Management of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Percutaneous Management of Hepatic Duct Injury Using Extra-Anatomic Biliary Catheters

Iatrogenic bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a known complication of low incidence. The outcome can be devastating if not recognized and managed timely and properly. In cases of iatrogenic biliary injury due to cholecystectomy, the management depends on the level of injury, the timing of discovery (intraoperative or postoperative), and the patient's condition. If discovered intraoperatively, the injury should be managed immediately. In case expertise is lacking, a surgical drain with external biliary drainage can provide a temporary alternative solution to allow for referral to a tertiary care center. If the patient is septic or not fit for surgery, a percutaneous internal-external biliary drainage (PTBD) catheter can be placed until the patient's condition improves. We report a case of complete transection of the common hepatic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed by extra-anatomic PTBD.

Biliary Cripple and the Spectrum of Complications following Cholecystectomy: A Case Report

Bile duct injury is a complication seen during cholecystectomy. Here, we highlight the occurrence of bile duct injury (BDI) during an open cholecystectomy who underwent hepaticojejunostomy (HJ), later presenting with a stricture of HJ. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was performed which led to the development of hepatic artery injury.

When Should We Perform Intraoperative Cholangiography? A Prospective Assessment of 1000 Consecutive Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has been historically used to detect common bile duct (CBD) stones, delineate biliary anatomy, and avoid or promptly diagnose bile duct injuries (BDIs) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We aimed to determine the usefulness of routine IOC during LC in an urban teaching hospital.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients undergoing LC with routine IOC from 2016 to 2018 was prospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes of interest were: CBD stones, BDI, and anatomical variations of the biliary tract. Secondary outcomes of interest were: IOC success rate, IOC time, and readmission for residual lithiasis. A comparative analysis was performed between patients with and without preoperative suspicion of CBD stones.

RESULTS

A total of 1003 LC were analyzed; IOC was successful in 918 (91.5%) patients. Mean IOC time was 10 (4 to 30) minutes. Mean radiation received by the surgeon per procedure was 0.06 millisieverts (mSv). Normal IOC was found in 856 (93.2%) patients. CBD stones and aberrant biliary anatomy were present in 58 (6.3%) and 4 (0.4%) cases, respectively. Two patients (0.2%) underwent unnecessary CBD exploration because of false-positive IOC. Four patients (0.4%) with normal IOC were readmitted for residual CBD stones. Five (0.5%) minor BDI undetected by the IOC were diagnosed. Patients with preoperative suspicion of CBD stones had significantly higher rates of CBD stones detected on IOC as compared with those without suspicion (23.2% vs. 2.1%, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Routine use of IOC resulted in low rates of BDI diagnosis, aberrant biliary anatomy identification and/or CBD stones detection. Selection of patients for IOC, rather than routine use of IOC appears a more reasonable approach.

Choledochoplasty with Gallbladder Wall Free Flap: A Novel Technique for Large Bile Duct Defects from Mirizzi Syndrome in High-Risk Patients-A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomies are almost universally performed laparoscopically with complication rates similar to open surgery. Possible complications include bleeding and damage to surrounding structures. These often require intervention to repair the damage immediately when recognized intraoperatively or postoperatively. These injuries can cause significant morbidity and mortality, and additional interventions further compound this, especially for high-risk patients. All attempts should be made to a lower risk while performing the safest operation and addressing complications appropriately. We present a case of a surgically high-risk patient who underwent an attempted laparoscopic, converted to open, cholecystectomy for Mirizzi syndrome, during which a biliary defect was found and repaired with a novel technique of choledochoplasty with a gallbladder wall free flap.

CASE

An 82-year-old female with abdominal pain was diagnosed with a cholecystocholedochal fistula from chronic cholecystitis and Mirizzi syndrome. During cholecystectomy, a large common bile duct defect was noted, and given intraoperative instability, the repair was completed using a gallbladder wall free flap. Postoperatively, the patient recovered well through a 4.5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy are rare but may result in additional interventions. For patients who are high-risk surgical candidates, gallbladder wall free flap choledochoplasty should be considered to avoid additional morbidity and mortality.

Excision of a part of the bile duct as an iatrogenic injury typical for laparoscopic cholecystectomy - characteristics, treatment and long-term results, based on own material

Introduction

Cholecystectomy is associated with the risk of bile duct injury (BDI). The nature of the injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) cases seems to be more serious.

Aim

We present an analysis of long-term results of the treatment of patients who underwent operations at our department due to iatrogenic excision of a part of the bile duct (EPBD).

Material and methods

Out of all 120 patients treated for BDI in our department we selected a group of 40 with EPBD. In all cases the corrective operation was hepaticojejunostomy. The median follow-up time was 157 (56–249) months. We evaluated risk factors for EPBD during LC compared to open cholecystectomy (OC).

Results

Among bile duct injuries referred to our centre, EPBD occurred more frequently during LC (46.7%) compared to OC (11%), p < 0.001. Injuries located in the hepatic hilum occurred more often in the case of LC (68.6%) than OC (20%), p = 0.056. We did not find a difference in the frequency of EPBD between LC and OC groups depending on the presence of acute or chronic cholecystitis. The narrow common hepatic duct was reported more frequently in the LC (68.6%) vs. OC (20%) group, p = 0.056. Satisfactory long-term reconstructive treatment results were observed in 36 (90%) of 40 patients.

Conclusions

Excision of a part of the bile duct occurs more often during LC than OC. It is often located in the hepatic hilum. Presence of a narrow common hepatic duct is a risk factor for EPBD during LC. Large diameter hepaticojejunostomy is a reconstructive procedure that promises good long-term results.

Restoration of Completely Transected Common Bile Duct Continuity Using Single Operator Cholangioscopy

Common bile duct (CBD) injury, ranging from a partial tear to a complete transection, is a major surgical complication of cholecystectomy with significant morbidity and mortality. Proper management of these complex injuries depends on the type and extent of injury and time of recognition. Identifying and repairing injuries during cholecystectomy can prevent development of complications, but this only occurs in about one-third of cases. We report a novel technique to reconnect a transected CBD with assistance of single-operator cholangioscopy.

Bile Duct Injury after Cholecystectomy: Surgical Therapy

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), being one of the most common performed surgical procedures, remain a substantial problem in gastrointestinal surgery. The most important aspect regarding this issue is the prevention of IBDI during index cholecystectomy. Once it occurs, early and accurate diagnosis of IBDI is very important for surgeons and gastroenterologists, because unidentified IBDI may result in severe complications such as hepatic failure and death. Laboratory tests, radiological imaging, and endoscopy play an important role in the diagnosis of biliary injuries.

METHODS

This review summarizes and discusses the current literature on the management of IBDI after LC from a surgical point of view.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

In general, endoscopic techniques are recommended for the initial diagnosis and treatment of IBDI and are important to classify them correctly. In patients with complete dissection or obstruction of the bile duct, surgical management remains the only feasible option. Different surgical reconstructions are performed in patients with IBDI. According to the available literature, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is the most frequent surgical reconstruction and is recommended by most authors. Long-term results are most important in the assessment of effectiveness of IBDI treatment. Apart from that, adequate diagnosis and treatment of IBDI may avoid many serious complications and improve the quality of life of our patients.

The morbidity and mortality of hepaticojejunostomies for complex bile duct injuries: a multi-institutional analysis of risk factors and outcomes using NSQIP

INTRODUCTION

Bile duct injury (BDI) is an infrequent but morbid complication of cholecystectomy. High-grade BDI repairs requiring hepaticojejunostomies are complex and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This study sought to establish the increased risk associated with complex bile duct repair at a multi-institutional level in the United States.

METHODS

Using the ACS-NSQIP Participant Use File, all patients who underwent a hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct repair between 2005 and 2012 were identified. Clinical data, perioperative risk factors and morbidity and mortality rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 293 BDI patients, 102 (65.2%) were female and the mean age was 49.8 years. The 30-day morbidity and mortality rates were 26.3% and 2%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified male gender, ASA class, functional status, diabetes, hypertension and chronic steroid use to be associated with increased morbidity. A higher ASA class was associated with increased postoperative sepsis and chronic steroid use was associated with increased overall morbidity on multivariable analysis. The morbidity rates for BDI repair within 30 days of injury vs. later repair were similar (24% vs. 23%), but the mortality rate was higher for the earlier repair group (5% vs. 0%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the largest multi-institutional analysis of 30-day outcomes after hepaticojejunostomies for BDI in the US, morbidity and mortality rates were established at 26.3% and 2% respectively. ASA class and preoperative functional status remain the main risk factors for surgery. Earlier repair in the face of ongoing sepsis and disability is associated with worse outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach at a specialized center aimed at controlling infection and improving functional status prior to surgical reconstruction is recommended.

Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Practical Tips and Clinical Indications for Biliary Disease Management

Since its introduction, MRCP has been improved over the years due to the introduction of several technical advances and innovations. It consists of a noninvasive method for biliary tree representation, based on heavily T2-weighted images. Conventionally, its protocol includes two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo images, acquired with thin sections or with multiple thick slabs. In recent years, three-dimensional T2-weighted fast-recovery fast spin-echo images have been added to the conventional protocol, increasing the possibility of biliary anatomy demonstration and leading to a significant benefit over conventional 2D imaging. A significant innovation has been reached with the introduction of hepatobiliary contrasts, represented by gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine: they are excreted into the bile canaliculi, allowing the opacification of the biliary tree. Recently, 3D interpolated T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo images have been proposed for the evaluation of the biliary tree, obtaining images after hepatobiliary contrast agent administration. Thus, the acquisition of these excretory phases improves the diagnostic capability of conventional MRCP-based on T2 acquisitions. In this paper, technical features of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography are briefly discussed; main diagnostic tips of hepatobiliary phase are showed, emphasizing the benefit of enhanced cholangiography in comparison with conventional MRCP.

Hemobilia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Imaging Features and Management of an Unusual Complication

PURPOSE

To assess the imaging features and the management of hemobilia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 12 patients who were treated for hemobilia after LC were included in the study. Selective arteriography was performed to find the bleeding artery. Coils or microcoils were deployed superselectively to occlude the bleeding branch. The clinical course, imaging findings, the embolic effect, complications, and follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Risk factors for hemobilia included a variant ductal anatomy, a variant cystic artery, and intraoperative adhesion. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) could provide the diagnostic signs as follows: a hematocele in the abdominal cavity, the gallbladder fossa, and the bile duct, biliary dilation, pseudoaneurysm of the right hepatic artery, and contrast extravasations on contrast-enhanced CT. No rebleeding occurred after the transcatheter arterial embolization in all patients without immediate procedural complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Gallbladder triangle anatomic variation and intraoperative adhesion were the risk factors for hemobilia after LC. Abdominal CT is a useful examination for the diagnosis. Transcatheter arterial embolization is the therapeutic option of choice.

Biliary tract injuries after lap cholecystectomy-types, surgical intervention and timing

Bile duct lesions, including leaks and strictures, are immanent complications of open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Endoscopic procedures have gained increasing potential as the treatment of choice in the management of postoperative bile duct injuries. Bile duct injury (BDI) is a severe and potentially life-threatening complication of LC. Several series have described a 0.5% to 0.6% incidence of BDI during LC. Early recognition and an adequate multidisciplinary approach are the cornerstones for the optimal final outcome. Suboptimal management of injuries often leads to more extensive damage to the biliary tree and its vasculature. Early referral to a tertiary care center with experienced hepatobiliary surgeons and skilled interventional radiologists would appear to be necessary to assure optimal results.

Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Post-surgical Biliary Leaks

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in the treatment of post-surgical biliary leaks and its efficacy in restoring the integrity of bile ducts. One hundred and fifty-seven patients with a post-surgical biliary leak were treated by means of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage. The biliary leak was due to laparoscopic procedures in 114 patients, while 43 patients had postoperative leak following open surgery. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was performed with an 8- to 10-F catheter, with the side holes positioned proximal to the site of extravasation to divert bile flow away from the leak site. The established biliary leaks at the site of origin were diagnosed at an average of 7 days (range 2-150 days) after surgery. In all cases, percutaneous access to the biliary tree was achieved. In 62 patients, biliary leak completely healed after drainage for 10-50 days (mean, 28 days) while 89 patients underwent surgical reconstruction subsequently. PTBD is a feasible, effective, and safe procedure for the treatment of post-surgical biliary leaks. It is therefore a reliable alternative to surgically repair smaller biliary leaks, while in patients with large defects, it helps prepare patients for surgical reconstruction.

Iatrogenic biliary injuries: identification, classification, and management

Because it offers several advantages over open cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has largely replaced open cholecystectomy for the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. The only potential disadvantage is a higher incidence of major bile duct injury. Although prevention of these biliary injuries is ideal, when they do occur, early identification and appropriate treatment are critical to improving the outcomes of patients suffering a major bile duct injury. This report delineates the key factors in classification (and its relationship to mechanism and management), identification (intraoperative and postoperative), and management principles of these bile duct injuries.

Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment of benign biliary strictures using a new fully covered self expandable metal stent

Background. In patients with benign biliary strictures, the use of fully covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) has been proposed as an alternative to plastic stenting, but high quality prospective data are sparse. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of a new fully covered SEMS for benign biliary strictures. Methods. All consecutive patients with benign biliary strictures were treated with placement of a fully covered SEMS (WallFlex) for 6 months. Short- and long-term stricture resolution, adverse events, and ease of stent removal were recorded. Results. 23 patients were enrolled. Stricture etiology was chronic pancreatitis (14), postorthotopic liver transplant (4), idiopathic (4), and biliary stones (1). All ERCPs were technically successful. All stents were successfully removed. Short-term stricture resolution was seen in 22/23 (96%) patients. Long-term success was 15/18 (83.3%). All 3 failures were patients with biliary strictures in the setting of chronic calcific pancreatitis. Conclusions. The use of the new SEMS for the treatment of benign biliary strictures led to short-term stricture resolution in the vast majority of patients. Over a long-term followup the success rate appears favorable compared to historical results achieved with multiple plastic stenting, particularly in patients with chronic pancreatitis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01238900).

Changing clinical profile, management strategies and outcome of patients with biliary tract injuries at a tertiary care center in Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract injuries are mostly iatrogenic. Related data are limited in developing countries. There are lessons to be learned by revisiting the clinical profiles, management issues and outcome of patients referred to a tertiary care center in Sri Lanka, compared with the previous data from the same center published in 2006. Such a review is particularly relevant at a time of changing global perceptions of iatrogenic biliary injuries. This study aimed to analyze and compare the changes in the injury pattern, management and outcome following biliary tract injury in a Sri Lankan study population treated at a tertiary care center.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 67 patients treated between May 2002 and February 2011. The profiles of the last 38 patients treated from October 2006 to February 2011 were compared with those of the first 29 patients treated from May 2002 to September 2006. Definitive management options included endoscopic biliary stenting, reconstructive hepaticojejunostomy with creation of gastric access loops, and biliary stricture dilation. Post-treatment jaundice, cholangitis and abdominal pain needing intervention were considered as treatment failures.

RESULTS

In the 67 patients, 55 were women and 12 men. Their mean age was 40.6 (range 19-80) years. Five patients had traumatic injuries. Thirty-seven injuries (23 during the second study period) were due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 25 (10 during the second study period) to open cholecystectomy. The identification rate of intra-operative injury was 19% in the laparoscopic group and 8% in the open group. Bismuth type I, II, III and IV injuries were seen in 18, 18, 15 and 12 patients, respectively. Endoscopic stenting was the definitive treatment in 20 patients. In 35 patients who had hepaticojejunostomy, 33 underwent creation of the gastric access loop. Twenty-two reconstructions were performed during the second study period. A gastric access loop was used for endotherapy in three patients with anastomotic occlusion at the site of hepaticojejunostomy. The overall outcome was satisfactory in the majority of patients. There were four injury-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Biliary tract injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy have become the most frequent cause of biliary injury management at our center. Although endotherapy was useful in selected patients, in the majority, surgical reconstruction with hepaticojejunostomy was required as the definitive treatment. Creation of the gastric access loop was found to be a useful adjunct in the management of hepaticojejunostomy strictures.

Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe which is associated with significant perioperative morbidity and mortality, reduced long-term survival and quality of life, and high rates of subsequent litigation. The aim of this article was to review the management of bile duct injury after cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Medline and PubMed database search was undertaken to identify articles in English from 1970 to 2008 using the key words 'bile duct injury', 'cholecystectomy' and 'classification'. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. Case report was excluded.

RESULTS

Early recognition of bile duct injury is of paramount importance. Only 25%-32.4% of injuries are recognized during operation. The majority of patients present initially with non-specific symptoms. Management depends on the timing of recognition, the type, extent and level of the injury. Immediate recognition and repair are associated with improved outcome, and the minimum standard of care after recognition of bile duct injury is immediate referral to a surgeon experienced in bile duct injury repair. There is a growing body of literature supporting the importance of early referral to a tertiary care hospital which can provide a multidisciplinary approach to treat bile duct injury. Inadequate management may lead to severe complications.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the classification system is universally accepted as each has its own limitation. The optimal management depends on the timing of recognition of injury, the extent of bile duct injury, the patient's condition and the availability of experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

Management of patients who return to the hospital with a bile leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

INTRODUCTION

Bile leaks after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) can be difficult to diagnose early. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of minor bile leaks and to discuss how to manage patients who revisit the hospital with minor bile leaks after LC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2001 to September 2007, 2219 LCs were performed at the Ajou University Medical Center. Twenty-four patients (1.0%) who presented with a bile leak or bile duct injury after a cholecystectomy were identified. The patients with minor bile duct injury were divided into two groups, depending on whether they revisited the hospital (group 2) or not (group 1) after LC.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 24 patients had minor bile leaks. The characteristics of patients in group 2 were long hospital stay, short operation time, and low frequency of indwelling surgical drains. Ten of 17 patients (58.8%) revisited the hospital at a mean of 7.0 +/- 2.7 days after the LC. However, 3 of 10 patients (30%) were discharged from the ER with atypical abdominal pain and returned to the hospital again within 5 days due to recurrent abdominal pain. There was a significant correlation between hospital stay and time to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) (P = 0.008) and between hospital stay and PCD (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Most minor bile leaks were managed by ERCP and/or percutaneous drainage. However, early diagnosis was difficult when patients revisited the hospital within 7 days after the LC. Therefore, early ERCP should be considered in these patients to diagnose the bile leak early and limit needed hospital stay.

Bile duct injuries in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomies

Bile duct injuries incurred during laparoscopic cholecystectomies remain a major complication in an otherwise safe surgery. These injuries are potentially avoidable with proper techniques and correct interpretation of the anatomy. The scope of the injury can range from a simple cystic duct leak to the injury of the left and right hepatic duct confluence. The key to successful outcomes from these injuries is to know when a referral to a specialized tertiary center is necessary. Evaluation and treatment of bile duct injuries is complex and often requires the expertise of an advanced endoscopist, interventional radiologist, and hepatobiliary surgeons. Before any planned intervention or operative repair, detailed evaluation of the biliary system and its associated vasculature is required. Better outcomes are achieved when patients are referred to centers specialized in biliary injury evaluation, treatment, and performing pretreatment planning early.

Hepatic resection for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuries: a literature review

OBJECTIVES

This study seeks to identify factors for hepatectomy in the management of post-cholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) and outcome via a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

Relevant literature was found by searching the PubMed database and the bibliographies of extracted articles. To avoid bias selection, factors for hepatectomy were analysed in series reporting both patients undergoing hepatectomy and patients undergoing biliary repair without hepatectomy (bimodal treatment). Relevant variables were the presence or absence of additional hepatic artery and/or portal vein injury, the level of BDI, and a previous biliary repair.

RESULTS

Among 460 potentially relevant publications, only 31 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 99 hepatectomies were reported among 1756 (5.6%) patients referred for post-cholecystectomy BDI. In eight series reporting bimodal treatment, including 232 patients, logistic regression multivariate analysis showed that hepatic arterial and Strasberg E4 and E5 injuries were independent factors associated with hepatectomy. Patients with combined arterial and Strasberg E4 or E5 injury were 43.3 times more likely to undergo hepatectomy (95% confidence interval 8.0-234.2) than patients without complex injury. Despite high postoperative morbidity, mortality rates were comparable with those of hepaticojejunostomy, except in urgent hepatectomies (within 2 weeks; four of nine patients died). Longterm outcome was satisfactory in 12 of 18 patients in the largest series.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatectomies were performed mainly in patients showing complex concurrent Strasberg E4 or E5 and hepatic arterial injury and provided satisfactory longterm outcomes despite high postoperative morbidity.

Single-balloon enteroscopy effectively enables diagnostic and therapeutic retrograde cholangiography in patients with surgically altered anatomy

BACKGROUND

In patients with surgically altered anatomy, ERCP is often unsuccessful. Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) enables deep intubation of the small bowel, permitting diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP in this subset of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of SBE in performing endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in patients with surgically altered anatomy.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Large quaternary-care center.

PATIENTS

Thirteen patients (11 women) underwent 16 SBE procedures with ERCP. Patient anatomy consisted of Whipple (n = 3), hepaticojejunostomy (n = 3), Billroth II (n = 1), and Roux-en-Y (n = 9).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients with surgically altered anatomy in whom standard ERCP techniques had failed or were not possible underwent ERC by using SBE with initial therapeutic intent.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Success rates of diagnostic ERC and therapeutic ERC in those patients who required biliary intervention. Procedure-related complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

Diagnostic ERC was successful 12 (92.3%) of 13 patients and in 13 (81.3%) of 16 cases. Therapeutic ERC was required in 10 patients in whom diagnostic ERC was first accomplished, and therapeutic ERC was successful in 9 (90%) of 10 patients. Biliary interventions included balloon dilation (n = 4), stone extraction (n = 2), sphincterotomy (n = 4), removal of a surgically placed stent (n = 3), and stenting (n = 2). Two patients developed pancreatitis after therapeutic ERC. Median follow-up was 53 days (range 22-522 days). Overall procedural success in an intent-to-treat analysis by case was 75%.

LIMITATION

Single-center experience.

CONCLUSION

SBE enables diagnostic and therapeutic ERC in most patients with altered anatomy. SBE-assisted therapeutic ERC may be associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis. Improvement of the available equipment is necessary to perform more efficient and effective biliary interventions.

Iatrogenic biliary injuries: classification, identification, and management

Iatrogenic biliary injuries most commonly occur during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Biliary injuries are complex problems requiring a multidisciplinary approach with surgeons, radiologists, and gastroenterologists knowledgeable in hepatobiliary disease. Mismanagement can result in lifelong disability and chronic liver disease. Given the unforgiving nature of the biliary tree, favorable outcome requires a well-thought-out strategy and attention to detail.

Management of major bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case report

Introduction

Bile duct injury is a severe and potentially life-threatening complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Several series have described a 0.5% to 0.6% incidence of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the presentation, characteristics, related investigation, and treatment results of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Case presentation

A rare case of a 48-year-old Greek woman with a triple bile duct injury (right and left hepatic duct ligation and common bile duct cross-section) is presented. A Roux en Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed after repeated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies, percutaneous transhepatic catheterization of the ducts and magnetic resonance cholangiographies to delineate the biliary anatomy and assess the level of injury.

Conclusion

Early recognition and an adequate multidisciplinary approach are the cornerstones for the optimal final outcome. Suboptimal management of injuries often leads to more extensive damage to the biliary tree and its vasculature. Early referral to a tertiary care center with experienced hepatobiliary surgeons and skilled interventional radiologists would appear to be necessary to assure optimal results.

[Management of patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury]

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to present an analysis of 30 patients with major bile duct injuries in a single hospital centre.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From January 2001 to December 2006, a prospective database was kept of all patients with a bile duct injury (BDI) following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Patients' charts were reviewed to analyse perioperative surgical management.

RESULTS

Over 6 years, 30 patients were treated for a major BDI. Patient demographics were not notable for 16 women (53%) and 14 men (47%) with a mean age of 58.9 years. Twenty of them sustained their BDI at another hospital. The mean interval from the time of BDI to referral was 17.4 days. A total of 30 patients underwent definitive biliary reconstruction, including 17 hepaticojejunostomies (56.7%), 8 end-to-end repairs (20%), 2 choledochoduodenostomies (6.7%), 3 liver transplantations (10%), 1 hepatectomy and 1 Whipple (3.3%). There were 2 deaths in the postoperative period (6.7%). Thirteen (43.3%) sustained at least 1 postoperative complication. The most common complications were cholangitis (20%), and intra-abdominal abscess/biloma (23.3%). The mean postoperative length of stay was 17.46 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Bile duct injury is a serious complication that affects mostly individuals with benign disease. Various subsequent procedures (surgical and/or endoscopic) are almost always necessary for its correction, with a high socioeconomic cost that imposes great suffering on the patients and their relatives. Clearly, all efforts should be made to prevent such accidents.

Current management of bile duct injury

Excellent results are achievable

Management of acute gallbladder disease in England

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease is safe and efficacious, but few data are available on the management of acute gallbladder disease in England.

METHODS

Hospital Episode Statistics data for the years 2003-2005 were obtained from the Department of Health. All patients admitted as an emergency with acute gallbladder disease during the period from April 2003 to March 2004 were included as a cohort. Repeat emergency admissions for acute gallbladder disease, and cholecystectomies performed during the first admission, an emergency readmission or an elective admission were followed up until March 2005.

RESULTS

Some 25,743 patients were admitted as an emergency with acute gallbladder disease, of whom 3791 had an emergency cholecystectomy during the first admission (open cholecystectomy (OC) 29.8 per cent, laparoscopic conversion rate (LCR) 10.7 per cent) and 9806 patients had an elective cholecystectomy (OC 11.3 per cent, LCR 8.3 per cent) during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Early cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease is not widely practised by surgeons in England. Open cholecystectomy is more commonly used in the emergency than in the elective setting. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy following an emergency admission carries a higher conversion rate than elective cholecystectomy.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of benign biliary strictures

Several conditions may cause benign biliary stricture formation. Intraoperative bile duct injury, most often sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, is the leading cause. Although surgical bypass procedure was the traditional treatment of choice for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures, therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography has recently come into favor; however, success rates have been variable and largely dependent on the underlying etiology. Because endoscopic therapy may be unsuccessful, a multidisciplinary approach to management, with surgical or radiological intervention if necessary, should be considered.

Surgical treatment and outcome of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy and the impact of different clinical classification systems

BACKGROUND

Different injury patterns of iatrogenic bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy have prompted the proposal of several different clinical classification systems. The aim of this study was to validate these systems comparatively.

METHODS

Results after surgical intervention for iatrogenic bile duct lesions in 74 consecutive patients at a tertiary referral centre were reviewed retrospectively. A new classification (Hannover classification) for iatrogenic bile duct lesions is proposed and compared with four other systems using the present clinical data.

RESULTS

Additional vascular lesions were found in 19 per cent. The hospital mortality rate was 3 per cent and the overall hospital complication rate after repair was 26 per cent. Sixteen of 74 patients required early surgical reintervention. The Hannover classification demonstrated a highly significant association between the discrimination of classifiable injury patterns and the different surgical treatments chosen (P < 0.005). The Strasberg and Neuhaus classifications do not consider vascular involvement, whereas the Stewart-Way, Siewert and Neuhaus systems do not discriminate between lesions at or above the bifurcation of the hepatic duct.

CONCLUSION

Additional vascular involvement and location of the lesion at or above the bifurcation of the hepatic duct have a major impact on the extent of surgical intervention required and should be reflected in any classification of bile duct injuries.

Retrievable Biliary Stent-Graft Management of Refractory Postoperative Bile Leakage

The authors report a case of a successful outcome after retrievable biliary stent-graft management in a patient with refractory postoperative bile leakage. A 52-year-old man who underwent a Whipple operation presented with postoperative bile leakage. A percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) catheter remained from the operation, and bile leakage persisted after 7 days of drainage with the catheter. A retrievable biliary stent-graft was placed; it was removed 14 days later. Cholangiography indicated patency of the anastomosis without contrast medium leakage, and the PTBD catheter was removed. There were no procedural-related complications.

A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of patients with acute cholecystitis in Japanese hospitals

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Despite the fact that there is evidence advocating early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), the practice of this treatment has not been investigated sufficiently. This study was designed to assess the current practice of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for AC among Japanese general surgeons.

METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to the 291 councillors of the Japanese Society of Abdominal Emergency Medicine in order to ascertain their current management of patients with AC.

RESULTS

The response rate was 72.5%. A policy of early cholecystectomy for AC was adopted by 41.7% of the responding surgeons. However, almost the same percentage of surgeons routinely managed their patients conservatively, and opted for delayed cholecystectomy at a later date. The adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was made by 79.1% of surgeons. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with AC who had percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) was adopted by 73.9% of the surgeons. Of the surgeons opting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 37.3% performed intraoperative cholangiography laparoscopically for all patients with AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early cholecystectomy for patients with AC was not adopted by the majority of the surgeons who responded, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was a common procedure for early and delayed cholecystectomy. Despite evidence that strongly supports the use of early cholecystectomy, the use of this treatment remains suboptimal in Japan.

Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

Cholecystectomy has been widely performed in the treatment of acute cholecystitis, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been increasingly adopted as the method of surgery over the past 15 years. Despite the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as an elective treatment for symptomatic gallstones, acute cholecystitis was initially considered a contraindication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The reasons for it being considered a contraindication were the technical difficulty of performing it in acute cholecystitis and the development of complications, including bile duct injury, bowel injury, and hepatic injury. However, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now accepted as being safe for acute cholecystitis, when surgeons who are expert at the laparoscopic technique perform it. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been found to be superior to open cholecystectomy as a treatment for acute cholecystitis because of a lower incidence of complications, shorter length of postoperative hospital stay, quicker recuperation, and earlier return to work. However, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis has not become routine, because the timing and approach to the surgical management in patients with acute cholecystitis is still a matter of controversy. These Guidelines describe the timing of and the optimal surgical treatment of acute cholecystitis in a question-and-answer format.

Evaluation of suspected bile duct injuries

The proper diagnosis and appropriate treatment are paramount in ensuring a satisfactory outcome after a bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Immediate recognition of a bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can allow proper treatment at that time, averting difficult complications that could occur in the postoperative period should the injury be missed. Unfortunately, most bile duct injuries are not recognized at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An appropriate level of suspicion followed by prompt and complete evaluation should result in accurate delineation of the biliary anatomy, which is essential for directing appropriate surgical reconstruction.

Bile Duct Injuries at Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Single-Institution Prospective Study. Acute Cholecystitis Indicates an Increased Risk

During the last decade laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become established as the gold standard. The drawbacks in the form of bile duct (BD) injuries have also come into focus. We present the results of a prospective, consecutive series of 1568 patients with reference to BD injuries regarding risks, management, and preventive measures. The significant complications of all patients operated upon with LC between October 1999 and December 2003 were recorded prospectively. BD injuries were classified according to Strasberg into types A-E. Transected major BDs, injuries of type E, were regarded as "major" injuries and types A, B, C, and D were "minor" injuries. Major BDs were transected in five patients (0.3%), three of whom had acute cholecystitis. In the two patients operated on electively, the BD injuries were detected postoperatively, while they were detected intraoperatively when the operation was performed of necessity. The BDs were all reconstructed with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Two patients had anastomotic strictures. Minor BD injuries were encountered in 19 patients (1.2%). The 13 patients with leakage from the cystic duct or gallbladder bed, injury type A, were treated by endoscopic (ERC) stenting without sequelae. Five patients sustained a lateral BD injury, type D; they were treated with a simple suture over a T-tube (at LC) or endoscopically (ERC) without further problems. A transected aberrant right hepatic BD, type C injury, was due to its small-caliber sutured. Minor BD injuries could be managed at the primary hospital if the endoscopic expertise were at hand. Acute cholecystitis seems to be a risk factor for BD injuries.

Current status of laparoscopic therapy of cholecystolithiasis and common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard operation for gallstone disease. The aim of this review was to scrutinize the advantages and benefits of this minimal invasive technique compared to the conventional operation according to the available literature. Regarding the evidence-based medicine criteria, the current status of laparoscopy in the treatment of cholecystolithiasis, cholecystitis and common bile duct stones has been worked out.

METHODS

A Medline, PubMed, Cochrane search.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available comparing laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. The superiority of LC in less postoperative pain, shorter recovery and hospital stay is stated. Operation time was longer in the first years of LC. 3 RCTs deal with acute cholecystitis: one paper could not find any significant advantage of LC over conventional cholecystectomy, the other two found benefits in recovery, hospital stay and postoperative pain. The range of conversion is between 5 and 7% in elective cases and increases up to 27% for acute cholecystitis. With a rate of more than 90% in Europe, the standard procedure for common bile duct stones is 'therapeutic splitting' with endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography preoperatively followed by LC. Laparoscopic bile duct clearance is effective and safe in experienced hands, however, the only proven benefit is a slightly shorter hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic approach is preferred in elective cholecystectomy and acute cholecystitis. The minimal invasive technique has proven to be effective, gentle and safe. The main benefits are evident within the first postoperative days.

Le risque de plaies biliaires au cours de la cholécystectomie par laparoscopie

The incidence of iatrogenic injuries of the bile ducts has increased significantly since laparascopic cholecystectomy became the "gold standard" in the treatment of cholelithiasis. The incidence of major biliary ductal injury ranges from 0.25% to 0.74%, and of minor injury from 0.28% to 1.7%. The cause of the injury is not always clearly identifiable. In more than half the cases, the injury occurs during maneuvers to isolate the cystic duct or to free the gallbladder from the common bile duct. These maneuvers may be more difficult and consequently more dangerous when there is significant inflammation as may be seen in acute cholecystitis, or in case of obesity, cirrhosis with portal hypertension, previous surgery with peritoneal adhesions, or anatomic variations of the hepatic pedicle. Pre-operative evaluation of clinical risk factors should be coupled with intra-operative caution and instrumental evaluation. The increase in frequency of iatrogenic biliary injuries can not be attributed simply to the inexperience of the surgeon or the learning curve as was initially suggested. Many injuries are due, rather, to the surgeon's failure to respect basic technical rules, long established for open cholecystectomy and which should not be modified for the laparoscopic technique. While routine cholangiography does not offer complete protection from iatrogenic ductal injuries, it is essential to visualize the biliary tract whenever a lesion of the ductal system is clearly identified or even suspected. In such cases, facility with the technique of intraoperative cholangiography and a knowledge of the radiological anatomy of the biliary tree are essential for an accurate and complete intraoperative evaluation of the biliary injury. Finally, in the presence of acute or chronic inflammation or other factors for technical difficulty (obesity, cirrhosis, previous surgery, anatomic variations, intraoperative bleeding), the surgeon must not hesitate to consider conversion to an open surgical approach. In such complicated cases, even the open approach is not a guarantee against biliary injury; there is no substitute for experience and caution in biliary surgery.

Management of acute cholecystitis in UK hospitals: time for a change

Early cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis is safe, cost effective, and leads to less time off work compared with delayed surgery. This study was designed to assess current practice in the management of acute cholecystitis in the UK. A postal questionnaire was sent to 440 consultant general surgeons to ascertain their current management of patients with acute cholecystitis. Replies were received from 308 consultants who were involved in treating patients with acute cholecystitis of whom 18 transferred these patients on to another team for further management the day after admission. Thirty two consultants (11%) routinely treated patients by early cholecystectomy, with limiting factors stated to be the availability of surgical staff, theatre space, and radiological investigations. The remaining consultants (n = 258) routinely manage their patients conservatively with intravenous antibiotics and allow the inflammation to resolve before undertaking cholecystectomy at a later date. Indications for undertaking early cholecystectomy during the first admission by this latter group included the presence of spreading peritonitis due to bile leak, empyema, and unexpected space on theatre list. The commonest method for both elective and early cholecystectomy is laparoscopic, but the percentage of consultants using an open method rises from 8% in the elective situation to 47% for urgent early cholecystectomy. Despite evidence which strongly advocates early cholecystectomy, this practice is routinely carried out by only 11% of consultants in the UK at present.

Management of major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the presentation, characteristics, related investigation, and treatment results of major bile duct injuries (MBDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 27 patients who were treated between January 1995 and December 2002 for MBDI after LC at a single unit in a tertiary center. Major bile duct injury was defined according to the Strasberg classification. All patients underwent magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to delineate the biliary anatomy and assess the level of injury. On the basis of the cholangiographic findings, all patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy after a waiting period of 8-12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 29 hepaticojejunostomies were performed in 27 patients. Seventeen patients (63%) presented with biliary fistula and ascites; 10 (27%) presented with obstructive jaundice. In 14 patients (52%) the MBDI was identified during the LC. Twenty patients (74%) had undergone one or more procedure before referral. Eight patients (30%) had E1, five patients (18.5%) had E2, nine patients (33%) had E3, and five patients (18.5%) had E4 injury. Two patients had early anastomotic stricture, for which redo hepaticojejunostomy with access loop was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Major bile duct injury after LC commonly presents with biliary fistula and ascites. High-injuries are common after LC. Hepaticojejunostomy repair yields excellent results in these cases.

Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine?

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy reveals the anatomy of the biliary tree and any stones contained within it. The use of intraoperative cholangiography may be routine for all laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An alternative approach is a selective policy, performing intraoperative cholangiography only for those cases in which choledocholithiasis is suspected on clinical grounds, or those for which the anatomy appears unclear at operation. The literature pertaining to both approaches is reviewed, to delineate their respective merits.

METHODS

Relevant articles in English were identified from the Medline database, and reviewed.

RESULTS

The literature reviewed consisted of retrospective analyses. Overall the incidence of unsuspected retained stones was 4%, but only 15% of these would go on to cause clinical problems. The incidence of complete transection of the common bile duct was rare for both routine and selective intraoperative cholangiography policies, and did not differ between them. Rates of minor bile duct injury did not differ between groups, but was more likely to be recognized in the routine group than the selective (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine intraoperative cholangiography yields very little useful clinical information over and above that which is obtained with selective policies. Large numbers of unnecessary intraoperative cholangiography are performed under routine intraoperative cholangiography policy, and therefore a selective policy is advocated.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy gained wide acceptance as treatment of choice for gallstone disease and cholecystitis. With this new technique, not only did the new era of minimal invasive surgery begin, but also the spectrum of complications changed. Laparoscopy-related complications such as access injuries and procedure-related problems are discussed in our article. Typical mishaps are reviewed according to the literature. Set-up of the pneumoperitoneum (morbidity up to 0.2%); bleeding-from trocar sites and vascular injury (mortality up to 0.2%); biliary leaks and bile duct injuries are the main topics in this article (still on a level of 0.2%-0.8%). Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment are discussed, and an overview of the most cited classifications of bile duct injuries is summarised graphically. Finally, bowel injuries as a specific complication in laparoscopy are discussed (incidence up to 0.87%).

CONCLUSION

Careful selection of patients, the knowledge of typical procedure-related complications, and their best treatment are the key points for a safe laparosopic cholecystectomy.

Percutaneous management of bile duct strictures and injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decade of experience

BACKGROUND

The 1990s were associated with a dramatic increase in bile duct injuries with the widespread use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Interventional radiology has an integral role in diagnosing and managing these injuries. Definitive percutaneous management with balloon dilatation might be possible in select patients with intact biliary-enteric continuity, but longterm data are limited.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were collected prospectively on 51 consecutive patients with major bile duct stricture or injury associated with LC, treated with percutaneous management, January 1, 1990, to December 31, 1999. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary catheter placement were followed by balloon dilatation and stenting. Outcomes were assessed with direct patient contact or hospital records.

RESULTS

All patients completed treatment, and 50 (98%) were stent free at mean followup of 76 months. The success rate of percutaneous management was 58.8%, without need for subsequent intervention. Presenting symptoms, level of injury, and number of stents or dilatations did not predict outcomes. Percutaneous treatment was more likely to fail in patients stented for less than 4 months (p < 0.001). Operative repair at Hopkins before percutaneous management was predictive of a successful outcome (p < 0.05). Including subsequent operations or percutaneous management, successful outcomes were achieved in 98% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Major bile duct injuries after LC remain a clinical challenge. Although surgical reconstruction is the treatment cornerstone, selected patients with biliary-enteric continuity can achieve successful long-term results with definitive percutaneous management. The combination of percutaneous management and surgical reconstruction results in successful outcomes in virtually all patients.

Timing of cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare early with delayed cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute lithiasic cholecystitis: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials.

METHODS

Pertinent studies were selected from the Medline, Embase, Cancerlit, HealthSTAR and Cochrane Library Databases, references from published articles, and reviews. Twelve prospective randomized trials (9 addressing open cholecystectomy and 3 laparoscopic cholecystectomy) were selected. Conventional meta-analysis according to the DerSimonian and Laird method was used for the pooling of the results. The rate difference (RD) (95% CI) and the number needed to treat (NNT) were used as a measure of the therapeutic effect.

RESULTS

Cumulative operative and perioperative mortality and morbidity were 0.9% and 17.8%, respectively, for open cholecystectomy and 0% and 13.1%, respectively, for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The pooled RD for operative complications in early surgery was 1.37% (95% CI =-3.78% to 6.53%; p= 0.2) for open cholecystectomy and 3.11% (95% CI =-15.10% to 8.87%; p= 0.6) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy the cumulative conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 21.5%. The pooled RD for conversion rate in early laparoscopic cholecystectomy was -7.99% (95% CI =-18.46% to 2.47%; p= 0.1; NNT = 13). Total hospital stay (mean +/- SD) was significantly shorter in the early surgery group (9.6 +/- 2.5 days vs 17.8 +/- 5.8 days; p < 0.0001). More than 20% of patients referred to delayed surgery fail to respond to conservative management or suffer recurrent cholecystitis in the interval period.

CONCLUSIONS

Early operation (open or laparoscopic) does not carry a higher risk of mortality and morbidity compared to delayed operation and should be the preferred surgical approach for patients with acute lithiasic cholecystitis.

Laparoscopic iatrogeny of the hepatic hilum as an indication for liver transplantation

The introduction of biliary laparoscopic surgery led to an increase in the incidence of liver hilum injuries. These types of lesions are very serious, because they can lead to secondary biliary cirrhosis or fulminant hepatic failure and the need for liver transplantation (LT). We present three cases of liver hilum injuries, which were treated with LT; one case was due to severe and persistent cholangitis, and two cases were due to fulminant hepatic failure. The world literature is also reviewed, and published cases of iatrogenic lesions of the liver hilum caused by laparoscopic surgery and requiring LT are presented. These iatrogenic lesions of the hepatic hilum are complex and technically demanding, due to their high morbidity and mortality and even the need for LT. In conclusion, these lesions must be always managed in centers with experience in hepatobiliary surgery.

Long-term results of major bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Major bile duct injury (MBDI) is the most serious complication associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This study reports on long-term outcomes and clinical factors which predicted the outcome of 25 patients with LC-associated MBDI.

METHODS

Twenty-five consecutive patients receiving either primary (n = 11) or redo (n = 14) biliary reconstructive surgery at Cathay General Hospital for LC-associated MBDI were prospectively followed for 2 to 10 (mean, 4.5) years to assess their long-term outcomes. Twelve clinical factors relevant to their outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Although the 1-year postoperative results were successful in 23 patients (92%), the mid- to long-term outcomes were successful in only 17 patients (68%). Eight patients (32%) developed biliary strictures at an average of 3.3 years postoperatively and required subsequent reoperation or biliary stenting. Statistical comparison of 12 risk factors between the successful and unsuccessful groups revealed that two were significant, namely, repair performed by a nonreferral surgeon (p = 0.02) and repair at a stage with recent active inflammation (p = 0.04). A serum alkaline phosphatase level greater than 400 IU in the sixth postoperative month was highly correlated with long-term nonsuccess (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 68% of patients with LC-associated MBDI who underwent reconstructive surgery at our institution had long-term success. A serum alkaline phosphatase level above 400 IU in the sixth postoperative month was predictive of nonsuccess. For better long-term results, repair should be performed by the referral surgeon at a stage without coexisting active inflammation.

Is male gender a risk factor for bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND

Since its introduction in the late 1980s laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the treatment of choice for gallstone disease. Unfortunately, the rate of iatrogenic biliary duct injuries (BDIs) has at least doubled after the adoption of the laparoscopic method. Population-based studies reporting the distribution of laparoscopic BDI patients according to gender and the severity of the BDI are mostly lacking. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the BDIs sustained during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in and around Turku University Central Hospital, with a special reference to the distribution of patients according to gender and the severity of the BDI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 3,736 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (2,627 female patients, 1,109 male) was performed in and around Turku University Central Hospital from 1995 to 2002 (by the end of April). The number and severity of BDIs and the gender of BDI patients were recorded, and the risk of BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy was calculated for the total patient population and for both genders separately.

RESULTS

The risk of BDI was 0.86% for the total patient population, 0.95% for female and 0.63% for male. The most conspicuous finding was that the female gender was predominant in the severe types of BDI. However, the risk of mild BDI seemed to be fairly equal in both genders.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that female gender seems to be a risk factor for severe iatrogenic BDI during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Surgeons' anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Bile duct injuries remain one of the most devastating injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Few studies target surgeons who have experienced bile duct injuries for their insight, their perspective, and their suggestions concerning this problem.

METHODS

A confidential questionnaire was sent to all practicing general surgeons under the age of 65 years in British Columbia, Canada.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of surgeons responded to the survey. Of the 114 questionnaires completed, more than 97% of respondents had completed formal training in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One half of surgeons reported experience with laparoscopic bile duct injury. A significant difference in years in practice between surgeons with injury and surgeons without injury was noted. The majority of injuries occurred after the surgeons's first 100 cholecystectomies performed. The first thoughts of surgeons after injury uniformly concerned the patient's well being. The next most common thoughts were in relation to obtaining help or a second opinion from another surgeon. Surgeons cited inflammation and short or anomalous cystic ducts as the most responsible factors contributing to injury. The majority of surgeons felt that these injuries are unavoidable and less than half felt that it was always a surgical error. Fewer than 15% thought injuries could be avoided by performing a cholangiogram. Surgeons suggested meticulous dissection and less haste to divide structures may prevent an injury. Surgeons recommend educating colleagues to remove the stigma of failure associated with conversion to laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

General surgeons in British Columbia have a one in two chance of experiencing a bile duct injury in their career. There were more injuries in surgeons who had already been in practice for 10 years at the time of introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The injuries are likely to occur despite high volumes of procedures and increased experience. The incidence of bile duct injuries does not seem to be different in surgeons who perform routine cholangiography and most surgeons feel that cholangiography would have little effect on injury incidence. Surgeons tend to have patient-centered concerns after injury and little concern for medicolegal issues. The majority of surgeons felt that these injuries could not be anticipated and as such it is an inherent risk of this procedure.

Percutaneous hepaticojejunostomy with use of a metal stent for injury of the right hepatic duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Bile-duct injuries related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be complex and require a multidisciplinary approach. The authors report a case of a high hepatic duct injury treated surgically by a left hepaticojejunostomy and an ischemic right hepatic duct that could not be identified during the operation. The right hepatic lobe was subsequently drained radiologically by the percutaneous creation of a right hepaticojejunostomy, through and into a jejunal access loop, followed by deployment of a metallic stent. The patient remained well at 3-year follow-up.

Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to determine whether contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography using IV mangafodipir trisodium can accurately detect the presence and location of bile duct leaks in patients who have undergone cholecystectomy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Our study group included 11 patients with suspected bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy. Axial single-shot fast spin-echo and gradient-echo images were acquired in all patients before and 1-2 hr after IV administration of mangafodipir trisodium. The contrast-enhanced MR cholangiograms were evaluated for image quality, degree of ductal or small bowel opacification, and the presence and location of bile duct leaks, strictures, and stones. MR cholangiograms were correlated with conventional contrast-enhanced cholangiograms obtained in all patients, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n = 10) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 1).

RESULTS

Excretion of mangafodipir trisodium was noted in the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts in all patients from 1 to 2 hr after IV administration. Bile ducts and fluid collections that contained excreted mangafodipir trisodium showed increased signal intensity on gradient-echo sequences and decreased signal intensity on single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Conventional contrast-enhanced cholangiography showed the presence of bile duct leaks in six patients and the absence of bile duct leaks in five patients, with false-negative findings in one patient and false-positive findings in one patient for bile duct leak (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 83%).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium can successfully detect the presence and location of bile duct leaks in patients suspected of having such leaks after undergoing cholecystectomy. More research is necessary before acceptance of this examination as routine in the workup of these patients.