erythematosus (LE) and pseudopelade of Brocq (PB), it has been suggested that both histopathologic examination and direct immunofluorescence studies (DIF) are necessary for an accurate diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of DIF studies in addition to histopathology in patients with cicatricial alopecia as a clinical feature.

METHODS

136 scalp biopsy specimens received for histopathology and DIF during a 5-year period were reviewed.

RESULTS

Definitive diagnosis was achieved by careful evaluation of scalp biopsies. The most prevalent diagnoses in order of frequency were LP (26%), LE (21%) and folliculitis decalvans (20%). PB was diagnosed in 10%. In most cases, the diagnosis could be made on the basis of histopathology and independently of DIF. Characteristic DIF patterns showed high specificity, but low sensitivity for LP, and high specificity and sensitivity for LE. The DIF pattern in PB showed no difference to LP.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathology permits diagnosis in the majority of cicatricial alopecias. DIF is of value in histopathologically inconclusive cases, particularly when LE is in question.

Update on primary cicatricial alopecias

The cicatricial alopecias encompass a diverse group of disorders characterized by permanent destruction of the hair follicle and irreversible hair loss. Destruction of the hair follicle can result from primary, folliculocentric disease or as a secondary result. This article focuses on the former, or primary cicatricial alopecias. The cause and pathogenesis of many of these disorders are largely unknown. Although unique clinicopathologic features allow for accurate diagnosis in some cases, diagnostic certainty is often elusive and reflects the limits of present understanding. Classification of the primary cicatricial alopecias on the basis of pathology provides a diagnostic and investigational framework and, it is hoped, will facilitate future enlightenment. Details of classification, etiopathogenesis, clinicopathologic features, differential diagnosis, and practical management of the primary cicatricial alopecias will be discussed.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Upon completion of this learning activity, participants should be familiar with the following aspects of the primary cicatricial alopecias: (1) the new, consensus-issued classification scheme, (2) current understanding about etiopathogenesis, (3) salient clinicopathologic features, (4) differential diagnosis, and (5) therapeutic management.

Primary cicatricial alopecia: Histopathologic findings do not distinguish clinical variants

BACKGROUND

Primary cicatricial alopecias encompass a group of disorders characterized by permanent destruction of the hair follicle. The varied clinical features and differences in terminology have led to difficulties in defining consistent clinicopathologic correlation.

OBJECTIVE

We sought clinicopathologic correlation of 6 clinically distinct primary cicatricial alopecias: lichen planopilaris, frontal fibrosing alopecia, pseudopelade (Brocq), central centrifugal alopecia, folliculitis decalvans, and tufted folliculitis.

METHODS

We conducted prospective and blinded histopathologic evaluation of clinically typical primary cicatricial alopecias. Biopsy specimens were taken from early affected scalp lesions and paired with samples from clinically unaffected areas in the same patient.

RESULTS

The lymphocytic and neutrophilic groups were readily distinguished histologically. However, within the two groups clinically distinct primary cicatricial alopecias could not be distinguished with current histopathologic techniques.

CONCLUSION

A descriptive, standardized histopathologic reporting of follicular architecture, type, location, and extent of the inflammatory infiltrate, and presence or absence of sebaceous glands, may be of greatest value in guiding the treatment of patients with primary cicatricial alopecias.

Evaluation of inflammatory infiltrate and fibrogenic cytokines in pseudopelade of Brocq suggests the involvement of T-helper 2 and 3 cytokines

BACKGROUND

Pseudopelade of Brocq (PB) is an acquired progressive cicatricial alopecia which is characterized by some distinctive clinical features. It may represent either a distinct entity, i.e. an idiopathic primary scarring alopecia, or the end stage of various forms of scarring alopecia such as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) or lichen planopilaris (LPP).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate a set of patients with a clinically defined PB, to ascertain whether their PB was idiopathic or secondary, and then to study the phenotype of the inflammatory infiltrate and the presence of any fibrogenic and antifibrogenic cytokines to identify idiopathic or secondary forms in more detail.

METHODS

Twelve female patients with PB were studied by means of histology, direct immunofluorescence (DIF) and immunohistochemistry, by using monoclonal antibodies to cell markers (lymphocyte subtypes, Langerhans cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, mastocytes and activation markers) and fibrogenic and antifibrogenic cytokines.

RESULTS

Using histology and DIF, we diagnosed two cases as DLE and three cases as LPP. Seven cases had nonspecific histology or DIF appearances and were classified as noncharacterized pseudopelade (NCPB). Two major phenotypic patterns of dermal infiltrate were identified by immunohistochemistry. These were: (i) a conspicuous infiltrate of CD3+ cells with a high CD4+/CD8+ ratio, variable numbers of macrophages, mast cells and fibroblasts always fewer than lymphocytes; (ii) an infiltrate of CD3+ cells with variable CD4+/CD8+ ratio and conspicuous amounts of macrophages, mast cells and fibroblasts, more numerous than infiltrating lymphocytes. The first pattern was typical of DLE and LPP, the second one was typical of NCPB. Fibrogenic cytokines were observed in all cases, but basic fibroblastic growth factor (bFGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta were more strongly expressed in NCPB. Interferon (IFN)-gamma was found in LPP.

CONCLUSIONS

In our PB patients we identified five of 12 secondary PB and seven of 12 idiopathic PB by means of histology and DIF. The phenotypic pattern of infiltration allowed us to further differentiate secondary (richer in lymphocytes) from idiopathic PB (richer in resident cells). The pattern of cytokine expression showed the presence of fibrogenic molecules (interleukins 4 and 6, bFGF and TGF-beta) in all cases, suggesting the involvement of mechanisms mediated by T-helper 2 and 3 cytokines in PB.

Cicatricial alopecia; a dermatopathologic and immunopathologic study of 33 patients (pseudopelade of Brocq is not a specific clinico-pathologic entity)

BACKGROUND

Pseudopelade of Brocq (PB) is a permanent progressive scarring alopecia characterized by numerous alopecic patches localized only in the scalp, that tend to coalesce into larger, irregular plaques with policyclic borders. PB can be considered either the final atrophic stage of several scarring disorders such as lichen planus pilaris (LPP) and discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) (secondary PB) or an autonomous disease (primary PB). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of primary vs. secondary PB by a combined histopathological and immunopathological study in a series of patients who fulfilled the clinical diagnostic criteria for PB set forth by Braun Falco et al.

METHODS

We studied 33 patients (5 males and 28 females, whose age ranged from 24 to 75 years). The duration of the disease (from onset to biopsy) ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Serum samples were tested for circulating auto-antibodies (antinuclear antibodies anti ENA, anticentromere, anti-Scl70, antithyroid, antigastric parietal cells) circulating immune complexes, total and single fraction (C3, C4) complement activity. The skin biopsies taken from the active advancing margin of the more recent alopecic patch were bisected vertically, one was sent for histopathological examination, and the other for the immunofluorescence studies.

RESULTS

In all patients the serum tests above were found to be negative or normal. Histopathologically, 11 biopsies (33.3%) displayed findings typical for LPP whereas seven cases (21.2%) showed typical DLE features. In the remaining 15 cases (45.5%) histopathological findings were not suggestive of any specific dermatosis. DIF investigations showed findings typical of LPP in six cases (18.1%) and typical of DLE in seven cases (21%). In three cases we did not find findings typical of LPP, DLE, or any other specific dermatitis. In 11 cases no immunological deposits could be detected and therefore were classified as negative.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, PB is a type of scarring alopecia of the scalp associated with a peculiar clinical presentation and evolution, which cannot be considered an autonomous nosologic entity because in 66.6% of patients it is the end stage of other inflammatory chronic diseases such as LPP and DLE. It is conceivable that even in those cases in which the histopathological and immunopathological findings did not allow for a specific diagnosis, LPP and DLE were also involved. It is noteworthy that in our study the histopathological and the immunopathological examinations did not conflict and often the results were even coincidental, thus confirming the compatibility of the combined histo-immunopathological approach in the diagnostic evaluation of PB.