Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: a multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era

Size-mismatched transplantation from large donors to small recipients is associated with pancreas graft thrombosis: A retrospective national observational study

INTRODUCTION

Donor-recipient (D/R) size mismatch has been evaluated for a number of organs but not for pancreas transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 438 patients who had undergone pancreas transplantation. The D/R body surface area (BSA) ratio was calculated, and the relationship between the ratio and graft prognosis was evaluated. We divided the patients into two groups and evaluated graft survival. The incidence of pancreas graft thrombosis resulting in graft failure within 14 days and 1-year graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the prognostic factors associated with graft thrombosis were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The mean/median donor and recipient BSAs were 1.63 m2 /1.65 m2 , and 1.57 m2 /1.55 m2 , respectively; the mean and median D/R BSAs were both 1.05. The receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff for the D/R BSA ratio was 1.09, and significant differences were identified between patients with ratios of ≥1.09 (high group) versus <1.09 (low group). The incidence of graft thrombosis resulting in pancreas graft failure within 14 days was significantly higher in the high group than in the low group (p < .01). One-year overall and death-censored pancreas graft survival were significantly higher in the low group than in the high group (p < .01). Multivariate analysis identified recipient height, donor BSA, and donor hemoglobin A1c as significant independent factors for graft thrombosis. Cubic spline curve analysis indicated an increased risk of graft thrombosis with increasing D/R BSA ratio.

CONCLUSION

D/R size mismatch is associated with graft thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.

Nutritional Risk of Candidates for Simultaneous Pancreatic-Kidney Transplantation-A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not much is known about the significance of nutritional status and support in transplant surgery, least of all in simultaneous pancreatic and kidney transplantation. Malnutrition in the context of simultaneous pancreatic-kidney transplantation seems to be complex and a still poorly investigated problem. Since SPKTX is highly qualified and also has a small volume procedure, it is difficult to obtain data from large cohorts of patients. The aim of this article is to gather existing evidence and information about the subject, as well as to elicit some questions and goals for the future.

METHODS

We searched through the Pub-Med database using the keywords "pancreas and kidney transplantation" combined with "nutritional risk", "nutritional status", "malnutrition", "nutritional intervention", and "frailty", finding a total of 4103 matching results. We then narrowed it down to articles written in English with the full text available. We also researched through the references of articles most accurately matching our researched terms.

RESULTS

There are numerous tools that have been investigated for the screening of malnutrition, such as the NRI index, PNI index, NLR, SGA scale, and NRS-2002 scale, each of which proved to be of some use in predicting patient outcomes in different surgical settings. Since all of them differed in components and assessed parameters and, in the absence of more sensitive or infallible indicators, the most reasonable approach seems to evaluate them jointly.

CONCLUSION

It is important to underline the necessity of nutritional screening and the subsequent introduction of adequate therapy while awaiting transplantation in an attempt to improve results. Considering the complexity of surgical procedures and the severity of underlying diseases with their intense metabolic components, the patient's nutritional status seems to significantly influence results. Consequently, nutritional risk assessments should be a part of the routine care of patients qualified for transplantation.

Early Increases in Posttransplant Pancreatic Enzymes Are Associated With Surgical Complications But Not Graft Failure Among Pancreas Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to find the association between immediate postoperative increases in pancreatic enzymes and posttransplant complications among pancreas transplant recipients (PTRs).

METHODS

We analyzed all PTRs transplanted at the University of Wisconsin between June 2009 and September 2018. Enzyme levels were presented as a ratio of absolute numbers to the upper limit of normal value, with value >1 considered as abnormal. We specifically evaluated bleeding, fluid collections, and thrombosis complications based on the amylase or lipase ratios on day 1 (Amylase1, Lipase1) and maximum ratios within 5 days of transplant (Amylasemax, Lipasemax). For early complications, we focused on technical complications that occurred within 90 days of transplant. For long-term outcomes, we assessed patient and graft survival, and rejections.

RESULTS

There were a total of 443 PTRs, 287 were simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients, and 156 were solitary pancreas recipients. Higher Amylase1, Liplase1, Amylasemax, and Lipasemax were associated with an increase in early complications, mainly need for pancreatectomy, fluid collections, bleeding complications, or graft thrombosis, particularly in the solitary pancreas group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding suggests that cases of early perioperative enzyme increase merit consideration for early imaging investigation to mitigate detrimental outcomes.

Improved surgical outcomes following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in the contemporary era

BACKGROUND

Complications leading to early technical failure have been the Achilles' heel of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT). The study purpose was to analyze longitudinally our experience with early surgical complications following SPKT with an emphasis on changes in practice that improved outcomes in the most recent era.

STUDY DESIGN

Single center retrospective review of all SPKTs from 11/1/01 to 8/12/20 with enteric drainage. Early relaparotomy was defined as occurring within 3 months of SPKT. Patients were stratified into two sequential eras: Era 1 (E1): 11/1/01-5/30/13; Era 2 (E2) 6/1/13-8/12/20 based on changes in practice that occurred pursuant to donor age and pancreas cold ischemia time (CIT).

RESULTS

255 consecutive SPKTs were analyzed (E1, n = 165; E2, n = 90). E1 patients received organs from older donors (mean E1 27.3 vs. E2 23.1 years) with longer pancreas cold CITs) (mean E1 16.1 vs. E2 13.3 h, both p < .05). E1 patients had a higher early relaparotomy rate (E1 43.0% vs. E2 14.4%) and were more likely to require allograft pancreatectomy (E1 9.1% vs. E2 2.2%, both p < .05). E2 patients underwent systemic venous drainage more frequently (E1 8% vs. E2 29%) but pancreas venous drainage did not influence either relaparotomy or allograft pancreatectomy rates. The most common indications for early relaparotomy in E1 were allograft thrombosis (11.5%) and peri-pancreatic phlegmon/abscess (8.5%) whereas in E2 were thrombosis, pancreatitis/infection, and bowel obstruction (each 3%).

CONCLUSION

Maximizing donor quality (younger donors) and minimizing pancreas CIT are paramount for reducing early surgical complications following SPKT.

Extracellular Vesicles in Type 1 Diabetes: A Versatile Tool

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting nearly 35 million people. This disease develops as T-cells continually attack the β-cells of the islets of Langerhans in the pancreas, which leads to β-cell death, and steadily decreasing secretion of insulin. Lowered levels of insulin minimize the uptake of glucose into cells, thus putting the body in a hyperglycemic state. Despite significant progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease, there is a need for novel developments in the diagnostics and management of type 1 diabetes. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-bound nanoparticles that contain diverse content from their cell of origin and can be used as a biomarker for both the onset of diabetes and transplantation rejection. Furthermore, vesicles can be loaded with therapeutic cargo and delivered in conjunction with a transplant to increase cell survival and long-term outcomes. Crucially, several studies have linked EVs and their cargos to the progression of type 1 diabetes. As a result, gaining a better understanding of EVs would help researchers better comprehend the utility of EVs in regulating and understanding type 1 diabetes. EVs are a composition of biologically active components such as nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, and lipids that can be transported to particular cells/tissues through the blood system. Through their varied content, EVs can serve as a flexible aid in the diagnosis and management of type 1 diabetes. In this review, we provide an overview of existing knowledge about EVs. We also cover the role of EVs in the pathogenesis, detection, and treatment of type 1 diabetes and the function of EVs in pancreas and islet β-cell transplantation.

Challenges, highlights, and opportunities in cellular transplantation: A white paper of the current landscape

Although cellular transplantation remains a relatively small field compared to solid organ transplantation, the prospects for advancement in basic science and clinical care remain bountiful. In this review, notable historical events and the current landscape of the field of cellular transplantation are reviewed with an emphasis on islets (allo- and xeno-), hepatocytes (including bioartificial liver), adoptive regulatory immunotherapy, and stem cells (SCs, specifically endogenous organ-specific and mesenchymal). Also, the nascent but rapidly evolving field of three-dimensional bioprinting is highlighted, including its major processing steps and latest achievements. To reach its full potential where cellular transplants are a more viable alternative than solid organ transplants, fundamental change in how the field is regulated and advanced is needed. Greater public and private investment in the development of cellular transplantation is required. Furthermore, consistent with the call of multiple national transplant societies for allo-islet transplants, the oversight of cellular transplants should mirror that of solid organ transplants and not be classified under the unsustainable, outdated model that requires licensing as a drug with the Food and Drug Administration. Cellular transplantation has the potential to bring profound benefit through progress in bioengineering and regenerative medicine, limiting immunosuppression-related toxicity, and providing markedly reduced surgical morbidity.

Challenges Associated with Pancreas and Kidney Retransplantation-A Retrospective Analysis

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) is an accepted treatment for diabetic patients with renal failure, and is associated with increased survival and quality of life for recipients. There are only a few publications on the outcomes of simultaneous pancreas–kidney retransplantation (Re-SPK) after previous SPK and the loss of function of both grafts. A total of 55 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus underwent pancreas retransplantation at our center between January 1994 and March 2021. Twenty-four of these patients underwent Re-SPK after a previous SPK. All 24 operations were technically feasible. Patient survival rate after 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 79.2%, 75%, and 66.7%, respectively. The causes of death were septic arterial hemorrhage (n = 3), septic multiorgan failure (n = 2), and was unknown in one patient. Pancreas and kidney graft function after 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years were 70.8% and 66.7%, 66.7% and 62.5%, and 45.8% and 54.2%, respectively. Relaparotomy was performed in 13 out of 24 (54.2%) patients. The results of our study show that Re-SPK, after previously performed SPK, is a technical and immunological challenge, associated with a significantly increased mortality and complication rate; therefore, the indication for Re-SPK should be very strict. Careful preoperative diagnosis is indispensable.

Risk Factors for Early Pancreatic Allograft Thrombosis Following Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation remains the most effective treatment for providing consistent and long-term euglycemia in patients having type 1 diabetes with renal failure. Thrombosis of the pancreatic vasculature continues to contribute significantly to early graft failure and loss. We compared the rate of thrombosis to graft loss and systematically reviewed risk factors impacting early thrombosis of the pancreas allograft following SPK transplantation. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and PREMEDLINE databases for studies reporting thrombosis following pancreas transplantation. Identified publications were screened for inclusion and synthesized into a data extraction sheet. Sixty-three studies satisfied eligibility criteria: 39 cohort studies, 22 conference abstracts, and 2 meta-analyses. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale appraisal of included studies demonstrated cohort studies of low bias risk; 1127 thrombi were identified in 15 936 deceased donor, whole pancreas transplants, conferring a 7.07% overall thrombosis rate. Thrombosis resulted in pancreatic allograft loss in 83.3% of reported cases. This review has established significant associations between donor and recipient characteristics, procurement and preservation methodology, transplantation technique, postoperative management, and increased risk of early thrombosis in the pancreas allograft. Further studies examining the type of organ preservation fluid, prophylactic heparin protocol, and exocrine drainage method and early thrombosis should also be performed.

The impact of donor pancreas extraction time on graft survival and postoperative complications in pancreas transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK) is the best therapeutic option for patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and end-stage renal disease. Recently, donor organ extraction time has been shown to affect kidney and liver graft survival. This study aimed to assess the effect of pancreas donor extraction time on graft survival and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all pancreas transplants performed in two Eurotransplant centers. The association of pancreas extraction time with pancreas graft survival was analyzed by a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after 3 months, 1 and 5 year. Besides, the effect of pancreas extraction time on the incidence of severe postoperative complications was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 317 pancreas transplants were included in this study. Death-censored pancreas graft survival was 85.7% after one year and 76.7% after five years. Median pancreas donor extraction time was 64 min [IQR: 52-79 min]. After adjustment for potential confounders, death censored graft survival after 30 days (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.9-1.03 (p = 0.23), 1 year (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03 (p = 0.22) and 5 years (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.02 (p = 0.57) was not associated with pancreas donor extraction time. However, extraction time was significantly associated with a higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications compared to Clavien-Dindo 1 + 2 complications: OR 1.012, 95% CI 1.00-1.02 (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that although no effect on graft survival was found, limiting pancreas extraction time can have a significant impact on lowering postoperative complications.

Outcomes of pancreas transplantation in older versus younger recipients: a comparative analysis

PURPOSE

The feasibility of pancreas transplantation (PT) in older recipients remains a matter of debate. We examined the influence of recipient age on PT outcomes and identified the prognostic factors for older recipients.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes of PT in recipients aged < 50 years (younger group; n = 285) with those in recipients aged ≥ 50 years (older group; n = 94). Prognostic factors in the older group were analyzed by a logistic regression model and the influence of recipient age on survival outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The patient survival rate was significantly worse in the older group (P < 0.001). Patient death from infection or/and multiple organ failure or cardiac/cerebrovascular events was also more frequent in the older group than in the younger group (P = 0.012 and P = 0.045, respectively). A longer duration of diabetes was an independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in the older group. In a propensity score-matched comparison, the older recipients (n = 77) had significantly poorer survival than the younger recipients (n = 77) (P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

PT should be considered with appropriate caution, especially for older recipients with a long duration of diabetes.

Interventions for preventing thrombosis in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Graft thrombosis is a well-recognised complication of solid organ transplantation and is one of the leading causes of graft failure. Currently there are no standardised protocols for thromboprophylaxis. Many transplant units use unfractionated heparin (UFH) and fractionated heparins (low molecular weight heparin; LMWH) as prophylaxis for thrombosis. Antiplatelet agents such as aspirin are routinely used as prophylaxis of other thrombotic conditions and may have a role in preventing graft thrombosis. However, any pharmacological thromboprophylaxis comes with the theoretical risk of increasing the risk of major blood loss following transplant. This review looks at benefits and harms of thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing solid organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of instituting thromboprophylaxis to patients undergoing solid organ transplantation.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 10 November 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs designed to examine interventions to prevent thrombosis in solid organ transplant recipients. All donor types were included (donor after circulatory (DCD) and brainstem death (DBD) and live transplantation). There was no upper age limit for recipients in our search.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The results of the literature search were screened and data collected by two independent authors. Dichotomous outcome results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Random effects models were used for data analysis. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two authors using the risk of bias assessment tool. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified nine studies (712 participants). Seven studies (544 participants) included kidney transplant recipients, and studies included liver transplant recipients. We did not identify any study enrolling heart, lung, pancreas, bowel, or any other solid organ transplant recipient. Selection bias was high or unclear in eight of the nine studies; five studies were at high risk of bias for performance and/or detection bias; while attrition and reporting biases were in general low or unclear. Three studies (180 participants) primarily investigated heparinisation in kidney transplantation. Only two studies reported on graft vessel thrombosis in kidney transplantation (144 participants). These small studies were at high risk of bias in several domains and reported only two graft thromboses between them; it therefore remains unclear whether heparin decreases the risk of early graft thrombosis or non-graft thrombosis (very low certainty). UFH may make little or no difference versus placebo to the rate of major bleeding events in kidney transplantation (3 studies, 155 participants: RR 2.92, 95% CI 0.89 to 9.56; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Sensitivity analysis using a fixed-effect model suggested that UFH may increase the risk of haemorrhagic events compared to placebo (RR 3.33, 95% CI 1.04 to 10.67, P = 0.04). Compared to control, any heparin (including LMWH) may make little or no difference to the number of major bleeding events (3 studies, 180 participants: RR 2.70, 95% CI 0.89 to 8.19; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) and had an unclear effect on risk of readmission to intensive care (3 studies, 180 participants: RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.12 to 3.90, I² = 45%; very low certainty evidence). The effect of heparin on our other outcomes (including death, patient and graft survival, transfusion requirements) remains unclear (very low certainty evidence). Three studies (144 participants) investigated antiplatelet interventions in kidney transplantation: aspirin versus dipyridamole (1), and Lipo-PGE₁ plus low-dose heparin to "control" in patients who had a diagnosis of acute rejection (2). None of these reported on early graft thromboses. The effect of aspirin, dipyridamole and Lipo PGE₁ plus low-dose heparin on any outcomes is unclear (very low certainty evidence). Two studies (168 participants) assessed interventions in liver transplants. One compared warfarin versus aspirin in patients with pre-existing portal vein thrombosis and the other investigated plasmapheresis plus anticoagulation. Both studies were abstract-only publications, had high risk of bias in several domains, and no outcomes could be meta-analysed. Overall, the effect of any of these interventions on any of our outcomes remains unclear with no evidence to guide anti-thrombotic therapy in standard liver transplant recipients (very low certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is a paucity of research in the field of graft thrombosis prevention. Due to a lack of high quality evidence, it remains unclear whether any therapy is able to reduce the rate of early graft thrombosis in any type of solid organ transplant. UFH may increase the risk of major bleeding in kidney transplant recipients, however this is based on low certainty evidence. There is no evidence from RCTs to guide anti-thrombotic strategies in liver, heart, lung, or other solid organ transplants. Further studies are required in comparing anticoagulants, antiplatelets to placebo in solid organ transplantation. These should focus on outcomes such as early graft thrombosis, major haemorrhagic complications, return to theatre, and patient/graft survival.

Recipient age and outcome after pancreas transplantation: a retrospective dual-center analysis

With a later onset of diabetes complications and thus increasing age of transplant candidates, many centers have extended upper age limits for pancreas transplantation. This study investigates the effect of recipient and donor age on outcomes after pancreas transplantation.We retrospectively analyzed 565 pancreas transplants performed at two Eurotransplant centers. The cohort was split at a recipient and donor age of 50 and 40 years, respectively. Median recipient age in old patients (≥50 years; 27.2%) was 54 years and 40 years in young patients (<50 years). Compared to young recipients, old recipients had an inferior patient survival rate (≥50: 5yr, 82.8%; 10yr, 65.6%; <50: 5yr, 93.3%; 10yr, 82.0%; P < 0.0001). Old recipients demonstrated comparable death-censored pancreas (≥50: 1yr, 80.6%; 5yr, 70.2%; <50: 1yr, 87.3%; 5yr, 77.8%; P = 0.35) and kidney graft survival (≥50: 1yr, 97.4%; 5yr, 90.6%; <50: 1yr, 97.8%; 5yr, 90.2%; P = 0.53) compared to young recipients. Besides a lower rate of kidney rejection, similar relative risks for postoperative complications were detected in old and young patients. This study shows that despite an increased mortality in old recipients, excellent graft survival can be achieved similar to that of young patients. Age alone should not exclude patients from receiving a pancreas transplant.

Serum pancreatic enzymes in the early postoperative period predict complications associated with pancreatic fluid after pancreas transplantation: A retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Pancreas transplantation (PT) is a radical treatment for diabetes mellitus (DM). Although the results of PT have been improving, surgical complications remain. Few reports have focused on complications associated with pancreatic fluid (CAPF) after PT. We aimed to investigate the risk factors and predictors for CAPF after PT.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients, who underwent deceased-donor PT for type 1 DM at our institution from August 2001 to May 2020, were retrospectively studied. We identified CAPF from those with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III and assessed risk factors by univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Twenty-one (30.4%) patients had complications with Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥grade III. Eleven (16.0%) patients were diagnosed with CAPF. Median serum pancreatic amylase (P-AMY) levels with CAPF on postoperative day (POD)1 and POD2 were significantly higher than those without CAPF (P = .019 and P = .027, respectively). In multivariable analysis, serum P-AMY levels on POD1 were an independent predictive factor for CAPF (odds ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.14, P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications associated with pancreatic fluid after PT is associated with high serum P-AMY in the early postoperative period. Serum pancreatic enzymes in the first few postoperative days after PT may be a significant predictive factor for CAPF.

First-day plasma amylase detects patients at risk of complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) carries a high risk of major postoperative complications, but knowledge on early warning signs and surrogate markers for postoperative complications is scarce.

AIMS

Our aim was to analyze the complication-predictive value of different laboratory tests in pancreas transplantation.

MATERIALS & METHODS

All SPKs in Finland between January 2010 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Levels of first three-day plasma amylase, drain fluid amylase, C-reactive protein, C-peptide, plasma trypsinogen, and white blood cell count were assessed for their performance predicting cumulative postoperative complications (assessed using the Comprehensive Complication Index) within 90 days from transplantation by using ROC analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 164 SPK patients included, 39 suffered at least one complication requiring laparotomy. First-day plasma amylase had the best value in predicting complications based on its high AUC value and easy clinical applicability, with an optimum cutoff of six times the upper normal limit. Negative predictive values (NPVs) and positive predictive values of this cutoff were 0.81 and 0.71 for any relaparotomy, and 0.91 and 0.71 for the Comprehensive Complication Index >47.7 (which equals the morbidity of two relaparotomies), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, first-day plasma amylase could be able to detect patients at risk of complications after SPK.

Donor risk factors in pancreas transplantation

The aim of the work was to analyze and expose the donor and recipient risk factors in pancreas transplantation. In the following paper, we exposed the 2018 Spanish Consensus Document on Donor and Recipient Selection Criteria for Pancreas Transplantation. An assessment of the previous Selection Criteria for Donors and Recipients of Pancreas Transplantation, published in 2005 by the Spanish Pancreas Transplant Group (GETP) and the National Transplant Organization (ONT) was performed. A literature review was performed using Cochrane Library, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Some of the following terms were used for the literature search: “Diabetes Mellitus,” “Pancreas Transplantation,” “Insulin-Secreting Cells,” “Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis,” “Allograft Pancreatitis,” “Donors’ Risk Factors,” “Recipients’ Risk Factors,” “Pancreas Allograft Rejection” and “Pancreas Allograft Survival.” After an extended search, different inclusion criteria were established. Articles and documents with abstracts of full text and in English or Spanish language were selected. Subsequently, different scientific meetings took place during 2015 and 2016 by the GETP. Finally, the updated criteria were published by the GETP and ONT in 2018. Several risk factors have been described in pancreas transplantation that can be divided into donor risk factors: Advanced age (> 50 years); high body mass index (BMI) (> 30 kg/m²); cause of death (e.g., stroke); previous hyperglycemia; hyperamylasemia; cold ischemia time (greater than 8 or 12 h, depending on the type of donation); the use of vasopressors in the intensive care unit or cardiac arrest; and the macroscopic aspect of the pancreas allograft. The following are recipient risk factors: Advanced age (> 50 years); active smoking; high BMI (> 30 kg/m²); and peripheral artery disease or sensorimotor polyneuropathy. Based on the aforementioned parameters, different selection criteria have been established for the recipients depending on the type of pancreas transplantation. Knowledge of the risk factors for pancreas transplantation allows the establishment of reliable selection criteria for choosing donors and recipients.

Applicability and reproducibility of the CPAT-grading system for pancreas allograft thrombosis

PURPOSE

Although pancreas allograft thrombosis (PAT) incidence has progressively decreased, it remains the most common cause of early graft failure. Currently, there is no consensus on documentation of PAT, which has resulted in a great variability in reporting. The Cambridge Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis (CPAT) grading system has recently been developed for classification of PAT. In this study we aimed to assess the applicability and validate the reproducibility of the CPAT grading system.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study. Selected for this study were all 177 pancreas transplantations performed at our center between January 1 st, 2008 and September 1 st, 2018 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 318 Computed Tomography (CT) images was reevaluated according the CPAT system by two local radiologists. Inter-rater agreement expressed in Cohen's kappa was 0.403 for arterial and 0.537 for venous thrombosis. Inter-rater agreement, expressed in the Fleiss' kappa, within clinically relevant thrombosis categories was 0.626 for Grade 2 and 0.781 for Grade 3 venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not perfect, we believe that implementation of the CPAT system would improve current documentation on PAT. However, it is questionable whether identification of a small Grade 1 thrombosis would be relevant in clinical practice. Furthermore, a good quality CT scan, including adequate phasing, is essential to accurately identify potential thrombus and extend after pancreas transplantation.

Is Prophylactic Drainage After Pancreas Transplant Associated With Reduced Reoperation Rate?

OBJECTIVES

Advances in surgery and perioperative care have contributed to improved outcomes after pancreas transplant. However, the development of peripancreatic infections carries a poor prognosis. It is not clear whether abdominal drainage is helpful in collection prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of adult consecutive pancreas transplants at a single institution between January 2017 and December 2018 was undertaken. Postoperative outcomes were compared between patients in whom prophylactic intraoperative drains were placed and patients with no drains.

RESULTS

We identified 83 patients who underwent pancreas transplant with a median age of 45 years; 54.2% were males, and median body mass index was 25.8. Thirty patients had 1 or 2 drains placed (36.1%). There was no difference in the readmission rate (70.0% vs 60.4%; P = .48), reoperation (20.0% vs 30.2%; P = .44), or percutaneous drainage of peripancreatic infections (20.0% vs 15.1%; P = .56) between patients with drains and no drains, respectively. However, prophylactic drainage was associated with a lower rate of reoperation for peripancreatic infections compared with those who were not drained (0.0% vs 13.2%; P < .05). No graft loss occurred in the drain group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic drainage after pancreas transplant may be helpful for reduction in the infection rate after reoperation. The risks of drain placement should be weighed against those of drain avoidance.

Pseudocyst of Pancreas Transplant Allograft: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic pseudocysts are rarely reported complications of pancreas transplant.

CASE

We present a case of a patient with simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant with bladder exocrine drainage who developed reflux pancreatitis and symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst as a result of neuropathic bladder, 15 years after the original transplant. He was initially managed with percutaneous aspiration and drainage along with Foley catheter placement to help with bladder emptying. But the pseudocyst recurred after drains and Foley were removed. Eventually, he underwent an enteric conversion of the pancreas allograft with resolution of his symptoms and the pseudocyst.

CONCLUSIONS

Enteric conversion should be considered in cases of bladder-drained pancreas transplants with recurrent reflux pancreatitis and/or pseudocyst formation.

Donor cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: impact on outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation - a retrospective study

Donor cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CACPR) has been considered critically because of concerns over hypoperfusion and mechanical trauma to the donor organs. We retrospectively analyzed 371 first simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplants performed at the Medical University of Innsbruck between 1997 and 2017. We evaluated short‐ and long‐term outcomes from recipients of organs from donors with and without a history of CACPR. A total of 63 recipients received a pancreas and kidney graft from a CACPR donor. At 1, and 5‐years, patient survival was similar with 98.3%, and 96.5% in the CACPR and 97.0%, and 90.2% in the non‐CACPR group (log rank P = 0.652). Death‐censored pancreas graft survival was superior in the CACPR group with 98.3%, and 91.4% compared to 86.3%, and 77.4% (log rank P = 0.028) in the non‐CACPR group, which remained statistically significant even after adjustment [aHR 0.49 (95% CI 0.24–0.98), P = 0.044]. Similar relative risks for postoperative complications Clavien Dindo > 3a, pancreatitis, abscess, immunologic complications, delayed pancreas graft function, and relative length of stay were observed for both groups. Donors with a history of CACPR are, in the current practice, safe for transplantation. Stringent donor selection and short CPR durations may allow for outcomes surpassing those of donors without CACPR.

Robotic pancreas transplantation: the state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Robotic pancreas transplantation is a novel procedure that aims to reduce surgical invasiveness, and thereby limit complications related to the surgical access. Given that few centers are providing robotic transplantation, this review serves as a state of the science article to outline early experiences and highlight areas for future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplantation results in relatively high rates of wound and other surgical complications that are known to deleteriously impact outcomes. The minimally invasive, robotic-assisted approach decreases wound complications. Because of the obesity epidemic, overweight and obese status is encountered in an increasing number of transplant candidates. These candidates are subject to increased wound-related complications and most benefit from a robotic approach. The first clinical reports on laparoscopic, robotic-assisted kidney and pancreas transplantation indicate a significant decrease in wound complications and excellent outcomes in obese patients otherwise denied access to transplantation.

SUMMARY

With excellent results achieved in surgically challenging patients and further accumulation of experience, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted pancreas and kidney transplantation may evolve to a new standard approach.

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and the impact of postoperative complications on hospitalization cost

OBJECTIVE

considering simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation cases, to evaluate the financial impact of postoperative complications on hospitalization cost.

METHODS

a retrospective study of hospitalization data from patients consecutively submitted to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), from January 2008 to December 2014, at Kidney Hospital/Oswaldo Ramos Foundation (Sao Paulo, Brazil). The main studied variables were reoperation, graft pancreatectomy, death, postoperative complications (surgical, infectious, clinical, and immunological ones), and hospitalization financial data for transplantation.

RESULTS

the sample was composed of 179 transplanted patients. The characteristics of donors and recipients were similar in patients with and without complications. In data analysis, 58.7% of the patients presented some postoperative complication, 21.8% required reoperation, 12.3% demanded graft pancreatectomy, and 8.4% died. The need for reoperation or graft pancreatectomy increased hospitalization cost by 53.3% and 78.57%, respectively. The presence of postoperative complications significantly increased hospitalization cost. However, the presence of death, internal hernia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and pancreatic graft dysfunction did not present statistical significance in hospitalization cost (in average US$ 18,516.02).

CONCLUSION

considering patients who underwent SPKT, postoperative complications, reoperation, and graft pancreatectomy, as well as surgical, infectious, clinical, and immunological complications, significantly increased the mean cost of hospitalization. However, death, internal hernia, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and pancreatic graft dysfunction did not statistically interfere in hospitalization cost.

Outcomes of pancreas retransplantation in patients with pancreas graft failure

Background

Pancreas retransplantation is still a controversial option after loss of a pancreatic graft. This article describes the experience of pancreas retransplantation at a high‐volume centre.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study of all pancreas retransplantations performed in a single centre between 1997 and 2013. Pancreatic graft loss was defined by the return to insulin dependence. Risk factors for graft loss as well as patient and graft survival were analysed using logistic and time‐to‐event regression models.

Results

Of 409 pancreas transplantations undertaken, 52 (12·7 per cent) were identified as pancreas retransplantations. After a median follow‐up of 65·0 (range 0·8–174·3) months, 1‐ and 5‐year graft survival rates were 79 and 69 per cent respectively, and 1‐ and 5‐year patient survival rates were 96 and 89 per cent. During the entire follow‐up, 22 grafts (42 per cent) were lost. Patient survival was not associated with any of the donor‐ or recipient‐related factors investigated. Five‐year graft survival was better after simultaneous kidney–pancreas retransplantation than pancreas retransplantation alone: 80 per cent (16 of 20) versus 63 per cent (20 of 32) (P = 0·226). Acute rejection (odds ratio 4·49, 95 per cent c.i. 1·59 to 12·68; P = 0·005) and early surgical complications (OR 3·29, 1·09 to 9·99, P = 0·035) were identified as factors with an independent negative effect on graft survival.

Conclusion

Pancreas retransplantation may be considered for patients whose previous graft has failed.

Good outcome in selected patients

Techniques of pancreas graft salvage/indications for allograft pancreatectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite improvements in pancreas allograft outcome, graft complications remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This review analyses the issues involved in the management of conditions that may require graft pancreatectomy, including the indications and techniques for graft salvage.

RECENT FINDINGS

With early recognition of graft complications, liberal use of radiological interventions, improved infection control, access to critical care and innovative surgical techniques, graft salvage is now feasible in many circumstances where graft pancreatectomy would previously have been necessary.

SUMMARY

The outcome of pancreas transplantation continues to improve with advances in the management of graft-threatening complications.

Pancreas transplantation: Advantages of a retroperitoneal graft position

INTRODUCTION

In the 50 years since the first pancreas transplant performed at the University of Minnesota, the surgical techniques employed have undergone many modifications. Techniques such as retroperitoneal graft placement have further improved the ability to reproduce the physiology of the «native» pancreas. We herein present our experience of a modified technique for pancreatic transplant, with the organ placed into a fully retroperitoneal position with systemic venous and enteric drainage of the graft by duodeno-duodenostomy.

METHODS

All pancreas transplantations performed between May 2016 and January 2017 were prospectively entered into our transplant database and retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 transplants were performed using the retroperitoneal technique (6 men: median age of 41 years [IQR 36-54]). Median cold ischemia times was 10,30h [IQR 5,30-12,10]. The preservation solution used was Celsior (n=7), IGL-1 (n=2), and UW (n=1). No complications related to the new surgical technique were identified. In one patient, transplantectomy at 12h was performed due to graft thrombosis, probably related to ischemic conditions from a donor with prolonged cardio-respiratory arrest. Another procedure was aborted without completing the graft implant due to an intraoperative immediate arterial thrombosis in a patient with severe iliac atheromatosis. No primary pancreas non-function occurred in the remaining 8patients. The median hospital stay was 13,50 days [IQR 10-27].

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal graft placement appears feasible with easy access for dissection the vascular site; comfortable technical vascular reconstruction; and a decreased risk of intestinal obstruction by separation of the small bowel from the pancreas graft.

Surgical Complications Not Related to the Renal and Pancreatic Grafts After Simultaneous Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is the most commonly performed multiorgan transplantation procedure worldwide. Transplanted organs are the main source of complication; however, some postoperative complications are not directly related to the pancreatic or renal grafts. The goal of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, type, and severity of postoperative complications not related to transplanted kidney or pancreas among SPKTx recipients.

METHODS

Complications unrelated to transplanted pancreas and kidneys among 112 SPKTx recipients were analyzed. The cumulative freedom from general surgical complications was assessed, and it was compared with cumulative freedom from complications related to kidney and pancreatic grafts. Severity of complications was classified according to a modified Clavien-Dindo scale.

RESULTS

The general surgery complication rate was 22.2%. Cumulative freedom from general surgical complications at days 60 and 90 after transplantation was 0.89 and 0.87, respectively. Cumulative freedom from general surgical complications was comparable with cumulative freedom from complications related to kidney grafts but significantly higher than cumulative freedom from complications related to pancreatic grafts (log-rank test, P < .001). The rates for grades of severity II, IIIa, IIIb, and IVb were 19.4%, 9.7%, 64.5%, and 6.4%, respectively. The most frequent cause of complications was intra-abdominal hematoma or abscess (25.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The general surgical complication rate was comparable to the rate of complications originating from the renal grafts but significantly lower than the complication rate related to the transplanted pancreas. The incidence of general surgical complications could be defined as moderate, and the severity of this type of complication was low.

Excessively Long Duodenum of the Pancreatic Graft Segment as a Rare Cause of Hyperammonemia After Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant is currently standard therapy to achieve long-term insulin-free euglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and concomitant end-stage kidney failure. A patient with symptoms of encephalopathy caused by hyperammonemia and with new-onset iron deficiency anemia was admitted to our institution 20 months after a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. Detailed screening did not reveal any specific cause for the hyperammonemia, and despite standard treatment, hyperammonemia did not resolve. An abdominal computed tomographic scan was performed, which showed a distended duodenal segment of the pancreas graft. This was confirmed during exploratory laparotomy when the anastomosis between duodenum and ileum was dismantled and found not to be stenotic. The excessively long stumps of the duodenum were then dissected and shortened, and a new anastomosis between graft-duodenum and recipient-ileum was created. The operation was followed by an uncomplicated postoperative course in which the serum ammonia normalized on the first postoperative day and remained normal afterwards. An excessively long segment of the duodenum of the pancreatic graft may lead to encephalopathy with hyperammonemia after a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant. This emphasizes the need for meticulous preparation of the graft to avoid this complication.

Surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

We investigated the rate of early surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) and their impact on both grafts and recipient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective analysis of typical pancreas-related complications, different methods of correction, and their efficacy were performed. Data describing pancreas transplant recipients were drawn from our SPKT waiting list.

RESULTS

The overall surgical complications rate was 37.5%. The 1-year pancreas graft survival was 82.5% and 1-year recipient survival was 90%. Surgical complications based on the graft loss rate did not exceed 2.5%. Direct surgical complications did not account for the loss of a single patient.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the high rate of surgical complications is a major obstacle to widespread application of pancreas transplantation; early recognition and appropriate treatment of graft-related complications is fundamental for graft survival.

Multivariate analysis of complications after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Identification of factors that have an impact on postoperative complications after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKTx) could help overcome limitations of this kind of treatment.

METHODS

Postoperative complications among 112 SPKTx recipients were divided into 3 groups: related to transplanted pancreas (n = 66), related to transplanted kidney (n = 23) and general surgical complications (n = 31) 120 refers to complications among 112 recipients. According to the modified Clavien-Dindo scale, complications were classified according to their severity for each group. Risk factors for complication development related to donor, recipient, surgical technique, and immunosuppression were included to establish the multivariable model using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Multiple regression analysis showed the following independent factors influenced mortal complications due to transplanted pancreas: age of donor (OR, 1.07; P < .04), duration of vascular pancreas anastomosis above 35 minutes (OR, 3.94; P < .04) and duration of recipient dialysis above 24 months before transplantation (OR, 0.14; P < .01). Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.8.

CONCLUSION

To improve results, the following modification of identified risk factors should be assumed: selection of donor in term of age, shortening of the second warm ischemia time, and adjustment of the waiting list to avoid prolongation of recipient dialysis before SPKTx.

Early complications related to the transplanted kidney after simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPKTx) is the most often performed multiorgan transplantation. The main source of complication is transplanted pancreas; as a result, early complications related to kidney transplant are rarely assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate prevalence, types, and severity of postoperative complications due to kidney graft among the simultaneous pancreas and kidney recipients.

METHODS

Complications related to transplanted kidney among 112 SPKTx recipients were analyzed. The indication for SPKTx was end-stage diabetic nephropathy due to long-lasting diabetes type 1. The cumulative survival rates for kidney graft function and cumulative freedom from complication on days 60 and 90 after transplantation were assessed. Severity of complications was classified according to the modified Dindo-Clavien scale.

RESULTS

The 12-month cumulative survival rate for kidney graft was 0.91. Cumulative freedom from complication on the 60th day after transplantation was 0.84. The rates for II, IIIA, IIIB, IVA, and IVB severity grades were: 34.9%, 4.3%, 26.1%, 26.1%, and 8.6%, respectively. Acute tubular necrosis and rejection were the most frequent (43.4%) cause of complication. The most frequent reasons for graft nephrectomy were infections (2/7; 28.6%) and vascular thrombosis due to atherosclerosis of recipient iliac arteries (2/7; 28.6%). The most severe (IVB) complications were caused by fungal infection.

CONCLUSION

Rate and severity of complications due to renal graft after SPKTx was low; however, to prevent the most serious ones reduction of fungal infection was necessary.

Pancreas transplantation: review

Vascularized pancreas transplantation is the only treatment that establishes normal glucose levels and normalizes glycosylated hemoglobin levels in type 1 diabetic patients. The first vascularized pancreas transplant was performed by William Kelly and Richard Lillehei, to treat a type 1 diabetes patient, in December 1966. In Brazil, Edison Teixeira performed the first isolated segmental pancreas transplant in 1968. Until the 1980s, pancreas transplants were restricted to a few centers of the United States and Europe. The introduction of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil in 1994, led to a significant outcome improvement and consequently, an increase in pancreas transplants in several countries. According to the International Pancreas Transplant Registry, until December 31st, 2010, more than 35 thousand pancreas transplants had been performed. The one-year survival of patients and pancreatic grafts exceeds 95 and 83%, respectively. The better survival of pancreatic (86%) and renal (93%) grafts in the first year after transplantation is in the simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant group of patients. Immunological loss in the first year after transplant for simultaneous pancreas-kidney, pancreas after kidney, and pancreas alone are 1.8, 3.7, and 6%, respectively. Pancreas transplant has 10 to 20% surgical complications requiring laparotomy. Besides enhancing quality of life, pancreatic transplant increases survival of uremic diabetic patient as compared to uremic diabetic patients on dialysis or with kidney transplantation alone.

Component analysis of hospital cost of pancreas-kidney transplant and correlations with different variables in a Brazilian hospital

INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is associated with a high rate of complications when it is compared with transplantation of other organs; these increased complications can result in increased financial costs of the procedure. The objective of this study was to determine operating costs and financial results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and its different variables in a Brazilian hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2011, the monthly costs of 105 patients were calculated. These patients were divided into 2 groups; the first consecutive 53 patients were labeled group I and the second set of 52 patients were labeled group II. The cost evaluation was made in US dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients corresponded to the public health system and 16 patients to the supplementary health system. The percentage of hospital discharge was 92.4%. There was an increase in operating room costs in group II compared with group I with no statistically significant difference ($18,749.33 for group I and $17,608.26 for group II). The outcome of the operation was positive; it was greater for group II than for group I ($16,303.22 vs $3494.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is a financially feasible procedure in Brazil, with the public health system being the main payment source.

Long-term Effects of Delayed Graft Function on Pancreas Graft Survival After Pancreas Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Compared with the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation, DGF after pancreas transplantation has not been fully evaluated.

METHODS

We retrospectively verified the impact of DGF on long-term pancreas graft survival in surgically successful cases. Pancreas graft failure was defined by the recipient's return to exogenous insulin administration.

RESULTS

Between May 2004 and April 2013, we performed 135 technically successful primary pancreas transplantations. Delayed graft function was defined as a total cumulative insulin requirement of 19 UI or greater within postoperative 7 days. Of the 135 recipients in our study cohort, 47 (34.8%) developed DGF after the pancreas transplantation. By multivariate analysis, DGF was found to be associated with a donor age of 30 years or older (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-7.69; P=0.003) and the increased ratio of body mass index in a recipient to a donor (odds ratio, 26.1; 95% confidence interval, 2.53-270.0; P=0.006). There was a trend toward higher acute rejection (P=0.622) and mortality (P=0.49) rates in recipients with versus without DGF, although this did not reach statistical significance. Delayed graft function was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure (P=0.016) and death-censored graft failure (P=0.037).

CONCLUSION

Delayed graft function after pancreas transplantation was found to be associated with a greater risk of overall pancreas graft failure and death-censored graft failure.

State of the art of robotic surgery in organ transplantation

Within the last two decades the application of minimally invasive surgical technologies has shown significant benefits when it comes to complex surgical procedures. Lower rates of complications and higher patient satisfaction are commonly reported. Until recently these benefits were inaccessible for patients with solid organ transplantation, because conventional laparoscopy was seen as nonapplicable in such technically demanding procedures. The introduction of the da Vinci Robotic Surgical System, with its inherent advantages, has expanded the ability to complete solid organ transplantation in a minimally invasive fashion. Robotic applications in kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation have been reported. The initial results showed the viability of this technique in the field. The most extensive experience has been described in kidney transplantation. Over 700 donor nephrectomies and more than 70 renal transplants have been performed successfully with the robotic system. The proven advantage of the robotic technique, especially in obese kidney recipients, is a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection, which in these highly immunosuppressed patients is reflected in superior outcomes. The first results in pancreas transplantation and living donor hepatectomy are very promising; however, larger series are needed in order to address the value of the robotic surgery in these areas of solid organ transplantation.

Pancreas-Kidney transplantation: Impact of dialysis modality on the outcome

It remains controversial whether dialysis modality prior to SPKT (simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation) affects the outcome. We analyzed outcomes in type 1 diabetic patients undergoing SPKT, comparing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) groups: 119 had been on HD; 39 on PD. They were comparable except regarding dialysis time, higher in HD patients (30 ± 23 vs. 21 ± 15 months, P = 0.003). Thrombosis-driven relaparotomy was more frequent in PD patients (12.8% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.014). Pancreas loss due to infection was higher in PD patients (12.8% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.042). Thrombosis-related kidney loss was more frequent in PD patients (5.1%, vs. 0% in HD patients, P = 0.058). Thirteen deaths occurred, more within the PD group (17.9% vs. 5%; P = 0.011), being infection the leading cause (13.5%, vs. 1.7% in HD patients, P = 0.010). Patient survival was inferior in PD patients. Besides PD, cardiovascular disease and graft failure were independent predictors of patient death. In conclusion, PD patients more frequently complicated with intra-abominal infection leading to pancreatic loss and with renal thrombosis, with adverse impact on survival. As a PD first strategy in end-stage renal disease patients is generally associated with good outcomes, these gloomier results after SPKT urge for careful adjustment of infection and thrombosis prophylactic protocols in PD patients.

Cooperative Study of the Spanish Pancreas Transplant Group (GETP): Surgical Complications

Technical failure in pancreas transplant has been the main cause of the loss of grafts. In the last few years, the number of complications has reduced, and therefore the proportion of this problem.

OBJECTIVES

The Spanish Pancreas Transplant Group wanted to analyze the current situation with regard to surgical complications and their severity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective and multicenter study was performed. 10 centers participated, with a total of 410 pancreas transplant recipients between January and December 2013.

RESULTS

A total of 316 transplants were simultaneous with kidney, 66 after kidney, pancreas-only 10, 7 multivisceral and 11 retrasplants. Surgical complication rates were 39% (n=161). A total of 7% vascular thrombosis, 13% bleeding, 6% the graft pancreatitis, 12% surgical infections and others to a lesser extent. Relaparotomy rate was 25%. The severity of complications were of type IIIb (13%), type II (12%) and type IVa (8.5%). Graft loss was 8%. Early mortality was 0.5%. The percentage of operations for late complications was 17%.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of surgical complications after transplantation is not negligible, affecting one in 3 patients. They are severe in one out of 5 and, in one of every 10 patients graft loss occurs. Therefore, there is still a significant percentage of surgical complications in this type of activity, as shown in our country.

Financial cost of the admissions for simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant in a Brazilian hospital

PURPOSE

To perform a cost analysis of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) in a Brazilian hospital.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2011, 105 consecutive SPKTs at the Hospital of Kidney and Hypertension in Sao Paulo were evaluated. We evaluated the patient demographics, payment source (public health system or supplementary system), and the impact of each hospital cost component. The evaluated costs were corrected to December 2011 values and converted to US dollars.

RESULTS

Of the 105 SPKT patients, 61.9% were men, and 38.1% were women. Eight patients died, and 97 were discharged (92.4%). Eighty-nine procedures were funded by the public health system. The cost for the patients who were discharged was $18.352.27; the cost for the deceased patients was $18.449.96 (p = 0.79). The FOR for SPKT during this period was positive at $5,620.65. The costs were distributed as follows: supplies, 36%; administrative costs, 20%; physician fees, 15%; intensive care unit, 10%; surgical center, 10%; ward, 9%.

CONCLUSION

Mortality did not affect costs, and supplies were the largest cost component.

Quality of pancreatic transplant program assessment using a risk-adjusted cumulative sum chart: experience from a single, small center

BACKGROUND

The high rate of complication after pancreas transplantation not only had an impact on recipient quality of life and survival but also had significant financial implications. Thus, monitoring transplant center performance was crucial to indentifying changes in clinical practice that result in quality deterioration.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate retrospectively the quality of the single, small pancreatic transplant program and to establish prospective monitoring of the center using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (CUSUM).

METHODOLOGY

From 1988 to 2014, 119 simultaneous pancreas and the kidney transplantations (SPKTx) were performed. The program was divided into 3 eras, based on surgical technique and immunosuppression. Analyses of the 15 fatal outcomes due to complication from pancreatic graft were performed. The risk model was developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis based on retrospective data of 112 SPKTx recipients. The risk-adjusted 1-sided CUSUM chart was plotted for retrospective and prospective events. The upper control limit was set to 2.

RESULTS

There were 2 main causes of death: multiorgan failure (73.3%; 11/15) and septic hemorrhage (26.7%; 4/15). Quality analysis using the CUSUM chart revealed that the process was not homogeneous; however, no significant signal of program deterioration was obtained and the performance of the whole program was within the settled control limit.

CONCLUSION

For a single pancreatic transplant center. The risk-adjusted CUSUM chart was a useful tool for quality program assessment. It could support decision making during traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conferences. For small transplant centers, increasing the sensitivity of the CUSUM method by lowering the upper control limit should be considered. However, an individual assessment approach of the for particular centers is recommended.

Long-term outcomes of pancreas after kidney transplantation in small centers: is it justified?

BACKGROUND

Currently, the long-term advantages of having a pancreas transplantation (PT) are debated, particularly in patients receiving pancreas after kidney (PAK) allografts. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) requires that a transplant center perform a minimum number of PT per year to remain an active PT center. The long-term outcomes and challenges of PAK in small pancreas transplant centers are not well studied.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we report short- and long-term outcomes in a small center performing 2-9 PT annually.

RESULTS

Forty-eight PT (25 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation [SPK], 23 PAK) were performed in our center. Donor and recipient demographics were similar in both groups. All suitable local donors were used for SPK. All organs for PAK transplantation were imported from other UNOS regions. Mean follow-up was 61 ± 46 and 74 ± 46 months for SPK and PAK, respectively. Patient and graft survival rates were similar in SPK and PAK groups and better than the reported national average. Four patients (11%) died (1 due to trauma, 1 brain lymphoma, 1 ruptured aneurysm; and 1 unknown cause). Two patients (4%; 1 SPK, 1 PAK) lost their grafts because of thrombosis on postoperative days 3 and 5 in 2002. No graft thrombosis occurred since 2002. Seven patients (15%) required reoperation (4 for bleeding, 2 anastomotic leaks, 1 small bowel perforation). Two patients (4%) developed post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease. Five patients (11%) experienced cytomegalovirus antigenemia which responded well to antiviral therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with outcomes for diabetic patients on dialysis, current SPK and PAK short- and long-term results are favorable even in a small PT center. Therefore, unless there is a contraindication, PT should be offered to all type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease at the time of kidney transplantation or afterward.

Single-center experience using organs after rescue allocation for pancreas transplant in the eurotransplant region

OBJECTIVES

Because of the shortage of available organs for transplants, graft allocation polices have been modified recently. This report deals with the effect of using organs after rescue allocation for pancreas transplant in a single center in the Eurotransplant Region to possibly expand the donor pool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed. Between 2007 and 2010, thirty-one pancreas transplants were performed at the University Hospital of Leipzig, in Leipzig, Germany. Among these, 7 cases used rescue organs. These organs had been officially offered to, but rejected by, at least 3 consecutive transplant centers. Donor/recipient and clinical/laboratory transplant/posttransplant outcomes from patients receiving rescue organs were collected and were compared with organs from conventional donors.

RESULTS

Mean donor age was greater in the rescue organ group than in the conventional donor group (28.3 ± 10.7 y vs 23.0 ± 12.5 y). During follow-up (2.3 ± 0.6 y rescue organ group vs 3.9 ± 1.2 y conventional donor group), patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 85% in all 3 categories in the rescue organ group, whereas outcomes for conventional donors were 88%, 85%, and 83%. Incidences of pancreatic graft thrombosis, delayed graft function, acute and late rejection episodes (eg, perioperative complications) were comparable between groups. No differences existed between mean serum urea levels and mean HbA1c levels between groups 2 years after transplant. Whereas 2 years after surgery, mean serum creatinine levels (rescue organ group, 78.8 ± 21.0 μmol/L vs 114.3 ± 28.4 μmol/L in the conventional donor group) showed significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results are promising. Further pro-spective studies are warranted to evaluate routine transplant of organs after rescue allocation.

An analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings--an update of the UNOS database

INTRODUCTION

Previously, increasing age has been a part of the exclusion criteria used when determining eligibility for a pancreas transplant. However, the analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings has largely been based on single-center reports.

METHODS

A UNOS database review of all adult pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on age categories: 18-29 (n = 1823), 30-39 (n = 7624), 40-49 (n = 7967), 50-59 (n = 3160), and ≥60 (n = 280). We compared survival outcomes and demographic variables between each age grouping.

RESULTS

Of the 20 854 pancreas transplants, 3440 of the recipients were 50 yr of age or above. Graft survival was consistently the greatest in adults 40-49 yr of age. Graft survival was least in adults age 18-29 at one-, three-, and five-yr intervals. At 10- and 15-yr intervals, graft survival was the poorest in adults >60 yr old. Patient survival and age were found to be inversely proportional; as the patient population's age increased, survival decreased.

CONCLUSION

Pancreas transplants performed in patients of increasing age demonstrate decreased patient and graft survival when compared to pancreas transplants in patients <50 yr of age.

Diagnosis of early pancreas graft failure via antibody-mediated rejection: single-center experience with 256 pancreas transplantations

Early pancreas graft loss is usually attributed to technical failure while the possibility of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is generally overlooked. To investigate the role of AMR in early pancreas graft loss, we retrospectively assessed 256 patients with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) between 1985 and 2010 at our institute. We included 33 SPK patients who lost their pancreas graft <1 year after transplantation. AMR was diagnosed based on donor-specific antibodies, C4d and histology in 7 cases, 8 cases were suspicious for AMR and 18 pancreas graft losses were not due to AMR. Acute AMR occurred >1 month after transplantation in 6/7 cases, whereas all other causes typically led to loss <1 month after transplantation. Thrombotic lesions occurred equally among the 33 cases. In 12/18 concurrent kidney specimens, the diagnostic results paralleled those of the pancreas graft. All patients with acute AMR of the pancreas graft lost their renal grafts <1 year after transplantation. In the setting of a thrombotic event, histopathological analysis of early pancreas graft loss is advisable to rule out the possibility of AMR, particularly because a diagnosis of acute AMR has important consequences for renal graft outcomes.

Robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation: where are we today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To analyze the current status of robotic-assisted pancreas transplantation as a treatment option for diabetic patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pancreas transplant recipients continue to suffer high rates of technical complications, including wound infections, fascial dehiscence, and postoperative ventral hernias. Robotic technology can potentially contribute to decreasing these dangerous complications and improve the postoperative course of pancreas transplantation.

SUMMARY

Current literature on both robotic pancreas and robotic kidney transplant were reviewed in order to determine feasibility, safety, and efficacy of robotic pancreas transplantation. To date, only three cases of robotic pancreas transplantation, two of which were solely pancreas transplantation and one combined pancreas-kidney transplantation, have been reported in a single publication by an Italian group. Their preliminary data show that robotic pancreas transplantation is feasible and well tolerated. The authors believe that robotic pancreas transplantation could have a prominent role in lone pancreas transplantation performed in overweight recipients, in parallel to their experience with fully robotic kidney transplant in morbidly obese candidates. Broader experience with this innovative approach will be necessary to establish if robotic pancreas transplantation will be a beneficial option for diabetic patients needing beta-cell replacement.