Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for long-term treatment of variceal bleeding. Early results of a randomized trial

Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of rebleeding in people with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

People with liver cirrhosis who have had one episode of variceal bleeding are at risk for repeated episodes of bleeding. Endoscopic intervention and portosystemic shunts are used to prevent further bleeding, but there is no consensus as to which approach is preferable.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of shunts (surgical shunts (total shunt (TS), distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS), or transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)) versus endoscopic intervention (endoscopic sclerotherapy or banding, or both) with or without medical treatment (non-selective beta blockers or nitrates, or both) for prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with liver cirrhosis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the CHBG Controlled Trials Register; CENTRAL, in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; LILACS (Bireme); Science Citation Index - Expanded (Web of Science); and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science (Web of Science); as well as conference proceedings and the references of trials identified until 22 June 2020. We contacted study investigators and industry researchers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing shunts versus endoscopic interventions with or without medical treatment in people with cirrhosis who had recovered from a variceal haemorrhage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. When possible, we collected data to allow intention-to-treat analysis. For each outcome, we estimated a meta-analysed estimate of treatment effect across trials (risk ratio for binary outcomes). We used random-effects model meta-analysis as our main analysis and as a means of presenting results. We reported differences in means for continuous outcomes without a meta-analytic estimate due to high variability in their assessment among all trials. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 27 randomised trials with 1828 participants. Three trials assessed TSs, five assessed DSRSs, and 19 trials assessed TIPSs. The endoscopic intervention was sclerotherapy in 16 trials, band ligation in eight trials, and a combination of band ligation and either sclerotherapy or glue injection in three trials. In eight trials, endoscopy was combined with beta blockers (in one trial plus isosorbide mononitrate). We judged all trials to be at high risk of bias. We assessed the certainty of evidence for all the outcome review results as very low (i.e. the true effects of the results are likely to be substantially different from the results of estimated effects). The very low evidence grading is due to the overall high risk of bias for all trials, and to imprecision and publication bias for some outcomes. Therefore, we are very uncertain whether portosystemic shunts versus endoscopy interventions with or without medical treatment have effects on all-cause mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.13; 1828 participants; 27 trials), on rebleeding (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.50; 1769 participants; 26 trials), on mortality due to rebleeding (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76; 1779 participants; 26 trials), and on occurrence of hepatic encephalopathy, both acute (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.92; 1649 participants; 24 trials) and chronic (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.55; 956 participants; 13 trials). No data were available regarding health-related quality of life. Analysing each modality of portosystemic shunts individually (i.e. TS, DSRS, and TIPS) versus endoscopic interventions with or without medical treatment, we are very uncertain if each type of shunt has effect on all-cause mortality: TS, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.13; 164 participants; 3 trials; DSRS, RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.33; 352 participants; 4 trials; and TIPS, RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.31; 1312 participants; 19 trial; on rebleeding: TS, RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.56; 127 participants; 2 trials; DSRS, RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.65; 330 participants; 5 trials; and TIPS, RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.55; 1312 participants; 19 trials; on mortality due to rebleeding: TS, RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.96; 164 participants; 3 trials; DSRS, RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.74; 352 participants; 5 trials; and TIPS, RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.04; 1263 participants; 18 trials; on acute hepatic encephalopathy: TS, RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.70 to 3.92; 115 participants; 2 trials; DSRS, RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.08; 287 participants; 4 trials, TIPS, RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.99; 1247 participants; 18 trials; and chronic hepatic encephalopathy: TS, Fisher's exact test P = 0.11; 69 participants; 1 trial; DSRS, RR 4.87, 95% CI 1.46 to 16.23; 170 participants; 2 trials; and TIPS, RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.93 to 3.80; 717 participants; 10 trials. The proportion of participants with shunt occlusion or dysfunction was overall 37% (95% CI 33% to 40%). It was 3% (95% CI 0.8% to 10%) following TS, 7% (95% CI 3% to 13%) following DSRS, and 47.1% (95% CI 43% to 51%) following TIPS. Shunt dysfunction in trials utilising polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents was 17% (95% CI 11% to 24%). Length of inpatient hospital stay and cost were not comparable across trials. Funding was unclear in 16 trials; 11 trials were funded by government, local hospitals, or universities.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence on whether portosystemic shunts versus endoscopy interventions with or without medical treatment in people with cirrhosis and previous hypertensive portal bleeding have little or no effect on all-cause mortality is very uncertain. Evidence on whether portosystemic shunts may reduce bleeding and mortality due to bleeding while increasing hepatic encephalopathy is also very uncertain. We need properly conducted trials to assess effects of these interventions not only on assessed outcomes, but also on quality of life, costs, and length of hospital stay.

The surgical treatment for portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim. To compare the effectiveness of surgical procedures (selective or nonselective shunt, devascularization, and combined shunt and devascularization) in preventing recurrent variceal bleeding and other complications in patients with portal hypertension. Methods. A systematic literature search of the Medline and Cochrane Library databases was carried out, and a meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Quality of Reporting Meta-Analyses (QUOROM) statement. Results. There were a significantly higher reduction in rebleeding, yet a significantly more common encephalopathy (P = 0.05) in patients who underwent the shunt procedure compared with patients who had only a devascularization procedure. Further, there were no significant differences in rebleeding, late mortality, and encephalopathy between selective versus non-selective shunt. Next, the decrease of portal vein pressure, portal vein diameter, and free portal pressure in patients who underwent combined treatment with shunt and devascularization was more pronounced compared with patients who were treated with devascularization alone (P < 0.05). Conclusions. This meta-analysis shows clinical advantages of combined shunt and devascularization over devascularization in the prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding and other complications in patients with portal hypertension.

Randomized controlled trial of emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acute bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Emergency treatment of bleeding esophageal varices (BEV) in cirrhosis is of paramount importance because of the resultant high mortality rate. Emergency therapy today consists mainly of endoscopic and pharmacologic measures, with use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) when bleeding is not controlled. Surgical portosystemic shunt has been relegated to last resort salvage when all other measures fail. Regrettably, no randomized controlled trials have been reported in which TIPS and surgical portosystemic shunt were compared in unselected patients with acute BEV, with long-term follow-up. This is a report of a long-term prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared TIPS with emergency portacaval shunt (EPCS) in patients with cirrhosis and acute BEV.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 154 unselected, consecutive cirrhotic patients ("all comers") with acute BEV were randomized to TIPS (n = 78) or EPCS (n = 76), and the two treatments were compared with regard to effect on survival, control of bleeding, portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), and disability. Diagnostic workup was completed within 6 h and TIPS or EPCS was initiated within 24 h. Regular follow-up was accomplished in 100 % of patients and lasted for 5 to 10 years in 85 % and 3 to 4.5 years in the remainder. This report focuses on control of bleeding and survival.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, and the distribution of Child classes A, B, and C was almost identical. TIPS was successful in controlling BEV for 30 days in 80 % of patients but achieved long-term control of BEV in only 22 %. In contrast, EPCS controlled BEV immediately in all patients and permanently in 97 % (p < 0.001). TIPS patients required almost twice as many units of blood transfusion as EPCS patients. Survival rate at all time intervals and in all Child classes was significantly greater following EPCS than after TIPS (p < 0.001). Median survival was over 10 years following EPCS, compared to 1.99 years following TIPS. Stenosis or occlusion of TIPS was demonstrated in 84 % of patients who survived 21 days, 63 % of whom underwent TIPS revision, which failed in 80 %. In contrast, EPCS remained permanently patent in 97 % of patients. Recurrent PSE was threefold more frequent following TIPS than after EPCS (61 versus 21 %).

CONCLUSIONS

EPCS was uniformly effective in the treatment of BEV, while TIPS was disappointing. EPCS accomplished long-term survival while TIPS resulted in a survival rate that was less than one fifth that of EPCS. The results of this RCT in unselected, consecutive patients justify the use of EPCS as a first-line emergency treatment of BEV in cirrhosis (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00734227).

Portal-systemic encephalopathy in a randomized controlled trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy versus emergency portacaval shunt treatment of acutely bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

In patients with cirrhosis and bleeding esophageal varices, there is a widespread belief that control of bleeding by portal-systemic shunts is compromised by a high incidence of shunt-related portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE). This important issue was examined by a randomized controlled trial that compared emergency and long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) to emergency direct portacaval shunt (EPCS) in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal hemorrhage.

METHODS

The study was a community-wide undertaking known as the San Diego Bleeding Esophageal Varices Study. A total of 211 unselected, consecutive patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis and endoscopically proven, acutely bleeding esophageal varices that required at least 2 units of blood transfusion were randomized to EST (n = 106) or EPCS (n = 105). The diagnostic workup was completed in less than 6 hours and EST or EPCS was initiated within 8 hours of initial contact. Long-term EST was performed according to a deliberate schedule over months. Criteria for failure of EST or EPCS were clearly defined and crossover rescue treatment was applied, whenever possible, when failure of primary therapy was declared. PSE was quantitated by a "blinded" senior faculty gastroenterologist. Four variously weighted components of PSE were graded on a scale of 0 to 4: (1) mental state, (2) asterixis, (3) number connection test, and (4) arterial blood ammonia. PSE was classified as recurrent if 2 or more episodes were documented. All patients (100%) had follow-up for more than 9.4 years or until death.

RESULTS

Child's risk classes in the EST and EPCS groups, respectively, were 25% and 30% in class A, 43% and 47% in class B, and 26% and 29% in class C. Mean time from onset of bleeding to EST or EPCS was less than 24 hours, and from study entry to EST or EPCS was 3.1 to 4.4 hours, respectively. EST achieved permanent control of bleeding in only 20% of patients, while EPCS permanently controlled bleeding in every patient (P ≤ 0.001). Survival following EPCS was 3.5 to 5 times greater than that of EST at 5, 10, and 15 years (P ≤ 0.001). The incidence of recurrent PSE following EST (35%) was more than twice the incidence following EPCS (15%) (P ≤ 0.001). EST patients had a total of 179 episodes of PSE and 146 PSE-related hospital admissions, compared with EPCS patients who had 94 episodes of PSE and 87 hospital admissions (P ≤ 0.001). Recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding, which was rare in the EPCS group, was a major causative factor of PSE in the EST patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to EST, EPCS permanently controlled variceal bleeding, resulted in significantly greater long-term survival, and was followed by a relatively low (15%) incidence of PSE. These results were facilitated by rigorous, frequent, and lifelong follow-up that included regular counseling on dietary protein restriction and abstinence from alcohol, and by long-term patency of the portacaval shunt in 98% of patients. Furthermore, these results call into question the practice of avoiding portacaval shunt because of fear of PSE, and thereby foregoing the lifesaving advantage achieved by surgical control of bleeding. (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00690027).

Randomized trial of emergency endoscopic sclerotherapy versus emergency portacaval shunt for acutely bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of bleeding esophageal varices in cirrhosis is highest during the period of acute bleeding. This is a report of a randomized trial that compared endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) with emergency portacaval shunt (EPCS) in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 211 unselected consecutive patients with cirrhosis and acutely bleeding esophageal varices who required at least 2 U of blood transfusion were randomized to EST (n=106) or EPCS (n=105). Diagnostic workup was completed within 6 hours and EST or EPCS was initiated within 8 hours of initial contact. Longterm EST was performed according to a deliberate schedule. Ninety-six percent of patients underwent more than 10 years of followup, or until death.

RESULTS

The percent of patients in Child's risk classes were A, 27.5; B, 45.0; and C, 27.5. EST achieved permanent control of bleeding in only 20% of patients; EPCS permanently controlled bleeding in every patient (p< or =0.001). Requirement for blood transfusions was greater in the EST group than in the EPCS patients. Compared with EST, survival after EPCS was significantly higher at all time intervals and in all Child's classes (p< or =0.001). Recurrent episodes of portal-systemic encephalopathy developed in 35% of EST patients and 15% of EPCS patients (p< or =0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

EPCS permanently stopped variceal bleeding, rarely became occluded, was accomplished with a low incidence of portal-systemic encephalopathy, and compared with EST, produced greater longterm survival. The widespread practice of using surgical procedures mainly as salvage for failure of endoscopic therapy is not supported by the results of this trial (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT00690027).

Variceal recurrence, rebleeding, and survival after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy in 287 alcoholic cirrhotic patients with bleeding esophageal varices

OBJECTIVE

This study tested the validity of the hypothesis that eradication of esophageal varices by repeated injection sclerotherapy would reduce recurrent variceal bleeding and death from bleeding varices in a high-risk cohort of alcoholic patients with cirrhosis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although banding of esophageal varices is now regarded as the most effective method of endoscopic intervention, injection sclerotherapy is still widely used to control acute esophageal variceal bleeding as well as to eradicate varices to prevent recurrent bleeding. This large single-center prospective study provides data on the natural history of alcoholic cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices who underwent injection sclerotherapy.

METHODS

Between 1984 and 2001, 287 alcoholic cirrhotic patients (225 men, 62 women; mean age, 51.9 years; range, 24-87 years; Child-Pugh grades A, 39; B, 116; C, 132) underwent a total of 2565 upper gastrointestinal endoscopic sessions, which included 353 emergency and 1015 elective variceal injection treatments. Variceal rebleeding, eradication, recurrence, and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Before eradication of varices was achieved, 104 (36.2%) of the 287 patients had a total of 170 further bleeding episodes after the first endoscopic intervention during the index hospital admission. Rebleeding was markedly reduced after eradication of varices. In 147 (80.7%) of 182 patients who survived more than 3 months, varices were eradicated after a mean of 5 injection sessions and remained eradicated in 69 patients (mean follow-up, 34.6 months; range, 1-174 months). Varices recurred in 78 patients and rebled in 45 of these patients. Median follow-up was 32.3 months (mean, 42.1 months; range, 3-198.9 months). Cumulative overall survival by life-table analysis was 67%, 42%, and 26% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. A total of 201 (70%) patients died during follow-up. Liver failure was the most common cause of death.

CONCLUSION

Repeated sclerotherapy eradicates esophageal varices in most alcoholic cirrhotic patients with a reduction in rebleeding. Despite control of variceal bleeding, survival at 5 years was only 26% because of death due to liver failure in most patients.

Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Randomised clinical trials have compared portosystemic shunting procedures with endoscopic therapy for variceal haemorrhage, but there is no consensus as to which approach is preferable.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of shunts (total surgical shunt (TS); distal spleno-renal shunts (DSRS) or transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunts (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy (ET, sclerotherapy and/or banding) for prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, and the references of identified trials were searched (last search February 2004). Researchers in the field and in industry were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing TS, DSRS or TIPS with ET in patients who had recovered from a variceal haemorrhage and were known to be cirrhotic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected to allow intention-to-treat analysis where possible. For each outcome, a pooled estimate of treatment effect (log hazard ratio for time to outcome, Peto odds ratio for binary outcomes, and differences in means for continuous outcomes) across trials was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials evaluating 1409 patients were included. All trials had problems of method. Shunt therapy compared with ET demonstrated significantly less rebleeding (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.30) at the cost of significantly increased acute hepatic encephalopathy (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.69) and chronic encephalopathy (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.62). There were no significant differences regarding mortality (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21) and duration of in-patient stay (weighed mean difference 0.78 day, 95% CI -1.48 to 3.05). The proportion of patients with shunt occlusion or dysfunction was 3.1% (95% CI 0.4 to 10.7%) following TS (two trials), 7.8% (95% CI 3.8 to 13.9%) following DSRS (four trials), and 59% (range 18% to 72%) following TIPS (14 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

All shunts resulted in a significantly lower rebleeding rate at the expense of a higher incidence of encephalopathy. TIPS was complicated by a high incidence of shunt dysfunction. No survival advantage was demonstrated with any shunt.

Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic therapy for variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Randomised clinical trials have compared portosystemic shunting procedures with endoscopic therapy for variceal haemorrhage, but there is no consensus as to which approach is preferable.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of shunts (total surgical shunt (TS); distal spleno-renal shunts (DSRS) or transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic shunts (TIPS) with endoscopic therapy (ET, sclerotherapy and/or banding) for prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, and the references of identified trials were searched (last search February 2004). Researchers in the field and in industry were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing TS, DSRS or TIPS with ET in patients who had recovered from a variceal haemorrhage and were known to be cirrhotic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected to allow intention-to-treat analysis where possible. For each outcome, a pooled estimate of treatment effect (log hazard ratio for time to outcome, Peto odds ratio for binary outcomes, and differences in means for continuous outcomes) across trials was calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials evaluating 1409 patients were included. All trials had problems of method. Shunt therapy compared with ET demonstrated significantly less rebleeding (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.30) at the cost of significantly increased acute hepatic encephalopathy (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59 to 2.69) and chronic encephalopathy (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.62). There were no significant differences regarding mortality (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.21) and duration of in-patient stay (weighed mean difference 0.78 day, 95% CI -1.48 to 3.05). The proportion of patients with shunt occlusion or dysfunction was 3.1% (95% CI 0.4 to 10.7%) following TS (two trials), 7.8% (95% CI 3.8 to 13.9%) following DSRS (four trials), and 59% (range 18% to 72%) following TIPS (14 trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

All shunts resulted in a significantly lower rebleeding rate at the expense of a higher incidence of encephalopathy. TIPS was complicated by a high incidence of shunt dysfunction. No survival advantage was demonstrated with any shunt.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts: Long-term Patency and Clinical Results in a Patient Cohort Observed for 3–9 Years

PURPOSE

To retrospectively assess the outcome of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in a nonselected group of consecutive patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TIPS placement was attempted in 82 patients. Patients were followed up for at least 3 years according to a standard protocol that included repeated shunt evaluations. Fifty-four patients underwent TIPS placement for variceal bleeding, 24 for refractory ascites, and four for other indications. Recurrent bleeding, effect on ascites, long-term patency, development of encephalopathy, and survival and complication rates were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

TIPS placement was successful in 75 patients (91%). Mean follow-up lasted 29.4 months. Primary patency was 22% and 12%, primary-assisted patency was 67% and 46%, and secondary patency was 91% and 91% at 1- and 5-year follow-up, respectively. Nonalcoholic liver disease (P =.007) and increasing platelet counts (P =.006) independently predicted development of shunt insufficiency. The 1- and 5-year rates of recurrent variceal bleeding were 21% and 27%, respectively. In the majority of patients with refractory ascites, a beneficial effect of TIPS placement was observed. The risk for encephalopathy was 25% at 1-month follow-up and 52% at 3-year follow-up. The risk for chronic or severe intermittent encephalopathy was 15% at 1-year follow-up and 20% at 3-year follow-up. Serum creatinine levels (P =.001) and age (P =.02) were independent risk factors. Overall survival rate was 61%, 49%, and 42% at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up, respectively. Age (P =.03), serum albumin level (P =.02), and serum creatinine level (P <.001) were independently related to mortality.

CONCLUSION

The risk for definitive loss of shunt function was 17% at 5-year follow-up, indicating that surveillance with shunt revision-when indicated-results in excellent long-term TIPS patency. TIPS placement effectively protects against recurrent bleeding.

A comparison of Child-Pugh, APACHE II and APACHE III scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality of patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic accuracy of Child-Pugh and APACHE II and III scoring systems in predicting short-term, hospital mortality of patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

200 admissions of 147 cirrhotic patients (44% viral-associated liver cirrhosis, 33% alcoholic, 18.5% cryptogenic, 4.5% both viral and alcoholic) were studied prospectively. Clinical and laboratory data conforming to the Child-Pugh, APACHE II and III scores were recorded on day 1 for all patients. Discrimination was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under a ROC curve (AUC). Calibration was estimated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.

RESULTS

Overall mortality was 11.5%. The mean Child-Pugh, APACHE II and III scores for survivors were found to be significantly lower than those of nonsurvivors. Discrimination was excellent for Child-Pugh (ROC AUC: 0.859) and APACHE III (ROC AUC: 0.816) scores, and acceptable for APACHE II score (ROC AUC: 0.759). Although the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic revealed adequate goodness-of-fit for Child-Pugh score (P = 0.192), this was not the case for APACHE II and III scores (P = 0.004 and 0.003 respectively)

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that, of the three models, Child-Pugh score had the least statistically significant discrepancy between predicted and observed mortality across the strata of increasing predicting mortality. This supports the hypothesis that APACHE scores do not work accurately outside ICU settings.

Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine long-term survival, shunt patency, and quality of life in patients after creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed up 103 patients who underwent TIPS for a mean of 20.10 +/- 25.58 months (range, 1 day-92 months). Various statistical methods were used to analyze long-term survival, shunt patency, and correlation with Child-Pugh classification and indications for TIPS. The Rand 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 was used to assess quality of life over time.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival rate was 68%, 60%, 50%, 41%, and 41% at years 1-5, respectively. The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher for patients classified as Child-Pugh class A or B versus those classified as class C (p < 0.01), as well as for patients with the original indication of variceal bleeding versus refractory ascites or hydrothorax (p < 0.01). No significant difference in survival rates was found between patients with Child-Pugh A and those with Child-Pugh B. The cumulative primary patency rate was 50%, 34%, 21%, 13%, and 13% at years 1-5, respectively, with assisted patency rate of 80%, 61%, 46%, 42%, and 36%. Cumulative secondary patency rate was 85%, 64%, 55%, 55%, and 55% at years 1-5. Mean follow-up time in 33 patients who completed quality-of-life questionnaires with one follow-up was 17.46 months. Scores after TIPS in all nine of the health categories were higher than those preprocedure with statistically significant improvement in four categories. The second follow-up was completed by 21 patients at a mean of 30.58 months after TIPS creation. Both scores after TIPS were higher than those before TIPS, and scores in five categories were further improved at the second surveillance (p < 0.0, only for health change), whereas in four categories, the scores were slightly worse.

CONCLUSION

TIPS has positive efficacy both for controlling bleeding or ascites and for improving the quality of life. The precise impact of TIPS on long-term survival, however, requires further clarification.

Bleeding esophagogastric varices from extrahepatic portal hypertension: 40 years' experience with portal-systemic shunt

BACKGROUND

This article discusses the largest and longest experience reported to date of the use of portal-systemic shunt (PSS) to treat recurrent bleeding from esophagogastric varices caused by extrahepatic portal hypertension associated with portal vein thrombosis (PVT).

STUDY DESIGN

Two hundred consecutive children and adults with extrahepatic portal hypertension caused by PVT who were referred between 1958 and 1998 after recovering from at least two episodes of bleeding esophagogastric varices requiring blood transfusions were managed according to a well-defined and uniformly applied protocol. All but 14 of the 200 patients were eligible for and received 5 or more years of regular followup (93%); 166 were eligible for and received 10 or more years of regular followup (83%).

RESULTS

The etiology of PVT was unknown in 65% of patients. Identifiable causes of PVT were neonatal omphalitis in 30 patients (15%), umbilical vein catheterization in 14 patients (7%), and peritonitis in 14 patients (7%). The mean number of bleeding episodes before PSS was 5.4 (range 2 to 18). Liver biopsies showed normal morphology in all patients. The site of PVT was the portal vein alone in 134 patients (76%), the portal vein and adjacent superior mesenteric vein in 10 patients (5%), and the portal and splenic veins in 56 patients (28%). Postoperative survival to leave the hospital was 100%. Actuarial 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year survival rates were 99%, 97%, and 95%, respectively. Five patients (2.5%), all with central end-to-side splenorenal shunts, developed thrombosis of the PSS, and these were the only patients who had recurrent variceal bleeding. During 10 or more years of followup, 97% of the eligible patients were shown to have a patent shunt and were free of bleeding. No patient developed portal-systemic encephalopathy, liver function tests remained normal, liver biopsies in 100 patients showed normal architecture, hypersplenism was corrected.

CONCLUSION

PSS is the only consistently effective therapy for bleeding esophagogastric varices from PVT and extrahepatic portal hypertension, resulting in many years of survival, freedom from recurrent bleeding, normal liver function, and no encephalopathy.

An evaluation of splenopancreatic disconnection as a modification of the distal splenorenal shunt, studied in nonalcoholic patients by sequential angiography

To evaluate the validity and complications of modifying the distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) by performing splenopancreatic disconnection (SPD), hemodynamic changes in the portal system were assessed by visceral angiography in 93 patients with nonalcoholic portal hypertension during early postoperative follow-up after DSRS. There were 40 patients who underwent DSRS alone and 53 who underwent DSRS plus SPD. Early follow-up angiography showed that portal vein perfusion was well maintained, and that the diameter of the portal vein had decreased significantly by the same degree in both groups. Hepatofugal collaterals for the shunt had developed to a greater extent in the DSRS group, while they were almost completely absent in the DSRS with SPD group. Nevertheless, partial portal vein thrombosis was not detected in the DSRS group, although it was seen in seven (13.2%) of the patients who underwent DSRS plus SPD, in whom the left proximal splenic vein was not visible. The proximal splenic vein was seen in significantly less of the DSRS with SPD patients (47.2%) than the DSRS group patients (85%). In conclusion, SPD more effectively prevented the early postoperative development of collateral pathways for the shunt compared with standard DSRS; however, the possible stagnation of blood flow in the left proximal splenic vein may predispose to a risk of partial portal vein thrombosis developing during the early postoperative period after DSRS with SPD.

Shunt surgery during the era of liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE

The indications for and the results of portosystemic shunts done in the authors' institution since initiation of a liver transplant program 10 years ago were reviewed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

With the widespread availability of liver transplantation as definitive treatment of chronic liver disease, the role of shunts in the overall management of variceal bleeding needs to be redefined.

METHODS

Seventy-one variceal bleeders with cirrhosis who received a shunt (82% distal splenorenal shunts) because of sclerotherapy failure or because endoscopic treatment was not indicated were reviewed retrospectively. In 44 patients with well-preserved hepatic reserve, the shunt was used as a long-term bridge to transplantation (shunt group 1). The remaining 27 patients with shunts were not transplant candidates mainly because of uncontrolled alcoholism or advanced age (shunt group 2). Survival of both shunt groups was compared to that of 180 adult patients with a history of variceal bleeding who underwent transplantation soon after referral.

RESULTS

Because of their more advanced liver disease, the liver transplant group had a higher operative mortality rate (19%) than did either of the shunt groups (5% and 7%, respectively) (p < 0.02). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed better survival in shunt group 1 (seven patients thus far transplanted) than in either the liver transplant group or shunt group 2 during the early years and superior survival of shunt group 1 and the liver transplant group as compared to shunt group 2 during the later years of the analysis. Only two patients from shunt group 1 have died of late postoperative hepatic failure without benefit of liver transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A shunt may serve as an excellent long-term bridge to liver transplantation in patients with well-preserved hepatic reserve. Shunt surgery still plays an important role in treatment of selected patients with variceal bleeding who are not present or future transplant candidates.

The role of liver transplantation in the management of portal hypertension

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end stage liver disease and not a treatment specifically for portal hypertension. A patient with complications of portal hypertension must be evaluated for the presence, etiology, and severity of liver disease to determine the most appropriate therapy. In a Child's Class A patient, who would not be a liver transplant candidate for two to three years, surgical shunts may be indicated. Shunt surgery, however, does not address the underlying liver disease. Liver transplantation is reserved for the patient with complications of cirrhosis (such as ascites, encephalopathy, malnutrition, intractable pruritus, and variceal hemorrhage) for whom no other form of therapy exists.

Randomised trial of transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt versus endoscopy plus propranolol for prevention of variceal rebleeding

BACKGROUND

The transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic shunt is a new interventional treatment for portal hypertension. The aim of our study was to compare the transjugular shunt with endoscopic treatment for the prophylaxis of recurrent variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Between March, 1993, and March, 1996, 126 patients with variceal bleeding were randomly assigned either transjugular shunt (n = 61) or endoscopic treatment (n = 65). Patients were followed up for a median of 14 (IQR 8-25) months and 13 (8-25) months, respectively. In 31 (51%) of the shunted patients, simultaneous transjugular-variceal embolisation was done at the time of shunt placement. Endoscopic treatment consisted of sclerotherapy and/or banding ligation and was combined with propranolol medication.

FINDINGS

Technical success was achieved in all patients assigned to the shunt group. During follow-up, the cumulative 1-year variceal rebleeding rates in the shunted and endoscopically treated patients were 15% and 41% and the 2-year rates were 21% and 52% (p = 0.001), respectively. In nine (12%) patients from the endoscopic group treatment failed and the patients received the transjugular-shunt treatment. A total of 19 bleeding episodes from any source occurred in 15 patients in the shunt group compared with 100 episodes in 33 patients in the endoscopic group. There was no difference in survival with estimated 1-year survival rates for shunted and endoscopically treated patients of 90% and 89%, and 2-year survival rates of 79% and 82%, respectively. The incidence of clinically significant hepatic encephalopathy after 1 year was higher in the shunt group (36% vs 18%, p = 0.011).

INTERPRETATION

These results suggest, that the transjugular shunt is more effective than endoscopic treatment in prevention of variceal rebleeding but has a considerable risk of hepatic encephalopathy. Survival is similar in the two groups.

Transabdominal esophagogastric devascularization as treatment for variceal hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

During the past 18 years we have used a selective operative approach for variceal bleeders in whom endoscopic sclerotherapy failed or sclerotherapy was not indicated. Esophagogastric devascularization with splenectomy has been reserved for unshuntable patients and for those in whom a shunt was deemed inadvisable. The purposes of this study are to describe the surgical procedure technique and indications for esophagogastric devascularization and to report its long-term results.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients who underwent either a limited (n = 9) or extensive (n = 23) esophagogastric devascularization procedure without esophageal transection for variceal bleeding were retrospectively reviewed. Common indications were thrombosis of all splanchnic veins (n = 12), distal splenorenal shunt thrombosis (n = 7), generalized portal hypertension with isolated splenic vein thrombosis (n = 5), and symptomatic splenomegaly or severe hypersplenism (n = 6). Eighteen patients (56%) had cirrhosis, eleven (34%) received an emergency operation, and eighteen (56%) bled from gastric varices.

RESULTS

Three patients with Child's class C disease undergoing emergency surgery died during the early postoperative interval. Rebleeding occurred in nine surviving patients (31%) and was the cause of death in three. Rebleeding rates for the limited and extensive devascularization procedures were 50% and 24%, respectively. Only one of 11 patients with diffuse splanchnic venous thrombosis without liver disease has died. The 5-year survival rate of patients with liver disease was 51%. Only two patients experienced postoperative encephalopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in selected patients, esophagogastric devascularization without esophageal transection is a reasonably effective alternative to shunt surgery.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with end-stage liver disease: results in 85 patients

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is becoming an accepted procedure as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and bleeding from portal hypertension. It allows the immediate control of acute bleeding and decreases the risk of recurrent acute bleeding while the patient is awaiting OLT. We review in this report, our experience with 85 patients who underwent a TIPS procedure for gastrointestinal variceal bleeding from September 1991 until April 1994. All patients had liver cirrhosis and all had previous sclerotherapy before TIPS. Child-Pugh score was calculated at enrollment, and all patients were evaluated for possible OLT. Thirteen patients were Child A, 49 were Child B, and 23 were Child C. Fifty-three patients were candidates for OLT, and 32 were not. TIPS was performed urgently in 25 patients. At a median follow-up of 582 days (range, 1 to 1,095), 35 patients underwent transplantation, 21 patients died, and 29 patients are still alive and did not undergo transplantation. Technical complications were observed in 7% of patients and new onset of clinical encephalopathy in 37%. The 30-day mortality rate after TIPS was 13%. Actuarial survival was 60% at 1 and 3 years. Child class C and urgent TIPS were shown to be two independent predictor factors for mortality. TIPS was shown to be a valuable procedure, not only as a bridge to OLT but also as palliation for bleeding from portal hypertension in patients who were not candidates for either surgical shunt or OLT. However, its role in bleeding patients with acceptable liver function needs further investigation.

Relation between portal pressure response to pharmacotherapy and risk of recurrent variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis

In patients with variceal bleeding as a complication of hepatic cirrhosis, propranolol therapy reduces the risk of recurrent variceal haemorrhage. However, the relation between portal pressure response to pharmacological treatment and clinical events has not been well defined. This relation was prospectively investigated in 69 cirrhotic patients receiving continued propranolol therapy after an episode of variceal bleeding. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was measured before and at 3 months of continued drug therapy. At 3 months HVPG had fallen by 20% or more in 25 patients. During follow-up of 28 (SD 17) months rebleeding occurred in 2 of these 25 patients compared with 23 of 44 who had lesser reductions in HVPG. Cumulative probability of rebleeding at 1, 2, and 3 years was 4%, 9%, and 9% in patients with a decrease in HVPG > or = 20%, and 28%, 39%, and 66% in patients with a decrease in HVPG < 20% (p < 0.001, log-rank test). On multivariate analysis, a decrease in HVPG > or = 20% was the only independent predictor of rebleeding (relative risk 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.41. Of the 8 patients in whom the HVPG fell to 12 mm Hg or less, none rebled. This study suggests that measurement of the HVPG response to pharmacotherapy will provide useful prognostic information on the long-term risk of variceal rebleeding.

Fifty years of surgery for portal hypertension at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Lessons and prospects

OBJECTIVE

The 50-year experience with surgery for the treatment of portal hypertension and bleeding varices at the Cleveland Clinic is reviewed.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

A variety of procedures have been used to treat bleeding varices during the past 50 years. These include transesophageal ligation of varices or devascularization of the esophagus and stomach with splenectomy; portal-systemic (total) shunts; distal splenorenal (selective) shunts; endoscopic sclerotherapy; transjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunts; and liver transplantation.

METHODS

Our experience with these procedures is reviewed in four time periods: 1946 to 1964, 1965 to 1980, 1980 to 1990, and 1990 to 1994.

RESULTS

Our use of these procedures has changed as experience and new techniques for managing portal hypertension have evolved. Most ligation--devascularization--splenectomy procedures were performed before 1980; they provide excellent results in patients with normal livers and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction, but a major complication (40-50%) is rebleeding. Total shunts were performed most frequently before 1980; with patient selection, operative mortality was reduced to 8%, control of bleeding was achieved in more than 90%, but the incidence of encephalopathy was high (30%). Selective shunts provide almost equal protection from rebleeding with less post-shunt encephalopathy. We currently use selective shunts for patients with good liver function. Liver transplantation has been used since the mid 1980s for patients with poor liver function and provides good results for this difficult group of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of patients for these procedures is the key to the successful management of portal hypertension.

Oesophageal varices: a potentially fatal complication of liver metastases

Haemorrhage from oesophageal varices is a common and potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension, which is usually due to cirrhosis of the liver. Although liver metastases and hepatic dysfunction frequently occur in malignant disease, reports of oesophageal varices arising as a consequence of metastatic liver disease are sporadic, suggesting that this complication is unusual. Indeed, one review of the literature identified only 23 cases, although a few others have subsequently been reported. The management of such patients bleeding from oesophageal varices is clearly very different from bleeding due to other causes such as peptic ulceration. We report three cases and review the literature. All of our cases presented to us within a period of one year, suggesting that this complication of metastatic liver disease is more common than originally considered to be the case.

Surgical management of portal hypertension

The surgical management of portal hypertension depends on the location of the obstruction. Suprahepatic obstruction is usually optimally treated by a surgical portacaval shunt. In extrahepatic obstruction the treatment should be sclerotherapy. For intrahepatic obstruction in emergency situations, sclerotherapy is the first choice, with portacaval systemic shunts or transjugular intrahepatic portal systemic stent shunt the second option. Liver transplantation in other situations should, if possible, be considered ahead of a portal diversion.

Prospective randomized trial of emergency portacaval shunt and emergency medical therapy in unselected cirrhotic patients with bleeding varices

A prospective randomized trial was conducted in unselected, consecutive patients with bleeding esophageal varices resulting from cirrhosis comparing (1) emergency portacaval shunt performed within 8 hr of initial contact (21 patients) with (2) emergency medical therapy (intravenous vasopressin and esophageal balloon tamponade) followed in 9 to 30 days by elective portacaval shunt in survivors (22 patients). All patients underwent the same diagnostic workup within 3 to 6 hr of initial contact, and received identical supportive therapy initially. All patients were followed up for at least 10 yr. The protocol contained no escape or cross-over provisions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in the incidence of any of the clinical variables, results of laboratory tests or degree of portal hypertension. Child's risk classes in the shunt group were A-2 patients, B-8 patients and C-11 patients, whereas in the medical group they were A-10 patients, B-5 patients, and C-7 patients, a significant difference (p < 0.01) that might have favored emergency medical treatment. Bleeding was controlled initially and permanently by emergency shunt in every patient, but by medical therapy in only 45% (p < 0.001). Mean requirement for blood transfusion was 7.1 +/- 2.6 units in the shunt group and 21.4 +/- 2.6 units in the medical group (p < 0.001). Eighty-one percent of the patients in the shunt group were discharged alive compared with 45% in the medical group (p = 0.027). Five- and 10-yr observed survival rates were 67% and 57%, respectively, after emergency shunt compared with 18% and 18%, respectively, after the combination of emergency medical therapy and elective shunt (p < 0.01). These survival rates produced by emergency shunt performed within 8 hr of initial contact confirm the effectiveness of this procedure observed in our previous unrandomized studies.

Percutaneous transjugular intrahepatic stent shunt for treatment of intractable varicose bleeding in paediatric patients

Two 10-year and 11-year-old children with oesophageal and gastric varicose haemorrhage unresponsive to medical treatment and repeated endoscopic sclerotherapy underwent percutaneous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPSS). A newly developed introducing system was used. The procedure was performed to avoid the increased risk of emergency liver transplantation in children with hepatic failure. Immediately after the procedure bleeding stopped and the patient's condition improved. Ascites disappeared and liver function improved. The stent shunt was shown to be patent by angiography and Doppler ultrasound for a follow up period of more than 1 year.

CONCLUSION

TIPSS may be of benefit in children with severe portal hypertension. It allows control of intractable bleeding, and stabilizes the patients preparing them for subsequent elective orthotopic liver transplantation.

Survival and quality of life after portal blood flow preserving procedures in patients with portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis

Between 1979 and 1991, 156 patients with histologically proven liver cirrhosis, good liver function, and bleeding portal hypertension underwent operation with portal blood flow preserving procedures (selective shunts: 101; Sugiura-Futagawa: 55). Long-term results of the procedures and the quality of life of the 145 patients who survived the operation were studied. During the observation period (range 3 to 156 months), 28 patients died. The main causes of death were liver failure and hepatoma. Twenty-three patients were lost for follow-up. Twenty-six patients (18%) developed 1 or more encephalopathic episodes. Four patients (3%) experienced rebleeding. One hundred eight patients (74%) had a good quality of life, and 26 (18%) had a poor quality of life. Eleven (15%) of 73 patients with a history of alcoholism continued drinking. Five-year survival for the selective shunt group was 81% and for the devascularization group was 83%. In 81% of the patients, portal blood flow was maintained. It is concluded that both procedures are effective in the long-term. Most patients are able to rehabilitate from the use of alcohol, and most of them have a good quality of life. For patients with good liver function (whose main problem is bleeding), surgery is the best choice of treatment.

Total shunting and elective management of variceal bleeding

A 20-year experience with treatment of esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis is reported. Considering that total shunts are well tolerated immediately after operation (hospital mortality rate for all elective procedures being 6.4%), that they offer a good protection against rebleeding (rebleeding variceal rate of 7.6%), and that they offer the same long-term survival as given by other shunts (5- and 10-year survival rates of 57% and 31%, respectively), the authors affirm that these kinds of shunts are still useful in well selected cases. Late follow-up results of a prospective randomized trial of elective mesocaval shunts compared to portacaval shunt have shown no significant differences in operative mortality, rebleeding rates, encephalopathy rates, or survival. Based on this information, the authors currently use portacaval shunt as their operation of choice.

Role of distal splenorenal shunt for long-term management of variceal bleeding

Distal splenorenal shunt (DSRS) has been studied extensively over the past 25 years to define its role in management of variceal bleeding. The operative technique of the shunt has not changed, but more aggressive attempts at portal-azygos disconnection have been studied for their effect on maintenance of portal perfusion. Control of variceal bleeding is achieved in about 90% of patients. Portal flow to the liver is maintained in > 90% of patients with nonalcoholic etiology of portal hypertension and in 50% to 84% of patients with alcoholic cirrhosis depending on the degree of portal-azygos disconnection. Encephalopathy and liver failure do not seem to be accelerated by DSRS but depend on the severity of the underlying liver disease. Reported survival likewise depends on the etiology of portal hypertension and the severity of liver disease: > 90% survival can be achieved in portal vein thrombosis and patients with cirrhosis and normal liver function, but 50% to 60% 3- to 5-year survivals are reported for patients with more advanced disease. DSRS offers one treatment modality for management of variceal bleeding that must fit into an overall strategy for these patients. Full evaluation is the key to allow selection of patients for pharmacotherapy, sclerotherapy, variceal decompression, or liver transplantation.

Treatment of bleeding esophagogastric varices due to extrahepatic portal hypertension: results of portal-systemic shunts during 35 years

From 1958 to 1990, elective therapeutic portal-systemic shunt (PSS) procedures were performed for recurrent bleeding esophagogastric varices in 162 children and adults with extrahepatic portal hypertension (EHPH) resulting from portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The onset of EHPH was in childhood for at least 74% of patients. Of the 162 patients, 147 were eligible for and received 5 years of follow-up (100%), and 117 were eligible for and received 10 years of follow-up (100%). The longest follow-up was 35 years. The cause of PVT was unknown in 68%, neonatal omphalitis in 12%, umbilical vein catheterization in 8%, peritonitis in 6%, trauma in 4%, and thrombotic coagulopathy in 2%. The number of variceal bleeding episodes ranged from 2 to 18 (mean, 5.6). None of the patients had clinical, biochemical, or liver biopsy evidence of liver disease. Esophageal varices were demonstrated by endoscopy, and/or contrast x-rays, and/or angiography in all patients. Visceral angiography was always used to demonstrate the extent of portal obstruction and the veins available for shunting. Before referral, the following procedures had failed: endoscopic sclerotherapy (68 patients), splenectomy alone (32 patients), central splenorenal shunt with splenectomy (10 patients), transesophageal varix ligation (12 patients). Three types of PSS were used: (1) central side-to-side splenorenal without splenectomy (75 patients, 46%); (2) central end-to-side splenorenal with splenectomy (34 patients, 21%); and (3) mesocaval (end-to-side cavomesenteric) (53 patients, 33%). PSS reduced the mean corrected portal pressure from 292 to 28 mm saline. All patients survived the procedure and left the hospital (100%). The actuarial survival rate for 5 years is 99%, and for 10 years is 96%. Three of the 6 deaths were unrelated to EHPH or PSS. Shunt patency for up to 35 years was demonstrated in 98% of patients by angiography and/or ultrasonography. In four patients (2%), all of whom had end-to-side splenorenal shunts, shunt thrombosis and rebleeding developed 3, 4, 4, and 6 years (respectively) after PSS. There were the only patients who experienced rebleeding. A diligent and repeated effort was made to detect portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), and no instance of PSE was found during 3 to 35 years of follow-up. Liver function and morphology remained normal, and hypersplenism was corrected in all patients. Quality of life was good in 98% of patients, and 5 years after PSS 96% were gainfully employed, engaged in full-time homemaking, or attending school.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt procedure for variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Transjugular placement of an intrahepatic stent is a new technique to establish a portosystemic shunt for treatment of portal hypertension. A puncture needle is advanced in a catheter through the inferior vena cava into a hepatic vein; then an intrahepatic branch of the portal vein is punctured and an expandable stent of metallic mesh is implanted to establish the shunt.

METHODS

We attempted the stent-shunt procedure in 100 of 112 consecutive patients with variceal bleeding due to cirrhosis, who were then followed for a mean (+/- SD) of 12 +/- 6 months. Of the 100 patients, 22 had Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis, 10 were treated on an emergency basis, and 68 had alcoholic cirrhosis. The shunt was established with use of Palmaz stents expanded to 8 to 12 mm in diameter.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 93 percent of the patients. The mean (+/- SD) time for the procedure was 1.2 +/- 0.3 hours. The shunt reduced the portal venous pressure gradient by 57 percent. Major complications were hemorrhage (intraabdominal bleeding in six patients, biliary bleeding in four, and bleeding in the liver capsule in three) and migration of the stent into the pulmonary artery (in two patients). At follow-up, stenosis of the shunt was evident in 21 patients and occlusion in 10 patients; 10 of these 31 patients had variceal rebleeding. Stenoses and occlusions of the shunt were all treated successfully by redilation, thrombolysis, or implantation of an additional stent. Hepatic encephalopathy (stages I to III) developed in 25 percent of the patients. The proportion of patients with shunts who remained free of variceal rebleeding was 92 percent at six months and 82 percent at one year. The 30-day mortality was 3 percent. The cumulative one-year survival was 85 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the transjugular placement of an intrahepatic portosystemic stent is an effective and safe treatment for variceal hemorrhage in patients with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis.

Long-term results of radical esophagogastrectomy for bleeding varices due to unshuntable extrahepatic portal hypertension

This report describes the long-term results of one-stage total gastrectomy and distal two-thirds esophagectomy, with reconstruction by esophagojejunostomy (16 Roux-en-Y; 2 interposition), in 18 adult patients with recurrent variceal hemorrhage due to unshuntable extrahepatic portal hypertension (EHPH) from occlusion of all major tributaries of the portal venous system. The etiology of portal venous occlusion was unknown in 11 patients, abdominal trauma in 3, peritonitis in 3, and thrombotic coagulopathy in 1. Almost half of the patients had their first episode of bleeding in childhood, and 83% experienced bleeding before 40 years of age. The severity of the problem was reflected by frequent previous bleeding episodes (mean: 12.8, range: 4 to 21), a large cumulative requirement for blood transfusions (mean: 129 units, range: 28 to 247 units), repeated, costly hospital admissions (mean: 15, range: 4 to 24), and numerous previous unsuccessful operations (mean: 4.4, range: 1 to 14). Blood transfusions transmitted serum hepatitis to three patients and AIDS to one, for an incidence of 22%. Bleeding recurred after repetitive endoscopic sclerotherapy in 10 patients and after various operations in 16 (failed portal-systemic shunts in 9, splenectomy in 16, devascularization procedures in 13). All patients had large esophageal and gastric varices on endoscopy, normal liver function, and widespread portal venous occlusion on visceral angiography. Radical esophagogastrectomy was usually a long and arduous operation because of dense adhesions, extensive collateral veins, and a scarred, contracted bowel mesentery due to previous operations. All patients survived the operation and are currently alive. No patient has had recurrent bleeding during 1 to 26 years of follow-up (mean: 13.9 years, 7 or more years in 14 patients). Quality of life has been good. It is concluded that radical esophagogastrectomy is the only effective treatment of unshuntable EHPH and that the operation should be performed promptly when this disease, which is associated with high mortality, high morbidity, and high costs, is diagnosed.

Propranolol versus sclerotherapy in preventing variceal rebleeding: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy has been widely recommended as initial treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding. The present study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of endoscopic sclerotherapy and long-term administration of propranolol in the prevention of rebleeding and long-term survival in patients who had bled from varices.

METHODS

One hundred sixteen consecutive cirrhotic patients admitted because of variceal bleeding were randomly allocated to either continuous administration of propranolol to reduce the resting heart rate by 25% (58 patients) or weekly intravariceal sclerotherapy sessions using 5% ethanolamide oleate until varices disappeared (58 patients). Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

Rebleeding occurred in 37 patients of the propranolol group and in 26 patients of the sclerotherapy group (RR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.03). The actuarial probability of rebleeding was lower in the sclerotherapy group (P = 0.02). No differences were found in rebleeding index, hospitalization requirements, survival, and causes of death. Complications were significantly more frequent and severe in the sclerotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the higher efficacy of sclerotherapy decreasing the probability of rebleeding when compared with propranolol, no beneficial effects were observed on other parameters also reflecting the efficacy of therapy. Moreover, complications of sclerotherapy were more frequent and severe than those of propranolol, which probably shall restrict the use of long-term elective sclerotherapy.

Selective shunts in selected older cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage

Whereas portal systemic shunts pose significant problems in many patients, they have long been thought to have particular risks when undertaken in older cirrhotic patients, with devastating encephalopathy reportedly common in older patients undergoing nonselective shunt surgery. With advances in anesthesia management and perioperative monitoring and the advent of selective shunting, we postulated that both the operative and long-term outcomes might be improved. In this context, we reviewed our recent experience with selective shunts [distal splenorenal (DSRS) and small-diameter interposition portacaval grafts (IPCG)] in patients over the age of 60 years with variceal bleeding. Nineteen consecutive cirrhotic patients over 60 years of age undergoing elective or urgent selective shunt surgery for variceal hemorrhage since 1986 were identified. Sixteen patients underwent DSRS, and 3 underwent IPCG. The etiologies of the cirrhosis were multiple, with 12 of 19 classified as Child's B or C disease. There were no operative deaths, and all but one patient returned home following the surgery. No patient has had recurrent bleeding or required further surgery for portal hypertension-related problems. Three of 19 developed encephalopathy, and 4 of 19 died of liver failure within 1 year of surgery. Of the 14 patients still alive and well (mean postoperative survival: 44 months, range: 4 to 74 months), all remain free of encephalopathy and live independently. Based on this experience, it would appear that one can anticipate satisfactory short- and long-term outcomes after selective shunt surgery in selected patients with variceal bleeding over the age of 60 years. These patients with portal hypertension should not, therefore, be rejected for shunt surgery based on age alone.

Treatment of acute gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage

About 30% to 35% of patients with portal hypertension bleed from gastroesophageal varices and mortality remains high reflecting the challenges of effectively dealing with the bleeding event itself and the problems of underlying liver disease. Careful resuscitation and control of risk of complications is the most essential element of medical therapy (Fig. 2). Use of newer, more effective drug combinations with vasopressin or somatostatin permit control of hemorrhage in the majority of patients with fewer drug-induced complications. Endoscopic sclerotherapy and, more recently, banding therapy provide immediate control of hemorrhage and eradication of varices and rebleeding in up to 90% of patients. Persistent, recurrent bleeding in the small number of remaining patients can be effectively managed by "portacaval shunt rescue" or orthotopic liver transplantation in selected cases with acceptable surgical morbidity and mortality. The contribution and role of the TIPS procedure is unknown but very promising; at least as a bridge procedure in patients awaiting transplantation. Until appropriate prospective, comparative trials are performed, the role of TIPS as a long-term alternative to portacaval shunt surgery or other endoscopic or surgical options remains unknown.

Intraperitoneal haemorrhage from anterior abdominal wall varices

Patients with oesophageal varices frequently present with gastrointestinal haemorrhage but bleeding from varices at other sites is rare. We present a patient with hepatitis C-induced cirrhosis and partial portal vein occlusion who developed spontaneous haemorrhage from anterior abdominal wall varices into the rectus abdominus muscle and peritoneal cavity.

Successful treatment of early hepatocellular carcinoma and concomitant esophageal varices

Twenty-two cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and concomitant esophageal varices underwent aggressive hepatic resection accompanied by simultaneous devascularization, perioperative endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, or both (group A). To evaluate this treatment, 37 cirrhotic patients without esophageal varices who underwent hepatic resection for small HCC (2 cm or less) during the same period (group B) were studied to compare clinical data, preoperative laboratory data, pathologic findings, disease-free rates, and survival rates. The operative time, blood loss, and resected liver weight did not differ between the two groups; however, the tumor size of group A (2.7 +/- 1.6 cm, mean +/- SD) was significantly larger than that of group B (1.5 +/- 0.3 cm). The preoperative liver function of group A was also more severe than that of group B except for prothrombin time. Despite these disadvantages, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free rates of the two groups were 72% versus 94%, 48% versus 54%, and 38% versus 45%, respectively, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 91% versus 97%, 79% versus 79%, and 54% versus 67% (group A versus group B), respectively, which showed no significant differences. Furthermore, there was no variceal bleeding in group A after treatment. Based on the above findings, for treatment of HCC and concomitant esophageal varices, aggressive hepatic resection accompanied by simultaneous devascularization, perioperative endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, or both is the preferred form of treatment.

Indications and technique for the use of the porto-renal shunt in the treatment of variceal hemorrhage

Although hepatic replacement has emerged as the most definitive treatment for patients with chronic liver disease with variceal hemorrhage, a significant number of patients remain better served by porto-systemic shunting. Historically, for those patients with coexisting ascites requiring side-to-side shunting, synthetic or autogenous graft material has been interposed between the portal vein and inferior vena cava when the two veins could not be brought into direct apposition. The porto-renal shunt, described in 1964 but rarely used, allows shunt construction without the use of synthetic materials. Six patients who recently underwent porto-renal shunting are described in order to clarify the indications for the use of this technique and to describe the technical aspects of its construction.

Shunt surgery versus endoscopic sclerotherapy for variceal hemorrhage: late results of a randomized trial

Between September 1982 and April 1988, 60 cirrhotic patients with prior variceal hemorrhage were randomized to undergo the placement of an elective shunt (distal splenorenal: 26; nonselective: 4) or long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy (n = 30). Eighty-six percent of patients had alcoholic cirrhosis, and 33% were classified as Child's class C. After a mean follow-up of 87 months, 60% of patients undergoing sclerotherapy and 17% of shunt patients experienced rebleeding (p < 0.001). Shunt patients have survived longer than those who had sclerotherapy (6-year survival rates of 53% and 26%, respectively; p < 0.05). In part because of the wide geographic distribution of patients, only 4 of 13 patients in whom sclerotherapy failed (31%) could undergo salvage by shunt surgery. Although hepatic portal perfusion was better maintained after sclerotherapy, there were no major differences between the groups in terms of post-therapy hepatic or psychoneurologic function. In a predominantly alcoholic cirrhotic patient population (half non-urban), the results of elective shunt surgery were superior to those of chronic endoscopic sclerotherapy with respect to the prevention of recurrent variceal hemorrhage and survival.

Portal hypertension and bleeding esophageal varices

Bleeding from esophageal varices exacts a high mortality and extraordinary societal costs. Prophylaxis--medication, sclerotherapy, or shunt surgery to prevent an initial bleeding episode--is ineffective. In patients who have bled from varices, endoscopic injection sclerotherapy can control acute bleeding in more than 90% of patients. Because recurrent bleeding frequently occurs and survival without definitive therapy is dismal, selection of a permanently effective treatment is mandatory once variceal bleeding has been controlled. Long-term injection sclerotherapy can be performed in compliant patients; it is relatively safe but is associated with a 30-50% rebleeding rate. Beta-blockers significantly reduce portal pressure and recurrent bleeding but have not been shown to diminish mortality from BEV. Portal decompressive surgery permanently halts bleeding in more than 90% of patients; the risk of operative mortality is high in decompensated cirrhotics, and long-term complications of encephalopathy and accelerated liver failure may limit indications for shunt surgery to good-risk cirrhotics who are not liver transplant candidates. Devascularization procedures have a low operative mortality and encephalopathy rate but unacceptably high rates of recurrent bleeding. Liver transplantation is curative therapy for bleeding esophageal varices and the associated underlying hepatic dysfunction; cost and availability of donor organs generally limit its use in this setting to variceal bleeders with end-stage liver disease not associated with active alcoholism.

Distal spleno-renal shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. A meta-analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials

Meta-analysis was used to evaluate 4 clinical trials comparing distal spleno-renal shunt (DSRS) with endoscopic sclerotherapy (EVS) in the prevention of variceal rebleeding: the interval between bleeding and therapy ranges from < 14 days to > 100 days. A questionnaire was sent to each author of the published trials concerning methods, definitions and results of the trials in order to obtain more detailed and up-to-date information. The selected end-points for the meta-analysis were: rebleeding, mortality and chronic encephalopathy. Analysis of the results in the questionnaires was made using the method proposed by Collins. The pooled relative risk (i.e. the combined Odds ratio of each trial as an estimate of overall efficacy) of rebleeding was statistically reduced by DSRS (0.16; 95% confidence interval 0.10-0.27). Despite this, the overall risk of death following DSRS was only marginally decreased (0.78; 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.29); the lack of homogeneity in the results does not permit any significant conclusions on this end-point. However, in non-alcoholic patients, the decrease in risk of death was greater, and this without heterogeneity, following DSRS than EVS (0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.50). The overall risk of chronic encephalopathy was slightly increased after DSRS (1.86; 95% confidence interval 0.90-3.86). In conclusion, DSRS significantly reduced the risk of rebleeding compared to EVS without increasing the risk of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. However, DSRS did not significantly affect the overall death risk. Only in non-alcoholic disease did it seem to show an advantage over EVS.

Approaches to the endoscopic treatment of esophageal varices

Endoscopic therapy is commonly employed for both initial and subsequent definitive treatment of variceal bleeding. Sclerotherapy performed with a flexible endoscope is currently the most widespread technique. Available data suggests that such treatment does not improve outcome in the acute treatment of variceal bleeding (first 30 days) but appears superior to conventional medical management in the long term. Sclerotherapy does not appear better or worse than pharmacological therapy or surgical therapy when these treatments are compared in the elective setting. Although effective, endoscopic sclerotherapy is recognized to be associated with many major and minor treatment-related complications and a significant incidence of recurrent hemorrhage. In response to these shortcomings newer forms of endoscopic therapy such as polymer injection and endoscopic ligation have been developed. Polymer injection appears well suited for patients with active bleeding and for those with gastric varices but does not have advantages for chronic treatment aimed at variceal eradication. Endoscopic ligation appears at least as effective as conventional sclerotherapy for control of acute bleeding and prevention of rebleeding and is associated with few treatment induced complications. While endoscopic therapy will likely continue as the most commonly employed treatment for patients with hemorrhage from esophageal varices, newer methods with wider margins of safety and efficacy seem destined to supplement or replace conventional endoscopic sclerotherapy.