Comparison of mammographically guided breast biopsy techniques

Effect of Intensive Psychological Care on Patients with Benign Breast Lumps after Mammotome-Assisted Tumor Resection

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of intensive psychological care on patients with benign breast lumps after Mammotome-assisted tumor resection.

Methods

A total of 160 patients with benign breast lumps diagnosed and treated in our hospital between May 2019 and January 2021 were recruited and divided into a study group (n = 80) and a control group (n = 80) via the random number table method. All patients received Mammotome-assisted tumor resection. Patients in the control group received conventional nursing, and those in the study group received intensive psychological care. The outcome measure included quality of life of patients, psychological states, treatment compliance, and nursing satisfaction.

Results

The differences in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores, and Morisky scores between the two groups were not significant before the intervention (p > 0.05). The FACT-G scores improved in both groups after the intervention, with higher results in the study group than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Patients in the study group showed a significantly greater reduction in the SAS and HAMD scores than those in the control group (p < 0.05). Intensive psychological care used in the study group resulted in significantly higher compliance scores in the body mass control, medication compliance, exercise compliance, and dietary compliance versus conventional care for the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Intensive psychological care provides satisfactory outcomes in patients with benign breast lumps after Mammotome-assisted tumor resection. It effectively improves the quality of life of patients, relieves their negative emotions, and strengthens treatment compliance and patient satisfaction, which shows good potential for clinical promotion.

Radioactive Seed Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in an Academic Comprehensive Cancer Program Community Hospital Setting

Wire localized excision (WLE) has been a long-standing method for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Disadvantages of this method include difficulty locating the wire tip in relation to borders of the lesion, imprecise placement of the wire, and the need to place the wire shortly before scheduled surgery. These shortcomings may lead to a high positive margin rate requiring re-excision to obtain clear margins for breast cancer. Radioactive seed localized excision (RSLE) of nonpalpable breast lesions has been advocated as a safe and effective alternative to WLE. The primary endpoints of the study were to compare re-excision rates between WLE and RSLE of nonpalpable breast lesions and to determine if there were any differences in volume of tissue removed. One hundred three patients were included in a retrospective review of localized breast excisions done by a single surgeon. Forty-four patients underwent WLE between April 2007 and February 2009. Fifty-nine patients underwent RSLE between September 2009 and January 2012. Margins were considered to be clear if at least 1 mm of normal tissue was obtained from the circumferential periphery of the lesion in question. RSLE resulted in a re-excision rate of 17 versus 55 per cent re-excision rate for wire localization ( P < 0.001). Excision volume was greater for patients having wire localization ( P = 0.074). RSLE is an effective technique for excision of non-palpable breast lesions in the community setting. This technique allows for accurate localization and appears to allow for smaller volume of tissue to be excised.

Accuracy and outcomes of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for diagnosis and management of nonpalpable breast lesions

Stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy (SVAB) is an alternative method of breast biopsy for nonpalpable lesions detected by mammography. Considering the diagnostic effectiveness, a direct comparison of SVAB and open surgical biopsy (OSB) is lacking. We performed a retrospective review of 276 (33.8%) SVAB and 541 (66.2%) OSB to compare the diagnostic accuracy and the total number of procedures the patients underwent. The negative predictive values of OSB and SVAB were 99.77% and 99.61%, and their false-negative rates were 0.96% and 4.76%, respectively. SVAB, as the first-line biopsy method, obviated 92.3% of operations. All malignancies diagnosed using SVAB could be treated with single therapeutic surgery. By contrast, 48% of malignancies of OSB group received two operations. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category used at the study correlated well with the percentage of malignancy and can thus be used to predict biopsy results. Our study concluded that SVAB is reliable for diagnosing nonpalpable breast lesions and is the better biopsy method for categories 3 and 4A lesions, which reduces the benign surgery rate. For lesions with a higher likelihood of malignancy, BI-RADS 4B, 4C and 5, SVAB has an advantage over OSB, which lowers the total number of operations for malignancy treatment.

High Residual Tumor Rate for Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy

Purpose: The objective of study is aiming to investigate the residual tumor rate after Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy (VABB) for early breast cancer excision and the efficacy of mammogram and ultrasound in detecting residual tumor.

Methods: Patients who underwent VABB and were confirmed with breast cancer in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. The residual tumor rate determined by histological examination was calculated, and then was compared with the results estimated by mammogram and ultrasound which were performed post VABB but before subsequent surgery. Univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression) were carried out to identify the independent risk factors associated with residual tumor.

Results: In total, 126 eligible patients with early breast cancer were recruited for this study, of whom 79 (62.7%) had residual tumor and 47 (37.3 %) underwent complete excision. The residual tumor rates for lesions < 10mm, lesions 10 to 20 mm and lesions >20mm in size were 55.0%, 68.9% and 53.1%, respectively. The complete excision rates estimated by mammogram and ultrasound were 76.5% and 73.9%, with a negative predictive value of only 46.2% and 50.6%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, no specific factors were found associated with risk of residual tumor (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions: There was a high residual tumor rate after VABB in early breast cancer. Both mammogram and ultrasound could not effectively detect the residual tumor after VABB.

Influence of surgical margins on the outcome of breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Breast-conserving surgery has become the preferred treatment for early breast cancer. Yet the question of what constitutes a 'safe margin', in terms of impact on patient outcome, remains unanswered. Our aim was to address this knowledge gap by determining the prevalence of positive and narrow margins after breast-conserving surgery, and evaluating how margin status impacted local recurrence and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected data about all women who underwent breast-conserving cancer surgery in our department between 2002 and 2011, focusing on patient and tumor characteristics, the distance from the tumor to the surgical margin, therapies administered, and outcome (measured in terms of local recurrence and overall survival). Data were analyzed by R (version 3.0.1), considering p < 0.05 as significant. Multivariate analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Of 1,192 women who received breast-conserving surgery, 264 were considered for widening; 111 of these patients had positive margins and 153 narrow (where narrow was defined as less than 5 mm). Widening was performed for 38 % of these patients (99/264) and mastectomy for 27 % (70/264), while 36 % (95/264) had no further surgery and were simply followed-up. Our multivariate analysis confirmed that local tumor recurrence and overall survival were not significantly influenced by margin status, either at initial surgery, or (for those patients with initially positive margins) at secondary margin-widening surgery. However, the following were found to be significantly correlated with local recurrence: tumor multifocality, high expression of Ki-67/Mib-1, comedo-like necrosis, and non-axillary lymph node positivity (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found the status of resection margins and the management of infiltrated or narrow margins to have no significant influence on local tumor recurrence rates or on overall patient survival. Instead, biological factors connected with tumor aggressiveness seem to play the most important role in breast cancer prognosis, independent of surgical radicality.

Intraoperative digital specimen mammography: a significant improvement in operative efficiency

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to determine the length of operative time and its effect on surgeon productivity with the use of intraoperative digital specimen mammography (IDSM) compared to standard specimen mammography (SSM).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 344 consecutive patients from a single breast surgeon from 2003 to 2010. Operative time was compared between procedures using SSM vs IDSM. Surgeon productivity was evaluated by the number of wire-localized excisions performed prior to and after implementation of IDSM.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty patients underwent SSM and 114 underwent IDSM. Average operative time in the SSM group was 78 minutes vs 68 minutes in the IDSM group (P < .0001). In the first 2 years after implementation of IDSM, the number of wire-localized excisions performed increased by 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative times were significantly shorter with the use of IDSM vs SSM, and this was associated with an increase in surgeon productivity.

An Intraoperative Localization Technique for a Postexcision Specimen of Nonpalpable Breast Calcifications: A Pilot Study

The specimens obtained through excisional biopsy (EB) are commonly large in size and it is difficult to remove the tissues containing nonpalpable calcifications accurately from them for pathologic examination. Therefore, the aim of the study is to develop a novel method of subarea localization technique (SLT) for sampling from the postexcisional specimens. A retrospective clinical study of 48 consecutive patients with breast microcalcifications were divided into a study group (n = 24 patients, 25 breasts) and a control group (n = 24 patients, 24 breasts) in time sequence. The specimens of study group were localized by SLT performed by cutting lines and/or metallic markers. The main study end points were the duration of intraoperative pathologic diagnosis (DIPD) and duration of conclusive pathology diagnosis (DCPD). The number of frozen blocks, number of paraffin blocks, number of sections, and other parameters correlated with pathologic diagnosis were compared between the two groups. SLT was succeeded in 48 of 48 (100%) patients, which shortened DIPD (29.3 vs 45.5 minutes, P < 0.01) significantly with less frozen blocks (6.2 vs 12.6, P < 0.01) and less frozen sections (8.5 vs 13.7, P = 0.01) than that of the control group. Moreover, SLT shortened DCPD (4.1 vs 5.1 days, P = 0.02) with less paraffin blocks (12.2 vs 21.7, P < 0.01) and less paraffin sections (20.0 vs 39.9, P < 0.01) than that of the control group. SLT decreased workload of the specimens sampling procedure and SLT may be recommended as a reliable specimens sampling method to guide pathology test for EB specimens containing calcifications.

Positive margins after breast-conserving therapy: localization technique or tumor biology?

BACKGROUND

The relative contributions of patient and tumor factors versus radiologic localization technique to the rates of inadequate margins of excision in breast-conserving therapy have not been defined.

METHODS

Patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy were studied. Margins less than 2 mm from tumor were considered inadequate.

RESULTS

Of 539 patients, 31% were guided by palpation and 69% were guided by preoperative radiologic localization. The palpation-guidance patients had larger tumors (P < .0001) and more nodal metastases (P = .0005). The rates of inadequate margins were 10% for palpation-guided patients and 11% for radiologic-localization patients (P = .53). The 3-year rates of local recurrence were .7% for palpation-guided patients and 1.8% for radiologic-guided patients (P = .5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient, tumor, and intraoperative pathologic factors, not just localization device shortcomings, produce inadequate margins of excision in breast-conserving therapy. A reasonable expected rate of inadequate margins owing to patient and tumor factors is 10%. Quality improvement for margin management must focus on intraoperative assessment of margins, especially for patients with identified risk factors, in addition to improving localization technique.

Ten-year experience with hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) breast lumpectomy

BACKGROUND

Pain, patient inconvenience, vasovagal symptoms, scheduling problems, wire malposition, and a positive margin rate of 40-75% are problems commonly associated with needle localized biopsy (NLBB). Despite these issues, NLBB is still the primary means of identifying nonpalpable lesions in the breast. We hypothesized that the hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided (HUG) procedure for intraoperative localization of nonpalpable lesions would allow for lumpectomy without the downfalls of needle localization and decrease the high positive-margin rate with NLBB.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from January 2000 to October 2009. Electronic chart review identified lumpectomy procedures performed in the clinic and operating room. These patients underwent preoperative core-biopsy diagnosis by ultrasound (US) or stereotactic means. When excision was necessary needle localization or HUG was planned. A multifrequency linear array transducer was used intraoperatively for the HUG procedures, and a block of tissue surrounding the hematoma was removed.

RESULTS

Localization procedures were performed in 455 patients: 126 (28%) via needle localization and 329 (72%) via HUG. The previous core-biopsy site in 100% of patients was successfully excised using HUG: 152 of 329 (46%) were benign and 177 of 329 (54%) were malignant. Margins were positive in 42 of these 177 cases (24%). was successful in 100% of patients: 88 of 126 (70%) were benign and NLBB 38 of 126 (30%) were malignant; margins were positive in 18 of these 38 (47%). Margin positivity was significantly higher for NLBB than HUG (P = 0.045, Fisher exact).

CONCLUSIONS

This 10-year experience, representing the largest to date, suggests that HUG is more accurate in localizing nonpalpable lesions than NLBB. Compared with the additional painful procedure of NLBB, HUG is more time and cost-efficient. Preoperative needle core biopsy is not only the minimally invasive diagnostic procedure of choice, but also becomes the localization procedure when excisional biopsy is necessary.

Current surgery for breast cancer

Surgeons retain the central role in the multidisciplinary care of the breast cancer patient. While technical details of the operations for these patients remain important, effective evidence-based decision making may be even more so. Advances in the methods of breast cancer diagnosis, localization techniques and surgical therapies, as well as the expanded role of the surgeon in breast cancer prevention, radiation therapy and the treatment of distant disease, requires surgeons to stay up to date with the available evidence. Herein, we present a review of the current surgical therapy of invasive breast cancer.

Minimally invasive technology in the management of breast disease

Minimally invasive surgery is gaining popularity around the world because it achieves the same or even superior results when compared to standard surgery but with less morbidity. Minimally invasive breast surgery is a broad concept encompassing new developments in the field of breast surgery that work on this minimally invasive principle. In this regard, breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy are good illustrations of this concept. There are three major areas of progress in the minimally invasive management of breast disease. First, percutaneous excisional devices are now available that can replace the surgical excision of breast mass lesions. Second, various ablative treatments are capable of destroying breast cancers in situ instead of surgical excision. Third, mammary ductoscopy provides a new approach to the investigation of mammary duct pathology. Clinical experience and potential applications of these new technologies are reviewed.

[Radioguided breast surgery. Evolution of the use of minimal-invasive technologies and current situation]

The increase in the detection of occult lesions has led to the development of new localisation methods using radiopharmaceutical products. The use of these products allows us to perform a "thrifty" (less-aggressive) surgical excision and, to simultaneously carry out the biopsy of the sentinel node in cases of breast cancer. On making a search for the most up to date references on this particular topic, we found many articles on radioguided surgery by many leading international work groups. These articles clearly show the advantages of the radioguided surgery method, its effectiveness and attractiveness to surgeons who are very much involved in the search for excellence in their daily work. We also contribute our experience as a functional group, with 413 interventions on occult lesions performed using the radioguided method (ROLL). In 229 cases out of these 413, we found a malignancy (75%); in all these 229 cases it was possible to perform the intervention simultaneously with the biopsy of the sentinel node (SNOLL), during the same surgical act. However the interest created by the new procedure, it is essential to keep a critical but innovative and reflexive mind on this issue, in order to accurately analyze the results obtained by each group. We must remember that these types of methods involve several clinical specialties and, therefore, each one will have to contribute with the highest efficiency.

Intraoperative loss of core biopsy clips: clinical implications

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to report the occurrence of intraoperative loss of metallic marking clips placed during image-guided biopsy and to hypothesize the likely mechanism of this clinical problem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2003 through December 2004, patients presenting for preoperative mammographic localization and operative excision of biopsy site marking clips were identified. Age, method of image-guided biopsy, number of excised specimens, and tissue diagnosis were determined. Specimen radiographs were used to identify cases of suspected intraoperative clip loss. Clips absent on specimen radiographs and postoperative mammograms were defined as lost intraoperatively. Biopsy site marking clips, surgical clips, and suction device apertures were measured.

RESULTS

In 78 surgical procedures performed during the study period, three (3.8%) of the patients experienced clip loss. Specimen radiographs confirmed the absence of clips in all submitted tissues. A median of four (range, three to five) separate biopsy specimens were excised among these three cases. A healing biopsy site from the stereotactic biopsy preceding the clip placement procedure was confirmed in all cases. Absence of the metallic clip was confirmed on postoperative mammograms. The apertures of two types of suction device were four and two times those of the biopsy clips.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative loss of metallic clips placed at the conclusion of image-guided breast biopsy is unusual but can occur during subsequent surgical excision. Repeated inability to locate the clip on specimen radiographs after accurate preoperative localization should raise the suspicion that the target clip has been lost, not missed, during surgery, likely because of inadvertent removal of the clip with the suction device.

[US-guided localization of non-palpable breast cancer and sentinel node using 99mTechnetium-albumin colloid]

OBJECTIVE

Surgery on non-palpable breast lesions is becoming increasingly common and new techniques for preoperative lesion localization have appeared. Radio-guided occult lesion localization (ROLL) enables malignant or probably malignant non-palpable breast lesions to be located and biopsy of the sentinel node to be performed (SNOLL: sentinel node and occult lesion localization).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Included were 118 patients with malignant or probably malignant non-palpable breast lesions visible on ultrasonography in whom radio-guided lesion resection and sentinel node biopsy were indicated. 99mTechnetium-albumin colloid was injected into the periphery of the lesion under ultrasonographic guidance and all patients underwent preoperative scintigraphy.

RESULTS

From November 2001 to December 2004, 118 patients were included. All patients underwent conservative surgery, with the non-palpable lesion being located in all cases (100% lesion detection rate). The histological diagnoses were: 81 invasive ductal carcinomas (68.64%), 7 infiltrating lobular carcinomas (5.93%), 5 mixed-type carcinomas (4.24%), 17 carcinomas in situ (14.40%), and 8 other invasive carcinomas (6.78%). The sentinel node was detected in 98.41%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Radio-guided ROLL surgery on non-palpable lesions located under ultrasonographic guidance is a simple, fast technique that enables the lesion to be safely excised. Both ROLL and SNOLL can be carried out in the same intervention with a single ultrasound-guided injection of 99mTechnetium-albumin colloid with satisfactory results.

Pathologic evaluation of cryoprobe-assisted lumpectomy for breast cancer

Cryoprobe-assisted lumpectomy is a relatively new technique that converts nonpalpable carcinomas into well-defined, palpable ones by creating an ice ball under ultrasonographic guidance, thus eliminating the need for preoperative needle localization. We evaluated the effect of cryoprobe-induced freezing on tumor tissue, peritumoral tissue, and margin status in 6 cases of cryoprobe-assisted lumpectomy performed for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Immunohistochemical stains for estrogen and progesterone receptors and the proliferation marker Ki-67 were performed on 4 cases and results compared with those of the pretreatment biopsy specimens. Although it was possible to recognize the tumor as infiltrating carcinoma in all cases, the alteration in tumor morphology interfered with tumor grading, distinguishing in situ and invasive components, and assessment of mitoses and lymphovascular invasion. The expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors was greatly reduced, whereas the Ki-67 staining was not significantly different when compared with pretreatment biopsy specimens. The "cryoprobe effect" did not interfere with evaluation of the margins and surrounding breast tissue.

Evaluation of 11-gauge and 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems in a breast parenchymal model

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare three commercially available vacuum-assisted breast biopsy systems for tissue yield, length and fragmentation of specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens were acquired from radiolucent (bacon) and radioopaque (turkey breast) tissue using three different commercially available vacuum-assisted breast biopsy devices. Two systems (system 1 and 2) were equipped with 11 G needles, one system (system 3) with a 9 G needle. As for systems 1 and 2 a second chamber for applying the vacuum is attached to the needle, the external maximum diameter was identical for all three systems. 48 specimens were taken out for each tissue type and for each device. Specimens were measured for total weight, individual length, and number of fragments. Differences between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

For both tissue types, system 1 and 2 showed similar results, for system 3 tissue weight and length of specimens were larger. Differences in lengths and weight were statistically significant between system 1 and 3 and system 2 and 3 (ANOVA, P < 0.05). Differences between length and weight were statistically significant between tissue 1 and 2 for all devices (t-Test < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

As for system 3 a larger tissue yield was obtained with the same number of specimens compared to systems 1 and 2, it can be assumed that the same diagnostic accuracy as for systems 1 and 2 may be achieved for system 3 with less passes through tissue.

Breast Surgery Techniques: Preoperative Bracketing Wire Localization by Surgeons

With the development of expertise in image guidance for breast surgery, many surgeons now perform preoperative wire localization themselves. Use of a single wire versus multiple wires to bracket a radiographic breast abnormality has previously been described, although benefits of this technique based on clinical outcomes such as margin status, tissue volume removed, and re-excision rates have not been established. This study is a retrospective analysis of wire-localized breast biopsies performed by 14 surgeons over 29 months; stereotactic and ultrasound guidance were used. During this time, 489 wire localizations were done, of which 159 used multiple wires. Two hundred eleven of these biopsies were done for malignant disease, 86 using multiple wires. After controlling for tumor node metastases stage, single and multiple wire placements were compared using endpoints of margin status, need for re-excision, and total volume of tissue removed. Neither margin status nor re-excision was related to the number of wires placed. However, the number of wires placed was significantly related to the total volume of tissue removed. Use of more than one localizing wire was associated with greater volume of tissue removal (measured in centimeters cubed) in benign disease (46 vs 25, P < 0.001), equivalent volumes in stage 0 disease (73 vs 67), less volume in stage 1 disease (113 vs 164), and less volume in stages 2 through 4 (158 vs 207, P = 0.03). Outcomes based on surgeon case volume during the study period demonstrated that low- (1–40), medium- (41–80), and high-volume (>80) surgeons did not differ in the type or stage of breast pathology treated. Surgeons with high case volumes were more likely to place multiple localizing wires ( P < 0.001) and were more likely to do a breast-conserving procedure if re-excision was performed ( P < 0.018). Surgeons with low case volumes were more likely to perform a re-excision ( P < 0.025). Surgeon experience has a positive impact on quality outcome measures such as performance of a definitive procedure at the time of initial surgery and use of breast-conserving procedures at the time of re-excision. Multiple wire localization can be used to significantly reduce the volume of breast tissue removed in malignant disease without sacrificing margin status or increasing the need for future re-excision.

Use of Ultrasound in Breast Surgery

The use of ultrasound has grown tremendously since it was introduced in 1951. This article describes use of this modality in patients who have breast disease.

Hematoma-Directed Ultrasound-Guided (HUG) Breast Lumpectomy

BACKGROUND

Needle localization breast biopsy (NLBB) is presently the primary means of localizing non-palpable lesions. Disadvantages of NLBB include vasovagal episodes, patient discomfort, and miss rates. Because hematomas naturally fill the cavity after vacuum-assisted breast biopsies (VABB), we hypothesized that ultrasound (US) could be used to find and accurately excise the actual biopsy site of non-palpable breast lesions without a needle.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study from January 2000 to July 2005. Electronic chart review identified patients with non-palpable breast lesions detected by means of mammogram who then underwent lumpectomy via NLBB or the hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided technique (HUG). HUG involved localizing the hematoma with a 7.5-MHz US probe and using the "line of sight" technique straight down toward the chest wall. A block of tissue encompassing the hematoma was then excised.

RESULTS

Localization procedures were performed in 186 patients-63 (34%) via needle localization and 123 (66%) via HUG. The previous VABB site in 100% of patients was successfully excised using HUG, 65 of 123 (53%) were benign and 58 of 123 (47%) were malignant; margins were positive in 13 of these 58 (22%). NLBB was successful in 100% of patients, 44 of 63 (70%) were benign and 19 of 63 (30%) were malignant; margins were positive in 14 of these 19 (73%). Margin positivity was significantly higher for NLBB than HUG (P = 0.0001, Fisher Exact).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that HUG is more accurate in localizing non-palpable lesions than NLBB. By eliminating the additional procedure needed for NLBB, HUG may also be more time- and cost efficient. HUG makes VABB not only a less invasive diagnostic procedure, but also a localization procedure.

Prospective randomized study comparing cryo-assisted and needle-wire localization of ultrasound-visible breast tumors

BACKGROUND

This study compared the surgical results of 2 localization methods-cryo-assisted localization (CAL) and needle-wire localization (NWL)-in patients undergoing breast lumpectomy for breast cancer.

METHODS

A total of 310 patients were treated in an institutional review board-approved study with 18 surgeons at 17 sites. Patients were randomized 2:1 to undergo either intraoperative CAL or NWL. A cryoprobe was inserted under ultrasound guidance in the operating room and an ice ball created an 8- to 10-mm margin around the lesion. The palpable ice ball then was dissected. NWL was placed according to institutional practice and resection was performed in a standard fashion. Surgical margins, complications, re-excisions, tissue volume, procedure times, ease of localization, specimen quality, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Positive margins were defined as any type of disease present 1 mm or less from any specimen edge.

RESULTS

Positive margin status did not differ between the 2 groups (28% vs. 31%). The volume of tissue removed was significantly less in the CAL group (49 vs. 66 mL, P = .002). Re-excisions were similar in both groups. CAL was superior in ease of lumpectomy, quality of specimen, acute surgical cosmesis, short-term cosmesis, patient satisfaction, and overall procedure time for the patient. CAL had a lower invasive positive margin rate (11% vs. 20%, P = .039) but a higher observed ductal carcinoma in situ-positive margin rate (30% vs. 18%, approaching statistical significance, P = .052).

CONCLUSIONS

CAL is a preferred alternative to standard wire localization because it provides a palpable template, removes less tissue and improves cosmesis, decreases overall procedure time, and is more convenient for the patient and surgeon.

[Is there still a place for extemporaneous exam in breast cancer?]

OBJECTIVE

The rise of preoperative diagnosis thanks to new methods of micro and macrobiopsy and the development of sentinel lymph node have dramatically modified the surgical management of patients with breast tumor. The purpose of this study is to know if extemporaneous exams still have a place in the management of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study which compares the qualitiative evolution of frozen sections in breast tumor at Jean-Perrin center before the practice of percutaneous strereotaxic biopsy and after the training of sentinel lymph node operative biopsy.

RESULTS

The results were in favour of a different distribution of anatomocytopathological activity with a decrease of frozen section in breast tumor and an increase of cytological imprints on sentinel nodes.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The interest of histologic preoperative diagnosis and the failure of consensus in the sentinel lymph node just leave a restrictive position to frozen section in breast cancer.

Mammotome: less invasive than ABBI with similar accuracy for early breast cancer detection

We performed a prospective analysis of two consecutive biopsy cohorts investigated by the same team to compare the Mammotome system with the ABBI procedure. From April 1997 to August 2003 a series of 413 nonpalpable mammographic lesions in 387 women (median age 56 years, range 30-84 years) were stereotactically biopsied in the University Hospital of Basel, Switzerland. Until October 1999 the ABBI system was applied exclusively, it was subsequently superseded by the Mammotome device in our clinic. Main outcome measures were accuracy, technical demand, and morbidity. Sensitivity (97.3%/96.8%), negative predictive value (99.2%/98.7%), and diagnostic accuracy (99.4%/99.1%) regarding the detection of malignancy were excellent for both techniques (ABBI/ Mammotome). The Mammotome procedure was faster and less invasive, thus causing significantly less morbidity. The larger specimen obtained by the ABBI procedure resulted in more detailed histology. In conclusion, recommend the Mammotome system as the method of choice for detecting nonpalpable early breast cancer.

Stereotactic radioguided surgery by siteSelect for subclinical mammographic lesions

BACKGROUND

We defined the indications for and evaluated the results of a new technique for radioguided surgery, the SiteSelect system. The procedure allows en-bloc resection of the breast parenchyma under local anesthesia.

METHODS

This prospective study was based on 167 patients operated on between December 2000 and October 2003 with 2 phases. The first step was an evaluation of the feasibility of the procedure with the 15-mm cannula, and the second was therapeutic with the 22-mm cannula.

RESULTS

The mean duration of the procedure was 42 minutes. In 96.9% of procedures, the lesion was excised successfully. Only one complication (hematoma) and two failures and were observed. Histological examination revealed benign disease in 65.8% of cases and cancer in 34.2% of cases. In the latter cases, the specimen margins were histologically involved in 86.2% of cases with the 15-mm procedure and in 41% with the 22-mm procedure. During the first evaluation, all patients with a cancer underwent systematic surgical re-excision: residual tumor was present in 18 cases (64.2%). The biopsy was painless for 88 patients, and the cosmetic result was good in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the SiteSelect procedure allows resection of the lesion in 96.9% of cases. Combined with complementary surgical lumpectomy during the same operation, this procedure achieved a success rate of 98.7%. In the case of cancer, the 15-mm cannula is not wide enough to allow free margins. The use of a new 22-mm cannula, currently under evaluation, might solve this problem.

Cryoablation and cryolocalization in the management of breast disease

Cryotechnology is currently used for both treatment and diagnosis of breast disease. Due to the natural analgesic effect of cold, cryoablation is potentially more patient-friendly than other technologies which raise tissue temperature. Freezing produces a predictable volume of necrosis and is easily observed and controlled during treatment. Recent studies have demonstrated that, as a primary therapy for breast fibroadenoma, cryoablation is safe and effective with durable results that can be reproduced in community practices. Certain barriers do exist before cryoablation, or any other in situ ablation, can become a standard therapy for the treatment of localized breast malignancy. Investigations are underway to refine patient selection criteria and develop valid confirmatory assays so that clinical trials can begin. Cryolocalization, which creates a well-delineated, palpable mass of frozen tissue encompassing a tumor, is a relatively new application of cold in medicine. This strategy promises to reduce positive margin rates during lumpectomy of non- or barely-palpable tumors. Finally, cryotechnology now also aids in the collection of tissue for histological analysis.

Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization

BACKGROUND

The current study sought to validate radioactive seed localization (RSL) as an alternative to wire localization (WL) to facilitate the operative excision of nonpalpable breast lesions.

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients underwent preoperative WL and the next 100 RSL. Margins were considered negative if > or =2 mm from in situ and invasive disease.

RESULTS

RSL resulted in 100% retrieval of the seeds and lesions. Sixty-eight percent of patients underwent RSL at least 1 day before surgery. RSL resulted in a 35% relative improvement in the rate of negative margins in the first specimen (P = 0.01) and a 62% relative improvement in the rate of reoperation for positive margins (P = 0.01). The sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate was 100% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RSL is effective and safe, and this procedure significantly improved the rate of negative margins in the first specimen and the rate of reoperation for positive margins compared to WL. We highly favor RSL over WL.

Combined image guidance excision of non-palpable breast lesions

When mammogramography detects a non-palpable lesion the surgeons may be called upon to establish a diagnosis. Various techniques are currently employed. We describe a technique, which can be used both for diagnostic and for therapeutic procedures. The technique essentially involves localising the tip of a guide-wire, placed under mammographic guidance, with ultrasound scanning. This minimises many of the problems encountered with wire guided excision. We conducted a prospective non-randomised study using our combined image guidance technique (CIG) for patients undergoing diagnostic (n = 24) and therapeutic biopsy (n = 13). We found that significantly smaller diagnostic biopsy weights were achievable using CIG, compared to non-CIG techniques. Reduced biopsy weights are recommended by current guidelines.

[Clinical management of non palpable breast lesions: experience about a series of 176 consecutive cases]

OBJECTIVE

To propose a rational attitude to treat infraclinic breast lesions about a 176-case retrospective analysis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January and December 2000, 176 patients were addressed for an infraclinic breast lesion. The epidemiologic and mammographic data, diagnostic management and histological results were collected.

RESULTS

Patients were addressed for an ACR 2 lesion in 0.8% of cases, ACR 3: 34.8%, ACR 4: 43.2% and ACR 5: 21.2%. One hundred and sixteen patients underwent a stereotactic macrobiopsy: 55 Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI), 61 Minimal Invasive Breast Biopsy (MIBB). Histologically, 59.5% were benign, 33.6% malignant, 2.6% borderline and 4.3% suspicious or non contributive. Forty-two patients underwent an open surgical biopsy. Histologically 56.1% were benign, 41.5% malignant and 2.4% borderline. Eighteen patients were controlled by mammography. Among ACR 3s there were 90% of benign lesions and 46% of malignancy in ACR 4s. Patients with malignant, borderline or suspicious result in stereotactic biopsy, underwent one-time surgery in 97% vs 55% in surgical biopsy (P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Infraclinic breast lesions must be radiologically classified with the ACR classification. Stereotactic macrobiopsies are reserved for ACR 4 and ACR 5 lesions. Because of their reliability, practice of macrobiopsies avoids surgery in about 50% of ACR 4 lesions which correspond to benign lesions. When the result is malignant, it allows most of times surgical procedure one-time.

Carbon localisation of impalpable breast lesions

BACKGROUND

Hookwire localisation (HL) is the most widely used technique for excision of impalpable breast lesions. This method has several drawbacks, particularly with logistics. Carbon localisation (CL) is an alternative procedure which is logistically superior to HL, but comparisons of accuracy and costs have not been reported.

METHODS

A consecutive case series of all patients from Northwestern BreastScreen undergoing either CL or HL between January 1999 and March 2001.

FINDINGS

Of 511 procedures, 219 CLs and 292 HLs were performed. The accuracy of excision did not vary significantly. Where a preoperative diagnosis of malignancy had been made by percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB), the margins were <1mm in 27 of the CL group (18.9%) and 21 of the HL group (29.2%) (P=0.087). Cost analysis was very favourable for CL performed concurrently with PNB since the costs were incremental.

INTERPRETATION

At service delivery level, CL is an accurate alternative to HL with better logistics and favourable costs. Nationally, it has the potential to improve the cost effectiveness of breast screening programmes.

Review of 125 SiteSelect stereotactic large-core breast biopsy procedures

Advances in stereotactic breast biopsies have introduced a variety of devices that yield different sizes of tissue samples. The choice of biopsy device should be based on which technique is most likely to yield a definitive diagnosis at the time of the initial biopsy. This is a prospective study of 104 patients who underwent a total of 125 stereotactic breast biopsies using the SiteSelect large-core biopsy device. From May 1999 to June 2001, 104 patients underwent 125 stereotactic breast biopsies with the SiteSelect large-core biopsy device. One hundred four 15 mm SiteSelect biopsies, eighteen 10 mm SiteSelect biopsies, and three 22 mm SiteSelect biopsies were performed. Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were found in 15% of the biopsies and infiltrating cancer was found in another 15% of the biopsies. Seventy-eight percent of the ADH and 90% of the DCIS lesions were associated with indeterminate calcifications noted on mammogram. Two of the 22 mm SiteSelect excisions yielded a specimen that contained the entire cancer with clear surgical margins. All of the patients with DCIS or invasive carcinoma underwent definitive surgical and adjuvant therapy. The sensitivity and specificity of SiteSelect in this series of patients was 100%. The SiteSelect biopsy procedure is safe, well tolerated by patients, and can be performed under local anesthesia. SiteSelect is comparable to an open excisional biopsy in its ability to obtain adequate tissue for accurate diagnosis, but excises significantly less normal surrounding breast tissue. Based on the data, indications for primary use of SiteSelect are indeterminate calcifications on mammogram, rebiopsy of a vacuum-assisted biopsy site that yielded atypia on pathologic examination, and complete excision of a lesion suspicious for invasive carcinoma in order to assess actual size and margin status.

[Breast biopsies: stereotactic vacuum-assisted core biopsy and stereotactic surgical breast biopsy]

Stereotactically-guided procedures for diagnosis of breast lesions can avoid a lot of surgical biopsies. Stereotactic guidance is used for vacuum-assisted core biopsies and for stereotactic breast biopsies. Technical details of the procedures are described, and the benefits and the limits of these methods are discussed. Indications for breast sampling are proposed according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories.

The rationale of surgical treatment of invasive breast cancer and decision making of surgical procedures

Surgery plays a major role in the primary treatment of breast cancer. There has been a rapid development in breast surgery over the last 20 years. Breast conserving therapy is standard today for tumours up till 4 cm in diameter, and can be used in selected cases for larger tumours after preoperative down staging with chemotherapy. Breast conserving therapy with postoperative radiotherapy gives the same long-term overall survival as mastectomy. Axillary surgery has also developed conservatively, with the introduction of the new technique of sentinel node biopsy, which offers an alternative to axillary clearance for staging of the axilla, with less morbidity.

Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate?

AIM

To audit the benign surgical biopsies in women screened, assessed, and referred by the Leeds/Wakefield Breast Screening Unit for the year 1999-2000 with a view to determining any association with a preoperative B3 core biopsy categorisation.

METHODS

The results of all preoperative diagnostic procedures in all patients who underwent surgical excision for a lesion proving benign in the year 1999-2000 were reviewed. Cases were categorised according to whether the preoperative fine needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) or core biopsy had been equivocal or of uncertain malignant potential (C3/B3), inadequate or unrepresentative (C1/B1), or benign (C2/B2). In those cases with a C3/B3 FNAC or core biopsy result, reasons for the uncertainty were determined by examination of the report and, where necessary, slides. In cases with C1/B1 or C2/B2 investigations and in those without a preoperative procedure, the reasons for surgical referral were determined from the screening records. Case records of all patients with a B3 core biopsy categorisation who subsequently proved to have malignancy were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty six women had benign surgical biopsies in the 1999-2000 screening year. In 13 of the 36 patients, referral for diagnostic biopsy rested on radiological and/or pathological suspicion of radial scar. The core biopsy category was B3 in all but one, which was in the B1 category. In a further 10 patients, referral was based primarily on a pathological B3 categorisation. The reasons for this were as follows: papillary lesion (two), fibroepithelial lesion (two), atypical intraductal epithelial proliferation (two), stromal mucin (two), atypical lobular hyperplasia (one), and an unusual vascular lesion (one). Two cases with a C3 on FNAC also derived from papillary lesions. In the remaining nine patients, the radiological features were sufficiently suspicious to prompt referral in the presence of either inadequate/unrepresentative (C1/B1) or benign (B2) preoperative pathological findings. Two women had no preoperative needle biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

In 22 of 36 benign biopsies, the initial core biopsy categorisation was B3. According to the current system of core biopsy categorisation, a diversity of lesions must be designated as of "uncertain malignant potential" (B3) because the technique provides insufficient tissue for full histological assessment. The use of this category may increase the number of benign biopsies if all such cases are referred for surgery. An increase in the benign biopsy rate may be averted if larger amounts of tissue can be obtained using newer vacuum assisted techniques such as the Mammotome.

Novel agents for chemoprevention, screening methods, and sampling issues

An aggressive approach to breast cancer control based on preventing the disease must complement efforts at effective treatment. To date clinical trials testing new chemopreventative agents have not generally met with the kind of success expected. A wide range of new breast cancer chemopreventative agents are poised to be tested in clinical trials. We review these novel agents and approaches, including those for which clinical trials have been initiated and those that are promising in the preclinical arena. Further progress in this area requires not only new agents, but novel methods for screening for risk assessment, sampling and development of intermediate biomarkers. We review these novel potential surrogate endpoints, including new imaging-techniques, breast sampling approaches, and methods to assess biomarkers in breast epithelium. Factors that could contribute to a meaningful choice of the chemopreventive agents and the design of clinical trials are discussed.

Advances in the Diagnosis and Excision of Breast Cancer

Until recently little advance in the diagnosis and excision of breast cancer has been made since the inception of needle localization breast biopsy (NLBB). Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy (SCNBB) can avoid most NLBB especially for calcifications. However, when open biopsy is necessary NLBB has been the standard of care. As many as 50 per cent of nonpalpable lesions can be seen by ultrasound (US) to avoid the unpleasantness and complications associated with NLBB. Further SCNBB leaves a blood-filled cavity that can be easily seen by US. Intraoperative US can be used to direct the excision while improving margin negativity. MRI has improved sensitivity in detecting suspicious breast lesions and techniques such as hematoma-directed US-guided breast biopsy can facilitate excision of such masses. Clearly new technologies have improved the ability to diagnosis and excise breast cancer. The onus on the surgeon is to incorporate them into standard practice to improve outcomes.

Pilot Trial of Cryoprobe-Assisted Breast-Conserving Surgery for Small Ultrasound-Visible Cancers

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic and ultrasonography-guided large core needle biopsy has replaced wire localization biopsy as the diagnostic method of choice. Lumpectomy alternatives are being sought to eliminate the need for preoperative wire localization, to facilitate easier and more accurate resection, and to decrease positive margin rates. Cryoprobe-assisted lumpectomy (CAL) was investigated as an alternative.

METHODS

Patients with ultrasonographically visible breast cancers that otherwise would have required wire localization participated. Before lumpectomy, a cryoprobe (Visica; Sanarus, Pleasanton, CA) was inserted through a 3-mm skin incision and directed by ultrasonography through the center of the tumor. An ice ball was created that enveloped the tumor plus an adjacent 5-10 mm of sonographically normal breast tissue.

RESULTS

Twenty-four CAL procedures were performed and all lesions were successfully localized. Mean (+/-SD) tumor size was 1.2 +/-.4 cm (range,.7-2.0 cm). Mean dimensions of the ice ball before excision were 3.9 +/-.3 cm by 2.5 +/-.5 cm, and the ice margin around the tumor was 8 +/- 2 mm. The size of the ice ball was controlled to the millimeter, and the ice ball itself provided a precise template around which to dissect. The margin re-excision rate was 5.6% among patients with an ice margin greater than 6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

CAL is a superior alternative to wire localization. Ultrasonographic visualization of the ice ball allows the size of the margin and tissue resected to be individually tailored and accurate within millimeters. The created template allows a precise lumpectomy, adding a dimension of control not previously realized with any other technology.

Application of image-guided biopsy for impalpable breast lesions in Chinese women

BACKGROUND

Screening for breast cancer has resulted in an increasing number of mammographically detected lesions that require further management. The Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation system is a recently added biopsy technique for the management of such lesions. The present paper will review the authors' experience in the use of this procedure in Chinese patients whose breast volume was smaller than that of Caucasians.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients were listed for the procedure and 78 (84%) underwent the procedure successfully. Ninety-two lesions were biopsied. Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) was performed for clustered microcalcifications or abnormal mass/density. Minimally Invasive Breast Biopsy (MIBB), a suction-assisted core biopsy device, was employed for more scattered lesions. For small volume breasts, it may be required to bring the hand through the aperture to get the targeted lesions onto the digital image or, in the case of ABBI, to excise just beyond the deep margin of the lesion rather than the recommended depth.

RESULTS

The ABBI was performed for 43 (46.7%) lesions and MIBB for 49 (53.3%) lesions. Nine (9.8%) were diagnosed to have ductal carcinoma in situ, two (2.2%) had ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion and eight (8.7%) had invasive ductal carcinoma. All the malignant lesions required further management. In addition, 19 (20.7%) were found to have atypical hyperplasia. Patients' satisfaction and cosmetic outcome are good.

CONCLUSION

The ABBI and MIBB procedures can be applied satisfactorily for biopsy of mammographic lesions with good -cosmetic outcome in Chinese patients.

Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy

BACKGROUND

Needle localization breast biopsy (NLBB) is the standard for removal of breast lesions after vacuum assisted core biopsy (VACB). Disadvantages include a miss rate of 0% to 22%, a positive margin rate of approximately 50%, and vasovagal reactions (approximately 20%). We hypothesized that clip migration after VACB is clinically significant and may contribute to the positive margin rates seen after NLBB.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of postbiopsy films in patients who had undergone VACB with stereotactic clip placement for abnormal mammograms. We measured the distance between the clip and the biopsy site in standard two view mammograms. The location of the biopsy air pocket was confirmed using the prebiopsy calcification site. The Pythagorean Theorem was used to calculate the distance the clip moved within the breast. Pathology reports on NLBB or intraoperative hematoma-directed ultrasound-guided breast biopsy (HUG, which localizes by US the VACB site) were reviewed to assess margin status.

RESULTS

In all, 165 postbiopsy mammograms on patients who had VACB with clip placement were reviewed. In 93 evaluable cases, the mean distance the clip moved was 13.5 mm +/- 1.6 mm, SEM (95% CI = 10.3 mm to 16.7 mm). Range of migration was 0 to 78.3 mm. The median was 9.5 mm. In 21.5% of patients the clip was more than 20 mm from the targeted site. Migration of the clip did not change with the age of the patient, the size of the breast or location within the breast. In the subgroup of patients with cancer, margin positivity (including those with close margins) after NLBB was 60% versus 0% in the HUG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant clip migration after VACB may contribute to the high positive margin status of standard NLBBs. Surgeons cannot rely on needle localization of the clip alone and must be cognizant of potential clip migration. HUG as an alternative biopsy technique after VACB eliminates operator dependency on clip location and may have superior results in margin status.

Three years of experience with advanced breast biopsy instrumentation (ABBI)

This article reports our experience using the advanced breast biopsy instrument (ABBI) system for excisional biopsy of mammographically visible nonpalpable breast lesions. Patients with nonpalpable mammographically detected breast lesions were evaluated as potential ABBI candidates. Selection criteria included noncystic lesions for which complete removal or large sampling was indicated, compressed thickness of the breast of more than 25 mm, and the patient's ability to lie prone for at least 1 hour. During the period August 1997-April 2000 (33 months), 284 patients were found to be potential ABBI candidates. Sixteen patients were subsequently excluded. Biopsies using the ABBI system were performed in 268 cases, yielding an overall technical success rate of 94.4%. The mammographic abnormalities included mass in 125 cases (46.6%), mass with calcifications in 63 cases (23.5%), and microcalcifications without a mass in 80 cases (29.8%). Histologically 56 specimens (20.9%) were malignant (mass in 30 cases, mass with calcifications in 12, and microcalcifications in 14) and 212 (79.1%) were benign. Carcinoma in situ was found in 17 cases (30.4%), invasive carcinoma in 35 cases (62.5%), tubular carcinoma in 2 cases (3.6%), metastatic intramammary lymph node of previously unknown malignant melanoma in 1 case, and malignant lymphoma in 1 case. Open reexcision was performed in 54 cases with primary breast cancer. The histologic investigation revealed that in 26 (48.15%) cases the mammographic lesion was completely excised and in 28 (51.85%) cases the margins involved malignant residue and/or other foci of carcinoma. There were complications in 17 cases: wound infection in 2, ecchymosis in 9, seroma in 5, and a large immediate hematoma in 1 patient. Only the latter patient required immediate revision and drainage; the remainder underwent successful conservative treatment. Most nonpalpable breast lesions, if selected properly, are accessible for ABBI procedure. The biopsy causes minimal complications and minimal distortion of the breast architecture. Should relumpectomy be needed after the ABBI procedure, the tunnel of the cannula path is easily recognized, leaving no need for needle localization.

Marking of wire-localized breast biopsies for mammographically detected microcalcifications

Impalpable breast lesions that are detected during screening mammography for breast cancer must be accurately identified and adequately sampled in biopsy specimens. Open wire-localized breast biopsy using hookwires remains the main method of sampling these lesions in centres without expensive stereotactic facilities. However, the hookwires can shift or become dislodged in the biopsy specimen. We have successfully modified a simple technique for the localization of impalpable lesions in these biopsies. The insertion of a small hypodermic needle into the fixed specimen with the assistance of the compression paddle and crosshairs on the mammography machine resulted in the precise localization of clusters of microcalcifications in 15 of 16 (94%) cases. In contrast, calcifications were identified in sections taken in the plane of the hookwire in only three cases (19%). The rate of detection of malignancy was 50% and the majority of malignant lesions were represented by ductal carcinoma in situ.

Patient-perceived cosmesis and satisfaction after breast biopsy: comparison of stereotactic incisional, excisional, and wire-localized biopsy techniques

BACKGROUND

Several options exist for obtaining tissue for pathologic diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions. They are generally divided into traditional, open wire-localized biopsy through a 3- to 5-cm incision, stereotactic-guided excisional biopsy through a 1- to 2.5-cm incision, and stereotactic-guided incisional biopsy through a puncture wound a few millimeters long. Because all 3 techniques are reliable, cosmesis has been suggested to be a critical issue driving procedure choice. However, no study has surveyed breast biopsy patients themselves as to the importance of this issue.

METHODS

We conducted telephone interviews with 59 women who underwent wire-localized biopsy (WL), stereotactic incisional biopsy with the Mammotome device (Mammo), or stereotactic excisional biopsy with the ABBI device (ABBI). All patients had benign diagnoses, were at least 2 years after procedure, and were matched to age and race. The questions were (1) How would you rate your scar? (2) Were you satisfied or dissatisfied with your biopsy experience? (3) Which is more important to you-complete removal of the abnormality or scar appearance? (4) Do you have any additional comments?

RESULTS

Eighty percent of patients ranked complete removal of the abnormality more important than cosmesis. Ninety-five percent of the ABBI and Mammo patients rated their scar as excellent, whereas only 25% of WL did (P =.02). Ninety percent of WL patients, 80% of Mammo patients, and 75% of ABBI patients were satisfied with their experience (P = not significant). Many of the reasons for dissatisfaction were related to service quality rather than medical quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete removal of the mammographic abnormality may be the priority for patients undergoing breast biopsy. There did not seem to be patient-perceived difference in cosmetic result between the Mammo and ABBI patients. Patient satisfaction is multifactorial, and attention must be paid to these issues generally ignored by physicians.

Diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer: a review

The literature on several methods of diagnosing non-palpable breast carcinoma has been reviewed. Skin projection and dye are methods not frequently used. Several aspects of FNA biopsy/cytology, ultrasound-directed methods, frozen section and MRI localization procedures are highlighted and comparisons are made. Much attention is being payed to needle localization breast biopsy and stereotactic core needle breast biopsy. The management of patients with mammographic abnormalities is shifting from needle localization to breast biopsy stereotactic core needle biopsy. Items of comparison between the two mentioned methods are accuracy, indications, complications and costs. The role of the ABBI system in the management of breast cancer has not yet been defined. A cooperative effort between the mammographer, surgeon and pathologist is critical to a successful image-guided breast biopsy programme.

Intratumoral cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy: opportunities for nonsystemic preoperative drug delivery

The recent literature documents the growing interest in local intratumoral chemotherapy as well as systemic preoperative chemotherapy with evidence for improved outcomes using these therapeutic modalities. Nevertheless, with few exceptions, the conventional wisdom and standard of care for clinical and surgical oncology remains surgery followed by radiation and/or systemic chemotherapy, as deemed appropriate based on clinical findings. This, in spite of the fact that the toxicity of conventional systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy affords limited effectiveness and frequently compromises the quality of life for patients. Indeed, with systemic chemotherapy, the oncologist (and the patient) often walks a fine line between attempting tumour remission with prolonged survival and damaging the patient's vital functions to the point of death. In this context, it has probably been obvious for more than 100 years, due in part to the pioneering work of Ehrlich (1878), that targeted or localized drug delivery should be a major goal of chemotherapy. However, there is still only limited clinical use of nonsystemic intratumoral chemotherapy for even those high mortality cancers which are characterized by well defined primary lesions i.e. breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, and skin. There has been a proliferation of intratumoral chemotherapy and immunotherapy research during the past two to three years. It is therefore the objective of this review to focus much more attention upon intratumoral therapeutic concepts which could limit adverse systemic events and which might combine clinically feasible methods for localized preoperative chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy with surgery. Since our review of intratumoral chemoimmunotherapy almost 20 years ago (McLaughlin & Goldberg 1983), there have been few comprehensive reviews of this field; only one of broad scope (Brincker 1993), three devoted specifically to gliomas (Tomita 1991; Walter et al. 1995; Haroun & Brem 2000), one on hepatomas (Venook 2000), one concerning veterinary applications (Theon 1998), and one older review of dermatological applications (Goette 1981). However, none have shed light on practical opportunities for combining intratumoral therapy with subsequent surgical resection. Given the state-of-the-art in clinical and surgical oncology, and the advances that have been made in intratumoral drug delivery, minimally invasive tumour access i.e. fine needle biopsy, new drugs and drug delivery systems, and preoperative chemotherapy, it is timely to present a review of studies which may suggest future opportunities for safer, more effective, and clinically practical non-systemic therapy.

Intraoperative localization after stereotactic breast biopsy without a needle

BACKGROUND

Needle localization breast biopsy (NLBB) is the standard for the removal of breast lesions after vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB). Disadvantages include a miss rate of 0% to 22%, risk of vasovagal reactions, and scheduling difficulties. We hypothesized that the hematoma resulting from VABB could be used to localize the VABB site with intraoperative ultrasonography (US) for excision.

METHODS

Twenty patients had VABB followed by intraoperative US-guided excision.

RESULTS

The previous VABB site in 19 patients was successfully visualized with intraoperative US and excised at surgery. One patient had successful removal of the targeted area under US guidance, but failed to show removal of the clip on initial specimen mammogram.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of US in identifying hematomas after VABB for excision. This technique, which can be performed weeks after VABB, improves patient comfort and allows easier scheduling.

SiteSelect: minimally invasive excision of breast lesions

The goal of screening mammograms is to provide early detection of breast cancer. As mammography technology improves, the ability to detect smaller and smaller suspicious lesions is increased. However, as mammography cannot always differentiate between malignant and benign lesions, biopsies are often needed. With the decreasing size of lesions seen on mammography, the size of the biopsy specimen needed for diagnosis also decreases. Thus, a smaller amount of normal breast tissue needs to be removed during a biopsy. For a majority of the small lesions, excision with a small margin of normal breast tissue is sufficient for diagnosis. The SiteSelect procedure utilizes stereotactic guidance to excise completely a tumor that is noted on a mammogram. The procedure can be performed under local anesthesia through a minimal incision (usually 1.5 cm). The SiteSelect biopsy procedure completely excises small tumors noted on the mammogram with minimal trauma to the breast tissue and with excellent cosmetic results. It is well tolerated by patients. For tumors requiring only local excision, such as atypical ductal hyperplasia or lobular carcinoma in situ, the SiteSelect procedure may be the only diagnostic procedure required.